scieee Open visual document viewer

Methods of Censusing Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations

Beltrán Gala, Juan Francisco; Delibes de Castro, Miguel; Rau, Jaime

Abstract

Estimating absolute or relative numbers in red fox populations is not an easy task. Although a range of methods has been described, neither an optimal nor a universally accepted technique has been found. Moreover, none has been tested on populations of known size. We reviewed the efficiency of fourteen indices of fox abundance classified into two groups: (a) methods where individuals are captured and marked, which include ear tagging or similar conspicuous markings, toe clipping, radioactive tagging of faeces, radio-tracking, and statistics from hunting and trapping; (b) methods not requiring capture, which include both direct methods (nocturnal counts, unsystematic observations, and drive censuses), and indirect methods (den counts, transects for track, scat counts, and scent stations). As a rule, statistics are rarely applicable to populations estimates. Methods involving capture are expensive but provide more accurate estimates than the second group of indices, which are not suitable for paired comparisons from one year to another. Management and wildlife specialists should have in mind such restrictions when considering their goals and the required level of accuracy. Finally, we recommend the simultaneous utilization and comparison of several methods (one from each group, as proposed in a double sampling strategy) for optimum evaluations.

Full text

Hysl i , (n.s.) 3 (1991): 199 - 214 A i I Simp. I d. Ca ni o i METHODS OF CENSUSING RED FOX (VULPES VULPES) POPULATIONS METODI DI CENSIMENTO DELLA VOLPE (VULPES WLPES) JUAN F RAN C I S C O BELT- (*), MIGUEL DELIBES (*) & JAIMP, R. RAW (**) ABSTRACT Es ima ing absolu e o ela i e numbe s in ed ox popula ions is no an easy ask. Al hough a ange o me hods has been desc ibed, nei he an op inid no a uni e sally accep ed echnique has been ound. Mo eo e , none has been es ed on popula ions o known size. We e iewed he e iciency o ou een indices o ox abundance classi ied in o wo g oups: (a) me hods whe e indi iduals a e cap u ed and ma ked, which include ea agging o simila conspicuous ma kings, oe clipping, adioac i e agging o aeces, adio- acking, and s a is ics om hun ing and apping; (b) me hods no equi ing cap u e, which include bo h di ec me hods (noc u nal coun s, unsys ema ic obse a ions, and d i e censuses), and indi ec me hods (den coun s, ansec s o ack, sca coun s, and scen s a ions). As a ule, s a is ics a e a ely applicable o popula ions es ima es. Me hods in ol ing cap u e a e expensi e bu p o ide mo e accu a e es ima es han he second g oup o indices, which a e no sui able o pai ed compa isons om one yea o ano he . Managemen and wildli e specialis s should ha e in mind such es ic ions when conside ing hei goals and he equi ed le el o accu acy. Fmally, we ecommend he simul aneous u iliza ion and compa ison o se e al me hods (one om each g oup, as p oposed in a double sampling s a egy) o op imum e alua ions. Key wo ds: Census me hods, Vulpes ulpes, Canidae. RIASSUNTO La alu azione della consis enza di una popolazione di Volpe, median e censimen i assolu i o ela i i, b di di icile soluzione. T a i di e si me odi di con eggio impiega i, nessuno si è i ela o o imale e uni e sale. Tu a ia nessuno è s a o ulilizza o pe popolazioni di consis enza no a. Qui esaminiamo la alidi à di 14 me odi impiega i pe il calcolo di indici di abbondanza, ipa endoli in due g uppi: (a) me odi che implicano la ca u a e il ma camen o degli animali median e ma che au icola i o con assegni simila i, ampu azione delle alangi, adioiso opi ile abili nelle eci, colla i adio eleme ici e me odi che si basano sulle s a is iche ena o ie e sui appolaggi; (b) me odi che non ichiedono la ca u a degli animali e che igua dano sia ile amen i di e i (con eggio no u no, awk amen i casuali, censimen o in ba u a), sia indi e i (con eggio delle ane, con eggio delle imp on e e delle eci su pe co si dc ini i, s azioni odo i e e). Ra amen e l'analisi s a is ica è applicabile alle s ime della consis enza delle popolazioni. I me odi che implicano la ca u a degli animali sono mol o impegna i i in e mini di empo e cos i, ma o niscono s ime più accu a e ispe o a quelli del secondo g uppo che non sono ada i pe la compa azione dei da i da un anno all'al o. Ques i limi i anno a en amen e conside a i in elazione aiie inali à e ai g ado di p ecisione che si in ende aggiunge e. Noi sugge iamo l'impiego simul aneo di più me odi di censimen o (almcno uno pe ciascun g uppo), pe una compa azione inc ocia a dci da i e pe o ene e una s ima co e a della consis enza. Pa ole chia e: Me odi di censimen o, Kdpes ulpes, Canidae. (*) Es aci6n Biolbgica de Doiiina, CSIC. Apdo. 1056. E - 41080 Se illa, Spain (**) Dp o. Ciencias Exac as y Na u alcs, IPO, Casilla 933, Oso no, Chile I NTRODUCTION We will use he e m census in a b oad sense. Censuses a e commonly aimed no so much a de e mining he ac ual numbe s o indi iduals in a popula ion (O e on, 1971; Da is and Wins ead, 1980), bu a he a es ima ing an index o abundance om a ce ain sampling size. This allows he compa ison o a eas on a empo al and/o spa ial basis. In any case he p oposed a ge is no easily achie able and i is expensi e. No one me hod, among he many desc ibed in he li e a u e, can be conside ed as he bes o he one always yielding op imal esul s. Ail o hem ha e limi a ions and mos o he assump ions upon which sampling p ocedu es a e based a e no usually me (Rau, 1988; Es es and Jameson, 1988). Mo eo e , he e is ha dly a simple case whe e indexes ha e been compa ed using popula ions o known size (e.g. Da is and Wins ead, 1980). Two o he aspec s o censusing me hods dese e mo e a en ion han hey a e commonly gi en. Fi s ly, he le el o accu acy (i.e. esolu ion) gi en by censusing is o en below accep able limi s. Rolley (1987) s udying his subjec in bobca s (Lym u us) - a medium sized ca ni o e - s a ed ha no single echnique has p o en sensi i e enough o de ec ing changes smalle han 10 - 25% wi hin a popula ion. Thus, he e ec o any ac o po en ially egula ing he popula ion could no likely be de ec ed unless i would exceed his pe cen age. Secondly, he ela ionship be ween cos o censusing and esul s ob ained is o en dis ega ded by he esea che . Usually, he mos amilia me hod has he highes p obabili y o being chosen. Specialis s in e es ed in es ima ing Red ox abundance a a gi en Tab. 1 - Summa y o me hods e iewed in his pape o es ima ing popula ion size in K ipes ulpes. ~~ ~ ~~~ A. - METHODS REQUIRING CAPTURE A.l. - Cap u e - ma k - ecap u e me hods (CMR) i. - Conspicuous agging (ea - agging, colla ing e c.) 2. - Toe - clipping 3. - Radioac i e ma king o aeccs A.2. - Home ange size A.3. - S a is ics 5. - Hun ing Indica o o Popula ion Densi y (HIPD) 6. - T ap - lines B. - METHODS WITHOUT CAPTURE €3.1. - Di ec me hods 7. - Nigh coun s 8. - D i e census 9. - Non - sys ema ic obse a ions (sigh ings) 10. - Den coun s 11. - T ack coun s 12. - Sca coun s 13. - Scen - s a ion ines 14. - O he ( " a pos e io i " ) B.2. - indi ec me hods 200 place and ime need o know, a leas c udely, bo h he inpu equi ed and esul s ob ainable om he a ailable me hods. Only in his way one can choose he mos sui able me hod ascomp omise be ween his needs (i.e. goals, aims) and his esou ce a ailabili y (i.e. money, helpe s, e c.). This pape is aimed a e ising ou een di e en me hods ha ha e been used o es ima ing Red ox popula ions ei he by us a he Do iana Biological Rese e (DBR) (Rau e al., 1985a), o by o he au ho s in o he coun ies. We include me hods applied o o he ca ni o es which can be adap ed o ox census, and we ou line he p incipal ad an ages and limi a ions o each. M ETHODS REQUIRING CAPTURE F om a p ac ical pe spec i e, me hods o es ima ing Red ox popula ions can be classi ied in o hose ha equi e he cap u e o indi iduals and hose ha do no (Tab. 1). Among he i s g oup, he e a e ob ious di e ences i he esea che himsel cap u es he animals and eleases hem a e wa ds (cap u e-ma k- ecap u e modi ied), o i da a a e ob ained om cap u es ca ied ou wi h a wide ange o echniques (e.g. hun ing and apping). CAF'TURE-MARK-RECAPTURE METHODS (CMR) Because i allows many possibili ies, his me hodology has been gi en a lo o a en ion in he li e a u e (e.g. O is e al., 1978; Sebe , 1982; Whi e e al., 1982; Mon gome y, 1987). Ne e heless, oxes a e di icul o cap u e and e en mo e o ecap u e, so ha his me hod canno be s ic ly applied. Ins ead, oxes should be cap u ed and ma ked wi h di e en sys ems, which allow o iden i y o de ec hem om a dis ance (S onehouse, 1978). The heo e ical basis o CMR me hods has a simple o mula ion: in a popula ion o N indi iduals, M indi iduals a e cap u ed and ma ked; om a subsequen sample o 'In'' indi iduals o he same popula ion, "me' ma ked indi iduals a e ound. The size o he popula ion is hen gi en by: N = (M.n)/m The p incipal assump ions a e: a) he popula ion is closed (Lincoln - Pe e sen o Schnabel p ocedu es can hen be applied, e.g. Todd e al., 1982, hough es ima o s o open popula ions such as hose o Bailey, and Jolly-Sebe a e also a ailable, e.g. Cla k, 1972; Caughley, 1977); b) indi iduals a e equally ca chable, ha is, he sample is homogeneously dis ibu ed among he popula ion, bo h be o e cap u ing and a e ma king. The socio - spa ial o ganiza ion o oxes - as o o he ca ni o es - in alida es he second assump ion, and co ec ion ac o s a e necessa y (Bu nham and O e on, 1979; Pollock, 1982; Pollock e al., 1985, among o he s). An addi ional p oblem conce ning his me hodology is he di icul y o es ima ing he cap u e a ea, since he ange o mo emen s o indi iduals is o en unknown. Radio - acking can usually sol e his p oblem (G eenwood e al., 1985; Ku eld e al., 1987; Babb and Kennedy, 1989). 201 CMR me hods yield absolu e es ima es o densi y (numbe indi iduals/ a ea). As a ule, any censusing me hod could yield an es ima e o he whole popula ion, hough i seems mo e app op ia e - see below ansec me hods - o conside census esul s only as ela i e abundance es ima es (Kolb, 1982; Ebe ha d and Simmons, 1987). CMR me hods a e po en ially use ul o sampling oxes i he unde lying assump ions can be me . CONSPICUOUS TAGGING Colou ed ags and o he ma ks ha a e di icul o see a nigh a e no sui able o he Red ox, gi en i s noc u nal o c epuscula ac i i y. Howe e , e lec ing ma ks (Macdonald, 1987) which can be li up om a dis ance, can be a e y use ul aid. This me hod equi es open places equen ed by oxes and he possibili y o a esea che o co e as la ge an a ea as possible. A DO iand Biological Rese e, a 7,000 hec a es s udy a ea in he Do iana Na ional Pa k, Sou hwes e n Spain, we ma ked oxes wi h adio- ansmi e s i ed o e lec ing colla s (Deiibes a id Bel an, 1986), bu he sca ci y o obse a ions (see below Sigh ings) due o hick sh ubs made his me hod unusable. O he au ho s ha e ea - agged oxes, bu unless a co ec ion is made o ag losses, his me hod may gi e e oneous esul s (Hu be e al., 1976; Englund, 1980). TOE - CLIPPING Wildli e specialis s ha e used con olled inge ampu a ions in coyo es (Canis Zu um) in o de o ecognize hei acks (Andel , 1981; Henshaw, 1981). The popula ion can be es ima ed ai ly accu a ely om he a io o " no mal " o " ampu a ed " animal acks, bu his me hod is es ic ed o places and ci cums ances whe e acks can easily be de ec ed (snow o sand ansec s, di oads, e c.). A su gical ope a ion may also be conside ed une hical on c uel y g ounds and because he animal is le wi h a pe manen handicap. I has he ad an age ha se e al popula ion ca ego ies can be ma ked (by sex, by age, indi idually, e c.), acco ding o he numbe and posi ion o he ampu a ed inge s, which allows mo e eliable and s uc u ed es ima ions. RADIOACTIVE MARKING OF FAECES Ma king o aeces wi h adioac i e iso opes has been in use o some wen y yea s o es ima e popula ion size in qui e a numbe o species. I was i s employed o census ox popula ions (Nellis e al., 1967) and hen o he ca ni o es, wi h success (Conne and Labisky, 1985; C ab ee e al., 1985). Once cap u ed, animals a e gi en an in amuscula o in ape i oneal injec ion (5-100 mic ocu ies) o one o se e al combined adioac i e iso opes, usually Zd5 and Cdl@, bu also Ce1@, Co n and Mn'54. Iso opes a e chosen o hei low adio - oxici y (mos o hem emi gamma adia ions), a mean physical and biological li e adjus ed o s udy pe iod ( anging om some weeks o yea s), and he majo ou e o elimina ion o he iso opes h ough aeces, among o he cha ac e is ics (Pel on and Ma cum, 1977; K uuk e al., 1980). I i e o he abo e ci ed iso opes we e injec ed singly o in combina ion wi h any o he , up o 15 di e en indi iduals o coho s o a wild popula ion could be ma ked, making i possible o ca y ou simul aneous sampling o in apopula ion di e ences in habi a use, ood p e e ences, ma king beha iou , e c. (Sibly and Smi h; 1985). A majo obs acle o his echnique, besides he co ec iden i ica ion o sca s, is he way e i o y enu e sys ems by di e en indi iduals can in luence de ec abili y o aeces. Fo ins ance, a e i o ial ox may use mo e conspicuous places o ma k han a ansien one; males may ma k in di e en places han emales and mo e equen ly, e c. Once mo e, adio- acking would be an ideal complemen a y ool (Mi chell-Jones e al., 1984; Conne and Labisky, 1985). Conside ing i s ad an ages, adioac i e ma king o aeces p o ides a e y good app oach o mee ing he assump ions o CMR me hodology because o : a) he s a is ical independence o he ma king and ecap u ing phases o he echnique, b) he ela i ely small selec i i y in ecap u e (i.e. low deg ee o he e ogenei y), and c) he ela i ely high ecap u e p obabili y, HOME RANGE SIZE This is p obably he mos common me hod applied o ca ni o e s udies, Ou knowledge o hese elusi e mammals has d ama ically inc eased wi h he de elopmen o adio- eleme y de ices (Pa ic e al., 1982; Kenwa d, 1987). Densi y es ima es (D) a e ob ained om he equa ion: whe e H is he mean indi idual home ange size popula ion, which can be e alua ed by a ious algo i hms (S uwe and Blohowiak, 1989). This me hod es ima es mhimum yield alues (i.e. i unde es ima es he popula ion), because i is assumed ha each home ange is used exclusi ely by one animai. This is no always ue. Foxes li e in social g oups whose sizes a y in ela ion o he abundance and spa ial dis ibu ion o esou ces (Voig and Macdonaid, 1984; Doncas e and Macdonald, 1991). Thus, es ima es based on his me hod mus be ea ed wi h cau ion, pa icula ly when sample biases a e suspec ed (Laund é and Kelle , 1984). In ou s udy a ea, Red oxes we e adio acked and sampled wi h o he census me hods a he same ime in o de o e alua e and imp o e di e en echniques. Besides he di icul y no ed abo e, we ound ha his me hod could be misleading because he seasonal a ia ions obse ed in home ange size we e no associa ed wi h changes in absolu e densi y (Rau, 1988). D = 1/H HUNTJNG AND TRAPPING LINES The numbe o oxes hun ed du ing spo , managemen o boun y ials o e a whole coun y, s a e, e c. p o ides su icien in o ma ion o es ima e HIPD 203 abundance index (Hun ing Indica o o Popula ion Densi y, Zimen, 1980). The HIPD o simila indices show a high deg ee o eliabili y o de e niining popula ion ends o e la ge a eas. Voig (1987) (see also Kolb and Hewson, 1980; Kolb, 1982) has poin ed ou ha moni o ing o hun ing o apping cap u es is likely o p o ide he bes es ima es o empo al a ia ion in he popula ion when he da a come om la ge enough a eas, despi e some non - negligible p oblems (see Smi h e al., 1984). P obably one o he mos signi ican handicaps is in he way how hun ing and apping da a a e collec ed, being coun y dependen . A good idea o he quali y o in o ma ion po en ially ob ainable is o be ound in he u sales ables o No ak e al. (1987). O he no able s udies a e desc ibed in Jenkins e al. (1981), and he classic pape by El on and Nicholson (1942). Zimen (1980) eco ded a close associa ion be ween empo al e olu ion o he HIPD and abundance o abid oxes in he samples. An index could hus be cons uc ed a pos e io i (see below) wi h adequa e adjus men s, o p edic ox popula ion ends om he abid oxes hun ed. We ema k, as a conclusion o his second ca ego y o me hods equi ing cap u e o animals, he ela i ely low cos in ol ed i sui able da a (i.e. su ey plans and egis a ion) a e collec ed, and he high eliabili y o hese me hods, al hough some co ec ion ac o s (e.g. cap u e pe uni e o when hun ing e iciency, u p ice, and o he a iables a ec he sample), mus be conside ed o in e p e ing he da a. M E T H O D S WITHOUT CAPTURE NIGHT COUNTS The p o ocol o his me hod can be summa ized as ollows: using a ehicle equipped wi h a mo eable spo ligh , a leas wo pe sons make a ansec su ey (40 km in A ois, 1981) a a cons an speed (10 kmhou ), wi h eplica ions (2 - 5) o he ansec on consecu i e nigh s. The me hod was i s designed o census lagomo ph popula ions, la e being applied o ca ni o es in open habi a s (Wase , 1980). A ois (1981), and Schan z and Libe g (1982), among o he s (see also Pandol i e al., 1991), ha e success ully adap ed he me hod o es ima e ed ox popula ions. Lloyd (1980) desc ibed how his me hod could be used in o es ed a eas well in e sec ed by oads: "ln such places oxes in ields adjoining oads a e no dis u bed by passing ca s and sigh ings can be made a ixed in e als along he oadside ...'I. Ne e heless, se e al ac o s should be aken in o accoun €o a s anda dized me hod. Fo example, A ois (1981) ound he mos a ou able condi ions o census we e be ween 21.00 - 03.00 a he newmoon, wi h high cloud co e , and no wind. O he ac o s he conside ed we e he annual cycle o ege a i e co e and he s uc u e o he ox popula ion. An au umn census could be used o de ec he inc ease in ox numbe s due o ec ui men and dispe sal, while an ea ly sp ing es ima e would comp ise la gely b eeding indi iduals. 204 Nigh coun s can be con e ed o es ima es o absolu e densi y i : a) he ange o isibili y is es ed each ime, and b) plo s o a known a ea a e sampled ins ead o a ansec line (Schan z and Libe g, 1982). Time uni s ( oxes coun edll-iou ) a e p e e able o compa ing a eas ha di e in habi a composi ion. Ano he a ia ion on he p ocedu e is o pa i ion a line ansec in o habi a segmen s. This op ion could also imp o e possibili ies o da a analysis. As o any line ansec p ocedu e (Bu nham e al., 1980), a basic ule is o s anda dize he sou ces o a ia ion associa ed wi h sampling e o (some men ioned abo e, also he expe ience o s a , abo e all i nigh coun s a e pe o med o se e al species simul aneously, e.g. p eda o s and p ey). Clea ly, one o he mos signi ican p oblems wi h nigh coun s is he g ea a ie y o ac o s in luencing he use o space and ime by animals. Fo example, one could ask: Wha pe cen age o he ox popula ion is eally coun ed, (i.e. de ec able) by spo ligh ing? A sui able co ec ion ac o has been calcula ed by adio - acking ed oxes and de e mining he mean pe cen age o ime spen by se e al indi iduals in open habi a s, whe e hey we e de ec able by spo ligh ing (Schan z and Libe g, 1982). DRIVE CENSUS The animals a e d i en in o a delimi ed a ea by ained people, some imes assis ed by hounds, and coun ed as hey c oss he obse e ’s line. O e on (1971) ci ed a simpli ied e sion o his me hod by eplacing he obse e ’s line wi h a sand ansec (o o he so ma e ial) om which he animal acks could la e be iden i ied. This me hod can be used success ully in woodland o dense ege a ion co e , such Medi e anean sh ubland. Fo example, Telle ia and SAez-Royuela (1984) es ima ed densi ies o ox and oe dee (Cup eoh cap ealus) by sampling in plo s o 75 hec a es o oak ha dwoods (Que cus obu ). Howe e , he e o equi ed o a sui able sample size ( hese au ho s conduc ed 35 d i e censuses), and also he ime spen in o ganizing a su icien numbe o helpe s (obse e s, bea e s, and hei hounds, e c.), should be conside ed when planning a d i e census. These p oblems we e esol ed o SAez-Royuela and Telle ia (1988) who we e able o p o i om hund eds o d i es o ganized o hun ing. Among he ad an ages o he d i e census a e i s eliabili y and he possibili y o ob ain simul aneous da a on o he animals, pa icula ly game species. I is impo an o no e ha he accu acy o he esul s will be posi i ely co ela ed wi h he numbe o bea e s, and nega i ely co ela ed wi h he size o a ea sampled (Telle ìa, 1986). Undoub edly, he deg ee o dis u bance ha he d i e census in ol ed mus also be conside ed; his is p obably no an ideal me hod o use in na u e ese es. In ou expe ience, we ha e ound a good app oxima ion be ween esul s ob ained om d i e census ou o he limi s o Doiiana Na ional Pa k and hose eco ded om o he densi y es ima o s p e iously de eloped o his a ea (see below), a abou 1.7 oxes/km2. 205 SIGHTINGS (NON - SYSTEMATIC OBSERVATIONS) The basis o his me hod is o ge a egis a ion o any ox sigh ing in a gi en a ea. Fo he analysis o such da a, sigh ings mus be e e ed o uni e o such as he numbe o obse e s, ime spen in he ield, dis ance a elled, e c (Rau, 1988). This is p obably he simples o all he a ailable me hods o es ima e ela i e abundance o ed oxes, being especially ecommended o p o ec ed a eas, o places whe e ield wo k is in p og ess ( esea ch, igilance, e c.). I implies many man/hou s spen in he ield. Alien and Sa gean (1975), and Ha is and Rayne (1986a) employed sigh ings o oxes o calcula e abundance indices. Ne e heless, he e y simplici y o his me hodology needs co ec ions in o de o alida e he esul s and o ob ain ealis ic in e p e a ions o he da a. See o example Voig 's (1987) commen s on he di icul ies in ol ed in de ining he co espondence be ween a sigh ing index and an es ima e o ela i e abundance. We ha e been able o de e mine a sui able adjus men o ou s udy a ea. Red ox sigh ings due o keepe s, esea che s, and isi o s we e co ec ed agains obse e numbe s. Iden i ica ion o animals wi h isual ags pe mi ed us o calcula e he pe cen age o e-sigh ing o any indi idual. Finally, simul aneous adio- acking da a we e used o es ima e p obabili y o a ox - c ossing di oad o i eb eak inside i s home ange, whe e i was mos easily de ec able in he ield. Compu ing hese ac o s, Rau (1988) ob ained a ox abundance index wi h ends well acco ded wi h he ox densi y in Doiiana Biological Rese e as es ima ed by o he mo e sophis ica ed me hods. The me hod's economy, simplici y, easy s anda diza ion, and good adjus men possibili ies wi h o he mo e eliable me hods, which a e also mo e expensi e (in money and ime), a e good enough easons o using a da a base o ox sigh ings as a measu e o popula ion ends. This app oach o densi y es ima o s has been named " double sampling " (Ebe ha d and Simmons, 1987). Fox-sigh ings is only one o he possibili ies (see below ack coun s), and can be applied o o he species besides oxes. DEN COUNTS Coun s o b eeding ox dens in la e sp ing o summe depending on he s udy - a ea (Lloyd, 1980), can be used o de e mine he absolu e abundance o he species. The li e a u e on his subjec is ce ainly no lacking. The classic wo k o Sa gean e al. (1975), p o i ing om he excellen isibili y o e hei s udy a ea o coun s o ox dens om an ai plane, can be compa ed wi h coun s accomplished on oo which equi es mo e s a , ield knowledge, e c. (S o m e al., 1976; Linds om, 1980; Hewson, 1986; P igioni e al., 1991). P obably he majo ad an age o censusing oxes by coun ing hei b eeding dens is he good le el o accu acy ob ained by his me hod. Sa gean e al. (1975) de ec ed 84% o 270 ox amilies in hei s udy a ea. Ob iously, some in o ma ion 206 has o be assumed such as he numbe o indi iduals pe den, e i o y size o a ox amily, e c. I he su ey is ca ied ou on oo , addi ional da a can be egis e ed such as ood habi s o cubs e sus adul s (Delibes and Maiiez, 1984), and compe i ion wi h o he species o den si es (Pigozzi, 1986). Den loca ion also p o ides a good basis o u he wo k such as cap u ing (Zoellick and Smi h, 1986) and popula ion managemen (Zimen, 1980; Hewson, 1986). TRACK COUNTS IN PERMANENT TRANSECI'S Di oads, i eb eaks, and o he simila clea ings a e commonly used by oxes, o a elling, ma king, o es ablishing hei home ange bo de (Sa gean , 1972; Fab igoulé and Mau el, 1982; Mau el, 1983, among o he s). This pa e n o space use is no a cha ac e is ic unique o ed oxes. Pulliainen (1981) moni o ed annual luc ua ions in ela i e abundance o ou species o ca ni o es, he ed ox included, by skiing along a pe manen ansec o 6 kilome e s weekly du ing he snowy season (No embe o Ap il). His esul s we e enhanced by simul aneous obse a ions on oden ac i i y and habi a p e e ences o he ca ni o es du ing a s udy pe iod long enough - 13 consecu i e win e s - o desc ibe p eda o -p ey and communi y dynamics. This me hodology has been used by Rau e al. (1985b) in Sou hwes e n Spain (Do iana Biological Rese e) o es ima e ox densi y by ack coun s on sand ansec s. A basic assump ion o his me hod is ha a linea ela ion exis s be ween he numbe o acks (o o he signs) de ec ed and he ela i e abundance o he species. Howe e , om ou expe ience, his is no always he case. F om simul aneous adio- acking o oxes and su eying o a 1.2 km long sand ansec , a con e sion ac o was ob ained o ack/km o oxes/km (Se in e al., 1987). Each ox c ossed he ansec 3 imes on a e age in each 24 hou cycle. Howe e , he loca ion o he ansec g ea ly in luenced he esul s. S ephenson (1986), and Schwa z and Becke (1988) ha e been in ol ed o se e al yea s in de eloping simple echniques o es ima e popula ion ends in Lynx canadensis. Thei design is a double sampling p ocedu e: simul aneous moni o ing o lynx acks in snow ansec s and adio- acking o indi iduals du ing 24 - 48 hou s. Mo emen s o ma ked lynxes cons i u ing a andom subse o he popula ion we e analysed by a ious me hods, including simula ion (Becke in p ess, in Schwa z and Becke , 1988). SCAT COUNTS IN PERMANENT TRANSECTS The use o sca coun s o de e mine ox abundance has some simila i y wi h he p e ious me hod: a) sampling is ca ied ou along delimi ed ansec s, i possible pe manen in loca ion; b) a s a i ied sampling design is also p e e ed in o de o a oid he e ec s on popula ion ends o seasonal changes in habi a use by oxes. The sca coun p ocedu e, howe e , equi es special co ec ion ac o s (see below). P obably no o he me hod has such long adi ion in he es ima ion o species abundance (Kolb and Hewson, 1980; Pu man, 1984). Rau e al. (1985a and b) 207 S unns, M. 1980. The Red Fox - Vilpes wlpes (L. 1758) - in Eu ope. In Zimen E. (ed.): The ed ox. Symposium on Beha iou and Ecology. Biogeog a ica 18 27 - 34. STUWE, M. & BLOIIOWIAK, C.E. 1989. McP& ( e sion 2.0). Mic ocompu e p og ams o he analysis o animai loca ions. Use s manual, i9 pp. TAYLOR, R.H. & WI~IANS, R.M. 1956. The use o pelle coun s o es ima ing he densi y o popula ions o he wild abbi O yc olagus cuniculus (L.). N. Z. J. Sci. Tech. 388: 236 - 256. TELLER~A, J.L. 1986. Manual pa a el censo de 10s e eb ados e cs es. Ed. Rakes, Mad id, 275 PP. TELLER~A, J.L. & SAL-ROYUEIA, C. 1984. The la ge mammals o Cen al Spain. Mammal Re icw 14 51 - 56. T ODD , A.W., %IT, L.B., F I S H E R , C.A. 1981. Popula ion ecology o coyo es du ing a luc ua ion o snowshoe ha es. J. Wddl. Manage. 47: 394-404. VOIGT, D.R. 1987. Red Fox. In No ak M., Bake JA. Obba d M.E. and Malloch B. (eds.): Wdd Fu bea e Managemen and Cpnsci a ion in No h Ame ica, 378 - 392. Minis y o Na u al Resou ces, On a io. V OIGT , D.R. & MACDONALD, D.W. 1984. Va ia ion in he spa iai and social beha iou o he ed ox Vulpes wipes. Ac a Zool. Fennica, 171: 261-265. WASER, P.M. 1980. Small noc u nal ca ni o es: ecological s udies in he Se enge i. A . J. Ecol. 18: W HITE , G.C., ANDERSON, D.R., BURNHAM, K.P., OTIS, D.L. 1982. Cap u e - ecap u e and emo al me hods o sampling closed popula ions. LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos Na ional Labo a o y, New Mexico, 235 pp. 167-185. W OOD , J.E. 1959. Rela i e es ima es o ox popula ion le els. J. Wddl. Manage. 23: 53 - 63. ZIMEN, E. (ed.). 1980. Fox social ecology and abies con ol. In The ed ox. Symposium on ZOELLICK, B.W. & S M ITH , N.S. 1986. Cap u ing dese ki oxes a dens wi h box aps. Wildl. Soc. Beha iou and Ecology. Biogeog a ica 18: 277-285. Bull. 14: 284-286. 214