Conflicting knowledge paradigms: competence discourse and disciplinary reality in social sciences teaching

Citation: Luna, Diego, and José Antonio Pineda-Alfonso. 2022. Conflicting Knowledge Paradigms: Competence Discourse and Disciplinary Reality in Social Sciences Teaching. Social Sciences 11: 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci11120553 Academic Editor: Alvaro Morote Received: 31 October 2022 Accepted: 25 November 2022 Published: 28 November 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). $ € £¥ social sciences Article Conflicting Knowledge Paradigms: Competence Discourse and Disciplinary Reality in Social Sciences Teaching Diego Luna * and JoséAntonio Pineda-Alfonso Department of Experimental and Social Sciences Didactics, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The purpose of this study was to offer an inside look at the coexistence of different ways of conceiving and organising the knowledge of social sciences in current schools. To this end, the methods of autoethnography and critical discourse analysis were used in a case study focused on the teaching experience of one of the authors. The system of categories constructed allowed us to empirically verify the existence of a conflict between two major epistemological paradigms, competency and disciplinary, in clear correspondence with a gap between innovative educational discourses and traditional school practices. In the case analysed, this conflict led to a curricular overdimensioning, which aimed to expand the elements to be worked on by teachers and their students qualitatively and quantitatively. The causes of this phenomenon are related to neo-liberal pedagogical parameters and allowed us to conclude that we should not conceive of competency-based learning either as an educational change by itself or as a strategy that guarantees change. Keywords: social sciences; competency-based learning; knowledge; case study 1. Introduction A methodological approach based on key competences and learning outcomes entails important changes in the conception of the teaching-learning process, changes in school organisation and culture; it requires close collaboration between teachers in curriculum development and in the transmission of information on student learning, as well as changes in working practices and teaching methods. (Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero 2015, de 21 de enero 2015, p. 6988) Competency-based learning is an important pedagogical pillar of innovative schools (Guzmán Marín 2017;Hou 2022;Marcotte and Gruppen 2022), a model to which all schools, both private and public, seem to aspire today. This can be seen, for example, in the strong commitment to the preparation or competency training of educational communities, which are understood as the “human capital” of schools (Valencia Álvarez and González 2017, p. 131). The prominence of competences in the desirable school model is also perceived in the argument for a globalising approach to learning content, with the supposed aim of developing an interpretative perspective of reality in pupils that is much more elaborate and complex than the traditional one. According to Spanish educational laws, the curricular integration of competencybased learning would be perfectly compatible with the classic objectives of areas such as social sciences: using different strategies (observation, data collection, measurement, interpretation, synthesis, drawing conclusions, and so on) to analyse the past in order to understand the present, applying social concepts to resolve significant problems of current reality, developing democratic habits through discussion and teamwork tools, incorporating new values and social attitudes to improve coexistence with others, acquiring intellectual maturity and developing a well-argued critical conscience, and so on. Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120553 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/socsci Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 2 of 16 Basically, competence is know-how or applied knowledge, around which old teaching and learning strategies need to be reconsidered. This approach should start from the elements of the curriculum, establishing meaningful relationships between different knowledge or subjects precisely by working on the so-called “key competences”. Currently, the Ministerio de Cultura y Formación Profesional (formerly the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) of the Spanish Government officially considers the following eight “key competences”, which have been integrated in the related curricular developments, from pre-school to baccalaureate: competence in linguistic communication; digital competence; entrepreneurial competence; multilingual competence; personal, social, and learning to learn competence; competence in cultural awareness and expression; competence in mathematics, science, technology, and engineering; and citizenship competence. The competency-based learning model, very close to vocational training, has actually been trying to penetrate schools for more than a decade through the latest educational laws. According to Cañadell (2018, p. 106), its origins date back to the end of 2007, when the European Union began to address the need for “new skills for new jobs”. Some of these “soft” skills were communication, analysis, problem solving, and entrepreneurship skills. In fact, the economicist perspective embedded in the reformist philosophy of laws such as the Ley Orgánica para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa (de España 2013) (Organic Law for the Improvement of the Quality in Education) is especially linked to the argument for useful skills to compete in the labour market. A more open, global and participatory society demands new, more sophisticated and diversified profiles of citizens and workers, as well as alternative ways of organisation and management that prioritise collaboration and teamwork, and proposals that assume that true strength lies in the mix of different skills and knowledge. (de España 2013, p. 5) Together with the LOMCE, within the Spanish regulatory framework, we can highlight the importance of texts such as Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero, por la que se describen las relaciones entre las competencias, los contenidos y los criterios de evaluación de la educación primaria, la educación secundaria obligatoria y el bachillerato (Order ECD/65/2015, of 21 January, which describes the relationships among the competences, the contents, and the evaluation criteria of primary education, compulsory secondary education, and baccalaureate). Addressed primarily to teachers, this document attempts to justify, clarify, and specify various aspects, both theoretical and operational, relating to the work and assessment of competences. At first glance, the objectives appear to be quite ambitious, since, among other issues, it states that: “competences should be developed in the fields of formal, non-formal and informal education throughout primary education, compulsory secondary education and baccalaureate, and in lifelong learning throughout life” (Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero 2015, de 21 de enero 2015, p. 6989). A close correspondence has also been established between competences and student motivation: “One of the key elements in teaching by competences is to awaken and maintain motivation for learning in students, which implies a new approach to the role of the student, active and autonomous, aware of being responsible for their learning” (Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero 2015, de 21 de enero 2015, p. 7002). These kinds of arguments, together with the numerous allusions to the international context with which the Order begins, seem to evoke a new pedagogical meta-narrative that is impossible to avoid. The most remarkable part of the text is undoubtedly its Appendix I, which includes rich descriptions of each of the key competences that are “essential for the well-being of European societies, economic growth and innovation, and describes the essential knowledge, skills and attitudes linked to each of them” (Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero 2015, de 21 de enero 2015, p. 6986). In this sense, authors such as Kozma (2012) have devoted their efforts to identifying the so-called “21st century skills”: responding flexibly to complex problems, communicating effectively, managing information, working in teams, using technology, and producing knowledge. Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 3 of 16 In any case, the sub-discourse of competency-based knowledge does not only affect students and their learning, but also the functions of agents such as school principals or teachers. The former must now possess new competences that go beyond the “insufficient” skills of traditional principals (Jolonch 2019, p. 217). In fact, it is no longer enough to be “a mere manager, and even less so to hold the status of government” (Jiménez Abad 2015, p. 172). On the contrary, the new leaders must “be optimistic, resilient, outwardlooking, curious, collaborative and committed to social justice, as well as being pragmatic,” while being “efficient and effective in leading the school to create an orderly environment” (Greany 2019, p. 64). Regarding teachers, today’s desirable teacher must have a vast range of new resources and skills, which complement or directly rethink some of the traditional teaching strategies. Their digital competence (Martínez-Abad et al. 2017;Redecker 2020;Rossi Cordero and Barajas Frutos 2018) depends not only on the design of new formats for teaching and learning but also the possibility of instilling in students a set of profoundly valuable knowledge in a highly technologised socio-cultural context. Hence, the need to reduce the digital divide that still exists between a large part of the teaching profession and digital natives is urgent (Liesa et al. 2018;Mohamed et al. 2017;Pérez-Escoda et al. 2016;Rubio and Tejada 2017). Along with the rest of the competences, digital or information literacy undoubtedly requires an in-depth review of traditional assessment formulas (Gulikers et al. 2018;Robinson and Dervin 2019). However, the argument for competency-based teaching and learning has not been without controversy in recent years (Cachinho and Reis 2007;Espinoza Aros 2014;Solé Blanch 2020;Soto and Pérez-Milans 2018), as the alleged drawbacks have not been few. Some of the voices against the competence approach have been the following. • Hirtt (2010) criticised the supposed displacement of humanistic learning in favour of the prominence of a set of skills clearly designed to be productive in professional settings. • From a pessimistic point of view, Barrio (2013) warned that: “If education were reduced to the provision of ‘skills’, it would be no different from the training of an irrational animal” (p. 111). • Jiménez Abad (2015) called for what he called “knowing how to be”, “that is, values and inclusive personal development” (p. 167). As an example, he referred to the case of digital competence, which “cannot be reduced to knowing how to operate a computer. It includes among other things a critical and reflective attitude to the information available and a responsible use of interactive media. It is not just a question of keys, it is above all a question of ideas, criteria and ethical values” (p. 165). • Tricot (2019) regretted the fact that “nothing should be taught that cannot be described in the form of competences” (p. 95). The same author argued that “this concept corresponds much more to an awareness than to an innovation” (p. 95), suggesting that competency learning would already have been implicit, in one form or another, in the traditional learning model. Assuming the existence of these critical perspectives on the chosen topic, the specific objective of this work, within the framework of a much broader doctoral research project, was to develop an internal investigation into the true place of competency-based learning in classroom practice, which is related to the traditional way of conceiving and working with school knowledge. 2. Methodology 2.1. A Case Study To carry out this project, we opted for a case study focused on all the converging discourses in the Geography and History classes in Spanish secondary education of one of the authors. This case was chosen for several reasons: (1) it was set in a discursive and practical context, a private school in the city of Seville, whose predominant school culture required an in-depth analysis; (2) it was undergoing a major epistemological crisis as a Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 4 of 16 result of the didactic transformations developed in recent years; and (3) it was a professional environment full of difficulties and contradictions, which had to be understood before it could be exposed to any kind of improvement proposal. The corpus compiled during the fieldwork combines a total of 12 texts from four different discursive fields: the legislative framework, the school, the Social Sciences Department, and the classroom itself (see Table 1). The research participants, the teacher–researcher and 44 students from the four years of secondary school, belong to the last of these contexts. Table 1. Composition and organisation of the research corpus. Sub-Corpora Text Spanish and Andalusian education policies (1) Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre (de España 2013) (2) Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre (3) Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero (4) Decreto 111/2016, de 14 de junio School (5) Orden de 14 de julio de 2016 (6) School Educational Project (7) School Regulation on Organisation and Operation Department of Social Sciences (8) Compilation of materials on the school’s methodology (9) Geography and history subject guide for students (10) Annual reports for the academic years 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 Geography and History class (11) Interviews with 44 students (11–15 years old) (12) Teacher–researcher’s diary 2.2. Methods, Techniques, and Instruments In this research, the analysis methods chosen were autoethnography (Adams et al. 2015;Ellis 2016;Mitra 2010;Starr 2010;Wamsted 2012) and critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 2003;Pardo Abril 2013;Pini 2009;Rogers 2011,2018;Wodak and Meyer 2003). In this way, the descriptive potential of narrative methodologies was combined with a set of varied procedures to compare the underlying intentions of the texts with their actual consequences. In this sense, it is worth highlighting the use of techniques that are applicable to both quantitative and qualitative data and that are both deductive and inductive in nature, always taking the demands of the object of study and its particular discursive– verbal approach into account (see Table 2). This methodological proposal was directly inspired by the assumptions established in the theoretical framework by previous research and teaching experiences as well as by the parameters of Grounded Theory (Strauss and Corbin 2008). Table 2. Relationships among the methods, techniques, and instruments used in the research. Methods Data Collection Techniques Analysis Techniques Instruments Autoethnography Participant observations Teacher–researcher’s diary Structured interviews Interview script Critical discourse analysis Pre-analysis Lexicometric analysis MAXQDA and Sketch Engine Content analysis Mixed category system Linguistic analysis Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 5 of 16 All the methodological elements of our case study were based on these parameters. In this sense, a constant work of observation, comparison, reflection and reading was developed throughout the research process, assuming the attributes of all qualitative researchers; for example, “the ability to live with ambiguity” or “an acceptance of the self as a research instrument” (Strauss and Corbin 2008, p. 13). 2.3. Strategies of Analysis The analysis, inspired by the proposals of several authors (Pardo Abril 2013;Wodak and Meyer 2003), although specifically designed for this research, involved four complementary steps. Each of these should be understood as a different, albeit complementary, approach to the research corpus. 1. Pre-analysis, where the texts of the corpus were characterised in order to discover their heuristic potential in relation to the research objectives. In this sense, we observed how the regulatory texts, with the LOMCE as the protagonist, found their raison d’être in a concept of business quality, which is in line with the ideology of the central government at the time. The sub-discourse on competences was perfectly aligned with this. On the other hand, the school’s texts responded precisely to the aims of a business project whose product was the educational model defended by its promoters, while the texts of the Department of Social Sciences reflected the existence of a certain discursive gap in terms of the Geography and History subject approach. Finally, we were able to note a strong impact of the previous discourses in the Geography and History class, according to the testimonies of its participants, but also an important margin for questioning. Although intuitive and preliminary, this corpus characterisation was the first step in laying the foundations for the subsequent quantitative and qualitative analyses. 2. Lexicometric analysis using techniques based on textual statistics (word count, identification of key segments, recognition of co-texts, and so on) made it possible to extract previously unnoticed information on frequencies and associations. For example, we were able to confirm the high quantitative presence of students in the four sub-corpora. With regard to the concept of innovation, the central focus of the global research, the identification of its corresponding associations allowed us to characterise this concept in the following way: (a) its meaning was taken for granted and worked as an argument to justify the changes of the LOMCE educational reform; (b) in its main collocations, it coincided with particularly ethereal words; (c) its co-occurrences and concordances only suggested positive connotations; (d) it was closely linked to business, entrepreneurship and economics; and (e) it appeared closely linked to new technologies and little to new methodologies. All these results encouraged us to go beyond the textual materiality to capture the meanings, visible and invisible, deductive and inductive, thematic and non-thematic, with which the discursive units were used in our corpus. 3. Content analysis, which materialised in a system that combined both deductive categories (identified in the theoretical framework) and inductive categories (from the analysed data). Our system of categories fulfilled the objective of deconstructing the corpus from a thematic perspective, allowing us to know what the main themes and topics present in our texts were, thus approaching the way in which such contents are interpreted according to each discursive field. In this sense, we managed to locate the central problem of our study, the impact of educational innovation from the teaching experience, in a broad, complex and contradictory context, where this phenomenon conflicted with different discourses and practices related to the educational model defended both in the laws and in the organisational documents of the school. 4. Linguistic analysis, which focused on identifying the grammatical resources and strategies used. The analysis of the coherence and consistency of the discourses present in the corpus revealed diverse conceptions of educational innovation, highlighting the dissonance represented by the teaching voice regarding the uncritical, distanced and Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 6 of 16 indifferent perspective of the rest of the discourses. The analysis of naming strategies allowed us to know how the discursive actors are recognised in the texts, according to the perspective of each discursive field. Finally, the analysis of legitimation processes showed us a wide range of persuasive strategies, which contributed to convince of the appropriateness and urgency of the proposals for change coming from the highest spheres. Particularly interesting was the game of recognition between students and their teacher. Each in their own way, with their own processes and linguistic resources, tried to construct their own discourse in response to the domination that was being exercised over them. Although these four phases were totally conducted, this paper focuses specifically on the third of these phases, an intermediate point between lexicometric exploration and the linguistic deconstruction of the different levels of meaning present in the discourses under analysis. In this phase, we can find the most appropriate response to the challenge of managing and organising a large and diverse corpus, providing a completer and more elaborate vision of the discursive topics than that offered in the pre-analysis phase. The category of analysis this study focused on directly linked us to the didactic model observed in the Geography and History classes that constitute our case study. More specifically, this category allowed us to understand the typology of the contents that the students and the teacher–researcher involved had to work on (see Table 3). The name of this category, confronting knowledge paradigms, refers, primarily, to the fact that the elements that make up this typology, which are all related to school knowledge identified in practical reality, are far from being homogeneous but, as we will see in the following section, are diverse and even contrary to each other. Table 3. Sections of the general category system on which this work is focused. Category Code Subcategory Code Confronting knowledge paradigms COKPA Competence discourse CODI Disciplinary reality DIRE 3. Results 3.1. Competence Discourse Our first subcategory reflects the prominence of competency-based learning in the educational discourse contained in the normative texts. This element is presented as the central axis of the curriculum of the different educational levels and as a definitive impetus for the educational changes that must take place in the classroom. This is expressed in the following fragment: “This Real Decreto is based on the promotion of learning by competences, integrated into the curricular elements in order to promote a renewal in teaching practice and in the teaching and learning process” (CODI-T2). First of all, it is worth noting the variety of definitions of the term “competence” in texts which, in theory, should be consonant with each other. On the one hand, competence is defined as “a combination of practical skills, knowledge, motivation, ethical values, attitudes, emotions, and other social and behavioural components that are mobilised together to achieve effective action” (CODI-T2). Moreover, it is stated that competences “are conceptualised as ‘know-how’ that applies to a variety of academic, social and professional contexts” (CODI-T2). Particular emphasis is also placed on the importance of a proper understanding of the typology of knowledge present in competences. Competence knowledge integrates a conceptual knowledge base: concepts, principles, theories, data and facts (declarative knowledge-knowing how to say); knowledge related to skills, referring to both observable physical action and mental action (procedural knowledge-knowing how to do); and a third component that has a strong social and cultural influence, and which involves a set of attitudes and values (knowing how to be). (CODI-T3) Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 7 of 16 Secondly, several benefits are associated with the interrelationships of the different components that characterise competence learning. One of these is the fact that this type of learning “favours the learning processes themselves and the motivation to learn” (CODI- T3). In this way, a direct and unquestionable correlation is established between work based on competences and the supposed stimulation of students. Another of the great virtues of competency-based learning is expressed in Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero, as “an integral training of people”, which enables them to “reorganise their thinking and acquire new knowledge, improve their actions and discover new forms of action and new skills that enable them to perform tasks efficiently, favouring lifelong learning” (CODI-T3). From this perspective, competency-based learning is presented as a definitive and revolutionary approach to renew and improve the quality of any educational process. As a complement to this apologetic approach, the same text indicates some of the keys to developing an effective process of competency-based learning at school. Since competency-based learning is characterised by its transversality, its dynamism and its comprehensive nature, the competency-based teaching-learning process must be approached from all areas of knowledge and by the various entities that make up the educational community, in both formal and non-formal and informal spheres. Its dynamism is reflected in the fact that competences are not acquired at a given moment and remain unalterable, but involve a process of development through which individuals gradually acquire higher levels of performance in the use of these competences. (CODI-T3) Focusing now on the process of integrating the competency-based learning model into the official Spanish curriculum, we can point out the international references identified in the normative texts. On the one hand, it was stated that UNESCO was the organisation that established the precursor principles for the application of competency-based teaching “by identifying the basic pillars of lifelong learning for the 21st century, consisting of ‘learning to know’, ‘learning to do’, ‘learning to be’ and ‘learning to live together’” (CODI-T3). On the other hand, in line with what was noted in the theoretical framework, the direct reference for Spain is the European Union. According to the text, the guidelines of this institution raise the relevance of competences by defending the acquisition of these “as an indispensable condition for individuals to achieve full personal, social and professional development that meets the demands of a globalised world and makes economic development possible, linked to knowledge” (CODI-T3). In fact, Spanish legislation adopts the concept of key competences as defined by the European Union: “those that all people need for their personal fulfilment and development, as well as for active citizenship, social inclusion and employment” (CODI-T2), adding, at another point, that these are “essential for the well-being of European societies, economic growth and innovation” (CODI-T2). The precedent, in the Spanish case, would be the Ley Orgánica de Educación (LOE) (2006), which included the term “basic competences” for the first time. In this sense, the LOMCE and the different regulatory texts that developed it claimed to go “further” in terms of the implementation of the curriculum of competences by including the term “competences” within the definition of the “basic curriculum” (CODI-T3). Specifically, the two main sources with which the Orden ECD/65/2015 de 21 de enero claimed to align itself are “the results of educational research” and “the European trends set out in Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning” (CODI-T3). On this basis, Article 2 of the Orden established that the key competences in the Spanish education system are the following: (a) linguistic communication, (b) mathematical competence and basic competences in science and technology, (c) digital competence, (d) learning to learn, (e) social and civic competences, (f) a sense of initiative and entrepreneurship, and (g) cultural awareness and expressions (CODI-T3). Article 4 (“Key competences and objectives of the stages”) contains certain requirements for the integration of competences in the different educational stages. Among them, due to the originality it represents with respect to the ideas already discussed, the following should be highlighted: “the design of integrated Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 8 of 16 learning activities that enable progress to be made towards the learning outcomes of more than one competence at the same time” (CODI-T3). At this point, it is necessary to know more specifically what the guidelines are for the integration of key competences in all curricular areas or subjects, which can be found in Article 5 of the same Orden we have just mentioned. These guidelines, which are summarised in the following table, constitute certain basic requirements to be taken into account by teachers when drawing up or redefining teaching programmes in terms of key competences (see Table 4). Table 4. Selection of excerpts from the Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero, on the topic guidelines for the integration of key competences in the curriculum. Excerpt Code The learning outcomes to be achieved by pupils should be “defined, made explicit and sufficiently developed in the subject areas”. CODI-T3 “( . . . ) Since the evaluable learning standards are linked to competences, this profile will identify those competences that are developed through that area or subject”. CODI-T3 “All areas and subjects must contribute to the development of competences. The set of evaluable learning standards of the different areas or subjects that relate to the same competence gives rise to the profile of that competence (competence profile). The elaboration of this profile will facilitate the competency assessment of students”. CODI-T3 “The assessment of the competency development must be integrated with the assessment of contents, insofar as being competent means mobilising knowledge, skills, attitudes and values to respond to the situations posed, providing learning with functionality and applying what is learnt from an integrated approach”. CODI-T3 Considering all these requirements, this is the right moment to find out how the competency approach is included in the subject of Geography and History, according to the regulatory discourses. In this sense, one of the objectives of the subject contemplated in the Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre can be used as an introduction to this new topic: “to continue acquiring the competences necessary to understand the reality of the world in which they live, past and present collective experiences, their orientation in the future, as well as the space in which life in society develops” (CODI-T2). In the Orden de 14 de julio de 2016, which, among other aspects, develops the curriculum of secondary education in the region of Andalusia, we found a characterisation of the subject which specified that our subject will train students in certain “skills” for, on the one hand, “the understanding of the complexity of current societies” and, on the other, “the analysis and implementation of the strategies required to exercise responsible, participatory citizenship, aware of their identity, rights and obligations, in a plural and globalised environment” (CODI-T5). This last idea is mentioned again in the supposed transversal “contributions” of Geography and History to the overall ESO curriculum, referring to “the development of personal competences and social skills for the exercise of participation through the assessment of the various channels of citizen action and empowerment” (CODI-T5). At first glance, in the context of our subject, the concept of competence acquires a new significance that moves away from what has been said about key competences to focus on knowledge that is fundamentally attitudinal and related to the development of civic education. In order to understand the supposed contribution of the subject of Geography and History to the development of competences, we must move forward in examining the same Orden. Below (see Table 5), we list some excerpts that allowed us to explore this issue in greater depth. Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 9 of 16 Table 5. Selection of excerpts on the topic contribution of the subject of Geography and History to the learning of competences, according to the Orden de 14 de julio de 2016. Competence Excerpt Code Linguistic communication “By working on oral and written comprehension and expression through source analysis, preparation of papers and participation in debates”. CODI-T5 Mathematics and basic competences in science and technology “Through the handling and analysis of numerical information as well as the assessment of scientific and technological advances for social progress”. CODI-T5 Digital competence “Use of applications and software that allow the collection, organisation, presentation and editing of information and conclusions of content and projects related to this subject”. CODI-T5 Cultural awareness and expressions “Thanks to the understanding of the cultural fact, its relationship with personal and social identity, its most outstanding manifestations and the importance and benefits of its conservation, dissemination and enhancement”. CODI-T5 Learning to learn “Through case studies, research papers, projects and the use of cognitive skills involving comparison, organisation and analysis”. CODI-T5 Sense of initiative and entrepreneurship “Thanks to the knowledge of the world of economics, business and the functioning of society and politics, as well as the development of personal and social skills in group work”. CODI-T5 Social and civic “With the knowledge and skills that promote personal and collective well-being through the assumption of the codes of conduct, rules of operation and rights and obligations of citizenship that govern social and democratic states”. CODI-T5 All these discursive propositions have an impact on the way in which the “Objectives” (the title of the section) or “competences” (the term by which the list of objectives is finally referred to) are linked to how the subject of Geography and History is formulated. In this respect, it is interesting to note the use of the latter word as a synonym for “specific competences” of the subject, which may cause some confusion for teachers when interpreting the official curriculum. In fact, it would seem that the development of these “competences” would imply the implementation of several competences at the same time. As an example of this last idea, one of the 16 objectives or capacities established in the Andalusian curriculum is reproduced below: “To know and analyse the ways in which human society transforms the environment, and how the territory influences the organisation and identity of this society, reflecting on the dangers that human intervention generates in the environment, with special emphasis on the case of Andalusia” (CODI-T5). 3.2. Disciplinary Reality In the area of Social Sciences, in particular, the contents are almost strictly conceptual, to the extent that there is a certain obsession with facts, dates, characters, data, features or geographical places on the map. Bearing in mind the importance we give to memorised exams, both in History and Geography, it is clear that these contents are understood as closed, almost timeless and, of course, classified in disciplinary compartments. Proof of this is that, from time to time, the Department asks us to include a series of notes and materials dating back fifty years. (DIRE-T12) Soc. Sci. 2022,11, 553 16 of 16 Rogers, Rebecca. 2018. Critical discourse analysis and educational discourses. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 465–79. Rossi Cordero, Andrea S., and Mario Barajas Frutos. 2018. Competencia digital e innovación pedagógica: Desafíos y Oportunidades. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado 22: 317–39. [CrossRef] Rubio, Vanesa, and JoséTejada. 2017. Las competencias informacionales de los docentes y alumnos de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers 8: 127–40. Sigurðardóttir, Anna K., and Torfi Hjartarson. 2015. The idea and reality of an innovative school: From inventive design to established practice in a new school building. Improving Schools 19: 62–79. [CrossRef] Slater, Graham B. 2015. Education as recovery: Neoliberalism, school reform, and the politics of crisis. Journal of Education Policy 30: 1–13. [CrossRef] SoléBlanch, Jordi. 2020. El cambio educativo ante la innovación tecnológica, la pedagogía de las competencias y el discurso de la educación emocional. Una mirada crítica. Teoría de la Educación32: 101–21. [CrossRef] Sondel, Beth. 2015. Raising Citizens or Raising Test Scores? Teach For America, No Excuses Charters, and the Development of the Neoliberal Citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education 43: 289–313. [CrossRef] Soto, Carlos, and Miguel Pérez-Milans. 2018. Language, Neoliberalism, and the Commodification of Pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication 18: 490–506. [CrossRef] Starr, Lisa J. 2010. The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/Revue Canadienne des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs en Éducation 3: 1–9. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage Publications. Tricot, André. 2019. Innovar en educación. Sí, pero ¿cómo? Mitos y realidades. Madrid: Narcea. Valencia Álvarez, Adriana B., and Jaime R. Valenzuela González. 2017. Innovación disruptiva, innovación sistemática y procesos de mejora continua . . . ¿Implican distintas competencias por desarrollar? In Innovación educativa: Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad. Edited by María S. Ramírez Montoya and Jaime R. Valenzuela González. Madrid: Síntesis, pp. 109–34. Wamsted, John O. 2012. Borges & Bikes Riders: Toward an Understanding of Autoethnography. Qualitative Research in Education 1: 179–201. [CrossRef] Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, comps. 2003. Métodos de Análisis Crítico del Discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa.