Unveiling the Artistry of Juan Martínez Montañés: Carving and Polychromy in the Santa Clara Church Altarpiece

Citation: Moreno-Soto, J.; Križnar, A.; Moreno-Galindo, C.; Gamero-Osuna, A.; Ager, F.J.; Martín-de-Soto, A.; Respaldiza, M.Á. Unveiling the Artistry of Juan Martínez Montañés: Carving and Polychromy in the Santa Clara Church Altarpiece. Heritage 2024,7, 4085–4108. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/heritage7080192 Academic Editors: Giovanni E. Gigante and Roberto Cesareo Received: 24 May 2024 Revised: 22 June 2024 Accepted: 18 July 2024 Published: 31 July 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). heritage Article Unveiling the Artistry of Juan Martínez Montañés: Carving and Polychromy in the Santa Clara Church Altarpiece Javier Moreno-Soto 1,2,*, Anabelle Križnar 3,* , Concepción Moreno-Galindo 4, Antonio Gamero-Osuna 5, Francisco JoséAger 1,2 , Agustín Martín-de-Soto 5and Miguel Ángel Respaldiza 2,6 1 Departamento de Física Aplicada I, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Virgen de África 7, E-41011 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] 2Centro Nacional de Aceleradores, Universidad de Sevilla-Junta de Andalucía-CSIC, Avenida Tomas Alva Edison 7, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] 3 Departamento de Escultura e Historia de las Artes Plásticas, Facultad de Bellas Artes, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Laraña 3, E-41003 Sevilla, Spain 4 Departamento de Historia del Arte, Facultad de Geografía e Historia, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Doña Maria de Padilla, E-41004 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] 5 Taller de Restauración del Palacio Arzobispal, Delegación Diocesana de Patrimonio Cultural, Archidiócesis de Sevilla, Plaza Virgen de los Reyes s/n, E-41004 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (A.G.-O.); [email protected] (A.M.-d.-S.) 6Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. de Reina Mercedes s/n, E-41012 Sevilla, Spain *Correspondence: jmor[email protected] (J.M.-S.); [email protected] (A.K.) Abstract: Juan Martínez Montañés was one of the most important sculptors and altarpiece architects of the Spanish Golden Age. The restoration of the Santa Clara church in Seville has presented a unique opportunity to study the main altarpiece, crafted by Montañés between 1621 and 1623. He was also in charge of the polychromy and gilding, believing that delegating these procedures to others would diminish the quality of his work. This conviction led to a well-known lawsuit with the renowned contemporary Spanish painter Francisco Pacheco. Ultimately, the painter and sculptor Baltasar Quintero performed the polychromy of this altarpiece, but under the strict conditions of Montañés. Various non-invasive analytical techniques, such as CT, UVF, XRF, and digital microscopy, were employed to study wood treatment and polychromy. Additionally, three samples were prepared as cross-sections and analysed by SEM-EDX. The results revealed Montañés’ meticulous woodwork, anticipating its long-term preservation. Consistent with Montañés’ commitment to maintaining the superior quality of his work, the analysis showed an absence of a ground layer in the flesh areas, while the gilding was executed with high-quality gold. The pigment palette corresponds to the treaties and documents of his time, and the extensive areas of later retouches were accurately located. These new data provide a deeper understanding of both the technique and the high standards of one of the most important and globally recognised sculptors. Keywords: polychromy; sculpture; woodwork; pigments; Montañés; altarpiece; XRF; SEM-EDX; computed tomography 1. Introduction The sculptor Juan Martínez Montañés (1568–1649) [ 1 – 3 ] is recognised as the foremost exponent of the so-called Sevillian School of Imagery. In his time, he was considered the “Andalusian Lysippos” and “the God of Wood” due to his mastery of working with this material. As the son of an embroiderer artist, Juan Martínez, he moved with his family from his hometown, Alcalála Real (Jaén), to Granada in 1579. There, at the age of 12, he apprenticed under the sculptor Pablo de Rojas and collaborated with other artists, exploring various artistic styles. This experimentation undoubtedly played a role in shaping his distinctive Heritage 2024,7, 4085–4108. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7080192 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/heritage Heritage 2024,74086 sculptural style. He later settled in Seville around 1581. On 1 December 1588, at the age of 21, he successfully passed the examination as a sculptor, master carver, and architect, overseen by artist–examiners Gaspar de Águila and Miguel Adán. Montañés established his own workshop in Seville, where he had as his favoured disciple the Cordovan Juan de Mesa. Evidence suggests a sojourn in Madrid in 1635 to sculpt the bust of Felipe IV, commissioned by painter Diego Velázquez for the monarch’s equestrian portrait in Plaza de Oriente. Tragically, Montañés succumbed to the plague epidemic that devastated Seville on 18 June 1649. As a master sculptor and assembler, he had the right to undertake works in architecture, design, and the crafting of altarpieces. Today, we primarily value him as a sculptor of altarpieces, for which he conceived a significant number of sculptures. His works exhibit elements of classicism and mannerism, reflecting the spirituality and emotional realism characteristic of the Counter-Reformation influenced by the rising importance of the Catholic Church. Montañés played a crucial role in the transition from the Renaissance to the Baroque, as his technical prowess and ability to imbue his works with profound emotion helped the establishment of the Baroque aesthetic in Spain. This work focuses on studying the main altarpiece that presides over the church of Santa Clara in Seville (Spain), see Figure 1. For its creation, Martínez Montañés was commissioned in 1621, who took charge of its design and carving. However, in 1722, the altarpiece underwent a renovation, during which a relief depicting Saint Clare (Santa Clara) among the nuns of her community was removed and replaced by a shrine, altering the original composition of the work. This mannerist-style altarpiece adapts to the polygonal apse of the church and is structured into two bodies and an attic. The first body features two reliefs depicting scenes from the life of Saint Clare: “The imposition of the habit on Saint Clare by Saint Francis” and “The miraculous blessing of bread”. These reliefs flank the central shrine housing the image of “Saint Clare”, between which are the sculptures of “Saint Bonaventure” and “Saint Anthony of Padua with the Child in his hands”. At the ends of the second body, two reliefs portray scenes of the “Nativity of the Lord” and the “Annunciation”, while the central aisle is presided over by the image of the “Virgin of the Rosary”, attributed to Francisco de Ocampo and dated around 1633. Flanking this central image are the sculptures of “Saint Agnes” and “Saint Mary Magdalene”. The attic is occupied by a representation of the “Holy Trinity”, following the post-Tridentine iconography of the Throne of Grace. Finally, on the altarpiece’s predella, on the sides of the tabernacle, are two small sculptures of “Saint Peter”, possibly crafted by Alonso Cano, and “Saint Paul”. In the assembly contract for the altarpiece of 6 November 1621, Montañés committed himself to undertaking the architecture, carving, and sculpting, boldly venturing to include among the contract conditions the execution of gilding, estofado (a decorative technique that imitates the appearance of gold brocade by scratching through a paint layer to reveal another layer of contrasting colour or material—generally gold—below), and flesh tones [ 4 ]. These latter conditions, which persisted in the subsequent contract, sparked the well-known lawsuit of 1623 with the renowned Sevillian painter Francisco Pacheco. The sculptor had breached the rigid guild regulations of the time, encroaching into the realm of painting by subcontracting competencies outside the trade for which he was examined. Additionally, Montañés made an economic estimate of the polychromy, which accounted for one-third of the financial estimate for the assembly and sculpture, leading to the Painters’ Guild feeling disgraced during a period when they sought to elevate their art and having it regarded as a more intellectual discipline than manual labour, in order to avoid paying sale taxes. Francisco Pacheco had already countered the sculptor’s actions by dedicating the famous dissertation “On the Antiquity and Honors of the Art of Painting and Its Comparison with Sculpture, Against Juan Martínez Montañés” published in 1622 [ 5 ]. In his discourse, the painter emphasised that only those who were examined would use the craft of painting, warning that the master sculptor risked a penalty ranging from 600 to 900 maravedis and up to nine days in jail with his attitude. Thus, it was not the first instance in which Montañés Heritage 2024,74087 had contracted the carving and painting of entire works, overcoming tasks that did not fall within his purview. Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 3 Figure 1. Main altarpiece of the church of Santa Clara: (a) Saint Peter; (b) Saint Paul; (c) The imposition of the habit on Saint Clare by San Francisco; (d) Saint Bonaventure; (e) Saint Clare; (f) Saint Anthony of Padua; (g) The miraculous blessing of bread; (h) Nativity of the Lord; (i) Saint Agnes; (j) Virgin of the Rosary; (k) Saint Mary Magdalene; (l) Annunciation; (m) Holy Trinity. In the assembly contract for the altarpiece of 6 November 1621, Montañés commied himself to undertaking the architecture, carving, and sculpting, boldly venturing to include among the contract conditions the execution of gilding, estofado (a decorative technique that imitates the appearance of gold brocade by scratching through a paint layer to reveal another layer of contrasting colour or material—generally gold—below), and flesh tones [4]. These laer conditions, which persisted in the subsequent contract, sparked the well-known lawsuit of 1623 with the renowned Sevillian painter Francisco Pacheco. The sculptor had breached the rigid guild regulations of the time, encroaching into the realm of painting by subcontracting competencies outside the trade for which he was examined. Additionally, Montañés made an economic estimate of the polychromy, which accounted for one-third of the financial estimate for the assembly and sculpture, leading to the Painters’ Guild feeling disgraced during a period when they sought to elevate their art and having it regarded as a more intellectual discipline than manual labour, in order to avoid paying sale taxes. Figure 1. Main altarpiece of the church of Santa Clara: (a) Saint Peter; (b) Saint Paul; (c) The imposition of the habit on Saint Clare by San Francisco; (d) Saint Bonaventure; (e) Saint Clare; (f) Saint Anthony of Padua; (g) The miraculous blessing of bread; (h) Nativity of the Lord; (i) Saint Agnes; (j) Virgin of the Rosary; (k) Saint Mary Magdalene; (l) Annunciation; (m) Holy Trinity. The terms outlined in Montañés’ contract [ 4 ] for the polychromy reflect the prevailing characteristics of the time, in line with the style and preferences of the early 17th century: a matte finish for the flesh, burnished gold, engravings, and application of estofado using a brush tip. Alongside these technical specifications, the contract also addresses more subjective conditions, highlighting the sculptor’s concern about entrusting his work to the painter and the potential impact this might have on his artwork. Specifically, it demanded Heritage 2024,74088 that the ground layers meticulously respect the volumes of the carving and preserve all the details of the sculptor’s craftsmanship. Montañés’ motivation for hiring polychromy stemmed from his desire to preserve the integrity of his remarkable works, unwilling to risk shattering them with deficient polychromies. As a celebrated artist of his time, estimated by clients ranging from religious orders and churches to individuals who trusted him for the execution of private devotions, Montañés held his artistic reputation in high regard. On the other hand, he contended that gilding and polychromy were not part of the realm of painting, considering them less intricate tasks than painting or drawing [ 6 , 7 ]. These assertions only served to outrage the demanding guild further and demonstrate the master sculptor’s pride in retaining sole control over his work. Finally, Montañés faced defeat in the lawsuit and delegated the task of polychromy to the esteemed painter Baltasar Quintero [ 8 ], recognised as one of the preeminent polychromists of the Sevillian School and admired even among his peers in the guild. Baltasar Quintero had previously collaborated with Montañés, and no new conditions were established in the contract, maintaining those initially set by Montañés. The Church of Santa Clara, which belongs to the Archdiocese of Seville, was completely restored, and the works were finished in February 2023. This restoration provided a unique opportunity for the study of the main altarpiece. The sculptures were taken to the restoration workshop of the Archbishop’s Palace of Seville and to the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores (CNA) for their study and conservation. Various analytical procedures as computed tomography (CT) [ 9 , 10 ], ultraviolet light (UV) [ 11 – 15 ], X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [ 14 , 16 – 19 ], optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) [ 19 – 21 ], were employed to gain insight into the artistic technique of one of the world’s most eminent sculptors, Martínez Montañés, from wood treatment and sculpting to the polychromy executed by Baltasar Quintero. The analysis of the altarpiece’s polychromy, entangled in a conflict between guilds, also allows for us to verify the significant demands of the polychrome technique within the Sevillian School during this period. These demands are evident in the signed conditions, which dictate the meticulous preservation of the sculptor’s carving and details, the client’s insistence on gold quality, and the painter’s precise technical execution and material selection. All these results were of great utility and support in the restoration process. It should be noted that there are currently no known studies on the material and technical aspects of Quintero’s polychromy and consequently, on the collaboration between both artists. There are several shorter art historical studies on Quintero [ 8 , 22 ] and very few publications regarding the art of polychromy in Spain during this period [ 22 – 24 ]. Given the absence of direct comparative analyses or previous scientific studies, our discussion draws upon broader art historical context and general principles of polychromy practices. 2. Materials and Methods The altarpiece was studied using various techniques aiming to understand the treatment of wood and its assemblies for the carving of the sculptures and to identify the support and pigments applied in the original polychromy as well as in later interventions. All these data offer a greater understanding of Montañés’ technique and the conditions he imposed in the polychromy process. Most of the techniques used were non-invasive. The application of CT [ 9 , 10 ] produces detailed images of the internal structure of a sculpture, which is crucial for understanding the carving technique and material distribution. Additionally, CT can reveal internal cavities or reinforcements, identify and characterise the materials used, and locate possible internal damages, such as cracks or deformations, that are not visible externally. The CT system belongs to the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores (CNA). It is a Siemens Biograph mCT device with multislice UFCTM (Ultra-Fast Ceramic) detectors, capable of producing images of up to 64 slices. The device’s aperture is 78 cm; therefore, most of the sculptures could be analysed except for the reliefs and the Christ Crucified. For the study of the polychromy, first, UV [ 11 – 15 ] fluorescence was applied to localise interventions, which significantly facilitated the cleaning of the sculpture and helped in Heritage 2024,74089 choosing original areas for subsequent material analysis. The UV images were captured using a Nikon D3X camera set at 400 ISO with an exposure time of 20 s. The painting was uniformly illuminated with four wooden lamps, with a wavelength of 254 nm, on both sides of a sculpture in a fully darkened room. The last applied non-invasive technique was XRF [ 14 , 16 – 19 ]. This technique is used to determine the elemental composition of materials based on their representative chemical elements by measuring the characteristic X-rays emitted when a sample is irradiated with X-rays. Thus, we can obtain a general idea of the material used for the ground layer, priming, original pigments, and those applied in later interventions. The portable XRF equipment used for this study included an EIS RX38 X-ray generator with a tungsten (W) anode and a silicon drift detector (SDD) with an energy resolution of 140 eV at the Mn-K α line. A 1 mm Al filter was applied to the X-ray generator window to eliminate characteristic W peaks from the anode, and the beam spot diameter was 3 mm. Both instruments were fixed to a metal framework to allow for precise forward and backward movements for accurate proximity to the sculpture, minimising the risk of accidents. Additionally, the system incorporates the intersection of two lasers to maintain a consistent measuring distance of 1 cm. All measurements were conducted under identical conditions for direct spectral comparison: 34 kV of energy and 80 µ A of current for 200 s acquisition time. The areas of the XRF peaks identified in the acquired spectra were used for a semi-quantitative examination of the colours to estimate whether a specific element is part of the painting’s surface layer or resides within an inner layer. A total of 76 points of different colours and shades were chosen to analyse the ground layer and pigments and their combinations to achieve various textures and volumes. Although the XRF technique is valuable for identifying chemical elements in pigments, it has some specific limitations in this context. XRF has difficulty detecting lighter elements, Z < 14 (Si), which may affect the ability to identify some lighter organic or inorganic pigments. On the other hand, it does not distinguish between compounds with the same elemental composition. Therefore, multiple pigments with the same combination of elements, such as copper or lead, may make it challenging to identify specific pigments. A common problem, also observed in the present study, is the inability to differentiate different Cu-based greens among them and from blue azurite (also identified by Cu) in pigment mixtures, where there is no specific green or blue colour. Also, lead white, yellow (massicot or litharge), and red (minium) cannot be differentiated in mixtures. Finally, three samples of different areas of the relief of the Nativity were prepared as cross-sections and analysed by OM and SEM-EDX [ 19 – 21 ]. These methods provide data about the arrangement and thickness of the colour layers, their composition, and the granulometry of the pigment. However, the valuable information of these three samples is not assumed to be wholly representative of the entire altarpiece, but when combined with XRF measurements they contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the polychromy and ground layers used. OM analysis was performed with an OLYMPUS BX41 optical microscope equipped with a UV light to distinguish interventions and certain pigments, while SEM-EDX used a FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope. The measurements were carried out in a low vacuum with a pressure of 30 Pa with an acceleration voltage of 22 kV. 3. Results 3.1. Wood Treatment The remarkable state of preservation of the sculptures’ supports in all images of the Santa Clara altarpiece was the key factor that prompted their examination using CT. Contrasting Montañés’ work with that of contemporary or even more recent sculptors, a notable absence of the typical damage that wood usually presents due to its inherent natural characteristics or the ageing process is observed. On the contrary, the works of other sculptors clearly exhibit evident signs of deterioration, such as natural cracks, openings at the joints and fissures, among others. Heritage 2024,74090 Wood, being an organic material, undergoes a pattern of movement throughout its lifecycle, from its origin as part of a tree to its final state as inert timber. During its growth, the tree is essentially composed of three parts: the heartwood, the sapwood, and the bark, arranged from the inside out. This internal structure is crucial when crafting a sculpture. Additionally, the presence of knots in the wood, which results from branches and forms radial marks on the trunk, must be considered. Depending on the cutting method, these knots can manifest as longitudinal marks in radial cuts or circular patterns in a longitudinal cut. Combining these pieces accurately requires a deep understanding of wood behaviour, acquired through experience and careful observation of its characteristics during drying. This behaviour is influenced by the physiognomy of each piece, the proportion of heartwood and sapwood, and the arrangement of growth rings. Sculptures can suffer two types of deterioration due to the twisting and warping movements of wood, driven by its capacity to absorb and expel water. Firstly, there are natural fissures known as cracks, which arise during the drying process as the wood fibres contract, leading to wood fractures that typically radiate from the centre outward, forming a visible radial pattern in cross-sections. Secondly, these movements can cause longitudinal cracks at the joints between wooden pieces, which environmental conditions and human factors can trigger during manufacturing. Montañés was knowledgeable about all these issues regarding the behaviour of wood, which allowed for him to apply preventive measures and different compositions in the joint to prevent future damage to his sculptures. Figure 2shows different cross-sections of several sculptures: Saint Mary Magdalene (a), Saint Anthony of Padua (b), Saint Bonaventure (c), and Saint Agnes (d). In the images corresponding to the heads, it can be clearly observed how the artist identifies areas affected by natural checks and replaces them with other pieces of wood devoid of such problems. In this way, Montañés mitigates the risk of cracks expanding outward over time due to the natural movements of this material. Moreover, the inserted pieces of wood were skilfully fashioned into dovetail (trapezoid) shapes to prevent the expulsion of these grafts under pressure. For the structure of the bodies, it becomes evident how essential the hollowing out of the pieces is for the stability of the sculptures. Montañés was acutely aware that wood is a living material that continues to move even after being cut due to variations in humidity and temperature, which, over time, could jeopardise the integrity of his works. Thus, he meticulously hollowed out the sculptures, leaving an almost regular thickness throughout each piece (similar to shaping clay sculptures). Sometimes, as seen in the torsos of Mary Magdalene and Saint Bonaventure, he hollowed them out so much that he perforated them, subsequently requiring repair by the polychromist. This hollowing operation reduces the likelihood of wood movements and, consequently, the emergence of cracks since these originate from the core or oldest part of the tree, which is less hygroscopic and more rigid. In the last image of the sculpture of Saint Bonaventure, Figure 2c, it can be observed that the joint is primarily formed by three-quarters of a tree trunk, to which other pieces were joined, leaving a space. Many sculptors construct joints in this manner, leaving only the spaces the material provides according to the shape the artist bestows. However, Montañés takes this further by enlarging this cavity by removing additional material, which reduces the wood’s capacity for movement by removing the core and part of the heartwood. This concept will be further elaborated in Section 4. Finally, in the first image of Figure 2c, it can be seen that the centre of the trunk has been removed to place a new piece that serves two functions. The first is to eliminate the wood’s core, and the second is to house the piece where the head is carved. The master was aware that carving the head in the heartwood leads to future deterioration and complicates the carving. Therefore, he incorporated a new piece from a section of sapwood, which is softer for carving and free of long-term issues. Heritage 2024,74091 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 7 Figure 2. Cross-sections of the sculptures: (a) Saint Mary Magdalene, (b) Saint Anthony of Padua, (c) Saint Bonaventure, and (d) Saint Agnes. From left to right, the cuts are made from the head to the feet of the sculpture. The red arrows indicate the inserted pieces of wood and the green arrow the piece where the head is carved. For the structure of the bodies, it becomes evident how essential the hollowing out of the pieces is for the stability of the sculptures. Montañés was acutely aware that wood is a living material that continues to move even after being cut due to variations in humidity and temperature, which, over time, could jeopardise the integrity of his works. Thus, he meticulously hollowed out the sculptures, leaving an almost regular thickness throughout each piece (similar to shaping clay sculptures). Sometimes, as seen in the torsos of Mary Magdalene and Saint Bonaventure, he hollowed them out so much that he perforated them, subsequently requiring repair by the polychromist. This hollowing operation reduces the likelihood of wood movements and, consequently, the emergence of cracks since these originate from the core or oldest part of the tree, which is less hygroscopic and more rigid. In the last image of the sculpture of Saint Bonaventure, Figure 2c, it can be observed that the joint is primarily formed by three-quarters of a tree trunk, to which other pieces were joined, leaving a space. Many sculptors construct joints in this manner, leaving only the spaces the material provides according to the shape the artist bestows. However, Montañés takes this further by enlarging this cavity by removing additional material, which reduces the wood’s capacity for movement by removing the core and part of the heartwood. This concept will be further elaborated in Section 4. Finally, in the first image of Figure 2. Cross-sections of the sculptures: (a) Saint Mary Magdalene, (b) Saint Anthony of Padua, (c) Saint Bonaventure, and (d) Saint Agnes. From left to right, the cuts are made from the head to the feet of the sculpture. The red arrows indicate the inserted pieces of wood and the green arrow the piece where the head is carved. 3.2. Examination under UV Light The sculptures were first studied under UV light. Ultraviolet fluorescence (Figure 3) revealed many interventions, each employing different materials, which is evident from the wide variety of shades observed. These ranged from dark, brown stains, indicative of retouching with earth pigments, to bright whites, characteristic of zinc white. It should be noted that the presence of a fluorescent area in an artwork is mainly informative rather than conclusive evidence, as only certain pigments produce fluorescence of considerable intensity. Other pigments may exhibit enhanced fluorescence due to the presence of added binders. Therefore, interpretation must consider both pigments and binders. Heritage 2024,74092 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 8 Figure 2c, it can be seen that the centre of the trunk has been removed to place a new piece that serves two functions. The first is to eliminate the wood’s core, and the second is to house the piece where the head is carved. The master was aware that carving the head in the heartwood leads to future deterioration and complicates the carving. Therefore, he incorporated a new piece from a section of sapwood, which is softer for carving and free of long-term issues. 3.2. Examination under UV Light The sculptures were first studied under UV light. Ultraviolet fluorescence (Figure 3) revealed many interventions, each employing different materials, which is evident from the wide variety of shades observed. These ranged from dark, brown stains, indicative of retouching with earth pigments, to bright whites, characteristic of zinc white. It should be noted that the presence of a fluorescent area in an artwork is mainly informative rather than conclusive evidence, as only certain pigments produce fluorescence of considerable intensity. Other pigments may exhibit enhanced fluorescence due to the presence of added binders. Therefore, interpretation must consider both pigments and binders. Figure 3. Photograph and UV images: (a) Nativity of the Lord; (b) Christ Crucified; (c) Saint Paul; (d) Saint Peter. The most significant interventions are found in the flesh areas in the sculptures studied. Particularly striking was the intense purple hue observed in the body and some areas of the hair and face of the Child in the Nativity. This hue is more likely due to an organic material rather than a pigment, indicating the presence of a binder or varnish used in this retouching. It could be a protein-based repaint applied with egg tempera or animal glue. Figure 3. Photograph and UV images: (a) Nativity of the Lord; (b) Christ Crucified; (c) Saint Paul; (d) Saint Peter. The most significant interventions are found in the flesh areas in the sculptures studied. Particularly striking was the intense purple hue observed in the body and some areas of the hair and face of the Child in the Nativity. This hue is more likely due to an organic material rather than a pigment, indicating the presence of a binder or varnish used in this retouching. It could be a protein-based repaint applied with egg tempera or animal glue. 3.3. Study of Polychromy Once the intervention areas were located, the original materials of the polychromy could be analysed. Due to time and accessibility limitations, a selection of sculptures was studied by XRF, not the entire altarpiece: Christ Crucified, Nativity of the Lord, and two small sculptures of Saint Peter and Saint Paul. The analysed areas can be seen in Appendix A(Tables A1–A4; Figures A1–A4) together with the elements detected by XRF and the proposed pigments. The results obtained from the analysis of these few sculptures are assumed to be representative of the rest of the altarpiece, as the same procedures and materials were usually employed in the same workshop. 3.3.1. Ground Layer The analyses by OM and SEM-EDX on the three extracted samples revealed that the ground layer is made with gypsum [ 25 , 26 ], as identified by the peaks of Ca and S (see Figure 4and Table 1). Measurements obtained by XRF further corroborated the presence of gypsum, which was identified by the peaks of Ca. This primer was applied throughout the surface, except for the flesh areas, adhering to Montañés’ specifications in the polychromy contract [ 4 ]. Only the faces of the shepherd and Saint Joseph in the Nativity exhibit a Heritage 2024,74093 minimal presence of Ca, which could indicate the specific method employed for producing the flesh tones, as explained later in Section 4. Table 1. Results of the SEM-EDX analysis of the samples shown in Figure 4. The thicknesses, elements, and proposed pigments detected in each layer of the cross-sections are indicated. Sample Layer Thickness ( µ m) Elements Proposed Pigment Observations (A) 3 10–15 - Varnish 2 80 Ca, S, Hg, Pb Lead white, calcium carbonate *, vermilion * Paint 1 >500 K, Ca, Si, S, Pb Gypsum, silicates * Ground layer (B) 2 10–35 Ca, S, Si, Pb Lead white, gypsum *, silicates * Paint 1 >500 Ca, S, Si Gypsum, silicates * Ground layer (C) 70.25 Au, Ag Gold (Au) Silver (Ag) Gold leaf 98.10% 1.90% 6 100 K, Ca, Si, Al, Fe, Pb Earth pigment, calcium carbonate * Bol 5 70–120 Ca, S, Si, Al, Fe, Pb Calcium carbonate, gypsum, earth pigment * Stucco 40.20 Au, Ag Gold (Au) Silver (Ag) Gold leaf 91.72% 8.28% 3≈45 K, Ca, S, Si, Al, Fe, Pb Earth pigment, calcium carbonate *, gypsum * Bol 2 40 K, Ca, Si, Al, Mn, Fe, Pb Earth pigment, umber, calcium carbonate * paint 1 0–15 Ca, S, Si, Al, Fe Gypsum, silicates * Ground layer * Low proportion. Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 9 3.3. Study of Polychromy Once the intervention areas were located, the original materials of the polychromy could be analysed. Due to time and accessibility limitations, a selection of sculptures was studied by XRF, not the entire altarpiece: Christ Crucified, Nativity of the Lord, and two small sculptures of Saint Peter and Saint Paul. The analysed areas can be seen in Appendix A (Tables A1–A4; Figures A1–A4) together with the elements detected by XRF and the proposed pigments. The results obtained from the analysis of these few sculptures are assumed to be representative of the rest of the altarpiece, as the same procedures and materials were usually employed in the same workshop. 3.3.1. Ground Layer The analyses by OM and SEM-EDX on the three extracted samples revealed that the ground layer is made with gypsum [25,26], as identified by the peaks of Ca and S (see Figure 4 and Table 1). Measurements obtained by XRF further corroborated the presence of gypsum, which was identified by the peaks of Ca. This primer was applied throughout the surface, except for the flesh areas, adhering to Montañés’ specifications in the polychromy contract [4]. Only the faces of the shepherd and Saint Joseph in the Nativity exhibit a minimal presence of Ca, which could indicate the specific method employed for producing the flesh tones, as explained later in Section 4. Figure 4. Samples cross-sections analysed by OM: (A) Virgin’s flesh tone near the garment, (B) angel’s flesh tone near the garment, (C) golden area. The right column shows the images obtained under UV illumination and the numbers indicate the different layers. Table 1. Results of the SEM-EDX analysis of the samples shown in Figure 4. The thicknesses, elements, and proposed pigments detected in each layer of the cross-sections are indicated. Sample Layer Thickness (µm) Elements Proposed Pigment Observations (A) 3 10–15 - Varnish Figure 4. Samples cross-sections analysed by OM: (A) Virgin’s flesh tone near the garment, (B) angel’s flesh tone near the garment, (C) golden area. The right column shows the images obtained under UV illumination and the numbers indicate the different layers. Heritage 2024,74100 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 15 Figure 9. XRF spectrum of the crown of thorns. 4. Discussion The analysis of the exceptional condition of the joint in the sculptures adorning the Santa Clara altarpiece reveals Montañés’ mastery of woodwork. Unlike sculptures by other artists that exhibit evident signs of deterioration, Montañés’ works display a notable absence of typical wood-related damages such as natural cracks and fissures. This observation suggests that Montañés had a profound understanding of wood’s behaviour as an organic material, allowing for him to apply preventive measures and compositional strategies for the joinery that prevented future damage. Montañés’ skill in identifying and treating areas affected by natural cracks becomes evident in the CT examination of the sculptures. Montañés prevented the expansion of fissures over time by replacing compromised sections with pieces of wood without problems, shaped like dovetails, to ensure a robust connection. In addition, the careful hollowing of the sculptures reduced the likelihood of wood movement, thus minimising the risk of long-term structural damage. Figure 10 shows a recreation of the process followed by Montañés to sculpt the image of Saint Anthony. Figure 10. Recreation of the construction process of a (b) joint, (c) carved and (d) hollowed, based on the (a) transversal image of the CT of the sculpture of Saint Anthony. On the other hand, we can verify how the use of the pigments in the polychromy significantly corresponds with contemporary treaties and documents [6,7,33]. It is important to mention that these studies only show the material composition of the works; however, they overlook the artist’s creativity and decorative aspects, which are visible to the naked eye. The polychromy of the Santa Clara altarpiece was commissioned to a single workshop under the direction of the painter Baltasar Quintero. This can be observed in the garment decorations, executed using distinct templates characteristic of each workshop, thus limiting the artists’ creativity. In addition, there are no differences in the chemical composition of the materials used throughout the altarpiece, as they all originate from the same source and were procured by the workshop for general use. However, it is evident that, in a work of such magnitude, the master relied on the assistance of workshop members (journeymen and apprentices), reflected in subtle differences observed in the execution and finishing quality of decorative elements such as gilding and sgraffito. The process of preparing colours and mixtures can be considered personal to each artist rather than specific to each workshop, depending on how they conducted the grinding process. It is essential to bear in mind that pigments, usually in powder or mineral form, need to be grounded, meticulously washed and purified, and then mixed with a binder. Variation in pigment grinding results in different hues obtained with the same pigment, as colour is influenced by the particle size and light reflection [ 6 , 7 , 32 ]. This aspect remains undisclosed due to the impossibility of conducting an exhaustive analysis of all the colours used in the garments and flesh tones across all the sculptural pieces. We cannot confirm whether the pigments were ground by the same artist or an apprentice, who generally prepared all the materials, and we cannot determine if they were prepared at different times by different individuals. A gypsum ground layer was observed in the three stratigraphies, and the XRF analyses are consistent with this primer applied on the entire surface, except for the flesh areas where Ca peaks were not detected. As mentioned in the terms of the contract for the polychromies, the ground layers consisted of four layers of coarse gypsum and four layers of matte gypsum, which would explain their thickness of over 500 µ m. It is a common procedure for baroque sculpture grounds to apply these two kinds of gypsum, as suggested by Pacheco and found in contemporary Baroque polychromed sculpture [ 25 ]. Nowadays, gypsum is principally a calcium sulphate; however, in the 17th century, we can distinguish Heritage 2024,74101 a coarse gypsum that predominantly consisted of sulphate anhydrite (being mixed with only a little amount of water), while the matte one used for the upper layers needed more water and was finer, consisting mostly of sulphate hydrate [ 35 ]. Since each layer of gypsum (coarse or matte) is identified by Ca, it is not possible to differentiate between them. The contract emphasises the importance of respecting the flesh area to the fullest extent possible, ensuring it does not resemble wood prepared for polychrome. The analyses corroborate this condition, as characteristic Ca peaks of gypsum are not detected in the flesh areas. However, the documentation does not specify the type of primer these areas received, but scientific analyses corroborate what was documented in the treaties of the time and what the painter Francisco Pacheco exposed in his work “Arte de la Pintura” [ 6 , 7 ] (book III, p. 406): “ . . . they shall be more finely finished and sanded in the wood, and shall spare the painter many ground layers (as was the case with those of Delgado and Martínez), and it shall suffice to give unto the flesh a coat of giscola with dead model plaster and a little ground white lead, all mixed in water and mingled with scrap glue, somewhat stronger than a bowl tempera, to apply two or three coats, and after it hath dried, to sand it once or twice, until all hair and beard, and all the highs and lows be without a granule, and very tender and smooth to the touch: priming over it with oil colours of flesh and a little red lead or litharge for a drier, all that which is to be incarnate in a matte finish.” In the faces of the shepherd and Saint Joseph, Ca was observed to have a low presence. This could be attributed to the preparation method for the matte flesh tones. In this process, only giscola (glue with garlic as a degreaser) [ 6 , 7 ] was applied along with a small amount of dead gypsum (gypsum that had already set and dried and was ground again) and ground lead white, all mixed in water with scraps of glue (pieces of leather from glove manufacturing waste that provided a purer and finer glue), applied in two or three layers. However, the impregnation of glue on the surface, which appears in the stratigraphy analysis, was uncommon in this type of matte flesh tones. This would contribute shine to the finish, contradicting the intended matte effect. Baltasar Quintero possibly added calcium carbonate to the colour mixtures to rectify this. Besides providing more opaque colours, this addition reduced the oil paint’s glossiness. The combination of the glue layer and the calcium carbonate provided a satin finish characterised by a waxy shine, which was distinctive of this painter. The analysis of the polychromy of the relief of the Nativity is particularly interesting. Two types of flesh tones were identified, perfectly reflecting the descriptions found in contemporary treaties [ 6 , 7 , 32 , 36 ], as well as in the conditions of contracts for other works of many artists: a rosy hue for children, women, and angels, and another ochre for male characters. The rosy tones were mainly achieved with a mixture of lead white and vermilion, as confirmed by stratigraphies, although sometimes with lead white and a bit of carmine. Francisco Pacheco [ 6 , 7 ] mentioned that over time, the oil in the mixture would naturally add a slight yellowish tint due to material ageing. In the case of male figures, a certain amount of ochre was added to the mixture, precisely as identified by XRF analyses. Finally, for the flesh tones of elderly male characters, it was common to add umber; however, in the images of Saint Peter and Saint Paul, the presence of Cu is observed, indicating the use of a Cu-based green or blue pigment. Another characteristic of Baltasar Quintero was painting the pupils in light tones (bluish-green), rarely brown or black. This produces a certain sweetness to the faces and gazes. XRF measurements demonstrated that the angel’s eyes are painted with azurite. Due to environmental conditions and ageing, azurite tends to acquire a greenish hue, so these bluish-green tones are visually appreciated in various parts of the altarpiece. The hair treatment presents peculiarities. Brown tones were achieved solely by combining ochre and umber, while Cu-based green and vermilion were employed to provide highlights and seek nuances, avoiding a homogeneous tone. There are no data describing these characteristics until Antonio Palomino mentions them in the early 18th century [32]. These nuances would replace ground gold for hair, which persisted in children, women, Heritage 2024,74102 and angels until the early 17th century. On the other hand, the use of bone black in darker hair was quite common, given its high opacity [32]. The variety of tones found in Baltasar Quintero’s work is typical. It is also quite peculiar that a high percentage of pigments containing Cu appear blended in different colours. We can observe numerous estofados painted with azurite and/or a Cu-based green. Occasionally, depending on its source, the azurite could be quite dark when mixed with oil for painting, so lead white was often added to lighten the hue or to serve as a drier. The polychromy of the Christ Crucified sculpture in the attic is extremely interesting due to its complete originality, preserved thanks to its inaccessible location. It follows the chromatic standards of the time, with a flesh tone composed mainly of lead white and ochre. A lead-tin yellow is employed instead of a green pigment commonly used in depictions of deceased bodies, producing an impression of lifeless yet delicate skin. The absence of vermilion in the lifeless body enhances its realism, a sought-after characteristic in Baroque representations. It was also common in those years for the crown of thorns to be painted in greenish tones, contrasting with the current representations in very dark hues. This greenish tone contributes to the realism, as a braided crown should be made with fresh green branches, as dried ones would break if bent. Both the hair and the cross display the artist’s singularity, achieving the dark brown colour by mixing different tones, including reds and greens. Finally, the intense peaks of Au observed by XRF in all the garments and the stratigraphy in Table 1showing a gold percentage higher than 90% offer evidence of adherence to the contract, which mandated the use of the highest quality gold available in Seville, due to the abundance of this precious metal in the region. 5. Conclusions The detailed analyses of the wood carvings from the altarpiece of the Church of Santa Clara in Seville (Spain) reveal Montañés’ excellent technical mastery and precise work with wood, surpassing that of his contemporaries and successors. His comprehension of the behaviour of this organic material enabled him to implement preventive measures and compositional strategies that protected his works from future deterioration. The study of the polychromy verified adherence to the conditions stipulated by Montañés in the contract, along with an insight into the techniques and materials used by the painter Baltasar Quintero. Differences in the flesh tones based on the gender and age of the depicted characters were identified, as well as the use of specific pigments to achieve realistic effects. Furthermore, no ground layer of gypsum was applied over the flesh areas, and it is worth noting the exceptional quality of the gold used, which met the strict requirements. The multidisciplinary study of the altarpiece of Santa Clara church provides a deep insight into Montañés’ technical skills. It also enhances our understanding of the techniques and materials used in sculpture and polychromy during the Baroque period. These results significantly enrich our appreciation and comprehension of sacred art from the “Golden Age” of Spanish art. Author Contributions: J.M.-S.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Validation, Visualisation. A.K.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualisation, Writing—Review and Editing. C.M.-G.: Conceptualisation, Writing—Original draft, Validation. A.G.-O.: Conceptualisation, Writing—Original draft, Validation. F.J.A.: Visualisation, Writing—Review and Editing. A.M.-d.-S.: Conceptualisation. M.Á.R.: Supervision, Project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: Work supported by the project P18-RT-1877 of Junta de Andalucía (Spain), as well as of the Margarita Salas contract given by the Spanish Ministry of Universities and funded by the European Union—“NextGenerationEU” is being acknowledged. We also thank Ángel Parrado for his work with the images obtained by CT. Heritage 2024,74103 Data Availability Statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Appendix A Table A1. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A1. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Ca *, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 2 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu *, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, most probably azurite, lead white 3 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), most probably azurite, lead white 4 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 5 Hg, Pb Vermilion, lead white 6 Ca, Ti, Fe, Zn, Hg, Pb Gypsum, titanium white, ochre, zinc white, vermilion, lead white 7 Ca, Ti *, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 8 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 9 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 10 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 11 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu, Zn *, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, Zinc white, lead white 12 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 13 Ca *, Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 14 Hg, Pb Vermilion, lead white 15 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 16 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, red lake, most probably azurite, lead white 17 Ca *, Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 18 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 19 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, zinc white, vermilion, lead white 20 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 21 Hg, Pb Vermilion, lead white 22 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, zinc white, vermilion, lead white 23 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 24 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 25 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), Cu-based green and/or most probably azurite, lead white 26 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), Cu-based green and/or most probably azurite, vermilion, lead white 27 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 28 Ca, Fe, Cu *, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 29 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 30 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 31 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 32 Ca, Fe, Cu *, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 33 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, bone black, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 34 Ca *, Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 35 Hg, Pb Vermilion, lead white 36 Fe *, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 37 Mn *, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Umber, ochre, most probably azurite, lead white, vermilion 38 Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 39 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white g.b.g: Gypsum, bole, and gold. * Low proportion. Heritage 2024,74104 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 20 Figure A1. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in the Relief of the Nativity. Table A2. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A2. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Ca, Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 2 Fe *, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 3 Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu - based green, vermilion, lead white 4 Ca, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 5 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 6 Ca, Ti, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, umber, ochre, Cubased green, zinc, white, lead white 7 K, Ca, Ti, Cr *, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cubased green, zinc white and/or yellow, lead white 8 Ca, Ti, Ba, Cr *, Fe, Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb Titanium white, barium white, chrome green, ochre, Cubased green, zinc, white, vermilion, lead white 9 Fe *, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 10 Ca, Ti *, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 11 Ca, Co, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb, As (g.b.g), smalt, ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 12 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * ( g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu - based green, lead white 13 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, lead white 14 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 15 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Pb * Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white g.b.g: Gypsum, bole, and gold. * Low proportion. Figure A1. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in the Relief of the Nativity. Table A2. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A2. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Ca, Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 2 Fe *, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 3 Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 4 Ca, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 5 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 6 Ca, Ti, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, zinc, white, lead white 7 K, Ca, Ti, Cr *, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, zinc white and/or yellow, lead white 8 Ca, Ti, Ba, Cr *, Fe, Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb Titanium white, barium white, chrome green, ochre, Cu-based green, zinc, white, vermilion, lead white 9 Fe *, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 10 Ca, Ti *, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 11 Ca, Co, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb, As (g.b.g), smalt, ochre, most probably azurite, lead white 12 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 13 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, lead white 14 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 15 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Pb * Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white g.b.g: Gypsum, bole, and gold. * Low proportion. Heritage 2024,74105 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 21 Figure A2. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Saint Peter. Table A3. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A3. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Fe *, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 2 Ca *, Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 3 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu - based green, lead white 4 Ca *, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 5 Ca, Ti, Cr *, Mn *, Fe, Zn, Hg *, Pb, Ag Gypsum, titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, zinc white, vermilion, lead white, silver. 6 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu * , Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu - based green, vermilion, lead white 7 Fe *, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 8 Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cubased green and/or most probably azurite, lead white 9 Ca, Ti * , Ba, Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Au, Pb * (g.b.g ), titanium white, barium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cu - based green and/or most probably azurite, zinc white, lead white 10 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cubased green and/or most probably azurite, vermilion, lead white 11 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), ochre , Cu - based green, vermilion, lead white 12 Ca *, Fe *, Cu, Hg, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 13 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white g.b.g: Gypsum, bole, and gold. * Low proportion. Figure A2. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Saint Peter. Table A3. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A3. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Fe *, Cu, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 2 Ca *, Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Gypsum, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 3 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 4 Ca *, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), umber, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 5 Ca, Ti, Cr *, Mn *, Fe, Zn, Hg *, Pb, Ag Gypsum, titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, zinc white, vermilion, lead white, silver. 6 Ca, Ti, Fe, Cu *, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 7 Fe *, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 8 Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Au, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cu-based green and/or most probably azurite, lead white 9 Ca, Ti *, Ba, Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Au, Pb * (g.b.g), titanium white, barium white, chrome green, umber, ochre, Cu-based green and/or most probably azurite, zinc white, lead white 10 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green and/or most probably azurite, vermilion, lead white 11 Ca, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 12 Ca *, Fe *, Cu, Hg, Au, Pb (g.b.g), ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 13 Ca, Ti *, Fe, Cu, Au, Hg, Pb (g.b.g), titanium white, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white g.b.g: Gypsum, bole, and gold. * Low proportion. Table A4. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A4. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Ca, Sn, Pb Gypsum, lead-tin yellow, lead white 2 Fe *, Cu *, Sn *, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, lead-tin yellow, lead white 3 Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 4 Fe *, Sn *, Pb Ochre, lead-tin yellow, lead white 5 Fe *, Sn, Pb Ochre, lead-tin yellow, lead white 6 Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 7 Ca, Ba, Fe, Cu, Pb * Gypsum, barium White, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 8 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 9 Ca, Mn *, Fe, Cu, Hg *, Pb * Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white * Low proportion. Heritage 2024,74106 Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 22 Figure A3. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Saint Paul. Table A4. Elements and proposed pigments in each spot analysed by XRF in Figure A4. The ground layer is assumed gypsum from the analysis of the samples. Spot Elements Proposed Pigment 1 Ca, Sn, Pb Gypsum, lead - tin yellow, lead white 2 Fe *, Cu *, Sn *, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, lead-tin yellow, lead white 3 Fe, Cu *, Hg, Pb Ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 4 Fe *, Sn *, Pb Ochre, lead-tin yellow, lead white 5 Fe * , Sn, Pb Ochre, lead - tin yellow, lead white 6 Fe *, Hg, Pb Ochre, vermilion, lead white 7 Ca, Ba, Fe, Cu, Pb * Gypsum, barium White, ochre, Cu-based green, lead white 8 Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Pb Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu-based green, vermilion, lead white 9 Ca, Mn * , Fe, Cu, Hg * , Pb * Gypsum, umber, ochre, Cu - based green, vermilion, lead white * Low proportion. Figure A3. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Saint Paul. Heritage 2024, 7, FOR PEER REVIEW 23 Figure A4. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Christ Crucified. Author Contributions: J.M.-S.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Validation, Visualisation. A.K.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualisation, Writing—Review and Editing. C.M.-G.: Conceptualisation, Writing—Original draft, Validation. A.G.-O.: Conceptualisation, Writing—Original draft, Validation. F.J.A.: Visualisation, Writing—Review and Editing. A.M.-d.-S.: Conceptualisation. M.Á.R.: Supervision, Project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: Work supported by the project P18-RT-1877 of Junta de Andalucía (Spain), as well as of the Margarita Salas contract given by the Spanish Ministry of Universities and funded by the European Union—“NextGenerationEU” is being acknowledged. We also thank Ángel Parrado for his work with the images obtained by CT. Data Availability Statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. References 1. Hernández Díaz, J. Juan Martínez Montañés: (1568–1649); Ediciones Guadalquivir: Sevilla, Spain, 1987. 2. Martínez Montañés, J. Juan Martínez Montañés; Fratelli Fabbri: Milano, Italy, 1966. 3. Proske, B.G. Juan Martínez Montañés: Sevillian Sculptor; Hispanic Society of América: New York, NY, USA, 1967. 4. Archive, Newspaper Library and Publications Service (SAHP) of the Seville Institute of Culture and Arts (ICAS). Reference: AHPSE Colección Celomar. Sig. P_19827, sf 1r–3r, 1r–2v, (n.d.). Figure A4. Numbers indicating the spots analysed by XRF in Christ Crucified. Heritage 2024,74107 References 1. Hernández Díaz, J. Juan Martínez Montañés: (1568–1649); Ediciones Guadalquivir: Sevilla, Spain, 1987. 2. Martínez Montañés, J. Juan Martínez Montañés; Fratelli Fabbri: Milano, Italy, 1966. 3. Proske, B.G. Juan Martínez Montañés: Sevillian Sculptor; Hispanic Society of América: New York, NY, USA, 1967. 4. Archive, Newspaper Library and Publications Service (SAHP) of the Seville Institute of Culture and Arts (ICAS). Reference: AHPSE Colección Celomar. Sig. P_19827, sf 1r–3r, 1r–2v, (n.d.). 5. Asensio, J.M. Francisco Pacheco: Sus Obras Artísticas y Literarias. In Sobre la Antigüedad y Honores del Arte de la Pintura y Su Comparación con la Escultura; Rasco, E., Ed.; Bustos Tavera: Sevilla, Spain, 1886. 6. Asensio, J.M. Francisco Pacheco: Sus obras artísticas y literarias. In A Los Profesores del Arte de la Pintura (Opúsculo); Rasco, E., Ed.; Bustos Tavera: Sevilla, Spain, 1886; p. 1622. 7. Pacheco, F. Arte de la Pintura, Su Antiguedad y Grandezas Descriuense los Hombres Eminentes que Ha Auido en Ella, assi Antiguos como Modernos. . . y Enseña el Modo de Pintar Todas las Pinturas Sagradas; Simon Faxardo: Sevilla, Spain, 1649. 8. Diaz Hierro, D. Baltasar Quintero: Arquitecto de retablos, pintor y escultor, fue este ilustre onubense el compañero predilecto de Martínez Montañés. Rev. Arch. Hisp. 1965,134/43, 303–309. 9. Albertin, F.; Bettuzzi, M.; Brancaccio, R.; Morigi, M.P.; Casali, F. X-ray Computed Tomography In Situ: An Opportunity for Museums and Restoration Laboratories. Heritage 2019,2, 2028–2038. [CrossRef] 10. Casali, F. Chapter 2 X-ray and neutron digital radiography and computed tomography for cultural heritage. In Physical Techniques in the Study of Art, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage; Bradley, D., Dudley, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 41–123. [CrossRef] 11. Dorrell, P. Photography in Archaeology and Conservation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. 12. Mairinger, F. The ultraviolet and fluorescence study of paintings and manuscripts. In Radiation in Art and Archeometry; Creagh, D.C., Bradley, D.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 56–75. [CrossRef] 13. Mairinger, F. UV-, IR- and X-ray imaging. In Non-Destructive Microanalysis of Cultural Heritage Materials; Janssens, K., van Grieken, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 15–71. [CrossRef] 14. Stuart, B.H. Analytical Techniques in Materials Conservation; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2007. [CrossRef] 15. Hain, M.; Bartl, J.; Jacko, V. Multispectral analysis of cultural heritage artefacts. Meas. Sci. Rev. 2003,3, 9–12. 16. Ferretti, M. X-ray Fluorescence Applications for the Study and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. In Radiation in Art and Archeometry; Creagh, D.C., Bradley, D.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 285–296. [CrossRef] 17. Janssens, K. X-ray based methods of analysis. In Non-Destructive Microanalysis of Cultural Heritage Materials; Janssens, K., van Grieken, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 129–226. [CrossRef] 18. Glinsman, L.D. The practical application of air-path X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in the analysis of museum objects. Stud. Conserv. 2005,50, 3–17. [CrossRef] 19. Artiolo, G. Scientific Methods of Cultural Heritage; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010. 20. Matteini, M.M.A. Scienza e restauro. In Metodi d´Indagine; Nardini Editore: Firenze, Italy, 1994. 21. Volpin, S.A.L. Le Analisi di Laboratorio Applicate ai Beni Artistici Policromi; Il Prato: Padova, Italy, 1999. 22. Gómez Moreno, M.E. La Policromía en la Escultura Española; Publicaciones de Escuela de Artes y Oficios Artísticos de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 1943; pp. 1–34. 23. Martín González, J.J. Escultura Barroca Castellana; Fundación Lázaro Galdiano: Madrid, Spain, 1958. 24. Sánchez Mesa Martín, D. La Técnica de la Escultura Policromada en Andalucía y Granada; Universidad de Granada: Granada Spain, 1971. 25. Bruquetas, R. Técnicas y Materiales de la Pintura Española en el Siglo de Oro; Fundación de Apoyo a la Historia del Arte Hispánico: Madrid, Spain, 2002. 26. Gayo, M.D.; Jover de Celis, M. Evolución de las Preparaciones en la Pintura de los Siglos XVI y XVII en España. Bol. Mus. Prado 2010,28, 39–59. 27. Feller, R.L.; Roy, A.; FitzHugh, E.W.; Berrie, B.H. Artists’ Pigments: A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics; National Gallery of Art: Washington, DC, USA, 1986. 28. Mayer, R. The Artist’s Handbook of Materials and Techniques, 5th ed.; Viking Penguin: New York, NY, USA, 1991. 29. Pacheco, F. Arte de la Pintura; Cátedra: Madrid, Spain, 2001. 30. Clemente Martínez, C.; SalvadóCabré, N.; ButíPapiol, S.; Pradell Cara, T. Estudio de Corladuras Sobre Oro y Plata del Retablo San Rufo; Unicum: Budapest, Hungary, 2015. 31. Seccaroni, C.; Moioli, P.; Fluorescenza, X. Prontuario per l’Analisi XRF Portatile Applicata a Superfici Policrome; Nardini Editore: Firenze, Italy, 2004. 32. Palomino de Castro y Velasco, A. El Museo Pictórico y Escala Óptica. In Practica de la Pintura, en que se Trata de el Modo de Pintar a el Olio, Temple y Fresco; Imprenta de Sancha: Madrid, Spain, 1797. 33. Broecke, L. Cennino Cennini’s Il Libro dell’Arte; Archetype Publications: London, UK, 2015. 34. Lock Eastlake, C. Methods and Materials of Paintings of the Great Schools and Masters; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2001. Heritage 2024,74108 35. Santos Gomez, S. Las Preparaciones de Yeso en la Pintura Sobre Tabla de la Escuela Española; Universidad Complutense, Facultad de Bellas Artes: Madrid, Spain, 2005. 36. Carducho, V. Diálogos de la Pintura; Francisco Martínez: Madrid, Spain, 1634. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.