scieee Open visual document viewer

Isolation, Identification and Biotechnological Applications of a Novel, Robust, Free-living Chlorococcum (Oophila) amblystomatis Strain Isolated from a Local Pond

Correia, Nádia,Pereira, Hugo,Silva, Joana T.,Santos, Tamára,Soares, Maria,Sousa, Carolina B.,Schüler, Lisa M.,Costa, Margarida,Varela, João,Pereira, Leonel,Silva, Joana

Abstract

This research was funded by the Portuguese national budget P2020 in the scope of the project no. 023310– ALGACO2: “Cultivo industrial de microalgas como tecnologia verde para captura de CO2 atmosférico”. This study received Portuguese national funds from FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology through project UIDB/04326/2020, and from the operational programmes CRESC Algarve 2020 and COMPETE 2020 through projects EMBRC.PT ALG-01-0145-FEDER-022121 and BIODATA.PT ALG-01-0145-FEDER-022231 and support of Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), within the scope of the project UIDB/04292/2020 – MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre.

Full text

applied sciences A icle Isola ion, Iden i ica ion and Bio echnological Applica ions o a No el, Robus , F ee-li ing Chlo ococcum (Oophila) amblys oma is S ain Isola ed om a Local Pond Nádia Co eia 1,2 , Hugo Pe ei a 3, Joana T. Sil a 1, Tamá a San os 3, Ma ia Soa es 1, Ca olina B. Sousa 3,4, Lisa M. Schüle 3, Ma ga ida Cos a 1, João Va ela 3,* , Leonel Pe ei a 2 and Joana Sil a 1 1Allmic oalgae Na u al P oduc s S.A., Resea ch and De elopmen Depa men —Rua 25 de Ab il, nº 19, 2445-413 Pa aias, Po ugal; [email p o ec ed] (N.C.); [email p o ec ed] (J.T.S.); ma ia.soa es@allmic oalgae.com (M.S.); [email p o ec ed] (M.C.); [email p o ec ed] (J.S.) 2MARE—Ma ine and En i onmen al Sciences Cen e, Depa men o Li e Sciences, Uni e si y o Coimb a, 3000-456 Coimb a, Po ugal; [email p o ec ed] 3CCMAR—Cen e o Ma ine Sciences, Uni e si y o Alga e, Gambelas, 8005-139 Fa o, Po ugal; [email p o ec ed] (H.P.); [email p o ec ed] (T.S.); ca olb [email p o ec ed] (C.B.S.); [email p o ec ed] (L.M.S.) 4Global Heal h and T opical Medicine (GHMT), Ins i u o de Higiene e Medicina T opical, Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisboa, Po ugal *Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +351-289-800-900; Fax: +351-289-800-069 Recei ed: 23 Ma ch 2020; Accep ed: 23 Ap il 2020; Published: 27 Ap il 2020   Abs ac : Biop ospec ion o no el au och honous s ains is key o he success ul indus ial-scale p oduc ion o mic oalgal biomass. A no el Chlo ococcum s ain was ecen ly isola ed om a pond inside he indus ial p oduc ion acili y o Allmic oalgae (Lei ia, Po ugal). Phylogene ic analysis based on 18S ibosomal ibonucleic acid ( RNA) gene sequences sugges s ha his isola e is a no el, ee-li ing Oophila amblys oma is s ain. Howe e , as ou phylogene ic da a s ongly sugges s ha he a o emen ioned axon belongs o he genus Chlo ococcum, i is he e p oposed o ename his species as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is. In o de o cha ac e ize he bio echnological po en ial o his no el isola e, g ow h pe o mance and biochemical composi ion we e e alua ed om he pilo (2.5-m 3 ) o indus ial (10-m 3 ) scale. The highes maximum a eal p oduc i i y (36.56 g · m −2· day −1 ) was eached in a 10-m 3 ubula pho obio eac o (PBR), as compa ed o ha ob ained in a 2.5-m 3 PBR (26.75 g · m −2· day −1 ). Chlo ococcum amblys oma is displayed high p o ein con en (48%–56% d y weigh (DW)) and mode a e le els o o al lipids (18%–31% DW), ca bohyd a es (6%–18% DW) and ashes (9%–16% DW). Fu he mo e, he lipid p o ile was domina ed by polyunsa u a ed a y acids (PUFAs). The highes pigmen con en s we e ob ained in he 2.5-m 3 PBR, whe e o al chlo ophylls accoun ed o 40.24 mg · g −1 DW, ollowed by lu ein wi h 5.37 mg · g −1 DW. O e all, his ee-li ing Chlo ococcum amblys oma is s ain shows g ea po en ial o nu i ional applica ions, coupling a p omising g ow h pe o mance wi h a high p o ein con en as well as ele an amoun s o PUFAs, chlo ophyll, and ca o enoids. Keywo ds: biop ospec ion; mic oalgae; Chlo ococcum (Oophila) amblys oma is; pho obio eac o s; indus ial-scale p oduc ion; bio echnological applica ions Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040; doi:10.3390/app10093040 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 2 o 14 1. In oduc ion Mic oalgal biodi e si y emains la gely unexplo ed and biop ospec ion e o s may ep esen an oppo uni y o disco e no el me aboli es and p omo e biomass p oduc ion a lowe cos s [ 1 , 2 ]. These mic oo ganisms ha e been widely ecognized as a co ne s one o bioeconomy and bio e ine y de elopmen , due o hei high applicabili y as eeds ocks o ood, eed, bioplas ics, bio e ilize s, and bio uels as well as o was ewa e ea men and CO 2 mi iga ion [ 3 – 5 ]. In Eu ope, mac o- and mic oalgae we e ecognized in he S a egic Ene gy Technological Plan (SET-PLAN) as a pa o he key- alue chain o ad anced bioma e ials p oduc ion. Po ugal, as a coas al coun y, has excellen clima ic condi ions and a g ea po en ial o a sus ainable indus ial mic oalgal cul i a ion [ 5 ]. Ne e heless, he high cos o mic oalgal p oduc ion is s ill he main es ic ion associa ed wi h he comme cializa ion o biomass o di e en commodi ies [5,6]. The wo ld’s inc easing popula ion and he p edic ions o an insu icien p o ein supply ha e led o esea ch on new al e na i e and uncon en ional p o ein sou ces [ 7 ]. Algal biomass is cu en ly conside ed as a good candida e o his pu pose since hese pho osyn he ic aqua ic mic oo ganisms a e able o syn hesize all he essen ial amino acids and hei cul i a ion does no compe e o a able land, as hey can be g own in bio eac o s [ 3 , 5 ]. P o eins a e he main cons i uen s o mic oalgae and one o he mos impo an p oduc s o mic oalgae-based bio e ine ies [ 8 ]. In e es ingly, hese p o eins, and pep ides he eo , a e e y in e es ing o unc ional ood applica ions due o hei biological ac i i ies, in pa icula hose ela ed o he p e en ion and educ ion o hype ension, oxida i e s ess, cance , diabe es, in lamma ion, and immune diso de s [ 9 ]. Mo eo e , as mic oalgae con ain la ge amoun s o pigmen s (e.g., ca o enoids), many o hem wi h known an ioxidan p ope ies and biomedically ele an bioac i i ies, mic oalgal biomass can be used o o i y o supplemen ood, eed, and cosme ics, imp o ing hei basic ma ke alue while p o iding inc eased heal h bene i s [ 10 ]. This is in line wi h he expec ed inc ease in he wo ldwide ma ke size o na u al pigmen s ueled by a g owing demand o such p oduc s by he consume s [3,5]. Biop ospec ing o no el mic oalgal species and p omo ing indus ial biomass p oduc ion is key o imp o ing he cu en po olio o a ailable s ains o di e en bio echnological applica ions. The sc eening o molecules and ac i i ies o bio echnological in e es as well as he unde s anding o mic oalgal ecosys em unc ioning a e essen ial o de elop sus ainable and economical solu ions o oday’s ci iliza ion and en i onmen al needs [11–13]. The p esen wo k aimed o cha ac e ize and e alua e he bio echnological po en ial o a new isola e ob ained om a pond a he Allmic oalgae acili ies whose 18S ibosomal deoxy ibonucleic acid ( DNA) sequence is iden ical o ha o Oophila amblys oma is. In e es ingly, his sequence clus e s oge he wi h hose o he S ephanosphae inia mac oclade belonging o he genus Chlo ococcum, sugges ing ha O. amblys oma is should be eclassi ied as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is. As he bio echnological use o his no el isola e was he ocus o he p esen wo k, i s g ow h pe o mance in he pilo and indus ial-scale sys ems was assessed. In addi ion, i s composi ion in e ms o p o ein, lipids, ca bohyd a es, and pigmen s we e e alua ed o de e mine he nu i ional po en ial o his mic oalga. 2. Ma e ials and Me hods 2.1. En i onmen al Sampling and S ain Isola ion The mic oalga used in his wo k, Chlo ococcum amblys oma is, was ob ained om a wa e sample collec ed om a eshwa e pond in he p oduc ion acili y o Allmic oalgae, loca ed in Pa aias (Lei ia, Po ugal). The isola ion p ocess was aken acco ding o Pa in e al. [ 14 ]. B ie ly, o isola e no el mic oalgal s ains, samples we e cen i uged se e al imes in o de o sepa a e mic oo ganisms acco ding o hei densi y g adien . The cells we e hen successi ely dilu ed and s eaked on pla es con aining g ow h medium (Sameca, Po o, Po ugal) whose composi ion is based on Guilla d’s F/2. Di e en colonies we e sepa a ed and obse ed mic oscopically. S eak-pla ing was pe o med in o de o ob ain unialgal, non-axenic, colonies. These isola ed cul u es we e hen s o ed in solid and Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 3 o 14 liquid media on Allmic oalgae cul u e collec ion a 17 ◦ C and 12 h o ligh i adiance pe day, unde a con inuous pho on lux densi y o 20 µmol·m−2·s−1. 2.2. Mic oscopic Obse a ion and Molecula Iden i ica ion Mic oscopic images we e acqui ed in a Zeiss AXIO Scope A1 mic oscope wi h a Zeiss AXIOCAM 503 colo came a and ZEN Blue 2.5 li e so wa e (Ca l Zeiss Mic oscopy GmbH, Jena, Ge many), using he 40-x lens. Mic oscopy was ca ied ou using di e en ial in e e ence con as (DIC). Phylogene ic analysis was pe o med h ough Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian in e ence using a pa ial sequence o C. amblys oma is 18S RNA gene, which was deposi ed in GenBank wi h he accession numbe MT026583. The DNA sample was ob ained, and i s sequence was gene a ed as desc ibed in Pe ei a e al. [ 15 ] using he 18SUni Fo and 18SUni Re p ime s. The subs i u ion models ha bes i he da a we e selec ed using M Model es 2 .2.3 [ 16 ] and PAUP* .4.0b10 [ 17 ] applying he Akaike in o ma ion c i e ia (AIC; Akaike 1974). The maximum-likelihood analysis was pe o med using RaxML .7.0.4 [ 18 ], assuming a GTR+G+I subs i u ion model, wi h 400 boo s ap eplica es. Pos e io p obabili ies we e de e mined by Ma ko Chain Mon e Ca lo (MCMC) sampling in M Bayes .3.1.2 [ 19 , 20 ]. M Bayes analysis was also conduc ed using he model GTR+G (ns =6 a es =gamma) wi h six chains o 10,000,000 MCMC gene a ions, sampling e e y 1000 h gene a ion and using he de aul o all he o he se ings. The MCMC uns con e gence and bu n-in we e de e mined h ough he analysis o he gene a ions s log p obabili y plo using he ace analysis ool TRACER 1.6 [ 21 ]. Using he bu n-in, 20% o he ees we e disca ded. ML bes and consensus ee and BI consensus ee we e gene a ed using makeConsensusT ee.py command and edi ed wi h he g aphical iewe FigT ee .1.4.2 [22]. 2.3. Scale-Up and Biomass P oduc ion All expe imen s desc ibed we e pe o med a Allmic oalgae indus ial acili ies be ween Janua y and June 2018. A concen a ed cul u e medium (Sameca, Po o, Po ugal) based on Guilla d’s F/2 and supplemen ed wi h 25 µ M o i on (Hubel Olh ã o, Po ugal) was added un il a inal concen a ion o 10 mM o ni a e was eached. Mic oalgal cul u es we e g own in he labo a o y in 5-L bubble column eac o s a 24 ± 1 ◦ C wi h con inuously injec ed comp essed 0.2- µ m il e ed ai , unde a con inuous pho on lux densi y o 100 µ mol · m −2· s −1 . The pH o he cul u e medium was kep be ween 7.5 and 8.0 by pe iodical CO2injec ion. The scale-up o he ou doo pilo and indus ial-scale eac o s was pe o med by using i e labo a o y eac o s o inocula e a 0.25-m 3 la panel (FP) (Figu e 1a). Cul u es we e ae a ed wi h 0.2- µ m il e ed ai , he pH was also main ained be ween 7.5 and 8.0 by CO 2 pulse injec ion and he empe a u e inside he FP was main ained below 28 ◦ C by a sp inkle -like i iga ion sys em. The ea e , he 0.25-m 3 FP was used o inocula e a ubula pho obio eac o (PBR) o 2.5-m 3 (Figu e 1b) and abou 80% o his was used as inoculum o a 10-m 3 PBR (Figu e 1c). The pH was main ained unde 8.0 h ough an au oma ed CO 2 injec ion sys em and he empe a u e was kep unde 28 ◦ C by a sp inkle -like i iga ion sys em. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 o 14 2.2. Mic oscopic Obse a ion and Molecula Iden i ica ion Mic oscopic images we e acqui ed in a Zeiss AXIO Scope A1 mic oscope wi h a Zeiss AXIOCAM 503 colo came a and ZEN Blue 2.5 li e so wa e (Ca l Zeiss Mic oscopy GmbH, Jena, Ge many), using he 40-x lens. Mic oscopy was ca ied ou using di e en ial in e e ence con as (DIC). Phylogene ic analysis was pe o med h ough Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian in e ence using a pa ial sequence o C. amblys oma is 18S RNA gene, which was deposi ed in GenBank wi h he accession numbe MT026583. The DNA sample was ob ained, and i s sequence was gene a ed as desc ibed in Pe ei a e al. [15] using he 18SUni Fo and 18SUni Re p ime s. The subs i u ion models ha bes i he da a we e selec ed using M Model es 2 .2.3 [16] and PAUP* .4.0b10 [17] applying he Akaike in o ma ion c i e ia (AIC; Akaike 1974). The maximum-likelihood analysis was pe o med using RaxML .7.0.4 [18], assuming a GTR+G+I subs i u ion model, wi h 400 boo s ap eplica es. Pos e io p obabili ies we e de e mined by Ma ko Chain Mon e Ca lo (MCMC) sampling in M Bayes .3.1.2 [19,20]. M Bayes analysis was also conduc ed using he model GTR+G (ns =6 a es=gamma) wi h six chains o 10,000,000 MCMC gene a ions, sampling e e y 1000 h gene a ion and using he de aul o all he o he se ings. The MCMC uns con e gence and bu n-in we e de e mined h ough he analysis o he gene a ions s log p obabili y plo using he ace analysis ool TRACER 1.6 [21]. Using he bu n-in, 20% o he ees we e disca ded. ML bes and consensus ee and BI consensus ee we e gene a ed using makeConsensusT ee.py command and edi ed wi h he g aphical iewe FigT ee .1.4.2 [22]. 2.3. Scale-Up and Biomass P oduc ion All expe imen s desc ibed we e pe o med a Allmic oalgae indus ial acili ies be ween Janua y and June 2018. A concen a ed cul u e medium (Sameca, Po o, Po ugal) based on Guilla d’s F/2 and supplemen ed wi h 25 µM o i on (Hubel Olhão, Po ugal) was added un il a inal concen a ion o 10 mM o ni a e was eached. Mic oalgal cul u es we e g own in he labo a o y in 5-L bubble column eac o s a 24 ± 1 °C wi h con inuously injec ed comp essed 0.2-µm il e ed ai , unde a con inuous pho on lux densi y o 100 µmol.m−2.s−1. The pH o he cul u e medium was kep be ween 7.5 and 8.0 by pe iodical CO2 injec ion. The scale-up o he ou doo pilo and indus ial-scale eac o s was pe o med by using i e labo a o y eac o s o inocula e a 0.25-m3 la panel (FP) (Figu e 1a). Cul u es we e ae a ed wi h 0.2-µm il e ed ai , he pH was also main ained be ween 7.5 and 8.0 by CO2 pulse injec ion and he empe a u e inside he FP was main ained below 28 °C by a sp inkle -like i iga ion sys em. The ea e , he 0.25-m3 FP was used o inocula e a ubula pho obio eac o (PBR) o 2.5-m3 (Figu e 1b) and abou 80% o his was used as inoculum o a 10-m3 PBR (Figu e 1c). The pH was main ained unde 8.0 h ough an au oma ed CO2 injec ion sys em and he empe a u e was kep unde 28 °C by a sp inkle -like i iga ion sys em. Figu e 1. Di e en scale sys ems used o ou doo scale-up: (a) 0.25-m3 la panel pho obio eac o (FP); (b) 2.5-m3 pilo -scale ubula pho obio eac o (PBR); (c) 10-m3 indus ial PBR. Pic u es we e p o ided by Allmic oalgae, Resea ch and De elopmen Depa men , Pa aias, Po ugal. Fo he assessmen o g ow h pe o mance and biomass p oduc ion, h ee 0.25-m3 FP we e cul i a ed be ween Janua y and Feb ua y a an a e age empe a u e o 13.6 °C and ligh i adiance o 14.06 MJ.m−2.day−1. The 2.5-m3 PBR iplica es we e g own om Ma ch o May a an a e age Figu e 1. Di e en scale sys ems used o ou doo scale-up: ( a ) 0.25-m 3 la panel pho obio eac o (FP); ( b ) 2.5-m 3 pilo -scale ubula pho obio eac o (PBR); ( c ) 10-m 3 indus ial PBR. Pic u es we e p o ided by Allmic oalgae, Resea ch and De elopmen Depa men , Pa aias, Po ugal. Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 4 o 14 Fo he assessmen o g ow h pe o mance and biomass p oduc ion, h ee 0.25-m 3 FP we e cul i a ed be ween Janua y and Feb ua y a an a e age empe a u e o 13.6 ◦ C and ligh i adiance o 14.06 MJ · m −2· day −1 . The 2.5-m 3 PBR iplica es we e g own om Ma ch o May a an a e age empe a u e o 17.7 ◦C and ligh i adiance o 19.04 MJ·m−2·day−1, while he indus ial PBR o 10-m3 iplica es we e g own om May o June a an a e age empe a u e o 15.5 ◦ C and ligh i adiance o abou 20.10 MJ·m−2·day−1. 2.4. G ow h Assessmen Mic oalgal g ow h was moni o ed h ough biomass d y weigh (DW). DW was de e mined by il e ing a de ined sample olume on mic o-glass il e s (0.7 µ m, VWR), hen washed wi h an equal olume o deionized wa e and d ied using a mois u e analyze (KERN DBS, Balingen-F omme n, Ge many) a 120 ◦C. Volume ic biomass p oduc i i y (P) was calcula ed as he di e ence in biomass concen a ion, in g ams pe li e (X) du ing a speci ic pe iod o ime ( ), as shown by Equa ion (1) in which he indices 1 and 2deno e di e en ime poin s: Pg·L−1·day−1=X2−X1 2− 1 (1) The a eal biomass p oduc i i y (Pa) was calcula ed as he p oduc o he olume ic biomass p oduc i i y (P) and he olume o he PBR, in L (V) di ided by he o al g ound a ea (including non-pho ic a eas) o PBR, in squa e me e s (A) as shown in Equa ion (2): Pag·m−2·day−1=P×V/A(2) The speci ic g ow h a e ( µ ) was de e mined by he quo ien be ween he g ow h a e and he biomass concen a ion wi hin a pe iod o ime, as seen in Equa ion (3): µday−1=ln (X2/X1) 2− 1 (3) whe e X2and X1 e e o biomass concen a ion (g·L−1) a di e en ime poin s. The pho osyn he ic e iciency was de e mined as he a io be ween he highe hea ing alue (HHV) and sun i adia ion. Tempe a u e and sola adia ion we e measu ed using a me eo ological s a ion (R.M. Young, Michigan, USA) and a py anome e (Apogee UT SP-110, Logan, USA). The HHV was calcula ed as indica ed in Equa ion (4) and as p e iously ecommended by Callejón-Fe e e al. [23]: HHVkJ·g−1=−3.393 +0.507.C−0.341.H+0.067.N(4) Elemen al analysis o C, H and N we e pe o med as desc ibed in Sec ion 2.5. 2.5. Biochemical Composi ion The biochemical composi ion was pe o med wi h biomass g own un il he la es exponen ial phase, which was eeze d ied p io o analysis. Elemen al analysis o C, H and N we e pe o med using a Va io EL III (Va io EL, Elemen a Analyse Sys em, GmbH, Hanau, Ge many) acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s p ocedu e. To al p o eins we e calcula ed by mul iplying he Ncon en gi en by elemen al analysis wi h he s anda d con e sion ac o o 6.25 [24]. To al lipid con en was de e mined ollowing he Bligh & Dye [ 25 ] me hod wi h some modi ica ions [ 15 ]. B ie ly, biomass was ex ac ed wi h a mix u e o chlo o o m, me hanol, and wa e (1:2:0.8, : : ) and homogenized wi h an IKA Ul a-Tu ax dispe se (IKA-We ke GmbH, S au en, Ge many) on ice o 60 s. Cen i uga ion allowed phase sepa a ion and he o ganic phase was ans e ed o new essels. A e wa ds, a known olume (0.7 mL) was pipe ed o p e-weighed ubes Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 5 o 14 and e apo a ed a 60 ◦ C. The esul ing d ied esidue was weighed and compa ed wi h he DW o p o ide an accu a e de e mina ion o he lipid ac ion. The ash con en was de e mined by he weigh di e ence be o e and a e he combus ion o he biomass. Biomass was hea ed a 550 ◦ C du ing 8 h using a u nace (J. P. Selec a, Sell ho n R9-L, Ba celona, Spain). Ca bohyd a es we e calcula ed by he di e ence o he o he mac onu ien s analyzed. Fa y acids we e con e ed in o he co esponding a y acid me hyl es e s (FAME) acco ding o Lepage & Roy [ 26 ] p o ocol, modi ied by Pe ei a e al. [ 15 ]. FAME we e analyzed in a gas ch oma og aphy–mass spec ome y (GC-MS) analyze (B uke SCION 456/GC, SCION TQ MS) equipped wi h a ZB-5MS capilla y column (30 m × 0.25 mm o in e nal diame e , 0.25 µ m o ilm hickens, Phenomenex), using helium as he ca ie gas. The empe a u e p og am was 60 ◦ C o 1 min, 30 ◦ C · min −1 o 120 ◦ C, 5 ◦ C · min −1 o 250 ◦ C and inal inc ease o 20 ◦ C · min −1 o 300 ◦ C. Injec ion empe a u e was 300 ◦ C. Fo iden i ica ion and quan i ica ion o FAME, i e di e en concen a ions o he s anda ds Supelco ® 37 componen FAME Mix 41 (Sigma-Ald ich, Sin a, Po ugal) we e analyzed in o de o es ablish calib a ion cu es o each o he s anda d. Fo pigmen s ex ac ion, 10 mg o esh biomass was ex ac ed wi h glass beads in 6 mL o ace one o 10 min. The sample was cen i uged (HERMLE Z300, New Yo k, NY, USA) a 3500 pm o 10 min un il comple e loss o he pelle colo . The supe na an was analyzed using a spec opho ome e (Genesys 10S UV-VIS, MA, USA) in he scanning spec um (380 o 700 nm) and he da a we e analyzed by he Excel Add-In Sol e on Windows 2013. Ca o enoid p o iles we e de e mined acco ding o Couso e al. [ 27 ]. B ie ly, he ex ac was comple ely d ied unde ni ogen low, esuspended in high-pe o mance liquid ch oma og aphy (HPLC)-g ade me hanol and il e ed (0.22 µ m) in o an ambe HPLC ial. The sepa a ion and ch oma og aphic analysis o pigmen s we e pe o med by Me ck Hi achi LaC om Eli e HPLC (Da ms ad , Ge many) equipped wi h a diode-a ay de ec o , using a LiCh oCART RP-18 (5 µ m, 250 ×4 mm , LiCh osphe ) column and a low a e o 1 mL · min −1 . The mobile phase consis ed o e hyl ace a e as sol en A and 9:1 ( : ) ace oni ile:wa e as sol en B. The g adien p og am applied was: 0–16 min, 0%–60% A; 16–30 min, 60% A; 30–32 min, 100% A and 30–35 min 100% B. The injec ion olume was 100 µ L. Quan i ica ion o pigmen s was ca ied ou a 450 nm using calib a ion cu es o he pigmen s anda ds neoxan hin, iolaxan hin, lu ein and β -ca o ene. The HPLC ch oma og am wi h ca o enoids e en ion imes (Figu e S1) and espec i e calib a ion cu es o pigmen s anda ds (Figu es S2–S5) is gi en in Supplemen a y Ma e ials. 2.6. S a is ical Analysis S a is ical analyses we e pe o med using R so wa e ( e sion 3.6.1) h ough RS udio IDE ( e sion 1.2.1335 ). When h ee o mo e condi ions we e analyzed, ANOVA was pe o med wi h he mul iple compa isons o Tukey-HSD. Fo he compa ison o g oups o independen esul s, a -s uden es was used. A con idence le el ≥ 95% was se . Fo each es , he mean and s anda d de ia ion we e de e mined among biological iplica es. 3. Resul s and Discussion 3.1. Mo phological Cha ac e iza ion The mic oalgal specimen collec ed in he eshwa e pond a he acili ies o Allmic oalgae was iden i ied based on bo anical, mic o-mo phological ea u es and axonomy as Chlo ococcum Meneghini. A ouche was deposi ed in he Allmic oalgae cul u e collec ion wi h numbe 0030CN. Vege a i e cells o he symbio ic algae appea ed g ass-g een, li e as soli a y cells o in empo a y g oups o inde ini e o m wi hou a mucilaginous en elope, a e ellipsoidal o sphe ical and a y in size om 8 o 25 µ m. Rep oduc ion wi hin he genus Chlo ococcum is mainly asexual, by bi lagella e zoospo es (o aplanospo es in case o wa e s ess) ha do no become sphe ical upon cessa ion Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 6 o 14 o mo ili y bu e ain an o oid, ellipsoid shape o some days [ 28 , 29 ]. By ligh mic oscopy, in h ee-week-old liquid cul u es, g een ege a i e cells wi h a hollow, pa ie al chlo oplas wi h o wi hou an open su ace we e obse ed. In he basal pa o he chlo oplas , a sphe ical py enoid was p esen and he nucleus was in a cen al posi ion in he cell (Figu e 2a). Tempo a y g oups o cells o inde ini e o m and wi hou a mucilaginous en elope (Figu e 2c) we e seen. In h ee-day-old liquid cul u es, nume ous zoospo angia (Figu e 2d– ), zoospo es (Figu e 2b) and young g een ege a i e cells became e iden . Zoospo es had wo lagella, an an e io s igma, one sphe ical py enoid in he cen al egion and a nucleus pos e io o py enoid. Zoospo es had an ellipsoidal o m (3.59 ± 0.43 µ m wide and 8.56 ± 0.82 µ m long), young g een cells had an ellipsoidal o o oid o m (6.70 ± 1.23 µ m wide and 9.66 ± 1.23 µ m long) and ma u e g een cells we e sphe ical (15.14 ± 2.34 µ m). P olonged obse a ions o cul u es show ha his Chlo ococcum mul iplica ion seems o be simila o Chlo ococcum in usionum Meneghini, mainly h ough he endogenous di ision o he con en o he ege a i e cell by p og essi e clea age o a mo he p o oplas in o uninuclea e segmen s [ 30 ]. The numbe o zoospo es migh a y acco ding o he size o he mo he cell. Once comple ely o med, zoospo es ee hemsel es by bu s ing he zoospo angium memb ane (Figu e 2e) due o excess p essu e inside. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 14 cen al egion and a nucleus pos e io o py enoid. Zoospo es had an ellipsoidal o m (3.59 ± 0.43 µm wide and 8.56 ± 0.82 µm long), young g een cells had an ellipsoidal o o oid o m (6.70 ± 1.23 µm wide and 9.66 ± 1.23 µm long) and ma u e g een cells we e sphe ical (15.14 ± 2.34 µm). P olonged obse a ions o cul u es show ha his Chlo ococcum mul iplica ion seems o be simila o Chlo ococcum in usionum Meneghini, mainly h ough he endogenous di ision o he con en o he ege a i e cell by p og essi e clea age o a mo he p o oplas in o uninuclea e segmen s [30]. The numbe o zoospo es migh a y acco ding o he size o he mo he cell. Once comple ely o med, zoospo es ee hemsel es by bu s ing he zoospo angium memb ane (Figu e 2e) due o excess p essu e inside. Figu e 2. Mic oscopic images o Chlo ococcum amblys oma is li e s ages using he di e en ial in e e ence con as (DIC): (a) ege a i e cell; (b) zoospo e; (c) g oup o cells wi h inde ini e o m; (d) zoospo angium; (e) and ( ) bu s o zoospo angium memb ane and ealizing o zoospo es. n = nucleus, p = py enoid, s = s igma, z = zoospo e, zp = zoospo angium. Scale ba (a) and (b) = 2 µm, (c) o ( ) = 5 µm. 3.2. Molecula Iden i ica ion and Phylogene ic Analysis Fo he de e mina ion o he axonomic classi ica ion o he new isola e wi hin he Chlo ococcaceae, he amily o which he genus Chlo ococcum belongs, molecula phylogene ic analysis was ca ied ou . Sequences o 18S RNA genes om se e al Chlo ococcaceae mic oalgae we e analyzed using Bayesian (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) in e ence. Chlo ella ulga is 18S RNA gene was used as an ou g oup. BI and ML ees opology (Figu e 3) indica es ha he s ain isola ed om a pond loca ed a Allmic oalgae indus ial acili ies (accession numbe : MT026583) belongs o a axonomic uni sis e o C. minu um/C. aqua icum, wi h an almos maximum pos e io p obabili y (0.99) and a 93% ML boo s ap alue. In e es ingly, C. ellipsoideum appea s o be an ou g oup, b anching o hese axa wi h maximum suppo . Al hough his isola e does p esen simila i ies o C. in usionum, he holo ype o he genus, conce ning i s ep oduc ion, phylogene ic analysis s ongly sugges s ha belongs o he S ephanosphae inia mac oclade, a he han o he Moewusinia, he mac oclade o C. in usionum (Figu e 3) [31]. Mo eo e , upon submi ing ou sequence o GenBank, he au ho s ound ha his sequence is 100% iden ical o an Oophila amblys oma is (Kings on isola e, Oophila clade A) sequence wi h he accession numbe KY091671 [32] and o o he sequences ha ha e no been classi ied down o he species le el. This inding is qui e in e es ing, as he phylogene ic da a he e p esen ed s ongly indica es ha O. amblys oma is does belong o he genus Chlo ococcum. This species is o en isola ed as a symbion in eggs o se e al amphibian species, bu i s p ope axonomy has emained unce ain [32]. Recen ly, i has been epo ed ha his species can also occu as ee-li ing mic oalgae [33]. Taken oge he , i is he e Figu e 2. Mic oscopic images o Chlo ococcum amblys oma is li e s ages using he di e en ial in e e ence con as (DIC): ( a ) ege a i e cell; ( b ) zoospo e; ( c ) g oup o cells wi h inde ini e o m; ( d ) zoospo angium; ( e ) and ( ) bu s o zoospo angium memb ane and ealizing o zoospo es. n =nucleus, p =py enoid, s=s igma, z =zoospo e, zp =zoospo angium. Scale ba (a) and (b)=2µm, (c) o ( )=5µm. 3.2. Molecula Iden i ica ion and Phylogene ic Analysis Fo he de e mina ion o he axonomic classi ica ion o he new isola e wi hin he Chlo ococcaceae, he amily o which he genus Chlo ococcum belongs, molecula phylogene ic analysis was ca ied ou . Sequences o 18S RNA genes om se e al Chlo ococcaceae mic oalgae we e analyzed using Bayesian (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) in e ence. Chlo ella ulga is 18S RNA gene was used as an ou g oup. BI and ML ees opology (Figu e 3) indica es ha he s ain isola ed om a pond loca ed a Allmic oalgae indus ial acili ies (accession numbe : MT026583) belongs o a axonomic uni sis e o C. minu um/C. aqua icum, wi h an almos maximum pos e io p obabili y (0.99) and a 93% ML boo s ap alue. In e es ingly, C. ellipsoideum appea s o be an ou g oup, b anching o hese axa wi h maximum suppo . Al hough his isola e does p esen simila i ies o C. in usionum, he holo ype o he genus, conce ning i s ep oduc ion, phylogene ic analysis s ongly sugges s ha belongs o he S ephanosphae inia mac oclade, a he han o he Moewusinia, he mac oclade o C. in usionum (Figu e 3) [ 31 ]. Mo eo e , upon submi ing ou sequence o GenBank, he au ho s ound ha his Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 7 o 14 sequence is 100% iden ical o an Oophila amblys oma is (Kings on isola e, Oophila clade A) sequence wi h he accession numbe KY091671 [ 32 ] and o o he sequences ha ha e no been classi ied down o he species le el. This inding is qui e in e es ing, as he phylogene ic da a he e p esen ed s ongly indica es ha O. amblys oma is does belong o he genus Chlo ococcum. This species is o en isola ed as a symbion in eggs o se e al amphibian species, bu i s p ope axonomy has emained unce ain [ 32 ]. Recen ly, i has been epo ed ha his species can also occu as ee-li ing mic oalgae [ 33 ]. Taken oge he , i is he e p oposed o ename O. amblys oma is as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is. This p oposal is suppo ed no only by he esul s o Figu e 3, bu also by he la es a emp a de ining he axonomy o his species [ 32 ]. Indeed, hese au ho s hin ha ha sequences o he Oophila clade A symbion s clus e wi h hose o Chlo ococcum, unlike “Oophila” clade B isola es, which appea o be closely ela ed o axa classi ied as Chlamydomonas [32]. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 14 p oposed o ename O. amblys oma is as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is. This p oposal is suppo ed no only by he esul s o Figu e 3, bu also by he la es a emp a de ining he axonomy o his species [32]. Indeed, hese au ho s hin ha ha sequences o he Oophila clade A symbion s clus e wi h hose o Chlo ococcum, unlike “Oophila” clade B isola es, which appea o be closely ela ed o axa classi ied as Chlamydomonas [32]. Figu e 3. Bayesian in e ence ees o he amily Chlo ococcaceae using 18S ibosomal ibonucleic acid ( RNA) sequences show ha he no el isola e (acc. numbe : MT026583) o ms a clade sis e o C. minu um/C. aqua icum wi h C. ellipsoideum as an ou g oup. In e es ingly, he MT026583 sequence is iden ical o ha o Oophila amblys oma is, a species ha can be ei he ee-li ing [33] o a salamande egg symbion [32]. As hese esul s s ongly sugges ha O. amblys oma is belongs o he genus Chlo ococcum, i is he e p oposed ha his species should be enamed as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is as gi en in he ee. Mo eo e , hese esul s con i m p e ious da a sugges ing ha he genus Chlo ococcum can be clea ly di ided in o wo mac oclades: S ephanosphae inia and Moewusinia [31]. ML boo s ap alues (>50) and BI pos e io p obabili ies (>0.70) a e indica ed a he espec i e b anches. The accession numbe o each sequence used is gi en a e he axonomic classi ica ion o each lea node. 3.3. Scale-up and Biomass P oduc ion G ow h assays we e pe o med in PBRs o di e en olumes and geome y, namely, pilo -scale 0.25-m3 FP, 2.5-m3 ubula PBR and indus ial-scale 10-m3 ubula PBR. The biomass p oduc i i ies, speci ic g ow h a es and pho osyn he ic e iciencies o C. amblys oma is a e p esen ed in Table 1. The highe olume ic p oduc i i ies we e achie ed in he pilo -scale sys ems, eaching simila global and maximum p oduc i i ies (p ≥ 0.05) in he 0.25-m3 FP (0.07 and 0.27 g.L−1.day−1) and 2.5-m3 PBR (0.09 and 0.26 g.L−1.day−1). On he o he hand, compa ed o pilo -scale sys ems, he indus ial scale 10-m3 PBR egis e ed signi ican ly lowe global and maximum olume ic p oduc i i ies o 0.05 and 0.09 g.L−1.day−1, espec i ely (p < 0.05). The ob ained olume ic p oduc i i ies a e lowe han hose p e iously epo ed by Cabanelas e al. [34] o Alki ia (Chlo ococcum) li o ale g own in a ho izon al ubula PBR o 0.09-m3 (0.74 g.L−1.day−1 in Oslo, 0.7 g.L−1.day−1 in Wageningen, 0.58 g.L−1.day−1 in Rio de Janei o and 0.6 g.L−1.day−1 in Cadiz). Table 1. Maximum olume ic p oduc i i y, o e all olume ic p oduc i i y, maximum a eal p oduc i i y and o e all a eal p oduc i i y, speci ic g ow h a e (μ) and pho osyn he ic e iciency (PE) o pilo - and indus ial-scale ubula pho obio eac o s (PBR). Di e en le e s indica e signi ican di e ences be ween eac o s. Values a e gi en as means ± s anda d de ia ion (n = 3). Reac o Volume ic P oduc i i y (g.L−1.d−1) A eal P oduc i i y (g.m−2.d−1) µ (d−1) PE (%) Maximum Global Maximum Global Figu e 3. Bayesian in e ence ees o he amily Chlo ococcaceae using 18S ibosomal ibonucleic acid ( RNA) sequences show ha he no el isola e (acc. numbe : MT026583) o ms a clade sis e o C. minu um/C. aqua icum wi h C. ellipsoideum as an ou g oup. In e es ingly, he MT026583 sequence is iden ical o ha o Oophila amblys oma is, a species ha can be ei he ee-li ing [ 33 ] o a salamande egg symbion [ 32 ]. As hese esul s s ongly sugges ha O. amblys oma is belongs o he genus Chlo ococcum, i is he e p oposed ha his species should be enamed as Chlo ococcum amblys oma is as gi en in he ee. Mo eo e , hese esul s con i m p e ious da a sugges ing ha he genus Chlo ococcum can be clea ly di ided in o wo mac oclades: S ephanosphae inia and Moewusinia [ 31 ]. ML boo s ap alues (>50) and BI pos e io p obabili ies (>0.70) a e indica ed a he espec i e b anches. The accession numbe o each sequence used is gi en a e he axonomic classi ica ion o each lea node. 3.3. Scale-Up and Biomass P oduc ion G ow h assays we e pe o med in PBRs o di e en olumes and geome y, namely, pilo -scale 0.25-m 3 FP, 2.5-m 3 ubula PBR and indus ial-scale 10-m 3 ubula PBR. The biomass p oduc i i ies, speci ic g ow h a es and pho osyn he ic e iciencies o C. amblys oma is a e p esen ed in Table 1. The highe olume ic p oduc i i ies we e achie ed in he pilo -scale sys ems, eaching simila global and maximum p oduc i i ies (p≥0.05) in he 0.25-m3FP (0.07 and 0.27 g·L−1·day−1) and 2.5-m3PBR (0.09 and 0.26 g · L −1· day −1 ). On he o he hand, compa ed o pilo -scale sys ems, he indus ial scale 10-m 3 PBR egis e ed signi ican ly lowe global and maximum olume ic p oduc i i ies o 0.05 and 0.09 g · L −1· day −1 , espec i ely (p<0.05). The ob ained olume ic p oduc i i ies a e lowe han hose p e iously epo ed by Cabanelas e al. [ 34 ] o Alki ia (Chlo ococcum) li o ale g own in a ho izon al ubula PBR o 0.09-m 3 (0.74 g · L −1· day −1 in Oslo, 0.7 g · L −1· day −1 in Wageningen, 0.58 g · L −1· day −1 in Rio de Janei o and 0.6 g·L−1·day−1in Cadiz). Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 8 o 14 Table 1. Maximum olume ic p oduc i i y, o e all olume ic p oduc i i y, maximum a eal p oduc i i y and o e all a eal p oduc i i y, speci ic g ow h a e ( µ ) and pho osyn he ic e iciency (PE) o pilo - and indus ial-scale ubula pho obio eac o s (PBR). Di e en le e s indica e signi ican di e ences be ween eac o s. Values a e gi en as means ±s anda d de ia ion (n=3). Reac o Volume ic P oduc i i y (g·L−1·d−1) A eal P oduc i i y (g·m−2·d−1) µ (d−1) PE (%) Maximum Global Maximum Global 0.25-m3FP 0.27 ±0.02 a0.07 ±0.00 a,b 22.31 ±1.50 a5.94 ±0.41 a0.16 ±0.00 a0.73 ±0.02 a 2.5-m3PBR 0.26 ±0.02 a0.09 ±0.02 a26.75 ±2.47 a8.65 ±1.62 a,b 0.13 ±0.03 a1.33 ±0.12 b 10-m3PBR 0.09 ±0.03 b0.05 ±0.01 b36.56 ±1.52 b14.84 ±3.98 b0.16 ±0.02 a1.84 ±0.18 c Howe e , an opposi e end was ound o he a eal p oduc i i y, whe e he highes maximum p oduc i i y was achie ed in he 10-m3PBR, eaching 36.56 g·m−2·day−1(p<0.05). The o e all a eal p oduc i i y was also highe in he 10-m 3 PBR, when compa ed o he FP (p<0.05), bu wi hou signi ican di e ences when compa ed o he 2.5-m 3 PBR (p ≥ 0.05). C. amblys oma is has shown highe a eal p oduc i i ies in compa ison wi h he same wo k o Cabanelas e al. [ 34 ] (16.6 g · m −2· day −1 in Oslo, 15.7 g · m −2· day −1 in Wageningen, 13.05 g · m −2· day −1 in Rio de Janei o and 13.5 g · m −2· day −1 in Cadiz). The explana ion o he di e ence be ween olume ic and a eal p oduc i i ies among sys ems is due o he geome y o he eac o s. As indus ial PBRs ha e a high densi y o ho izon al ubes, he lowe ubes ecei e a lowe amoun o ligh i adiance, caused by shadowing, which educes he olume ic p oduc ion. Despi e his, as he olume o biomass p oduced in he same a ea is subs an ially highe , i esul s in highe a eal p oduc i i ies. This end was p e iously epo ed o he same PBRs geome y upon he cul i a ion o Te aselmis sp. (Chlo ophy a) CTP4 [ 12 ] and Phaeodac ylum ico nu um (Bacilla iophy a) [35]. Speci ic g ow h a es we e simila among he di e en eac o s (p ≥ 0.05) and conside ably lowe compa ed o ha o A. li o ale g own in a 0.09-m 3 PBR ( om 0.46 day −1 o 0.62 day −1 ) [ 34 ]. In addi ion, he pilo -scale FP egis e ed he lowes pho osyn he ic e iciency, 0.73 % (p<0.05), while he indus ial PBR achie ed he highes alue, 1.84 % (p<0.05). Simila PEs we e epo ed o P. ico nu um using he same 2.5-m 3 PBR (1.11%) and 10-m 3 PBR (2.08%) [ 35 ]. Fa o able climac e ic condi ions and sunligh exposu e du ing he g ow h pe iod in he indus ial PBR we e bene icial o he cul u e g ow h. Highe pho osyn he ic e iciency was al eady expec ed in he indus ial PBR, since he olume o cul u e pe uni o a ea o he pho ic a ea is subs an ially highe . Fu he mo e, he FP ae a ion sys em is less e icien in compa ison o ha o he indus ial PBR, hampe ing ligh abso p ion due o bio ilm o ma ion on he walls o he eac o . 3.4. Biochemical Composi ion In o de o u he cha ac e ize C. amblys oma is, he biochemical composi ion o he biomass was analyzed. Fo his pu pose, only biomass p oduced in he 2.5- and 10-m 3 PBR was analyzed, since hese a e he cul u e sys ems used o p oduce biomass by Allmic oalgae in he la ge-scale indus ial acili y. 3.4.1. P oxima e Composi ion The con en o p o eins, lipids, ca bohyd a es, and ashes de ec ed in he biomass p oduced in bo h PBRs is p esen ed in Table 2. The esul s ob ained e ealed ha p o eins a e he main mac onu ien p esen in C. amblys oma is biomass. The highes p o ein con en was achie ed in mic oalgal cells g own in he 2.5-m 3 PBR, eaching mo e han 55% o hei DW (p<0.05), while he biomass p oduced in he 10-m 3 PBR egis e ed a p o ein con en o 48% DW. Mic oalgal p o eins a e app ecia ed as an addi i e o eed o a wide a ie y o animals anging om ish (aquacul u e) o pe s and a m animals and a e e y in e es ing o unc ional ood applica ions due o hei demons a ed biological ac i i ies impac ing di e en Appl. Sci. 2020,10, 3040 9 o 14 human heal h condi ions [ 3 , 9 ]. The lowe alue o p o ein a io ob ained in he biomass g own in he 10-m 3 PBR was p obably due o exposu e o he cul u es o s ess ul condi ions. E en hough he accumula ion o ca bohyd a es in mic oalgae is mainly due o he ne balance be ween pho osyn hesis and espi a ion [ 36 ], i would be expec ed ha he biomass g own in he 10-m 3 PBR showed he highes alue o ca bohyd a es, since i was exposed o highe ligh i adiance. Howe e , i was in he biomass g own in he pilo -scale PBR ha he highes pe cen age o ca bohyd a es was de ec ed, achie ing 17.43% o biomass DW (p<0.05), wi hin he ange o epo ed alues o he majo i y o mic oalgae [ 4 , 9 ]. Indeed, unde un a o able condi ions (e.g., high i adiance and ni ogen limi a ion), he excess o ca bon ixed du ing pho osyn hesis may ha e been di e ed in o s o age compounds such as lipids o ca bohyd a es [ 4 , 9 , 37 , 38 ]. This could also explain he highe lipid con en obse ed in he biomass g own in he 10-m 3 PBR (p<0.05), 31.44% DW, in compa ison o ha o mic oalgal cells g own in he 2.5-m3PBR (18.33%). Table 2. Biochemical composi ion o Chlo ococcum amblys oma is biomass g own in he 2.5- and 10-m 3 ubula pho obio eac o s (PBR). P o eins, lipids, and ca bohyd a es a e p esen ed as he pe cen age o biomass d y weigh (DW). Di e en le e s indica e signi ican di e ences be ween eac o s. Values a e gi en as means ±s anda d de ia ion (n=3). Reac o P o eins (%) Lipids (%) Ca bohyd a es (%) Ashes (%) 2.5-m3PBR 55.72 ±2.85 a18.33 ±0.97 b17.43 ±3.58 a9.88 ±5.87 a 10-m3PBR 48.22 ±0.43 b31.44 ±4.10 a5.78 ±3.99 b15.85 ±5.00 a 3.4.2. Fa y Acid P o ile In o de o assess he lipid composi ion o he biomass, he a y acid p o ile was analyzed (Table 3). The FAME p o ile o C. amblys oma is is domina ed by C16:4n-3 (21.94%–23.65% o o al a y acids; TFA), C16:0 (15.24%–19.29% o TFA), C18:4n-3 (8.61%–8.83% o TFA), C18:3n-3 (27.58%–31.40% o TFA) and C18:1 (5.34%–6.27% o TFA). In e es ingly, his mic oalga con ains a high con en o polyunsa u a ed a y acids (PUFAs), eaching 74.70% o TFA in he biomass p oduced in he 2.5-m 3 PBR, which is signi ican ly highe han he 67.10% o TFA de ec ed in he biomass ob ained om he 10-m 3 PBR (p<0.05) . Sa u a ed a y acids (SFAs) and monounsa u a ed a y acids (MUFAs) a e simila be ween he eac o s. O e all, he FAME p o ile does no ma ch wi h p e ious alues epo ed o o he Chlo ococcum mic oalgae, whe ein he FAME p o ile combines highe pe cen ages o SFAs and MUFAs, and lowe con en s o PUFAs [ 39 , 40 ], ein o cing he conclusion ha C. amblys oma is is a species dis inc om hose whose a y acid p o iles ha e been desc ibed p e iously. PUFAs a e classi ied as n-3 and n-6 and play an impo an ole in human and animal nu i ion [ 41 , 42 ]. I is epo ed ha n-3 a y acids play an impo an ole in he p e en ion o co ona y hea disease and in lamma o y disease, b ain diso de , such as Alzheime ’s disease and help in cance he apy [ 43 – 45 ], while n-6 a y acids a e p o-in lamma o y [ 41 , 46 ]. The unc ional sou ces o n-3 in mic oalgae a e no mally eicosapen aenoic (EPA, C20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic (DHA, C22:6n-3) acids; howe e , chlo ophy es and pa icula ly eshwa e mic oalgae a e, in gene al, de icien in bo h C20 and C22 PUFAs [ 4 , 45 ]. Ne e heless, he e a e o he impo an PUFAs such as linoleic (LA, C18:2n-6), α -linolenic (ALA, C18:3n-3) and γ -linolenic (GLA, C18:3n-6) acids wi h p o en biomedical and nu aceu ical applica ions [ 42 ]. Fu he mo e, once consumed, hese a y acids a e me abolized wi hin mammalian cells. The eby, ALA is con e ed o s ea idonic (C18:4n-3) and eicosa e aenoic (C20:4n-3) acids o o m EPA, which is u he me abolized o DHA (C22:6n-3) [ 41 , 47 ]. Al hough he n-3 and n-6 PUFAs biosyn he ic pa hways sha e he same se ies o enzymes, he heal h e ec s a e dependen on he Σ n-6/ Σ n-3 a io [ 41 , 46 , 47 ], which is ecommended o be lowe han 10 by he Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO) in o de o p e en in lamma o y, ca dio ascula and ne ous sys em diso de s [ 46 , 47 ]. The e o e, since C. amblys oma is, p esen s a PUFA/SFA a io o 4.30–2.81 and a Σ n-6/ Σ n-3 a io o 0.10–0.13, his s ain can be conside ed as a good al e na i e sou ce o die a y PUFA.