scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Colored semi-transparent Cu-Si oxide thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering

Gil Rostra, Jorge; Yubero Valencia, Francisco; Fernández, R.; Cotrino Bautista, José; Ortega-Feliú, Inés; Rodríguez González-Elipe, Agustín

Abstract

Colored semi-transparent Cu-Si oxide thin films have been prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering from a single cathode of copper-silicon composition. Thin films of different composition and optical response were obtained by changing process parameters like the relative amount of copper in the target and the O2/Ar mixture of the reactive plasma gas. The film characteristics were analyzed by several techniques. Their optical properties (refractive index, absorption coefficient, color) have been correlated with the process parameters used in the film preparation as well as with the film stoichiometry and chemistry.

Full text

Colored semi-transparent Cu-Si oxide thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering J. Gil-Rosta,1,* F. Yubero,1 R. Fernández,4 T. Vilajoana,2 P. Artús,2 J. C. Dürsteler,2 J. Cotrino,1 I. Ortega,3 and A. R. González-Elipe1 1Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla (CSIC – U. Sevilla), C/ Américo Vespucio 49, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain 2INDO (Av. Alcalde Barnils), 72. 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain 3Centro Nacional de Aceleredadores (CSIC-U. Sevilla), Tomas Alba Edison 7, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain 4Dept. of Physical Metallurgy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas (CENIM) CSIC, Av. Gregorio del Amo 8, E-28040 Madrid, Spain *[email protected] Abstract: Colored semi-transparent Cu-Si oxide thin films have been prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering from a single cathode of coppersilicon composition. Thin films of different composition and optical response were obtained by changing process parameters like the relative amount of copper in the target and the O2/Ar mixture of the reactive plasma gas. The film characteristics were analyzed by several techniques. Their optical properties (refractive index, absorption coefficient, color) have been correlated with the process parameters used in the film preparation as well as with the film stoichiometry and chemistry. ©2011 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (310.6860) Thin films, optical properties; (310.1860) Deposition and fabrication; (310.3840) Materials and process characterization; (330.4460) Ophthalmic optics and devices. References and links 1. M. Arbab and J. J. Finley, “Glass in architecture,” Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 1(1), 118–129 (2010). 2. C. M. Parler, J. A. Ritter, and M. D. Amiridis, “Infrared spectroscopic study of sol–gel derived mixed-metal oxides,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 279(2-3), 119–125 (2001). 3. C. Córdoba, R. Arroyo, J. L. G. Fierro, and M. Viniegra, “Study of xerogel–glass transition of CuO/SiO2,” J. Solid State Chem. 123(1), 93–99 (1996). 4. M. G. Ferreira da Silva and J. M. Fernandez-Navarro, “Colour of silicate sol-gel glasses containing CuO,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100(1-3), 447–452 (1988). 5. B. Balamurugan and B. R. Mehta, “Optical and structural properties of nanocrystalline copper oxide thin films prepared by activated reactive evaporation,” Thin Solid Films 396(1-2), 90–96 (2001). 6. A. S. Reddy, G. V. Rao, S. Uthanna, and P. S. Reddy, “Structural and optical studies on dc reactive magnetron sputtered Cu2O films,” Mater. Lett. 60(13-14), 1617–1621 (2006). 7. V. F. Drobny and D. L. Pulfrey, “Properties of reactively-sputtered copper oxide thin films,” Thin Solid Films 61(1), 89–98 (1979). 8. P. Carvalho, J. M. Chappé, L. Cunha, S. Lanceros-Méndez, P. Alpuim, F. Vaz, E. Alves, C. Rousselot, J. P. Espinós, and A. R. González-Elipe, “Influence of the chemical and electronic structure on the electrical behavior of zirconium oxynitride films,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(10), 104907 (2008). 9. H. L. Smith and A. J. Cohen, “Absorption spectra of cations in alkali-silicate glasses of ultra-violet transmission,” Phys. Chem. Glasses 4, 173–187 (1963). 10. I. Nakai, C. Numako, H. Hosono, and K. Yamasaki, “Origin of the red color of satsuma copper-ruby glass as determined by EXAFS and optical absorption spectroscopy,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82(3), 689–695 (1999). 11. T. Akai, H. Yamanaka, and H. Wakabayashi, “Preparation of copper-ruby glasses by sputtering: the effect of atmosphere on the growth of copper particles,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79(4), 859–864 (1996). 12. C. R. Bamford, “The application of the ligand field theory to coloured glasses,” Phys. Chem. Glasses 3, 189–202 (1962). 13. J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon, 1985), Vol. I. 14. J. Schanda, Colorimetry: Understanding of the CIE System (John Wiley and Sons, 2007). 15. F. Liu, C. S. Ren, Y. N. Wang, X. L. Qi, and T. C. Ma, “The optical emission spectroscopy study of an rfplasma-enhanced magnetron sputtering system,” Vacuum 81(3), 221–225 (2006). 16. F. Gracia, F. Yubero, J. P. Holgado, J. P. Espinós, A. R. González-Elipe, and T. Girardeau, “SiO2/TiO2 thin films with variable refractive index prepared by ion beam induced and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Thin Solid Films 500(1-2), 19–26 (2006). 17. G. Papadimitropoulos, N. Vourdas, V. Vamvakas, and D. Davazoglou, “Optical and structural properties of copper oxide thin films grown by oxidation of metal layers,” Thin Solid Films 515(4), 2428–2432 (2006). #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1100 18. B. Lefez, R. Souchet, K. Kartouni, and M. Lenglet, “Infrared reflection study of CuO in thin oxide films,” Thin Solid Films 268(1-2), 45–48 (1995). 19. M. Scrocco, “Satellite structure in the x-ray photoelectron spectra of CuO Cu2O,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 63(1), 52–56 (1979). 20. J. P. Espinós, J. Morales, A. Barranco, A. Caballero, J. P. Holgado, and A. R. González-Elipe, “Interface effects for Cu, CuO, and Cu2O deposited on SiO2 and ZrO2: XPS determination of the valence state of copper in Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2 catalysts,” J. Phys. Chem. B 106(27), 6921–6929 (2002). 21. C. D. Wagner, “Chemical shifts of Auger lines, and the Auger parameter,” Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 60, 291–300 (1975). 22. G. Moretti, “Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a review,” J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 95(2-3), 95–144 (1998). 23. J. Morales, J. P. Espinós, A. Caballero, A. R. González-Elipe, and J. A. Mejías, “XPS study of interface and ligand effects in supported Cu2O and CuO nanometric particles,” J. Phys. Chem. B 109(16), 7758–7765 (2005). 24. A. Forouhi and I. Bloomer, “Optical dispersion relations for amorphous semiconductors and amorphous dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. B 34(10), 7018–7026 (1986). 25. A. E. Rakhshani, “Measurement of dispersion in electrodeposited Cu2O,” J. Appl. Phys. 62(4), 1528–1529 (1987). 26. T. Mahalingam, J. S. P. Chitra, S. Rajendran, M. Jayachandran, and M. J. Chockalingam, “Galvanostatic deposition and characterization of cuprous oxide thin films,” J. Cryst. Growth 216(1-4), 304–310 (2000). 27. A. Parretta, M. K. Jayaraj, A. Di Nocera, S. Loreti, L. Quercia, and A. Agati, “Electrical and optical properties of copper oxide films prepared by reactive RF magnetron sputtering,” Phys. Status Solidi A 155(2), 399–404 (1996). 28. J. Pierson, E. Duverger, and G. Banakh, “Experimental and theoretical contributions to the determination of optical properties of synthetic paramelaconite,” J. Solid State Chem. 180(3), 968–973 (2007). 29. C. R. Bamford, “The application of the ligand field theory to coloured glasses,” Phys. Chem. Glasses 3, 189–202 (1962). 30. R. Fernandez-Serrano, A. Vilajoana-Mas, J.C. Dürsteler-López, J. Gil-Rostra, F. Yubero-Valencia, A.R. González-Elipe, “Polymer lens comprising a hardening layer, and absorbent layer, and a interferential multilayer and corresponding method,” PCT/ES2010/000100. 31. F. J. Ferrer, F. Yubero, J. A. Mejías, F. J. García-López, and A. R. González-Elipe, “Microscopic and macroscopic dielectric description of mixed oxide thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 102(8), 084112 (2007). 32. F. Yubero, A. Stabel, and A. R. González-Elipe, “Optical properties and electron spectroscopy characterization of AlxTiyOz thin films,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(6), 3477–3482 (1998). 1. Introduction Colored thin films have been prepared by a variety of methods including physical vapor evaporation, magnetron sputtering or plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) [1–7]. In most cases, the films not only present a given color but also a certain glow because of the highly reflecting character of their surfaces. In many cases, these thin films also present a good electrical conductivity. Within this type of materials we can quote the nitrides, oxinitrides, carbides and nitrocarbides of the elements of the first transition series [8]. In comparison with the huge number of works on this topic available in the literature, there are very few reports on the preparation of colored oxide thin films which show some absorption in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectra. These films can find application in important industrial sectors related to decorative coatings or ophthalmic industry due to their aesthetic aspect and other functional properties. A typical way to tailor the optical properties of oxide thin film materials, particularly their color, is to adjust the relative concentration of two single oxides mixed in a single phase. The range of variation of the optical characteristics of the films achieved in this way can be very wide if the two oxides mixed together have rather different refractive index and extinction coefficient. This idea is related to the common use of transition metal oxides to color glasses, traditionally employed in stained-glass windows and other hand-craft glasses [3,4,9–12]. However, control of the optical performance (refractive index, absorption, color) in thin films of reduced thickness faces important problems related with the adjustment of the concentration of the coloring cation and the tuning of their chemistry, particularly if the deposition process occurs at low temperature and no post-deposition treatment is feasible because of the thermal stability of the substrate. For example, this is the case for ophthalmic and other optical applications based on polymeric lenses. In this regard, it is particularly convenient that the colored cation to be incorporated is fully compatible with SiO2 or other #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1101 transparent oxides used as standard low index materials in antireflective or dielectric mirror coatings or as antiscratching coatings. In this paper, we report on semi-transparent coatings based on mixed Cu-Si oxide thin films prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering, where copper is the coloring cation and silicon, in 4 + oxidation state, defines the host transparent matrix. The incorporation of copper in silicate glasses is a well known procedure to color them. For example, the characteristic ruby color is achieved by incorporation of metallic Cu colloidal particles in transparent silica or sodium silicate matrix [9,10]. It is also well known that glasses with reddish color can be obtained by the incorporation of Cu2+ ions and CuO clusters in these transparent matrices [3,4,9,12]. Thus, a crucial important point for the characterization of the prepared Cu-Si oxide thin films has been to distinguish whether the constituent oxides form a randomly distributed mixed phase (solid solution of the oxide phases) or segregate into separated phases, and to which extent the local electronic structure around the two cations is dependent on mixing. Another important issue from a technological point of view is the in situ control of the deposition process. In this respect, we have characterized the plasma discharge used in the deposition process by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES). Special effort has been devoted to correlate the characteristics of the process plasma with the final properties of the films. Finally, information about the local electronic structure of the films has been also gained by means of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies. 2. Experimental 2.1 Sample preparation Mixed Cu-Si oxide thin films were prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering. Silicon targets of 2 inches diameter were used as the source of silicon. Copper was supplied by Cu strips (0.25 mm thickness, 1.4 mm wide from Goodfellow) wrapped to the Si target along its diameter. Samples were prepared with 1, 2, 3 and 5 strips. As evidenced by the erosion track formed in the target, sputtering mainly occurred in a circumference of ~20 mm of radius (i.e., ~125 mm circumference length). The area ratio of the sputtered copper strips was about 3, 6, 9, and 15% of the total target area for the experimental situations used for the preparation of the films. At industrial scale this approach could be substituted by one in which targets of Si- Cu alloys or mixtures are used to assure automatic reproducibility of results. Samples with different optical performances were also prepared by varying the O2/Ar ratio in the process gas mixture. The O2/Ar gas mixture was set with mass flow controllers. The oxygen mass flow ΦO2 was varied between 4 to 25 sccm, while the argon mass flow ΦAr was varied between 40 and 10 sccm. Thus, the mass flow ratio ΦO2/ΦAr was varied between 0.1 and 2.5. The base pressure in the deposition chamber was 2x10−6 mbar and the working pressure was set constant to 5x10−3 mbar. The magnetron head (GENCOA, 5 cm diameter targets) was powered with a pulsed DC source (MPS15 from Milko Angelov Consulting Ltd). A pulse frequency of 80 kHz and a duty cycle of 40% were used, with applied powers ranging between 100 and 300 W. The sample holder was polarized with −100 V. The target-sample distance was also varied between 50 to 100 mm. In these conditions, the sample temperature during film growth was always below 373 K. The reactive plasmas used for deposition of the thin films were characterized by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES). The emission spectrum was analyzed using a 0.5 m CVI Digikrom DK480 monochromator (CVI Laser Corporation, Albuquerque, NM), with two 1200 grooves/mm gratings, 200/600 blaze. Wavelength selective filters may be used to eliminate the unwanted radiation. In the experiments, the spectral resolution was of 0.2 nm, and spectral sensitivity ranging from 200 to 900 nm (Hamamatsu R928 phototube). The light was collected by an optical fiber which was fixed to the monochromator and positioned near the middle plane between the anode and the cathode using a vacuum feedthrough with a collimating lens in the plasma chamber. #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1102 2.2 Thin film characterization Thin film microstructure was analyzed with a Hitachi S4800 field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cross sectional and planar views of thin films prepared on Si(100) wafers were taken to characterize the microstructure and to assess the film thicknesses. Elemental depth profiling was performed by means of Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) at the 3 MeV tandem ion accelerator of the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores of Seville. The RBS spectra were analyzed with the SRIM software [13]. Chemical characterization by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out with a PHOIBOS 5MCD electron analyzer using unmonocromatised Al-Kα radiation. Prior to the XPS characterization a mild O2+ (1 keV, sample current 1 μA /cm2, 20 min) sputtering was performed to all the samples to remove the adventitious carbon contamination. Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) in transmission mode was performed in a Nicolet 510 apparatus for thin films prepared on polished undoped Si(100) wafers to identify the type of bonding and local structural arrangement around each metal cation. Optical characterization of the films was performed by transmission and reflection UVVIS in a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 12 spectrometer. Refractive index and extinction coefficient were obtained by least squared fit of the simulation of the transmitted and reflected spectra. Color coordinates were evaluated according to standard theory [14]. 3. Results 3.1 Analysis of the deposition process OES analysis of the magnetron plasma discharge has been carried out in situ, during thin film growth, as a function of process parameters. As a general behavior, all emitted lines increase in intensity when the magnetron power is increased. More interesting is the performance for a fixed power. Figure 1 shows a series of OES spectra, recorded in the 315-425 nm range, using a series of standard conditions (fixed magnetron power to 100 W, total pressure to 5x10−3 mbar, target-sample distance of 10 cm, and 3 Cu strips in the target and several Φ O2/ΦAr ratios) during the deposition processes. The strongest lines in these spectra can be easily ascribed to Cu-I (I324, I327) and Ar-I (I416, I420) emissions [15]. We observe that these emission lines increase in intensity as the amount of Ar in the plasma discharge increases (for fixed power and pressure). The inset in Fig. 1 shows the intensity ratio between these Cu and Ar lines. When ΦO2/ΦAr ≥ 1 the ratio between the Cu and Ar emissions ICu/IAr (ICu = I324 + I327; IAr = I416 + I420) remains constant. However, it increases up to a factor 2 for ΦO2/ΦAr = 0.1. Fig. 1. OES spectra corresponding to several ΦO2/ΦAr ratios of the process plasma discharge, as indicated. Bands are assigned to different species according to [15]. Inset: Intensity ratios of the strongest Cu (I324 + I327) and Ar (I416 + I420) emission lines in the plasma discharge as a function of the gas flow ratio Φ O2/ΦAr corresponding to a Si target with 3 Cu strips, 100 W applied power and 5x10−3 mbar total pressure in the reaction chamber. #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1103 Regarding the deposition rate dr, it is found that it diminishes when the sample-target distance increases (5-10 cm range), and increases with the power supplied to the magnetron (100-300 W) and number of Cu strips in the target. For example, for 100 W power, a sample target distance of 10 cm, and ΦO2/ΦAr = 1.0, dr increases from 3.2 nm/min for no Cu strip (deposition of pure SiO2) to 5.2 nm/min for 5 strips. It also varies with the mass flow ratio ΦO2/ΦAr used during the deposition process. Thus, for 100 W, 10 cm sample-target distance and 3 Cu strips, it increases from 3.8 nm/min to 9.8 nm/min when ΦO2/ΦAr decreases from 2.5 to 0.1. Table 1 collects a survey of preparation conditions and the corresponding deposition rates. 3.2 Elemental composition and depth analysis The in-depth composition of the films was studied by RBS. Figure 2 shows typical RBS indepth composition spectra and their fitting with the SRIM software. The analysis demonstrates that, in all cases, copper distributes homogeneously in depth and that the copper content varies depending on the deposition conditions. Besides, no significant surface segregation of any of the two constituent cation is observed. Table 1 summarizes the relative stoichiometry xCu (xCu = [Cu]/([Si] + [Cu]), obtained for several preparation conditions. The reported values show that the Cu content in the films is clearly dependent on the number of Cu strips wrapped to the Si target, varying between 0.16, 0.39, and 0.68 when using 1, 3 and 5 Cu strips wrapped to the Si cathode, respectively. On the other hand, xCu is not significantly affected by ΦO2/ΦAr. Fig. 2. Experimental and fitted RBS spectra of two selected mixed Cu-Si oxide thin films. The spectra demonstrate a homogenous in-depth distribution of Cu and Si atoms. The surface composition of the samples was also analyzed by standard XPS. General XPS spectra showed that all the films prepared were composed of O, Si and Cu and very low amount of C atoms (below 2 atomic percent), probably due to adventitious carbon. Regarding the relative xCu values defined above, both XPS and RBS techniques agreed in the quantification within 5 atomic %, thus confirming that no surface segregation of any of the constituents was present. 3.3 Microstructure and bonding structure of the films Figure 3 shows typical SEM cross section images obtained for the Si-Cu oxide films. They appear flat and featureless, without any defined grain structure. The structure of the films was also assessed by means of standard Bragg-Brentano X-ray diffraction analysis. No diffraction reflections were detected, confirming the amorphous character of the structure of the films. #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1104 Fig. 3. SEM cross section micrograph of a typical Cu-Si oxide thin film. Information about the bonding environment around Si and Cu atoms was obtained by FT-IR analysis. Figure 4 shows a series of FT-IR spectra of selected samples. We observe that the stretching mode corresponding to Si-O-Si vibration, that appears at about 1065 cm−1 for pure SiO2 films, shifts to lower wavenumbers (to ~1055 cm−1) as the amount of Cu in the film increases. At the same time a new band at ~925 cm−1 develops in the spectra. This latter band is a clear indication of Si-O-Cu bond formation [16]. For films with 50% Cu the Si-O-Si band has nearly disappeared, indicating that there is no segregation of a pure SiO2 phase in the films. Note also that a broad band at about 450-650 cm−1 develops when the amount of Cu in the films increases. However, the typical bands to Cu-O-Cu stretching modes in either Cu2O (at 615 cm−1) or CuO (480 and 529 cm−1) are not observed in the spectra [17,18]. This confirms the absence of any significant phase segregation of these oxides, and therefore that the films can be described as a solid solution of silicon and copper oxides. Fig. 4. FT-IR spectra of a series of Cu-Si oxide thin films with increasing number of Cu strips in the Si cathode and prepared with 3 strips and increasing values of ΦO2/ΦAr for the process gas. 3.4 Chemical state analysis and local bonding structure Figure 5 shows a series of Cu 2p spectra obtained for several Cu-Si mixed oxide samples. The evolution in the shape of the spectra can be rationalized by a progressive change in the relative content of copper atoms with either Cu+ or Cu2+ oxidation states [19,20]. We observe that it varies from a situation with mostly Cu2+ for films prepared with one copper strip and ΦO2/ΦAr = 1.0 to pure Cu+ for the films prepared with three copper strips and ΦO2/ΦAr = 0.1 #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1105 (i.e., the minimum amount of O2 in the reactive gas that warranties full oxidation of silicon to Si4+). The partition between these two oxidation states can be deduced by linear combination of the spectra of corresponding to pure Cu2+ and Cu+ states. The [Cu+]/([Cu+] + [Cu2+]) ratios obtained in this way are reported in Table 1 for the different preparation conditions. In general we obtain that, for a fixed Cu content in the Cu-Si target, the amount of copper atoms in the Cu + oxidation state which are incorporated in the Cu-Si mixed oxide thin film increases for lower ΦO2/ΦAr ratios. However, precise quantification of the film chemistry based only on this technique has to be taken with care, since we have observed that the surface cleaning procedure (mild O2+ sputtering) tends to reduce the Cu2+ species to Cu+ at the sample surface. Table 1. Survey of Experimental Conditions and Properties Obtained for Mixed Si-Cu Oxides Prepared by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering # Cu strips Φ O2 /Φ Ar (sccm) d r (nm/min) [Cu]/ ([Cu] + [Si]) [Cu+]/ ([Cu + ] + [Cu 2+ ]) n550 k550 0 10/10 13 0 - 1.46 <0.005 1 10/10 18 0.16 0 1.64 0.020 2 10/10 24 0.27 0.20 1.76 0.030 3 10/10 27 0.39 0.35 1.83 0.062 5 10/10 35 0.68 0.48 2.12 0.15 3 4/40 7 0.38 1 1.81 0.063 3 25/10 25 0.40 0.36 1.82 0.058 Further information of the chemical nature and local electronic structure around the two constituent cations of the mixed oxide thin films can be gained through the Si and Cu Auger parameters [21–23]. The Auger parameter is a local probe that can be correlated to: i) changes in the chemical nature (i.e., oxidation state) of the emitter atom and ii) variation in the extraatomic relaxation energy when, for a fixed oxidation state, the local environment of a cation changes. Auger parameters of Si αSi and Cu αCu have been evaluated in the usual way [21,22] αSi = BE(Si 2p) + KE(Si KLL) αCu = BE(Cu 2p3/2) + KE(Cu L3VV) where BE(Si 2p) and BE(Cu 2p3/2) are the binding energies of the Si 2p and Cu 2p3/2 signals and KE(Si KLL) and KE(Cu L3VV) are the kinetic energies of the Si KLL and Cu L3VV Auger emissions, respectively. Figure 6 (left) shows that αSi varies linearly between 1712.2 to 1712.6 eV as the Cu percentage increases in the Si-Cu-O matrix. As a reference, the αSi of pure SiO2 samples (prepared without Cu) appears at 1711.4 eV. Note that for all studied samples, silicon atoms are always present as Si4+ species. Therefore, the increase of αSi as the amount of Cu in the films increases indicates that the photoholes created at the Si sites relax easier (more energy is released by polarization of the nearby matrix) as the amount of copper in the films increases. Therefore, the probability that Cu is the second neighbor through the development of Si-O-Cu bond structures increases with increasing Cu content in the films. This result points again to lack of phase segregation, yielding as a result a continuous evolution in the Auger parameter of Si4+ species from the pure SiO2 matrix to Si diluted in a mostly CuOx matrix for the samples with highest xCu values. #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1106 Fig. 5. Cu 2p photoemission spectra of Cu-Si oxide thin films prepared with different experimental process parameters. The opposite behavior is observed for αCu. The interpretation of the evolution of αCu with the films composition is not so straightforward, as both the oxidation state (Cu+, Cu2+) and the polarization effects vary simultaneously. Figure 6 (right) shows the evolution of αCu with the relative amount of Cu+ species in the samples, as determined by XPS. Since the reported Auger parameter of Cu+ species in Cu2O is 1849.2 eV and Cu2+ species in CuO is 1851.6 eV (see Fig. 6 (right)), it is likely that changes in αCu are a consequence of both the presence of different oxidation states in the films and the influence of the different polarization of the environment [20]. Fig. 6. Silicon Auger parameter αSi (left) and Cu Auger parameters αCu (right) as a function of the composition of the Cu-Si oxide thin films. 3.5 Optical properties Figure 7 shows transmission UV-Vis spectra of several films prepared on glass with 100 watts as magnetron power. It shows a series of spectra of samples prepared with a fixed ratio ΦO2/ΦAr = 1.0 and varying the number of Cu strips wrapped to the target, as well as spectra of samples prepared with several Cu strips and different mass flow ratio Φ O2/ΦAr. The thicknesses of these samples are about 0.2 microns. It is apparent that the overall absorption of the films increases with the number of Cu strips in the cathode and for lower ΦO2/ΦAr values, i.e., with the percentage of Cu in the films (see Table 1). It is observed a constant weak #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1107 absorption above 0.6 microns. This absorption increases for shorter wavelengths. The threshold at about 0.3 microns corresponds to the absorption of the glass used in this study. Fig. 7. UV-Vis transmission spectra of a series of Cu-Si oxide thin films prepared under several preparation conditions (see legend). The refractive index and extinction coefficient of Cu-Si oxide materials was evaluated by simulation of transmission and reflection UV-Vis spectra of the films, considering a homogeneous single layer and a Forohui-Bloomer model of the complex refractive index [24]. The results of this analysis for the series of samples shown in Fig. 7 is reported in Fig. 8. Refractive index of pure SiO2 (prepared without Cu strips and ΦO2/ΦAr = 1.0) is also included for completeness. Table 1 collects the refractive index values at 550 nm (n550) for these films. It is found that the refractive index of the Cu-Si oxide films increases with the Cu content in the films. Thus, for ΦO2/ΦAr = 1.0 and xCu = 0.16, 0.27, 0.37, and 0.68 we obtain that n550 = 1.64, 1.76, 1.83, and 2.12, respectively. Besides, for a fixed Cu/Si stoichiometry, it is found that lowering the ΦO2/ΦAr ratio, the refractive index further increases. According to the previous chemical quantification, this increase of refractive index is correlated with the increase of Cu+ species in the films. Fig. 8. Refractive index (left) and extinction coefficient (right) of a series of Cu-Si oxide thin films for a ΦO2/ΦAr ratio of 1.0 and different number of strips in the cathode and for 3 stripes and different values of the ΦO2/ΦAr ratio. At this point it is convenient to correlate the obtained results with data reported in the literature for single SiO2, Cu2O or CuO oxides. It is well known that the refractive index of SiO2 is about 1.45. Refractive indices of cuprous oxide thin films [6,17,18,25–27], cupric oxide [17,18,27] and mixtures of them [28] have been reported in the literature. From the #152015 - $15.00 USD Received 22 Aug 2011; revised 2 Sep 2011; accepted 2 Sep 2011; published 11 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1108