scieee Open visual document viewer

Proportion of non-native plants in urban parks correlates with climate, socioeconomic factors and plant traits

Bayón, Álvaro; Godoy, Oscar; Maurel, Noëlie; van Kleunen, Mark; Vilà, Montserrat

Abstract

Urban parks and gardens provide cultural and aesthetic services critical for human well-being. Yet, they represent one of the main reasons for the intentional introduction of ornamental species, some of which can escape and establish in natural ecosystems. Besides aesthetic reasons, climate and socioeconomic factors can also modulate which species are planted in urban parks. Here, we evaluate the relationship between traits of 486 ornamental woody species from 46 Spanish urban parks and climatic and socioeconomic variables. We specifically assessed how plant traits, climatic, and socioeconomic factors are related to the proportion of non-native species and, among them, to the proportion of established non-native species in Spain. Overall, we found clear associations between species traits and climatic variables. Most notably, parks with warmer winters have more plant species with conspicuous flowers, whereas parks with colder winters and a more continental climate have more species with higher tolerances to cold and shade. Most of the species recorded in our study are non-native (82 %). Higher proportions of non-native species in urban parks were positively associated with towns with large size homes and inhabitants with higher median age but negatively related to parks with species with a higher hardiness-zone range. Moreover, a greater proportion of non-native species that can establish in the natural ecosystems was found in parks with lower continentality conditions. Our results show that Spanish urban parks have an overwhelming proportion of non-native woody species, some of which have the potential to establish, and that the variation in their proportions can be explained by climatic, and socioeconomic factors.

Full text

U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 A ailable online 12 June 2021 1618-8667/© 2021 Published by Else ie GmbH. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY-NC-ND license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). P opo ion o non-na i e plan s in u ban pa ks co ela es wi h clima e, socioeconomic ac o s and plan ai s ´ Al a o Bay´ on a , Osca Godoy b , No¨ elie Mau el c , Ma k an Kleunen c , d , Mon se a Vil` a a , e , * a Es aci´ on Biol´ ogica de Do˜ nana (EBD-CSIC), A . Am´ e ico Vespucio 26, 41092, Se illa, Spain b Depa men o Biology, Uni e si y o Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain c Ecology, Depa men o Biology, Uni e si y o Kons anz, Kons anz, Ge many d Zhejiang P o incial Key Labo a o y o Plan E olu iona y Ecology and Conse a ion, Taizhou Uni e si y, Taizhou, 318000, China e Depa men o Plan Biology and Ecology, Uni e si y o Se ille, Se ille, Spain ARTICLE INFO Handling Edi o : W Wendy McWilliam Keywo ds: Ha diness zones In asi e species O namen al plan s Plan ai p o ile ABSTRACT U ban pa ks and ga dens p o ide cul u al and aes he ic se ices c i ical o human well-being. Ye , hey ep esen one o he main easons o he in en ional in oduc ion o o namen al species, some o which can escape and es ablish in na u al ecosys ems. Besides aes he ic easons, clima e and socioeconomic ac o s can also modula e which species a e plan ed in u ban pa ks. He e, we e alua e he ela ionship be ween ai s o 486 o namen al woody species om 46 Spanish u ban pa ks and clima ic and socioeconomic a iables. We speci - ically assessed how plan ai s, clima ic, and socioeconomic ac o s a e ela ed o he p opo ion o non-na i e species and, among hem, o he p opo ion o es ablished non-na i e species in Spain. O e all, we ound clea associa ions be ween species ai s and clima ic a iables. Mos no ably, pa ks wi h wa me win e s ha e mo e plan species wi h conspicuous lowe s, whe eas pa ks wi h colde win e s and a mo e con inen al clima e ha e mo e species wi h highe ole ances o cold and shade. Mos o he species eco ded in ou s udy a e non-na i e (82 %). Highe p opo ions o non-na i e species in u ban pa ks we e posi i ely associa ed wi h owns wi h la ge size homes and inhabi an s wi h highe median age bu nega i ely ela ed o pa ks wi h species wi h a highe ha diness-zone ange. Mo eo e , a g ea e p opo ion o non-na i e species ha can es ablish in he na u al ecosys ems was ound in pa ks wi h lowe con inen ali y condi ions. Ou esul s show ha Spanish u ban pa ks ha e an o e whelming p opo ion o non-na i e woody species, some o which ha e he po en ial o es ablish, and ha he a ia ion in hei p opo ions can be explained by clima ic, and socioeconomic ac o s. 1. In oduc ion U ban pa ks and ga dens p o ide cul u al and aes he ic se ices c i ical o human well-being (Bolund and Hunhamma , 1999; Hulme, 2007; Kendal e al., 2012), ye hey a e one o he main easons o he in en ional in oduc ion o o namen al non-na i e plan species wo ld- wide (Maye e al., 2017; an Kleunen e al., 2018). This sou ce o non-na i e species in oduc ion is pa ly explained by he ac ha in ou con inuous sea ch o no el y, we, as humans, a e ac i ely looking o plan ea u es ha inc ease he aes he ic alue o u ban pa ks while c ea ing a sense o place. In addi ion, p e ious wo k has shown ha such sea ch is also modula ed by he socioeconomic con ex o he owns wi hin a coun y. In gene al, he p esence o non-na i e plan species is explained by clima e, human ac o s and a combina ion o bo h (Pyˇ sek e al., 2010). Fo ins ance, owns wi h high a e age incomes and high de elopmen dedica e g ea e mone a y in es men o he in oduc ion o no el species wi h highe aes he ic alue (Vaz e al., 2018) and o he main enance o g een a eas, wi h mo e di e se species composi ion (Pyˇ sek e al., 2010). Likewise, densely popula ed egions a e cha ac- e ized by highe p opagule p essu e, he e o e, mo e indi iduals a e plan ed and mo e in asi e plan s p esen (Pino e al., 2005; Pyˇ sek e al., 2010). Ne e heless, he deco a i e alue is only one eason o plan ing non-na i e species in u ban pa k. O he impo an easons ela e o he abili y o some non-na i e species o cope wi h en i onmen al s ess. Commonly, pa k manage s selec species ha a e easy o es ablish and main ain. This means inding species wi h pa icula ai s ha a e p e- adap ed o he pa icula clima ic condi ions. Howe e , his * Co esponding au ho . E-mail add esses: [email p o ec ed] (´ A. Bay´ on), [email p o ec ed] (M. Vil` a). Con en s lis s a ailable a ScienceDi ec U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening jou nal homepage: www.else ie .com/loca e/u ug h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.u ug.2021.127215 Recei ed 30 No embe 2020; Recei ed in e ised o m 2 June 2021; Accep ed 7 June 2021 U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 2 managemen can b ing en i onmen al p oblems as i also acili a es hei es ablishmen in na u al ecosys ems in he in oduced ange (Gonz´ alez-Mo eno e al., 2014; Mau el e al., 2016; Pyˇ sek e al., 2010). In gene al e ms, i has been well-documen ed ha he dis ibu ion o woody species along clima ic g adien s is modula ed by he pa icula o gans and whole-plan ai s ha allow species o ole a e en i on- men al s esso s such as os , shade, and d ough (Rueda e al., 2017; Zanne e al., 2014). The e o e, when a non-na i e species is in oduced in a no el a ea, he in e ac ion o clima ic condi ions wi h he species ai s de e mine which species will pe sis (Haeuse e al., 2018, 2017; Dullinge e al., 2017; an de Veken e al., 2008). This in e ac i e p ocess is no di e en in he case o u ban lo as, al hough ga dening p ac ices (e.g. wa e ing, d ainage sys ems o excess wa e , p uning) can o e come o compensa e o some o hese clima ic limi a ions. The in oduc ion o non-na i e woody species in u ban pa ks can pose a conse a ion p oblem because some o he species can escape, es ablish popula ions (i.e. na u alize) in na u al ecosys ems and become in asi e. Se e al in asi e woody species ha e he po en ial o dis up he unc ioning o na u al ecosys ems causing en i onmen al impac s, as well as socio-economic and human heal h p oblems (Hulme, 2007; Niineme s and Pe˜ nuelas, 2008; Pa ke e al., 1999). Al hough he numbe o na u alized species has inc eased exponen ially du ing he las decades (Seebens e al., 2017), we s ill ha e a poo unde s anding o he d i e s in luencing he in oduc ion o non-na i e plan species in o he u ban lo a compa ed o he d i e s in luencing he la e s ages o he in asion p ocess. Along he in asion p ocess om anspo o sp ead and in asion (Blackbu n e al., 2011; Colau i and MacIsaac, 2004), i has been well documen ed ha species ai s, clima ic condi- ions and socioeconomic ac o s ul ima ely in luence in asion success. Ne e heless, hese ac o s a e also likely o in luence he p obabili y ha a species is in oduced somewhe e in he i s place, and i is wo h no ing ha he species ai s de e mining in asion success migh no necessa ily be he same as hose de e mining hei delibe a e in oduc- ion, since he la e depends di ec ly on human pe cep ion, p e e ences and uses. Wi h his knowledge a hand, wha emains o be explo ed is how hese h ee main componen s (i.e. species ai s, clima e and socioeco- nomic con ex ) explain a ia ion in he p opo ion o non-na i e o na- men al species (non-na i e species numbe / o al species numbe ) in u ban pa ks. Indeed, he ela i e impo ance o each ac o is likely o a y ac oss a la ge e i o y i he e is a ia ion in clima ic and socio- economic a iables. Fo ins ance, se e e clima ic condi ions migh limi he impo ance o socioeconomic a iables in de e mining he p opo - ion o non-na i e o namen al species due o di ec en i onmen al il e ing p ocesses (K a e al., 2015). Howe e , wi h a elaxa ion o s ess ul condi ions due o mild clima ic condi ions o indi ec e ec s media ed by human ga dening ac i i ies, human popula ion size o hei income is expec ed o in luence he p opo ion o non-na i e o namen al species plan ed in u ban pa ks. C i ically, hese ex insic ac o s a e going o be media ed by plan ai s (Vaz e al., 2018). The e o e, knowledge o he ai p o iles o o namen al plan communi ies in conce wi h clima ic and socioeconomic co ela es will inc ease ou unde s anding o he p ocesses d i ing he in oduc ion and composi- ion o non-na i e lo as in u ban pa ks, and he es ablishmen o hese non-na i e species. In hese lines, p e ious wo k has shown ha socio- economic ac o s explain as much o he a ia ion o he dis ibu ion o non-na i e species es ablished in na u al ecosys ems as clima ic ac o s (Essl e al., 2011; Pyˇ sek e al., 2010). Howe e , we do no know o wha ex en he p opo ion o woody species na u alized in na u al ecosys- ems is associa ed wi h median species ai alues o he pa ks, and hei clima ic and socioeconomic a iables. In his s udy, we analyze he species plan ed in u ban pa ks ha a y in size and ounding yea . We speci ically ask (1) how clima ic and so- cioeconomic cha ac e is ics o he own in which he pa ks a e loca ed, de e mine he pa ks’ plan - ai p o iles and (2) how plan o igin (na i e s. non-na i e) and he in asion s a us (es ablished s. no es ablished in na u al ecosys ems) o he species plan ed in pa ks a e associa ed wi h plan ai s, clima ic and socioeconomic a iables? To answe hese ques ions, we ocused ou s udy on he peninsula e i o y o Spain (he ea e Spain) o se e al easons. Fi s , he o namen al use o non- na i e plan species in Spain is one o he main pa hways o in oduc- ion o po en ial in asi e species (Sanz Elo za e al., 2004). Wi h his de ailed in o ma ion, we can assess he ai p o iles o he communi ies o non-na i e u ban lo as ha a e mo e likely o escape om pa ks and become in asi e in na u al landscapes. Recen ly, 83 in asi e o po en- ially in asi e species we e iden i ied in nu se y ca alogues, a ailable o comme ce, including eigh egula ed in asi e species (Bay´ on and Vil` a, 2019). The exis ence o hese in asi e and po en ial in asi e spe- cies o consume s make i easie o be plan ed in pa ks and ga dens despi e ha i is o bidden. Second, Spain has a b oad ange o clima ic condi ions ( om Medi e anean and semia id o empe a e and con i- nen al clima es). We expec ha inland cold condi ions will impose a s ong il e o non-na i e woody species, while d ough e ec s in some coas al a eas in sou he n Spain will be amelio a ed by i iga ion du ing summe . Mo eo e , he d ough pe iods cha ac e is ic o mos clima es in Spain has e olu iona y limi ed he ai p o ile o na i e lo a o de elop species wi h a summe lowe ing pe iod and dense oliage (Godoy e al., 2009), and we would expec his o be e lec ed in non-na i e species. Consequen ly, we expec a b oade a ia ion o ai p o iles o non-na i e plan s in coas al owns. Finally, he owns selec ed a e no equally weal hy ac oss he coun y. In gene al, he weal h o a own and i s unemploymen a es migh ac as impo an d i e s di e en ia ing he non-na i e lo as o u ban pa ks (Schwa z e al., 2006; T en ano i e al., 2013; Vaz e al., 2017). 2. Me hods 2.1. U ban pa ks da ase We ob ained lo is ic ca alogs o 46 u ban pa ks and ga dens dis ibu ed in 23 owns ac oss he Spanish peninsula e i o y (Ap- pendix 1) om he ‘Vi i lospa ques’ da abase (www. i i lospa ques. es/; las accessed 12 Feb 2021), an online ool by he ‘Spanish Associ- a ion o Public Pa ks and Ga dens’ (AEPJP, 2010). This da abase p o- ides he mos upda ed and comple e in o ma ion o he species plan ed wi hin u ban pa ks in Spain as well as addi ionally impo an de ails such as o al pa k a ea, he ounding yea and he spa ial coo dina es o mos pa ks. Missing in o ma ion o pa k a ea was comple ed by using Google Maps ools and, o he yea he pa k was ounded, by ci y hall websi es. F om hese ca alogs, we selec ed he comple e lis o 486 woody plan species (i.e. ees, sh ubs, a bo eal cac i and palm ees). He bs we e excluded because hei plan ings can a y adically om yea o yea . Once he species lis was ob ained, we used The Plan Lis (2013) o ha monize scien i ic species names (www. heplan lis .o g; las accessed 5 Oc obe 2018). Non-speci ic axa, such as gene a wi h unspeci ied species epi he s, such as Rosa spp. o hyb ids such as Ci us ×au - an i olia, we e excluded. In he case o in aspeci ic axa (e.g. subspecies, a ie ies), such as Ced us a lan ica a . glauca, we only kep he binomial species names. Then, each species was classi ied, acco ding o hei o igin, as na i e o non-na i e in Spain, based on Sanz-Elo za e al. (2004) and Cas o iejo (2012). Fo non-na i e species, we consul ed hei es ablishmen s a us in Spain in (Sanz Elo za e al., 2004), which ollows he Richa dson e al. (2000) s a us de ini ions: es ablished and no es ablished in na u al ecosys ems. We included as es ablished spe- cies, hose ha can be ound g owing in na u al ecosys ems in Spain. These include na u alized species ha ha e es ablished pe sis en pop- ula ions, bu we he e also included non-na i es classi ied as casuals (i.e. species ha a e equen ly ound in na u al a eas bu do no a ain pe sis ing popula ions). We included casual non-na i es among he es ablished ones because he na u alized s casual classi ica ion is no e y p ecise o in oduced species in Spain, and because many species ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 3 conside ed casual a e known o cause en i onmen al impac s in na u al a eas (And eu e al., 2009). 2.2. Socioeconomic and clima ic da ase Clima ic a iables collec ed om Wo ldClim 2 (Fick and Hijmans, 2017) we e calcula ed o each pa k wi h QGIS so wa e (QGIS De el- opmen Team, 2009). Ras e maps wi h 1 km esolu ion we e ob ained o all he a iables a ailable in he sou ce: 11 empe a u e a iables and 8 p ecipi a ion a iables, as well as al i ude (Table 1a). Finally, we ob ained in o ma ion o nume ous socioeconomic a iables o he o al a ea o he 23 owns selec ed. Speci ically, we ob ained all he a iables a ailable a he Spanish S a is ics O ice (INE, 2017), which p o ide in o ma ion o mean alues be ween 2010 and 2016 (Table 1b) o 11 a iables associa ed wi h popula ion demog aphy, 4 wi h u baniza ion, and 6 wi h employmen and economy. We decided o ob ain all he in- o ma ion a ailable because we do no ha e ‘a p io i’ expec a ion o which a iables a e ele an o ou s udy. Such high dimensionali y was la e educed when pe o ming s a is ical analyses (see below). Due o he limi ed esolu ion o he da abase o socioeconomic Table 1 Clima ic and socioeconomic a iables used o desc ibe 46 u ban pa ks in 23 owns ac oss Spain. A) Clima ic a iables Type o a iable Va iable Code Kind o a iable Uni Fi s PCA selec ion Tempe a u e Annual mean empe a u e mean_ quan i a i e Celsius deg ee (◦C) * Mean diu nal ange diu n_ ang quan i a i e Celsius Iso he mali y iso he m quan i a i e % Tempe a u e seasonali y _season quan i a i e % Maximum empe a u e o he wa mes mon h max_ _wm quan i a i e Celsius Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h min_ _cm quan i a i e Celsius * Annual ange o empe a u e _ann_ g quan i a i e Celsius * Mean empe a u e o he we es qua e m _we _Q quan i a i e Celsius Mean empe a u e o he d ies qua e m _d ie_Q quan i a i e Celsius Mean empe a u e o he wa mes qua e m _wa m_Q quan i a i e Celsius Mean empe a u e o he coldes qua e m _cold_q quan i a i e Celsius P ecipi a ion Annual p ecipi a ion ann_p ecip quan i a i e mm P ecipi a ion o he we es mon h p ec_we M quan i a i e mm P ecipi a ion o he d ies mon h p ec_d ieM quan i a i e mm P ecipi a ion seasonali y p ec_seaso quan i a i e % P ecipi a ion o he we es qua e p ec_we Q quan i a i e mm P ecipi a ion o he d ies qua e p ec_d ieQ quan i a i e mm * P ecipi a ion o he wa mes qua e p ec_wa mQ quan i a i e mm P ecipi a ion o he coldes qua e p ec_coldQ quan i a i e mm Al i ude al s quan i a i e m a.s.l. B) Socioeconomic a iables Type o a iable Va iable Code Kind o a iable Uni Fi s PCA selec ion Basic demog aphy Numbe o esiden s n_ esid_10000 quan i a i e x 10 000 P opo ion o esiden s ≤14 yea s old n_0.14y quan i a i e % P opo ion o esiden s 15−64 yea s old n_15.64y quan i a i e % P opo ion o esiden s ≥65 yea s old n_.64y quan i a i e % Median age median_age quan i a i e yea s * P opo ion o na ional esiden s na ionals_pe cen quan i a i e % P opo ion o o eign esiden s o eign_pe cen quan i a i e % P opo ion o esiden s na i e om he own na i e_pe cen quan i a i e % * P opo ion o esiden s bo n ou side he own bo n_ou s_pe cen quan i a i e % Na ali y a e na ali y_pe _ housand quan i a i e ‰ Mo ali y a e mo ali y_pe _ housand quan i a i e ‰ U banis ics Numbe o homes n_homes_10000 quan i a i e x 10 000 Numbe o con en ional homes (Ca as al) con _homes_10000 quan i a i e x 10 000 Mean household size (numbe o inhabi an s pe home) home_size quan i a i e * P opo ion o single-pe son homes single_pe s_home_pe cen quan i a i e % Employmen and economics Unemploymen a e unemploy_pe cen quan i a i e % Wo king popula ion in ac i e age (20−64 yea s old) X20.64y_pe cen _ocupa ed_in_ac i e quan i a i e % * Ac i e popula ion ac i i y_pe cen quan i a i e % Indus y wo ke s indus y_wo ke s_pe cen quan i a i e % Se ice wo ke s se ice_wo ke s_pe cen quan i a i e % A e age money incoming pe home a g_inc_eu o_10000 quan i a i e x 10 000 € * A ea o he own a ea_c quan i a i e km 2 C) Pa k-dependen a iables Type o a iable Va iable Code Kind o a iable Uni Pa k-dependen A ea o he pa k a ea_m_sq quan i a i e m 2 Founding yea o he pa k yea quan i a i e Table 1. A i s compila ion o clima ic a iables (A) was pe o med h ough a sys ema ic sea ch om Wo ldClim 2 (Fick and Hijmans, 2017). The i s compila ion o socioeconomic a iables (B) was pe o med h ough a sys ema ic sea ch om he Spanish S a is ics O ice (INE, 2017). Pa k-dependen a iables (C) we e mainly ob ained om AEPJP (2010), and seconda y, om Google Map ools (a ea) and ci y hall websi es (yea ). Finally, we made a selec ion using a Pea son co ela ion analysis (Appendix 2, Fig. A2.1 and A2.2) and PCA (Fig. 1a and b) in which we applied a b oken-s ick c i e ion (Appendix 2, Fig. A2.4 and A2.5), as desc ibed in he Me hods. * Va iables ma ked wi h an as e isk we e inally selec ed by he PCA and b oken-s ick me hod. ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 4 a iables, possible a ia ions below he own le el, such as dis ic s o neighbo hoods, we e no possible o add ess. The e o e, he socioeco- nomic da a o pa ks wi hin he same ci y we e he same. We ob ained da a om a wide ange o own sizes — om e y densely popula ed (e.g. Ba celona) o e y small owns (e.g. Ciudad Real)— and clima ic con- di ions — om a we empe a e clima e (e.g. Bilbao) o a ho and d y Medi e anean clima e (Lo ca)—. The a e age numbe o pa ks wi hin he same ci y is 2, and only 2 owns ha e mo e han 3 pa ks (Appendix 1). 2.3. Plan ai s da ase We used se e al sou ces o in o ma ion o ob ain o gan-le el and whole-plan ai s a he species le el. The majo i y o plan ai s we e ex ac ed om he TRY Da abase (Ka ge e al., 2011). We pe o med a second sea ch in se e al in e ne da abases (Table 2). Fo each species, we ob ained 21 plan ai s (17 con inuous and 4 bina y) ela ed o whole-plan cha ac e is ics, lea es, ep oduc i e o gans ( lowe s and dispe sal uni s), plan lowe ing and ui ing phenology, and ole ances o se e al en i onmen al s esso s such as os (minimum absolu e empe a u e ole a ed and numbe o os days pe yea ), shade, d ough , wa e logging and i e, as well as he minimum and maximum ha diness alues and i s ange (Table 2). Ha diness zones a e ca o- g aphical s anda diza ions o he a e age annual minimum win e empe a u es di ided in o 10-deg ee F zones (S´ anchez de Lo - enzo-C´ ace es, 2004; USDA, 2012). Thus, he ha diness alues o a gi en species is de ined as he abili y o su i e and g ow in a speci ic ange o ha diness zones. We conside he lowe ha diness zone alue ha he species can ole a e as “minimum ha diness”, he highes alue as “maximum ha diness”, and he di e en be ween bo h alues, he “ ange o ha diness”. Spain includes ha diness zones 7a (-17.8 ◦C o -15 ◦C) o 11b (7.2 ◦C–10 ◦C; Fick and Hijmans, 2017; S´ anchez de Lo - enzo-C´ ace es, 2004). This comp ehensi e sea ch did un o una ely no ende ai in o - ma ion o all species. The e o e, we excluded o u he analyses i e ai s wi h da a missing o mo e han 50 % o he species (Table 2). Fo he emaining ai s, missing da a was impu ed. P e ious wo k has shown ha impu ing missing alues is be e han simply emo ing missing-da a a iables o missing-da a species, as emo ing da a could bias he esul s (Penone e al., 2014). We applied nonpa ame ic missing alue impu a ion using andom o es s implemen ed in he R package ‘missFo es ’ (S ekho en and Buhlmann, 2012), which uses a andom o es ained on he obse ed alues o p edic he missing alues. This impu a ion me hod can handle mul i a ia e da a consis ing o con in- uous and ca ego ical a iables simul aneously, as was he case in ou s udy. O e all, a e se en i e a ions, he ou -o -bag no malized oo mean squa ed e o was low (1.1608; PFC 0.0295), indica ing a good impu a ion pe o mance (S ekho en and Buhlmann, 2012). 2.4. S a is ical analyses 2.4.1. O e iew Due o he high numbe o a iables ob ained, and some o hem showing high collinea i y, we decided o educe he numbe o a iables using s a is ical ools wi h he inal objec i e o a oid o e i ing he s a is ical models (King and Jackson, 1999; Zhou e al., 2010). We i s buil a da abase o he plan - ai p o ile o he pa ks, calcula ing he median alue o each quan i a i e ai and he mean alue o each bi- na y ai ( equency) o each pa k. We conside ed each pa k as a eplica e. The educ ion o a iables was done on each o he h ee main g oups o a iables selec ed (i.e. clima ic a iables, socioeconomic a iables, and pa k ai p o ile) ollowing h ee complemen a y s eps. Fi s , we pe o med a co ela ion ma ix o iden i y he mos co ela ed a iables (Appendix 2). I wo a iables we e closely co ela ed ( -Pea son >0.70), we emo ed one o hem. Second, we pe o med a p incipal componen analysis (PCA), in which we used a b oken s ick c i e ion (Simon e al., 2011) on he i s and second dimensions (Ap- pendix 2) o iden i y he main a iables explaining he ob ained PCA. Thi d, we pe o med Lasso eg ession models (F iedman e al., 2010; Simon e al., 2011; Tibshi ani, 1996) o exclude non-in o ma i e explana o y a iables (Hesamian and Akba i, 2019). Wi h he comple- ion o hese h ee s eps, we ob ained he inal se o a iables, which we e used o bes p edic a ia ion in he p opo ion o plan o igin (na i e s. non-na i e) and in he in asion s a us (es ablished s. no es ablished in na u al ecosys ems). This s a is ical p ocess is ully explained in Appendix 3. Acco ding o his p ocedu e, he i s and second axes o he PCA on clima ic a iables explained 39 % and 35 % o he a ia ion, espec i ely (Fig. 1a). We selec ed i e clima ic a iables (annual mean empe a u e, p ecipi a ion in d ies qua e , minimum empe a u e in coldes mon h, and annual ange o empe a u es; Table 1a). Fo he PCA on socio- economic a iables, he i s and second p incipal axes explained 37 % and 25 % o he a ia ion, espec i ely (Fig. 1b). We selec ed i e so- cioeconomic a iables (mean household size, median age o inhabi an s, pe cen o na i e popula ion, pe cen o wo king popula ion be ween 20 and 64 yea s old in ac i e, and a e age incoming money pe home; Table 1b). Finally, he i s and second p incipal axes o he PCA in ol ing pa k ai p o iles explained 28 % and 19 % o he a ia ion, espec i ely (Fig. 1c). We selec ed i e plan ai s (minimum, maximum and ange o ha diness, ole ance o shade, and ha ing conspicuous lowe s; Table 2). Wi h he inal se o a iables selec ed, we hen pe o med gene al- ized linea models (GLMs), using he ‘glm’ unc ion om he R package ‘s a s’ (R Co e Team, 2019) wi h a linea combina ion o p e iously selec ed a iables as p edic o s in each case, he species ichness o he pa ks as p io weigh s, and a ea and ounding yea o he pa k as co a ia es because bigge and olde pa ks ha e had mo e space and ime o accumula e a wide di e si y o species. 2.4.2. Rela ionships be ween plan - ai p o ile and clima ic and socioeconomic cha ac e is ics To answe he i s ques ion, namely whe he clima ic and socio- economic a iables explain a ia ion in he unc ional plan - ai p o ile ac oss pa ks, we conside ed in he Lasso eg essions all he clima ic and socioeconomic a iables p eselec ed as independen a iables, while we ea ed each p eselec ed ai (i.e. minimum, maximum and ange o ha diness, ole ance o shade and ha ing conspicuous lowe s) as dependen a iable in each model (see ‘O e iew’). A e he educ ion o a iables, we pe o med i e GLMs (Poisson dis ibu ion wi h he quasipoisson se ing o accoun o o e - dispe sion), one o each ai selec ed o he pa k p o ile. P edic o s we e a linea combina ion o clima ic and socioeconomic ac o s p e- iously selec ed in he Lasso eg ession (i.e. minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h, annual empe a u e ange, and household size; Table A4.1 om Appendix 4), and a ea and ounding yea o he pa k we e included as co a ia es. 2.4.3. In luence o plan - ai p o ile, clima ic and socioeconomic cha ac e is ics on he p opo ion o non-na i e species To answe he second ques ion, namely, whe he species o igin: na i e s. non-na i e; and es ablishmen s a us: es ablished s. no es ablished; can be explained by clima ic and socioeconomic a iables, and he pa ks’ plan - ai p o ile, we i s ob ained he numbe o na i e and non-na i e species wi hin each pa k, and o he non-na i e ones, he numbe o species ha ha e es ablished in na u al ecosys ems (being in asi e, na u alized o casual, acco ding o Sanz Elo za (S´ anchez de Lo enzo-C´ ace es, 2004; USDA, 2012)(2004) and o he wo ks (Bay´ on and Vil` a, 2019; Gass´ o e al., 2010). We used a pai ed S uden ’s - es (‘ . es ’ unc ion o he ‘s a s’ basic R package; R Co e Team, 2019) o es whe he he numbe s o non-na i e and na i e species we e simila . Simila ly, we es ed whe he he numbe s o no es ablished and es ablished non-na i e species we e simila . ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 5 Table 2 T ai s used o desc ibe woody plan species in 46 u ban pa ks in 23 owns ac oss Spain. (B¨ a els and Schmid (2014); Bo ´ anica (2014); B ines e al. (1997); Cen aal Bu eau oo de S a is iek (2003); CSIC (2014); Cze epano (1995); Gallaghe and Leishman (2012); Hin ze e al. (2013); Moles e al. (2004); Mo ales (2002); Plan s Fo A Fu u e (2010); S´ anchez de Lo enzo-C´ ace es (1999); Uni e sidad de M´ alaga (2011); USDA (2008); Whea ley (2009) and Wyse-Jackson (2006)). Type o ai T ai Code Kind o a iable Uni % eal da a % impu a ed da a Fi s PCA selec ion Da a sou ces beyond TRY Whole plan Max heigh heigh _m quan i a i e m 100 % 0 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 Max li espan — quan i a i e yea s 44 % Va .Ex. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 Lea es A ea lea _a ea_sq_mm quan i a i e sq. mm 54 % 46 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 17 Lamina leng h lea _leng h_cm quan i a i e cm 85 % 15 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 17 Lamina wid h lea _wid h_cm quan i a i e cm 63 % 37 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 17 Lea ype lea _ ype_0 o1 bina y 0 =b oadlea ed 97 % 3 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 18 1 =coni e Rep oduc i e o gans Flo al uni size — quan i a i e mm 9 % Va .Ex. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 Conspicuous lowe isual_ lowe _0 o1 bina y 0 =No 93 % 7 % * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 1 =Yes Pollina ion synd ome pollin_synd_0 o1 bina y 0 = Anemophilous 93 % 7 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 1 = En omophilous Gymnospe m lowe s gymnosp_ lowe _0 o1 bina y 0 =No 93 % 7 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12 1 =Yes Dispe sal uni mass — quan i a i e g 15 % Va .Ex. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 17 Plan Phenology Rep oduc i e phenology iming phenol_ iming quan i a i e o dinal mon h 85 % 15 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16 Lea phenology lea _phen_0 o1 bina y 0 =deciduous 97 % 3 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 15, 18 1 =e e g een Tole ances To os empe a u e ol_ os _ emp quan i a i e Celsius 82 % 18 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 To os days — quan i a i e num. days 32 % Va .Ex. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 To shade ol_shade_0 o5 quan i a i e 1−5 92 % 8 % * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 To d ough ol_d ough _0 o5 quan i a i e 1−5 89 % 11 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 To wa e logging ol_wa e logging_0 o5 quan i a i e 1−5 76 % 24 % 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 To i e — quan i a i e 1−5 29 % Va .Ex. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 Ha diness min. ha diness_min quan i a i e 1−12 67 % 33 % * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Ha diness max. ha diness_max quan i a i e 1−12 67 % 33 % * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Ha diness ange ha diness_ ange quan i a i e 1−12 Calcula ed di ec ly: di e ence be ween max. and min. alues * Calcula ed Da a sou ces Num. Sou ce e e ence 1 B ines R, Tejuelo I, Bel ´ an P and Balague ´ A. (1997) Guía Ve de. h ps://www.guia e de.com/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 2 CSIC A bolapp. (2014) In: A bolapp. h p://www.a bolapp.es/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 3 Mo ales J. (2002) In oja dín. h p://www.in oja din.com/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 4 S´ anchez de Lo enzo-C´ ace es JM. (1999) ´ A boles O namen ales. h p://a boleso namen ales.es/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 5 Uni e sidad de M´ alaga. (2011) Ja dín Bo ´ anico de la Uni e sidad de M´ alaga. h p://www.ja dinbo anico.uma.es/ja dinbo anico/index.php. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 6 Wyse-Jackson P. (2006) Missou i Bo anical Ga den. h ps://www.missou ibo anicalga den.o g/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 7 Bo ´ anica Y Ja dines. (2014) In: Bo ´ anica Y Ja dines. h p://www.bo anicayja dines.com/. Accessed 1 Sep 2017 8 B¨ a els A. and Schmid P. A. (2014) Enzyklop¨ adie de Ga engeh¨ olze, 2nd edn. Ulme E. Ve lag 9 Plan s Fo A Fu u e (PFAF). (2010) In: Plan s Fo A Fu u e. h ps://p a .o g/use /De aul .aspx. Accessed 1 Jun 2017 10 Wea hley, R. (2009) B and T Wo ld Seeds. h p://b-and- -wo ld-seeds.com/. Accessed 1 Jun 2017 11 USDA. (2008) USDA Plan s Da abase. h ps://plan s.usda.go /ja a/. Accessed 1 Jun 2017 12 Hin ze C, Heydel F, Hoppe C, e al (2013) D3: The Dispe sal and Diaspo e Da abase – Baseline da a and s a is ics on seed dispe sal. Pe spec i es in Plan Ecology, E olu ion and Sys ema ics 15:180–192. 13 Cen aal Bu eau oo de S a is iek BioBase (2003) In: Cen aal Bu eau oo de S a is iek. h ps://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diens en/me hoden/classi ica ies/o e ig/bio base-2003/biobase-2003. Accessed 1 Jun 2017 14 Cze epano SK (1995)Vascula plan s o Russia and adjacen s a es ( he o me USSR). Camb idge Uni e si y P ess, New Yo k 15 Zanne AE, Tank DC, Co nwell WK, e al (2004) Th ee keys o he adia ion o angiospe ms in o eezing en i onmen s. Na u e 506:89–92. 16 Moles AT, Fals e DS, Leishman MR, Wes oby M (2012) Small-seeded species p oduce mo e seeds pe squa e me e o canopy pe yea , bu no pe indi idual pe li e ime. Jou nal o Ecology 92:384–396. 17 Gallaghe RV, Leishman MR (2012) A global analysis o ai a ia ion and e olu ion in climbing plan s. Jou nal o Biogeog aphy 39:1757–1771. 18 Panchen ZA, P imack RB, No d B, e al (Panchen e al., 2014) Lea ou imes o empe a e woody plan s a e ela ed o phylogeny, deciduousness, g ow h habi and wood ana omy. New Phy ol 203:1208–1219. Table 2. A i s compila ion o plan ai s was pe o med h ough a sys ema ic sea ch in he TRY Da abase (Ka ge e al., 2011). A second sea ch was pe o med o comple e he da abase —see Da a Sou ces. Then, hose a iables o which we had mo e han 50 % o he da a we e selec ed, and, on hem, we made a nonpa ame ic missing alue impu a ion by andom o es (S ekho en and Buhlmann, 2012). ‘Va .Ex.’ indica es a iables excluded om impu a ion because no enough da a. Finally, we made a selec ion using a Pea son co ela ion analysis (Appendix 2, Fig. A2.3) and PCA (Fig. 1c) in which we applied a b oken-s ick c i e ion (Appendix 2, Fig. A2.6) as desc ibed in he Me hods. * Va iables ma ked wi h an as e isk we e inally selec ed by he PCA and b oken-s ick me hod. ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 6 Fig. 1. PCAs o ela ions o a iables among pa ks. P incipal componen analyses (PCA) o A) clima ic a iables o each pa k, B) socioeconomic a iables o he locali ies o each pa k and C) median alues o he plan ai s in each pa k. See Appendix 1 o he lis o locali ies and codes o pa ks, and Ta- bles 1 and 2 o he desc ip ion o ai s and a iables. (Fo in e p e a ion o he e e ences o colou in his igu e legend, he eade is e e ed o he web e sion o his a icle). ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 7 Then, o each pa k we calcula ed he ollowing p opo ions o spe- cies: •P opo ion o non-na i e species, pAi=Ai Ni+Ai •P opo ion o es ablished non-na i e species, pEi=Ei NEi+Ei Whe e Ni is he numbe o na i e species in pa k i; Ai is he numbe o non-na i e species in pa k i; NEi is he numbe o non-na i e species ha ha e no es ablished in na u al ecosys ems o pa k i; and Ei is he numbe o non-na i e species ha ha e es ablished in na u al ecosys- ems o pa k i. We es ed whe he hese p opo ions a ied signi ican ly ac oss pa ks using a Pea son’s Chi-squa ed es (‘chisq. es ’ unc ion o he R package ‘s a s’; R Co e Team, 2019). A e he educ ion o he numbe o a iables by using co ela ions, PCA and b oken s ick c i e ia, we conside ed o he lasso eg essions all he emaining a iables and ai s p eselec ed as independen a iables, while we ea ed he p opo ion o non-na i e species and he p opo ion o es ablished species as dependen a iables in each model (see ‘O e iew’). Then we pe o med wo GLMs (binomial dis ibu ion), one o each p opo ion. P edic o s we e a linea combina ion o ai s, cli- ma ic and socioeconomic ac o s p e iously selec ed in he Lasso eg ession (i.e. annual empe a u e ange, household size, median age o own inhabi an s, pe cen o wo king popula ion in ac i e age (20−64 yea s old wi h job), maximum ha diness and ange o ha diness; Table A4.2 om Appendix 4), and a ea and ounding yea o he pa k we e included as co a ia es. 2.5. Da a esou ces The da a unde pinning he analyses, epo ed in his pape , a e deposi ed in he Zenodo eposi o y a h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zen- odo.4095422 (Bay´ on e al., 2020) 3. Resul s O e all, he da abase has 486 woody species. On a e age, he e we e 53 ±5.14 (mean ±se) species pe pa k and he maximum numbe was 144 species. Many species appea only in one o a ew pa ks. Each species is in 5 ±0.26 (mean ±SE) pa ks. Mo e p ecisely, 180 species (37.04 %) appea in only one pa k each, 68 species (13.99 %) appea in wo pa ks, and 45 species (9.26 %) in h ee pa ks, whe eas only 11 species (2.25 %) occu in hal o he pa ks o mo e (Appendix 1). The lis o mos common species and i s s a us we e: Cup essus sempe i ens (32 pa ks; es ablished), Cel is aus alis (26 pa ks; na i e), Robinia pseudoa- cacia (26 pa ks; es ablished), S yphnolobium japonicum (25 pa ks, non- na i e), Ced us a lan ica (24 pa ks; es ablished), Ced us deoda a (24 pa ks; es ablished), Magnolia g andi lo a (24 pa ks; non-na i e), Ce cis siliquas um (23 pa ks; es ablished), Lau us nobilis (23 pa ks; na i e), Phoenix cana iensis (23 pa ks; non-na i e) and Populus alba (23 pa ks; na i e). Acco ding o he o igin, we ound 86 na i e species (17.70 %) and 400 non-na i e species (82.30 %), 130 (26.75 %) o which ha e es ablished in na u al ecosys ems (Table 3). 3.1. Pa k cha ac e iza ion The co elog am o clima ic a iables (Fig. A2.1 om Appendix 2) shows ha he e is a s ong co ela ion be ween di e en ypes o cli- ma ic a iables. Values o p ecipi a ion, excep seasonali y, showed e y high co ela ions be ween each o he (minimum Pea son’s =0.49 be ween p ecipi a ion o he d ies qua e and he coldes qua e ). The i s axis o he clima ic PCA accoun ed o 38.5 % o he o e all clima ic a ia ion ac oss pa ks, and i was mainly explained by he opposi e end be ween p ecipi a ion and mean empe a u e in he d ies qua e . The second PCA axis accoun ed o 34.9 % o he obse ed clima ic a ia ion ac oss pa ks, and i was explained by he same beha io o he minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h and he mean in he we es qua e (Fig. 1a). Among socioeconomic a iables, he highes co ela ions (Fig. A2.2 om Appendix 2) was obse ed be ween he numbe o esiden s and numbe o homes (Pea son’s =1). A e age household sizes in he owns o he pa ks we e di ec ly ela ed o he p opo ion o kids and adul inhabi an s (Pea son’s =0.62 o kids unde 14 yea s old, and = 0.60 o adul s be ween 15 and 64 yea s old), and in e sely o he p opo ion o people o e 64 yea s old ( =-0.70). This p opo ion o people o e 64 is in addi ion di ec ly ela ed wi h he median age o he popula ion (Pea son’s =0.97). Mo eo e , we ound ha o he so- cioeconomic PCA, household size and median age we e bo h dis ibu ed along he i s axis (36.7 %) bu in opposi e di ec ions. Median age o he popula ion ollowed a e y simila pa e n o he pe cen age o wo ke s in he se ice sec o wi hin he i s socioeconomic PCA axis. Finally, he pe cen age o employed people, as well as he a e age income pe home, we e bo h dis ibu ed along he second PCA axis (25 %) and in he same di ec ion (Fig. 1b). Rega ding he pa ks’ plan - ai p o iles (Table 2), some a iables we e highly co ela ed (Appendix 2, ig. A2.3). Fo example, en o- mophilous pollina ion was co ela ed wi h se e al o he ai s such as he p esence o conspicuous lowe s (Pea son’s =1), maximum heigh (Pea son’s =-0.82) and he ole a ed minimum empe a u e (Pea - son’s =0.52). As expec ed, he e was also a high co ela ion be ween cold ole ance and he minimum alue o ha diness (Pea son’s =0.79). O he co ela ions wo h men ioning we e hose ound be ween he ype o lea (coni e needle – b oad lea ) and whe he o no species a e gymnospe m (Pea son’s =0.98). Lea size a iables we e all closely co ela ed wi h each o he (Pea son’s =0.76 o wid h s a ea; 0.76 o a ea s leng h; 0.73 o wid h s leng h). Wi h all his a ia ion, he i s axis o he plan ai PCA accoun ed o 28 % o he o e all ai a i- a ion and i was mainly explained by an opposi e end be ween mini- mum ha diness, ha diness ange and he p esence o conspicuous lowe s. In addi ion, maximum ha diness and lea wid h was also dis ibu ed along he i s axis o a ia ion bu o e all had a less s a is- ical weigh . Shade and d ough ole ance we e pa ly ela ed o he second axis o he PCA in opposi e di ec ions (Fig. 1c). 3.2. Rela ionships be ween plan - ai p o iles and clima ic and socioeconomic cha ac e is ics A e educing model dimensionali y, wo clima ic a iables we e e ained o explain some a ia ion in he ai p o ile ac oss pa ks. These a iables we e he minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h, and he ange o empe a u es. The emaining p edic o s, hese a e, household size, ounding yea o he pa k and pa k a ea, did no explain any o he ai s selec ed as dependen a iables (Table 4). Speci ically, minimum and maximum plan ha diness as well as he p esence o conspicuous lowe s we e posi i ely ela ed o minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h. On he o he hand, ha diness ange and shade ole ance we e nega i ely ela ed o minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h (Fig. 2a). Simila ly, we obse ed a signi ican posi i e ela ionship be- ween he annual ange o empe a u es and he minimum and maximum ha diness (i.e. highe maximum ha diness alues means plan s a e less ole an o cold), while he ela ionship be ween he annual ange o empe a u es and he ole ance o shade was nega i e. Howe e , he e was no signi ican ela ionship be ween he annual Table 3 Numbe o woody o namen al plan species by s a us and g ow h o m in 46 u ban pa ks in 23 owns o Spain. T ees Sh ubs Palms A bo eal Cac i To al Na i e 59 26 1 0 86 Non-na i e no es ablished 154 85 30 1 270 Non-na i e es ablished 95 30 4 1 130 To al 308 141 35 2 486 ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 8 ange o empe a u es and he ha diness ange, no wi h he p esence o isual and conspicuous lowe s (Fig. 2b). In luence o plan - ai p o iles, clima ic and socioeconomic cha - ac e is ics on he p opo ion o non-na i e species O e all, he e is a g ea e p esence o non-na i e (39.2 ±4.15; mean ±se) han o na i e species (14.2 ±1.27; pai ed - es ; =7.475; p- alue <0.01; Fig. 3a) ac oss pa ks. Fo he case o non-na i e species, he numbe o species ha a e no known o ha e es ablished in na u al ecosys ems (21.15 ±2.06) is signi ican ly la ge han he numbe o es ablished species (18.02 ±2.27; pai ed - es ; =2.4393; p- alue = 0.0187; Fig. 3b). The p opo ion o non-na i e species and he p opo - ion o es ablished species a e bo h signi ican ly he e ogeneous ac oss pa ks (Chi-squa ed =132.98, and 148.17, espec i ely; p <0.01 in bo h cases). A e educing model dimensionali y, only one clima ic a iable (annual ange o empe a u e), wo socioeconomic a iables (mean o household size, and median age o inhabi an s) and one plan ai o he pa k p o ile ( ange o ha diness) explained he p opo ion o non-na i e species. The emaining p edic o s (pe cen age o ac i e popula ion, maximum ha diness, ounding yea o he pa k, and pa k a ea) did no explain any o he p opo ions selec ed as dependen a iables. The GLM analysis indica es (Table 5) a signi ican nega i e ela- ionship be ween annual ange o empe a u e and he p opo ion o es ablished species bu no wi h he p opo ion o non-na i e species (Fig. 4a). Rega ding socioeconomic a iables, mean o household size and median age bo h signi ican ly explained he p opo ion o non- na i e species bu no he p opo ion o es ablished species (Fig. 4b, c). Finally, a ia ion in ha diness ange o he pa k’s p o ile nega i ely explained he p opo ion o non-na i e species, bu i did no explain he p opo ion o es ablished species (Fig. 4d). 4. Discussion We ha e a poo unde s anding o he combina ion o plan ai s, clima e a iables and socioeconomic ac o s guiding he plan ing on non-na i e woody plan species in u ban pa ks. This knowledge is essen ial o iden i y how di e en d i e s in luence he success o non- na i e species om in oduc ion o in asion. He e, we p esen insigh s om a la ge ep esen a ion o u ban pa ks ac oss Spain showing ha hey ha bo a mo e non-na i e han na i e plan species. In e es ingly, his high p opo ion o non-na i e woody species (82.3 %) is no asso- cia ed wi h a pa icula se o axa. Ra he , Spanish pa ks p esen a high species u no e , meaning ha he as majo i y o woody plan species appea in one o e y ew pa ks, while e y ew species a e p esen in he majo i y o pa ks. The a e age pe cen age o non-na i e woody species in Spanish u ban pa ks is much highe han in Cen al Eu opean u ban lo as (Pyˇ sek, 1998), and many o he egions (Dangulla e al., 2019; de F ei as e al., 2019; Jha e al., 2019; Temple on e al., 2019), whe e he a e age ep esen a ion o non-na i e species is be ween 40 % and 50 %. In line wi h his inding, he pe cen age o non-na i e species a ailable in Spanish nu se ies is 76 % app oxima ely (Bay´ on and Vil` a, 2019). The small di e ence be ween he pe cen age in pa ks and nu se ies is p obably no signi ican , and can be due o he ac ha he s udy o Spanish nu se ies includes all ypes o plan g ow h o ms, while his s udy only ocus on woody species. Mo eo e , many plan s in pa ks a e no longe sold in Spanish nu se ies (Bay´ on and Vil` a, 2019) such as Buddleja madagasca iensis, Casua ina cunninghamiana, Elaeagnus pungens, F axinus pennsyl anica, Pa kinsonia aculea a, Pi ospo um undula um, Ricinus communis and Schinus molle. We ha e ound ha he plan ai composi ion o u ban pa ks can be explained by a combina ion o socioeconomic and clima ic a iables. We obse ed a ia ion in he p opo ion o species wi h conspicuous lowe s (which is a di ec p oxy o he pollina ion synd ome) ac oss u ban pa ks, and his a ia ion was explained by minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h. Species wi h en omophilous pollina ion end o be poo ly ole an o os , p obably due o he dependence o hei pollina ing insec s on milde empe a u es. Meanwhile, wind-pollina ed plan s ha e a wide ange o ole ance o os . Fo ins ance, oak species a e known o be os ole an , whe eas o he species like palms do no show he same adap a ions. The la e a e p edominan ly ound in owns wi h oceanic clima e, whe e os is a a e phenomenon. The pollina ion Table 4 Gene al Linea ized Models on plan ai s. A) Minimum ha diness Es ima e S d. E o alue P (>| |) (In e cep ) 1.5667 0.3541 4.4244 0.0001 *** Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h 0.0456 0.0071 6.4694 < 0.0001 *** Annual ange o empe a u e 0.0191 0.0048 3.9906 0.0003 *** Mean household size −0.0271 0.0448 −0.6033 0.5497 Founding yea o he pa k −0.0002 0.0002 −1.1550 0.2549 . A ea o he pa k −1.9019E- 07 1.2108E- 07 −1.5708 0.1241 B) Maximum ha diness Es ima e S d. E o alue P (>| |) (In e cep ) 2.1459 0.1665 12.8890 < 0.0001 *** Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h 0.0180 0.0033 5.4110 < 0.0001 *** Annual ange o empe a u e 0.0082 0.0023 3.6049 < 0.0001 *** Mean household size −0.0216 0.0209 −1.0313 0.3086 Founding yea o he pa k −0.0001 0.0001 −0.9207 0.3628 A ea o he pa k −1.8047E- 08 5.3817E- 08 −0.3353 0.7391 C) Range o ha diness Es ima e S d. E o alue P (>| |) (In e cep ) 1.2575 0.4182 3.0068 0.0045 ** Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h −0.0288 0.0084 −3.4244 0.0014 ** Annual ange o empe a u e −0.0080 0.0057 −1.3926 0.1714 Mean household size −0.0304 0.0513 −0.5929 0.5566 Founding yea o he pa k 0.0001 0.0002 0.6964 0.4902 A ea o he pa k 6.0555E- 08 1.2795E- 07 0.4733 0.6386 D) Tole ance o shade Es ima e S d. E o alue P (>| |) (In e cep ) 2.0327 0.5283 3.8473 0.0004 *** Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h −0.0376 0.0107 −3.5268 0.0011 ** Annual ange o empe a u e −0.0320 0.0072 −4.4644 0.0001 *** Mean household size 0.0829 0.0687 1.2063 0.2348 Founding yea o he pa k −0.0003 0.0002 −1.3355 0.1893 A ea o he pa k −1.2227E- 07 1.6867E- 07 −0.7249 0.4727 E) P esence o conspicuous lowe s Es ima e S d. E o alue P (>| |) (In e cep ) −3.3205 1.1389 −2.9156 0.0058 ** Minimum empe a u e o he coldes mon h 0.0815 0.0220 3.7109 0.0006 *** Annual ange o empe a u e 0.0273 0.0146 1.8666 0.0693 . Mean household size 0.1330 0.1388 0.9586 0.3435 Founding yea o he pa k 0.0008 0.0005 1.5061 0.1399 A ea o he pa k −3.0225E- 07 3.8541E- 07 −0.7842 0.4375 Gene alized linea models o he i e plan ai s selec ed as dependen a iables, e sus clima ic and socioeconomic a iables p eselec ed by lasso eg ession (Table A4.1 om Appendix 4) as independen a iables. ** 0.001 <p ≤0.01. *** p ≤0.001, o he wise non signi ican . G aphical ep esen a ion in Fig. 2. ´ A. Bay´ on e al. U ban Fo es y & U ban G eening 63 (2021) 127215 9 synd ome can change in u ban lo as depending on hei na i e and non- na i e o igin. Fo ins ance, A onson e al. (2007) documen ed ha conspicuous lowe s, ha ends o be beau i ul, di e in hei pollina ion equi emen s; howe e , we did no ind his pa e n in ou s udy. Di - e ences be ween esul s migh be ela ed o he ac ha he s udy o A onson e al. (2007) was conduc ed in si es wi h simila en i onmen al condi ions, while ou s udy includes owns wi h a wide ange o clima es om con inen al o Medi e anean, and om inland o oceanic clima ic condi ions. Besides cold ac ing as a il e o ep oduc ion synd omes, we ound ha he ole ance o shade inc eased wi h highe minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h and wi h wide he mal ange. In egions wi h an oceanic clima e, such as he no he n coas , win e s a e milde and cloudiness is mo e equen and las s longe , especially in he summe mon hs, han in he es o Spain. Howe e , in egions whe e he clima e is mo e con inen al, as in he pla eaus, win e s a e colde and summe s a e no only ho e bu also e y sunny wi h high e apo anspi a ion a es (AEMET, 2019). These di e ences a e likely o cing plan species selec ed o be plan ed in oceanic clima es o be mo e ole an o inso- la ion, educing lea a ea o a oid wa e loss, while plan s wi h la ge lea es end o be dis ibu ed in a eas wi h highe wa e a ailabili y and lowe i adiance (Holmg en e al., 2012; Ma kes eijn and Poo e , 2009). Finally, he minimum and maximum ha diness alues o he plan s we e di ec ly ela ed o bo h minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h and highe annual anges o empe a u e. This is indeed an ob ious ela ionship, as ha diness is a p oxy o he ole ance o low empe a u es (S´ anchez de Lo enzo-C´ ace es, 2004; USDA, 2012), and i ep esen s a p ima y ac o in selec ing which species a e plan ed. Speci ically, hose species wi h high ole ance o cold, a e usually no plan ed in wa m places e en i hey could su i e he e. This explana- ion is suppo ed by he ac ha he ange o ha diness dec eases wi h he minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h. These esul s sugges he e is a ade-o be ween species ha ole a e shade and hose ha ha e conspicuous lowe s, as well as wi h hose ha ha e highe ha diness alues. We expec ed ha di e ences ac oss pa ks be ween he p opo ion o Fig. 2. Rela ionship o i e plan ai s o (A) he minimum empe a u e in he coldes mon h and (B) he annual ange o empe a u e. Gene alized linea models (GLMs) o plan ai s e sus minimum empe a u e in coldes mon h and annual ange o empe a u e. The con inuous ai a iables (i. e. minimum ha diness, maximum ha diness, ange o ha diness [scale 1–12], and shade ole ance [scale 1–5]) is shown on he main y axis (le side o he g aph), while he scale o he unique bina y ai a i- able (i.e. p esence o conspicuous lowe ), con e ed o p opo ion o species ha ing pe pa k, is shown on he seconda y y axis ( igh side). * 0.01 <p ≤0.05, ** 0.001 <p ≤0.01, *** p ≤0.001, o he wise non- signi ican . P- alues in Table 4. (Fo in e p e a ion o he e e ences o colou in his igu e legend, he eade is e e ed o he web e sion o his a icle). ´ A. Bay´ on e al.