scieee Open visual document viewer

Catalysts of university social responsability into strategic planning by thematic analysis and deductive coding

Ramos-Monge, Elva,Llinàs Audet, Francisco Javier,Barrena Martínez, Jesús

Abstract

The relevance of higher education institutions (HEI) for social development is unquestionable because of their potential for contributing intellectual solutions for the social, economic, and environmental welfare of society. The current study aims to: 1) examine which are the main catalysts of university social responsibility (USR) from a strategic management perspective; 2) show the relations among those catalysts through semantic networks; and 3) analyse the role of university promotion of entrepreneurship. The method uses a content analysis in a sample of 23 universities and examines the subject and codes to clarify the catalysts. The semantic networks are shown to reveal these connections. It was found that a high percentage of universities orient their efforts towards enhancing the employability of students, mainly through entrepreneurial projects intended to achieve social responsibility.

Full text

1 CATALYSTS OF UNIVERSITY SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INTO STRATEGIC PLANNING BY THEMATIC ANALYSIS AND DEDUCTIVE CODING El a L. Ramos-Monge Poly echnic Uni e si y o Ca alonia, Depa men o Managemen , Ba celona, Spain [email p o ec ed] Xa ie Llinàs-Aude Poly echnic Uni e si y o Ca alonia, Depa men o Managemen , Ba celona, Spain [email p o ec ed] Jesús Ba ena-Ma ínez Uni e si y o Cadiz, Depa men o Business Managemen , Facul y o Economics and Business, Cadiz, Spain [email p o ec ed] ABSTRACT The ele ance o highe educa ion ins i u ions (HEI) o social de elopmen is unques ionable because o hei po en ial o con ibu ing in ellec ual solu ions o he social, economic, and en i onmen al wel a e o socie y. The cu en s udy aims o: 1) examine which a e he main ca alys s o uni e si y social esponsibili y (USR) om a s a egic managemen pe spec i e; 2) show he ela ions among hose ca alys s h ough seman ic ne wo ks; and 3) analyse he ole o uni e si y p omo ion o en ep eneu ship. The me hod uses a con en analysis in a sample o 23 uni e si ies and examines he subjec and codes o cla i y he ca alys s. The seman ic ne wo ks a e shown o e eal hese connec ions. I was ound ha a high pe cen age o uni e si ies o ien hei e o s owa ds enhancing he employabili y o s uden s, mainly h ough en ep eneu ial p ojec s in ended o achie e social esponsibili y. Keywo ds: s a egic managemen , s a egic planning, s akeholde heo y, highe educa ion ins i u es, uni e si y social esponsibili y, sus ainable en ep eneu ship, s uden employabili y, uni e si y economic managemen , uni e si y coope a ion, quali a i e esea ch, deduc i e me hod. Biog aphical no es: El a Lize h Ramos-Monge is a PhD s uden in Business Adminis a ion and Managemen a he Uni e si a Poli ècnica de Ca alunya (Spain) in he Depa men o Managemen . She holds a mas e ’s deg ee in business and economic s udies. He mas e ’s hesis was ela ed o s uden en ep eneu ship in Spanish and Mexican uni e si ies. He esea ch ocuses on he inclusion o social esponsibili y in uni e si ies, i s applica ion, he ole o s akeholde s, and he in eg a ion o social esponsibili y in uni e si y s a egy. He esea ch in e es s include s a egic managemen , uni e si y social esponsibili y (USR), co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR), quali a i e analysis, and uni e si y en ep eneu ship. She has published a chap e in INTECH en i led ‘Uni e si ies as co po a e en i ies: he ole o social 2 esponsibili y in hei s a egic managemen ’ and an a icle en i led ‘D i e s and ba ie s o uni e si y social esponsibili y: in eg a ion in o s a egic plans’. Xa ie Llinàs-Aude is a lec u e a he Poly echnic Uni e si y o Ca alonia in he Depa men o Managemen (OE). He esea ches he ields o human capi al, compe i i eness and inno a ion, s a egic managemen , economics, business aining, highe educa ion managemen , egional economy, and people managemen . He speci ically explo es issues such as he ole o aining in o ganisa ions, manage ial skills, and compe encies. He has published a icles in na ional and in e na ional jou nals such as In angible Capi al, In e na ional Jou nal o T aining and De elopmen , Re is a de Educación, and he Eu opean Jou nal o Enginee ing Educa ion. Jesús Ba ena-Ma ínez is an assis an lec u e in he Facul y o Business and Economics a he Uni e si y o Cadiz (Spain). His PhD disse a ion ecei ed a special men ion om he San ande Chai o Co po a e Social Responsibili y (CSR) o he bes PhD on CSR in Spain in 2014. He has published in jou nals such as he In e na ional Jou nal o Human Resou ce Managemen , Co po a e Social Responsibili y, and En i onmen al Managemen , In angible Capi al, Eu opean Resea ch on Managemen and Business Economics, Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics, and Jou nal o Human Values. His eaching and esea ch in e es s include human esou ce managemen , co po a e social esponsibili y, and in ellec ual capi al. 1. INTRODUCTION The s udy o uni e si y social esponsibili y (USR) ecei es conside able academic a en ion o i s con ibu ion o sus ainabili y in e ms o social, economic, and en i onmen al impac . To enable ha posi i e impac , highe educa ion ins i u ions (HEI) should conside he in eg a ion o USR as pa o hei s a egy. USR can be explained as a policy o ensu ing an e hical quali y o pe o mance o he uni e si y s akeholde s h ough esponsible managemen (Vallaeys 2013). HEI should p omo e d i e s (o ca alys s) o USR o achie e his esponsible managemen . These ca alys s a e unde s ood in his esea ch as he speci ic ac ions ha academic au ho i ies os e and in eg a e as pa o uni e si y ac i i ies. In his line, academic au ho i ies should unde s and, engage, communica e, con ol, coo dina e and lead ac ions o USR. This ask can be helped by using s a egic plans as a main ool o academic managemen (Llinàs e al. 2011) and a b idge be ween s a egic hinking and s a egic ac ions. The po en ial o uni e si ies o help social de elopmen has no been su icien ly explo ed, al hough many e o s by many o ganisa ions ha e been made (GRI 2017; GUNI 2017; ISO 26000 2017; PRME 2018). In his wo k, USR is s udied om he uni e si y managemen app oach, speci ically including USR in s a egy and s a egic plans o o malise i in HEI. Consequen ly, conside able in e es in his issue a ises om he alue ha social esponsibili y could b ing o social de elopmen and he possible answe s i may o e o cu en socio- economic challenges. The objec i es o his wo k a e o: 1) disco e which a e he main ca alys s ha uni e si ies in eg a e in o s a egic plans, and ou hypo heses a e p oposed ela ed o USR ca alys s, 2) show ela ions among ca alys s h ough seman ic ne wo ks, and 3) analyse how uni e si ies p omo e en ep eneu ship o achie e hei esponsibili y o s uden s. To achie e hese objec i es and o espond o he 3 hypo heses, he ca alys s we e aken om he model o ‘USR d i e s in Spanish uni e si ies’ (Ramos-Monge e al. 2017a). Resul s show ha uni e si ies conside USR ca alys s in e e y uni e si y dimension. Mo eo e , connec ions among ca alys s a e displayed by means o seman ic ne wo ks o iden i y how some ca alys s include o he s. Finally, o achie e he hi d objec i e, p ojec s, p og ammes, and o he uni e si y ac i i ies we e iden i ied o disco e how hey p omo e en ep eneu ship (as ‘P omo ion o en ep eneu ial p ojec s’ is a USR ca alys ). I is shown ha e e y uni e si y in he sample has implemen ed en ep eneu ial ac i i ies. I is sugges ed ha uni e si ies p omo e en ep eneu ial beha iou by boos ing sus ainable en ep eneu ship, as his ype o en ep eneu aims o balance economic heal h, social equali y, and en i onmen al esilience (Hocke s & Wüs enhagen 2010; Rice e al. 2014; Ra en e al. 2017). Fu he mo e, i has been iden i ied ha he li e a u e suppo s he p omo ion o social en ep eneu ship in uni e si ies in o de o o e solu ions o social challenges (Ra en & Welpe 2011). To de elop his wo k, a hema ic analysis and a deduc i e coding is used. Thema ic analysis is a me hodology o iden i ying, analysing, and egis e ing pa e ns o hemes wi hin da a (B aun & Cla ke 2006). This p ocess includes he iden i ica ion o hemes h ough ‘ca e ul eading and e- eading o he da a’ (Rice & Ezzy 1999). The e o e, 23 s a egic uni e si y plans we e aken as a sample and ATLAS. i so wa e was used o analyse each s a egic plan. The con en o his documen is s uc u ed as ollows. The i s sec ion explains he esea ch gap and heo e ical amewo k. Secondly, he manusc ip explo es he me hod and alida ion o he model. The inal sec ion p esen s he esul s, conclusions, and discussions. 1.1. Resea ch gap and objec i es Uni e si ies a e making impo an e o s o implemen social esponsibili y. Ne e heless, he e is no consensus abou which speci ic ac i i ies o ca alys s belong o USR and how hese ac i i ies a e in e connec ed. Mo eo e , al hough uni e si ies a e inc easing hei e o s o p omo e en ep eneu ial p ojec s (Ro hae mel e al. 2007), he link be ween he USR and uni e si y en ep eneu ship needs u he analysis. The e o e, his esea ch es ablishes he ollowing objec i es: 1. Find he main ca alys s o uni e si y social esponsibili y (USR) in s a egic plans and gi e esponse o hypo heses 2. Rep esen ela ions among USR ca alys s h ough seman ic ne wo ks 3. Analyse he ole o uni e si y p omo ion o en ep eneu ship. 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Fo a be e unde s anding o his issue, i is impo an o make e e ences o speci ic subjec s such as uni e si y s a egic managemen , USR concep , s akeholde heo y, USR in s a egic plans, and USR ca alys s. 2.1. S a egic managemen and s a egic planning In e e y o ganisa ion, s a egic managemen is an essen ial ac i i y o es ablish he pa h o ollow, and s a egic planning se es o cla i ying ha di ec ion, es ablishing p io i ies, and imp o ing o ganisa ional pe o mance (Shah 2013). S a egic managemen includes a echnical eam o moni o ac i i ies 4 ela ed o HEI wo k by using he s a egic plan as a p incipal managemen ool (Llinàs e al. 2011). The USR, as CSR when used s a egically, helps c ea e alue in he long e m as i is mo e e icien in esou ce u ilisa ion (Rexhepia e al. 2013). Thus, uni e si y s a egic managemen helps academic au ho i ies achie e uni e si y missions h ough s a egic decisions (Ramos-Monge e al. 2017b). In his line, i is impo an o de ine s a egy as ‘a sys em o inding, o mula ing, and de eloping a doc ine ha will ensu e long- e m success i ollowed ai h ully’ (K in 2009). The e o e, i e e s o inding an e icien way o achie e he speci ied objec i es. S a egy is also unde s ood as de ining he goals and wha is needed o achie e hese goals (Po e 1980; Po e 1996). No mally, i is expec ed ha uni e si ies, as public o ganisa ions, pu sue social s a egies because o hei inhe en social mission (Vázquez e al. 2016). Al hough s a egic planning belonged mainly o he p i a e sec o un il he 1970s (Candy & Go don 2011), by he la e 1980s s a egic planning had eme ged in uni e si ies as pa o an imp o ed managemen p ocess (Albon e al. 2016). S a egic managemen is o building and execu ing HEI goals by academic au ho i ies. In his p ocess, esou ces and in e nal and ex e nal en i onmen s should be conside ed (Nag e al. 2007). S a egic managemen no mally includes wo s eps: 1) o mula ion o a plan, which includes in e nal and ex e nal analysis, s a egy o ma ion, and ecogni ion o goals; 2) implemen a ion o a plan, which includes s uc u e (de ine o ganisa ional s uc u e and ini ia i es) and con ol and eedback (Min zbe g & Quinn 1996). Execu ion o implemen a ion o he plan is usually he mos di icul pa , his complica ion is commonly ela ed o se e al aspec s such as lack o au onomy, go e nance, leade ship, s akeholde pa icipa ion, and manage ial alen . This s ep is di icul because i in ol es mo e people and equi es a high le el o commi men (H ebiniak 2007). Success depends on he abili y o hink s a egically. S a egic hinking in ol es he applica ion o knowledge, in ui ion, and c ea i i y, he main objec i e being o de e mine compe i i e s a egies o posi ion he o ganisa ion (Min zbe g 1994). S a egic hinking and s a egic planning should no be con used. S a egic hinking needs in ui i e, c ea i e, inno a i e, and uncon en ional me hods o hinking (He acleous 1998). Howe e , s a egic planning in ol es an analy ical p ocess (Min zbe g 2009) ha is o en complex and chao ic (Min zbe g 1994). Inc easingly, s a egic planning is no longe a well-es ablished p ocess and has been shown as a nonlinea ac i i y (Albon e al. 2016). Communica ion among uni e si y s akeholde s is o g ea impo ance o ca ying ou s a egic planning. Beyond desc ibing mission, ision, and alues, s a egic planning mus include speci ic and achie able goals (Cowbu n 2005). These goals a y acco ding o each uni e si y en i onmen and he esou ces and needs. To help his ask, s a egic managemen a ises as a way o imp o ing o ganisa ion, inc easing compe i i eness, and is ela ed om he beginning wi h he accoun abili y and acc edi a ion s anda ds (Aleong 2007). 2.1.1. Uni e si y social esponsibili y and i s backg ound To explain social esponsibili y in uni e si ies, i is necessa y o cla i y essen ial concep s o uni e si y managemen , since social esponsibili y a ises om he uni e si y’s adminis a ion. Thus, co po a e go e nance p ocesses he ela ions by which o ganisa ions a e managed (Shaile 2004) and his ep esen s an 5 impo an s a ing poin . These aspec s mus be ca e ully ca ied ou o achie e speci ic objec i es. Consequen ly, he di ec ion o such ac ions is he key o achie ing he objec i es. In uni e si ies, academic au ho i ies will pe o m ha impo an ole, while o companies he p incipal objec i e o co po a e go e nance is o p o ec he owne ’s in e es s. Co po a e go e nance in HEI se es o co e he uni e si y s akeholde demands. These demands dis inguish HEI om p i a e co po a ions, due o he ac ha he uni e si y’s mission as a public o ganisa ion is mainly social (Vázquez e al. 2016). This co po a e go e nance ecognises igh s and esponsibili ies among s akeholde s and emb aces decision-making p ocess in he o ganisa ion (Lin 2013). Wi hou a well-o ganised uni e si y go e nance, decisions ela ed o social esponsibili y ca alys s (as i is called in his wo k) could be qui e di icul o make. Once co po a e go e nance is clea , i is impo an o con inue wi h he eme ging concep o USR, which o igina ed in p i a e o ganisa ions, speci ically when i was ecognised ha decision-making by businesses a ec s socie y (Bowen 1953). The concep o co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR) appea ed as a mechanism by which o ganisa ions moni o and ensu e hei ac i i ies a e legal and e hical (Rasche e al. 2017). The main heo ies on CSR ha e been classi ied in o ou g oups: 1) ins umen al heo ies ha conside social esponsibili y as an ins umen o weal h c ea ion; 2) poli ical heo ies ela ed o he esponsible use o co po a e powe in he poli ical ield; 3) in eg a i e heo ies based on sa is ying social demands; and 4) e hical heo ies ounded on e hical esponsibili ies o socie y (Ga iga & Melé 2004). Howe e , he di icul ies o applying CSR seem o be ela ed o doub s abou i s bene i s. This may be explained as ha managemen will a ely apply CSR wi hou inancial bene i s (Bu ke & Logsdon 1996). Se e al au ho s ha e s udied he ela ionship be ween CSR and inancial s a egy and ha e de e mined ha CSR has a s a egic alue (Bu ke & Logsdon 1996; McWilliams & Siegel 2001). Fo uni e si ies, he scena io is qui e di e en , uni e si ies ha e a social mission and do no pu sue p o i s. Conside ing he desc ip ion o CSR, USR can be de ined as he pe o mance o e hical policy by uni e si y s akeholde s h ough esponsible managemen o educa ional, cogni i e, and en i onmen al impac s, and in cons an dialogue wi h socie y o inc ease sus ainable de elopmen (Vallaeys 2013). USR can also be unde s ood as he s a egic commi men o socie y, he ecogni ion o e e y in e nal and ex e nal s akeholde , and he sea ch o policies ha will bene i he s akeholde s (UNIBILITY 2017). As men ioned in he in oduc ion, his wo k is suppo ed by a p e ious esea ch using he Delphi me hod (Ga cía & Suá ez 2013), which consis ed o asking expe s abou USR. Besides ob aining esul s ela ed o USR ca alys s, he e we e also impo an con ibu ions o USR de ini ions (see Table 1). The e o e, decision-making by academic au ho i ies a ec s socie y, bu no in he same way as p i a e companies – and uni e si ies a e expec ed o ha e a posi i e e ec on socie y by encou aging social, economic, and en i onmen al de elopmen and b inging social alue. This alue makes e e ence o he deg ee o which a pa icula ac ion o planned ac ion is impo an o use ul in ela ion o some hing o achie e (Camb idge Dic iona y 2017). In his line, i is impo an o 6 no e he impo ance o USR ca alys s o achie ing he social mission o he uni e si y. Uni e si y e hical wo k can be di ided in o wo domains aligned wi h he uni e si y’s social cha ac e : 1) communica i e associa ion, ela ed o ci il beha iou , igh o speak, jus ice, solida i y, compassion, ole ance, empa hy and dialogue, based on hones y and espec ; and 2) he domain o secula in ellec ual p ac ices ela ed o eedom o in ellec ual ac i i ies, obse a ion, easoning, esea ch, c i icism, and imagining (Ma ginson 2007). This esea ch is based on he ou uni e si y impac s: o ganisa ional, educa i e, social, and cogni i e (Vallaeys e al. 2009). E o s ega ding social esponsibili y ocused on p omo ing e hical ac ions in bo h public and p i a e o ganisa ions ha e been mos ly o ien ed by in e na ional o ganisa ions, who ha e joined e o s o be e de ine, measu e, con ol and e alua e he subjec . Uni e si ies ha e used hese sou ces and ied o adap hem o he pa icula i ies o HEI. Some o hese o ganisa ions a e:  Global Repo ing Ini ia i e (GRI) is an in e na ional o ganisa ion ha has de eloped sus ainabili y epo ing, helping p i a e and public o ganisa ions o communica e hei impac s in o issues such as: clima e change, human igh s, go e nance, and social well-being (Dumay e al. 2010; GRI 2017). This is he p incipal s anda d o epo ing in o ma ion ela ed o social esponsibili y and one o he mos demanding s anda ds (Rueda & U ibe 2011).  Global Uni e si y Ne wo k o Inno a ion (GUNi) is an in e na ional ne wo k c ea ed by he UNESCO, (UNU), and (UPC) which inspi es HEI o ede ine hei ole by changing hei posi ion wi hin socie y (GUNI 2017)  ISO 26000 Social Responsibili y, as an in e na ional s anda d ha helps all public o p i a e o ganisa ions, ega dless o hei size, o de elop a esponsible managemen , ollowing p inciples ega ding human igh s, labou p ac ices, he en i onmen , ai ope a ing p ac ices, consume issues and, communi y in ol emen and de elopmen (ISO 26000 2017).  P inciples o Responsible Managemen Educa ion (PRME) C ea ed unde he coo dina ion o he UN Global Compac and key academic ins i u ions, PRME de eloped six p inciples: 1) de elop s uden capabili ies o business and socie y; 2) uni e si y p omo ion o alues ela ed o global social esponsibili y; 3) imp o e educa ional me hods o e ec i e lea ning and esponsible leade ship; 4) encou age esea ch abou he ole, dynamics, and impac o co po a ions in he c ea ion o sus ainable social, en i onmen al, and economic alue; 5) c ea e ne wo ks wi h business manage s o lea n mo e abou he challenges in mee ing social and en i onmen al esponsibili ies; and 6) p omo e communica ion among uni e si y s akeholde s on issues ela ed o global social esponsibili y and sus ainabili y (PRME 2018). Likewise, o he o ganisa ions such as he Ca alan Associa ion o Public Uni e si ies (ACUP) and he Ca alan Agency o De elopmen and Coope a ion in coo dina ion wi h o he Ca alan uni e si ies ha e joined e o s o engage uni e si ies wi h he Sus ainable De elopmen Goals (USDG 2017). 2.1.2. S akeholde heo y 7 USR implemen a ion needs e o s by academic au ho i ies in ecognising g oups in ol ed o a ec ed by HEI ac i i ies, and wi hou his ecogni ion i could be di icul o s a e s a egic ac ions in eply o hei demands. Thus, s akeholde heo y explains and suppo s USR (La án Jo ge & And ades Peña 2015). The uni e si y communi y includes mul iple s akeholde s: s uden s and amilies; uni e si y adminis a i e s a and acul y membe s; supplie s o goods and se ices; educa ional sec o ; o he uni e si ies; comme ce and indus y (Rea ill 1998). S akeholde s ha e also been classi ied as in e nal o ex e nal (Bu ows 1999; Jongbloed e al. 2008). Some au ho s ag ee ha no all s akeholde s a e equally impo an , and his is explained by he s akeholde le el o in luence acco ding o he heo y o s akeholde salience (Mi chell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood 1997). This heo y dis inguishes hose s akeholde s wi h an u gency o immedia e ac ions, in luence, o powe in he de elopmen o speci ic ac ions; and he legi imacy o he ac i i ies ha he ins i u ion pe o ms. In he case o uni e si ies, s uden s claim special a en ion because hey end o be he main clien s o HEI (Sánchez & Maina des 2016). Ini ia i es such as he P inciples o Responsible Managemen Educa ion (PRME) ocus a en ion on imp o ing s uden aining by p omo ing s uden alues in business schools. 2.1.3. Ca alys s o uni e si y social esponsibili y To add ess he s a egic ac ions aken by academic au ho i ies o achie e USR, his pape ook a model o USR ca alys s ob ained om he s udy en i led ‘D i e s and ba ie s o uni e si y social esponsibili y: in eg a ion in o s a egic plans’ (Ramos-Monge e al. 2017a). This s udy used a Delphi me hod, which consis s o gi ing se e al i e a ions o ques ionnai es o expe s on a USR opic, wi h each ques ionnai e modi ied acco ding o he eedback p o ided by expe s in p e ious i e a ions. This s udy conside ed 27 expe s om Spanish and Mexican uni e si ies and a ques ionnai e was applied wi h a Like scale and open ques ions. The objec i e was o achie e expe consensus (Lins one & Tu o 1975). As a esul o he Delphi me hod, a USR ca alys model was ob ained (see Table 2). The model is di ided in o ou dimensions and each has sepa a e g oups o ca alys s (as ac ions wi h a mo e gene al concep ) and sub-ca alys s (mo e speci ic ac ions o look o USR). E e y g oup o USR ca alys s was chosen based on a li e a u e e iew, and dimensions we e de eloped based on he uni e si y impac s sugges ed by Vallaeys e al. 2009: (1) he o ganisa ional dimension includes s a , lec u e s, and uni e si y supplie s, as desc ibed in his s udy; (2) he o ganisa ional dimension includes e hical and en i onmen al managemen , as well as managemen s a ; (3) he educa ional dimension includes he impac on s uden s; (4) he cogni i e dimension includes impac s on esea che s; and (5) social pa icipa ion includes impac s on ex e nal ac o s such as ci il socie y, and p i a e and public sec o s. 2.1.4. P omo ion o uni e si y en ep eneu ship as USR ca alys s En ep eneu ship is an impo an ca alys o social de elopmen , pa icula ly, when he economy is ocused on a mo e echnological socie y (Schumpe e & Opie 1934). Uni e si ies a e a key ac o o echnological and economic de elopmen (Mowe y e al. 2001; Rosenbe ga & Nelsonb 1994). Thus, since en ep eneu ship is conside ed an oppo uni y o he de elopmen o socie y (S e anescu e al. 2011), i is conside ed ha 8 en ep eneu ship o e s inno a i e solu ions o social p oblems (OECD 2010). Sus ainable en ep eneu ship is iewed as a ype o en ep eneu ship ha sea ches o en i onmen al solu ions (Dean & McMullen 2007; Cohen & Winn 2007; Yo k & Venka a aman 2010) and social challenges (Zah a e al. 2009). Because he bene i s o en ep eneu ship a e closely ela ed o social and economic de elopmen , he issue dese es special a en ion o highligh he ela ionships be ween uni e si y and en ep eneu ship. Fi s ly, i is impo an o poin ou ha uni e si ies inc ease e o s o p omo e en ep eneu ial p ojec s (Ro hae mel e al. 2007), due o he abili y o uni e si ies o s a and encou age he en u e-c ea ion p ocess (Rasmussen & Bo ch 2010). Mo eo e , uni e si ies boos en ep eneu ship ac i i ies in o de o achie e social bene i s (Williams e al. 2016). Uni e si ies ake ca e o hei social esponsibili ies, pa icula ly o s uden demands, as educa ional impac s seem o be he uni e si y a ea wi h he highes le el o a en ion (Vázquez e al. 2016), and s uden s seem o ep esen he main s akeholde (Sánchez & Maina des 2016). 2.2. Hypo heses The knowledge economy (D ucke 1969) has gi en he uni e si ies new economic and social challenges, inducing hem o ede ine hei objec i es, s a egies and policies (GUNI 2017; Bena ides 2001). These challenges need o inco po a e s a egic ini ia i es in hei s a egic plans (Kelle 1983) because such plans a e an ins umen ha comp ises uni e si y mission, ision, s a egic objec i es, and pe o mance indica o s (Llinàs e al. 2011). The e o e, his wo k sugges s as hypo heses ha a se ies o USR ca alys s a e conside ed in s a egic plans o add ess hese economic and social challenges:  H1. Uni e si ies include in hei s a egic plans he ollowing ca alys s o achie e esponsible uni e si y managemen : o Responsible economic managemen o esou ces o Equal oppo uni ies o P omo ion o en i onmen al ca e o Responsible managemen s a  H2. Uni e si ies include in hei s a egic plans he ollowing ca alys s o achie e esponsible academic aining: o De elopmen o esponsible capabili ies and compe ences among s uden s o E o s o s uden employabili y o Adjus academic aining o socie y needs  H3 Uni e si ies include in hei s a egic plans he ollowing ca alys s o achie e esponsible esea ch: o E hical ways o in es iga e and o p oduce use ul esea ch o socie y  H4 Uni e si ies include on hei s a egic plans he ollowing ca alys s o achie e esponsible social de elopmen : o P omo ion o solida i y and uni e si y coope a ion 3. METHOD To de elop his wo k, a hema ic analysis was d i en by a deduc i e a p io i empla e o codes (C ab ee & Mille 1999). In his esea ch, he empla e was de ined by a p e ious esea ch ob ained using a Delphi me hod as explained p e iously. 9 To de elop a deduc i e analysis, he empla e, o codebook as C ab ee & Mille (1999) called i , is de ined be o e he in-dep h analysis o he da a. In his case, a model o USR ob ained om he Delphi me hod was aken as a empla e o de elop his esea ch. Thus, he hema ic analysis d i en in his wo k is explained in six phases (see Table 3). The o al o uni e si ies wi h open access in hei s a egic plans was 41. Howe e , only 23 we e up- o-da e, as Sec ion 3.1 explains. Consequen ly, 23 s a egic plans we e en e ed in o ATLAS. i, a compu e p og am ha is widely used in quali a i e da a analysis and da a coding p ocesses. The objec i e o his documen collec ion was o ga he s a egic plans o analyse and ep esen USR ca alys s conside ed wi hin s a egic plans. 3.1. Sample The sample has been buil conside ing 76 Spanish uni e si ies (CRUE 2017) and ollowing he p ocess p esen ed in Figu e 1. Fi s ly, 41 s a egic plans wi h open access we e iden i ied, and he 35 uni e si ies wi hou an a ailable s a egic plan we e con ac ed ia e-mail. Ne e heless, hose who answe ed he eques did no ha e he s a egic plans upda ed o 2017. In consequence, he sample consis s o 23 alid s a egic plans (see Table 4). 3.2. Ins umen As an ins umen o analysis, he ATLAS. i p og am was chosen because i enables de eloping a sys ema ic analysis and has capaci y o a la ge amoun o da a. Mo eo e , he p og am p o ides ools o codi y and anno a e special indings o acili a e analysis o esul s. 3.3. Valida ion The alida ion o his s udy has been di ided in o wo pa s: 1. Valida ion o he o iginal model ob ained om he s udy ‘D i e s and ba ie s o uni e si y social esponsibili y: in eg a ion in o s a egic plans’ in which he eliabili y o he in e nal consis ency o he ques ionnai e applied o academic au ho i ies was es ed. I was shown ha ques ions o he ins umen measu ed he same cons uc and we e highly co ela ed. 2. Valida ion o hema ic analysis, in his pa , alida ion and c edibili y is ela ed o co obo a ing and legi ima ing coded hemes, which is he p ocess o con i ming he indings (C ab ee & Mille 1999). In his line, he di e en esea che s o his wo k made he co esponding e i ica ions o esul s om mul iple pe spec i es. 4. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS The p esen a ion o esul s is di ided in o h ee pa s o e lec he h ee objec i es o his wo k: 1) examine he main ca alys s o uni e si y social esponsibili y (USR) and gi e esponse o he hypo heses; 2) ep esen ela ions among USR ca alys s h ough seman ic ne wo ks; and 3) analyse he ole o uni e si y p omo ion o en ep eneu ship. 4.1. Main ca alys s in s a egic plans and hypo heses In his pa , he main ca alys s a e p esen ed o each dimension gi ing esponse o he ou hypo heses. The ca alys s we e chosen by he numbe o 16 Ha a d Uni e si y P ess. Shah, C., 2013. E ec s o awa eness on coo dina ion in collabo a i e in o ma ion seeking. J Am Soc In Sci Tec, 64(6), pp.1122–1143. Shaile , G., 2004. An In oduc ion o Co po a e Go e nance in Aus alia, Aus alia, Sydney: Pea son Educa ion. S e anescu, D., Gabo , M.R. & Con iu, L.C., 2011. In e na ional Con e ence on Economy and Managemen T ans o ma ion. In Changes o he Eu opean Coun ies dis ibu ions based on En ep eneu ship and Social Economic Sus ainable De elopmen Indica o s, in Recen Resea che s in Economics and Managemen T ans o ma ion. pp. 153–158. Teelken, C. & Deem, R., 2013. All a e equal, bu some a e mo e equal han o he s: manage ialism and gende equali y in highe educa ion in compa a i e pe spec i e. Compa a i e Educa ion, 49(4), pp.520–535. UNED | Uni e sidad Nacional de Educación a Dis ancia, La UNED emp ende. A ailable a : h p://po al.uned.es/po al/page?_pageid=93,644264&_dad=po al&_schema=PO RTAL&id_no icia=1529 [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. UNESCO, 1998. Decla ación Mundial sob e la Educación Supe io en el Siglo XXI: Visión y Acción. In Con e encia Mundial Sob e la Educación Supe io . UNESCO. Pa ís, F ancia. UNIBILITY, U.M.S.R., 2017. Guidelines o Uni e si ies Engaging in Social Responsibili y, Uni e sidad de Alcalá, Escuela de Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h ps://escuelaemp endimien o.uah.es/Emp endimien oIndex [Accessed Decembe 1, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Alican e, 2017. P oyec o ua:emp ende. A ailable a : h ps://uaemp ende.ua.es/ [Accessed Decembe 2, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Cádiz, Cá ed a de Emp endedo es. A ailable a : h p://emp endedo es.uca.es/p oyec os/ [Accessed Decembe 9, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Can ab ia, Vice ec o ado de Es udian es y Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h ps://web.unican.es/consejo- di eccion/ ces udian esempleabilidadyemp endimien o/a ea-de-emp endimien o [Accessed Decembe 5, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Deus o, 2017. ENTREPRENEURSHIP. A ailable a : h p://www.deus o.es/cs/Sa elli e/deus o/en/en ep eneu ship-1?cambioidioma=si [Accessed Decembe 4, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Ex emadu a, Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h ps://www.unex.es/o ganizacion/gobie no/ ice ec o ados/ icealumn/ unciones/e mp endimien o [Accessed Decembe 7, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Jaén, P og ama de Apoyo a Emp endedo es. A ailable a : h ps://www10.ujaen.es/conocenos/o ganos-gobie no/ ices /p og ama-de-apoyo- emp endedo es [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e sidad de la Rioja, Cá ed a de Emp endedo es. A ailable a : h ps:// undacion.uni ioja.es/Ca ed as_subsecciones/ iew/6/Ca ed a-de- Emp endedo es [Accessed Decembe 5, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Las Palmas de G an Cana ia, 2016. Cá ed a Fundación DISA-ULPGC. A ailable a : h p://www.ca ed a undaciondisaulpgc.o g/ [Accessed Decembe 7, 2017]. Uni e sidad de Salamanca, 2017. Vice ec o ado de In es igación y T ans e encia. A ailable a : h ps://emp ende.usal.es/ [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. 17 Uni e sidad del Pais Vasco, Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h ps://www.ehu.eus/es/web/gipuzkoa/emp endizaje [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e sidad Loyola Andalucía, EMPLEABILIDAD Y EMPRENDIMIENTO. A ailable a : h ps://www.uloyola.es/se icios/empleabilidad-y- emp endimien o/emp endimien o [Accessed Decembe 3, 2017]. Uni e sidad Pon i icia de Comillas, P og ama de Apoyo a Emp endedo es. A ailable a : h p://www.comillas.edu/es/?op ion=com_con en & iew=a icle&id=303&I emid= 641&jjj=1512577301696 [Accessed Decembe 4, 2017]. Uni e sidad San Jo ge, 2016. APOYO Y FOMENTO DE EMPRENDEDORES. A ailable a : h ps://www.usj.es/alumnos/o ien acion-empleo/emp ende [Accessed Decembe 5, 2017]. Uni e sidade da Co uña, C eación de Emp esas. A ailable a : h p://o i.udc.es/c eacion-de-emp esas/ [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e sidade de San iago de Compos ela, Á ea de Valo ización, T ans e encia e Emp endemen o. A ailable a : h p://www.usc.es/es/in es igacion/a e/ [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e si a de Ba celona, Ba celona Ins i u d’Emp enedo ia. A ailable a : h p://www.ub.edu/emp enedo ia/ [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e si a de les Illes Balea s, 2017. P og ama de c eación de emp esas. A ailable a : h p://inno acio.uib.es/es/Fomen -de-lespe i -emp enedo / [Accessed No embe 29, 2017]. Uni e si a de València, 2017. In es igación y T ans e encia. A ailable a : h ps://www.u .es/u web/uni e sidad/es/in es igacion- ans e encia/emp endedu ia/p esen acion-no edades-1285946448373.h ml [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e si a Obe a de Ca alunya, Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h p://alumni.uoc.edu/opencms_alumni/opencms/es/se icios/emp endimien o/inde x.h ml [Accessed Decembe 1, 2017]. Uni e si a Poli ècnica de València, 2012. Vice ec o ado de Empleo y Emp endimien o. A ailable a : h ps://www.up .es/en idades/VE2/index-es.h ml [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. Uni e si a Pompeu Fab a, Uni e si a Pompeu Fab a. A ailable a : h ps://www.up .edu/web/inno acio/emp enedo s-es udian s [Accessed Decembe 6, 2017]. USDG, 2017. USDG Uni e si ies Sus einable De elopmen Goals. Pu ing he 2030 Agenda a he hea o ou uni e si ies’ wo k, p.h p://ods.ca /en/. Vallaeys, F., 2013. La Responsabilidad Social Uni e si a ia: ¿Cómo en ende la pa a que e la y p ac ica la? Re is a se icio comuni a io, 2(1). Vallaeys, F., De la C uz, C. & Sasia, P., 2009. Responsabilidad Social Uni e si a ia. Manual p ime os pasos, México D.F., México.: McG aw Hill. Vázquez, J.L., Aza, C. & Lane o, A., 2016. Ci izens’ pe cep ions on social esponsibili y in public adminis a ion o ganiza ions: a case s udy on Spain. T ansyl anian Re iew o Adminis a i e Sciences, (48), pp.166–183. Williams, C.C., Ma inez-Pe ez, A. & Kedi , A.M., 2016. In o mal En ep eneu ship in De eloping Economies: The Impac s o S a ing Up Un egis e ed on Fi m Pe o mance. En ep eneu ship Theo y and P ac ice. Yo k, J.G. & Venka a aman, S., 2010. The en ep eneu –en i onmen nexus: Unce ain y, inno a ion, and alloca ion. Jou nal o Business Ven u ing, 25(5), 18 pp.449–463. Zah a, S.A. e al., 2009. A ypology o social en ep eneu s: Mo i es, sea ch p ocesses and e hical challenges. Jou nal o Business Ven u ing, 24(5), pp.519–532. 19 De ini ion o Uni e si y Social Responsibili y by expe s “Is o ensu e ha s a ha e he bes wo king condi ions and ha he igh s o s uden s, esea che s and eache s a e espec ed, wi h special a en ion o pe sons wi h disabili ies, disad an aged g oups, and gende equali y” “Is a concep ha should be applied o e e y uni e si y ac i i y, due uni e si y is c ea ed as wo king o ganiza ion on he knowledge ield wi h he main objec i e o guide educa ion and esea ch o he common good, hus all hei ac ions should be aimed a de eloping hei esponsibili y owa ds socie y” “Is he ans e o aining and educa ion ac i i ies o a knowledge amewo k, allowing solu ions o social issues” “Is he eal commi men o he public uni e si ies o manage hei impac s (social, en i onmen al, economic, educa ional and esea ch). Is he imp o emen o employmen si ua ion o hei employees, also, i means o ain c i ical ci izens who p omo e social de elopmen ” “Is when he uni e si ies a e awa e o hei ela ionships and impac s in o hei communi y. Social esponsibili y achie e when uni e si ies gi e special ecogni ion o en i onmen al impac s, also when uni e si ies look o wa d o sol e social issues” “Is o apply all he p ecep s o co po a e social esponsibili y wi h he pa icula i ies o he uni e si y en i onmen ” “Is he p omo ion o ac i i ies o s uden s en ol o social esponsibili y h ow hei academic aining, including hose ac i i ies ha bene i in e nal s akeholde s” “Is o p omo e and suppo esponsible p ac ices, in o de o he uni e si y become a o ce o c ea ing alue, helping o ans o m a socie y and a mo e p oduc i e, sus ainable and inclusi e economy” “Is a way o manage he uni e si ies, aking in o conside a ion opinions and in e es s o e e y s akeholde ” “Is he demons a ion ha aining and esea ch is ocused on he social needs. I e e s o opics such as en i onmen al ca e, social inclusi eness, and accoun abili y cul u e” “I is he commi men o Highe Educa ion Ins i u ions o ca e o he en i onmen , go e nance, anspa ency, equi y, access o cul u e, p omo ion o s uden s heal h and employees, esea ch wi h social use and imp o emen o wo king condi ions. Thei goal is o achie e a digni ied li e o all” “USR is a alue ela ed o eedom o eaching and esea ch, which guide he labou o he ul ilmen o i s social mission” “Is he uni e si y s akeholde engagemen included on s a egic plans and uni e si y ac i i ies o achie e a sus ainable, peace ul and cul u ed socie y” Table 1.Expe s de ini ions o Uni e si y Social Responsibili y ob ained om s udy “D i e s and ba ie s o Uni e si y Social Responsibili y: in eg a ion in o s a egic plans” (Ramos-Monge e al. 2017a) Uni e si y dimensions Ca alys s Li e a u e suppo Responsible uni e si y managemen Responsible economic managemen o esou ces (PRME 2018; GRI 2017) Sub-ca alys s:  Look o s able unding sou ces  Look o p i a e unds  P omo ion o ne wo ks wi h companies o look o p i a e unds  Look o in e nal unds o esea ch  P omo ion o ne wo ks wi h companies o p omo e esea ch, dissemina ion and en ep eneu ship  T anspa ency and accoun abili y 20 Equal oppo uni ies (Jacobs 1996; Teelken & Deem 2013) Sub-ca alys s:  Gende equali y  Uni e si y ac ions o people wi h disabili ies  Uni e si y ac ions o people wi h limi ed esou ces  Campus wi h disabili y se ices P omo ion o en i onmen al ca e (Hines e al. 1987) Sub-ca alys s:  Responsible esou ce managemen  Ene gy e iciency plan  P omo ion o sus ainable anspo Responsible managemen s a (Gibbs & Co ey 2016; Mu ay & Lomba di 2010; Ra en & Suseno 2006; A aya & Pe e s 2010) Sub-ca alys s:  E alua ions o he eaching pe o mance  E alua ions o adminis a i e pe o mance  P omo ion o cul u al ac i i ies among s a  T aining o uni e si y s a inside and ou side he ins i u ion  Concilia ion o wo k and amily li e  A ac ion o s a alen Responsible academic aining De elop o esponsible capabili ies and compe ences among s uden s (PRME 2018). Volun ee ing (C onje 2015). Sub-ca alys s:  P omo ion o cul u al ac i i ies among s uden s  P omo ion o e hical aining linked o he p o essional p o ile  P omo ion o spo s ac i i ies among s uden s  Abili y o in e ac and collabo a e in o a eam  A ac ion o s uden alen  P omo ion o olun ee ing E o s o s uden s employabili y (Williams e al. 2016; Ra en 2017; Cooke 2007; Fe ei a e al. 2017) Sub-ca alys s:  P omo ion o en ep eneu ial p ojec s  P omo ion o ne wo ks wi h companies o p omo e s uden employmen Adjus academic aining o socie y needs (Bena ides 2001) Sub-ca alys s:  P omo ion o o eign language lea ning in he uni e si y  P omo ion o schola ships o inancial aid Responsible esea ch E hical way o in es iga e and in e p e indings (Owen e al. 2012; PRME 2018; UNESCO 1998; GUNI 2017) Sub-ca alys s:  Con ibu ion o esea ch o he p o ec ion o he en i onmen  Con ibu ion o esea ch o social de elopmen  S udies o social e u n o he uni e si y esea ch ac i i y  Con ibu ion o esea ch ela ed o equali y, mino i ies, disad an aged g oups, gende iolence, ci izen pa icipa ion, child po e y and anspa ency 21  Uni e si y pa icipa ion in he de ini ion o na ional esea ch p io i ies  Uni e si y ac ions o dissemina e esea ch (publica ions, semina s, con e ences, e c.)  A ac ion o esea ch alen  Look o p i a e unds o esea ch  Look o public unds o esea ch  Fos e ing esea ch ela ionships wi h companies o o he s o ganiza ions Responsible social de elopmen P omo ion o solida i y and uni e si y coope a ion (GUNI 2017; De la C uz & Sasia 2008; UNESCO 1998; Mo is e al. 2011; Rexhepia e al. 2013) Sub-ca alys s:  Figh disc imina ion  P omo ion o cul u al and spo ing ac i i ies o socie y  A en ion o cu en p oblems o poli ics, economy, heal h, e c.  P omo ion o uni e si y communica ion h ough di e en pa hs (social ne wo ks, mee ings, web pages, con e ences, cong esses, e c.)  De elop Uni e si y Social Responsibili y memo y  P omo ion o ac ion o comba po e y  P omo ion o en ep eneu ial p ojec s in ol ing he pa icipa ion o socie y Table 2.Model and li e a u e suppo o ca alys s and sub-ca alys s o USR Phase Desc ip ion o phase Con ibu ion 1 De eloping he code manual In his s age, a dep h analysis o USR heo y was ca ied ou , heo e ical concep s was aken o coding in e es ing ea u es o he da a ela ed o ca alys s o USR. Fi e code ca ego ies we e in eg a ed in o code manual (dimensions o uni e si y wo k). 2 Tes ing he eliabili y o codes To de e mina e he applicabili y o he aw in o ma ion coding a Delphi me hod was ca ied ou o es he code manual. Thus, he Delphi me hod consul ed 27 academic expe s on social esponsibili y om Spain and Mexico. Alpha o C onbach o alida e in e nal consis ency o he ques ionnai e was measu ed ob aining sa is ac o y esul s. 3 Summa izing da a and iden i ying ini ial hemes Reading aw da a om he s a egic plans. Then, ecognizing key poin s o whole analysis. In his s ep, s a egic ac ions speci ied in o plans we e analysed. 4 Applying empla e o codes and addi ional coding To use a “ empla e analy ic echnique”. A model esul ing om he Delphi me hod was in oduced in o ATLAS. i p og am. This model include a se ies o USR ca alys s in o HEI, all hose ca alys s we e consensual by expe s. Thus, coding he segmen s o da a in plans ook pa in he p ocess, ma ching ela ed segmen s wi h codes (USR ca alys s). Also, induc i e codes (Boya zis 1998)we e added, due o he ac ha hey we e closely ela ed wi h o he ca alys s ha we e al eady egis e ed on USR d i e s model. Ones he plans we e coded, seman ic ne wo k we e de eloped o clus e he codes o each a ea o uni e si y wo k. 5 Connec ing he codes and iden i ying hemes This connec ion o codes is he p ocess o de e mining pa e ns (C ab ee & Mille 1999). The hemes we e ede ined. In his wo k, hemes a e equi alen o dimensions o uni e si y wo k. Al hough hese dimensions we e p e-de ined, ca alys s we e g ouped in o ca alys s (gene al) and sub-ca alys s (mo e speci ic ca alys s). 6 Co obo a ing and legi ima ing coded hemes Co obo a ing i o con i m he indings (C ab ee & Mille 1999). This phase is closely ela ed o alidi y and c edibili y. In his s udy, esea che s o his wo k had made he e i ica ions o 22 esul s. Making e i ica ion possible as esea ches ga e hei pe spec i es o alida e esul s. Table 3.Phases o codi ica ion da a based on C ab ee & Mille 1999; Boya zis 1998 Figu e1.P ocess o he sample selec ion. 31 wi h open access o hei s s a egic plan 50 Public 26 P i a e 76 Uni e si ies in Spain 10 wi h open access o hei s s a egic plan 18 wi h s a egic plan wi hin ime pe iod 2017 5 wi h s a egic plan wi hin ime pe iod 2017 19 wi hou open access o hei s s a egic plan 16 wi hou open access o hei s s a egic plan 35 eques o s a egic plan 6 esponses 2 uni e si ies do no ha e s a egic plan 4 uni e si ies ha e s a egic plan ou o he pe iod 23 Spanish Uni e si y plans as he sample Du a ion o uni e si y plan Uni e si a de València 2016-2019 Uni e si a Poli ècnica de València 2015-2020 Uni e sidade de San iago de Compos ela 2011-2020 Uni e si a Pompeu Fab a 2016-2025 Uni e sidade da Co uña 2013-2020 Uni e sidad de Jaén 2014-2020 Uni e sidad Pon i icia de Comillas 2014-2018 Uni e si a de Ba celona 2008-2020 Uni e sidad de Salamanca 2013-2018 Uni e sidad del Pais Vasco 2012-2017 Uni e si a Obe a de Ca alunya 2014-2020 Uni e sidad San Jo ge 2015-2020 Uni e si a de les Illes Balea s 2015-2017 Uni e sidad Loyola Andalucía 2013-2018 UNED | Uni e sidad Nacional de Educación a Dis ancia 2014-2017 Uni e sidad de Deus o 2014-2018 Uni e sidad de Cádiz 2015-2020 Uni e sidad de la Rioja 2014-2020 Uni e sidad de Ex emadu a 2014-2018 Uni e sidad de Las Palmas de G an Cana ia 2015-2018 Uni e sidad de Alcalá 2015-2017 Uni e sidad de Alican e 2014-2019 Uni e sidad de Can ab ia 2015-2018 Table 4.Uni e si ies wi h s a egic plan aking as sample Table 5.Main USR ca alys s on uni e si y managemen Table 6.Main USR ca alys s on academic aining Uni e si y dimensions Ca alys s Sub-Ca alys s S a egic plans men ions Fo ce in pe cen age Responsible uni e si y managemen Responsible economic managemen o esou ces Look o s able unding sou ces 13 56% T anspa ency and accoun abili y 12 52% Equal oppo uni ies 12 52% P omo ion o en i onmen al ca e Responsible esou ce managemen 13 56% Responsible managemen s a E alua ions o he eaching pe o mance 12 52% T aining o uni e si y s a inside and ou side he ins i u ion 16 69% Uni e si y dimensions Ca alys s Sub-Ca alys s S a egic plans men ions Fo ce in pe cen age Responsible academic aining De elop o esponsible capabili ies and compe ences among s uden s P omo ion o olun ee ing 12 52% E o s o s uden s employabili y P omo ion o en ep eneu ial p ojec s 13 56% Adjus academic aining o socie y needs P omo ion o o eign language lea ning in he uni e si y 15 65% 24 Table 7.Main USR ca alys s on esponsible esea ch Table 8.Main USR ca alys s on social de elopmen Figu e 2.Seman ic ne wo k o esponsible uni e si y managemen and sub-ca alys s. The op node o he igu e is he dimension and hei immedia e o sp ing a e he ca alys s. The emaining nodes a e conside ed sub-ca alys s. Uni e si y dimensions Ca alys s Sub-Ca alys s S a egic plans men ions Fo ce in pe cen age Responsible esea ch E hical way o in es iga e and in e p e indings Uni e si y ac ions o dissemina e esea ch (publica ions, semina s, con e ences, e c.) 13 56% Uni e si y dimensions Ca alys s Sub-Ca alys s S a egic plans men ions Fo ce in pe cen age Responsible social de elopmen P omo ion o solida i y and uni e si y coope a ion P omo ion o uni e si y communica ion h ough di e en pa hs (social ne wo ks, mee ings, web pages, con e ences, cong esses, e c.) 13 56% 25 Figu e 3.Seman ic ne wo k o esponsible academic aining and sub-ca alys s. The op node o he igu e is he dimension and hei immedia e o sp ing a e he ca alys s. The emaining nodes a e conside ed sub- ca alys s. Figu e 4.Seman ic ne wo k o esponsible esea ch and sub-ca alys s. The op node o he igu e is he dimension and hei immedia e o sp ing a e he ca alys s. The emaining nodes a e conside ed sub-ca alys s.