scieee Open visual document viewer

In vitro effect photodynamic therapy with differents photosensitizers on cariogenic microorganisms

Soria Lozano, P.; Gilaberte, Y.; Paz Cristobal, M. P.; García Luque, Isabel

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy has been proposed as an alternative to suppress subgingival species. This results from the balance among Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans in the dental biofilm. Not all the photosensitizers have the same photodynamic effect against the different microorganims. The objective of this study is to compare in vitro the photodynamic effect of methylene blue (MB), rose Bengal (RB) and curcumin (CUR) in combination with white light on the cariogenic microorganism S. mutans, S. sanguis and C. albicans. Go to: Results Photodynamic therapy with MB, RB and CUR inhibited 6 log 10 the growth of both bacteria but at different concentrations: 0.31–0.62 μg/ml and 0.62–1.25 μg/ml RB were needed to photoinactivate S. mutans and S. sanguis, respectively; 1.25–2.5 μg/ml MB for both species; whereas higher CUR concentrations (80–160 μg/ml and 160–320 μg/ml) were required to obtain the same reduction in S. mutans and S. sanguis viability respectively. The minimal fungicidal concentration of MB for 5 log10 CFU reduction (4.5 McFarland) was 80–160 μg/ml, whereas for RB it ranged between 320 and 640 μg/ml. For CUR, even the maximum studied concentration (1280 μg/ml) did not reach that inhibition. Incubation time had no effect in all experiments. Go to: Conclusions Photodynamic therapy with RB, MB and CUR and white light is effective in killing S. mutans and S. sanguis strains, although MB and RB are more efficient than CUR. C. albicans required higher concentrations of all photosensitizers to obtain a fungicidal effect, being MB the most efficient and CUR ineffective.

Full text

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access In i o e ec pho odynamic he apy wi h di e en s pho osensi ize s on ca iogenic mic oo ganisms P. So ia-Lozano 1 , Y. Gilabe e 2,3 , MP Paz-C is obal 3 , L. Pé ez-A iaga 3 , V. Lampaya-Pé ez 3 , J. Apo a 4 , V. Pé ez-Laguna 3 , I. Ga cía-Luque 5 , MJ Re illo 1 and A. Rezus a 1,3,6* Abs ac Backg ound: An imic obial pho odynamic he apy has been p oposed as an al e na i e o supp ess subgingi al species. This esul s om he balance among S ep ococcus sanguis,S ep ococcus mu ans and Candida albicans in he den al bio ilm. No all he pho osensi ize s ha e he same pho odynamic e ec agains he di e en mic oo ganims. The objec i e o his s udy is o compa e in i o he pho odynamic e ec o me hylene blue (MB), ose Bengal (RB) and cu cumin (CUR) in combina ion wi h whi e ligh on he ca iogenic mic oo ganism S. mu ans, S. sanguis and C. albicans. Resul s: Pho odynamic he apy wi h MB, RB and CUR inhibi ed 6 log 10 he g ow h o bo h bac e ia bu a di e en concen a ions: 0.31–0.62 μg/ml and 0.62–1.25 μg/ml RB we e needed o pho oinac i a e S. mu ans and S. sanguis, espec i ely; 1.25–2.5 μg/ml MB o bo h species; whe eas highe CUR concen a ions (80–160 μg/ml and 160–320 μg/ml) we e equi ed o ob ain he same educ ion in S. mu ans and S. sanguis iabili y espec i ely. The minimal ungicidal concen a ion o MB o 5 log10 CFU educ ion (4.5 McFa land) was 80–160 μg/ml, whe eas o RB i anged be ween 320 and 640 μg/ml. Fo CUR, e en he maximum s udied concen a ion (1280 μg/ml) did no each ha inhibi ion. Incuba ion ime had no e ec in all expe imen s. Conclusions: Pho odynamic he apy wi h RB, MB and CUR and whi e ligh is e ec i e in killing S. mu ans and S. sanguis s ains, al hough MB and RB a e mo e e icien han CUR. C. albicans equi ed highe concen a ions o all pho osensi ize s o ob ain a ungicidal e ec , being MB he mos e icien and CUR ine ec i e. Backg ound The human o al ca i y is colonized by a highly di e se communi y o bac e ia [1]. Den al ca ies is a ch onic, in- asi e disease in ol ing demine aliza ion o he oo h ollowed by des uc ion o he o ganic phase o he den ine [2] and i is he consequence o he in e ac ion be ween o al mic o lo a, die , den i ion and o al en i - onmen [3]. S ep ococci a e he main colonize s o o al su aces and cons i u e 70 % o he cul i able bac e ia exis ing in he human den al plaque [4]. In ac , S. mu ans is he mos p e alen mic oo ganism o he plaque and he p ima y pa hogenic agen esponsible o ca ies disease [5], whe eas S. sanguis is hough o play a benign, i no a bene icial, ole in he o al ca i y [6]. On he o he hand, C. albicans is a commensal ungal species com- monly colonizing human mucosal su aces [7]. False a e al. [8] hypo hesize ha S. mu ans-C. albicans associ- a ion may enhance S. mu ans in ec ion and modula e he de elopmen o hype i ulen bio ilms on oo h su - aces, which will in u n in luence he onse and se e i y o den al ca ies in i o. Fo his eason, S. mu ans,S. sanguis and C. albicans should be included in any s udy abou human den al plaque mic oo ganisms. Pho odynamic he apy (PDT) has been ad oca ed as an al e na i e o an imic obial agen s o supp ess subgingi al species [9] due o he ex ensi e and inapp op ia e use o an imic obial agen s which g adually led o he de elop- men o pe asi e esis ance [10]. An imic obial PDT * Co espondence: [email p o ec ed] 1 Depa men o Mic obiology, Hospi al Uni e si a io Miguel Se e , Za agoza, Spain 3 Heal h Science Ins i u e o A agón, Za agoza, Spain Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle © 2015 So ia-Lozano e al. Open Access This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons license, and indica e i changes we e made. The C ea i e Commons Public Domain Dedica ion wai e (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/publicdomain/ze o/1.0/) applies o he da a made a ailable in his a icle, unless o he wise s a ed. So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 DOI 10.1186/s12866-015-0524-3 (aPDT) is a echnique ha u ilizes eac i e oxygen species (ROS) p oduced by non- oxic dye o pho osensi ize (PS) molecules in he p esence o low in ensi y isible ligh o kill mammalian o mic obial cells [11]. Due o his mech- anism, I is hypo hesized ha bac e ia will no be easily able o de elop esis ance o PDT [12]. Mo e han 400 compounds wi h pho osensi izing p ope ies a e known, including dyes, d ugs, chemicals and many na u al subs ances [13]. Me hylene blue (MB), a well-known dye wi h high ligh abso p ion a 665 nm, is e ec i e in aPDT, showing abili y o kill no only G am posi i e and G am nega i e bac e ia bu also ungi [14–17]. Rose Bengal (RB) is a xan hene dye cha ac e ized by ligh abso p ion a wa eleng hs (λ)o 450–600 nm, used o he diagnosis o eye diseases [18]. F om an an imic obial poin o iew, RB has shown a good p o ile o pho oinac i a e mic oo gan- isms [19–22]. Cu cumin (CUR) is an in ensely yellow pigmen , isola ed om hizomes o Cu cuma longa, wi h a peak o ligh abso p ion a 430 nm [23]. Among i s many biological ac i i ies a e i s an i-ca cinogenic, an ioxidan , an iin lamma o y, an imic obial p ope ies and i s hypoglycemic e ec s in humans [24, 25]. Some s udies ha e shown i s capaci y o e ec i ely pho oi- nac i a e in i o C. albicans [26, 27]. The e a e many pape s explo ing he aPDT e ec o di e en pho osensi ize s (PSs) in almos all kind o mi- c obial species [28–31]. Howe e , only ew o hem com- pa e he e icacy o se e al pho osensi ize s on di e en mic oo ganism [32]. The aim o his s udy was o compa e he pho oinac i- a ion e ec o h ee PSs, MB, RB and CUR, on S. mu ans,S. sanguis and C. albicans. Resul s Pho oinac i a ion o bac e ial suspensions Unde he expe imen al condi ions, PDT wi h MB, RB and CUR inhibi ed 6 log10 he g ow h o bo h s ains o bac e ia eaching a bac e icidal e ec . Howe e , less concen a ion o RB han o he o he PSs was needed o kill S ep ococcus spp. Whe eas his bac e icidal e - ec was achie ed o S. mu ans wi h a concen a ion o RB as low as 0.31–0.62 μg/ml, highe MB concen a ion (1.25–2.5 μg/ml) was needed o each he same educ ion. In he case o S. sanguis, he RB and MB concen a ions needed o ob ain he same bac e icidal e ec we e qui e simila o hose used o S.mu ans (0.62–1.25 μg/ml and 1.25–2.5 μg/ml, espec i ely). Much highe concen a ions o CUR we e necessa y o ob ain he same educ ion ei- he o S. mu ans o S. sanguis (Table 1). Rega ding he e ec o he incuba ion ime o S ep o- coccus cells wi h he PSs, one hou hal ed he minimal concen a ion o MB o RB necessa y o a ain 6 log10 educ ion espec o an incuba ion ime lowe han 1 min (<1 min), especially o S. sanguis (Table 1). In he case o CUR, his e ec was only obse ed o S. sanguis. No signi ican addi ional bene i was achie ed using 3 h o incuba ion (Table 1). Compa ing he pho odynamic e ec o MB o S. mu ans and S. sanguis suspensions, using he op imal in- cuba ion o each PS, lowe concen a ions we e needed o each he bac e icidal e ec o S. sanguis han o S. mu ans (Fig. 1). Howe e , no di e ences we e obse ed using RB as PS. Pho oinac i a ion o C. albicans Table 1 shows he minimum ungicidal concen a ion (MFC) o each PS s a ing om C. albicans 4.5 McFa land. Unde he expe imen al condi ions, PDT wi h MB, RB bu no wi h CUR inhibi ed 5 log 10 he g ow h o C. albicans, being he needed concen- a ions o MB smalle han he RB ones (Fig. 2). An inc ease in he incuba ion ime wi h he PS was only bene icial o MB, because 3 h hal ed he concen a- ion needed o each a 5 log10 educ ion in C. albi- cans espec o sho e imes (Table 1). Discussion Den al ca ies may be a disease well sui ed o PDT [2]. Ou in es iga ion showed ha PDT using MB o RB and a whi e lamp can kill ca iogenic mic oo ganisms, such as S. mu ans,S. sanguis and C. albicans. In con as , e en hough PDT wi h CUR eaches he same bac e i- cidal e ec , much highe concen a ions we e needed and i was no e ec i e agains yeas s. PDT e icacy depends on he mic oo ganism, he PS and he ligh used. Acco ding o ou esul s, RB showed highe an imic obial pho odynamic e ec o Table 1 Minimal ange concen a ion o educe 6 log10 o S. mu ans and S. sanguis and 5 log10 o C. albicans P e-i adia ion Incuba ion ime (h) MB RB CUR S. mu ans ATCC 35668 <1 min 1.25–2.5 μg/ml 0.31–0.62 μg/ml 80–160 μg/ml 1 h 0.62–1.25 μg/ml 0.15–0.31 μg/ml 160–320 μg/ml 3 h 0.62–1.25 μg/ml 0.31–0.62 μg/ml 160–320 μg/ml S. sanguis ATCC 10556 <1 min 1.25–2.5 μg/ml 0.62–1.25 μg/ml 160–320 μg/ml 1 h 0.31–0.62 μg/ml 0.15–0.31 μg/ml 40–80 μg/ml 3 h 0.15–0.31 μg/ml 0.15–0.31 μg/ml 40–80 μg/ml C. albicans ATCC 1023 <1 min 80–160 μg/ml 320–640 μg/ml >1280 μg/ml 1h 80–160 μg/ml >1280 μg/ml >1280 μg/ml 3h 40–80 μg/ml >1280 μg/ml >1280 μg/ml I adia ion wi h me al halide lamp, λ420–700 nm, luence 37 J.cm −2 So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 2 o 8 S ep ococcus spp han he o he PSs s udied, whe eas MB was be e o Candida spp. CUR always showed he lowes an imic obial ac i i y; his could be due o he ac ha he highe peaks o he spec um emis- sion o he lamp co espond be e o he abso p ium spec a o RB and MB han CUR. Table 2 shows ha compa ed wi h p e ious s udies using aPDT wi h MB, RB and CUR o S. mu ans, ou pa ame e s seem o be mo e e icien , especially conside ing he pe cen age o bac e ial g ow h inhibi ion o 99.9999 %. Rega ding he an imic obial e ec o MB-PDT on he iabili y o S. mu ans, A aujo e al. [33] needed 25 μg/ml MB o each 73 % inhibi ion. Ne e heless, ou esul s a e no comple ely compa able because hey used ed ligh , which co esponds wi h he maximum spec um abso bance o MB. Rega ding RB, s udies ca ied ou by Cos a e al. [34] show ha he concen a ion needed o a ain 6.86 log10 CFU/mL educ ion o S. mu ans was 2.02 μg/ml, using a LED lamp wi h λ 440–460 nm and a luence o 95 J/cm 2 .Compa ing o ou esul s hey needed highe concen a ions o PS o each a simila e ec , pe haps because he λo hei lampwaslesscon enien hanou s oexci eRB;an- o he eason could be he use o dis illed wa e as dis- sol en , whe eas hey used phospha e-bu e ed saline because, based in he s udy o Nuñez e al. [35], a sig- ni ican di e ence in he same aPDT expe imen can be p omo ed only by he use o di e en s dissol en s. Acco ding o his s udy, CUR needs much highe con- cen a ion han RB and MB o pho oinac i a e bac e ia. This esul ag ees wi h hose ob ained by A aujo e al. [23] who, using a concen a ion o 1500 μg/ml and blue LEDs lamp (λ450 nm, luence 5.7 J/cm 2 ), eached 60 % inhibi ion o S. mu ans in plank onic cul u es. Howe e , o he s udies ob ained 95 % educ ion o S. mu ans in- s ead o 6 logs using only 0.73 μg/ml CUR, which could be explained by he highe luence used (72 J/cm 2 ), he λ o he lamp (blue ligh ) and he lowe pe cen age o bac- e icidal ac i i y ob ained. Few s udies compa e he e icacy o di e en PSs o pho oinac i a e o al mic oo ganisms. Rolim e al. [36] showed ha MB, oluidine blue o ho, malachi e g een, e y h osine, eosin and RB, using a ed LEDs lamp o he o me and a blue one o he la e , we e pho oac i e in i o agains S. mu ans, bu only oluidine blue e- duced 99.9 % o he mic oo ganism. In his s udy, hey also ind a bac e icidal e ec o RB on S. mu ans wi hou ligh . Ne e heless, in ou s udy no an imic obial e ec s we e obse ed when he s ains we e exposed ei he o he dyes o he ligh sou ce sepa a ely. Conside ing ha he ca iogenic po en ial o S. sanguis is deemed low compa ed o ha o he S. mu ans, he numbe o epo s using aPDT o kill S. sanguis is lowe han hose o S. mu ans. Chan e al. [37] demons a ed Fig. 1 Pho odynamic e ec o MB and RB on S. sanguis and S. mu ans depending on hei concen a ion (Incuba ion ime wi h he PS <1 min and i adia ion using a me al halide lamp wi h a luence o 37 J/cm 2 ) Fig. 2 Pho odynamic e ec o MB and RB on C. albicans depending on hei concen a ion (incuba ion ime o 1 h o MB and <1 min o RB, and i adia ion using a me al halide lamp whi a luence o 37 J/cm 2 ) So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 3 o 8 ha PDT wi h MB was able o ob ain a educ ion o 99–100 % on cul u es o S. sanguis.Howe e , heyused highe concen a ions (100 μg/ml) han we used bu lowe luence (21.2 J/cm 2 ) o a diode lase (665 nm). Pe ei a e al. [32] only ob ained a 9.9 % inhibi ion wi h 5μg/ml RB and hey used a highe luence. The e o e, ou esul s show MB as he mos e icien bac e icidal PS o S. sanguis. Acco ding o he p esen in es iga ion, MB has be e an i ungal p o ile han RB and CUR. O he au ho s [14, 15, 38], show ha MB–aPDT is endowed wi h an i ungal po en ial agains C. albicans, whe eas Cos a e al. [18] show ha RB only each a 1,97 log10 educ ion in C. albicans. Compa ing he h ee PSs, he p esen s udy shows ha MB is he mos e ec i e PS on C. albicans while RB was sligh ly supe io o S. mu ans. Den al ca ies esul om in e ac ions among di e en ca iogenic mic oo ganisms, so using o combining di e en PSs could imp o e he e icacy o aPDT. In his sense, he use o a whi e ligh lamp ha co e s all he abso p ion spec um o mos PSs can e icien ly exci e hem, mak- ing PDT easie o pe o m and a oiding he necessi y o using a lamp o each PS. Howe e , a ligh sou ce wi h an emission spec um ha co esponds o he maximum abso p ion spec um o each PS heo e ic- ally de e mines a highe e icacy [39]. Red ligh sou ces (630–700 nm) ha e been used ex ensi ely in PDT due o hei ela i ely long wa eleng hs, which can e ec i ely pene a e biological issues and ac i- a es some o he mos e ec i e PSs, such as pheno- hiazines and po phy ins. Addi ionally, o he s udies ha e also shown ha blue ligh (380–520 nm) is an a - ac i e op ion o PDT, because blue ligh sou ces can be used in combina ion wi h many PSs, such as RB, eosin, e y h osine, and CUR o pho oinac i a e o al mic oo ganisms [36]. Fo his eason, one limi a ion o ou s udy is he use o he same lamp o pho oac i a e he h ee PSs, whose emission spec um ma ches qui e accu a ely wi h he maximum abso p ium spec a o RB and MB bu no wi h CUR. This could in luence he bad esul s ob ained wi h he la e . Acco ding o ou da a, he minimal bac e icidal o un- gicidal concen a ion was educed in some expe imen s wi h a p e-i adia ion incuba ion ime o 1 h. Howe e , conside ing ha he inc ease in he concen a ion was only o one o wo dilu ions, he di icul y o main ain he apeu ic concen a ions o he PS in he high low con- di ions wi hin he o al ca i y (due o sali a and/o gingi al c e icula luid) o a long pe iod o ime [40] do no sup- po he use o incuba ion ime in he clinical se ing. And ade e al. [26] using CUR and Rezus a e al. [41] wi h hype icin concluded ha none incuba ion ime enhance he pho oinac i a ion o plank onic cul u es o C. albicans. Addi ionally, al hough he ad e se e ec s o blood and sali a could be a oided wi h he help o den al dams, no p e-incuba ion ime is mo e com o able o he pa ien s and mo e e icien o doc o s. Conclusions The pho odynamic e icacy o each PS a ies acco ding o he a ge mic oo ganism. The combina ion o di e - en PS and whi e ligh could be a p omising app oach o ea hose in ec ions caused by a combina ion o mic o- o ganisms, such as ca ies. Table 2 Summa y o he in i o PDT s udies using me hylene blue, ose Bengal o cu cumin on S. mu ans, S. sanguis and C. albicans PS Concen a ion Inhibi ion λFluence (μg/ml) (%) (nm) (J/cm 2 ) S. mu ans A aújo e al. [33]MB25 73 ND ND Ou s udy MB 2.5 999.999 420–700 37 Cos a e al. [34] RB 2.02 999.999 440–460 95 Ou s udy RB 0,62 999.999 420–700 37 A aújo e al. [23] CUR 1500 99.9 450 5.7 Paschoal e al. [44] CUR 1473.5 60 450 72 Manoil e al. [45] CUR 0.73 95 % 360–550 542 Ou s udy CUR 160 999.999 420–700 37 S. sanguis Chan e al. [37] AM 100 99–100 632.8 21.2 Ou s udy AM 2.5 999.999 420–700 37 Pe ei a e al. [32] RB 5 9.9 455 95 Ou s udy RB 0.62 999.999 420–700 37 Ou s udy CUR 1500 999.999 420–700 37 Ma iello e al. [46] TB 200 84.32 660 10 C. albicans Souza e al. [15] AM 100 99.9 660 39,5 Peloi e al. [14] 4 AM 22,5 95,14 663 6 Souza e al. [16] AM 100 88,6 685 28 Ou s udy AM 160 99.999 420–700 37 Cos a e al. [18] RB 23 9.9 455 95 Demido a e al. [47] RB 200 99,9999 525–555 80 Ou s udy RB >1280 <99.999 420– 700 37 And ade e al. [26] CUR 7,3 89.5 455 5,28 Do igo e al. [48] CUR 14,8 85 440–460 18 Ou s udy CUR >2460 <99.999 420–700 37 PS pho osen ize , MB me hylene blue, RB ose bengal, CUR cu cumin, TB oluidine blue o ho, ND no da a So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 4 o 8 Ma e ials and me hods Chemicals Me hylene Blue (MB) and Cu cumin (CUR) we e pu - chased om Sigma-Ald ich and Rose Bengal om Fluka. Sabou aud Dex ose Aga (SB) and Columbia Blood Aga (BA) we e pu chased om Oxoid. Mic oo ganisms and g ow h condi ions S. mu ans ATCC 35668, S. sanguis ATCC 10556 and C. albicans ATCC 10231 s ains we e ob ained om he Ame ican Type Cul u e Collec ion (ATCC; Rock ille, MD). McFa land scale is ecommended o pe o mance o suscep ibili y es ing by CLSI [42] and EUCAST [43]. The yeas s we e g own ae obically o e nigh in SB medium a 35 °C. S ock inoculum suspensions we e p e- pa ed in dis illed wa e and adjus ed o op ical densi ies co esponding o 4.5 McFa land o i e logs educ ion assays. Cell iabili y was assessed coun ing he numbe o colony- o ming uni s (CFU), de eloped on SB a e an incuba ion pe iod o 24 h a 35 °C. S. mu ans and S. sanguis we e g own ae obically in BA medium a 35 °C o 48 h. S ock inoculum suspen- sions we e p epa ed in dis illed wa e and adjus ed o op ical densi ies co esponding o 0.5 McFa land o six logs educ ion assays. Cell iabili y was assessed coun - ing he numbe o CFU, de eloped on BA a e an incu- ba ion pe iod o 48 h o S. mu ans and 24 h o S. sanguis a 35 °C. Pho osensi ize solu ions S ock MB, RB and CUR solu ions we e p epa ed in dis- illed wa e and dilu ed ei he wi h bidis illed wa e o he desi ed concen a ion immedia ely p io o use. The concen a ions used anged om 0.1–12800 μg/ml. All solu ions we e p epa ed and handled unde ligh - es ic ed condi ions. Ligh sou ce In o de o co e he spec um abso p ion o he 3 PSs (Fig. 3), MB, RB and CUR (maximal abso p ion λa 665, 557 and 430 nm espec i ely), we used a me al halide lamp emi ing a 420–700 nm (Fig. 4) wi h an i adiance o 90 mW/cm 2 , being he speci ic i adiance a he max- imal abso p ium λo each PS : 292 μW/cm 2 a 557 nm, 300 μW/cm 2 a 665 nm and 186 μW /cm 2 a 430 nm. Mic oo ganisms suspensions wi h he di e en PSs p e- pa ed in o a 96 wells mic o i e pla e, wi h a well diame e o 6 mm, we e i adia ed o 6 min and 51 s a a dis ance o 10 cm. The ligh beam diame e was 21 cm and he Fig. 3 Spec um abso p ion o ose Bengal a, me hylene blue band cu cumin c So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 5 o 8 luence used 37 J/cm 2 . The e ec i e ligh ecei ed on he dishes esul s om in eg a ing he powe o he lamp o all he e ec i e wa eleng hs o each PS. Pho odynamic ea men s o mic oo ganisms Suspensions wi h he desi ed McFa land alue o e e y mic oo ganism we e p epa ed in bidis illed wa e . 90 μL o hese ini ial suspensions was d opped in o di e en wells o a mic o i e pla e and 10 μL o he di e en PS solu ions we e added. The inal PS concen a ion in he expe imen s used anged om 0.01–1280 μg/ml. The pla es we e hen main ained in he da k o di e en pe iods o ime (<1 min, 1 and 3 h) o e alua e he in lu- ence o con ac ime wi h he PS on he ou come o he pho odynamic ea men s. A e wa ds, mic oo ganisms we e subjec ed o illumina ion (37 J/cm 2 ). Fungal and bac e ial cul u es g own unde he same condi ions wi h and wi hou PS, ei he kep in he da k o illumina ed, se ed as con ols. A e pho odynamic ea men s, samples and con ols we e incuba ed a 35 °C o 24 h, in case o C. albicans and S. sanguis expe imen s, and o 48 h in case o S. mu ans. The an imic obial e ec was de e mined by coun ing he numbe o CFU pe millili e. A c i e ion o 5 log10 uni dec ease om he s a ing inoculum was adop ed o de ine ungicidal ac i i y, and a mo e s ingen c i e ion o 6 log10 uni o bac e icidal ac i i y, due o he di e ences in cell size and mass be- ween Candida spp and S ep ococcus spp ( he cell con- cen a ion o C. albicans used was 10 imes lowe (>10 5 ) han ha used o he wo bac e ial species (>10 6 )). All expe imen s we e ca ied ou a leas i e imes. Abb e ia ions MB: Me hylene blue; RB: Rose bengal; CUR: Cu cumin; CFU: Colony o ming uni s; PDT: Pho odynamic he apy; aPDT: An imic obial pho odynamic he apy; PS: Pho osensi ize ; SB: Sabou aud dex ose aga ; BA: Columbia blood aga . Compe ing in e es s The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no compe ing in e es s. Au ho s’con ibu ions PSL concei ed o he s udy, conduc ed all expe imen s and d a ed he manusc ip . YG pa icipa ed in he design o he s udy, in he in e p e a ion o da a o he wo k and she d a ed he manusc ip , he co e le e and he answe s o he e iewe ’s epo s. LPA and VLP conduc ed some expe imen s and helped o d a he manusc ip . VPL is s udying he pho odynamic e ec in co-cul u es o C. albicans and S. mu ans and she checked ou esul s. She also e ised he manusc ip and con ibu ed o he esolu ion o e iewe ’s epo s. IGL has con ibu ed o he in e p e a ion o da a o he wo k and o he esolu ion o bio ilms ques ions and in he discussion o he inal manusc ip because she wo ks wi h us in he p ojec CTQ 2013–48767-C3-2-R om he Spanish Minis y o Science and Inno a ion s uding he e ec o pho odynamic he apy on bio ilms. MPPC pa icipa ed in he design o he s udy, analyzed he da a, pe o med he Figs. 1 and 2 and he e ised he manusc ip pa icula ly he me hodology and he ma e ials. JAA pe o med he Figs. 3 and 4 and he w o e e e y hing ela ed ligh pa ame e s bo h in he manusc ip and in he answe s o he e iewe ’s epo s. MJR con ibu ed o he design o he wo k, and e ising and co ec ing i , pa icula ly he backg ound and he discussion. AR concei ed o he s udy and d a ed he manusc ip . All au ho s ead and app o ed he inal manusc ip . Fig. 4 Rela i e emission cu e o he me al halide lamp So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 6 o 8 Acknowledgemen s This s udy was suppo ed by g an s CTQ2013-48767-C3-2-R om he Spanish Minis y o Science and Inno a ion, Spain and Eu opean Regional De elopmen Fund. Au ho de ails 1 Depa men o Mic obiology, Hospi al Uni e si a io Miguel Se e , Za agoza, Spain. 2 Depa men o De ma ology, Hospi al San Jo ge, Huesca, Spain. 3 Heal h Science Ins i u e o A agón, Za agoza, Spain. 4 Depa men o Applied Physics. Facul y o Science, Uni e si y o Za agoza, Za agoza, Spain. 5 Depa men o Mic obiology, Uni e si y o Se illa, Se illa, Spain. 6 Depa men o Mic obiology, Uni e si y o Za agoza, Za agoza, Spain. Recei ed: 6 No embe 2014 Accep ed: 21 Sep embe 2015 Re e ences 1. Vahabi S, Fek azad R, Ay emlou S, Tahe i S, Zangeneh N. The e ec o an imic obial pho odynamic he apy wi h adachlo in and oluidine blue on S ep ococcus mu ans: an in i o s udy. J Den (Teh an). 2011;8(2):48–54. 2. Lima JP, de Melo MA S, Bo ges FM, Teixei a AH, S eine -Oli ei a C, Nob e Dos San os M, e al. E alua ion o he an imic obial e ec o pho odynamic an imic obial he apy in an in si u model o den ine ca ies. Eu J O al Sci. 2009;117(5):568–74. 3. Ma sh PD. Mic obiologic aspec s o den al plaque and den al ca ies. Den Clin No h Am. 1999;43(4):599–614. - i. 4. Jenkinson HF. Adhe ence and accumula ion o o al s ep ococci. T ends Mic obiol. 1994;2(6):209–12. 5. O asmo EMW, O ani C, Khou i S. In i o AFM e alua ion o S ep ococcus mu ans memb ane exposed o wo mou hwashes. JAPS. 2013;3:024–8. 6. Cau ield PW, Dasanayake AP, Li Y, Pan Y, Hsu J, Ha din JM. Na u al his o y o S ep ococcus sanguinis in he o al ca i y o in an s: e idence o a disc e e window o in ec i i y. In ec Immun. 2000;68(7):4018–23. 7. Me walli KH, Khan SA, K om BP, Jab a-Rizk MA. S ep ococcus mu ans, Candida albicans, and he human mou h: a s icky si ua ion. PLoS Pa hog. 2013;9(10):e1003616. 8. False a ML, Klein MI, Colonne PM, Sco -Anne K, G egoi e S, Pai CH, e al. Symbio ic ela ionship be ween S ep ococcus mu ans and Candida albicans syne gizes i ulence o plaque bio ilms in i o. In ec Immun. 2014;82(5):1968–81. 9. Fon ana CR, Abe ne hy AD, Som S, Ruggie o K, Douce e S, Ma can onio RC, e al. The an ibac e ial e ec o pho odynamic he apy in den al plaque- de i ed bio ilms. J Pe iodon al Res. 2009;44(6):751–9. 10. Ball AR, Tego GP. Eme ging an imic obial d ug-disco e y s a egies: an e ol ing necessi y. 1s ed. Camb idge: Cabi; 2012. 11. Kha kwal GB, Sha ma SK, Huang YY, Dai T, Hamblin MR. Pho odynamic he apy o in ec ions: clinical applica ions. Lase s Su g Med. 2011;43(7):755–67. 12. Zanin IC, Gonçal es RB, Junio AB, Hope CK, P a en J. Suscep ibili y o S ep ococcus mu ans bio ilms o pho odynamic he apy: an in i o s udy. J An imic ob Chemo he . 2005;56(2):324–30. 13. Meisel P, Koche T. Pho odynamic he apy o pe iodon al diseases: s a e o he a . J Pho ochem Pho obiol B. 2005;79(2):159–70. 14. Peloi LS, Soa es RR, Biondo CE, Souza VR, Hioka N, Kimu a E. Pho odynamic e ec o ligh -emi ing diode ligh on cell g ow h inhibi ion induced by me hylene blue. J Biosci. 2008;33(2):231–7. 15. Souza RC, Junquei a JC, Rossoni RD, Pe ei a CA, Munin E, Jo ge AO. Compa ison o he pho odynamic ungicidal e icacy o me hylene blue, oluidine blue, malachi e g een and low-powe lase i adia ion alone agains Candida albicans. Lase s Med Sci. 2010;25(3):385–9. 16. de Souza SC, Junquei a JC, Balducci I, Koga-I o CY, Munin E, Jo ge AO. Pho osensi iza ion o di e en Candida species by low powe lase ligh . J Pho ochem Pho obiol B. 2006;83(1):34–8. 17. Munin E, Gi oldo LM, Al es LP, Cos a MS. S udy o ge m ube o ma ion by Candida albicans a e pho odynamic an imic obial chemo he apy (PACT). J Pho ochem Pho obiol B. 2007;88(1):16–20. 18. Cos a AC, Ras ei o VM, Pe ei a CA, Rossoni RD, Junquei a JC, Jo ge AO. The e ec s o ose bengal- and e y h osine-media ed pho odynamic he apy on Candida albicans. Mycoses. 2012;55(1):56–63. 19. Chui C, Aoki A, Takeuchi Y, Sasaki Y, Hi a suka K, Abiko Y, e al. An imic obial e ec o pho odynamic he apy using high-powe blue ligh -emi ing diode and ed-dye agen on Po phy omonas gingi alis. J Pe iodon al Res. 2013;48(6):696–705. 20. Bolean M, Paulino TP, Thedei G, Ciancaglini P. Pho odynamic he apy wi h ose bengal induces G oEL exp ession in S ep ococcus mu ans. Pho omed Lase Su g. 2010;28 Suppl 1:84–S7. 21. F ei e F, Cos a AC, Pe ei a CA, Bel ame Junio M, Junquei a JC, Jo ge AO. Compa ison o he e ec o ose bengal- and eosin Y-media ed pho odynamic inac i a ion on plank onic cells and bio ilms o Candida albicans. Lase s Med Sci. 2014;29(3):949–55. 22. Guo Y, Rogelj S, Zhang P. Rose Bengal-deco a ed silica nanopa icles as pho osensi ize s o inac i a ion o g am-posi i e bac e ia. Nano echnology. 2010;21(6):065102. 23. A aújo NC, Fon ana CR, Bagna o VS, Ge bi ME. Pho odynamic e ec s o cu cumin agains ca iogenic pa hogens. Pho omed Lase Su g. 2012;30(7):393–9. 24. Wang D, Hu J, L L, Xia X, Liu J, Li X. Enhanced inhibi o y e ec o cu cumin ia eac i e oxygen species gene a ion in human nasopha yngeal ca cinoma cells ollowing pu ple-ligh i adia ion. Oncol Le . 2013;6(1):81–5. 25. Kunnumakka a AB, Anand P, Agga wal BB. Cu cumin inhibi s p oli e a ion, in asion, angiogenesis and me as asis o di e en cance s h ough in e ac ion wi h mul iple cell signaling p o eins. Cance Le . 2008;269(2):199–225. 26. And ade MC, Ribei o AP, Do igo LN, B une i IL, Giampaolo ET, Bagna o VS, e al. E ec o di e en p e-i adia ion imes on cu cumin-media ed pho odynamic he apy agains plank onic cul u es and bio ilms o Candida spp. A ch O al Biol. 2013;58(2):200–10. 27. Ga cia-Gomes AS, Cu elo JA, Soa es RM, Fe ei a-Pe ei a A. Cu cumin ac s syne gis ically wi h luconazole o sensi ize a clinical isola e o Candida albicans showing a MDR pheno ype. Med Mycol. 2012;50(1):26–32. 28. Jackson Z, Meghji S, Mac obe A, Hende son B, Wilson M. Killing o he yeas and hyphal o ms o Candida albicans using a ligh -ac i a ed an imic obial agen . Lase s Med Sci. 1999;14(2):150–7. 29. Jo i G, Fab is C, Soncin M, Fe o S, Coppello i O, Dei D, e al. Pho odynamic he apy in he ea men o mic obial in ec ions: basic p inciples and pe spec i e applica ions. Lase s Su g Med. 2006;38(5):468–81. 30. O’Rio dan K, Akilo OE, Hasan T. The po en ial o pho odynamic he apy in he ea men o localized in ec ions. Pho odiagnosis Pho odyn The . 2005;2(4):247–62. 31. Lamb ech s SA, Aalde s MC, Van Ma le J. Mechanis ic s udy o he pho odynamic inac i a ion o Candida albicans by a ca ionic po phy in. An imic ob Agen s Chemo he . 2005;49(5):2026–34. 32. Pe ei a CA, Cos a AC, Ca ei a CM, Junquei a JC, Jo ge AO. Pho odynamic inac i a ion o S ep ococcus mu ans and S ep ococcus sanguinis bio ilms in i o. Lase s Med Sci. 2013;28(3):859–64. 33. A aújo PV, Teixei a KI, Lanza LD, Co es ME, Pole o LT. In i o le hal pho osensi iza ion o S. mu ans using me hylene blue and oluidine blue O as pho osensi ize s. Ac a Odon ol La inoam. 2009;22(2):93–7. 34. Cos a AC, Chibebe Junio J, Pe ei a CA, Machado AK, Bel ame Junio M, Junquei a JC, e al. Suscep ibili y o plank onic cul u es o S ep ococcus mu ans o pho odynamic he apy wi h a ligh -emi ing diode. B az O al Res. 2010;24(4):413–8. 35. Núñez SC, Ga cez AS, Ka o IT, Yoshimu a TM, Gomes L, Bap is a MS, e al. E ec s o ionic s eng h on he an imic obial pho odynamic e iciency o me hylene blue. Pho ochem Pho obiol Sci. 2014;13(3):595–602. 36. Rolim JP, De-Melo MA, Guedes SF, Albuque que-Filho FB, De Souza JR, Noguei a NA, e al. The an imic obial ac i i y o pho odynamic he apy agains S ep ococcus mu ans using di e en pho osensi ize s. J Pho ochem Pho obiol B. 2012;106:40–6. 37. Chan Y, Lai CH. Bac e icidal e ec s o di e en lase wa eleng hs on pe iodon opa hic ge ms in pho odynamic he apy. Lase s Med Sci. 2003;18(1):51–5. 38. Pupo YM, Gomes GM, San os EB, Cha es L, Michel MD, Kozlowski VA, e al. Suscep ibili y o Candida albicans o pho odynamic he apy using me hylene blue and oluidine blue as pho osensi izing dyes. Ac a Odon ol La inoam. 2011;24(2):188–92. 39. Calza a a-Pin on PG, Ven u ini M, Sala R. Pho odynamic he apy: upda e 2006. Pa 1: Pho ochemis y and pho obiology. J Eu Acad De ma ol Vene eol. 2007;21(3):293–302. 40. Wilson M. Le hal pho osensi isa ion o o al bac e ia and i s po en ial applica ion in he pho odynamic he apy o o al in ec ions. Pho ochem Pho obiol Sci. 2004;3(5):412–8. So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 7 o 8 41. Rezus a A, López-Chicón P, Paz-C is obal MP, Alemany-Ribes M, Royo-Díez D, Agu M, e al. In i o ungicidal pho odynamic e ec o hype icin on Candida species. Pho ochem Pho obiol. 2012;88(3):613–9. 42. Clinical and Labo a o y S anda ds Ins i u e. Pe o mance S anda ds o An imic obial Suscep ibili y Tes ing: 520 Q6. Twen y-Fou h In o ma ional Supplemen . CLSI documen M 100-S24 (ISBN 1-56238-897-S (P in ); ISBN 1- 56238-898-3 (Elec onic)). Wayne, PA: Clinical and Labo a o y S anda ds Ins i u e; 2014. 43. The Eu opean Commi ee on An imic obial Suscep ibili y Tes ing. B eakpoin ables o in e p e a ion o MICs and zone diame e s. Ve sion 4.0, 2014. h p://www.eucas .o g. 44. Paschoal MA, Tonon CC, Spolidó io DM, Bagna o VS, Gius i JS, San os-Pin o L. Pho odynamic po en ial o cu cumin and blue LED agains S ep ococcus mu ans in a plank onic cul u e. Pho odiagnosis Pho odyn The . 2013;10(3):313–9. 45. Manoil D, Filie i A, Gamei o C, Lange N, Sch enzel J, Wa aha JC, e al. Flow cy ome ic assessmen o S ep ococcus mu ans iabili y a e exposu e o blue ligh -ac i a ed cu cumin. Pho odiagnosis Pho odyn The . 2014;11(3):372–9. 46. Ma iello FD, Coelho AA, Ma ins OP, Ma iello RD, Fe ão Júnio JP. In i o e ec o pho odynamic he apy on Agg ega ibac e ac inomyce emcomi ans and S ep ococcus sanguinis. B az Den J. 2011;22(5):398–403. 47. Demido a TN, Hamblin MR. E ec o cell-pho osensi ize binding and cell densi y on mic obial pho oinac i a ion. An imic ob Agen s Chemo he . 2005;49(6):2329–35. 48. Do igo LN, Pa a ina AC, Ca mello JC, Machado AL, B une i IL, Bagna o VS. Suscep ibili y o clinical isola es o Candida o pho odynamic e ec s o cu cumin. Lase s Su g Med. 2011;43(9):927–34. Submi you nex manusc ip o BioMed Cen al and ake ull ad an age o : • Con enien online submission • Tho ough pee e iew • No space cons ain s o colo figu e cha ges • Immedia e publica ion on accep ance • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Schola • Resea ch which is eely a ailable o edis ibu ion Submi you manusc ip a www.biomedcen al.com/submi So ia-Lozano e al. BMC Mic obiology (2015) 15:187 Page 8 o 8