scieee Open visual document viewer

Tradition and modernity in the Portuguese Inner Colonisation: the laboratorial case of Pegões

PRISTA, Marta Lalanda

Abstract

The intertwining of tradition and modernity is a rooted discussion within the Portuguese history of architecture since the mid-twentieth century. From then on, the dichotomisation of erudite and vernacular architectures, urban and rural cultures and settings, nationalist and universalistic values, seems to have been debated and reviewed. This paper aims to contribute to such de-essentialisation processes by focusing on the Portuguese Estado Novo project of inner colonisation conducted by the Junta de Colonização Interna (1936-1974), and examining the dialogues and frictions between its traditional and modern ideals and accomplishments as spatialised in one very particular colony – Pegões. On the one hand, the paper ponders upon the Portuguese colonisation’s neo-physiocratic basis, locating the tradition-modernity binomial in the intent to modernise the agrarian world while perpetuating its traditional lifestyle, simultaneously fostering an economic development, social control and national identity. On the other hand, the paper draws upon the laboratorial colony of Pegões, which was the first, the biggest and the only one built in Southern Portugal, to more thickly analyse the colonisation’s politics and fulfilments, and its understanding and uses of traditional and modernist ideals, aesthetics and representations. Special attention is given to the dialectics between political and economic agencies, social negotiations, embodied experiences, and meanings and affections, by looking into the official-written history of the colony and emotional-sensory memory of its settlers. This approach results from the work carried out within the scope of MODSCAPES research project (funded by HERA Uses of the Past), notably in what concerns its research line on the memories and perceptions of European colonisation policies, schemes and resulting landscapes.

Full text

342 TRADITION AND MODERNITY IN THE PORTUGUESE INNER COLONISATION The labo a o ial case o Pegões Ma a P is a CRIA/NOVA FCSH, Cen o em Rede de In es igação em An opologia / Cen e o Resea ch in An h opology, Lisbon, Po ugal Abs ac The in e wining o adi ion and mode ni y is a oo ed discussion wi hin he Po uguese his o y o a chi ec u e since he mid- wen ie h cen u y. F om hen on, he dicho omisa ion o e udi e and e nacula a chi ec u es, u ban and u al cul u es and se ings, na ionalis and uni e salis ic alues, seems o ha e been deba ed and e iewed. This pape aims o con ibu e o such de-essen ialisa ion p ocesses by ocusing on he Po uguese Es ado No o p ojec o inne colonisa ion conduc ed by he Jun a de Colonização In e na (1936-1974), and examining he dialogues and ic ions be ween i s adi ional and mode n ideals and accomplishmen s as spa ialised in one e y pa icula colony – Pegões. On he one hand, he pape ponde s upon he Po uguese colonisa ion’s neo-physioc a ic basis, loca ing he adi ion-mode ni y binomial in he in en o mode nise he ag a ian wo ld while pe pe ua ing i s adi ional li es yle, simul aneously os e ing an economic de elopmen , social con ol and na ional iden i y. On he o he hand, he pape d aws upon he labo a o ial colony o Pegões, which was he i s , he bigges and he only one buil in Sou he n Po ugal, o mo e hickly analyse he colonisa ion’s poli ics and ul ilmen s, and i s unde s anding and uses o adi ional and mode nis ideals, aes he ics and ep esen a ions. Special a en ion is gi en o he dialec ics be ween poli ical and economic agencies, social nego ia ions, embodied expe iences, and meanings and a ec ions, by looking in o he o icial-w i en his o y o he colony and emo ional-senso y memo y o i s se le s. This app oach esul s om he wo k ca ied ou wi hin he scope o MODSCAPES esea ch p ojec ( unded by HERA Uses o he Pas ), no ably in wha conce ns i s esea ch line on he memo ies and pe cep ions o Eu opean colonisa ion policies, schemes and esul ing landscapes. Keywo ds: T adi ionalism, Mode nism, He i age. In oduc ion The in e wining o adi ion and mode ni y is a oo ed discussion wi hin he Po uguese his o y o a chi ec u e since he mid- wen ie h cen u y. Ma ked by poli ical eadings and social posi ionings, such discussion ends o asse a dialogical ela ion be ween mode n a chi ec u e and e nacula isms. Howe e , i Regionalism, Na ionalism & Mode n A chi ec u e Con e ence P oceedings. Po o, Oc obe 25-27, 2018 343 also se s apa mode n mo emen and na ional a chi ec u es (Po as, 1978), mode nism and c i ical egionalism (Tos ões, 1997), in wha is seen as he pola i ies and pe meabili ies o a chi ec u e wi hin he Po uguese his o y o a (Cos a, 1995). A ecognised challenge he e lies in de ini ions. Di e en au ho s use he e ms mode n a chi ec u e, mode n mo emen , mode nism, o e e o in e changing e e en s. Acco ding o McLeod (2017), such polysemy led o he banalisa ion o ‘mode nism’ which nowadays needs adjec i es and ad e bs o be clea on pu pose 1 . This e lec s he pos mode n e ision o he concep and i s de iance o a hegemonic de ini ion. Bu also he academic eluc ance in hinking a chi ec u e beyond i s echnical and aes he ical ames, and wi hin i s poli ical, in ellec ual and social milieu. In Po ugal, a emp s o o e come his bias led o con as ing eadings o mode nis a chi ec u e as an exp ession o a ascis egime (B i es, 2016) and i s con es a ion (Almeida, 2008). Howe e , despi e he e o s o blu e udi e and popula cul u es’ apa ness in ligh o pos mode n hyb idi y, cul u al binomials like he u ban/ u al o he adi ion/in ellec ual keep being essen ialised due o he nos algic imagining o u ali y and adi ion as au hen ic and na u al (Vellinga, 2007). This pape aims o con ibu e o his discussion by d awing a en ion o he policies, schemes and p ojec s o inne colonisa ion in Po ugal, aking one colony as a case s udy. B oadly speaking, inne colonisa ion was ca ied ou by se e al o ali a ian and au ho i a ian Eu opean egimes inspi ed by neo- physioc a icis , mode nis and poli ical u opias h oughou he 20 h cen u y, and aimed o de elop ag a ian economies and os e na ional and na ionalis ic iden i ies h ough a mode nisa ion o ag icul u al sec o s, ese lemen o popula ions, and u al planning and building 2 . I he e o e p esen s a unique case s udy o discuss he in e wining o adi ion and mode ni y, u al and u ban, popula and e udi e ca ego ies. Compa a i ely, Po ugal was a poo u al coun y wi h sca ce indus ial de elopmen uled by an au ho i a ian conse a i e egime ha elied on 1 Some examples a e he ‘high’ o Sco , he ‘anxious’ o Goldhagen and Legaul , he ‘sou he n’ o CEAA, o he ‘o he ’ o DOCOMOMO. 2 I s compa a i e analysis is he co e subjec o he esea ch p ojec MODSCAPES – Mode nis Rein en ions o he Ru al Landscape, in he scope o which he esea ch ha led his pape was conduc ed. Ma a P is a, T adi ion and mode ni y in he Po uguese Inne Colonisa ion. The labo a o ial case o Pegões 344 di e en poli ical s anding eli es and imposed a adi ional o de on socie y. Consequen ly, i s inne colonisa ion p ojec led by he Jun a de Colonização In e na (1936-1974) du ing he igh -wing dic a o ship o Es ado No o (1933- 1974), was ola ile in ideological and echnological guidelines, and cons ained in scale and impac s. One pa icula colony excels in he con ex o Po uguese inne colonisa ion: Pegões. On he one hand, looking a he pas , mos au ho s acknowledged Pegões as JCI labo a o ial se lemen due o i s loca ion, ex ension and ma e ial and social schemes o implemen a ion. On he o he hand, looking a he p esen , Pegões is s ill ac i e in he ag icul u al sec o , made a name in he wine business, as is unde a p ocess o he i agisa ion in poli ical, social and in ellec ual a enas. Thus, Pegões is a pa icula ly eloquen ield o examine how di e en ac o s a scene physically and concep ually loca ed and keep loca ing adi ion and mode ni y in social space h ough social ep esen a ions, ela ionships and p ac ices ha b ing oge he popula and e udi e cul u e, u al and u ban ea u es (c . Low, 1996). S ill a an explo a o y s age o esea ch, his pape aims o s ess how b oade pe spec i es on buil space can enligh en hese en anglemen s, by pu ing in o a dialogue o icial, in ellec ual and social discou ses on Pegões, collec ed by documen al and bibliog aphic esea ch, explo a o y ield ips, second-hand es imonies o se le s, and hei online sha ed memo ies. The labo a o ial and he excep ional case o Pegões colony Se e al au ho s ha e jus i ied he labo a o ial cha ac e o Pegões in JCI pu pose o es i s policies and plans de elopmen ’s managemen (Gue ei o, 2015). Howe e , his asse ion calls o mode a ion. Indeed, Pegões was he i s colony planned om sc a ch by JCI 3 and i s plans we e p esen ed in he same yea o JCI’s o ganic econ igu a ion (1942) 4 . No wi hs anding, Pegões e inces 3 The p e ious colonies o Milag es and Sabugal we e inhe i ed om p e ious ins i u ions ope a ing on inne colonisa ion. 4 Dec ee-Law n.º 32:439, Diá io do Go e no, 24 No embe 1942. Regionalism, Na ionalism & Mode n A chi ec u e Con e ence P oceedings. Po o, Oc obe 25-27, 2018 345 excep ional ea u es ha p eclude unde aking i linea ly as he p o o ype o Po uguese inne colonisa ion. Fi s , Pegões’ lands we e s a e-owned, no common lands no exp op ia ed. They we e dona ed in will by he cha i able landowne Ro isco Pais o he Lisbon Ci il Hospi als in 1932, ending up in JCI’s es a e in 1937 (Pe ei a, 2004). Secondly, Ro isco himsel had implemen ed a colonisa ion p ocess in 1/3 o Pegões a ms ead, a ac ing a ound 120 amilies om di e en o igins (Mes e, 2009) 5 . This acili a ed he p ocess and a oided ensions wi hin he deba e ha opposed landlo ds and p og essis eli es on he modali ies o ag a ian e o mism. In hi d place, all au ho s acknowledge he wo old dimensions o JCI ac ions, one being echnical-scien i ic and he o he poli ical-ideological (e.g. Sil a, 2011). He eo , conside ing ha u ali y was a key ac o o inne colonisa ion as an economy space and a eposi o y o na ional iden i y, and ha Pegões was he only colony buil in he Sou he n Po ugal, on he ou ski s o a majo u ban cen e, and close o a main access o na ional bo de s, i is a leas easonable o ques ion whe he Pegões wasn’ o emos JCI’s chie ac o p opaganda. These excep ional ea u es migh explain why Pegões excelled in ma e ial and he o ical in es men s compa ing o o he s colonies. I s 1942 plan was an ex ensi e and di e si ied p og amme ha included land clea ing, manu ing, hyd aulic wo ks, ese oi s, i iga ion sys ems, oad cons uc ion, houses ypologies and se e al public acili ies 6 . These assembled h ee nuclei wi h plo s o ganised along he hyd aulic ne wo k o na u al s eams in Pegões Velhos and Faias, and an a i icial sys em in Figuei as 7 . Such a dispe se mode o se lemen , mode a ed in Figuei as, sui ed he idea o comple e and sel -su icien ag a ian dwelling uni s (casal ag ícola). Each uni included 11ha o d y land o ce eals p oduc ion, 4ha o ineya d, 2ha o pine o es and 1ha o i iga ed land, and a building ha concen a ed housing and a ming acili ies such as a s able, a 5 Today’s illage o Fo os, be ween Pegões colony’s nucleous o Figuei as and Faias, esul ed om Ro isco’s ini ia i e. 6 In o ma ion collec ed h ough in di e en olumes published by JCI ega ding he colonisa ion o Pegões in he ICS’s A chi e o Social His o y and he a chi es o he Di ec o a e-Gene al o Ag icul u e and Ru al De elopmen o Po ugal. 7 Plo s di e ed in size: 20 ha in Pegões Velho, 18,5 ha in Figuei as and 15 ha in Faias. Ma a P is a, T adi ion and mode ni y in he Po uguese Inne Colonisa ion. The labo a o ial case o Pegões 346 pigs y, a silo, a poul y house and a abbi hu ch. Only a oo less dung was physically de ha ched. The o mal and unc ional op ions behind he plans o he dwelling uni s in Pegões con e ed hem a sense o uni y whils simul aneously keeping apa people and animals, gende s and usages, o he sake o new hygiene s anda ds. These ha e been conside ed a mode nis sub ex o JCI’s ac ion despi e he buildings being asse ed o be inspi ed in he adi ional ea u es ha he Es ado No o ein en ed as na ional a chi ec u e (e.g. Gue ei o, 2015). Sill, mode nism in inne colonisa ion is mainly associa ed wi h he unc ional, aes he ics and echnical layou s o i s public buildings, pa icula ly in Pegões whe e pa aboloide buildings s and ou as excep ional exp essions o Po uguese mode nism. Howe e ex ao dina y hese may be, looking beyond a chi ec u al ea u es, wha is excep ional in Pegões is he abundance o hese buildings. While o he colonies ell sho on public acili ies, Boalhosa o ins ance has only wo, in Pegões JCI ac ually buil ou schools, wo chu ches, wo medical cen es, h ee aining cen es, h ee echnical assis ance cen es, h ee b eeding cen es, along wi h s o age buildings and se e al dwellings o echnicians, eache s, social assis an s, and isi an s. The physical and ma e ial in es men s in Pegões ansla ed in o i s social space. The 206 amilies o se le s ha mo ed in o Pegões, in 1952 8 , we e by a he la ges ese lemen ca ied ou by JCI. Only 313 houses we e buil and 253 inhabi ed in he whole o he o he colonies. Such demog aphics canno be unde s ood solely as dimensional oday, no ably when poli ical, in ellec ual and social discou ses add ess he pas o inne colonisa ion h ough hei p esen engagemen in ac s o emembe ing and in e p e ing. A e all, place as a concep ual ca ego y is a social cons uc ion ha depends on he way mul iple ac o s li e, know, emembe , con es and imagine social spaces (Feld e Basso, 1996). 8 Ini ial plans poin ed a a ound 2500 people. The buil plan accommoda ed a ound 1100 people. 288 amilies applied, o which 94 amilies we e alloca ed o Pegões Velho, 50 o Figuei as, and 62 o Faias. Regionalism, Na ionalism & Mode n A chi ec u e Con e ence P oceedings. Po o, Oc obe 25-27, 2018 347 O e all, wo issues dese e special a en ion he e. The i s was he idea o ans o ming u al wo ke s in small u al landowne s (Maia, 2018). JCI announced he colonies as an incuba o o se le s o he colonial empi e and a means o comba g owing p ole a ia h ough he os e ing o a u al popula ion ha gua an eed Po uguese na ionali y (SNI, 1945). Bu his would be pu sued by a ac ing u al wo ke s wi h he p omise o owne ship o e ag icul u al sel - su icien p i a e p ope ies in a ime o se e e unemploymen and po e y. Emplaced, his popula ion would ep oduce he adi ional li es yles ha he S a e claimed o os e pa io ism wi h he assis ance o social con ol p og ammes and legisla ion on he indi isible, inalienable and inhe i able na u e o he colonisa ion plo s 9 . The second issue ela es o o ms o collec i e iden i ica ion. In o de o apply, se le s had o be heal hy Po uguese men, hold ag a ian expe ience, no eco d o misconduc , exp ess lo e o wo k and amily, and comply wi h he social and poli ical o de 10 . As s a ed in he Cons i u ion (1933), amily was he oo o he Po uguese ace, he basis o poli ical o de , and he labou o ce uni in u al space. O he o ms o social iden i ica ion we e mos ly disca ded. In ac , na ionwide, JCI’s calls o se le s esul ed in he ga he ing o people coming om Sou he n o No he n Po ugal in one single communi y, easing he os e ing o a na ional bu no egional ones. Religious iden i ies we e no disca ded ei he , bu i s Ca holic sup emacy was la en in he building o chu ches and he colonisa ion’s aming in he ag a ian social doc ine (JCI, 1962). In sho , JCI pu o p ac ice he Es ado No o ilogy ‘God, Fa he land, Family’. Aes he ics and poli ics in he s udy o inne colonisa ion Mos au ho s ha add ess he opic o inne colonisa ion in Po ugal h ough i s a chi ec u al and u ban designs acknowledge ha ea u es o adi ion and o mode ni y we e en angled in he p og ammes and plans o JCI. In Pegões, he 9 Law 2014, Di io do Go e no, 27 May 1946. 10 Dec ee-Law n.º 36:709, Diá io do Go e no, 5 Janua y 1948. Ma a P is a, T adi ion and mode ni y in he Po uguese Inne Colonisa ion. The labo a o ial case o Pegões 348 unc ional and hygienic mode n conce ns wi h he house (Ca a ino, 2010) a e coun e poised o he oman ic ein e p e a ion o u al g amma s in he image o a Po uguese house (Coelho, 2009). Dwelling ypes a e simul aneously unde s ood o ha e s anda dised housing condi ions while a oiding u ban e udi e meaningless mono ony (Gue ei o, 2015). Bu p o oca i ely, by calling in o he housing p og ammes o Es ado No o, like he u ban Economic Houses, one could ead hese mode nising ai s con e sely. Compa able in e oga ions a ise ega ding public spaces. U ban a angemen s a e seen as displays o a mode n e i o ial legibili y (Gue ei o, 20015), bu sha e disposi ions wi h adi ional illages. Mechanisa ion o ag icul u e is acknowledged a majo goal (Sousa, 1964) bu se le s we e gi en adi ional ools and pe o med adi ional u al labou (Pe ei a, 2004). Mode nis buildings in Pegões a e ex olled in aes he ic and echnical ea u es (Coelho, 2009), bu hei spa ial and unc ional p og ammes ansla e a adi ional social o de and s uc u e. So, he ques ion o be aised is i mode nis buildings in Pegões can be hough o as spa ial s a egies o pe pe ua e a adi ional u al communi y, despi e any mode ni y in hei o mal ea u es, and whe he his challenges hei mode nis concep ion. Despi e some e o s in p o iding mode n li e s anda ds, JCI s i ed o poli ically and echnically en o ce adi ion in Pegões by egula ion and social con ol measu es, bu also h ough u ban and a chi ec u al solu ions ha ein o ced social classes’ di isions and oo ed a sel - ep esen a ion o se le s as peasan s. The p oblem o unde s anding i s mode n- adi ional en anglemen seems o lie in he dis inc concep ualisa ion o mode nism depending on his adi ion being ein e p e ed by a egionalis o a na ionalis ic pu pose. Howe e , egionalism and na ionalism in a chi ec u e a e no me hodological dis inc (Ma ins, 1999); and p ocesses o adi ion’s de amilia iza ion, in e p e a ion and e- seman isa ion ha e ope a ed since he 19 h cen u y h oughou Eu ope, bo h p opelling mo emen s o social e o m and ac ing as ep ession ools (Lowen hal, 1985). Regionalism, Na ionalism & Mode n A chi ec u e Con e ence P oceedings. Po o, Oc obe 25-27, 2018 349 Mo eo e , ollowing on G i in (2007), mode nism is as a ques o an al e na i e mode ni y o he socie al e osion b ough up by mode nisa ion as a secula ising o ce. Because i is cosmological, and no aes he ic, mode nism became a powe ul ame in poli ical a enas. He ein he au ho asse ed ascism as one o i s exp essions, ecalling i s palingene ic ul ana ionalism ha ing ough adi ional eli es’ decadence h ough a o ali a ian con ol o na ional li e ha aimed o egene a e i s e hos. Fo emos , G i in’s a gumen app ises us o ake cau ion in ela ing mode nism o one o ano he poli ical s ance. Mode nism encompasses ascism, bu as cosmological phenomenon i ex ends way beyond. So, i s analysis canno be limi ed by looking a he wo ld o hings, unless i also akes in o conside a ion he wo ld o ideas. The main idea o his pape was p ecisely o b ing o wa d he abo e wo key lines o easoning in o he analysis o how mode n a chi ec u e, egionalism and na ionalism in e wine. Fu he mo e, because he excep ional cha ac e o Pegões is loca ed in pas and p esen e ms, i s canno be analysed in ma e ial o ms apa om hei con ex ual and dynamic imagina ion. Unde s anding space as meaning ul implies looking in o bo h i s social p oduc ion and social cons uc ion, i.e. he social, economic, ideological and echnological ac o s behind i s physical c ea ion, and he meaning cons ued wi hin he p ocesses o social exchange, con lic and con ol ha media e i s emo ional and senso ial expe ience (Low, 1996). I is in his ame ha buil space becomes a ‘means by which we gi e o m o, and come o an unde s anding o ou sel es, o he s, o abs ac ions such as he na ion o he mode n’ (Mille , 1994, p. 397). Th ough he social sciences lens, a chi ec u e is a p ocess o objec i ica ion o cul u e ha gi es ma e ial o m o cul u al p ocesses. I hus holds la en possibili ies o meaning, because hings, like people, ha e social li es (Appadu ai, 1986, p.3). This ames he i age as, mo e han a hing, a ‘p ocess o engagemen , an ac o communica ion and an ac o making meaning in and o he p esen ’ (Smi h, 2006, p. 1). One is hus equi ed o pay a en ion o cu en e en s in he unde s anding o he pas , namely in Pegões, whe e an emblema isa ion as he labo a o y o Po uguese Ma a P is a, T adi ion and mode ni y in he Po uguese Inne Colonisa ion. The labo a o ial case o Pegões 350 inne colonisa ion has buil up i s ep esen a ion as he spa ial locus o he dialogues be ween mode nism, egionalism and na ionalism. (Re)imagining Pegões Looking in o w i en ma e ials on Pegões and o al es imonies o i s o me se le s, de ia ions come o ligh . O cou se, by na u e o speech, dis inc sou ces e e o di e en na u es o easoning. Li e a u e emphasises he ou pu s o inne colonisa ion in depic ions o policies, p og ammes and ma e iali y. Fo me se le s sha e li e s o ies and expe iences, poin ing ou amily and social ne wo ks, and emembe ing special and dis essing e en s. Bu in he case o Pegões, he e is mo eo e a di e en way o looking a he colony. E udi e p oduc ion and social ac o s se apa and b ing oge he , espec i ely, he social p oduc ion and social cons uc ion o Pegões as a place. P o iding an illus a ion, mos au ho s ha add ess buil space in Pegões conside ha housing and public buildings we e di o ced in aes he ics and ideological ames, ela ing his gap o i s adi ional e sus mode nis languages and acili ies; bu se le s’ es imonies dilu e bo h his ma ching and apa ness in an imagining o he colony as a whole. No ably, hei memo ies ake buil space as he locus o pe sonal and collec i e expe iences and emo ions ha emi o he wo issues highligh ed abo e in ega d o JCI social p ojec - owne ship and iden i ies. Conce ning hei houses, o me se le s sha e a ondness o i s ‘Po uguese a chi ec u al s yle’ 11 while esen ing hei child en s udying a pe ol lamps’ ligh s, oads u ning in o muddy swamps du ing win e , access o po able wa e being di icul , and sinks being kep in ac o gues s while amilies used wooden cooking bowls 12 . They emembe women sewing and men playing ca ds in un e enings 13 in a pe o mance o gende oles ha was ep oduced by he echnicians in he ag icul u al ields and hei wi es in he con ol o hygiene and 11 Colona o de San o Isid o de Pegões, acebook page, 25 Janua y 2014. 12 In e iew wi h Moisés by Sa a Pe ei a, 27 Oc obe 2004. 13 Eulália Leb e, online commen in Colona o de San o Isid o de Pegões, acebook page, 21 Janua y 2015.