scieee Open visual document viewer

A scenario- guided strategy for the futuremanagement of biological invasions

Roura Pascual, Núria; Saul, Wolf Christian; Pérez-Granados, Cristian; Rutting, Lucas; Peterson, Garry D.; Latombe, Guillaume; Bernardo Madrid, Rubén; Vilà, Montserrat; Jonathan M.

Abstract

Future dynamics of biological invasions are highly uncertain because they depend on multiple social–ecological drivers. We useda scenario-based approach to explore potential management options for invasive species in Europe. During two workshops involv-ing a multidisciplinary team of experts, we developed a management strategy arranged into 19 goals relating to policy, research,public awareness, and biosecurity. We conceived solutions for achieving these goals under different plausible future scenarios, andidentified four interrelated recommendations around which any long-term strategy for managing invasive species can be struc-tured: a European biosecurity regime, a dedicated communication strategy, data standardization and managementtools, and a monitoring and assessment system. Finally, we assessed the feasibility of the management strategy and found sub-stantial differences among scenarios. Collectively, our results indicate that it is time for a new strategy for managing biologicalinvasions in Europe, one that is based on a more integrative approach across socioeconomic sectors and countries

Full text

© 2024 The Au ho s. F on ie s in Ecology and he En i onmen published by Wiley Pe iodicals LLC on behal o The Ecological Socie y o Ame ica. A scena io- guided s a egy o he u u e managemen o biological in asions Nú ia Rou a- Pascual1*†, Wol - Ch is ian Saul2,3,4†, C is ian Pé ez- G anados1,5, Lucas Ru ing6, Ga y D Pe e son7, Guillaume La ombe8,9, F anz Essl8, Tim Ad iaens10, Da id C Ald idge11,12, S en Bache 13, Rubén Be na do- Mad id14,15, Lluís B o ons16,17,18, F ançois Diaz19, Belinda Galla do20, Pie o Geno esi21,22, Ma ina Goli e s23, Pablo González- Mo eno24,25, Ma cus Hall26, Pe a Ku lesa27, Be nd Lenzne 8, Chunlong Liu28,29, Kon ad Pagi z30, Te esa Pas o 31, Wol gang Rabi sch32, Pe e Robe son33, Helen E Roy34, Hanno Seebens35, Wojciech Sola z36, Uwe S a inge 37, Rob Tanne 38, Mon se a Vilà14,15, B ian Leung39, Ca la Ga cia- Lozano1, and Jona han M Jeschke2,3,4 Fu u e dynamics o biological in asions a e highly unce ain because hey depend on mul iple social–ecological d i e s. We used a scena io- based app oach o explo e po en ial managemen op ions o in asi e species in Eu ope. Du ing wo wo kshops in ol - ing a mul idisciplina y eam o expe s, we de eloped a managemen s a egy a anged in o 19 goals ela ing o policy, esea ch, public awa eness, and biosecu i y. We concei ed solu ions o achie ing hese goals unde di e en plausible u u e scena ios, and iden i ied ou in e ela ed ecommenda ions a ound which any long- e m s a egy o managing in asi e species can be s uc- u ed: (1) a Eu opean biosecu i y egime, (2) a dedica ed communica ion s a egy, (3) da a s anda diza ion and managemen ools, and (4) a moni o ing and assessmen sys em. Finally, we assessed he easibili y o he managemen s a egy and ound sub- s an ial di e ences among scena ios. Collec i ely, ou esul s indica e ha i is ime o a new s a egy o managing biological in asions in Eu ope, one ha is based on a mo e in eg a i e app oach ac oss socioeconomic sec o s and coun ies. F on Ecol En i on 2024; 22(4): e2725, doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 In asi e species a e key d i e s o global en i onmen al change and s ongly con ibu e o global biodi e si y loss, exe ing unsus ainable economic losses h ough di ec damage and managemen ac ions (Pyšek e al.2020; Diagne e al.2021). Despi e ongoing e o s in policy, esea ch, and managemen , he numbe o non- na i e species in ading p e iously unoccu- pied a eas and es ablishing popula ions a ound he wo ld is s ill inc easing, wi h no sign o sa u a ion (Ea ly e al.2016; Seebens e al.2017). The Con en ion on Biological Di e si y (CBD) u ges coun ies o de elop ea ly- wa ning and su eil- lance sys ems, ac ion plans o add ess p io i y pa hways o in oduc ion, apid e adica ion p ocedu es o p e en es ab- lishmen , and long- e m mi iga ion and con ol measu es (CBD2022b). Howe e , implemen a ion o hese managemen ecommenda ions is challenging due o limi ed esou ces and capaci y, a lack o legal amewo ks (CBD 2020), and he unce ain ies associa ed wi h u u e ajec o ies o socie ies and global change (Pyšek e al.2020; La ombe e al.2022). The numbe o non- na i e species p esen in con inen al Eu ope, in bo h e es ial and ma ine habi a s, is p ojec ed o inc ease o mos axonomic g oups by 2050 (Sa dain e al. 2019; Seebens e al. 2021). These es ima es, which a e based ei he on obse ed pas ends in he accumula ion o non- na i e species o on a limi ed se o global socioeconomic ac o s (eg g oss domes ic p oduc o egional ade), p o ide a baseline o explo ing he u u e dynamics o biological in a- sions. Howe e , u u e numbe s and impac s o in asi e spe- cies a e expec ed o s ongly depend on mul iple en i onmen al and socioeconomic d i e s, which a e highly unce ain and he e o e di icul o an icipa e (Essl e al.2020). Quan i a i e models ha inco po a e hese complexi ies a e s ill lacking and, in any case, would be based on speci ic assump ions ha In a nu shell: • A eam o 35 expe s om di e en coun ies and s ake- holde g oups de eloped a s a egy o managing biological in asions in Eu ope in he coming decades • The s a egy conside s a wide a ay o goals ela ing o policy, esea ch, public awa eness, and biosecu i y • Gi en he high deg ee o mu ual dependence be ween hese goals, managemen e o s should s i e o add ess hem join ly o be e ensu e success • Pa icipan s assessed and e ined he s a egy unde se e al u u e in asion scena ios o imp o e i s o e all easibili y • Managemen o biological in asions in Eu ope equi es a shi owa d a mo e in eg a i e app oach ac oss sec o s and coun ies 1Depa amen de Ciències Ambien als, Facul a de Ciències, Uni e si a de Gi ona, Gi ona, Ca alonia, Spain *([email p o ec ed]); 2Ins i u e o Biology, F eie Uni e si ä Be lin, Be lin, Ge many; 3Leibniz Ins i u e o F eshwa e Ecology and Inland Fishe ies, Be lin, Ge many; 4Be lin- B andenbu g Ins i u e o Ad anced Biodi e si y Resea ch, Be lin, Ge many; 5Depa men o Ecology, Uni e si y o Alican e, (con inued on las page) CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 1 o 7 F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 N Rou a- Pascual e al. would likely limi he space o plausible and imaginable ajec- o ies. In con as , quali a i e scena ios allow o a mo e open explo a ion o plausible u u es (Lenzne e al.2019), and con- sequen ly a e ins umen al in in o ming en i onmen al policy and planning (Wiebe e al.2018). We explo ed quali a i e scena ios abou he u u e o bio- logical in asions in all Eu ope (no es ic ed o con inen al Eu ope o he Eu opean Union) and de eloped a obus man- agemen s a egy in he ace o c i ical unce ain ies using a pa icipa o y p ocess. To do so, we (1) downscaled ou global scena ios o biological in asions (Rou a- Pascual e al.2021) o he Eu opean le el, (2) de eloped an o e a ching managemen s a egy o biological in asions in Eu ope conside ing he challenges posed by each indi idual scena io, (3) examined he ela ionship be ween he di e en elemen s o he s a egy, and (4) assessed i s easibili y in he con ex o he downscaled sce- na ios. Due o COVID- 19 a el es ic ions and social dis- ancing ini ia i es ha discou aged o p e en ed in- pe son mee ings, he p ocess was conduc ed in wo online wo kshops (1–2 Ap and 20 Sep–2 Oc 2020) wi h expe - based in e nal discussions (AppendixS1: Panel S1 and Figu eS1). A o al o 35 indi iduals ep esen ing 12 Eu opean coun ies and h ee dis inc s akeholde g oups—namely, public adminis a ion, nongo e nmen al o ganiza ions/in e es g oups, and academia (a ull lis o pa icipan s is p o ided in Appendix S1: TableS1)—pa icipa ed in he p ocess. Fu u e scena ios o biological in asions To he bes o ou knowledge, quali a i e scena ios o bio- logical in asions ha e no ye been applied in a con inen al con ex o used o in o m policy. Recen ly, Rou a- Pascual e al. (2021) de eloped he i s global scena ios o biological in asions ha explo ed plausible u u e ajec o ies o biological in asions in he coming decades. These global scena ios—16 in all—we e clus e ed in o ou main con- as ing se s o u u es ha anged om high o low le els o biological in asions, accoun ed o unce ain ies in social– ecological de elopmen s conside ed o be c i ical o in asi e species on a global scale, and we e mo e ocused on biodi- e si y asse s han o he global change scena ios (eg sha ed socioeconomic pa hways; O’Neill e al.2017). O he 16 global scena ios, ou we e selec ed as being ep esen a i e o he ou main con as ing clus e s based on consensus o ing among wo kshop pa icipan s. Selec ed scena ios we e e amed and downscaled o he Eu opean le el, esul ing in he ollowing ou Eu opean scena ios: (1) Los (in) Eu ope (clus e A), (2) Big Tech Rules Eu ope (clus e B), (3) G een Local Go e nance (clus e C), and (4) Technological (Pseudo- ) Panacea (clus e D) (Figu e1; AppendixS1: Figu e S2); no e: all clus e s we e de i ed om Rou a- Pascual e al. (2021). The exac p ocedu e o downscaling he global scena ios o he Eu opean le el and he ela ionships be ween hese sce- na ios is desc ibed in g ea e de ail elsewhe e (Appendix S1: Panel S1; Pé ez- G anados e al. 2024). He e, we p esen a gene al o e iew o he ou selec ed scena ios and ou line how hey we e used o de elop he managemen s a egy o in asi e species and o assess he s a egy’s u u e easibili y. Managemen s a egy o in asi e species Wo kshop pa icipan s i s o mula ed a numbe o gene al isions (objec i es) o he u u e managemen o in asi e species in Eu ope. These isions we e collec ed and p esen ed o all 35 pa icipan s, each o whom cas o es o he isions hey deemed as he ou mos impo an . The ou isions ha ob ained he mos o es we e hen indi idually assigned o b eakou g oups, each o which was esponsible o de el- oping a p elimina y managemen s a egy o achie ing he assigned ision. The esul ing p elimina y managemen isions and s a egies we e combined in o a single managemen ision and s a egy (“be a e sion”) composed o mul iple goals and ac ions. The goals e e ed o speci ic managemen aspec s iden i ied as impo an by he wo kshop pa icipan s, and he ac ions desc ibed he s eps equi ed o each each goal. Pa icipan s hen iden i ied he s eng hs and weaknesses o he o e all managemen s a egy (“s ess es ”) and assessed which ac ions (and consequen ly goals) would likely be easible, pa ially easible, o un easible unde each scena io. On he basis o his assessmen , pa icipan s e ised he ac ions assessed as pa ially easible o un easible o imp o e easibili y ac oss all scena ios, wi h e isions subsequen ly in eg a ed in o he managemen s a egy (AppendixS1: Panel S1 and Figu eS1). The gene al ision ag eed upon by he pa icipan s was: “By 2050, he ha m ul impac s o in asi e species in Eu ope (EU membe s a es and non- EU s a es) a e subs an ially educed compa ed o oday”. This ision is in conco dance wi h he Kunming- Mon eal Global Biodi e si y F amewo k, which includes a a ge o educe he in oduc ion and es ablishmen o in asi e species and hei impac s (see Ta ge 6 in CBD[2022b]). Pa icipan s iden i ied 19 goals as ele an o achie ing his gene al ision, which we e g ouped in o ou ca ego ies: Policy (goals P1–6), Resea ch (goals R1–4), Public Awa eness (goals A1–3), and Biosecu i y (goals B1–6) (Figu e2; AppendixS1: Panel S2), highligh ing he mul i ac- e ed na u e o he managemen o in asi e species and he impo ance o conside ing elemen s complemen a y o di ec managemen ac ions. Se e al o hese goals ha e al eady been iden i ied as ele an o managing biological in asions (Pi ia e al.2017) and a e included in a amewo k o s anda dize managemen e minology (Robe son e al. 2020). To guide he long- e m managemen o biological in asions, we o gan- ized he goals in o a new amewo k ha conside s u u e unce ain ies. Managing in asi e species e icien ly equi es ha monizing policy and biosecu i y e o s ac oss Eu opean coun ies (Kelle e al. 2011) as well as globally (Hulme 2021). The implemen a ion o EU egula ion 1143/2014 on in asi e spe- cies ep esen s majo p og ess in his ega d, as i has helped 2 o 7 CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 Fu u e managemen o biological in asions EU membe s a es o de elop and implemen managemen measu es o in asi e species included on he so- called Union lis (a lis o in asi e species o Union conce n), ollowing a common amewo k ha includes isk assessmen , su eil- lance, and epo ing. Howe e , coo dina ion be ween EU and non- EU coun ies emains lacking, and he e ec i eness o managemen ac ions is in luenced by limi ed unding and con- lic ing iews among manage s (eg whe he emo al o es ab- lished in asi e species is wa an ed; Blaalid e al. 2021), scien is s (Shackle on e al.2022), and he gene al public (eg ega ding he killing o in asi e animals; No oa e al.2017). Al hough an imp essi e amoun o knowledge and echnical in o ma ion has accumula ed h ough yea s o esea ch and managemen p ac ices (Scale a e al.2017; Dana e al.2019), p ac ical knowledge on managing in asi e species is s ill la gely disconnec ed om academic knowledge (Bayliss e al.2013; Muñoz- Mas e al.2021). Mo e esea ch on how o acili a e esponses o managemen needs and how o imp o e he a ailabili y and accessibili y o da a o biological in asions is needed (Ga o e al.2013). To be e align scien i ic esea ch wi h managemen needs and esol e con lic ing e hical iews, i is c ucial o imp o e communica ion be ween scien is s and s akeholde s, and o p omo e public engagemen and awa e- ness o acili a e knowledge ans e ac oss Eu ope. S a egy associa ions and key ecommenda ions In addi ion o de eloping he managemen s a egy, we ana- lyzed he ela ionships be ween he s a egy’s goals. We i s cha ac e ized he essence o each goal and hen e iewed all o he goals o iden i y any associa ions be ween hem. An associa ion was loosely de ined as any di ec ela ionship be ween wo goals, wi hou necessa ily implying causali y (see Appendix S1: Panel S1 o de ails). O e all, we ound high Figu e 1. Illus a ions o he ou u u e scena ios o biological in asions in Eu ope, and associa ed cha s depic ing he easibili y o he managemen s a egy unde each scena io as assessed by he wo kshop pa icipan s. Means (colo ed squa es) and s anda d e o s (e o ba s) indica e he a e age easibili y o he goals included in he s a egy (1 = easible, 0.5 = pa ially easible, 0 = un easible) as g ouped in o ou ca ego ies: Policy (P), Resea ch (R), Public Awa eness (A), and Biosecu i y (B) (Figu e2; AppendixS1: Panel S2). See AppendixS1: TableS2 o he easibili y o each indi idual goal unde he di e en scena io assump ions. Scena io illus a ions c ea ed by K Tseno a (Paidia Consul ing L d). CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 3 o 7 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 N Rou a- Pascual e al. connec i i y among he ou ca ego ies o goals (Figu e 2c) and among he 19 goals o he managemen s a egy (Figu e 2b), wi h each goal associa ed wi h 13 o he o he 18 goals (72%) on a e age. This highligh s he in eg a i e na u e o he s a - egy and he mu ual dependency o i s componen s o ensu e i s e ec i eness. The goals wi h he highes numbe s o asso- cia ions we e: Eu opean Coope a ion (B1) and Communica ion S a egy (A1), ollowed by C i ical Tools (R3) and Moni o ing Sys em (B3) (Figu e 2b; o goal desc ip ions and designa ions, see also Appendix S1: Panel S2). These goals a e key elemen s o he implemen a ion o he o e all managemen s a egy, as eaching hem is also conduci e o he achie emen o many associa ed goals. The e o e, hey dese e pa icula a en ion. On he basis o hese ou “keys one” goals and u he c osscu ing aspec s eme ging om he managemen s a - egy, we iden i ied ou key ecommenda ions o managing biological in asions in Eu ope. They ep esen gene al undamen al p inciples ha lie a he co e o he s a egy and should guide i s implemen a ion. Recommenda ion 1: Eu opean coope a ion o a common and e ec i e biosecu i y egime Es ablishing a dedica ed Eu opean agency o an in e go e nmen al ag eemen u nished wi h a manda e and esou ces o egula e and o e see ac i i ies ela ed o he managemen o in asi e species in Eu ope will s eng hen coope a ion be ween s a es and s akeholde s ac oss Eu ope (see keys one goal B1; Appendix S1: Panel S2). I will also posi i ely a ec mos o he goals, imp o ing he e icacy o moni o ing and managing in asi e species. Such an ins i u ion should liaise wi h Eu opean and global in e - na ional o ganiza ions (eg Cen e o Ag i- cul u e and Bioscience In e na ional [CABI], CBD, Eu opean Alien Species In o ma ion Ne wo k [EASIN], Eu opean and Medi e - anean Plan P o ec ion O ganiza ion [EPPO]) o guidance on in asi e species policy, p i- o i iza ion, bes p ac ice, and managemen ha moniza ion be ween Eu opean coun ies (and including non- EU s a es). I should os e in e ac ions and syne gies ac oss sec o s, s ake- holde s, and biosecu i y egimes; conside egional pa icula i ies (eg ega ding di e - ences in managemen p io i ies); and in eg a e local knowledge and cul u es. Sha ed go e n- ance and pa icipa o y decision making shall s eng hen he legi imacy o ag eed- upon ac ions. Recommenda ion 2: c oss- sec o al communica ion and ou each s a egy Es ablishing a c oss- sec o al communica ion s a egy abou in - a si e species (including a dedica ed educa ion cu iculum o schools) and a cen alized, mul ilingual communica ion pla o m a he Eu opean le el (see keys one goal A1; Appendix S1: Panel S2) will help inc ease awa eness o causes and impac s o in asi e species and hei managemen , as well as acili a e knowledge ans e and collabo a ion. Goals in all ca ego ies o he managemen s a egy bene i om p inciples o good and anspa en communica ion, leading o an inc eased unde - s anding among s akeholde s and he gene al public, which is equi ed o sus ained suppo o managemen ac ions. Figu e 2. (a) Visual summa y o he managemen s a egy o in asi e species in Eu ope, con- sis ing o 19 goals g ouped in o ou ca ego ies: Policy (P), Resea ch (R), Public Awa eness (A), and Biosecu i y (B) (AppendixS1: Panel S2). (b and c) Visual ep esen a ion o he associa ions be ween goals and ca ego ies o goals. In (b), colo ed cells signi y an associa ion be ween wo goals, and diagonal numbe s indica e he o al numbe o associa ions each goal has wi h o he goals. In (c), he a ch’s wid h ha connec s wo pa s o he ci cle deno es he numbe o associa ions be ween goals o wo connec ed ca ego ies (o wi hin he same ca ego y). 4 o 7 CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 Fu u e managemen o biological in asions Recommenda ion 3: da a s anda diza ion and managemen ools Rou inely iden i ying and add essing c i ical gaps in ools o impac / isk assessmen and managemen o in asi e spe- cies (see keys one goal R3; Appendix S1: Panel S2) will imp o e p oac i e and eac i e capaci y o manage (new) in ade s. This includes c ea ing and/o imp o ing s anda d p o ocols o assessing pa hways, impac s, and ulne abili y o p io i y a eas; concei ing adap i e app oaches o guide managemen decisions; and de eloping no el managemen echniques. These ools should be adop ed a he coun y and Eu opean le el (and i easible a he global le el as well). Fo example, he In e na ional Union o Conse a ion o Na u e (IUCN) ecen ly adop ed he En i onmen al Impac Classi ica ion o Alien Taxa (EICAT) as a ool o collec s anda dized impac da a (IUCN 2020). Se e al goals (eg R2 and R4; Appendix S1: Panel S2) also call o he es ablish- men o a Eu ope- ocused cen alized open- da a po al ha acili a es e icien eco ding, s o ing, s anda diza ion, upda - ing, pee - e iewing, and accessibili y o all in o ma ion ela ed o in asi e species and hei managemen in Eu ope. EASIN may p o ide a use ul ounda ion o his pla o m. No el au oma ed app oaches a e needed o managing and analyzing big da ase s esul ing om such da a agg ega ion. Many aspec s o his ecommenda ion a e echoed in he CBD COP15 Decision ega ding in asi e species (see Annex 5 in CBD [2022a]), which was ecen ly adop ed in connec ion wi h he Kunming- Mon eal Global Biodi e si y F amewo k (CBD 2022b). Recommenda ion 4: moni o ing, assessmen , and managemen p io i ies Es ablishing a comp ehensi e egime o moni o ing and assessing in asi e species a he Eu opean and coun y le els (see keys one goal B3; Appendix S1: Panel S2) will imp o e he capaci y o ea ly de ec ion and apid esponse. Sound and comp ehensi e knowledge o he pas , cu en , and u u e ci cums ances o he in oduc ion, es ablishmen , and sp ead o in asi e species, as well as hei (ac ual and po en ial) impac s and success o pas managemen a emp s, is a p e- equisi e o e ec i e managemen and o es ablishing man- agemen p io i ies a di e en le els (ie species, si es, and pa hways). Policy egula ions (eg he Union lis o in asi e species in Regula ion 1143/2014) a e use ul o de ining legally binding p io i ies (eg goals P4–P6; Appendix S1: Panel S2), bu p io i ies should also be lexible and upda able based on, o ins ance, new da a ob ained by manage s (eg goals B4–B6; AppendixS1: Panel S2), o acili a e apid adap a ion o changing condi ions. S a egy easibili y The sugges ions gene a ed om he s ess- es ing p ocess unde he ou di e en scena ios o biological in asions we e inco po a ed in o he goals and ac ions o he man- agemen s a egy. In an online exe cise a e he wo kshops, pa icipan s e isi ed he easibili y assessmen gi en du ing he s ess es and epea ed he assessmen p ocess o he e isi ed, inal ac ions. Fo g aphical pu poses, we con e ed he assessmen s assigned o each ac ion o he s a egy in o a nume ical alue ( easible ac ion = 1; pa ially easible ac ion = 0.5; un easible ac ion = 0) and a e aged hese alues a he goal le el (Appendix S1: Panel S1). To isualize di e - gences among scena ios, we displayed he means o he goals’ a e aged alues a he ca ego y le el (Figu e1). The esul s indica ed ha some u u e scena ios a e mo e challenging han o he s o he managemen o in asi e species (Figu e1; AppendixS1: Figu eS2). Scena ios wi h high le els o echnological de elopmen , public en i onmen al awa eness, and e ec i eness o policies on in asi e species ha encou age esea ch and biosecu i y (eg Technological [Pseudo- ]Panacea) o e a o able condi ions o implemen ing he managemen s a egy ac oss all goals (AppendixS1: TableS2), whe eas dis up- i e scena ios, such as hose concei ing an isola ionis Eu ope (eg Los [in] Eu ope), a e mo e p oblema ic o managemen s a egy implemen a ion. In pa icula , goals ha equi e coo di- na ion ac oss Eu ope, such as policy- ela ed goals and he es ab- lishmen o a Eu opean biosecu i y egime (B1, Eu opean Coope a ion) and a Communica ion S a egy (A1), will be ex emely di icul o achie e unde his scena io (AppendixS1: TableS2). Be ween hese wo ex emes, he e a e scena ios wi h an in e media e easibili y o he managemen goals (and ca ego- ies o goals). Some o hese scena ios include p ominen le els o economic powe and echnology ha s imula e esea ch and policy de elopmen on in asi e species bu ha e poo public awa eness and biosecu i y measu es (eg Big Tech Rules Eu ope). The easibili y o o he scena ios is mo e balanced ac oss managemen goals and hei ca ego ies, wi h echnolog- ical de iciencies being o se (a leas o some ex en ) by g ea e public awa eness (eg G een Local Go e nance). Fo hese in e media e scena ios, mos goals wi hin he biosecu i y ca e- go y (goals B3–6) had a medium le el o easibili y, sugges ing ha ou ision would only be pa ially achie able (AppendixS1: TableS2). Conclusions E ec i ely educing he impac s o biological in asions o e he long e m will equi e conside a ion o he ange o social– ecological de elopmen s ha in luence hem. Ou s a egy o managing in asi e species in Eu ope consis s o 19 closely in e connec ed goals ela ing o policy, esea ch, public awa e- ness, and biosecu i y. Gi en he unce ain ies o he u u e, i is c ucial o assess he easibili y o hese goals and hei associa ed ac ions unde di e en u u e scena ios co e ing a b oad ange o social, economic, and ecological ajec o ies. Ou esea ch e eals how he easibili y o speci ic managemen goals a ies unde di e en scena ios. Fo example, scena ios CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 5 o 7 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 N Rou a- Pascual e al. wi h low echnological de elopmen , weak public en i onmen al awa eness, and ine ec i e policies will educe he easibili y o he managemen s a egy, he eby making i less likely ha he impac s o in asi e species will be subs an ially educed by 2050. Fu he mo e, ou esul s highligh ou in e ela ed key ec- ommenda ions ha any s a egy aimed o p e en and mi iga e he impac s o in asi e species in Eu ope should p io i ize. These include (1) p omo ing coope a ion be ween coun ies and s akeholde s a he Eu opean le el, (2) os e ing commu- nica ion and ou each ac oss sec o s, (3) s anda dizing da a and de eloping ools in suppo o managemen , and (4) mon- i o ing in asi e species e icien ly and p io i izing manage- men acco dingly. Al hough none o hese ecommenda ions alone will su ice, hey ep esen key elemen s ha can s uc- u e a long- e m s a egy o managing biological in asions a he Eu opean le el. In sho , i is ime o shi he ocus o bio- logical in asion managemen in Eu ope and elsewhe e owa d a mo e in eg a ed pe spec i e ha akes in o accoun di e en sec o s and coun ies, and explici ly accoun s o plausible u u e scena ios. Acknowledgemen s This esea ch was unded h ough he 2017–2018 Belmon Fo um and Biodi ERsA join call o esea ch p oposals, unde he Biodi Scen ERA- Ne COFUND p og am, and wi h he unding o ganiza ions Agencia Es a al de In es- igación (AEI), Bundesminis e ium ü Bildung und Fo schung (BMBF), and Aus ian Science Fund (FWF) (g an s AEI PCI2018- 092966 [NR- P, CP- G, CG- L]/AEI PCI2018- 092939 [MV]/AEI PCI2018- 092986 [BG]/BMBF p ojec s 16LC1803A and 16LC1807B [JMJ, W- CS]/BMBF 01LC1807A [HS]/FWF p ojec 4011- B32 [FE, GL, BLenzne ]) and Swiss Na ional Science Founda ion (g an 31BD30_184114 [SB]). CP- G acknowledges suppo om Minis e io de Educación y Fo mación P o esional h ough he Bea iz Galindo Fellowship (Bea iz Galindo – Con oca o ia 2020). Open Access unding p o ided hanks o he CRUE- CSIC ag ee- men wi h Wiley. We g ea ly app ecia e he pa icipa ion o S Fle a is, I Kühn, and J P iess in he wo kshops, and he scena io illus a ions by K Tseno a. Da a A ailabili y S a emen Da a a e al eady published and publicly a ailable, wi h hose i ems p ope ly ci ed in his a icle. Re e ences Bayliss H, S ewa G, Wilcox A, and Randall N. 2013. A pe cei ed gap be ween in asi e species esea ch and s akeholde p io i ies. NeoBio a 19: 67–82. Blaalid R, Magnussen K, Wes be g NB, and Na ud S. 2021. A ben- e i –cos analysis amewo k o p io i iza ion o con ol p og ams o well- es ablished in asi e alien species. NeoBio a 68: 31–52. CBD (Con en ion on Biological Di e si y). 2020. Global biodi e si y ou look 5. Mon eal, Canada: CBD Sec e a ia . CBD (UN Con en ion on Biological Di e si y). 2022a. In asi e alien species. Mon eal, Canada: CBD Sec e a ia . CBD (UN Con en ion on Biological Di e si y). 2022b. Kunming- Mon eal global biodi e si y amewo k. Mon eal, Canada: CBD Sec e a ia . Dana ED, Ga cía- de- Lomas J, Ve loo e F, and Vilà M. 2019. Common de iciencies o ac ions o managing in asi e alien species: a decision- suppo checklis . NeoBio a 48: 97–112. Diagne C, Le oy B, Vaissie e AC, e al. 2021. High and ising economic cos s o biological in asions wo ldwide. Na u e 592: 571–76. Ea ly R, B adley BA, Dukes JS, e al. 2016. Global h ea s om in a- si e alien species in he wen y- i s cen u y and na ional esponse capaci ies. Na Commun 7: 12485. Essl F, Lenzne B, Bache S, e al. 2020. D i e s o u u e alien species impac s: an expe - based assessmen . Glob Change Biol 26: 4880–93. Ga o F, Ka sane akis S, Vandeke kho e J, e al. 2013. E alua ion o online in o ma ion sou ces on alien species in Eu ope: he need o ha moniza ion and in eg a ion. En i on Manage 51: 1137–46. Hulme PE. 2021. Ad ancing One Biosecu i y o add ess he pandemic isks o biological in asions. BioScience 71: 708–21. IUCN (In e na ional Union o Conse a ion o Na u e). 2020. IUCN EICAT ca ego ies and c i e ia: he En i onmen al Impac Classi ica ion o Alien Taxa (EICAT). Gland, Swi ze land: IUCN. Kelle RP, Geis J, Jeschke JM, and Kühn I. 2011. In asi e species in Eu ope: ecology, s a us, and policy. En i on Sci Eu ope 23: 23. La ombe G, Seebens H, Lenzne B, e al. 2022. Capaci y o coun ies o educe biological in asions. Sus ain Sci 18: 771–89. Lenzne B, Leclè e D, F anklin O, e al. 2019. A amewo k o global wen y- i s cen u y scena ios and models o biological in asions. BioScience 69: 697–710. Muñoz- Mas R, Ca e e M, Cas o- Díez P, e al. 2021. Managemen o in asi e alien species in Spain: a bibliome ic e iew. NeoBio a 70: 123–50. No oa A, Dehnen- Schmu z K, F ied J, e al. 2017. Does public awa e- ness inc ease suppo o in asi e species managemen ? P omising e idence ac oss axa and landscape ypes. Biol In asions 19: 3691–705. O’Neill BC, K iegle E, Ebi KL, e al. 2017. The oads ahead: na a i es o sha ed socioeconomic pa hways desc ibing wo ld u u es in he 21s cen u y. Global En i on Chang 42: 169–80. Pé ez- G anados C, Lenzne B, Goli e s M, e al. 2024. Eu opean sce- na ios o u u e biological in asions. People Na 6: 245–59. Pi ia M, Copp GH, Dick JTA, e al. 2017. Tackling in asi e alien spe- cies in Eu ope II: h ea s and oppo uni ies un il 2020. Manag Biol In asions 8: 273–86. Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simbe lo D, e al. 2020. Scien is s’ wa ning on in asi e alien species. Biol Re 95: 1511–34. Robe son PA, Mill A, No oa A, e al. 2020. A p oposed uni ied amewo k o desc ibe he managemen o biological in asions. Biol In asions 22: 2633–45. 6 o 7 CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License F on Ecol En i on doi:10.1002/ ee.2725 Fu u e managemen o biological in asions Rou a- Pascual N, Leung B, Rabi sch W, e al. 2021. Al e na i e u u es o biological in asions. Sus ain Sci 16: 1637–50. Sa dain A, Sa dain E, and Leung B. 2019. Global o ecas s o shipping a ic and biological in asions o 2050. Na Sus ain 2: 274–82. Scale a R, Cozzi A, Caccamo C, and Rossi I (Eds). 2017. A ca alogue o LIFE p ojec s con ibu ing o he managemen o alien species in he Eu opean Union. Milan, I aly: Na u a che ale. Seebens H, Bache S, Blackbu n TM, e al. 2021. P ojec ing he con i- nen al accumula ion o alien species h ough o 2050. Glob Change Biol 27: 970–82. Seebens H, Blackbu n TM, Dye EE, e al. 2017. No sa u a ion in he accumula ion o alien species wo ldwide. Na Commun 8: 14435. Shackle on RT, Vime ca i G, P obe AF, e al. 2022. Consensus and con o e sy in he discipline o in asion science. Conse Biol 13: e13931. Wiebe K, Zu ek M, Lo d S, e al. 2018. Scena io de elopmen and o esigh analysis: explo ing op ions o in o m choices. Annu Re En Resou 43: 545–70. Suppo ing In o ma ion Addi ional ma e ial can be ound online a h p://onlineli- b a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725/suppin o Alican e, Spain; 6Cope nicus Ins i u e o Sus ainable De elopmen , Uni e si y o U ech , U ech , he Ne he lands; 7S ockholm Resilience Cen e, S ockholm Uni e si y, S ockholm, Sweden; 8Di ision o This is an open access a icle unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License, which pe mi s use, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed. BioIn asions, Global Change & Mac oecology, Depa men o Bo any and Biodi e si y Resea ch, Uni e si y o Vienna, Vienna, Aus ia; 9Ins i u e o Ecology and E olu ion, Uni e si y o Edinbu gh, Edinbu gh, UK; 10Resea ch Ins i u e o Na u e and Fo es , B ussels, Belgium; 11Depa men o Zoology, Uni e si y o Camb idge, Camb idge, UK; 12BioRISC, S Ca ha ine’s College, Uni e si y o Camb idge, Camb idge, UK; 13Depa men o Biology, Uni e si y o F ibou g, F ibou g, Swi ze land; 14Es ación Biológica de Doñana, Se ille, Spain; 15Depa men o Plan Biology and Ecology, Uni e si y o Se ille, Se ille, Spain; 16CREAF, Bella e a, Spain; 17CSIC, Ce danyola del Vallès, Spain; 18CTFC, Solsona, Spain; 19P epa edness and Resilience Depa men , Wo ld O ganisa ion o Animal Heal h, Pa is, F ance; 20Ins i u o Pi enaico de Ecología, CSIC, Za agoza, Spain; 21Ins i u e o En i onmen al P o ec ion and Resea ch (ISPRA), Rome, I aly; 22Chai IUCN/SSC In asi e Species Specialis G oup, Rome, I aly; 23Depa men o Communi y Ecology, Helmhol z Cen e o En i onmen al Resea ch – UFZ, Halle, Ge many; 24Depa men o Fo es Enginee ing, Dend oda Lab – ERSAF, Uni e si y o Có doba, Có doba, Spain; 25CABI, Egham, UK; 26Ins i u e o E olu iona y Biology and En i onmen al S udies, Uni e si y o Zu ich, Zu ich, Swi ze land; 27Ins i u e o En i onmen and Na u e, Minis y o Economy and Sus ainable De elopmen , Zag eb, C oa ia; 28The Key Labo a o y o Ma icul u e, Minis y o Educa ion, College o Fishe ies, Ocean Uni e si y o China, Qingdao, China; 29Ins i u e o Hyd obiology, Chinese Academy o Sciences, Wuhan, China; 30Depa men o Bo any, Uni e si y o Innsb uck, Innsb uck, Aus ia; 31EUROPARC Fede a ion, Ba celona, Spain; 32En i onmen Agency Aus ia, Vienna, Aus ia; 33Modelling, E idence and Policy G oup, Newcas le Uni e si y, Newcas le upon Tyne, UK; 34UK Cen e o Ecology and Hyd ology, Walling o d, UK; 35Senckenbe g Biodi e si y and Clima e Resea ch Cen e, F ank u , Ge many; 36Ins i u e o Na u e Conse a ion, Polish Academy o Sciences, K aków, Poland; 37Julius Kühn- Ins i u e, Ins i u e o Na ional and In e na ional Plan Heal h, B aunschweig, Ge many; 38Eu opean and Medi e anean Plan P o ec ion O ganiza ion, Pa is, F ance; 39Depa men o Biology, McGill Uni e si y, Mon eal, Canada; † hese au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k. CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 7 o 7 15409309, 2024, 4, Downloaded om h ps://esajou nals.onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ ee.2725 by Uni e sidad De Se illa, Wiley Online Lib a y on [29/05/2024]. See he Te ms and Condi ions (h ps://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/ e ms-and-condi ions) on Wiley Online Lib a y o ules o use; OA a icles a e go e ned by he applicable C ea i e Commons License