scieee Open visual document viewer

Chromosomal position effect influences the heterologous expression of genes and biosynthetic gene clusters in Streptomyces albus J1074.

Bilyk, Bohdan,Horbal, Liliya,Luzhetskyy, Andriy N

Abstract

Efforts to construct the Streptomyces host strain with enhanced yields of heterologous product have focussed mostly on engineering of primary metabolism and/or the deletion of endogenous biosynthetic gene clusters. However, other factors, such as chromosome compactization, have been shown to have a significant influence on gene expression levels in bacteria and fungi. The expression of genes and biosynthetic gene clusters may vary significantly depending on their location within the chromosome. Little is known about the position effect in actinomycetes, which are important producers of various industrially relevant bioactive molecules.

Full text

Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 DOI 10.1186/s12934-016-0619-z RESEARCH Ch omosomal posi ion e ec in luences he he e ologous exp ession o genes andbiosyn he ic gene clus e s inS ep omyces albus J1074 Bohdan Bilyk1,2, Liliya Ho bal3 and And iy Luzhe skyy1,2,3* Abs ac Backg ound: E o s o cons uc he S ep omyces hos s ain wi h enhanced yields o he e ologous p oduc ha e ocussed mos ly on enginee ing o p ima y me abolism and/o he dele ion o endogenous biosyn he ic gene clus- e s. Howe e , o he ac o s, such as ch omosome compac iza ion, ha e been shown o ha e a signi ican in luence on gene exp ession le els in bac e ia and ungi. The exp ession o genes and biosyn he ic gene clus e s may a y signi ican ly depending on hei loca ion wi hin he ch omosome. Li le is known abou he posi ion e ec in ac ino- myce es, which a e impo an p oduce s o a ious indus ially ele an bioac i e molecules. Resul s: To demons a e an impac o he ch omosomal posi ion e ec on he he e ologous exp ession o genes and gene clus e s in S ep omyces albus J1074, a ansposon mu an lib a y wi h andomly dis ibu ed ansposon ha includes a β-glucu onidase epo e gene was gene a ed. Repo e gene exp ession le els ha e been shown o depend on he posi ion on he ch omosome. Using a combina ion o he ansposon sys em and a φC31-based ec- o , he a anciamycin biosyn he ic clus e was in oduced andomly in o he S. albus genome. The p oduc ion le els o a anciamycin a ied up o eigh old depending on he loca ion o he gene clus e wi hin he ch omosome o S. albus J1074. One o he isola ed mu an s ains wi h an a i icially in oduced a achmen si e p oduced app oxima ely 50% mo e a anciamycin han s ains wi h endogenous a Bs. Conclusions: In his s udy, we demons a e ha exp ession o he epo e gene and a anciamycin biosyn he ic clus e in S ep omyces albus J1074 a ies up o eigh old depending on i s posi ion on he ch omosome. The in eg a- ion o he he e ologous clus e in o di e en loca ions on he ch omosome may signi ican ly in luence he i e o he p oduced subs ance. This knowledge can be used o he mo e e icien enginee ing o Ac inobac e ia ia he eloca ion o he biosyn he ic gene clus e s and inse ion o addi ional copies o he e ologous cons uc s in a sui able ch omosomal posi ion. Keywo ds: S ep omyces albus J1074, He e ologous exp ession, Ch omosomal posi ion e ec , φC31-a achmen si e © The Au ho (s) 2017. This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons license, and indica e i changes we e made. The C ea i e Commons Public Domain Dedica ion wai e (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/ publicdomain/ze o/1.0/) applies o he da a made a ailable in his a icle, unless o he wise s a ed. Backg ound Du ing he pas ew decades, s ep omyce es ha e been ex ensi ely employed o he he e ologous exp ession o bioac i e na u al p oduc s. He e ologous exp es- sion con ibu es subs an ially o he disco e y and cha ac e isa ion o seconda y me aboli es. The inc ease in he numbe o sequenced mic obial genomes dem- ons a es ha mos o he biosyn he ic clus e s emain silen unde s anda d labo a o y condi ions. The exp es- sion o silen gene clus e s in a well-cha ac e ised he e - ologous hos is a alida ed app oach o he disco e y o new na u al p oduc s [1]. Howe e , insu icien yields o he e ologously p oduced molecules o en p e en hei u he pu i ica ion and cha ac e isa ion. Cu en ly, Open Access Mic obial Cell Fac o ies *Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]land.de 1 Pha mBioTec GmbH, Science Pa k 1, 66123 Saa b ücken, Ge many Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle Page 2 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 se e al S ep omyces s ains ha e been u ilised as hos s o he p oduc ion o na u al p oduc s. The mos widely used a e S ep omyces coelicolo , S ep omyces a e - mi illis and S ep omyces albus J1074 [2]. Howe e , he p oduc ion le el o he he e ologously p oduced com- pounds o en needs o be u he op imised. Indus i- ally ele an i es o some na u al p oduc s may each he mul i-g am pe li e scale (e.g.,≥10g/L e y h omy- cin;≥30g/L e acycline;≥80g/L salinomycin; pe sonal communica ion wi h P o . H oje Pe ko ic, Ljubljana Uni e si y), whe eas he yields o na u al p oduc s in he e ologous hos s emain in he millig am ange [2]. One o he ac o s signi ican ly in luencing he exp es- sion o genes and biosyn he ic gene clus e s is hei loca- ion on he ch omosome, he so-called ‘ch omosomal posi ion e ec ’. This e m desc ibes di e ences in he exp ession o a gene depending on i s ch omosomal loca ion. S udies o gene exp ession in Saccha omyces ce e isiae demons a ed ha he exp ession o he e - ologous genes was ep essed when in eg a ed a silen loci, indica ing ha ep ession occu ed due o a posi- ional e ec [3]. In ano he s udy [4], i was shown ha an Aspe gillus nidulans mu an , de ec i e in he sys em esponsible o his one me hyla ion, ac i a es silen sec- onda y me aboli e clus e s. The posi ion e ec can in luence no only he exp es- sion le el o a na i e gene a e spon aneous ansloca- ions, bu also ansgene exp ession a e inse ion in o di e en egions o a genome, leading o changes in he - e ologous p oduc ion. I was demons a ed ha a ia- ions in β-galac osidase ac i i y can each 300- old in esponse o ansloca ions o he β-galac osidase gene in he Esche ichia coli ch omosome [5]. Howe e , Schmid and Ro h demons a ed [6] only a h ee old a ia ion in he exp ession le el o he his ope on clus e andomly dis ibu ed wi hin he Salmonella yphimu ium ch omo- some. Addi ionally, Lac obacillus lac is mu an s showed a h ee old di e ence in he le els o gus(a) exp ession [7]. The main ac o s causing such a iabili y in gene exp ession a e: (i) he le el o DNA compac iza ion [8]; (ii) a ia ions in he p omo e s eng h; and (iii) he dis- ance o he o igin o eplica ion [7]. The i s wo ac o s a e mo e c i ical o euka yo ic o ganisms, which ha e high le els o DNA compac iza ion and g ea e a ia- ion in p omo e s eng hs, which may in luence a down- s eam he e ologous gene. By con as , he dis ance o he eplica ion o igin is he majo ac o o a iabili y in gene exp ession in p oka yo ic cells, because hey con- ain a single o igin o eplica ion pe genopho e. Thus, a gene placed close o he o igin o eplica ion is epli- ca ed be o e a gene loca ed nea he e minus and he e- o e has an ope a i e inc ease in gene dosage [9]. Despi e he impo ance o s ep omyce es as p oduc- e s o na u al p oduc s, he posi ion e ec has no ye been in es iga ed in hem. The ep esen a i es o his genus ha e a complex li e cycle. These bac e ia colonise he en i onmen by g owing b anching, mul igenomic hyphae while simul aneously o ming unigenomic spo es o achie e dispe sion. Recen s udies iden i ied a no el p o ein speci ic o Ac inobac e ia ha is esponsible o DNA compac iza ion, ch omosome seg ega ion and an ibio ic p oduc ion [10]. In o he s udies [11], a his- one-like p o ein was cha ac e ised ha can s uc u ally couple changes in DNA con o ma ion and ansc ip ion in esponse o s ess. Such complexi y in nucleoid o gani- sa ion leads o a ia ions in exp ession o di e en DNA egions and causes a ch omosomal posi ion e ec . How- e e , o da e, a lack o e icien ools o he explo a ion o s ep omyce es genomics has limi ed any a emp s o e alua e he impac o his ac o on he exp ession o he e ologous genes and clus e s. He e, we ex end p e ious s udies on he ch omosomal posi ion e ec o he mycelial mic oo ganism S ep omy- ces albus J1074, which is a ypical ep esen a i e o he S ep omyces genus and is well known o i s ou s and- ing po en ial as a hos o he he e ologous p oduc ion o bioac i e small molecules [12]. Du ing he pas decade, S. albus J1074 has been used o he he e ologous exp es- sion o a ious an ibio ic biosyn he ic clus e s, e.g. hio- co aline, cyclooc a in and s e imycin. Nume ous gene ic ools ha e ecen ly been de eloped o he s ain, making i s genome enginee ing a he s aigh o wa d [13–15]. To e alua e he impac o he ch omosomal posi ion e ec on he e ologous exp ession in he genome o S. albus J1074, a ansposon mu an lib a y wi h andomly dis ibu ed gus(a), he β-glucu onidase epo e gene, was gene a ed. The exp ession o he epo e gene in ecombinan s ains was analysed, and a ious ac o s in luencing he exp ession o he gusA gene a e dis- cussed. In addi ion, using a combina ion o a ansposon sys em and he φC31-based ec o , he a anciamycin biosyn he ic clus e was in oduced andomly in o he S. albus genome. Analysis o a anciamycin p oduce s also demons a ed an eigh old a ia ion in he p oduc- ion le el o he an ibio ic depending on i s ch omosomal loca ion. One o he isola ed mu an s ains wi h an a i- icially in oduced a achmen si e p oduced 53% mo e a anciamycin han s ains wi h endogenous a Bs. Resul s anddiscussion Impac o  he ch omosomal posi ion e ec ongene exp ession To examine an impac o he ch omosomal posi ion e ec on he exp ession o he e ologous genes in S. albus J1074, a ansposon ha bou ing he epo e gene Page 3 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 was cons uc ed (Fig.1). The ansposon con ained he gus(a) epo e gene, encoding β-glucu onidase unde he con ol o he e mEp1 p omo e [16]. The ac i i y o β-glucu onidase can be spec opho ome ically meas- u ed. The gus(a) gene is lanked by wo d-phage e mina- o s [17], which p e en ansc ip ion in bo h di ec ions wi h an e iciency o up o 85% (Addi ional ile1: Figu e S1). The ap amycin esis ance gene was cloned ups eam and in he opposi e di ec ion o gus(a) o exclude any impac on exp ession o he epo e gene. Then he ansposon was cloned in o he plasmid con aining syn- he ic gene o Hima 1- ansposase and empe a u e sensi i e pSG5 eplicon. The ec o was in oduced in o genome S. albus J1074 and lib a y o ansposon mu an s was gene a ed as desc ibed p e iously [14]. Eigh een mu an s om his lib a y wi h he andomly dis ibu ed epo e gene we e isola ed and analysed. The inse ions we e mapped on he ch omosome using escue cloning, as desc ibed elsewhe e [14] (Table1; Fig.2). All iden i ied inse ions we e localised in a co e egion o he ch omo- some. A measu emen o he GusA ac i i ies was made a e 48h o g ow h (Table1; Fig.4). The a e age alue o ac i i y was 8.6U/mg, and eigh o he analysed mu an s (44%) had ac i i ies ha lay wi hin his ange (mu an s # 1, 2, 4, 5, 14, 16, 17 and 18). Fi e mu an s (28%) had ac i - i y alues abo e a e age, and ano he i e mu an s (28%), loca ed mos ly in he cen e o he ch omosome, and had alues below a e age. The a ia ion in he epo e gene exp ession was six- old ( he lowes alue obse ed was 2.7U/mg, and he highes was 17.3U/mg), which was compa able o esul s desc ibed o o he p oka yo es, whe e wo- o h ee old a ia ions in ac i i y ha e been obse ed [6, 7, 18]. Owing o he isola ion o gus(a) by he wo e mina- o s, he ac i i y o he local p omo e s should no ha e had a signi ican impac on i s exp ession. To con i m his, he GusA ac i i ies o he mu an s we e compa ed wi h S. albus J1074 RNA-seq da a a e 48h o cul i a- ion in liquid medium. The RPKM ( eads pe kilobase pe million eads) alues o he genes, which a e loca ed in he genome o S. albus J1074 ups eam and in he same o ien a ion as gus(a), we e analysed. The esul s dem- ons a ed ha , in he ob ained ansposon mu an s, local p omo e s had a mino e ec on he le el o gus(a) Fig. 1 The map o he plasmid con aining gus(a) in he ansposon, pALG. Plasmids con ains ollowing ea u es: hima 1(a)—syn he ic ansposase gene, unde con ol o p1— ipAp, hios ep on inducible p omo e ; gus(a)— epo e gene o glucu onidase; p2—e mEp1, p omo e 1 o e y h omycin esis ance gene; d e mina o o d- phage, pSG5 ep ac inomyce es empe a u e-sensi i e eplicon; aac(3) IV ap amycin esis ance ma ke , hph hyg omycin esis ance ma ke , ITR in e ed e minal epea s; R6Ko i o igin o escue cloning Table 1 Loci o pALG- ansposon inse ions inS. albus J1074 iden i ied by escue plasmid sequencing M Locus (XNR) Gene unc ion GUS ac i i y (U/mg) S . de . (U/mg) Exp ession le el (RPKM) 1 1302 U ease subuni α 1 8.2 0.6 1.9 2 1853 Bi- unc ional ans e ase/deace ylase 7.7 0.4 2.2 3 1880 Phospha ase 15.4 2.1 42.5 4 2035 Cons. hyp. p o ./biosyn hesis docking sca old p o . 9.1 1.3 5.7 5 2089 In eg al memb ane p o ein 8.1 0.1 24.7 6 2358 Reg. p o ./Me R- amily ansc ip ional eg. 11.8 1.1 22.7 7 2599 P edic ed p o ein/adenyla e cyclase 17.3 1.8 3.5 8 2683 Be a-lac amase 3.4 1.7 31.7 9 2883 Te R- amily ansc ip ional egula o 6.2 1.2 6.0 10 2981 In eg al memb ane p o ein 3.5 0.5 102.6 11 3133 Pep idase C14 caspase ca aly ic subuni 3.3 0.1 97.1 12 3300 Conse ed hypo he ical p o ein 2.7 0.9 2.3 13 3826 Conse ed hypo he ical p o ein/DNA-binding p o . 9.9 1.1 27.5 14 4204/5 IGR (in e genic egion) b w. wo p edic ed p o eins 8.6 1.1 25.4 15 4675/6 IGR b w. cons. hyp. p o ein and phospholipase 14.7 1.5 19.6 16 5073/4 IGR b w. ansmemb . anspo e and in eg al memb . p o . 8.8 1.3 3.5 17 5168 Glyce ol kinase 1/2 7.8 1.0 27.9 18 5663 Succina e dehyd ogenase la op o ein subuni 8.0 1.3 29.9 Page 4 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 exp ession, e.g., mu an 10, which exhibi ed one o he lowes le els o GusA ac i i y, was lanked ups eam by he egion wi h a high RPKM alue (Fig.3). Concu en ly, mu an s wi h a ela i ely low RPKM o lanking genes (e.g. mu an s 7 and 15) we e cha ac e ised by a high GusA ac i i y le el (Fig.3). Ch omosomal posi ion e ec does no co ela e wi hdis ance oo iC P e ious s udies on he posi ion e ec in E. coli and Sal- monella demons a ed ha a ia ions in he exp ession le el o epo e genes a e caused mainly by gene dosage [6, 19–21]. Unlike mos bac e ia ha possess a ci cula ch omosome, s ep omyce es ca y a linea ch omosome wi h a cen ally loca ed o iC. Thus, i he gene dosage plays a signi ican ole in he exp ession le el o he e - ologous genes, he GusA ac i i y in mu an s wi h inse - ions localised close o he ch omosome cen e should be highe han in hose wi h inse ions localised close o he ch omosome ends. Howe e , plo ing he GusA ac i i ies wi h posi ions o he epo e gene showed ha mu an s wi h in eg a ion nea he o iC demons a ed GusA ac i i y below a e age (mu an s 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12), whe eas s ains wi h an inse ion loca ed some dis ance om he o iC, close o cen es o he ch omosomal shoulde s, demons a ed abo e-a e age esul s (mu an s 3, 6 and 15). Reloca ion o  he si e o gene clus e in eg a ion The ob ained esul s demons a ed ha he ansloca ion o he he e ologous cons uc may signi ican ly in luence i s exp ession. This esul should also be alid o mo e complex gene ic s uc u es, such as an an ibio ic bio- syn he ic gene clus e . I is di icul o deli e an ibio ic biosyn he ic gene clus e s in o a s ep omyce es ch omo- some ia a ansposon, due o hei la ge size. Mos o he ec o s ca ying biosyn he ic gene clus e s a e in eg a ed in o he ch omosome ia he phage φC31 in eg a ion sys- em. Thus, we ansloca ed he a B a achmen si e o φC31 in o a ious loca ions o he S. albus J1074 ch o- mosome. A ansposon wi h an a achmen si e o he φC31-phage was cons uc ed and cloned in o a non- ep- lica i e ec o con aining hima 1(a), he syn he ic ans- posase gene. The ob ained plasmid pAHT (Fig.4) did no equi e any addi ional induc ion s eps o cu ing o he plasmid backbone, because he exconjugan s ob ained al eady con ained a copy o he ansposon inse ed in he genome. This ec o was han in oduced in o S. albus SAM3 (Δa B·ΔpseB4), lacking bo h endogenous a B si es [22], by in e gene ic conjuga ion om E. coli. The a anciamycin gene clus e was in eg a ed in o a i- icially dis ibu ed a Bs. This 35.9-kb la ge clus e was isola ed om S ep omyces echina us [23] and was p e i- ously exp essed in di e en s ep omyce es [24]. The cos- mid wi h he a anciamycin clus e was in oduced in o wen y- ou ansposon mu an s. In his way, a lib a y o s ains ca ying he a anciamycin biosyn he ic clus e a di e en ch omosomal posi ions was ob ained. As a con- ol, wo s ains con aining na u ally loca ed a Bs (Δa B and ΔpseB4 [22]) we e used. Al oge he , he mu an s demons a ed an eigh old a ia ion in a anciamycin p oduc ion. Such a a ia ion in he exp ession le el o a he e ologous clus e co ela ed wi h esul s ob ained o gus(a)-gene exp ession desc ibed he ein. The a e age p oduc ion o a anciamycin o he mu an s ains was 40.53U/mg. Howe e , in his case, we obse ed s onge a ia ion in he esul s: only one o he 24 mu an s p o- duced in he ange o 40.53±10% (mu an 24). Thi een mu an s (54%) demons a ed below-a e age esul s, and 10 mu an s (42%) e inced abo e-a e age esul s (Fig.5). The p oduc ion o a anciamycin om ou a i icially in eg a ed a Bs was mo e han 20% abo e he a e age p oduc ion om endogenous a achmen si es (Fig. 5, mu an s 1, 2, 4 and 21). The yield o a anciamycin in one o hose mu an s (mu an 2) was 56% highe han in he con ol s ains. This esul demons a ed ha he anslo- ca ion o he clus e may esul in signi ican a ia ion in an ibio ic p oduc ion. These da a sugges ha he cen al egions o he ch omosomal “shoulde s” a e mo e p e e able loci o he exp ession o he e ologous cons uc s, because GusA ac i i y in mu an s wi h hese in eg a ions was highe han a e age. Gi en ha s ep omyce es a e well- es ablished cell ac o ies o he biosyn hesis o na u al p oduc s, i is impo an o s udy he in luence o ch o- mosomal localisa ion on he exp ession o biosyn he ic gene clus e s. Indeed, he eigh old a ia ion in an ibio ic p oduc ion was obse ed in he lib a y o mu an s ca ying co e- sponding gene clus e s in di e en loca ions o he ch o- mosome. Fou o he 24 isola ed mu an s demons a ed mo e han a 20% inc ease in an ibio ic p oduc ion, and Fig. 2 Dis ibu ion o inse ion loci o pALG- ansposons in S. albus J1074. Blue hombs ep esen posi ions o he mapped ansposon inse ions; ed ci cle ep esen s posi ion o o iC o S. albus-ch omosome Page 5 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 one o hese mu an s showed a 56.5% inc ease in he yield o a anciamycin (82.4U/mg) compa ed wi h he a e age p oduc ion o he con ol s ains (52.65 U/mg). Thus, he p oposed app oach can be used in combi- na ion wi h o he me hods ha a e employed o he op imisa ion o he he e ologous p oduc ion o na u- al p oduc s. This app oach can be used no only o ansloca ion o he a achmen si e, bu also o in o- duce addi ional in eg a ion si es in o he genome, hus esul ing in an inc ease in he numbe o clus e s pe genome [25]. We belie e ha he gene ic ools desc ibed he ein will ind wide applica ions in he cons uc ion and manipula ion o ac inobac e ial he e ologous hos s. Conclusions Ou s udy demons a es he e ec o he ch omosomal posi ion e ec on a he e ologously exp essed epo e gene and on mo e complex gene ic cons uc s, such as an ibio ic biosyn he ic gene clus e s in S. albus J1074. Based on his phenomenon, we de eloped an app oach ha can be used o he cons uc ion o hos s ains wi h imp o ed he e ologous p oduc ion ea u es. Me hods Bac e ial s ains andcul i a ion condi ions The cul i a ion o he S. albus s ains was conduc ed on a soy-manni ol aga o in a liquid TSB medium a 29°C. The cul i a ion o E. coli was conduc ed in an LB medium a 37°C. The in e gene ic conjuga ion o he plasmids was pe o med as p e iously desc ibed [26]. The lib a y Fig. 3 The compa ison o GusA-ac i i y le els wi h exp ession le el o adjacen genes (co ela ion coe icien is equal—0.34). Blue columns co - espond o alues o GusA-ac i i y. S ains we e g own o 48 h a 28 °C; ligh g ey columns co espond o RPKM a e 48 h o cul i a ion a 28 °C. Mu an s a e placed acco ding o loca ion o hei ansposons on he ch omosome Fig. 4 The map o he plasmid con aining phage a achmen si e in he ansposon, pAHT. Plasmids con ains ollowing ea u es: hima 1(a)—syn he ic ansposase gene, unde con ol o p1— ipAp, hios ep on inducible p omo e , aac(3)IV ap amycin esis ance ma ke , hph hyg omycin esis ance ma ke , ITR in e ed e minal epea s, R6Ko i o igin o escue cloning, a B a achmen si e o φC31- phage Page 6 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 o ansposon mu an s was ob ained as desc ibed else- whe e [14]. Recombinan DNA echniques Lambda- ed-media ed ecombina ion was conduc ed as desc ibed in he s anda d p o ocol [27]. The isola ion o genomic DNA om S. albus s ains was pe o med acco ding o a p e iously desc ibed me hod [26]. PCR using Phusion polyme ase (The mo Scien i ic), sepa a- ion o DNA by aga ose gel elec opho esis and Sou h- e n blo hyb idisa ion we e pe o med as p e iously desc ibed [28]. DNA agmen s and PCR p oduc s we e pu i ied using PROMEGA™ ki s. Oligonucleo ides we e syn hesised by Eu o ins MWG Ope on. DNA sequenc- ing was pe o med by GATC-Bio ec. Isola ion o  escue plasmids Ch omosomal DNA was isola ed om he desi ed s ains and diges ed wi h SacII o pALG ansconjugan s, espec i ely. The agmen s we e hen sel -liga ed and ans o med in o E. coli T ans o max cells. The ans o - man s we e selec ed based on hei esis ance o ap amy- cin. The ob ained plasmids we e isola ed and sequenced using he P1-pALG-ch p ime . Plasmid cons uc ion The plasmids and p ime s used in his s udy a e lis ed below (see Addi ional ile1). The DNA manipula ions and cloning p ocedu es we e pe o med acco ding o s anda d p o ocols [29], and he plasmid cons uc s we e con i med by DNA sequencing. Cons uc ion o pALG The gus(a) gene was ampli ied using he pSETgus(a) plas- mid as a empla e, he o wa d p ime , F -XI-ep1-gus(a), ca ying he XbaI si e and e mEp1, a Saccha opolys- po a e y h aea e mEp1 gene p omo e and he e e se p ime , Rs-MI- d-gus(a), ca ying he d-phage e mi- na o and he MunI si e. The PCR agmen was liga ed in o pNheIaac [14] linea ised by XbaI and MunI leading o p11-8. The aac(3)IV gene was ampli ied using pIJ773 as a empla e, he o wa d p ime , F -ERI- d-aac, ca - ying he d e mina o and he e e se p ime , Rs-ERI- aac. Bo h p ime s ca y he EcoRI si e. The agmen was cloned in o he EcoRI si e o p11-8 eplacing an exis ing aac(3)IV, esul ing in p11-8aac d. The P uII agmen o p11-8aac d, con aining he ansposon, was liga ed o pALHim linea ised wi h EcoRV, o yield pALG (Fig.1). Cons uc ion o pAHT The hph gene was ampli ied using pAL1 as a empla e, wi h F -MI-a B-hph as he o wa d p ime , ca ying a B and he MunI es ic ion si e, and Rs-XI-hph as he e e se p ime ca ying he XbaI si e. The ampli- ied agmen was cloned in o he MunI and XbaI si es o pTn5Oks esul ing in pTn5Oksa Bhph(II). To con- s uc a backbone o he ansposon ec o , he hyg o- mycin esis ance gene in p31Him was eplaced by S. albus-mu an s 0 20 40 60 80 10 0 1/g Fig. 5 Rela i e concen a ion o a anciamycin in cul u e media o he e ologous a anciamycin p oduce s. da B—S. albus SAM1(Δa B)::p412C06; dpseB4—S. albus SAM2(ΔpseB4)::-p412C06; 1-24—S. albus SAM3 (Δa B·ΔpseB4)::pAHT::p412C06-mu an s. Do ed black line co esponds o a e age p oduc ion o a anciamycin by ansposon mu an s ains; do ed ed line co esponds o a e age p oduc ion o a anciamycin by con ol s ains wi h one in eg a ion si e. S ains we e g own o 120 h a 28 °C. Rela i e concen a ion o a anciamycin was calcula ed as peak a ea pe g am o d y mass Page 7 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 he ap amycin esis ance gene using λ- ed-media ed ecombina ion [30]. The p ime s F -hph/aac(3)IV and Rs-hph/aac(3)IV we e used o ampli y he agmen o ecombina ion. The ob ained plasmid, pAHS, was lin- ea ized by EcoRV and liga ed wi h he ansposon om he pTn5Oksa Bhph(II) plasmid, gi ing pAHT (Fig.4). Measu emen o glucu onidase ac i i y A e a s a iona y phase o g ow h was eached, 10mL o he main cul u e was ans e ed in o 15mL-conical cen i uge ubes. Mycelium was pelle ed by cen i uga- ion, he supe na an was disca ded and he samples we e d ied o 24h a 65°C. A e 24h, he conical cen i uge ubes wi h d y mycelium we e weighed. The spec opho- ome ic measu emen o glucu onidase ac i i y was ca - ied ou as p e iously desc ibed [29]. S ain cul i a ion andHPLC analysis The S. albus s ains con aining he a anciamycin biosyn- he ic clus e we e g own in 20mL o a TSB medium o 48h a 30°C. Then, 200μL o p ecul u e we e ans e ed in o 15mL o a NL5+1% yeas ex ac medium and cul- i a ed o an addi ional 120h a 30°C. A e cul i a ion, 5mL o he mycelia we e ha es ed by cen i uga ion o 30min a 2000 c . The supe na an was ans e ed in o a new Falcon ube and mixed wi h 5mL o e hyl ace a e and o a ed on a o a o o 30min. Then, he samples we e cen i uged a 4000 pm o 10min, and he uppe phase o he samples was ans e ed o glass ials and d ied unde N2. The d y pelle was dissol ed in ace oni- ile and cen i uged a 20,000 c o 10min o emo e he cell deb is. Then, 80μL o he ex ac s we e ans- e ed in o HPLC ials and analysed by HPLC. The HPLC–ESI–MS-UV–Vis analysis was pe o med on a Dionex Ul ima e 3000 HPLC sys em (The mo Fishe Scien i ic) ha was connec ed o an ESI–MS Amazon mass spec ome e (B uke ). The HPLC sys em was equipped wi h a 100×2.1mm, 1.7-µm BEH C18 col- umn (Wa e s); a 50×2.1mm, 1.7-µm BEH C18 column (Wa e s); o a 100×2mm, 2.5-µm Luna C18 column (Phenomenex), depending on he me hod. Fo unknown ex ac s, an 18-min g adien was pe o med, mainly on he long column, whe eas a 9-min g adien was used o he p epu i ied o known ex ac s. All g adien me h- ods began wi h 5% B and inc eased o 95% B o e 9 o 18min. Sol en A consis ed o H2O+0.1% o mic acid, whe eas sol en B con ained ACN+0.1% o mic acid. The low a e o he BEH C18 columns was 0.6 mL/ min, whe eas he low a e o he Luna C18 column was 0.4mL/min; UV–Vis de ec ion was pe o med om 210 o 600nm. Mos o he ime, he ESI–MS was used in al e na ing mode (posi i e and nega i e). Only a ull MS scan o an addi ional scan wi h MS2 da a was eco ded, depending on he me hod. Bo h HPLC and MS sys ems we e combined using he Hys a p og am (B uke ). As such, he s anda d LC–MS expe imen s could be selec ed as supe me hods. These expe imen s included he selec ed column (Luna=Luna C18; 100=BEH C18 100mm; 50=BEH C18 50mm), g adien (9, 18min) and MS mode (MS only, ms2 posneg). High- esolu ion ESI–MS was measu ed using a Maxis Q-To 4G (B uke ) o an O bi ap LTQ (The mo Fishe Scien i ic) mass spec ome e connec ed o he same HPLC sys em used o s anda d LC–MS. Abb e ia ions RPKM: eads pe kilobase o ansc ip pe million eads; Cons. hyp. p o .: conse a i e hypo he ical p o ein; Reg. p o .: egula o y p o ein; IGR: in e - genic egion; Memb . p o .: memb ane p o ein; ME: mosaic end; ITR: in e ed e minal epea . Au ho s’ con ibu ions BB pa icipa ed in he design o expe imen s, pe o med he expe imen s and analysed he da a. LH pe o med addi ional e i ica ion o he esul s and analysed he da a. AL designed he expe imen s and pe o med p ojec supe ision. BB and AL w o e he pape . All au ho s ead and app o ed he inal manusc ip . Au ho de ails 1 Pha mBioTec GmbH, Science Pa k 1, 66123 Saa b ücken, Ge many. 2 Helm- hol z-Ins i u e o Pha maceu ical Resea ch Saa land, Campus, Building C2.3, 66123 Saa b ücken, Ge many. 3 Depa men o Pha maceu ical Bio echnology, Saa land Uni e si y, 66123 Saa b ücken, Ge many. Compe ing in e es s The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no compe ing in e es s. A ailabili y o da a and ma e ials The cons uc ed mu an s ains and plasmids a e a ailable a he Depa men o Pha maceu ical Bio echnology o he Saa land Uni e si y, Saa b ücken, Ge many. Funding This wo k was suppo ed h ough unding om DZIF g an and by he Eu o- pean Commission unde he 7 h F amewo k P og am h ough he “Collabo- a i e P ojec ” ac ion “STREPSYNTH” G an No. 613877 and h ough he ERC s a ing g an EXPLOGEN No. 281623 o AL. Recei ed: 9 June 2016 Accep ed: 20 Decembe 2016 Re e ences 1. Ongley SE, Bian X, Neilan BA, Mülle R. Recen ad ances in he he e olo- gous exp ession o mic obial na u al p oduc biosyn he ic pa hways. Na P od Rep. 2013;30:1121–38. 2. Bal z RH. Gene ic manipula ion o seconda y me aboli e biosyn hesis o imp o ed p oduc ion in S ep omyces and o he ac inomyce es. J Ind Mic obiol Bio echnol. 2016;43:343–70. Addi ional ile Addi ional ile1: Figu e S1. Glucu onidase ac i i y in cell lysa es o ecombinan S. albus s ains. Table S1. Plasmids used in his wo k. Table S2. P ime s used in his wo k. Page 8 o 8 Bilyk e al. Mic ob Cell Fac (2017) 16:5 • We accep p e-submission inqui ies • Ou selec o ool helps you o ind he mos ele an jou nal • We p o ide ound he clock cus ome suppo • Con enien online submission • Tho ough pee e iew • Inclusion in PubMed and all majo indexing se ices • Maximum isibili y o you esea ch Submi you manusc ip a www.biomedcen al.com/submi Submi you nex manusc ip o BioMed Cen al and we will help you a e e y s ep: 3. Schnell R, Rine J. A posi ion e ec on he exp ession o a RNA gene media ed by he SIR genes in Saccha omyces ce e isiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:494–501. 4. Bok JW, Chiang Y-M, Szewczyk E, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Da idson AD, Sanchez JF, Lo H-C, Wa anabe K, S auss J, Oakley BR, e al. Ch oma- in-le el egula ion o biosyn he ic gene clus e s. Na Chem Biol. 2009;5:462–4. 5. B yan JA, Sella s LE, Busby SJW, Lee DJ. Ch omosome posi ion e ec s on gene exp ession in Esche ichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;. doi:10.1093/na /gku828. 6. Schmid MB, Ro h JR. Gene loca ion a ec s exp ession le el in Salmonella yphimu ium. J Bac e iol. 1987;169:2872–5. 7. Thompson A, Gasson MJ. Loca ion e ec s o a epo e gene on exp es- sion le els and on na i e p o ein syn hesis in Lac ococcus lac is and Saccha omyces ce e isiae. Appl En i on Mic obiol. 2001;67:3434–9. 8. Go schling DE, Apa icio OM, Billing on BL, Zakian VA. Posi ion e ec a S. ce e isiae elome es: e e sible ep ession o Pol II ansc ip ion. Cell. 1990;63:751–62. 9. Pa i GD, Higgins CF. Ch omosomal domains o supe coiling in Salmo- nella yphimu ium. Mol Mic obiol. 1993;10:685–96. 10. Swie cz JP, Nanji T, Gloyd M, Gua ne A, Ellio MA. A no el nucleoid- associa ed p o ein speci ic o he ac inobac e ia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4171–84. 11. Ald idge M, Facey P, F ancis L, Bayliss S, Del Sol R, Dyson P. A no el bi unc- ional his one p o ein in S ep omyces: a candida e o s uc u al coupling be ween DNA con o ma ion and ansc ip ion du ing de elopmen and s ess? Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4813–24. 12. Bal z R. S ep omyces and Saccha opolyspo a hos s o he e ologous exp ession o seconda y me aboli e gene clus e s. J Ind Mic obiol Bio- echnol. 2010;37:759–72. 13. Pe zke L, Luzhe skyy A. In i o Tn5-based ansposon mu agenesis o S ep omyce es. Appl Mic obiol Bio echnol. 2009;83:979–86. 14. Bilyk B, Webe S, My ono skyi M, Bilyk O, Pe zke L, Luzhe skyy A. In i o andom mu agenesis o s ep omyce es using ma ine -based ansposon Hima 1. Appl Mic obiol Bio echnol. 2013;97:351–9. 15. Siegl T, Luzhe skyy A. Ac inomyce es genome enginee ing app oaches. An onie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102:503–16. 16. Bibb MJ, Whi e J, Wa d JM, Janssen GR. The mRNA o he 23S RNA me hylase encoded by he e mE gene o Saccha opolyspo a e y h aea is ansla ed in he absence o a con en ional ibosome-binding si e. Mol Mic obiol. 1994;14:533–45. 17. O suka J, Kunisawa T. Cha ac e is ic base sequence pa e ns o p omo e and e mina o si es in phi X174 and d phage DNAs. J Theo Biol. 1982;97:415–36. 18. Sousa C, de Lo enzo V, Cebolla A. Modula ion o gene exp ession h ough ch omosomal posi ioning in Esche ichia coli. Mic obiology. 1997;143:2071–8. 19. Beckwi h JR, Signe ER, Eps ein W. T ansposi ion o he lac egion o E. coli. Cold Sp ing Ha bo Symp Quan Biol. 1966;31:393–401. 20. Block DH, Hussein R, Liang LW, Lim HN. Regula o y consequences o gene ansloca ion in bac e ia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:8979–92. 21. Coope S, Helms e e CE. Ch omosome eplica ion and he di ision cycle o Esche ichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1968;31:519–40. 22. Bilyk B, Luzhe skyy A. Unusual si e-speci ic DNA in eg a ion in o he highly ac i e pseudo-a B o he S ep omyces albus J1074 genome. Appl Mic obiol Bio echnol. 2014;98:5095–104. 23. Kelle -Schie lein W, Mülle A. The suga componen o a anciamycin: 2-0-me hyl-l- hamnose. Expe ien ia. 1970;26:929–30. 24. Luzhe skyy A, Maye A, Ho mann J, Pelze S, Holzenkämpe M, Schmi B, Wohle SE, Ven e A, Bech hold A. Cloning and he e ologous exp ession o he a anciamycin biosyn he ic gene clus e e ealed a new lexible glycosyl ans e ase. ChemBioChem. 2007;8:599–602. 25. Mandelscheid N, Bilyk B, Busche T, Kalinowski J, Paulula T, Bech hold A, Pe zke L, Luzhe skyy A. An in luence o he copy numbe o biosyn he ic gene clus e s on he p oduc ion le el o an ibio ics in a he e ologous hos . J Bio echnol. 2016;20(232):110–7. doi:10.1016/j.jbio ec.2016.05.038. 26. Kiese T, Bibb MJ, Bu ne MJ, Cha e KF, Hopwood DA. P ac ical S ep o- myces gene ics. No wich: John Innes Founda ion; 2000. 27. Da senko KA, Wanne BL. One-s ep inac i a ion o ch omosomal genes in Esche ichia coli K-12 using PCR p oduc s. P oc Na l Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6640–5. 28. Samb ook J, Russel DW. Molecula cloning: a labo a o y manual. 3 d ed. Cold Sp ing Ha bo : Cold Sp ing Ha bo Labo a o y P ess; 2001. 29. My ono skyi M, Welle E, Fedo enko V, Luzhe skyy A. β-Glucu onidase as a sensi i e and e sa ile epo e in ac inomyce es. Appl En i on Mic obiol. 2011;77:5370–83. 30. Gus B, Challis GL, Fowle K, Kiese T, Cha e KF. PCR- a ge ed S ep omyces gene eplacemen iden i ies a p o ein domain needed o biosyn he- sis o he sesqui e pene soil odo geosmin. P oc Na l Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1541–6.