scieee Open visual document viewer

Comparing empathy in medical students of two Portuguese medicine schools

Santiago, Luiz Miguel,Rosendo, Inês,Coutinho, Mona-Lisa,Mauricio, Katia Sophie,Neto, Isabel,Simões, José Augusto

Abstract

Background: Empathy is paramount in the doctor-patient relationship being a comprehensive and multidimensional concept. Self-ratings of empathy change across the years of medical education only when the Jefferson Scale of Physicians Empathy is used, with a worrying decrease being found throughout the years in Medicine Schools. As there are only few studies on the factors influencing medical student’s empathy, particularly of the curricular model, this study aimed to compare the levels of empathy of medicine students of two Schools with different curricular models in central Portugal, the Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra (FMUC) and the Faculty of Health Sciences - University of Beira Interior (FCS-UBI). Methods: Cross-sectional observational study with the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy – students’ Portuguese version (JSPE – spv) to 1st, 3rd and 6th year students of the 2017/2018 academic year with descriptive and inferential statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Results: Size representative sample of 795 students. Higher total empathy score (TES) (p = 0.008) and “Perspective taking” (p = 0.001) in FCS-UBI were found. JSPE-TES was higher in FCS-UBI, 3rd year (p = 0.038). Higher FCS-UBI “Perspective taking” in the 1st year (p = 0.030) and 6th year (p = 0.044), for “Compassionate care” in the 3rd (p = 0.019) and for “Standing in the patient’s shoes” in the 1st year (p = 0.018) and in FMUC for “Compassionate care” in the 1st year (p = 0.037) and the “Standing in the patient’s shoes” in year 3 (p = 0.002) were found. Higher levels of empathy were found in FCS-UBI female students, for JSPE-TES (p = 0.045) and “Perspective taking” (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Higher empathy levels in FCS-UBI were found, with different results in the third year suggesting influence of the medical course teaching characteristics between the two Medicine schools, student’s empathy levels being higher when earlier and more intense contact with patients accompanied by skilled tutors was developed.

Full text

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Compa ing empa hy in medical s uden s o wo Po uguese medicine schools Luiz Miguel San iago 1,2,3* , Inês Rosendo 1,4,5 , Mona-Lisa Cou inho 1 , Ka ia Sophie Mau ício 1 , Isabel Ne o 6 and José Augus o Simões 6,7,5 Abs ac Backg ound: Empa hy is pa amoun in he doc o -pa ien ela ionship being a comp ehensi e and mul idimensional concep . Sel - a ings o empa hy change ac oss he yea s o medical educa ion only when he Je e son Scale o Physicians Empa hy is used, wi h a wo ying dec ease being ound h oughou he yea s in Medicine Schools. As he e a e only ew s udies on he ac o s in luencing medical s uden ’s empa hy, pa icula ly o he cu icula model, his s udy aimed o compa e he le els o empa hy o medicine s uden s o wo Schools wi h di e en cu icula models in cen al Po ugal, he Facul y o Medicine - Uni e si y o Coimb a (FMUC) and he Facul y o Heal h Sciences - Uni e si y o Bei a In e io (FCS-UBI). Me hods: C oss-sec ional obse a ional s udy wi h he Je e son Scale o Physician Empa hy –s uden s’Po uguese e sion (JSPE –sp ) o 1s , 3 d and 6 h yea s uden s o he 2017/2018 academic yea wi h desc ip i e and in e en ial s a is ical analysis (p<0.05). Resul s: Size ep esen a i e sample o 795 s uden s. Highe o al empa hy sco e (TES) (p=0.008)and“Pe spec i e aking”(p= 0.001) in FCS-UBI we e ound. JSPE-TES was highe in FCS-UBI, 3 d yea (p= 0.038). Highe FCS-UBI “Pe spec i e aking”in he 1s yea (p=0.030)and6 hyea (p= 0.044), o “Compassiona e ca e”in he 3 d (p=0.019) and o “S anding in he pa ien ’sshoes”in he 1s yea (p= 0.018) and in FMUC o “Compassiona e ca e”in he 1s yea (p= 0.037) and he “S anding in he pa ien ’sshoes”in yea 3 (p= 0.002) we e ound. Highe le els o empa hy we e ound in FCS-UBI emale s uden s, o JSPE-TES (p=0.045)and“Pe spec i e aking”(p=0.001). Conclusion: Highe empa hy le els in FCS-UBI we e ound, wi h di e en esul s in he hi d yea sugges ing in luence o he medical cou se eaching cha ac e is ics be ween he wo Medicine schools, s uden ’s empa hy le els being highe when ea lie and mo e in ense con ac wi h pa ien s accompanied by skilled u o s was de eloped. Keywo ds: Medical empa hy, Medical s uden s, Doc o -pa ien ela ionship, JSPE, Medical educa ion, S uden ’sempa hy Backg ound Empa hy is pa amoun in he doc o -pa ien ela ionship, con ibu ing o pa ien sa is ac ion wi h hei doc o , ease in p o iding ele an in o ma ion, be e adhe ence o he apy and clinical esul s, lowe li iga ion a es o medical mal-p ac ice and le els o s ess and p o essional bu nou [1–4]. Empa hy is a comp ehensi e and mul idimensional con- cep . Hoja e al. ha e desc ibed i as a p edominan ly cog- ni i e ( a he han emo ional) a ibu e ha in ol es he abili y o unde s and ( a he han eel) he pa ien ’sexpe i- ences, conce ns, and pe spec i es associa ed wi h he abil- i y o communica e ha same unde s anding [5]. Empa hy can be augh and ained h ough educa- ional p ocesses and e lec ion [6–9]. © The Au ho (s). 2020 Open Access This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License, which pe mi s use, sha ing, adap a ion, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium o o ma , as long as you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons licence, and indica e i changes we e made. The images o o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his a icle a e included in he a icle's C ea i e Commons licence, unless indica ed o he wise in a c edi line o he ma e ial. I ma e ial is no included in he a icle's C ea i e Commons licence and you in ended use is no pe mi ed by s a u o y egula ion o exceeds he pe mi ed use, you will need o ob ain pe mission di ec ly om he copy igh holde . To iew a copy o his licence, isi h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/. The C ea i e Commons Public Domain Dedica ion wai e (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/publicdomain/ze o/1.0/) applies o he da a made a ailable in his a icle, unless o he wise s a ed in a c edi line o he da a. * Co espondence: [email p o ec ed] 1 Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, Coimb a, Po ugal 2 Gene al P ac ice/Family Medicine Clinic o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, Coimb a, Po ugal Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s12909-020-02034-3 Thus, i is impo an o p omo e e ec i e educa ional in e en ions ha can imp o e and main ain he le els o empa hy in s uden s, physicians o be as well in p ac- icing doc o s, con ibu ing o he s eng hening o he doc o -pa ien ela ionship and o a be e heal hca e sys em [6,8,9]. Despi e he consensus on he impo ance o empa hy in medical educa ion and p ac ice [6], a wo ying de- c ease in he empa hy o medical s uden s h oughou hei yea s in Medicine Schools is epo ed [6,10–14]. A ecen me a-analysis indica es signi ican e idence o sel - a ings o empa hy changing ac oss he yea s o medical educa ion only when he JSPE is used [9]. Sca ce Po uguese li e a u e ocused on he e olu ion o empa hy in po uguese medical s uden s. A mul i- ins i u ional s udy e eals ha empa hy and pe sonali y o medical s uden s a e closely ela ed [7]. C oss-cul u al adap a ion and alida ion o he Je e son Scale o Phys- ician Empa hy –s uden s’Po uguese e sion (JSPE – sp ) has al eady been made [1,5,15]. The e a e ew s udies on he ac o s ha can in luence he empa hy o medical s uden s, pa icula ly he in lu- ence o he cu icula model p ac iced in he di e en Medicine Schools [2]. This s udy aimed o compa e he le els o empa hy o medicine s uden s o wo Schools wi h di e en cu icu- la models, allowing in es iga ion on he di e ences and in luences o he eaching sys em in s uden ’s empa hy. We compa ed he Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e - si y o Coimb a (FMUC) and he Facul y o Heal h Sci- ences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io (FCS-UBI). To pu i in o con ex , he wo Medicine Schools ha e he same admission p ocess o incoming s uden s, mos o hem admi ed h ough a compe i i e na ional exam [16,17], emales en e ing mo e in bo h schools a an ap- p oxima e 3:1 a io, highe ma ks being obse ed o en ande a FMUC han a FCS-UBI. FMUC ecei ing 350 s uden s a yea and FCS-UBI 150. In bo h Schools, he cou se is 6 yea s long [16,17] bu he s uden - u o a io is highe a FMUC 18.5 o FMUC and 3.1 o FCS-UBI [17,18]. FMUC’s eaching is semes e ial, ap- plies a non-in eg a ed eaching sys em, based on he compa men aliza ion o con en s in o subjec s, empha- sizes he “s o age”o in o ma ion [16,18,19] and e alu- a ions a e mainly by heo e ical exams. FCS-UBI has a qua e ly pe iod o ganiza ion and applies an in eg a ed eaching sys em p omo ing sel -di ec ed lea ning using, whene e possible, p oblem-based lea ning [17,20]. Ac- co ding o Eu opean “Bologna Decla a ion”[h ps://ec. eu opa.eu/educa ion/policies/highe -educa ion/bologna- p ocess-and-eu opean-highe -educa ion-a ea_p accessed on he 19 h Decembe 2019] medicine s uden s a e o pe o m a Thesis a he end o hei s udies, so ac- qui ing a Mas e on Medicine deg ee (MIM). De ails on cu icula in o ma ion can be ob ained a e he Medicine School’s websi e [16,17,19,20]. In b ie , analysing he cu iculum o each acul y, FCS-UBI in- cludes mo e con en s in he a ea o human sciences, mo e ole-playing ac i i ies and an ea lie clinical in- p ac ice con ac wi h pa ien s [8,21,22]. This s udy objec i es we e o unde s and he di e - ences iuni e si ies n le els o empa hy be ween FMUC and FCS-UBI medical s uden s, and o compa e hem by gende and schola yea . Me hods We pe o med a c oss-sec ional obse a ional s udy ap- plying an ins umen o measu e he le els o empa hy o i s , hi d and six h-yea s uden s a ending he MIM in FMUC and FCS-UBI a e app o al by he E hics Commi ee o Heal h o he Cen al Regional Heal h Adminis a ion o Po ugal was g an ed. The JSPE-sp , a sel -adminis e ed ques ionnai e allowing e alua ion o he s uden ’s sel -pe cep ion o empa hy in pa ien ca e, was used [5]. I is conside ed a eliable ins u- men wi h e idence ha suppo s i s alidi y [1,5,15,23, 24]. Wi h 20 i ems, o be answe ed on a Like scale om 1 (s ongly disag ee) o 7 poin s (s ongly ag ee) i s udies h ee componen s: “Pe spec i e aking”(10 i ems; e e s o he abili y o analyse ano he pe son’sp oblem om he ou side), “Compassiona e ca e”(8 i ems, de ined by he ac- i i y in a ou o he one we see su e ing) and “S anding in he pa ien ’sshoes”(2 i ems; e e s o he ac o hinking as i we we e in he o he pe son’splace)[5,15,23]. The o al sco e a ies om 20 o 140, and he highe he sco e he highe he le el o empa hy [15,23]. The sample size was calcula ed a e he o al numbe o s uden s o be en olled in each acul y in he aca- demic yea 2017/2018 pe yea o a endance. FMUC 471 s uden s in he 1s yea , 328 in he 3 d yea and 314 in he 6 h yea and FCS-UBI 186 in he 1s yea , 136 in he 3 d yea and 141 in he 6 h yea . The sample size calcula ion was made using he si e “The Su ey Sys em - Sample Size Calcula o ”[25] o ep esen he uni e se wi h a 95% con idence le el and a 5% ma gin o e o . The s udy ins umen was dis ibu ed in pape du ing p ac ical classes o he i s , hi d and six h cu icula yea in bo h uni e si ies, in 2018 Ap il and May. Re- sponsible P o esso s o each andomly chosen class we e p e iously in o med and g an ed consen . The numbe o s uden s o be en olled, implied a d aw o each yea classes o achie e he needed sample size, wi h ex a classes o sample collec ion secu i y easons. S u- den ’s pa icipa ion was indi idual, olun a y, anonym- ous and wi h w i en in o med consen . In o ma ion on gende (male / emale) and MIM yea ( i s / hi d / six h) was ob ained. San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 Page 2 o 6 The SPSS®) So wa e o Windows e sion 24.0″was used o s o age, desc ip i e and in e en ial s a is ical analysis o da a. Checking he non-no mali y o he da a dis ibu ion wi h he Kolmogo o -Smi no es , non- pa ame ic es s (Mann-Whi ney es ) was used o s a - is ical analysis. A p alue o < 0.05 was conside ed o signi ican di e ence. Resul s A ep esen a i e sample size o a leas 286 ques ion- nai es a FMUC and 210 a FCS-UBI was es ima ed. Fo his s udy a sample o 795 medical s uden s, 420 om FMUC and 375 om FCS-UBI was s udied. I s desc ip- ion acco ding o he uni e si y, he MIM yea a ended and gende is shown in Table 1. The Kolmogo o - Smi no es showed no nume ic da a wi h no mal dis- ibu ion (p< 0.001). Using he chi-squa e es and he Mann-Whi ney U es , no signi ican di e ences we e ound be ween uni e si ies o gende (p= 0.096) and yea o MIM (p= 0.408). Table 2shows he di e ences in he mean alue o he answe s sco es be ween uni e si ies o o al JSPE and each one o i s componen s (“Pe spec i e aking,”“Com- passiona e ca e”,“S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes”). Wi h he Mann-Whi ney U es signi ican di e ences we e ound be ween he wo Schools o he o e all JSPE sco e (p= 0.008) and he “Pe spec i e aking”compo- nen sco e (p= 0.001) wi h a highe sco e in FCS-UBI. Table 3 e eals he mean alue o he esponses pe Medicine School and pe yea o MIM o he o al JSPE and o each o i s componen s pe yea be ween Scholls (“Pe spec i e aking”,“Compassiona e ca e”,“S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes”) and o gende , again wi h Mann-Whi ney U es . The e was signi ican di e ence in he 3 d yea (p= 0.038), highe sco e in he FCS-UBI. Fo “Pe spec i e aking” he e we e signi ican di e - ences in he 1s (p= 0.030) and in he 6 h yea (p= 0.044), bo h sco es being highe in he FCS-UBI. Fo he “Compassiona e ca e”componen , he e was a di e ence in he 1s yea (p= 0.037), and in he 3 d yea wi h highe sco es in he FCS-UBI (p= 0.019). Rega ding he “S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes”compo- nen , signi ican di e ences we e ound in he 1s yea (p= 0.018), FCS-UBI sco ing be e , and in he 3 d yea (p= 0.002) highe a he FMUC. By gende be ween uni e si ies o o al JSPE and o each o i s componen s he e was a s a is ically signi i- can di e ence, be e o emale s uden s, o he o al JSPE sco e (p= 0.045) and he “Pe spec i e aking”sco e (p= 0.001), again wi h a highe sco e in FCS-UBI. Discussion Signi ican ly highe le els o empa hy we e ound in FCS-UBI s uden s o he o al sco e o JSPE, o he “Pe spec i e aking”componen and o 3 d yea s u- den s s ill wi h highe sco es in FCS-UBI. These esul s a e in line wi h he only s udy we ound compa ing he le els o empa hy in wo uni e si ies wi h di e en cu icula models in a Pakis an s udy [26]. An- o he mul i-ins i u ional s udy e ealed he in luences o eaching scheme on he le els o medical s uden ’s em- pa hy hough no speci ica ion o cu icula model was epo ed [27]. Gi en he di e en socio-economic en i- onmen s and medical and educa ional con ex s be ween Po ugal and Pakis an we can only ecognise ha Table 1 Sample acco ding o Uni e si y, yea o equency o Mas e In Medicine (MIM) and gende FMUC n (%) FCS-UBI n (%) To al n (%) Yea o MIM (p= 0,408) a 1° 152 (36.2) 153 (40.8) 305 (38.4) 3° 164 (39.0) 137 (36.5) 301 (37.9) 6° 104 (24.8) 85 (27.7) 189 (23.8) To al 420 (100) 375 (100) 795 (100) Gende (p= 0,096) Female 278 (69.8) 282 (75.2) 560 (72.4) Male 120 (30.2) 93 (24.8) 213 (27.6) To al 398 (100) 375 (100) 773 (100) FMUC Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, FCS-UBI Facul y o Heal h Sciences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io . (*) Mann-Whi ney U Table 2 Di e ences in he mean alue o he answe s pe uni e si y o he o al JSPE and o each one o i s componen s “Pe spec i e aking”,“Compassiona e ca e”and “S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes”by Uni e si y FMUC FCS-UBI p (*) JSPE o al (Max = 140) N 420 375 0.008 Mean ± SD 89.2 ± 7.6 90.6 ± 7.6 95% ic 88,2 o 89,14 89,75 o 91,34 Pe pec i e aking (Max = 70) N 420 375 0.001 Mean ± SD 59.4 ± 5.8 60.7 ± 6.7 95% ic 58,44 o 59,21 60,04 o 61,39 Compassiona e ca e (Max = 56) N 420 375 0.800 Mean ± SD 15.1 ± 4.1 15.2 ± 4.3 95% ic 14,71 o 15,21 14,75 o 15,61 S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes (Max = 14) N 420 375 0.399 Mean ± SD 7.4 ± 2.3 7.3 ± 2.5 95% ic 7,32 o 7,59 7,01 o 7,52 FMUC Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, FCS-UBI Facul y o Heal h Sciences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io . (*) Mann-Whi ney U San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 Page 3 o 6 Po uguese medicine s uden s appea o be less em- pa hic, he asons o such being specula i e. Lowe le els o empa hy in FMUC s uden s can pos- sibly be explained by: Teaching cha ac e is ics o each school. FCS-UBI cu iculum p o iding in-p ac ice classes wi h he s uden accompanied by skilled u o oge he wi h p ac ical sessions ollowing a heo e ical u o ial. Analysing he cu icula o bo h Uni e si y Medical schools [16,17]. FCS-UBI had a la ge numbe o cu icula uni s ela ed o humanis ic sciences, wi h emphasis on he de elopmen o in e ac ion and com- munica ion skills. Role-playing ac i i ies a e conduc ed egula ly wi h discussion and speci ic assessmen o s uden s’communica i e and empa hic abili ies is made [8,21,22]. FMUC lacks subjec s ela ed o he humanis- ic sciences and has a mo e supe icial and limi ed ap- p oach o clinical p ac ice s a ed in he 4 h yea o MIM. The cu icula uni o Gene al P ac ice/Family Medicine, is one o he wo cu icula uni s o include he discussion o opics such as empa hy and communi- ca ion and he pe o mance o ole-playing ac i i ies, is only augh in he 5 h yea . So by he 3 d yea , FCS-UBI s uden s al eady ha e had con ac wi h clinical p ac ice, whe eas FMUC s uden s ha e no [16,17]. Tu o ’s cha ac e is ics in luence he le els o s uden ’s empa hy [14,21]. Thus, he di e ences be ween he wo uni e - si ies can also be so explained, and ha dese es u u e s udy, suppo ing in e en ions in hei u o s, upg ading hem. O he seconda y ac o s can also help explain di e en le els o epa hy: S uden - u o a io FMUC wi h a a io o 18.5 (Po uguese a e age 7.53), con as ing wi h a 3.1 a- io in FCS-UBI. Highe s uden - u o a io a FMUC con ibu ed o lowe sa is ac ion wi h eaching, less clinical con ac and less oppo uni ies o de elop empa hic ela ionships wi h pa ien s [18]. Au ho Table 3 Di e ences in he mean alue o he esponses pe uni e si y and pe yea o MIM and gende o he o al JSPE and o each o i s componen s “Pe spec i e aking”,“Compassiona e ca e”and “S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes” Yea o a endance FMUC FCS-UBI p (be ween uni e si ies) (*) 1° 3° 6° 1° 3° 6° 1° 3° 6° JSPE o al (Max = 140) N 152 164 104 153 137 85 0.215 0.038 0.308 Mean ± SD 90.3 ± 9.1 90.4 ± 5.7 85.7 ± 6.9 91.8 ± 7.4 91.5 ± 7.6 86.8 ± 7.1 Pe pespec i e aking (Max = 70) N 152 164 104 153 137 85 0.030 0.108 0.044 Mean ± SD 59.0 ± 6.1 60.4 ± 5.6 58.5 ± 5.8 60.8 ± 7.3 61.0 ± 6.5 60.1 ± 5.8 Compassiona e ca e (Max = 56) N 152 164 104 153 137 85 0.037 0.019 0.741 Mean ± SD 16.8 ± 4.5 13.9 ± 3.6 14.5 ± 3.1 15.9 ± 5.0 14.9 ± 3.7 14.5 ± 3.6 S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes (Max = 14) N 152 164 104 153 137 85 0.018 0.002 0.611 Mean ± SD 6.6 ± 2.3 8.2 ± 2.2 7.2 ± 2.2 7.3 ± 2.4 7.4 ± 2.6 7.0 ± 2.5 Gende Female Male Female Male Female Male JSPE o al (Maximum = 140) N 278 120 282 93 0.045 0.071 Mean ± SD 89.0 ± 8.1 89.8 ± 6.8 90.4 ± 7.7 91.0 ± 7.4 Pe spec i e aking (Max = 70) N 278 120 282 93 0.001 0.777 Mean ± SD 59.7 ± 5.7 58.9 ± 6.1 61.3 ± 6.4 58.8 ± 7.0 Compassiona e ca e (Max = 56) N 278 120 282 93 0.874 0.174 Mean ± SD 14.8 ± 3.9 15.9 ± 4.1 14.7 ± 4.1 16.6 ± 4.4 S anding in he pa ien ’s shoes (Max = 14) N 278 120 282 93 0.321 0.704 Mean ± SD 7.3 ± 2.4 7.6 ± 2.3 7.1 ± 2.5 7.7 ± 2.4 FMUC Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, FCS-UBI Facul y o Heal h Sciences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io . (*) Mann-Whi ney U San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 Page 4 o 6 da a a i m he need o adequa e ole-models o em- pa hy. In ac FMUC s uden s ha e a 13 ECTS con- en in Gene al P ac ice a e he 1s yea , 6 h, 5 h yea one semes e and 6 h yea 2 mon hs wi h a dedica ed Gene al P ac ice u o , compa ing o 30 ECST in FCS-UBI, 1s , 2nd, 4 h, 5 h and 6 h yea s and do mos o hei in-p ac ice cases in a la ge o e -c owded Cen al Hospi al [16,17,19,20]. Suden ’s sa is ac ion: A s uden ’s opinions pool, ound ou ha FMUC was he na ional medicine school wi h he wo s le el o o e all sa is ac ion and clinical each- ing and s udy condi ions, whe eas FCS-UBI had he highes le els [28]. So a no s udies in speci ic s uden ’s cha ac e is ics we e pe o med o di e en ia e be ween FMUC and FCS-UBI excep o en y ma ks, highe in Coimb a. Sig- ni ican di e ences we e only ound in eminine gende and only in he o al JSPE sco e and in he “Pe spec i e aking”componen , being highe in FSC-UBI, emale s uden s o FCS-UBI had highe le els o empa hy han male ones. Empa hy is posi i ely in luenced by quali y o li e and nega i ely by a igue, s ess, and bu nou . S udies ca ied ou in bo h uni e si ies ha pa ook in his s udy showed ha , FCS-UBI s uden s ha e a be e quali y o li e and a e less ulne able o s ess and a igue [28,29]. The exis ence o di e ences in empa hy be ween he wo uni e si ies suppo s he need o conside he im- pac o he cu iculum model and o he MIM cha ac e - is ics on he de elopmen o he empa hic capaci ies o medical s uden s. So se e al changes can be conside ed in o de o inc ease he le els o empa hy in medical s u- den s, in he long e m, in o de o imp o e and main- ain he le els o empa hy in medical s uden s: Educa ional in e en ions ocused on empa hic capaci- ies by ole-playing, ideo-wa ching and eal consul a- ions wi h pa ien s wi h analysis and discussion o medical communica ion is deemed necessa y [22]. Also lec u es and p ac ice o he impo ance o empa hy and communica ion in he doc o -pa ien ela ionship and ea ly in eg a ion o mo e con en s o he human sciences a ea in o he s udy plan, wi h a mo e educed s uden - u o a io, p e e ably a one o one e en i o sho e pe iod o ime [8,9]. E en hough “empa hy is ela ed o pe sonali y”, a ma e his s udy did no ocus on [30,31]. Resea ch is o be con inued in his a ea. In spi e o he a emp s o minimize bias, he e may ha e been dis ac ion in eading he ques ionnai es. A - emp s we e made o close he selec ion bias h ough he andom selec ion o he classes included in he s udy. The JSPE s uden ’s e sion e alua es sel - pe cep ion o empa hy, which may be di e en om he ac ual empa hic beha iou . As p ac ical poin s om ou s udy we mus emphasize ha (1) empa hy is a pa amoun elemen o he doc o - pa ien ela ionship ha can be ained h ough an edu- ca ional p ocess, (2) s uden ’s empa hy le els we e highe when ea lie and mo e in ense con ac wi h pa- ien s accompanied by skilled u o s was de eloped and (3) eassessmen o cu icula pa icula i ies mus bea in mind p ac ical ac i i ies in eal wo ld con ex , ecog- nizing ha each s uden has i s own in insic psycho- logic cha ac e is ics. Conclusion The le els o empa hy o FCS-UBI medical s uden s we e highe han hose ound in FMUC s uden s. Compa ing he esul s pe yea o MIM, he di e ence was mainly in he 3 d yea wi h be e esul s in FCS- UBI. By gende emales sco e s a is ically di e en be ween he wo Schools, be e in FCS-UBI. These esul s suppo he need o eassess he lea ning cu iculum and he eaching con ex , wi h he objec i e o p omo ing e ec i e educa ional in e en ions in he de elopmen o s uden empa hy. Abb e ia ions MIM: In eg a ed Mas e ’s deg ee in Medicine; FMUC: Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a; FCS-UBI: Facul y o Heal h Sciences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io ; JSPE –sp : Je e son Scale o Physician Empa hy – s uden s’Po uguese e sion; TES: o al empa hy sco e Acknowledgemen s None a e o be done. P ac ice Poin s 1. Empa hy, a pa amoun elemen o he doc o -pa ien ela ionship, can be ained h ough an educa ional p ocess. 2. S uden ’s we e highe when mo e p ecocious con ac wi h pa ien s was de eloped. 3. So eassessmen o cu icula pa icula i ies mus ba e in mind p ac ical ac i i ies in eal wo ld con ex , bea ing he in insic cha ac e is ics o he s uden ’s popula ion. Au ho s’con ibu ions MLC: concep ion, da a analysis, w i ing, e ising and manusc ip app o al. IRS: concep ion, da a analysis, w i ing, e ising and manusc ip app o al. IN: concep ion, da a ga he ing and analysis, w i ing, e ising and manusc ip app o al. KM: manusc ip e ision in English scien i ic e ision and app o al. JAS: scien i ic e ision and app o al. LMS: concep ion, da a ga he ing and analysis, w i ing, e ising, manusc ip app o al and submission p ocessing. All he au ho s ha e ead he manusc ip and ag ee in i s submission o BMC Medical Educa ion and consen i is done. Funding No unding we e ob ained o his s udy which was been made in ou o au ho s wo king job hou s. A ailabili y o da a and ma e ials All da a will become a ailable i eques ed. E hics app o al and consen o pa icipa e This s udy has had an e hics commi ee app o al, by he “Comissão de É ica da ARS-C”. San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 Page 5 o 6 Consen o publica ion All da a we e ob ained a e w i en in o med consen o answe and o da a o be analysed and published. Compe ing in e es s The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no compe ing in e es s. Au ho de ails 1 Facul y o Medicine o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, Coimb a, Po ugal. 2 Gene al P ac ice/Family Medicine Clinic o he Uni e si y o Coimb a, Coimb a, Po ugal. 3 CEISUC, Coimb a, Po ugal. 4 USF Coimb a Cen o, ARS Cen o, Coimb a, Po ugal. 5 CINTESIS, Po o, Po ugal. 6 Facul y o Heal h Sciences o he Uni e si y o Bei a In e io , Co ilhã, Po ugal. 7 USF Caminhos do Cé oma, ARS Cen o, Coimb a, Po ugal. Recei ed: 19 Augus 2019 Accep ed: 5 Ap il 2020 Re e ences 1. Lou ei o J, Gonçal es-Pe ei a M, T ancas B, Caldas-De-Almeida JM, Cas o- Caldas A. Empa hy in he doc o -pa ien ela ionship as iewed by i s -yea medical s uden s: da a on alidi y and sensibili y o change o he Je e son measu e in Po ugal. Ac a Medica Po . 2011;24:431–42.. 2. Hegazi I, Wilson I. Main aining empa hy in medical school: i is possible. Med Tech. 2013;35(12):1002–8. 3. Kim S, Kaplowi z S, Johns on M. The e ec s o physician empa hy on pa ien sa is ac ion and compliance. E al Heal h P o . 2004;27(3):237–51. 4. on Ha sche H, Desma ais N, Dollinge R, G ossman S, Aldana S. The impac o empa hy on bu nou in medical s uden s: new indings. Psychol Heal h Med. 2017;23(3):295–303. 5. Hoja M, Ve ga e MJ, Maxwell K, e al. The de il is in he hi d yea : a longi udinal s udy o e osion o empa hy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182–91. 6. Cos a P, Al es R, Ne o I, Ma ão P, Po ela M, Cos a MJ. Associa ions be ween medical s uden empa hy and pe sonali y: a mul i-ins i u ional s udy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):1–7. 7. Hoja M, Axel od D, Spando e J, Mangione S. Enhacing and sus aining empa hy in medical s uden s. Med Teach. 2013;35(12):996–1001. 8. Magalhães E, Dechamplain A, Salguei a A, Cos a MJ. Medical empa hy: Adap a ion and alida ion o a scale o medical s uden s. In: Book o Abs ac s o he 7 h Na ional Symposium o Resea ch in Psychology, B aga, Po ugal; 2010. p. 77–89. 9. Spa oula V, Panagopoulou E, Mon gome y A. Does empa hy change du ing unde g adua e medical educa ion? –a me a-analysis. Med Teach. 2019;41: 895–904. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1584275. 10. Machado A. Medical empa hy in he eyes o medical s uden s [disse a ion]. Coimb a (PT): Coimb a Uni e si y; 2016. (Mas e ’s Tesis in Po uguese). 11. Pa k K, Roh H, Suh D, Hoja M. Empa hy in Ko ean medical s uden s: indings om a na ionwide su ey. Med Teach. 2014;37(10):943–8. 12. Chen D, Lew R, He shman W, O lande J. A c oss-sec ional measu emen o medical s uden empa hy. J Gen In e n Med. 2007;22(10):1434–8. 13. Yousse F, Nunes P, As B, Williams S. An explo a ion o changes in cogni i e and emo ional empa hy among medical s uden s in he Ca ibeean. In J Med Educ. 2014;5:185–92. 14. Neumann M, Edelhäuse F, Tauschel D, e al. Empa hy decline and i s easons: a sys ema ic e iew o s udies wi h medical s uden s and esiden s. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):996–1009. 15. Aguia P, Salguei a A, F ada T, Cos a MJ. Medical empa hy: ansla ion, alida ion and applica ion o a measu emen ins umen . In: P oceedings o he 10 h Galician-Po uguese In e na ional Cong ess o Psychopedagogy, B aga, Po ugal; 2009. p. 3705–16. 16. Uni e si y o Coimb a. In eg a ed Mas e s in Medicine. A ailable in h ps:// apps.uc.p /cou ses/en/cou se/5841. Accessed 20 Jan 2019. 17. Uni e si y o Bei a In e io . In eg a ed Mas e s in Medicine. A ailable in h p://www.ubi.p /en/cou se/52. Accessed 20 Jan 2019. 18. G ilo D, Mo ei a M, Coimb a A, e al. S udy on Po uguese medical Schools' lea ning condi ions: a Na ional Analysis on s uden sa is ac ion, s uden - u o a ios and numbe o admissions. Ac a Medica Po . 2016;29(5):301–9. 19. Uni e si y o Coimb a. In eg a ed Mas e s in Medicine. S udy P og amme. A ailable in h ps://apps.uc.p /cou ses/en/p og amme/5841/2018-2019?id_ b anch%20=16221. Accessed 20 Jan 2019. 20. Uni e si y o Bei a In e io . In eg a ed Mas e s in Medicine. S udy Plan. A ailable in h ps://www.ubi.p /en/s udyplan/52/1595/2019/. Accessed 20 Jan 2019. 21. Ah weile F, Neumann M, Goldbla H, Hahn E, Sche e C. De e minan s o physician empa hy du ing medical educa ion: hypo he ical conclusions om an explo a o y quali a i e su ey o p ac icing physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:122. 22. Quince T, Thiemann P, Benson J, Hyde S. Unde g adua e medical s uden s' empa hy: cu en pe spec i es. Ad Med Educ P ac . 2016;7:443–55. 23. Hoja M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJM, Gonnella JS, E dmann JB. The Je e son scale o physician empa hy: de elopmen and p elimina y psychome ic da a. Educ Psychol Meas. 2011;61(2):349–65. 24. Hoja M, Gonnella J. Ele en yea s o da a on he Je e son scale o empa hy- medical s uden e sion (JSE-S): p oxy no m da a and en a i e cu o sco es. Med P inc P ac . 2015;24(4):344–50. 25. The Su ey Sys em. Sample Size Calcula o . A ailable in h ps://www. su eysys em.com/sscal.h m. Accessed 2 Feb 2018. 26. Ayub A, Khan RA. Measu ing empa hy o medical s uden s s udying di e en cu icula; a causal compa a i e s udy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67: 1238–41. 27. Quince TA, Kinne sley P, Hales J, e al. Empa hy among unde g adua e medical s uden s: a mul i-Cen e c oss-sec ional compa ison o s uden s beginning and app oaching he end o hei cou se. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:92. 28. Pe ei a APM. Quali y o li e and ulne abili y o s ess in 5 h and 6 h yea medical s uden s. [disse a ion]. Coimb a (PT): Coimb a Uni e si y; 2017. h p://hdl.handle.ne /10316/82616. (Mas e ’s Tesis in Po uguese). 29. Feliza do MGG, San iago LM. Quali y o li e and s ess ulne abili y in s uden s o he 6 h yea o he FCS-UBI MIM. Re ADSO. 2019;9:16–26 (Pape in Po uguese). 30. Guile a T, Ba alla I, Fo né C, Sole -González J. Empa hy and big i e pe sonali y model in medical s uden s and i s ela ionship o gende and special y p e e ence: a c osssec ional s udy. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):57. h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s12909-019-1485-2. 31. Shapi o J, Mo ison E, Boke J. Teaching empa hy o i s yea medical s uden s: e alua ion o an elec i e li e a u e and medicine cou se. Educ Heal h. 2004;17(1):73–84. Publishe ’sNo e Sp inge Na u e emains neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in published maps and ins i u ional a ilia ions. San iago e al. BMC Medical Educa ion (2020) 20:153 Page 6 o 6