Full text
JMR 14, 2021 319-340 Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış Sebastián VARGAS-VÁZQUEZ - Manuel ROMERO PÉREZ* (Received 02 March 2021, accepted after revision 26 August 2021) Abstract The present-day city of Antequera, in the province of Malaga, Spain, dominates an extensive territory encompassing numerous archaeological sites from different eras. The urban centres of Singilia Barba, Anticaria and Aratispi, belong to the Roman period, now only offering us two mosaics, and a good number of rural properties, from which most of the set of Antequera mosaics come. Within the Antequeran mosaic repertoire, the geometric mosaic occupies a special place, with specimens of great beauty and excellent design, for example those in the majestic Roman villa of La Estación. From a figurative point of view, Antequera has beautiful specimens, such as the Oceanus mosaic of the baths of Santa María and that of the Erotes and Priapus figures of the Roman villae of La Estación and Bobadilla, respectively. Particularly, the Roman villa of Caserío Silverio has a heritage consisting of a large number of figurative representations, highlighting the imposing, although poorly preserved, pavement of the triclinium. This mosaic must have contained a scene related to the mythology of water, of which singular fragments are preserved, such as the representation of the Tiber River and some epigraphic verses extracted from book IV of Vergil’s Georgics. Keywords: Baetica, Roman villa, Roman mosaic, Oceanus, Priapus, Vergil’s Georgics. Öz İspanya’nın Malaga eyaletinde bulunan günümüz Antequera şehri, farklı dönemlerden çok sayıda arkeolojik alanı kapsayan geniş bir bölgeye hâkimdir. Singilia Barba, Anticaria ve Aratispi’nin kent merkezleri Roma Dönemi’ne aittir ve şimdi bize yalnızca iki mozaik ve Antequera mozaiklerinin çoğunun geldiği çok sayıda kırsal mülk sunmaktadır. Antequeran mozaik repertuvarında, örneğin La Estación’un görkemli Roma villasında bulunanlar gibi, harika güzellik ve mükemmel tasarım örnekleri ile geometrik mozaik özel bir yere sahiptir. Figüratif bir bakış açısından, Antequera, Santa María hamamlarının Oceanus mozaiği ve sırasıyla La Estación ve Bobadilla’nın Roma villalarının Eroslar ve Priapus figürleri gibi güzel örneklere sahiptir. Özellikle, Caserío Silverio’nun Roma villası, çok sayıda figüratif temsilden oluşan bir mirasa sahiptir ve tricliniumun kötü korunmuş olmasına rağmen heybetli döşemesini vurgulamaktadır. Bu mozaik, Tiber Nehri’nin temsili ve Vergilius’un Georgics’in IV. kitabından alınan bazı epigrafik dizeler gibi tekil parçalarının korunduğu su mitolojisiyle ilgili bir sahne içeriyor olmalıdır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Baetica, Roma villası, Roma mozaiği, Oceanus, Priapus, Vergilius’un Georgics’i. DOI: 10.26658/jmr.1014576 (Research Article / Araştırma Makalesi) * Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez, University of Seville, Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, Seville, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015- 412X. E-mail: [email protected] Manuel Romero Pérez, Municipal archaeologist of Antequera, Antequera Municipality, Málaga, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-2079. E-mail: [email protected] Work funded by VI Plan Propio de Investigación y Transferencia de la Universidad de Sevilla (VI PPIT-US). This work is part of the R+D+i Project “Vivere in urbe. Arquitectura residencial y espacio urbano en Corduba, Ategua e Ituci. Investigación y socialización” (PID2019-105376GB-C43), granted by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, whose principal investigators are Ángel Ventura Villanueva and Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez. The authors would like to thank Maja Kramer and Pedro Albuquerque for the care taken in reviewing the English version of this text.
320 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez Antequera is situated in the provincia de Málaga (Southern Spain), in the ancient and rich territory of Conventus Astigitanus within the territorial limits of the ancient Roman Baetica. Part of this province coincide with the present-day Andaluzia (Fig. 1). Within its municipal boundary, it encompasses the former territories dependent on Anticaria, Singilia Barba and Aratispi. Next to these cities, a large number of Roman villae structured and gave cohesion to their vast and extensive territory, revealing, once again, the richness of the Baetic countryside, in which one of their key products, olive oil, acquired a main role. Up to a total of 203 Roman villae and / or rural structures have been documented in the Antequeran countryside, and olive oil production has been stated in 41 of them; among these, 27 belong to the ager anticariensis and singiliensi. Olive oil production is also documented at other sites in the surrounding area, now related to the Iberian Roman city of Aratispi and of the Laguna de Fuente de Piedra (Romero 2011-2012: 381-399)1. The Roman remains documented today in Antequera are multiple and varied. Among them the rich mosaic heritage stands out, originating from the previously mentioned luxurious villae. Although to a lesser extent, the Roman city of Anticaria has also contributed to this heritage, showing that not only in urban areas but also in the countryside was mosaic one of the preferred types of pavement. In the case of the three cities documented today in the territory of Antequera, it has only been possible to document mosaic pavements in the old city of Anticaria, located under the current city of Antequera (Fig. 1). In the city of Singilia Barba, on the other hand, despite the monumentality manifested by its archaeological remains, the total absence of mosaics, so far, is significantly surprising. In the case of the rural environment, the presence of mosaics is revealing, given that some of its Roman villae offer a rich and varied pavement catalogue. In total, mosaics have been documented in the Antequeran villae of Bobadilla, Carnicería de los Moros, La Estación and Caserío Silverio (Fig. 1), while in other rural properties the presence of this type of pavement can only be suggested with the help of one’s imagination. Such is the case of the villae of Huerta del Ciprés (Cisneros et al. 2016: 453, 456), where the pars urbana is still to be excavated, and La Quinta, where remains of a mosaic were documented nearby. 1 For a more accurate knowledge of the Roman villae of Antequera, particularly their definition, location, production features, etc., see Romero 1998: 115-141; 2001: 278-279; 2011: 53-80. Figure 1 Antequera in Spain’s Map and location of the Antequeran archaeological sites cited in this paper on relief Map Iberpix IGN. 2021
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 321 Documented Mosaics in Urban Settings Roman baths of Santa María The Roman baths of Santa María, located next to the current Collegiate Church of Santa María, belong to the city of Anticaria (Atencia et al. 1990: 220-226; Atencia 1991: 157-159). This is a spectacular public bath complex where two mosaics dated to the first half of the third century are preserved (Fig. 2). One of them paves a large area interpreted as the apodyterium of the bath, and is characterized by its wide field of ceramic tesserae (Fig. 3). In this mosaic, two small spaces are reserved for emblems or symbols that contain representations of a goblet crater (Fig. 4) and a dolphin with a trident or pitchfork (Fig. 5), which could allude to the Roman god Neptune, although not necessarily. The particularity of mosaics that have a wide field with abundant ceramic tesserae, opus figlinum, is very significant in Roman Baetica. One of our team members is currently studying and cataloguing them. They are also documented in other Antequeran villae, such as in Caserío Silverio, and in other areas of Baetica like Écija and Sevilla (Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 304-305). Figure 2 Orthophoto of the baths of Santa María de Antequera. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera. Figure 3 Baths of Santa María de Antequera: Apodoteryum’s mosaic. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
322 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez The other mosaic paves a distribution room and presents an elegant geometric field with a central emblem depicting the bust of Oceanus (Fig. 6). The god, with a serene and expressive face, seems to emerge from the sea, which is subtly depicted with simple blue strokes. His thick beard and long hair are drawn in pronounced waves, with crab or crustacean claws and legs protruding from between them2. 2 To deepen the study of this mosaic, see Atencia et al. 1990: 220-226; Atencia 1991: 157-159; Romero 1992: 56-62; López Monteagudo 2006: 485-491; Mourão 2010: I, 342-345, 351; II, 174; López Monteagudo 2011: 287-302; Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 60-61; 2018: 315-331. On the iconography of Oceanus see: Foucher 1975: 48-52; Paulian 1979: 115-133; Rodríguez 2011: 541-549; Eraslan 2012: 157-166; 2015: 195-200. Figure 6 Mosaic of water distributor of the baths of Santa María de Antquera. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera. Figures 4 - 5 Details of the Apodoteryum’s mosaic of the baths of Santa María de Antequera. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 323 This wonderful emblem is framed by a well-crafted cube composition. Besides its great sense of character, it is the subtle sensation of undulating and fluid movement that stands out. This is reminiscent of the waves of the sea and it is cleverly achieved by the rotation of the composition, which emphasises the knowledge of the artisans who created it (Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 60-61; 2018: 325). The decorative elements located in the space that occupies one of the thresholds that gave access to the room are also remarkable and are clearly linked to the thermal activity. They represent a container for oils and/or ointments, a strigilis and part of a sandal. The other sandal was lost due to a breakage of the tessellated surface (Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 60; 2018: 324). Documented Mosaics in Rural Areas Roman villa of Bobadilla One of the greatest Roman villae located in Antequera is Bobadilla (Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2017: 119-138); the mosaics3 were discovered in 1891 by Mr. Antonio Aguilar y Correa, Count of Bobadilla and also Marquis of Vega de Armijo, on the land of his property (Aguilar 1892: 100). From the moment of their discovery, the mosaics were subjected to many alterations and changes, which in some cases resulted in the loss of some of the perimeter borders. On another note, the fact that they were extracted without being part of any documented study makes the configuration of the villa itself very difficult to understand. In contrast, the archaeological work carried out in 2004 prior to the construction of the Córdoba-Málaga High Speed Line led to the discovery of the Necropolis and the Alfa of Arroyo Villalta; these are well-studied complexes that have been clearly associated with the Roman villa of Bobadilla (Fernández – Romero 2007: 401-432; Fernández et al. 2010: 177-200). At the time of the discovery of this villa, four mosaics were found (Rodríguez 1988: 141), of which only three are currently preserved; these were deposited in the warehouses of the Archaeological Museum of Córdoba, except for the emblem with the representation of Priapus. This is displayed in a completely separated way from the rest of the mosaic in the ‘Customs Museum’ in Málaga. Among the three preserved mosaics, one is a black and white exclusively geometric. Its geometric composition shows a grid of intersecting horizontal and vertical bands. The other two are polychrome and had two central emblems. In one of them the emblem has completely disappeared and was framed by concentric borders of interlacing capes, chainlets, ogives and swirls of peltas with Solomon’s knots in the interior. The mosaic also has a geometric field of secant and tangent octagons. The second emblem is located inside a geometric design of crosses framed by rhomboids and cubes, which gives the pavement a clear and marked three-dimensional effect. As a secondary decorative element, Solomon’s knots and braids of two strands stand out (Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 78-81). The emblem, which stands out for its rich polychromy, shows a representation of the god Priapus, standing in a frontal position, young and beardless (Figs. 7-8). The god is holding up his cloak with both hands, in the manner of a basket, to contain fruit and flowers, revealing his large erect phallus. The image of the god 3 An examination of these mosaics in Rodríguez 1987; 1988: 137-169; Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 78-81; Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2017: 119-138.
324 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez Figure 7 Priapus Mosaic in the Roman villa of Bobadilla. Courtesy of P. Rodríguez Oliva. Figure 8 Detail of Priapus Mosaic in the Roman villa of Bobadilla. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 325 is accompanied by two birds facing each other with their beaks joined together and red rosebuds that symbolically complement the allusion to fertility as they may stand as a female symbol, like Priapus stands as a male symbol, and the representation of a pedum plant, which enhances the prophylactic and beneficent nature of the representation. To this could be added, as symbolic elements, the Solomon’s knots and the braids of capes. These mosaics have been dated to a period between the end of the second century and the first half of the third century, probably during Severian times4. With regard to the rooms these mosaics may have paved, we cannot say anything about them for the reasons stated above. However, it is very likely that the Priapus mosaic paved one of the noblest spaces of the Roman villa. In the case of the mosaic with the disappeared emblem, judging from the configuration of its pavement, with a less decorative geometric mosaic surface on one side, we could venture to say it could be the pavement of a bedroom. This area would then have been the place where the bed stood, although such a placing is not necessarily always the case. As it has been possible to verify in the mosaics of the Roman villa of Bobadilla, geometry acquires great prominence and especially so in the case of pavements with figurative emblems, acting here as an unsurpassed framework. As for the vegetation decoration, it is practically absent; it is only seen framing and accompanying the representation of the god Priapus. Along with the findings of the mosaics, the Marquis of la Vega de Armijo refers to other outstanding materials found in the surroundings of the villa. Among them we can find some vessels and a white marble mask (Aguilar 1892: 100), a copper cup, a ram-shaped façade-crowning made of bronze, the base of a herm with an inscription (Rodríguez 1988: 140-141) and pieces of mosaics, which show that the villa originally contained more spaces paved with mosaics. Roman villa of Carnicería de los Moros The Roman villa of Carnicería de los Moros was partially excavated in 1984 by Mr. Antonio Riñones Carranza (Riñones 1987: 251-256; 1989: 1081-1090). It is very likely that when the excavation is completed it will become one of the most wondrous villae of the Iberian Peninsula. At the moment, little it is known about it, but it shows evident signs of luxury and monumentality. With its extraordinary and grand front formed by a front wall with a series of apses, the villa is reminiscent of the Mysteries of Pompeii; this is definitely its most impressive part. From this wall a large pond extends, 53.85 x 11.55 m, which at other end, borders a large porticoed gallery, paved with the only mosaic of the villa that has been found so far, a large tessellated surface over 50 m long and 3.70 m wide. The mosaic, which turns 90º at one end, could constitute the pavement of a large peristyle, although the current state of the investigation does not allow ensuring or expanding in this regard. Of this large pavement, only a number of isolated pieces are preserved, such as a perimeter band of ceramic tesserae, a white line decorated with equidistant knots and a polychrome border decorated with a three-strand braid. Its interior section is defined by a wide smooth carpet of ochre or yellow tesserae (Fig. 9), in which the complete absence of decoration stands out strongly (Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2016: 418-422). 4 For the study of this mosaic, see Rodríguez 1987; 1988: 137-169; Blázquez 2008: 107-115; López Monteagudo 2010: 160-161; Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 79-80; Vargas-Vázquez – López Monteagudo 2016: 430 fig. 15; Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2017: 119-138. Figure 9 Mosaic of the Roman villa of Carnicería de los Moros. Riñones 1989.
326 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez Roman villa of La Estación The residential complex of this majestic Roman villa, of suburban character, is imposing. The complex is partially excavated and is articulated around a peristyle with a large pond, in which four islets were found (three of them were excavated). These islets were built with circular and decorated alcorques with a diameter of 4 m probably decorated with vegetal motives and sculptures. In the immediate vicinity, a few metres beyond the residential complex, is the balneum. In between, probably surrounded by a garden area, a beautiful nymphaeum is located (Fig. 10). All of the mosaics documented in this villa are concentrated to the residential complex, while in the case of the balneum they have not been preserved. Tesserae made of glass paste were found in the nymphaeum, which may have been covered by them. The pavements of the villa are distributed almost throughout all the spaces, oecus, galleries and corridors - mosaic of the peristyle gallery, ramp gallery mosaic, mosaic of the porticoed gallery, mosaic of the great gallery or corridor, and a more private area of the villa that contains the compluvium mosaics of the small atrium, that of the corridor and others probably associated with cubicula5. All these paved areas are characterized by the use of geometric mosaics, which in some cases denote impeccable work, as evidenced by the mosaics of the oecus (Fig. 11) and the porticoed gallery (Fig. 12), as well as by the predominance of polychromy. As an exception those of the most private area could be mentioned; these are characterized by a more extensive use of black and white, although in some of them slight colour notes are introduced into the decorative elements (Fig. 13). 5 An examination of these mosaics in Romero et al. 2006: 239-258; Mañas – Vargas-Vázquez 2007: 315-338; Romero et al. 2010: 3569-3590; Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 437-447; Vargas-Vázquez 2016: 62-77. Figure 10 Plan of the Roman villa of La Estación. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 327 Figure 11 Oecus mosaic of the Roman villa of La Estación. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera. Figure 12 Mosaic from the porticoed gallery of the Roman villa of La Estación. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
334 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez The river god7 is shown as an elderly bearded man. His torso is uncovered and surrounded by riverside vegetation and reclining next to a rock from which water flows, which would represent the source of the river itself, the Atria Tiberina. His thick hair stands out, with tesserae of blue vitreous paste, as well as the cloak that covers his legs. This depiction would mimic the course of water that rises from the rock and flows beneath the god, serving as a bed for him. This kind of representation is unknown to us in Hispanic Roman mosaics, although it is the only one whose identification is beyond doubt thanks, as stated before, to the inscription preserved on the pavement. In Roman Hispania, apart from the one we are analyzing, only the mosaic from the House of Medusa at Ferragial d’El Rei (Alter do Chão, Portugal) was identified with the river Tiber (Mourão 2010: I, 327-330; II, 65-66; Caetano – Mourão 2012: 210, 213-216). Regarding the subject of the mosaic inscription, it can be stated without much doubt that it is a unicum within the Roman mosaic technique. The verses identified are taken from Vergil’s Georgics’ Book IV (Verg. georg. 337, 353-354, and 369)8. The following fragments are preserved (Fig. 22): Fragment 1 (Fig. 24): (---)m per c(an?)d(ida---?) (Verg. georg. 4. 337). In this fragment, the nymphs are spinning near Cyrene and warned her how Aristeo was showing up with his laments. In addition, the poet describes the headdress of some of these nymphs. “…Caesariem effusae nitidam per candida colla…” (Verg. georg. 4. 337). 7 Further reading about the river gods: Gais 1978: 355-370; Ostrowski 1991; Brewster 1997; Montero 2012. 8 See Gómez 2014: 168-178; Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2014: 139-148. Figure 24 Mosaic of triclinium. Inscription. Fregment 1. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 335 Fregment 2 (Fig. 25): “(---t) anto cyrene soror” (Verg. georg. 4. 353-354). This fragment belongs to the verses where the author describes the moment when Arethusa tells Cyrene that her son is calling her grievously near the river: “O gemitu non frustra exterrita tanto, Cyrene soror, ipse tibi, tua maxima cura, tristis Aristaeus Penei genitoris ad undam stat lacrimans et te crudelem nomine dicit.” (Verg. georg. 4. 353-356) Fragment 3 (Fig. 26): “Vnde pater tiberinv (s ---)” (Verg. georg. 4. 369). Fragment belonging to the part of the text in which Cirene orders the river to open itself to let her son pass. Other rivers are named in it. Et caput, unde altus primum se erumpit Enipeus, Unde pater Tiberinus, et unde Aniena fluenta´ (Verg. georg. 4. 368-369). From this part of the text, it can be deduced that the other three spandrels of the mosaic contained other representations of rivers, which, following the guidelines of Vergil’s text, could well be the Enipeus, the Aniena and the Eridanus. In one of them, remains of vegetation associated with the river were preserved. Figure 25 Mosaic of triclinium. Inscription. Fregment 2. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
336 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez In the rest of the mosaic, the preserved fragments show remains of marine animals, so it is more than likely that nereids were represented riding on a fantastic sea-horses or on sea monsters (Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2014: 145- 146); characters that would also be present in the exedras that open on the sides of the room, at least in one of them. This would be the previously mentioned exedra located on the west side, where the remains of what could have been the tail of another sea monster can be seen, allowing us to discern again the possibility of the representation of nereids (Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2014: 148-152), all accompanied by an interesting marine fauna. One of the most significant elements of the figurative decoration of this villa is the frequent allusion to water. This is repeated in the central space of the peristyle, where different representations of fish, dolphins and water birds can be seen (Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2014: 156-159). Conclusions The study of Antequeran mosaics shows once again the richness of the Roman Baetica, which is clearly evident in the urban and rural environment. In the latter, the great Roman villae reveal wealth and splendour with the construction of large building complexes that make use of prestigious elements such as sculpture and mosaic. As we have seen, most of the Roman mosaics in Antequera were found in villae. The mosaics found in the baths of Santa Maria suggest that they were used in Figure 26 Mosaic of triclinium. Inscription. Fregment 3. Courtesy of Oficina Arqueológica de Antequera.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 337 urban areas. It is also noteworthy that mosaics, types of pavement preferred by the wealthiest layers of society, and were also used to pave public spaces. Considering the entire Antequeran Mosaic ensemble and a comparison between the pavements of the different villae, and also between them and those preserved in the Baths of Santa Maria, one can postulate that there are no clear elements to define common features or connections between them. No relation can be seen in preference, nor fashion or tendencies within the same chronology; neither is it possible to delimit the activities of the same workshop geographically. This lack of a clear reference occurs even considering that there are common elements that are generally found in Roman mosaics. The reason can mainly be that the mosaics of the villae do not coincide in the temporal frame. Moreover, the lack of a greater number of pavements limits the possibilities of establishing more precise comparisons. In this sense, we must not forget that the number of pavements that still exist in Antequera are no more than a small sample of those that originally paved their domus and villae. From a chronological point of view, only the mosaics of the baths of Santa Maria would be in a time frame close to those of the Roman villa of Bobadilla. Nevertheless, apart from the detail of framing the figurative representation in a small central box, their stylistic differences are noticeable and evident. Regarding the mosaics of the villa of La Estación and those of Caserío Silverio, these are also chronologically close to each other and show much more significant typological and stylistic differences. Among all Antequeran mosaics, geometry is commonly the most prominent and used element, either as an individual adornment or as the dominant decoration, especially in the mosaics of the villa of La Estación. In that sense, its presence is also documented in one of the pavements of the Roman villa of Bobadilla and in another Roman villa at Caserío Silverio. The latter is surrounded by a broad field of opus figlinum. Geometry is a perfect framework to present and to experience the main scenes or representations, figurative or of any other type. This is the model chosen for the mosaic of the Baths of Santa María, where the cube field encompasses a beautiful representation of Oceanus. It also occurs in the mosaic of the Roman villa of Bobadilla, in which the majestic representation of Priapus predominates. Both specimens are conceived as geometric fields that surround a single central emblem. Although similar, the other mosaic of Bobadilla, with the lost emblem, is of a different type. This can be understood since the main representation, which is now lost, was set inside a large box framed by borders; all this was accompanied by a secondary field of octagons. Geometry, also conceived as a framework, is designed in more extensive sections and with a greater number of spaces reserved for figurative representations. Geometrical patterns occur in many mosaics, such as in the mosaic of the erotes figure of the villa of La Estación, in which the composition of scuta crosses dominates. Furthermore, it is part of the mosaic that paves the porches of the peristyle of the Roman villa of Caserío Silverio, in which the chosen design is straight and oblique squares. It can also be seen in the impluvium, where the main design is an octagon composition. Nevertheless, the depiction of extensive figurative scenes in large spaces was the formula chosen in the villa of Caserío Silverio for the pavements of the
338 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez triclinium and a sector of the impluvium mosaic. The pavement of the apodyterium of the baths of Santa María contrasts with this type of mosaics because of the two emblems located inside a broad field of ceramic tesserae. Here, the geometric element is absent. This type of pavement in which a wide field of ceramic tesserae surrounds smaller mosaic surfaces is also identified, as we have already noted, in the Roman villa of Caserío Silverio, despite the chronological difference between the two sites. All in all, this shows that the model was used in the Baetica province for a long time. The mosaic of the Roman villa of Carnicería de los Moros is unique in the Antequeran area. It presents a contour of ceramic tesserae in which a line of white tesserae intersected with equidistant knots is inserted, and a border decorated with a richly coloured three-strand braid. This braid is well executed and delimits an apparently non-compartmental inner field of yellow or ochre tesserae without decoration. These types of pavements, far from constituting a rarity, are documented in other places, such as in Ecija, the old Astigi. As in our case, they can also be seen decorating corridors and galleries in some pavements of Villa Adriana in Tivoli. Furthermore, this is found in other outstanding and emblematic spaces. It is assumed that beautiful and richly decorated carpets were placed on those pavements to embellish them. Within the figurative representations of the Antequeran mosaics, mythology is by far the predominant theme, conceiving the scenes in an isolated way and with a simple representation, as we have already seen, like in the case of the emblems of Priapus and Oceanus. These scenes appear in several shared spaces that contain different parts of the same theme, which is the intention of the mosaic of the erotes of the villa de La Estación, and in the impluvium of the villa of Caserío Silverio. In the triclinium mosaics of the Roman villa of Caserío Silverio and in one of the sectors of the impluvium mosaic, a broader space reflects a much wider scene. It is likely that all the figurative mosaics of this villa had as a common feature the depiction of the mythology of waters. That was also a feature of the mosaics found in the Roman baths of Santa María9. Within the villa of Caserío Silverio, the inscription of the triclinium mosaic, aside from constituting a rarity within the mosaic ensemble in general, highlights the cultural concerns and taste of a rich and surely cultured dominus. Finally, we can only point out that vegetation is not a particularly recurring element among the Antequeran mosaics, since it is used predominantly in a secondary way, as part of the decoration of borders, as isolated figures accompanying emblems or decorating the occasional geometric figure. However, inside the whole complex, the mosaic of the atriolum of the villa of La Estación stands out. Here, the rinceaus or scrolls of hedera that flow from the craters, covering the entire space, can be appreciated. 9 In other Antequeran and Baetican sites, is not usual to find figurative mosaics in the same building centred in one theme.
Roman Mosaics of Antequera. An Overview / Antequera’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Genel Bir Bakış 339 Bibliography – Kaynaklar Aguilar 1892 A. Aguilar y Correa, “Mosaicos de Bobadilla”, BacRHist 20, 100-105. Atencia 1991 R. Atencia Páez, “Excavaciones de urgencia en las termas romanas de Santa María (Antequera, Málaga)”, Actas de las IV Jornadas de Arqueología Andaluza, Jaén, 157-159. Atencia et al. 1990 R. Atencia Páez – M. Romero Pérez – I. Rueda Rodríguez, “Excavaciones de urgencia en las Termas Romanas de Santa María. Campaña de 1988”, AnArqAnd 1988, III, 220-226. Blázquez 2008 J. M. Blázquez Martínez, “Esculturas y mosaicos de Príapo en Hispania”, E. La Roca - P. León - C. Parisi (eds.), Le due patrie acquisite. Studi di archeologia dedicati a Walter Trillmich, Roma, 107-115. Brewster 1997 H. Brewster, The River Gods of Greece: Myths and Mountain Waters in the Hellenic World, London. Caetano – Mourão 2012 M. T. Caetano – C. Mourão, “A “Portrait” of Book XII of the Æneid: the mosaic from the «House of the Medusa» (Portugal, Alter do Chão)”, M. Şahin (ed.), 11th International Colloquium on Ancient Mosaics, Bursa, 205-224. Cisneros et al. 2016 M. I. Cisneros García – M. Romero Pérez – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “Huerta del Ciprés”, R. Hidalgo Prieto (coord.), Las villas romanas de la Bética II, Catálogo, Sevilla, 453-457. Eraslan 2012 Ş. Eraslan, “Antik Dönem Sanatında Okeanos Figürleri”, Sanat Dergisi 22, 157-166. Eraslan 2015 Ş. Eraslan, “Iconographic differences of Oceanus in the mosaic art”, G. Trovabene (a cura di), XII Colloquio AIEMA: Venezia, Verona, 195-200. Espinar et al. 2014 A. M. Espinar Cappa – M. I. Cisneros García – L. E. Fernández Rodríguez, “La fase romana del yacimiento arqueológico de la villa de Caserío Silverio-Mayorga”, A. M. Espinar Cappa - L. E. Fernández Rodríguez - M. Romero Pérez (coords.), La villa romana de Caserío Silverio, Antequera, 66-97. Espinar et al. 2016 A. M. Espinar Cappa – M. I. Cisneros García – M. Ferrando de la Lama - A. Arcas Barranquero - L. E. Fernández Rodríguez - M. Romero Pérez, “Caserío Silverio (Antequera, Málaga)”, R. Hidalgo Prieto (coord.), Las villas romanas de la Bética II, Catálogo, Sevilla, 423-430. Fernández – Romero 2007 L. E. Fernández Rodríguez – M. Romero Pérez, “Las necrópolis en el entorno de Antikaria y Singilia Barba. Bases para su estudio sistemático”, Mainake 29, 401-432. Fernández et al. 2010 L. E. Fernández Rodríguez – M. Romero Pérez – A. Arcas Barraquero, “El complejo alfarero romano del Arroyo Villalta. Bobadilla, Antequera (Málaga)”, Romula 9, 177-200. Foucher 1975 L. Foucher, “Sur l´iconographie du dieu Ocean”, Caesarodunum 10, 48-52. Gais 1978 M. Gais, “Some problems of River-God Iconography”, AJA 82, 3, 355-370. Gómez 2014 J. Gómez Pallarès, “Virgilio musivo en Antequera”, M. I. Cisneros - L. E. Fernández - M. Romero (coord.), La villa romana de Caserío Silverio, Antequera, 168-178. López Monteagudo 2006 G. López Monteagudo, “Oceanus on the Roman Mosaic Pavements of Spain”, G. Wiplinger (ed.), Cura Aquarum in Ephesus: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the History of Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering, Ephesus, Leuven, 485-491. López Monteagudo 2010 G. López Monteagudo, “Mosaicos”, P. León (coord.), Arte Romano de la Bética: Mosaico. Pintura. Manufacturas, vol. 3, Sevilla, 17-186. López Monteagudo 2011 G. López Monteagudo, “La iconografía del dios Oceanos en los mosaicos hispano-romanos”, V. Correia (ed.), O mosaico antigo nos centros e nas periferias: originalidades, influencias e identidades, Actas do X Colóquio internacional da AIEMA, Coimbra, 287-302. Mañas – Vargas-Vázquez 2007 I. Mañas Romero – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “Nuevos mosaicos hallados en Málaga: las villas de La Estación y de la Torre de Benagalbón”, Mainake 29, 315-338. Mourão 2010 C. Mourão, AVTEM NON SVNT RERVM NATVRA – Figurações heteromórficas em mosaicos hispanoromanos, Vols. I-II, tese de Doutoramento, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa. (online: https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/6268) Montero 2012 S. Montero, El emperador y los ríos: religión, ingeniería y política en el Imperio Romano, Madrid. Ostrowski 2012 J. A. Ostrowski, Personifications of rivers in Greek and Roman art, Cracovia. Paulian 1979 A. Paulian, “Le Dieu Océan en Espagne: un thème de l‘art hispano-romain”, MelCasaVelazquez 15, 115-133. Riñones 1987 A. Riñones Carranza, “Intervención de urgencia en el Ninfeo romano de Carnicería de los Moros (Antequera, Málaga), 1985”, AnArqAnd 1985 III, 251-256.
340 Sebastián Vargas-Vázquez - Manuel Romero Pérez Riñones 1989 A. Riñones Carranza, “El Ninfeo romano de Carnicería de los Moros”, Crónica del XIX Congreso Arqueológico Nacional, vol. 1, Zaragoza, 1081-1090. Rodríguez 1987 P. Rodríguez Oliva, Mosaicos Romanos de Bobadilla (Málaga), Málaga. Rodríguez 1988 P. Rodríguez Oliva, “Los mosaicos de la villa romana de Bobadilla (Málaga)”, BSAA 54, 137-169. Rodríguez 2011 M. I. Rodríguez López, “Iconografía de océano en el Imperio Romano: el modelo metropolitano y sus interpretaciones provinciales”, T. Nogales - I. Rodà (eds.), Roma y las provincias: modelo y difusión I, Roma, 541-549. Romero 1992 M. Romero Pérez, “Termas romanas en Antequera”, RAMadrid 129, 56-62. Romero 1998 M. Romero Pérez, “Algunas reflexiones sobre la producción de aceite en las villae de la comarca de Antequera”, Mainake 19-20, 115-141. Romero 2001 M. Romero Pérez, “Algunas reflexiones sobre la producción de aceite en las villae de la comarca de Antequera”, Revista de Estudios Antequeranos 12, 278-279. Romero 2011 M. Romero Pérez “La villas romanas de la depresión de Antequera”, M. Romero Pérez (ed.), El Efebo de Antequera, Antequera, 53-80. Romero 2011-2012 M. Romero Pérez, “Producción oleícola durante la antigüedad en la depresión de Antequera: Estudios en el ager antikariensis y singiliensis”, Anales de Prehistoria y Arqueología 27-28, 381-399. Romero et al. 2006 M. Romero Pérez – I. Mañas Romero – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “Primeros resultados de las excavaciones realizadas en la Villa de La Estación (Antequera, Málaga)”, AespA 79, 239-258. Romero et al. 2010 M. Romero Pérez – I. Mañas Romero – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “Excavaciones realizadas en la Villa de La Estación (Antequera, Málaga)”, AnArqAnd 2006, III, 3569-3590. Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2012 M. Romero Pérez – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “Mosaic workshop located in the Station Villa of Antequera, Málaga (Spain)”, M. Şahin (ed.), 11th International Colloquium on Ancient Mosaics, Bursa, 823-828. Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2016 M. Romero Pérez – S. Vargas-Vázquez, “La Estación (Antequera, Málaga)”, R. Hidalgo Prieto (coord.), Las villas romanas de la Bética II, Catálogo, Sevilla, 437-447. Romero – Vargas-Vázquez 2017 M. Romero Pérez - S. Vargas-Vázquez, “La villa romana de Bobadilla”, Romula 16, 119-138. Vargas-Vázquez 2016 S. Vargas-Vázquez, Diseños geométricos en los mosaicos del Conventus Astigitanus, Oxford. Vargas-Vázquez 2018 S. Vargas-Vázquez “Cube Designs in Roman Baetica Mosaics”, JMR 11, 315-331. Vargas-Vázquez – López Monteagudo 2016 S. Vargas-Vázquez – G. López Monteagudo, “La decoración musiva”, R. Hidalgo Prieto (coord.), Las villas romanas de la Bética I, Sevilla, 419-441. Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2014 S. Vargas-Vázquez – M. Romero Pérez, “Los mosaicos de la villa romana de Caserío Silverio”, M. I. Cisneros García – L. E. Fernández Rodríguez – M. Romero Pérez (coord.), La villa romana de Caserío Silverio, Antequera, 138-167. Vargas-Vázquez – Romero 2016 S. Vargas-Vázquez – M. Romero Pérez, “Carnicería de los Moros (Antequera, Málaga)”, R. Hidalgo Prieto (coord.), Las villas romanas de la Bética II, Catálogo, Sevilla, 418-422.