scieee Open visual document viewer

Influence of Ambient Temperature on Radiative and Convective Heat Dissipation Ratio in Polymer Heat Sinks

Komínek, Jan; Zachar, Martin; Guzej, Michal; Bartuli, Erik; Kotrbáček, Petr

Abstract

Miniaturization of electronic devices leads to new heat dissipation challenges and traditional cooling methods need to be replaced by new better ones. Polymer heat sinks may, thanks to their unique properties, replace standardly used heat sink materials in certain applications, especially in applications with high ambient temperature. Polymers natively dispose of high surface emissivity in comparison with glossy metals. This high emissivity allows a larger amount of heat to be dissipated to the ambient with the fourth power of its absolute surface temperature. This paper shows the change in radiative and convective heat transfer from polymer heat sinks used in different ambient temperatures. Furthermore, the observed polymer heat sinks have differently oriented graphite filler caused by their molding process differences, therefore their thermal conductivity anisotropies and overall cooling efficiencies also differ. Furthermore, it is also shown that a high radiative heat transfer leads to minimizing these cooling efficiency differences between these polymer heat sinks of the same geometry. The measurements were conducted at HEATLAB, Brno University of Technology.

Full text

polyme s A icle In luence o Ambien Tempe a u e on Radia i e and Con ec i e Hea Dissipa ion Ra io in Polyme Hea Sinks Jan Kominek * , Ma in Zacha , Michal Guzej, E ik Ba uli and Pe Ko bacek   Ci a ion: Kominek, J.; Zacha , M.; Guzej, M.; Ba uli, E.; Ko bacek, P. In luence o Ambien Tempe a u e on Radia i e and Con ec i e Hea Dissipa ion Ra io in Polyme Hea Sinks. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ polym13142286 Academic Edi o : Ni in Meh a Recei ed: 16 June 2021 Accep ed: 2 July 2021 Published: 12 July 2021 Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in published maps and ins i u ional a il- ia ions. Copy igh : © 2021 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps:// c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Hea T ans e and Fluid Flow Labo a o y, Facul y o Mechanical Enginee ing, B no Uni e si y o Technology (BUT), Technicka 2896, 616 69 B no, Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed] (M.Z.); [email p o ec ed] (M.G.); [email p o ec ed] (E.B.); Pe [email p o ec ed] (P.K.) *Co espondence: [email p o ec ed] Abs ac : Minia u iza ion o elec onic de ices leads o new hea dissipa ion challenges and adi- ional cooling me hods need o be eplaced by new be e ones. Polyme hea sinks may, hanks o hei unique p ope ies, eplace s anda dly used hea sink ma e ials in ce ain applica ions, especially in applica ions wi h high ambien empe a u e. Polyme s na i ely dispose o high su ace emissi i y in compa ison wi h glossy me als. This high emissi i y allows a la ge amoun o hea o be dissi- pa ed o he ambien wi h he ou h powe o i s absolu e su ace empe a u e. This pape shows he change in adia i e and con ec i e hea ans e om polyme hea sinks used in di e en ambien empe a u es. Fu he mo e, he obse ed polyme hea sinks ha e di e en ly o ien ed g aphi e ille caused by hei molding p ocess di e ences, he e o e hei he mal conduc i i y aniso opies and o e all cooling e iciencies also di e . Fu he mo e, i is also shown ha a high adia i e hea ans e leads o minimizing hese cooling e iciency di e ences be ween hese polyme hea sinks o he same geome y. The measu emen s we e conduc ed a HEATLAB, B no Uni e si y o Technology. Keywo ds: polyme hea sink; he mal managemen ; he mal conduc i i y; adia ion; con ec- ion; composi es 1. In oduc ion Wi h new ad ancemen s in elec onics, especially in hei minia u iza ion, new cooling challenges need o be me so ha he elec onics’ e iciency and se ice li e would no dec ease. Polyme s, due o hei easy ab ica ion, low cos and low weigh , a e al eady ind- ing hei ways in many ac i e cooling applica ions despi e hei low he mal conduc i i y as polyme hea exchange s in cooling elec onics and also in he au omo i e indus y [ 1 – 4 ]. Thei amo phous s uc u e esponsible o hei low he mal conduc i i y p e en s hei usage in passi e cooling applica ions as hea sinks. This disad an age could be elimina ed i he igh ille s wi h high he mal conduc i i y would be inco po a ed in o he base polyme ma ix using mode n p oduc ion echniques, hese composi es could be used in elec onics passi e cooling applica ions whe e hey would b ing wi h hem o he polyme bene i s [ 5 – 11 ]. High he mally conduc i e polyme s could be used as hea sinks especially in applica ions whe e high ambien empe a u e is expec ed. Mode n polyme blends o e high he mal conduc i i y, bu in compa ison wi h adi ionally used aluminum and coppe , hei conduc i i y s ill emains low app oxima ely by en old. Howe e , hey could be used in applica ions whe e he hea ans e ia conduc ion inside he ma e ial is no es ic ing he o e all hea ans e om he cooled pa o he ambien , which is ypical in passi e cooling using a hea sink [ 4 ]. Especially in applica ions whe e hea ans e om he hea sink by con ec ion is s ic ly limi ed (enclosed space) o whe e hei na u ally high emissi i y would lead o high hea ans e ia adia ion (applica ions wi h high ambien empe a u e). Beha io o polyme hea sinks en iched wi h g aphi e lakes used in ambien wi h oom empe a u e was s udied in [ 12 ]. These esul s showed especially he impo ance Polyme s 2021,13, 2286. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/polym13142286 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/polyme s Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 2 o 12 o he choice o mel en y du ing hei ab ica ion bu did no del e deepe in o he hea sinks’ e iciency i condi ions would be any di e en om he oom empe a u e and i na u al con ec ion would be limi ed due o use in enclosed space as is o en he case in eal applica ions. As polyme hea sinks ha ha e na u ally high emissi i y hea dissipa ion ia adi- a ion canno be igno ed, he hea sinks’ design should be subjec ed o his mode o hea ans e . Impo ance o adia ion on he o e all cooling e iciency was s udied in [ 13 – 16 ]. Huang, L. e al. in [ 14 ] s a e ha compa ing high emissi i y coa ing wi h a low emissi i y one applied o an LED ilamen bulb can educe i s empe a u e by 10%. B a o, R.H. e al. in [ 16 ] showed in hei publica ion ha in case o an a ay o elec onic chips moun ed be ween wo pa allel pla es he he mal adia ion ep esen ed 33% o he o al hea ans e . This pape shows how hea dissipa ion om a polyme hea sink changes when sub- jec ed o di e en ambien empe a u es. Change o ai p ope ies wi h ising empe a u e by ens o deg ees is minimal; he e o e, he hea ans e coe icien by con ec ion s ays almos he same. Hence, using a me al hea sink wi h glossy su ace in an ambien whe e he empe a u e should ise would lead o ise o he en i e cooling sys em by he same ma gin. Howe e , i a hea sink wi h high su ace emissi i y is applied, his inc ease in ambien empe a u e can lead o signi ican ise o hea dissipa ion ia adia ion, he e o e be e cooling e iciency. 2. Ma e ials and Me hods 2.1. Geome y o Tes ed Hea Sinks The es ed hea sinks had dimensions (58 × 40 × 106) mm wi h 9 ins (de ails a e shown in Figu e 1). Fo he s udy’s pu pose he chosen design was simplis ic o allow an easy way o calcula e dissipa ed hea h ough he hea sinks’ ins acco ding o [ 17 ]. Hea sinks we e p oduced om Polyamide 66 as he ma ix ma e ial wi h g aphi e lakes as he main ille ha ensu ed he high he mal conduc i i y. This blend is comme cially a ailable and was p oduced by A ien (P ague, Czech Republic). The he mal conduc i i y o his ma e ial anged om 5 o 20 W/m · K depending on he ille o ien a ion, densi y 1640 kg/m 3 . The hea capaci y is unknown (no essen ial because he da a p esen ed in his pape is o he he mal s eady s a e). All he alues we e aken om he o icial da a shee . Figu e 1. Geome y o es ed hea sinks (dimensions a e in mm). To compa e he in luence o he mel low, wo polyme hea sinks o he same geome- y we e used in he measu emen . The di e ence be ween he wo hea sinks was in he mel en y poin du ing p oduc ion. One hea sink was p oduced wi h he mel en y along he hea sink’s longe base’s edge so he mel would low in pa allel wi h he hea sink’s ins and he o he had he mel en y on he sho e base’s edge pe pendicula o he hea sink’s ins. En y poin s o bo h measu ed hea sinks a e shown in Figu e 2. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 3 o 12 Figu e 2. Mel en ance along sinks’ edge ( ed), di ec ion o mel low depic ed by g een a ow. Le —edge o longe base’s side (mel low pa allel o he ins), igh —edge o sho e base’s side (mel low pe pendicula o he ins). Fu he mo e, an aluminum hea sink o he same geome y was also compa ed wi h he wo polyme hea sinks. The aluminum hea sink had he mal conduc i i y 130 W/m · K and a low su ace emissi i y. One o he measu ed polyme hea sinks wi h high emissi i y and he aluminum hea sink wi h low emissi i y a e shown in Figu e 3. Figu e 3. Measu ed polyme (le ) and aluminum ( igh ) hea sinks side by side. The esul s om he cooling e iciency we e used o demons a e he impo ance o he su ace emissi i y in applica ion wi h highe ambien empe a u es. 2.2. Measu emen Desc ip ion The measu ed polyme hea sinks we e si ua ed inside a measu emen box, which was placed inside a he mos a ic chambe Binde MK 720 (manu ac u e Binde , H adec K alo e, Czech Republic) du ing he conduc ed measu emen s. The box wi h one o he measu ed hea sinks inside he he mos a ic chambe is shown in Figu e 4. The box’s holde s ouched he hea sinks only in ou poin s o ensu e minimal hea conduc ion away om he hea sinks and in o he box i sel . The he mos a ic chambe se ed as he sou ce o he desi ed ambien empe a u e and he box p o ec ed he hea sinks om any unwan ed o ced con ec ion c ea ed by he chambe ’s ans. The box’s on doo also se ed as a placemen o he FLIR E5 he mog aphic came a. The hea leading o he hea sink was gene a ed wi h a esis ance hea e . The con ac su ace a ea be ween he hea sink and he hea e was 35 × 40 mm. The placemen o he hea e on he hea sink’s base is shown in Figu e 5. A he mally conduc i e pas e wi h a he mal conduc i i y o 4.2 W/m · K was applied be ween he hea sou ce and he hea sink base. This pas e ensu ed a good he mal con ac , which was he same o e e y expe imen . Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 4 o 12 Figu e 4. Hea sink placemen inside he measu emen box (le ), measu emen box inside he he mos a ic chambe wi h a ached he mal imaging came a (middle), de ail o he measu emen box ( igh ). Figu e 5. Hea e placed in he middle o he hea sink’s base (dimensions a e in mm). The hea ou pu o he hea e was se o 15 W wi h a p ecision o ± 0.1 W. I was u he con olled wi h a LabView p og am o ensu e he same amoun o hea was gene a ed ega dless o he hea e ’s esis ance change caused by inc ease o i s empe a u e. E e y measu emen was epea ed wi h de aching and ea aching he hea e . The measu emen s’ esul s we e compa ed o elimina e he possibili y o he bad con ac be ween he hea e and he hea sink leading o he measu emen e o . Bo h measu ed polyme hea sinks we e measu ed in wo posi ions as in [ 12 ]. The posi ions we e named ‘de aul ’ and ‘upside-down’. This led o change o he ille o ien a- ion in ela ion o g a i y and he e o e buoyancy in case o he polyme hea sink wi h he mel en y poin pa allel o he ins, which as was shown in [ 12 ] led o di e en cooling e iciencies. Change o he mel low di ec ion in ega d o g a i y is shown in Figu e 6. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 5 o 12 Figu e 6. O ien a ion o he mel en y o bo h measu ed hea sinks in wo di e en measu emen posi ions, le —de aul posi ion, igh —‘upside-down’. Mel en ance along he ed edge, mel low in he di ec ion o he g een a ow. ( A ) hea sink wi h mel en ance along he longe base’s edge (pa allel o ins)—de aul posi ion, ( B ) hea sink wi h mel en ance along he longe base’s edge (pa allel o ins)—upside-down posi ion, ( C ) hea sink wi h mel en ance along he sho e base’s edge (pe pendicula o ins)—de aul posi ion, ( D ) hea sink wi h mel en ance along he sho e base’s edge (pe pendicula o ins)—upside-down posi ion. 3. Measu emen Unce ain y Analysis To ensu e maximal measu emen p ecision and o minimize all he possible e o s he ollowing measu es we e aken. The used he mocouple was calib a ed o di e en ambien empe a u es beyond i s s anda d measu emen p ecision o ± 2.2 ◦ C. I s new maximum de ia ion was se o only ±0.2 ◦C. When a s eady s a e o he measu emen s was achie ed a he mal came a FLIR E5 wi h measu emen p ecision o ± 2 ◦ C and wi h esolu ion o 120 × 90 pixels was used o u he analyze he empe a u e ield on he hea sinks’ ins. To u he inc ease i s p ecision ano he ype K he mocouple calib a ed he same way as he p e ious one was placed in he back wall inside an a ea which was seen in all he measu emen s. As his wall was dyed wi h a g aphi e sp ay o known emissi i y he he mal image y esul s could be u he adjus ed by compa ing i s alues inside he a ea whe e he he mocouple was si ua ed. This a ea is shown in Figu e 7. To ensu e he ambien empe a u e was as close o i s desi ed alue, wo esis ance he mome e s PT100 we e placed a he bo om o he measu emen box which se ed as he inle once he ai low induced by he na u al con ec ion was s abilized. These he mome e s measu ed wi h he measu emen e o o ±0.2 ◦C. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 6 o 12 Figu e 7. The mog am wi h an indica ed a ea whe e he he mocouple o he e i ica ion o he co ec measu ed empe a u e ia he mal image y was placed. 4. Resul s All he con igu a ions we e measu ed mul iple imes (as desc ibed in Sec ion 2.2) wi h good epea abili y. The da a p esen ed was gene a ed by a e aging he esul s o each measu ed con igu a ion. 4.1. Tempe a u e Compa ison Bo h compa ed polyme hea sinks we e measu ed wi h 15 W he mal inpu powe o he hea e in wo posi ions as desc ibed in Sec ion 2.2. The ambien empe a u e was main ained a 50 ◦C. The empe a u es o he hea e a e shown in Table 1. Table 1. Hea e empe a u e in all polyme hea sinks conduc ed measu emen s o ambien empe - a u e 50 ◦C. The le e s in pa en heses e e o posi ions acco ding o Figu e 6. De aul Posi ion (◦C) Upside-Down (◦C) Posi ion Di e ence (◦C) Mel en ance along he longe base’s edge (pa allel o ins) 99.0 (A) 97.1 (B) 1.9 (A)-(B) Mel en ance along he sho e base’s edge (pe pendicula o ins) 100.3 (C) 100.5 (D) 0.2 (D)-(C) Mel En y Di e ence (◦C) 1.5 (C)-(A) 3.4 (D)-(B) These esul s can be compa ed wi h he esul s om measu emen o ambien em- pe a u e 20 ◦C. These esul s a e shown in Table 2. By compa ing hese esul s, i can be concluded ha wi h highe ambien empe a u e he impo ance o he mel en y poin in o he mold diminishes and he same s ands o he impo ance o he hea sink’s posi ion i he mel en y poin is pa allel o ins. Going om ambien empe a u e 20 ◦ C o 50 ◦ C dec eased he hea e ’s empe a u e be ween he bes and he wo s hea sinks’ pe o mances by 49.3% om 6.7 ◦ C o only 3.4 ◦ C. In case o e iciency change o he hea sink wi h mel en e ing along he base’s longe edge he hea e ’s empe a u e di e ence d opped by 25% om 2.8 ◦C o 1.9 ◦C. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 7 o 12 Table 2. Hea e empe a u e in all polyme hea sinks conduc ed measu emen s o ambien empe - a u e 20 ◦C [12]. The le e s in pa en heses e e o posi ions acco ding o Figu e 6. De aul Posi ion (◦C) Upside-Down (◦C) Posi ion Di e ence (◦C) Mel en ance along he longe base’s edge (pa allel o ins) 72.3 (A) 69.5 (B) 2.8 (A)-(B) Mel en ance along he sho e base’s edge (pe pendicula o ins) 76.1 (C) 76.2 (D) 0.1 (D)-(C) Mel En y Di e ence (◦C) 3.9 (C)-(A) 6.7 (D)-(B) 4.2. Con ec ion-Radia ion Hea T ans e Compa ison F om he p e iously shown esul s i is isible ha he di e ence be ween cooling e iciencies o he measu ed hea sinks is signi ican ly lowe o he ambien empe a u e 50 ◦ C compa ed o he esul s o he ambien empe a u e 20 ◦ C. This phenomenon shows ha he means o hea dissipa ion om he hea sinks is signi ican ly di e en . The a io be ween he dissipa ion ia con ec ion and adia ion mus change i he hea sinks ha e an o e all highe empe a u e as he adia ion hea ans e ises wi h he ou h powe o he su ace’s absolu e empe a u e. To p o e his change in hea ans e means om he hea sinks o he ambien he same app oach o he e iciency compa ison as in [ 12 ] was used. The equa ions used in his app oach a e o be ound in [ 17 ] and i analyses he amoun o dissipa ed hea ia hea sink’s ins. Fi s ly, he empe a u e ield on he hea sinks’ ins is measu ed wi h he mal image y and he empe a u e di e ence be ween he hea sinks’ ins empe a u e and ambien is calcula ed. ∆Tij =T in,ij −Tambien . (1) The index i e e s o he in numbe and j o he su ace Sj . To calcula e hea ans e by con ec ion Rayleigh numbe is de e mined. Raij = g·βai ·∆Tij ·L3 j νai ·αai , (2) whe e g is g a i a ional accele a ion, βai is he mal expansion coe icien o he ambien ai , νai is kinema ic iscosi y o he ambien ai , αai is he mal di usi i y o he ambien ai and Lj is cha ac e is ic dimension o he su ace Sj ( L1 , L2 , L3 — in leng h, L4 , L5 —su ace a ea di ided by i s pe ime e ). The ai p ope ies used o he calcula ion a e de e mined om so called ilm empe a u e on he ins. T ilm,ij =T in,ij +Tambien 2. (3) Nex , con ec i e hea ans e is calcula ed as a unc ion o Rayleigh numbe , ambien ai ’s he mal conduc i i y and cha ac e is ic dimension. hcon ,ij = jRaij,Lj,kai , (4) whe e kai is ambien ai ’s he mal conduc i i y a he ilm empe a u e. The adia i e hea ans e was calcula ed using he known su ace emissi i y and S e an–Bol zmann cons an . h ad,ij =εσT in,ij +Tambien ·T2 in,ij +T2 ambien , (5) whe e he su ace emissi i y εwas se o 0.95 and σis S e an–Bol zmann cons an . Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 8 o 12 Fo he ins’ su ace ha adia ed hea be ween hemsel es a iew ac o was calcu- la ed. Figu e 8shows he su aces whe e he iew ac o was conside ed (blue) and whe e i was no ( ed). The ou e su aces wi hou aking iew ac o in o accoun o med oge he an a ea o 18,963 mm 2 and he in e nal su aces whe e he iew ac o was conside ed c ea ed oge he an a ea o 23,331 mm 2 , which is 55.2% o he en i e su ace. This means ha less han a hal o he hea sink’s su ace can adia e hea away eely. Figu e 8. Hea sinks’ su aces wi hou aking iew ac o in o accoun ( ed) and wi h aking iew ac o in o accoun (blue). The inal indi idual hea lows om ins Qiwe e calcula ed: Qi=∑ j Qij,Qij =hcon ,ij +h∗ ad,ij·Aj·∆Tij, (6) whe e h is hea ans e coe icien , he index i e e s o he in numbe and j e e s o indi idual su ace a eas o ins Aj. Table 3shows calcula ed hea lows om ins o he hea sink made wi h he mel low pa allel o i s ins o he measu ed hea sinks in bo h 20 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C ambien empe a u es and di e ences be ween hem. Table 3. Calcula ed hea ans e s om ins o he polyme hea sink wi h mel low pa allel o i s ins o bo h 20 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C ambien empe a u es. The le e s in pa en heses e e o posi ions acco ding o Figu e 6. Hea Sink Mel En e ing Pa allelly o Fins (De aul Posi ion) (A) Mel En e ing Pa allelly o Fins (Upside-Down Posi ion) (B) Ambien empe a u e (◦C) 20 50 20 50 Con ec i e hea low (W) 7.7 6.8 7.6 6.9 Radia i e hea low (W) 3.2 3.8 3.1 3.9 To al hea low (W) 10.9 10.5 10.8 10.7 Addi ionally, Table 4shows calcula ed hea lows om ins o he hea sink made wi h he mel low pe pendicula o i s ins o he measu ed hea sinks in bo h 20 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C ambien empe a u es and di e ences be ween hem. Polyme s 2021,13, 2286 9 o 12 Table 4. Calcula ed hea ans e s om ins o he polyme hea sink wi h mel low pe pendicula o i s ins o bo h 20 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C ambien empe a u es. The le e s in pa en heses e e o posi ions acco ding o Figu e 6. Hea Sink Mel En e ing Pe pendicula ly o Fins (De aul Posi ion) (C) Mel En e ing Pe pendicula ly o Fins (Upside-Down Posi ion) (D) Ambien empe a u e (◦C) 20 50 20 50 Con ec i e hea low (W) 7.2 6.1 7.2 6.0 Radia i e hea low (W) 2.9 3.4 3.0 3.4 To al hea low (W) 10.1 9.5 10.2 9.4 F om hese esul s i is ob ious ha hea ans e by adia ion g ows signi ican ly wi h highe ambien empe a u e. As he same amoun o powe is gene a ed inside he hea e and he adia i e hea ans e g ows, he hea ans e ia con ec ion mus d op. Calcula ed hea ans e om hea sinks’ ins also shows d op in he o e all hea ans e and especially o he case o he hea sink p oduced wi h mel low pe pendicula o i s ins. As he hea sink’s base is he wa mes pa , he amoun o hea adia ed away o he ambien ises he e he mos , hence he o al amoun o hea ans e ed away om ins d ops. 4.3. Con ec ion-Radia ion Hea T ans e Compa ison The same ype o measu emen was done o an aluminum hea sink o he same geome y. The hea e was a ached o he aluminum hea sink wi h inpu powe o 15 W and he sou ce’s empe a u e was measu ed in bo h condi ions wi h ambien empe a u e 20 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C. Table 5shows how he hea e ‘s empe a u e changed be ween he wo measu emen condi ions o he aluminum hea sink and bo h polyme hea sinks. Table 5. Hea e ‘s empe a u e change wi h change o he ambien empe a u e on di e en measu ed hea sinks. The le e s in pa en heses e e o posi ions acco ding o Figu e 6. The da a o he ambien empe a u e 20 ◦C a e om [12]. Hea Sink Hea e Tempe a u e o Ambien Tempe a u e 20 ◦C (◦C) Hea e Tempe a u e o Ambien Tempe a u e 50 ◦C (◦C) Di e ence (◦C) Aluminum 65.7 95.6 29.9 Polyme made wi h mel low along ins (B) 69.5 97.1 27.6 Polyme made wi h mel low pe pendicula o ins (D) 76.1 100.3 24.2 In case o he aluminum hea sink, he hea e ’s empe a u e ose by 29.9 ◦ C wi h he ambien empe a u e change o 30 ◦ C. In case o he polyme hea sink p oduced wi h he mel low pa allel o i s ins and posi ioned in he mos sui able posi ion o induced na u al con ec ion he hea e ’s empe a u e inc emen o he same ambien empe a u e change was 27.6 ◦ C. This p o es ha he amoun o hea adia ed away hanks o i s high emissi i y ises wi h inc easing he ambien empe a u e. This phenomenon is especially isible in case o he hea sink p oduced wi h mel low pe pendicula o i s ins whe e he hea e ’s empe a u e ose only by 24.2 ◦ C. This is caused by hea sink’s unideal hea conduc i i y o i s ins; he e o e, i s o e hea ed base adia es away e en highe amoun o hea .