scieee Open visual document viewer

The migration ability of stem cells can explain the existence of cancer of unknown primary site. Rethinking metastasis.

López Lázaro, Miguel

Abstract

Cancers of unknown primary site are metastatic cancers for which primary tumors are not found after detailed investigations. In many cases, the site of origin is not identified even on postmortem examination. These cancers are the fourth most common cause of cancer death. The biological events involved in the development of this type of cancers remain unknown. This manuscript discusses that, like metastatic cells, stem cells have a natural ability to migrate. A cancer of unknown primary site would form when deregulated, premalignant or cancerous stem cells migrated away from their natural tissue and gave rise to a cancer in a new site before or without generating a tumor in their original tissue. It is important to realize that forming a tumor in a tissue is not a prerequisite for stem cells to migrate away from that tissue. This view is in accordance with recent observations that strongly support the tumorigenesis model in which cancer arises from normal stem cells. Evidence has accumulated that cancer stem cells may play a key role in cancer progression and resistance to therapy. Successful treatment of cancer, including that of unknown primary site, may therefore require the development of therapies against cancer stem cells.

Full text

Oncoscience467 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience Oncoscience 2015, Vol.2, No.5 The mig a ion abili y o s em cells can explain he exis ence o cance o unknown p ima y si e. Re hinking me as asis. Miguel López-Láza o1 1 Depa men o Pha macology, Facul y o Pha macy, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain Co espondence o: Miguel López-Láza o, email: [email p o ec ed] Keywo ds: Cance o unknown o igin, Cance s em cells, Cance he apy, Cells o o igin in cance , S em cell model o cance Recei ed: Ap il 5, 2015 Accep ed: Ap il 28, 2015 Published: May 1, 2015 This is an open-access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License, which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho and sou ce a e c edi ed. ABSTRACT Cance s o unknown p ima y si e a e me as a ic cance s o which p ima y umo s a e no ound a e de ailed in es iga ions. In many cases, he si e o o igin is no iden i ied e en on pos mo em examina ion. These cance s a e he ou h mos common cause o cance dea h. The biological e en s in ol ed in he de elopmen o his ype o cance s emain unknown. This manusc ip discusses ha , like me as a ic cells, s em cells ha e a na u al abili y o mig a e. A cance o unknown p ima y si e would o m when de egula ed, p emalignan o cance ous s em cells mig a ed away om hei na u al issue and ga e ise o a cance in a new si e be o e o wi hou gene a ing a umo in hei o iginal issue. I is impo an o ealize ha o ming a umo in a issue is no a p e equisi e o s em cells o mig a e away om ha issue. This iew is in acco dance wi h ecen obse a ions ha s ongly suppo he umo igenesis model in which cance a ises om no mal s em cells. E idence has accumula ed ha cance s em cells may play a key ole in cance p og ession and esis ance o he apy. Success ul ea men o cance , including ha o unknown p ima y si e, may he e o e equi e he de elopmen o he apies agains cance s em cells. INTRODUCTION Me as asis is conside ed o be he p ocess by which cance cells lea e a p ima y umo and o m one o se e al seconda y umo s in o he pa s o he body; hese seconda y umo s a e called me as a ic umo s o me as ases [1]. His ological analyses commonly show ha cells om he p ima y and seconda y umo s a e simila and esemble hose o he no mal issue o o igin. In mos cance pa ien s, he p ima y umo is diagnosed be o e o a he same ime han i s me as ases. Some imes, me as a ic umo s a e ound be o e s anda d diagnos ic s udies e eal he loca ion o he p ima y si e. Bu o he imes, me as a ic umo s a e ound, and a p ima y umo is no iden i ied a e de ailed diagnos ic in es iga ions. These umo s gene ally con ain poo ly di e en ia ed o undi e en ia ed cells, which makes he iden i ica ion o he issue o o igin di icul . In some cases, he his ology o loca ion o he umo s ongly sugges a speci ic p ima y si e; howe e , exhaus i e in es iga ions also ail o iden i y a p ima y umo . These cance s a e called cance s o unknown p ima y (CUP), cance s o unknown p ima y si e, cance s o unknown o igin, o occul p ima y cance s [2-4]. Cance o unknown p ima y si e is a he e ogeneous g oup o cance s o which he ana omical si e o o igin emains occul a e de ailed in es iga ions. In 15- 25% o cases, he p ima y si e is no iden i ied e en on pos mo em examina ion. Cance o unknown p ima y si e accoun s o app oxima ely 3-5% o all human cance s. I is he se en h o eigh h mos equen malignancy, and i is he ou h mos common cause o cance dea h in bo h sexes. In a hi d o pa ien s diagnosed wi h CUP, h ee o mo e o gans a e in ol ed a he ime o diagnosis. The pa e n o me as asis ( equency and loca ion o me as ases) in pa ien s diagnosed wi h CUP may be signi ican ly di e en om ha in pa ien s wi h known p ima y umo s. Mos cance s o unknown p ima y si e show an agg essi e beha io and a e incu able [2-4]. Since he si e o he p ima y umo usually dic a es he ea men and expec ed ou come, he inabili y o iden i y a p ima y si e aises conce n among oncologis s Oncoscience468 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience and pa ien s. Cu en esea ch and clinical e o s a e made o de elop and use knowledge and echnology o loca e he p ima y umo o , a leas , o eliably p edic he issue o o igin. P ima y and me as a ic umo s commonly ha e simila exp ession p o iles and molecula signa u es. This makes immunohis ochemical es ing and issue-o -o igin molecula p o iling use ul ools o p edic ing he issue o o igin [3]. Recen ly, Polak e al. compa ed mu a ion densi ies o epigene ic p o iles o no mal and cance cells om di e en issues, and epo ed indings sugges ing ha he issue o o igin o a cance may be accu a ely p edic ed based on he dis ibu ion o mu a ions along i s genome [5]. P edic ing he issue o o igin is pa icula ly impo an o he ypes o CUP ha espond ela i ely well o speci ic he apies (app oxima ely 20% o CUP). When hese cance s a e uled ou , i usually becomes less impo an o ind o p edic he p ima y si e. Fo example, in an analysis o se e al pos -mo em coho s udies, he po en ial p ima y umo was iden i ied in 73% o pa ien s, and he mos common p ima ies we e lung (27%) and panc ea ic (24%) umo s [6]. The i e- yea ela i e su i al a e o pa ien s wi h lung cance and panc ea ic cance wi h dis an me as ases is 4% and 2%, espec i ely [7]. The e o e, he iden i ica ion o a p ima y si e in pa ien s wi h hese wo ypes o cance would no ha e changed much hei ou come. Unde s anding he exis ence o cance s o unknown p ima y si e and he mechanisms in ol ed in hei o ma ion may lead o he de elopmen o be e ea men s. These ea men s may be use ul no only o pa ien s wi h hese cance s, bu also o pa ien s wi h o he me as a ic cance s. Cu en ly, i is gene ally accep ed ha CUP exis s because o ou inabili y o iden i y he p ima y umo due o clinical o echnological ine iciencies, o because he p ima y umo eg esses o s ays do man a e sp eading he cance cells ha gene a e he me as ases [2- 4]. Some s udies ha e shown molecula ea u es sha ed by cance s o unknown p ima y o igin. Fo example, a ecen analysis o 1806 cases o cance o unknown p ima y si e has e ealed ha TP53 is he mos commonly mu a ed gene in hese cance s [8]. Howe e , he biological e en s ha allow he p ima y si e o emain occul a e he de elopmen o me as ases emain unknown [2-4]. S em cells ha e a na u al abili y o mig a e Recen e idence sugges s ha he biological e en s occu ing du ing he de elopmen o me as asis a e a he simila o hose occu ing du ing emb yonic de elopmen . Du ing emb yogenesis, s em cells can in ade issues, mo e h ough he in e io o he emb yo, a el long dis ances, and es ablish in new places o pa icipa e in he o ma ion o o gans and issues [9-11]. Du ing me as asis, cance cells can in ade issues, mo e h ough he lympha ic and ci cula o y sys ems, a el long dis ances, and es ablish in new issues o o m umo s [1,12]. The ac i a ion o he epi helial-mesenchymal ansi ion (EMT) and he mesenchymal-epi helial ansi ion (MET) seems o play a c i ical ole in he mig a ion abili y o bo h emb yonic s em cells and me as a ic cells. The ac i a ion o hese ansi ion p og ams in ol es p o ound changes in cell mo phology and beha io , including changes in cy oskele on s uc u e, cell pola i y, cell-cell con ac and ex acellula ma ix deg ada ion. Recen da a sugges ha EMT ac i a ion is an ea ly e en in ca cinogenesis, and ha he e is a c oss alk among EMT ac i a ion, he acquisi ion o molecula and unc ional ai s o cance s em cells, and he inac i a ion o mu a ion o p53 [9,10,13-15]. The mig a ion abili y o s em cells is ep essed a e emb yonic de elopmen , bu p obably eappea s du ing pa hological condi ions. Adul s em cells (also known as issue s em cells) can inc ease hei mig a o y ac i i y when hei mic oen i onmen is al e ed [16]. These cells play a key ole in issue damage epai ; issue inju y ac i a es de elopmen al p og ams ha ac i a e adul s em cell mig a ion o he si e o damage [17]. In e es ingly, issue inju y may inc ease cance isk [18-21]. Adul s em cells may also inc ease hei mig a o y po en ial a e accumula ing speci ic DNA al e a ions. These p emalignan s em cells may also acqui e addi ional DNA al e a ions and become cance s em cells (CSCs). These cance cells seem o play a key ole in umo me as asis [12,22]. I has been p oposed ha CSCs can be s a iona y (which es ablish umo g ow h) o mobile (which lead o umo me as asis) [23], and hese wo popula ions o CSCs ha e been ound in human cance issues [24]. The mig a ion abili y o s em cells can explain he exis ence o cance s o unknown p ima y si e. A cance o unknown p ima y si e would o m when de egula ed, p emalignan o cance ous s em cells mig a ed away om hei na u al issue and ga e ise o a cance in he new si e be o e o wi hou gene a ing a umo in hei o iginal issue. I is impo an o ealize ha o ming a umo in a issue is no a p e equisi e o s em cells o mo e away om ha issue; his is p obably he key o unde s and he exis ence o cance o unknown p ima y si e. S em cells can mig a e om hei na u al issue and ini ia e a cance in he new si e be o e gene a ing a de ec able umo in hei na u al issue. In his case, he p ima y umo could be iden i ied a e some ime. Howe e , s em cells can also mig a e away om hei na u al issue wi hou gene a ing a cance he e. In his case, he “p ima y umo ” would ne e exis . This can explain why he p ima y si e is no iden i ied e en on pos mo em examina ion in many pa ien s wi h hese cance s (Figu e 1). Cance may a ise om no mal s em cells This explana ion o he exis ence o cance s o unknown p ima y si e implies ha hese cance s a ise ei he om no mal s em cells o om non-s em cells ha Oncoscience469 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience ha e ac i a ed s em cell p og ams. He e I discuss e idence sugges ing ha cance , including ha o unknown p ima y, may o igina e in no mal s em cells. Nume ous expe imen al in es iga ions ha e been conduc ed o iden i y he cells o o igin in cance [25]. These in es iga ions bo h challenge and suppo he idea o cance a ising om s em cells [25-27]. Fo example, expe imen al da a sugges ha p ogeni o cells can dedi e en ia e and de elop s em-like p ope ies; his has led o he p oposal ha cance may s a in p ogeni o cells [26]. Expe imen al da a ha e also shown ha long- e m passaged s em cells become cance cells in cul u e and gene a e solid umo s when injec ed in o oden s [28]. I is impo an o no e ha all hese in es iga ions in ol e expe imen al manipula ion. As discussed elsewhe e [28], s em cells a e de ined in e ms o hei unc ional p ope ies: long- e m sel - enewal capaci y and di e en ia ion po en ial. This p esen s an inhe en p oblem because hese p ope ies can only be assessed by expe imen al manipula ion, and expe imen al manipula ion p obably al e s he unc ional p ope ies o hese cells. Jus cul u ing s em cells in i o may induce p o ound changes in hei p oli e a i e a es, cellula a e o beha io . In i o, s em cells a e es ablished in niches. S em cell niches a e mic oen i onmen s ha p o ec he s em cells and egula e he way hey beha e. The s em cell niche p o ides suppo and signals ha egula e hei p oli e a i e a es, sel - enewal, di e en ia ion and mig a ion ac i i ies [16]. S em cells cul u ed in i o a e dep i ed o hei niches, which may comple ely change hei biological beha io . This may explain, o example, ha s em cells ha a e es ing in i o may become p oli e a i e in cell cul u e. In addi ion, he s udies aimed a iden i ying he cells o o igin in cance usually in ol e a gene ic o chemical manipula ion o he cells [25]. We should he e o e in e p e he indings o hese expe imen al s udies cau iously. Solid biological concep s may p o ide mo e eliable in o ma ion on he cells o o igin in cance . The long li espan and sel - enewal capaci y o s em cells suppo he idea o cance a ising om hese cells. These biological p ope ies indica e ha s em cells ha e he oppo uni y o accumula e su icien DNA al e a ions o gene a e cance cells [29]. Th ee easons a e commonly used o challenge his idea. Fi s , cance p obably s a s in cells wi h high p oli e a i e a es, and he adul s em cells o some issues do no di ide o en. Second, s em cells ep esen a small popula ion wi hin a issue, and he p obabili y o a s ochas ic ca cinogenic hi is lowe in a small popula ion han in a la ge popula ion. Thi d, ca cinogenesis depends on he acquisi ion o ad an ageous cell pheno ypes, and hese pheno ypes a e less likely o occu when a cell sel - enews han when a cell di e en ia es [26]. Recognizing ha li e s a s be o e bi h makes he i s wo challenging easons di icul o accep . Fi s , s em cells di ide e y ac i ely du ing emb yonic de elopmen . Figu e 1: The mig a ion abili y o s em cells can explain he exis ence o cance o unknown p ima y si e. A cance o unknown p ima y si e would o m when de egula ed s em cells, p emalignan s em cells o cance s em cells mig a ed away om hei na u al issue (p ima y si e) and o med a umo in ano he issue (seconda y si e) be o e o wi hou gene a ing a umo in hei p ima y loca ion. Thick a ows ep esen he p obably mos common pa hway o me as asis. Cu ed a ows ep esen sel - enewal capaci y. See ex o u he de ails. Oncoscience470 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience Du ing his ela i ely sho pe iod, one cell (zygo e) gi es ise o he billions o cells ha o m a de eloped emb yo [30]. The genome o he adul s em cells a he ime o bi h has al eady been copied many imes, and p obably con ains many he i able al e a ions in ela ion o ha o he zygo e. In some adul s em cells, hese al e a ions may con ibu e o a possible ca cinogenesis p ocess occu ing la e in li e. They may also inc ease hei p oli e a i e a es du ing adul hood. Second, s em cells a e he only cell popula ion a he ini ial s ages o emb yonic de elopmen . S em cells a e he e o e he only cells exposed o he acquisi ion o ca cinogenic damage du ing his pe iod o in ense mi o ic ac i i y. Thi d, he chance o a ca cinogenic hi du ing cell di ision is p obably simila in a cell ha sel - enews o p oduce wo undi e en ia ed daugh e cells han in a cell ha gi es ise o wo di e en ia ed daugh e cells. The limi ed ideli y o DNA polyme ases is known o be an impo an sou ce o DNA mu a ions du ing cell di ision. DNA polyme ases p obably inse simila le els o inco ec nucleo ides in he DNA o he daugh e cells when copying he DNA o a s em cell ha sel - enews han when copying he DNA o a p ogeni o cell ha di e en ia es. The acquisi ion o ad an ageous cell pheno ypes is p obably ele an a la e s ages o ca cinogenesis; howe e , his ac o is unlikely o de e mine wha ype o cell is mo e p one o acqui e he i s ca cinogenic hi . O e all, he idea o cance a ising om no mal s em cells has a solid biological basis. Figu e 2: The s em cell model o cance can explain he age dis ibu ion o cance . A) Age is he mos impo an cance isk ac o , and cance incidence inc eases wi h age. B) S em cells sel - enew, ha e a long li espan, and a e he only cells ha ansmi he DNA o he zygo e o he cells we ha e a he ime o dea h. S em cells can di e en ia e in o p ogeni o cells and e en ually in o di e en ia ed cells. C) S em cells can acqui e and accumula e DNA al e a ions du ing ou whole li e. Because p ogeni o cells lack an inna e abili y o sel - enew and ha e a ela i ely sho li espan (un il hey ully di e en ia e), hey can acqui e and accumula e DNA al e a ions only du ing ela i ely sho pe iods o ou li e. The model in which cance a ises om s em cells i s he age dis ibu ion o cance be e han he model in which cance ini ia es in p ogeni o cells. Cu ed a ows ep esen sel - enewal capaci y. SC: s em cell; PC: p ogeni o cell; DC: di e en ia ed cell. zygo e dea h emb yo e us bi h RISK OF DEVELOPING CANCER SC SC SC SC SC PC DC DC PC Unlike p ogeni o cells, s em cells can acqui e and accumula e DNA al e a ions du ing ou whole li e S em cells ha e a long li espan, di ide many imes, and a e he only cells ha ansmi he DNA o he zygo e o he cells we ha e a he ime o dea h Cance isk inc eases h oughou li e (age dis ibu ion o cance ) SC SC SC DNA al e a ions DNA al .PC CANCER PC DC DC PC PC DC DC PC DC DC PC PC DC DC PC DC DC PC CANCER PC CANCER CANCER DNA al .DNA al . A B C Oncoscience471 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience I is impo an o ecognize ha he i s ca cinogenic hi does no necessa ily ha e o be he i s mu a ion occu ing in one o he genes whose in ol emen in cance de elopmen is unde s ood a a gi en momen . The i s ca cinogenic hi should be e e ed o as he i s he i able change (e.g., DNA mu a ion, epigene ic change o ch omosome al e a ion) ha pa icipa es in he o ma ion o a cance . The i s hi may be a DNA al e a ion wi h biological implica ions no ye unde s ood, and may occu in a non-coding DNA sequence [31]. Obse a ional s udies do no in ol e expe imen al manipula ion and may p o ide eliable in o ma ion ega ding he cells o o igin in cance . Nume ous obse a ional s udies ha e shown ha age is he mos impo an cance isk ac o [7,32-35]. Fo example, ecen da a show ha app oxima ely 4.4% o people unde 50 yea s old a e diagnosed wi h cance in he US; his pe cen age inc eases o 6.3% in people in hei 50s, o 12.5% in people in hei 60s, and o 31.2% in people olde han 70 yea s old [7]. These s udies indica e ha ou cance isk inc eases du ing ou whole li e. S em cells a e he only cells ha ansmi he genome o he zygo e o he cells we ha e a he ime o dea h and, he e o e, a e he only cells ha can acqui e and accumula e DNA al e a ions du ing ou whole li e. P ogeni o cells lack an inna e abili y o sel - enew and ha e a ela i ely sho li espan. P ogeni o cells, he e o e, can acqui e and accumula e DNA al e a ions only du ing ela i ely sho pe iods o ou li e. I cance a ose om p ogeni o cells, a p ogeni o cell p oduced when we a e 10 would ha e he same p obably o ini ia e a cance han a p ogeni o cell p oduced when we a e 30 o 50. A e a lag pe iod o e.g. 20 yea s, ou isk o ha ing cance would be simila in ou 30s, 50s o 70s. Cance s a is ics show o he wise. The s em cell model o cance i s he age dis ibu ion o cance be e han he p ogeni o cell model o cance (Figu e 2). Cance s a is ics also show ha cance incidence decele a es la e in li e, i.e., cance incidence ises wi h age, bu he ise occu s mo e slowly in la e yea s. In e es ingly, an o e all decline in issue egene a i e po en ial also occu s in la e yea s, which is a ibu ed o a decline in s em cell unc ionali y wi h age [36]. The obse a ion ha some issues gi e ise o cance s millions o imes mo e o en han o he issues has long puzzled cance esea che s. This obse a ion canno be explained by di e en le els o exposu e o ca cinogens. Fo example, melanocy es and basal epide mal cells o he skin a e exposed o simila le els o he same ca cinogen (ul a iole adia ion); howe e , basal cell ca cinomas a e much mo e common han melanomas [37]. C. Tomase i and B. Vogels ein [37] ha e ecen ly p o ided an explana ion o his obse a ion. They ound ha he e exis s a highly posi i e co ela ion (Spea man’s ho = 0.81; P < 3.5 × 10−8) be ween he numbe o no mal s em cell di isions in a issue and he li e ime isk o de eloping cance in ha issue. This s iking co ela ion applied o 31 cance ypes and ex ended ac oss i e o de s o magni ude. No en i onmen al o inhe i ed ac o is known o co ela e so s ongly wi h cance incidence ac oss issues [37]. In simple e ms, he da a p o ided by C. Tomase i and B. Vogels ein indica e ha i he no mal s em cells om one o ou issues di ide once, ou cance isk in ha issue is app oxima ely 1X. I hey di ide 10 imes, ou cance isk is 10X. I hey di ide 1,000 imes, ou cance isk is 1,000X. And i he no mal s em cells om one o ou issues di ide 100,000 imes, ou cance isk in ha issue is app oxima ely 100,000X. This s ongly sugges s ha he main eason we ha e cance is ha ou no mal s em cells di ide. A easonable way o in e p e his is ha cance a ises om no mal s em cells. The o he op ion would be di icul o accep . I cance a ose and de eloped in non-s em cells, we would ha e o admi ha s em cell di ision is he main de e minan o he neoplas ic ans o ma ion o non-s em cells. This would mean ha any ime a pa icula cell di ides, ano he cell is ans o med. I makes much mo e sense o hink ha no mal s em cells acqui e and accumula e ca cinogenic damage when hey di ide han o hink ha hei di ision in lic s ca cinogenic damage on non-s em cells. CONCLUDING REMARKS Cu en ly, me as asis is conside ed o ollow he nex sequence: in asion and in a asa ion o cance cells om he p ima y umo , dissemina ion h ough he ci cula ion, ex a asa ion in di e en o gans, su i al on a i al, se lemen in o la ency, eac i a ion, and o e coloniza ion wi h gene a ion o a new mac oscopic umo [1,12]. I me as asis is he p ocess by which cance cells lea e a p ima y umo and o m seconda y umo s in o he loca ions [1,12], he exis ence o cance s o unknown p ima y si e can be seen as a biological mys e y [4]. Howe e , i we challenge his p e ailing iew and conside ha he cells ha lea e he p ima y issue do no necessa ily ha e o be cance cells om a umo , he exis ence o cance s o unknown p ima y si e becomes a plain biological p ocess. The injec ion o mo phologically no mal b eas cells om gene ically enginee ed mice in o he ail eins o o he emale mice esul ed, a e oncogene induc ion, in he o ma ion o umo s in he lungs bu no in he b eas [38]. Al hough hese cells we e gene ically and chemically manipula ed, hese expe imen s show ha he o ma ion o a p ima y umo is no a equisi e o he o ma ion o me as a ic umo s. Me as asis should be seen as he p ocess by which cells om a issue o m umo s in o he issues. All cance s, including hose o unknown p ima y si e, i in his simple de ini ion (Figu e 1). The e m occul p ima y umo should be a oided in he absence o a p ima y umo , because i implies ha he umo exis s and is hidden. This e m may cause anxie y among clinicians and pa ien s, who may hink ha hei e alua ion has been de icien . In many cance s o Oncoscience472 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience unknown p ima y si e, p ima y umo s a e ne e ound. In an analysis o pos -mo em coho s udies, p ima y umo s we e no iden i ied in 27% o pa ien s [6]. In some cance s o unknown p ima y si e, he his ology o loca ion o he umo s ongly sugges a speci ic p ima y si e. Fo example, he iden i ica ion o adenoca cinomas in isola ed unila e al axilla y lymph nodes in women wi h CUP s ongly sugges s ha hese umo s o igina e in he b eas . B eas umo s commonly me as asize o his si e, and his ype o CUP is ound almos exclusi ely in women. Howe e , b eas umo s we e no iden i ied in 28% o 446 women who we e diagnosed wi h his ype o CUP and unde wen mas ec omy and subsequen his ological analysis [2,39]. The e ms p ima y umo and seconda y umo should also be a oided in he absence o a p ima y umo . In CUP pa ien s, he e ms p ima y si e and umo o unknown p ima y si e should be used ins ead, a leas un il a possible p ima y umo is e en ually ound. No all cells can lea e hei na u al issue and o m umo s in o he loca ions. The cell needs mig a ion abili y o lea e i s issue and each he new one, p oli e a i e capaci y o accumula e enough DNA al e a ions o p oduce a cance cell, and sel - enewal capaci y so ha i s only a e is no he gene a ion o non-di iding di e en ia ed cells. S em cells cons i u e he only cell popula ion wi h hese h ee biological p ope ies unde physiological condi ions. This implies ha cance s o unknown p ima y si e o igina e in s em cells, o in non-s em cells ha ha e acqui ed hese biological p ope ies. Non-s em cells (e.g., p ogeni o cells) can acqui e DNA al e a ions. In some cases, hese al e a ions may esul in he ac i a ion o s em-cell p og ams, and may e en de e mine whe he o no we will e en ually ha e a cance . Bu his does no imply ha hese cance s a ise om non-s em cells, because he s em cells om which hey de i e may ha e DNA al e a ions ha also pa icipa e in he o ma ion o hese cance s. Th ee lines o e idence discussed in his manusc ip sugges ha he majo i y o human cance s may a ise om no mal s em cells. Fi s , cell di ision is a majo sou ce o DNA al e a ions, s em cells cons i u e he only cell popula ion du ing he ini ial pe iod o li e (ea ly s ages o emb yonic de elopmen ), and s em cells di ide e y ac i ely du ing his pe iod. This means ha i is likely ha s em cells acqui e DNA al e a ions du ing emb yonic de elopmen , which may play a ole in a possible ca cinogenic p ocess occu ing la e in li e. Because he i s ca cinogenic hi may be a DNA al e a ion wi h biological implica ions no ye unde s ood, we canno exclude he possibili y ha an impo an pe cen age o cance s may s a be o e bi h. Second, s em cells a e he only cells ha ansmi ou DNA du ing ou whole li e, and he isk o de eloping cance is known o inc ease du ing ou whole li e. The obse a ion ha cance isk inc eases wi h age can be be e explained by a model in which cance ini ia es in s em cells han by a model in which cance ini ia es in p ogeni o cells (Figu e 2). Thi d, i cance ini ia ed and de eloped in non-s em cells, he p esence o biological ac i i y o s em cells in a issue would no signi ican ly modi y he isk o de eloping cance in ha issue. Howe e , ecen obse a ions s ongly sugges ha he numbe o no mal s em cell di isions in a pa icula issue seems o be he main de e minan o de eloping cance in ha issue [37]. I cance a ises om no mal s em cells, hese cells would e en ually become cells wi h he abili y o gene a e umo s, i.e., cance s em cells (CSCs). In o he wo ds, a CSC would be a s em cell ha has de eloped a long- e m abili y o gene a e he e ogeneous umo popula ions. This iew o CSCs conside s hei o igin (no mal s em cells), hei sel - enewal capaci y (abili y o copy hemsel es du ing long pe iods), and hei di e en ia ion po en ial (abili y o gene a e he e ogeneous cellula popula ions). These cells would de elop in all ypes o cance , including hose in which hey ha e no ye been iden i ied. Some CSCs would sel - enew, and o he s would di e en ia e and gi e ise o cells wi hou sel - enewal abili y (p ogeni o cance cells) and wi hou sel - enewal abili y and p oli e a i e capaci y (di e en ia ed cance cells). All hese cance cells would con ibu e o he cellula he e ogenei y o umo s [40]. A CSC loca ed in a issue di e en om ha o he no mal s em cell om which i o igina es would be a me as a ic cance s em cell. This iew implies ha he s em cell can mig a e o he new issue be o e o a e becoming a CSC. I is impo an o ealize ha he p ocess by which a no mal cell becomes a cance cell does no necessa ily ha e o s a and comple e in he same issue. CSCs seem o play a c ucial ole in umo g ow h, me as asis and esis ance o he apy [22,41]. Success ul cance he apy may he e o e equi e he elimina ion o hese cells. Expe imen al da a indica e ha non-s em cance cells may dedi e en ia e in o CSCs [27,42-45]. This means ha , i we only elimina e CSCs, non-s em cance cells may gene a e new CSCs and epopula e he umo [42]. Success ul he apy may he e o e equi e he elimina ion o CSCs and hei p ogeny. Clinical ials a e ongoing o es he e icacy o d ugs a ge ing CSCs, alone and in combina ion wi h con en ional d ugs a ge ing non- s em cance cells [46]. An i-CSC he apies migh show e icacy in a wide ange o CUP pa ien s. His ological analyses o many umo s om CUP pa ien s show popula ions o poo ly di e en ia ed o undi e en ia ed cells. Since s em cells cons i u e he less di e en ia ed cell ype, he undi e en ia ed cells o hese umo s migh be CSCs; hese cells would play a ole in he known agg essi e beha io and he apeu ic esis ance o hese cance s. In addi ion, he p ognosis o mos CUP pa ien s is poo e en when he p ima y si e is p edic ed. The iden i ica ion o a possible p ima y si e allows CUP pa ien s o be ea ed wi h he he apies used in me as a ic pa ien s wi h known p ima y umo s. These he apies, howe e , a e gene ally Oncoscience473 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience no cu a i e. CUP pa ien s migh he e o e bene i om pa icipa ing in clinical ials e alua ing new an i-CSC ea men s. The lack o e ec i e ea men s o mos CUP pa ien s should no jus i y hei inclusion in clinical s udies es ing expe imen al he apies no p ope ly alida ed in p eclinical models. Clinical ials in oncology ha e he highes ailu e a e compa ed wi h o he he apeu ic a eas [47]. Mos o he d ugs ha show ema kable an icance e ec s in p eclinical models ail when es ed in cance pa ien s. Pa o hese ailu es may be due o poo p eclinical designs, in which he needs o cance pa ien s a e o en misunde s ood [48]. Cance pa ien s do no need new d ugs ha a ge hei cance cells a low concen a ions i hey also a ge hei no mal cells a simila concen a ions. Cance pa ien s will p obably no bene i om d ugs ha induce ma ked umo sh inkages in animal models ha do no ep esen hei disease. Cance pa ien s need d ugs ha imp o e he e icacy o he exis ing ea men s. Selec i i y (in i o) and su i al a e (in i o) a e p obably he mos eliable pa ame e s o p edic d ug e icacy in cance pa ien s [48]. In i o, he new ea men should imp o e he selec i i y o he exis ing d ugs when es ed in cance cells e sus a a ie y o no mal cells (non-s em cells and s em cells om a a ie y o heal hy issues) [48-50]. The e icacy o a new d ug combina ion should be assessed by es ing in cance cells e sus non-malignan cells i i imp o es he selec i i y o he s anda d ea men , and no by es ing in cance cells i i s cy o oxici y is enhanced (po en ia ion ac o ) o syne gis ically inc eased (combina ion index) in ela ion o he cy o oxici y induced by each d ug indi idually [48]. In i o, he new ea men should imp o e he su i al a e o he exis ing he apy in animal models ep esen a i e o he pa ien s who would e en ually ecei e he new d ugs [48]. Selec ing animal models o me as asis is essen ial i he new d ugs a e in ended o CUP pa ien s o o o he pa ien s wi h me as a ic disease. I should be no ed ha CSCs may cons i u e a mino i y popula ion wi hin a umo (pe haps 1 o 3% [46]), and ha a ema kable umo sh inkage may lea e he whole CSC popula ion una ec ed. In summa y, e idence sugges s ha he majo i y o human cance s may o igina e in no mal s em cells. Cance s o unknown p ima y si e p obably exis because s em cells (de egula ed, p emalignan o cance ous) mig a e away om hei na u al issues and gene a e umo s in o he loca ions be o e o wi hou gene a ing umo s in hei na u al issues. Me as asis should be conside ed as he p ocess by which cells om a issue gi e ise o umo s in o he loca ions. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The au ho decla es no con lic o in e es . REFERENCES 1. Vanha an a S, Massague J. O igins o me as a ic ai s. Cance Cell 2013; 24(4):410-421. 2. Pa lidis N, Pen he oudakis G. Cance o unknown p ima y si e. Lance 2012; 379(9824):1428-1435. 3. Va adhacha y GR, Rabe MN. Cance o unknown p ima y si e. N Engl J Med 2014; 371(8):757-765. 4. G eco FA. Cance o unknown p ima y si e: s ill an en i y, a biological mys e y and a me as a ic model. Na Re Cance 2014; 14(1):3-4. 5. Polak P, Ka lic R, Ko en A, Thu man R, Sands om R, Law ence MS, Reynolds A, Rynes E, Vlaho icek K, S ama oyannopoulos JA, Sunyae SR. Cell-o -o igin ch oma in o ganiza ion shapes he mu a ional landscape o cance . Na u e 2015; 518(7539):360-364. 6. Pen he oudakis G, Gol inopoulos V, Pa lidis N. Swi ching benchma ks in cance o unknown p ima y: om au opsy o mic oa ay. Eu J Cance 2007; 43(14):2026-2036. 7. Siegel RL, Mille KD, Jemal A. Cance s a is ics, 2015. CA Cance J Clin 2015; 65(1):5-29. 8. Ga alica Z, Millis SZ, V anic S, Bende R, Basu GD, Voss A, Von Ho DD. Comp ehensi e umo p o iling iden i ies nume ous bioma ke s o d ug esponse in cance s o unknown p ima y si e: analysis o 1806 cases. Onco a ge 2014; 5(23):12440-12447. 9. Lim J, Thie y JP. Epi helial-mesenchymal ansi ions: insigh s om de elopmen . De elopmen 2012; 139(19):3471-3486. 10. Thie y JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nie o MA. Epi helial- mesenchymal ansi ions in de elopmen and disease. Cell 2009; 139(5):871-890. 11. Nie o MA. Epi helial plas ici y: a common heme in emb yonic and cance cells. Science 2013; 342(6159):1234850. 12. Oska sson T, Ba lle E, Massague J. Me as a ic s em cells: sou ces, niches, and i al pa hways. Cell S em Cell 2014; 14(3):306-321. 13. Puisieux A, B able z T, Ca amel J. Oncogenic oles o EMT-inducing ansc ip ion ac o s. Na Cell Biol 2014; 16(6):488-494. 14. Wang Y, Yang J, Zheng H, Tomasek GJ, Zhang P, McKee e PE, Lee EY, Zhu Y. Exp ession o mu an p53 p o eins implica es a lineage ela ionship be ween neu al s em cells and malignan as ocy ic glioma in a mu ine model. Cance Cell 2009; 15(6):514-526. 15. B able z T. EMT and MET in me as asis: whe e a e he cance s em cells? Cance Cell 2012; 22(6):699-701. 16. Scadden DT. The s em-cell niche as an en i y o ac ion. Na u e 2006; 441(7097):1075-1079. 17. Imi ola J, Raddassi K, Pa k KI, Muelle FJ, Nie o M, Teng YD, F enkel D, Li J, Sidman RL, Walsh CA, Snyde EY, Khou y SJ. Di ec ed mig a ion o neu al s em cells o si es Oncoscience474 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience o CNS inju y by he s omal cell-de i ed ac o 1alpha/ CXC chemokine ecep o 4 pa hway. P oc Na l Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(52):18117-18122. 18. D o ak HF. Tumo s: wounds ha do no heal. Simila i ies be ween umo s oma gene a ion and wound healing. N Engl J Med 1986; 315(26):1650-1659. 19. Rigby JE, Mo is JA, La elle J, S ewa M, Ga ell AC. Can physical auma cause b eas cance ? Eu J Cance P e 2002; 11(3):307-311. 20. Phillips LE, Koepsell TD, an Belle G, Kukull WA, Geh els JA, Longs e h WT, J . His o y o head auma and isk o in ac anial meningioma: popula ion-based case-con ol s udy. Neu ology 2002; 58(12):1849-1852. 21. Scha e M, We ne S. Cance as an o e healing wound: an old hypo hesis e isi ed. Na Re Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9(8):628-638. 22. Ado no-C uz V, Kib ia G, Liu X, Dohe y M, Junk DJ, Guan D, Hube C, Vene e M, Mulkea ns-Hube E, Sinyuk M, Al a ado A, Caplan AI, Rich J, Ge son SL, La hia J, Liu H. Cance S em Cells: Ta ge ing he Roo s o Cance , Seeds o Me as asis, and Sou ces o The apy Resis ance. Cance Res 2015; 75(6):924-929. 23. B able z T, Jung A, Spade na S, Hlubek F, Ki chne T. Opinion: mig a ing cance s em cells - an in eg a ed concep o malignan umou p og ession. Na Re Cance 2005; 5(9):744-749. 24. He mann PC, Hube SL, He le T, Aiche A, Ellwa JW, Guba M, B uns CJ, Heeschen C. Dis inc popula ions o cance s em cells de e mine umo g ow h and me as a ic ac i i y in human panc ea ic cance . Cell S em Cell 2007; 1(3):313-323. 25. Vis ade JE. Cells o o igin in cance . Na u e 2011; 469(7330):314-322. 26. Cha e CL, Weinbe g RA. How does mul is ep umo igenesis eally p oceed? Cance Disco 2015; 5(1):22-24. 27. Blagosklonny MV. Cance s em cell and cance s emloids: om biology o he apy. Cance Biol The 2007; 6(11):1684-1690. 28. Seabe g RM, an de KD. S em and p ogeni o cells: he p ema u e dese ion o igo ous de ini ions. T ends Neu osci 2003; 26(3):125-131. 29. Reya T, Mo ison SJ, Cla ke MF, Weissman IL. S em cells, cance , and cance s em cells. Na u e 2001; 414(6859):105- 111. 30. Bianconi E, Pio esan A, Facchin F, Be audi A, Casadei R, F abe i F, Vi ale L, Pelle i MC, Tassani S, Pi a F, Pe ez- Amodio S, S ippoli P, Canaide S. An es ima ion o he numbe o cells in he human body. Ann Hum Biol 2013; 40(6):463-471. 31. Weinhold N, Jacobsen A, Schul z N, Sande C, Lee W. Genome-wide analysis o noncoding egula o y mu a ions in cance . Na Gene 2014; 46(11):1160-1165. 32. A mi age P, Doll R. The age dis ibu ion o cance and a mul i-s age heo y o ca cinogenesis. B J Cance 1954; 8(1):1-12. 33. DePinho RA. The age o cance . Na u e 2000; 408(6809):248-254. 34. Campisi J. Cance and ageing: i al demons? Na Re Cance 2003; 3(5):339-349. 35. F ank SA. Age-speci ic accele a ion o cance . Cu Biol 2004; 14(3):242-246. 36. Rando TA. S em cells, ageing and he ques o immo ali y. Na u e 2006; 441(7097):1080-1086. 37. Tomase i C, Vogels ein B. Cance e iology. Va ia ion in cance isk among issues can be explained by he numbe o s em cell di isions. Science 2015; 347(6217):78-81. 38. Podsypanina K, Du YC, Jechlinge M, Be e ly LJ, Hamba dzumyan D, Va mus H. Seeding and p opaga ion o un ans o med mouse mamma y cells in he lung. Science 2008; 321(5897):1841-1844. 39. Pen he oudakis G, Laza idis G, Pa lidis N. Axilla y nodal me as ases om ca cinoma o unknown p ima y (CUPAx): a sys ema ic e iew o published e idence. B eas Cance Res T ea 2010; 119(1):1-11. 40. Magee JA, Piskouno a E, Mo ison SJ. Cance s em cells: impac , he e ogenei y, and unce ain y. Cance Cell 2012; 21(3):283-296. 41. Dawood S, Aus in L, C is o anilli M. Cance S em Cells: Implica ions o Cance The apy. Oncology (Willis on Pa k) 2014; 28(12):202935. 42. Pa abi aman DR, Weinbe g RA. Tackling he cance s em cells - wha challenges do hey pose? Na Re D ug Disco 2014; 13(7):497-512. 43. Gup a PB, Fillmo e CM, Jiang G, Shapi a SD, Tao K, Kupe wasse C, Lande ES. S ochas ic s a e ansi ions gi e ise o pheno ypic equilib ium in popula ions o cance cells. Cell 2011; 146(4):633-644. 44. Cha e CL, B ueckmann I, Scheel C, Kaes li AJ, Wiggins PA, Rod igues LO, B ooks M, Reinha d F, Su Y, Polyak K, A end LM, Kupe wasse C, Bie ie B, Weinbe g RA. No mal and neoplas ic nons em cells can spon aneously con e o a s em-like s a e. P oc Na l Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(19):7950-7955. 45. Cha e CL, Ma jano ic ND, Lee T, Bell G, Klee CG, Reinha d F, D’Alessio AC, Young RA, Weinbe g RA. Poised ch oma in a he ZEB1 p omo e enables b eas cance cell plas ici y and enhances umo igenici y. Cell 2013; 154(1):61-74. 46. Kaise J. The cance s em cell gamble. Science 2015; 347(6219):226-229. 47. Hu chinson L, Ki k R. High d ug a i ion a es--whe e a e we going w ong? Na Re Clin Oncol 2011; 8(4):189-190. 48. Lopez-Laza o M. Two p eclinical es s o e alua e an icance ac i i y and o help alida e d ug candida es o clinical ials. Oncoscience 2015; 2(2):91-98. 49. Lopez-Laza o M. A Simple and Reliable App oach o Oncoscience475 www.impac jou nals.com/oncoscience Assessing An icance Ac i i y In Vi o. Cu Med Chem 2015; 22(11):1324-1334. 50. Lopez-Laza o M. How many imes should we sc een a chemical lib a y o disco e an an icance d ug? D ug Disco Today 2015; 20(2):167-169.