scieee Open visual document viewer

Generating Globally Regular Indirect Utility functions

Conniffe, Prof. Denis

Abstract

Despite their scarcity in the literature, an abundance of globally regular indirect utility functions, involving as many parameters as desired, exists. They are easily constructed as a function of simple homothetic component utilities.

Full text

GENERATING GLOBALLY REGULAR INDIRECT UTILITY FUNCTIONS Denis Conni e Economics Depa men , Na ional Uni e si y o I eland Maynoo h Abs ac Despi e hei sca ci y in he li e a u e, an abundance o globally egula indi ec u ili y unc ions, in ol ing as many pa ame e s as desi ed, exis s. They a e easily cons uc ed as a unc ion o simple homo he ic componen u ili ies. JEL Classi ica ion: D 11 Keywo ds: Global egula i y, indi ec u ili y unc ions. Add ess o co espondence: Denis Conni e, Economics Depa men , Na ional Uni e si y o I eland, Maynoo h, Co. Kilda e, I eland. Tel: 353 1 7086299; Fax: 353 1 7083934; e-mail: Denis.Conni [email protected] 2 1. INTRODUCTION Regula i y means ha an indi ec u ili y unc ion complies wi h he cons ain s implied by a ional economic beha iou 1. Regula i y is global i i holds o all (posi i e) p ices and incomes, gi en app op ia e anges o he alues o pa ame e s occu ing in he unc ion. This sho pape is conce ned wi h he gene a ion o such globally egula unc ions. 2. COMBINING HOMOTHETIC COMPONRNTS Conside a se o homo he ic u ili y unc ions, each o he o m (1) ,/),( kk PyyU k  p whe e k  is posi i e and is inc easing in p ices, homogeneous o deg ee k Pk  in p ices and is a conca e unc ion o p ices wi h nega i e de ini e o semi-de ini e Hessian. Then he ecip ocal o is k P con ex in p ices, because 2 2 2 2 32 12 12 i k k i k ki k p P P p P Pp P                 and ji k k j k i k k ji k pp P P p P p P P pp P                          2 23 12 12 , so he Hessian o is 1 k P ' 3 2                    pp kk k PP P, which is posi i e semi-de ini e, minus he Hessian o , which also gi es a nonnega i e de ini e k P ma ix. So is con ex in p, non-dec easing in y, non-inc easing in p and as well as ),( yUkp homogeneous o deg ee ze o in income y and p ices. So i is globally egula . A ew p ope ies o k Ua e wo h examining. As is al eady ob ious, is a conca e unc ion o p ices. Fo posi i e 1 k U 1  , , being an inc easing conca e unc ion o a conca e unc ion, is conca e in     kk UU 1 1 Tha is, a consume maximises di ec u ili y unde a budge cons ain . This implies he indi ec u ili y unc ion should be homogeneous o deg ee ze o in income y and p ices p, non- dec easing in y, non-inc easing in p, and con ex o quasi-con ex in p. These cons ain s imply co esponding condi ions (agg ega ion, homogenei y, Slu sky symme y and nega i i y) on he demand equa ions. ),( yU p 3 p ices. Fo 1  , is an inc easing con ex unc ion o a con ex unc ion and so is con ex in   k U p ices. Fo 1  , i is simple o e i y ha    k Phas a nega i e de ini e o semi-de ini e Hessian and he e o e i s ecip ocal is con ex in p ices and so is     kk UU    k Py k/. So is   k U con ex in p ices o all posi i e  . Also, is con ex in p ices as i equals k Ulog Py kloglog   and since is an inc easing conca e unc ion o a conca e unc ion, i is conca e and minus i is Plog con ex. Now conside he unc ion      1    kkUU , (2) whe e he k  a e non-nega i e and sum o uni y2. Commence wi h posi i e 1   . is conca e   k U in p ices and since sums o conca e unc ions a e conca e,     kkU is conca e. Then     1  kkU is a dec easing unc ion o a quasi-conca e unc ion and so is quasi-con ex. Since             kkkkk UU yy U1 1 1 and  i k k kkkk ip P P UU p U        1 1 1    Uis inc easing in income and dec easing in p ices. I is ob iously homogeneous o deg ee ze o in income and p ices since each is. So U is globally egula o k U1   . Now ake  nega i e and pu    . Then (2) becomes      1  kkUU . As al eady shown is con ex in p ices, so  k U    kkUis con ex and since an inc easing unc ion o a con ex unc ion is quasi-con ex, Uis quasi-con ex in p ices. I is clea ha is again inc easing U in income, dec easing in p ices and homogeneous o deg ee ze o in income and p ices. Finally, o 2 The unc ion (2) is o he o m o he ecip ocal o a CES (cons an elas ici y o subs i u ion) p ice index, al hough he e i is an index o componen u ili ies no p ices. 4 0  , he amilia limi ing a gumen as 0  ( o example, Diewe , 1993) gi es o  k k UU   kk UU loglog  . Since each is con ex in p ices, he sum is, and since an ilog is an inc easing con ex unc ion, k Ulog Uis. So (2) gi es a globally egula u ili y unc ion o all 1   . Fo u ili ies o he o m , which a e special cases o (1), he sums, p oduc s and ha monic k Py/ means, which a e special cases o (2), ha e been examined in Conni e (2002). Howe e , hey a e o limi ed in e es as he esul ing u ili ies mus all be homo he ic. 3. EXAMPLES Conside   jj p y U  1 and   jiij pp y U  2. Bo h a e easily shown o be con ex in p ices, he o me s ic ly so, p o ided he j  and ij  a e posi i e and ij  = ji  . Take 3/1,3/2 2     iand 1   , so ha (2) is a weigh ed ha monic mean o and . I is 1 U2 U 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 23                                    y p y p y pj i ij j j  , (3) Diewe ’s (1974) gene alised Leon ie u ili y unc ion. Diewe p o ed i s global egula i y, bu ha is immedia ely e iden om he de i a ion he e. Mo e impo an ly, (3) is jus one o many possibili ies, all globally egula . Taking 1  , wi h he same  alues as be o e, gi es a weigh ed a i hme ic mean o and 1 U2 U 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2                                              y p y p y pj i ij j j  . (4) The demand sys ems ollowing om (3) and (4) a e no he same and show di e ences ha a e possibly impo an in p ac ice. Fo example, he income elas ici ies o he gene alised Leon ie demand sys em a e 5                                                                2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 y p y p y p y p y p y p w E j i ij j j j i ij i i i i    , which mus be g ea e han a hal . The income elas ici ies co esponding o (4) a e                                                2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 /2 / 2 3 jiijjj j j jiijjj i i i i ppp y p ppp y p w E     ’ which mus be less han 3/2, which migh be mo e accep able han cons aining hem o exceed a hal . Regula i y need no imply he capabili y o model a wide ange o consume beha iou . The gene alised Leon ie ’s de iciencies in his ega d ha e been men ioned by Ca es and Ch is ensen (1980) and Diewe and Wales (1987) and (4) has i s own in lexibili ies. Hoewe e ,  , o a  , could be ea ed as an unknown pa ame e o gain mo e lexibili y. The case o 0  , gi ing p oduc s o u ili ies is pa icula ily in lexible since he esul ing unc ion is s ill homo he ic. Many o he choices o and a e ob iously possible; o example, could be aken o be 1 U2 U1 U j j p y   1, whe e 1    j. Using (2) o combine his wi h he p e ious wi h 2 U  =1 and 2/1 21    gi es 1 2 1 2 1 2                                     y p y p y pj i ij j j   , and he co esponding demand equa ions a e                                                        2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 y p y p y p y p y p y p w j i ij j j ij i j i i j j     . 6 Clea ly, h ee o mo e componen u ili y unc ions could be employed in (2) o p oduce e en mo e hea ily pa ame e ised, bu s ill globally egula , u ili y unc ions. While he lexibili y o he esul ing demand sys ems would be inc eased, especially i  , o he  we e also pa ame e ised, he da a equi emen s o he es ima ion o so many pa ame e s could be a se ious p ac ical di icul y. 4. DISCUSSION This pape has shown how o gene a e highly pa ame e ised globally egula u ili y unc ions om (2) using he globally egula componen s (1). Familia and mo e pa simonious u ili y unc ions could also be seen as ollowing om (2). Hou hakke ’s (1960) indi ec addilog unc ion j j jp y          , whe e i  and i  ha e he same sign and i  >-1, is globally egula and is ob iously (2) applied o j py/ o he powe o j  wi h 1  and jj    . The componen s employed in sec ion 3 could be conside ed as esul ing om applica ion o (2) o s ill simple componen s. Fo example, le kk pyU /, a u ili y unc ion co esponding o expendi u e o he whole budge on good k. Using (2) wi h 1  and jj    gi es he o sec ion 3. 1 Ukiik ppyU /, a u ili y unc ion co esponding o expendi u e o hal he budge on good i and hal on good k, is (2) applied o and i U k Uwi h 0  and 2/1 ki   . Then applying (2) o wi h ik U1   and  o  gi es 2 Uo sec ion 3. O cou se, many u ili y unc ions ha e appea ed in he li e a u e ha a e no o he class gene a ed by (2) om componen s o he o m (1). Bu hey a e no globally egula . REFERENCES Ca es, D. and L. R. Ch is ensen (1980): “Global p ope ies o lexible unc ional o ms”, Ame ican Economic Re iew, 70, 422-432. Conni e, D. (2002): “Sums and P oduc s o U ili y Func ions”, Economic and Social Re iew, 33, 285-295. Diewe , W. E. (1974): “Applica ions o duali y heo y”, in F on ie s o Quan i a i e Economics Vol. II, ed. By M. D In iliga o , and D. A.Kend ick, Ams e dam: No h-Holland, 106-171. Diewe , W. E.and T. J. Wales (1987): “Flexible unc ional o ms and global cu a u e Condi ions”, Econome ica, 55, 43-68. Hou hakke , H. S. (1960), “Addi i e P e e ences”, Econome ica, 28, 244-256.