scieee Open visual document viewer

Objective measures of spatial sffects in Spanish concert halls

Girón Borrero, Sara; Zamarreño García, Teófilo; Bustamante, Pedro

Abstract

The present work consists of a statistical study of the monaural (lateral-reflection fractions and level)and binaural acoustic parameters (inter-aural cross-correlation coefficients) that evaluate the amount ofearly and late lateral acoustic energy encountered in 9 performance halls in Andalusia (southern Spain).Hall volumes range between 6,163 m3and 34,594 m3and all enclosures are used for presentations of symphonic concerts and other music performances. The majority of these venues are located in provincial capitals of the community and often constitute the only premises in the city where symphonic concertscan be held. The acoustic parameters under study here were derived from impulse responses analyses using a sine-sweep signals which were generated and processed by WinMLS 2004 software in the octave-band frequency centred from 125 to 4 kHz, and all parameters were spectrally averaged according to theISO 3382-1 standard. A comparison is presented of monaural experimental results as a function of source-receiver distance with the prediction of Barron’s revised theory for concert halls, and the analyses of the acoustic parameter results are carried out in terms of their respective just noticeable differences: at the many microphone positions for the two source positions on stage, for the spatial distribution of seats in the audience zone relative to the central axis (for left- and right-hand sides) of the rooms, and for the presence of the orchestra shell on stage. Results reveal that the orchestra shell propitiates a perceptible decrementin the values of the early lateral energy fraction and an increment in the late lateral level at the audience seats. In addition, a regression study reveals that the two kinds of measures of laterality, monaural andbinaural, are correlated when the hall-average data is considered, but they remain uncorrelated when all individual positions are used. Like wise, the ranges of variation of the acoustic parameters found in thesehalls are narrower than those specified in the ISO 3382-1. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relationships of hall-average data of the five parameters with eight geometric and acoustic variables

Full text

ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 529–547 (2012) Copy igh c 2012 by PAN – IPPT DOI: 10.2478/ 10168-012-0063-y Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial E ec s in Spanish Conce Halls Sa a GIRÓN(1), Teófilo ZAMARRE˜ NO(1), Ped o BUSTAMANTE(2) (1) Depa amen o de F´ısica Aplicada II Uni e sidad de Se illa, E.T.S. A qui ec u a (IUACC) A . Reina Me cedes 2, 41012-Se illa, Spain; e-mail: {sgi on, eofilo}@us.es (2) Depa amen o de Cons ucciones A qui ec ónicas I, Uni e sidad de Se illa, E.T.S. A qui ec u a (IUACC) A . Reina Me cedes 2, 41012-Se illa, Spain; e-mail: bus aman[email p o ec ed] ( ecei ed Ap il 9, 2012; accep ed Oc obe 22, 2012) The p esen wo k consis s o a s a is ical s udy o he monau al (la e al- eflec ion ac ions and le el) and binau al acous ic pa ame e s (in e -au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien s) ha e alua e he amoun o ea ly and la e la e al acous ic ene gy encoun e ed in 9 pe o mance halls in Andalusia (sou he n Spain). Hall olumes ange be ween 6,163 m3and 34,594 m3and all enclosu es a e used o p esen a ions o symphonic conce s and o he music pe o mances. The majo i y o hese enues a e loca ed in p o incial capi als o he communi y and o en cons i u e he only p emises in he ci y whe e symphonic conce s can be held. The acous ic pa ame e s unde s udy he e we e de i ed om impulse esponses analyses using a sine-sweep signals which we e gene a ed and p ocessed by WinMLS 2004 so wa e in he oc a e- band equency cen ed om 125 o 4 kHz, and all pa ame e s we e spec ally a e aged acco ding o he ISO 3382-1 s anda d. A compa ison is p esen ed o monau al expe imen al esul s as a unc ion o sou ce- ecei e dis ance wi h he p edic ion o Ba on’s e ised heo y o conce halls, and he analyses o he acous ic pa ame e esul s a e ca ied ou in e ms o hei espec i e jus no iceable diffe ences: a he many mic ophone posi ions o he wo sou ce posi ions on s age, o he spa ial dis ibu ion o sea s in he audience zone ela i e o he cen al axis ( o le - and igh -hand sides) o he ooms, and o he p esence o he o ches a shell on s age. Resul s e eal ha he o ches a shell p opi ia es a pe cep ible dec emen in he alues o he ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion and an inc emen in he la e la e al le el a he audience sea s. In addi ion, a eg ession s udy e eals ha he wo kinds o measu es o la e ali y, monau al and binau al, a e co ela ed when he hall-a e age da a is conside ed, bu hey emain unco ela ed when all indi idual posi ions a e used. Likewise, he anges o a ia ion o he acous ic pa ame e s ound in hese halls a e na owe han hose specified in he ISO 3382-1. The pape concludes wi h a discussion on he ela ionships o hall-a e age da a o he fi e pa ame e s wi h eigh geome ic and acous ic a iables. Keywo ds: conce hall acous ics, di ec ional ene gy pa ame e s, binau al pa ame e s, spa ial imp es- sion, spa ial effec s. 1. In oduc ion A e he commencemen o he science o a chi ec- u al acous ics wi h W. C. Sabine’s con ibu ions in 1895 (Sabine, 1993), b eak h oughs and apid de el- opmen o elec oacous ics in he fi s hal o he wen- ie h cen u y p opi ia ed a g ea ad ance in gene al acous ics. Howe e , i is om he las hi d o he las cen u y ha he science o oom acous ics expe ienced a esu gence p opelled by he eme gen compu e and signal science. As a consequence o esea ch in ha new age, conside a ions o he han hose in he monau al empo al ac o s came in o play beyond he scope o e- e be a ion ime o de e mine op imal configu a ions o lis ening spaces (Be anek, 1962). In he 1960s, he fi s e e ences appea ed (Sch oede e al., 1966; Ma shall, 1967) ha conside ed he significance o spa ial effec s in he acous ics o conce halls. This pe cep ion e e s o how he acous ical imp ession in a oom diffe s om ha which lacks many delayed e- flec ions a i ing om all di ec ions. Soon a e , wo k by Ma shall (1968), and Ba on (1971) confi med ha his imp ession is p oduced by he ea ly la e al eflec ions, and his unde s anding has since had a sig- nifican impac on conce hall design (C eme , 1989; Be anek, 1992). As a ypical spa ial ac o o he sound field, Damaske and Ando (1972) defined he in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien , and in a efined 530 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 app oach, Ando (2007) de eloped a heo y o subjec- i e p e e ences in ela ion o empo al and spa ial ac- o s o he sound fields based on he modelling o he human audi o y-b ain sys em (Soe a e al., 2002). Rooms o music a e he mos isible and in e es - ing spaces in a chi ec u al acous ics whe e he h ee disciplines, o acous ics, a chi ec u e and music a e blended. Howe e , a ing he acous ic quali y o a hall o musical pe o mances is a non i ial and mul idi- mensional opic due o he lack o an unequi ocal c i- e ion o lis ene s’ music app ecia ion, in con as o ha o he one-dimensional comp ehension o speech (Peu z, 1971). Spa ial imp ession phenomenon is a gene al e m which co e s wo subjec i e pe cep ual ca ego ies: ap- pa en sou ce wid h (ASW), and lis ene en elopmen (LEV). ASW is he appa en audi o y wid h o he sound field c ea ed by a pe o ming en i y as pe cei ed by a lis ene in he audience a ea o a conce hall, and expe imen s ha e concluded ha i is mainly e- la ed o he ea ly la e al eflec ions eaching he lis- ene (Ba on, 1971). LEV is conside ed as he sub- jec i e imp ession by a lis ene o being en eloped by he sound field: a condi ion ha is, acco ding o ex- pe imen s, p ima ily ela ed o he la e la e al sound field (B adley e al., 2000). Two ypes o measu emen s o la e al eflec ions om he impulse esponse in a oom ha e eme ged: he monau al la e al ene gy ac ions (J) ela ed o he ene gy o ea ly o la e la e al eflec ions in he o me case, and he in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien (IACC) in he la e , which is a measu e o he diffe - ence in sound a he wo ea s and hence o la e ali y. To assess ASW, he ea ly la e al ene gy ac- ion JLF (Ba on, Ma shall, 1981), (o al e na- i ely, he ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion cosine JLFC (Kleine , 1989), is accep ed as a monau al di ec ion- ally influenced measu e. Likewise, he no malised in- e au al c oss-co ela ion unc ion IACF (Damaske, Ando, 1972) is a measu e o he dissimila i y be ween he a i als o he wa e a he wo ea s. F om his unc- ion he in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien s, IACC, a e hen gi en by: IACC 1, 2= max IACF 1, 2 o −1ms < τ < +1 ms. In which 1= 0 and 2= 80 ms (subsc ip E) a e cho- sen o he ea ly in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien IACCEwhich assesses he ASW pe cep ual a ibu e (Hidaka e al., 1995; Okano e al., 1998). In he same way, he la e la e al sound le el LJis p oposed as a s anda d (B adley, Soulod e, 1995a; 1995b) in he monau al impulse esponse measu emen in o de o p o ide a p ac ical indica o o he amoun o lis ene en elopmen in conce halls o sound a - i ing om all di ec ions (E jen e al., 2001), and he la e in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien IACCL (co ela ion calcula ed om 1= 80 ms o infini y (subsc ip L)) in he binau al measu emen , is p o- posed by Hidaka e al. (1995), and Okano e al., (1998). Al e na i ely, a u he pa ame e which in ol es a a io, he la e la e al ene gy ac ion JLLF, (Ba on, 2001) defined by he same a io as JLF bu o he la e in e al, o s udy lis ene in ol emen is also consid- e ed he e. Bo h monau al la e la e al pa ame e s a e ela ed o omnidi ec ional sound s eng h Gand cla - i y pa ame e C80 h ough: JLLF = 10(LJ−G)/10 1 + 10C80/10.(1) Due o he con amina ion o he esul s wi h back- g ound noise unde ce ain equencies, his pa ame e canno be ob ained di ec ly om WinMLS, and hence i s calcula ion in his wo k is as defined abo e. Acco ding o se e al expe imen s, he spec al con- en o la e al eflec ions ha con ibu e owa ds he ASW and LEV and la e al le els in he monau al pa- ame e s a e in he ou oc a e bands wi h cen e e- quencies 125, 250, 500, and 1000 Hz (Hidaka e al., 1995), espec i ely. This measu e a ou s he equency egion whe e he wa eleng hs a e mos ly longe han he acous ical dis ance be ween he le - and igh - hand sides o a head. In he case o he IACC pa- ame e , no widesp ead ag eemen ye exis s on how o calcula e a e ages o e a ious oc a e bands: in ac ISO 3382-1:2009(E) (2009) does no speci y his poin . Th oughou his wo k he spec al a e age o he IACC pa ame e is de e mined ollowing Hidaka’s ins uc ions (Hidaka e al., 1995; Okano e al., 1998), which a e based on p e ious expe imen s o Blaue and Lindemann (1986a, 1986b) and which concludes ha 500, 1 k, and 2 kHz a e he oc a e bands o equal and p incipal impo ance o he ASW a ibu e co - e ing he effec on spa ial imp ession ca ego ies o he en i e oc a e band equency ange (Okano e al., 1998). Hence o wa d, hese expe imen al measu es ob- ained by a i hme ically a e aging wi hin hese e- spec i e a o emen ioned equencies a e named JLFm, JLFCm,JLLFm, IACCEm, and IACCLm, espec i ely. Acco ding o in e na ional s anda ds (ISO, 2009) he equency-a e aged la e la e al sound ene gy le el, LJm mus be a e aged in ene gy. Al hough De V ies e al. (2001) sugges ed a de- composi ion o he measu es o supp ess in e e ence effec s o which he human ea is appa en ly insensi- i e, he e ised ISO s anda d (ISO, 2009) has p o- posed JLFm,JLFCm as objec i e measu emen s o he pe cep ual lis ene aspec ASW, a jus -no iceable di - e ence o 0.05, and a ypical ange o alues om 0.05 up o 0.35 ( equency-a e aged alues in single posi- ions in non-occupied conce and mul i-pu pose halls up o 25,000 m3). Fo LJm, i s jus -no iceable di - e ence emains unknown and o IACC acco ding o Cox e al. (1993) a jus -no iceable diffe ence o 0.075 is assumed. S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 531 Wi hin his field, o he pieces o wo k (Mo imo o e al., 2008) ha e p oposed expe imen s o cla i y he essen ials o ASW and LEV om he poin o iew o audi o y beha iou by sugges ing ha he acous- ic componen s o he eflec ions o e and beyond he uppe limi o he p ecedence effec con ibu e owa ds ASW and LEV, espec i ely. Fu he mo e, he compo- nen s om behind he lis ene gene a e g ea e LEV (Mo imo o e al., 2001). Abdou and Guy (1996) also poin ed ou he necessi y o spa ial in o ma ion on he sound fields o he e alua ion o he acous ics o ooms and he diagnosis and co ec ion o he causes o acous ic de ec s. This pape aims o in e p e and discuss he esul s o monau al and binau al measu es o spa ial imp es- sion in 9 pe o mance spaces o sou he n Spain which a e used as conce halls and o o he musical pe o - mances. Analyses a e ca ied ou in e ms o sea posi- ions and hall-a e age alues wi h significan physical a iables o he acous ic field. The spa ial dis ibu ion o he a ious pa ame e s, he diffe ences ound due o he wo sou ce posi ions on he s age, and o he o ches a shell a e analysed in e ms o hei espec- i e jus -no iceable diffe ences (JND). These analyses could p o ide a s a ing poin o u he s udies o co ela ion be ween objec i e pa ame e s and spa ial imp ession. 2. Expe imen al me hod 2.1. Measu emen echnique The p ocedu es employed he e a e hose es ab- lished in he ISO 3382-1 s anda d (ISO, 2009), whe eby measu emen s we e ca ied ou in unoccupied ooms and on unoccupied s ages (no public, no musicians), sa e y cu ains we e always d awn open, and, in ce - ain cases wi h he o ches a shell configu a ion in he s age, chai s and music s ands we e p esen . Tempe a- u e and ela i e humidi y we e moni o ed du ing he measu emen s which e ealed a ange o a ia ion o he en i onmen al condi ions du ing measu emen s in all enclosu es o 16.8–25.2◦C o he empe a u e, and 38–60% o he ela i e humidi y, espec i ely, wi h he excep ion o Falla G and Thea e which was measu ed in win e , whose minimum empe a u e was 14.1◦C. The a ia ions be ween he en i onmen al condi ions o he halls ha ha e been measu ed wi h and wi h- ou an o ches a shell in he s ages ne e exceeded 1◦C in empe a u e and 8.5% in ela i e humidi y espec- i ely, excep o Falla G and Thea e whose measu e- men s we e ca ied ou in win e and sp ing wi h a diffe ence o 9◦C in empe a u e and 12% in ela i e humidi y, espec i ely. Monau al and binau al impulse esponses (IRs) we e measu ed o de e mine, among o he s, he ol- lowing pa ame e s o each equency band be ween 125 Hz o 4000 Hz and in all ecei e posi ions: he ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion (JLF )and ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion cosine (JLFC), he la e la e al ac ion (JLLF), he la e la e al le el (LJ), and he binau al in- e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien s (IACC), o s udy he spa ial imp ession phenomena in he ooms. The IR has been ob ained a each ecep ion poin using sine sweep signals which we e gene a ed and analysed by WinMLS 2004 so wa e ia he VX Pocke 2 sound ca d om Digig am. The omnidi ec ional dodecahed al sou ce DO12 wi h i s In e M-1000 am- plifie , is placed a he mos usual poin o loca ion o he na u al sou ce (S) on he o ches a pla o m (none in he o ches a pi which was always co e ed wi h wooden panels o hea y cu ains) a a heigh o 1.50 m om he floo . Whe e e possible, measu e- men s in wo sou ce posi ions on he s age ha e been ca ied ou (see Table 1 and Fig. 1). In all cases he S1 posi ion coincides wi h he cen al sou ce posi ion on he s age; and hese wo sou ce loca ions coincide o he configu a ions wi h and wi hou an o ches a shell. Two mic ophones ha e been used: mul ipa e n config- u able Audio-Technica AT4050/CM5 (wi h an app o- p ia e signal-condi ioning Ea hwo ks LAB1 amplifie ) o measu e la e al ene gy ac ions and le els; and a o so ype HSU III simula o (Code 1323) om Head Acous ic (wi h OPUS amplifie ) o eco d binau al IR. They a e all loca ed a he app oxima e heigh o he head o a sea ed pe son, ∼1.20 m om he floo , in a p ede e mined numbe o sea s wi hin he a ious audience zones ( hese sea s a e coinciden o he mea- su emen s ca ied ou wi h and wi hou he o ches a shell on he s age in ce ain halls). 2.2. The halls esea ched In his sec ion, da a o he 9 conce halls unde esea ch is p esen ed: Co doba G and Thea e (CGT), loca ed in Co doba; Falla G and Thea e (FGT), lo- ca ed in Cadiz; Huel a G and Thea e (HGT), loca ed in Huel a; Isabel la Ca ólica Thea e (ICT), loca ed in G anada; Lope de Vega Thea e (LVT), loca ed in Se ille; Miguel de Ce an es Thea e (MCT), lo- ca ed in Malaga; Manuel de Falla Audi o ium (MFA), loca ed in G anada; Maes anza Thea e (MT), lo- ca ed in Se ille; and Villama a Thea e (VT), lo- ca ed in Je ez de la F on e a (Cadiz). They appea in alphabe ical o de in acco dance wi h he ac onyms assigned om hei names on he MIREM web si e (digi al scenic and musical enclosu e map o Spain), whe e u he in o ma ion on he enclosu es is a ail- able (MIREM, 2012). De ails on he s age shell o hese spaces and s age suppo pa ame e s ha e been pub- lished elsewhe e (Gi ón e al., 2010). In all hese buildings, se e al ypes o cul u al ac- i i ies, such as ope a, hea e, dancing, cinema and conce s, may be pe o med, excep in he Manuel de Falla Audi o ium whe e only conce s and eci als a e p esen ed. These a e pe o mance spaces wi h a fixed 532 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 public-s age ela ionship and a on al desc ip ion, ex- cep he Manuel de Falla Audi o ium which p esen s a bi- on al desc ip ion, (i consis s o wo ooms A and B, see Fig. 1). I is also pe inen o add ha all 7 p oscenium hea es we e e u bished by he e- gional go e nmen du ing he 1980s and 1990s, and ha acous ic measu es ha e been ca ied ou a e hese e u bishmen s. In Table 1, he yea o comple ion o inaugu a ion, a chi ec u al ype, he numbe o floo s, he numbe o poin s o ecep ion o he mic ophones, and he sea capaci y a e all summa ized in alphabe ical o - de , oge he wi h he mos ele an a chi ec u al and acous ical dimensions (León e al., 2007), whose cal- cula ions a e desc ibed below. Mean wid h W: o ho seshoe-shaped halls his is he maximum wid h on he g ound floo excluding boxes; i i is ec angula bu i egula , hen a mean alue is aken as in ICT; in he case o MFA, his geo- Fig. 1. G ound plan and longi udinal sec ion o 4 halls o he o al spaces analysed. The posi ions o he sou ce and he ecep ion poin s on each floo a e also shown. me ical ac o excludes boxes a bo h sides o oom A; and in MT his is i s ans e se diame e . Mean heigh H: calcula ed as he a e age o he heigh o he oom in he mou h o he s age, in he middle, and a he ea o he hall. Mean dep h D: he a e age o he ho izon al mea- su e ha exis s om he s age o he back o he oom on all floo s. (In he case o MFA, i is he leng h o oom A). Audience su ace SA: he a ea occupied by all sea s in he hall. To al olume V: hall and s age olume (in he wo configu a ions i i exis s wi h and wi hou he o ches- a shell). Re e be a ion ime T: he e e be a ion ime mea- su ed in he unoccupied halls and a e aged spa ially and spec ally in he 500 and 1000 Hz oc a e bands. Abso p ion A: he abso p ion ob ained using he e e be a ion ime in Sabine’s o mula. S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 533 Table 1. Rele an da a o he conce halls s udied. Hall CGT FGT HGT ICT LVT MCT MFA MT VT Yea o comple ion 1873 1910 1923 1952 1929 1870 1978 1991 1928 TypologyaHP HP SP SP HP HP RA CA SP Numbe o sea s N946 1038 601 689 733 1058 A: 890 B: 413 1800 1200 Hall olume [m3] 6071 8114 4800 5035 5902 6594 A: 4274 B: 1536 20321 7988 Numbe o loo s 4 4 4 3 4 4 1 1 3 S age olume no shell [m3] 4631 5556 1963 1742 3363 4907 3421 14273 3703 S age olume wi h shell [m3] 872 1728 – – – 945 – 1850 574+405 To al olumeb[m3] no shell V′10702 13670 6763 6777 9265 13873 9231c34594 11691 To al olumeb[m3] wi h shell V6943 9842 – – – 9911 – 22171 8562 Hall mean wid h, W[m] 17.0 17.7 10.4 18.0 16.6 17.7 A+B: 19.7 37.0 22.8 Hall max dep h, D[m] 25.3 25.6 17.4 21.9 27.1 23.3 A+B: 24.4 36.3 24.9 Hall mean heigh , H[m] 12.4 14.9 16.7 17.3 18.9 19.9 A+B: 11.1 14.3 14.9 Sea su ace, SA[m2] 536 687 354 449 411 699 A+B: 786 1156 555 R. poin s no shell 22 15 16 12/12 14/14 15 22/22 – 18/18 wi h shell 17 15/15 – – – 15/15 – 15/15 17 T[s] no shell 1.17 1.89 1.41 1.26 1.44 1.26 2.33 – 1.85 wi h shell 1.19 1.86 – – – 1.14 – 2.51 1.70 A[m2]no shell 1473 1165 772 866 1036 1773 638 – 1017 wi h shell 939 852 – – – 1400 – 1422 811 aHP – Ho seshoe p oscenium loo plan. SP – Shoebox p oscenium loo plan. RA – Rec angula audi o ium loo plan. CA – Cylind ical audi o ium loo plan. bHall and s age olumes. cHalls A and B plus s age. To comple e his in o ma ion and o a oid excessi e leng h, Fig. 1 shows he plo ed g aphs o he g ound plans and longi udinal sec ion o only he CGT, MFA, MT, and VT, espec i ely. The plans include he poin s o ecep ion on each floo in he hea es wi h diffe en Fig. 2. Views om he s age o he in e io s o he halls; o MFA he iew is om oom B. symbols, and he wo posi ions o he sou ce on he s age. In addi ion, Fig. 2 shows a se o pho og aphs o he in e io s o each hall aken om hei s age, and om oom B in he case o MFA. 534 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 3. Analyses o expe imen al esul s and discussions This sec ion co e s, in i s a ious subsec ions, he analyses o monau al and binau al pa ame e s s udied in he 9 conce enues, bo h in e ms o hei spa- ial alues in he spaces as well as in e ms o he ela ionships be ween he diffe en ypes o pa ame- e s ha e alua e he same pe cep ual a ibu es o spa ial imp ession. The co ela ions be ween he hall- a e age pa ame e s wi h he geome ic and acous ic pa ame e s o he halls a e also ca ied ou . In all cases, he analyses p esen ed e e o he esul s o he spec- al a e ages o he pa ame e s as s a ed a he end o Sec. 1. These esul s can be used o u he s udies o co ela ion be ween objec i e pa ame e s and spa ial imp ession. As a s a ing poin , a compa ison by eg ession o he expe imen al alues o he wo monau al ea ly la - e al ac ions, JLFm and JLFCm, is ca ied ou . Re- g ession analysis shows ha he wo pa ame e s a e linea ly ela ed when he esul s a e compa ed o each hall and include he esul s o he wo s age configu a- ions, and when he esul s a e s udied in all indi idual posi ions in all he halls oge he . In he o me case he weakes co ela ion is, o FGT wi hou he o ches- a shell: JLFCm = 0.569 JLFm + 0.132, R2= 0.6144, P = 0.0005, (2) and he s onges linea co ela ion also o FGT, bu wi h he shell: JLFCm = 0.785 JLFm + 0.104, R2= 0.9560, P < 0.0001. (3) By conside ing he esul s in all indi idual posi ions o all halls (321 pai s o alues, o he wo configu a ions o he s age and he wo sou ce posi ions) he bes fi co esponds o a s aigh line: JLFCm = 0.837JLFm + 0.091, R2= 0.8554, P < 0.0001. (4) The good esul s o s a is ical analysis indica e ha hese wo pa ame e s a e e y simila and ha he expe imen al p ocedu e is co ec and can he e o e be used al e na ely o ei he di ec ional pa ame e o ea ly la e al ene gy. Simila esul s ha e been ob ained wi h diffe en equipmen in wo ship spaces o a com- mon ypology (Gi ón e al., 2008). Hence o wa d, he esul s o JLFm a e used since his pa ame e p esen s he bes acili ies o measu ing and has expe ienced he wides use in o he expe imen al wo k, he eby a- cili a ing compa ison. 3.1. Spa ial dis ibu ion o he la e al acous ic pa ame e s. E ec o he o ches a shell As a fi s s ep o his analysis, all he pa ame e s we e s udied as a unc ion o sou ce- ecei e dis ance. In gene al, he empi ical da a se appea s as a cloud o poin s and ails o indica e any p edic able beha iou in e ms o sou ce- ecei e dis ance. Fu he mo e, o he wo possible s age configu a ions, hese expe imen- al esul s we e also compa ed wi h he heo e ical al- ues de e mined by Ba on’s e ised heo y o sound p opaga ion in halls (Ba on, Lee, 1988), whe e e- e be a ion ime T, (measu ed in he unoccupied halls and a e aged spa ially and spec ally in he 500 and 1000 Hz oc a e bands), and he o al olume V, a e he only magni udes in ol ed in hei calcula ions. In o de o a oid excessi e leng h, he de ailed e- sul s o his s udy a e no shown. Howe e , i s main conclusions can be summa ized as: A) The e is con- side able sca e om he heo e ical p edic ions and he u hes de ia ions gene ally occu in he la e la - e al le el LJm ega dless o he ype o hall and o he sou ce- ecei e dis ance. B) The influence o he o ches al shell on he s age in he heo e ical p edic- ions is e y small. In he expe imen al esul s he di - e ences a e small, simila o he findings ob ained by B adley (1996), bu pe cep ible (in e ms o JND), as will be analysed la e . C) Ba on’s e ised heo y o sound p opaga ion in halls indica es ha la e la e al sound le els a e mo e sensi i e o changes in e e be a- ion ime and oom olume han ea ly la e al ac ions (Ba on, 2001), and hence he effec o adding an o - ches a shell may be he g ea es on he la e la e al a i ing sound le els a audience sea loca ions. In he absence o p edic able beha iou when s udying he esul s o hese fi e pa ame e s e sus dis- ance o he sou ce on he s age, i was decided o con- duc a s udy o hei spa ial dis ibu ion by ollowing a common me hodology o he fi e pa ame e s s udied. This consis s o e alua ing he pa ame e s acco ding o dis ances om he poin s o ecep ion o he cen al axis o he oom, x( o le - and igh -hand sides), and by no malizing hese dis ances wi h espec o hal he a e age wid h o each oom, w, hen hese ela i e dis- ances a e p esen ed as (x/w). This me hod o e alu- a ion is jus ified by he ac ha spa ial imp ession is ela ed o he p esence o ea ly and la e la e al eflec- ions, and ha he close he walls, he highe in ensi y should be. Fo he analysis o his comp ehensi e spa ial dis- ibu ion in all ooms, he alues o he acous ic pa- ame e s ela ed o spa ial imp ession a e g ouped in o disc e e in e als o he a o emen ioned ela i e dis- ances (x/w). The magni ude o hese in e als is se a 0.25, whe e posi ions x/w > 1exp ess he posi ions o he mic ophone e y close o he side walls, which in all cases co espond o posi ions in a eas o boxes and S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 535 side e aces on he g ound o uppe floo s and he e- o e usually unde an o e hang, (e.g. in CGT, FGT, HGT, LVT, MCT and MFA). I should be bo ne in mind ha all he pa ame e s s udied a each posi ion ha e been a e aged in equency a he oc a e bands, wi h he p ocedu es es ablished by ISO 3382-1 (ISO, 2009), lis ed in Sec. 1. On he o he hand, in small ci ies, i is e y com- mon o adap pe o mance halls o he needs o o ches- al music by means o o ches a shells. Despi e hei widesp ead use, e y li le published in o ma ion exis s on hei acous ical p ope ies and hei influence in he acous ic field o he hall. This sec ion also analyses he influence o shells on he pa ame e s conside ed in he diffe en a eas. 3.1.1. Ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion JLFm In Fig. 3a, he ea ly la e al ene gy monau al pa- ame e JLFm is plo ed in o dina es and scaled a in- e als o 1 JND. In abscissa, he ela i e dis ance o he cen al axis o he oom is gi en o all he halls s udied wi hou he o ches a shell and wi h esul s o he wo posi ions o he sound sou ce (S1 and S2 on he s age, in he d awings o Fig. 1). The numbe o measu emen poin s in each disc e e posi ional zone is also specified a he op o he g aph. The ypical ange o his pa ame e (exp essed in Fig. 3a as ISO) acco ding o ISO 3382-1 (ISO, 2009), is (0.05, 0.35) o non-occupied conce halls and mul i-pu pose halls wi h a olume o less han 25,000 m3. Figu e 3a also indica es ano he na owe ange ound in hese pe o - mance spaces (0.10, 0.30) which means a cu o 1 JND in bo h he uppe and lowe limi s o he ange wi h espec o hose specified in ISO 3382-1. I can be ob- se ed ha his ange includes, in each case, he as majo i y o expe imen al esul s. The c i e ion used in hei specific de e mina ion acco ding o Fig. 3b, is discussed la e . The filled symbols linked by lines show he a e age alues o he JLFm pa ame e in each posi ional in e - al, and he deg ee o spa ial dispe sion in each in e - al is cha ac e ized by he s anda d de ia ion ( e ical ba s). The spa ial dispe sion ends o inc ease sligh ly o posi ions close o he side walls x/w >1 and he analysis o he esul s indica es ha , o x/w be ween 0.25 and 0.75, he a e age alues o he pa ame e a e e y cons an and only o he a ea nea he cen e o he halls, x/w < 0.25, does JLFm educe i s alues by 0.5 JND. As a complemen o Fig. 3a, and in o de o no mal- ize he expe imen al da a wi h espec o he spa ial dis ibu ion in he a eas conce ned, Fig. 3b exp esses in o dina es he pe cen age o he expe imen al da a in each in e al o 1 JND (n) o alues o JLFm in each posi ional a ea (x/w) in ela ion o he o al da a in he same a ea, named n∆(x/w)(see op o Fig. 3a). a) b) Fig. 3. a) Ea ly la e al ene gy ac ions in he ela i e dis- ance in e als o he cen al axis o he halls, o all halls, o he wo sou ce posi ions and o he wi hou shell on he s age. The mean alues and hei s anda d de ia ions o each in e al a e also shown. The ypical ange o alues in his wo k and in ISO 3382-1 a e p esen ed; b) ac ion o da a o alues o JLFm in s eps o 1 JND in he diffe en in e als o x/w ela i e o he o al numbe o da a in each in e al co esponding o he esul s shown in pa (a). I can be seen ha o each in e al he o al sum ails o each 100%, he eason being ha only hose alues o he acous ic pa ame e o which he da a lies mos ly abo e 10% in he whole ange a ia ion we e conside ed as significan in he wo figu es. Residual alues co espond o he ange o a ia ion o JLFm be- ween (0.00, 0.10) in he lowe ange and (0.30, 0.45) in he op ange. This de e mines he ypical ange o pa- ame e a ia ion in hese ooms. In his dis ibu ion, i can be obse ed how he pe cen age o he wo ma- jo anges (black and da k g ey ba s) inc emen s when app oaching he la e al walls. In o de o disce n he effec o he o ches al shell on he beha iou o he pa ame e , Fig. 4a shows a sim- ila s udy o JLFm bu conside ing only he ou pe - o mance halls (CGT, FGT, MCT, and VT) which 536 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 a) b) c) Fig. 4. a) Ea ly la e al ene gy ac ions in e ms o he di - e en in e als o ela i e dis ance o he cen al axis o 4 halls, a S1 sou ce posi ion and o he wo s age configu- a ions. The mean alues and hei s anda d de ia ions o each in e al and he ypical ange o alues in his wo k (wi h shell and no shell) and in ISO 3382-1, a e also shown; b) ac ion o da a o alues o JLFm in s eps o 1 JND in diffe en in e als o x/w ela i e o he o al amoun o da a in he same in e al, o 4 halls wi hou he o ches a shell; c) idem wi h he o ches a shell on he s age. ha e been s udied wi h he wo configu a ions o he s age and solely a he sou ce posi ion S1, o ensu e compa ible da a in he wo configu a ions. The s udy hus shows he possible effec when he amendmen o only one a iable is in ol ed ( he shell). (Al hough he amoun o da a should coincide, he e emains a sligh diffe ence due o echnical p oblems ha a ose in one space (CGT), see he op o Fig. 4a). Resul s confi m he end ob ained o he wi hou - shell configu a ions ha we e s udied o all halls in Fig. 3a, and he main enance o he ange es ablished (0.10, 0.30) o bo h s a is ical popula ions o da a ( he eby alida ing s a is ical esul s o he wi h-shell configu a ion), and also show ha shells lead o a sig- nifican dec ease in he a e age alues o he pa ame e JLFm in all audience zones. Specifically, in he cen e o he s alls, x/w ∈(0.00, 0.25), while be ween 0.50 and 0.75, he dec ease is abou 0.5 JND. Fo he zone o boxes and uppe balconies unde o e hangs, he o de o he dec ease is 1 JND. This sugges s, a leas ini- ially, ha shells ocus sound by dec easing he ini ial la e al eflec ions, especially in he a eas unde bal- conies. In addi ion, spa ial dispe sion p esen s simila be- ha iou emaining e y simila in he o he a eas and eaches i s highes alue, a x/w >1, he a ea nea he side walls. Resul s also confi m he na owe ange deduced be o e o he no-shell configu a ion in his pa ame e (0.10, 0.30), and ano he e en na owe ange in he uppe limi (0.10, 0.25) o he wi h-shell configu a- ion. The effec o he p esence o he o ches a shell on his ea ly la e al ene gy pa ame e in he audience sea s al hough small is audible, as seen in B adley’s wo k on a se o Ame ican halls (B adley, 1996). Complemen a y o hese s a emen s, Figs. 4b and 4c include he esul s o he pe cen age o da a in each posi ional in e al o his pa ame e , in s eps o 1 JND in each in e al, whe eby only hose esul s o he pa ame e o which he e a e significan alues abo e 10% in all a eas a e included. These esul s co - espond o he ange om 0.10 o 0.30 o he s age wi hou he o ches al shell and a e simila o he con- clusion d awn om Fig. 3b, and om 0.10 o 0.25 o he shell configu a ion. I is also wo h no ing ha he black ba does no appea i he shell is p esen . 3.1.2. La e la e al le el LJm A simila analysis was pe o med wi h he o he monau al pa ame e associa ed wi h he subjec i e pe cep ion, known as he en elopmen o sound o he subjec , LJm. Thus Fig. 5a shows he expe imen- al esul s ob ained a he wo sou ce posi ions in all halls wi hou he shell, and he a e aged alues o he pa ame e in he diffe en posi ional a eas. Mean al- ues a e e y simila in all posi ional zones, and lowe spa ial dispe sion is p esen a he cen e o he s alls and in he icini y o he side walls. Fu he mo e, i is wo h no ing ha he ange o a ia ion o he pa am- e e s udied in all he ooms can be se om −6dB o 0 dB which is a na owe ange o a ia ion om he ypical ange specified in ISO 3382-1 o conce halls and mul ipu pose ooms wi h a olume <25,000 m3. Fo he comple ion o his s udy, and in o de o no malize he dis ibu ion o da a, Fig. 5b p esen s he pe cen age o he amoun o da a, in s eps o 2 dB, ela i e o he o al amoun o da a in each posi ional in e al agains hese spa ial in e als. I is wo h no ing ha o he highes in e al (−2dB, 0 dB) he e is an inc emen o ecep ion poin s om he cen e o he halls o he la e al walls (black ba ), excep o he x/w > 1posi ions. Since he JND o his pa ame e emains unknown, he alue o 2 dB S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 537 a) b) Fig. 5. a) A e aged la e la e al le el in he diffe en in e - als o no malized dis ance o he cen al axis o he halls: o all halls, he wo sou ce posi ions and wi hou o ches- a shell. The means and hei s anda d de ia ion alues a e also shown, oge he wi h he ypical ange o alues in his wo k and he ypical ange in ISO 3382-1; b) ac ion o da a o alues o LJm in s eps o 2 dB in he diffe en in e als o x/w ela i e o he o al amoun o da a in he same in e al, o all halls wi hou he o ches a shell on he s age. has been chosen due o he wide ange o he a ia ion: om −8.57 dB o +8.15 dB. In his ep esen a ion, he esul s o he alues o his pa ame e ha ail o p esen a significan amoun o da a (abo e 10%) in all posi ional zones a e igno ed. By es ic ing he s udy o he 4 ooms in which acous ic measu emen s we e aken in he wo config- u a ions, wi h and wi hou he o ches a shell on he s age, se o Figs. 6, he a e aged alues emain con- s an in all posi ional a eas and confi m he beha iou o he pa ame e alues in all ooms s udied in Fig. 5a, al hough sligh ly highe alues a e encoun e ed. Bo h Figs. 5a and 6a, main ain he uppe alue o he ange o a ia ion o he pa ame e in hese spaces (0 dB) de- spi e he significan numbe o poin s ha a e igno ed abo e 0 dB, because hey a e less han 10% in each 2 dB jump. Fu he mo e, hese esul s ela e mos ly o ecep o s o MFA ( his space has no o ches al shell) and a e he e o e no shown in Fig. 6a. In ac , he dis ibu ion o mean alues is app oxima ely −2dB when he shell is p esen and app oxima ely −4dB in i s absence (Fig. 6a). The gap be ween he wo con- figu a ions ends o dec ease o he a eas closes o he side walls (x/w > 0.75). Rega ding he spa ial dis- pe sion as assessed by he s anda d de ia ion, his is gene ally in he same o de o magni ude o he wo configu a ions o he s age, in all posi ional zones o he audience a ea. a) b) c) Fig. 6. a) La e la e al le el esul s in he diffe en in e als o no malized dis ance o he cen al axis o he halls o 4 halls, a S1 sou ce posi ion and o he wo s age config- u a ions. The mean alues and hei s anda d de ia ions o each in e al a e also shown, oge he wi h he ypi- cal ange o alues in his wo k and he ISO 3382-1 ange; b) ac ion o da a o alues o LJm in s eps o 2 dB in he diffe en in e als o x/w, ela i e o he o al amoun o da a in he same in e al, o 4 halls wi hou he o ches a shell; c) idem wi h he o ches a shell on he s age. As o he complemen a y s udy conduc ed h ough Figs. 6b and 6c, he da ase wi h alues o n/n∆xabo e he 10% limi sugges s sho ening he LJm ypical al- ues o be ween −8dB and 0 dB o he wi hou -shell configu a ion, in Fig. 5b he ange is na owe (−6dB, 0 dB), and be ween −6dB and +2 dB o he configu- a ion wi h he shell. The shell he e o e inc eases he 544 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 In all cases, he linea fi s s udied show e y weak co ela ions. Taking in o accoun he a o emen ioned assump ions, he only eliable co ela ions a e hose o (1-IACCEm)wi h A(wi h nega i e slope), (1- IACCLm)wi h T, whe eby he pa ame e inc eases when e e be a ion ime inc eases, and ha o LJm wi h V/N which also has a posi i e slope Eqs. (10)– (12). The alues and linea eg essions co esponding o he binau al pa ame e s a e plo ed in Figs. 11a and b, espec i ely. LJm =−0.763(V/N) + 5.159, R2= 0.4861, P = 0.0081,(10) (1 −IACCEm) = −0.0001A+ 0.668, R2= 0.5538, P = 0.0035,(11) (1 −IACCLm) = 0.044T+ 0.759, R2= 0.5828, P = 0.0024.(12) In he same way as he simple image model indi- ca es in conce halls and ope a houses, he mean hall ea ly la e al ene gy ac ions a e influenced by he hall wid h. O he pieces o wo k ha e ound his co ela- ion, o ins ance Gade (1989) concludes ha JLFm has no meaning ul connec ion o diffuse field heo y a) b) Fig. 11. a) Hall-a e age alues o (1-IACCEm) e sus A; b) (1-IACCLm) alues e sus T, in he wo configu a ions o he s ages and hei linea fi s. bu shows a highly significan ela ionship wi h hall wid h. Based on he da a om all 32 halls, he co e- la ion is R2= 0.43 and nega i e. Howe e , i he anal- ysis is es ic ed o 16 ec angula halls, i inc eases o R2= 0.67. In addi ion, he a io 2H/W which de e - mines he ela i e a i al ime o ea ly la e al and e - ical eflec ions, as Wes (1966) sugges ed o conce halls, seems o be a geome ical measu e in connec ion wi h ea ly la e al ac ion measu es. In he halls s ud- ied in his wo k, he wo geome ical magni udes W, and 2H/W p esen a e y poo ela ionship wi h he monau al ac ion JLFm and wi h he binau al mea- su e (1-IACCEm). Pe haps he low co ela ion in his wo k is due o he ac ha o ches a shells p o oke au- dible a ia ions in he acous ic pa ame e s, while he associa ed geome ical quan i ies emain unchanged. To sum up, unde he la ge olume o da a ana- lyzed in his wo k and he many a iables included i would be desi able o ollow B adley’s e y ecen sug- ges ions (B adley, 2011) in connec ion wi h ca ying ou expe imen al wo k o a mo e ocused na u e. 3.4. Summa y and discussion In his sec ion, a synopsis o he s udy is un- de aken and he esul s a e p esen ed o he objec- i e acous ic pa ame e s, (spec ally a e aged in acco - dance wi h he ISO 3382-1 s anda d (ISO, 2009)) ha quali y he spa ial imp ession in 9 pe o mance halls in sou he n Spain (Andalusia) in he a ious app oaches. The dependence o monau al and binau al pa am- e e s on sou ce- ecei e dis ance shows no p edic able beha iou and expe imen al esul s ha e been com- pa ed wi h he heo e ical calcula ions o Ba on’s e- ised heo y, which needs only he mean e e be a ion ime and o al hall olume o each hall (Subsec. 3.1, (Ba on, Lee, 1988)). The s udy o spa ial dis ibu ion o acous ic pa- ame e s in he ooms was join ly ca ied ou by scal- ing he esul s a in e als o 1 JND (0.05 o JLFm and JLLFm, 0.075 o (1-IACCm)measu es, and 2 dB o LJm, whose JND is no known) depending on he ela i e posi ions o he poin s o ecep ion o he cen- al axis o each oom ( o le and igh -hand sides), which we e no malized ela i e o hal hei espec i e mean wid h, (Subsec. 3.1). The o ches a shell com- monly p oduces a small bu pe cep ible effec on hese pa ame e s measu ed in he audience a ea, since o JLFm, Fig. 4a, he change may each a alue o 1 JND, especially in he a eas closes o he side walls. In ad- di ion, he ange o a ia ion o JLFm in he se o alues o all ooms is (0.10, 0.30) in he configu a ion wi hou shell (Figs. 3a and 4a), and (0.10, 0.25) wi h he o ches al shell, Fig. 4a, which sugges s ha he shell a ou s a edis ibu ion o he acous ic ene gy in he audience a ea in hese pe o mance spaces. Fu - he mo e, he a e age alues o JLFm in all posi ional S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 545 in e als a e lowe when he shell is p esen on s age han when i is absen . Fo he la e la e al le el LJm, howe e , he shell seems o a ou an inc ease o he pa ame e , and in bo h configu a ions o he s age he ange o a ia ion is also much na owe han he yp- ical ange s a ed in ISO 3382-1 (ISO, 2009), (−8, 0) dB o he no-shell configu a ion, and (−6, 2) dB o he wi h shell, see se o Figs. 6. As o he binau al pa ame e s, (Table 2), bo h he ea ly la e al ene gy as well as he la e ene gy ex- hibi simila spa ial dispe sion and a e lowe han he monau al pa ame e s a he a ious posi ional in e - als. Fo (1-IACCEm), he ypical ange in hese spaces is (0.40, 0.70) o he wo configu a ions o he s age. Pa ame e (1-IACCLm)exhibi s he same beha iou in i s mean alues in each posi ional zone wi h a sligh peak in he a ea be ween he cen al axis and side walls o he oom (s alls zone). The s anda d de ia- ions show ha he spa ial dispe sions a e no wide, and a e sligh ly highe , gene ally, in he configu a ion wi hou shell. The ypical ange o his pa ame e in hese a eas is (0.75, 0.90) ega dless o whe he he e is an o ches a shell on s age. The effec on la e al ene gy pa ame e s measu ed in he audience zone due o he change o sou ce po- si ion on s age has been also s udied in e ms o he absolu e alue o he diffe ences in hei alues, scaled a in e als o 1 JND a each ecep ion poin o each oom. No p edic able beha iou o hese diffe ences in he pa ame e s associa ed wi h he a ia ion o sou ce- ecei e dis ance, no o he diffe en la e ali y o he sou ce sound posi ion has been de ec ed. In a s a is i- cal su ey o all ecep ion poin s, classified acco ding o how hey see he sou ce in all ooms oge he , mos o he sea s ha e a ia ions ha a e in he ange 1–2 JND o he ea ly la e al ene gy pa ame e s, whils o he la e la e al ene gy, mos poin s lie wi hin diffe - ences <1JND (Figs. 7 and Table 3). Conside ing he beha iou o hese diffe ences o each oom, JLFm p esen s e y homogeneous alues in MCT and LVT halls, as shown in Fig. 8a, which bo h ha e ho seshoe ypology. Gene ally o he la e la e al le el, LJm, Fig. 8b, a g ea e change is ound in he alues o hese diffe ences om place o place wi hin all he halls s udied. The esul s o he compa ison be ween alues o he wo ypes o measu es o la e al ene gy (monau al and binau al o he same empo al in e al) ob ained in he 9 halls in all he indi idual posi ions show ha he co ela ions a e e y weak and ha he ela ionships a e no s a is ically significan , as shown in he se o Figs. 9. Howe e , ela ionships imp o e when he da a on each hall is conside ed exclusi ely, especially in ce - ain halls, and when all hall-a e age da a is s udied o a compa ison be ween JLFm and (1-IACCEm). In he la e case, he inclusion in he s udy o he esul s o a se o 15 halls om Okano’s wo k (Okano e al., 1998) u he imp o es he co ela ion ound (Fig. 10a). Fo he la e la e al ene gy pa ame e s, no simila da a is a ailable in he li e a u e. Howe e , by aking in o ac- coun he alues o he 9 halls s udied in his wo k o he wo configu a ions o he s age, he ela ionship be- ween (1-IACCLm)and LJm pa ame e s becomes sim- ila o ha ob ained p e iously o he ea ly la e al ene gy pa ame e s as shown in Fig. 10b. Finally, he s udy in Subsec. 3.3.2 o he dependen- cies o hese hall-a e age pa ame e s wi h eigh acous- ic and geome ical pa ame e s, (namely, mean wid h W, mean heigh - o-wid h a io H/W, mean heigh - o- dep h a io H/D, mean dep h- o-wid h a io D/W , o al- olume- o-numbe -o -sea s a io V/N, audience- su ace- o-numbe -o -sea s a io SA/N, e e be a ion ime T, and abso p ion A), enables he conclusion ha he s a is ically significan ela ionships a e he ollowing linea eg essions be ween he a iables: (1-IACCEm)wi h A, Fig. 11a, wi h nega i e slope; (1-IACCLm)wi h T, Fig. 11b, wi h posi i e slope; and ha o LJm wi h V/N, also wi h nega i e slope. I can be obse ed ha , in all cases, he independen a iable is ela ed o he e e be a ion cha ac e is ic o he oom (i mus be aken in o accoun ha he majo abso ben su ace in hese spaces is he audi- ence zone, which is closely ela ed o he V/N a io). In his analysis, no o he geome ical o acous ic a i- ables ha e shown hei po en ial influence on he alues o he pa ame e s ela ed o spa ial imp ession. 4. Conclusions O he a ious aspec s s udied in his wo k on he monau al di ec ional and binau al pa ame e s (spec- ally a e aged in acco dance wi h he ISO 3382-1 s anda d) o e alua e he spa ial effec s o he sound fields in 9 pe o mance spaces in Andalusia (sou he n Spain), i is fi s wo h emphasising ha he depen- dence o he pa ame e s on sou ce- ecei e dis ance in each hall has e ealed ha la e al acous ic ene gy is no dis ibu ed acco ding o he heo e ical p edic ions o he diffuse e ised heo y by Ba on. As a esul , a common me hodology has been used o all a eas and pa ame e s unde s udy. In his me hodology he po- si ion o he ecei ing poin s a e exp essed in ela ion o hei dis ance om he symme y axis o he oom (le - and igh -hand sides) no malized wi h espec o hal he a e age wid h o he oom, and he acous- ic pa ame e s a e scaled a in e als o hei espec- i e JND. The s a is ical ea men is he same o he pa- ame e s, da a om all ooms wi h sou ce in S1 and S2 wi hou shell, and hen he 4 ooms in which hey a e measu ed wi h he wo configu a ions on he s age. The main enance o conclusions when ea ing a wide s a is ical ensemble wi h he second case (smalle ) gi es alidi y o he esul s and conclusions when shells 546 A chi es o Acous ics – Volume 37, Numbe 4, 2012 a e on he s ages. S a is ical esul s show ha he spa- ial dis ibu ion o ea ly la e al ene gy ac ions p o- ides highe alues o posi ions close o he side walls (mean alues o x/w > 1exceed hose o he cen al a ea o e 1 JND), whe eas hose pa ame e s associ- a ed wi h la e la e al ene gy and binau al pa ame e s p esen a mo e uni o m s a is ical dis ibu ion in he posi ional zones. The applied me hodology has allowed, o each pa- ame e s udied, he sys ema ic es ablishmen o hei cha ac e is ic anges o he dis ibu ion o hei al- ues o he wo shell configu a ions on he s age. These anges a e gene ally smalle han hose sugges ed in ISO 3382-1. S a is ical esul s ha e shown ha he o ches al shell p omo es a edis ibu ion o acous ic ene gy in o he audience a ea and p oduces a no iceable dec ease o he ea ly la e al ene gy ac ion: his dec ease is g ea e o posi ions close o he side walls. Howe e , o he la e la e al le el he p esence o he shell on s age leads o an inc ease in i s alues and a simila i y in magni ude in all posi ional in e als. This sugges s, a leas ini ially, ha shells ocus sound by dec eas- ing he ini ial la e al eflec ions, especially in he a eas unde balconies. This is eflec ed in he alues o he limi s o he anges men ioned in he p e ious pa a- g aph. The change in he wo posi ions o he sound sou ce on s age also influences hese pa ame e s; i s influence is g ea e on he ea ly la e al ene gy pa ame e s, and he diffe ences ound due o he change a e mo e ho- mogeneous o he ho seshoe ypology. Fo he la e la e al ene gy pa ame e s, he e is a lowe incidence o change in posi ion o he sound sou ce and esul s p esen mo e uni o mi y in audi o ium ypologies. The analysis has no shown ha he ela i e posi ion o he ecei e in on o he sou ce (le / igh ) has a signi - ican effec in any o he pa ame e s analyzed. The change in posi ion o he sou ce implies ha , o all he pa ame e s analysed, mo e han 80% o ecei e s o he en i e enclosu es expe ience a ia ions lowe han 2 JND. Fo he (1-IACCLm)pa ame e , his pe cen - age eaches 100% o ecei e s. Monau al and binau al pa ame e s desc ibe e y diffe en physical cha ac e is ics o he sound field, and hus co ela ions a e e y weak when s udying pai s o esul s a each posi ion o signal ecep ion. Exclusi ely when each hall is desc ibed by a single alue ( he spa- ial a e age) an accep able ela ionship be ween he pa ame e s is ound bo h o he ea ly and la e ime- in e al pa ame e s. Finally, in o de o d aw conclusions in ela ion o design a iables, monau al and binau al pa ame e s ha e been compa ed wi h he mean alues o geome i- cal and acous ical a iables o he pe o mance spaces. Reg essions show ha nei he he mean wid h, no he mean-heigh /mean-wid h a io is significan and ha in all cases, pa ame e s ela ed o e e be a ion a e he key (abso p ion, e e be a ion ime, and V/N a io). Acknowledgmen The au ho s wish o exp ess hei g a i ude o he s aff and managemen o each hall o hei coope a ion in allowing he measu emen s o be ca ied ou . This wo k has been sponso ed by FEDER unds and he Spanish Minis y o Science and Technology (MCYT) wi hin he p ojec s wi h e e ences BIA2003-09306- CO4-02, and BIA2010-20523. Re e ences 1. Abdou A., Guy R.W. (1996), Spa ial in o ma ion o sound fields o oom-acous ics e alua ion and diagno- sis, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 100, 3215–3226. 2. Ando Y. (2007), Handbook o Acous ics, Thomas Ross- ing, Edi o , Sp inge -Ve lag, New Yo k Chap e 10. 3. Ba on M. (1971), The subjec i e effec s o fi s e- flec ions in conce halls - he need o la e al eflec- ions, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 15, 475–494. 4. Ba on M. (2001), La e la e al ene gy ac ions and he en elopmen ques ion in conce halls, Applied Acous ics, 62, 185–202. 5. Ba on M., Lee L-J. (1988), Ene gy ela ions in con- ce audi o ia I, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 84, 618–628. 6. Ba on M., Ma shall A.H. (1981), Spa ial imp es- sion due o ea ly la e al eflec ions in conce halls. The de i a ion o a physical measu e, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 77, 211–232. 7. Be anek L.L. (1962), Music, Acous ics and A chi ec- u e, John Wiley & Sons, New Yo k. 8. Be anek L.L. (1992), Conce hall acous ics, The Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 92, 1– 39. 9. Blaue J., Lindemann W. (1986a), Audi o y spa- ciousness: Some u he psychoacous ic analyses, The Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 80, 533– 542. 10. Blaue J., Lindemann W. (1986b), Supplemen- a y psychoacous ical esul s on audi o y spaciousness, Acus ica, 59, 292–293. 11. B adley J.S. (1994), Compa ison o conce hall mea- su emen s o spa ial imp ession, Jou nal o he Acous- ical Socie y o Ame ica, 96, 3525–3535. 12. B adley J.S. (1996), Some effec s o o ches a shells, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 100, 889- 898. 13. B adley J.S. (2011), Re iew o objec i e oom acous- ics measu es and u u e needs, Applied Acous ics, 72, 713–720. S. Gi ón, T. Zama e˜no, P. Bus aman e – Objec i e Measu es o Spa ial Effec s in Spanish Conce Halls 547 14. B adley J.S., Reich R.D., No c oss S.G. (2000), On he combined effec s o ea ly- and la e-a i ing sound on spa ial imp ession in conce halls, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 108, 651–661. 15. B adley J.S., Soulod e G.A. (1995a), The in- fluence o la e-a i ing ene gy on spa ial imp ession, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 97, 2263– 2291. 16. B adley J.S., Soulod e G.A. (1995b), Objec i e measu es o lis ene en elopmen , Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 98, 2590–2597. 17. Cox T.J., Da ies J., Lam Y.W. (1993), The sensi i - i y o lis ene s o ea ly sound field changes in audi o ia, Acus ica, 79, 27–41. 18. C eme L. (1989), Ea ly eflec ions in some mod- e n conce halls, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 85, 1213–1225. 19. Damaske P., Ando Y. (1972), In e au al c oss co e- la ion o mul ichannel loudspeake ep oduc ion, Acus- ica, 27, 232–238. 20. De V ies D., Hulsebos E.M., Baan J. (2001), Spa- ial fluc ua ions in measu es o spaciousness, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 110, 947–954. 21. E jen P., B adley J.S., No c oss S.G. (2001), The effec o la e eflec ions om abo e and behind on lis- ene en elopmen , Applied Acous ics, 62, 137–153. 22. Gade A.C. (1989), An acous ical su ey o ele en Eu- opean conce halls - a basis o discussion o halls in Denma k, The Acous ics Labo a o y, Tech. Uni . o Denma k, [Repo No.44]. 23. Gi ón S., Galindo M., Zama e˜ no T. (2008), Dis- ibu ion o la e al acous ic ene gy in Mudeja -Go hic chu ches, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 315, 1125– 1142. 24. Gi ón S., Zama e˜ no T., Galindo M. (2010), Ex- pe imen al s udy o suppo pa ame e s in audi o ium and p oscenium s ages, Ac a Acus ica uni ed wi h Acus ica, 96, 1026–1041. 25. Hidaka T., Be anek L.L., Okano T. (1995), In e - au al c oss-co ela ion, la e al ac ion, and low- and high- equency sound le els as measu es o acous ical quali y in conce halls, Jou nal o he Acous ical So- cie y o Ame ica, 98, 988–1007. 26. In e na ional O ganiza ion Fo S anda diza ion ISO 3382-1:2009(E), (2009), Acous ics-Measu emen o oom acous ic pa ame e s, pa 1: Pe o mance ooms, Gene a, Swi ze land. 27. Kleine M. (1989), A new way o measu ing he la - e al ene gy ac ions, Applied Acous ics, 27, 321–327. 28. León A.L., Send a J.J., Na a o J., Zama e- ˜ no T. (2007), Acous ics and es o a ion in hea es o Andalucia [in Spanish: Ac´us ica y Rehabili ación en Tea os de Andaluc´ıa], Sec e a iado de Publicaciones de la Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se illa. 29. Ma shall A.H. (1967), A no e on he impo ance o oom c oss-sec ion in conce halls, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 5, 100–112. 30. Ma shall A.H. (1968), Le els o eflec ion masking in conce halls, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 7, 116–118. 31. MIREM (Mapa In o ma izado de Recin os Esc´enicos y Musicales; Fundación Au o , Sociedad Gene al de Au o es y Edi o es) h p://www.a ene sgae.com- /mi e/index.h m [Digi al Scenic and Musical Enclosu e Map, Au ho Founda ion] (Accessed Sep embe 2012, cu en ly only in Spanish). 32. Mo imo o M., Iida K., Sakagami K. (2001), The ole o eflec ions om behind he lis ene in spa ial imp ession, Applied Acous ics, 62, 109–124. 33. Mo imo o M., Nakagawa, K. Iida K. (2008), The ela ion be ween spa ial imp ession and he law o he fi s wa e on , Applied Acous ics, 69, 132-140. 34. Okano T., Be anek L.L., Hidaka T. (1998), Re- la ions among in e au al c oss-co ela ion coefficien (IACCE), la e al ac ion (LFE), and appa en sou ce wid h (ASW) in conce halls, Jou nal o he Acous i- cal Socie y o Ame ica, 104, 255–265. 35. Peu z V.M.A. (1971), A icula ion loss o consonan s as a c i e ion o speech ansmission in a oom, Jou - nal o he Audio Enginee ing Socie y, 19, 915–919. 36. Sabine W.C. (1993), Collec ed Pape s on Acous ics. (Camb idge: Ha a d Uni e si y P ess), Rep in ed by Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, New Yo k. 37. Sch oede M.R., A al B.S., Sessle G.M., Wes J.E. (1966), Acous ical measu emen s in he Philha monic Hall (New Yo k), Jou nal o he Acous- ical Socie y o Ame ica, 40, 434–440. 38. Soe a Y., Nakagawa S., Tonoike M., Ando Y. (2002), Magne oencephalog aphic esponses co e- sponding o indi idual subjec i e p e e ence o sound fields, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 258, 419–428. 39. Wes J.E. (1966), Possible subjec i e significance o he a io o heigh o wid h o conce halls, Jou nal o he Acous ical Socie y o Ame ica, 40, 1245.