scieee Open visual document viewer

Core excitation effects in the breakup of the one-neutron halo nucleus 11Be on a proton target

Moro Muñoz, Antonio Matías; Crespo, Raquel

Abstract

We investigate the phenomenon of core excitation in the inelastic and breakup of two-body halo nuclei, composed by a valence nucleon and a core. To evaluate the importance of this effect we propose a simple reaction model based on an extension of the standard distorted wave Born approximation (DWBA) method. The model takes into account core-excited admixtures in the states of the composite projectile, as well as the possibility of dynamic core excitation due to the interaction of the core with the target. As an application of the model, we present calculations for the breakup of 11Be on a proton target at an incident energy of 63.7 MeV/nucleon, comparing it with the available data for this reaction. We find that the data are well reproduced by the model and that the effect of dynamic core excitation is essential to explain the observed cross section.

Full text

PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) Co e exci a ion e ec s in he b eakup o he one-neu on halo nucleus 11Be on a p o on a ge A. M. Mo o1,*and R. C espo2,3,† 1Depa amen o de F´ ısica A ´ omica, Molecula y Nuclea , Uni e sidad de Se illa, Apa ado 1065, E-41080 Se illa, Spain 2Cen o de F´ ısica Nuclea , Uni e sidade de Lisboa, A enida do P o esso Gama Pin o 2, P-1649-003 Lisboa, Po ugal 3Depa amen o de F´ ısica, Ins i u o Supe io T´ ecnico, Uni e sidade T´ ecnica de Lisboa, A enida do P o esso Ca aco Sil a, Taguspa k, P-2780-990, Oei as, Po ugal (Recei ed 6 Ma ch 2012; published 9 May 2012) We in es iga e he phenomenon o co e exci a ion in he inelas ic and b eakup o wo-body halo nuclei, composed by a alence nucleon and a co e. To e alua e he impo ance o his e ec we p opose a simple eac ion model based on an ex ension o he s anda d dis o ed wa e Bo n app oxima ion (DWBA) me hod. The model akes in o accoun co e-exci ed admix u es in he s a es o he composi e p ojec ile, as well as he possibili y o dynamic co e exci a ion due o he in e ac ion o he co e wi h he a ge . As an applica ion o he model, we p esen calcula ions o he b eakup o 11Be on a p o on a ge a an inciden ene gy o 63.7 MeV/nucleon, compa ing i wi h he a ailable da a o his eac ion. We ind ha he da a a e well ep oduced by he model and ha he e ec o dynamic co e exci a ion is essen ial o explain he obse ed c oss sec ion. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRe C.85.054613 PACS numbe (s): 24.50.+g, 25.60.Gc, 27.20.+n I. INTRODUCTION B eakup and inelas ic sca e ing a e now s anda d ech- niques o s udy he s uc u e o halo nuclei. In pa icula , he p o on a ge is e y appealing o spec oscopic s udies because he exci a ion occu s mainly due o he nuclea in e - ac ion, he eby exci ing se e al mul ipola i ies and e ealing he esonan s uc u e o he p ojec ile con inuum [1,2]. To ex ac eliable in o ma ion om hese da a i is impo an o iden i y he ele an exci a ion mechanisms. In he case o a p ojec ile composed by a alence pa icle weakly bound o a co e, i is commonly assumed ha he main exci a ion mechanism is due o he exci a ion o he alence nucleon ou side he co e. This single-pa icle pic u e is behind many ew-body eac ion o malisms used in he analysis o eac ions induced by halo and o he weakly bound nuclei, such as he con inuum-disc e ized coupled-channels (CDCC) me hod [3], he adiaba ic app oxima ion [4,5], he Al , G assbe ge , Sandhas (AGS) o mula ion o he Faddee equa ions [6,7], and a a ie y o semiclassical app oaches [8–13]. Despi e he ela i e success o hese me hods, hey ypically igno e he ac ha he p ojec ile s a es will con ain, in gene al, signi ican admix u es o se e al co e componen s and, he e o e, he exci a ion o he p ojec ile may be caused also by ansi ions be ween hese co e s a es. These e ec s a e no included in he s anda d o mula ions o he me hods discussed abo e, al hough some e o s ha e been made in ecen yea s owa d his di ec ion. A ecen example is he ex ended e sion o he CDCC me hod (named XCDCC) ecen ly p oposed by he au ho s o Re . [14]. The e ec o co e exci a ion has also been s udied [15], using an ex ension o he adiaba ic model o Re . [16]. The o malism was applied o he elas ic sca e ing o 8Bona *[email p o ec ed] †[email p o ec ed] ca bon a ge , and some con ibu ion was ound a la ge angles due o he exci a ion o he 7Be co e. I is he pu pose o his wo k o e alua e he in luence o hese co e exci a ion e ec s in he inelas ic and b eakup o halo nuclei using a simple model, bu e aining ne e heless he key physics. The model p esen ed he e is an ex ension o he co e exci a ion model p esen ed in a p e ious wo k [17]. Unde he assump ion ha he DWBA app oxima ion is alid, and ha co e- ecoil e ec s can be neglec ed, his model gi es a simple ela ion be ween he exci a ion o he p ojec ile and ha o he co e on he same a ge . The model was applied o he b eakup o 11Be on a p o on a ge a 63.7 MeV/nucleon inciden ene gy, and compa ed wi h he da a om Re . [1]. Due o he expe imen al ene gy esolu ion, he expe imen al angula dis ibu ions o he exclusi e b eakup we e ex ac ed o wo in e als o neu on-10Be co e ene gy: (i) E el =0– 2.5 MeV and (ii) E el =2.5–5.0 MeV. In he i s in e al one expec s an impo an con ibu ion coming om he low-lying na ow 5/2+ esonance a a ela i e ene gy o 1.28 MeV [18]. This esonance has a dominan 10Be(0+)⊗ν1d5/2pa en age and a small componen 10Be(2+)⊗ν2s1/2. The c oss sec ion o he second in e al con ains, p esumably, con ibu ions coming om se e al esonances, namely, Ex=2.64 MeV (3/2−), 3.40 MeV (3/2−,3/2+), 3.89 MeV (5/2−), and 3.95 (3/2−)[18]. In a p e ious wo k, we analyzed hese da a using a simple e sion o he co e exci a ion model [17], and showed ha he main con ibu ion o he second in e al comes om he esonance a 3.40 MeV, o which we assumed a 3/2+assignmen , ollowing he sugges ion o he au ho s o Re . [19]. These calcula ions p o ided a easonable ag eemen wi h he da a o Re . [1] and, mos impo an ly, e idenced he impo ance o he co e exci a ion mechanism in he b eakup o halo nuclei. The calcula ions pe o med by he au ho s o Re . [17] assumed a simple single-pa icle con igu a ion o he alence neu on in he 11Be nucleus ela i e o he 10Be co e. I is he pu pose o his wo k o ex end his model o he mo e 054613-1 0556-2813/2012/85(5)/054613(8) ©2012 Ame ican Physical Socie y A. M. MORO AND R. CRESPO PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) ealis ic si ua ion in which he p ojec ile s a es consis o a supe posi ion o di e en alence con igu a ions and co e s a es. The pape is s uc u ed as ollows. In Sec. II we in oduce he Hamil onian used in his wo k. In Sec. III, we desc ibe he co e exci a ion eac ion model used in he sca e ing calcula ions. In Sec. IV we de ail he s uc u e model used o desc ibe he 11Be s a es. In Sec. Vwe p esen he calcula ions o he 11Be +p eac ion. Finally, Sec. VI is le o summa y and conclusions. II. THE FEW-BODY HAMILTONIAN The h ee-body Hamil onian o he sys em has he o m H=TR+Hp oj +Vc +V ,(1) whe e TR ep esen s he kine ic ene gy ope a o o he p ojec ile- a ge ela i e mo ion, Vc and V a e he co e- a ge and he alence- a ge in e ac ions, and Hp oj is he in e nal Hamil onian o he p ojec ile, gi en by Hp oj =T +V c( ,  ξ)+hco e( ξ),(2) whe e  is he ela i e coo dina e be ween he alence and he co e, T he co e- alence kine ic ene gy ope a o , and hco e( ξ) he in insic Hamil onian o he co e, whose ene gies and eigens a es a e labeled by he angula momen um (I) and i s p ojec ion (Mc), ha is, hco e|IMc=εI|IMc.(3) Addi ional quan um numbe s, equi ed o ully speci y he co e s a es, a e omi ed o simplici y in he no a ion. The co e- alence and co e- a ge in e ac ions may depend upon he in e nal co e deg ees o eedom  ξ. A gi en p ojec ile s a e wi h o al angula momen um and p ojec ion JM will consis on a linea supe posi ion o se e al alence-co e con igu a ions JM( ,  ξ)= α=I,,j ψJ α( )⊗I( ξ)JM,(4) whe e ψJ α( ) a e wa e unc ions desc ibing he mo ion o he alence neu on ela i e o a gi en co e s a e. The se o quan um numbe s s,, and j e e o he in insic spin o he alence pa icle, i s o bi al angula momen um ela i e o he co e, and hei sum, espec i ely. The wa e unc ions ψJ α( ) will depend upon he adop ed s uc u e model. Fo ou case s udy his will be desc ibed in Sec. IV. III. THE REACTION APPROACH: CORE EXCITATION REACTION MODEL In his sec ion we epo in de ail he co e-exci ed eac ion o malism (C-ex) ha shall be used o desc ibe he exci a ion o a p ojec ile nucleus (p), om i s g ound s a e wi h o al angula momen um J o a inal s a e Jdue o i s in e ac ion wi h a a ge ( ). The p ojec ile nucleus is assumed o be well desc ibed by a alence pa icle ( ) o bi ing a ound a co e o nucleons (c). The a ge is assumed o be ine . In ou Rc R ξ c R FIG. 1. (Colo online) Rele an coo dina es o he sca e ing o a wo-body sys em, composed o a co e (c) and a alence pa icle ( ), sca e ed o a a ge nucleus ( ). wo king example, his will co espond o he exci a ion o 11Be (10Be +n) on a p o on a ge o inal s a es in he con inuum, bu he o malism could be equally applied o he ansi ion be ween bound s a es. Fo simplici y, he e we igno e he spin o he p o on a ge . The di e en ial c oss sec ion o he exci a ion om an ini ial s a e |i JM o a inal s a e | JMo he p ojec ile is gi en in gene al by dσp d =1 ˆ J2 μp (2π¯h2)2 K K M,M TJM,JM p 2(5) wi h ˆ J=√2J+1, μp is he p ojec ile- a ge educed mass,  K( K) he ini ial ( inal) linea momen um, and TJM,JM p is he ansi ion ampli ude. Wi hin he DWBA app oach, he la e is gi en by TJM,JM p =χ(−)  K( R) JM( , ξ)VTχ(+)  K( R)i JM( ,  ξ),(6) whe e χ(+)  K( R) and χ(−)  K( R) a e dis o ed wa es desc ibing he p ojec ile- a ge ela i e mo ion in he ini ial and inal channels, espec i ely. In a co e + alence model o he p ojec ile, he ansi ion po en ial is VT=V ( R )+Vc ( Rc , ξ),(7) whe e V ( R ) and Vc ( Rc , ξ) a e he alence- a ge and co e- a ge po en ials. The ele an coo dina es o his p oblem a e depic ed in Fig. 1. The alence- a ge in e ac ion is assumed o be cen al, and hence V ( R )=V (R ). On he o he hand, he co e- a ge in e ac ion con ains bo h cen al and noncen al pa s, and is w i en as he mul ipola expansion Vc ( Rc , ξ)= L,M V(L) c (Rc ,ξ)Y∗ LM(ˆ R)YLM(ˆ ξ).(8) We assume ha he adial o m ac o does no depend on he in e nal coo dina es o he co e [i.e., VL(Rc ,ξ)=VL(Rc )], which is alid o he o a ional model used he e. F om Eqs. (6) o (8) he DWBA ampli ude is exp essed as a sum o wo e ms: TJM,JM p ( K, K)=TJM,JM al +TJM,JM co ex .(9) The i s e m, ha we deno e alence ampli ude o sho ness, is explici ly gi en by TJM,JM al ( K, K)=χ(−)  K( R) JM( , ξ)V (R ) +V(0) c (Rc )χ(+)  K( R)i JM( ,  ξ).(10) 054613-2 CORE EXCITATION EFFECTS IN THE BREAKUP OF THE ... PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) This e m con ains only he cen al pa s o he agmen - a ge po en ials V and Vc and he e o e i canno induce ansi ions in ol ing exci a ions o he co e. Using he gene al o m (4) o he ini ial and inal s a es, his ampli ude can be ew i en as TJM,JM al ( K, K)= α,αχ(−)  K( R)ψJ α( )V (R ) +V(0) c (Rc )χ(+)  K( R)ψJ α( )δI,I.(11) Fo each s a e Io he co e con ained in bo h he ini ial and inal s a es o he p ojec ile, his ampli ude is simila o ha ound in con en ional CDCC calcula ions and he e o e can be e alua ed using he s anda d codes a ailable o his kind o calcula ions. The second e m o he ansi ion ampli ude is due o he noncen al pa o he co e in e ac ion, ha is, TJM,JM co ex ( K, K)= L>0,Mχ(−)  K( R) JM( , ξ)V(L) c (Rc ) ×Y∗ LM(ˆ Rc )YLM(ˆ ξ)χ(+)  K( R)i JM( ,  ξ). (12) This e m accoun s o he dynamic exci a ion o he co e du ing he collision. I is he pu pose o he p esen wo k o e alua e his e m app oxima ely, bu e aining he key physics, o p o ide a simple es ima ion o he co e exci a ion e ec s. In addi ion o he co e exci a ion mechanism, he ampli- ude (12) may also p oduce exci a ions in he co e- alence ela- i e mo ion. This is because he ansi ion po en ial is e alua ed a  Rc . This coo dina e can be exp essed as  Rc = R+γ [γ=m /(m +mc)]. The dependence on he co e- alence coo dina e ( ) p oduces a co e- ecoil e ec ha can induce exci a ions o he p ojec ile. Howe e , because in ou es case γ1, we will assume ha his e ec can be neglec ed in his ampli ude [al hough i is ully aken in o accoun in he ampli ude (11)], so we can make he app oxima ion  R≈ Rc in Eq. (12), which means ha he dis o ed wa es in Eq. (12) a e e alua ed a he  Rc coo dina e. This app oxima ion leads o wha we shall call he ea e he co e exci a ion (C-exc) eac ion model. We no e ha his model can be deduced om he XCDCC o malism [14] by calcula ing he ansi ion in he Bo n app oxima ion and neglec ing he co e- ecoil e ec s o L>0. The sca e ing ampli ude o he C-exc app oach ac o izes hen in o a sum o p oduc s o a eac ion and a s uc u e e m TJM,JM co ex = L>0,M TLM( K, K) × JM( , ξ)YLM(ˆ ξ)i JM( ,  ξ),(13) whe e we ha e in oduced he quan i ies TLM( K, K)=χ(−)  K( Rc )|V(L)(Rc )Y∗ LM(ˆ Rc )|χ(+)  K( Rc ), (14) which con ain he dependence on he eac ion pa o he ansi ion ampli ude. Using he Wigne -Ecka heo em in he o m [20], we can w i e o he s uc u e componen  JMYL,M (ˆ ξ)i JM=JM|JMLM J||YL( ξ)||i J. (15) No ing ha he ope a o appea ing in he educed ma ix elemen depends only on he co e coo dina es and ha he ini ial and inal s a es a e exp essed in he o m (4), his ma ix elemen can be w i en as (see, o ins ance, Re . [20], Appendix VI)  J||YL( ξ)||i J= α,αRJ αRJ αG(L) αJ,αJI||YL( ξ)||I, (16) whe e we in oduced he geome ic ac o G(L) αJ,αJ=δj,j(−1)L+j+J+Iˆ Jˆ IJJL II j.(17) The educed ma ix elemen I||YL( ξ)||Iappea ing in Eq. (16) depends on he s uc u e model assumed o he co e and will be speci ied la e . Collec ing esul s, he sca e ing ampli ude o he co e exci a ion eads TJM,JM co ex = L>0,MJMLM|JMTLM( K, K) × α,αRJ α|RJ αG(L) αJ,αJI||YL( ξ)||I.(18) The di e en e ms ha en e in his ansi ion ampli ude a e ela i ely s aigh o wa d o calcula e. The ampli udes TLM( K, K), de ined by Eq. (14), a e hose appea ing in s an- da d DWBA calcula ions wi h local o m ac o s, o example, in inelas ic sca e ing calcula ions. The adial unc ions RJ α( ) a e he solu ion o a coupled se o di e en ial equa ions and he echniques o sol e his p oblem a e desc ibed elsewhe e (see, e.g., he Appendix VI o Re . [21]). The es o he e ms a e jus kinema ical and geome ical ac o s. The ampli ude (18) can also be ela ed o he wo-body inelas ic ampli udes o a co e- a ge sca e ing p oblem. To make his ela ion explici , le us conside a gi en ansi ion IMc→IM c o he inelas ic exci a ion o he co e sca e ed o he same a ge . In DWBA, he ampli ude o his p ocess eads, simila ly o Eq. (6), TIMc,I M c c =χ(−)  K( Rc ) IM c( ξ)Vc ( Rc , ξ) ×χ(+)  K( Rc )i IMc( ξ).(19) Using he Wigne -Ecka heo em, his ampli ude can be also w i en as TIMc,I M c c =IM c|IMcLM T(LM) c (I→I),(20) wi h he educed ampli udes  T(LM) c (I→I)=TLM( K, K)I||YL(ˆ ξ)||I,(21) wi h TLM( K, K) gi en by Eq. (14). 054613-3 A. M. MORO AND R. CRESPO PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) Compa ing wi h Eq. (18) and making use again o he no- ecoil app oxima ion (  Rc ≈ R) we ge he ela ion TJM,JM co ex = L>0,MJM|JMLM × α,αRJ αRJ αG(L) αJ,αJ T(LM) c (I→I).(22) This ampli ude is equi alen o ha gi en by Eq. (18),bu emphasizes in a clea way he ela ion be ween he h ee- body sca e ing ampli ude, Eq. (12), and he co esponding wo-body ampli udes, unde he app oxima ions assumed by he model. Equa ion (22) p o ides also a p ac ical way o nume ically implemen ing he co e-exci ed model since he wo-body ampli udes can be ob ained om any s anda d DWBA code. In he ex eme si ua ion in which he alence exci a ion is small compa ed wi h he co e exci a ion mechanism, he ansi ion ampli ude is gi en en i ely by Eq. (18) and he co esponding c oss sec ion is ob ained inse ing his ampli ude in o Eq. (5). Fu he mo e, i he e is a con ibu ion om a single mul ipole ansi ion L, and a single con ig- u a ion in he ini ial and inal s a es, he p ojec ile- a ge c oss sec ion becomes p opo ional o he c oss sec ion o he exci a ion o he co e mul iplied by a geome ic ac o and he adial o e lap, ha is, dσp d co ex =ˆ J2 ˆ J2 ˆ I2 ˆ I2G(L) αJ,αJRJ α|RJ α2dσc d (I→I). (23) This pa icula case was used in a p elimina y applica ion o his model o 11Be +p esonan b eakup [17]. No e, howe e , ha in gene al bo h he alence and he co e exci a ion mechanisms will con ibu e o he b eakup p ocess. In his case, he co esponding ampli udes need o be added cohe en ly and hence in e e ence e ec s will a ise. In he p esen wo k we ake in o accoun simul aneously he alence and co e exci a ion con ibu ions. IV. STRUCTURE MODEL To calcula e he ini ial and inal s a es o he p ojec ile one needs o speci y he s uc u e model o he co e. In he calcula ions p esen ed in his wo k o he 11Be +psys em, he p ojec ile is ea ed wi hin he pa icle- o o model o Boh and Mo elson [21]. Then we assume a o a ional model o he 10Be co e wi h a pe manen quad upole de o ma ion, which, o simplici y, is aken o be axially symme ic. The e o e, we can cha ac e ize he de o ma ion by a single pa ame e β2.In he body- ixed ame, he su ace adius is hen pa ame ized as R(ˆ ξ)=R0[1 +β2Y20(ˆ ξ)], wi h R0an a e age adius, o be speci ied la e . S a ing om a cen al po en ial, V(0) c ( ), he ull alence-co e in e ac ion is ob ained by de o ming his cen al in e ac ion V c( , ˆ ξ)=V(0) c [ −δ2Y20(ˆ ξ)],(24) wi h δ2=β2R0being he de o ma ion leng h. T ans o ming o he space- ixed ame o e e ence, and expanding in sphe ical ha monics, his de o med po en ial eads V c( ,  ξ)= L,M V(L) c ( )Y∗ LM(ˆ )YLM(ˆ ξ).(25) The in e nal s a es o he p ojec ile a e expanded acco ding o Eq. (4). I we w i e ψJ α( )=RJ α( )Ysjm(ˆ ), wi h Ysjm(ˆ )= [Y(ˆ )⊗χs]jm, he p ojec ile s a es become JM( ,  ξ)= α RJ α( )[Ysj (ˆ )⊗I( ξ)]JM.(26) The adial unc ions RJ α( ) a e hen ob ained by sol ing he Sch ¨ odinge equa ion using he po en ial (25) and wi h he app op ia e bounda y condi ions. Fo bound s a es, hese adial unc ions decay exponen ially o →∞gi ing ise o squa e-in eg able unc ions. Fo con inuum s a es, he unc ions RJ α( ) a e also ob ained by sol ing a se o coupled adial equa ions, bu subjec o he bounda y condi ion ha inciden wa es occu in a gi en open channel cha ac e ized by a se o quan um numbe s α={, s, j, I}. Al hough he calcula ions p esen ed in his wo k could be pe o med wi h he sca e ing s a es hemsel es, i is nume ically ad an ageous o adop a binning p ocedu e, simila o ha used in CDCC calcula ions. Then, he con inuum spec um is di ided in o ene gy in e als. Fo each ene gy in e al, o bin, a ep esen a i e squa e-in eg able s a e is cons uc ed by a weigh ed supe posi ion o sca e ing s a es wi hin he bin in e al. The bin wa e unc ion o a gi en incoming wa e αis gi en by a squa e-in eg able unc ion, wi h a s uc u e simila o ha o he bound s a es (26) bin [k1k2]αJM( ,  ξ)= α RJ [k1k2]αα( ) ×[Ysj (ˆ )⊗I( ξ)]JM,(27) whe e [k1k2] deno es he momen um in e al de ining he bin. V. APPLICATION TO 11Be +pRESONANT BREAKUP We now apply he co e-exci ed model o he b eakup o 11Be on a p o on a ge and compa e wi h he da a o [1]. Be o e p esen ing he calcula ions wi h his model, we conside he case igno ing he e ec o de o ma ion in bo h he 11Be s uc u e and in he co e- a ge in e ac ion. A. Calcula ions wi hou de o ma ion The calcula ions wi h no-de o ma ion we e done wi h he s anda d CDCC me hod, using he FRESCO code [22]. These calcula ions a e simila o hose p esen ed in ou p e ious wo k [23]. The alence-co e in e ac ion con ains cen al +spin-o bi e ms, o Woods-Saxon shape, wi h pa ame e s adjus ed o ep oduce he g ound s a e sepa a ion ene gy, he bound exci ed s a e (1/2−), and he posi ion o he low-lying 5/2+ esonance. The co e- a ge in e ac ion co esponds o he Wa son pa ame iza ion o Re . [24]. Fo he in e ac ion be ween he alence neu on and he p o on a ge , we conside ini ially a simple Gaussian in e ac ion 054613-4 CORE EXCITATION EFFECTS IN THE BREAKUP OF THE ... PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) 0246 E el (MeV) 0 20 40 dσ/dE el (mb/MeV) Faddee : 3S1 Gaussian Faddee : CD Bonn CDCC: 3S1 Gaussian CDCC: Modi ied Gaussian FIG. 2. (Colo online) Di e en ial c oss sec ion as a unc ion o he n-10Be ela i e ene gy calcula ed wi h he Faddee /AGS and CDCC me hods, using di e en choices o he alence neu on- p o on in e ac ion. The solid line is he Faddee calcula ion using he ealis ic CD Bonn in e ac ion. The do ed and do ed-dashed lines a e, espec i ely, he Faddee and CDCC calcula ions using a p-n Gaussian in e ac ion adjus ed o he 3S1s-wa e phase-shi s: V( )= −72.15 exp[−( /1.484)2]. The dashed line is he CDCC calcula ions using he modi ied Gaussian in e ac ion wi h he same geome y, bu wi h he educed s eng h V0=−45 MeV. All hese calcula ions igno e he 10Be de o ma ion. V( )=−72.15 exp[−( /1.484)2][3], which ep oduces he deu e on binding ene gy and low-ene gy s-wa e iple (3 S1) phase shi s. The 11Be con inuum was disc e ized in ene gy in e als using he s anda d binning p ocedu e. We included n-10Be pa ial wa es up o =2. In Fig. 2we ep esen he calcula ed ene gy spec um dσ/dE el ha eme ges by in eg a ing he b eakup c oss sec ion o e he solid angle dc.m.. To assess he eliabili y o he CDCC me hod in his case, we include also he Faddee calcula ion (quo ed om Re . [23]), pe o med wi h he same wo-body in e ac ions. The CDCC calcula ion (do -dashed line) ep oduces ai ly well he Faddee esul indica ing ha , a leas in he limi o no-de o ma ion, he CDCC is a eliable ool o analyze his eac ion. I was ound by he au ho s o Re . [23] ha he b eakup c oss sec ions a e e y sensi i e o he in e ac ion be ween he alence neu on and he p o on a ge . This is illus a ed by he solid line in Fig. 2, which ep esen s he Faddee calcula ion pe o med eplacing he simple Gaussian po en ial by he ealis ic CD Bonn in e ac ion. This p oduces a sizable educ ion o he b eakup c oss sec ion. Consequen ly, o ge e- liable esul s i is manda o y o use a ealis ic nucleon-nucleon (NN) in e ac ion. Un o una ely, exis ing implemen a ions o he CDCC me hod do no inco po a e he possibili y o using hese ealis ic NN in e ac ions, such as Pa is o CD Bonn. Ne e heless, we ha e ound ha he e ec o using a ealis ic NN in e ac ion can be well simula ed educing he dep h o he Gaussian in e ac ion o V0≈−45 MeV. The co esponding CDCC calcula ion, depic ed by he dashed line in Fig. 2, is seen o ep oduce ai ly well he Faddee esul wi h he CD Bonn po en ial. The co esponding angula dis ibu ions a e shown in Fig. 3. The uppe and bo om panels co espond o he ela i e 0 20 40 dσ/dΩc.m. (mb/s ) Faddee : CD Bonn CDCC: modi ied Gaussian DWBA: modi ied Gaussian 10 20 30 40 θc.m. (deg) 0 10 20 dσ/dΩc.m. (mb/s ) (b) E el=2.5-5 MeV (a) E el=0.0-2.5 MeV FIG. 3. (Colo online) Angula dis ibu ion o he b eakup o 11Be on a p o on a ge a 63.7 MeV/nucleon o E el =0–2.5MeV (uppe panel) and E el =2.5–5.0 MeV (bo om panel) calcula ed wi hou de o ma ion. The ci cles a e he expe imen al da a o Re . [1]. The solid line is he Faddee calcula ion wi h he ealis ic CD Bonn in e ac ion. The dashed line is he CDCC calcula ion using he modi ied Gaussian in e ac ion (Vg=−45 MeV) and he do -dashed line is he CDCC calcula ion calcula ed in i s o de . ene gy in e als E el =0–2.5 MeV and E el =2.5–5.0MeV, espec i ely. In each panel, he solid line is he Faddee calcula ion using he ealis ic CD Bonn in e ac ion, whe eas he dashed line is he CDCC calcula ion using he modi ied Gaussian po en ial. I is seen ha bo h calcula ions a e in easonable ag eemen . The e a e disc epancies below 15◦, whe e no da a exis ne e heless. Since he calcula ions including de o ma ion a e pe o med wi hin he DWBA app oxima ion, we ha e included also in his plo he CDCC calcula ion pe o med in i s o de , which is equi alen o a DWBA calcula ion. I is seen ha his calcula ion is e y close o he ull CDCC esul , jus i ying he use o he Bo n app oxima ion in his eac ion. This plo shows also e y clea ly ha he single-pa icle exci a ion mechanism is no adequa e o desc ibe hese da a, pa icula ly in he highe exci a ion ene gy in e al. F om he calcula ions p esen ed in his sec ion, we conclude ha he CDCC me hod (e en o i s o de ), using an adequa e e ec i e p-nin e ac ion, p o ides a good app oxima ion o he mo e sophis ica ed Faddee calcula ion wi h a ealis ic NN in e ac ion. In he ollowing sec ion, we in oduce he e ec o co e de o ma ion using he C-ex model desc ibed in Sec. III. 054613-5 A. M. MORO AND R. CRESPO PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) B. Calcula ions wi h he co e exci a ion model To calcula e he ini ial and inal s a es o he p ojec ile [Eqs. (26) and (27)] we adop he alence-co e po en ial om Re . [25] (model Be12b) consis ing o a cen al Woods-Saxon po en ial, wi h adius R0=2.483 m, di useness a=0.65 m, and pa i y-dependen dep h, wi h V0=−54.239 MeV (V0= −49.672 MeV) o he e en (odd) wa es. This po en ial is de o med using a de o ma ion pa ame e β2=0.67, which co esponds o a de o ma ion leng h o δ2=β2R0=1.64 m. A spin-o bi e m, using he s anda d Woods-Saxon de i a i e o m o he adial shape, wi h he same adius and di useness as he cen al pa and a dep h o Vso =8.5MeV,isalso included. Fo he 10Be co e we conside only he g ound s a e (0+) and he i s exci ed s a e (Iπ=2+,Ex=3.368 MeV). The o bi al angula momen um is unca ed a max =3. We conside ed con inuum s a es wi h Jπ=1/2+,1/2−,3/2−, 3/2+, and 5/2+. Wi h he assumed Hamil onian and model space, he g ound s a e co esponds p edominan ly o a s1/2con igu a ion coupled o he co e in he g ound s a e (≈85%), bu wi h a signi ican admix u e o he |2+⊗νd5/2con igu a ion (≈13%). This po en ial p oduces also he low-lying na ow eso- nances 5/2+,3/2−, and 3/2+a ela i e ene gies o 1.2, 2.7, and 3.2 MeV, espec i ely. These esonances can be iden i ied wi h he s a es obse ed by Fukuda e al. in he 11Be + 12C eac ion a 70 MeV/nucleon [19]. The 5/2+ esonance co esponds p edominan ly o a d5/2con igu a ion coupled o he co e in he g ound s a e, whe eas he 3/2+ esonance has a dominan 10Be(2+)⊗νs1/2pa en age. Fo he in e ac ion be ween he alence neu on and he p o on a ge we use he modi ied Gaussian in e ac ion ob ained in he p e ious sec ion. Fo he cen al pa o he 10Be +pin e ac ion we keep he Wa son po en ial [24]. This in e ac ion is used o calcula e he dis o ed wa es appea ing in he DWBA ansi ion ampli ude. The noncen al pa o his in e ac ion, equi ed o allow o he dynamic exci a ion o he co e, is ob ained de o ming his cen al po en ial using he same de o ma ion leng h (δ2= 1.64 m). In Fig. 4we show he calcula ed b eakup c oss sec ion, as a unc ion o he n-10Be ela i e ene gy, in eg a ed o e he cen e -o -mass angula ange θc.m.⩽60◦. Figu e 4(a) shows he con ibu ion o he dominan Jπpa ial wa es o he calcula ed ene gy spec um, as well as he o al sum o all included wa es. I is seen ha he b eakup c oss sec ion is domina ed by he esonan 3/2+and 5/2+con ibu ions and, a low exci a ion ene gies, by he 3/2−non esonan con inuum. The 1/2−and 1/2+wa es (no shown in his igu e) gi e also some con ibu ion a small exci a ion ene gies. I is also obse ed ha he 3/2− esonance (loca ed a E el =2.7MeV in his model) has a negligible e ec on he c oss sec ion. In Fig. 4(b), we show sepa a ely he alence and co e exci a ion con ibu ions o he angle-in eg a ed b eakup c oss sec ion. The low-ene gy spec um is mos ly due o he alence exci a ion, and hence he dynamic co e exci a ion is negligible a hese exci a ion ene gies. As he exci a ion ene gy inc eases he e ec o co e exci a ion becomes mo e and mo e impo an . 012345 E el (MeV) 0 20 40 60 dσ/dE el (mb/MeV) (b) alence co e alence+ co e 0 20 40 60 dσ/dE el (mb/MeV) (a) 3/2- 5/2+ 3/2+ ull θc.m.=(0o- 60o) FIG. 4. (Colo online) Di e en ial ene gy c oss sec ion o p(11Be,p)10Bena 63.7 MeV/nucleon in eg a ed o e he cen e - o -mass angula ange θc.m.⩽60◦, calcula ed wi h he C-ex model p oposed in his wo k. The uppe panel shows he indi idual con ibu ion o he main pa ial wa es and he sum o all included pa ial wa es. The bo om panel shows he sepa a e con ibu ion coming om he alence exci a ion and dynamic co e exci a ion ampli udes. See ex o de ails. In pa icula , co e dynamic e ec s a e clea ly dominan in he egion o he 3/2+ esonance and a e also impo an in he egion o he 5/2+ esonance. We hus expec signi ican changes in he co esponding angula dis ibu ions. In Fig. 5we compa e ou esul s o he b eakup c oss sec ion angula dis ibu ion dσ/dc.m.wi h he expe imen al da a o Re . [1] con aining con ibu ions wi hin ela i e neu on–10Be ene gy ange 0–2.5 MeV [Fig. 5(a)] and 2.5–5 MeV [Fig. 5(b)]. Again, we show he sepa a e con- ibu ions coming om he alence exci a ion (do -dashed line) and dynamic-co e exci a ion (dashed line), as well as hei cohe en sum (solid line). In he lowe ene gy in e al [Fig. 5(a)] he c oss sec ion is domina ed by he single-pa icle b eakup mechanism. The calcula ed angula dis ibu ion ep oduces easonably well he shape o he da a, al hough some o e es ima ion o he absolu e magni ude is obse ed. On he o he hand, in he highe ene gy in e al [Fig. 5(b)], bo h he single-pa icle and dynamic co e exci a- ion mechanisms a e impo an . The sum o bo h con ibu ions accoun s easonably well o he da a, excep o he i s da a poin , which is o e es ima ed. The main con ibu ion in his exci a ion ene gy egion comes om he popula ion o he 3/2+ esonance, as can be expec ed om Fig. 4. These esul s 054613-6 CORE EXCITATION EFFECTS IN THE BREAKUP OF THE ... PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) 0 20 40 60 dσ/dΩc.m. (mb/s ) ull ( alence+ co e) co e alence 10 20 30 40 θc.m. (deg) 0 10 20 dσ/dΩc.m. (mb/s ) (b) E el=2.5-5 MeV (a) E el=0.0-2.5 MeV FIG. 5. (Colo online) Angula dis ibu ion o he b eakup o 11Be on a p o on a ge a 63.7 MeV/nucleon o E el =0–2.5MeV (uppe panel) and E el =2.5–5.0 MeV (bo om panel). The ci cles a e he expe imen al da a o Re . [1]. The dashed-do ed and dashed cu es ep esen he alence and co e exci a ion con ibu ions, espec i ely, whe eas he solid line co esponds o hei cohe en sum. e idence he impo ance o he co e exci a ion mechanism and con i m ou ea lie indings using a mo e simpli ied model [17]. Finally, we no e ha his eac ion has been s udied also by he au ho s o Re . [26] using an ex ended e sion o he CDCC me hod, which inco po a es equi alen co e exci a ion e ec s o hose discussed he e. Howe e , con a y o ou esul s, he e ec o co e exci a ion was ound o be e y small in ha wo k. This esul is unexpec ed gi en he la ge de o ma ion o he 10Be nucleus. VI. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we s udied he p oblem o co e exci a ion in he b eakup sca e ing o halo nuclei. To accoun o his e ec in a quan i a i e way, we de eloped a co e exci a ion eac ion model, based on he DWBA app oxima ion, which akes in o accoun he e ec o co e de o ma ion in he s uc u e o he halo nucleus, as well as he possibili y o dynamic co e exci a ion du ing he collision. We showed ha , igno ing co e- ecoil e ec s, he con ibu ion o he sca e ing ampli ude a ising om he co e exci a ion can be w i en in e ms o a supe posi ion o wo-body ampli udes co esponding o he inelas ic sca e ing o he co e sca e ed by he same a ge . As an illus a ion o he model, we pe o med calcula ions o he b eakup o 11Be on p o ons a an inciden ene gy o 63.7 MeV/nucleon. The ini ial and inal s a es a e ea ed wi hin he pa icle- o o model and hence hey a e conside ed as a supe posi ion o se e al alence con igu a ions coupled o he 10Be co e in ei he he g ound s a e (0+)o he i s exci ed s a e (2+). The noncen al pa o he 10Be + p o on in e ac ion, which is esponsible o he dynamic co e exci a ion, is ob ained de o ming he 10Be +p o on po en ial. We ind ha he co e exci a ion mechanism gi es an impo an con ibu ion and i s inclusion pe mi s a sui able desc ip ion o he da a om Re . [1]. We also showed ha he impo ance o dynamic co e exci a ion becomes mo e impo an a inc easing exci a ion ene gies and is in ac essen ial o accoun o he ene gy-in eg a ed angula dis ibu ion a E el =2.5–5.0MeV. F om he calcula ions p esen ed in his wo k, we may con- clude ha hese co e exci a ion e ec s will be also impo an in o he eac ions induced by weakly bound p ojec iles wi h de o med cons i uen s. The me hod p oposed he e can p o ide a use ul and simple es ima e o hese e ec s in hose si ua ions in which he assump ions o he model (i.e., he alidi y o he Bo n app oxima ion and he possibili y o neglec ing co e- ecoil) a e jus i ied. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This wo k has been pa ially suppo ed by he FCT G an No. PTDC/FIS/103902/2008, by he Spanish Minis e io de Ciencia e Inno aci´ on unde P ojec No. FPA2009-07653, and by he Spanish Consolide -Ingenio 2010 P og amme CPAN (CSD2007-00042). [1] A. Sh i as a a e al. ,Phys. Le . B 596, 54 (2004). [2] Y. Sa ou e al.,Phys. Le . B 660, 320 (2008). [3] N. Aus e n, Y. Ise i, M. Kamimu a, M. Kawai, G. Rawi sche , and M. Yahi o, Phys. Rep. 154, 125 (1987). [4] P. Bane jee and R. Shyam, Phys. Re . C 61, 047301 (2000). [5] J. A. Tos e in, S. Rugmai, and R. C. Johnson, Phys.Re .C57, 3225 (1998). [6] L. D. Faddee , Zh. Eksp. Theo . Fiz. 39, 1459 (1960) [So . Phys. JETP 12, 1014 (1961)]. [7] E. O. Al , P. G assbe ge , and W. Sandhas, Nucl. Phys. B 2, 167 (1967). [8] S. Typel and G. Bau , Phys.Re .C50, 2104 (1994). [9] H. Esbensen and G. F. Be sch, Nucl. Phys. A 600, 37 (1996). [10] T. Kido, K. Yabana, and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Re . C 50, R1276 (1994). [11] S. Typel and G. Bau , Phys. Re . C 64, 024601 (2001). [12] P. Capel, G. Golds ein, and D. Baye, Phys. Re . C 70, 064605 (2004). [13] A. Ga cia-Camacho, A. Bonacco so, and D. M. B ink, Nucl. Phys. A 776, 118 (2006). [14] N. C. Summe s, F. M. Nunes, and I. J. Thompson, Phys.Re .C 74, 014606 (2006). [15] K. Ho ii, M. Takashina, T. Fu umo o, Y. Saku agi, and H. Toki, Phys.Re .C81, 061602 (2010). 054613-7 A. M. MORO AND R. CRESPO PHYSICAL REVIEW C 85, 054613 (2012) [16] R. C. Johnson, J. S. Al-Khalili, and J. A. Tos e in, Phys. Re . Le . 79, 2771 (1997). [17] R. C espo, A. Del u a, and A. M. Mo o, Phys. Re . C 83, 044622 (2011). [18] J. H. Kelley e al.,Nucl. Phys. A 880, 88 (2012). [19] N. Fukuda e al.,Phys. Re . C 70, 054606 (2004). [20] D. B ink and G. Sa chle , Angula Momen um, 2nd ed., (Cla endon P ess, Ox o d, 1968). [21] A. Boh and B. Mo elson, Nuclea S uc u e, edi ed by W. A. Benjamin, (New Yo k, 1969). [22] I. Thompson, Compu . Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988). [23] E. C a o, R. C espo, A. M. Mo o, and A. Del u a, Phys. Re . C 81, 031601 (2010). [24] B. A. Wa son, P. P. Singh, and R. E. Segel, Phys. Re . 182, 977 (1969). [25] F. M. Nunes, J. A. Ch is ley, I. J. Thompson, R. C. Johnson, and V. D. E os, Nucl. Phys. A 609,43 (1996). [26] N. C. Summe s and F. M. Nunes, Phys. Re . C 76, 014611 (2007). 054613-8