Polarizationless P Systems with One Active Membrane
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the computational power of P systems with one active membrane without polarizations. For P systems with active membranes, it is known that computational completeness can be obtained with either of the following combinations of features: 1)two polarizations, 2)membrane creation and dissolution, 3)four membranes with three labels, membrane division and dissolution, 4)seven membranes with two labels, membrane division and dissolution. Clearly, with one membrane only object evolution rules and send-out rules are permitted. Two variants are considered: external output and internal output.
Full text
Pola iza ionless P Sys ems wi h One Ac i e
Memb ane
A iom Alhazo 1, Rudol F eund2
1Ins i u e o Ma hema ics and Compu e Science, Academy o Sciences o Moldo a
Academiei 5, Chi¸sin˘au MD-2028 Moldo a
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
2Facul y o In o ma ics, Vienna Uni e si y o Technology
Fa o i ens . 9, 1040 Vienna, Aus ia
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
Summa y. The aim o his pape is o s udy he compu a ional powe o P sys ems wi h
one ac i e memb ane wi hou pola iza ions. Fo P sys ems wi h ac i e memb anes, i is
known ha compu a ional comple eness can be ob ained wi h ei he o he ollowing com-
bina ions o ea u es: 1) wo pola iza ions, 2)memb ane c ea ion and dissolu ion, 3) ou
memb anes wi h h ee labels, memb ane di ision and dissolu ion, 4)se en memb anes
wi h wo labels, memb ane di ision and dissolu ion.
Clea ly, wi h one memb ane only objec e olu ion ules and send-ou ules a e pe -
mi ed. Two a ian s a e conside ed: ex e nal ou pu and in e nal ou pu .
1 In oduc ion
Memb ane compu ing is a heo e ical amewo k o pa allel dis ibu ed mul ise p ocess-
ing. I has been in oduced by Gheo ghe P˘aun in 1998, and has been an ac i e esea ch
a ea since hen, see [10] o he comp ehensi e bibliog aphy and [6],[8] o a sys ema ic
su ey. Memb ane sys ems a e also called P sys ems.
I has been shown in [4] (some esul s being imp o emen s o he esul s om [1] and
[3]) ha he ollowing P sys ems wi h ac i e memb anes a e compu a ionally comple e:
1) wi h one memb ane and wo pola iza ions, as accep o s, 2) pola iza ionless ones wi h
memb ane c ea ion and dissolu ion, 3) pola iza ionless ones s a ing wi h ou memb anes
and h ee labels, 4) pola iza ionless ones s a ing wi h se en memb anes and wo labels.
The objec o s udy o his pape is he amily o P sys ems wi h one ac i e mem-
b ane wi hou pola iza ions. Simila ques ions o non-coope a i e ansi ional P sys ems
wi hou any addi ional ea u es ha e been add essed in [2].
10 A. Alhazo , R. F eund
2 De ini ions
2.1 Fo mal Language P elimina ies
Conside a ini e se V. The se o all wo ds o e Vis deno ed by V∗, he conca ena ion
ope a ion is deno ed by •(which is w i en only when necessa y) and he emp y wo d
is deno ed by λ. Any se L⊆V∗is called a language. Fo a wo d w∈V∗and a sym-
bol a∈V, he numbe o occu ences o ain wis w i en as |w|a. The pe mu a ions
o a wo d w∈V∗a e Pe m(w) = {x∈V∗| |x|a=|w|a o all a ∈V}. We deno e
he se o all pe mu a ions o he wo ds in Lby Pe m(L), and we ex end his no a ion
o amilies o languages. We use F IN,REG,LIN,CF ,MAT ,CS,RE o deno e i-
ni e, egula , linea , con ex - ee, ma ix wi hou appea ance checking and wi h e asing
ules, con ex -sensi i e, and ecu si ely enume able amilies o languages, espec i ely.
The amily o languages gene a ed by ex ended ( abled) in e ac ionless L sys ems is de-
no ed by E(T)0L. The amily o se s o numbe s gene a ed by o bidden andom con ex
mul ise g amma s is deno ed by N RC. Fo mo e o mal language p elimina ies, we
e e he eade o [9].
Th oughou his pape we use s ing no a ion o deno e he mul ise s. When speak-
ing abou memb ane sys ems, keep in mind ha he o de in which symbols a e w i en
is i ele an , unless we speak abou he symbols sen o he en i onmen . In pa icu-
la , speaking abou he con en s o some memb ane, when we w i e an1
1· · · anm
m(o any
pe mu a ion o i ), we mean a mul ise consis ing o niins ances o symbol ai, 1 ≤i≤m.
2.2 P sys ems wi h One (Ac i e) Memb ane
We p esen he de ini ion o a P sys em wi h ac i e memb anes, simpli ied o s udying
he gene a i e powe in case o one memb ane.
Π= (O, µ = [ ]1, w1, R1, i0),whe e
Ois a ini e se o objec s,
w1is he ini ial mul ise in egion 1,
R1is he se o ules associa ed o memb ane 1,
i0is he ou pu egion; when languages a e conside ed, i0= 0 is assumed.
The ules o a memb ane sys em ha e he o ms (a0) [ a→u]1(e olu ion o an
objec ), and (c0) [ a]1→[ ]1b(sending an objec ou , possibly enaming i ), whe e
a, b ∈Oand u∈O∗.
The ules a e applied in maximally pa allel way: no u he ule should be applicable
o he idle objec s, excep ules o ype (c0) may be applied o a mos one objec a any
s ep.
Aca aly ic P sys em (wi h one memb ane) is a cons uc
Π= (O, C, µ = [ ]1, w1, R1, i0),whe e
Ois a ini e se o objec s,
Cis a special subse o Owhose elemen s a e called ca alys s,
w1is he ini ial mul ise in egion 1,
R1is he se o ules associa ed o memb ane 1,
i0is he ou pu egion; when languages a e conside ed, i0= 0 is assumed.
Pola iza ionless P Sys ems wi h One Ac i e Memb ane 11
The ules in Ra e ei he non-coope a i e ules o he o m a→(b1, a 1)· · · (bk, a k)
wi h aand he bi, 1 ≤i≤k, being om O Cand he a i∈ {he e, ou }be-
ing he a ge s o he co esponding symbols bi, o ca aly ic ules o he o m ca →
c(b1, a 1)· · · (bk, a k) wi h c∈C.
A con igu a ion o a P sys em is a cons uc which con ains he in o ma ion abou
he con en s o he skin memb ane as well as he sequence o objec s sen ou . A sequence
o ansi ions be ween he con igu a ions is called a compu a ion. The compu a ion hal s
when such a con igu a ion is eached ha no ules a e applicable. In case o ex e nal
ou pu (i0= 0), as he esul o a (hal ing) compu a ion we may conside he sequence o
objec s sen o he en i onmen ; we deno e i by L(Π). Bo h in case o in e nal ou pu
(i0= 1) and in case o ex e nal ou pu , we may conside as he esul he ec o o
mul iplici ies o objec s in egion i0, we deno e i by P s(Π), o he o al numbe o
objec s in egion i0, which we deno e by N(Π).
The amily o P sys ems wi h one pola iza ionless ac i e memb ane may be deno ed
by OP1(a0, c0). The class o se s o numbe s/ ec o s/wo ds gene a ed by a amily Fo
P sys em is deno ed by NF,P sFand LF, espec i ely. We use a supe sc ip in o
ex when speaking abou in e nal and ex e nal ou pu , espec i ely, and we may omi
subsc ip ex in he case o gene a ing languages, i.e., ex e nal ou pu is assumed o LF.
Mo eo e , we may use a subsc ip T o deno e e minal il e ing o he esul ; in his
case, a subse T⊂Ois addi ionally speci ied o Π, and he objec s no belonging o Ta e
no conside ed in he esul . Fo example, he amily o se s o ec o s o non-nega i e
in ege s gene a ed in e nally by P sys ems wi h one pola iza ionless ac i e memb ane
wi h e minal il e ing a e deno ed by P sin
TOP1(a0, c0).
Example 1. To illus a e gene a ion, conside he ollowing P sys em:
Π= (O={S, a, b, c, d, }, µ = [ ]1, w1=a, R1, i0),
R1={[S→Sabcd ]1,[S→ ]1,
[a]1→[ ]1a, [b]1→[ ]1b, [c]1→[ ]1c}.
Objec Sp oduces objec s a,b,c,din a bi a y bu equal amoun s. Objec s a,b,ca e
sen ou in a bi a y o de . Hence, i i0= 1 hen N(Π) = N1(i.e., he se o all posi i e
in ege s), and i i0= 0 hen L(Π) = Sn≥0Pe m(anbncn) = {w∈ {a, b, c}∗| |w|a=
|w|b=|w|c}.
P sys ems can be also iewed as accep o s. In ha case, an inpu subalphabe Σis
addi ionally speci ied in he uple de ining P sys em be o e µ, and i0= 1 is he inpu
egion. An inpu mul ise o e Σis addi ionally placed inside he memb ane be o e he
compu a ion s a s, and i is accep ed i and only i he compu a ion hal s. The esul
P sacc(Π) is he se o all accep ed inpu s, and he amily o ec o se s accep ed by P
sys ems wi h one ac i e memb ane is P saccOP1(a0, c0).
3 Compa ison wi h a T ansi ional Model:
Ca aly ic P Sys ems wi h One Ca alys
The model o P sys ems wi h ac i e memb anes, o he case o one memb ane, can
be compa ed o he ollowing case o ansi ional P sys ems: non-dis ibu ed P sys ems
12 A. Alhazo , R. F eund
wi h one ca alys . Indeed, o each P sys em wi h one ac i e memb ane, he e exis s a
1-ca aly ic non-dis ibu ed P sys em wi h he same beha io , as non-coope a i e ules
wo k equi alen ly in bo h models: [ A→u]his equi alen o A→u, and sending ou
co esponds o pa icula ules wi h one ca alys , i.e., [ A]h→[ ]haco esponds wi h
cA →c(a, ou ), o , i wi hou es ic ing gene ali y we assume he se o symbols ha
may appea inside he sys em o be disjoin om he se o symbols ha may be sen o
he en i onmen , simply wi h cA →c(a, he e).
No ice ha o P sys em wi h ex e nal ou pu , we may igno e he objec s emaining
inside he sys em when i hal s (as explained in he nex sec ion), while o P sys ems
wi h in e nal ou pu , we should igno e he objec s sen ou . In his way, o he case
o in e nal ou pu , sending ou co esponds o a ca aly ic e asing, while o he case
o ex e nal ou pu sending ou co esponds o a ca aly ic enaming o a non- e minal
symbol in o a e minal symbol.
Hence, we can immedia ely conclude ha
Xα
βOP1(a0, c0)⊆XβOP1(ncoo, ca 1) o X∈ {N, P s, L}, α ∈ {in , ex }, β ∈ {−, T },
whe e β=−s ands o no speci ying a subsc ip .
One-ca aly ic P sys ems we e in es iga ed in [5], whe e some subclasses o P sys-
ems wi h one ca alys a e de ined and ce ain esul s on hei gene a i e powe a e
p esen ed. In pa icula , i was shown in [5] ha N−cOP1(wsepca 1) = NREG and
N−cOP1(complca 1)⊆N RC. Clea ly, he co esponding es ic ions migh also be
conside ed o pola iza ionless P sys ems wi h one ac i e memb ane, and such esul s
can be claimed as uppe bounds o he co esponding es ic ions, e.g.,
NOP1(wsep(a0, c0)) = NREG,
whe e he es ic ion o he weak sepa a ion can be e o mula ed o he model wi h ac i e
memb anes as ollows: he se Oo objec s is di ided in o h ee disjoin subse s O0,O00
and O000, such ha
•objec s a∈O0ha e no associa ed ules ( hey canno e ol e o be sen ou , so i hey
a e p oduced, hey emain idle inside he sys em),
•objec s a∈O00 ha e associa ed send-ou ules, bu no e olu ion ules,
•objec s a∈O000 ha e associa ed e olu ion ules, bu no send-ou ules.
I is wo h men ioning ha he addi ional equi emen om [5] ha he objec s p oduced
by a ca aly ic ule canno unde go a non-coope a i e ule is au oma ically sa is ied a e
ansla ion in o he ac i e memb ane case, so he only es ic ion emaining in he case
o weak sepa a ion is ha a ule o ype (a0) and a ule o ype (c0) a e no allowed o
compe e o he same objec . This es ic ion means, o ins ance, ha all objec s ha
ha e associa ed send-ou ules canno e ol e inside he sys em, hey simply wai he e
un il hey a e chosen o be sen ou .
A di e en es ic ion conside ed in [5] is comple e P sys ems (men ioned abo e as
complca 1). I can be e o mula ed in he model o pola iza ionless P sys ems wi h ac i e
memb anes as ollows: he e is no objec ha ing associa ed ules o ype (c0) and no ules
o ype (a0). This es ic ion means ha no objec is allowed o be empo a ily idle;
i i is no sen ou , hen i ei he e ol es immedia ely, o emains idle h oughou he
compu a ion. I ollows ha
NREG ⊆NOP1(compl(a0, c0)) ⊆N RC.
Pola iza ionless P Sys ems wi h One Ac i e Memb ane 13
I is in e es ing o no e ha weak sepa a ion and comple eness a e, in some sense, wo
opposi e equi emen s. While he la e one equi es ha all objec s which can be sen
ou mus e ol e i hey a e no chosen o be sen ou , he i s special case equi es ha
no objec s which can be sen ou a e allowed o e ol e. O cou se, in he mos gene al
case he e can be bo h kinds o objec s which can be sen ou .
4 Ex e nal ou pu
The i s goal o his sec ion is o p esen a educ ion o any P sys em wi h one ac i e
memb ane wi hou pola iza ions and ex e nal ou pu o an equi alen no mal o m. Then
we will use his no mal o m o p o e an uppe bound esul . We equi e he no mal o m
men ioned abo e o sa is y he ollowing condi ions:
•E e y objec appea s on he le side o some ule.
•The only e asing ule allowed is o he ini ial objec ; i so, he ini ial objec does no
appea on he igh side o any ule. (I we ha e an ini ial mul ise w, hen we add
he ule S→wwhe e Sis a new symbol now being he ini ial objec .)
We app oach his goal in a ew s ages. Fi s , we ema k ha , wi hou es ic ing gen-
e ali y, we may assume ha no objec s may emain inside he sys em when i hal s.
Indeed, le Oλbe he se o all objec s ha do no ha e associa ed ules. By adding ules
Rλ={[a→λ]1|a∈Oλ}, we make su e ha he e a e no objec s ha do no ha e
associa ed ules. On he o he side, adding ules Rλdoes no a ec he esul o a P sys-
em wi h ex e nal ou pu , since p ese ing/e asing objec s om Oλhas no al e na i es,
and i does no a ec he en i onmen .
Second, we ema k ha , wi hou es ic ing gene ali y, we may assume ha he ini ial
mul ise consis s o only one objec , say S, which does no appea in he igh side o
any ule. Indeed, o a P sys em s a ing wi h a mul ise ( ep esen ed by) w, conside an
equi alen P sys em s a ing wi h a mul ise consis ing o a new objec S, and adding
RS={[S→w]1} o R1.
Thi d, we claim ha o any P sys em sa is ying he assump ions men ioned abo e,
he e exis s a P sys em wi hou e asing ules (excep , possibly, o S).
P oo . Indeed, le us i s add ules R ={[a→# ]1|([ a→λ]1)∈R1o a= #},
whe e # is a new symbol, sha ed o all such educ ions, so i i appea s in a con igu a ion,
he sys em will ne e hal , and will he e o e no p oduce any esul . This ans o ma ion
will ce ainly no a ec he esul o he sys em, since e e y new compu a ion b anch will
no be p oduc i e, while he exis ing b anches will no be a ec ed (since by cons uc ion,
one can always apply some o he ule o ains ead o apping).
Second, compu e he se Oλo e asable objec s as ollows:
•Se Oλ o {a∈O|[a→λ]1∈R1,
•I [ a→u]1is in R1and u∈O∗
λ, hen add a o Oλ,
•I e a e he p e ious p ocedu e un il no mo e elemen s can be added o Oλ.
Thi d, eplace each ule [ a→u]1by ules [ a→u0]1, whe e he u0a e ob ained
om uby emo ing (in all possible combina ions) some objec s om Oλ. This will again
yield an equi alen sys em, because e e y symbol ha could e en ually be dele ed does
no ha e o be p oduced in he i s place.
14 A. Alhazo , R. F eund
Fou h, emo e all e asing ules. We claim ha he esul ing P sys em is s ill equi -
alen o he o iginal P sys em. Indeed, any objec (o he han S) ha should be e ased,
could be “p e-e ased” by no p oducing i in he i s place. Howe e , any objec ha
should e ol e can e ol e by o he ules, and any objec ha should be sen ou can be
sen ou (unless some compe ing objec is sen ou , in which case he simula ion would
no be co ec , so he compu a ion is disca ded by p oducing symbol #).
Co olla y 1. LOP1(a0, c0)⊆CS.
P oo . Indeed, he o al numbe o objec s (inside and ou side he memb ane) ne e
dec eases h oughou he compu a ion (excep , possibly, o he emp y wo d, gene a ed
in one s ep), and he leng h o he esul ma ches he o al numbe o objec s when he
sys em hal s.
We now p oceed wi h he lowe bound esul .
Theo em 1. LOP1(a0, c0)⊇REG •Pe m(REG).
P oo . Conside an alphabe Tand wo a bi a y egula languages o e T. Then he e
exis educed egula g amma s G1= (N1, T, P1, S1) and G2= (N2, T, P2, S2) gene a ing
hem, such as N1∩N2=∅. We cons uc he ollowing P sys em:
Π= (O=N1∪N2∪T∪T0, µ = [ ]1, w1=S1, R1),
T0={a0|a∈T},
R1={[A→aB ]1|(A→aB)∈P1} ∪ {[A→S2]1|(A→λ)∈P1}
∪ {[A→a0B]1|(A→aB)∈P2} ∪ {[A→λ]1|(A→λ)∈P2}
∪ {[a0→a0]1|a∈T} ∪ {[a]1→[ ]1a, [a0]1→[ ]1a|a∈T}.
The P sys em cons uc ed abo e gene a es L(G1)•L(G2), excep he symbols gene a ed
by he second g amma s a e p oduced in a p imed o m, and may unde go i ial ew i ing
o an a bi a ily long ime be o e hey a e sen ou , which ensu es ha a e gene a ing
a wo d om L(G1), any pe mu a ion o a wo d om L(G2) may be gene a ed.
We now p esen a ew closu e p ope ies.
Lemma 1. The amily LOP1(a0, c0)is closed unde enaming mo phisms.
P oo . The s a emen ollows om applying he enaming mo phism o he send-ou
ules.
Theo em 2. LOP1(a0, c0)is closed unde union.
P oo . The closu e unde union ollows om adding a new axiom and p oduc ions o
non-de e minis ic choice be ween mul iple axioms.
Pola iza ionless P Sys ems wi h One Ac i e Memb ane 15
5 In e nal ou pu
In his case he en i onmen is no longe ele an : i does no ma e which symbol is
w i en in he igh side o a send-ou ule. The objec sen ou no longe a ec s he
esul , so sending ou is equi alen o a sequen ial e sion o e asing.
O cou se, we can gene a e P sREG wi h ules o ype (a0) co esponding o he ules
o a educed egula g amma . Hence,
P sin OP1(a0, c0)⊇P sREG.
Is i an open ques ion whe he non-semilinea numbe se s can be gene a ed, see also
he pa ial esul s ans e ed om he one-ca aly ic model, ecalled in Sec ion 3.
6 P sys ems wi h inpu
In his sec ion we show ha , no e y su p isingly, o P sys ems wi h one pola iza ionless
ac i e memb ane, hei accep ing powe is e en smalle han hei gene a i e powe . Mo e
exac ly, unless such a P sys em accep s all allowed inpu s, i only accep s speci ic ini e
se s. We s a by es ablishing some use ul ac s (we emind ha we use ⊆ o deno e he
submul ise ela ion, ∪ o deno e he union o mul ise s, and o deno e he di e ence
o mul ise s).
Lemma 2. Le Π∈OP1(a0, c0)be a P sys em wi h alphabe O, le [u]1⇒[ ]1α
in Π(α∈O∪ {λ}) Then o e e y mul ise u0⊆u, ei he [u0]1is al eady a hal ing
con igu a ion, o he e exis s a mul ise 0⊆ and β∈O∪{λ}such ha [u0]1⇒[ 0]1β
in Π.
P oo . In a ansi ion [ u]1⇒[ ]1α, one o h ee possible cases happen o e e y (copy
o ) objec ain u:
•ais ew i en by some ule o Πin o a (possibly emp y) mul ise , con ibu ing o ;
•ais sen ou by some ule o Πas α;
•a emains idle, con ibu ing o .
No e ha consis s exac ly o he esul ing objec s om he i s case and he objec s
o he hi d case. Mo e p ecisely, le he union o mul ise s o he igh side ules o
all copies o ew i en objec s be , and le he mul ise o idle objec s be i; hen,
= ∪ i. By de ini ion o he model, he second case was applied o a mos one (copy
o ) an objec in u. Also by de ini ion o he model, o each objec in he hi d case, he e
exis no ules o e ol e i , excep , possibly, send-ou ules, in which case α6=λ.
We ecall ha u0may be ob ained om uby e asing some (copies) o objec s. Fix
some co espondence o (copies o ) objec s in u0 o objec s in u, and conside a ansi ion
om u0by he same beha io o objec s in u0as o objec s in u:
• ew i en objec s will yield some submul ise 0
o ;
•β0will be p oduced in he en i onmen , β0=αo β0=λ;
•idle objec s will yield some submul ise 0
io i.
16 A. Alhazo , R. F eund
I is ob ious ha hese ules a e applicable, and ha 0
∪ 0
i⊆ . Maximali y also holds,
excep in one special si ua ion: when α6=λ, bu i was p oduced om a (copy o ) an
objec no in u0, while he e exis s a leas one objec b ha was idle in a ansi ion
[u]1⇒[ ]1α.
In his si ua ion, one objec b, ins ead o being idle, should be sen ou as β, and he
esul ing mul ise in he skin is 0= 0
∪ 0
i b(i his si ua ion does no happen, we ake
β=β0and 0= 0
∪ 0
i).
The e o e, [ u0]1⇒[ 0]1βin Πi a leas one (copy) o objec om u0 ell in o he
i s o he second case, and o he wise [ u0]1is al eady a hal ing con igu a ion.
Lemma 3. I n∈N(Π), hen also n0∈N(Π) o any non-nega i e in ege n0≤n.
P oo . Le he alphabe o Πbe O, le he ini ial con en s o he skin memb ane o Πbe
w1, and le he inpu subalphabe o Πbe Σ. By de ini ion o accep ance, a numbe n
is accep ed i he e exis s a hal ing compu a ion in Πs a ing om con igu a ion [ u]1,
o some u∈w1Σn.
Conside he “sub-inpu ” o only n0objec s, i.e., u0∈w1Σnsuch ha u0⊆u. I
[u]1is al eady hal ing, hen so is [ u0]1, so he s a emen o he lemma holds; now we
assume he con a y: [ u]1⇒[ ]1α. By he p e ious lemma, in one s ep, ei he he
compu a ion wi h u0in he skin will immedia ely hal (and he s a emen o he lemma
again holds), o he e is a one-s ep ansi ion [ u0]1⇒[ 0]1βwi h 0⊆ .
I e a ing he applica ion o he p e ious lemma, by induc ion, we conclude ha he e
exis s a compu a ion s a ing om [ u0]1 ha will hal in a mos as many s ep as he
hal ing compu a ion s a ing om [ u]1 ha we conside ed. Hence n0∈N(Π).
I ollows ha he accep ed se o numbe s is ei he N, o emp y, o i con ains all
in ege s less han o equal o he maximal accep ed numbe , so accep ing P sys ems
wi h one pola iza ionless ac i e memb ane canno be compu a ionally comple e, and P
sys ems wi h one pola iza ionless ac i e memb ane a e ob iously weake as accep o s
han as gene a o s:
NaccOP1(a0, c0)⊆ {∅,N} ∪ {{k|0≤k≤n} | n∈N}.
In he es o he sec ion we show, by all necessa y examples, ha his inclusion is
an equali y:
Π∅= (O={a}, Σ ={a}, µ = [ ]1, w1=a, R1={[a→a]1}, i0= 1).
ΠN= (O={a}, Σ ={a}, µ = [ ]1, w1=λ, R1={[a→λ]1}, i0= 1).
Πn= (O={ai|0≤i≤n}, Σ ={a0}, µ = [ ]1, w1=λ, R1, i0= 1),whe e
R1={[ai→ai+1 ]1,[ai]1→[ ]1a0|0≤i < n} ∪ {[an→an]1}.
Clea ly, Π∅accep s no hing, since wi h any inpu i s a s wi h a leas one objec , and
ca ies ou an in ini e compu a ion. On he o he end o he spec um, sys em ΠNaccep s
any inpu , by e asing i in one s ep and hal ing. Finally, we claim ha sys em Πnaccep s
exac ly se {k|0≤k≤n}. Indeed, any objec inc emen s i s index e e y s ep, unless
he objec is sen ou , o he index eaches n( o cing an in ini e compu a ion). I is easy
o see ha a mos ninpu objec s may be sen ou in his way; he sys em wi h inpu
(a0)khas a hal ing compu a ion i and only i k≤n.
Pola iza ionless P Sys ems wi h One Ac i e Memb ane 17
O e all, we ha e es ablished he ollowing esul s:
REG •Pe m(REG)⊆LOP1(a0, c0)⊆CS,
P sin OP1(a0, c0)⊆P sREG,
NαOP1(wsep(a0, c0)) = NREG, α ∈ {in , ex },
NREG ⊆NαOP1(compl(a0, c0)) ⊆N RC, α ∈ {in , ex },
NaccOP1(a0, c0) = {{k|0≤k≤n} | n∈N} ∪ {∅,N}.
7 Conclusions
In his pape we ha e conside ed he amily o languages gene a ed by pola iza ionless P
sys ems wi h one ac i e memb ane. A no mal o m was gi en o ex e nal ou pu case. I
was han shown ha he amily o gene a ed languages lies be ween REG •Pe m(REG)
and CS, and is closed unde union and enaming mo phisms. The exac cha ac e iza ion
is an open ques ion, bu pola iza ionless P sys ems wi h one ac i e memb ane can be
simula ed by (and a e, he e o e, a mos as powe ul as) P sys ems wi h one ca alys ,
ans e ing wo esul s on he gene a i e powe o wo es ic ed classes, independen ly
om he ou pu egion.
Then we also conside ed se s o ec o s o numbe s gene a ed in e nally, as well as se s
o ec o s o numbe s accep ed by pola iza ionless P sys ems wi h one ac i e memb ane.
Se e al ques ions abou he amilies o hese se s a e s ill open, oo.
Ano he possible gene aliza ion ha can be conside ed is o also allow ules o ype
(b0) o b ing objec s om he en i onmen back o he skin. No e ha such sys ems
would s ill co espond o a subclass o 1-ca aly ic P sys ems, bu some de ini ions would
ha e o be e ised, as well as all ela ed esul s.
We ha e p o ed ha accep ing P sys ems wi h one pola iza ionless ac i e memb ane
a e no compu a ionally comple e, unlike hose wi h wo pola iza ions o like hose wi h
memb ane c ea ion and dissolu ion, o wi h mul iple memb anes and memb ane dissolu-
ion.
The ques ions abou he compu a ional powe o pola iza ionless P sys ems wi h
ac i e memb anes wi h 2 and 3 memb anes in he ini ial con igu a ion a e s ill open, as
well as o pola iza ionless sys ems wi h less han 7 memb anes and wo labels, o o all
pola iza ionless sys ems wi h only one label.
Re e ences
1. A. Alhazo : P Sys ems wi hou Mul iplici ies o Symbol-Objec s. In o ma ion P o-
cessing Le e s 100, 3, 2006, 124–129.
2. A. Alhazo , C. Ciubo a u, Yu. Rogozhin, S. I ano : The Family o Languages Gene -
a ed by Non-Coope a i e Memb ane Sys ems. In: Gh. P˘aun, M.J. P´e ez-Jim´enez, A.
Riscos-N´u˜nez, G. Rozenbe g, A. Salomaa: Memb ane Compu ing, 11 h In e na ional
Con e ence, CMC11, Jena, Re ised Selec ed Pape s, Lec u e No es in Compu e Sci-
ence 6501, 2011, 65–79.