scieee Open visual document viewer

Kindness, memory and the true meaning of human dwelling and building in two poems by Robert Frost

Rodríguez Rodríguez, Félix

Full text

Re is a de Es wlios No eame icanos, n! 4 ( 1996), pp. 217 -223 KINDNESS, MEMORY AND THE TRUE MEANING OF HUMAN DWELLING AND BUILDING IN TWO POEMS BY ROBERT FROST FÉLIX RODRÍGUEZ RODR ÍGUEZ Uni e sidad Complu ense, Mad id In one o his l as lec u es o s ude n s Robe F os a gued ha poe y was no hing bu «dwelling on hings»: «Gloa ing and do ing», said F os , «is he whole business, you know. Dwelling on hing s! Dwelling on hings! «Dwelling on he ac ! l i 's beau i ul s a is i cs- you know, he e a e so ne beau i ul s a is ics o gloa on, oo. Th a 's wha i all i s- dwelling on some hing ha ib a es and s ays in you mind and keeps coming back, ... » (li in g Voice, 191) l was no he i s im e ha he de ined poe y in such a way. He had e e ed o his po em «Mowing» using simila e ms ou yea s ea lie . This ea ly so nne has o en been associa ed by c i ics, as he poe himsel also did when he acknowledged ha i had «some hing o do wi h my own philosophy o a », (LV 133) wi h F os 's belie s on he na u e and aims o poe ic w i ing. The emp ha sis on ac and i s seemingly pa adoxical econcilia ion wi h d ea ming , would i in o his dis us o he ole o an sce nden al expe iences. As his w i ings on h e a o poe y clea ly show F os depend ed on his unconscious acul ies, c ea i e imagina ion, inspi a ion, e e ies, o he co mpo si ion o his poems. He on ce explained ha poe y di e s om philosophy in hei sha ed co ncem o knowledge in ha h e i s a ains i un consciousl y. Ye he always opposed, as he l ees in his ema kable poem «The Sound o T ees» ha may alk o going bu ne e do, h e i ee sa ely oo ed in he g ound, a com ple e depa u e om ea h o any p omising sky. The epea ed symbo li c mo emen s he speake s o his poems may ei he hink o a emp ing o ac ually engage in , a e a lw ays checked a he s a o ollowed by an eq ually s ong impul se ha leads hem back o ea li y, o ea h. His in en ion is o s ay wi h he hings, o dwell on he hings as he pu s i . Bu how and o wha ex e n can a poe dwell on his ea h? F os uses in his s a emen ju s 218 Félix Rod íguez Rod íguez quo ed wo wo ds ha should make his meaning clea : gloa ing and do ing. The i s one sugges s sa is ac ion and pleasu e and he second on e !o e and ca e. To dwell hen would be bolh o ind sa is ac ion in he objec s o eali y, o enjoy hem, and o eel a ec ion, e en passion as do ing also implies. This signi icance o he ac o dwelling sui s well he epi aph in which F os de ined himsel as some one who had had all his li e ime a lo e 's qua el wi h he wo ld. Though a cons an and o en us a ing con lic because na u e objec s o being known, i is al so a ela ionship ha ne e lacks lo ing a ec ion. F os emphasizes his endu ing and la s ing quali y o his do ing on hings in he same quo a ion. By dwelling he poe keeps in his mind h e elemen s o na u e ha he la es. An essen ial ea u e o his a ec ion is ha he ne e o ge s o dismisses hem. I is a pa ssion ha main ains ali e he memo y o he hings ha one once lo ed. To dwell would he e o e mean no only o eel passiona e lo e bu o be capable o emembe ing long ha a ec ion. I is o ha e he capaci y o ai h ul and endu ing lo e, o ha ib a ion and deep emo ion ha ne e anishes, o he hings ha he poe ca es o . Dwelling is also he subjec o wo o he essays o Ma ín Heidegge ' s book , Poe y, Language, Though . In he i s on e, «Building Dwelling Thinking », a e es ablishing ha no human building is possible unless man leams o dwell on his ea h , he e lec s on he eal and ue signi ican ce o he second e m. Dwelling, he a g ues , is i s o ali «a s aying wi h hings» ha demands om human beings a di e en a i ude in ela ion o he essen ial na u e o he hings a ound him. In o de o be capa ble o dwelling, hey should sa e and p o ec hose undamen al ea u es ha make hing s wha h ey a e ins ead o was ing and mas e ing hem: «Dwelling is spa i ng and p ese ing. To sa e he ea h a he han o exploi i o e en wea i ou . Sa ing he ea h does no mas e he ea h and <loes no subjuga e i , ... »( 150) Heidegge , in one o his ead ings o he poe y o Holde lin , inds hi ~ accomplished in poe ical wo ks. «Poe ically man dwells» he philosophe sha es wi h h e poe b ec ause as Heidegge explains poe y ep esen s he embodimen o he ha mon) o man, ea h and sk y. The poe explo es he dimension and space ex is ing be wee ea h and sky and in doing so holds he necessa y balance o hose h ee elemen s Poe y allows poe s o measu e he span ha se pa a es he sky om he ea h ye eac h ol hei imagina i e ligh s, as F os also de ended, p o okes an equally powe ul ea c io owa ds h e ea h. The objec and aim o ali poe y, Heidegge ema ks, is no o anspon man o a anscenden al eali y bu o make him s a y wi h hings, o make him capabl( o dwelling: «Poe y does no ly abo e and su moun he ea h in a d e o escape i anc ho e o e i . Poe y is wha i s b ings man on o he ea h, making him belong o i and hus b ing him in o dwelling .» («Poe ically Man Dwells», 218) This measu ing ac i i y o poe y ha le s man dwell and he e o e build o ea h is agains he ene ic and excessi e on e ha he Ge man philo so phe sees in h( modem me hods o building. Unable o hink o he ue na u e o dwelling ha allow! him o be a peace wi h hings by p ese ing h ei iden i y and own sel , his building: Kindness. Memo y and he T ue Meaning o Human Dwe/ling and Building in Two Poems 219 a e h e esul o a mechanical, blind and ca eless calcula ing ha causes hi s es less and unpoe ic exis ence: «Thus», Heidegge says, «i migh be ha ou unpoe ic dwelling, i s incapaci y o ake he measu e , de i es om a cu ious excess o an ic measu ing and calcula ing.» (228) Only i man abandons his inapp opia e and hos ile a i ude owa d he hing s on ea h, will he eco e h e signi icance o dwelling. Only hen will he be capab le o humane dwelling and building. Bu how is man o know he eal na u e o dwelling and building? Wha 's mo e , how is he going o u se ha knowledge o change bis mis aken dwelling and building? Heidegge inds he answe s o hese ques ions once mo e in Hold e lin. Poe s, he says, can be a peace wi h hings because hey a e kind o hem :»'As long as Kindness, The Pu e, s ill s ays wi h his hea ... ,' HOlde lin says in an idiom he liked o use: 'wi h his hea ,' no 'in bi s hea .' Tha is, i has come o he dwelling being o man, come as he claim and appeal o h e measu e o he hea in such a way ha he hea u ns o gi e heed o he measu e.» (229) As long as he e ains hings in his memo y he will go on measu ing he space be ween he ea h and he sky. He will only ail o do i i his kindness abandons hei hea s. Dwelling, ei he poe ically o jus humanly, is hus ied, as F os had also pu i , o he possibili y o do ing and emembe ing long he hings ha belong o his ea h. These ideas and conside a ions o bo h poe and philosophe on he meaning o dwelling and building, a e e lec ed in wo poems o F os in which a na u al elemen , he b ook, is he subjec ha elici s he medi a ions o he speake . They a e no he only poems o his in which b ooks appea . How e e , h ey p esen simila i ies in manne and con en which make hem he igh choices o s how he di e en ways man may s ay wi h hings. Ei he human beings a e capab le o ne e -ending ca e o hings as hey a e and, as a consequence, he e is a chance o peace ul dwelling, o , on he con a y, hey neglec he objec s o he ex e na! wo ld and b ing upon hemsel es pains and su e ings. Th e dis inc exis ences o hese b ooks o he wo po ems show ha bo h possibili ies may occu . The poem « Hyla B ook» was included inF os 's hi d collec ion o poe y, Moun ain In e al. l ells o a small b ook ha disappea s e e y June d ied up by he hea o la e sp ing. By ha ime i s bed is al eady illed wi h he dead lea es o he n ea by ees so ha no one passing by would no ice ha he e lowed a s eam wi h «song and speed.» No one bu hose who, Jike he sp eake o he poem, saw i lashing ea lie in he yea . He s ill emembe s how i used o un be a e i wen unde g ound o eed he ege a ion ha g ows on wha once we e i s banks. l may n o be as powe ul and sw i as hose o he b ook s usually celeb a ed in so ngs bu i s memo y has emained wi h he speake : A b ook o non e bu who emembe long. : his as i will be seen is o he a Than wi h b ooks ak en o he whe e in song. We Jo e he hings we lo e o wha hey a e. (The Poe y o Rohe F os 119) 220 Félix Rod íguez Ro d í guez The inal line o he poem, one o ho se sayings ha F os some imes lik ed o end his poems wi h, explains why he speake ecalls his ail and puny b ook. Though i is a p esen nowhe e o be seen, bis la e and a ec ion has kep i in his hea . And he will e ain he p esence o he b ook un il i eco e s i s s eng h. The b ook s a ys wi h him when he e is no ace o i s s eam bu in he minds o ho se who a e ab le o « emembe long.» In hi s way, he speake has p o ed o ha e h a one hing need ul a dwelling. His kindness has p ese ed and sa ed om obli ion a hing o his ea h and, he has done i wi hou conside ing any kind o se l -in e es o pe sonal bene i . His is he pu e kindness ha allows men o d we ll on hings. Few people in he ci y depic ed in he poem «A B ook in he Ci y» in New Hamp shi e , would know wha o say i h ey we e asked abou he b o ok ha so ne ime ago licked h e wa ll s o he old a mhouse. No one seems o ecall when and h ow, as ha o «Hyla B ook», i aded. Unless hey looked a he old maps o his a me u al en i onmen h ey would ell he speake o he poem w ho now seeks i s p esen whe eabou s, ha no b ook e e an wa e o e he e. Fo una ely a he b ook, his ques ions a e li le mo e han a p e en se o emind he popula ion o his u ban se ing ha i s ill li es and lows. Anyone sea ching a i should look in he sewe s wh e e he cons an and un elen ing g ow h o he c i y has d i en i : Wha cinde loads dumped down? The b ook was h own deep in a sew e dungeon unde s one In e id da kness s ill o li e and un- (231) This ime he b ook has no been wiped ou by h e hea o he s un . No has i gone unde g ound o nou ish g ass and lowe s. The de elopmen o he ci y has umed he b ook in o an useless and pal y hing. Ins ead o p ese ing h e essen ial na u e o wha i is, a b ook, mode n building h as was ed an «inmo al hing» as he poem d esc i- bes i . I migh well be his e e nal quali y o he b o ok, as opposed o he mo al c ha ac e o he human cons uc ions, ha gi es he speake he n ecessa y con idence o sugges ha i is people's o ge ulness wha does n o !e h em li e a peace. His wo ds sh a e so ne o ha menacing in lec ion o he o ice ha wa ned he ees o «Sp ing Po o ls » agains «sweeping away» hose pools o mel ed snow. The di e ence is ha whe eas in «Sp ing Pools» he e is only he e bal h ea , in «A B ook in he Ci y» he p eo ple a e al eady be in g paid back a wha hey ha e done o he b ook. As he app opia e c enge a ha ing being o ced o g a pe unde g ound in o il hy and da k sewe s, i has pushed i s way in o h e un consc ious c hannel s o he mind. In a so o eudean e a li a ion, he b ook haun s hem day and nigh making h em eel uneasy and es less: Kindness, Memo y and he T ue Meaning o Human Dwe//ing and Building in Two Poems 221 No one would know excep o ancien maps Tha su ch a b ook an wa e . Bu 1 wonde I om i s being kep o e e unde The hough may no ha e isen ha so keep This new-buil ci y om bo h wo k and sleep. (231) « Thei Ea s a e no se enaded wi h he pe pe ua( mu mu o B ooks», as Robe Be e ly desc ibed in 1705 in his book The His o y and P esen S a e o/Vi ginia ( q . in Leo Ma x's The Machine in he Ca den, 83), he encoun e o he i s colonis s wi h na u e. Only he speake would escape his cu se ha de e s he es o he popula ion om leading a quie and se ene exis ence. He seems o be he only one who, as he speake o «Hyla B ook» is ca pable o emembe ing long. He has kep all h ough his ime his ecollec ions o ha b ook he used o play wi h: J ask as one who knew he b ook, i s s eng h And impulse, ha ing dipped a inge leng h And made i leap my knuckle, ha ing ossed A lowe o y i s cu en whe e hey c ossed. (231) Whe eas he ci y has no only bu ied and sunk in obli ion bu also dep i cd h e b ook o i s essen ial ea u es as such, his memo y has dwel ai h ully upon i . His ememb ance o ha pas ime when he dipped his inge in o i s wa e and his wa ning agains he ci y comes om someone who lo ed and keeps on eeling a ec ion o he b ook. Unlike he ci y whose « an ic calcula ing», as H eidegge pu s i , has umed he b ook in o one o he numbe less lines ha con igu a e i s physiognom y, he has sa ed he image o he b ook as i s hould look and be. l he kind o building o his modem ci y p o es ha i s people do no know he eal signi icance o dwelling and, as a consequence, hey do no li e a es and peace wi h hings, he possesses he indispen- sable elemen s: lo e and he capaci y o e ain i . His pu e kindness will pe ni him o dwell wi h hings and he e o e o build. Unkindness was p ecisely, acco ding o John Ru skin, he o igin o he ulga and clumsy a chi ec u e o his ime. In The Se en Lamps o A chi ec u e, he missed he ca e ul and pa ien oil o housands o unknown wo ke s who had pu up he old buildings. In hose a chcs, balconies, sculp u es and omamen s o chu ches and palaces ha he d ew o his book, he pe cei ed he de o ed and deligh ul e 01 o he anonymous man who had ca ed he s one. In opposi ion o his a chi ec u e o old in which m en pu hei hea s in wha hey we e doing, mode n building is he p oduc o wha he calls machine wo k. I oug h o be despised and banished no beca use he esul s a e coa se o bad, bu because hey do no ell o he single human hea ha made each o i s de ails. They migh be 222 Félix Rod íguez Rod íguez pe ec buildings bu hei cold egula i y o lines and uni onni y igno e he eeling and !o e ha mus always exis when hand and s one ouch:»I canno oo o en epea », w o e Ruskin, «i is no coa se cu ing, i is no blun cu ing, ha is neces sa ily bad; bu i is cold cu ing he Iook o equal ouble e e yw he e he smoo h, di used anquili y o hea less pains ... » (162). Heideggge , alongside F os , would ha e said ha he cause o all h ese p oblems is ha men do no know how o dwell any mo e. They seem o ha e o go en how o s ay wi h hings, o be a peace wi h hem, o lo e and es pec he b ook and he s one. In his sen se, mod em building is he highes exp ession o men 's loss o memo y and ca e o hings. I a chi ec u e, as Ru sk in himse l obse es in he chap e «The Lamp o Memo y », is one o « he lwo s ong conque o s o he o ge ulness o men»,(169) i seems ha i has esigned om his du y in mode o imes. Poe s , as bo h Heidegge sees in Hé.ild e lin and F os shows, h ough he speake s o his poem s, in «Hyla B ook» and «A B ook in h e Ci y», con inue o dese e ha name. They sa e and p ese e he ea h and he hings on i by means o he Ia s ing !o e h ey eel o hem. As a co nse qu ence, poe y le s men dwell by eminding h em o he meaning o dwelling which is no hing bu o do e on an d s ay wi h hings. Building, on he o he hand, no Iong e based on he ue na u e o dw elling, condems a he han escues hem om obli ion. Someone, poe s pe haps, should ell he people o he ci ies, as I alo Cal ino w o e in Las ci ud ades in isibles, ha he oad o hei u u e is pa ed wi h ememb ances and ecollec ions. Ma co Polo ealizes when he walks in he ci ies he a i es in, o ju s d eams as Kublai Khan, guesses, ha he mul iple agmen s and de ails ha may con igu a e men 's e en ual exis ences a e al eady gi en om he s a . The coun less boughs ha will shape and sus ain hei li e s g ow in he pas . l is hen hei esponsabili y o p o ec hem so ha hey n e e wi he . As Cal ino pu s i , «los u u os no ealizados son sólo amas del pasado: amas secas.» (42) The speake o «Hyla B ook», by singing o he b ook ha once sung o him ill snow an d ain enew i s s eng h, seems o be awa e o his close connec ion be ween pas and u u e. His kindness e ains he memo y o h is b ook un il i washes o he dead l ea es ha now co nceal i s d ied up bed. The u u e belongs o hose w ho ha e leamed ha dw elling on hings is o « em embe long.» WORKSCITED CALVINO, ITALO. Las ciudades in isi /Jl es. Mad id: Ediciones Si uela, 1994. COOK, REGINALD L. Robe F os . The Li ing Voice. Amhe s : Uni e s i y ol Massachusse s, 1974. FROST, ROBE RT. The Poe 1y o Rohe F os . New Yo k: Hol , Rineha & Wins on 1966. Ki11dness , Memo y and he T ue Meaning o H uman Dwelling and Building in Two Poems 223 HEIDEGGER, MARTIN. Poe y, Lan guage, Though . New Yo k: Ha pe Colophon Books, 1975. MARX, LEO. The Machine in he Ca den. New Yo k: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess, 1964. RUSKIN, JOHN. The Se en Lamps o A chi ec u e. New Yo k: The Noonday P ess, 1974.