Gender differences in transdiagnostic predictors of problematic alcohol consumption in a large sample of college students in Ecuador

Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 1 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 24 February 2022 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784896 Edited by: Julia Maria D’Andréa Greve, University of São Paulo, Brazil Reviewed by: Stephan Arndt, The University of Iowa, UnitedStates Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, European University of Madrid, Spain *Correspondence: Rafael Sánchez-Puertas [email protected] Pablo Ruisoto [email protected] Carla López-Núñez [email protected] Specialty section: This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Received: 28 September 2021 Accepted: 20 January 2022 Published: 24 February 2022 Citation: Sánchez-Puertas R, Ruisoto P, López-Núñez C and Vaca-Gallegos S (2022) Gender Differences in Transdiagnostic Predictors of Problematic Alcohol Consumption in a Large Sample of College Students in Ecuador. Front. Psychol. 13:784896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784896 Gender Differences in Transdiagnostic Predictors of Problematic Alcohol Consumption in a Large Sample of College Students in Ecuador RafaelSánchez-Puertas 1,2*, PabloRuisoto 1 *, CarlaLópez-Núñez 3* and SilviaVaca-Gallegos 2 1 Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain, 2 Department of Psychology, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador, 3 Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, School of Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain Background: Alcohol use is one of the main risk factors that leads to detrimental health effects and support for a transdiagnostic approach to alcohol use disorders is growing. However, the role of transdiagnostic predictors of problematic alcohol consumption in Ecuador are understudied. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine gender differences in psychological stress and inflexibility as transdiagnostic predictors of problematic alcohol consumption in a large sample of college students in Ecuador. Methods: A total of 7,905 college students (21.49 years, SD = 3.68; 53.75% females) were surveyed using the following standardized scales: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Perceived Stress Scale-14, and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-7). Macro Process for SPSS (models 4 and 7) was used to analyze mediation and moderation effects. Results: Reported alcohol consumption was significantly higher in men than women students. On the other hand, women reported significantly higher levels of perceived stress and psychological inflexibility than men students. Gender, age, psychological stress, and inflexibility were significant predictors of alcohol consumption. Moreover, psychological inflexibility mediated the impact of stress on alcohol consumption, particularly in women (for men b = 0.065, 95% CI [0.048 to 0.083], for women b = 0.070, 95% CI [0.051 to 0.089]). Discussion: Results of this study support psychological stress and psychological inflexibility as critical transdiagnostic variables related to increased rates of alcohol consumption among Ecuadorian college students. These conclusions contribute to the development of transdiagnostic comprehensive programs, which encompasses promotive, preventive, and treatment services that allow to alleviate the burden of alcohol, as well as to enrich the growing research on alcohol consumption in this population from a gender perspective. Keywords: alcohol, gender differences, transdiagnostic predictors, college students, psychological stress, psychological inflexibility, Ecuador Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 2 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 INTRODUCTION According to the Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018, among young adults between the ages of 20–39 years old, approximately 13.5% of all deaths are the result of alcohol consumption; moreover, the peak of alcohol consumption in young adults falls between the 20 and 24 years (World Health Organization, 2018), corresponding with college ages. In Ecuador, based on the latest Report on Drug Use in the Americas, 2019, prevalence of alcohol consumption in the last month among college students is 51%, and a total of 41% of alcohol users reported problematic levels of consumption, systematically higher in male than female college students (Organization of the American States, 2019). Despite the great influence of diagnostic approaches to alcohol use disorders (AUD) and other-related mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety (Castillo-Carniglia et al., 2019; McHugh and Weiss, 2019), some studies argue that psychiatric gnosologies must be updated to fulfill their purpose in research and clinical practice (Carragher et al., 2015; Hofmann and Hayes, 2019). Therefore, a new transdiagnostic approach is proposed, which goes beyond the traditional diagnostic limits, and can provide a new perspective into how to account for AUD and other mental health problems, thus having a better classification system, compared to the existing standard (Dalgleish et al., 2020). This new approach arises from a series of findings that suggest that the commonalities between the different disorders should be taken into account for evaluation and treatment (Nolen-Hoeksema and Watkins, 2011). In this context, some transdiagnostic factors have drawn special attention in AUD and other mental health-related problems, being psychological (in)flexibility one of the key transdiagnostic clinical variables. This construct, also known as experiential avoidance, is defined as the tendency to control, avoid, or suppress the intensity and/or frequency of thoughts and feelings, even when doing so generates behavioral harm (Hayes et al., 1996), and may contribute to the development, maintenance, and exacerbation of AUD among college students (Levin et al., 2012). Second, psychological stress also plays a crucial role within this transdiagnostic emotional vulnerability model, and it is defined as a subjective perception of not being able to control or foresee the results of our behavior (Cohen et al., 1983), which has also been related to AUD in college students (Anthenelli, 2012; Keyes etal., 2012; Karyotaki et al., 2020). Previous studies have warned about the particularly high and continuously growing rates of problematic alcohol consumption among college students in Ecuador (Ruisoto etal., 2016; Aguilar et al., 2022), but successful assessment models accounting for this problematic behavior and gender differences remain a challenge, in particular how key transdiagnostic variables moderate and/or meditate alcohol consumption (Nolen- Hoeksema, 2004; Dodd et al., 2010; Heidari et al., 2018). With the purpose of overcoming this gap in the literature, the aim of this study was to examine gender differences in psychological stress and inflexibility as transdiagnostic predictors of problematic alcohol consumption in a large sample of college students in Ecuador. Furthermore, we examined whether psychological inflexibility and psychological stress mediate the relationship between gender and alcohol consumption, and whether psychological inflexibility mediates the relationship between stress and alcohol consumption, moderated by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants Students enrolled at 11 Ecuadorian universities were invited to participate in the study by email, completing a computerized survey within a 3-week assessment period. A total of 7,905 participants (average age was 21.49 years, SD = 3.68; 53.75% females) met the inclusion criteria of being enrolled in a full academic year and having completed the entire survey. The average response rate across universities was 47.80%, ranging from 39.10 to 56.35%. All participants gave their written informed consent before their enrolment in the study. The majority of students was single (91.3%), they belonged to the Highlands region (63.49%), and their main occupation was being students (73.38%). For a detailed description of sociodemographic measures by gender, see Table 1. Measures The questionnaire had the following sections: Sociodemographic Data This section included information regarding basic sociodemographic data, such as gender, age, marital status, geographic region, and main occupation. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Self-Report Version) It is a 10-item questionnaire that measures dangerous alcohol intake (Babor etal., 2001). Each question is answered indicating the frequency of alcohol consumption and/or the experience of symptoms related to problem consumption on a scale that goes from 0 (“never”) to 4 (“4 or more times a week”), with a maximum score of 40. A high score reflects an increased risk of problem alcohol use, the cut-off point being a score of 8 or more (Conigrave et al., 1995; Berner et al., 2007). The Ecuadorian adaptation of the Spanish version of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; López et al., 2019) was used, whose Cronbach’s α coefficient for the reliability of internal consistency was 0.816 for men and 0.795 for women. Perceived Stress Scale-14 It measures the degree to which people perceive a lack of control in their daily life, and it has 14 items (Remor, 2006). It is answered according to a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 0 (“never”) to 4 (“very often”). The score ranges from 0 to 56 points. Higher levels of psychological stress represent higher scores. The Ecuadorian adaptation of the Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 3 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) was used, whose Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.85 (Ruisoto et al., 2020). Acceptance and Action Questionnaire The Ecuadorian adaptation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-7) was used (Bond etal., 2011; Paladines- Costa et al., 2021). It measures the psychological inflexibility or rigidity in the handling of unpleasant emotions or internal events. It has seven items and is answered on a 7-point Likerttype scale, which ranges from 1 (“never”) to 7 (“always”). Scores vary between 7 and 49. Higher scores represent greater inflexibility or greater tendency to act under the need to control or avoid aversive thoughts, memories, or feelings. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.919. Design and Procedure A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected over a period of 3 weeks (November 2015). Participation was confidential and anonymous. At the end, subjects obtained a free summary of individual scores, the purpose of which was to encourage them to answer honestly and increase the response rate. The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Research in Human Beings of the Ministry of Public Health of the Republic of Ecuador in June 2015 (MSP-DIS-2015-0088-O) and was developed following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data Analysis The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21.0 for Mac (IBM Spain, Madrid, Spain) was used for data analysis. The sample was described through the means and standard deviations (M + SD) for the quantitative variables. For the nominal variables, frequencies and percentages were used. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between quantitative variables, and Student’s t-test was used to examine the differences between the two independent samples. Effect size was measured by Cohen’s d and interpreted following Lakens (2013) and Cohen (1988) guidelines. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check normality and Levene’s to examine equality of variance across gender groups. In addition, in order to analyze whether there were gender differences in the presence of problematic alcohol consumption as well as whether there were statistically significant differences between the scores for each psychological variable, we used Chi-square test for independence (χ2) for comparison of frequencies of categorical variables (with Yates’ Continuity Correction and Fisher’s exact test where necessary). Subsequently, an independent hierarchical multiple regression model was conducted to examine the effect of gender (step 1), age (step 2), and transdiagnostic variables: psychological inflexibility or psychological stress (Step3) on alcohol consumption, controlling for different covariates significantly associated with the outcome. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to detect multicollinearity, considering a VIF > 5 as the cut-off point for the collinearity diagnosis. The multiple determination coefficient for multiple regression (R2) was evaluated together with residual plots to determine the goodness of fit of the data to the regression model and to rule out possible biases. Finally, indirect effect of psychological inflexibility/gender on the effect of psychological stress on alcohol consumption was examined using Process macro version 3.3 (Sheather, 2009) for SPSS (models 4 for conditional mediation analysis and 7 for moderated mediation analysis). The number of bootstrap samples was set at 10,000. Complementary, Baron and Kenny’s (1986) mediational triangle was used to visually display the mediation effects. The general significance level adopted was p < 0.05. RESULTS Gender Differences on Problematic Alcohol Consumption and the Main Transdiagnostic Predictor Variables Reported alcohol consumption was significantly higher in men (M =7.8; SD=6.15) than women (M =4.81 ± 4.90; t7,903 = 24.05, p < 0.001), showing a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.54). Table 2 shows the main gender differences of alcohol use by level of consumption according to AUDIT scores. A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in the alcohol consumption in the three geographical regions χ2(2, N = 7,905) = 309.07, p < 0.001. Alcohol consumption was lower in coast region (Md = 3) in comparison with the amazon region (Md = 6) and highlands region (Md = 6). About gender, Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in the male alcohol consumption in the three regions TABLE1 | Gender differences in sociodemographic variables. Variables Men M (SD) (n = 3,656) Women M (SD) (n = 4,249) t p Cohen’s d Age (years) 21.79 (3.68) 21.24 (3.68) 6.66 <0.001*** 0.15 Men % (n = 3,656) Women % (n = 4,249) Chi Square pCramer’s V Geographical region (A/C/H) 9.21 (337)/23.25 (850)/67.53 (2469) 9.86 (419)/30.15 (1281)/60.0 (2549) 53.155 <0.001*** 0.082 Marital status (S/M/D/W) 43.18 (3413)/2.85 (225)/0.22 (17)/0.01 (1) 48.17 (3808)/5.1 (400)/0.051 (40)/0.01 (1) 35.62 <0.001*** 0.067 Main occupation (St/SW) 32.52 (2571)/13.73 (1085) 40.86 (3230)/12.9 (1019) 32.63 <0.001*** 0.064 M, media; fr, frequency. National region: A, Amazon, C, Coast, and H, Highlands; Institution: P, public and Pr, private; Marital status: S, single, M, married, D, divorced, and W, widowed; and Main occupation: St, student and SW, student and worker. ***p < 0.001. Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 4 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 χ2(2, N = 3,656) = 191.44, p < 0.001. Alcohol consumption in men was lower in coast region (Md = 5) in comparison with the amazon region (Md = 8) and highlands region (Md = 8); about female alcohol consumption, Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in the three regions χ2(2, N = 4,249) = 103.52, p < 0.001. Alcohol consumption in women was lower in coast region (Md = 3) and amazon region (Md = 3) in comparison with highlands region (Md = 4). Finally, gender differences were consistently reported in the two transdiagnostic predictor variables of alcohol consumption. In this regard, women reported significantly higher levels of perceived stress (27.41; SD=6.32) than men (25.34; SD=6.62; p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.32). Similarly, women reported significantly higher levels of psychological inflexibility (M =23.03; SD=10.35) than men (M =20.76; SD=10.01; p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.22). Effect of Perceived Stress and Psychological Inflexibility on Problematic Alcohol Consumption The hierarchical multiple regression showed that gender was a significant predictor of alcohol consumption (Step 1; F1,7,903 = 578.55, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.068). Moreover, gender and age scores (Step 2) were significant predictors (F2,7,902 = 300.98, p < 0.001; ΔR2 = 0.003). Finally, gender, age, stress, and psychological inflexibility (F4,7,900 = 239.88, p < 0.001) scores (Step3) were also significant predictors (ΔR2 = 0.038). Residual plots (x = standardized predicted value and y = standardized regression residual) were randomly dispersed around the horizontal axis, supporting the appropriateness of the regression model (Table 3). Mediation and Moderation Models of Perceived Stress and Psychological Inflexibility on Problematic Alcohol Consumption After controlling for significant covariates in the regression models (gender, age, stress, and psychological inflexibility), following recommendation of Baron and Kenny’s (1986), the Figure 1 visually displays the mediational triangle for the relationship between gender and alcohol consumption mediated by psychological inflexibility and stress. Gender significantly predicted psychological inflexibility (path a), b = 2.268, t(7,903) = 9.863, p < 0.001, explaining 1.20% of the variance of psychological inflexibility (p < 0.001). On the other hand, psychological inflexibility significantly predicted alcohol consumption (path b), b = 0.101, t(7,902) = 16.820, p < 0.001, accounting for 10.04% of the variance (p < 0.001). The direct effect of gender on alcohol consumption (path c), ignoring the mediator, was significant, b = −2.992, t(7,903) = −24.053, p < 0.001. Finally, the indirect effect of gender on alcohol consumption (path c’) after controlling for psychological inflexibility as mediator and covariates was significant, b = −3.219, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.1746 to 0.2836. On the other hand, gender significantly predicted stress (path a), b = 2.066, t(7903) = 14.181, p < 0.001, explaining 2.48% of the variance of stress (p < 0.001). Moreover, stress significantly predicted alcohol consumption (path b), b = 0.1518, t(7902) = 16.063, p < 0.001, accounting for 9.77% of the variance (p < 0.001). The indirect effect of gender on alcohol consumption (path c’) after controlling for stress as mediator and covariates was significant, b = −3.305, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.2556 to 0.3742. In a next step, and given that psychological inflexibility and stress are variables that mediate the effect of gender on alcohol consumption (as has just been indicated), weanalyzed the mediation effect of psychological inflexibility on the TABLE2 | Gender differences on alcohol consumption levels (AUDIT scores). Men Women t p Cohen’s d n (%) M SD n (%) M SD Non-consumption 530 (32.8) 0 0 1,085 (67.2) 0 0 – – – Prudent 1,417 (42.5) 4.4 1.9 1,914 (57.5) 3.5 1.6 15.24 <0.001 0.52 Risky 1,308 (54.5) 10.9 2.2 1,092 (45.5) 9.8 2.4 11.72 <0.001 0.50 Harmful 243 (71.1) 17.3 1.1 99 (28.9) 17.1 1.1 1.16 0.24 0.18 Dependence 158 (72.8) 24.1 3.8 59 (27.2) 23.2 3.0 1.85 0.07 0.25 AUDIT = 0 = Non-consumption; AUDIT (men) > 0 < 8 = Prudent; AUDIT (women) > 0 < 7 = Prudent; AUDIT (men) ≥ 8 < 15 = Risky; AUDIT (women) ≥ 7 < 15 = Risky; AUDIT ≥ 16 < 20 = Harmful; and AUDIT = 20–40 = Dependence. TABLE3 | Hierarchical regressions examining the effect of perceived stress and psychological inflexibility on alcohol consumption. Regression models (steps and predictors) bConfidence interval (95%) pVIF Step1 (R2 = 0.068) Gender −0.261 −3.235/−2.748 <0.001 1.000 Step2 (R2 = 0.071) Gender −0.257 −3.192/−2.704 <0.001 1.006 Age 0.051 0.046/0.112 <0.001 1.006 Step3 (R2 = 0.108) Gender −0.285 −3.502/−3.017 <0.001 1.031 Age 0.056 0.054/0.119 <0.001 1.007 Perceived stress (PSS-14) 0.080 0.010/0.021 <0.001 1.823 Psychological inflexibility (AAQ-7) 0.133 0.021/0.032 <0.001 1.803 b, unstandardized Beta Coefficient; VIF, Variance inflation factor; PSS-14, Perceived Stress Scale; and AAQ-7, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 5 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 relationship between stress and alcohol use, as well as the moderating effect of gender (Figure 2). First, stress significantly predicted psychological inflexibility, b = 0.944, t(7901) = −2.842, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.861–1.027], and gender predicted psychological inflexibility, b = −1.735, t(7901) = −2.410, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−3.146 to −0.324]. Moreover, the interaction between stress and gender predicted psychological inflexibility (path a), b = 0.070, t(7901) = 2.626, p = 0.010, 95% CI [0.018–0.122], explaining 44.96% of the variance of psychological inflexibility (p < 0.001). On the other hand, psychological inflexibility significantly predicted alcohol consumption (path b), b = 0.064, t(7902) = 7.703, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.048–0.081]. Direct effect of stress on alcohol consumption (path c´), ignoring the mediator and moderator, was also significant, b = 0.045, p < 0.001, 95% CI ranging from 0.019 to 0.070, explaining 2.38% of the variance of alcohol consumption (p < 0.001). Finally, the indirect conditional effect of stress (path c) after controlling for psychological inflexibility as mediator and gender as moderator was significant for men (b = 0.065, 95% CI [0.048– 0.083]) and women (b = 0.070, 95% CI [0.051–0.089]). The relationship between the indirect effect and the moderating variable, gender, was statistically significant (moderated mediation index = 0.004, 95% CI, 0.001–0.008). DISCUSSION The aim of this study was to examine gender differences in psychological stress and psychological inflexibility as transdiagnostic predictors of problematic alcohol consumption in a large sample of college students in Ecuador. To our knowledge, this is the first and largest study carried out in Ecuador examining alcohol consumption from both a transdiagnostic and gender perspective. Results have shown higher rates of alcohol consumption among men than women (of every 10 students with harmful alcohol consumption or dependence, seven are men), and higher levels of stress and psychological inflexibility among women than men. Interestingly, psychological inflexibility and stress mediated the effect of gender on alcohol consumption. Moreover, the mediation of psychological inflexibility between stress and alcohol consumption is positive and strong for both men and women, that is, gender moderated this mediation. Firstly, men reported higher rates of alcohol consumption than women, being such result consistent with previous studies (UNODC, 2017; Gavurova et al., 2020; Villarosa-Hurlocker et al., 2020). Traditionally, research highlights that men drink more per drinking episode, that is, more often and over longer periods of time than women, while the last frequently use protective behavioral strategies (LaBrie et al., 2011). In this vein, Nolen-Hoeksema and Hilt (2006) found that men, compared to women, are more likely to beexposed to some risk factors, such as fewer social penalties for drinking and more positive expectations regarding alcohol consumption, among others as well as they might perceive alcohol use as a more acceptable activity because such consumption could be a part of their gender role (Perrotte etal., 2020). By contrast, the manifestation of alterations in cognitive and motor functioning, even with low doses of alcohol, in addition to its negative consequences on reproductive health, can dissuade most women from alcohol consumption, which would explain the presence of lower rates of alcohol use disorders and related problems, compared to men (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2004). Consumption in women, although lower than in men, according to Norberg et al. (2010), might be explained by social anxiety levels, a risk factor for them, who are more likely to report drinking in negative situations to deal with aversive emotions. In this regard, Engs and Hanson (1990) found that a higher percentage of college men are more likely than women to drink, to drink more often, to consume more, and to experience more drinking problems. As has previously reported, several transdiagnostic factors have traditionally influenced severity of AUD, such as stress and psychological inflexibility. In particular, stress appears to be a serious problem for college students, who represent a very vulnerable group of the population (Robotham and Julian, 2006; Saleh et al., 2017) that commonly meet several health complaints and symptoms of depression, mood swings, and anxiety (Barbosa-Leiker et al., 2012). In the present study, women reported significantly higher levels of perceived stress than men students did. These findings are consistent with the results obtained in precedent research conducted among college students (Tavolacci et al., 2013; Varghese et al., 2015; Cavallo et al., 2016; Olfert et al., 2019; Seedhom et al., 2019; Choi, 2020; Meckamalil et al., 2020), and such gender differences may be explained due to women usually choose emotionalbased coping styles (Tamres et al., 2002) as well as due to FIGURE1 | Unstandardized regression coefficients for the mediation effect of (a) psychological inflexibility on the relationship between gender and alcohol consumption and (b) stress on the relationship between gender and alcohol consumption. ***p < 0.001. FIGURE2 | Unstandardized regression coefficients for the mediation effect of psychological inflexibility on the relationship between stress and alcohol consumption, moderated by gender. ***p < 0.001. Moderated mediation index = 0.004 CI [0.001–0.008]. Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 6 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 the presence of reduced stress resilience and coping resources (Kizhakkeveettil etal., 2017), leading to lower levels of wellbeing (Innes, 2017). Taking into account that there are several factors involved, more research is needed to understand and determine the differences in stress between the genders. On the other hand, Psychological inflexibility is the avoidance of painful internal experiences, such as memories, thoughts, emotions, sensations, and representing a difficulty to act consistently according to significant personal values (Serowik and Orsillo, 2019). There is more and more research that supports the idea that psychological inflexibility is a transdiagnosis variable present in various psychological disorders (Kashdan and Rottenberg, 2010; Bond et al., 2011; Levin et al., 2014). For our purpose, psychological inflexibility has been theorized to play a role in the cause and maintenance of substance use disorders (Levin etal., 2012, 2014). In the present study, women reported significantly higher levels of psychological inflexibility than men students did, being such results consistent with precedent research (Levin et al., 2012; Mendoza et al., 2016; Serrano-Ibáñez et al., 2021). This could be explained due to the differences between men and women regarding their emotional processing (Whittle et al., 2011), as women tend to experience more negative affect than men and report more frequent and intense negative emotions (Brebner, 2003), which can lead them to avoid these emotions. It could also beexplained due to the fact that higher levels of psychological inflexibility in women than in men may be related to traditional gender roles established in the Latino cultural context (Mendoza et al., 2016). Furthermore, hierarchical regressions determined than psychological stress and inflexibility were significant predictors of alcohol consumption. Precedent studies (Kingston et al., 2010; Levin et al., 2012) also highlight the importance of psychological inflexibility in alcohol consumption. Levin et al. (2014) found that this variable was significantly related to having a comorbid depressive, anxiety, or substance use (including alcohol) disorder. In contrast, Serowik and Orsillo (2019) found little evidence for a unique association between inflexibility in alcohol consumption. Regarding psychological stress, it has been linked to an increased alcohol consumption (Sebena etal., 2012; Collins etal., 2014; Böke etal., 2019) in college students, and therefore, it is possible that students who are stressed drink alcohol as an experiential avoidance strategy. In view of the importance of knowing the variables that explain alcohol consumption and the variety of results found in the aforementioned studies, more research is needed. The mediation model of psychological inflexibility and stress on the effect of gender on alcohol consumption was statistically significant. These results suggest for the first time in the literature that higher levels of psychological inflexibility and stress may play a role in alcohol consumption among college students, regardless of gender. Students (men and women) who consume higher amounts of alcohol do so not only because they experience negative emotional states, but also because they experience higher levels of stress. Eisenbeck et al. (2019) found that psychological inflexibility was related to psychological stress. Apparently, college students consume alcohol in order to avoid unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and sensations (Zgierska etal., 2009); in other words, those who drink motivated to change their unpleasant internal states to reduce their negative affects, are at greater risk of high alcohol consumption (Reynolds et al., 2015). Alcohol consumption, when it serves inflexible tendencies, could increase the level of unwanted thoughts and feelings, being possible that high levels of psychological inflexibility generate an endless cycle guided by unpleasant experiences and their avoidance, which in turn generates more unpleasant experiences. If a person believes that feeling stress or anxiety is a negative thing, they are likely to use problematic coping strategies, such as avoidance, substance abuse, or other equally harmful ones. (Leahy, 2018). To date, there are no studies that have analyzed these same relationships, although there exist precedent research that includes other interesting transdiagnostic variables. For example, Levin etal. (2012) found that psychological inflexibility mediated the relationship of psychological distress to alcohol-related problems, and Pedrelli etal. (2011) found a moderated relationship between depressive symptoms and daily alcohol consumption. Moreover, Devynck et al. (2019) found a strong positive association between repetitive negative thinking and alcohol use or alcohol-related problems. Negative urgency (propensity to engage in impulsive behavior while experiencing distress) also explains the association between anxiety symptomatology and both alcohol and cannabis use problems (Wolitzky-Taylor etal., 2016). Nonetheless, more studies are required to reach conclusive results in this field. The effect of stress on alcohol consumption after controlling for psychological inflexibility as mediator and gender as moderator was significant for both men and women students. In other words, the mediation of psychological inflexibility between stress and alcohol consumption is positive and strong for both men and women, even higher in women. It could beexplained because women reported significantly higher levels of both psychological inflexibility and stress than men students did. Likewise, Kheirabadi et al. (2021) and Barenz (2017) revealed that psychological inflexibility positively mediates the relationship between stress and substance abuse. However, to our knowledge, there are no investigations that have studied the relationships between these variables. Therefore, our study adds to the previous literature the influence of gender in the relationship between stress and psychological inflexibility, as transdiagnostic variables, in the consumption of alcohol among college students. This transdiagnostic approach opens up new ways of assessing and classifying AUD, suggesting alternatives in the understanding of the processes involved, and provides a new theoretical foundation on the initiation and maintenance, as well as the clinical treatment and recovery of these disorders (Dalgleish etal., 2020). Overall, this novel emotional vulnerability model includes a set of key clinical factors underlying alcohol use and different emotional conditions (Leventhal and Zvolensky, 2015). However, to date, no research had yet examined the relationship between both transdiagnostic constructs (psychological stress and psychological inflexibility) and problematic alcohol consumption. There is still much to investigate henceforth to generate true innovations and avoid Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 7 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 conceptual biases to deliver a transdiagnostic paradigm shift that can improve assessment protocols and clinical care (Fusar- Poli et al., 2019). Several limitations of this study merit mention. Firstly, statistically significant differences might be sensible to the large size of the sample. In addition, results might be confound by university culture, since differences in alcohol consumption were reported between the three main Ecuadorian regions in men and women, as expected based on previous studies (CONSEP, 2014). Moreover, results of this study must be considered with caution since cross-sectional design limits the capacity to stablish causal relationships. Future studies would benefit from longitudinal design to further explore changes on psychological inflexibility, stress, and alcohol consumption over time. Finally, self-reported data may be subject to desirability. CONCLUSION Results of this study support psychological stress and psychological inflexibility as critical transdiagnostic variables related to increased rates of alcohol consumption among Ecuadorian college students. Furthermore, psychological inflexibility mediates the negative impact of psychological stress on alcohol consumption, with a higher degree among women. These findings contribute to the development of transdiagnostic comprehensive programs, which encompasses promotive, preventive, and treatment services, to alleviate the burden of alcohol, including gender differences, and to enrich the growing research on alcohol consumption in this population. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. ETHICS STATEMENT The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by MSP-DIS-2015-0088-O. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS PR and SV-G: conceptualization and funding acquisition. PR, CL-N, and RS-P: methodology and data curation, RS-P: writing— original draft preparation. PR and CL-N: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. FUNDING This study was funded by the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (Ecuador) and the National Council for the Control of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (CONSEP), grant number PROY.PSC.1055. Additional funding was provided by the European Union—Next Generation EU through the Grant for the Requalification of the Spanish University System for 2021–2023 at the Public University of Navarra (Resolution 1402/2021). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Authors would like to thank the National Council for the Control of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (CONSEP) for their support and guidance. REFERENCES Aguilar, M. P. O., Palomera, P. R., Núñez, C. L., Maroño, C. T., Gallegos, S. V., Cabrera, N. J. P., et al. (2022). The Role of age of onset in problematic alcohol consumption: artefact or cohort effect? Clínica y Salud 33, 11–17. doi: 10.5093/clysa2021a11 Anthenelli, R. M. (2012). Overview: stress and alcohol use disorders revisited. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 34, 386–390. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., and Monteiro, M. G. (2001). Audit. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Switzerland: World Health Organization. Barbosa-Leiker, C., Kostick, M., Lei, M., McPherson, S., Roper, V., Hoekstra, T., et al. (2012). Measurement invariance of the perceived stress scale and latent mean differences across gender and time. Stress Health 29, 253–260. doi: 10.1002/smi.2463 Barenz, J. D. (2017). Modeling Effects of Trauma and Stress on Disordered Eating and Substance Abuse: The Role of Experiential Avoidance and Meaning in Life. United States: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 Berner, M. M., Kriston, L., Bentele, M., and Härter, M. (2007). The alcohol use disorders identification test for detecting at-risk drinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 68, 461–473. doi: 10.15288/ jsad.2007.68.461 17446987 Böke, B. N., Mills, D. J., Mettler, J., and Heath, N. L. (2019). Stress and coping patterns of university students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 60, 85–103. doi: 10.1353/ csd.2019.0005 Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav. Ther. 42, 676–688. doi: 10.1016/j. beth.2011.03.007 22035996 Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 34, 387–394. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00059-4 Carragher, N., Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., and Slade, T. (2015). Disorders without borders: current and future directions in the meta-structure of mental disorders. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 50, 339–350. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-1004-z Castillo-Carniglia, A., Keyes, K. M., Hasin, D. S., and Cerdá, M. (2019). Psychiatric comorbidities in alcohol use disorder. Lancet. Psychiat. 6, 1068–1080. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30222-6 Cavallo, P., Carpinelli, L., and Savarese, G. (2016). Perceived stress and bruxism in university students. BMC. Res. Notes 9, 514–516. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2311-0 Choi, J. (2020). Impact of stress levels on eating behaviors among college students. Nutrients 12:1241. doi: 10.3390/nu12051241 Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 8 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Erlbaum. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404 Collins, S. E., Kirouac, M., Taylor, E., Spelman, P. J., Grazioli, V., Hoffman, G., et al. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of college drinking in students’ own words: content analysis of the decisional balance worksheet. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 28, 727–733. doi: 10.1037/a0036354 Conigrave, K. M., Hall, W. D., and Saunders, J. B. (1995). The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Addiction 90, 1349–1356. doi: 10.1046/j. 1360-0443.1995.901013496.x CONSEP (2014). IV Estudio Nacional sobre uso de drogas en población de 12 a 65 años del Ecuador. Available at: http://sisco.copolad.eu/web/uploads/ documentos/Encuesta_uso_drogas_CONSEP_08.2013.pdf (Accessed November 26, 2021). Dalgleish, T., Black, M., Johnston, D., and Bevan, A. (2020). Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: current status and future directions. J. Consult. Cli. Psych. 88, 179–195. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000482 Devynck, F., Rousseau, A., and Romo, L. (2019). Does repetitive negative thinking influence alcohol use? A systematic review of the literature. Front. Psychol. 10:1482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01482 Dodd, V., Glassman, T., Arthur, A., Webb, M., and Miller, M. (2010). Why underage college students drink in excess: qualitative research findings. Am. J. Health Educ. 41, 93–101. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2010.10599133 Eisenbeck, N., Carreno, D. F., and Uclés-Juárez, R. (2019). From psychological distress to academic procrastination: exploring the role of psychological inflexibility. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 13, 103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.07.007 Engs, R. C., and Hanson, D. J. (1990). Gender differences in drinking patterns and problems among college students: A review of the literature. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 35, 36–47. Fusar-Poli, P., Solmi, M., Brondino, N., Davies, C., Chae, C., Politi, P., et al. (2019). Transdiagnostic psychiatry: a systematic review. World Psychiatry 18, 192–207. doi: 10.1002/wps.20631 Gavurova, B., Ivankova, V., and Rigelsky, M. (2020). Relationships between perceived stress, depression and alcohol use disorders in university students during the CoViD-19 pandemic: a socio-economic dimension. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He. 17:8853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238853 Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., and Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. J. Consult. Cli. Psych. 64, 1152–1168. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152 Heidari, S., Babor, T. F., De Castro, P., Tort, S., and Curno, M. (2018). Gender and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Gac. Sanit. 33, 203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.04.003 Hofmann, S. G., and Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: process-based therapy. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7, 37–50. doi: 10.1177/2167702618772296 Innes, S. I. (2017). The relationship between levels of resilience and coping styles in chiropractic students and perceived levels of stress and well-being. J. Chiropr. Educ. 31, 1–7. doi: 10.7899/JCE-16-2 Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P., Albor, Y., Alonso, J., Auerbach, R. P., Bantjes, J., et al. (2020). Sources of stress and their associations with mental disorders among college students: results of the World Health Organization world mental health surveys international college student initiative. Front. Psychol. 11:1759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01759 Kashdan, T. B., and Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 865–878. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 Keyes, K. M., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Grant, B. F., and Hasin, D. S. (2012). Stress and alcohol: epidemiologic evidence. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 34, 391–400. Kheirabadi, H., Jajarmi, M., and Bakhshipoor, A. (2021). The structural correlation modeling of stress and substance abuse by mediating meaning of life and experiential avoidance. Int. J. Behav. Sci. 15, 34–40. doi: 10.30491/ IJBS.2021.225787.1241 Kingston, J., Clarke, S., and Remington, B. (2010). Experiential avoidance and problem behavior: A mediational analysis. Beh. Modif. 34, 145–163. doi: 10.1177/0145445510362575 Kizhakkeveettil, A., Vosko, A. M., Brash, M., and Philips, M. A. (2017). Perceived stress and fatigue among students in a doctor of chiropractic training program. J. Chiropr. Educ. 31, 8–13. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-27 LaBrie, J. W., Lac, A., Kenney, S. R., and Mirza, T. (2011). Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences. Addict. Behav. 36, 354–361. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.013 Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 Leahy, R. L. (2018). Emotional Schema Therapy: Distinctive Features. London: Taylor & Francis Group. Leventhal, A. M., and Zvolensky, M. J. (2015). Anxiety, depression, and cigarette smoking: A transdiagnostic vulnerability framework to understanding emotion– smoking comorbidity. Psychol. Bull. 141, 176–212. doi: 10.1037/bul0000003 Levin, M. E., Lillis, J., Seeley, J., Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., and Biglan, A. (2012). Exploring the relationship between experiential avoidance, alcohol use disorders, and alcohol-related problems among first-year college students. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 60, 443–448. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2012.673522 Levin, M. E., MacLane, C., Daflos, S., Seeley, J. R., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., et al. (2014). Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 3, 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003 López, V., Paladines, B., Vaca, S., Cacho, R., Fernández-Montalvo, J., and Ruisoto, P. (2019). Psychometric properties and factor structure of an Ecuadorian version of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in college students. PLoS One 14:e0219618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219618 McHugh, R. K., and Weiss, R. D. (2019). Alcohol use disorder and depressive disorders. Alcohol Res. 40:arcr.v40.1.01. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.1.01 Meckamalil, C., Brodie, L., Hogg-Johnson, S., Carroll, L. J., Jacobs, C., and Côté, P. (2020). The prevalence of anxiety, stress and depressive symptoms in undergraduate students at the Canadian memorial chiropractic college. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 1–6. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1751173 [Epub ahead of print]. Mendoza, H., Goodnight, B. L., Caporino, N. E., and Masuda, A. (2016). Psychological distress among Latina/o college students: the roles of selfconcealment and psychological inflexibility. Curr. Psychol. 37, 172–179. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9500-9 Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2004). Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 24, 981–1010. doi: 10.1016/j. cpr.2004.08.003 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., and Hilt, L. (2006). Possible contributors to the gender differences in alcohol use and problems. J. Gen. Psychol. 133, 357–374. doi: 10.3200/genp.133.4.357-374 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., and Watkins, E. R. (2011). A heuristic for developing transdiagnostic models of psychopathology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 589–609. doi: 10.1177/1745691611419672 Norberg, M. M., Norton, A. R., Olivier, J., and Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Social anxiety, reasons for drinking, and college students. Behav. Ther. 41, 555–566. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.03.002 Olfert, M., Barr, M., Charlier, C., Greene, G., Zhou, W., and Colby, S. (2019). Sex differences in lifestyle behaviors among US college freshmen. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He. 16:482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030482 Organization of the American States (2019). Report on Drug Use in the Americas 2019. Whashington D.C. Available at: http://www.cicad.oas.org/main/pubs/ Informe%20sobre%20el%20consumo%20de%20drogas%20en%20las%20 Am%C3%A9ricas%202019.pdf (Accessed September 23, 2021). Paladines-Costa, B., López-Guerra, V., Ruisoto, P., Vaca-Gallegos, S., and Cacho, R. (2021). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) in Ecuador. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He. 18:2944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062944 Pedrelli, P., Farabaugh, A. H., Zisook, S., Tucker, D., Rooney, K., Katz, J., et al. (2011). Gender, depressive symptoms and patterns of alcohol use among college students. Psychopathology 44, 27–33. doi: 10.1159/000315358 Perrotte, J. K., Martin, J. L., and Piña-Watson, B. (2020). Traditional feminine gender roles, alcohol use, and protective behavioral strategies among Latina college students. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 69, 644–652. doi: 10.1080/07448481. 2019.1705836 Remor, E. (2006). Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the perceived stress scale (PSS). 2006. Span. J. Psychol. 9, 86–93. doi: 10.1017/ S1138741600006004 Reynolds, A., Keough, M. T., and O’Connor, R. M. (2015). Is being mindful associated with reduced risk for internally-motivated drinking and alcohol Sánchez-Puertas et al. Gender Differences in Alcohol Consumption Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 9 February 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 784896 use among undergraduates? Addict. Behav. 42, 222–226. doi: 10.1016/j. addbeh.2014.11.027 Robotham, D., and Julian, C. (2006). Stress and the higher education student: a critical review of the literature. J. Further High. Educ. 30, 107–117. doi: 10.1080/03098770600617513 Ruisoto, P., Cacho, R., López-Goñi, J. J., Vaca, S., and Jiménez, M. (2016). Prevalence and profile of alcohol consumption among university students in Ecuador. Gac. Sanit. 30, 370–374. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.02.008 Ruisoto, P., López-Guerra, V. M., Paladines, M. B., Vaca, S. L., and Cacho, R. (2020). Psychometric properties of the three versions of the perceived stress scale in Ecuador. Physiol. Behav. 224:113045. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113045 Saleh, D., Camart, N., and Romo, L. (2017). Predictors of stress in college students. Front. Psychol. 8:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019 Sebena, R., El Ansari, W., Stock, C., Orosova, O., and Mikolajczyk, R. T. (2012). Are perceived stress, depressive symptoms and religiosity associated with alcohol consumption? A survey of freshmen university students across five European countries. Subst. Abuse. Treat. Pr. 7:21. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X–7-21 Seedhom, A. E., Kamel, E. G., Mohammed, E. S., and Raouf, N. R. (2019). Predictors of perceived stress among medical and nonmedical college students, Minia. Egypt. Int. J. Prev. Med. 10:107. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_6_18 Serowik, K. L., and Orsillo, S. M. (2019). The relationship between substance use, experiential avoidance, and personally meaningful experiences. Subs. Use. Misuse. 54, 1834–1844. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1618329 Serrano-Ibáñez, E. R., Ruíz-Párraga, G., Gómez-Pérez, L., Ramírez-Maestre, C., Esteve, R., and López-Martínez, A. (2021). The relationship between experiential avoidance and posttraumatic stress symptoms: A moderated mediation model involving dissociation, guilt, and gender. J. Trauma Dissociatio. 22, 304–318. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2020.1869647 Sheather, S. (2009). A Modern Approach to Regression with R. New York: Springer. Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., and Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6, 2–30. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0601_1 Tavolacci, M. P., Ladner, J., Grigioni, S., Richard, L., Villet, H., and Dechelotte, P. (2013). Prevalence and association of perceived stress, substance use and behavioral addictions: a cross-sectional study among university students in France, 2009-2011. BMC Public Health 13:724. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2458-13-724 UNODC (2017). III Estudio epidemiológico andino sobre consumo de drogas en la población universitaria, Informe regional 2016. Available at: https:// www.unodc.org/documents/peruandecuador/Informes/Otros/Informe_ Universitario_Regional.pdf (Accessed September 23, 2021). Varghese, R. P., Norman, T. S. J., and Thavaraj, S. (2015). Perceived stress and self efficacy among college students: A global review. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Man. 5, 15–24. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2703908 Villarosa-Hurlocker, M. C., Schutts, J. W., Madson, M. B., Jordan, H. R., Whitley, R. B., and Mohn, R. C. (2020). Screening for alcohol use disorders in college student drinkers with the AUDIT and the USAUDIT: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Am. J. Drug. Alcohol. Ab. 46, 531–545. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1712410 Whittle, S., Yücel, M., Yap, M. B. H., and Allen, N. B. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: evidence from neuroimaging. Biol. Psychol. 87, 319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.003 Wolitzky-Taylor, K., McBeth, J., Guillot, C. R., Stone, M. D., Kirkpatrick, M. G., Zvolensky, M. J., et al. (2016). Transdiagnostic processes linking anxiety symptoms and substance use problems among adolescents. J. Addict. Dis. 35, 266–277. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2016.1207969 World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (Accessed September 23, 2021). World Medical Association (2013). World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310, 2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 Zgierska, A., Rabago, D., Chawla, N., Kushner, K., Koehler, R., and Marlatt, A. (2009). Mindfulness meditation for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Subst. Abus. 30, 266–294. doi: 10.1080/08897070903250019 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Publisher’s Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Copyright © 2022 Sánchez-Puertas, Ruisoto, López-Núñez and Vaca-Gallegos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.