Full text
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ysic20 Studies in Conservation ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ysic20 Guidelines for Conservation and Restoration of Historic Polychrome Plasterwork: the Church of St María la Blanca in Seville, Spain Marta Torres-González, Juan Jesús Martín-Del-Rio, Francisco Javier Alejandre- Sánchez, Miguel León Muñoz, David Bienvenido-Huertas & Juan Manuel Macías Bernal To cite this article: Marta Torres-González, Juan Jesús Martín-Del-Rio, Francisco Javier Alejandre-Sánchez, Miguel León Muñoz, David Bienvenido-Huertas & Juan Manuel Macías Bernal (2022): Guidelines for Conservation and Restoration of Historic Polychrome Plasterwork: the Church of St María la Blanca in Seville, Spain, Studies in Conservation, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2022.2072096 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2022.2072096 Published online: 11 May 2022. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 114 View related articles View Crossmark data
ORIGINAL RESEARCH OR TREATMENT PAPER Guidelines for Conservation and Restoration of Historic Polychrome Plasterwork: the Church of St María la Blanca in Seville, Spain Marta Torres-González 1,2 , Juan Jesús Martín-Del-Rio 1 , Francisco Javier Alejandre-Sánchez 1 , Miguel León Muñoz 1 , David Bienvenido-Huertas 1,3 and Juan Manuel Macías Bernal 1 1 Department of Architectural Construction II, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources, IST –University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 3 Department of Building Construction, University of Granada, Granada, Spain ABSTRACT Carrying out an intervention for the conservation and restoration of architectural heritage, focused on the preservation of decorative elements such as polychromed plasterwork, implies following a methodology to study the materials and techniques used in each case to establish an intervention proposal according to the circumstances. This work offers some methodological guidelines necessary to approach the conservation of plasterwork and its polychromies, applied in a recent case study according to the criteria established by the 14th General Assembly of ICOMOS in 2003, the Law 14/2007 of Andalusian Historical Heritage, the Law 16/1985 of the Spanish Historical Heritage, and indications contained in the ECCO Guidelines. The novelty of the paper is that it presents the conservation decisions on a real case from the beginning until the end —showing the entire process and validating the proposed methodology —by using current restoration techniques and digital tools for the reconstruction of plasterwork. ARTICLE HISTORY Received January 2022 Accepted April 2022 KEYWORDS Plasterwork; polychrome; heritage; anomalies; material characterization Introduction The literature provides extensive information on ancient and historic polychrome plasterwork in relation to its characterization, the anomalies that could be present, and restoration procedures. Usually, research in this field is focused on specific topics like non-destructive testing applied to study the state of preservation of plasterwork (Torres-Gonzá- lez et al. 2021a; Grazzini 2019; Torres-González et al. 2021b; Dominguez Vidal et al. 2012), methodologies comprising the survey, evaluation, and inspection of the preservation status of the building before the repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of gypsum plasterwork (Cotrim, do R. Veiga, and De Brito 2007; Gleeson 2002; Tsakiridis and Toumbakari 2010), the study of the polychromies that decorate the plaster (Coba Peña et al. 2016;Hernández Pablos et al.; Calero Castillo et al. 2017; Calero-castillo et al. 2021) and their cleaning issues (Vivar García, Calero Castillo, and García Bueno 2021b), and the characterization of limewash layers that frequently cover the plasterwork (Blasco López et al. 2019; Martínez-Domingo et al. 2020). Previous research has addressed the anomalies present in historic plasterwork and its polychromies and presented proposals for their maintenance, conservation, and preservation in representative case studies such as the Alhambra (Dominguez Vidal et al. 2014; Rubio Domene 2011; Campos Suñol et al. 2013; De La Torre-López et al. 2014; Rubio Domene 2010; Cardell-Fernández and Navarrete-Agui- lera 2006) and the Palacio de la Madraza (Ramos Molina et al. 2017; Ramos Molina 2015a; Ramos Molina 2015b) in Granada and the ‘Real Alcázar’in Seville (Torres-González et al. 2021a; Torres-González et al. 2021b; Blasco López et al. 2019; Blasco López et al. 2012; Campos de Alvear 2020; Blasco López, Alejandre Sánchez, and Flores Alés 2016a; Silva et al. 2019; Calero Castillo 2016). They address aspects such as cleaning methods (Vivar García, Calero Castillo, and García Bueno 2021b), conservation treatments (López Borges, Burgio, and Clark 2005), and the materials to be used in repairs and reconstructions to ensure their reversibility (Productos – Mortero Alhambra). Other studies are focused on historic gypsum physical, mechanical, mineralogical, and microstructural characterization by sampling and analysis (Dominguez Vidal et al. 2014; Blasco López et al. 2012; Freire et al. 2019a; Bueno García and Medina Flórez 2004; Freire et al. 2019b; Rani, Santhanam, and Bais 2019; Blasco López 2011; Blasco López et al. 2016b; Calero Castillo et al. 2016; Blasco López and Alejandre Sánchez 2013a) or on the assessment of restoration materials compatible with the original (Freire et al. 2021; Ranesi, Faria, and do R. Veiga 2021) and/or distinguishable (‘Productos –Mortero Alhambra’). © The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works 2022 CONTACT Juan Jesús Martín-Del-Rio [email protected] Department of Architectural Construction II, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain STUDIES IN CONSERVATION https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2022.2072096
This work presents the methodological guidelines necessary to evaluate the current condition and approaches to the restoration of plasterwork and its polychromies, and the results obtained after the restoration intervention in a recent case study of the Church of St María la Blanca (Seville, Spain). The novelty of the paper is to present the intervention work on a real case from the beginning to the end, showing the entire process and following and validating the proposed methodology by using not only traditional but also current restoration techniques and digital tools for the reconstruction of plasterwork. Case study: the Church of Santa María la Blanca The Church of Santa María la Blanca (hereinafter, SMLB) is one of the greatest examples of the Andalusian Baroque style of the seventeenth century, due to the rich set of plasterwork and painting decorations (Figure 1). The building was declared an Historic Artistic Monument 1 in 1995 and has its own level of protection. 2 By virtue of the degree of protection established, urban regulations determine that it must be preserved in its entirety due to its singular and monumental character and for historical-artistic reasons, preserving all its architectural characteristics. This temple was a mosque in the eleventh-thir- teenth centuries and a synagogue from 1248 until the expulsion of the Jews in 1391 (Falcón Márquez 2015; de la Torre Farfán 1666; Gil Delgado 2013a; Gil Delgado 2013b). Currently, the building has a rectangular floor plan, with an extension of the head and two bodies, also rectangular, attached to the wall of the nave of the epistle. Inside, it has three naves of similar height, divided into six sections by ten Tuscan red marble columns. On top of them, there are semicircular arches that support barrel vaults with false lunettes in the central nave and groin vaults in the lateral ones. The presbytery space is covered by a barrel vault with lunettes (Figure 2). Regarding the interventions that have been carried out over time, most of them were caused by structural problems, which were responsible for the cracking of the vaults, and by leaks and dampness due to capillarity; finally, there was also damage caused by cleaning and sweeping the chimney (Gil Delgado 2014). As a result of the 1969 earthquake that affected not only the structure of the church but also the plasterwork, the restoration project by the architect Rafael Manzano was approved: the roofs were waterproofed and the plasterwork restored and consolidated in the vaults, domes, and arches (Gil Delgado 2014). In 2015 the restoration work involving the plasterwork and polychromies ended and the temple recovered the appearance it had in the last third of the seventeenth century. The origin of plasterwork and its execution techniques There is an exceptional plasterwork program developed throughout the whole extension of SMLB, highlighted by a repertoire of forms in high relief made up of plant and architectural motifs and figurative and epigraphic elements. In fact, the entire surface of the vaults, dome, and soffit of the arches is filled with a profuse and volumetric plaster decoration, which gives movement to an orthogonal architectural plan lacking dynamism. Plasterwork attributed to the Borja brothers and to Pedro Roldán and polychromies in SMLB were not executed until 1662 (Gil Delgad 2015; Bonet Correa 1978; Falcón Márquez 2017). The technique used to execute the original plasterwork was molding: the volume of the plaster pieces was obtained thanks to molds, then –with the plaster still fresh –the geometries and specific details were carved, and finally they were fixed to the support. Additionally, there was another way of execution consisting of cutting the profile of the plaster moldings by using templates (Falcón Márquez 2017). Regarding their fixation, plaster grouts were used after preparing the support (Figure 3) for greater grip. In elements of higher volume and weight, Figure 1. Location of Seville in the Iberian Peninsula (A), situation of SMLB in the province of Seville (B), and interior view of SMLB (C). 2M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
reinforcements based on nails inserted into the piece during its elaboration were used, fixed with plaster and oakum in the back of the vault (Rubio Domene 2002). The plasterwork was executed based on previous drawings on the support and the delimitation of the spaces. After that, the smooth bands that articulate the different decorative spaces and the decorative pieces were placed. Finally, the joints were checked for burrs and a layer of plaster grout was applied to hide the joints, marks, etc., homogenizing the whole. In the case of the vaults (Figure 4), the support of the reliefs consists of a plaster layer arranged on a slatted frame and a wooden skeleton, which forms the vaults of the three naves of the church. This layer is fixed and varnished on its internal face prior to gilding. There are clear differences between the plasterwork of the presbytery and the main arch, and that in the rest of the church. It is also known that there is a colored base for the gilded background (a red underpainting) that does not exist in other gilded areas in the building. However, the phases and manufacturing procedures are unknown, as are other relevant data regarding the composition of materials. These topics are key aspects to determine the causes of degradation and to foresee an evolution of the materials in the short and long term. However, taking into account the morphological details of the plasterwork, the following typological classification was proposed (de la Torre Farfán 1666): 1. High reliefs: This group consists of the reliefs located in the main nave, dome, choir, and apse. Due to its volume and the roundness of the undulations that makes its shapes, the plastic effect achieved is even greater. This type of relief is reserved for the representation of leaves, fruits, garlands, stems, and other plant forms; human figures Figure 2. Plans for SMLB. Figure 3. Cornice of the central nave (A), marks made to adhere a corbel, partially filled with the adhesion grout (B). GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 3
such as angels and cherubs; emblems and inscriptions; ribbons; and scallops (Figure 5(a)). 2. Cardboard templates: These are geometric shapes formed by the flat bands that decorate the vaults of the two lateral naves. This type of decoration is made with mold casting techniques, according to its morphology and its symmetric and serial character. The corner vaults of the Gospel and Epistle naves are decorated with ferroneries or cut-out cardboard and plaster volumes (Figure 5(b)). 3. Gilding::Thisisthe surfacewheretherestoftheornamental motifs are found. It is a rarely used resource because of the complexity of its execution and the Figure 4. Sections of the vault of the lunettes of the central nave (A). The plaster burrs that appear between the decking can be seen following the scheme shown in (B). Figure 5. (A) High reliefs, (B) Cutouts from the central vault, (C) Gilding. 4M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
high material cost, which sought to create an astonishing space. The pictorial technique used is gilding with gold leaf (Gárate Rojas 2008)(Figure 5(c)). Evaluation of the state of preservation of plasterwork Prior to the restoration intervention, a the condition was assessed in each of the areas of pictorial decoration and plasterwork by following steps suggested by Cotrim (2004) (Cotrim 2004). Damage to the interior decorations of the SMLB can correspond to movements and/or structural failures, to inappropriate previous interventions or inadequate cleaning systems, to the normal aging of the materials, the accumulation of dust and grease, and the lack of maintenance. However, the presence of water in any of its states is the cause of generalized degradation of the decorations since the main component of plaster renders and plasterwork is gypsum. Gypsum has low hygroscopicity (Mesquita 2012; Goossens 2003) and mediumlow solubility (Rubio Domene 2010) that does not represent a direct risk to the preservation of plasterwork (Torres-González et al. 2021a). Nevertheless, gypsum plaster has high capillary absorption –in this case, liquid water comes from roof leaks and some singular points –which is the main cause of degradation of these decorative elements. Additionally, the water that penetrates solubilizes any existing salts and also some gypsum, causing the formation of efflorescence at the surface when evaporation occurs. This favors the separation of the gilding layers and the degradation and deformation of the volumes in plaster, or even fracture when strength is lost (Rubio Domene 2010). Additionally, plaster is the binder in paints so its contact with water from leaks causes a washing effect of the paints. The main damage found in the plasterwork and polychromies of SMLB are flaking, small detachments, and lifting of the layers of gilding; stains due to migration of dirt from the back of the elements – which is drawn in by the water from leaks, when it evaporates –remain on many decorative elements. Other damage includes swelling and weakening of the plaster volumes, causing breakage, a problem worsened when the pieces have metallic materials (Rubio Domene 2002) that, in contact with water, oxidize, causing an increase in volume and internal tensions that originated the fracture; and finally, the damage caused by washing of the pictorial layers, a consequence of larger leaks (Figure 6). Methodology and characterization techniques Over the last decades, different authors have proposed their own methodologies for the evaluation of historical plasterwork (Rubio Domene 2011; Ramos Molina et al. 2017; Blasco López et al. 2012; Bueno García and Medina Flórez 2004; Rani, Santhanam, and Bais 2019; Cotrim 2004; Cotrim, do R. Veiga, and de Brito 2008; Blasco López and Alejandre Sánchez 2013b; Gómez et al. 1992). All proposals are linked to a particular case study that requires a specific and customized evaluation, adapted to the circumstances of the building. Any methodological proposal applied to historical plasterwork and its polychromies must start with the evaluation and inspection of the condition of the building before repair, replacement, and restoration of the plasterwork (Cotrim, do R. Veiga, and De Brito 2007; Gleeson 2002; Historic Environment Scotland 2016), based on a 2D planimetric survey and even 3D if necessary to assist with the intervention. In most cases, historical plasterwork is found in buildings of cultural or architectural interest that are subject to a degree of legal protection. That is why non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are very useful in the field of conservation and architectural restoration, as they enable as much information as possible to be gathered without damaging the heritage materials (Tejedor et al. 2022). After the initial inspection –necessary to know the deterioration factors, local problems, the present anomalies, and the constituent materials and techniques (Gleeson 2002) descriptive files are generated to record existing anomalies and their location, and to indicate which are related to the base or to the pictorial layer. These files constitute strong support for the development of the conservation or restoration project (Cotrim 2004). Following the methodology indicated in Figure 7, once the state of the plasterwork and polychromies of SMLB was known and documented, the samples were chosen by following the criteria of representativeness and minimal impact. A total of eight samples was taken for chemical characterization (Table 1). Three of these samples (N1, N2, and N3) are related to the gilded polychromy in order to know the composition of the preparation layer (inorganic base and organic binder), pigments, and the quality of the gilding. Sample N4 refers to the base mortar of the polychromies and the remaining four samples (N5, N6, N7, and N8) correspond to plasterwork at different points, with the purpose of identifying the composition of the material. The sampling respected the preservation of the plasterwork and the quantities extracted were the smallest possible for the analyses in order to minimize the visual impact on the panels (UNE 2014). The extraction was carried out with a scalpel and the areas were recorded with photographs before and after the extraction. Gypsum samples (N5-N8) were observed using an S8 APO LEICA optical microscope, with LEICA DC300 GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 5
video capture and Image Manager 50 software version 1.20. Cross-sections were prepared by impregnation with methacrylate resin at low pressure, then cut with adiamondblade,andfinally polished. The structure and thickness of the microlayers were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A Jeol JSM 6460- LV microscope was used, equipped with an energy-dis- persive X-ray (EDX) microprobe, a beryllium window ATW2, and specific software (Oxford INCA) for point semiquantitative chemical analyses. SEM images in secondary electron mode (SE) and backscattered electron mode (BSE) were acquired using several coated of samples. To identify the presence and type of organic binders, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed with a Jasco FT/IR4100 equipped with an accessory ATR Miracle™to measure attenuated total reflection (ATR), which allows a direct measurement of samples without the need of solvents or dissolution media, which could Figure 6. Alterations present in the plasterwork: damp stains (A), loss of support (B), detachment of gold leaf in the choir area (C), detachment and loss of material (D), fissures and cracks (E), and oxidation of metallic element used to fix the plasterwork (F). 6M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
cause blind spots in the spectrum. Spectra were obtained with a resolution of 4 cm −1 and recorded between 4000 and 650 cm −1 . Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for samples N1 and N2 in order to determine lipophilic substances, such as oil driers, resins, and waxes, and hydrophilic substances, such as proteins and gums –polysaccharides (gum Arabic and related products). A 5890A gas chromatograph (Hewlett- Packard, USA) equipped with an injection port on the column and a 5971A mass spectrometric detector model was used to separate and identify the compounds. Hewlett Packard Chemstation software (B.04.02) was used for the integration of peaks and for the evaluation of mass spectra. Samples were treated with Meth-prep II methylation reagent to analyze lipophilic substances, and hydrolysis with 6M HCl and derivatization with MTBSTFA in pyridine of the resulting fatty acids, amino acids, and monosaccharides were carried out to analyze carbohydrates and proteins. Once the composition of the materials was known and the base support was studied, different treatments and consolidants compatible with the existing materials were tested (Rubio Domene 2010) and the effectiveness of each of them was evaluated to establish the optimal conservation criteria. In this regard, the work addressed by Vivar-García et al. (Vivar García, Calero Castillo, and García Bueno 2021a) in which they perform different tests on gypsum specimens to evaluate the effectiveness of cleaning treatments and determine which methods are most effective for lime and polychrome plaster coatings was followed. This methodology allows establishing the action criteria and the treatments and materials to be used in each of the treatments. Likewise, it provides essential data to define the maintenance project and the complementary actions that are necessary to carry out in the future. Results and discussion By applying the methodology described in the previous section, the following results concerning the materials chemical characterization were obtained and suitable treatments for plasterwork and its polychromies, and the treatment criteria were established. Characterization of polychromies and plasterwork In N1 sample, the inner double-preparation layers are very rich in a lipid-based binder (Figure 8). It can be described that the base for gilding was achieved with a double layer of brown color. The first (layer 2) is very rich in linseed oil; another thicker layer (layer 3) was added, with a higher proportion of pigments than the previous one, but also rich in oil, onto which the gold leaf was applied. The EDX spectrum (Figure 9) in N1 sample shows that the first white layer is essentially gypsum with a very low proportion of silicates. Layer 2, approximately 20 µm thick, has a chemical composition attributable to the presence of red earth, shade earth, white lead in a low proportion, calcium carbonate and gypsum also in a low proportion, and bone black in a very low proportion. In layer 3, which is thicker than the previous one (approximately 80 µm), blue enamel appears in low proportions and azurite in very low propotions, together with those components found in layer 2 such as red earth, white lead, shade earth, and gypsum. Finally, layer 4, which is almost 1 µm thick, shows gold with 93.4%, silver 5.7%, and copper with 0.9%. Cerussite is a mineral consisting of lead carbonate (PbCO 3 ), and its use as a siccative suggests the use of Figure 7. Methodological proposal for the study and intervention of plasterwork and polychromies of SMLB. Table 1. Description of the micro-samples taken from the SMLB. Designation Type N1 Gold. Polychromies N2 Altered gold. Polychromies N3 Pictorial restoration. Polychromies N4 Base mortar for polychromies N5 Plaster. Choir vault. Plasterwork N6 Base mortar. Choir vault. Plasterwork N7 Adhesion mortar. Choir vault. Plasterwork N8 Plaster. Choir vault. Plasterwork GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 7
oil-based binders which, together with the plasterwork, could comprise the preparation of the gold leaf (Almagro Gorbea et al. 2010). The data show that the gilt was applied on mixture, a procedure that involves fixing the gold leaf on a prepared layer called a mordant or mixture (Mayer 1991). The mordant consists of a mixture of linseed oil (Figure 9) with compounds of lead and manganese oxides. A traditional technique of gold covering based on the application of a liquid adhesive called ‘mixtion’is shown in Figure 10. Samples N1 and N2 indicate that the gold was applied in a very thin sheet barely one micron thick, which is gilded with gold leaf, on a mixed mordant (20-80 µm) and without any other prior preparation or bole so it is possible that a light wetting of the varnish (clay or iron oxide) would adhere it (Figures 8–10). Sample N2 of altered gilding (Figure 10A), in which the stamping of the gilding is observed, is in a worse state than sample N1. From the study by GC-MS of sample N1, it was concluded that that the most transparent material, corresponding to the layer in contact with the gold, has fatty acids (palmitic acid, stearic acid, suberic acid, and azelaic acid) and terpenes (dehydroabietic acid and 7-oxodehydroabietic acid), compounds that reveal a linseed oil content and a conifer resin, probably rosin (Peris Vicente 2008)(Figure 11(a)). Regarding sample N2 (Figure 11(b)), the results indicate a clear linseed oil due to the proportions of palmitic and stearic acid, with a small fraction of diterpenes. As in the case of sample N1, the relationship between the proportions of suberic and azelaic acid appears to indicate a previous cooking of the oil to increase its drying properties, or simply as a consequence of the manufacturing process of the homogeneous mixture itself. After observation by optical microscopy and SEM of sample N3 with analysis by EDX, two layers were observed (Figure 12): Layer 1, white, with a thickness Figure 8. (A) Cross-section of micro-sample N1 obtained under a light microscope (20X / 0.40 MPlan objective); (B) (50X / 0.75 MPlan objective) partially crossed polarizers. The metallic shine of the gold leaf can be seen. Figure 9. EDX spectrum of sample N1: layer 1 (A), layer 2 (B), layer 3 (C), layer 4 (D). 8M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
(i), the reintegration of small decorative motifs by molding the particular piece (ii), and the reintegration of larger volumes through digital fabrication of the pieces (iii). (i) The attachment of loose fragments was carried out with polyvinyl acetate adhesive and reinforcement with fiberglass dowels, after studying the correspondence of the existing detached fragments that were collected and stored to locate them in their correct position (Figure 20); the joints were sealed with plaster paste. (ii) The morphological definition of the pieces started with a specific design work for each one (Figure 21); similar motifs that exist in the set were taken into account given the symmetry that defines the composition. Only those general forms, such as scrolls, rockery, and leaves, were reconstructed, without defining the details of the other unique forms that differentiate each piece: fruits, small flowers, and vegetable stems. These were only defined in their volume. (iii) Medium level reintegration is a ‘differentiated reintegration’resource that enables the complete integration of the new elements into the whole, without achieving full replication of the original work and without causing aesthetic or visual conflicts that harm the general contemplation of the interior space. In this case, given the symmetry of the shapes and the repetition of the decorative patterns, 3D scanning of the vaults and significant details was carried out using a white light scanner, digitizing the model and rebuilding elements by 3D printing Figure 19. Insertion of fiberglass rods to secure thick plaster elements (A) and fixation of plasterwork by injection (B). Figure 20. Detached angel’s arm reattachment using fiberglass dowels. Figure 21. Volumetric reintegration (plaster + 25% lime paste) using a fiberglass structure. (A) Initial state and (B) reconstruction state. Figure 22. Creation of new volumes in PLA using 3D printing. Figure 23. Before (A) and after (B) the intervention in the plasterwork of the tribune (cleaning and reintegration of volumes). GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 15
with polylactic acid, commonly designated as PLA (Figures 22–24) (Ávila Rodríguez 2019; Norin, Golovina, and Tikhonov 2019). For the adhesion of the printed elements, polyvinyl acetate was used, and in large volumes they were reinforced with fiberglass rods and epoxy adhesive. Chromatic reintegration The intervention carried out in the project for the conservation and restoration of the golden polychromies of SMLB was comprehensive in nature. All conservation problems related to the deterioration of the constituent materials were addressed, as well as aesthetic needs taking into account its technical and historical-artistic characteristics (Botticelli, Botticelli, and S Botticelli 1992; Fundación Santa María la Real. 2005; Mora, Mora, and Philippot 2003). Thus, the chromatic reintegration was carried out in order to give unity and legibility to the whole and to help a better visual reading of it. Reversible and distinguishable methods that allow the water vapour permeability required by the plasters were used for chromatic reintegration. Fixation and settling of the gilding were carried out by applying Acril ME in a 2% solution in water, with a soft hairbrush and interposing Japanese paper, applying a second coat after a 24-hour interval in the case of areas with greater difficulty (Figure 25). In the case of small losses of gilding in the bottoms of the vaults or walls, watercolor glazes were applied to tone and mitigate the disturbing effect of the white background; in the case of larger extensions, the metallic shine was provided with a pattern of vertical lines, made with gold mica and 22k gold in pills, bonded with gum Arabic that replaces, in a reversible and differentiable way, the lost parts of the original polychromies. Conclusions This work offers some methodological guidelines to approach a restoration intervention of plasterwork and polychromies applied in a recent real case according to the criteria established by the 14th General Assembly of ICOMOS in 2003, the Law 14/2007 of Andalusian Historical Heritage, the Law 16/1985 of the Spanish Historical Heritage, and indications contained in the E.C.C.O. guidelines. In accordance with previous examination, characterization tests, and on-site treatment tests, the following actions were carried out: .Several cleaning techniques were selected depending on the area and the degradation level of the plasterwork and its polychromies. General superficial dirt was removed by using different techniques: (i) manual cleaning with a synthetic rubber sponge, with 50:50 water/ethanol solution; (ii) a soft eraser; or (iii) cleaning with a Nd-YAG laser at different intensities below 150 Hz, with results optimal in areas stained with black smoke or in the case of gilding. .Moisture stains were treated with a chemical bleach applied with cotton swabs, controlling their neutralization, and salt deposits were cleaned by mechanical processes with gentle brushing. .The sealing of cracks was carried out with plaster mortar similar to the original one and, in certain cases, micro-stitching was performed with fiberglass rods and epoxy adhesive. The plaster was consolidated by applying water-based acrylic resin nanoparticle microemulsion and cavities were filled with water-based adhesive injections. In larger cavities, a PLM mortar was used. .The reintegration of the lost areas of the reliefs was made using three different methods: (i) The attachment of loose fragments carried out with polyvinyl acetate adhesive, with reinforcement of fiberglass spikes; (ii) the reintegration of small decorative motifs by molding the particular piece; and (iii) the reintegration of larger volumes through digital fabrication of the pieces in PLA. .Regarding the polychromies, reversible and distinguishable methods that do not compromise water vapour permeability required by the plaster were used for chromatic reintegration. A double impregnation was applied with a brush interposing Japanese paper to avoid dragging gold flakes and a second coat of the product was applied directly with a brush to ensure color fixation and layer adhesion. The treatments used Figure 24. Before (A) and after (B) volumetric reintegration. Figure 25. Before (left) and after (right) the color reintegration treatment. 16 M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
were 5% gum Arabic dissolved in water/alcohol (50:50) and, in case of golden areas, 2% Acril ME dissolved in water. Throughout the intervention process, it was possible to verify that specific tests carried out previously in several points were representative and define the composition and techniques used in the whole area. This fact contributed very favorably to complete the intervention within the term agreed in the contract and the respective budget, without causing any deviation. Notes 1. DECRETO 186/1995, of July 25, 1995. 2. New Management Plan, Resolution of the Ministry of Public Works of the Junta de Andalucía of 19 July 2006 and published in BOJA No. 174 of 7 September 2006. 3. Law 14/2007, of 26 November, on the Historical Heritage of Andalusia. 4. Law 16/1985, of 25 June, on Spanish Historical Heritage. 5. Document promoted by the European Confederation of Conservative-Restorers Organizations and approved by its General Assembly. Brussels, 1 March 2002. 6. Whenever the protection arrangement is chosen, it will end with the removal of this protection and the elimination of the remains of the adhesive. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the contributions and work developed by Dédalo, Bienes Culturales S.L., Artelan Restauración S.L., AGORA SL and the management team that carried out the restoration of the church of STMLB. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Funding The authors are grateful for the financing received from the VI PPIT-2021-I.3 from the University of Seville. Author contributions All authors had full access to all the data and assume responsibility for the integrity and the accuracy of the data analysis. ORCID Marta Torres-González http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118- 8431 Juan Jesús Martín-Del-Rio http://orcid.org/0000-0003- 1935-5437 Francisco Javier Alejandre-Sánchez http://orcid.org/0000- 0003-0942-8313 Miguel León Muñoz http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-938X David Bienvenido-Huertas http://orcid.org/0000-0003- 0716-8589 Juan Manuel Macías Bernal http://orcid.org/0000-0001- 6073-9745 References Almagro Gorbea, A., A. García Bueno, O. López Cruz, and V. J. Medina Flórez. 2010.“Restoration of the Façade of the Palace of Pedro I. Second Phase. Right Wing.”Apunt. del Alcázar Sevilla 11: 8–37. Ávila Rodríguez, M. 2019.‘Aplicación de la tecnología 3D a las técnicas de documentación, conservación y restauración de Bienes Culturales’, Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Bellas Artes. Blasco López, F. J. 2011.‘Yeserías medievales de tradición islámica del Real Alcázar de Sevilla: Revisión Historiográfica, Metodología para la caracterización, evaluación de su durabilidad y elaboración de un inventario’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Seville. Blasco López, F. J., and F. J. Alejandre Sánchez. 2013a.“Las Yeserías del Patio del sol del Real Alcázar de Sevilla: Caracterización y Cronología.”Informes de la Construccion 65 (530): 175–182. Blasco López, F. J., and F. J. Alejandre Sánchez. 2013b. “Porosity and Surface Hardness as Indicators of the State of Conservation of Mudéjar Plasterwork in the Real Alcázar in Seville.”Journal of Cultural Heritage 14 (2): 169–173. Blasco López, F. J., F. J. Alejandre Sánchez, and V. Flores Alés. 2016a.“Encalados: Su Influencia en la Durabilidad de Yeserías.”V Jornadas FICAL 53 (9): 1689–1699. Blasco López, F. J., F. J. Alejandre Sánchez, V. Flores Alés, and I. Cortés Albalá. 2016b.“Plasterwork in the Ambassadors Hall (Salón de Embajadores) of the Real Alcázar of Seville (Spain): Graphic Reconstruction of Polychrome Work by Layer Characterization.”Construction and Building Materials107: 332–340. Blasco López, F. J., F. J. Alejandre Sánchez, V. Flores Alés, J. J, and Martín del Río. 2012.“Caracterización de Yeserías de Tradición Islámica del Real Alcázar de Sevilla.”Apunt. del Alcázar Sevilla 13: 162–174. Blasco López, F. J., F. J. Alejandre Sánchez, V. Flores Alés, R. Villegas-Sánchez, and M. T. Freire. 2019.“Study of the Influence of Limewash on the Conservation of Islamic Plasterworks Through Weathering Tests.”International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15 (4): 580–592. Bonet Correa, A. 1978.Andalucía Barroca: Arquitectura y Urbanismo. Ediciones. Spain: Sevilla. Botticelli, G., S. Botticelli, and S. Botticelli. 1992.Metodologi di Restauro Delle Pitture Murali. Firenz, Italia: Centro di. Firenz. Bueno García, A., and V. J. Medina Flórez. 2004.“The Nasrid Plasterwork at “Qubba Dar al-Manjara l-Kubra”in Granada: Characterisation of Materials and Techniques.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 5 (1): 75–89. Calero Castillo, A. I. 2016.‘Materiales, técnicas y procedimientos en la decoración arquitectónica. Aplicaciones a la conservación y restauración de las yeserías del Patio de las Doncellas. Real Alcázar de Sevilla.’, Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada, Granada. GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 17
Calero Castillo, A. I., A. García Bueno, O. López Cruz, and V. J. Medina Flórez. 2016.“Las Yeserías del Patio de las Doncellas del Real Alcázar de Sevilla. Avance de Resultados de la Caracterización de Materiales y la Técnica.”Al. Qantara 37 (1): 129–141. Calero Castillo, A. I., A. García Bueno, O. López Cruz, and V. J. Medina Flórez. 2017.“La Policromía Original de las Yeserías del Patio de las Doncellas del Real Alcázar de Sevilla. Materiales Constitutivos y Técnicas de Ejecución.” Arqueol. y Territ. Mediev 24: 255–290. Calero-castillo, A. I., A. C. Peña, O. L. Cruz, and A. G. Bueno. 2021.“Analysis of the Mudejar Polychrome Decoration of the Patio de las Doncellas . Interventions Carried out Throughout its History.”Conserv. Património.https://doi. org/10.14568/cp2020003 Campos de Alvear, R. 2020.“Programa de Actuaciones Para la Conservación-Restauración de las Yeserías del Palacio Mudéjar.”Apunt. del Alcázar Sevilla 20: 63–85. Campos Suñol, M. J., M. Torre López, R. Rubio Domene, M. J. Ayora Cañada, and A. Domínguez Vidal. 2013.“Yeserías de Mocárabes de la Alhambra. Estudio no Invasivo in Situ y de Laboratorio.”Macla Rev. la Soc. Española Mineral (17): 29–30. Cardell-Fernández, C., and C. Navarrete-Aguilera. 2006. “Pigment and Plasterwork Analyses of Nasrid Polychromed Lacework Stucco in the Alhambra (Granada, Spain).”Studies in Conservation 51 (3): 161–176. Coba Peña, A. C., A. I. Calero Castillo, F. J. Collado Montero, A. Hernández Pablos, and V. J. Medina Flórez. 2016. “Reconstrucción Virtual de Color Sobre la Policromía del Alfarje y Yeserías del Patio de las Doncellas.”PH Investig. Rev. del IAPH Para la Investig. del Patrim. Cult 7: 1–24. Conely, R. T. 1979.Espectroscopía Infrarroja. 1. España: Alhambra. Cotrim, H. 2004.‘Ancient Gypsum Plasters Rehabilitation’, Master dissertation. University of Lisbon. Cotrim, H., M. do R. Veiga, and J. De Brito. 2007. “Methodology for the Rehabilitation of Ancient Gypsum Plasterwork.”Journal of Building Appraisal 3 (3): 195–212. Cotrim, H., M. do R. Veiga, and J. de Brito. 2008.“Freixo Palace: Rehabilitation of Decorative Gypsum Plasters.” Construction and Building Materials22 (1): 41–49. de la Torre Farfán, F. 1666.‘Fiestas que celebro la Iglesia Parrochial de S. Maria la Blanca, capilla de la Sta. Iglesia Metropolitana y Patriarchal de Seuilla, en obsequio del nueuo breue concedido por N. Smo. Padre Alejandro vij, en fauor del Purissimo Mysterio de la Concepcion sin’. Juan Gomez de Blas, Sevilla. De La Torre-López, M. J., A. Dominguez-Vidal, M. J. Campos Suñol, R. Rubio Domene, U. Schade, and M. J. Ayora Cañada. 2014.“Gold in the Alhambra: Study of Materials, Technologies, and Decay Processes on Decorative Gilded Plasterwork.”Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 45(11–12): 1052–1058. Dirección General de Bienes Culturales. 1997.“Programa de Mantenimiento de Bienes Culturales de la Junta de Andalucía.”Cons. Cult., 235. Dominguez Vidal, A., M. J. De La Torre-Lopez, R. Rubio Domene, and M. J. Ayora Cañada. 2012.“In Situ Noninvasive Raman Microspectroscopic Investigation of Polychrome Plasterworks in the Alhambra.”The Analyst 137(24): 5763–5769. Dominguez Vidal, A., M. J. de la Torre-López, M. J. Campos Suñol, R. Rubio Domene, and M. J. Ayora Cañada. 2014. “Decorated Plasterwork in the Alhambra Investigated by Raman Spectroscopy: Comparative Field and Laboratory Study.”Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 45(11–12): 1006– 1012. Falcón Márquez, T. 2015.La Iglesia de Santa María la Blanca y su Entorno. Arte e Historia. Sevilla, España: Universidad de Sevilla. Falcón Márquez, T. 2017.“Santa María la Blanca, un Milagro Barroco. Contribución de Murillo y Neve a su Patrimonio Monumental y Artístico.”Cartografía Murillesca: Los Pasos Contados,94–111. Freire, M. T., M. do R. Veiga, A. Santos Silva, and J. De Brito. 2019a.“Studies in Ancient Gypsum Based Plasters Towards Their Repair: Physical and Mechanical Properties.” Construction and Building Materials 202: 319–331. Freire, M. T., M. do R. Veiga, A. S. Silva, and J. de Brito. 2021. “Restoration of Ancient Gypsum-Based Plasters: Design of Compatible Materials.”Cement and Concrete Composites 120 (March): 104014. Freire, M. T., A. Santos Silva, M. do R. Veiga, and J. de Brito. 2019b.“Studies in Ancient Gypsum Based Plasters Towards Their Repair: Mineralogy and Microstructure.” Construction and Building Materials 196: 512–529. Fundación Santa María la Real. Centro de estudios del románico. 2005.Tratamientos y MetodologÍas de Conservacion de Pinturas Murales. Aguilar de Campoo, Palencia: VVAA. Gárate Rojas, I. 2008.Artes de los Yesos: Yeserías y Estucos. Madrid: Munilla-Lería. Gil Delgado, Ó. 2013a.“Santa María la Blanca de Sevilla: Templo de Tres Religiones. Estudio Arquitectónico.” Archivo Hispalense; Revista Historica, Literaria y Artistica 96 (291): 65–97. Gil Delgado, Ó. 2013b.“Una Sinagoga Desvelada en Sevilla: Estudio Arquitectónico.”Sefarad 73 (1): 69–96. Gil Delgado, Ó. 2014.La iglesia de Santamaria la Blanca de Sevilla. Análisis, documentación e intervención en el patrimonio arquitectónico. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Sevilla. Gil Delgado, Ó. 2015.Arquitectura de Santa María la Blanca. Mezquita, Sinagoga e Iglesia en Sevilla, vol. 49. Sevilla, España: Universidad de Sevilla, IUACC. Gilabert Montero, M. 2012.‘La consolidación de pinturas murales al temple. Fijación de películas pictóricas pulverulentas. Estudio y comparación de materiales y aplicación.’, masters dissertation, Universitat Politècnica de València. Gleeson, J. F. 2002.‘The Survey and inspection of External Plasterwork for Repair and Replacement’, Project ‘Plaster Architecture’ref. n.: CLT2000/AI/IT-465. Goossens, E. 2003.‘Moisture transfer properties of coated gypsum’, Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Gómez, T., B. Hasbach, R. Bruquetas, M. L. Gómez, and I. Arroyo. 1992.“The Polychromed Plasterwork of the Corral de Villalpando Brothers. Historical Study, Scientific Examination, Conservation Problems and Possibilities of Treatment.”Studies in Conservation 37 (1): 62–67. Grazzini, A. 2019.“In Situ Analysis of Plaster Detachment by Impact Tests.”Applied Sciences 9 (2): 1–11. Hernández Pablos, A., A. I. Calero Castillo, A. C. Coba Peña, F. J. Collado Montero, and A. García Bueno. ‘Reconstruccion del color en las yeserías y alfarje del Patio de las Doncellas en el Real Alcázar de Sevilla a partir de la creación de paletas virtuales’. Historic Environment Scotland. 2016.‘2. Conservation of Plasterwork (Revised 2002)’. Technical, Advice & Guidance, Technical Advice Notes, pp. 1–46. 18 M. TORRES-GONZÁLEZ ET AL.
López Borges, V. H., L. Burgio, and R. J. H. Clark. 2005. ‘Documentación y autentificación de yeserías nazaríes a través del tratamiento de conservación y el análisis científico.’,Investig. en Conserv. y restauración II Congr. del Grup. Español del IIC [9,10 y 11 noviembre 2005, Barcelona], p. 12. Madariaga, J. M., et al. 2014.“In Situ Analysis with Portable Raman and ED-XRF Spectrometers for the Diagnosis of the Formation of Efflorescence on Walls and Wall Paintings of the Insula IX 3 (Pompeii, Italy).”Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 45 (11–12): 1059–1067. Maguregui, M., et al. 2008.“Analytical Diagnosis Methodology to Evaluate Nitrate Impact on Historical Building Materials.”Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 391 (4): 1361–1370. Martínez-Domingo, MÁ, A. I. C. Castillo, E. V. García, and E. M. Valero. 2020.“Evaluation of Cleaning Processes Using Colorimetric and Spectral Data for the Removal of Layers of Limewash from Medieval Plasterwork.”Sensors (Switzerland) 20 (24): 1–17. Mayer, R. 1991.The Artist’s Handbook of Materials and Techniques, no. 5. Barcelona: Tursen, Hermann Blume. Mesquita, C. A. C. 2012.‘Revestimientos Continuos Interiores de Varias Capas con Características de Barrera de Vapor e Higroscopicidad’, Doctoral dissertation, Polytechnic University of Madrid. Mora, P., L. Mora, and P. Philippot. 2003.La Conservazione Delle Pitture Murali. Colombia: Books. Norin, V., S. Golovina, and Y. Tikhonov. 2019.‘Application of three-dimensional technologies in restoration of architectural decor elements’,E3S Web Conf., vol. 135. Peris Vicente, J. 2008.‘Estudio analítico de materiales empleados en barnices, aglutinantes y consolidantes en obras de arte mediante métodos cromatográficos y espectrométricos’,Doctoral disertation. Universitat de Valencia, Valencia. ‘Productos –Mortero Alhambra’. [Online]. Available: http:// morteroalhambra.es/?page_id = 18. [Accessed: 27-Dec- 2021]. Ramos Molina, J. 2015a.Estudio de Materiales y Técnicas Constructivas de Elementos Singulares en el Palacio de la Madraza. Protocolo de Actuación. Granada, Spain: Universidad de Granada. Ramos Molina, J. 2015b.Estudio de Materiales y Técnicas Constructivas de Elementos Singulares en el Palacio de la Madraza. Protocolo de Actuación. ANEXOS. Granada, Spain: Universidad de Granada. Ramos Molina, J., J. A. Durán Suárez, E. M. Sebastián Pardo, and M. P. Sáez Pérez. 2017.“Estudio del Estado de Conservación de las Yeserías del Oratorio de la Madraza de Granada. Identificación, Evaluación y Análisis.” Informes de la Construcción 69 (545): 1–11. Ranesi, A., P. Faria, and M. do R. Veiga. 2021.‘Traditional and Modern Plasters for Built Heritage : Suitability and Contribution for Passive Relative Humidity Regulation’, pp. 2337–2355. Rani, D., M. Santhanam, and S. Bais. 2019.‘Historic incised plasterwork of India-characteristics and microstructure’, no. January 2021. Rubio Domene, F. R. 2002.‘Fijación de paños de yeserías en el periodo nazarí en la Alhambra. Granada’, no. 84-932568-1– 1, p. 24. Rubio Domene, R. 2010.Yeserías de la Alhambra. Historia, Técnica y Conservación. Granada: Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife. University of Granada. Rubio Domene, R. 2011.“Restauración de Yeserías y Alicatados del Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife. GRANADA.”Rehabil. y Restauración 114: 92–101. Silva, A., M. T. Freire, F. J. Blasco López, F. J. Alejandre Sánchez, V. Flores Alés, and A. I. Calero Castillo. 2019.“Modelling of the Conservation State of Gypsum-Based Plasters in the Real Alcazar of Seville.” Science and Digital Technology for Cultural Heritage, 375–379. Silveira, P. M., M. do R. Veiga, and J. de Brito. 2002.‘Cracking of ancient gypsum plasters’,inXXX IAHS World Congress on Housing, no. October 2015, pp. 1779–1785. Stuart, B. 2007.Analytical Techniques in Materials Conservation. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons. Tejedor, B., E. Lucchi, D. Bienvenido-Huertas, and I. Nardi. 2022.“Non-Destructive Techniques (NDT) for the Diagnosis of Heritage Buildings: Traditional Procedures and Futures Perspectives.”Energy and Buildings, (263): 112029. Torres-González, M., F. J. Alejandre, V. Flores-alés, A. I. Calerocastillo, and F. J. Blasco-lópez. 2021a.“Analysis of the State of Conservation of Historical Plasterwork Through Visual Inspection and non-Destructive Tests . The Case of the Upper Frieze of the Toledanos Room (The Royal Alcázar of Seville, Spain).”Journal of Building Engineering 40 (102314): 1–14. Torres-González, M., C. Rubio-Bellido, D. Bienvenido-Huertas, J. M. Alducin-Ochoa, and V. Flores-Alés. 2021b.“Long-term Environmental Monitoring for Preventive Conservation of External Historical Plasterworks.”Journal of Building Engineering 47 (December 2021): 103896. Tsakiridis, P. E., and E. E. Toumbakari. 2010.“Characterisation of Ancient Gypsum Mortars from the Archaeological Site of Amathus, Cyprus.”2nd Historic Mortars conference & TC 203-RHM’, 373–380. UNE, A. E. de N. 2014.‘UNE-EN 16085. Conservation of Cultural property. Methodology for sampling from materials of cultural property. General rules’. 2014. Vivar García, E., A. I. Calero Castillo, and A. García Bueno. 2021a.‘Estudio de métodos de limpieza sobre yeserías medievales’, 2021, no. March 2021. Vivar García, E., A. I. Calero Castillo, and A. García Bueno. 2021b.“Study of Cleaning Methods on Medieval Plasterwork.”Ge-Conservación 19: 74–89. Unpublished resources consulted ‘Estudio para la restauración de la decoración mural interior de la Iglesia de Santa María la Blanca de Sevilla,’Artelan Restauración S.L., julio 2013. ‘Proyecto de restauración y conservación de las yeserías y pinturas murales. Iglesia Santa María la Blanca, Sevilla.’ Macías Bernal, J.M. y Domínguez Fernández, F.; GEYSER Gestión y Servicios Técnicos a la Construcción S.L., Junio 2014. ‘Estudio de conservación de la Iglesia de Santa María la Blanca, de Sevilla. Investigación de los organismos implicados en el biodeterioro.’Jurado Lobo, V., Zélia Miller, A., Sáiz Jiménez, C. IRNAS-CSIC, Noviembre 2015. ‘Memoria. Restauración yeserías y pinturas murales Santa María la Blanca, Sevilla.’Agora SL, Juan Aguilar Gutiérrez y Bárbara Hasbach Lugo, 2015. GUIDELINES FOR CONSERVATIONANDRESTORATIONOFHISTORICPOLYCHROMEPLASTERWORK 19