scieee Open visual document viewer

On characterizations of classical polynomials

Álvarez Nodarse, Renato

Abstract

It is well known that the classical families of Jacobi, Laguerre, Hermite, and Bessel polynomials are characterized as eigenvectors of a second order linear differential operator with polynomial coefficients, Rodrigues formula, etc. In this paper we present an unified study of the classical discrete polynomials and q-polynomials of the q-Hahn tableau by using the difference calculus on linear-type lattices. We obtain in a straightforward way several characterization theorems for the classical discrete and q-polynomials of the q-Hahn tableau. Finally, a detailed discussion of the Marcelln et. al. characterization is presented.

Full text

ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE Abs ac . I is well known ha he classical amilies o Jacobi, La- gue e, He mi e, and Bessel polynomials a e cha ac e ized as eigen ec- o s o a second o de linea di e en ial ope a o wi h polynomial co- e icien s, Rod igues o mula, e c. In his pape we p esen an uni ied s udy o he classical disc e e polynomials and q-polynomials o he q- Hahn ableau by using he di e ence calculus on linea - ype la ices. We ob ain in a s aigh o wa d way se e al cha ac e iza ion heo ems o he classical disc e e and q-polynomials o he q-Hahn ableau. Fi- nally, a de ailed discussion o he Ma celln e . al. cha ac e iza ion is p esen ed. 1. In oduc ion The classical polynomials ( hose o He mi e, Lague e, Jacobi, and Bessel) a e he mos impo an ins ances o o hogonal polynomials. One o he easons is because hey sa is y no only a h ee- e m ecu ence ela ion (TTRR) xPn(x) = αnPn+1(x) + βnPn(x) + γnPn−1(x), γn6= 0, P−1(x) = 0, P0(x) = 1,(1.1) bu also o he use ul p ope ies: hey a e he eigen ec o s o a second o de linea di e en ial equa ion wi h polynomial coe icien s, hei de i a i es also cons i u e an o hogonal amily, hei gene a ion unc ions can be gi en explici ly, among o he s (see o ins ances [1, 8, 24, 25] o he mo e ecen wo k [3]). Among all hese p ope ies he e a e e y impo an ones ha cha ac e ize he classical amilies. In ac no e e y p ope y cha ac e izes he classical polynomials. The simples example is he TTRR (1.1). I is well known (see e.g. [8]) ha he TTRR cha ac e izes he o hogonal polynomials i γn6= 0 o all n∈N. This is he so-called Fa a d Theo em ( o a e iew see [18]). Ne e heless he e exis se e al amilies ha sa is y he TTRR bu no a linea di e en ial equa ion wi h polynomial coe icien s, o a Rod igues- ype o mula. In ac only ew amilies o o hogonal polynomials sa is y hese p ope ies as we will show. Fo e iews on he cha ac e iza ion heo ems see [1, 3, 8]. 2000 Ma hema ics Subjec Classi ica ion. 33C45,33D45. Key wo ds and ph ases. classical polynomials, q-Hahn ableau, disc e e polynomials, cha ac e iza ion heo ems. 1 2 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE The oldes cha ac e iza ion is he so called Hahn cha ac e iza ion —unless his was i s ly obse ed and p o ed o he Jacobi, Lague e, and He mi e polynomials by N. Sonin in 1887—. In [11], Hahn p o ed he ollowing Theo em 1.1 (Sonin-Hahn [11, 19]).Gi en a sequence o o hogonal poly- nomials (Pn)n, i is a classical sequence i an only i he sequence o hei de i a i es (P0 n)nis an o hogonal sequence. In ac he ollowing heo em holds (see he nice su ey pape [1] and also [19, 20]) Theo em 1.2. The ollowing p ope ies a e equi alen : (1) (Pn)nis a classical o hogonal polynomial sequence (COPS), (2) The sequence o hei de i a i es (P0 n)nis an COPS1, (3) (Pn)nsa is ies he second o de linea di e en ial equa ion wi h poly- nomial coe icien s (Bochne [7]) σ(x)P00 n(x) + τ(x)P0 n(x) + λPn(x) = 0, whe e deg(σ)≤2,deg(τ) = 1, and a e independen o n, and λis a cons an independen o x. (4) (Pn)ncan be exp essed by he Rod igues o mula (T icomi [27] and C ye [9])Pn(x) = Bn ρ(x) dn dxn[σn(x)ρ(x)]. (5) The polynomials a e o hogonal wi h espec o a weigh unc ion ρ ha sa is ies he Pea son di e en ial equa ion [σ(x)ρ(x)]0=τ(x)ρ(x), whe e he polynomials σand τa e such ha deg(σ)≤2,deg(τ) = 1 (Hildeb and [14]). (6) The e exis h ee sequences (an)n,(bn)n,(cn)n, and a polynomial σ, deg(σ)≤2, such ha (Al-Salam & Chiha a [2]) σ(x)P0 n(x) = anPn+1(x) + bnPn(x) + cnPn−1(x), n ≥1.(1.2) (7) The e exis wo sequences ( n)nand (gn)nsuch ha he ollowing ela ion o he monic polynomials holds (Ma cell´an e al [19]) Pn(x) = P0 n+1(x) n+ 1 + nP0 n(x) + gnP0 n−1(x), n ≥1.(1.3) The p oo o his heo em can be ound in he appendix A. A na u al ex ension o he classical polynomials a e he so-called disc e e polynomials ( hose o Cha lie , Meixne , K a chuk, and Hahn, see e.g. [8, 24, 25]) and he q-polynomials (see e.g. [6, 24, 25]). In ac , Hahn in 1949 [13] posed he p oblem o inding all he o hogonal polynomial sequences ha sa is y he condi ions 2–5 om heo em 1.2 bu ins ead o using he 1No ice ha his is no he Hahn heo em. In he Hahn heo em he o hogonali y o bo h sequences i is impossed whe eas he e a mo e es ic i e condi ions is supposed: (Pn)no (P0 n)nis a classical amily. ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 3 de i a i es, he use he linea ope a o Lq,w Lq,w (x) = (qx +w)− (x) (q−1)x+w, q, w ∈R+. Hahn sol ed he p oblem o he case when q∈(0,1) and w= 0, ha leads o he q-Hahn ableau (see e.g. [16] and [5]). The case w=q= 1, leads o he classical disc e e polynomials o Cha lie , Meixne , K a chuk, and Hahn (see [8, 17, 24]). A comple e s udy o he cha ac e iza ion heo ems o hese wo cases has been pe o med using a unc ional app oach in he pape s [10] (disc e e case) and [21] (“q” case). The main aim o he p esen pape is wice: on one hand o p esen a e y simple and uni ied app oach o he a o e said wo cases using he heo y o di e ence equa ions on la ices p esen ed in [24, 25], and on he o he hand o comple e he s udy s a ed in [10, 20, 21]. The s uc u e o he pape is as ollows: In sec ion 2 we in oduce he “linea ” la ices x(s) and cha ac e ize hem. In sec ion 3 he cha ac e i- za ion heo em is p esen ed and p o ed o any linea - ype la ice and, as co olla ies, he co esponding heo ems o he uni o m la ice x(s) = sand he q-linea la ice x(s) = c1qs+c2a e ob ained. Finally, in Sec ion 4, we discuss each case in de ails as well as he classical case ( ha can be ob ained aking an app op ia e limi q→1−). In pa icula , some p oblems ela ed wi h he Ma cell´an e al. cha ac e iza ion [19] a e discussed. 2. The linea - ype la ices x(s) De ini ion 2.1. We say ha x(s)is a linea - ype la ice i x(s+ζ) = F(ζ)x(s) + G(ζ),∀s, ζ ∈C, F(ζ)6= 0.(2.1) Ob iously o he linea la ice x(s) = swe ha e F(ζ) = 1 and G(ζ) = ζ. Ano he impo an ins ance o he linea - ype la ice is he q-linea la ice, (q6={0,±1}), i.e., he unc ions o he o m x(s) = Aqs+B. In his case x(s+ζ) = F(ζ)x(s) + G(ζ), whe e F(ζ) = qζand G(ζ) = B(1 −qζ). P oposi ion 2.2. Le q6={0,±1}. The unc ion x(z)is a q-linea la ice o zi and only i i sa is ies x(z+ 1) = qx(z) + C. P oo . A s aigh o wa d compu a ion shows ha i x(z) is a q-linea unc- ion o n, i.e., x(z) = cqz+d hen i sa is ies he ecu ence o mula x(z+ 1) = qx(z) + C, whe e C=d(1 −q) is a cons an . Bu he gene al solu ion o he di e ence equa ion x(z+ 1) = qx(z) + Cis x(z) = Aqz+D, whe e Aand Da e, in gene al, non-ze o cons an s.  No ice ha o he linea - ype la ices, i Qm(x(s)) is a polynomial o deg ee min x(s), Qm(x(s+α)) is also a m− h deg ee polynomial in x(s), i.e., Qm(x(s+α)) = e Qm(x(s)). Mo eo e , o he linea - ype la ices we ha e he ollowing 4 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE Lemma 2.3. Le x(s)be a linea - ype la ice and Qm(x(s)) a polynomial o deg ee min x(s). Then ∆Qm(x(s+α)) ∆x(s+β)=Rm−1(x(s)),∀α, β ∈C, whe e Rm−1(x(s)) is again a polynomial in x(s)bu o deg ee m−1and ∆ (s) = (s+ 1) − (s). P oo . I is su icien o p o e he lema o he powe s xn(s). Since x(s) is a linea - ype la ice ∆xn(s+α) ∆x(s+β)=∆(F(α)x(s) + G(α))n F(β)∆x(s)= n X k=0 n kF(α)kG(α)n−k F(β) ∆xk(s) ∆x(s). Bu ∆xk(s)/∆x(s) is a polynomial o deg ee k−1 in x(s) and he e o e ∆xn(s+α)/∆x(s+β) also is.  To conclude his sec ion le poin ou he ollowing Rema k 2.4. F om P oposi ion 2.2 and De ini ion 2.1 i ollows ha he only linea - ype la ices a e hose co esponding o F(1) = 1 ( he linea la ice x(s) = C1s+C2) and he ones when F(1) = q6={0,±1}( he q-linea la ices x(s) = c1qs+c2). 3. The cha ac e iza ion heo em o classical polynomials In he sequel we will assume ha (Pn[x(s)])nis a sequence o o hogonal polynomials on a linea - ype la ice x(s). Fo sake o simplici y we will deno e Pn(s) := Pn[x(s)]. Since Pn(s) a e o hogonal hey sa is y he TRRR x(s)Pn(s) = αnPn+1(s) + βnPn(s) + γnPn−1(s), P−1(s) = 0, P0(s) = 1. (3.1) Le us poin ou ha i γn6= 0, o all n∈N, hen he abo e TTRR de ines an o hogonal polynomial sequence. Ne e heless he e a e se e al examples o which γn= 0 o some n0∈N(e.g. he Hahn and q-Hahn polynomials). In his case we ha e a ini e amily o o hogonal polynomials (see e.g. [8, 25]). In he i s case, i.e., when γn6= 0, o all n∈Nwe say ha i is a quasi-de ini e case [8] (also called he egula case) whe eas in he second one, we ge a weak-quasi-de ini e case o weak- egula case. He e we will deal wi h he “classical” polynomials and we will assume ha γn6= 0 o all n∈ N whe e by Nwe deno e he se N= 1,2,...,n0 o some n0∈No N:= N. He e we will use he no a ion o he heo y o di e ence calculus on non- uni o m la ices ( o mo e de ails see [25, §13] o [24, chap e 3]). Le s=a, a + 1, a + 2,.... We will de ine he o wa d and backwa d di e ences in x(s) by ∆y[x(s)] ∆x(s),∇y[x(s)] ∇x(s), ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 5 espec i ely, whe e ∇ (s) = (s)− (s−1), ∆ (s) = (s+ 1) − (s). Fo he ope a o ∆ we ha e ∆{ (s)g(s)}=g(s){∆ (s)}+ (s+ 1){∆g(s)}.(3.2) Thus he ollowing o mula o summa ion by pa s holds b X s=a (s)∆g(s) = (s)g(s) b+1 a − b X s=a∆ (s)g(s+ 1).(3.3) Also we de ine he k- h o wa d di e ence o a unc ion (s) by ∆(k) (s) := ∆ ∆xk−1(s) ∆ ∆xk−2(s)... ∆ ∆x(s) (s), xm(s) = xs+m 2. Rema k 3.1. No ice ha he di e ences ∆(k)Pn(s)can be w i en in he linea - ype la ice, up o a cons an ac o , as (∆/∆x(s))kPn(s). Mo eo e , he ope a o ∆/∆x(s) o he q-linea la ice x(s) = c1qsbecomes in o he classical Jackson ope a o Dqde ined by DςP(x) = P(ςx)−P(x) x(ς−1) , ς 6= 0,±1.(3.4) Nex we s a e he Hahn-Lesky heo em: Theo em 3.2. Gi en a sequence o o hogonal polynomials (Pn)n, i is a classical sequence i an only i •The sequence o hei ini e di e ences (∆Pn)nis an o hogonal se- quence [17, 10]. •The sequence o hei q-di e ences (DqPn)nis an o hogonal se- quence [13, 21]. No ice ha since we a e deal wi h linea la ices he s a emen o he heo em can be eplaced by he ollowing equi alen one: Theo em 3.2. A sequence o o hogonal polynomials (Pn)nis classical i and only i he sequence o hei ini e di e ences (∆/∆x(s)Pn)nis an o - hogonal sequence. The s anda d p oo o his heo em can be ound in [17] o he linea la ice x(s) = s, and in [10] using he unc ional echnique de eloped by Ma oni. Fo he q-linea la ice x(s) = qsi has been done by Hahn in [13] and using a unc ional app oach in [21]. We s a wi h he ollowing De ini ion 3.3. We say ha he sequence (Pn)nis a classical amily on he linea - ype la ice i hey a e o hogonal wi h espec o he disc e e measu e ρ(s)∇x1(s), i.e., b−1 X s=a Pn(s)Pm(s)ρ(s)∇x1(s) = δnmd2 n,∆s= 1,(3.5) 6 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE whe e ρis he solu ion o he Pea son- ype equa ion ∆ ∆x(s−1/2)[σ(s)ρ(s)] = τ(s)ρ(s),(3.6) and σand τa e ixed polynomials on x(s)o deg ee a mos 2 and exac ly 1. The unc ion ρis usually called he o hogonalizing weigh unc ion o he polynomial amily (Pn)n. Now we a e eady o enuncia e ou main esul : Theo em 3.4. Le x(s)be a linea - ype la ice and le σ(s)and ρ(s)be wo unc ions such ha akσ(a)ρ(a) = bkσ(b)ρ(b) = 0, o all k≤0. Then, he ollowing p ope ies a e equi alen (1) (Pn)nis a classical o hogonal polynomial sequence (COPS). (2) The sequence o hei di e ences ∆(1)Pnnalso is an COPS. (3) (Pn)nsa is ies he second o de linea di e ence equa ion wi h poly- nomial coe icien s σ(s)∆ ∆x(s−1/2) ∇Pn(s) ∇x(s)+τ(s)∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)+λPn(s) = 0,(3.7) whe e deg(σ)≤2,deg(τ) = 1, a e independen o nand λis a cons an independen o x. (4) (Pn)ncan be exp essed by he Rod igues- ype o mula2 Pn(s) = Bn ρ(s) ∇ ∇x1(s) ∇ ∇x2(s)··· ∇ ∇xn(s)[ρn(s)].(3.8) (5) The polynomials a e o hogonal wi h espec o a weigh unc ion ρ ha sa is ies he Pea son- ype di e ence equa ion (3.6), whe e deg(σ)≤2,deg(τ) = 1. (6) The e exis h ee sequences (an)n,(bn)n,(cn)n, and a polynomial φ, deg(φ)≤2, such ha φ(x)∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)=anPn+1(x) + bnPn(x) + cnPn−1(x), n ≥1. (7) The e exis h ee sequences (en)n,( n)n,(gn)nsuch ha he ollow- ing ela ion holds o all n≥1 Pn(x) = en ∆Pn+1(s) ∆x(s)+ n ∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)+gn ∆Pn−1(s) ∆x(s), en6= 0, gn6=γn, whe e γnis he co esponding coe icien o he TTRR (1.1). As a simple consequence o he abo e heo em we ha e he ollowing Co olla y 3.5 ([10, 21]).The disc e e polynomials on he linea la ice x(s) = sa e classical. The q-polynomials in he q-linea la ice (o expo- nen ial la ice) x(s) = c1qs+c2a e classical. 2The ope a o ∇ ∇x1(s) ∇ ∇x2(s)· · · ∇ ∇xn(s)in he linea ype la ices can be ew i en in he o m ∇n o he linea la ice and q−n(n+1)/2“∇ ∇x(s)”n o he q-linea ones. ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 7 P oo . I ollows om he ac ha x(s) = sand x(s) = c1qs+c2a e linea - ype la ices.  Le us p o e he Theo em 3.4. The idea o he p oo is summa ized in he nex igu e:  * HH Hj ? 6  1 2 3 4 5 HH Hj  * 6 6 6 7 We s a p o ing ha (1)→(2): P oposi ion 3.6. Le x(s)be a linea - ype la ice and le (Pn)nbe a clas- sical amily o hogonal wi h espec o a weigh unc ion ρ, solu ion o he Pea son- ype equa ion (3.6) and such ha 3 σ(a)ρ(a) = σ(b)ρ(b) = 0.(3.9) Then he sequence ∆(1)Pn(s)n, whe e ∆(1)Pn(s) = ∆Pn(s) ∆x(s), is also a clas- sical o hogonal amily wi h espec o he unc ion ρ1(s)∆x(s), whe e he weigh unc ion is ρ1(s) = σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1). P oo . Le Qk(s) be an a bi a y k- h deg ee polynomial on x(s), k < n. The o hogonali y condi ions o (Pn)nyield, o all k < n, 0 = b−1 X s=a Pn(s)Qk−1(s)τ(s)ρ(s)∇x1(s) ( om (3.6)) = b−1 X s=a Pn(s)Qk−1(s)∆(σ(s)ρ(s)) ( om (3.3), (3.9)) =− b−1 X s=a ∆(Pn(s)Qk−1(s))σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1) Applying he Leibniz ule (3.2) 0 = − b−1 X s=a (∆Pn(s))Qk−1(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)+ b−1 X s=a Pn(s+ 1)(∆Qk−1(s))σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1) (s→s−1, and (3.9)) 3This condi ion leads o he so-called disc e e o hogonal polynomials, i.e., polynomials wi h a disc e e o hogonali y o he o m (3.5). Fo he q-linea la ices (3.5) becomes in o he q-Jackson in eg al (see e.g. [5, 15, 16]). Fo he con inuous o hogonali y see [24, §3.10]. 8 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE =− b−2 X s=a∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)Qk−1(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)∇x1(s+ 1/2)+ b X s=a+1 Pn(s) ∆Qk−1(s−1) ∆x(s−1/2) σ(s)ρ(s)∇x1(s) Nex , we use Lemma 2.3 as well as he condi ions (3.9), hen 0 = − b−2 X s=a∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)Qk−1(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)∇x1(s+1/2)+ b−1 X s=a Pn(s)Rk−2(s)σ(s) |{z } deg ee ≤n ρ(s)∇x1(s) ( om (3.9), (3.5)) =− b−2 X s=a∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)Qk−1(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)∇x1(s). Thus, ∆Pn(s)/∆x(s) is o hogonal wi h espec o ρ1(s)∇x1(s+ 1/2) = σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)∆x(s). We only need now o p o e ha ∆(1)Pn(s) is a classical amily. Fo doing his no ice ha he weigh unc ion ρ1(s) sa is y he Pea son ype equa ion (see e.g. [24, §3.2.2]) ∆ ∆x1(s−1/2) [σ(s)ρ1(s)] = τ1(s)ρ1(s) whe e τ1is a i s deg ee polynomial on x(s) gi en by τ1(s) = σ(s+ 1) −σ(s) + τ(s+ 1)∆x1(s) ∆x(s). Thus ρ1sa is ies a di e ence equa ion o he o m (3.6). This comple e he p oo .  In he same way, using induc ion we ha e Co olla y 3.7. Le x(s)be a linea - ype la ice and le (Pn)nbe a classical amily. Then, he sequence o hei k- h ini e di e ences ∆(k)Pn(s), whe e ∆(k):= ∆ ∆xk−1(s) ∆ ∆xk−2(s)... ∆ ∆x(s), also is a classical amily. Now we p o e ha (1)+(2)→(3): P oposi ion 3.8. Le x(s)be a linea - ype la ice. I he sequences (Pn)n and ∆(1)Pnna e classical, hen (Pn)nsa is ies he second o de linea di e ence equa ion o hype geome ic ype (3.7). ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 9 P oo . Le k < n. Then, using he o hogonali y o ∆(1)Pn, 0 = b−2 X s=a ∆Pn(s) ∆x(s) ∆Qk(s) ∆x(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1)∇x1(s+1/2) ( om (3.9)) = b−1 X s=a ∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)∆Qk(s)σ(s+ 1)ρ(s+ 1) ( om (3.3), (3.9)) =− b−1 X s=a Qk(s)∆∆Pn(s−1) ∆x(s−1) σ(s)ρ(s)(∆ (s) = ∇ (s+ 1)) =− b−1 X s=a Qk(s)∆∇Pn(s) ∇x(s)σ(s)ρ(s)( om (3.2)) =− b−1 X s=a Qk(s)σ(s)ρ(s)∆∇Pn(s) ∇x(s)+∇Pn(s+1) ∇x(s+1) ∆[σ(s)ρ(s)] ( om (3.6)) =− b−1 X s=a Qk(s) σ(s)∆ ∆x(s−1/2) ∇Pn(s) ∇x(s)+τ(s)∆Pn(s) ∆x(s)!ρ(s)∇x1(s). Bu , since he la ice x(s) is o he linea ype, Q(s) := σ(s)∆ ∆x(s−1/2) ∇Pn(s) ∇x(s)+τ(s)∆Pn(s) ∆x(s) is a polynomial o deg ee nin x(s). The e o e, i should be, up o a cons an ac o (in gene al depending on n) he polynomial Pn(s). Thus Q(s) = −λPn(s).  Rema k 3.9. The p oo o he las p oposi ion in he linea la ice x(s) = s can be ound in he i s Russian edi ion o he book [25]. The las p oposi ion is e y impo an because i gi es a e y simple me hod o inding he classical polynomials on he linea - ype la ice. In ac , i was he key in he p oo s o Hahn and Lesky o p o ing he Theo em 3.2. The solu ions o he di e ence equa ion (3.7) ha e been ex ensi ely s ud- ied (see e.g. [6, 24, 25]). In pa icula hey can be w i en by he Rod igues- ype o mula (3.8) [24, 25], so (3)→(4). Le us men ion ha om he Rod igues- ype o mula (3.8) one can ob ain an explici exp ession o he classical polynomials in e ms o he hype geome ic o basic hype geome ic se ies as i is shown in se e al p e ious wo ks (see e.g. [6, 24]). Ano he consequence o he Rod igues o mula is he ollowing: Pu ing n= 1 in (3.8) we ob ain P1(s) = B1 ρ(s) ∆ ∆x(s−1/2)[σ(s)ρ(s)] ⇒∆ ∆x(s−1/2)[σ(s)ρ(s)] = ρ(s)τ(s), i.e. he Pea son- ype equa ion (3.6) hus (4)→(5). 16 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE Bu now, using he exp ession (see e.g. [3, page 108]) cn=λnγn/n, we see ha o all n≥1, cn6= 0. The condi ion p+na 6= 0 o all n∈ N is he admissibili y condi ion in his case. Le us now analyze he s uc u e ela ion (4.12). In his case [3, page 109] gn=−(n−1)aγn p+(n−2)a, he e o e in he quasi-de ini e case gn6= 0. I γn=gn o all n, hen we ob ain ha p+ (2n−3)a= 0, o all nwhich is in con adic ion wi h he admissibili y condi ion. Rema k 4.3. In [10] he condi ion gn6= 0 o all n∈ N was imposed bu no he mo e es ic i e one gn6=γn, om whe e he i s one immedia ely ollows. Fo he disc e e case in [10] he admissibili y condi ion p+na 6= 0 i is assumed and he e o e gn6=γn o all n∈ N . F om he abo e discussion also ollows ha he classical disc e e polyno- mials a e comple ely cha ac e ized by he ela ion (4.12) wi h he es ic ion gn6=γn o all n∈ N. Mo eo e , i gn=γn o all n∈ N, hen he co e- sponding o hogonal polynomial sequence, i such a sequence exis s, is no a classical one. 4.3. The classical case. The classical case can be ob ained om he q-case aking he limi q→1−. Ne e heless he Theo em 1.2 can be p o en using he same scheme sec ion 3. The only di e ence is ha he e one uses he s anda d in eg al calculus and in eg a ion by pa s ins ead o he calculus wi h he di e ence ope a o . O pa icula in e es is he p oo o p ope y 7 so we will p o ide i he e: Taking de i a i es o he TTRR (1.1) and using (1.3), we ha e he exp ession xP0 n(x) = n n+ 1P0 n+1(x) + (βn− n)P0 n(x) + (γn−gn)P0 n−1(x),(4.13) om whe e, i gn6=γn,∀n∈ N, and using he Fa a d heo em he sequence (P0 n)nis an OPS, and he e o e by he Sonin-Hahn Theo em 1.1 Pnis a classical amily. No ice again ha he condi ion gn6=γnshould be imposed. Using he o mulas in [20] i is easy o see ha his condi ion is equi alen o he condi ion nσ00/2 + τ0= 0 which is no hing else ha he admissibili y condi ion o he classical polynomials [20]. Le us poin ou ha he mo e es ic i e condi ion γn6=gn o all n∈Nwas no conside ed in [19] ( hey conside ed only he egula case, i.e., γn6= 0). As in he cases al eady dis- cussed we conclude ha he classical con inuous polynomials a e comple ely cha ac e ized by he ela ion (1.3) wi h he es ic ion gn6=γn o all n∈N. Mo eo e , i gn=γn o n= 1,2,...,n0, hen he co esponding o hogonal polynomial sequence, i such a sequence exis s, is no a classical one. 4.4. The Ma cell´an e al. cha ac e iza ion. A his poin he ollowing ques ion a ises: wha happens i we do no impose he condi ion gn6=γn, ∀n= 1,2,...,n0? The e is any amily o o hogonal polynomials, necessa ily non classical, ha sa is ies he TTRR (1.1) whe e γn6= 0 o n∈ N, and he ela ion (1.3) wi h gn=γn o all n∈ N? i.e., ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 17 Pn(x) = P0 n+1(x) n+ 1 + nP0 n(x) + γnP0 n−1(x).(4.14) To answe his ques ion we can use (4.13) bu ew i en in he o m4 P0 n+1(x) = n+ 1 n(x−βn+ n)P0 n(x), ha leads o P0 n(x) = n n−1 Y j=1 (x−βj+ j), n ≥2. The e o e, subs i u ing he las exp ession in (4.14) we ge , deno ing ξj= βj− j, Pn(x) = [(x−ξn)(x−ξn−1) + n n(x−ξn−1) + (n−1)γn] n−2 Y j=1 (x−ξj). Bu his implies ha o n≥3, wo consecu i e polynomials ha e common ze os ha is a con adic ion. The e o e he e is no any amily o o hogonal polynomials ha sa is y (4.14). Fo he linea la ices x(s) = sand x(s) = qs he si ua ion is he same. We p esen he e he compu a ions only o he q-case, he o he case is analogous —in ac he inal exp ession o he polynomials Pncoincide wi h he one in he classical “con inuous” case. Fo he q-case we p oceed as be o e, i.e., we ake he q-de i a i es o he TTRR (3.1) and use he ela ion (4.3) whe e en= 1/[n]q,gn=γn,F(1) = 1, G(1) = 0, we ob ain DqPn+1(x) = [n+ 1]q [n]q (x−ξn/q), ξj=βj− j. Subs i u ing i in (4.3) when gn=γnwe ob ain he ollowing exp ession o he polynomials Pn Pn(x) = [(x−ξn/q)(x−ξn−1/q) + [n]q n(x−ξn−1/q) + [n−1]qγn] n−2 Y j=1 (x−ξj/q). As be o e, om his exp ession ollows ha o n≥3, wo consecu i e polynomials has common ze os, ha is in con adic ion wi h he ac ha hey cons i u es an o hogonal sequence. F om he abo e discussion ollows ha he s uc u e ela ion (3.11) when gn6=γn o all n∈ N comple ely cha ac e izes he classical o hogonal polynomials. 4As in sec ion 4.3 we will ake he de i a i e o he TTRR (1.1) bu now use (4.14). 18 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE Acknowledgemen s. The au ho hanks L. Ca doso, J.S. Dehesa, A. Du ´an, F. Ma cell´an, J. C. Medem, and J.C. Pe onilho o s imula ing discussions. This wo k was suppo ed by he Minis e io de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa o Spain unde he g an BFM-2003-06335-C03, and he Jun a de Andaluc´ıa unde g an FQM-262. Also he inancial suppo by Acciones In eg adas Hispano- Lusas HP2002-065 & E-6/03 is acknowledged. Appendix A. The classical polynomials In his appendix we will p esen he p oo o he Theo em 1.2. We will ollow he same scheme in Sec ion 3 (see igu e 1). As s a ing poin we will use he Pea son equa ion, i.e., we say ha he classical polynomials a e he polynomials o hogonal wi h espec o a con- inuous weigh unc ion ρsuppo ed in he in e al (a, b), solu ion o he Pea son equa ion [σ(x)ρ(x)]0=τ(x)ρ(x),(A.1) whe e σand τa e polynomials o deg ee a leas wo and exac ly one, e- spec i ely, and such ha he ollowing bounda y condi ions hold5σ(a)ρ(a) = σ(b)ρ(b) = 0. (1)→(2): Using he o hogonali y o he classical amily (Pn)nwi h espec o ρwe ha e ha o any polynomial o deg ee less han o equal o k−1, Qk−1, wi h k < n, 0 = Zb a Pn(x)Qk−1(x)τ(x) |{z } deg ee≤k<n ρ(x)dx =Zb a Pn(x)Qk−1(x)[σ(x)ρ(x)]0dx =Pn(x)Qk−1(x)σ(x)ρ(x)b a |{z } =0 −Zb a [Pn(x)Qk−1(x)]0σ(x)ρ(x)dx =−Zb a Pn(x) deg ee<n z}| { Q0 k−1(x)σ(x)ρ(x)dx | {z } =0 −Zb a P0 n(x)Qk−1(x)[σ(x)ρ(x)]dx. Thus P0 nis o hogonal o any polynomial o deg ee k−1< n −1, i.e., (P0 n)n is also an o hogonal amily. Fu he mo e, since he weigh unc ion o he sequence (P0 n)nis ρ1(x) = σ(x)ρ(x), we ha e ha hey sa is y he equa ion [σ(x)ρ1(x)]0= [τ(x) + σ0(x)]ρ1(x), i.e., a Pea son equa ion (A.1). 5These condi ions ollow om he ac ha o he classical amilies he momen s µn=Rb axnρ(x)dx,n≥0, o he measu e associa ed wi h ρ(x) a e be ini e. ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 19 (2)→(3): We use now ha (P0 n)nis an o hogonal amily wi h espec o he weigh unc ion ρ1(x) = σ(x)ρ(x). Thus 0 = Zb a P0 n(x)Q0 k(x)τ(x)ρ1(x)dx =P0 n(x)Qk(x)σ(x)ρ(x)b a |{z } =0 −Zb a [σ(x)ρ(x)P0 n(x)]0Qk(x)dx =−Zb a Qk(x){[σ(x)ρ(x)]0 |{z } =τ(x)ρ(x) P0 n(x) + σ(x)ρ(x)P00 n(x)} =Zb a Qk(x)[σ(x)P00 n(x) + τ(x)P0 n(x)]ρ(x)dx. Bu since he las in eg al anishes o e e y polynomial Qko deg ee k < n hen σ(x)P00 n(x)+τ(x)P00 n(x) should be p opo ional o Pn, i.e., σ(x)P00 n(x)+ τ(x)P00 n(x) = −λnPn, whe e λnis a cons an , in gene al depending on n. (3)→(4): The solu ion o he abo e di e en ial equa ion can be w i en in he ollowing compac o m (see e.g. [25, §2] o [24, §1.2]) usually called he Rod igues o mula Pn(x) = Bn ρ(x) dn dxn[σn(x)ρ(x)], whe e Bnis a cons an . (4)→(5): I ollows om he Rod igues o mula jus pu ing n= 1. (4)→(6): F om he Rod igues o mula he ollowing exp ession (see e.g. [25, Eq. (7) page 25]) immedia ely ollows σ(x)P0 n(x) = λn nτ0 nτn(x)Pn(x)−Bn Bn+1 Pn+1(x), τn(x) = τ(x) + nσ0(x), om whe e, using he h ee- e m ecu ence ela ion o he amily (Pn)n he s uc u e ela ion (1.2) ollows. (6)→(2): Suppose ha (1.2) holds whe e deg σ≤2 and (Pn)nis an o hog- onal amily. No ice ha he in eg al Zb a Qk(x)P0 n(x)σ(x)ρ(x)dx= Zb a Qk(x)ρ(x)[anPn+1(x)+bnPn(x)+cnPn−1(x)]dx anishes o all k < n −1. Then (P0 n)nis an o hogonal amily wi h espec o he weigh unc ion ρ1(x) = σ(x)ρ(x) and he e o e by he Sonin-Hahn Theo em 1.1 (Pn)nis a classical amily. (1)+(2)→(7): Fo p o ing his we suppose ha (Pn)nand (P0 n)na e o hog- onal wi h espec o ρ(x) and ρ1(x) = σ(x)ρ(x), espec i ely. I (Pn)nis a monic sequence hen Pn(x) = 1 n+ 1P0 n+1 + nP0 n(x) + gnP0 n−1(x) + n−2 X k=1 ck(n)P0 k(x). 20 R. ´ ALVAREZ-NODARSE Bu ck(n) = Rb aPn(x)P0 k(x)σ(x)ρ(x)dx Rb a[P0 k(x)]2σ(x)ρ(x)dx = 0, since deg P0 kσ≤k+ 1 < n −2 and (Pn)nis and o hogonal amily wi h espec o ρ(x). Finally he p oo (7)→(2) is p esen ed in sec ion 4.3. Re e ences [1] W. A. Al-Salam, Cha ac e iza ion heo ems o o hogonal polynomials. In: O hog- onal Polynomials: Theo y and P ac ice. P. Ne ai (Ed.) NATO ASI Se ies C, Vol. 294. Kluwe Acad. Publ., Do d ech , 1990, 1-24. [2] W. A. Al-Salam and T. S. Chiha a, Ano he cha ac e iza ion o he classical o hog- onal polynomials. SIAM J. Ma h. Anal. 3(1972) 65-70. [3] R. ´ Al a ez-Noda se, Polinomios hipe geom´e icos y q-polinomios. Monog a ´ıas del Semina io Ma em´a ico “Ga c´ıa de Galdeano” Vol. 26. P ensas Uni e si a ias de Za agoza, Za agoza, Spain, 2003. In Spanish. [4] R. ´ Al a ez-Noda se and J. A es´u, On he q-polynomials in he exponen ial la ice x(s) = c1qs+c3.In eg al T ans o m. Special Func . 8(1999) 299-324. [5] R. ´ Al a ez-Noda se and J. C. Medem, q−Classical polynomials and he q−Askey and Niki o o -U a o Tableaus. J. Compu . Appl. Ma h. 135 (2001) 197-223. [6] N. M. A akishiye , M. Rahman, and S. K. Suslo , On classical o hogonal polynomi- als. Cons . App ox. 11 (1995) 181-226. [7] S. Bochne , ¨ Ube S u m-Liou illesche polynomsys eme. Ma h. Zei . 29 (1929) 730- 736. [8] T. Chiha a, An In oduc ion o O hogonal Polynomials. Go don and B each, New Yo k, 1978. [9] C. W. C ye , Rod igues’ o mula and he classical o hogonal polynomials. Boll. Un. Ma . I al. 25(3) (1970) 1-11. [10] A. G. Ga c´ıa, F. Ma cell´an, and L. Sal o, A dis ibu ional s udy o disc e e classical o hogonal polynomials. J. Compu . Appl. Ma h. 57 (1995) 147-162. [11] W. Hahn, ¨ Ube die Jacobischen polynome und zwei e wand e polynomklassen. Ma h. Zei . 39 (1935) 634-638. [12] W. Hahn, ¨ Ube h¨ohe e Ablei ungen on O hogonalpolynome. Ma h. Zei . 43 (1937) 101. [13] W. Hahn, ¨ Ube o hogonalpolynomen die q-di e en ialgleichungen gen¨ugen. Ma h. Nach . 2(1949) 4-34. [14] E. H. Hildeb and , Sys ems o polynomials connec ed wi h he Cha lie expansion and he Pea son di e en ial and di e ence equa ion. Ann. Ma h. S a is . 2(1931) 379-439. [15] R. Koekoek and R. F. Swa ouw, The Askey-scheme o hype geome ic o hogonal polynomials and i s q-analog. Repo s o he Facul y o Technical Ma hema ics and In o ma ics No. 98-17. Del Uni e si y o Technology, Del , 1998. [16] T. H. Koo nwinde , Compac quan um g oups and q-special unc ions. In Rep e- sen a ions o Lie g oups and quan um g oups. V. Baldoni & M.A. Pica dello (Eds.) Pi man Resea ch No es in Ma hema ics se ies 311, Longman Scien i ic & Technical, 1994 New Yo k, 46-128. [17] P. Lesky, ¨ Ube Polynomsys eme, die S u m-Liou illeschen di e enzengleichungen gen¨ugen. Ma h. Zei . 78 (1962) 439-445. [18] F. Ma cell´an and R. ´ Al a ez-Noda se, On he Fa a d Theo em and hei ex ensions. Jo nal o Compu a ional and Applied Ma hema ics 127, (2001) 231-254. ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CLASSICAL POLYNOMIALS 21 [19] F. Ma cell´an, A. B anquinho, and J. Pe onilho, Classical o hogonal polynomials: A unc ional app oach. Ac a Appl. Ma h. 34 (1994) 283-203. [20] F. Ma cell´an and J. Pe onilho, On he solu ion o some dis ibu ional di e en ial equa ions: exis ence and cha ac e iza ions o he classical momen unc ionals. In e- g al T ans o m. Special Func . 2(1994) 185-218. [21] J. C. Medem, R. ´ Al a ez-Noda se and F. Ma cell´an, On he q−polynomials: A dis- ibu ional s udy. J. Compu . Appl. Ma h. 135 (2001) 157-196. [22] J.C. Medem, The quasi-o hogonali y o he de i a i es o semi-classical polynomials. Indag. Ma h., New Se . 13 (2002) 363-387 [23] J.C. Medem, A amily o singula semi-classical unc ionals. Indag. Ma h., New Se . 13 (2002) 351-362. [24] A. F. Niki o o , S. K. Suslo , and V. B. U a o , Classical O hogonal Polynomials o a Disc e e Va iable. Sp inge Se ies in Compu a ional Physics. Sp inge -Ve lag, Be lin, 1991. [25] A.F. Niki o o and V.B. U a o , Special Func ions o Ma hema ical Physics. Bi kh¨ause , Basel, 1988. [26] A. F. Niki o o and V. B. U a o , Polynomial Solu ions o hype geome ic ype di e ence Equa ions and hei classi ica ion. In eg al T ans o m. Spec. Func . 1(1993) 223-249. [27] F. T icomi, Vo lesungen ¨ube O hogonal eihen. G undleh en de Ma hema ischen Wissenscha en 76, Sp inge -Ve lag, Be l´ın-Go inga-Heidelbe g, 1955. Depa amen o de An´ alisis Ma em´ a ico, Facul ad de Ma em´ a ica, Uni e si- dad de Se illa. Apdo. Pos al 1160, Se illa, E-41080, Se illa, Spain and Ins i- u o Ca los I de F´ ısica Te´ o ica y Compu acional, Uni e sidad de G anada. E-18071 G anada, Spain E-mail add ess:[email p o ec ed]