scieee Open visual document viewer

Prevalence of depression in retirees: a meta-analysis

Pabón Carrasco, Manuel; Ramírez-Baena, Lucía; López Sánchez, Raúl; Rodríguez-Gallego, Isabel; Suleiman-Martos, Nora; Gómez-Urquiza, José L.

Abstract

Background: Retirement is a final life stage characterized by the ceasing of work and the loss of a routine, social relations, role, status, accomplishments, and aspirations, etc. Many times it is accompanied by negative feelings and can provoke different psychoemotional reactions such as depression, among others. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of depression, as well as its psychoeducational approach in retirees. Methods: A paired systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in different databases—Medline, Scopus, CUIDEN, CINAHL, LILACS and PsycINFO. Original studies were included in English, Spanish and French that were published in the last 10 years, and which approached depression in retirees. Results: A total of 11 articles were selected after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean value of the prevalence levels of depression in retirees obtained in the meta-analysis was 28%. Depression is more frequent in retirees, with mandatory retirement, retirement due to illness, and anticipated retirement presenting higher levels of this disease. The health role in the psychoeducational approach is highlighted in 41.6% (n = 5). Conclusions: With almost one-third of retirees suffering from depression, it is necessary to implement prevention and early detection measures to approach a public health problem.

Full text

heal hca e Re iew P e alence o Dep ession in Re i ees: A Me a-Analysis Manuel Pabón-Ca asco 1, Lucia Rami ez-Baena 1,* , Raúl López Sánchez 2, Isabel Rod íguez-Gallego 1, No a Suleiman-Ma os 3and JoséL. Gómez-U quiza 4 1Spanish Red C oss Nu sing School, Se illa Uni e si y, 41009 Se illa, Spain; mpabon@c uz oja.es (M.P.-C.); is oga@c uz oja.es (I.R.-G.) 2 In e nal Medicine, Hospi al Qui ó nsalud Ba celona, 08023 Ba celona, Spain; [email p o ec ed] 3Nu sing Depa men , Facul y o Heal h Sciences, Uni e si y o G anada, Campus Uni e si y o Ceu a, 51001 Ceu a, Spain; no asm@ug .es 4Facul y o Heal h Sciences, Uni e si y o G anada, 6018016 G anada, Spain; jlgu quiza@ug .es *Co espondence: lucia b@co eo.ug .es Recei ed: 30 June 2020; Accep ed: 2 Sep embe 2020; Published: 4 Sep embe 2020   Abs ac : Backg ound: Re i emen is a inal li e s age cha ac e ized by he ceasing o wo k and he loss o a ou ine, social ela ions, ole, s a us, accomplishmen s, and aspi a ions, e c. Many imes i is accompanied by nega i e eelings and can p o oke di e en psychoemo ional eac ions such as dep ession, among o he s. The aim o his s udy is o analyze he p e alence o dep ession, as well as i s psychoeduca ional app oach in e i ees. Me hods: A pai ed sys ema ic e iew wi h me a-analysis was conduc ed in di e en da abases—Medline, Scopus, CUIDEN, CINAHL, LILACS and PsycINFO. O iginal s udies we e included in English, Spanish and F ench ha we e published in he las 10 yea s, and which app oached dep ession in e i ees. Resul s: A o al o 11 a icles we e selec ed a e applying inclusion and exclusion c i e ia. The mean alue o he p e alence le els o dep ession in e i ees ob ained in he me a-analysis was 28%. Dep ession is mo e equen in e i ees, wi h manda o y e i emen , e i emen due o illness, and an icipa ed e i emen p esen ing highe le els o his disease. The heal h ole in he psychoeduca ional app oach is highligh ed in 41.6% (n=5). Conclusions: Wi h almos one- hi d o e i ees su e ing om dep ession, i is necessa y o implemen p e en ion and ea ly de ec ion measu es o app oach a public heal h p oblem. Keywo ds: aging; dep ession; e i emen ; heal h pe sonnel; nu sing 1. In oduc ion Acco ding o he Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO), dep ession is a men al diso de ha mani es s i sel h ough sadness, ex eme apa hy, anhedonia, eelings o guil , low sel -es eem, sleep diso de s, appe i e, lack o concen a ion, and sensa ion o i edness [1]. The WHO es ima es ha dep ession a ec s mo e han 300 million people in he wo ld [ 2 ]. In i s mos se ious o m, his disease can lead o suicide, since 800,000 indi iduals commi suicide each yea in he wo ld, his being he second mos common cause o dea h in indi iduals be ween 15 and 29 yea s old [2]. E en so, dep ession a ec s all age anges, especially ulne able indi iduals such as e i ees. Re i emen is a ansi ion which occu s in he las s age o li e and is cha ac e ized by he ceasing o wo k and, wi h ha , he loss o a ou ine, social ela ions, ole, s a us, accomplishmen s, and aspi a ions, e c. [ 3 ]. This implies changing he li es yle adop ed du ing many yea s in he wo king s age and supposes a phenomenon ha can al e he psychosocial ealm o he e i ee [ 4 ]. Addi ionally, Heal hca e 2020,8, 321; doi:10.3390/heal hca e8030321 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/heal hca e Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 2 o 11 he aging p ocess supposes di e se changes in heal h and i would lead o he decline o indi iduals who su e i , al e ing hei sel -image, sel -es eem, au onomy, and unc ionali y [5]. The majo i y o indi iduals unde s and he ansi ion om being ac i e in wo king li e o e i emen as he p ocess by which hey s a o become old [ 3 ], which gene a es eelings o uselessness, hus p edisposing hem o dep ession. Dep ession is one o he mos unde diagnosed diseases and, s ill in he 21 s cen u y, i is s ill being s igma ized o e en banalized, igno ing he esou ces, ea men s, and eco e y o his c uel disease [ 6 ]. Resea ch on he dep ession o e i ees is e y sca ce, and ew s udies di ec ly ela e dep ession wi h e i emen [ 7 ], despi e he g ea di e si y o published a icles on his disease [ 8 ]. Cu en ly, he publica ions on dep ession a e di ec ed o aluing di e en ea men s o de e mine i hey a e e ec i e such as, o example, he use o acupunc u e, music he apy, and he sea ch o he ideal an idep essan [9–11]. Al hough he cu en esea ch lines on he sea ch o e ec i e ea men s agains dep ession a e impo an , mo e s udies should be conduc ed on he di ec ela ion be ween e i emen and dep ession. I is also impo an o know he p e alence o dep ession and how heal h p o essionals, including nu ses, can collabo a e on a psychoeduca ional app oach o lowe he p e alence igu es. The ac is ha , bo h in heal h p e en ion and p omo ion, nu sing plays a e y p ominen ole o s op he p og ess o his disease [ 12 ]. Nu sing is e y impo an in ea ly de ec ion [ 7 ], apa om i s undamen al con ibu ion o he psychoeduca ional app oach [ 12 ]. These heal h p o essionals a e also in cha ge o main aining a close ela ionship wi h pa ien s and hei ela i es, so as o os e a good use o pha macological ea men s, inc easing adhe ence o hem [ 13 , 14 ] and hus p e en ing u u e elapses [7]. The e o e, he main aim o his pape is wo- old: (a) o analyze he p e alence o dep ession in e i ees; (b) o analyze he ole o he psychoeduca ional app oach o dep ession. 2. Me hodology 2.1. Da a Sou ces and Inclusion C i e ia A sys ema ic e iew wi h me a-analysis was conduc ed un il Ma ch 2020, ollowing he ecommenda ions o he P e e ed Repo ing I ems o Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-analyses (PRISMA) s a emen [ 15 ]. The ollowing scien i ic da abases we e consul ed: Medline, Scopus, CUIDEN, CINAHL, LILACS and PsycINFO. The inclusion c i e ia o he selec ion o s udies we e: o iginal s udies in English, Spanish and F ench; ime es ic ion o he las 10 yea s; a heme ela ed o e i emen and dep ession diagnosed by heal hca e p o essionals wi h he p e alence con i med by a alida ed scale, including all he modali ies o e i emen (an icipa ed, p e e i emen , due o disease, olun a y o manda o y) wi h no age limi in e i emen . The las 10 yea s we e ma ked o app ecia e he e ec o he global economic c isis in 2008. Many people had o ad ance hei e i emen age and i has been a pe iod o in e es a he social, heal h and economic le el. The exclusion c i e ia we e s udies no a ailable in ull ex , a manda o y e i emen whose cause was dep ession and a icles o low me hodological quali y, as well as e iews, clinical cases o expe opinions. 2.2. Sea ch S a egy The sea ch equa ion was elabo a ed by means o e ms (MeSH) used o iden i y he p ima y s udies: e i emen , dep ession, aged, nu sing and “heal h Pe sonnel”. Table 1shows he di e en sea ch equa ions conduc ed in each da abase, wi h he il e s used and he esul s ob ained in each o hem. Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 3 o 11 Table 1. Sea ch s a egies conduc ed in he di e en da abases. Da abases Sea ch S a egy Fil e s Resul s Medline ( e i emen OR pensions OR unemploymen ) AND (aged OR aging OR senescence OR elde ly) AND (dep ession OR “dep essi e symp oms” OR “emo ional dep ession” OR “dep essi e diso de ” OR “dep essi e synd ome” OR melancholia) AND (nu s* OR “heal h Pe sonnel”) (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench. 101 Scopus ( e i emen OR pensions OR unemploymen ) AND (aged OR aging OR senescence OR elde ly) AND (dep ession OR “dep essi e symp oms” OR “emo ional dep ession” OR “dep essi e diso de ” OR “dep essi e synd ome” OR melancholia) AND (nu s* OR “heal h Pe sonnel”) (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench 73 CUIDEN jubilación AND dep esión (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench 0 CINHAL ( e i emen OR pensions OR unemploymen ) AND (aged OR aging OR senescence OR elde ly) AND (dep ession OR “dep essi e symp oms” OR “emo ional dep ession” OR “dep essi e diso de ” OR “dep essi e synd ome” OR melancholia) AND (nu s* OR “heal h Pe sonnel”) (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench. 35 LILACS ( e i emen OR pensions OR unemploymen ) AND (aged OR aging OR senescence OR elde ly) AND (dep ession OR “dep essi e symp oms” OR “emo ional dep ession” OR “dep essi e diso de ” OR “dep essi e synd ome” OR melancholia) AND (nu s* OR “heal h Pe sonnel”) (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench. 43 PsycINFO ( e i emen OR pensions OR unemploymen ) AND (aged OR aging OR senescence OR elde ly) AND (dep ession OR “dep essi e symp oms” OR “emo ional dep ession” OR “dep essi e diso de ” OR “dep essi e synd ome” OR melancholia) AND (nu s* OR “heal h Pe sonnel”) (a) Time es ic ion: 10 yea s. (b) Languages: English, Spanish and F ench. 81 2.3. S udy Selec ion This manusc ip is egis e ed in PROSPERO wi h he ollowing e e ence code: CRD42020163979. A p eselec ion was conduc ed by pai s, whe e he esul s we e sc eened based on he inclusion c i e ia. Subsequen ly, he ull ex was ead and hen a c i ical eading was conduc ed o e alua e he alidi y o he s udy ollowing he ecommenda ions o Coope , Hedges and Valen ine [16]. Fo each selec ed s udy, a back-and- o h sea ch was pe o med o loca e mo e esea ch s udies ela ed o he heme o in e es . In case o a disag eemen be ween he wo eam membe s, a hi d esea che was consul ed, blinded o his pee s’ decision and who ollowed he same sea ch c i e ion p o ocol [ 17 ]. Finally, a c i ical eading was pe o med o he chosen a icles o e alua e possible biases in he me hodology [ 16 ]. Apa om ha , a sea ch was pe o med by an expe in he g ey li e a u e o iden i y po en ially alid a icles. Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 4 o 11 S a ing om an ini ial sea ch o 556 a icles, 179 we e selec ed a e elimina ing duplica es using he Mendeley ® bibliog aphical manage and applying he inclusion c i e ia. A e eading i les and abs ac s, 148 a icles we e dele ed, wi h a o al o 31 a icles emaining. A ull ex eading o hese 31 a icles was pe o med, a e which a se ies o a icles was dele ed acco ding o he inclusion c i e ia, as can be seen in Figu e 1, hus ob aining a inal sample o n=11. An analysis o he biases was ca ied ou using he STROBE, CONSORT and CASPE ools (Table S1). Fo he assessmen o he me hodological quali y o he obse a ional s udies, he STROBE s a emen was used. All s udies abo e 11 o he 22 i ems we e conside ed alid. CONSORT was used o he e alua ion o clinical ials. I was es ima ed as a cu sco e o 13/25. CASPE was used o quali a i e s udies oo. The selec ion p ocess was assessed by wo in es iga o s independen ly and in case o a disc epancy a hi d decided. A Kappa indic was ob ained om 0.91. Figu e 1. Flow diag am in he selec ion o a icles acco ding o P e e ed Repo ing I ems o Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-analyses (PRISMA). 2.4. Da a Coding A da a coding handbook was used. The ollowing a iables we e ex ac ed om each s udy: (a) name o he lead au ho ; (b) yea o publica ion; (c) language o he publica ion (English–Spanish–F ench); (d) coun y whe e he s udy was conduc ed; (e) ype o s udy design; ( ) o al o he sample o e i ees o indi iduals o e i emen age in each s udy; (g) dep ession scale used in he s udy; (h) p e alence o s udy pa icipan s su e ing om dep ession; (i) main esul s; (j) psychoeduca ional app oach. The p e alence a es o he numbe o e i ees su e ing om dep ession we e ob ained di ec ly om each s udy ( o al sample o he s udy and sample wi h he diagnosis). The in e - esea che eliabili y o he da a coding p ocess was e i ied by calcula ing he in aclass co ela ion coe icien . Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 5 o 11 2.5. Da a Analysis The da a analysis was pe o med by means o he S a sDi ec ® me a-analysis so wa e package (S a sDi ec L d., Camb idge, UK). Fi s a sensi i i y analysis was conduc ed o de e mine i excluding any o he included s udies p oduced signi ican changes o he esul s. Apa om ha , he publica ion bias was e alua ed by using Egge ’s eg ession es . The p e alence and he con idence in e als we e calcula ed by me a-analyzing andom e ec s. The he e ogenei y o he sample was de e mined by he I2index [18]. 3. Resul s 3.1. Cha ac e is ics o he S udy Sample A o al o 11 a icles we e inally selec ed, 18.1% (n=2) o which we e published in 2018, he same numbe in 2017, 2015, 2013, and 2009, and 9.1% (n=1) in 2012. The language o he publica ions was mos ly English, wi h 90.1% (n=10) o he sample in ha language, e sus one a icle published in Spanish (8.3%). The coun ies whe e he s udies we e published we e mainly he Uni ed S a es, wi h 27.2% o he sample (n=3), ollowed by G eece (n=2) and Aus alia (n=2), bo h wi h 18.1%, whe eas Singapo e, Spain, F ance and Canada we e ep esen ed by one wi h 9.1% (n=1) each. Rega ding he ype o design, c oss-sec ional desc ip i e coho s udies p edomina e wi h 45.4% o he sample (n=5), ollowed by coho s udies wi h 27.3% (n=3), non andomized clinical ials wi h 18.8% (n=2) and, inally, a mixed s udy (quali-quan i a i e) wi h 9.1%, as shown in Table S1. Table 2shows he desc ip i e da a o he sample o e i ees included in each o he s udies (gende dis ibu ion, mean age o e i emen , mean ime om e i emen and he diagnos ic o dep ession). Table 2. P e alence o dep ession in e i ees. Au ho s and Yea Gende Dis ibu ion Mean Age o Re i emen (Yea s) Mean Time om Re i emen (Yea s) Diagnos ic o Dep ession Cla k e al., 2018 [19] Female n=2 (4%) M=76.8 SD =7.42 R=64–88 ————- Scale =GDS Diagnosed by =Ge ia ician Hebe e al., 2018 [20] Female n=80 (100%) Ages 55 and olde ————- Scale =Ad-hoc Diagnosed by =—————– Ge ogianni e al., 2017 [21] Female n=152 (36.7%) M=63.54 R=54–72 M=1.5 Scale =BDI-II and HADS Diagnosed by =PCP Kyp aiou e al., 2017 [22] Female n=27 (5.4%) M=54.1 SD =7.4 M=6.1 SD =5.6 Scale =BDI-II Diagnosed by =PCP Culph e al., 2015 [23] Male n=12 (100%) M=67.4 R=52–77 ————- Scale =BDI-II Diagnosed by =PCP S ancli e e al., 2015 [24] Female n=16 (29%) M=55.6 SD =6.6 R=44–72 ————- Scale =GDS-G and Mini PASS-ADD Diagnosed by =PCP Zi in e al., 2013 [25] Female n=4195 (51.4%) M=63.8 SD =8.3 ————- Scale =CES-D Diagnosed by =—————— Oli e e al., 2013 [26] Male n=30 (100%) M=67.8 R=55-82 ————- Scale =BDI-II Diagnosed by =sel -iden i ied (n=10); o mally diagnosed by a physician (n=20) Pé ès e al., 2012 [27] Female n=401 (40%) M=75.1 SD =6.6 ————- Scale =CES-D Diagnosed by =Neu opsychologis In e iew Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 6 o 11 Table 2. Con . Au ho s and Yea Gende Dis ibu ion Mean Age o Re i emen (Yea s) Mean Time om Re i emen (Yea s) Diagnos ic o Dep ession Lizaso e al., 2009 [28] Female n=37 (31.9%) M=66.5 SD =5.60 n=99 (83.2%) be o e 65 n=20 (16.8%) a e 65 Scale =GADS Diagnosed by =Psychia is Schwingel e al., 2009 [29] Female n=1159 (66.1%) M=66.9 SD =7.8 ————- Scale =GDS Diagnosed by =Ge ia ician No e: BDI-II =Beck’s Dep ession In en o y, 2nd Edi ion; CES-D =Cen e o Epidemiological S udies-Dep ession scale; GADS =Goldbe g’s anxie y and dep ession scale; GDS =Yesa age’s Ge ia ic Dep ession Scale (abb e ia ed); GDS-G =Glasgow’s Dep ession Scale; HADS =Hospi al Anxie y and Dep ession Scale; M =mean age; Mini PASS-ADD =Mini Psychia ic Assessmen o Adul s wi h De elopmen al Disabili ies; n= o al sample o e i ees; PCP =P ima y Ca e Physician; R = ange o age; SD =s anda d de ia ion. 3.2. P e alence o Dep ession The scales and measu emen ins umen s o e alua e dep ession mos used and collec ed in he selec ed a icles we e mos ly he ollowing: “Beck’s Dep ession In en o y” (BDI-2) wi h 44.5% (n=5), he “Yesa age’s Ge ia ic Dep ession Scale” (GDS) in 18.2% o he sample (n=2), ollowed by he “Cen e o Epidemiological S udies-Dep ession” (CES-D) scale, he “Glasgow’s Dep ession” (GDS-G) scale, he “Hospi al Anxie y and Dep ession Scale” (HADS) scale, he “Quali y o Li e Index” (QLI), o he ”Mini Psychia ic Assessmen o Adul s wi h De elopmen al Disabili ies” (Mini PASS-ADD). Acco ding o he esul s ob ained in he s udies included in his sys ema ic e iew, i is concluded ha he e i ees wi h he highes p e alence o dep ession a e he ones who e i e in a manda o y ashion o due o illness [20,28,29]. Acco ding o he da a ound in his e iew, he es ima ed p e alence o dep ession in e i ees anges om 0.42 o 22.7%, di e en ia ing be ween manda o y and olun a y e i emen , as well as by he le el o dep ession su e ed: minimum (46.7–66.7%), sligh (10–40%), mode a e (17.1–24%) and se e e (3.8–16.7%). 3.3. Me a-Analysis o he P e alence o Dep ession in Re i ees The o al sample o e i ees collec ed in he sys ema ic e iew is n=3019, e en ually including a o al o n=360 e i ees in he me a-analysis, as wo a icles had o be disca ded om he me a-analysis o no con ibu ing da a on he p e alence o dep ession (n=9). The ollowing able shows he absolu e igu es o he p e alence o dep ession in he di e en samples o e i ees om he selec ed a icles (Table 3). The sample aken om he s udies is om he e i ed in gene al popula ion, which was analyzed by he men ioned scales. Table 3. P e alence o dep ession in e i ees. Au ho s and Yea n o al o Re i ees n o al o Re i ees wi h Dep ession Cla k e al., 2018 [19] 50 12 Hebe e al., 2018 [20] 80 10 Ge ogianni e al., 2017 [21] 414 122 Kyp aiou e al., 2017 [22] 502 135 Culph e al., 2015 [23] 12 11 S ancli e e al., 2015 [24] 58 4 Oli e e al., 2013 [26] 30 28 Lizaso e al., 2009 [28] 119 6 Schwingel e al., 2009 [29] 1754 32 When he sensi i i y analysis was pe o med, he es ima ed alue o he p e alence did no change in a s a is ically signi ican way when each o he s udies was emo ed om he analysis. An Egge ’s Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 7 o 11 analysis showed ha he e was no publica ion bias, wi h i s esul s showing no s a is ical signi icance (p=0.121). In he he e ogenei y analysis, he I 2 index was 98.7% (95% CI =98.4–98.9%), showing high he e ogenei y. Rega ding he p e alence alues ob ained in he me a-analysis, he p e alence o dep ession in e i ees was 28% (95% CI =13–46%), as can be seen in Figu e 2. Figu e 2. Fo es plo o he p e alence o dep ession in e i ees. 4. Discussion A e analyzing he 11 a icles included in his sys ema ic e iew, and answe ing o he wo- old objec i e o his pape ( o analyze he p e alence o dep ession in e i ees and he psychoeduca ional app oach o dep ession), he esul s e eal a 28% p e alence o dep ession in e i ees, which shows ha almos one- hi d o his collec i e popula ion ha e his condi ion. The sca ce numbe o esea ch s udies on he heme e eal e y dissimila pe cen ages [30,31] and i is di icul o compa e hem, as has al eady been seen in he e y a icles included in he me a-analysis [19–24,26,27]. E en so, me a-analyzing he collec ed da a on he p e alence o his disease gi es as a b oad iew o he magni ude o he p oblem and allows o he es ima ion o a pe cen age which un eils he eal impo ance o he phenomenon, so as o ace i wi h s a egies o p e en ion and ea ly de ec ion [18–20]. To his should be added ha he majo i y o he s udies included in his e iew (41.6%) use “Beck’s Dep ession In en o y”, whose es has a high eliabili y wi h a C onbach’s Alpha o 0.91 [32]. The bo om line is ha he esul s highligh he sani a y ole in he psychoeduca ional app oach wi h 41.6% (n=5), ollowed by p e en ion wi h 25% (n=3) and, inally, de ec ion and adhe ence o he ea men wi h 16.6% each (n=2). Some o he a icles included in his e iew p opose he ealiza ion by p ima y ca e nu sing p o essionals p og ams aimed a e alua ing and assis ing people who a e in his pe iod o hei li es [ 20 – 22 ], helping people o ind new ac i i ies ha mo i a e hem [ 29 ], encou aging hem o pa icipa e in communi y g oups [ 24 ], helping indi iduals o deal wi h he new si ua ion [ 22 ] and inding ac i i ies ha inc ease hei sel -es eem again [26]. Acco ding o he s udy ca ied ou by Hebe and collabo a o s [ 20 ], he in ol emen o he amily in his new s age is also impo an , wi h nu sing being in cha ge o gi ing hem he in o ma ion necessa y so ha hey a e able o de ec in ime he appea ance o symp oms o dep ession. A sec ion o e i ees hea ily a ec ed by dep ession, acco ding o he s udy ca ied ou by Lizaso and collabo a o s [ 28 ], a e hose who e i e due o illness, being a ield in which nu sing could ac in o de o educe he p e alence o dep ession ha we ind in hese people. Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 8 o 11 In many cases, he ansi ion pe iod owa ds e i emen is loaded wi h unce ain y among he popula ion, wi h e i ees being mo e suscep ible o de eloping men al heal h p oblems [ 20 ]. Fo his eason, some o he a icles included in his e iew sugges ha he heal h p o essionals mus implemen p og ams in ended o e alua e and help he people in his pe iod o hei li es [ 20 – 22 ], helping indi iduals in hei sea ch o new ac i i ies ha mo i a e hem [ 29 ], o encou age hem o pa icipa e in communi y g oups [ 24 ], o help hem build he necessa y will powe o ace he new si ua ion [23], and o ind ac i i ies ha imp o e hei sel -es eem [26]. The WHO de ends aging as a p ocess in which oppo uni ies a e s eamlined o ha e good heal h, social pa icipa ion and sel -con idence in o de o enjoy a good quali y o li e by means o campaigning o an ac i e aging p ocess [ 33 ]. This ac i e aging p ocess would include no only good physical and men al heal h, bu also social pa icipa ion, hus a oiding ea ing olde people as passi e beings and ull o needs [ 5 ]. Ac i e aging can be applied bo h indi idually and in g oups, as long as i po en ia es he physical, social, and men al well-being o he elde ly popula ion; o his eason, bo h in socie y and in he socio-sani a y policies, he impo ance i eally has by means o subsidies and p omo ion ini ia i es o his mo emen has o be assigned so ha he popula ion a e in o med. All o he abo e could help o educe he g ea numbe o dea hs p oduced a e exi ing he s age which socie y unde s ands as ac i e, namely he wo king li e [34]. Acco ding o a s udy conduc ed by Hebe and collabo a o s [ 20 ], he commi men o he amily membe s is also impo an in his new s age, he mul idisciplina y eam o heal h p o essionals being in cha ge o gi ing hem he necessa y in o ma ion so ha hey can p omp ly de ec he onse o he symp oms o dep ession. In he same line is a s udy by Wahyuni e al., whe e he ela ion be ween he elde ly’s social suppo and he incidence a e o dep ession is assessed. The au ho s conclude ha he g ea e he le el o social suppo , he lowe he incidence o dep ession will be. They s ess he impo ance o heal h wo ke s, especially nu ses, since among hei compe ences is p o iding heal h se ices, especially when hey ela e o p o iding social suppo and o he an icipa ed incidence o dep ession in he homes o he elde ly [35]. The in e change places o e i ees [ 23 , 26 ] a e also men ioned, spaces whe e he indi iduals can pe o m ac i i ies olun a ily, pa icipa e in opinion o ums wi h o he e i ees, suppo each o he and all supe ised and o ganized by well- ained pe sonnel [36]. A g oup o e i ees which is deeply a ec ed by dep ession a e hose who e i e due o illness [20,28,29] , his being a ield in which ac ions could be aken wi h he aim o educing he no iceable p e alence o dep ession in hese indi iduals. E en so, his s udy concludes ha he e is no di ec ela ionship be ween dep ession and e i emen , wi h he possibili y ha e i ing inc eases he le els o dep ession he pe son has al eady su e ed om, o ha dep ession is he eason o e i ing. In o de o elucida e his, u he esea ch is needed, using longi udinal s udies ha allow he es ablishing o causali y ela ions and e i y i aging is a mode a o a iable in he de elopmen o dep ession in e i ees, al hough he e al eady exis s udies wi h his ype o design ha ha e p o ed dep ession and e i emen a e di ec ly ela ed [25]. On he o he hand, he di e en a icles included in he e iew di e en ia e he p e alence o dep ession su e ed by he pa icipan s o each s udy depending on i i s le el is minimum, sligh , mode a e o se e e, o mode a e, sligh o high le els [ 19 , 21 – 23 , 26 ], he pe cen age being highe in he case o minimum dep ession, which coincides and suppo s he impo ance o p e en ion and ea ly de ec ion, a eas in which he heal h p o essional plays an essen ial ole [37]. Limi a ions Se e al limi a ions ha e occu ed, among which he ollowing a e wo h highligh ing: he sca ce numbe o a icles ound add essing he s udy heme and he ac ha such a icles a e conduc ed in a ious coun ies wi h di e en e i emen ages and socioeconomic di e ences ha may in luence he e i emen p ocess, such as he pensions ecei ed, he socio-sani a y sys em, e c. Ano he limi a ion is he ac ha pa o he sample has had a manda o y e i emen by any o he disease, which Heal hca e 2020,8, 321 9 o 11 may be a mode a ing a iable o conside . Apa om ha , he e a e ew esea ch s udies on his heme and he sca ce da a con ibu ed on he p e alence o dep ession in e i ees a e e y dissimila , hus inc easing he he e ogenei y o he esul s, as can be e i ied in he esul s o he me a-analysis pe o med in his s udy. Ano he in luencing ac o is he ac ha he majo i y o he s udies a e c oss-sec ional and desc ip i e, u he longi udinal esea ch s udies being necessa y so as o es ablish causali y and de e mine i aging is a mode a o a iable in he de elopmen o dep ession in e i ees. 5. Conclusions The high pe cen age o minimum dep ession is wo h highligh ing, wi h he ole o heal h p o essionals being e y impo an o p e en hese le els om ad ancing in o a deepe dep ession. Acco ding o he selec ed a icles in his e iew, he es ima ed o al p e alence o dep ession in e i ees is 29%. The e o e, and conside ing he numbe o e i ees wo ldwide, his implies ha one ou o h ee e i ees su e s om dep ession o , mo e op imis ically, one ou o ou ce ainly su e s om his disease. S ill, a g ea e diagnos ic eliabili y and app op ia e ools a e needed o alida e his p e alence da a, so ha we can unde s and how many e i ees mee he diagnos ic c i e ia o majo dep ession. Answe ing o he second objec i e based on he impo ance o he psychoeduca ional app oach o dep ession in e i ees, i is concluded ha he nu sing p o essionals ha e o be in o med o be able o de ec he signs and symp oms o dep ession, especially in p ima y ca e, he place whe e he highes le el o au onomy exis s and in which a good popula ion sc eening should be conduc ed in ela ion o his disease. The app oach o a opic as e sa ile as dep ession mus be done om a mul idisciplina y pe spec i e ha in eg a es all kinds o p o essionals such as physicians, nu ses, psychologis s, social wo ke s, occupa ional he apis s, e c. Supplemen a y Ma e ials: The ollowing a e a ailable online a h p://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/321/s1, Table S1: A icles selec ed in he sys ema ic e iew. Au ho Con ibu ions: Concep ualiza ion, R.L.S.; me hodology, M.P.-C., L.R.-B. and R.L.S.; So wa e, J.L.G.-U.; alida ion, M.P.-C., L.R.-B., R.L.S., I.R.-G., N.S.-M. and J.L.G.-U.; o mal Analysis, M.P.-C., L.R.-B. and J.L.G.-U.; in es iga ion, M.P.-C., L.R.-B. and R.L.S.; esou ces, M.P.-C. and L.R.-B.; da a cu a ion, M.P.-C., L.R.-B., R.L.S., I.R.-G., N.S.-M. and J.L.G.-U.; w i ing—o iginal d a p epa a ion, L.R.-B. and R.L.S.; w i ing— e iew and edi ing, I.R.-G. and N.S.-M.; isualiza ion, M.P.-C., L.R.-B., R.L.S., I.R.-G., N.S.-M. and J.L.G.-U.; supe ision, M.P.-C., L.R.-B. and J.L.G.-U.; p ojec adminis a ion, M.P.-C. and L.R.-B. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o he manusc ip . Funding: This pape has no ecei ed any unding. Acknowledgmen s: To An onio Mo eno Gue í n o his ex e nal assessmen as an expe in Ge ia ics, and o Jos é Manuel Ma í nez Mon illa o his assessmen as an ex e nal agen o he me hodology de eloped o ca y ou he s udy. Con lic s o In e es : The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es . Re e ences 1. Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion. Dep ession. 2017. A ailable online: h ps://www.who.in / opics/dep ession/es/ (accessed on 30 Janua y 2020). 2. Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion. 2020. A ailable online: h ps://www.who.in /es/news- oom/ ac -shee s/de ail/ dep ession (accessed on 30 Janua y 2020). 3. Ni a do, F.; Gainza, V. Re i emen a ings. Impo ance and ad an ages o he p epa a ion. Ge oin o 2009 , 4, 1–12. 4. Aguile a, M.Á.Heal h and Re i emen ; Uni e si y Edi o ial: Guadalaja a, México, 2010. 5. Zunzunegui, M.V.; B é land, F. C oss-sec o al policies o add ess he challenge o ac i e aging. Repo . SESPAS 2010. Gac. Sani . 2010,24, 68–73. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 6. B ink, T.L. Dep ession in he aged: Dynamics and ea men . J. Na l. Med. Assoc. 1977 ,69, 891–893. [PubMed] 7. To es, H.M.L.; Sep ú l eda, Y.L.; Aguila , J.L.V.; P é ez, R.H. Psychosocial ac o s ha a ec he dep ession o he eldes adul . Medimay 2015,21, 65–74.