scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Factors that influence the development of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in eutocic deliveries: 3–4D transperineal ultrasound study

García Mejido, José Antonio; Gutiérrez-Palomino, Laura; Borrero González, Carlota; Valdivieso, Pamela; Fernández Palacín, Ana; Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio

Abstract

Introduction: Levator ani muscle (LAM) lesions are the most frequent injuries of the pelvic floor during delivery. Ten to 36% of women report this lesion during their first delivery. Many risk factors have been proposed but very few evaluate the aspects that can influence during natural vaginal delivery. Method: A prospective observational trial was conducted involving 74 primiparous women following vaginal delivery. Maternal, fetal and obstetric characteristics were analyzed. A transperineal three or four-dimensional (3D–4D) ultrasound was offered six months after delivery in order to evaluate avulsions and anomalies of the hiatus. Results: Seventy four women were included, three of them did not show up for ultrasound evaluation. Sixty two (87.3%) demonstrated no avulsion in comparison with nine (12.7%) who did. Five of these lesions were unilateral and four bilateral. Mean newborn weight was 3193 g in the “no avulsion group” versus 3470 g in the “avulsion” group (p=0.025). Discussion: According to the results, the most important risk factor established, for avulsion during natural childbirth, was the newborn weight. This contrasts with many other authors who have established that birth weight has no impact on these lesions. Conclusions: The most important factor intervening in the avulsion of LAM during natural vaginal delivery is the newborn weight. Patients with diagnosed avulsions present an enlarged urogenital hiatus during valsalva and maximal contraction.

Full text

Factors(that(influence(the(development(of(avulsion(of(the(levator(ani( muscle(in(eutocic(deliveries.(364D(transperineal(ultrasound(study.( Autores: José Antonio García Mejido* Laura Gutiérrez Palomino* Carlota Borrero González* Pamela Valdivieso Mejías* Ana Fernández Palacín** José Antonio Sainz Bueno* * Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital Universitario de Valme (Seville) ** University of Seville. Author responsible: José Antonio García Mejido Dirección: Carretera de Cádiz S/N. Hospital Universitario Valme. Sevilla, España. Teléfono: (+34) 955018385 E-mail: [email protected]. Factors(that(influence(the(development(of(avulsion(of(the(levator(ani( muscle(in(eutocic(deliveries.(364D(transperineal(ultrasound(study.( ( Abstract( Introduction* Levator(ani(muscle((LAM)(lesions(are(the(most(frequent(injuries(of(the(pelvic(floor(during( delivery.( 10?36%( of( women( report( this( lesion( during( their( first( delivery.( Many( risk( factors(have(been(proposed(but(very(few(evaluate(the(aspects(that(can(influence(during( natural(vaginal(delivery.(( ( Method* A( prospective( observational( trial( was( conducted( involving( 74( primiparous( women( following(vaginal(delivery.(Maternal,(fetal(and(obstetric(characteristics(were(analyzed.(A( transperineal( three( or( four?dimensional( (3D?4D)( ultrasound( was( offered( six( months( after(delivery(in(order(to(evaluate(avulsions(and(anomalies(of(the(hiatus.(( ( ( Results* 74( women( were( included,( 3( of( them( did( not( show( up( for( ultrasound( evaluation.( 62( (87,3%)(demonstrated(no(avulsion(in(comparison(with(9((12,7%)(who(did.(5(of(these( lesions(were(unilateral(and(4(bilateral.(Mean(newborn(weight(was(3193gr(in(the((“no( avulsion(group”(versus(3470gr(in(the(“avulsion”(group((p=0,025).( ( Discussion* According(to(the(results,(the(most(important(riskfactor(established,(for(avulsion(during( natural( childbirth,( was( the( newborn( weight.( This( contrasts( with( many( other( authors( who(have(established(that(birth(weight(has(no(impact(on(these(lesions.(( ( Conclusions* The(most(important(factor(intervening(in(the(avulsion(of(LAM(during(natural(vaginal( delivery(is(the(newborn(weight.(Patients(with(diagnosed(avulsions(present(an(enlarged( urogenital(hiatus(during(valsalva(and(maximal(contraction.(( ( Key(words:(Eutocic(delivery,(avulsion,(childbirth,(levator(ani(muscle.(( Introduction( ( Vaginal'delivery'is'an'important'factor'related'to'lesions,'muscular'or'ligamentous,'in' the' pelvic' floor.' These' lesions' could' contribute' in' the' development' of' urinary' incontinence' and' pelvic' organ' prolapse1.' LAM’s' avulsion' is' the' most' frequent' muscular' injury' found' after' vaginal' delivery.' Avulsion' is' defined' as' a' discontinuity' between' puborectalis' muscle' and' the' inferior' pubic' rami' as' consequence' of' its' maximum'stretch'during'the'2nd'stage'of'labor2,'3.' Currently,'the'diagnosis'of'LAM'avulsion'is'based'on'3D/4D'ultrasound'assessment'or' MRI2,'4,'5.' It'has'been'established'that'10M36%'of'primiparous'women'will'present'LAM'trauma' during'delivery6,'7.'Multiple'risk'factors'have'been'related8.'The'objective'of'this'study' is'to' assess'the' most'relevant' risk' factors'related' to'LAM' lesions'in'natural' vaginal' delivery.'' '' Method( ( A'prospective' observational'study'was' conducted'involving' 74'primiparous'women' with' natural' vaginal' delivery' at' term' (37M42' gestational' weeks)' between' October' 2013'and'January'2014'at'Hospital'Universitario'Virgen'de'Valme'–'Seville.'' ' None'of'the'patients'had'history'of'pelvic'floor'surgical'interventions.'The'totally'of' deliveries' initiated' spontaneously,' terminated' in' vaginal' natural' delivery' and' were' conducted'by'proven'experienced'midwives.'All'women'who'request'analgesia'were' provided' with' epidural' anesthesia' (6ml' 0,2%' ropivacaine' bolus' and' 0,125%' ropivacaine' plus' fentanyl' 1mcg/ml' for' maintenance' at' 12ml/h).' The' delivery' was' assisted'in'a'dorsal'lithotomy'position.'Episiotomy'was'used'in'a'restrictive'fashion' when' maximum' perineum' distention' was' reached.' All' the' patients' included' were' required'to'sign'an'informed'consent.'Pregnancies'with'maternalMfetal'pathology'were' excluded.'' ' The' obstetric' parameters' included' were:' maternal' age,' gestational' age' at' delivery,' body'mass'index,'weight'gain'during'pregnancy,'type'of'analgesia,'time'for'epidural' anesthesia,' length' of' second' stage' of' labor,' perineum' tears,' episiotomy,' fetal' head' circumference'and'fetal'weight.'' ' Ultrasound'study'was'achieved'6'months'post'delivery'using'a'Toshiba'Aplio'500®' (Toshiba'Medical'Systems'Corp.,'Tokyo,'Japan)'with'3D'abdominal'PVTM675MV'(90º' angle).' An' experienced' explorer,' who' had' no' knowledge' of' the' deliveries' characteristics,'performed'the'ultrasound'evaluation.'Images'were'obtained'while'in' dorsal'lithotomy'and'empty'bladder9,10.'Ultrasound'analysis''assessed'the'pelvic'floor' at'rest,'during'valsalva'and'at'maximal'contraction.'' ' Avulsion'injury'was'defined'as'the'abnormal'insertion'of'LAM,'which'was'identified' using' a' minimal' dimension' axial' plane'(MDP)' with' double' 2,5mm' slice' interval' above11'(image'1).'The'urogenital'hiatus'area'was'calculated'according'to'MDP'during' rest,'valsalva'and'maximal'pelvic'floor'contraction12.' ' Quantitative' variables' were' resumed' evaluating' means,' standard' deviations' and' qualitative'variables'with'percentages.'T'student'and'U'MannMWhitney'test'(ShapiroM Wilk' test)' were' used' to' evaluate' independent' samples' and' samples' with' asymmetrical'distribution'respectively.'' Qualitative' variables' were' evaluated' by' contingency' tables,' ChiMsquare' test' and' not' asymptotic'methods'as'Monte'Carlo'and'Exact'test.'Statistical'analysis'was'performed' using'IBM'SPSS'22'program.' ' Results( 74' women' were' studied.' 3' were' excluded' because' of' absenteeism' to' ultrasound' evaluation.'62'cases'(87,3%)'did'not'show'avulsion.'9'cases'(12,7%)'revealed'avulsion,' 5'of'these'were'unilateral'and'4'bilateral.'' ' Table(1(demonstrates' the' different' obstetric' parameters' evaluated' according' to' the' presence'or'not'of'avulsion.'No'significant'differences'were'found'between'groups.'' Table(2'collects' data' related' to' the' studied' patients.'Neonatal' weight' was' the' only' parameter'that'demonstrated'statistically'significant'difference'comparing'deliveries' with'or'without'avulsion.'Mean'newborn'weight'was'3193gr'in'the'no'avulsion'group' in' contrast' to' 3470gr' found' in' the' avulsion' group.' Our' data' shows' that' cases' with' avulsion' presented' an' enlarged' 2nd' stage' of' labor' (>110' minutes),' although,' no' significant'differences'have'been'able'to'establish'this'as'a'risk'factor'for'pubovisceral' muscle'lesions.'' Table( 3'contrasts' “avulsion' group”' versus' “no'avulsion' group”' according' to' the' urogenital'hiatus'area.'The'avulsion'group'showed'an'increased'urogenital'hiatus'area' and'anteroMposterior'and'lateroMlateral'distance'compared'to'the'no'avulsion'group.' Such'differences'emphasize'during'valsalva'or'maximal'pelvic'floor'contraction.'' ' Discussion( ( Avulsion' of' the' levator' ani' muscle' entails' several' future' dysfunctions' of' the' pelvic' floor' in' women.' 1,'13,'14' Nowadays,' no' screening' method' has' been' proved' to' predict' these'lesions.15'Knowledge'of'the'associated'risk'factors'could'help'to'prevent'LAM' injury.' Forceps' delivery' is' the' most' important' risk' factor' related' to' avulsion.' Using' transperineal' ultrasound,' injuries' have' been' demonstrated' in' 35M64%' of' these' cases8,16,'17,'18,'19.'' 'Among' other' risk' factors,' there' is' evidence' that' an' enlarged' second' stage' of' labor' over' 110' minutes' associates' an' OR' of' 2,27' for' LAM' injuries8,' 17,20.' Fetal' head' circumference' appears' to' be' an' independent' risk' factor.8,' 14' Circumferences' over' 35,5cm'reveals'OR'of'3,34'for'LAM'avulsions8.'Nevertheless,'other'authors'have'not' proved'such' association21.'According'to' our'results,'this' relationship'have' not'been' proven'either.'' Although'several'risk'factors'for'avulsion'have'been'described,'protective'factors,'as' epidural' anesthesia,' have' also' been' proposed17.' This' last' association' has' not' been' proven'by'our'results'either14.'' Other'factors,'such'as'maternal'age'and'body'mass'index'(BMI),'have'been'proposed' to'be'associated'with'LAM'injuries'although'there'is'not'enough'evidence'to'confirm' this.'Several'authors'have'established'that'advanced'maternal'age'is'associated'with' an'increased'risk'of'LAM'injuries'during'their'first'vaginal'delivery21,'24.'Other'authors' have' not' proved' such' relationship13,' 15,' 20.' In' contrast,' it' has' been' proposed' that' women' with' low' BMI' are' less' exposed' to' LAM' injuries,' although' this' has' not' been' proven8.'Our'results'were'not'able'to'demonstrate'these'associations.'' According' to' this' trial,' the' most' important' risk' factor' associated' with' avulsions,' during'vaginal'delivery,'is'estimated'fetal'weight14.'This'fact'does'not'agree'with'other' authors'who'reject'this'relationship13,'17,'25,'26.' Pubovisceral' muscle' injuries' showed' an' increased' urogenital' hiatus' area' at' rest,' valsalva'and'maximal'contraction.'The'increased'area'of'the'hiatus'has'been'described' previously'and'has'demonstrated'an'envidence'level'II14,'19,26M28.' Finally,' this' trial' determines' that' the' most' important' factor' associated' with' LAM' injuries'during'vaginal'delivery'is'the'estimated'fetal'weight'and,'in'case'of'avulsion,' hiatus'area'is'increased'at'rest,'valsalva'and'maximal'contraction.'' ' ' Bibliography( ' 1. Kearney R, Sawhney R, DeLancey JO. Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):168–73. 2. Halban J, Tandler J. Anatomie und aetiologie der genitalprolapse beim weibe. Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumuller; 1097. 3. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126(5): 568-573. 4. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(26):1905-11. 5. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak MM, Bogusiewicz M, Rechbereger T. High-resolution threedimensional endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J. 2009; 20:1213–22. 6. Lawson JO. Pelvic anatomy. I. Pelvic floor muscles. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.1974;54(5):244-52. 7. International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee. Nomina Anatomica. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins; 1983. 8. Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Thakar, Sultan AH, Tunn R. Obstetric levator ani muscle injuries: current status. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(4):372-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.11080. 9. Yavagal S, de Farias TF, Medina CA, Takacs P. Normal vulvovaginal, perineal, and pelvic anatomy with reconstructive considerations. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25(2):121-9. 10. Frudinger A, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Spencer JA, Kamm MA. Changes in anal anatomy following vaginal delivery revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 233–7. 11. Blasi I, Fuchs I, D´Amico R, Vinci V, La Sala GB, Mazza V, et al. Intrapartum translabial threedimensional ultrasound visualization of levator trauma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.2011; 37(1):88-92. 12. Sultan AH, Thakar R. Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 16:99-115. 13. Albrich S.B, Laterza R.M, Skala C, Salvatore S, Koelbl H, Naumann G. Impact of mode of delivery on levator morphology: a prospective observational study with three-dimensional ultrasound early in the postpartum period. BJOG. 2012; 119(1):51-60. 14. Falkert A, Endress E, Weigl M, Seelbach-Göbel B. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor 2 days after first delivery: influence of constitutional andobstetric factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(5):583-8. 15. Shek KL, Dietz HP. Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 586.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.038. 16. Dietz HP, Kirby A. Modelling the likelihood of levator avulsion in a urogynaecological population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50: 268–72. 17. Shek K, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma.. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1485–92. 18. Krofta L, Otcenasek M, Kasikova E, Feyereisl J. Pubococcygeus– puborectalis trauma after forceps delivery: evaluation of the levator ani muscle with 3D/4D ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20: 1175–81. 19. Shek K, Dietz H. The effect of childbirth on hiatal dimensions. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1272–8. 20. Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 91.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.028. 21. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 144–9. 22. Dietz HP, Simpson JM. Does delayed child-bearing increase the risk of levator injury in labour?. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 47: 491–5. 23. Ecker J, Chen K, Cohen A, Riley L, Lieberman E. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185:883-7. 24. Bell JS, Campbell DM, Graham WJ, Penney GC, Ryan M, Hall MH. Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. BJOG. 2001; 108:910–8. 25. Chan SS, Cheung RY, Tui AK, Lee LL, Pang AW, Choy KW, et al. Prevalence of levator ani muscle injury in Chinese women after first delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(6):704-9. 26. Cassadó J, Pessarradona A, Espuña M, Duran M, Felgueroso A, Rodriguez M, et al. Fourdimensional sonographic evaluation of avulsion of the levator ani according to delivery mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 701-6. 27. Cassadó J, Pessarrodona A, Espuña M, Durán M, Felgueroso A, et al. Tridimensional sonographic anatomical changes on pelvic floor muscle according to the type of delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(8):1011-8. 28. Memon H, Blomquist JL, Dietz HP, Pierce CB, Weinstein MM, Handa V. Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps and vacuum assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2015; accepted. ( ( ( ( ( Table(1.'Obstetric'data.' ' ! Mean((±(TD)(o(%! P! ! No(Avulsion( (n=62)! Avulsion( (n=9)! Maternal'mean'age! 28.15'(±5.56)! 28.33'(±5.52)! NS! Gestational'age! 39.24'(±1.04)! 38.44'(±1.51)! NS! BMI! 23.27'(±3.26)! 23.58'(±3.81)! NS! Weight'gain'during'pregnancy'! 11.95'(±4.68)! 12.83'(±4.54)! NS! Induced'labor! 10'(16.1%)! 0'(0%)! NS! No'statistical'significance'(NS).'Statistical'significance'(*)' ' ' Table(2.'Data'related'to'delivery'according'to'Avulsion.'' ' ! Mean((±TD)(o(%! p! ! Without( Avulsion( (n=62)! (((((((Avulsion( (n=9)! Epidural'analgesia! 54'(87.1%)! 6'(66.7%)! NS! Time'of'epidural'anesthesia' (minutes)! 341.74' (±153.97)! 435.83' (±199.58)! NS! Length'2nd'stage'of'labor' (minutes)! 92.18'(±65.39)! 121.67' (±64.66)! NS! Episiotomy! 23'(37.1%)! 3'(33.3%)! NS! Perineal'tears'(PT)! 30'(48.4%)! 7'(77.8%)! NS! '''''PT'I'grade! 14'(46.7%)! 3'(42.9%)! NS! '''''PT'II'grade! 13'(43.3%)! 3'(42.9%)! NS! '''''PT'III'grade! 3'(10%)! 1'(14.3%)! NS! Head'Circumference'(cm)! 34.29(±1.31)! 34.33(±1.03)! NS! Neonatal'weight'(g)! 3193.47' (±343.62)! 3470.56' (±289.82)! 0.025*! No'statistical'significance'(NS).'Statistical'significance'(*)' Table 3. Urogenital hiatus area according to avulsion. ! Mean((±TD)(! p! ! Without( Avulsion( (n=62)! (((((((Avulsion( (n=9)! Urogenital(hiatus(area((cm2)( ! Rest! 16.24'(±2.93)! 18.23'(±4.24)! NS! Valsalva! 18.51'(±3.94)! 23.16'(±5.24)! 0.002*! Maximum'contraction! 15.47'(±3.08)! 19.05'(±4.62)! 0.003*! No'statistical'significance'(NS).'Statistical'significance'(*)' ' Image 1: LAM'injuries'identified'in'the'three'central'slices'of'multislice'ultrasound' study.' '