The n-TOF facility: Neutron beams for challenging future measurements at CERN

EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 03001 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714603001 ND2016 The n TOF facility: Neutron beams for challenging future measurements at CERN E. Chiaveri1,9,14,a,O.Aberle 1, J. Andrzejewski2, L. Audouin3, M. Bacak4,1,5, J. Balibrea6, M. Barbagallo7,F.Be ˇ cv´ aˇ r8, E. Berthoumieux5, J. Billowes9, D. Bosnar10,A.Brown 11, M. Caama˜ no12, F. Calvi˜ no13, M. Calviani1, D. Cano-Ott6, R. Cardella1, A. Casanovas13,F.Cerutti 1,Y.H.Chen 3, N. Colonna7,G.Cort ´ es13,M.A.Cort ´ es-Giraldo14,L.Cosentino 15, L.A. Damone7,16, M. Diakaki5, C. Domingo-Pardo17, R. Dressler18, E. Dupont5,I.Dur ´ an12, B. Fern´ andez-Dom´ ınguez12, A. Ferrari1, P. Ferreira19, P. Finocchiaro15,K.G ¨ obel20,A.R.Garc ´ ıa6, A. Gawlik2, S. Gilardoni1, T. Glodariu21, I.F. Gonc¸alves19, E. Gonz´ alez6, E. Griesmayer4, C. Guerrero14, F. Gunsing5,1, H. Harada22,S.Heinitz 18,J.Heyse 23, D.G. Jenkins11, E. Jericha4,F.K ¨ appeler24, Y. Kadi1, A. Kalamara25,P.Kavrigin 4,A.Kimura 22,N.Kivel 18, M. Kokkoris25, M. Krtiˇ cka8, D. Kurtulgil20, E. Leal-Cidoncha12, C. Lederer26,H.Leeb 4, J. Lerendegui-Marco14,S.LoMeo 27,28, S.J. Lonsdale26, D. Macina1, J. Marganiec2,29,T.Mart ´ ınez6,A.Masi 1,C.Massimi 28,30, P. Mastinu31, M. Mastromarco7, E.A. Maugeri18, A. Mazzone7,32, E. Mendoza6, A. Mengoni27, P.M. Milazzo33, F. Mingrone1, A. Musumarra15,34, A. Negret21, R. Nolte29,A.Oprea 21, N. Patronis35, A. Pavlik36, J. Perkowski2,I.Porras 37, J. Praena37, J.M. Quesada14, D. Radeck29, T. Rauscher38,39,R.Reifarth 20, C. Rubbia1, J.A. Ryan9, M. Sabat´ e-Gilarte1,14, A. Saxena40, P. Schillebeeckx23, D. Schumann18, A.G. Smith9, N.V. Sosnin9, A. Stamatopoulos25, G. Tagliente7,J.L.Tain 17, A. Tarife˜ no-Saldivia13,L.Tassan-Got 3, A. Tsinganis1, S. Valenta8, G. Vannini28,30,V.Variale 7,P.Vaz 19, A. Ventura28, V. Vlachoudis1,R.Vlastou 25,A.Wallner 41,S.Warren 9, P.J. Woods26, T. Wright9,P. ˇ Zugec10,1, and the n TOF Collaboration 1European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Switzerland 2University of Lodz, Poland 3Institut de Physique Nucl´ eaire, CNRS-IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, 91406 Orsay Cedex, France 4Technische Universit¨ at Wien, Austria 5CEA Saclay, Irfu, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 6Centro de Investigaciones Energ´ eticas Medioambientales y Tecnol´ ogicas (CIEMAT), Spain 7Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy 8Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 9University of Manchester, UK 10 University of Zagreb, Croatia 11 University of York, UK 12 University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 13 Universitat Polit` ecnica de Catalunya, Spain 14 Universidad de Sevilla, Spain 15 INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy 16 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit` a degli Studi di Bari, Italy 17 Instituto de F´ ısica Corpuscular, Universidad de Valencia, Spain 18 Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Villingen, Switzerland 19 Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Lisbon, Portugal 20 Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany 21 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Romania 22 Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-mura, Japan 23 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel, Belgium 24 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Campus North, IKP, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany 25 National Technical University of Athens, Greece 26 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, UK 27 Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie (ENEA), Bologna, Italy 28 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna, Italy 29 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany 30 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit` a di Bologna, Italy 31 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Legnaro, Italy 32 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy 33 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy 34 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit` a di Catania, Italy c The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 03001 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714603001 ND2016 35 University of Ioannina, Greece 36 University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria 37 University of Granada, Spain 38 Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland 39 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, UK 40 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India 41 Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract.The CERN n TOF neutron beam facility is characterized by a very high instantaneous neutron flux, excellent TOF resolution at the 185 m long flight path (EAR-1), low intrinsic background and coverage of a wide range of neutron energies, from thermal to a few GeV. These characteristics provide a unique possibility to perform high-accuracy measurements of neutron-induced reaction cross-sections and angular distributions of interest for fundamental and applied Nuclear Physics. Since 2001, the n TOF Collaboration has collected a wealth of high quality nuclear data relevant for nuclear astrophysics, nuclear reactor technology, nuclear medicine, etc. The overall efficiency of the experimental program and the range of possible measurements has been expanded with the construction of a second experimental area (EAR-2), located 20 m on the vertical of the n TOF spallation target. This upgrade, which benefits from a neutron flux 30 times higher than in EAR- 1, provides a substantial extension in measurement capabilities, opening the possibility to collect data on neutron cross-section of isotopes with short half-lives or available in very small amounts. This contribution will outline the main characteristics of the n TOF facility, with special emphasis on the new experimental area. In particular, we will discuss the innovative features of the EAR-2 neutron beam that make possible to perform very challenging measurements on short-lived radioisotopes or sub-mg samples, out of reach up to now at other neutron facilities around the world. Finally, the future perspectives of the facility will be presented. 1. Introduction The neutron time-of-flight facility n TOF at CERN [1,2] is a pulsed white neutron source for high-accuracy neutron cross-section measurements over a wide neutron energy range. The neutrons are produced in a monolithic Pbspallation target, where a pulsed 20 GeV/c proton beam provided by the CERN Proton Synchrotron (PS) [3] impinges with a maximum repetition rate of 0.8 Hz. The primary proton beam has a width of 7 ns rms. The Pb-target is surrounded by an additional moderator layer to generate a neutron beam with energies ranging from thermal up to several GeV. At the facility in operation since 2000 the measurements take place in an experimental area placed at the end of a horizontal beamline, 200 m in length. The experimental conditions and neutron beam characteristics at this horizontal flight path are presented in full detail in Ref. [4]. The horizontal 200 m flight path, with its record instantaneous neutron beam intensity, has allowed very important cross-sections to be measured, getting unprecedented energy resolution in both neutron capture [5,6] and fission [7] as well as extending the measurement range to previously unreachable neutron energies [8]. However, there are more challenging experiments that require an even more intense neutron beam. To address the needs of data for short-lived radioisotopes, or for stable isotopes available in extremely small amounts, the n TOF Collaboration proposed the construction of a new experimental area (EAR-2) at a shorter distance from the spallation target to exploit a much higher neutron flux [9]. Since the spallation target is placed underground at approximately 20 m under the surface, a very convenient solution was to build the new experimental area just on top of the pit hosting the target, in the vertical direction. The large gain in the neutron flux, of about a factor of 30 relative to the first experimental area, allows one to perform measurements with samples of correspondingly ae-mail: [email protected] smaller mass or in a shorter time. Most importantly, the combination of the higher flux and shorter time-of-flight, a factor of 10 relative to EAR-1, is particularly convenient when measuring radioactive isotopes, as it results in an increase of the signal-to-background ratio of more than two orders of magnitude for the background related to the radioactive decay of the sample. As a consequence, in EAR-2 it becomes feasible to perform challenging measurements with isotopes of half-life as short as a few tens of years, offering the unique opportunity to address some open questions in nuclear astrophysics, in applications related to energy production, both from fission and fusion, in nuclear medicine, in fundamental nuclear physics, and in related fields. With these goals in mind, the construction of the second beam-line started at the beginning of a long accelerator shut-down at CERN, in December 2012, and was completed, with almost perfect timing, before the restart of the PS accelerator, in July 2014. 2. EAR-2 neutron flux The neutron flux is one of the most important features of the n TOF facility not only for the characterization of the experimental areas but also because it is essential on the yield ascertainment for determining the energy dependence of the neutron induced cross section. Furthermore, the beam time requested in any experiment proposed at n TOF relies on the precision of the flux. In order to reach the desirable high accuracy, a combination of three different neutron induced reactions considered standards, for instance, 10B(n,α)7Li, 6Li(n,t)4He and 235U(n,f), is required to cover the wide energy range of the n TOF neutron spectrum; in addition, a combination of several detection systems based on different working principle allows reducing the overall uncertainties. Gaseous detectors as micromegas [10], Parallel Plate Avalanche Chamber (PPAC) [11] and Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) [12]aswell as solid state detectors like Silicon Monitor [13,14], 2 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 03001 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714603001 ND2016 182.5 m 18.2 m EAR2 EAR1 Two experimental areas (EAR): •Horizontal flight path: EAR1 at 182.5 m •Vercal flight path: EAR2 at 18.2 m Both beam lines have: •1 st collimator: halo cleaning + first beam shaping. •Filter staon. •Sweeping magnet. •2 nd collimator: beam shaping. Two experimental areas running in parallel Figure 1. The n TOF facility. Figure 2. Comparison of the n TOF neutron flux integrated over the whole beam profile at EAR-1 [15]andEAR-2[16]forthe small collimator. especially designed for monitoring purpose at n TOF, are used. Figure 2shows a comparison of the n TOF neutron flux at EAR-1 (red) and EAR-2 (blue); highlighting the main advantage of the new experimental facility EAR-2 respect to the existing one, i.e., the flux is two order of magnitudes bigger in EAR-2 around 0.0253 eV besides exhibiting a 30–40 times higher value in the rest of the neutron energy range. 3. Two measurements demonstrating the performance of EAR-2 3.1. 7Be(n,α) The expanded measurement capability of the n TOF facility has allowed to perform for the first time the measurement of the 7Be(n,α) reaction cross-section in a wide energy range. The reaction is of particular interest in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), and in particular for the Cosmological Lithium Problem (CLiP): it refers to the large discrepancy between the abundance of primordial 7Li predicted by the standard theory of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and the value deduced from the observation of galactic halo dwarf stars. A possible solution in Nuclear Astrophysics is related to the incorrect estimation of the destruction rate of 7Be, which is responsible for the production of 95% of primordial Lithium. While the role of charged particle induced reactions has mostly been ruled out by recent Figure 3. Detected number of coincidences as a function of time during measurement. measurements, data on the 7Be(n,α) and 7Be(n,p) reactions are scarce or completely missing, thus affecting the abundance of 7Li predicted by the standard theory of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Recently, (n,α) and (n,p) reaction cross-sections have been measured at n TOF-EAR-2 with two different silicon detection systems, providing for the first time nuclear data on the 7Be(n,α) and 7Be(n,p) cross-section in a wide neutron energy range, namely in the energy range of interest for Nuclear Astrophysics. In the case of the 7Be(n,α)4He reaction, a sandwich of two silicon detectors has been used to detect the two alpha-particles that are emitted back-to-back with a maximum energy of 9.5 MeV (the Q-value of the reaction is 18.99 MeV). Each sandwich hosted a target consisting of an extremely thin backing (0.6 µm Polyethylene and 5 µm Aluminum) with the nitrate solution of 7Be on one of the surfaces, for a total activity of about 40 GBq. The measurement relied on the coincident detection of the two alpha particles emitted back-to-back in the reaction with several MeV energy each, that ensured a strong rejection of any other source of background (Fig. 3) and allowing measuring the desired cross-section from 10 meV to 10 keV. The results of the n TOF measurement hint to a minor role of the 7Be(n,α)4He reaction in BBN, leaving the Cosmological Lithium Problem unsolved [17]. 3.2. 240Pu(n,f) The measurement of the 240Pu fission cross-section is the first measurement to be performed at the newly commissioned Experimental Area II of the CERN n TOF facility. Data were collected from thermal energies up to at least several MeV. Most notably, data showing clear resonant structures have been obtained even in the sub-threshold region (up to a few tens of keV) where the cross-section is lowest and where evaluations show a smooth behaviour of the crosssection. The success of this measurement is largely due to the favourable characteristics of EAR-2, in particular the increased neutron flux and stronger background suppression compared to EAR-1, where the measurement was not feasible (see Fig. 4). These features will allow nTOF to expand Its measurements capabilities to even 3 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 03001 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714603001 ND2016 Figure 4. Pulse-height spectra obtained from a 240Pu sample during the measurements in EAR-1 (black) and EAR-2 (red). Counts are normalised per beam bunch for direct comparison. The significant suppression of the sampleinduced α-background is evident, as is the much higher rate of fission events. more short-lived and rare isotopes such as 230Th, 232U, 238,241Pu and 244Cm. 4. Conclusions There is need of accurate new data on neutron crosssection both for astrophysics and nuclear technology. Since 2001, n TOF is contributing to the world efforts aimed at collecting high quality data, mostly on capture and fission. Main advantage of n TOF is the high instantaneous neutron flux and high performance detectors. The new EAR-2 offers the unique opportunity to perform challenging measurements involving short-lived radioisotopes or sub-mg samples. References [1] C. Rubbia, et al., A high Resolution Spallation driven Facility at the CERN-PS to Measure Neutron Cross Sections in the Interval from 1 eV to 250 MeV, CERN/ LHC/98-002-EET, 1998 [2] http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/ research/NTOF-en.html [3] J.-P. Burnet, et al., Fifty Years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron: Volume 1, CERN-2011-04, 2011 [4] C.Guerrero,etal.,Eur.Phys.J.A49, 27 (2013) [5] F. Gunsing, et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 064601 (2012) [6] C. Guerrero, et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 119, 5 (2014) [7] M. Calviani, et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 034616 (2012) [8] C. Paradela, et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 024602 (2015) [9] E. Chiaveri et al., Proposal for n TOF Experimental Area 2, CERN INTC-2011-032 [10] S. Andriamonje et al., J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 59, 1597 (2011) [11] C. Paradela et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 034601 (2010) [12] D.B. Gayther, Metrologia 27, 221 (1990) [13] S. Marrone et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 517, 389–398 (2004) [14] L. Cosentino et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 86, 073509 (2015) [15] M. Barbagallo, C. Guerrero and the n TOF Collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 156 (2013) [16] M. Sabat´ e-Gilarte, M. Barbagallo and The n TOF Collaboration (in preparation) [17] M. Barbagallo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 152701 (2016) [18] A. Tsinganis et al., in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, June 15–19, 2016, Varenna, Italy, F. Cerutti et al. (Eds.), p. 21–26 (2016) 4