scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Recurrence relations for connection coefficients between q-orthogonal polynomials of discrete variables in the non-uniform lattice X(s) = q2s

Álvarez Nodarse, Renato; Ronveaux, André

Abstract

We obtain the structure relations for q-orthogonal polynomials in the exponential lattice q 2s and from that we construct the recurrence relation for the connection coe cients between two families of polynomials belonging to the classical class of discrete q-orthogonal polynomials. An explicit example is also given.

Full text

RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR CONNECTION COEFFICIENTS BETWEEN Q-ORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS OF DISCRETE VARIABLES IN THE NON-UNIFORM LATTICE x ( s ) = q 2 s . 1 R.  Alvarez-No darse 2 Departamento de Matematicas. Escuela Politecnica Superior. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Butarque 15, 28911,Leganes,Madrid. A. Ronveaux 3 Mathematical Physics, Facultes Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, B-5000 Namur, Belgium. Key words and phrases: q-Hahn, q-Meixner, q-Charlier and q-Kravchuk p olynomials, discrete p olynomials, q-p olynomials p olynomials. AMS (MOS, 1991) sub ject classication: 33D45 Abstract We obtain the structure relations for q-orthogonal p olynomials in the exp onential lattice q 2 s and from that we construct the recurrence relation for the connection co ecients b etween two families of p olynomials b elonging to the classical class of discrete q-orthogonal p olynomials. An explicit example is also given. 1 Intro duction. Given two families of Polynomials, denoted by P n ( x ) and Q m ( x ), of degree exactly equal to resp ectively n and m , the Connection Problem asks to compute the so-called Connection Coecients C m ( n ) dened by the relation: P n ( x ) = n X m =0 C m ( n ) Q m ( x ) : When b oth families are orthogonal with resp ect to two dierent measures the Connections Co ecients satisfy a relative simple recurrence relation, but mixing in the ( m; n ) table three adjacent m and three adjacent n crossing at ( m; n ). The rst survey on this topic was given by Askey 20 years ago [1]-[2], giving in some cases explicit expression for the Co ecients and discussing also the p ositivity prop erties of these Co ecients. 1 Octob er 29, 1996 2 e-mail renato@dulcinea .uc3m.es Fax:(+431) 6249430 3 e-mail Andre.Ronv[email protected] e Fax(+3281) 724707 1 It was noticed only recently that an additional assumption on the orthogonality measure gives for C m ( n ) a recurrence only in m; n b eing xed. This Orthogonality class is called semi-classical and is very large [11], [7] . The classical (continuous) family: Jacobi, Bessel, Laguerre, Hermite (see for instance [12]) and the classical(discrete) family: Hahn , Kravchuk, Meixner, Charlier (see for instance [13]) are of course included in the semi-classical class. When the orthogonality measure is dened by a weight  ( x ), the semi-classical class covers all weights solution of a linear rst order dierential (or dierence) equation with p olynomial co ecients. The key prop erty inside the semi-classical class, in order to obtain a one index (m) recurrence relation for C m ( n ), comes from the existence of a so called Structure Relation, linking linearly the derivative (or dierence) of P n ( x ) times a p olynomial, to a xed combination of P k ( x ). An algorithm has b een given recently building for b oth discrete and continuous classical families (see [3], [15] and [16] ) the explicit recurrences for C m ( n ), solving in many cases theses recurrences with the help of Mathematica [20]. Lo oking for the situation for which a structure relation is known explicitly, we realize that, from the data of Orthogonal Polynomial on the exp onential lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s (a small subset of the q-world). Here we need to p oint out that exits two dierent p oint of view in the study of the q-p olynomials. The rst one, in the framework of the q-basic hyp ergeometric series [6], [8], [9] and the second, in the framework of the theory of dierence equations develop ed by Nikiforov et al. [12], [13], [14]. In this work we will use the second one b ecause it gives us the p ossibility to provide an uniform treatment of several classes of orthogonal p olynomials and, probably, it is the b est way to nd further applications. This pap er shows how to apply the technique to a particular (simple) case: the exp onential lattice, building rst the corresp onding Structure Relations. 2 Structure relations for q-orthogonal p olynomials on the exp onential lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s . Let us to start with the study of some general prop erties of orthogonal p olynomials of a discrete variable in non-uniform lattices. Let b e ~  ( x ( s )) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 ) 5 Y ( s ) 5 x ( s ) + ~  ( x ( s )) 2  4 Y ( s ) 4 x ( s ) + 5 Y ( s ) 5 x ( s )  + Y ( s ) = 0 ; 5 f ( s ) = f ( s )  f ( s  1) ; 4 f ( s ) = f ( s + 1)  f ( s ) ; (1) the second order dierence equation of hypergeometric type for some lattice function x ( s ), where 5 f ( s ) = f ( s )  f ( s  1) and 4 f ( s ) = f ( s + 1)  f ( s ) denote the backward and forward nite dierence quotients, resp ectively. Here ~  ( x ) and ~  ( x ) are p olynomials in x ( s ) of degree at most 2 and 1, resp ectively, and  is a constant. 2 The previous equation (1) can b e obtained from the classical hypergeometric equation ~  ( x ) y 00 ( x ) + ~  ( x ) y 0 ( x ) + y ( s ) = 0 ; via the discretization of the rst and second derivatives y 0 and y 00 in an apropiate lattice [12], [13]. It is b etter to rewrite (1) in the equivalent form (see [13] and [14])  ( s ) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 ) 5 Y ( s ) 5 x ( s ) +  ( s ) 4 Y ( s ) 4 x ( s ) + Y ( s ) = 0 ;  ( s ) = ~  ( x ( s ))  1 2 ~  ( x ( s )) 4 x ( s  1 2 ) ;  ( s ) = ~  ( x ( s )) : (2) The q-orthogonal polynomials P n ( x ( s )) q  P n ( s ) q on the exp onential lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s are, for given functions  ( s ) and  ( s ), the p olynomial (in p owers of x ( s ) = q 2 s ) solution of the second order dierence equation (2). The k-order dierence derivative of the p olynomials P n ( x ( s )) q , dened by v k n ( s ) = 4 4 x k  1 ( s ) 4 4 x k  2 ( s ) ::: 4 4 x ( s ) [ P n ( x ( s )) q ]  4 ( k ) [ P n ( x ( s )) q ] ; and x m ( s ) = x ( s + m 2 ) ; also satisfy the dierence equation of hyp ergeometric typ e of the form  ( s ) 4 4 x k ( s  1 2 )  5 v k n ( s ) 5 x k ( s )  +  k ( s ) 4 v k n ( s ) 4 x k ( s ) +  k v k n ( s ) = 0 ; (3) where (see [13], page 62, Equation (3.1.29))  k ( s ) =  ( s + k )   ( s ) +  ( s + k ) 4 x ( s + k  1 2 ) 4 x k  1 ( s ) ; and  k =  n + k  1 X m =0 4  m ( s ) 4 x m ( s ) : These p olynomial solutions denoted by P n ( x ( s )) q  P n ( s ) q satisfy the orthogonality prop erty b  1 X s i = a P n ( x ( s i )) q P m ( x ( s i )) q  ( s i ) 4 x ( s i  1 2 ) =  nm d 2 n ; (4) where  ( x ) is some non-negative function (weight-function), i.e.,  ( s i ) 4 x ( s i  1 2 ) > 0 ( a  s i  b  1) ; supp orted in a countable subset of the real line [ a; b ] ( a; b can b e 1 ). The functions  ( s ) and  k ( s ) are the solutions of the Pearson-typ e dierence equations ([13], Eq.(3.2.9) and (3.2.10) page 64) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 ) [  ( s )  ( s )] =  ( s )  ( s ) ; (5) 3 and 4 4 x k ( s  1 2 ) [  ( s )  k ( s )] =  k ( s )  k ( s ) (6) and  ( s ) satisfy the condition [14]:  ( s )  ( s ) x k ( s  1 2 ) j s = a;b = 0 ; 8 k ; l 2 IN ( IN = f 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; ::: g ) : In (4) d 2 n denotes the square of the norm of the corresp onding orthogonal p olynomials. The q-orthogonal p olynomials satisfy a three term recurrence relations (TTRR) of the form x ( s ) P n ( s ) q =  n P n +1 ( s ) q +  n P n ( s ) q +  n P n  1 ( s ) q ; (7) with the initial conditions P  1 ( s ) q = 0 ; P 0 ( s ) q = 1 : It is well known [13]-[14], that the p olynomial solutions of equation (2), denoted by P n ( x ( s )) q , are uniquely determined, up to a normalizing factor B n , by the dierence analog of the Ro drigues formula (see [13] page 66 Eq. (3.2.19) ): P n ( s ) q = B n  ( s ) 5 ( n ) n [  n ( s )] 5 ( n ) n = 5 5 x 1 ( s ) 5 5 x 2 ( s ) ::: 5 5 x n ( s ) [  n ( s )] ; (8) where  n ( s ) =  ( n + s ) Q n k =1  ( s + k ) : These solutions corresp ond to some values of  n - the eigenvalues of equation (2), which is computed from ( see [13], page 104 and [14] )  n =  1 2 [ n ] q f ( q n  1 + q  n +1 ) ~  0 + [ n  1] q ~  00 g ; (9) where ~  ( s ) =  ( s ) + 1 2 ~  ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 ) and ~  ( s ) =  ( s ) (see Eq. (2)). Here [ n ] q denotes the so called q-numbers [ n ] q = q n  q  n q  q  1 = sinh ( hn ) sinh ( h ) ; q = e h : 2.1 The rst structure relation for the q-p olynomials in the lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s . Let us now try to obtain a structure relation for the q-p olynomials in the exp onential lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s . (For the linear lattice see [13] Eq.(2.2.10) page 24.) First of all, we rewrite the Ro drigues equation (8) in another form. We will use the linearity of the op erator 5 ( n ) n , as well as the identity 5 x k ( s ) = q k 5 x ( s ) : Then, a straightforward calculation gives us 4 P n ( s ) q = q  n ( n +1) 2 B n  ( s )  5 5 x ( s )  n [  n ( s )] ;  5 5 x ( s )  n = n-times z}| { 5 5 x ( s ) ::: 5 5 x ( s ) : (10) Now, from formulas (5) and (10) we nd 5  n +1 ( s ) 5 x n +1 ( s ) = 5 [  n ( s + 1)  ( s + 1)] 5 x n ( s + 1 2 ) = 4 [  ( s )  n ( s )] 4 x n ( s  1 2 ) =  n ( s )  n ( s ) : Then by using the Ro drigues formula (8) we obtain P n +1 ( s ) q = B n +1  ( s ) 5 ( n +1) n +1 [  n ( s )] = B n +1  ( s ) 5 ( n ) n 5  n +1 ( s ) 5 x n +1 ( s ) = = B n +1  ( s ) 5 ( n ) n [  n ( s )  n ( s )] = q  n ( n +1) 2 B n +1  ( s )  5 5 x ( s )  n [  n ( s )  n ( s )] : (11) In order to obtain an expression for h 5 5 x ( s ) i n [  n ( s )  n ( s )] we successively apply the formula 5 f ( s ) g ( s ) = f ( s ) 5 g ( s ) + g ( s  1) 5 f ( s ), as well as formulas 4  n ( s ) 4 x ( s ) = q n  0 n ;  5 5 x ( s  1)  n = q 2 n  5 5 x ( s )  n : Then, Eq. (11) gives us the following P n +1 ( s ) q = q  n ( n +1) 2 B n +1  ( s )    n ( s )  5 5 x ( s )  n [  n ( s )] + q 2 n  1 [ n ] q  0 n  5 5 x ( s )  n  1 [  n ( s  1)] ! : (12) Using the Ro drigues formula for the dierence derivative of the p olynomial ([13], Eq. (3.2.18) page 66) we nd (notice that 4 x ( s  1) = q  2 4 x ( s )): 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) = 4 P n ( s  1) q 4 x ( s  1) =  q  ( n  1)( n +2) 2  n B n  ( s )  ( s )  5 5 x ( s  1)  n  1 [  n ( s  1)] = =  q  ( n  1)( n  2) 2  n B n  ( s )  ( s )  5 5 x ( s )  n  1 [  n ( s  1)] : Therefore, equation (12) can b e rewritten in the form P n +1 ( s ) q = B n +1  n ( s ) B n P n ( s ) q  [ n ] q B n +1  0 n  ( s )  n B n 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) and then, the following dierentiation formula holds  ( s ) 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) =  n [ n ] q  0 n   n ( s ) P n ( s ) q  B n B n +1 P n +1 ( s ) q  : (13) 5 If we now use the p ower expansion of  n ( s ), i.e.,  n ( s ) =  0 n x n ( s ) +  n (0) =  0 n q n x ( s ) +  n (0) and the TTRR (7) we obtain the rst structure relation  ( s ) 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) = ~ S n P n +1 ( s ) q + ~ T n P n ( s ) q + ~ R n P n  1 ( s ) q ; (14) where ~ S n =  n [ n ] q  q n  n  B n  0 n B n +1  ; ~ T n =  n [ n ] q  q n  n   n (0)  0 n  ; ~ R n =  n q n  n [ n ] q : (15) 2.2 The second structure relation for the q-p olynomials in the lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s . Let us try to obtain now the second structure relation. Firstly, we notice that 4 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) = 4 P n ( s ) q 4 x ( s )  5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) : Then, by using the dierence equation (2)  ( s ) 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) =  ( s ) 4 P n ( s ) q 4 x ( s )   ( s ) 4 5 P n ( s ) q 5 x ( s ) = = [  ( s ) +  ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 )] 4 P n ( s ) q 4 x ( s ) +  n 4 x ( s  1 2 ) P n ( s ) q : and (14) we nd [  ( s ) +  ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 )] 4 P n ( s ) q 4 x ( s ) = ~ S n P n +1 ( s ) q + +( ~ T n   n 4 x ( s  1 2 )) P n ( s ) q + ~ R n P n  1 ( s ) q ; (16) Now, taking into account that 4 x ( s  1 2 ) = ( q  q  1 ) x ( s ), and using the TTRR (7) we nally obtain the second structure relation [  ( s ) +  ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 )] 4 P n ( s ) q 4 x ( s ) = S n P n +1 ( s ) q + T n P n ( s ) q + R n P n  1 ( s ) q ; (17) where S n = ~ S n  ( q  q  1 )  n  n ; T n = ~ T n  ( q  q  1 )  n  n ; R n = ~ R n  ( q  q  1 )  n  n : (18) 6 3 Recurrence relations for connection co ecients. Let us consider two families of q-p olynomials P n ( x ) and Q n ( x ) b elonging to the class of discrete orthogonal p olynomials in the exp onential lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s . Each p olynomial P n ( x ) can b e represented as a linear combination of the p olynomials Q n ( x ). In particular P n ( x ) = n X m =0 C m ( n ) Q m ( x ) : (19) For the family P n ( x ) we will use the notation 1.  ( s ),  ( s ) and  n for the dierence equation (2) 2.  n ,  n and  n for the TTRR (7) co ecients 3. S n , R n and T n for the second structure relation (17) and for the Q n ( x ) 1.   ( s ),   ( s ) and   n for the dierence equation (2) 2.   n ,   n and   n for the TTRR (7) co ecients 3.  S n ,  R n and  T n for the second structure relation (17) Since the p olynomials of the family P n ( x ) are solutions of the second order dierence equation (2) the action of the dierence op erator of second order ^ L , dened by ^ L =  ( s ) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 )  5 5 x ( s )  +  ( s ) 4 4 x ( s ) +  n ; on Eq. (19) gives us n X m =0 C m ( n ) "  ( s ) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 )  5 Q m ( x ) 5 x ( s )  +  ( s ) 4 Q m ( x ) 4 x ( s ) +  n Q m ( x ) # = 0 : (20) Multiplying by   ( s ) and using   ( s ) 4 4 x ( s  1 2 )  5 Q m ( x ) 5 x ( s )  =    ( s ) 4 Q m ( x ) 4 x ( s )    n Q m ( x ) ; we obtain the relation n X m =0 C m ( n )  (  ( s )   ( s )    ( s )  ( s )) 4 Q m ( x ) 4 x ( s ) + (  n   ( s )   ( s )   m ) Q m ( x )  = 0 : (21) In order to eliminate 4 Q m ( x ) 4 x ( s ) , we multiply (21) by   ( s ) +   ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 ) and use the second structure relation (17) for the Q m ( x ) family, obtaining n X m =0 C m ( n )  (  ( s )   ( s )    ( s )  ( s ))(  S m Q m +1 ( x ) +  R m Q m  1 ( x ) +  T m Q m ( x ))+ + (   ( s ) +   ( s ) 4 x ( s  1 2 ))(  n   ( s )   ( s )   m ) Q m ( x )  = 0 : (22) 7 The last step consists to expand the remaining terms of typ e   2 ( s ) Q m ( x ),   ( s )  ( s ) Q m ( x ),  ( s )   ( s ) Q m ( x ) and   ( s )  ( s ) Q m ( x ) in linear combination of Q m ( x ) by using the TTRR (7) rep eatedly for the Q m ( x ) family. After this pro cess, (22) reduces to N X m =0 M m [ C 0 ( n ) ; C 1 ( n ) ; :::; C n ( n )] Q m ( x ) (23) where N = max f n + deg  + deg (   ) ; n + 2 deg (   ) ; n + 1 + deg (   ) + deg (  ) ; n + 1 + deg (   ) + deg (  ) ; 1 + deg (   ) + deg (   ) g : Taking into account the linear indep endence of the family Q m ( x ) we obtain the linear system M m [ C 0 ( n ) ; C 1 ( n ) ; :::; C n ( n )] = 0 : (24) These relations contain (linearly) several connection co ecients C i ( n ) dep ending essentially on the degrees of  ( s ) and   ( s ). In the most general situation they are p olynomials of second degree in x ( s ) = q 2 s . In this case we obtain a relation of the following typ e the linear system we are lo oking for M m [ C m +4 ( n ) ; :::; C m  4 ( n )] = 0 ; (25) which is valid for n greater or equal than the numb er of initial conditions needed to start the recursion ( n  8). Notice that for ( n < 8) the system also gives the solution, but not in a recurrent way. Notice that for the q-Hahn, q-Meixner, q-Charlier and q-Kravchuk p olynomials, as it is show in [13], table 3.3 , page 95, the  ( s ) is a p olynomial of second degree in x ( s ) = q 2 s . This implies that for such p olynomials the recurrence relations for the connection co ecient all are of the form (25). Again we want to remark that we are follow the notation intro duced by Nikiforov et al. [13]. 4 Recurrence relations for connection co ecients: A simple example. As we have noticed in the previous section the recurrence relation for connection co ecients for dierent classes of q-p olynomials are to o large (8-terms). Here we will analyze a more simple case. Firstly, notice that in the previous algorithm we have not used the orthogonality prop erty of the p olynomials P n , and only that they satisfy a dierence equation. On the other hand, for the p olynomials Q m we need to have structure relations as well as three term recurrence relations. Let us to show and example in which we will decomp ose a set of p olynomials P n ( s ), satisfying a certain dierence equation of rst order in the lattice x ( s ) = q 2 s , as a linear combination of the orthogonal q-p olynomials dened in the same lattice, i.e., the q-Hahn, q-Meixner, q-Kravchuk and q-Charlier orthogonal p olynomials (see [13], [4] and [17]) 8 Let us dene the quantities ( s ) q and ( s n ) q , dened by ( s ) q = q 2 s  1 q 2  1 = q s  1 [ s ] q (26) and ( s n ) q = ( s ) q ( s  1) q  ( s  n + 1) q = n  1 Y k =0 q 2 s +2 k  1 q 2  1 (27) The quantities ( s n ) q are closely related to the q-Stirling numbers ~ S q 2 ( n; k ) ; s  q 2 ( n; k ) [21] by formulas ( s ) n q = n X k =0 ~ S q 2 ( n; k )( s k ) q ; ( s n ) q = n X k =0 s  q 2 ( n; k )( s ) k q (28) and satisfy the following two dierence equations (here, as b efore, x ( s ) = q 2 s ) ( q 2 s  1) 5 ( s n ) q 5 x ( s )  q  n +1 [ n ] q ( s n ) q = 0 (29) and ( q 2 s  2 n +2  1) 4 ( s n ) q 4 x ( s )  q  n +1 [ n ] q ( s n ) q = 0 : (30) Since ( s n ) q is a p olynomial in x ( s ) = q 2 s , it can b e represented as a linear combination of the p olynomials Q m ( x ), the q-p olynomials in the exp onential lattice. In particular ( s n ) q = n X m =0 C m ( n ) Q m ( x ) : (31) Let us to obtain the recurrence relation for the connection co ecients C m ( n ) b etween the ( s n ) q and the q-Charlier, q-Meixner or q-Kravchuk. (For q-Hahn p olynomials we will consider it separately). In order to do that we apply the op erator ~ L = ( q 2 s  1) 5 5 x ( s )  q  n +1 [ n ] q (32) to b oth sides of (31). Using formula (29) ( ~ L ( s n ) q = 0) and multiplying by q 2 s we obtain the following expression 0 = n X m =0 C m ( n )  q 2 s ( q 2 s  1) 5 Q m ( x ) 5 x ( s )  q  m +1 [ m ] q q 2 s Q m ( x )  : (33) Taking into account that for q-Charlier, q-Meixner and q-Kravchuk the  ( s ) function in (2) coincide with q 2 s ( q 2 s  1) and applying the structure relation (14) and the TTRR (7) to the previous expression we nd 0 = n X m =0 C m ( n ) f A m Q m +1 ( x ) + B m Q m ( x ) +  m Q m  1 ( x ) g ; from where we obtain the following TTRR for the connection co ecients C m ( n ) A m  1 C m  1 ( n ) + B m C m ( n ) +  m +1 C m +1 ( n ) = 0 ; (34) 9