scieee Open visual document viewer

Protein O-mannosyltransferases participate in ER protein quality control

Goder, Veit; Melero, Alejandro

Abstract

In eukaryotic cells, proteins enter the secretory pathway at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as linear polypeptides and fold after translocation across or insertion into the membrane. If correct folding fails, many proteins are O-mannosylated inside the ER by an O-mannosyltransferase, the Pmt1p-Pmt2p complex. The consequences of this modification are controversial and the cellular role of the Pmt1p-Pmt2p complex in this respect is unclear. Here, we have identified the binding partners of yeast Pmt1p and Pmt2p. These include ER chaperones involved in oxidative protein folding; the Hrd1p complex, which is involved in ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD); and the p24 protein complex involved in ER export. The results suggest that the Pmt1p-Pmt2p complex participates in these processes. We tested this assumption in a functional assay and found that whereas the Pmt1p-Pmt2p complex promotes fast ER export of the GPI-anchored protein Gas1p, it retains the misfolded version Gas1*p and targets it to the Hrd1p complex for subsequent degradation. Our results reveal previously unknown cellular roles of the Pmt1p-Pmt2p complex in connection with the ERAD machinery and show its participation in ER protein quality control.

Full text

144 Resea ch A icle In oduc ion A e ansloca ion ac oss o inse ion in o he endoplasmic e iculum (ER), memb ane p o eins ha e o old, a p ocess ha is assis ed by a a ie y o ER esiden chape ones ( o a e iew see Ellgaa d and Helenius, 2003). Folding is moni o ed by ER quali y con ol mechanisms, and co ec ly olded p o eins a e allowed o exi he ER by esicula budding (Ba lowe, 2003). Assis ance in p o ein olding and quali y con ol a e o en o e lapping unc ions o ER chape ones. A olding in e media e is ecognized by a chape one h ough such uni e sal signa u es as exposed hyd ophobic pa ches, unpai ed cys eines, and p oneness o agg ega ion (F a e al., 1993; Hellman e al., 1999; Zhang e al., 1997). I ini ial olding is slow o ails, hese ea u es will con inue o be exposed and will ensu e immedia e e-binding o a chape one. By his mechanism, slow- olding p o eins o p o eins ha mis old will be e ained inside he ER o ex ended pe iods o ime. Some ER e en ion mechanisms ha e addi ional complexi y, such as he calnexin–cal e iculin cycle ound in mammalian cells, whe e se e al chape ones and enzymes oge he moni o he olding o glycop o eins (Hammond e al., 1994; Pa odi, 2000). As well as aiding in p o ein olding and ER e en ion, some uni e sal chape ones such as calnexin and BiP possess a hi d unc ion in ha hey can a ge e minally mis olded p o eins o deg ada ion (B odsky e al., 1999; Denic e al., 2006; McC acken and B odsky, 1996; Plempe e al., 1997). Deg ada ion o abe an ER p o eins occu s mos ly by a p ocess called ER-associa ed p o ein deg ada ion (ERAD), whe eby p o eins a e ‘ e o ansloca ed’ in o he cy osol o be deg aded by he ubiqui in– p o easome sys em ( o a e iew see Meusse e al., 2005). Co e componen s o he esponsible machine ies o e o ansloca ion a e he ER memb ane-embedded E3 ubiqui in ligases. In yeas , he e a e wo such ubiqui in ligases, Doa10p and H d1p, which a e ound in dis inc memb ane p o ein complexes (Ca alho e al., 2006; Denic e al., 2006; Swanson e al., 2001). Toge he hey p omo e e o ansloca ion and deg ada ion o mos , i no all, mis olded subs a es in he ER. Whe eas he Doa10p complex a ge s memb ane p o eins wi h lesions in hei cy osolic po ions o he p o easome, a ou e e med he ERAD-C pa hway, he H d1p complex e o ansloca es memb ane p o eins wi h mis olded ansmemb ane domains (ERAD-M pa hway) o memb ane and soluble p o eins wi h de ec s in hei luminal po ion (ERAD-L pa hway) (Ca alho e al., 2006; Vashis e al., 2001). All pa hways con e ge a he cy osolic Cdc48p ATPase complex, which p obably p o ides he ene gy o e o ansloca ion and o subs a e ans e o he p o easome (Ca alho e al., 2006; Rabino ich e al., 2002; Ye e al., 2001). Whe eas he as majo i y o mis olded p o eins o he sec e o y pa hway a e ecognized ea ly while s ill inside he ER and will ul ima ely be a ge ed o ERAD, he e a e cases whe e a ac ion o hese species exi s he ER no mally. This occu s i de ec i e p o eins a e exp essed in la ge quan i ies o i expo signals a e dominan enough ha hey compe e wi h e en ion mechanisms (Caldwell e al., 2001; Haynes e al., 2002; Kincaid and Coope , 2007; Vashis e al., 2001). In ei he case, i becomes mo e e iden ha he cell possesses addi ional, albei less well-cha ac e ized, quali y con ol mechanisms in pos -ER compa men s ha can a ge abe an p o eins o deg ada ion (He ema e al., 2004; Hong e al., 1996; Reggio i and Pelham, 2002; Wang and Ng, 2010). One in e es ing bu poo ly unde s ood p o ein modi ica ion ha occu s inside he ER is ha o p o ein O-mannosyla ion, which is one o a a ie y o possible O-glycosyla ion e en s ha occu h oughou he sec e o y pa hway ( o a e iew see Spi o, 2002). O-mannosyla ion is media ed by membe s o he p o ein O- mannosyl ans e ase (PMT) amily (Lussie e al., 1995; S ahl- Bolsinge e al., 1993). PMTs a e mul ispanning memb ane p o eins Accep ed 9 No embe 2010 Jou nal o Cell Science 124, 144-153 © 2011. Published by The Company o Biologis s L d doi:10.1242/jcs.072181 Summa y In euka yo ic cells, p o eins en e he sec e o y pa hway a he endoplasmic e iculum (ER) as linea polypep ides and old a e ansloca ion ac oss o inse ion in o he memb ane. I co ec olding ails, many p o eins a e O-mannosyla ed inside he ER by an O-mannosyl ans e ase, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. The consequences o his modi ica ion a e con o e sial and he cellula ole o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in his espec is unclea . He e, we ha e iden i ied he binding pa ne s o yeas Pm 1p and Pm 2p. These include ER chape ones in ol ed in oxida i e p o ein olding; he H d1p complex, which is in ol ed in ER-associa ed p o ein deg ada ion (ERAD); and he p24 p o ein complex in ol ed in ER expo . The esul s sugges ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex pa icipa es in hese p ocesses. We es ed his assump ion in a unc ional assay and ound ha whe eas he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex p omo es as ER expo o he GPI-ancho ed p o ein Gas1p, i e ains he mis olded e sion Gas1*p and a ge s i o he H d1p complex o subsequen deg ada ion. Ou esul s e eal p e iously unknown cellula oles o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in connec ion wi h he ERAD machine y and show i s pa icipa ion in ER p o ein quali y con ol. Key wo ds: Endoplasmic e iculum, ER p o ein quali y con ol, ER-associa ed p o ein deg ada ion, Pm complex P o ein O -mannosyl ans e ases pa icipa e in ER p o ein quali y con ol Vei Gode * and Alejand o Mele o Depa men o Gene ics, Uni e si y o Se ille, A e Reina Me cedes 6, 41012 Se ille, Spain *Au ho o co espondence ([email p o ec ed]) Jou nal o Cell Science wi h se en ansmemb ane domains and wo la ge luminal loops, which oge he a e needed o he enzyma ic ac i i y (Gi bach e al., 2000; S ahl-Bolsinge and Scheinos , 1999). They a e conse ed om yeas o humans al hough hey appea o be missing in plan s (Wille e al., 2003). Single mannose esidues a e a ached o side chains o one o se e al se ine o h eonine esidues. I was epo ed ha many p o eins will be O-mannosyla ed inside he ER only in cases whe e hey mis old (Ha y e al., 2001; Vashis e al., 2001). The a e o mis olded p o eins ha ha e been O- mannosyla ed is con o e sial. Whe eas some o hem seem inc easingly p o ec ed om deg ada ion, o he s a e epo ed o be deg aded by he cy osolic p o easome o which hey a e a ge ed by an unknown mechanism (Ha y e al., 2001; Hi ayama e al., 2008). In e es ingly, like mos ER chape ones o membe s o he ERAD machine ies, PMTs a e up egula ed du ing ER s ess by he un olded p o ein esponse (UPR) (T a e s e al., 2000). This s udy aimed a iden i ying he cellula ole o he PMTs wi h espec o mis olded p o eins. We iden i ied he cellula binding pa ne s o yeas Pm 1p and Pm 2p, which a e known o o m an ac i e s ochiome ic complex (Pm 1p–Pm 2p) (Gi bach and S ahl, 2003). Binding pa ne s include ER chape ones in ol ed in oxida i e p o ein olding; he H d1p complex, which is in ol ed in ERAD; and he p24 p o ein complex, which is in ol ed in p o ein ER expo (Muniz e al., 2000; Schimmolle e al., 1995). These indings sugges ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex migh pa icipa e in all hese cellula p ocesses. In a subsequen unc ional assay, we es ed his hypo hesis and showed ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is equi ed o as ER expo o he GPI-ancho ed p o ein Gas1p, whe eas i e ains he mis olded e sion Gas1*p and a ge s i o he H d1p complex o subsequen deg ada ion. Ou esul s pu he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in a ca ego y wi h ER chape ones ha unc ion in ER p o ein quali y con ol. We p o ide a model o how he machine ies o p o ein O-mannosyla ion, ER expo and ERAD a e connec ed on a molecula le el. Finally, ou esul s uni y p e iously con adic ing da a o he ole o he Pm 1p– Pm 2p complex in ERAD. Resul s In e ac ion pa ne s o Pm 1p and Pm 2p To e eal he cellula unc ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex, we i s asked which componen s i is associa ed wi h. We sepa a ely agged Pm 1p and Pm 2p ch omosomally wi h a usion ag ha con ained a P o ein A moie y and a calmodulin binding pep ide (CA ag) and exp essed he p o eins om hei endogenous p omo e s. These agged p o eins we e ully unc ional (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S1). Yeas cells we e g own in olumes o 3 l. A e cell lysis, memb ane ac ions we e isola ed and solubilized wi h 1% digi onin. Tagged p o eins we e a ini y pu i ied oge he wi h hei binding pa ne s using IgG-coupled magne ic beads. The elua e was subjec ed o SDS-PAGE ollowed by Coomassie Blue s aining (Fig. 1A). The isualized bands we e cu ou and hei iden i y de e mined by andem mass spec ome y (Table 1 and supplemen a y ma e ial Table S1). Al e na i ely, we p ecipi a ed he en i e elua e wi h ichlo oace ic acid (TCA) and iden i ied he pool o bound p o eins by andem mass spec ome y (Table 1 and supplemen a y ma e ial Table S1). A wild- ype s ain wi hou agged p o eins was used as a con ol in all expe imen s. As shown in Fig. 1A, Pm 1p and Pm 2p we e isola ed oge he bu no abundan addi ional binding pa ne s we e isible (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 3, bands 1 and 2; Table 1). Howe e , a ain smea was seen con aining p o eins o he p24 p o ein complex (Fig. 1A, 145 Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER quali y con ol lanes 2 and 3, band 5; Table 1). In Fig. 1A, bands 3 and 4 con ained esidual IgG hea y and ligh chain om incomple e coupling o magne ic beads. Using TCA p ecipi a ion, we iden i ied addi ional and less abundan binding pa ne s o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. Along wi h p o eins o he p24 p o ein complex, we ound Cdc48p, H d1p, Usa1p and Yos9p (componen s o he ERAD-media ing H d1p complex), E o1p and Pdi1p (p o eins in ol ed in oxida i e p o ein olding), Ub 1p and Cue4p (p o eins in ol ed in p o ein ubiqui yla ion), D m1p (a dis inc co- ac o o he Cdc48p ATPase) and Ted1p (a p o ein linked o GPI-ancho emodeling) (see Table 1). In summa y, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex associa es weakly and hus p obably ansien ly, wi h ER componen s ha ha e es ablished oles in p o ein olding and ER expo as well as in ERAD. We Fig. 1. The Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex associa es wi h ER machine ies in ol ed in ER p o ein expo and in ERAD. (A)  In e ac ion pa ne s o Pm 1p and Pm 2p. Wild- ype yeas cells (con) o cells exp essing ei he Pm 1- CA o Pm 2-CA we e lysed and memb ane ac ions solubilized wi h 1% digi onin. The ex ac was incuba ed wi h IgG-coupled magne ic beads and bound ma e ial analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue s aining. Visualized bands (lanes 2 and 3) and egions om he con ol eac ion (lane 1) we e numbe ed, cu ou and hei p o ein con en de e mined by mass spec ome y (Table 1; supplemen a y ma e ial Table S1). (B)  Yeas cells exp essing Emp24-3H wi h o wi hou exp essing Pm 2-CA we e lysed. Samples we e analyzed di ec ly (inpu ; 5% o o al ma e ial) o a e immunop ecipi a ion using IgG-coupled magne ic beads (IP:IgG; 95% o o al ma e ial). All samples we e sepa a ed by SDS-PAGE (4-20% g adien gel) and analyzed by immunoblo ing (IB) wi h he indica ed an ibodies. The a owhead indica es he co-immunop ecipi a ed ac ion. The s a indica es Pm 2-CA ha was also ecognized by he seconda y an ibody. (C)  As o B, bu using cells exp essing Pm 1-3HA wi h o wi hou exp essing H d1-CA. The SDS-PAGE was pe o med using a 7% s anda d gel. The a owhead indica es he co-immunop ecipi a ed ac ion. The s a indica es H d1-CA ha was also ecognized by he seconda y an ibody. Jou nal o Cell Science hus hypo hesized ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex i sel ac i ely pa icipa es in hese cellula p ocesses. Be o e es ing ou hypo hesis expe imen ally we wan ed o con i m and isualize he in e ac ions o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex wi h he p edominan binding pa ne s ha we iden i ied: he H d1p complex and he p24 p o ein complex. To his end, we cons uc ed s ains in which wo p o eins we e di e en ially agged. As can be seen in Fig. 1B, a ac ion o HA- agged Emp24p (Emp24-3HA, a membe o he p24 p o ein complex) co-p ecipi a es wi h CA- agged Pm 2p (Pm 2-CA). A con ol s ain wi hou Pm 2-CA did no b ing down agged Emp24p (Fig. 1B, compa e lanes 5 and 6). As can be seen in Fig. 1C, we could co-isola e a ac ion o HA- agged Pm 1p (Pm 1- 3HA) wi h CA- agged H d1p (H d1-CA, he E3-ligase o he H d1p complex). Only ain backg ound s aining was isible i H d1p was un agged (Fig. 1C, compa e lanes 5 and 6). To assess whe he deg ada ion o he agged Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex by he H d1p complex leads o hei obse ed associa ion, we pe o med a cycloheximide (CHX)-chase analysis o CA- agged Pm 2p. Su p isingly, Pm 2-CA was ela i ely uns able and was deg aded wi h an app oxima e hal li e o 1.5 hou s (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S2). Howe e , he u no e was independen o H d1p and hus he physical in e ac ion was no due o deg ada ion by he H d1p complex (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S2). Gas1*p is a subs a e o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex and is la gely deg aded by he ERAD-L pa hway To add ess ou hypo hesis ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex pa icipa es in p o ein olding, ER expo and ERAD, we nex looked o a sui able model subs a e. Ideally, such a subs a e should no mally be expo ed om he ER in a p24 p o ein complex- dependen manne , whe eas a mu an should be deg aded ia H d1p complex-media ed ERAD. The GPI-ancho ed p o ein Gas1p comes closes o hese c i e ia. In i s wild- ype o m, he p o ein lea es 146 Jou nal o Cell Science 124 (1) he ER depending on he p24 p o ein complex and is a ge ed o he plasma memb ane (Muniz e al., 2001; Muniz e al., 2000; Schimmolle e al., 1995). Impo an ly, a mu an e sion o Gas1p, Gas1*p, is uns able and deg aded by an uniden i ied p o easome- dependen pa hway (Fuji a e al., 2006). In e es ingly, whe eas Gas1p is O-glycosyla ed by Pm 4p and Pm 6p alone, Gas1*p is u he O-glycosyla ed by Pm 1p and Pm 2p (Hi ayama e al., 2008). Thus, he wild- ype p o ein Gas1p and i s mu an e sion Gas1*p appea well sui ed o ou analysis. We i s con i med ha Gas1*p is O-mannosyla ed by he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex as epo ed p e iously (Hi ayama e al., 2008). To his end, we exp essed ch omosomally HA- agged species o wild- ype Gas1p [Gas1p(HA)] o mu an Gas1*p [Gas1*p(HA)] om hei endogenous p omo e s in wild- ype o in Pm 1–Pm 2 dele ion mu an (pm 1pm 2) cells. We gene ally obse ed a lowe p o ein exp ession le el in pm 1pm 2 cells han in wild- ype cells, which was also e lec ed in a educed g ow h a e (da a no shown). As can be seen in Fig. 2A, Gas1*p showed an inc ease in elec opho e ic mobili y in pm 1pm 2 cells as compa ed wi h wild- ype cells, consis en wi h i being O-mannosyla ed (Fig. 2A, compa e lanes 3 and 4, a ows). We occasionally obse ed a smea abo e he majo p o ein bands, bu because he phenomenon was a e we conside ed i unspeci ic. In con as o Gas1*p, bo h he p ecu so and he ma u e o m o Gas1p mig a ed wi h simila elec opho e ic mobili y in pm 1pm 2 and in wild- ype cells (Fig. 2A, compa e lanes 1 and 2). To exclude he possibili y ha he inc ease in elec opho e ic mobili y o Gas1*p in pm 1pm 2 cells esul s om de ec i e N-glycosyla ion a he han om lack o O-mannosyla ion, we pe o med an addi ional se o expe imen s using he de-N-glycanase PNGase F o emo e N-linked glycans p io o SDS-PAGE (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S3) and co- immunop ecipi a ion wi h he mannose-speci ic lec in Concana aline A (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S4B). Finally, he Table 1. Summa y o in e ac ing p o eins ha we e immunop ecipi a ed wi h CA- agged Pm 1p (Pm 1-CA) o CA- agged Tagged p o ein (bai ) Pm 1-CA Pm 2-CA In e ac ing p o ein Func ional ca ego y Indi idual To al Indi idual To al Pm 1p 33[1] 36/32 35[2] 39/34 Pm 2p O-mannosyla ion 28[2] 25/22 20[1] 22/21 Cdc48p ERAD – 1/2 – 18/3 E o1p P o ein olding – 2/2 – 3/2 Pdi1p P o ein olding – 2/1 – –/1 H d1p ERAD – 1/– – 2/– Usa1p ERAD – 2/– – 2/2 Yos9p ERAD – –/– – 1/– Ub 1p Ubiqui in ligase – –/5 – –/– D m1p Cdc48p co ac o – –/– – 5/2 Cue4p Ubiqui in binding – –/2 – 1/3 Ted1p GPI emodeling – –/3 – –/2 IgG hc [3] [3] IgG lc [4] [4] Emp24p – 2/2 – 2/2 E 25p 1[5] 6/4 – 5/4 E p1p 1[5] 5/5 2[5] 4/3 E p2p ER expo (p24 complex) – 2/2 4[5] 1/1 Bound p o eins we e iden i ied using mass spec ome y. We analyzed ei he indi idual p o ein bands a e hei sepa a ion using SDS-PAGE and s aining wi h Coomassie Blue (indi idual) o he o al p o ein elua e a e p ecipi a ion wi h ichlo oace ic acid ( o al). Numbe s indica e he numbe o pep ides iden i ied by mass spec ome y. Fo mul iple expe imen s, numbe s a e sepa a ed by a solidus. The numbe s in squa e b acke s co espond o he bands in Fig. 1A. See supplemen a y ma e ial Table S1 o he comple e se o mass spec ome y da a. Al hough Yos9p was only iden i ied wi h one indi idual pep ide and would no pass ou c i e ia as a ue hi , we show i because i is a well-known H d1p complex componen . IgG hc, immunoglobulin hea y chain; IgG lc, immunoglobulin ligh chain. Pm 2p (Pm 2-CA) Jou nal o Cell Science a o emen ioned expe imen o es o he unc ionali y o agged Pm 2p showed a Pm 2p-dependen change in elec opho e ic mobili y o Gas1*p o e ime (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S1). Toge he , hese da a con i m ha Gas1*p bu no Gas1p is modi ied in a Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex-dependen manne , s ongly sugges ing ha Gas1*p in e ac s di ec ly wi h he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex and is O-mannosyla ed. Nex , we asked whe he Gas1*p is deg aded ia he H d1p complex-dependen ERAD-L pa hway as p edic ed on he basis o he ac ha he mis olded GPI-ancho ed p o ein is exposed en i ely o he lumen o he ER. To his end, we exp essed Gas1*p in wild- ype and dele ion mu an s o he H d1p complex and pe o med a CHX-chase expe imen . As can be seen in Fig. 2B, lanes 1–4 and g aph, when exp essed in wild- ype cells Gas1*p is deg aded wi h a hal -li e o oughly 1.5 hou s, consis en wi h p e ious da a (Fuji a e al., 2006). When we es ed dele ion mu an s o all memb ane-bound H d1p complex componen s (H d1p, H d3p, De 1p,and Usa1p), we ound ha hey s abilized Gas1*p whe eas 147 Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER quali y con ol dele ion o Doa10p ( he cen al componen o he ERAD-C pa hway) did no (Fig. 2B,C). Dele ions o D m1p, Ub 1p o Cue4p (o he binding pa ne s o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex; Table 1) did no in luence Gas1*p u no e (Fig. 2C and da a no shown). These esul s show ha Gas1*p is indeed a ge ed o deg ada ion by he ERAD-L pa hway. Ou esul s a e di e en om hose published p e iously epo ing ha dele ing H d1p had no e ec on Gas1*p u no e (Fuji a e al., 2006). I has been epo ed ha he p24 p o ein complex has a ole in deg ada ion o Gas1*p (Fuji a e al., 2006). Because he p24 p o ein complex has an es ablished unc ion in ER expo o wild- ype Gas1p, he simples scena io would be consis en wi h a p24 p o ein complex-dependen ER exi o a ac ion o Gas1*p and i s a ge ing o deg ada ion om a pos -ER compa men . Howe e , ou ea lie esul s showed ha bo h he H d1p complex and he p24 p o ein complex a e p esen as associa es o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. I could hus be ha he p24 p o ein complex in e ac s di ec ly wi h he H d1p complex and has a ole in a ge ing o Gas1*p o he Fig. 2. The mis olded model p o ein Gas1*p is a subs a e o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex and is in pa deg aded by he ERAD-L pa hway. (A)  Gas1p(HA) o Gas1*p(HA) we e indi idually exp essed in wild- ype o in pm 1pm 2 cells. Equal amoun s o cells we e lysed and he p o eins analyzed by SDA-PAGE (5% s anda d gel) ollowed by an i-HA immunoblo ing. A ows indica e he O-mannosyla ed ac ion o Gas1*p: p, p ecu so o m; m ma u e o m. (B,C)  The deg ada ion o Gas1*p(HA) was measu ed in wild- ype cells o in cells ca ying he designa ed dele ions a e inhibi ion o p o ein syn hesis by addi ion o 200  g/ml cycloheximide. A he indica ed ime poin s, equal aliquo s o cells we e emo ed, lysed and he amoun o emaining Gas1*p(HA) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (4–20% g adien gel) ollowed by an i-HA immunoblo ing. The bands we e quan i ied by densi ome y and he esul s o a leas h ee independen se s o expe imen s we e plo ed ( igh panels). Jou nal o Cell Science ERAD machine y. To check his idea, we es ed whe he we could co-immunop ecipi a e membe s o he ERAD machine y di ec ly wi h Emp24p. As can be seen in Fig. 3A, we could no co- p ecipi a e Usa1p (a membe o he H d1p complex) wi h Emp24- CA, whe eas he con ol eac ion using CA- agged De 1p (De 1-CA), ano he membe o he H d1p complex, eadily b ough down Usa1p (Fig. 3A, compa e lanes 4–6). Fu he mo e, we did no ind H d1p complex componen s as binding pa ne s o Emp24- CA when pe o ming a la ge-scale pull-down expe imen ollowed by mass spec ome ic analysis, as desc ibed in Fig. 1 (V.G. and A.M., unpublished da a). We hen di ec ly measu ed he deg ada ion o Gas1*p in p24 p o ein complex dele ion mu an s. Dele ions o ei he Emp24p o o E 25p led o s abiliza ion o Gas1*p (Fig. 3B, lanes 1–12), consis en wi h p e ious da a (Fuji a e al., 2006). This ac ion was no sec e ed o a ge ed o he acuole (V.G. and A.M., unpublished da a). When we addi ionally disabled he ERAD-L pa hway using h d1emp24 dele ion mu an cells we ound maximal s abiliza ion o Gas1*p (Fig. 3B, lanes 13–16 and g aph). Toge he , hese da a sugges ha Gas1*p can be deg aded by wo sepa a e pa hways: one is he ERAD-L pa hway, which depends on he H d1p complex, and he o he depends on he p24 p o ein complex and is consis en wi h leading o p o ein deg ada ion om a pos -ER compa men . The Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex e ains Gas1*p and ul ima ely a ge s i o he H d1p complex o deg ada ion Nex , we di ec ly add essed he ole o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in deg ada ion o Gas1*p. The physical in e ac ion o he Pm 1p– Pm 2p complex wi h he H d1p complex sugges s ha he Pm 1p– 148 Jou nal o Cell Science 124 (1) Pm 2p complex migh a ge Gas1*p o he H d1p complex. In ha case, absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex would lead o a s abiliza ion o Gas1*p. I , al e na i ely, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex e ains Gas1*p and p e en s i s e o ansloca ion by he H d1p complex, i s absence should esul in as e deg ada ion o Gas1*p. To dis inguish be ween hese possibili ies, we pe o med a CHX- chase expe imen wi h dele ion mu an s o ei he Pm 1p o Pm 2p o bo h. As can be seen in Fig. 4, dele ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex d as ically inc eases he u no e a e o Gas1*p, bes isible o he pm 1pm 2 cells, in which he hal li e was educed o app oxima ely 45 minu es. This indica es ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex has an inhibi o y unc ion o he deg ada ion o Gas1*p, consis en wi h an ER e en ion unc ion o he mis olded p o ein. As men ioned ea lie , some classical ER chape ones such as BiP and calnexin a e known o ha e mul iple unc ions and play a ole in p o ein olding, p o ein ER e en ion and in a ge ing o p o ein deg ada ion. A simila unc ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex o a ge subs a es o he ERAD machine y o o he p24 p o ein complex could be masked by he e en ion e ec ha we obse ed. We hus cons uc ed iple mu an s in which we dele ed H d1p o Emp24p in a pm 1pm 2 backg ound and measu ed he deg ee o s abiliza ion o Gas1*p. This allowed us o compa e he amoun o Gas1*p deg aded by ei he pa hway in he p esence and absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. As can be seen in Fig. 4B, bo h iple mu an s s abilized Gas1*p as compa ed wi h pm 1pm 2 cells. Howe e , he ela i e amoun o Gas1*p deg aded ia he ERAD-L pa hway was ma kedly educed in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex, whe eas mos o he Gas1*p was deg aded ia a p24 complex-dependen pa hway (Fig. Fig. 3. The p24 p o ein complex does no in e ac wi h he H d1p complex and is pa o an ERAD-L independen deg ada ion pa hway o a ac ion o Gas1*p. (A)  Wild- ype cells (lanes 1 and 4) o cells exp essing a agged e sion o De 1p (De 1-CA; lanes 2 and 5) o Emp24-CA (lanes 3 and 6) we e lysed and samples we e analyzed as o Fig. 1B excep ha memb anes we e immunos ained wi h an i-Usa1p an ibodies. The SDS-PAGE was pe o med using a 7% s anda d gel. The a owhead indica es co-immunop ecipi a ed ac ion (no e ha he signal o Usa1p in he inpu ac ions is low; lanes 1–3). S a s indica e Emp24-CA and De 1-CA ha we e also ecognized by he seconda y an ibody. The b acke indica es IgG hea y chains ha we e ecognized by he seconda y an ibody. (B)  The deg ada ion o Gas1*p(HA) was measu ed, quan i ied and plo ed in wild- ype cells o in cells ca ying he designa ed dele ions as desc ibed in Fig. 2. The SDS- PAGE was pe o med using a 7% s anda d gel. Jou nal o Cell Science 4C). Toge he wi h ou da a o physical in e ac ions (Fig. 1C), hese esul s sugges ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex has a dual ole in he a e o Gas1*p: i s , i e ains he p o ein and p e en s i s o he wise apid deg ada ion; and second, i ul ima ely deli e s he p o ein o he H d1p complex-dependen ERAD-L pa hway o deg ada ion. The Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is equi ed o he as ER exi o wild- ype Gas1p Because o he associa ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex wi h he p24 p o ein complex, we p edic ed ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex plays a ole in ER exi o e en wild- ype Gas1p. I he Pm 1p– Pm 2p complex possesses a chape one unc ion, i should p omo e ER exi o Gas1p. We i s es ed whe he Gas1p would be s able in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex, which would be an indica ion o i s p ope olding. To his end, we exp essed ch omosomally HA- agged Gas1p in wild- ype cells and in pm 1pm 2 cells and pe o med a CHX-chase expe imen (Fig. 5A, lanes 5–12). As can be seen, Gas1p ma u ed and was s able o e a pe iod o se e al hou s in wild- ype and in pm 1pm 2 cells, which was consis en wi h he wild- ype p o ein being olded p ope ly e en in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. As a con ol, we show he ypical pa e n o Gas1*p ha is being O- mannosyla ed and deg aded in wild- ype cells (Fig. 5A, lanes 1– 4). We we e awa e o a minu e dec ease in elec opho e ic mobili y o he ma u e o m o Gas1p in pm 1pm 2 cells compa ed wi h wild- ype cells, he eason o which is cu en ly unknown (Fig. 5A, compa e lanes 5–8 wi h 9–12). Nex , we di ec ly add essed he ER exi kine ics o Gas1p in wild- ype cells and in pm 1pm 2 cells. We pe o med a adioac i e pulse-labeling and chase 149 Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER quali y con ol expe imen ollowed by immunop ecipi a ion o Gas1p (Fig. 5B). As can be seen, he ER exi o Gas1p was ma kedly dec eased in pm 1pm 2 cells compa ed wi h wild- ype cells, as judged by he slowe con e sion o he p ecu so o m in o he ma u e o m. Whe eas in wild- ype cells abou hal o he Gas1p was con e ed in o he ma u e o m wi hin 10 minu es, he same p ocess ook abou 22 minu es in pm 1pm 2 cells (Fig. 5B). By con as , he ER exi o endogenous ca boxypep idase Y (CPY) was undis u bed in pm 1pm 2 cells compa ed wi h wild- ype cells, showing ha he o e all kine ics o ER exi we e no gene ally a ec ed (Fig. 5C). These esul s demons a e ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex p omo es ER exi o wild- ype Gas1p. Discussion We ha e shown ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex possesses p e iously unknown cellula unc ions ha a e eminiscen o hose collec i ely e med ‘ER p o ein quali y con ol’. The iden i ica ion o i s binding pa ne s and subsequen unc ional da a p o ide a ela i ely simple pic u e and sugges a model o how he Pm 1p– Pm 2p complex pe o ms quali y con ol o ER p o eins. Ou da a also cla i y some puzzling esul s wi h ega d o he deg ada ion o mis olded GPI-ancho ed p o eins. Fo ins ance, al hough i was epo ed ha Gas1*p is la gely deg aded by he p o easome, a pa hway o he p o easome could no be iden i ied (Fuji a e al., 2006). Fu he mo e, al hough i was shown ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex O-mannosyla es Gas1*p, i has emained unclea why and whe e O-mannosyla ed Gas1*p is a ge ed o deg ada ion (Hi ayama e al., 2008). In he model depic ed in Fig. 6, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex plays he cen al and mo e uni e sal ole, whe eas he unc ion o Fig. 4. The Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex has a dual ole in he a e o Gas1*p: ini ial e en ion o he p o ein and i s ul ima e a ge ing o he H d1p complex. (A,B)  Deg ada ion o Gas1*p(HA) in cells ca ying he indica ed dele ions was measu ed, quan i ied and plo ed as desc ibed in Fig. 2. The SDS-PAGE was pe o med using a 4–20% g adien gel (A) o 5% s anda d gel (B). (C)  The deg ee o Gas1*p(HA) s abiliza ion when deple ing he H d1p complex was compa ed wi h ha when deple ing he p24 p o ein complex, bo h in he absence and p esence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (see Ma e ials and Me hods o calcula ion). Jou nal o Cell Science he p24 p o ein complex is es ic ed o GPI-ancho ed p o eins, like ou model p o eins Gas1p and Gas1*p. We base he la e assump ion on he ac ha he p24 p o ein complex is associa ed wi h Gas1p h oughou i s ER esidence ime and also du ing i s ER exi (Manuel Muñiz, pe sonal communica ion). Acco dingly, we p opose ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex binds o Gas1p ha is al eady associa ed wi h he p24 p o ein complex. Because he p esence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex p omo es as ER exi o Gas1p (Fig. 5B), he simples scena io would be ha he complex di ec ly o indi ec ly aids in p o ein olding (Fig. 6A). This is suppo ed by wo obse a ions: i s , E o1p and Pdi1p, which media e oxida i e p o ein olding, a e amongs he binding pa ne s o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (Table 1); and second, mammalian cells exp ess a highly UPR- egula ed soluble p o ein in he ER wi h homology o he la ges luminal loop, loop 5, o he amily o PMTs (Fukuda e al., 2001; Hamada e al., 1996). This p o ein, SDF2L1 in mouse, is also ound in complex wi h o he ER esiden chape ones (Meunie e al., 2002). Ve y in e es ingly, on he basis o he egion o homology be ween SDF2L1, Pm 1p and Pm 2p and on unc ional s udies wi h Pm 1p (Gi bach e al., 2000), SDF2L1 should be incapable o media ing O-mannosyla ion. This s ongly sugges s ha he p oposed chape one-like unc ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is dis inc om i s O-mannosyla ion ac i i y. Finally, p24 p o ein complex-dependen ER expo o co ec ly olded Gas1p occu s a e dissocia ion om he Pm 1p– 150 Jou nal o Cell Science 124 (1) Pm 2p complex, which, in con as o he p24 p o ein complex, emains in he ER (Haselbeck and Tanne , 1983; Huh e al., 2003). Like Gas1p, Gas1*p binds o he p24 p o ein complex and subsequen ly o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (Fig. 6B). Howe e , since Gas1*p canno be olded p ope ly i con inuously ebinds o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex and is hus e ained by i in he ER (Fig. 4 and Fig. 6B). This e en ion has a leas wo consequences: i s , Gas1*p is inc easingly O-mannosyla ed wi h ime in a Pm 1p– Pm 2p complex-dependen manne (Fig. 2, Fig. 5A, Fig. 6B; supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S1 and Fig. S3); and second, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex e en ually a ge s Gas1*p o he H d1p complex o ERAD (Fig. 4 and Fig. 6B). The p ecise molecula ole o O-mannans in Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex-media ed p o ein e en ion and H d1p complex-media ed p o ein deg ada ion is an exci ing subjec o be add essed nex . Because he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex can associa e wi h he H d1p complex p o ein, O- mannosyla ion should ha e a unc ion di e en om a ge ing p o eins o he ERAD machine y. Consis en ly, O-mannosyla ion is no s ic ly equi ed o ERAD-dependen deg ada ion o Gas1*p because deg ada ion ia he H d1p complex s ill occu s in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (Fig. 4B). We es ed whe he he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex migh egula e subs a e deg ada ion by O-mannosyla ing ERAD machine y componen s bu ound ha his is no he case (supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S4). In ano he model, inc easing O-mannosyla ion o he subs a e migh help o Fig. 5. The Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex p omo es ER exi o Gas1p. (A)  Gas1*p(HA) o Gas1p(HA) we e indi idually exp essed in wild- ype o in pm 1pm 2 cells and analyzed as desc ibed in Fig. 2. p, p ecu so o m; m, ma u e o m. The SDS-PAGE was pe o med using a 5% s anda d gel. (B)  Yeas cells exp essing Gas1p(HA) in wild- ype o in pm 1pm 2 cells we e labeled wi h [35S]me hionine o 10 minu es and chased o he indica ed imes. The cells we e lysed and Gas1p(HA) was immunop ecipi a ed using an i- HA an ibodies and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (5% s anda d gel) and au o adiog aphy. P o ein ma u a ion was plo ed o e ime on he basis o he ob ained ac ion o ma u e p o ein o m (m) om o al p o ein a indica ed imes ( igh panel). Values we e ob ained using a Phospo Image . The appa en a e o ma u a ion o Gas1p was calcula ed and shown wi h linea eg ession a e inclusion o he alue ze o a ime –10 (s a o pulse). (C)  The same expe imen wi h iden ical cells was pe o med bu he acuola pep idase CPY was immunop ecipi a ed using an i-CPY an ibodies. p1, p ecu so o m 1, p2, p ecu so o m 2. Plo ing and calcula ions we e done as o B. Jou nal o Cell Science dissocia e i om he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex and allow ans e o he associa ed ERAD machine y. This model can be es ed in he u u e h ough he gene a ion and u iliza ion o sui able O- mannosyla ion mu an s o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. Deple ion o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex leads o an ‘escape’ o mos o he Gas1*p om H d1p complex-media ed ERAD o a p24-dependen , p obably pos -ER, deg ada ion (Figs 4 and 6). Redundan quali y con ol in he ER, al hough abundan , is p obably no oo s ingen o a oid cos ly des uc ion o olding in e media es. Howe e , i becomes clea ha he cell possesses addi ional and less well cha ac e ized quali y con ol sys ems in he sec e o y pa hway downs eam o he ER ha can a ge p o eins o deg ada ion (Caldwell e al., 2001; Haynes e al., 2002; Vashis e al., 2001; Wang and Ng, 2010). Al hough we canno ule ou wi h ce ain y ha he p24 complex is a membe o such a pos -ER 151 Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER quali y con ol quali y con ol sys em, we did no ind componen s wi h known unc ional links o he p o easome o o he acuole when we analyzed he binding pa ne s o Emp24p (V.G. and A.M., unpublished da a). Thus, he pa hway o p24 p o ein-dependen Gas1*p deg ada ion emains o be iden i ied. Apa om Gas1*p, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex has been shown o O-mannosyla e se e al o he mis olded soluble o memb ane- bound p o eins. Examples include KHN, KWW, mu an aspa ic p o ease I and mu an - ac o , none o which a e GPI-ancho ed bu all o which a e subjec ed o H d1p complex-dependen ERAD (Ha y e al., 2001; Naka sukasa e al., 2004; Vashis e al., 2001; Wahlman e al., 2007). An o e all inc ease in p o ein O- mannosyla ion has also been obse ed upon inhibi ion o N- glycosyla ion, which induces p o ein mis olding (Ha y e al., 2001). We he e o e sugges ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex can a ge a wide a ie y o mis olded p o eins o he H d1p complex. One explana ion why his conclusion has been missed so a and why he e is con o e sy abou he a e o O-mannosyla ed mis olded p o eins is ha classical es s o in ol emen o cellula componen s in p o ein deg ada ion measu e he deg ee o inhibi ion o subs a e deg ada ion in dele ion mu an s. Howe e , ou da a clea ly show ha he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex has a e en ion unc ion on op o i s a ge ing unc ion o he ERAD machine y, which complica es ma e s. In addi ion, he cell possesses mul iple and appa en ly e y dynamic pa hways o p o ein deg ada ion, which can lead o he a ge ing o mis olded p o eins o di e en ou es upon deple ion o one pa hway. Conside ing his, a mo e combina o ial app oach using mu an s wi h dis up ions in mul iple pa hways was needed o ob ain be e insigh in o he se e al unc ions o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (Fig. 4). The same a gumen s eadily explain he kine ic al e a ions obse ed o ER expo o Gas1p and o he deg ada ion o Gas1*p in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex. Whe eas he expo a e o Gas1p was dec eased (Fig. 5), he appa en deg ada ion a e o Gas1*p was inc eased (Fig. 4). Wi h espec o Gas1p, he delay o ER expo in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is consis en wi h loss o a chape one ha helps apid olding o Gas1p (Fig. 5B). Wi h espec o Gas1*p, as e deg ada ion by a pa hway o he han ERAD in he absence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is consis en wi h loss o bo h ER e en ion and a ge ing o ERAD (Fig. 4). Besides i s gene al ole in ER p o ein e en ion, ERAD and ER expo , he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex migh possess an addi ional and mo e speci ic unc ion o he olding and ER expo o GPI- ancho ed p o eins. This is sugges ed by he physical link o he p24 p o ein complex, as only one o many known ER expo ac o s. In e es ingly, we also iden i ied Ted1p as a binding pa ne o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex bu no o he p24 p o ein complex (Table 1; V.G. and A.M., unpublished da a). Ted1p was i s iden i ied in a sc een o p o eins impai ing he su ace exp ession o mammalian G-p o ein-ac i a ed Ki channel GIRK2 in yeas (Haass e al., 2007). Likewise, he p24 p o ein complex componen s Emp24p and E 25p we e among he only six o he hi s om he 376 es ed dele ions. I was p e iously shown ha Ted1p and he p24 complex p o eins clus e in an epis asis mini-a ay (E-MAP), which sugges ed a common biological unc ion (Schuldine e al., 2005). Indeed, he ma u a ion o Gas1p was delayed in a Ted1p dele ion s ain simila o an Emp24p dele ion s ain (Haass e al., 2007). The mammalian o holog o Ted1p, PAGP5, is a GPI- ancho emodeling enzyme and was ecen ly shown o emo e he Fig. 6. A model o he ole o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER p o ein quali y con ol. The scheme illus a es he p oposed ole o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex in ER p o ein quali y con ol o he es ed model p o eins Gas1p and Gas1*p. The basic p inciple should also be applicable o o he subs a es (see Discussion). (A)  ER ma u a ion o Gas1p (solid black a ows). A e ER ansloca ion and GPI-ancho ans e and p io o ER expo , Gas1p olds and has i s GPI ancho emodeled. Gas1p is p obably associa ed o he p24 p o ein complex h oughou i s ER esidence ime. Because he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex possesses some cha ac e is ics o classical chape ones and aids in apid ER expo o Gas1p, i could be in ol ed in p o ein olding and/o GPI- ancho emodeling ( hick g ay a ows). (B)  ER e en ion and deg ada ion o Gas1*p (dashed black a ows). Like Gas1p, Gas1*p associa es wi h he p24 p o ein complex. Howe e , an ER expo compe en old canno be achie ed, which esul s in ex ended associa ion wi h he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (“Re en ion”), p o ein O-mannosyla ion (“O-mannosyla ion”) and subsequen ans e o he H d1p complex (“Ta ge ing o ERAD”) o e o ansloca ion and p o easomal deg ada ion (see Discussion o de ails). Those Gas1*p a ian s ha can escape his p ima y ER quali y con ol ( he amoun will d as ically inc ease when he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex is absen ) will be subjec ed o a second, as ye uncha ac e ized, con ol sys em, p obably in a pos -ER compa men (ques ion ma k). Jou nal o Cell Science 152 Jou nal o Cell Science 124 (1) side-chain e hanolamine phospha e o he second mannose a ached o he GPI-ancho backbone. This ac i i y is p e equisi e o e icien ER exi o GPI-ancho ed p o eins (Fuji a e al., 2009). In a specula i e model, he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex migh egula e access o he Gas1p–p24 p o ein complex o GPI-ancho emodeling enzymes and hus couple p o ein olding wi h GPI- ancho emodeling. This scena io could be pa o Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex-media ed Gas1p ‘ olding’, as shown in Fig. 6A. Ma e ials and Me hods Yeas s ains and plasmids The s ains used we e isogenic o W303 (MATa leu2-3,112 p1-1 can1-100 u a3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15) excep hose used in expe imen s shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 3A and supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S2, which we e isogenic o BY4741 (MATa his3leu2 u a3). Tagging o p o eins o genomic gene dele ions we e pe o med using s anda d PCR-based homologous ecombina ion echniques. Gas1*p(HA) was in eg a ed in o he URA3 locus o yeas cells using he in eg a i e plasmid pMF616, which was a gi om Mo ihisa Fuji a (Fuji a e al., 2006). Gas1p(HA) was de i ed om pMF616 by back mu a ion o he single base exchange using s anda d PCR- based mu agenesis and in eg a ed in o he URA3 locus o yeas cells. All cons uc s we e sequenced. P o ein complex pu i ica ion and co-immunop ecipi a ion Fo mass spec ome y analysis, app oxima ely 15 g o cells we e lysed by g inding in liquid ni ogen and he memb anes sedimen ed. Memb anes we e solubilized in bu e con aining 1% digi onin (Calbiochem). The ex ac was incuba ed o se e al hou s wi h IgG-coupled magne ic beads (Dynal). A e washing and elu ion, he elua e was ei he p ecipi a ed wi h ichlo oace ic acid (TCA) o sepa a ed by SDS- PAGE, ollowed by Coomassie Blue s aining and excision o indi idual bands. In bo h cases, he p o eins we e iden i ied by mass spec ome y. Fo co- immunop ecipi a ion, essen ially he same p o ocol was u ilized, wi h he excep ion ha ma e ial om 200 ml cul u es we e used and cells we e lysed using bead bea ing. A e SDS-PAGE, p o eins we e analyzed by immunblo ing wi h an ibodies o HA (Roche) o Usa1p (Ca alho e al., 2006), o wi h abbi IgG (Sigma). Gas1*p(HA) and Gas1p(HA) deg ada ion expe imen s Cycloheximide shu -o expe imen s we e pe o med in exponen ially g owing cells. The shu -o was s a ed by addi ion o CHX o a inal concen a ion o 200 g/ml. Equal olume aliquo s o cell cul u e we e emo ed a indica ed ime poin s and mo ed o ice. Cells we e lysed using 150 mM NaOH ollowed by addi ion o sample bu e con aining 1% SDS and hea ing. Cellula Gas1*p(HA) o Gas1p(HA) con en was p obed by SDS-PAGE ollowed by wes e n blo ing using an i-HA an ibodies. To quan i y bands wi h he Odyssey In a ed Imaging Sys em (LI-COR Biosciences) a dye-coupled seconda y an ibody was used (Fig. 2B,C, Fig. 4A; supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S2). To quan i y bands wi h a LAS-3000 Imaging Sys em (Fuji ilm Li escience) and Mul i-Gauge So wa e, a pe oxidase-coupled seconda y an ibody was used (Fig. 3B, Fig. 4B; supplemen a y ma e ial Fig. S1). Radioac i e pulse-chase and immunop ecipi a ion Fo in i o pulse labeling, an o e nigh yeas cul u e was dilu ed and g own o an op ical densi y (OD) o ~0.8 a 600 nm. Cells equi alen o 5 OD we e esuspended in 1 ml medium lacking me hionine, incuba ed o 15 minu es a 30°C, and labeled o 10 minu es wi h 100 Ci/ml [35S]me hionine (Pe kin Elme s). Cells we e dilu ed o OD 0.8, supplemen ed wi h me hionine and 200 g/ml CHX. Aliquo s we e aken a indica ed imes, cells we e mo ed o ice and supplemen ed wi h 10 mM azide, pelle ed, esuspended in 50 mM T is pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, and lysed wi h glass beads o 7 minu es in a bead-bea e , supplemen ed wi h 1% SDS, and hea ed a 65°C o 10 minu es. Cell emnan s we e emo ed by cen i uga ion o 10 minu es in a mic o uge, and he supe na an used o immunop ecipi a ion using an i-HA an ibodies. Immune complexes we e isola ed wi h P o ein G-Sepha ose (GE Heal hca e) and analyzed by SDS-gel elec opho esis and au o adiog aphy using a Phospho Image (Fuji). Calcula ing Gas1*p s abiliza ion in h d1 and emp24 cells in p esence o absence o he Pm 1/2p complex as shown in Fig. 4C Gas1*p u no e in wild- ype cells was de e mined om a leas h ee indi idual expe imen s by measu ing emaining Gas1*p by wes e n blo ing as shown in Fig. 2B. The ob ained alues o indi idual imepoin s we e used o linea eg ession using he leas squa e me hod (LINEST unc ion in EXCEL). We ob ained R2 alues o 0.9344 o highe o each da a se . The m alues (ymx+b) o each indi idual eg ession se we e calcula ed, as well as he mean alue and i s s anda d de ia ion. We hen compa ed he m alue ob ained wi h wild- ype cells wi h hose ob ained wi h single dele ion mu an s (emp24 and h d1). The de ia ion in m alues o mu an s om hose ob ained wi h wild- ype cells was aken as deg ee o s abiliza ion (s abmmu /mw ). Because we ound Gas1*p is maximally s able in emp24h d1 cells compa ed o he indi idual mu an s (Fig. 3B), we assumed sepa a e deg ada ion pa hways and combined he indi idual de e mined deg ees o s abiliza ion o 100% (s abemp24+s abh d1100). Las ly, we plo ed he deg ee o Gas1*p s abiliza ion o each mu an as a pe cen age o o al, ei he in he p esence o he Pm 1p–Pm 2p complex (h d1 s emp24) o in i s absence (h d1pm 1pm 2 s emp24pm 1pm 2). We would like o hank Ped o Ca alho (CRG, Ba celona, Spain) and Manuel Muñiz (Uni e si y o Se ille, Se ille, Spain) o an ibodies, Mo ihisa Fuji a (Osaka Uni e si y, Osaka, Japan) o plasmids and Ross Tomaino (Ha a d Medical School, Bos on, MA) o excellen mass spec ome ic analysis, Alex Palazzo, Tom Rapopo , Ma in Spiess and Ka l E landson o c i ical eading o an ea lie e sion o he manusc ip ; and Manuel Muñiz and Le icia Lemus o e y ui ul discussions h oughou he wo k. V.G. is suppo ed by a G an o he Spanish Minis y o Science, BFU2009-07290. V.G. is a Ramon y Cajal ellow. Supplemen a y ma e ial a ailable online a h p://jcs.biologis s.o g/cgi/con en / ull/124/1/144/DC1 Re e ences Balli , B. A., Roux, P. P., Ge be , S. A., MacKeigan, J. P., Blenis, J. and Gygi, S. P. (2005). Quan i a i e phospho yla ion p o iling o he ERK/p90 ibosomal S6 kinase- signaling casse e and i s a ge s, he ube ous scle osis umo supp esso s. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 667-672. Ba lowe, C. (2003). Signals o COPII-dependen expo om he ER: wha ’s he icke ou ? T ends Cell. Biol. 13, 295-300. B achmann, C. B., Da ies, A., Cos , G. J., Capu o, E., Li, J., Hie e , P. and Boeke, J. D. (1998). Designe dele ion s ains de i ed om Saccha omyces ce e isiae S288C: a use ul se o s ains and plasmids o PCR-media ed gene dis up ion and o he applica ions. Yeas 14, 115-132. B odsky, J. L., We ne , E. D., Dubas, M. E., Goeckele , J. L., K use, K. B. and McC acken, A. A. (1999). The equi emen o molecula chape ones du ing endoplasmic e iculum-associa ed p o ein deg ada ion demons a es ha p o ein expo and impo a e mechanis ically dis inc . J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3453-3460. Caldwell, S. R., Hill, K. J. and Coope , A. A. (2001). Deg ada ion o endoplasmic e iculum (ER) quali y con ol subs a es equi es anspo be ween he ER and Golgi. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23296-23303. Ca alho, P., Gode , V. and Rapopo , T. A. (2006). Dis inc ubiqui in-ligase complexes de ine con e gen pa hways o he deg ada ion o ER p o eins. Cell 126, 361-373. Denic, V., Quan, E. M. and Weissman, J. S. (2006). A luminal su eillance complex ha selec s mis olded glycop o eins o ER-associa ed deg ada ion. Cell 126, 349-359. Dieguez-Acuna, F. J., Ge be , S. A., Kodama, S., Elias, J. E., Beausoleil, S. A., Faus man, D. and Gygi, S. P. (2005). Cha ac e iza ion o mouse spleen cells by sub ac i e p o eomics. Mol. Cell P o eomics 4, 1459-1470. Ellgaa d, L. and Helenius, A. (2003). Quali y con ol in he endoplasmic e iculum. Na . Re . Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 181-191. F a, A. M., Fagioli, C., Finazzi, D., Si ia, R. and Albe ini, C. M. (1993). Quali y con ol o ER syn hesized p o eins: an exposed hiol g oup as a h ee-way swi ch media ing assembly, e en ion and deg ada ion. EMBO J. 12, 4755-4761. Fuji a, M., Yoko, O. T. and Jigami, Y. (2006). Inosi ol deacyla ion by Bs 1p is equi ed o he quali y con ol o glycosylphospha idylinosi ol-ancho ed p o eins. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 834-850. Fuji a, M., Maeda, Y., Ra, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Taguchi, R. and Kinoshi a, T. (2009). GPI glycan emodeling by PGAP5 egula es anspo o GPI-ancho ed p o eins om he ER o he Golgi. Cell 139, 352-365. Fukuda, S., Sumii, M., Masuda, Y., Takahashi, M., Koike, N., Teishima, J., Yasumo o, H., I amo o, T., Asaha a, T., Dohi, K. e al. (2001). Mu ine and human SDF2L1 is an endoplasmic e iculum s ess-inducible gene and encodes a new membe o he Pm / p o ein amily. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 280, 407-414. Gi bach, V. and S ahl, S. (2003). Membe s o he e olu iona ily conse ed PMT amily o p o ein O-mannosyl ans e ases o m dis inc p o ein complexes among hemsel es. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 12554-12562. Gi bach, V., Zelle , T., P iesmeie , M. and S ahl-Bolsinge , S. (2000). S uc u e- unc ion analysis o he dolichyl phospha e-mannose: p o ein O-mannosyl ans e ase ScPm 1p. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19288-19296. Gode , V., Ca alho, P. and Rapopo , T. A. (2008). The ER-associa ed deg ada ion componen De 1p and i s homolog D m1p a e con ained in complexes wi h dis inc co ac o s o he ATPase Cdc48p. FEBS Le 582, 1575-1580. Haass, F. A., Jonikas, M., Wal e , P., Weissman, J. S., Jan, Y. N., Jan, L. Y. and Schuldine , M. (2007). Iden i ica ion o yeas p o eins necessa y o cell-su ace unc ion o a po assium channel. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18079-18084. Hamada, T., Tashi o, K., Tada, H., Inazawa, J., Shi ozu, M., Shibaha a, K., Nakamu a, T., Ma ina, N., Nakano, T. and Honjo, T. (1996). Isola ion and cha ac e iza ion o a no el sec e o y p o ein, s omal cell-de i ed ac o -2 (SDF-2) using he signal sequence ap me hod. Gene 176, 211-214. Hammond, C., B aakman, I. and Helenius, A. (1994). Role o N-linked oligosaccha ide ecogni ion, glucose imming, and calnexin in glycop o ein olding and quali y con ol. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 913-917. Jou nal o Cell Science