Full text
1
Valida ed me hod o he de e mina ion o pe luo ina ed compounds in
placen al issue samples based on a simple ex ac ion p ocedu e p io o
ul a–high pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy– andem mass
spec ome y analysis
J. Ma ína, R. Rod íguez–Gómezb, A. Za a–Gómez*b, E. Alonsoa, J.L. Vílchezb, A. Na alónb
1 Depa men o Analy ical Chemis y, Supe io Poly echnic School, Uni e si y o Se ille, C/ Vi gen
de Á ica 7, E-41011 Se ille, Spain
2 Resea ch G oup o Analy ical Chemis y and Li e Sciences, Depa men o Analy ical Chemis y,
Uni e si y o G anada, Campus o Fuen enue a, E-18071 G anada, Spain
ABSTRACT Exposu e o xenobio ics du ing p egnancy is ine i able. De e mina ion
o pe luo ina ed compounds (PFCs), enowned en i onmen al con aminan s by Public Heal h
Au ho i ies due o i s pe sis ence, bioaccumula i e e ec and oxici y, is a challenge. In he
p esen wo k, a me hod based on a simpli ied sample ea men in ol ing s eps o eeze-
d ying, sol en ex ac ion and dispe si e clean-up o he ex ac s wi h C18 p io o ul a-high
pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy– andem mass spec ome y (UHPLC–MS/MS) analysis
o he de e mina ion o 5 pe luo ina ed ca boxylic acids ( om C4 o C8) and
pe luo ooc ane sul ona e (PFOS) in placen al issue samples is de eloped and alida ed. The
mos in luen ial pa ame e s a ec ing he ex ac ion me hod and he clean-up s ep we e
op imized using design o expe imen s. The me hod was alida ed using ma ix-ma ched
calib a ion. Found de ec ion limi s (LOD) anged om 0.03 o 2 ng g-1 and quan i ica ion
limi s (LOQ) om 0.08 o 6 ng g-1, while in e - and in a-day a iabili y was unde 14% in all
cases. Reco e y a es o spiked samples anged om 94 o 113%. The me hod was
sa is ac o ily applied o he de e mina ion o compounds in human placen al issue samples
collec ed a he momen o deli e y om 25 andomly selec ed women.
Keywo ds: Pe luo ina ed compounds; Placen al issue; Dispe si e solid phase ex ac ion;
UHPLC–MS/MS
_________________
* Co esponding au ho
2
E–mail add ess: [email p o ec ed] (A. Za a-Gómez)
3
1. In oduc ion
Exposu e o xenobio ics du ing p egnancy is ine i able. They a e likely o ac no only
di ec ly on he e us bu also on he placen a i sel which may a ec i s abili y o suppo
p egnancy [1]. Endoc ine dis up o s (EDs) a e ubiqui ous in he en i onmen a ound us and as
a consequence in human bodies. The e is a g owing conce n abou he po en ial heal h e ec s
o exposu e o a ious en i onmen al chemicals du ing p egnancy and in ancy. Mono-2-
e hylhexyl ph hala e (MEHP), oc ylphenol (OP), 4-nonylphenol (4-NP) o polyb omina ed
diphenyl e he s (PBDEs) ha e been de ec ed in physiologically ele an compa men s wi hin
p egnan women and he de eloping e uses, such as ma e nal u ine, co d blood, b eas milk,
meconium, placen a and amnio ic luid in se e al s udies [2-8], showing ha p egnan women
and hei e uses a e exposed o hose chemicals.
Pe luo ina ed compounds (PFCs) ha e been ecognized as an impo an class o
po en ial con aminan s by Public Heal h Au ho i ies due o i s pe sis ence, bioaccumula i e
e ec and oxici y [9]. Since hei i s p oduc ion in 1947, PFCs ha e been used in a wide
ange o comme cial and indus ial applica ions such as polyme s, me al pla ing and cleaning,
su ac an s, lub ican s, pes icides, coa ing o mula ions, inks, a nishes, i e igh ing oam, and
s ain/wa e epellen s o lea he , pape and ex iles. Wo ldwide human exposu e o PFCs has
been con i med [10-13]. Fo he gene al popula ion he majo sou ce o con amina ion a ises
om ood and some imes d inking wa e [12, 14-16]. Human exposu e also a ises om
indoo and ambien ai and house dus . Pe luo ooc ane sul ona e (PFOS) is gene ally he
mos abundan PFCs ound in humans, he second usually being pe luo ooc anoic acid
(PFOA) [9]. An ad anced es ima ion (2012) o die a y exposu e was ~5–10 ng/kg bw/day o
PFOS, 4–7 ng/kg bw/day o PFOA, he mos impo an con ibu o s being ish and sea ood,
ui and ui p oduc s [17]. Child en, especially oddle s, a e mo e exposed han adul s (2-3
imes highe ) on a body weigh basis, due o highe ela i e ood consump ion and o hand- o-
mou h ans e om imp egna ed ca pe s and inges ion o dus , esul ing in highe PFCs
se um le els han o adul s [14, 18, 19]. In u e o and pos na al exposu es a e o pa icula
conce n. PFCs c oss he placen al ba ie , exposing neona es ia hei mo he 's blood [20-22].
In addi ion, i s scien i ic e idences sugges ing ha PFCs would be esponsible o
ep oduc i e diso de s in humans ha e been ecen ly published [23-29]. Bu enho e al. [26]
published a wo k on he ole o PFCs in he onse o heal h oubles a ec ing he ep oduc i e
unc ion when exposu e occu s du ing c i ical s ages o he de elopmen , i.e. he pe ina al
4
pe iod. Fei e al. [25] obse ed an associa ion be ween high se um le els o PFOS and PFOA
and a longe ime o p egnancy. E ec s o in u e o exposu e o PFCS on he emale
ep oduc i e unc ions ha e also been epo ed. In a ecen s udy, ca ied ou by K is ensen
and co-wo ke s [29], daugh e s who we e exposed in u e o o le els o PFOA ha we e
highe han he e e ence g oup showed a la e age o mena che. In pa icula , a numbe o
animal oxicology s udies ha e shown ha exposu e o PFOS and PFOA can al e o a ian
unc ion [27] and a ec he de elopmen o mamma y gland issue [28].
In his con ex , he cha ac e iza ion o he PFCs ans e , i any, om he mo he o he
e us ( h ough placen a) and/o o he newbo n ( h ough b eas eeding) is acu ely expec ed.
Biomoni o ing da a e lec ing he in e nal PFCs exposu e le els in he gene al popula ion
ha e al eady been p o ided in b eas milk, ma e nal and co d se um om di e en
s a es/coun ies [30]. Howe e , he e is limi ed da a on he in u e o exposu e le els o
newbo ns o hese PFCs so a . Mos o he esea ches on placen al ans e o PFCs we e
conduc ed by animal o in i o expe imen s ins ead o human s udies. The e o e, he
alida ion o analy ical me hods o de e mine PFCs in human placen al issue is o special
scien i ic in e es .
The p e e ed echnique o he analysis o hese compounds has been high-pe o mance
liquid ch oma og aphy- andem mass spec ome y in nega i e elec osp ay ioniza ion mode
(LC/ESI–MS/MS) [31-32]. The isola ion o analy es om his complex biological ma ix is a
c i ical aspec e en when a ch oma og aphic echnique is employed due o selec i i y and
sensi i i y issues. Some echniques such as mic owa e-assis ed ex ac ion (MAE) o
p essu ized liquid ex ac ion (PLE) could be good al e na i es o maximize he ex ac ion
e iciency, bu he applica ion o hese echniques in ol es d as ic condi ions, speci ic
echnical esou ces and no e y clean inal ex ac s including ion supp ession, which is
c i ical when mass spec ome y is employed as de ec ion echnique [33]. Sol en ex ac ion
wi h o ex homogeniza ion ollowed by a clean-up o he ex ac based on dispe si e solid-
phase ex ac ion (d-SPE) was chosen in ou s udy as ex ac ion echnique because i s
simplici y, low cos , sho ex ac ion ime, low olume o sol en s equi ed and i s widesp ead
use in mos o he labo a o ies ocused on ou ine analyses.
To ou knowledge, he e is a lack o published li e a u e on PFCs de e mina ion in
placen al issue. The aim o he p esen wo k was o alida e a as , simple, accu a e and
sensi i e UHPLC–MS/MS me hod o he de e mina ion o PFCs in eeze-d ied human
placen al issue samples. A e alida ion, he me hod was sa is ac o ily applied o de e mine
he ee con en o a ge compounds in samples collec ed om 25 unknown olun ee s.
5
2. Expe imen al
2.1. Chemicals and eagen s
All eagen s we e analy ical g ade unless o he wise speci ied. Wa e (18.2 MΩ cm) was
pu i ied using a Milli-Q sys em om Millipo e (Bed o d, MA, USA). Pe luo obu anoic acid
(PFBuA) (98%), pe luo open anoic acid (PFPeA) (97%), pe luo ohexanoic acid (PFHxA) (≥
97%), pe lu o ohep anoic acid (PFHpA) (99%), pe lu o ooc anoic acid (PFOA) (96%), and
pe luo ooc anesul onic acid (PFOS) (≥ 98%) and pe luo o-n-[1,2,3,4-13C4]oc anoic acid
(MPFOA) we e pu chased om Sigma-Ald ich (Mad id, Spain). S ock solu ions o each
compound, a a concen a ion o 1000 mg L-1, we e p epa ed in me hanol and s o ed a -20 ºC.
Wo king solu ions we e p epa ed by dilu ing he s ock s anda d solu ions in me hanol o in
he ini ial mobile phase immedia ely be o e use. These solu ions we e s o ed a 4 ºC and
p epa ed esh weekly. All solu ions we e s o ed in da k glass bo les o p e en
pho odeg ada ion. Anhyd ous magnesium sul a e was p o ided by Pan eac (Ba celona,
Spain). PSA so ben (p ima y seconda y amine, 40–60 µm) was pu chased om Scha lab
(Ba celona, Spain) and BAKERBONDs oc adecyl C18 so ben (40 µm pa icle size) was
p o ided by J. T. Bake (De en e , The Ne he lands). LC–MS g ade me hanol, wa e and
ace oni ile, ace ic acid and ammonia (25%, w/ ) we e pu chased om Sigma-Ald ich.
2.2. Ins umen a ion and so wa e
UHPLC–MS/MS analysis was pe o med using a Wa e s Acqui y UPLCTM H-Class
(Wa e s, Manches e , UK), consis ing o Acqui y UPLCTM bina y sol en manage and
Acqui y UPLCTM sample manage . A Xe o TQS andem quad upole mass spec ome e
(Wa e s) equipped wi h an o hogonal Z-sp ayTM elec osp ay ioniza ion (ESI) sou ce was
used o PFCs de ec ion. An Acqui y UPLC® BEH C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 µm pa icle
size) and a CORTECS UPLCTM C18 (Wa e s) column (50 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.6 µm pa icle
size) om Wa e s (UK) we e assayed as ch oma og aphic columns. Placen al issue samples
we e eeze-d ied using a SCANVAC CoolSa e™ eezed ye (Lynge, Denma k). A B anson
digi al soni ie (Danbu y, CT, USA), a o ex-mixe (IKA, S au en, Ge many), an ul asound-
HD ba h (Selec a, Ba celona, Spain), a Spec a uge™ 24D cen i uge om Labne
6
In e na ional, Inc. (New Je sey, USA) and a sample concen a o (S ua , S a o dshi e, UK)
we e also used. S a g aphics Plus so wa e e sion 5.1 (S a poin Technologies Inc., Vi ginia,
USA) was used o s a is ical ea men o da a.
2.3. Sample collec ion and s o age
Placen a issue samples we e ob ained om heal h women li ing in G anada, Spain.
Samples we e anonymized, ozen a -20 ºC and s o ed un il analysis in ou labo a o y. The
s udy was pe o med in compliance wi h he E hical P inciples o Medical Resea ch
In ol ing Human Subjec s issued by he Wo ld Medical Associa ion, and all olun ee s
signed he in o med consen o m. Human placen al issue samples we e collec ed om
olun ee s a he momen o deli e y. In o de o ensu e he homogenei y and
ep esen a i eness o he whole placen a issue, each one was accu a ely examined, weighed
and agmen ed. Then, hal o he placen a (including ma e nal and e al sides and cen al and
pe iphe al pa s) was placed in he glass con aine o a mixe o i s homogeniza ion. Once
homogenized, aliquo s o 25 g we e s o ed ozen a –86 ºC wi hin 90 min o i s collec ion.
Samples we e anonymized o p ese e he con iden iali y o pa ien s. All olun ee s signed
hei in o med consen o pa icipa e in he s udy.
Be o e p ocessing, placen al issue aliquo s we e addi ionally homogenized using an
ul asonic spindle. The con aine was placed in a glass ull o ice in o de o a oid sample
hea ing and he spindle was in di ec con ac wi h he placen al issue. Ul asound se ing
consis ed in pulses du y cycles o 30 s ollowed by 30 s wi hou sonica ion, un il comple e 5
min o e ec i e adia ion. Once he samples we e homogenized, hey we e ozen a −86 ºC
and s o ed con iden ially and anonymously un il analysis.
2.4. Basic p ocedu e
2.4.1. P epa a ion o spiked samples
Due o he absence o ce i ied ma e ials o hese compounds in his ma ix, 6 g o
spiked sample we e p epa ed con aining he analy es a se en di e en concen a ion le els,
om 0.025 o 62.5 ng g-1, o calib a ion s anda ds and 1.25, 6.25, 12.5 and 25 ng g-1, o
quali y con ol and alida ion o he me hod. Spiked samples we e accu a ely s i ed and
sligh ly hea ed (35 ºC) o homogenize. Then, aliquo s o 1 g we e weigh ed in 8 mL glass
7
ials and o i ied wi h 200 µL o a me hanolic solu ion (62.5 ng mL-1) o he su oga e
MPFOA ( inal concen a ion 12.5 ng g-1 in placen al issue). A e shaking o 10 min, he
spiked samples we e eady o he expe imen s.
2.4.2. Sample ea men
An aliquo o placen al issue sample (1 g) was weighed in an 8 mL glass ial, o i ied
wi h 200 µL o me hanol con aining 62.5 ng mL-1 o MPFOA, shaken o 5 min and eeze-
d ied. The sample was homogenized wi h 5 mL o ace oni ile in o ex o 1 min. Then, he
mix u e was cen i uged o 10 min a 4050 × g.
In o de o dec ease he ma ix co-ex ac i es in he ex ac ha could cause he ma ix
e ec , a clean-up o he ex ac based on d-SPE was ca ied ou . The ex ac was ans e ed
o an 8 mL polyp opylene conical ube con aining 108 mg o C18 so ben . The mix u e was
hand-shaken o 2 min and cen i uged o 5 min a 4050 4050 × g. The o ganic phase
(ace oni ile) con aining he analy es was sepa a ed in o a glass ial and hen e apo a ed unde
a ni ogen s eam a oom empe a u e and he inal esidue was dissol ed wi h 250 µL o he
ini ial mobile phase. A e s i ing o 30 s in o ex and cen i uga ion o 5 min a 16,300 ×
g, he sample was eady o be injec ed in o he LC sys em.
2.4.3. Ul a-high pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy– andem mass spec ome y condi ions
Ch oma og aphic sepa a ion o compounds was pe o med using a CORTECS UPLCTM
C18 (Wa e s) column (50 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.6 µm pa icle size). The compounds we e
sepa a ed using a g adien mobile phase consis ing o a bu e solu ion ace ic acid/ammonium
ace a e (pH 4.4) (sol en A) and me hanol (sol en B). G adien condi ions we e: 0.0-5.0 min,
20-100% B and back o 20% in 0.1 min and kep o 1.9 min o equilib a e he column. Flow
a e was 0.3 mL min-1. The injec ion olume was 10 µL. The column empe a u e was
main ained a 40 ºC. To al un ime was 7 min.
The andem mass spec ome e was ope a ed in he selec ed eac ion moni o ing (SRM)
mode and Q1 and Q3 quad upoles we e se a uni mass esolu ion. ESI was pe o med in
nega i e ion mode. The ion sou ce empe a u e was main ained a 150 ºC. Ins umen
pa ame e s we e as ollows: capilla y ol age, 0.60 kV; sou ce empe a u e, 150 ºC;
desol a ion empe a u e, 500 ºC; cone gas low, 150 L h-1; desol a ion gas low, 500 L h-1;
collision gas low, 0.15 mL min-1, and nebulize gas low, 7.0 ba . Ni ogen (99.995%) was
8
used as cone and desol a ion gas, and a gon (99.999%) was used as a collision gas. Dwell
ime was 25 ms. Table 1 shows he pa ame e s and he mass ansi ions o each compound.
Table 1
2.4.4. Me hod alida ion
Valida ion in e ms o linea i y, selec i i y, accu acy ( ueness and p ecision) and
sensi i i y, was pe o med acco ding o he US Food and D ugs Adminis a ion (FDA)
guideline o bioanaly ical assay alida ion [34].
Linea i y o he calib a ion g aphs was es ed using he de e mina ion coe icien s (%, R2)
and he P- alues o he lack-o - i es (%, Plo ) [35]. The speci ici y o he me hod was
de e mined by compa ing he ch oma og ams o blank wi h he co esponding spiked
placen al issue. Due o he absence o ce i ied ma e ials, in o de o e alua e he ueness and
he ep oducibili y o he me hod, a s udy wi h spiked placen a samples, a h ee
concen a ions le els (6.25, 12.5 and 25 ng g-1 o PFBuA, PFPeA and PFHxA and 1.25, 6.25
and 12.5 ng g-1 o PFHpA, PFOA and PFOS) was pe o med. P ecision, exp essed as ela i e
s anda d de ia ion (%, RSD) was de e mined om iplica e spiked samples du ing he same
day and in six di e en days, and he ueness was e alua ed by a eco e y assay. The
eco e y o he es ed compounds in placen a samples was e alua ed by compa ing he known
concen a ion in spiked samples wi h he concen a ion o each compound de e mined using
he me hod p oposed. Finally, LODs and LOQs we e calcula ed by aking in o conside a ion
he s anda d de ia ion o esiduals, sy/x, he slope, b, o he calib a ion g aphs and an es ima e
so ob ained by ex apola ion o he s anda d de ia ion o he blank (Analy ical Me hods
Commi ee). The LOD was 3·so and he LOQ was 10·s0.
2.4.54. Quali y assu ance and quali y con ol
Validi y o he analy ical esul s was e i ied by some simple quali y assu ance and
quali y con ol (QA/QC) measu es. P ocedu al blanks we e injec ed o moni o o
backg ound con amina ion. Blanks we e p ocessed in he same way as he samples and
injec ed in o he UHPLC–MS/MS sys em. No quan i iable amoun s o a ge compounds we e
de ec ed. On he o he hand, in o de o e alua e possible con amina ions and he a iabili y o
he ins umen al analysis, s anda ds (spiked blank samples a 0 and 25 ng g-1) and a s anda d
in he ini ial mobile phase (100 ng mL-1) we e injec ed by iplica e e e y 20 samples.
9
3. Resul s and discussion
3.1. Liquid ch oma og aphic-mass spec ome ic analysis
A BEH C18 UPLCTM column (50 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 µm pa icle size) and a
CORTECS UPLCTM C18 (Wa e s) column (50 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.6 µm pa icle size) we e
es ed. Al hough bo h columns o e ed simila esolu ion o all he analy es in es iga ed, a
he e en ion ime o he analy es elu ed CORTECS UPLCTM column p o ided be e peak
shape in he sho es ime wi h, e en his las gene a ed p essu es 1000 psi lowe han BEH
C18 UPLCTM. Consequen ly, his column was he one we selec ed o u he expe imen s.
The e ec o he mobile phase on ch oma og aphic sepa a ion was also s udied. Ou aim
was o ob ain high sensi i i y and selec i i y in a sho ime. Fi s , he pH o he mobile phase
was s udied and deionized wa e wi h di e en addi i es was s udied as sol en A. Ace ic acid
( om 0% o 0.2%, / ), ammonia ( om 0% o 0.050%, w/ ) and mix u es o hem we e
assayed. Highe esponses and be e peak shapes we e ob ained using a mix u e o 1:1 ( / )
o ace ic acid (0.1%, / ) and ammonia (0.025% w/ ). MeOH, ACN and mix u es o hese
sol en s we e e alua ed as o ganic mobile phases (sol en B). MeOH was selec ed because o
he sensi i i y, peak shapes and sepa a ion achie ed. A linea g adien , as desc ibed in he
p e ious sec ion, was used. The injec ion olume was s udied in o de o enhance he
analy ical signal and consequen ly he LOD o he me hod. A ange om 2.5 o 10 µL was
analyzed and 10 µL was chosen as injec ion olume since a ma ked inc ease in sensi i i y
wi hou loss o esolu ion was ob ained. Finally, he inc ease o empe a u e om 30 o 50 ºC
did no imp o e signi ican ly he cha ac e is ics o ch oma og aphic me hod, he e o e 340 ºC
was chosen as op imum.
The MS/MS de ec ion me hod was se up by con inuous in usion o s anda d solu ions o
each indi idual compound (1 mg L-1) o op imize he esponse o he p ecu so ion. The mass
spec ome ic condi ions we e op imized o each compound. ESI and ESCI in e aces in
posi i e and nega i e modes we e e alua ed. ESI in e ace in nega i e mode was selec ed
because i showed highe sensi i i y o all compounds o in e es . Fo each compound wo
p oduc ions ( wo eac ions) we e moni o ed: one o quan i ica ion and he o he o
con i ma ion. The mos abundan ansi ion ion was selec ed o ob ain maximum sensi i i y
16
This s udy was suppo ed by he Regional Go e nmen o Andalusia (P ojec o Excellence
No. P09-CTS-4470) and by he Minis y o Economy and Compe i i eness (P ojec
CGL2013-44402-R). The au ho s a e g a e ul o Regional Go e nmen o Andalusia o he
ellowship g an ed o R. Rod íguez-Gómez and o Uni e si y o Se ille o he mobili y g an
awa ded o J. Ma ín.
17
Re e ences
[1] S. Ba baux, J.J. E wich, P.O. Fa a on, S. Gil, D. Gallo , T.G. Golos, A. Gonzalez-
Bulnes, J. Guibou denche, A.E. Heazell, T. Jansson, O. Lap é o e, R.M. Lewis, R.K.
Mille , D. Monk, B. No ako ic, C. Oudejans, M. Pa as , P. Peugne , C. P a e , H.
Pina , C.T. Robe s, W. Robinson, R. Sa e y, C. Salomon, A. Sex on, A.C. S a , M.
Su e , A. Ta ade, J. Wallace, C. Vaillancou , D. Vaiman, S.A. Wo on, G.E. Lash,
Placen a 36, Supplemen 1, T ophoblas Res. 29 (2015) S5eS10.
[2] K. Ka o, M.J. Sil a, L.L. Needham, A.M. Cala a , Quan i ying ph hala e me aboli es in
human meconium and semen using au oma ed o -line solid-phase ex ac ion coupled
wi h on-line SPE and iso ope-dilu ion high-pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy- andem
mass spec ome y, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 6651–6655.
[3] M.J. Sil a, J.A. Reidy, A.R. He be , J.L. J P eau, L.L. Needham, A.M. Cala a ,
De ec ion o ph hala e me aboli es in human amnio ic luid, B. En i on. Con am. Tox.
72 (2004) 1226–1231.
[4] M.L. Chen, C.C. Chang, Y.J. Shen, J.H. Hung, B.R. Guo, H.Y. Chuang, I.F. Mao,
Quan i ica ion o p ena al exposu e and ma e nal- e al ans e o nonylphenol,
Chemosphe e 73 (2008) 239–245.
[5] H.R. Chao, S.L. Wang, W.J. Lee, Y.F. Wang, O. Papke, Le els o polyb omina ed
diphenyl e he s (PBDEs) in b eas milk om cen al Taiwan and hei ela ion o in an
bi h ou come and ma e nal mens ua ion e ec s, En i on. In . 33 (2007) 239–245.
[6] B. Goma a, L. He e o, J.J Ramos, J.R. Ma eo, M.A. Fe nandez, J.F. Ga cía, M.J.
González, Dis ibu ion o polyb omina ed diphenyl e he s in human umbilical co d
se um, pa e nal se um, ma e nal se um, placen as, and b eas milk om Mad id
popula ion, Spain, En i on. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007) 6961–6968.
18
[7] Y. Kawashi o, H. Fuka a, M. Omo i-Inoue, K. Kubonoya, T. Jo aki, H. Takigami, S.
Sakai, C. Mo i, Pe ina al exposu e o b omina ed lame e a dan s and polychlo ina ed
biphenyls in Japan, Endoc . J. 55 (2008) 1071–1084.
[8] J.B. He bs man, A. Sjodin, M. Ku zon, S.A. Lede man, R.S. Jones, V. Rau, L.L.
Needham, D. Tang, M. Niedzwiecki, R.Y. Wang, F. Pe e a, P ena al exposu e o
PBDEs and neu ode elopmen , En i on. Heal h Pe sp. 118 (2010) 712–719.
[9] M.P. K a , J.G. Riess, Pe - and poly luo ina ed subs ances (PFASs): en i onmen al
challenges, Cu . Opin. Colloid In. 20 (2015) 192–212.
[10] OECD/UNEP Global PFC G oup, Syn hesis pape on pe and poly luo ina ed
chemicals. OECD; 2014. A ailable a :
h p://www.oecd.o g/chemicalsa e y/ isk-managemen /syn hesis-pape -on-pe -and-poly luo ina ed-chemicals.h m
(Visi ed 16/10/2015).
[11] Y.G. Zhao, C.K.C. Wong, M.H. Wong, En i onmen al con amina ion, human exposu e
and body loadings o pe luo ooc ane sul ona e (PFOS), ocusing on Asian coun ies,
Chemosphe e 89 (2012) 355–368.
[12] H. F omme, S.A. Ti lemie , W. Völkel, M. Wilhelm, D. Twa della, Pe luo ina ed
compounds - exposu e assessmen o he gene al popula ion in wes e n coun ies, In . J.
Hyg. En i . Heal. 212 (2009) 239–270.
[13] G.W. Olsen, C.C. Lange, M.E. Elle son, D.C. Mai , T.R. Chu ch, C.L. Goldbe g, R.M.
He on, Z. Medhdizadehkashi, J.B. Nobile i, J.A. Rios, W.K. Reagen, L.R. Zobel,
Tempo al ends o pe luo oalkyl concen a ions in Ame ican Red C oss adul blood
dono s, 2000–2010, En i on. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012) 6330–6338.
[14] W. D'Hollande , P. de Voog , W. de Coen, L. Be oe s, Pe luo ina ed subs ances in
human ood and o he sou ces o human exposu e, Re . En i on. Con am. T. 208
(2010) 179–215.
[15] R. Ves e g en, I.T. Cousins, T acking he pa hways o human exposu e o
pe luo oca boxyla es, En i on. Sci. Technol. 43 (2009) 5565–5575.
19
[16] C. Sch ö e -Ke mani, J. Mülle , H. Jü ling, A. Con ad, C. Schul e, Re ospec i e
moni o ing o pe luo oca boxyla es and pe luo osul ona es in human plasma a chi ed
by he Ge man En i onmen al Specimen Bank, In . J. Hyg. En i . Heal. 216 (2013)
633–640.
[17] Eu opean Food Sa e y Au ho i y (EFSA), Pe luo oalkyla ed subs ances in ood:
occu ence and die a y exposu e, EFSA Jou nal 10 (2012) 2743–2798.
[18] M. Shoeib, T. Ha ne , G.M. Webs e , S.C. Lee, Indoo sou ces o poly- and
pe luo ina ed compounds (PFCS) in Vancou e , Canada: implica ions o human
exposu e, En i on. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 7999–8005.
[19] T. Zhang, H.W. Sun, Q. Wu, X.Z. Zhang, S.H. Yun, K. Kannan, Pe luo ochemicals in
mea , eggs and indoo dus in China: assessmen o sou ces and pa hways o human
exposu e o pe luo ochemicals, En i on. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 3572–3579.
[20] H. Lee, A.G. Te lin, S.A. Mabu y, S.A. Mabu y, Fa e o poly luo oalkyl phospha e
dies e s and hei me aboli es in biosolids-applied soil: biodeg ada ion and plan up ake
in g eenhouse and ield expe imen s, En i on. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014) 340–349.
[21] H. F omme, C. Mosch, M. Mo o i z, I. Alba-Alejand e, S. Boehme , M. Ki anoglu, F.
Fabe , I. Hannibal, O. Genzel-Bo o iczény, B. Kole zko, W. Völkel, P e- and pos na al
exposu e o pe luo ina ed compounds (PFCs), En i on. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 7123–
7129.
[22] S. Kim, K. Choi, K. Ji, J. Seo, Y. Kho, J. Pa k, e al., T ans-placen al ans e o hi een
pe luo ina ed compounds and ela ions wi h e al hy oid ho mones, En i on. Sci.
Technol. 45 (2011) 7465–7472.
[23] R. Renne , G owing, conce n o e pe luo ina ed chemicals, En i on. Sci. Technol. 35
(2001) 154A–160A.
20
[24] U. No ds öm Joensen, R. Bossi, H. Le e s, A.A. Jensen, N.E. Skakkebaek, N.
Jo gensen, Do pe luo oalkyl compounds impai human semen quali y? En i on. Heal h
Pe sp. 117 (2009) 923–927.
[25] C. Fei, J.K. McLaughlin, L. Lipwo h, J. Olsen, Ma e nal le els o pe luo ina ed
chemicals and sub ecundi y, Hum. Rep od. 24 (2009) 1200–1205.
[26] J.L. Bu enho , G.L. Kennedy, S.R. F ame, J.C. O'Conno , R.G. Yo k, The ep oduc i e
oxicology o ammonium pe luo ooc anoa e (APFO) in he a , Toxicology 196 (2004)
95–116.
[27] A. Zhai, J. Ax , E.C. Hamil on, E. Koehle , H.N. 3 d Lo o n, Assessing gonadal
unc ion a e childhood o a ian su ge y, J. Pedia . Su g. 47 (2012) 1272–1279.
[28] S.S. Whi e, S.E. Fen on, E.P. Hines, Endoc ine dis up ing p ope ies o pe luo ooc anoic
acid, J. S e oid Biochem. 127 (2011) 16–26.
[29] S.L. K is ensen, C.H. Ramlau-Hansen, E. E ns , S.F. Olsen, J.P. Bonde, A. Ves ed, T.I.
Halldo sson, G. Beche , L.S. Haug, G. To , Long- e m e ec s o p ena al exposu e o
pe luo oalkyl subs ances on emale ep oduc ion, Hum. Rep od. 28 (2013) 3337–3348.
[30] R. Ca iou, B. Vey and, A. Yamada, A. Be ebi, D. Zalko, S. Du and, C. Pollono, P.
Ma chand, J.C. Leblanc, J.P. An ignac, B. Le Bizec, Pe luo oalkyl acid (PFAA) le els
and p o iles in b eas milk, ma e nal and co d se um o F ench women and hei
newbo ns, En i on. In . 84 (2015) 71–81.
[31] A. Kä man, G. Linds öm, T ends, analy ical me hods and p ecision in he
de e mina ion o pe luo oalkyl acids in human milk, T ends Anal. Chem. 46 (2013)
118–128.
[32] A.L. Cap io i, C. Ca alie e, A. Ca azzini, P. Foglia, A. Laganà, S. Pio esana, R.
Sampe i, High pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy andem mass spec ome y
de e mina ion o pe luo ina ed acids in cow milk, J. Ch oma og . A 1319 (2013) 72–
79.
21
[33] F. Vela-So ia, O. Balles e os, F.J. Camino-Sánchez, A. Za a-Gómez, L. Balles e os, A.
Na alón, Ma ix solid phase dispe sion o he ex ac ion o selec ed endoc ine
dis up ing chemicals om human placen al issue p io o UHPLC-MS/MS analysis,
Mic ochem. J. 118 (2015) 32–39.
[34] Guidance o Indus y, Bioanaly ical Me hod Valida ion, U.S. Depa men o Heal h
and Human Se ices, Food and D ug Adminis a ion, Cen e o D ug E alua ion and
Resea ch (CDER), Cen e o Ve e ina y Medicine (CVM), 2001.
[35] Analy ical Me hods Commi ee, Is my calib a ion linea ? Analys 119 (1994) 2363–
2366.
[36] R. Rod íguez-Gómez, N. Do i al-Ga cía, A. Za a-Gómez, F.J. Camino-Sánchez, O.
Balles e os, A. Na alón, New me hod o he de e mina ion o pa abens and bisphenol
A in human milk samples using ul asound-assis ed ex ac ion and clean-up wi h
dispe si e so ben s p io o UHPLC–MS/MS analysis J. Ch oma og . B 992 (2015) 47–
55.
[37] A.G. González, M.A. He ado , A p ac ical guide o analy ical me hod alida ion,
including measu emen unce ain y and accu acy p o iles, T ends Anal. Chem. 26
(2007) 227–238.
[38] F. Pé ez, M. Llo ca, M. Fa é, D. Ba celó, Au oma ed analysis o pe luo ina ed
compounds in human hai and u ine samples by u bulen low ch oma og aphy coupled
o andem mass spec ome y, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402 (2012) 2369–2378.
22
Figu e cap ions
Fig. 1. In luence o sol en on he ex ac ion p ocedu e (n = 3).
Fig. 2. In luence o he ex ac ion modali y ( o ex o ul asound assis ed) on he eco e ies
(n = 3).
Fig. 3. S anda dized main e ec Pa e o cha s o he Box–Behnken design. (+) Posi i e
e ec s on he esponse, (-) nega i e e ec s on he esponse. Ve ical line shows he
limi o decision o conside he signi icance o he ac o s (based on he s anda dized
e ec = es ima ed e ec /s anda d e o , a 95% o con idence le el).
Fig. 4. UHPLC–MS/MS ch oma og ams o : (A) a spiked blank (25 ng g-1 o each analy e);
(B) a posi i e placen al issue sample con amina ed wi h PFOA and PFOS (mo he
24).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
21
Figu e cap ions
Fig. 1. In luence o sol en on he ex ac ion p ocedu e (n = 3).
Fig. 2. In luence o he ex ac ion modali y ( o ex o ul asound assis ed) on he eco e ies
(n = 3).
Fig. 3. S anda dized main e ec Pa e o cha s o he Box–Behnken design. (+) Posi i e
e ec s on he esponse, (-) nega i e e ec s on he esponse. Ve ical line shows he
limi o decision o conside he signi icance o he ac o s (based on he s anda dized
e ec = es ima ed e ec /s anda d e o , a 95% o con idence le el).
Fig. 4. Response su ace plo s co esponding o he desi abili y unc ion when op imizing
he ollowing pai o ac o s om he clean-up s ep wi h d-SPE so ben s: (A) amoun
o PSA s. amoun o C18; (B) amoun o MgSO4 s. amoun o C18 and (C) amoun
o MgSO4 s. amoun o C18. Resul s we e e alua ed using a 95% con idence
in e al.
Fig. 5. UHPLC–MS/MS ch oma og ams o : (A) a spiked blank (25 ng g-1 o each analy e);
(B) a posi i e placen al issue sample con amina ed wi h PFOA and PFOS (mo he
24).
Table 1
Op imized MS/MS pa ame e s o SRM analysis.
Name
Abb e ia ion
Re en ion ime
(min)
P ecu so
Ion (m/z)
SRM 1a
(m/z)
SRM 2b
(m/z)
CV
(V)
CE
(eV)
Pe luo obu anoic acid
PFPuA
1.60
213
169
51.6
36
20
Pe luo open anoic acid
PFPeA
3.18
263
219
89.7
36
20
Pe luo ohexanoic acid
PFHxA
3.98
313
269
119
36
20
Pe luo ohep anoic acid
PFHpA
4.49
363
319
333
36
20
Pe luo ooc anoic acid
PFOA
4.87
413
369
194
36
20
Pe luo ooc ane sul ona e
PFOS
5.18
499
80
52
36
20
Pe luo o-n-[1,2,3,4-13C4]oc anoic acid
MPFOA
4.87
417
371
168
36
20
CV: Cone ol age (V); CE: Collision ene gy (eV); a: SRM ansi ion used o quan i ica ion; b: SRM ansi ion used o con i ma ion
Table
Table 2
Analy ical and s a is ical pa ame e s.
PFBuA
PFPeA
PFHxA
PFHpA
PFOA
PFOS
bMP (g ng-1)
0.066
0.12
0.24
0.19
0.19
0.59
sbMP (g ng-1)
8.5·10-4
9.4·10-4
3.1·10-3
2.2·10-3
2.2·10-3
6.9·10-3
bPT (g ng-1)
0.036
0.11
0.24
0.20
0.20
0.30
sbPT (g ng-1)
1.1·10-3
6.4·10-3
4.4·10-3
7.0·10-3
7.0·10-3
1.1·10-2
s uden
13
1
2
1
1
13
% R2
99.9
99.3
99.9
99.8
99.8
99.6
LOD (ng g-1)
1.5
2
0.5
0.03
0.03
0.03
LOQ (ng g-1)
4
6
2
0.08
0.08
0.08
LDR (ng g-1)
4.0-62.5
6.0-62.5
1.8-62.5
0.08-62.5
0.08-62.5
0.08-62.5
MP: Mobile phase; PT: Placen al issue; b: slope; sb: slope s anda d de ia ion; R2: de e mina ion
coe icien ; LOD: limi o de ec ion; LOQ: limi o quan i ica ion; LDR: linea dynamic ange
Table
Figu e
Click he e o download high esolu ion image
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
21
Figu e cap ions
Fig. 1. In luence o sol en on he ex ac ion p ocedu e (n = 3).
Fig. 2. In luence o he ex ac ion modali y ( o ex o ul asound assis ed) on he eco e ies
(n = 3).
Fig. 3. S anda dized main e ec Pa e o cha s o he Box–Behnken design. (+) Posi i e
e ec s on he esponse, (-) nega i e e ec s on he esponse. Ve ical line shows he
limi o decision o conside he signi icance o he ac o s (based on he s anda dized
e ec = es ima ed e ec /s anda d e o , a 95% o con idence le el).
Fig. 4. Response su ace plo s co esponding o he desi abili y unc ion when op imizing
he ollowing pai o ac o s om he clean-up s ep wi h d-SPE so ben s: (A) amoun
o PSA s. amoun o C18; (B) amoun o MgSO4 s. amoun o C18 and (C) amoun
o MgSO4 s. amoun o C18. Resul s we e e alua ed using a 95% con idence
in e al.
Fig. 5. UHPLC–MS/MS ch oma og ams o : (A) a spiked blank (25 ng g-1 o each analy e);
(B) a posi i e placen al issue sample con amina ed wi h PFOA and PFOS (mo he
24).
Table 1
Op imized MS/MS pa ame e s o SRM analysis.
Name
Abb e ia ion
Re en ion ime
(min)
P ecu so
Ion (m/z)
SRM 1a
(m/z)
SRM 2b
(m/z)
CV
(V)
CE
(eV)
Pe luo obu anoic acid
PFPuA
1.60
213
169
51.6
36
20
Pe luo open anoic acid
PFPeA
3.18
263
219
89.7
36
20
Pe luo ohexanoic acid
PFHxA
3.98
313
269
119
36
20
Pe luo ohep anoic acid
PFHpA
4.49
363
319
333
36
20
Pe luo ooc anoic acid
PFOA
4.87
413
369
194
36
20
Pe luo ooc ane sul ona e
PFOS
5.18
499
80
52
36
20
Pe luo o-n-[1,2,3,4-13C4]oc anoic acid
MPFOA
4.87
417
371
168
36
20
CV: Cone ol age (V); CE: Collision ene gy (eV); a: SRM ansi ion used o quan i ica ion; b: SRM ansi ion used o con i ma ion
Table
Table 2
Analy ical and s a is ical pa ame e s.
PFBuA
PFPeA
PFHxA
PFHpA
PFOA
PFOS
bMP (g ng-1)
0.066
0.12
0.24
0.19
0.19
0.59
sbMP (g ng-1)
8.5·10-4
9.4·10-4
3.1·10-3
2.2·10-3
2.2·10-3
6.9·10-3
bPT (g ng-1)
0.036
0.11
0.24
0.20
0.20
0.30
sbPT (g ng-1)
1.1·10-3
6.4·10-3
4.4·10-3
7.0·10-3
7.0·10-3
1.1·10-2
s uden
13
1
2
1
1
13
% R2
99.9
99.3
99.9
99.8
99.8
99.6
LOD (ng g-1)
1.5
2
0.5
0.03
0.03
0.03
LOQ (ng g-1)
4
6
2
0.08
0.08
0.08
LDR (ng g-1)
4.0-62.5
6.0-62.5
1.8-62.5
0.08-62.5
0.08-62.5
0.08-62.5
MP: Mobile phase; PT: Placen al issue; b: slope; sb: slope s anda d de ia ion; R2: de e mina ion
coe icien ; LOD: limi o de ec ion; LOQ: limi o quan i ica ion; LDR: linea dynamic ange
Table
Table 3
Reco e y assay, p ecision and ueness o a ge compounds in placen al issue.
Compound
Spiked (ng g-1)
Found (ng g-1) (SD)
RSD (%)
Reco e y (%)
PFBuA
6.25
6.02 (1)
14
96
12.5
12.8 (2)
12
103
25
28 (2)
6
113
PFPeA
6.25
6.61 (1)
9
106
12.5
12.3 (2)
10
98
25
24 (3)
9
94
PFHxA
6.25
6.44 (1)
10
103
12.5
12.4 (2)
12
99
25
23 (3)
12
94
PFHpA
1.25
1.32 (0.1)
1
105
6.25
6.24 (1)
4
100
12.5
11.8 (1)
12
95
PFOA
1.25
1.30 (0.1)
1
104
6.25
6.24 (1)
4
100
12.5
11.8 (1)
12
95
PFOS
1.25
1.30 (0.1)
1
104
6.25
6.11 (1)
13
98
12.5
12.6 (2)
14
101
SD: S anda d de ia ion; RSD: Rela i e s anda d de ia ion
Table
Table 4
Concen a ions o PFCs de e mined in he placen a samples.
Sample
*Found amoun (ng g-1) (SD)
PFBuA
PFPeA
PFHxA
PFHpA
PFOA
PFOS
Mo he 01
D
ND
D
ND
D
D
Mo he 02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 04
ND
ND
D
ND
ND
1.1 (0.01)
Mo he 05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D
Mo he 06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D
Mo he 07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0 (0.01)
Mo he 08
30 (2)
ND
4.9 (0.5)
ND
D
ND
Mo he 09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2 (0.01)
Mo he 10
D
ND
D
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D
Mo he 14
ND
ND
D
D
D
D
Mo he 15
28 (1.5)
ND
5.1 (0.4)
ND
ND
D
Mo he 16
ND
ND
D
ND
ND
D
Mo he 17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 18
ND
ND
D
ND
D
1.1 (0.01)
Mo he 19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 20
D
ND
D
ND
ND
D
Mo he 21
D
ND
ND
D
0.37 (0.03)
1.2 (0.01)
Mo he 22
ND
ND
ND
D
ND
ND
Mo he 23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mo he 24
ND
ND
ND
D
0.37 (0.02)
0.21 (0.01)
Mo he 25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND: below limi o de ec ion; D: below he limi o quan i ica ion bu abo e he limi o de ec ion
* Mean o six de e mina ions
Table
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
PFBuA PFPeA PFHxA PFHpA PFOA PFOS
Reco e y (%)
Ace one
Ace oni ile
E hyl ace a e
Figu e
Click he e o download high esolu ion image
Figu e
Click he e o download high esolu ion image