scieee Open visual document viewer

Protein turn over as a component in the light/dark regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase protein-serine kinase activity in C4 plants

Jiao, J.; Echevarría Ruiz de Vargas, Cristina; Vidal, J.; Chollet, R.

Abstract

Maize leaf phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase [PEPC; orthophosphate:oxaloacetate carboxy-lyase (phosphorylating), EC 4.1.1.31] protein-serine kinase (PEPC-PK) phosphorylates serine-15 of its target enzyme, thus leading to an increase in catalytic activity and a concomitant decrease in malate sensitivity of this cytoplasmic C4 photosynthesis enzyme in the light. We have recently demonstrated that the PEPC-PK activity in maize leaves is slowly, but strikingly, increased in the light and decreased in darkness. In this report, we provide evidence that cycloheximide, an inhibitor of cytoplasmic protein synthesis, when fed to detached leaves of C4 monocots (maize, sorghum) and dicots (Portulaca oleracea) in the dark or light, completely prevents the in vivo light activation of PEPC-PK activity regardless of whether the protein kinase activity is assessed in vivo or in vitro. In contrast, chloramphenicol, an inhibitor of protein synthesis in chloroplasts, has no effect on the light activation of maize PEPC-PK. Similarly, treatment with cycloheximide did not influence the light activation of other photosynthesis-related enzymes in maize, including cytoplasmic sucrose-phosphate synthase and chloroplast stromal NADPH-malate dehydrogenase and pyruvate, Pi dikinase. These and related results, in which detached maize leaves were treated simultaneously with cycloheximide and microcystin-LR, a potent in vivo and in vitro inhibitor of the PEPC type 2A protein phosphatase, indicate that short-term protein turnover of the PEPC-PK itself or some other essential component(s) (e.g., a putative protein that modifies this kinase activity) is one of the primary levels in the complex and unique regulatory cascade effecting the reversible light activation/seryl phosphorylation of PEPC in the mesophyll cytoplasm of C4 plants.

Full text

P oc. Nadl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 2712-2715, Ap il 1991 Bo any P o ein u no e as a componen in he ligh /da k egula ion o phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase p o ein-se ine kinase ac i i y in C4 plan s ( egula o y phospho yla ion/C4 pho osyn hesis/ligh ac i a ion/p o ein kinase/cycloheximide) JIN-AN JIAO*, CRISTINA ECHEVARR A* , JEAN VIDAL , AND RAYMOND CHOLLET*§ *Depa men o Biochemis y, Uni e si y o Neb aska-Lincoln, Eas Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583-0718; Labo a o io de Fisiologia Vege al, Facul ad de Biolog a, Uni e sidad de Se illa, A enida de la Reina Me cedes s/n, 41012, Se illa, Spain; and Labo a oi e de Physiologie V6gd ale Mol6culai e, Uni 6 de Reche che Associde Cen e Na ional de la Reche che Scien i ique 1128, Uni e si de Pa is-Sud, Cen e d'O say, Bi imen 430, O say-Cedex, F ance Communica ed by William L. Og en, Janua y 3, 1991 ( ecei ed o e iew No embe 13, 1990) ABSTRACT Maize lea phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase [PEPC; o hophospha e:oxaloace a e ca boxy-lyase (phospho- yla ing), EC 4.1.1.311 p o ein-se ine kinase (PEPC-PK) phos- pho yla es se ine-15 o i s a ge enzyme, hus leading o an inc ease in ca aly ic ac i i y and a concomi an dec ease in mala e sensi i i y o his cy oplasmic C4 pho osyn hesis enzyme in he ligh . We ha e ecen ly demons a ed ha he PEPC-PK ac i i y in maize lea es is slowly, bu s ikingly, inc eased in he ligh and dec eased in da kness. In his epo , we p o ide e idence ha cycloheximide, an inhibi o o cy oplasmic p o- ein syn hesis, when ed o de ached lea es o C4 monoco s (maize, so ghum) and dico s (Po ulaca ole acea) in he da k o ligh , comple ely p e en s he in i o ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y ega dless o whe he he p o ein kinase ac i i y is assessed in i o o in i o. In con as , chlo am- phenicol, an inhibi o o p o ein syn hesis in chlo oplas s, has no e ec on he ligh ac i a ion o maize PEPC-PK. Simila ly, ea men wi h cycloheximide did no in luence he ligh ac i- a ion o o he pho osyn hesis- ela ed enzymes in maize, in- cluding cy oplasmic suc ose-phospha e syn hase and chlo o- plas s omal NADPH-mala e dehyd ogenase and py u a e,P; dikinase. These and ela ed esul s, in which de ached maize lea es we e ea ed simul aneously wi h cycloheximide and mic ocys in-LR, a po en in i o and in i o inhibi o o he PEPC ype 2A p o ein phospha ase, indica e ha sho - e m p o ein u no e o he PEPC-PK i sel o some o he essen ial componen (s) (e.g., a pu a i e p o ein ha modi ies his kinase ac i i y) is one o he p ima y le els in he complex and unique egula o y cascade e ec ing he e e sible ligh ac i a- ion/se yl phospho yla ion o PEPC in he mesophyll cy o- plasm o C4 plan s. Ligh e e sibly ac i a es a numbe o pho osyn hesis- ela ed enzymes in plan s ia se e al di e en mechanisms (1-4). Among hese is he ligh ac i a ion o lea cy oplasmic phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase [PEPC; o hophos- pha e:oxaloace a e ca boxy-lyase (phospho yla ing), EC 4.1.1.31] in C4 plan s by e e sible p o ein phospho yla ion (5, 6). P e ious in i o (7, 8) and in i o (9) s udies wi h maize lea PEPC demons a ed ha he phospho yla ion o a single, N- e minal se yl esidue (Se -15) leads o an inc ease in ca aly ic ac i i y and a dec ease in eedback inhibi ion o he a ge enzyme by L-mala e. Rela ed indings om a econ- s i u ed phospho yla ion sys em indica ed ha he ac i i y o he p o ein-se ine kinase ha ca alyzes his egula o y phos- pho yla ion o PEPC is no a ec ed by a numbe o pu a i e, ligh -modula ed cy oplasmic e ec o s (e.g., educed hio e- doxin h, Ca2+, PPj, uc ose 2,6-bisphospha e) and au ophos- pho yla ion (6, 7). Howe e , mo e ecen wo k has es ab- lished ha he phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase p o ein- se ine kinase (PEPC-PK) is ac i a ed by ligh and inac i a ed by da kness in i o (10). Mo eo e , his s iking egula o y p ocess appea s independen o SH s a us, Ca2l le els, and a pu a i e, igh -binding PEPC-PK e ec o (10). One o he dis inguishing ea u es o he e e sible ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK and i s a ge enzyme, PEPC, in C4 plan s is i s sluggishness in i o; when compa ed o he in i o ac i a ion o pho o egula ed mesophyll chlo oplas s omal enzymes such as py u a e,Pi dikinase (PPDK) and NADPH- mala e dehyd ogenase (MDH) (2, 6), he o me a e bo h ela i ely slow p ocesses, aking up o 1 h , a he han minu es, o comple ion (10-12). To gain mo e insigh in o his di e ence and he speci ic mechanism(s) by which he PEPC-PK ac i i y in i o is slowly, bu s ikingly, inc eased in he ligh and dec eased in da kness (10), de ached maize lea es we e ed wo widely used inhibi o s o p o ein syn- hesis. PEPC-PK ac i i y was subsequen ly assessed ei he in i o [mala e IC50 alues o inhibi ion o he a ge enzyme (11, 12)] o in i o [32p phospho yla ion o pu i ied da k- o m PEPC (7, 10)]. Whe eas chlo amphenicol (CAP), a 70S ibo- some-speci ic inhibi o o chlo oplas ic p o ein syn hesis, had no e ec on he ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK, cyclohex- imide (CHX), an inhibi o o cy oplasmic p o ein syn hesis, comple ely blocked he ligh ac i a ion o his p o ein-se ine kinase. In con as , he in i o ac i a ion o se e al o he pho o egula ed cy oplasmic [suc ose-phospha e syn hase (SPS)] and chlo oplas ic (PPDK, MDH) pho osyn hesis- ela ed enzymes was no in luenced by CHX ea men . These esul s indica e ha he syn hesis and deg ada ion o PEPC-PK pe se o some o he essen ial componen (s) a e in ol ed a one o he p ima y le els in he egula o y cascade e ec ing he e e sible ligh ac i a ion/se yl phos- pho yla ion o PEPC in he mesophyll cy oplasm o C4 plan s. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ma e ials. Maize (Zea mays L., c . Golden C oss Ban am) plan s we e g own as desc ibed (7, 10). [y-32P]ATP [speci ic ac i i y, 3000 Ci (111 TBq)/mmol] was pu chased om Ame sham. Da k- o m maize lea PEPC was pu i ied by he p ocedu e desc ibed (7, 8). All biochemical eagen s we e ob ained om Sigma excep o mic ocys in-LR (MC) (Cal- Abb e ia ions: PEPC, phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase; PEPC- PK, phosphoenolpy u a e ca boxylase p o ein-se ine kinase; SPS, suc ose-phospha e syn hase; PPDK, py u a e,P1 dikinase; MDH, NADPH-mala e dehyd ogenase; CHX, cycloheximide; CAP, chlo - amphenicol; MC, mic ocys in-LR. §To whom ep in eques s should be add essed a : Uni e si y o Neb aska-Lincoln, Depa men o Biochemis y, 210 BcH, Eas Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583-0718. 2712 The publica ion cos s o his a icle we e de ayed in pa by page cha ge paymen . This a icle mus he e o e be he eby ma ked "ad e isemen " in acco dance wi h 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely o indica e his ac . P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 2713 biochem). S ock solu ions o 10 mM CHX and 310 mM CAP we e p epa ed in absolu e e hanol, while 0.5 mM MC was dissol ed in 20% ( ol/ ol) me hanol. Feeding o P o ein Syn hesis and P o ein Phospha ase In- hibi o s. P eillumina ed lea es (-2 g esh w each) om 4- o 6-week-old maize plan s we e excised unde wa e , in- se ed in o 150-ml beake s con aining 100 ml o dis illed wa e (con ol), 5 ILM CHX, 310 ,uM CAP, o 10 nM MC in wa e and main ained a oom empe a u e. When eeding was done in he da k, he beake s we e placed in a da kened ume hood o e nigh . The da k sample was hen p epa ed om hese lea es and he co esponding ligh sample was collec ed a e a 90-min illumina ion o he issue. When eeding was done in he ligh , de ached con ol lea es ha had been p eillumi- na ed o 1.5 h in wa e we e ei he main ained in wa e o ed inhibi o s o 4 h in con inued ligh , ollowed by p ep- a a ion o lea ex ac s. Illumina ion was p o ided by a o ced-ai cooled 300-W, low- empe a u e lamp a an inciden ligh in ensi y o 600-800 /iE m 2 s-' (E, eins ein) (400-700 nm). P epa a ion o Lea Ex ac s. Samples (0.3 g esh w ) om he con ol o inhibi o - ea ed lea ma e ial we e chopped and g ound a 40C in a p echilled mo a con aining washed sand, 2% (w / ol) insoluble poly inylpy olidone, and 1.5 ml o he app op ia e ex ac ion bu e . Bu e A [0.1 M T is HC1, pH 8.0/20% ( ol/ ol) glyce ol/10 mM MgCl2/14 mM 2-me cap oe hanol/1 mM EDTA] was used o p epa- a ion o PEPC and i s p o ein-se ine kinase; bu e B (bu e A plus 2 mM py u a e) was used o PPDK; bu e C (50 mM Mops-NaOH, pH 7.5/15 mM MgCl2/2.5 mM di hio h ei ol/1 mM EDTA/0.1% T i on X-100) was used o SPS; and bu e D (0.1 M T is-HCl, pH 8.0/1 mM EDTA/14 mM 2-me cap- oe hanol) was used o MDH. The c ude lea homogena es we e il e ed h ough an 80-, m nylon ne and cen i uged o 1.5 min a 8700 x g. The supe na an luid was ei he used immedia ely (PPDK, MDH) o a e a 0.2-ml aliquo was apidly desal ed a 4°C on a Sephadex G-25 column (1 x 5 cm) equilib a ed wi h 0.1 M T is-HCI, pH 7.5/10 mM MgCI2/20% ( ol/ ol) glyce ol o PEPC and PEPC-PK o bu e C minus T i on X-100 o SPS. Ac i i y Assays. PEPC ac i i y was de e mined spec o- pho ome ically a 340 nm and 30°C. The assay mix u e (12) con ained, in a o al ol o 1 ml, 50 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.3), 2.5 mM phosphoenolpy u a e, 5 mM MgCI2, 1 mM NaHCO3, 0.2 mM NADH, 10 uni s o mala e dehyd ogenase, a ious concen a ions o L-mala e, and 10 ,ul o desal ed ex ac (added las ). Mala e IC50 alues we e aken as he mala e concen a ion equi ed o 50%o inhibi ion o PEPC ac i i y unde hese assay condi ions. PEPC-PK ac i i y was mea- su ed by 32p inco po a ion om [y32P]ATP in o pu i ied da k- o m PEPC (10). The phospho yla ion mix u e con- ained 35 ,ul o desal ed ex ac , 10 ug o pu i ied da k- o m maize PEPC, an adenyla e kinase inhibi o plus a c ea ine kinase/phosphoc ea ine ADP-sca enging sys em (10), 25 ,uM ATP, and 3 ,Ci o [y-32P]ATP in a inal ol o 60 p1. A e 45 min o incuba ion a 30°C, he eac ion was s opped by adding 20 ,ud o SDS sample bu e (0.25 M T is-HCl, pH 6.8/8% SDS/40o glyce ol/20% 2-me cap oe hanol), ol- lowed by immedia e boiling o 2 min. Ve ical SDS/PAGE was pe o med as desc ibed (13, 14), and au o adiog aphs we e p epa ed om he d ied gels wi h Kodak X-Oma AR ilm and wo Ligh ning Plus in ensi ying sc eens (DuPon ) a -800C. SPS, PPDK, and MDH ac i i ies we e measu ed acco ding o e . 15 (a limi ing subs a e concen a ions plus 10 mM P1 a 250C), e . 16 ( o wa d di ec ion plus 2.5 mM glucose 6-phospha e and 2 uni s o pu i ied maize PEPC a 300C), and e . 17 a 30TC, espec i ely. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION E ec s o CHX, CAP, and MC on he Ligh -Induced Changes in Mala e Sensi i i y o Maize Lea PEPC. The IC50 alues o PEPC inhibi ion by L-mala e we e used as an indi ec means o ollowing he e ec o da k o ligh ansi- ions on he appa en in i o ac i i y o he PEPC-PK since hese alues e lec he se yl-phospho yla ion s a us o he a ge enzyme bo h in i o (7, 8) and in i o in esponse o ligh and da k (9-12). Feeding 5 ,uM CHX o de ached p eillumina ed maize lea es in he da k o e nigh comple ely and ep oducibly p e en ed he subsequen ligh -induced inc ease in he mala e IC50 alue o PEPC wi hou ha ing any signi ican e ec on he da k- o m enzyme (Table 1). In con as , CAP ea men had no e ec on he ligh -induced changes in mala e sensi i i y o PEPC (Table 1). O e nigh eeding o 5 AM CHX in he da k o p eda kened maize lea es had he same inhibi o y e ec on ligh ac i a ion o PEPC. Resul s simila o hose p esen ed in Table 1 we e ob ained when de ached lea es o so ghum, ano he C4 g ass, and hal ed lea es o Po ulaca ole acea, a C4 dico , we e ed CHX (da a no shown). Gi en ha such inhibi o s a e known no o be absolu ely speci ic, hus possibly causing de imen al side e ec s (18), and ha he 3-(3 ,4-dichlo ophenyl)-1, 1-dime hylu ea- sensi i e ligh ac i a ion/phospho yla ion o PEPC occu s in he cy oplasm and is somehow ela ed o pho osyn he ic elec on anspo and/o pho ophospho yla ion (5, 6, 19), i was impe a i e o examine he e ec o CHX ea men on he in i o ligh ac i a ion o o he pho osyn hesis- ela ed enzymes in maize. Cy oplasmic SPS and chlo oplas s omal PPDK a e, like PEPC, ligh -ac i a ed by e e sible phos- pho yla ion/dephospho yla ion cycles (2, 3, 6, 15, 20). In con as , s omal MDH is ligh ac i a ed by 3-(3,4- dichlo ophenyl)-1,1-dime hylu ea-sensi i e changes in i s SH edox s a us media ed by noncyclic elec on low and he chlo oplas ic e edoxin/ hio edoxin m sys em (1, 2, 17, 21). No ably, he esul s (Table 2) indica e ha he ligh ac i a ion o hese h ee enzymes was no signi ican ly a ec ed by eeding 5 A&M CHX o de ached maize lea es unde condi- ions iden ical o hose desc ibed in Table 1. Simila ly, CHX ea men o de ached lea es had no ob ious e ec on ei he hei o al soluble p o ein con en (mg/g esh w ) o poly- pep ide pa e n (e.g., see Fig. lA, lane 2 e sus 3 and lane 5 e sus 6) o e he du a ion o hese ela i ely sho - e m expe imen s. Thus, he inhibi o y e ec o CHX on he appa en in i o ac i i y o he PEPC-PK (Table 1) appea s a he selec i e o he ligh ac i a ion o his speci ic con- e e enzyme. F om he esul s desc ibed abo e, i is clea ha de no o syn hesis o PEPC-PK o some o he essen ial componen (s) (e.g., a pu a i e modi ying p o ein ha ac i a es his p o ein- se ine kinase in i o) is induced du ing a 1.5-h exposu e o ligh . Thus, i was an icipa ed ha i CHX we e ed o illumina ed de ached lea issue a e a poin a which su i- cien p o ein (i.e., ei he PEPC-PK o he pu a i e modi ying Table 1. E ec s o p o ein syn hesis inhibi o s on ligh -induced inc ease in he mala e IC50 alue o maize lea PEPC Mala e IC50, mM Inhibi o Ligh (L) Da k (D) L/D None (con ol) 0.45 0.18 2.5 CHX 0.20 0.17 1.2 CAP 0.46 0.18 2.6 P eillumina ed maize lea es we e excised and ed wa e (con ol), 5 gM CHX, o 310 jLM CAP in he da k o e nigh . Da k- o m PEPC ex ac s we e hen p epa ed om hese lea es and he co esponding ligh - o m ex ac s we e made a e a 90-min illumina ion o he issue. Bo any: Jiao e al. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) Table 2. E ec s o CHX ea men on in i o ligh ac i a ion o SPS, PPDK, and MDH in de ached maize lea es Ligh /da k ac i i y a io Enzyme Con ol* + 5 IAM CHX SWP 6.5 5.5 PPDK 7.0 6.9 MDH 11.7 12.7 See Table 1 and Ma e ials and Me hods o expe imen al de ails. *The ligh -ac i a ed ac i i ies (in ,&mol pe min pe mg o soluble p o ein) o SPS, PPDK, and MDH we e 0.14, 0.43, and 0.16, espec i ely. Ac i i y was de e mined a limi ing subs a e concen a ions in he p esence o he inhibi o Pi (15). p o ein) had al eady been syn hesized in he ligh so ha PEPC was phospho yla ed and in i s high mala e IC50 o m, con inued illumina ion o he inhibi o - ed issue would main- ain he a ge enzyme in i s high ac i a ion (phospho yla ion) s a e. This easoning assumes ha he ac i i y o he PEPC ype 2A p o ein phospha ase (22) is ela i ely low in he ligh and/o ha apid deg ada ion o he newly syn hesized PEPC-PK o pu a i e modi ying p o ein does no ake place in he ligh . Howe e , when p eillumina ed (1.5 h in he ligh ) con ol lea issue was placed in wa e o 5 ,M CHX and main ained in he ligh o an addi ional 4 h , he mala e IC50 alue emained cons an in he absence o he inhibi o bu dec eased o a le el cha ac e is ic o da k- o m PEPC in he p esence o CHX (Table 3). These da a sugges ha (i) he PEPC ype 2A p o ein phospha ase is ac i e in he ligh , and (ii) he e is ne u no e o he PEPC-PK o pu a i e modi- ying p o ein in he ligh in he absence o i s syn hesis, he eby leading o a ne dephospho yla ion o PEPC and he esul ing dec ease in i s mala e IC50 alue. Based on hese obse a ions and sugges ions, a mo e c i ical and e ealing expe imen was designed. Con ol de ached lea es ha had been p eillumina ed o 1.5 h we e ed 5 AsM CHX and 10 nM MC, alone and in combina ion, o 4 h in he ligh . This la e cyclic hep apep ide is a po en and speci ic inhibi o o plan and animal ype 1 and 2A p o ein phospha ases bo h in i o and in i o (23-25). In he absence o he p o ein syn hesis inhibi o , bo h he con ol and MC- ea ed illumina ed issue main ained PEPC in i s high mala e IC50 o m (Table 3). In con as , in he p esence o CHX alone, he ac i a ion (phospho yla ion) s a e o he a ge enzyme collapsed back o a mala e IC50 alue cha ac e is ic o he da k- o m enzyme (see abo e and Table 3). Howe e , in he p esence o bo h inhibi o s, he CHX-induced dec ease in he mala e IC50 alue was la gely p e en ed, clea ly indica ing ha he p o- ein phospha ase ha dephospho yla es ligh - o m PEPC in i o emains o ally ac i e in he ligh and is o he ype 1 o ype 2A class (23-25), as p e iously implica ed by in i o s udies (22). Thus, he egula o y phospho yla ion s a us o PEPC is mainly de e mined by i s ligh -ac i a ed p o ein- se ine kinase (10), he la e o which appea s o be ligh /da k Table 3. E ec s o p o ein syn hesis and p o ein phospha ase inhibi o s on he main enance o he high mala e IC50 o m o PEPC in he ligh Inhibi o (s) Mala e IC50, mM None (con ol) 0.46 CHX 0.17* MC 0.42 CHX + MC 0.35 De ached con ol lea es, p eillumina ed o 1.5 h in wa e , we e A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 modula ed by he ela i e a es o i s syn hesis and deg ada- ion in he cy oplasm o bo h C4 monoco s (maize, so ghum) and dico s (P. ole acea). E ec s o P o ein Syn hesis Inhibi o s on PEPC-PK Ac i i y. One ques ion a ising om he mala e-sensi i i y expe imen s desc ibed abo e (Tables 1 and 3) is whe he CHX inhibi s he appa en in i o PEPC-PK ac i i y by di ec in e ac ion wi h his con e e enzyme, a pu a i e modi ying p o ein, o PEPC pe se. To add ess his and o he issues, in i o 32P phospho yla ion assays o PEPC-PK ac i i y we e pe o med wi h apidly p epa ed, desal ed lea ex ac s and pu i ied da k- o m PEPC as he p o ein subs a e (10). Fig. 1 shows he e ec o CHX and CAP on ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y when he inhibi o s we e ed o p eillumina ed de- ached maize lea es in da kness o e nigh . While he ac i i y o he PEPC-PK is low in da kness and high in he ligh o he con ol (10) and CAP- ea ed issue (c . lane 2 e sus 5 and lane 4 e sus 7, espec i ely, in Fig. 1B), eeding 5 juM CHX comple ely p e en ed his s iking ligh ac i a ion o he p o ein-se ine kinase (c . lane 3 e sus 6 in Fig 1B). When ei he CHX (5 gM) o CAP (310 LM) was added di ec ly o he phospho yla ion assay mix u e con aining he desal ed ex ac om he illumina ed con ol lea issue, no in i o inhibi ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y was obse ed (c . lanes 5, 8, and 9 in Fig. 1B). Simila ly, when de ached con ol lea es, p eillumina ed o 1.5 h in wa e , we e ed CHX (5 juM) o an addi ional 4 h in he ligh , PEPC-PK ac i i y was o ally inhibi ed (c . lanes 2 and 4 e sus lane 3 in Fig. 2B). The p esence o bo h CHX and MC also led o a comple e inhibi ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y (Fig. 2B, lane 5), e en hough he mala e IC50 alue o he endogenous PEPC was ela i ely PEPC=_. _ - PPDK B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PEPC- FIG. 1. Ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y and he e ec s o p o ein syn hesis inhibi o s in i o and in i o. P eillumina ed maize lea es we e de ached and ed wa e , 5 ,uM CHX, o 310 ,uM CAP in he da k o e nigh . The da k- o m PEPC-PK was ex ac ed be o e illumina ion o hese lea es and he co esponding ligh - o m p o ein kinase was ex ac ed a e a 90-min illumina ion (c . Table 1). PEPC-PK ac i i y in desal ed lea ex ac s was de e mined by 32P phospho yla ion o pu i ied da k- o m PEPC as desc ibed in Ma e- ials and Me hods and in e . 10. (A) SDS gel s ained wi h Coomassie blue R-250. (B) Co esponding au o adiog aph o A. Desal ed ex- ac s we e p epa ed om da kened (lanes 2-4) and illumina ed (lanes 5-9) lea issue ed wa e (lanes 2, 5, 8, and 9), 5 ,.M CHX (lanes 3 and 6), o 310 ,uM CAP (lanes 4 and 7). Lanes 8 and 9, expe imen s in which 5 ,uM CHX and 310 ,uM CAP, espec i ely, we e added di ec ly o he in i o assay mix u e o PEPC-PK ac i i y ex ac ed om illumina ed con ol lea issue. Lane 1, pu i ied da k- o m PEPC. The 43-kDa c ea ine kinase monome [* (see e . 10)] and he 95-kDa PPDK and 110-kDa PEPC subuni s a e indica ed in A. A ows in B poin o o he ligh -enhanced bu CHX-insensi i e phosphop o eins. subsequen ly main ained in wa e (con ol) o edS ,uM CHX, 10 nM MC, o bo h o an addi ional 4 h in he ligh be o e ex ac ion and assay o PEPC ac i i y wi h o wi hou L-mala e. *Da k- o m PEPC has a mala e IC50 alue o -0.2 mM (see Table 1). 2714 Bo any: Jiao e al. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 2715 A 1 2 3 4 5 PEPC-u* -*i a" PPDK- B 2 3 4 5 Al ; I'liL F ..V FIG. 2. E ec s o CHX and MC on PEPC-PK ac i i y when ed o .4 h in he ligh o de ached con ol lea es ha had been p eillumina ed o 1.5 h in wa e be o e ea men (c . Table 3). PEPC-PK was assayed by 32p phospho yla ion o pu i ied da k- o m PEPC as desc ibed in Ma e ials and Me hods and in e . 10. (A) SDS gel s ained wi h Coomassie blue R-250. (B) Co esponding au o a- diog aph o A. Desal ed ex ac s we e p epa ed om p eillumina ed con ol lea issue ha was main ained in wa e (lanes 2) o ed 5 JLM CHX (lanes 3), 10 nM MC (lanes 4), o 5 IAM CHX plus 10 nM MC (lanes 5) o an addi ional 4 h in he ligh . Lane 1, pu i ied da k- o m PEPC. The c ea ine kinase (*), PPDK, and PEPC monome s a e indica ed in A. high unde hese condi ions (Table 3). These collec i e ind- ings u he suppo he iew ha he PEPC ype 2A p o ein phospha ase(s) (22) emains ully ac i e in he ligh , e en in he p esence o CHX, and is e ec i ely inhibi ed by nano- mola concen a ions o MC in i o. Excep in he p esence o bo h CHX and MC, whene e he in i o PEPC-PK ac i i y was low, so was he mala e IC50 alue o he endogenous PEPC om he co esponding lea issue and ice e sa (c . Table 1 e sus Fig. 1B and Table 3 e sus Fig. 2B). I is no able ha while he in i o ligh ac i a ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y is comple ely inhibi ed by eeding CHX o de ached lea es (Fig. 1B), o he soluble lea p o eins ha a e phospho yla ed in i o by endogenous p o ein kinases a e no a ec ed by such ea men ; his includes e en hose polypep ides whose in i o phospho yla ion s a us is g ea e in he ligh han in he da k ex ac s (see a ows in Fig. 1B). The e o e, i is e iden om he p esen s udy ha he inhibi o y e ec o his cy oplasmic p o ein syn hesis inhib- i o is qui e speci ic o he PEPC-PK o some o he essen ial componen (s) (e.g., i s pu a i e modi ying p o ein), wi hou ha ing signi ican e ec s on o he p o ein kinase and/o p o ein phospha ase ac i i ies (Fig. 1B) and ligh -ac i a ion sys ems (Table 2). CONCLUDING REMARKS The p esen s udy demons a es ha he in i o ligh /da k egula ion o PEPC-PK ac i i y in C4 lea es (10) in ol es ne de no o cy oplasmic p o ein syn hesis in he ligh and sub- sequen deg ada ion in da kness. A p esen , i is no known wha essen ial componen (s)-e.g., PEPC-PK i sel o a pu a i e modi ying p o ein-is he a ge o his unique ligh -modula ion sys em. The inc easingly complex PEPC egula o y cascade, in ol ing a leas p o ein syn hesis/ deg ada ion and phospho yla ion/dephospho yla ion cycles, is o ally di e en om o he well-known mechanisms o e e sible ligh ac i a ion o pho osyn hesis- ela ed enzymes (1-4, 6, 15) and may well explain why he ligh /da k modu- la ion o PEPC-PK (10) and i s a ge enzyme PEPC (11, 12, 19) is so much slowe han ha o o he pho oac i a ed enzymes (e.g., PPDK, MDH). I is ob ious ha u he pu i ica ion o he PEPC-PK (7) and he subsequen p oduc- ion o monospeci ic an ibodies agains his p o ein will elucida e whe he , indeed, his speci ic enzyme is he a ge o his unique, p o ein u no e -based egula o y sys em. In addi ion, ou indings aise se e al in e es ing ques ions as o how pho osyn hesis- ela ed (5, 6, 19) ligh and da k signals so speci ically in luence cy oplasmic p o ein syn he- sis and deg ada ion, espec i ely, and whe he sho - e m p o ein u no e is, like o he pos ansla ional co alen modi ica ions, a gene al mechanism o egula ing enzyme ac i i y in plan s in esponse o ex e nal and in e nal s imuli. Clea ly, ou esul s indica e ha his is p obably no he case wi h espec o he ligh -ac i a ion sys ems associa ed wi h o he pho osyn hesis- ela ed cy oplasmic and s omal en- zymes. We hank Ms. Shi ley Condon o he excellen echnical assis - ance. This esea ch was suppo ed in pa by G an s DMB-8704237 and DCB-9017726 om he Na ional Science Founda ion (R.C.) and by he Labo a o io de Fisiologia Vege al a Se illa Uni e si y (C.E.) and is published as jou nal se ies no. 9418 o he Uni e si y o Neb aska Ag icul u al Resea ch Di ision. 1. Csdke, C. & Buchanan, B. B. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Ac a 853, 43-63. 2. Edwa ds, G. E., Nakamo o, H., Bu nell, J. N. & Ha ch, M. D. (1985) Annu. Re . Plan Physiol. 36, 255-286. 3. Budde, R. J. A. & Randall, D. D. (1990) Plan Physiol. 94, 1501-1504. 4. Sal ucci, M. E. (1989) Physiol. Plan . 77, 164-171. 5. Jiao, J.-A. & Cholle , R. (1991) Plan Physiol. 95, 981-985. 6. Cholle , R., Budde, R. J. A., Jiao, J.-A. & Roeske, C. A. (1990) in Cu en Resea ch in Pho osyn hesis, ed. Bal sche sky, M. (Kluwe , Do d ech , The Ne he lands), Vol. 4, pp. 135-142. 7. Jiao, J.-A. & Cholle , R. (1989) A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 269, 526-535. 8. Jiao, J.-A. & Cholle , R. (1990) A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 283, 300-305. 9. Jiao, J.-A., Vidal, J., Eche a a, C. & Cholle , R. (1991) Plan Physiol. 96, in p ess. 10. Eche a ia, C., Vidal, J., Jiao, J.-A. & Cholle , R. (1990) FEBS Le . 275, 25-28. 11. Nimmo, G. A., McNaugh on, G. A. L., Fewson, C. A., Wil- kins, M. B. & Nimmo, H. G. (1987) FEBS Le . 213, 18-22. 12. Jiao, J.-A. & Cholle , R. (1988) A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 261, 409-417. 13. Eche a a, C., Vidal, J., LeMa echal, P., B ul e , J., Ran- je a, R. & Gadal, P. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 155, 835-840. 14. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Na u e (London) 227, 680-685.. 15. Hube , J. L. A., Hube , S. C. & Nielsen, T. H. (1989) A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 270, 681-690. 16. E ns , S. M., Budde, R. J. A. & Cholle , R. (1986) J. Bac e iol. 165, 483-488. 17. Ash on, A. R. & Ha ch, M. D. (1983) A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 227, 416-424. 18. Pes ka, S. (1977) in Molecula Mechanisms o P o ein Biosyn- hesis, eds. Weissbach, H. & Pes ka, S. (Academic, New Yo k), pp. 467-553. 19. Sama as, Y., Mane as, Y. & Ga alas, N. A. (1988) Pho osyn- hesis Res. 16, 233-242. 20. Hube , S. C., Nielsen, T. H., Hube , J. L. A. & Pha , D. M. (1989) Plan Cell Physiol. 30, 277-285. 21. Nakamo o, H. & Edwa ds, G. E. (1986) Plan Physiol. 82, 312-315. 22. Ca e , P. J., Nimmo, H. G., Fewson, C. A. & Wilkins, M. B. (1990) FEBS Le . 263, 233-236. 23. MacKin osh, C., Bea ie, K. A., Klumpp, S., Cohen, P. & Codd, G. A. (1990) FEBS Le . 264, 187-192. 24. Siegl, G., MacKin osh, C. & S i , M. (1990) FEBS Le . 270, 198-202. 25. Honkanen, R. E., Zwille , J., Moo e, R. E., Daily, S. L., Kha a, B. S., Dukelow, M. & Boyn on, A. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19401-19404. Bo any: Jiao e al. :.!, :!: 11. .. 1'. .., :, .. .. 1;w; O" 10. 00. qw 4mw