scieee Open visual document viewer

A management tool for indicator-supported systems: A public health service application

Carrizosa Priego, Emilio José; Conde Sánchez, Eduardo; Fernández, F.R.; Puerto Albandoz, Justo

Abstract

We develop a decision-making methodology for hierarchical structures. It provides different decision makers with decision-oriented information based on obtained satisfaction levels. This is specially convenient for public services, where the main goal is user's satisfaction. Our methodology and its associated software (INDI) have been implemented in the Andalusian Health Service (SAS), supporting resource allocation decisions in order to reduce the complaints presented against such an institution.

Full text

204 Eu opean Jou nal o Ope a ional Resea ch 61 (1992) 204-214 No h-Holland A managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems: A public heal h se ice applica ion E. Ca izosa, E. Conde, F.R. Fe n indez and J. Pue o Depa amen o de Es ad[s ica e In es igaci6n Ope a i a, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se illa, Spain Recei ed Ma ch 1991; e ised Sep embe 1991 Abs ac : We de elop a decision-making me hodology o hie a chical s uc u es. I p o ides di e en decision make s wi h decision-o ien ed in o ma ion based on ob ained sa is ac ion le els. This is specially con enien o public se ices, whe e he main goal is use 's sa is ac ion. Ou me hodology and i s associa ed so wa e (INDI) ha e been implemen ed in he Andalusian Heal h Se ice (SAS), suppo ing esou ce alloca ion decisions in o de o educe he complain s p esen ed agains such an ins i u ion. Keywo ds: Decision Suppo Sys ems; decision heo y; mul ic i e ia decision making 1. In oduc ion Any o ganiza ion in a compe i i e ma ke needs some ools o eac agains unexpec edly inc easing cos s o dec easing quali y. This has gi en an impo an ole o he in o - ma ion depa men : moni o ing he p oduc ion p ocess h ough in o ma ion sys ems gi es he manage he ools o compa e he ou pu s wi h p ese a ge s and check he quali y o hem. Un il he beginning o he 80s, all ha was equi ed we e Managemen In o ma ion Sys ems (MIS), he decisions being ese ed o he man- age s, wi h he only aid o he epo s gi en by he MIS. Howe e , he e has been in he las yea s an inc easing in e es in he de elopmen o no ma i e decision models, suppo ing he mak- ing o non-s uc u ed o semi-s uc u ed deci- sions in o de o sys ema ize he p ocess o con- inuous imp o emen . Mos o he e o s ha e been de o ed o he de elopmen o me hodologies o speci ic deci- sion si ua ions (Valada es e al., 1986; Boldy, 1987; And eu and Co ominas, 1989; Vla6i6, 1989). The de elopmen o ou me hodology HIDS (Hie a chical In o ma ion and Decision Sys em) and i s associa ed so wa e had as a s a ing poin a con ac wi h he Se icio Andaluz de Salud (Andalusian Heal h Se ice), known as SAS. The e, we had o de elop an in e ac i e sys em suppo ing decisions abou he alloca ion o e- sou ces in o de o educe he numbe o com- plain s in public heal h cen e s. We ha e de eloped a uni ied decision-making en i onmen o suppo ing decisions a di e en le els in any hie a chical s uc u e. This en i on- men can be seen as a shell ha he decision make s (DMs) use in o de o de elop hei own DSS p o ile inside he s uc u e. Ou aim is o gi e all he DMs ex emely manageable and meaning ul decision-o ien ed in- o ma ion. The me hodology is based on he anal- ysis o he sa is ac ion le el ob ained h ough he ou pu s o he sys em. This sa is ac ion is mea- su ed by means o obse ed ajec o ies, no mal- ized using sa is ac ion unc ions. This p ocedu e is especially con enien o public se ices, whe e he main goal is o ob ain a high le el o use 's sa is ac ion. This pape is di ided in o ou sec ions. In Sec ion 2, we desc ibe he model and i s unde ly- ing hypo heses, he In o ma ion and Decision P ocesses. In Sec ion 3 we p esen a eal applica- ion o ou me hodology applied o public heal h 0377-2217/92/$05.00 © 1992 - Else ie Science Publishe s B.V. All igh s ese ed E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems 205 se ices. Sec ion 4 is de o ed o he desc ip ion o he so wa e a chi ec u e ha has been de el- oped o he model. The pape ends wi h wo ma hema ical appendices dealing wi h some as- pec s o he In o ma ion and Decision P ocesses. 2. The Hie a chical In o ma ion and Decision Sys em (HIDS) 2.1. The model The model we p opose is based on a se o hypo heses we desc ibe below. They do no co e- spond o heo e ical condi ions, bu appea in almos any eal la ge-scale in o ma ion-decision sys em. Due o hei na u e, hese hypo heses a e classi ied in o h ee g oups: - S uc u e hypo heses (S). - Sys em Pa ame e hypo heses (P). - P ese Ta ge s hypo heses (T). S1. The sys em can be ep esen ed h ough a hie a chical s uc u e. $2. Any elemen in he sys em (DM) occupies only one place in he s uc u e. $3. No elemen ac s isola ed om he es . $4. The e a e wo p eo de s on he s uc u e, called he Decision ela ion and In o ma ion e- la ion. Each one is he in e se o he o he . $5. The e exis s only one maximal elemen o he Decision ela ion: The Supe Decision Make (SDM). Fo any DM, he Decision ela ion in- duces exac ly one chain om he SDM o him. PI. Any DM a he lowes le el in he hie a - chy ( e minal DM) is esponsible o a unique se eice cen e . The pe o mance o such a se ice is con olled by a s ochas ic p ocess ha depends on a se o pa ame e s. T1. The pe o mance quali y o a se ice cen- e i a ime is a unc ion o a se V~( ) o nume ical ea u es (which a e pe iodically mea- su ed), and a se o p ese a ge s. T2. The sa is ac ion o a e minal DM is he pe o mance quali y o his associa ed se ice cen- e . The sa is ac ion o any non- e minal DM a ime is a unc ion o he sa is ac ion o hose DMs subo dina ed o him ollowing he Decision ela ion. In a na u al way, he hypo heses desc ibed abo e lead us o a ep esen a ion o he sys em by means o a ma hema ical s uc u e H = (N, F, B), whe e: 1) N is he se o all he DMs in he hie a chy 2) F is he Decision ela ion. I (n, m)~F, we say ha m is subo dina ed o n. 3) B is he In o ma ion ela ion. I (n, m) ~ B, we say ha n in o ms m. 4) (N, F) is an acyclic connec ed dig aph, wi h only one DM wi h ze o ank: he Supe Decision Make (SDM). 5) (N, B) is an acyclic connec ed dig aph, wi h only one elemen wi h maximal ank: he SDM. 6) (n, m) ~ F i (m, n) ~ B. No e ha he hypo heses we imposed a e ex- plici ly used in his o mula ion. In ac , $1 and $2 jus i y he acyclic g aph s uc u e, $3 he con- nec edness, and $4 he exis ence o wo g aphs, one o each di ec ion o low: whe eas he a cs in (N, F) ep esen in di ec ion in which he decisions a e ansmi ed, he ones in (N, B)-s a e he di ec ion o in o ma ion low. Hypo hesis $5 is aken in o accoun in (4) and (5); hypo hesis P1 is needed o explain he non- de e minis ic na u e o he sys ems we a e model- ing. Finally, he T1 and T2 hypo heses allow he e alua ion o sys em pe o mance, and cons i u e he co ne s one o he In o ma ion P ocess we desc ibe below. 2.2. The In o ma ion P ocess (IP) E icien managemen needs e y sha p and belie able knowledge abou sys em pe o mance. Due o he sys em's na u e, only he DMs in he lowes le el in he hie a chy ha e di ec ac- cess o in o ma ion, bu such in o ma ion gi es only e y pa ial knowledge abou he eal pe o - mance o he whole sys em. Howe e , he DMs in he highes le els ( hose wi h a b oade ac ion ield) no only lack di ec access o in o ma ion, bu also need mo e gene al knowledge abou he sys em: as gene al as he kind o he decisions hey ha e o ake. Hence, we ha e o ace wo p oblems: • How should he DMs collec in o ma ion? • How should such in o ma ion be p ocessed and sen o DMs in highe le els in he hie a - chy? The aim o e e imp o ing he quali y o a se ice ad ises agains collec ing in o ma ion abou he se ice h ough me ely desc ip i e a i- 206 E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems Figu e 1. Some sa is ac ion unc ions ables. A decision-o ien ed p ocess is mo e sui - able, e alua ing he e icacy o e iciency o pe - o mance agains some p ese and pe iodically ixed a ge s. A powe ul ool o his pu pose is p o ided by Pe o mance Indica o s (PI) (Wes on and B o he s, 1984; Fo uin, 1988). Hence, in- s ead o conside ing ea u es in isola ion, we will use pe o mance indica o s, which a e de ined by a ea u e and i s associa ed a ge . To ge his goal, such PIs mus be easy o unde s and, clea ly de ined and ep esen a i e o he sys em's pe o - mance, which is e lec ed in hypo hesis T1 im- posed o ou model. Fo mally, in o de o measu e a ime he quali y o he se ice associa ed o e minal DM i, a se V/( ) o quan i a i e a iables a e aken. Fo any a iable ~ V/( ), we need a couple (O,,( ), G ( )), whe e Q( ) is he obse ed alue o , and Q( ) is he goal o i . This couple is added o p e ious obse a ions and goals, gi ing us he s ochas ic p ocess {(O~.(s), GL,(s):s ~ T,,}, whe e T~, is he se o ins an s when he a iable has been obse ed. Mo e p ecisely, he quali y should be measu ed h ough he s ochas ic p o- cess {O,,(s):s ~ T,,}, whe e D,~(s) = ~,(O,,(s)- G (s), G~(s)), and is a [0, 1]- alued unc ion, indica ing he le el o ag eemen be ween he obse ed alue and he goal. Hence, De(s)= 1 i a ime s, he p ese goal is eached, and Dc(s) = 0 i he goal is no eached a all. The DMs should ha e a hand a se o unc- ions ~ o i hei eal pe cep ion o ag eemen ; some pa icula ins ances, aken om P ome hEe me hodology (B ans e al, 1984; B ans and Vincke, 1985) a e shown in Figu e 1. Wi h his, we ha e p ocessed he wo-dimen- sional s ochas ic p ocess {(O (s), G~,(s): s ~ T~} in o a one-dimensional p ocess {D~,(s):s ~ T~.} ep esen ing he le el o achie emen h ough ime (S ep 1 in Figu e 2). We a e aced now wi h he p oblem o e alua - ing he e olu ion o such an achie emen (S ep 2 in Figu e 2). This e alua ion should no be done using only he mos ecen obse ed alue (DL( )), because ends o imp o emen o wo sening would no be app ecia ed: he same e alua ion would be ob ained o e y di e en beha io s (Figu e 3). This is he eason why we dis inguish wo di e en pe iods o ime o a a iable : we S ochas ic P ocess O ( ),G ( ) Bidimensionll S ochas ic P o¢Isl -4 '4 By( ) D= i= lon$ P oc=ss N umbe in (0,1) Figu e 2. E alua ing a a iable by a numbe E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems 207 Io DMn,, hen DMn ecei es he m- uple (an, .... , anm). This m- uple has also o be p o- cessed in o a scala alue; a p ocedu e ha i s hese needs e y well is he Analy ic Hie a chy P ocess (AHP) (Saa y, 1980; Va gas, 1990). This globalizing p ocess is ecu si ely execu ed and ends eaching he SDM. 2.3. The Decision P ocess (DP) Figu e 3. Di e en ends wi h he same las obse ed alue de ine a sho pe iod as he ime uni y o he obse a ions (week, mon h, qua e .... ), and a long pe iod as he g oup o he sho pe iods o be conside ed in o de o explain he e olu ion o he quali y o (mon h, yea .... ). Wi h he de ini ions abo e, jus he la es long pe iod should be conside ed. The decisi e ole played by he DM should be aken in o accoun in he e alua ing (globalizing) p ocess h ough his a i ude owa ds isk. As has been widely s udied in decision heo y, a neu al a i ude owa ds isk is exp essed by means o he a e age alue, a pessimis ic a i ude by he mini- mum, and an op imis ic a i ude by he maximum (Milno , 1954). Hence, he sui able and simple choice o he globalizing unc ion could ha e he o m qb(a(1), a, a(n)), wi h a(1 ) = min{al,..., an} , a = (l/n) E a i, a n ) = max {a ..... an}, n is he num- be o sho pe iods included in a long pe iod, and a i is he le el o achie emen in he i- h sho pe iod in he long pe iod. A i ing p ocedu e when qb is assumed o be addi i e is desc ibed in Appendix 1. Wi h ha p ocedu e we ha e a scala e alua ion o any a iable o he se ice cen e associa ed o he e minal DMi. The in o ma ion ha has been p ocessed by he e minal DMs has o low owa ds he SDM h ough he dig aph (N, B) (see Figu e 4). The DMs in he hie a chy ecei e meaning ul bu simpli ied in o ma ion. O cou se, i i does no su ice, a d illing p ocess should be a ailable in o de o ob ain mo e echnical da a. Hence, i {DMn¢..., DMn, .} is he se o non- e minal DMs subo dina ed o DM n and an, ep- esen s he le el o achie emen ob ained by The pe o mance measu e we y o op imize is he global sys em sa is ac ion, ob ained using he IP desc ibed abo e. We assume ha he s ochas ic mechanism con- olling he sys em can be modi ied by means o esou ces, and i an unlimi ed amoun o e- sou ces we e a ailable, he o al sa is ac ion would be ob ained. Howe e , his is an u opic si ua ion, so a p ocedu e suppo ing decisions conce ning esou ce alloca ion is needed. In eal sys ems, op imal esou ce alloca ion does no su ice, so an op imal managemen o exis ing esou ces is also necessa y. As a consequence o he IP in he hie a chy, he DMs can de ec and co ec w ong esou ce managemen ; hence, he p ocedu e we p opose deals wi h he o he aspec o he p oblem: he alloca ion o new esou ces. The DP is de eloped h ough he dig aph (N, F). An amoun o a ailable esou ces o he DM can be seen as a low emana ing om him, and ha ing as sinks his subo dina es in (N, F). The p ocess is ecu si ely execu ed, un il eaching he lowes le el in he hie a chy, whose DMs a e he only ones wi h he capabili y o using esou ces in modi ying he sys em pe o - mance. Figu e 4. Agg ega ing sa is ac ions 208 E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems The p ocess can be done in di e en ways, depending on he le el o knowledge ha DMs ha e abou he sa is ac ion unc ion. I he e exis s a unc ional dependence be- ween esou ces and ou pu s in he sys em (Vla6i~, 1989), he esou ce alloca ion p oblem is sol ed h ough he ollowing ma hema ical p og amming p oblem: P(F) max (Sij(Oj, Uj, Xj)){,i,j)~F:FF, j,=¢} s. . xj= E Xij Vj/(i,j)~F:FF(j)=#, jEFF 1 R >1 ~ Xlj , j~FF(I) E xik <~ E Xkj i~FTl(k) j~FF(k) Vk~N, k :g 1, FF(k) 4: ~, O <xij < cij 'q(i,j)~F whe e si~(Oj, Bj, x j) is he unc ion measu ing he sa is ac ion o DM/~ N, whose pe o mance de- pends on pa ame e s Oj, has p ese goals Bj and ecei es xj uni s o esou ce. The o al amoun o a ailable esou ces a e R, we suppose ha he e exis s some capaci y Cij in he a cs, and he decisions a iables a e 0 and Xj. P(F) is a mul iobjec i e p oblem, and i he knowledge o a globalizing unc ion is assumed (which is a sensible assump ion due o he AHP ollowed in he IP), p oblem P(F) becomes a scala p oblem, whose op imal solu ion gi es he alues o esou ce alloca ing a iable pa ame e s and global sa is ac ion ob ained o such an amoun o esou ces. When he explici o ms o he sa is ac ion unc ions a e no known, he p ocedu e abo e is in easible. Fo such cases, an in e ac i e me hod- ology is mo e sui able. The i e a i e p ocess we p opose consis s o wo phases (Backwa d and Fo wa d), desc ibed below. In he backwa d phase, he e minal DMs demand an amoun o esou ces hey would like o ecei e, and associa e o such demand he le el o sa is ac ion o be ob ained. This in o ma ion lows un il i eaches he SDM. In he o wa d phase, an o e o esou ces lows om he SDm un il eaching he e minal DMs. These wo phases a e epea ed un il a ce ain equilib ium is ob ained. Compa a i ely, whe eas he backwa d phase looks o op imali y in sa is ac ion, he o wa d phase looks o easibili y. The backwa d phase This phase consis s o h ee s eps: S ep 1. Fixing uppe bounds o any e minal DM and esou ce. In he i s backwa d phase, hese bounds a e de e mined in a ealis ic way, maybe upda ing pas alloca ions. In he ollowing backwa d phases, he bounds a e de e mined based on he o e s done in he p eceding o - wa d phase. S ep 2. Demands and sa is ac ion. Any DM, DMj, gi es a pai ( j, sj), whe e j is a esou ce ec o demand, easible wi h espec o he p e- sen uppe bounds u j, and sj is he le el o sa is ac ion ha would be ob ained wi h such an amoun o esou ces. The p ocess is di e en depending on he kind o DM. A e minal DMj's demand mus be he consequence o a desi ed change in his ec o pa ame e . Such a change may be suppo ed by means o he p ocedu e desc ibed in Appendix 2. A non- e minal DMj's demand o esou ces j equals Y'-i i, and i s associa ed sa is ac ion sj is he agg ega ion o he sa is ac ions o his subo di- na es, ollowing he IP: s= Y~i wisi. Ob iously, his agg ega ion should be supe - ised by DMj in o de o co ec possible e o s in i , due o he ac ha we ha e admi ed a linea globalizing unc ion and he a ibu es may no be mu ually independen (Fishbu n, 1970). S ep 3. Feasibili y es . The p ocess o agg e- ga ion o esou ces and sa is ac ion ends eaching he SDM; he ecei es a pai ( , s), whe e is he amoun o esou ces he sys em desi es, and s is he sa is ac ion ha such esou ces would induce. The SDM has an amoun o o esou ces. I o >/ , he sys em eaches equilib ium, and he DP s ops; i his we e no he case, a o wa d phase s a s, wi h he aim o eaching easibili y. The numbe o i e a ions needed o each equilib ium s ongly depends on how ealis ic he demands made by he e minal DMs a e. Such ealism can be con olled by he SDM h ough a ionally ixing he bounds in S ep 1. The o wa d phase The amoun o esou ces i ha DM i has mus be dis ibu ed among his subo dina e DMs. E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems 209 PROPERTIES El MENT5 REOURSIYITY GLOBAL UNDIREDT ELABORATED WEIGHTING BY A.H.P. PARTIAL DIREOT EA iY TO EY/¢UATE WEIGHTIN6 BY A.H.P. lObs' oO "ue¢ O ( l I °(}'1~' =(hi Figu e 5. In o ma ion and Decision P ocesses Such a dis ibu ion should be a unc ion o he couples ( i, sj), Vj ~ F(i), ob ained in he p eced- ing backwa d phase, and should be done in ol - ing DMi. A easible choice o his pu pose could be ob ained by sol ing he ollowing linea ma he- ma ical p og am: max ~ ~sjwi6kj j k s. . Y'~ 6~j <~ 1 Vk = 1 ..... , J O<~6~j Vk=l,..., , j~F(i) whe e 8kj is he ac ion o k- ype esou ce as- signed o DMj and w J is he weigh ha DMi gi es o his subo dina e DMj. The op imal alues o he decision a iables Ski gi e he ac ion o esou ces assignable o e e y DMj. This p ocess is done ecu si ely, and s ops when he lowes le el is eached. Then, a new backwa d phase s a s. In o de o as en he con e gence o equilib- ium, a p uning p ocess could be used, emo ing hose DMs whose demands in a s age we e easi- ble. These wo sec ions ha e been de o ed o de- sc ibe he HIDS. A summa izing diag am is shown in Figu e 5. Fo p ac ical applica ions, all ha is needed i so iden i y he eal s uc u e wi h he elemen s in ou model. This is wha we do in he nex sec ion. 3. A case s udy When his de elopmen was con ac ed, he public heal h se ices in Andalusia (Spain) de- pended on a public ins i u ion called SAS (Se icio Andaluz de Salud). [ EA . DIRECTOR 1 H.I LM. P-k 6. • Figu e 6. SAS s uc u e 210 E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems The SAS o ganiza ion Table 1 A simpli ied o ganig am o he adminis a i e s uc u e o his ins i u ion is shown in Figu e 6. The op manage is he SAS di ec o . A he second le el he e a e wo gene al di ec o s: The Hospi al Assis ance Gene al Mange (HAGM) and he P ima y Assis ance Gene al Manage (PAGM). Andalusia is adminis a i ely di ided in o eigh p o inces, each one wi h i s own P o incial Man- age (PM), subo dina e o he wo gene al di ec- o s. E e y cen e has i s own manage (Hospi al o P ima y Assis ance Cen e Manage ). All he cen e s in a p o ince a e unde he esponsibili y o hei P o incial Manage . The complain sys em Ins ead o being ocused on p oduc i i y, pub- lic sys ems a e mainly in e es ed in o e ing high quali y in hei se ices. This is why one o he goals o SAS manage s has always been he con inuous imp o emen o he le el o ob ained sa is ac ion, he la e being measu ed by means o he complain s he use s make. Such complain s a e classi ied acco ding o he ype o pe sonnel, he a ea o ac i i y, he eason o he complain and he answe ob ained o he complain (Table 1). HIDS modeling The hie a chical and adminis a i e SAS s uc- u es coincide, excep o he P o incial Man- age s. Since hese DMs join wo clea ly sepa able asks ( he managemen o he hospi als and he p ima y assis ance cen e s), hey ha e been spli up acco ding o he o ganig am shown in Figu e 7. The main pa ame e s (gi en by he manage s) ha con ol he pe o mance o he di e en elemen s in he sys em a e shown in Table 2. The se o obse ed a iables (ou pu s) h oughou ime shows di e en ypes o p e- sen ed complain s, classi ied ollowing Table 1. The manage s ha e sugges ed ha da a should be collec ed in he cen e s e e y mon h (a sho pe iod). In o de o p ocess such in o ma ion, all ha is needed is (i) he sa is ac ion unc ions associa ed o he di e en a iables and (ii) he Reason: CA. Assis en quali y TP. Poli eness EM. Pe o mance o ins umen s TA. Bu eauc acy PP. Tes s los LI. Cleaning PU. Punc uali y IN. In o ma ion SA. Medical examina ion cancelled LE. Wai ing lis AL. Food IA. Assis en in o ma ion OT. O he s A ea: PL. Floo UR. U gency CE. Ex e nal examina ions QU. Su gical a ea PT. In e nal examina ion LA. Labo a o y and analysis SG. Gene al Se ices S a : ME. Doc o s EM. Nu ses AA. O ice wo ke s CE. A endan s MA. Main enance DI. Di ec o s CL. Res au an , cleaning employees IN. O he s. Resul : a. b. C. d. e. . The use is igh and his p oblem is sol ed. The use is igh and his p oblem emains unsol ed. The use is w ong. The complain is no clea enough. The use needs addi ional in o ma ion. The cen e is no esponsible o he eason o he complain . I ;*s' °zRsc °R 1 N.k E. kl. P.A.E.M. Figu e 7. HIDS modeling E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems 211 Table 2 Hospi als P ima y Assis ance Cen e s Numbe o beds X Numbe o examina ion ooms X X Special examina ions X X Assis en ial s a X X Adminis a i e s a X X Gene al se ice s a X X Numbe o ope a ing ooms X Numbe o ambulances X X Numbe o u gency boo hs X Figu e 8. A menu display globalizing unc ions o ajec o ies; we ha e gi en he manage s a small lib a y o sa is ac ion unc ions, aken om decision heo y manuals. The globaliza ion o ajec o ies, done acco ding o Appendix 1, is now being alida ed. Following also manage 's sugges ions, he goals o he a iables a e o be ixed a he beginning o e e y na u al (a long pe iod). Due o he na u e o his sys em, wha manage s ha e o de e mine is he highes numbe o complain s o e e y ype ha is going o be seen as accep able. In he DP, he main esou ces used in o de o imp o e he sa is ac ion le el a e essen ially o economical na u e, al hough in some cases he use s assigned o e e y cen e we e also used as esou ces. Fo his pu pose, he e minal DMs (Hospi al o P ima y Assis ance Cen e Man- age s) could change he pa ame e s associa ed o hei managed cen e (see Table 2). Such a change should be execu ed ollowing he manage 's own expe ience, and, i needed, suppo ed by he p o- cedu e p oposed in Appendix 2: gi en a Heal h Se ice cen e , hose se ices wi h simila pa am- e e s a e de ec ed; by means o a decision p o- cess, which akes in o accoun echnical con- s ain s (uppe bounds o he numbe o beds, dependence be ween he numbe o ope a ing ooms and assis en s a , e c.), a change in he ec o o pa ame e s is p oposed. 4. So wa e a chi ec u e HIDS has been implemen ed in a so wa e a chi ec u e called INDI. INDI is an objec -o i- en ed decision en i onmen ha allows he ep e- sen a ion o decision si ua ions in a e y gene al con ex , and allows he analysis o in o ma ion. One he main ea u es o INDI is i s e olu i e na u e: i pe mi s he addi ion o new ele an elemen s and disca ding o useless ones. The sys em is based on a se o ela ional da a bases, managed by a knowledge base ha de e mines he ela ions among di e en elemen s in he hie a chy. This se o ules desc ibes he p o- cesses o in o ma ion and decision. INDI is a mul i-use sys em, ha uns in a local a ea ne wo k wi h DOS compa ible compu - e s. Some displays a e shown in Figu es 8 and 9. INDI has wo di e en modules: 1) Use in e ace. • Main enance. Allows he ep esen a ion o any hie a chical sys em. The use can c ea e new elemen s and i s associa ed ea u es, and de ine he ela ions among hese elemen s and he es o he hie a chy. These da a a e loca ed in he knowledge-base. • In o ma ion p ocess gene a o . Gene a es he epo s o any DM in he hie a chy, and p ocesses he in o ma ion h ough he IP o ob ain he le el o sa is ac ion o he DMs. ! JUNTA 0E ANOkLUCIA ESTANOAR: ESTANCIA MEDIA I D.A.P:I0.O0 CONSEJERIA DE SALLIO y OE~GLOSE: H.O~ I D.A.N:IO.QO SERVICIOS SCCIALES U.I'IEDIOA: DIAS P lEDICCIQNES. PERI ENERO FEBRERO VAqZO ABRIL P gAS 5 5 5 5 E R ~ 67 0 0 0 I 0 DES -62,00 5.00 5.00 5.00 T BAS 5.00 5.OO S.O0 S.OO A RF~ 67.00 67.00 67.00 67.00 e i~s -~.oo *E,?.oo -62.oo -~.oo PERIO EX~E~O N(~4AL NOW~L NORNAL T.A.H EXTEF6qO EXTE~40 EXTE~6NO EXTEF~O PULSE CL~L~J[ER TECLA PARA CONT[NUAR Figu e 9. A p edic ions display 212 E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems "FORWARD PHASE -,Ho,__ I I.OEOISIOH SU,,ORT/ / FREE-TExT NE'NTS "UTIL "HIERARCHY MANAGEME "FORECASTING INOI ATORS RELA ON A ONG DM8 • oN--INE "~1 I'.AIN~ENAHCE~ I ""J'.AIN;~NANC~ ' [ORR[I~RRATI ON I 'MS[TI gRF[[T ION l " SPECIAL FUNCTIONS l • INTRODUCTION OF DATA Figu e 10 G aphical and sc een-edi o epo s a e a ail- able. • Analyze . This is he co ne s one o he DP. I allows in e ac i e analysis (abou he esou ces), p edic i e analysis abou he beha - io o he obse ed a iables and s a is ical anal- ysis (homogenei y in e minal elemen s, clus e analysis). • In e ac i e aid. 2) Sys em in e ace. Allows he con igu a ion o ha dwa e pa ame e s, and he c ea ion o use s and le els o esponsibili y and accessibil- i y o he di e en modules o INDI. An a chi ec u e diag am is shown in Figu e 10. Appendix 1 Ou aim is he i ing o an addi i e globalizing unc ion q~ in o de o agg ega e he achie emen ajec o y ob ained h ough a long pe iod by means o a eal alue q~(a(1), ~, a(n )) ep esen ing he sa is ac ion associa ed o he a iable. By addi i i y we mean ha @ is o he o m q~(a(l ), ~, a(,)) = o a(1 ) +/3~ + 3"a(n ) o some a,/3, 3' >~ 0, a +/3 + 3' = 1, o be es i- ma ed. We assume ha , i he achie emen ajec o y is displayed, he DM is able o sco e he global achie emen (sa is ac ion) in an long pe iod wi h a alue in [0, 1]. E en unde his assump ion, he p ocedu e we p opose is e y use ul, because i a oids ime-con- suming ou inely e alua ions o e e y a iable. The pa ame e s a e i ed in a p elimina y i ing p ocess. Fo any sho pe iod i, le a(1)(i) , ~(i) and a(m(i) be he lowes , a e age and highes achie e- men , espec i ely, ob ained in he long pe iod ending in i. Le also (i) be he sco e in [0, 1] ha he DM p oposes o such a long pe iod. When his p ocess is epea ed du ing k con- secu i e sho pe iods, we ob ain a sample {(a(1)(i), -d(i), a(m(i) , (i)), i= 1 .... , k}. We p opose as pa ame e es ima o s, (a*,/3", 3'*), he op imal solu ion o he p ob- lem: k min E [om(1)(i) +/3~(i) +3"a(m(i ) - (i)] 2 i=1 s. . a+/3+3"=1, a,/3, 3' >/0. Once he DM's sco es ag ee wi h he global- ized alues, he i ing s age ends. F om hen on, he globaliza ion will be au oma ically done as a*ao) +/3"~ + 3"*a(m. O cou se, i a any ime he DM s ops ag ee- ing wi h his globaliza ion, a new i ing s age should s a . Appendix 2 The backwa d s age in he DP s a s a he lowes le el, whe e he sa is ac ion associa ed o esou ce demand mus be de e mined. Le DM n be a e minal DM wi h demand n. In o de o ob ain he associa ed sa is ac ion s n, we p opose a p ocedu e ha shows a heu is ic use o esou ces by modi ying he d-dimensional pa ame e O n associa ed o DM,. The in o ma ion ha DM, has abou sys em pe o mance is summa ized in he de ia ion ec-