Time-of-flight and activation experiments on 147Pm and 171Tm for astrophysics

EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 01007 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714601007 ND2016 Time-of-flight and activation experiments on 147Pm and 171Tm for astrophysics C. Guerrero1,a, J. Lerendegui-Marco1, C. Domingo-Pardo2, A. Casanovas3, R. Dressler4,S.Halfon 5, S. Heinitz4, N. Kivel4,U.K ¨ oster6,M.Paul 7, J.M. Quesada-Molina1, D. Schumann4,A.Tarife ˜ no-Saldivia3, M. Tessler7, L. Weissman5, O. Aberle8, J. Andrzejewski9, L. Audouin10, M. Bacak8,12,J.Balibrea 13, M. Barbagallo14, F. Becvar15, E. Berthoumieux12, J. Billowes16, D. Bosnar17,A.Brown 18,M.Caama ˜ no19, F. Calvi˜ no3, M. Calviani8, D. Cano-Ott13, R. Cardella8, F. Cerutti8, Y.H. Chen10, E. Chiaveri1,8, N. Colonna14,G.Cort ´ es3,M.A.Cort ´ es-Giraldo1, L. Cosentino20, L.A. Damone14,21, M. Diakaki12, E. Dupont12,I.Dur ´ an19, B. Fern´ andez-Dom´ ınguez19, A. Ferrari8, P. Ferreira22, P. Finocchiaro20,K.G ¨ obel23,A.R.Garc ´ ıa13, A. Gawlik9, S. Gilardoni8, T. Glodariu24, I.F. Gonc¸alves22, E. Gonz´ alez13, E. Griesmayer11, F. Gunsing8,12, H. Harada25,J.Heyse 26, D.G. Jenkins18, E. Jericha11,F.K ¨ appeler27, Y. Kadi8, A. Kalamara28,P.Kavrigin 11,A.Kimura 25,N.Kivel 18, M. Kokkoris28,M.Krticka 15, D. Kurtulgil20, E. Leal-Cidoncha19, C. Lederer29, H. Leeb11,S.LoMeo 30,31, S.J. Lonsdale26, D. Macina8, J. Marganiec2,29, T. Mart´ ınez13,A.Masi 1, C. Massimi30,31,P.Mastinu 34, M. Mastromarco7, E.A. Maugeri4, A. Mazzone14,35, E. Mendoza13, A. Mengoni30, P.M. Milazzo36, F. Mingrone8, A. Musumarra20,37,A.Negret 24, R. Nolte32, A. Oprea24, N. Patronis38,A.Pavlik 39, J. Perkowski2,I.Porras 40, J. Praena40, D. Radeck32, T. Rauscher41,42,R.Reifarth 23, P.C. Rout43, C. Rubbia8, J.A. Ryan16, M. Sabat´ e-Gilarte1,8, A. Saxena43, P. Schillebeeckx26, A.G. Smith16, N.V. Sosnin16, A. Stamatopoulos28, G. Tagliente14,J.L.Tain 2,L.Tassan-Got 10, A. Tsinganis28, S. Valenta15, G. Vannini30,33,V.Variale 14,P.Vaz 22, A. Ventura31, V. Vlachoudis8,R.Vlastou 28, A. Wallner44,S.Warren 16,C.Weiss 8, P.J. Woods29, T. Wright16,P. ˇ Zugec8,17, and the n TOF Collaboration 1Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain 2Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular IFIC, Valencia, Spain 3Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya UPC, Barcelona, Spain 4Paul Scherrer Institute PSI, Villigen, Switzerland 5Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Yavne, Israel 6Institut Laue-Langevin ILL, Grenoble, France 7Hebrew University, Jerusalem 8European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Switzerland 9University of Lodz, Poland 10 Institut de Physique Nucl´ eaire, CNRS-IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, 91406 Orsay Cedex, France 11 Technische Universit¨ at Wien, Austria 12 CEA Saclay, Irfu, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 13 Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnol´ ogicas (CIEMAT), Spain 14 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy 15 Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 16 University of Manchester, UK 17 University of Zagreb, Croatia 18 University of York, UK 19 University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 20 INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy 21 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit` a degli Studi di Bari, Italy 22 Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Lisbon, Portugal 23 Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany 24 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Romania 25 Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-mura, Japan 26 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel, Belgium 27 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Campus North, IKP, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany 28 National Technical University of Athens, Greece 29 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, UK 30 Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie (ENEA), Bologna, Italy 31 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna, Italy ae-mail: [email protected] c The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 01007 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714601007 ND2016 32 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany 33 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit` a di Bologna, Italy 34 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Legnaro, Italy 35 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy 36 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy 37 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit` a di Catania, Italy 38 University of Ioannina, Greece 39 University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria 40 University of Granada, Spain 41 Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland 42 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, UK 43 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India 44 Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract.The neutron capture cross section of several key unstable isotopes acting as branching points in the s-process are crucial for stellar nucleosynthesis studies, but they are very challenging to measure due to the difficult production of sufficient sample material, the high activity of the resulting samples, and the actual (n,γ) measurement, for which high neutron fluxes and effective background rejection capabilities are required. As part of a new program to measure some of these important branching points, radioactive targets of 147Pm and 171Tm have been produced by irradiation of stable isotopes at the ILL high flux reactor. Neutron capture on 146Nd and 170Er at the reactor was followed by beta decay and the resulting matrix was purified via radiochemical separation at PSI. The radioactive targets have been used for time-of-flight measurements at the CERN n TOF facility using the 19 and 185 m beam lines during 2014 and 2015. The capture cascades were detected using a set of four C6D6scintillators, allowing to observe the associated neutron capture resonances. The results presented in this work are the first ever determination of the resonance capture cross section of 147Pm and 171Tm. Activation experiments on the same 147Pm and 171Tm targets with a high-intensity 30 keV quasi-Maxwellian flux of neutrons will be performed using the SARAF accelerator and the Liquid-Lithium Target (LiLiT) in order to extract the corresponding Maxwellian Average Cross Section (MACS). The status of these experiments and preliminary results will be presented and discussed as well. 1. Introduction The s- and r-processes are the responsible for the formation in the stars of practically all the chemical elements heavier than iron. The phenomenological picture of the classical s process was formulated about 50 years ago in the seminal papers of Burbidge et al. [1] and of Cameron [2] in 1957, where the entire s-process panorama was already sketched in its essential parts. They explain how, in this process, the elements heavier than iron are produced by a continuous chain of neutron capture reactions and beta-decays that give rise to the heavy elements. The phenomenology of the s-process implies that the solar abundance distribution is composed of two parts, a main component, which is responsible for the mass region from Y to Bi, and a weak component, which contributes to the region from Fe to Sr. The main and weak components can be assigned to low mass stars (between 1 and 3 solar masses) and to massive stars (more than 8 solar masses), respectively. Accordingly, the Galactic enrichment with s-process material starts with the lighter s elements, because massive stars evolve much quicker. For a recent and comprehensive review see Ref. [3]. A quantitative description of the abundances arising from the s-process requires both, the neutron capture rates and the b-decay probabilities of all the isotopes involved. Along the s-process path, unstable nuclei with relatively long (y) and with very long (Gy) half-lives, known as branching point isotopes, become of utmost interest: their destruction via either beta decay or neutron capture depends on the conditions of the environment (density, temperature). Hence the importance of knowing the corresponding capture cross sections. Despite of their pivotal role, as of today, only the capture cross section of 2 out of a list of 21 important s-process branching points isotopes (see [3]) have been measured by neutron time-of- flight. In this work, we add three more items to the list of measured isotopes. We have produced sizable quantities of 147Pm, 171Tm and 204Tl inside the ILL high flux reactor, purified the material, made suitable targets out it [4], and measured the corresponding capture cross section by time-of-flight at the CERN n TOF facility [5,6] and by activation at LiLiT [7]. Since the data analysis is ongoing, this paper does not include final results but a description of the experiments and an outlook of the analysis and expected results. Figure 1. Picture of the 171Tm target. 2 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 01007 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714601007 ND2016 Figure 2. Experimental capture yield of the 171Tm(n,γ) measurement at CERN n TOF. 2. Experiments 2.1. Production of the radioactive targets The isotopes 147Pm, 171Tm and 204Tl have been produced by neutron irradiation at the high flux reactor at Institute Laue-Langevin (ILL), Grenoble of 98.2 mg of 146Nd2O3 enriched to 98.8%, 238 mg of 170Er2O3enriched to 98.1%, and 263 mg of 203Tl2O3enriched to 99.5%. The powder of each isotope was pressed into pellets, each of which was then encapsulated into a high purity quartz ampule sealed by a flame torch. These ampules were irradiated at ILL for a period of 55 days with an average neutron flux of 8.2 ×1014 n/cm2/s and, after a cooling period of approximately 1.5 years, the samples were shipped to PSI where they underwent chemical processing. While the 204Tl target was left inside the quartz ampule for the subsequent measurements due to its prohibitive dose rate, the irradiated Nd (150 GBq) and Er (3 GBq) pellets were chemically purified prior to making suitable targets. The material was electroplated onto 5 µm thick aluminum backings resulting in two high quality targets of 22 mm diameter with a total of 3.8 mg of 171Tm and 85 µg of 147Pm. A picture of one of the targets is shown in Fig. 1. 2.2. Time-of-flight experiments at n TOF The CERN time-of-.flight facility features two neutron beam lines: a shorter one with increased neutron flux at only 19 m [5] and a longer one with better energy resolution at 185 m [6]. Both beam lines look at the neutrons produced by spallation induced by a pulsed 20 GeV/c proton beam impinging on a cylindrical lead block every (at best) 1.2 seconds. After traveling through the chosen beam line, a fraction of the neutrons incident on the target under study (147Pm, 171Tm and 204Tl in this case) undergoes neutron capture reactions, and the subsequent γ-rays are detected by an array of four C6D6liquid scintillators [8]. These are detectors with very low neutron sensitivity that allow one eliminating the background due to neutrons scattered in the target. After the corresponding background subtraction, the measured distributions of capture counts as a function of time-of-flight, i.e., neutron energy, are transformed into the capture yield applying the so-called Pulse Height Weighting Technique (PHWT) [9] and using the saturated resonance of 197Au for an absolute normalization [10]. 2.3. Activation experiments at LiLiT The Liquid Lithium Target (LiLiT) [7] installed at the SARAF facility (Israel) represents the most intense quasi-Maxwellian neutron beam worldwide. The SARAF accelerator provides a proton beam of 1–2 mA with an energy of ∼1.93 MeV (just above the threshold of the 7Li(p,n) reaction) that is driven into a thin (1.5 mm) liquid lithium layer, hence providing the quasi-Maxwellian neutron energy distribution (see [11] for details). At LiLiT, Maxwellian Averaged Cross Sections (MACS) are measured via the activation technique. The targets are exposed to the neutron beam and the number of capture reactions is determined from the number of A+1Z nuclei produced. Assuming that the A+1Z isotope is radioactive, the number of unstable nuclei is quantified using a Ge detector looking at the associated emission of γ-rays. In this case, the MACS of 197Au serves as a reference. 3. Preliminary and expected results The time-of-flight measurements of both 171Tm and 204Tl were carried out at the n TOF long neutron beam line, EAR1. In both cases, despite of the severe background conditions arising for the high activity of the targets, we have obtained a nice data set that allows resolving capture resonances for the first time. In the case of 171Tm the preliminary capture yield is displayed in Fig. 2, showing resonances up to 700 eV and illustrating the good resolution of n TOF-EAR1. This data set will provide a complete set of resonance parameters and the unresolved resonance region will be derived from these with the help of the Hauser-Feshbach statistical model. In the case of 204Tl the observed resonance are actually in the keV region of interest in astrophysics. In the case of 147Pm, the mass of the target is so small (85 µg) that it is at the detection limit of the n TOF short beam line, EAR2. In this case only a few resonances have been observed and therefore the data will not allow extracting a cross section value in the keV energy region of interest. In the case of the activation measurements, both 147Pm(n,γ) and 171Tm(n,γ) have been successfully measured at LiLiT. Indeed, due to the high neutron beam intensity at LiLiT we have significantly increased the 3 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 01007 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714601007 ND2016 statistics achieved in the previous experiment and will therefore be able to use more γ-ray lines, improving the accuracy and increasing the reliability of our results. The results will be the measured MACS at 30 keV with an expected accuracy of 10%. The authors acknowledge financial support by Spanish FPA2013-45083-P and FPA2014-53290-C2-2-P projects and the EC FP7 projects NeutAndalus (Grant No. 334315) and CHANDA (Grant No. 605203). References [1] E. Burbidge, G. Burbidge, W. Fowler, F. Hoyle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957) [2] A. Cameron, A.E.C.L. Chalk River, Canada, Technical Report No. CRL–41 (1957) [3] F. Kaeppeler, R. Gallino, S. Bisterzo, Wako Aoki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) [4] S. Heinitz, et al., in preparation [5] C. Weiss, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 799 (2015) [6] C.Guerrero,etal.,Eur.Phys.J.A49, 27 (2013) [7] S. Halfon, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 (2014) [8] P.F. Mastinu, et al., CERN-n TOF-PUB-2013-002 [9] U. Abbondanno, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 521 (2004) [10] R. Macklin, J. Halperin, R. Winters, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 164 (1979) [11] W. Ratynski, F. K¨ appeler, Phys. Rev. C 37 (1988) 4