Functionalization Routes for Keratin from Poultry Industry Side-Streams—Towards Bio-Based Absorbent Polymers

Citation: Perez-Puyana, V.M.; Capezza, A.J.; Newson, W.R.; Bengoechea, C.; Johansson, E.; Guerrero, A.; Hendeqvist, M.S. Functionalization Routes for Keratin from Poultry Industry Side-Streams—Towards Bio-Based Absorbent Polymers. Polymers 2023, 15, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polym15020351 Academic Editor: Donatella Duraccio Received: 16 December 2022 Revised: 30 December 2022 Accepted: 5 January 2023 Published: 9 January 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). polymers Article Functionalization Routes for Keratin from Poultry Industry Side-Streams—Towards Bio-Based Absorbent Polymers Victor M. Perez-Puyana 1,* , Antonio J. Capezza 2,* , William R. Newson 3, Carlos Bengoechea 1, Eva Johansson 3, Antonio Guerrero 1and Mikael S. Hendeqvist 2 1Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain 2Fibre and Polymer Technology Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden 3Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, SE-23422 Lomma, Sweden *Correspondence: [email protected] (V.M.P.-P.); [email protected] (A.J.C.) Abstract: Keratin is a largely available protein that can be obtained from the ca. 3 million tons of feathers that the European poultry industry produces as a side-stream. Here, the functionalization of keratin from poultry feathers was evaluated using a oneversus two-stage process using two functionalization agents (succinic anhydride-SA and ethylene dianhydride-EDTAD). The functionalization resulted in the keratin having improved liquid swelling capacities, reaching up to 400%, 300%, and 85% increase in water, saline, and blood, respectively, compared to non-functionalized keratin. The highest swelling was obtained for samples functionalized with EDTAD (one-stage process), while the highest saline uptake was noted for samples processed with 25 wt% SA (two-stage process). Swelling kinetics modeling indicated that the water uptake by the functionalized samples takes place in two steps, and the EDTAD samples showed the highest diffusivity. It is demonstrated that the one-stage functionalization of keratin utilizing EDTAD results in better performance than two-stages, which allows for resource-saving and, thereby, protecting the environment. The results show some potential for the keratin to be utilized as liquid absorbent materials in water, saline, and blood uptake applications. Using keratin from side-streams is an advantage from a sustainability perspective over biomacromolecules that need to be extracted from virgin biomass. Keywords: poultry feathers; biopolymer; functionalization; succinic anhydride; EDTAD; superabsorbent 1. Introduction The poultry industry is an important contributor to the total meat production in Europe and other regions worldwide [ 1 , 2 ]. Spain is a leading European meat producer, with chicken meat representing 11.8% of the entire local production [ 3 ]. In fact, the preference for chicken as the source of protein has grown by 70% over the last three decades, and poultry livestock are promoted as a food source to meet the protein requirements of human nutrition [ 4 ]. The poultry industry generates various types of waste, including feathers, blood, bones, and skin; feather alone represents 5 million tons of waste per year (worldwide) [ 5 ]. Its chemical composition mainly consists of carbon (around 35%); small amounts of phosphorous and nitrogen (around 4%); and trace amounts of several elements such as calcium, sodium, manganese, potassium, etc. (around 1–2%) [6]. Keratin protein is the main component in poultry feathers and is also present in hair, nails, skin, and wool [ 7 ]. Keratin is a fibrillar protein consisting of ca. twenty amino acids with a high sulfur content (4.0–5.5%) [ 8 ]. Due to the high sulfur content of the protein, intra- and intermolecular bonds are formed in and between fibrillar chains, leading to difficulties in solubilizing the protein. Due to its high protein content and hydrophilic character, keratin has been beneficial in several applications, e.g., developing nanoparticles Polymers 2023,15, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020351 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers Polymers 2023,15, 351 2 of 16 for encapsulation and drug release, hydrogels, scaffolds or tissues for cell regeneration, or in therapeutic applications [9–11]. Biorefining waste to extract keratin-based substances from biomass (i.e., proteins, amino acids, hydrolysates, and keratinases) is increasing attention for upcycling and manufacturing sustainable products for various industrial applications. Recently reported applications for the upcycled extracted keratin from waste ranges from biohybrid composites to electrospun fibers [2,12]. Absorbent materials are used in many products/applications where water holding might be important, ranging from diapers and sanitary pads to agriculture and horticulture [ 13 , 14 ]. Absorbent materials are generally derived from non-biodegradable fossilbased acrylic monomers [ 15 ]. Recent studies have shown that biopolymers, such as proteins from industrial by-products, can produce sustainable absorbents with similar swelling behavior to their synthetic counterparts while providing biodegradability and low toxicity [ 16 – 19 ]. Additionally, using keratin from side-streams is an advantage from a sustainability perspective over biomacromolecules that need to be extracted from virgin biomass [20]. Raw materials that can be developed into superabsorbent polymers must be hydrophilic with adequate water absorption capacity [ 21 – 23 ]. Some raw materials, e.g., proteins, may require chemical modifications to obtain such characteristics. Functionalization of proteins has been demonstrated to contribute to improved absorption capacity by adding chemically active groups [ 24 , 25 ]. Acylation of the amino acid residues with anhydrides is one of the most commonly utilized functionalization strategies, where succinic anhydride (SA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride (EDTAD) are the most frequently used anhydrides [26,27]. The present study aims to evaluate different functionalization methodologies on keratin extracted from poultry feathers to increase the material’s absorption capacity. The main novelty of this study is the functionalization of keratin using SA and EDTAD in a two-stage (i.e., alkaline extraction followed by functionalization) or a single-stage process (i.e., alkaline extraction and functionalization carried out simultaneously), not reported before in the literature. The liquid swelling and swelling kinetics of the materials obtained were evaluated as related to their potential to be used as absorbents. The results show that the extracted keratin is a promising candidate for future studies aiming at replacing current petroleum-based absorbents used in many single-use articles, producing large amounts of non-biodegradable waste into the environment. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials Poultry feathers were supplied by Paviso Alimentación (Sevilla, Spain). Succinic anhydride (SA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride (EDTAD), used as functionalization reagents, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other reagents, i.e., hydrochloric acid (HCl) or sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were purchased from Panreac Química, S.A. (Barcelona, Spain). All the reagents were of analytical grade and used without purification. Defibronated sheep blood was purchased from Håtunalab AB (Bro, Sweden). 2.2. Extraction and Functionalization of Keratin The feathers were washed with soap and water, then rinsed extensively with water, and dried in a conventional oven at 40 ◦ C for 24–48 h. Samples were prepared as described in Table 1, utilizing a two- or one-stage process (as described below). SA or EDTAD were used as functionalization agents at 10 or 25 wt% (relative to the protein content) based on results from previous studies [ 26 , 27 ]. In Table 1, the first number in the sample names refers to the stages of the process (2 or 1), “F” refers to functionalized samples, and “S” or “ED” to the functionalization agent used (S = SA, ED = EDTAD). The last two numbers in the sample names (10 or 25) represent the concentration of functionalization agent used Polymers 2023,15, 351 3 of 16 (10% or 25 wt%). As-extracted keratin (KE) was used as a control sample. A schematic overview of the different extraction processes is shown in Figure 1. Table 1. Summary yield and composition of the different samples after functionalization with succinic anhydride (SA) or EDTAD at either 10 or 25 wt% of acylation agent content. Samples Extraction–Functionalization Composition Funct. Agent—Content Yield Protein (%) Ash (%) Lipids (%) KE - 34.87% 67.77 ±1.30 11.80 ±0.28 0.88 ±0.25 2FS10 SA—10% 17.38% 79.40 ±0.29 0.38 ±0.01 1.80 ±0.03 2FS25 SA—25% 13.98% 91.79 ±0.72 1.88 ±1.51 0.99 ±0.62 1FS10 SA—10% 20.94% 78.40 ±2.55 0.30 ±0.18 2.36 ±0.18 1FS25 SA—25% 20.33% 94.75 ±0.68 0.53 ±0.16 0.93 ±0.79 1FED10 EDTAD—10% 23.85% 80.05 ±1.51 0.42 ±0.09 0.74 ±0.02 1FED25 EDTAD—25% 23.21% 84.80 ±1.18 0.42 ±0.01 0.82 ±0.47 KE = keratin, sample names (2FS10-1FED25) refer to stages of process (2 or 1), functionalization agent (S = SA, ED = EDTAD), and concentration (10 or 25%). Polymers2023,15,x 3of16   referstothestagesoftheprocess(2or1),“F”referstofunctionalizedsamples,and“S”or “ED”tothefunctionalizationagentused(S=SA,ED=EDTAD).Thelasttwonumbersin thesamplenames(10or25)representtheconcentrationoffunctionalizationagentused (10%or25wt%).As‐extractedkeratin(KE)wasusedasacontrolsample.Aschematic overviewofthedifferentextractionprocessesisshowninFigure1. Table1.Summaryyieldandcompositionofthedifferentsamplesafterfunctionalizationwithsuccinicanhydride(SA)orEDTADateither10or25wt%ofacylationagentcontent. SamplesExtraction–FunctionalizationComposition Funct.Agent—ContentYieldProtein(%)Ash(%)Lipids(%) KE‐34.87%67.77±1.3011.80±0.280.88±0.25 2FS10SA—10%17.38%79.40±0.290.38±0.011.80±0.03 2FS25SA—25%13.98%91.79±0.721.88±1.510.99±0.62 1FS10SA—10%20.94%78.40±2.550.30±0.182.36±0.18 1FS25SA—25%20.33%94.75±0.680.53±0.160.93±0.79 1FED10EDTAD—10%23.85%80.05±1.510.42±0.090.74±0.02 1FED25EDTAD—25%23.21%84.80±1.180.42±0.010.82±0.47 KE=keratin,samplenames(2FS10‐1FED25)refertostagesofprocess(2or1),functionalization agent(S=SA,ED=EDTAD),andconcentration(10or25%).  Figure1.Schematicoverviewofthetwo‐stageprocesswithExtraction(A)andFunctionalization (B)asseparatestepsandtheone‐stageprocesswithExtractionandFunctionalizationin1stage(C). Thetwo‐stageprocessstartedwithanextractionstep(Figure1A)andafunctionalizationstep(Figure1B).Toextractthekeratin,40goffeatherswereweighedanddispersed in200mLof2MNaOHsolution.Thesuspensionwaskeptundermagneticstirringat500 rpmfor2hat60°C,atapHof11.5–12.5.Theresultingsolutionwascentrifuged(10,000 rpmfor7min),thesupernatantcollected,andthenthepHofthesupernatantwaslowered totheisoelectricpointofkeratin(pH4–4.5).Afterthat,thesamplewascentrifuged(10,000 rpmfor7min),andtheresultingsolidwascollected,rinsedwithwater,andlyophilized for24–48htoremoveallexcesswater.Tofunctionalizetheobtainedkeratin,14gwas dispersedin200mLof2MNaOHsolution,andthesuspensionwaskeptunderstirringat Figure 1. Schematic overview of the two-stage process with Extraction ( A ) and Functionalization ( B ) as separate steps and the one-stage process with Extraction and Functionalization in 1 stage (C). The two-stage process started with an extraction step (Figure 1A) and a functionalization step (Figure 1B). To extract the keratin, 40 g of feathers were weighed and dispersed in 200 mL of 2 M NaOH solution. The suspension was kept under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm for 2 h at 60 ◦ C, at a pH of 11.5–12.5. The resulting solution was centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 7 min), the supernatant collected, and then the pH of the supernatant was lowered to the isoelectric point of keratin (pH 4–4.5). After that, the sample was centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 7 min), and the resulting solid was collected, rinsed with water, and lyophilized for 24–48 h to remove all excess water. To functionalize the obtained keratin, 14 g was dispersed in 200 mL of 2M NaOH solution, and the suspension was kept under stirring at 500 rpm at 60 ◦ C. After 30 min stirring, SA was added to the solution, which was kept under agitation for another 1.5 h, maintaining the pH of the solution at 11.5–12.5 with 2 M NaOH. Then, the resulting solution was centrifuged, the supernatant collected, and the supernatant’s pH was decreased to pH 4–4.5. Thereafter, the samples were purified through Polymers 2023,15, 351 4 of 16 dialysis utilizing cellulose membranes of 14 kDa cut-off (Ref. D9652 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and subsequently submerged in distilled water with constant renewal of the distilled water for 72 h. Finally, the samples were frozen at − 40 ◦ C for 2 h and freeze-dried for 48 h. In the one-stage process (Figure 1C), 40 g of feathers were dispersed in 200 mL of 2 M NaOH solution, and the suspension was then stirred at 500 rpm and 60 ◦ C for 30 min. After that, an adequate amount of either SA or EDTAD was added to the solution. The agitation of the solution was kept for another 1.5 h while the pH was maintained at 11.5–12.5. Then, the samples were centrifuged, the supernatant collected, and the pH was lowered to 4–4.5. Similarly to the two-stage process, the samples were purified through dialysis utilizing cellulose membranes, followed by submerging the samples in distilled water with constant renewal for 72 h, freezing the samples at −40 ◦C for 2 h, and freeze-drying for 48 h. 2.3. Characterization Techniques 2.3.1. Yield The yield of each sample was calculated as the ratio between the final amount obtained and the initial raw material used. 2.3.2. Chemical Composition Protein quantification: The nitrogen content of the samples was determined in triplicate using the Dumas method with a Flash 2000 N/C Analyser (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 5.71 was used [28]. Lipid quantification: The lipid content was determined in triplicate utilizing the Soxhlet method [ 29 , 30 ], i.e., by condensing heated hexane to the samples to extract the lipids, and then calculating the change in sample weight before and after the treatment. Ash quantification: Ash content was determined in triplicate by calcining 1 g of sample at 550 ◦ C in a muffle furnace for 4 to 5 h [ 30 ], and then calculating the change in sample weight before and after the treatment. Moisture content: The moisture content was determined in triplicate by heating 0.5–1.0 g of sample in a furnace at 105 ◦ C for 24 h [ 30 ], and then calculating the change in sample weight before and after the treatment. 2.3.3. Amino Acid Composition The amino acid composition of keratin was obtained following the procedure described in Felix et al. [ 31 ]. Briefly, keratin protein was dissolved in 6 M hydrochloric acid and incubating it in an oven at 110 ◦ C for 24 h. After hydrolysis, pH was adjusted to 7 using 6 M NaOH and the samples were filtered through a Whatman glass microfiber filter (GF/C). Finally, the samples were diluted (1:500) by adding doubly distilled water. Reverse phase HPLC was carried out with a precolumn fluorescence derivatization with o-phtaldialdehyde (SIL-9A Auto Injector, LC-9A Liquid Chromatograph, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). 2.3.4. Water Imbibing Capacity (WIC) The WIC of the samples was measured utilizing a Baummann apparatus (Figure 2), according to Cuadri et al. [ 32 ]. Briefly, a glass Buchner funnel equipped with a borosilicate filter (ROBU Glasfilter-Geraete GmbH, Hattert, Germany) was connected to a horizontal graduated pipette filled with distilled water to the same level as the filter. A 0.5 g thin layer sample was placed on the filter while closing the funnel mouth with an airtight lid. The amount of liquid water absorbed was recorded over time until equilibrium was reached. Then, the WIC was determined from the change in sample weight initially and when the steady-state was achieved. Polymers 2023,15, 351 5 of 16 Polymers2023,15,x 5of16   Theamountofliquidwaterabsorbedwasrecordedovertimeuntilequilibriumwas reached.  Figure2.Imageofthesetupusedforthewaterimbibingcapacitytests. Then,theWICwasdeterminedfromthechangeinsampleweightinitiallyandwhen thesteady‐statewasachieved. 2.3.5.WaterAbsorptionModelling Theaverageparticlesizeindryandwetconditionswasdeterminedtomodelthe waterabsorptionprofiles.TheparticlesizewasmeasuredwithalaserdiffractionsizeanalyzerMastersizer2000(MalvernPanalytical,Malvern,UK),followingtheISO13320:2020 standard.Inthisway,theparticlesweredispersedbyultrasound(vibrationfeedrate55%) andaspirated(disperserpressure1bar)towardsthelens,wheretheyhitthe633nmlaser, causingablockageof0.5–6%inthelens.Thescatteringangleofthelaserwasrecorded for20swith20,000images.TheparticlesizewascalculatedusingFraunhofer’stheoryof lightscattering,assumingamodelofasphereequivalenttovolume[33].Theresultswere expressedthroughtheSauter’sdiameter(D[2,3]),whichisthesurface‐weightedmean. Theproteinparticles’wateruptakekineticswereanalyzedusingFick’ssecondlaw forasphericalgeometry(Equation(1))[34].Thewaterconcentrationprofilesduringthe wateruptakeweregeneratedwithaMatlabcodeusingtheOde15sdifferentialequation solver. C t D2 r C r  2 C r 2       (1) Theswellinggeometrywasconsideredbyperformingthemodelingandcalculating thediffusivityforboththedry(Dd)andthesaturated(wet,Dw)particlediameters(fdand fw,respectively).fwwasestimatedbyassuminganadditivevolumeofthematerialandthe liquidandconsideringthesaturateduptake(inmlliquid/gmaterial),whichdefinedthe WICparameter.Thedensityofthedifferentmaterialswasusedinthecalculations.For eachcase,thediffusivitywasconsideredaconstant,andtheaveragediffusivityforthe dryandwetsystemswasdetermined.Theaveragingwasmadeintwoways,basedon eitherthedirectvaluesDav1=(Dd+Dw)/2orthelogarithmicvaluesDav2=exp((ln(Dd)+ ln(Dw))/2). 2.3.6.SolubilityandZ‐Potential Aqueousdispersions(ca.1gprotein/40mL)werepreparedtomeasuretheprotein solubilityatdifferentpHvalues,andthepHofaliquotswasadjustedtoalkalinepHvalueswitha6NNaOHsolutionandacidpHvalueswitha2NHClsolution.Sampleswere Figure 2. Image of the setup used for the water imbibing capacity tests. 2.3.5. Water Absorption Modelling The average particle size in dry and wet conditions was determined to model the water absorption profiles. The particle size was measured with a laser diffraction size analyzer Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK), following the ISO 13320:2020 standard. In this way, the particles were dispersed by ultrasound (vibration feed rate 55%) and aspirated (disperser pressure 1 bar) towards the lens, where they hit the 633 nm laser, causing a blockage of 0.5–6% in the lens. The scattering angle of the laser was recorded for 20 s with 20,000 images. The particle size was calculated using Fraunhofer’s theory of light scattering, assuming a model of a sphere equivalent to volume [ 33 ]. The results were expressed through the Sauter’s diameter (D [2,3]), which is the surface-weighted mean. The protein particles’ water uptake kinetics were analyzed using Fick’s second law for a spherical geometry (Equation (1)) [ 34 ]. The water concentration profiles during the water uptake were generated with a Matlab code using the Ode15s differential equation solver. ∂C ∂t=D2 r ∂C ∂r+ ∂2C ∂r2(1) The swelling geometry was considered by performing the modeling and calculating the diffusivity for both the dry (D d ) and the saturated (wet, D w ) particle diameters (f d and f w , respectively). f w was estimated by assuming an additive volume of the material and the liquid and considering the saturated uptake (in ml liquid/g material), which defined the WIC parameter. The density of the different materials was used in the calculations. For each case, the diffusivity was considered a constant, and the average diffusivity for the dry and wet systems was determined. The averaging was made in two ways, based on either the direct values D av1 = (D d +D w )/2 or the logarithmic values Dav2 = exp((ln(Dd) + ln(Dw))/2). 2.3.6. Solubility and Z-Potential Aqueous dispersions (ca. 1 g protein/40 mL) were prepared to measure the protein solubility at different pH values, and the pH of aliquots was adjusted to alkaline pH values with a 6 N NaOH solution and acid pH values with a 2 N HCl solution. Samples were homogenized and centrifuged for 20 min at 15,000 rpm and 10 ◦ C. The supernatants were collected for protein content measurement by the Markwell method [ 35 ]. Solubility was expressed as a percentage (g soluble protein/100 g isolate in the sample). The isoelectric point was measured using a Zetasizer 2000 device (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Therefore, different samples were prepared at 1 wt% at a pH value with buffers. Before analysis, the samples were stirred at 20 ◦ C and centrifuged at 10,000 × gfor 10 min in an RC5C Sorvall centrifuge (Sorvall Instruments, Silver Spring, MD, USA). After that, the samples were measured in triplicate at 20 ◦ C. The zeta potential was calculated using the Henry equation and the Smoluchowski approximation from Polymers 2023,15, 351 6 of 16 electrophoretic mobility. The isoelectric point corresponds to the point where the potential value is zero, at which all charges of particles are neutralized [36]. 2.3.7. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) The FTIR spectra of the samples were obtained using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100, coupled to an ATR single-reflection Golden Gate unit (Graseby Specac LTD, Kent, UK) and a triglycine sulfate detector. All the spectra were obtained with an average of 16 scans and a scanning resolution of 4.0 cm −1 . Samples were dried in a desiccator for 1 week before the tests. All the spectra were normalized against the peak at 917 cm −1 , which is assigned as the skeletal stretching [37]. 2.3.8. Size Exclusion High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) The protein extractability and polymerization in the samples were evaluated by sizeexclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Waters 2690 HPLC instrument and a Phenomenex BIOSEP SEC-4000 column following methods previously described [ 13 ]. This procedure consisted of a three-stage extraction process using a 0.5 wt% SDS and 0.05M NaH 2 PO 4 solution as the extraction buffer. For each sample, the prepared suspension was agitated at 2000 rpm for 5 min and centrifuged at 12,500 rpm for 30 min, obtaining the soluble extractable from the supernatant (Extraction 1). Subsequently, the resulting pellet from the 1st extraction was resuspended in fresh SDS-phosphate buffer solution, ultrasonicated for 30 s with a Sanyo Soniprep 150 Ultrasonic Disintegrator, and centrifuged for 30 min at 12,500 rpm. Once again, the soluble extractable was obtained from the supernatant (Extraction 2). Finally, the third extraction consisted of ultrasonication for 2 min of the centrifugated pellet with fresh SDS-phosphate solution (Extraction 3). The total protein extraction from the non-functionalized keratin was used as a reference for normalization. All the measurements were carried out in triplicate. The resulting chromatograms (Supplementary Material Figure S1) used for analysis were obtained by UV-detection using a Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector at a wavelength of 210 nm. The chromatograms were divided into 1–15 min for the polymeric fraction (named as total PP) and 15–30 min for the monomeric fraction (named as total MP). 2.3.9. Visual Absorption Test (VAT) Swelling and liquid spreading properties of the dried samples in blood and 0.9 wt% NaCl (saline solution) were assessed utilizing a visual absorption test, as previously described [ 38 ]. Briefly, 100 mg of the extracted sample was placed on a glass petri dish, and 100 µ L aliquots of the tested liquid (blood or saline solution) were gently pipetted onto the material. A timer was set after the addition of the first aliquot. Each aliquot was allowed to soak before adding the subsequent aliquot, and the addition stopped when liquid saturation was apparent. The VAT was calculated as grams of liquid required to reach saturation per gram of dry powder and reported as the average from duplicates. 2.4. Statistical Analysis Calculated in Excel, mean values and standard deviations have been used to compare samples and their behavior. 3. Results 3.1. Extraction and Functionalization of Keratin 3.1.1. Product Yield and Chemical Composition Both the functionalization process and the type and amount of functionalization agent impacted the product yield and the chemical composition of the products (functionalized keratin). Similarly, as in previous studies [ 39 , 40 ], a yield of ca. 35% was obtained for KE (non-functionalized keratin). However, the yield normally depends on the processing conditions (temperature, time, pH, nature, and content), and yield from 30 to 95% has Polymers 2023,15, 351 7 of 16 been previously reported [ 41 , 42 ]. Additionally, to produce soluble keratin, reagents such as 2-mercaptoethanol or sodium bisulfite under moderately alkaline conditions have been evaluated to reduce disulfide bonds. However, from an industrial and environmental point of view, substituting those reducing reagents with NaOH, which results in alkaline hydrolysis, is more viable [ 40 ]. Functionalizing the KE generally decreased yield to 14–24%, with the highest yield for the 1FED10 and 1FED25 samples (one-stage process). The chemical composition of the KE samples (Table 1), with a protein content of 68%, an ash content of 12%, and a lipid content below 1%, corresponded well with previously reported keratin results [ 30 ]. Functionalization of the samples resulted in a general increase in protein content (to 80–95%), with a simultaneous decrease in ash content (to 0.3–1.9%), with the highest protein content and lowest ash content in 2FS25 and 1FS25 samples (Table 1). The low ash content in the functionalized samples, and thus a high protein content, is the result of the dialysis step carried out at the end of the functionalization process. The dialysis step aimed to remove impurities and excess reagents, thus eliminating the inorganic residues remaining in the protein. Similar studies on the functionalization of keratin to obtain absorbent capacity are scarce. However, Brown et al. report keratin production from wool with a similar protein, ash, and lipid content for wool fibers after hexane extraction [ 43 ] to our functionalized samples. However, different types of keratin might be expected if extracted from wool rather than from chicken feathers. Chicken feathers contain β -keratins, which are part of hard avian and reptilian tissues, such as feathers [ 44 ]. The samples’ high protein and low ash content are likely favorable for their functional properties and use as absorbent materials. 3.1.2. Amino Acid Composition The amino acid composition of the KE sample (Table 2) corresponded well with results from previous investigations [ 32 , 33 ] with a high glycine, serine, and valine content and a cysteine content below 2%. Functionalization of the KE via acylation typically occurs via the condensation of -COOH groups on the lysine (–NH 2 ) residues. The presence of a significant amount of arginine, glutamine, and lysine in the samples is thereby critical for more efficient acylation processes, i.e., more condensation of -COOH on the lysine residues. This reaction was previously stated in the literature in which the reaction mechanism of the functionalized protein was included [45]. Table 2. Amino acid composition of keratin protein. Amino Acid Content (g/100 g Protein) Asp 6.2 Thr 4.0 Ser 10.9 Gln 11.6 Gly 9.5 Ala 4.4 Cys 1.8 Val 10.4 Met 0.3 Ile 5.1 Leu 8.5 Tyr 1.8 Phe 5.0 His 0.3 Lys 1.9 Arg 7.0 3.1.3. Swelling Capacity of the Extracted Keratin The Water Imbibing Capacity (WIC) increased when the KE was functionalized (Figure 3), with the highest capacity for the 1FED10 and 1FED25 samples (functional- Polymers 2023,15, 351 8 of 16 ized in one-stage using EDTAD). In these samples, the water absorption was increased three-fold (from 160 to 430 and 500) in relation to the non-functionalized sample (KE; Table 3). Polymers2023,15,x 8of16   Met0.3 Ile5.1 Leu8.5 Tyr1.8 Phe5.0 His0.3 Lys1.9 Arg7.0 3.1.3.SwellingCapacityoftheExtractedKeratin TheWaterImbibingCapacity(WIC)increasedwhentheKEwasfunctionalized(Figure3),withthehighestcapacityforthe1FED10and1FED25samples(functionalizedin one‐stageusingEDTAD).Inthesesamples,thewaterabsorptionwasincreasedthree‐fold (from160to430and500)inrelationtothenon‐functionalizedsample(KE;Table3).  Figure3.WaterImbibingCapacityofkeratin(KE)andsampleoffunctionalizedkeratinusingatwo‐ (2)orone‐(1)stageprocesswitheitherSuccinicAcid(SA)orEDTAD(ED)of10%(10)or25%(25) asfunctionalizingagent. Table3.Waterabsorptionofthedifferentsystemsobtained. SystemsWaterAbsorption(%) KE160±5 2FS10330±21 2FS25370±35 1FS10380±14 1FS25380±28 1FED10430±17 1FED25500±42 Inpreviousstudies[20],functionalizingsoyproteinisolatethroughacylationhas shownthattheWICisdirectlyconnectedtotheamountoffunctionalizingagentutilized. However,inthepresentstudyonKE,theamountoffunctionalizationagentplayedarole inthetwo‐stageprocessusingSAasafunctionalizingagent,whileitdidnotshowto affecttheWICintheone‐stageprocess(Figure3).Itwaspossibletoreachca.30%more WICofthekeratiniftheSAcontentwasincreasedto25wt%usingthetwo‐stageprocess. Onthecontrary,intheone‐stageprocessusingEDTADasafunctionalizingagent,more Figure 3. Water Imbibing Capacity of keratin (KE) and sample of functionalized keratin using a two- (2) or one- (1) stage process with either Succinic Acid (SA) or EDTAD (ED) of 10% (10) or 25% (25) as functionalizing agent. Table 3. Water absorption of the different systems obtained. Systems Water Absorption (%) KE 160 ±5 2FS10 330 ±21 2FS25 370 ±35 1FS10 380 ±14 1FS25 380 ±28 1FED10 430 ±17 1FED25 500 ±42 In previous studies [ 20 ], functionalizing soy protein isolate through acylation has shown that the WIC is directly connected to the amount of functionalizing agent utilized. However, in the present study on KE, the amount of functionalization agent played a role in the two-stage process using SA as a functionalizing agent, while it did not show to affect the WIC in the one-stage process (Figure 3). It was possible to reach ca. 30% more WIC of the keratin if the SA content was increased to 25 wt% using the two-stage process. On the contrary, in the one-stage process using EDTAD as a functionalizing agent, more WIC was obtained in the keratin when 25 wt% EDTAD was used (Figure 3). Thus, the impact of the amount of functionalization agent added to a protein seemed to be dependent on the nature of the reagent used and the functionalization/extraction route. An absorbent material is used in many applications, where medical, hygiene, and daily care products absorbing liquids such as urine and blood, have a large share [ 15 ]. The functionalized KE evaluated here showed a high potential to absorb such liquids (Figure 4A) as visualized by an absorption test (VAT) utilizing blood and a saline solution (0.9 wt% NaCl). The greatest saline absorption (ca. 6 g/g) was displayed by the 2FS25 samples, while the highest blood absorption (4.5 g/g) was obtained for 1FED25. Thus, KE, 2FS25, and 1FED25 were selected to visualize the liquid spreading properties (Figure 4B–D, respectively). The results indicated similarities for saline spreading in KE (Figure 4B) and 2FS25 (Figure 4C) despite the highly different VAT values (Figure 4A). The saline spreading was rapid throughout the dry powder for all samples, shown for most representative samples (KE, 2FS25, and 1FED25) in Supplementary Material (Video S1). Polymers 2023,15, 351 9 of 16 Polymers2023,15,x 9of16   WICwasobtainedinthekeratinwhen25wt%EDTADwasused(Figure3).Thus,the impactoftheamountoffunctionalizationagentaddedtoaproteinseemedtobedependentonthenatureofthereagentusedandthefunctionalization/extractionroute. Anabsorbentmaterialisusedinmanyapplications,wheremedical,hygiene,and dailycareproductsabsorbingliquidssuchasurineandblood,havealargeshare[15].The functionalizedKEevaluatedhereshowedahighpotentialtoabsorbsuchliquids(Figure 4A)asvisualizedbyanabsorptiontest(VAT)utilizingbloodandasalinesolution(0.9 wt%NaCl).Thegreatestsalineabsorption(ca.6g/g)wasdisplayedbythe2FS25samples, whilethehighestbloodabsorption(4.5g/g)wasobtainedfor1FED25.Thus,KE,2FS25, and1FED25wereselectedtovisualizetheliquidspreadingproperties(Figure4B–D,respectively).TheresultsindicatedsimilaritiesforsalinespreadinginKE(Figure4B)and 2FS25(Figure4C)despitethehighlydifferentVATvalues(Figure4A).Thesalinespreadingwasrapidthroughoutthedrypowderforallsamples,shownformostrepresentative samples(KE,2FS25,and1FED25)inSupplementaryMaterial(VideoS1).  Figure4.VisualAbsorptionTestforthesamplesutilizingbloodandsalinesolution(A):theaddition ofsalineuntilthesaturationpointforkeratin(B)andkeratintwo‐stagefunctionalizedwith25wt% SA(C),andofbloodforkeratinone‐stagefunctionalizedwith25wt%EDTAD(D). Althoughthe1FED25samplehadthehighestbloodabsorption,withanincreaseof 350%comparedtoKE(Figure4A),thesecond‐highestbloodabsorptionwasfoundforthe 2FS25sample.AsSAisknownforbeinglessexpensiveandcontributinglessgreenhouse gasemissionstotheenvironmentthanEDTAD[36–38],thesefindingspointtowardsthe potentialofSAtoproduceKEfunctionalizedsampleswithincreasedliquidswelling propertiescomparedtoEDTAD.Thefunctionalizedsamples’improvedinteractionand bloodswellingpropertiescomparedtoKEareshownasrepresentativesamples(KE, 2FS25,1FED25)inSupplementaryVideoS2.ContrarytothesalineVATresults,theblood Figure 4. Visual Absorption Test for the samples utilizing blood and saline solution ( A ): the addition of saline until the saturation point for keratin ( B ) and keratin two-stage functionalized with 25 wt% SA (C), and of blood for keratin one-stage functionalized with 25 wt% EDTAD (D). Although the 1FED25 sample had the highest blood absorption, with an increase of 350% compared to KE (Figure 4A), the second-highest blood absorption was found for the 2FS25 sample. As SA is known for being less expensive and contributing less greenhouse gas emissions to the environment than EDTAD [ 36 – 38 ], these findings point towards the potential of SA to produce KE functionalized samples with increased liquid swelling properties compared to EDTAD. The functionalized samples’ improved interaction and blood swelling properties compared to KE are shown as representative samples (KE, 2FS25, 1FED25) in Supplementary Video S2. Contrary to the saline VAT results, the blood VAT revealed that all functionalized materials (SA and EDTAD) absorbed the blood only on the spot where the droplet touched the powder and had a slow liquid spreading, taking up to 6 min to reach saturation (Figure 4D). Additionally, when the blood-saturated functionalized materials were stirred, non-colored parts of the sample were spotted, indicating that not all the powder participated in the swelling (Supplementary Material Video S2). These results suggest that the functionalized materials presented a gel-blocking effect, a common defect in absorbent materials when too rapid swelling of the particles occurs, which has been shown in previous studies to hinder the liquid from spreading evenly through the powder [ 25 ]. Improvements in saline swelling and a more rapid blood uptake are interesting properties to focus on for KE-based absorbent materials to be used in sanitary products such as incontinence and menstruation pads. Polymers 2023,15, 351 16 of 16 45. Cuadri, A.A.; Romero, A.; Bengoechea, C.; Guerrero, A. The Effect of Carboxyl Group Content on Water Uptake Capacity and Tensile Properties of Functionalized Soy Protein-Based Superabsorbent Plastics. J. Polym. Environ. 2018 ,26, 2934–2944. [CrossRef] 46. Patel, S.K.S.; Choi, S.H.; Kang, Y.C.; Lee, J.-K. Eco-Friendly Composite of Fe 3 O 4 -Reduced Graphene Oxide Particles for Efficient Enzyme Immobilization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017,9, 2213–2222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 47. Kong, J.; Yu, S. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of Protein Secondary Structures. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2007,39, 549–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 48. Kaczmarek, B.; Nadolna, K.; Owczarek, A. The Physical and Chemical Properties of Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780128164211. 49. Chieng, B.W.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Yunus, W.M.Z.W.; Hussein, M.Z. Poly(lactic acid)/Poly(ethylene glycol) Polymer Nanocomposites: Effects of Graphene Nanoplatelets. Polymers 2013,6, 93–104. [CrossRef] 50. Lim, S.L.; Tang, W.N.H.; Ooi, C.W.; Chan, E.S.; Tey, B.T. Rapid swelling and deswelling of semi-interpenetrating network poly(acrylic acid)/poly(aspartic acid) hydrogels prepared by freezing polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 ,133, 43515. [CrossRef] 51. Bragulla, H.H.; Homberger, D.G. Structure and functions of keratin proteins in simple, stratified, keratinized and cornified epithelia. J. Anat. 2009,214, 516–559. [CrossRef] 52. He, M.; Teng, F.; Chen, H.; Wu, C.; Huang, Y.Y.; Li, Y. Fabrication of soy protein isolate-succinic anhydride-dextran nanogels: Properties, performance, and controlled release of curcumin. LWT 2022,160, 113259. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.