A management tool for indicator-supported systems: A public health service application
Abstract
We develop a decision-making methodology for hierarchical structures. It provides different decision makers with decision-oriented information based on obtained satisfaction levels. This is specially convenient for public services, where the main goal is user's satisfaction. Our methodology and its associated software (INDI) have been implemented in the Andalusian Health Service (SAS), supporting resource allocation decisions in order to reduce the complaints presented against such an institution.
Full text
204 Eu opean Jou nal o Ope a ional Resea ch 61 (1992) 204-214
No h-Holland
A managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed
sys ems: A public heal h se ice applica ion
E. Ca izosa, E. Conde, F.R.
Fe n indez and
J.
Pue o
Depa amen o de Es ad[s ica e In es igaci6n Ope a i a, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se illa, Spain
Recei ed Ma ch 1991; e ised Sep embe 1991
Abs ac : We de elop a decision-making me hodology o hie a chical s uc u es. I p o ides di e en
decision make s wi h decision-o ien ed in o ma ion based on ob ained sa is ac ion le els. This is specially
con enien o public se ices, whe e he main goal is use 's sa is ac ion. Ou me hodology and i s
associa ed so wa e (INDI) ha e been implemen ed in he Andalusian Heal h Se ice (SAS), suppo ing
esou ce alloca ion decisions in o de o educe he complain s p esen ed agains such an ins i u ion.
Keywo ds: Decision Suppo Sys ems; decision heo y; mul ic i e ia decision making
1. In oduc ion
Any o ganiza ion in a compe i i e ma ke
needs some ools o eac agains unexpec edly
inc easing cos s o dec easing quali y.
This has gi en an impo an ole o he in o -
ma ion depa men : moni o ing he p oduc ion
p ocess h ough in o ma ion sys ems gi es he
manage he ools o compa e he ou pu s wi h
p ese a ge s and check he quali y o hem.
Un il he beginning o he 80s, all ha was
equi ed we e Managemen In o ma ion Sys ems
(MIS), he decisions being ese ed o he man-
age s, wi h he only aid o he epo s gi en by
he MIS. Howe e , he e has been in he las
yea s an inc easing in e es in he de elopmen o
no ma i e decision models, suppo ing he mak-
ing o non-s uc u ed o semi-s uc u ed deci-
sions in o de o sys ema ize he p ocess o con-
inuous imp o emen .
Mos o he e o s ha e been de o ed o he
de elopmen o me hodologies o speci ic deci-
sion si ua ions (Valada es e al., 1986; Boldy,
1987; And eu and Co ominas, 1989; Vla6i6, 1989).
The de elopmen o ou me hodology HIDS
(Hie a chical In o ma ion and Decision Sys em)
and i s associa ed so wa e had as a s a ing poin
a con ac wi h he Se icio Andaluz de Salud
(Andalusian Heal h Se ice), known as SAS.
The e, we had o de elop an in e ac i e sys em
suppo ing decisions abou he alloca ion o e-
sou ces in o de o educe he numbe o com-
plain s in public heal h cen e s.
We ha e de eloped a uni ied decision-making
en i onmen o suppo ing decisions a di e en
le els in any hie a chical s uc u e. This en i on-
men can be seen as a
shell
ha he decision
make s (DMs) use in o de o de elop hei own
DSS p o ile inside he s uc u e.
Ou aim is o gi e all he DMs ex emely
manageable and meaning ul decision-o ien ed in-
o ma ion. The me hodology is based on he anal-
ysis o he sa is ac ion le el ob ained h ough he
ou pu s o he sys em. This sa is ac ion is mea-
su ed by means o obse ed ajec o ies, no mal-
ized using
sa is ac ion unc ions.
This p ocedu e is especially con enien o
public se ices, whe e he main goal is o ob ain a
high le el o use 's sa is ac ion.
This pape is di ided in o ou sec ions. In
Sec ion 2, we desc ibe he model and i s unde ly-
ing hypo heses, he In o ma ion and Decision
P ocesses. In Sec ion 3 we p esen a eal applica-
ion o ou me hodology applied o public heal h
0377-2217/92/$05.00 © 1992 - Else ie Science Publishe s B.V. All igh s ese ed
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
205
se ices. Sec ion 4 is de o ed o he desc ip ion o
he so wa e a chi ec u e ha has been de el-
oped o he model. The pape ends wi h wo
ma hema ical appendices dealing wi h some as-
pec s o he In o ma ion and Decision P ocesses.
2. The Hie a chical In o ma ion and Decision
Sys em (HIDS)
2.1. The model
The model we p opose is based on a se o
hypo heses we desc ibe below. They do no co e-
spond o heo e ical condi ions, bu appea in
almos any eal la ge-scale in o ma ion-decision
sys em. Due o hei na u e, hese hypo heses a e
classi ied in o h ee g oups:
- S uc u e hypo heses (S).
- Sys em Pa ame e hypo heses (P).
- P ese Ta ge s hypo heses (T).
S1. The sys em can be ep esen ed h ough a
hie a chical s uc u e.
$2. Any elemen in he sys em (DM) occupies
only one place in he s uc u e.
$3. No elemen ac s isola ed om he es .
$4. The e a e wo p eo de s on he s uc u e,
called he Decision ela ion and In o ma ion e-
la ion. Each one is he in e se o he o he .
$5. The e exis s only one maximal elemen o
he Decision ela ion: The Supe Decision Make
(SDM). Fo any DM, he Decision ela ion in-
duces exac ly one chain om he SDM o him.
PI. Any DM a he lowes le el in he hie a -
chy ( e minal DM) is esponsible o a unique
se eice cen e . The pe o mance o such a se ice
is con olled by a s ochas ic p ocess ha depends
on a se o pa ame e s.
T1. The pe o mance quali y o a se ice cen-
e i a ime is a unc ion o a se V~( ) o
nume ical ea u es (which a e pe iodically mea-
su ed), and a se o p ese a ge s.
T2. The sa is ac ion o a e minal DM is he
pe o mance quali y o his associa ed se ice cen-
e . The sa is ac ion o any non- e minal DM a
ime is a unc ion o he sa is ac ion o hose
DMs subo dina ed o him ollowing he Decision
ela ion.
In a na u al way, he hypo heses desc ibed
abo e lead us o a ep esen a ion o he sys em by
means o a ma hema ical s uc u e H =
(N, F, B), whe e:
1) N is he se o all he DMs in he hie a chy
2) F is he Decision ela ion. I (n, m)~F,
we say ha m is subo dina ed o n.
3) B is he In o ma ion ela ion. I (n, m) ~ B,
we say ha n in o ms m.
4) (N, F) is an acyclic connec ed dig aph, wi h
only one DM wi h ze o ank: he Supe Decision
Make (SDM).
5) (N, B) is an acyclic connec ed dig aph, wi h
only one elemen wi h maximal ank: he SDM.
6) (n, m) ~ F i (m, n) ~ B.
No e ha he hypo heses we imposed a e ex-
plici ly used in his o mula ion. In ac , $1 and
$2 jus i y he acyclic g aph s uc u e, $3 he con-
nec edness, and $4 he exis ence o wo g aphs,
one o each di ec ion o low: whe eas he a cs
in (N, F) ep esen in di ec ion in which he
decisions a e ansmi ed, he ones in (N, B)-s a e
he di ec ion o in o ma ion low.
Hypo hesis $5 is aken in o accoun in (4) and
(5); hypo hesis P1 is needed o explain he non-
de e minis ic na u e o he sys ems we a e model-
ing. Finally, he T1 and T2 hypo heses allow he
e alua ion o sys em pe o mance, and cons i u e
he co ne s one o he In o ma ion P ocess we
desc ibe below.
2.2. The In o ma ion P ocess (IP)
E icien managemen needs e y sha p and
belie able knowledge abou sys em pe o mance.
Due o he sys em's na u e, only he DMs in
he lowes le el in he hie a chy ha e di ec ac-
cess o in o ma ion, bu such in o ma ion gi es
only e y pa ial knowledge abou he eal pe o -
mance o he whole sys em.
Howe e , he DMs in he highes le els ( hose
wi h a b oade ac ion ield) no only lack di ec
access o in o ma ion, bu also need mo e gene al
knowledge abou he sys em: as gene al as he
kind o he decisions hey ha e o ake.
Hence, we ha e o ace wo p oblems:
• How should he DMs collec in o ma ion?
• How should such in o ma ion be p ocessed
and sen o DMs in highe le els in he hie a -
chy?
The aim o e e imp o ing he quali y o a
se ice ad ises agains collec ing in o ma ion
abou he se ice h ough me ely desc ip i e a i-
206
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
Figu e 1. Some sa is ac ion unc ions
ables. A decision-o ien ed p ocess is mo e sui -
able, e alua ing he e icacy o e iciency o pe -
o mance agains some p ese and pe iodically
ixed a ge s. A powe ul ool o his pu pose is
p o ided by Pe o mance Indica o s (PI) (Wes on
and B o he s, 1984; Fo uin, 1988). Hence, in-
s ead o conside ing ea u es in isola ion, we will
use pe o mance indica o s, which a e de ined by
a ea u e and i s associa ed a ge . To ge his
goal, such PIs mus be easy o unde s and, clea ly
de ined and ep esen a i e o he sys em's pe o -
mance, which is e lec ed in hypo hesis T1 im-
posed o ou model.
Fo mally, in o de o measu e a ime he
quali y o he se ice associa ed o e minal DM i,
a se V/( ) o quan i a i e a iables a e aken. Fo
any a iable ~ V/( ), we need a couple
(O,,( ), G ( )), whe e
Q( )
is he obse ed alue
o , and
Q( )
is he goal o i . This couple is
added o p e ious obse a ions and goals, gi ing
us he s ochas ic p ocess {(O~.(s),
GL,(s):s ~ T,,},
whe e T~, is he se o ins an s when he a iable
has been obse ed. Mo e p ecisely, he quali y
should be measu ed h ough he s ochas ic p o-
cess
{O,,(s):s ~ T,,},
whe e
D,~(s) = ~,(O,,(s)-
G (s), G~(s)), and is a [0, 1]- alued unc ion,
indica ing he le el o ag eemen be ween he
obse ed alue and he goal. Hence, De(s)= 1 i
a ime s, he p ese goal is eached, and
Dc(s) = 0
i he goal is no eached a all.
The DMs should ha e a hand a se o unc-
ions ~ o i hei eal pe cep ion o ag eemen ;
some pa icula ins ances, aken om P ome hEe
me hodology (B ans e al, 1984; B ans and
Vincke, 1985) a e shown in Figu e 1.
Wi h his, we ha e p ocessed he wo-dimen-
sional s ochas ic p ocess {(O (s), G~,(s): s ~ T~}
in o a one-dimensional p ocess
{D~,(s):s ~ T~.}
ep esen ing he le el o achie emen h ough
ime (S ep 1 in Figu e 2).
We a e aced now wi h he p oblem o e alua -
ing he e olu ion o such an achie emen (S ep 2
in Figu e 2).
This e alua ion should no be done using only
he mos ecen obse ed alue
(DL( )),
because
ends o imp o emen o wo sening would no
be app ecia ed: he same e alua ion would be
ob ained o e y di e en beha io s (Figu e 3).
This is he eason why we dis inguish wo
di e en pe iods o ime o a a iable : we
S ochas ic P ocess
O ( ),G ( )
Bidimensionll S ochas ic
P o¢Isl
-4 '4
By( )
D= i= lon$
P oc=ss
N
umbe in
(0,1)
Figu e 2. E alua ing a a iable by a numbe
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
207
Io
DMn,, hen DMn ecei es he m- uple
(an, ....
,
anm).
This m- uple has also o be p o-
cessed in o a scala alue; a p ocedu e ha i s
hese needs e y well is he Analy ic Hie a chy
P ocess (AHP) (Saa y, 1980; Va gas, 1990).
This globalizing p ocess is ecu si ely execu ed
and ends eaching he SDM.
2.3. The Decision P ocess (DP)
Figu e 3. Di e en ends wi h he same las obse ed alue
de ine a
sho pe iod
as he ime uni y o he
obse a ions (week, mon h, qua e .... ), and a
long pe iod
as he g oup o he sho pe iods o be
conside ed in o de o explain he e olu ion o
he quali y o (mon h, yea .... ).
Wi h he de ini ions abo e, jus he la es long
pe iod should be conside ed.
The decisi e ole played by he DM should be
aken in o accoun in he e alua ing (globalizing)
p ocess h ough his a i ude owa ds isk. As has
been widely s udied in decision heo y, a neu al
a i ude owa ds isk is exp essed by means o he
a e age alue, a pessimis ic a i ude by he mini-
mum, and an op imis ic a i ude by he maximum
(Milno , 1954).
Hence, he sui able and simple choice o he
globalizing unc ion could ha e he o m
qb(a(1), a, a(n)), wi h a(1 ) = min{al,...,
an} , a =
(l/n) E
a i, a n ) = max {a ..... an}, n
is he num-
be o sho pe iods included in a long pe iod,
and a i is he le el o achie emen in he i- h
sho pe iod in he long pe iod.
A i ing p ocedu e when qb is assumed o be
addi i e is desc ibed in Appendix 1. Wi h ha
p ocedu e we ha e a scala e alua ion o any
a iable o he se ice cen e associa ed o he
e minal DMi.
The in o ma ion ha has been p ocessed by
he e minal DMs has o low owa ds he SDM
h ough he dig aph (N, B) (see Figu e 4). The
DMs in he hie a chy ecei e meaning ul bu
simpli ied in o ma ion. O cou se, i i does no
su ice, a d illing p ocess should be a ailable in
o de o ob ain mo e echnical da a.
Hence, i {DMn¢..., DMn, .} is he se o non-
e minal DMs subo dina ed o DM n and an, ep-
esen s he le el o achie emen ob ained by
The pe o mance measu e we y o op imize
is he global sys em sa is ac ion, ob ained using
he IP desc ibed abo e.
We assume ha he s ochas ic mechanism con-
olling he sys em can be modi ied by means o
esou ces, and i an unlimi ed amoun o e-
sou ces we e a ailable, he o al sa is ac ion would
be ob ained. Howe e , his is an u opic si ua ion,
so a p ocedu e suppo ing decisions conce ning
esou ce alloca ion is needed.
In eal sys ems, op imal esou ce alloca ion
does no su ice, so an op imal managemen o
exis ing esou ces is also necessa y.
As a consequence o he IP in he hie a chy,
he DMs can de ec and co ec w ong esou ce
managemen ; hence, he p ocedu e we p opose
deals wi h he o he aspec o he p oblem: he
alloca ion o new esou ces.
The DP is de eloped h ough he dig aph
(N, F). An amoun o a ailable esou ces o he
DM can be seen as a low emana ing om him,
and ha ing as sinks his subo dina es in (N, F).
The p ocess is ecu si ely execu ed, un il
eaching he lowes le el in he hie a chy, whose
DMs a e he only ones wi h he capabili y o
using esou ces in modi ying he sys em pe o -
mance.
Figu e 4. Agg ega ing sa is ac ions
208
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
The p ocess can be done in di e en ways,
depending on he le el o knowledge ha DMs
ha e abou he sa is ac ion unc ion.
I he e exis s a unc ional dependence be-
ween esou ces and ou pu s in he sys em (Vla6i~,
1989), he esou ce alloca ion p oblem is sol ed
h ough he ollowing ma hema ical p og amming
p oblem:
P(F)
max (Sij(Oj, Uj, Xj)){,i,j)~F:FF, j,=¢}
s. .
xj=
E Xij
Vj/(i,j)~F:FF(j)=#,
jEFF 1
R >1 ~
Xlj ,
j~FF(I)
E xik <~ E Xkj
i~FTl(k) j~FF(k)
Vk~N,
k :g 1, FF(k) 4: ~,
O <xij < cij
'q(i,j)~F
whe e
si~(Oj, Bj, x j)
is he unc ion measu ing he
sa is ac ion o DM/~ N, whose pe o mance de-
pends on pa ame e s
Oj,
has p ese goals
Bj
and
ecei es
xj
uni s o esou ce.
The o al amoun o a ailable esou ces a e R,
we suppose ha he e exis s some capaci y
Cij
in
he a cs, and he decisions a iables a e 0 and
Xj.
P(F) is a mul iobjec i e p oblem, and i he
knowledge o a globalizing unc ion is assumed
(which is a sensible assump ion due o he AHP
ollowed in he IP), p oblem P(F) becomes a
scala p oblem, whose op imal solu ion gi es he
alues o esou ce alloca ing a iable pa ame e s
and global sa is ac ion ob ained o such an
amoun o esou ces.
When he explici o ms o he sa is ac ion
unc ions a e no known, he p ocedu e abo e is
in easible. Fo such cases, an in e ac i e me hod-
ology is mo e sui able.
The i e a i e p ocess we p opose consis s o
wo phases (Backwa d and Fo wa d), desc ibed
below. In he backwa d phase, he e minal DMs
demand an amoun o esou ces hey would like
o ecei e, and associa e o such demand he le el
o sa is ac ion o be ob ained. This in o ma ion
lows un il i eaches he SDM. In he o wa d
phase, an o e o esou ces lows om he SDm
un il eaching he e minal DMs. These wo
phases a e epea ed un il a ce ain equilib ium is
ob ained. Compa a i ely, whe eas he backwa d
phase looks o
op imali y
in sa is ac ion, he
o wa d phase looks o
easibili y.
The backwa d phase
This phase consis s o h ee s eps:
S ep 1.
Fixing uppe bounds o any e minal
DM and esou ce. In he i s backwa d phase,
hese bounds a e de e mined in a ealis ic way,
maybe upda ing pas alloca ions. In he ollowing
backwa d phases, he bounds a e de e mined
based on he o e s done in he p eceding o -
wa d phase.
S ep
2. Demands and sa is ac ion. Any DM,
DMj, gi es a pai
( j, sj),
whe e j is a esou ce
ec o demand, easible wi h espec o he p e-
sen uppe bounds
u j,
and
sj
is he le el o
sa is ac ion ha would be ob ained wi h such an
amoun o esou ces.
The p ocess is di e en depending on he kind
o DM. A e minal DMj's demand mus be he
consequence o a desi ed change in his ec o
pa ame e . Such a change may be suppo ed by
means o he p ocedu e desc ibed in Appendix 2.
A non- e minal DMj's demand o esou ces
j
equals Y'-i i, and i s associa ed sa is ac ion
sj
is
he agg ega ion o he sa is ac ions o his subo di-
na es, ollowing he IP:
s= Y~i wisi.
Ob iously, his agg ega ion should be supe -
ised by DMj in o de o co ec possible e o s
in i , due o he ac ha we ha e admi ed a
linea globalizing unc ion and he a ibu es may
no be mu ually independen (Fishbu n, 1970).
S ep 3.
Feasibili y es . The p ocess o agg e-
ga ion o esou ces and sa is ac ion ends eaching
he SDM; he ecei es a pai ( , s), whe e is he
amoun o esou ces he sys em desi es, and s is
he sa is ac ion ha such esou ces would induce.
The SDM has an amoun o o esou ces. I
o >/ , he sys em eaches equilib ium, and he
DP s ops; i his we e no he case, a o wa d
phase s a s, wi h he aim o eaching easibili y.
The numbe o i e a ions needed o each
equilib ium s ongly depends on how ealis ic he
demands made by he e minal DMs a e. Such
ealism can be con olled by he SDM h ough
a ionally ixing he bounds in S ep 1.
The o wa d phase
The amoun o esou ces i ha DM i has
mus be dis ibu ed among his subo dina e DMs.
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
209
PROPERTIES El MENT5 REOURSIYITY
GLOBAL
UNDIREDT
ELABORATED
WEIGHTING
BY A.H.P.
PARTIAL
DIREOT
EA iY TO
EY/¢UATE
WEIGHTIN6
BY A.H.P.
lObs' oO "ue¢ O ( l I °(}'1~' =(hi
Figu e 5. In o ma ion and Decision P ocesses
Such a dis ibu ion should be a unc ion o he
couples
( i, sj), Vj ~ F(i),
ob ained in he p eced-
ing backwa d phase, and should be done in ol -
ing DMi.
A easible choice o his pu pose could be
ob ained by sol ing he ollowing linea ma he-
ma ical p og am:
max ~ ~sjwi6kj
j k
s. . Y'~ 6~j <~ 1 Vk = 1 ..... ,
J
O<~6~j
Vk=l,..., ,
j~F(i)
whe e 8kj is he ac ion o k- ype esou ce as-
signed o DMj and w J is he weigh ha DMi
gi es o his subo dina e DMj.
The op imal alues o he decision a iables
Ski gi e he ac ion o esou ces assignable o
e e y DMj.
This p ocess is done ecu si ely, and s ops
when he lowes le el is eached. Then, a new
backwa d phase s a s.
In o de o as en he con e gence o equilib-
ium, a p uning p ocess could be used, emo ing
hose DMs whose demands in a s age we e easi-
ble.
These wo sec ions ha e been de o ed o de-
sc ibe he HIDS. A summa izing diag am is shown
in Figu e 5. Fo p ac ical applica ions, all ha is
needed i so iden i y he eal s uc u e wi h he
elemen s in ou model. This is wha we do in he
nex sec ion.
3. A case s udy
When his de elopmen was con ac ed, he
public heal h se ices in Andalusia (Spain) de-
pended on a public ins i u ion called SAS
(Se icio Andaluz de Salud).
[
EA .
DIRECTOR 1
H.I LM. P-k 6. •
Figu e 6. SAS s uc u e
210
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
The SAS o ganiza ion Table 1
A simpli ied o ganig am o he adminis a i e
s uc u e o his ins i u ion is shown in Figu e 6.
The op manage is he SAS di ec o . A he
second le el he e a e wo gene al di ec o s: The
Hospi al Assis ance Gene al Mange (HAGM)
and he P ima y Assis ance Gene al Manage
(PAGM).
Andalusia is adminis a i ely di ided in o eigh
p o inces, each one wi h i s own P o incial Man-
age (PM), subo dina e o he wo gene al di ec-
o s. E e y cen e has i s own manage (Hospi al
o P ima y Assis ance Cen e Manage ). All he
cen e s in a p o ince a e unde he esponsibili y
o hei P o incial Manage .
The complain sys em
Ins ead o being ocused on p oduc i i y, pub-
lic sys ems a e mainly in e es ed in o e ing high
quali y in hei se ices. This is why one o he
goals o SAS manage s has always been he
con inuous imp o emen o he le el o ob ained
sa is ac ion, he la e being measu ed by means
o he complain s he use s make.
Such complain s a e classi ied acco ding o he
ype o pe sonnel, he a ea o ac i i y, he eason
o he complain and he answe ob ained o he
complain (Table 1).
HIDS modeling
The hie a chical and adminis a i e SAS s uc-
u es coincide, excep o he P o incial Man-
age s. Since hese DMs join wo clea ly sepa able
asks ( he managemen o he hospi als and he
p ima y assis ance cen e s), hey ha e been spli
up acco ding o he o ganig am shown in Figu e
7. The main pa ame e s (gi en by he manage s)
ha con ol he pe o mance o he di e en
elemen s in he sys em a e shown in Table 2.
The se o obse ed a iables (ou pu s)
h oughou ime shows di e en ypes o p e-
sen ed complain s, classi ied ollowing Table 1.
The manage s ha e sugges ed ha da a should
be collec ed in he cen e s e e y mon h (a sho
pe iod). In o de o p ocess such in o ma ion, all
ha is needed is (i) he sa is ac ion unc ions
associa ed o he di e en a iables and (ii) he
Reason:
CA. Assis en quali y
TP. Poli eness
EM. Pe o mance o ins umen s
TA. Bu eauc acy
PP. Tes s los
LI. Cleaning
PU. Punc uali y
IN. In o ma ion
SA. Medical examina ion cancelled
LE. Wai ing lis
AL. Food
IA. Assis en in o ma ion
OT. O he s
A ea:
PL. Floo
UR. U gency
CE. Ex e nal examina ions
QU. Su gical a ea
PT. In e nal examina ion
LA. Labo a o y and analysis
SG. Gene al Se ices
S a :
ME. Doc o s
EM. Nu ses
AA. O ice wo ke s
CE. A endan s
MA. Main enance
DI. Di ec o s
CL. Res au an , cleaning employees
IN. O he s.
Resul :
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
.
The use is igh and his p oblem is sol ed.
The use is igh and his p oblem emains unsol ed.
The use is w ong.
The complain is no clea enough.
The use needs addi ional in o ma ion.
The cen e is no esponsible o he eason o he
complain .
I ;*s' °zRsc °R 1
N.k E. kl. P.A.E.M.
Figu e 7. HIDS modeling
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
211
Table 2
Hospi als P ima y
Assis ance
Cen e s
Numbe o beds X
Numbe o examina ion ooms X X
Special examina ions X X
Assis en ial s a X X
Adminis a i e s a X X
Gene al se ice s a X X
Numbe o ope a ing ooms X
Numbe o ambulances X X
Numbe o u gency boo hs X Figu e 8. A menu display
globalizing unc ions o ajec o ies; we ha e
gi en he manage s a small lib a y o sa is ac ion
unc ions, aken om decision heo y manuals.
The globaliza ion o ajec o ies, done acco ding
o Appendix 1, is now being alida ed.
Following also manage 's sugges ions, he goals
o he a iables a e o be ixed a he beginning
o e e y na u al (a long pe iod). Due o he
na u e o his sys em, wha manage s ha e o
de e mine is he highes numbe o complain s o
e e y ype ha is going o be seen as accep able.
In he DP, he main esou ces used in o de o
imp o e he sa is ac ion le el a e essen ially o
economical na u e, al hough in some cases he
use s assigned o e e y cen e we e also used as
esou ces. Fo his pu pose, he e minal DMs
(Hospi al o P ima y Assis ance Cen e Man-
age s) could change he pa ame e s associa ed o
hei managed cen e (see Table 2). Such a change
should be execu ed ollowing he manage 's own
expe ience, and, i needed, suppo ed by he p o-
cedu e p oposed in Appendix 2: gi en a Heal h
Se ice cen e , hose se ices wi h simila pa am-
e e s a e de ec ed; by means o a decision p o-
cess, which akes in o accoun echnical con-
s ain s (uppe bounds o he numbe o beds,
dependence be ween he numbe o ope a ing
ooms and assis en s a , e c.), a change in he
ec o o pa ame e s is p oposed.
4. So wa e a chi ec u e
HIDS has been implemen ed in a so wa e
a chi ec u e called INDI. INDI is an objec -o i-
en ed decision en i onmen ha allows he ep e-
sen a ion o decision si ua ions in a e y gene al
con ex , and allows he analysis o in o ma ion.
One he main ea u es o INDI is i s e olu i e
na u e: i pe mi s he addi ion o new ele an
elemen s and disca ding o useless ones. The
sys em is based on a se o ela ional da a bases,
managed by a knowledge base ha de e mines
he ela ions among di e en elemen s in he
hie a chy. This se o ules desc ibes he p o-
cesses o in o ma ion and decision.
INDI is a mul i-use sys em, ha uns in a
local a ea ne wo k wi h DOS compa ible compu -
e s. Some displays a e shown in Figu es 8 and 9.
INDI has wo di e en modules:
1) Use in e ace.
• Main enance. Allows he ep esen a ion o
any hie a chical sys em. The use can c ea e
new elemen s and i s associa ed ea u es, and
de ine he ela ions among hese elemen s and
he es o he hie a chy. These da a a e loca ed
in he knowledge-base.
• In o ma ion p ocess gene a o . Gene a es
he epo s o any DM in he hie a chy, and
p ocesses he in o ma ion h ough he IP o
ob ain he le el o sa is ac ion o he DMs.
!
JUNTA 0E ANOkLUCIA ESTANOAR: ESTANCIA MEDIA I D.A.P:I0.O0
CONSEJERIA DE SALLIO y OE~GLOSE: H.O~ I D.A.N:IO.QO
SERVICIOS SCCIALES U.I'IEDIOA: DIAS P lEDICCIQNES.
PERI ENERO FEBRERO VAqZO ABRIL
P gAS 5 5 5 5
E
R ~ 67 0 0 0
I
0 DES -62,00 5.00 5.00 5.00
T BAS 5.00 5.OO S.O0 S.OO
A RF~ 67.00 67.00 67.00 67.00
e i~s -~.oo *E,?.oo -62.oo -~.oo
PERIO EX~E~O N(~4AL NOW~L NORNAL
T.A.H EXTEF6qO EXTE~40 EXTE~6NO EXTEF~O
PULSE CL~L~J[ER TECLA PARA CONT[NUAR
Figu e 9. A p edic ions display
212
E. Ca izosa e al. / Managemen ool o indica o -suppo ed sys ems
"FORWARD PHASE
-,Ho,__ I I.OEOISIOH SU,,ORT/ / FREE-TExT NE'NTS
"UTIL "HIERARCHY MANAGEME "FORECASTING
INOI ATORS RELA ON A ONG
DM8
• oN--INE "~1 I'.AIN~ENAHCE~ I ""J'.AIN;~NANC~
' [ORR[I~RRATI ON I 'MS[TI gRF[[T ION
l
" SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
l
• INTRODUCTION
OF
DATA
Figu e 10
G aphical and sc een-edi o epo s a e a ail-
able.
• Analyze . This is he co ne s one o he
DP. I allows in e ac i e analysis (abou he
esou ces), p edic i e analysis abou he beha -
io o he obse ed a iables and s a is ical anal-
ysis (homogenei y in e minal elemen s, clus e
analysis).
• In e ac i e aid.
2) Sys em in e ace. Allows he con igu a ion
o ha dwa e pa ame e s, and he c ea ion o
use s and le els o esponsibili y and accessibil-
i y o he di e en modules o INDI.
An a chi ec u e diag am is shown in Figu e 10.
Appendix 1
Ou aim is he i ing o an addi i e globalizing
unc ion q~ in o de o agg ega e he achie emen
ajec o y ob ained h ough a long pe iod by
means o a eal alue q~(a(1), ~,
a(n ))
ep esen ing
he sa is ac ion associa ed o he a iable.
By addi i i y we mean ha @ is o he o m
q~(a(l ), ~, a(,)) = o a(1 ) +/3~ + 3"a(n )
o some a,/3, 3' >~ 0, a +/3 + 3' = 1, o be es i-
ma ed.
We assume ha , i he achie emen ajec o y
is displayed, he DM is able o sco e he global
achie emen (sa is ac ion) in an long pe iod wi h
a alue in [0, 1].
E en unde his assump ion, he p ocedu e we
p opose is e y use ul, because i a oids ime-con-
suming ou inely e alua ions o e e y a iable.
The pa ame e s a e i ed in a p elimina y
i ing p ocess.
Fo any sho pe iod i, le a(1)(i) , ~(i) and
a(m(i)
be he lowes , a e age and highes achie e-
men , espec i ely, ob ained in he long pe iod
ending in i. Le also
(i)
be he sco e in [0, 1]
ha he DM p oposes o such a long pe iod.
When his p ocess is epea ed du ing k con-
secu i e sho pe iods, we ob ain a sample
{(a(1)(i),
-d(i), a(m(i) , (i)), i= 1 .... , k}.
We p opose as pa ame e es ima o s,
(a*,/3", 3'*), he op imal solu ion o he p ob-
lem:
k
min E [om(1)(i) +/3~(i)
+3"a(m(i )
- (i)] 2
i=1
s. .
a+/3+3"=1,
a,/3, 3' >/0.
Once he DM's sco es ag ee wi h he global-
ized alues, he i ing s age ends. F om hen on,
he globaliza ion will be au oma ically done as
a*ao) +/3"~ + 3"*a(m.
O cou se, i a any ime he DM s ops ag ee-
ing wi h his globaliza ion, a new i ing s age
should s a .
Appendix 2
The backwa d s age in he DP s a s a he
lowes le el, whe e he sa is ac ion associa ed o
esou ce demand mus be de e mined.
Le DM n be a e minal DM wi h demand
n.
In o de o ob ain he associa ed sa is ac ion s n,
we p opose a p ocedu e ha shows a heu is ic
use o esou ces by modi ying he d-dimensional
pa ame e
O n
associa ed o DM,.
The in o ma ion ha DM, has abou sys em
pe o mance is summa ized in he de ia ion ec-