scieee Open visual document viewer

Heterorhabditis, Steinernema and their bacterial symbionts - lethal pathogens of insects

Burnell, Ann,Stock, S. Patricia

Abstract

The entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) Heterorhabditis and Steinernema together with their symbiont bacteria Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus, respectively, are obligate and lethal parasites of insects. EPN can provide effective biological control of some important lepidopteran, dipteran and coleopteran pests of commercial crops and they are amenable to large-scale culture in liquid fermentors. They are unique among rhabditids in having a symbiotic relationshipwith an enteric bacterium species. The bacterial symbiont is required to kill the insect host and to digest the host tissues, thereby providing suitable nutrient conditions for nematode growth and development. This review describes the general biology of EPN and their symbionts and gives an overview of studies to date on EPN biodiversity, biogeography and phylogeny. The impetus for research in EPN and their symbionts has come about because of their biological control potential, with much of the focus in EPN research having been on applied aspects relating to pest control. However EPN and their symbionts are increasinglybeing viewed as exciting subjects for basic research in the areas of ecology, biodiversity, evolution, biochemistry, symbiosis and molecular genetics. Much progress has been made over the past 20 years in our understanding of the basic biology and genetics of EPN and their symbionts. We are now entering a new phase in which the tools of molecular genetics are being increasingly used to address a range of biological questions in EPN research. The knowledge gained from this endeavour should ensure that EPN will become even more effective biopesticides and should also ensure that EPN and their symbionts gain prominence as unique and intrinsically interesting biological systems.

Full text

Nema ology, 2000, Vol. 2(1), 31-42 Symposium He e o habdi is,S eine nema and hei bac e ial symbion s — le hal pa hogens o insec s Ann M. BURNELL 1,*and S. Pa icia STOCK 2 1Depa men o Biology, Na ional Uni e si y o I eland Maynoo h, Maynoo h, Co. Kilda e, I eland 2Depa men o Nema ology, Uni e si y o Cali o nia Da is, CA 95616-8668,USA P esen ed a he symposium ‘Biodi e si y in he phylum Nema oda’, Gen , Belgium, 17 Sep embe 1999 Summa y – The en omopa hogenic nema odes (EPN) He e o habdi is and S eine nema oge he wi h hei symbion bac e ia Pho o habdus and Xeno habdus, espec i ely,a e obliga e and le hal pa asi es o insec s. EPN can p o ide e ec i e biological con ol o some impo an lepidop e an, dip e an and coleop e an pes s o comme cial c ops and hey a e amenable o la ge-scale cul u e in liquid e men o s.They a e unique among habdi idsin ha ing a symbio ic ela ionshipwi h an en e ic bac e ium species. The bac e ial symbion is equi ed o kill he insec hos and o diges he hos issues, he eby p o iding sui able nu ien condi ions o nema ode g ow h and de elopmen . This e iew desc ibes he gene al biology o EPN and hei symbion s and gi es an o e iew o s udies o da e on EPN biodi e si y, biogeog aphy and phylogeny. The impe us o esea ch in EPN and hei symbion s has come abou because o hei biological con ol po en ial, wi h much o he ocus in EPN esea ch ha ing been on applied aspec s ela ing o pes con ol.Howe e EPN and hei symbion s a e inc easinglybeing iewed as exci ing subjec s o basic esea ch in he a eas o ecology, biodi e si y, e olu ion, biochemis y, symbiosis and molecula gene ics. Much p og ess has been made o e he pas 20 yea s in ou unde s anding o he basic biology and gene ics o EPN and hei symbion s. We a e now en e ing a new phase in which he ools o molecula gene ics a e being inc easingly used o add ess a ange o biological ques ions in EPN esea ch. The knowledge gained om his endea ou should ensu e ha EPN will become e en mo e e ec i e biopes icidesand should also ensu e ha EPN and hei symbion s gain p ominence as unique and in insicallyin e es ingbiological sys ems. Résumé – He e o habdi is, S eine nema e leu s symbio es bac é iens — Pa hogènes mo els des insec es –Les néma odes en o- mopa hogènes (EPN) He e o habdi is e S eine nema, a ec leu bac é ies symbio es Pho o habdus e Xeno habdus, espec i emen , son des pa asi es obligés e mo els des insec es. Les EPN peu en se i à un con ôle biologique de quelques lépidop è es, dip è es e coléop è es impo an s pou les cul u es comme ciales e ils son éle ables à g ande échelle dans des e men eu s liquides. Ils son uniques chez les habdi ides pa leu ela ion symbio ique a ec une espèce de bac é ie en é ique. La bac é ie symbio e es nécessai e pou ue l’insec e hô e e pou digé e les issus de l’hô e, pe me an ainsi des condi ons de nu i ion a o ables à la c oissance e au dé eloppemen du néma ode. La p ésen e e ue déc i la biologie géné ale des EPN e de leu symbio es e donne un é a des é udes ac uelles su la biodi e si é, la biogéog aphie e la phylogénie des EPN. L’impulsion donnée aux eche ches su les EPN e leu sym- bio es p o ien de leu po en iali és pou le con ôle biologique, une g ande pa ie des eche ches su les EPN ayan ai à des aspec s appliqués en ela ion a ec ce con ôle des pa asi es. Cependan , les EPN e leu symbio es bac é iens son de plus en plus considé és comme des suje s in é essan s pou la eche che ondamen ale dans les domaines de l’écologie, de la biodi e si é, de l’é olu ion, de la biochimie, des p ocessus symbio iques e de la géné ique moléculai e. De nomb eux p og ès on é é éalisés ces 20 de niè es années dans la comp éhension de la biologie e de la géné ique des EPN e de leu symbio es. Nous en ons ac uellemen dans une nou elle phase oùles moyens de la biologie moléculai e son u ilisés de maniè e c oissan e pou o mule une sé ie de ques ions biologiques pou la eche che su les EPN. Les connaissances ésul an de ces e o s doi en condui e à é i e que les EPN de iend on des biopes icides oujou s plus e  caces e que les EPN e leu symbio es p end on de l’impo ance en an que sys èmes biologiques uniques e in insèquemen in é essan s. Keywo ds – biogeog aphy,en omopa hogenic nema ode, habi a p e e ence,Pho o habdus, phylogeny, symbiosis, Xeno habdus. The e a e many gene a o nema odes ha pa asi ise in- sec s ( e iewed by Poina , 1979), howe e esea ch on in- *Co espondingau ho , e-mail: ann.bu [email protected] sec pa asi ic nema odes is la gely concen a eda p esen on wo amilies o habdi id nema odes: he S eine ne- c ®Koninklijke B ill NV, Leiden, 2000 31 Symposium ma idaeChi wood& Chi wood,1937 and he He e o hab- di idae Poina , 1976. These soil-dwelling nema odes a e obliga e and le hal pa asi es o insec s and a e usually e e ed o as en omopa hogenic nema odes (EPN). EPN can p o idee ec i ebiologicalcon olo some impo an lepidop e an, dip e an and coleop e an pes s o comme - cial c ops and hey a e amenable o la ge-scale cul u e in liquid e men o s. EPN a e unique among habdi ids in ha ing a symbio ic ela ionshipwi h an en e ic bac e ium species. The bac e ial symbion is equi ed o kill he in- sec hos and o diges he hos issues, he eby p o iding sui able nu ien condi ions o nema ode g ow h and de- elopmen .He e o habdi isand S eine nemaspeciesha e a global dis ibu ion( e iewed by Hominick e al., 1996). Species in hese gene a exhibi di e ences in hos ange, in ec i i y,en i onmen al ole ances and in sui abili y o comme cialp oduc ionand o mula ionand his has s im- ula ed many su eys, seeking new s ains and species o EPN o biocon ol applica ions. Thus he numbe o e- sea ch publica ions on his g oup o nema odes has in- c eased d ama ically in ecen yea s and a la ge numbe o labo a o ies wo ld-wide a e cu en ly engaged in EPN esea ch. Gene al biology and li e cycle The hi d s age daue ju enile (DJ) occu s ee in he soil and i s ole is o seek ou and in ec an insec la a. S eine nema gainsen y o he insec la a h oughna u al openings(mou h, anus and spi acles). In addi ion o hese modes o en y, He e o habdi isalso gainsen y by ab ad- ing he in e segmen al memb anes o he insec using a do sal oo h. Once in he haemocoel o he insec he DJ eleases cells o a symbion bac e ium ha i ca ies in i s in es ine. The insec haemolymph p o ides ich medium o he bac e ial cells and hese begin o g ow, elease ox- ins and exoenzymes and kill he insec . The insec dies apidly, usually wi hin 24-48 h. The nema odes esume de elopmen , moul o he J4 s age and each adul hood wi hin 2 (S. ca pocapsae) o 3 (H. bac e iopho a) days when cul u ed in i o in la ae o he g ea e wax mo h Galle ia mellonella a 23°C (Wang & Bedding, 1996). Nema ode ep oduc ioncon inueso e wo o h eegene - a ions un il he nu ien s a us o he cada e de e io a es whe eupon adul de elopmen is supp essed and DJ ac- cumula e. These non- eedingin ec i e s ages eme ge in o he soil whe e hey may su i e o se e al mon hs in he absence o a sui able hos . In S eine nema ep oduc ionis amphimic ic.S eine ne- ma id DJ ma u e o become ei he a male o a emale and sex de e mina ion appea s o be o he XX/XO ype, ypical o nema odes (Dix e al., 1994). In He e o hab- di is by con as , he DJ ma u e o gi e  s gene a ion he maph odi e emales, bu hese emales gi e ise o a second gene a ion o amphimic ic males and emales and o sel e ile he maph odi e emales and DJ (Dix e al., 1992; S auch e al., 1994). The male and emale ka y- o ypes o He e o habdi is ha e no ye been de e mined, bu a ailable da a indica e ha sexual pheno ype is en i- onmen ally de e mined. Wang and Bedding (1996) s ud- ied he dynamics o popula ionde elopmen o H. bac e- iopho a and S. ca pocapsae in la ae o G. mellonella, a e injec ionin o he insec haemocoel o one o wo DJ, espec i ely. Unde hese condi ions h ee adul gene a- ions we e p oduced by bo h nema ode species (Fig. 1). Indi idual H. bac e iopho a he maph odi es laid up o 1000 eggs which de elopedin o second gene a ion males and emales, bu he  s gene a ion he maph odi es also e ained abou 500 eggs which de eloped in o DJ ia en- do okia ma icida. Second gene a ion emales also laid ca six o en eggs which de eloped in o ano he gene - a ion o adul s, bu hey also e ained ano he 30 eggs wi hin he nema ode body which de eloped in o DJ ia endo okiama icida. The hi d gene a ion emales did no o iposi and all o hei eggs (ca 50 pe emale) de eloped ia endo okiama icida in o DJ. Fi s and second gene a- ion S. ca pocapsae we e ound o lay a la ge p opo ion o hei eggs han do H. bac e iopho a, bu all he eggs p oduced by hi d gene a ion emales de eloped ia en- do okia ma icida. Unlike H. bac e iopho a, he ju enile s ages esul ing om endo okia ma icida in S. ca pocap- sae did no de elopin o daue ju enilesun il hey had ex- i ed om he body o he mo he nema ode. In a ou able nu i i e condi ionsin liquid cul u e sec- ondgene a ionHe e o habdi isDJ eco e and de elop o he maph odi es (S auch e al., 1994; Johnigk & Ehle s, 1999). S auch e al. (1994) ha e also shown ha when J1 ju enileswe e s a ed o 24 h in Ringe solu ion40% be- came he maph odi es, 6.6% became amphimic ic adul s and 53% became DJ. O he J1 ha de eloped in o he - maph odi es 90% had gone h ough a p e-daue J2 s age, which was mo phologically dis inc om hose J2 g ow- ing in o amphimic ic adul s, and 10% we e eco e ed DJ. These da a clea ly show he impo ance o nu i ionalsig- nals in He e o habdi is sex de e mina ion. The ex en o which second gene a ion DJ eco e in i o and esume de elopmen has no been de e mined, no has he p o- 32 Nema ology Symposium Fig. 1. Popula ion dynamics o A: He e o habdi isbac e iopho aand B: S eine nema ca pocapsaeA24 in a la a o Galle ia mellonella a e injec ing one o wo DJ pe insec espec i ely. The pie cha s ep esen he numbe o DJ p ogeny ec ui ed om each gene a ion. ( ): DJ p ogeny ec ui ed om  s gene a ion emales; ( ): DJ p ogeny ec ui ed om second gene a ion emales; ( ): DJ p ogeny ec ui ed om hi d gene a ion emales ( om Wang & Bedding, 1996). po ion o second gene a ion ju eniles which en e he J2 s age; howe e Dix e al. (1992) ha e shown ha he ea ly second gene a ion adul s which de elop in G. mellonella a e all amphimic ic. The symbio ic associa ion Rhabdi id pa asi es o bo h e eb a es and in e e- b a es a e conside ed o ha e e ol ed om ee li ingbac- e ial eeding nema odes(Adamson, 1986). Some habdi- id nema odes ha e an associa ion wi h soil in e eb a es o which Sudhaus and Schul e (1988) ha e in oduced he e m nec omency. The DJ o nec omenic nema odes en e hei hos by he body openings o a e inges ed by he hos . The DJ emain quiescen in he hos un il i e en- ually dies and i s body becomes in aded by sap ophy ic bac e ia. Then he nema ode DJ esumes de elopmen and g ow h and ep oduc ion occu s based on he bac e- ia associa ed wi h he decaying cada e . Sudhaus (1993) has sugges ed ha He e o habdi isand S eine nema mos p obably e ol ed om nec omenic nema odes which de- eloped a symbio ic associa ion wi h an en omopa ho- genic bac e ium. Such a symbiosis specialised o pa a- si isinganimalshas no been desc ibedso a o any o he g oup o nema odes. Howe e he nu i ional in e ac ions be ween EPN and hei symbion bac e ia bea many simi- la i ies o he ec osymbiosesbe ween insec s and  lamen- ous ungi (Wilkinson & Hay, 1997). Symbion s associ- a ed wi h S eine nema a e placed in he genus Xeno hab- dus (Thomas & Poina , 1979) while he bioluminescen symbion s associa ed wi h He e o habdi is a e placed in he genus Pho o habdus (Boema e e al., 1993). Sym- bion bac e ia o bo h gene a a e mo ile and g am-nega i e and belong o he En e obac e iaceae. Compa isons o 16S DNA sequences show ha species o Pho o habdus and Xeno habdus o m a phylogene icallycohe en clus- e ha di e ged ea ly om he main line o adia ion o he En e obac e iaceae(Fo s e al., 1997). When symbion bac e ia a e eleased by he nema ode in o he insec haemolymph he bac e ial cells begin o Vol. 2(1), 2000 33 Symposium g ow and dea h o he insec ensues, ei he om oxaemia o om sep icemia, depending on he sensi i i y o he insec and he symbion s ain (Fo s e al., 1997; Boe- ma e & Gi audan, 1998). Some s ains o Xeno habdus and Pho o habdus a e highly i ulen : injec ion o less han en cells o he bac e ium in o he haemocoel may be su  cien o kill a suscep ible insec such as G. mel- lonella o Manduca sex a (Poina & Thomas, 1967; Fo s e al., 1997, ench-Cons an & Bowen,1999).When cul- u ed in liquid medium, bo h gene a o symbion bac e ia sec e e highly i ulen insec icidal oxinsin o he medium (Ja e e al., 1997; Bowen e al., 1998). As he bac e ia en e he s a iona y phase o hei g ow h cycle hey se- c e e lipase(s), p o ease(s) and se e al b oad spec um an- ibac e ialand an i ungalan ibio ics( e iewed by Akhu s & Boema e, 1990; Fo s & Nealson, 1996). The likely ole o he deg ada i e enzymes is o b eak down he in- sec issues he eby p o iding a ich ood supply o he de eloping nema ode. The insec cada e con aining he apidly expanding popula ion o nema odes and bac e ia e ains i s shape and does no pu e y, implying a ole o he an ibio ics p oduced by symbion bac e ia. Howe e , Ja oz (1996) ound ela i ely low le els o an ibio ics in cada e s o G. mellonella in ec ed wi h S. ca pocapsae and he pos ula ed ha he lack o con amina iono insec cada e s esul ed om he abili yo he symbion bac e ia o ou -compe e many o he no mal gu mic o o a o he insec hos . Since he majo i y o EPN bac e ial complexes a e e - ec i e o e a wide ange o insec o de s and he ype o humo al and cellula de ence eac ions o he hos s a ies signi can ly o e ha ange (Akhu s , 1993), i is likely ha bo h he nema odes and he bac e ia u ilise a a ie y o pa hogenic s a egies. Al hough nema ode i - ulence s a egies ha e ecei ed less a en ion han hose o he bac e ium, i is known ha DJ o S. ca pocapsae and H. bac e iopho a elease p o ease sec e ions which des oy he an ibac e ial ac o s o accina ed G. mel- lonella la ae (Gö z e al., 1980; Simoes, 1998). The im- po ance o he symbio ic in e ac ion in he pa hogenesis p ocess is clea ly seen in he S. glase i/X. poina ii com- plex. When G. mellonella la ae we e injec ed wi h ei- he axenic S. glase i o wi h 1150 cells o X. poina ii, he insec la ae su i ed. Howe e co-injec ion o 115 X. poina ii cells and one S. glase i DJ killed 75% o he insec la ae (Akhu s , 1986). Bo h Xeno habdusandPho o habdusoccu in wo phe- no ypic o ms. Phase I cells a e la ge han phase II cells and p oducesigni can lyg ea e amoun so exoenzymes, oxins,an ibio ics han phase II o ms. Howe e he nema- ode DJ package and anspo only phase I cells. Phase I cells a e s o ed in a special esicle in he an e io o he in es ine in s eine nema ids(Bi d & Akhu s , 1983) while He e o habdi isdoes no ha e a special esicle bu s o es he cells o he symbion in he an e io o he in es ine (Endo & Nickle, 1991). The ole o phase II cells in he symbio ic associa ion is s ill unclea , as a e he molecula mechanisms esponsible o his phenomenon. The e a e no epo s o he isola ion o Xeno habdus and Pho o habdus om soil and i has been gene ally as- sumed ha hese bac e ia canno exis in he soil en i on- men in he absence o hei nema ode associa es. Mo gan e al. (1997) eleased gene icallyma ked s ains o X. ne- ma ophila and P. luminescens in o non-s e ile soil mic o- cosms and hey ound ha he eleased cells declined o below de ec ion limi s wi hin se en days. Al hough i- able colony o ming uni s could no be de ec ed a e 7 days, measu emen o adenosine iphospha e (ATP) le - els sugges ed ha he cells may ha e en e ed in o a do - man , non-cul u ablebu iable phase. Bleakley and Chen (1999) epo ed ha P. luminescens was able o su i e and g ow o e a 30 day pe iod when inocula ed in o s e - ilised soil o which nu ien amendmen s had been added. Taxonomic s a us The amily S eine nema idae Chi wood & Chi wood, 1937 is cu en ly composed o wo gene a: S eine nema T a assos, 1927 and Neos eine nema Nguyen & Sma , 1994.The o me genus wi h 25 species desc ibed and he la e wi h only one species: N. longicu icauda(Table 1). The amily He e o habdi idaePoina , comp ises only one genus, He e o habdi is Poina , 1976 wi h H. bac e io- pho aas he ypespeciesand eigh o he speciesdesc ibed (Table 2): howe e , he axonomics a us o some o hese species has been ques ioned (Adams e al., 1998). EPN species ha e mainly been desc ibed using he Lin- nean and biological species concep s and mo phologi- cal/mo phome ic c i e ia and c oss-b eeding es s ha e been he mos equen lyused ools o hei iden ica ion (Poina , 1990; Dix e al., 1994; Nguyen & Sma , 1996; Kaya & S ock, 1997). Addi ionally, a numbe o molec- ula echniques, including isoenzyme pa e ns (Akhu s , 1987), o al p o ein pa e ns (Poina & Kozodoi, 1988; Joyce e al., 1994a), RFLP analysis (Cu an & Web- s e , 1989; Reid & Hominick, 1993; Joyce e al., 1994b), RAPDs (Ga dne e al., 1994; Liu & Be y, 1995), sa el- li e DNA (G enie e al., 1996), genomic DNA sequenc- 34 Nema ology Symposium Table 1. The gene a and species o he amily S eine nema idae. Family S eine nema idaeChi wood & Chi wood, 1937 = Neoaplec anidaeSbole , 1953 Type genus: S eine nema T a assos, 1927 Type species: S eine nema k aussei (S eine , 1923) T a assos, 1927 O he species: S. abbasi Elawad, Ahmad & Reid, 1997 S. a ena ium (A yukho sky,1967) Wou s, M áÏcek, Ge din & Bedding, 1982 S. a  ne (Bo ien, 1937) Wou s, M áÏcek, Ge din & Bedding, 1982 S. bico nu um Tallosi, Pe e s & Ehle s, 1995 S. ca pocapsae (Weise , 1955) Wou s, M áÏcek, Ge din & Bedding, 1982 S. cauda um Xu, Wang & Li, 1991 S. ce a opho um Jian, Reid and Hun , 1997 S. cubanum M áÏcek, He nandez & Boema e, 1994 S. el iae (Filipje , 1934) Wou s, M áÏcek, Ge din & Bedding, 1982 S. glase i (S eine , 1929) Wou s, M áÏcek, Ge din & Bedding, 1982 S. in e medium (Poina , 1985) Mamiya, 1988 S. ka ii Wa u u, Hun & Reid, 1997 S. kushidai Mamiya, 1988 S. longicaudum Shen & Wang, 1992 S. mon icolum S ock, Choo & Kaya, 1997 S. neocu illae Nguyen & Sma , 1992 S. o egonense Liu & Be y, 1996 S. pue o icense Roman & Figue oa, 1994 S. a um (Douce , 1986) Mamiya, 1988 S. iob a e Cabanillas, Poina & Rauls on, 1994 S. i e i de Douce & Douce , 1992 S. scap e isci Nguyen & Sma , 1992 S. siamkayai S ock, Somsook & Kaya, 1998 Genus: Neos eine nema Nguyen & Sma , 1994 Type and only species: Neos eine nema longicu icauda Nguyen & Sma , 1994 ing (Liu e al., 1997;Adams e al., 1998), ha e been used, no only as diagnos ic ools, bu also o s udy phylogene ic a  ni ies among EPN. Recen ly, Adams (1998) p oposed ha he mos sui able species concep o use in nema ol- ogy is an amalgama ion o he phylogene ic and he e o- lu iona y species concep s. Using He e o habdi is axa as an example, he delimi ed species o his genus based on his e olu ion-basedapp oach. Table 2. The gene a and species o he amily He e o habdi ae. Family He e o habdi idaePoina , 1976 Type and only genus: He e o habdi isPoina , 1976 Genus He e o habdi isPoina , 1976 =Ch omonema Khan, B ooks & Hi schman, 1976 Type species: He e o habdi isbac e iopho a Poina , 1976 =Ch omonema helio hidis Khan, B ooks & Hi schman, 1976 =H. helio hidis (Khan, B ooks & Hi schman, 1976) Poina , Thomas & Hess, 1977 O he species: H. a gen inensisS ock, 1993 H. b e icaudis Liu, 1994 H. hawaiiensis Ga dne , S ock & Kaya, 1994 H. indica Poina , Ka unaka & Da id, 1992 H. ma ela us Liu & Be y, 1996 =H. hepialius S ock, S ong & Ga dne , 1996 H. megidis Poina , Jackson & Klein, 1988 H. poina i Kakulia & Mikaia, 1997 H. zealandica Poina , 1990 EPN biodi e si y and biogeog aphy Hominick e al. (1996) p o ided a lis wi h he ge- og aphic dis ibu ion o desc ibed EPN species a bo h con inen aland na ionalle el. S eine nema idsha e been eco ded om all con inen s excep An a c ica (G i  n e al., 1990). Wi hin he genus S eine nema wo species, S eine nema ca pocapsae and S eine nema el iae, ap- pea o ha e a global dis ibu ion(Hominick e al., 1996). The o he S eine nema species seem o ha e a mo e es ic ed geog aphic dis ibu ion and hei occu ence has been eco ded only a he con inen al o na ional le el (Hominick e al., 1996). Howe e , as mo e su - eys a e pe o med, he known ange o many species is expec ed o expand. Fo ins ance, S eine nema k aus- sei o iginally isola ed in he Geggen Moun ains, Wes - phalia, Ge many (S eine , 1923) has subsequen ly been isola ed om o he loca ions in Ge many (M áÏcek e al., 1992; M áÏcek, 1994), and also om o he Eu o- pean coun ies, such as he Czech Republic, (M áÏcek, 1977), he Ne he lands (Hominick e al., 1995), Swi ze - land (S eine , 1994), he Uni ed Kingdom (Hominick e al., 1995), and Spain (Ga cia del Pino & Palomo, 1996), sugges ing his species has a Palea c ic dis ibu ion.How- e e , he known geog aphic ange o his species has e- cen ly been expanded o include No h Ame ica (S ock e al., 1999b) hus indica ing a Hola c ic dis ibu ion. Sim- ila ly, S. longicaudum, o iginally isola ed in China, has Vol. 2(1), 2000 35 Symposium ecen ly been eco e ed in Ko ea and Wes e n USA, indi- ca ing a wide geog aphic ange o his species (S ock e al., unpubl.). The si ua ion is somewha di e en o he e o habdi- ids, pa icula ly because ewe species ha e been de- sc ibed. Fo ins ance, H. bac e iopho a is cu en ly he wides geog aphically dis ibu ed he e o habdi id, ound in all Ame icas, Sou he n and Cen al Eu ope, Aus alia and Eas Asia (China, Japan, Ko ea). H. indica also has a wide dis ibu ion,occu ing in he opics and sub opics, ound in sou he n India, S i Lanka, peninsula Malaysia, Indonesia, No h Aus alia, he Ca ibbean egion, Egyp , Kenya and in sub opical and wa m empe a e zones in Japan. In con as ,H. zealandica, and H. ma ela us appea o be species wi h a mo e es ic ed geog aphic dis ibu- ion ha ing been ound only, espec i ely,in New Zealand (Akhu s , 1987) and in O egon and Cali o nia, USA (Liu & Be y, 1996a; S ock e al., 1997). The summa y p e- sen ed in Tables 1 and 2 indica es ha he di e si y o s eine nema ids is g ea e han ha o he e o habdi ids. This is also e ec ed in he DNA ela edness s udies dis- cussed in he nex sec ion. Al hough a numbe o su eys ha e documen ed habi- a p e e ence o EPN, he e a e a p esen insu  cien and con adic o yda a o es o co ela ions(Hominicke al., 1996).Howe e , se e al au ho s (S eine , 1994;Hominick e al.,1995; S ock e al., 1999; S u han, 1999) ha e ob- se ed ha some S eine nema species a e associa ed wi h speci c habi a ypes. Fo example, S. el iae,S. a  ne and S. in e medium ha e been ound mainly in g assland ecosys ems (Boag e al., 1992; Hominick e al., 1995; S ock e al., 1999). O he S eine nema species, by con- as , seem o ha e a wide habi a ange. Fo ins ance, S. k aussei has been ound in coni e ous and deciduous o es s (M áÏcek e al., 1999; S eine , 1994; S ock e al., 2000) and also in g asslands (S u han, 1999). These habi- a p e e ences may e ec no only he dis ibu ion o sui able insec hos s, bu also physiological and beha - iou al needs ha equi e speci c niches(Kaya & Gaugle , 1993;Hominick e al., 1996). Wi h espec o He e o habdi idae,in o ma ionon habi- a speci ci y widely indica es ha some species o his amily a e p e alen in coas al sandy soils (G i  n e al., 1994; Yoshida e al., 1998; S ock e al., 1999). Howe e , o he su eys ha e indica ed ha H. bac e iopho acan be ound and is widely dis ibu ed in u and weedy habi- a s (S ua & Gaugle , 1994, S ock e al., 1996). Addi- ionally, G i  n e al. (1999) ound ha he I ish ype o He e o habdi is, which is es ic ed o he coas al egions o I eland and B i ain, also occu s in g asslandso Cen al and No he n Eu ope. In all hese co ela ions and associa ions wi h habi a , i is impo an o bea in mind ha ac o s such as sam- pling size, seasonali y and spa ial dis ibu ion should be aken in o accoun when eco ding and in e p e ing da a. Ano he c i ical aspec ha needs o be ca e ully consid- e ed is he co ec iden ica ion o he isola es which may equi e he combina ion o di e en me hods (mo phol- ogy, c oss-hyb idisa ion, molecula echniques) o a oid e oneousassump ions.Res ic ion diges iono DNA am- pli ed by he polyme ase chain eac ion (PCR) om he DNA ITS space egion is a e y con enien and eliable means o so ing new uniden ied isola es in o species g oups. This echnique is no di  cul o se up in an ecol- ogy labo a o y and diagnos ic es ic ion p o les o se - e al He e o habdi is and S eine nema species ha e been published (Joyce e al., 1994b; Reid e al., 1997). Su  - cien ma e ial o PCR ampli ca ion can be ob ained om a single in ec i e ju enileo youngadul and i is no nec- essa y o ca y ou a DNA ex ac ion. A clea and com- p ehensi e desc ip ion o he p o ocols o he molecula cha ac e isa ion o EPN ia RFLP analysis o he DNA ITS egion is gi en in Hominick e al. (1997). P o ocols o de e mining biological species by c oss-b eeding a e gi en in Poina (1967) and Akhu s and Bedding (1978) o S eine nema spp. and in Dix e al. (1992) o He - e o habdi isspp. Fi e species o Xeno habdusha e been desc ibed (see Table 3). Th ee o hese bac e ial species a e associa ed wi h a single species o S eine nema bu X. bo ienii is as- socia ed wi h ou (Akhu s & Boema e, 1988; Fische - Le Saux e al., 1999a) and X. poina ii wi h wo nema- ode species (Fische -Le Saux e al., 1999a). The genus Pho o habdus consis s mos ly o he bac e ial symbion s o He e o habdi is as well as some non-symbio ic clin- ical isola es om human wounds (Fa me e al., 1989). Sequence analysis o he 16S DNA gene o 40 s ains o P. luminescens including ou clinical samples, indi- ca ed ha P. luminescens was a he e ogeneousg oup and also showed ha he clinical samples o med a closely ela ed sub-clus e (Szallas e al., 1997). Fishe -Le Saux e al. (1999b) ha e ecen ly e ised he axonomy o he genus Pho o habdus and p oposed he c ea ion o wo new species, P. empe a a and P. asymbio ica, and, u he , ha P. luminescens be di ided in o h ee subspecies. An in e es ing ques ion ye o be add essed is he equency o co-specia ion be ween he nema ode hos s and hei 36 Nema ology Symposium Table 3. Desc ibed species o bac e ial symbion s o en o- mopha hogenic nema odes. Genus: Xeno habdus Thomas & Poina , 1979 Type species: Xeno habdus nema ophila (Thomas & Poina , 1979) Akhu s & Boema e, 1988 O he species: X. piona ii Akhu s & Boema e, 1988 X. bo ienii Akhu s & Boema e, 1988 X. beddingii Akhu s & Boema e, 1988 X. japonica Nishimu a, Hagiwa a, Suzuki & Yamanaka, 1994 Genus: Pho o habdus Boema e, Akhu s & Mou an , 1993 Type species: Pho o habdus luminescens (Thomas and Poina , 1979) Boema e, Akhu s & Mou an , 1993 P. luminescens luminescens Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 P. luminescens akhu s ii Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 P. luminescens laumondii Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 P. empe a a empe a a Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 O he species: P. empe a a Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 P. asymbio ica Fische -Le Saux, Vialla d, B unel, No mand & Boema e, 1999 symbion bac e ia and he ex en o ho izon al and e ical ans e o he symbion among he nema ode lineages. Phylogene ic s udies o EPN The e olu iona y ela ionships o EPN we e ou lined o he  s ime by Poina (1981) in his book The na - u al his o y o nema odes, whe e he specula ed ha S ein- e nema idae and He e o habdi idae a ose as wo sepa a e lineages, a oughly he same ime in he mid-Palaeozoic, some 375 million yea s ago. He also indica ed ha simi- la i ies in hei mo phology,li e cycles and bac e ial sym- biosis can be a ibu ed o con e gen e olu ion. Sudhaus (1993) also concluded ha he simila i ies be ween He - e o habdi isandS eine nemaa e basedon symplesiomo - phic cha ac e s and con e gence.Poina (1993) sugges ed po en ial ances o s o bo h amilies based on a li e a- u e compila iono mo phological,biological,physiolog- ical and dis ibu ionale idence.Examiningsimila i ies o he buccal capsule and male ail mo phology,Poina sug- ges ed ha he e o habdi ids e ol ed om a ‘Pelliodi is- like ances o ’ in an a enicolous ma ine en i onmen , and ha s eine nema idse ol ed om a ‘p o o-Rhabdi onema ances o ’ in a e es ial en i onmen . Se e al app oaches, bo h om he molecula and mo - phologicalpe spec i es, ha e been used o s udy he e o- lu iona y ela ionships o EPN. Reid (1994) and Reid e al. (1997) s udied phylogene ic ela ionships o S ein- e nema idaeand He e o habdi idaebased on RFLP analy- sis o he DNA epea uni . Fo his s udy, 26 isola es ep esen ing 11 S eine nema and h ee He e o habdi is species we e conside ed. Addi ionally, wo habdi oids, Caeno habdi iselegansand Phasma habdi issp. we e in- cluded o ou g oup compa isons. The ela ionships be- ween S eine nemaspecies de e minedby es ic ionmap- ping, mi o ed (in gene al e ms) hose o he mo pholog- ical da a. Fo example, S. a ena ium and S. glase i, wo mo phologically and biologically simila species, we e clus e ed oge he . This analysis also showed a close ela- ionshipbe ween S. ca pocapsaeand S. scap e isci, which was o iginally e e ed o as he U uguay s ain o S. ca - pocapsae (Nguyen & Sma , 1988). Reid e al. (1994) also showed ha membe s o he amily He e o habdi i- dae we e mo e closely ela ed o one ano he han was he case wi h membe s o he S eine nema idae, he la e g oup being much mo e he e ogeneous. This s udy also showed ha he he e o habdi id and s eine nema id gen- e a in es iga ed we e mo e closely ela ed o each o he han o he wo o he habdi oidsused o ou g oup com- pa isons. O he app oachesha eincludedei he combinedanaly- ses o mo phologicaland RAPD agmen s (Liu & Be y, 1996b),o nucleo idesequence analyses o a ious DNA egions such as he 18S DNA sequences (Liu e al., 1997), he ITS-1 space egion (Adams e al., 1998) and also he ND4 sequenceso mi ochond ialDNA (Liu e al., 1999). Liu e al. (1997) in e ed phylogene ic ela ion- ships among bo h amilies o EPN using sequence da a om pa o he 18S DNA gene. Se en een isola es o EPN (12 desc ibed and  e undesc ibed species) and six Rhabdi idae axa ha includedRhabdi ellaaxei,Rhabdi is spp. and ou Caeno habdi isspecies. As in Reid’s (1994) s udy, Liu e al. (1997) also ound ha s eine nema ids had mo e sequencedi e gence han he e o habdi ids.This obse a ion ag eed wi h he documen ed mo phological, biological and dis ibu ional e idence. Al hough he e- la ionships o se e al S eine nema and He e o habdi is species we e no well suppo ed in hei cladis icanalysis,  nal in e p e a ion o hei phylogene ic s udy indica ed Vol. 2(1), 2000 37 Symposium ha S eine nema idae and He e o habdi idae a e wo in- dependen monophyle icg oups. Phylogene ic ela ionshipsamong cu en ly ecognised He e o habdi is species we e s udied by Adams e al. (1998) based on 18S DNA sequences. The ela ionships among axa we e well es ablished, bu lack o di e - gence wi hin h ee lineages o sis e axa (H. ma ela us +H. hepialius;H. indica +H. hawaiiensis;H. bac e- iopho a +H. a gen inensis) sugges ed conspecici y. In suppo o his conclusion, a mo phological e-examina- ion has al eady led o synonymisa ion o H. ma ela us and H. hepialius (S ock, 1997). The He e o habdi isphy- logenyo Liu e al. (1999)based on he ND4 m DNA gene is b oadly in ag eemen wi h ha p esen ed by Adams e al. (1998). The s udy o Adams e al. (1998)also indica ed ha he ou g oup axon Pelliodi is was mo e closely e- la ed o He e o habdi is han o Caeno habdi isand S ein- e nema. Blax e e al. (1998) also in es iga ed he phylogene ic ela ionships o EPN in hei molecula amewo k o he phylum Nema oda. Based on he analysis o 18S DNA sequences, heyconcludedhe e o habdi idsand s eine ne- ma ids do no sha e a common ances y. Thei s udy indi- ca ed ha He e o habdi is was associa ed wi h S ongyl- ida and S eine nema was mo e closely ela ed o Pana- g olaimidae and S ongyloides. An ongoingphylogene ic s udy (S ock e al., unpubl.) based on a combined analy- sis o mo phologicaland molecula cha ac e s (28S DNA sequences) o 24 S eine nema and h ee He e o habdi is species, sugges s ha he S eine nema idae cons i u e a pa aphyle ic g oup, and ha membe s o he amily He - e o habdi idaeseem o ha e e ol ed wi hin he S eine ne- ma idae. This summa y o esea ch on he phylogene ic ela- ionships o EPN shows he e is con adic o y e idence on he ela ionships among hese wo amilies o EPN. While some au ho s indica ed ha he e o habdi ids and s eine nema idsha e e ol edas wo sepa a e independen lineages (Liu e al., 1997; Adams e al., 1998; Blax e e al., 1998), o he s sugges ed hese wo amilies a e ei he sis e axa (Reid, 1994), o ha e e ol ed oge he (S ock e al., unpubl.). Incong uencebe ween hese s udies may be a ibu ed o many causes, including homoplasy, low esol ing powe o he echniques used, o use o ee building algo i hms wi h di e en e olu iona y assump- ions. The e o e, igo ous examina ion o EPN species, wi h mo phologicaland biologicals udiesandsequencing o mo e genes, is encou aged o u he assess obus phy- logene ic ela ionshipsamong his g oup o nema odes. Concluding ema ks The impe us o esea ch in EPN and hei symbion s has come abou because o hei biological con ol po- en ial, so much o he ocus in EPN esea ch has been on applied aspec s ela ing o pes con ol (see Gaugle & Kaya, 1990;Beddinge al. 1993 o e iews on hese op- ics). Howe e EPN and hei symbion s a e inc easingly being iewed as an exci ing subjec o basic esea ch in ecology, biodi e si y,e olu ion,biochemis y and molec- ula gene ics. The bac e ial symbion s p oduce no el in- sec icidal oxins, an ibio ics and exoenzymes, bu many o hese bac e ial species and s ains a e s ill unexplo ed. The molecula in e ac ions be ween EPN and hei sym- bion bac e iawhich enable he nema odes o packageand ansmi he bac e ia a e s ill la gely unknown. EPN be- long o he same amily as C. elegans whose genome has been ully sequencedandanno a ed.Like C. elegans, hei genomesize is small (G enie e al., 1997).EPN also ha e he ad an age ha hey can be g own in i o on lipid aga pla es and a e ex emely p oli c. They a e easy o isola e om soil by bai ing wi h suscep ible insec la ae hus a- cili a ing s udies in biogeog aphy and habi a p e e ence (Bedding & Akhu s , 1975). In he 10 yea s since he  s in e na ional mee ing on EPN a Asiloma (see p oceed- ings edi ed by Gaugle and Kaya, 1990), much p og ess has been made in ou unde s andingo he basic biology and gene ics o EPN and hei symbion s. We a e now en- e ing a new phase in which he ools o molecula gene - ics a e being inc easingly used o add ess a ange o bio- logical ques ions in EPN esea ch. The knowledge gained om his endea ou should ensu e ha EPN will become e en mo e e ec i e biopes icides and should also ensu e ha EPN and hei symbion s gain p ominenceas unique and in insically in e es ing biological sys ems. Acknowledgemen s Wo k in he au ho s’ labo a o ies is suppo ed by he Eu opean Communi y (STD-3 P og amme Con ac s TS3 CT94-0273 and FAIR CT 97-3116, AMB) and by he Eppley Founda ion o Resea ch (SPS). Re e ences ADAMS, B.J. (1998). Species concep s and he e olu iona y pa adigm in mode n nema ology. Jou nal o Nema ology 30, 1-21. 38 Nema ology Symposium ADAMS, B.J., BURNELL, A.M. & POWERS, T.O. (1998). A phylogene ic analysis o He e o habdi is (Nema a: Rhabdi i- dae) based on in e nal ansc ibed space 1 DNA sequence da a.Jou nal o Nema ology 30, 22-39. ADAMSON, M.L. (1986). Modes o ansmission and e olu ion o li e his o ies in zoopa asi ic nema odes. Canadian Jou nal o Zoology 64, 1375-1384. AKHURST, R.J. (1986). Xeno habdus nema ophilus subsp. poina ii: i s in e ac ion wi h insec pa hogenic nema odes. Sys ema ic and Applied Mic obiology 8, 142-147. AKHURST, R.J. (1987). Use o s a ch gel elec opho esis in he axonomy o he genus He e o habdi is (Nema oda: He - e o habdi idae).Nema ologica 33, 1-9. AKHURST, R.J. (1993). Bac e ial symbion s o en omopa ho- genicnema odes — he powe behind he h one.In: Bedding, R., Akhu s , R. & Kaya, H. (Eds). Nema odes and he bio- logical con ol o insec pes s. Melbou ne, Aus alia, CSIRO P ess, pp. 127-135. AKHURST, R.J. & BEDDING, R.A. (1978). A simple c oss- b eeding echnique o acili a e species de e mina ion in he genus Neoaplec ana.Nema ologica 24, 328-330. AKHURST, R.J. & BOEMARE, N.E. (1988). A nume ical axo- nomic s udy o he genus Xeno habdus (En e obac e iaceae) and p oposed ele a ion o he subspecies o X. nema ophilus o species. Jou nal o Gene al Mic obiology 134, 751-761. AKHURST, R.J. & BOEMARE, N.E. (1990). Biology and ax- onomy o Xeno habdus. In: Gaugle , R. & Kaya, H.K. (Eds). En omopa hogenicnema odesin biological con ol. Boca Ra- on, FL, USA, CRC P ess, pp. 75-90.. BEDDING, R.A. & AKHURST, R.J. (1975).A simple echnique o he de ec iono insec pa asi ic habdi id nema odes in he soil. Nema ologica 21, 109-110. BEDDING, R., AKHURST, R. & KAYA, H. (1993). Nema odes and he biological con ol o insec pes s. Melbou ne, Aus- alia, CSIRO P ess, 178 pp. BIRD, A.F. & AKHURST, R.J. (1983). The na u e o he in- es inal esicle in nema odes o he amily S eine nema idae. In e na ional Jou nal o Pa asi ology 13, 599-606. BLAXTER, M.L., DELEY, P., GAREY, J.R., LIU, L.X., SCHHELDEMAN, P., VIERSTRAETE, A., VANFLETEREN, J.R., MACKEY, L.Y., DORRIS, M., FRISSE, L.M., VIDA, J.T. & THOMAS, W.K. (1998). A molecula e olu iona y amewo k o he phylum Nema oda. Na u e 392, 71-75. BLEAKLEY, B.H. & CHEN, X. (1999). Su i al o insec pa ho- genic and human clinical isola es o Pho o habdus lumi- nescens in p e iously s e ile soil. Canadian Jou nal o Mi- c obiology 45, 273-278. BOAG, B., NEILSON, R. & GORDON, S.C. (1992). Dis ibu- ion and p e alenceo he en omopa hogenicnema odeS ein- e nema el iae in Sco land. Annals o Applied Biology 121, 355-360. BOEMARE, N.E., AKHURST, R.J. & MOURANT, R.G. (1993). Deoxy ibonucleic acid ela edness be ween Xeno hab- dus spp. (En e obac e iaceae), symbio ic bac e ia o en- omopa hogenic nema odes, wi h a p oposal o ans e Xeno habdus luminescens o a new genus Pho o habdus gen. no . In e na ional Jou nal o Sys ema ic Bac e iology 43, 249-255. BOEMARE, N. & GIVAUDAN, A. (1998). Pa hogenici y o he symbion s. In: Simoes, N., Boema e, N. & Ehle s, R.-U. (Eds). Pa hogenici y o en omopa hogenic nema odes e sus insec de ence mechanisms: impac on selec ion o i ulen s ains. Luxembou g, Eu opean Commission, ISBN 92-828- 0821-1, pp. 3-7. BOWEN, D., ROCHELEAU, T.A., BLACKBURN, M., AN- DREEV, O., GOLUBEVA, E., BHARTIA, R. & FFRENCH- CONSTANT, R.H. (1998). No el insec icidal oxins om he bac e ium Pho o habdus luminescens.Science 280, 2120- 2132. CURRAN, J. & WEBSTER, J.M. (1989). Geno ypic analysis o He e o habdi is isola es om No h Ca olina. Jou nal o Nema ology 21, 140-145. DIX, I., BURNELL, A.M., GRIFFIN, C.T., JOYCE, S.A., NU- GENT, M.J. & DOWNES, M.J. (1992). The iden ica ion o biological species in he genus He e o habdi is (Nema oda: He e o habdi idae) by c oss-b eeding second gene a ion am- phimic ic adul s. Pa asi ology 104, 509-518. DIX, I., KOLTAI, H., GLAZER, I. & BURNELL, A.M. (1994). Spe m compe i ion in ma ed  s gene a ion he maph odi e emales o he HP88 s ain o He e o habdi is (Nema oda: He e o habdi idae) and p ogeny sex a ios in ma ed and un- ma ed emales. Fundamen al and Applied Nema ology 17, 17-27. ENDO, B.Y. & NICKLE, W.R. (1991). Ul as uc u e o he in es inal epi helium, lumen and associa ed bac e ia in He- e o habdi isbac e iopho a .Jou nal o he Helmin hological Socie y o Washing on 58, 202-212. FARMER, J.J., JORGENSEN, J.H., GRIMONT, P.A.D., AK- HURST, R.J., POINAR, G.O. JR, PIERCE, G.V., SMITH, J.A., CARGER, G.P., WILSON, K. & HINKMAN-BRENNER, F.W. (1989). Xeno habdus luminescens (DNA hyb idisa ion g oup 5) om human clinical specimens. Jou nal o Clinical Mic obiology 27, 1594-1600. FORST, S., DOWDS, B., BOEMARE, N. & STACKEBRANDT, E. (1997). Xeno habdus and Pho o habdus spp.: bugs ha kill bugs.Annual Re iew o Mic obiology 51, 47-72. FORST, S. & NEALSON, K. (1996). Molecula biology o he symbio ic-pa hogenic bac e ia Xeno habdus spp. and Pho- o habdus spp.Mic obiological Re iews 60, 1-43. FFRENCH-CONSTANT, R. & BOWEN, D. (1999). Pho o hab- dus oxins: no el biological insec icides. Cu en Opinion in Mic obiology 2, 284-288. FISCHER-LESAUX, M., ARTEAGA-HERNÁNDEZ, E., MRÁ Ï CEK, Z. & BOEMARE, N. (1999a). The bac e ial symbion Xeno habdus poina ii (En e obac e iaceae) is ha bo ed by wo phylogene ic ela ed hos nema odes: he en omopa hogenic species S eine nema cubanum and Vol. 2(1), 2000 39