scieee Open visual document viewer

Breaking Barriers. Giancarlo De Carlo from CIAM to ILAUD

GRIECO, Lorenzo

Abstract

After World War II, the inflexibility characterizing the first CIAM congresses soon become unsustainable, provoking the criticism of Team 10, active from 1953 for a reform of the congress. The participated discourse of the group, “considering the characteristics of society and individuals”, would be inherited, years later, by the International Laboratory of Architecture and Urban Design (ILAUD), founded by Giancarlo De Carlo in 1976. The laboratory, together with the magazine Spazio e Società (1978-2001), called back to De Carlo’s operative militancy in Team 10, expressing a brand-new approach to urban studies. As De Carlo himself affirmed: “Some messages of Team 10 have been gathered in ILAUD […] but ILAUD and Team 10 are different things”. Indeed, the laboratory strongly pushed on the dimension of the project and on the students’ collective contribution. The project was no more an end point but became the tool through which every possible solution to the problem could be tested. Courses at ILAUD were given by international professionals like Aldo Van Eyck, Peter Smithson, Renzo Piano, Sverre Fehn and Balkrishna Vithaldas Doshi, some already in Team 10. The laboratory formed many young students, and several would have become internationally-recognized professionals -e.g. Eric Miralles, Carme Pinos, Santiago Calatrava, Mario Cucinella-. The paper wants to consider the contribution of ILAUD to urban studies and didactics through the examination of the rich material (annual publications, posters, projects, photos, etc.) collected in the archive of the Biblioteca Poletti in Modena. The aim is to point out how ILAUD represented a turning point in the formation of the post-CIAM generation and a certain reference for the architectural practices of the XXI century.

Full text

BREAKING BARRIERS Gianca lo De Ca lo om CIAM o ILAUD Lo enzo G ieco Uni e si à degli S udi di Roma To Ve ga a / Uni e si y o Rome To Ve ga a, Rome, I aly Abs ac A e Wo ld Wa II, he in lexibili y cha ac e izing he i s CIAM cong esses soon become unsus ainable, p o oking he c i icism o Team 10, ac i e om 1953 o a e o m o he cong ess. The pa icipa ed discou se o he g oup, “conside ing he cha ac e is ics o socie y and indi iduals”, would be inhe i ed, yea s la e , by he In e na ional Labo a o y o A chi ec u e and U ban Design (ILAUD), ounded by Gianca lo De Ca lo in 1976. The labo a o y, oge he wi h he magazine Spazio e Socie à (1978-2001), called back o De Ca lo’s ope a i e mili ancy in Team 10, exp essing a b and-new app oach o u ban s udies. As De Ca lo himsel a i med: “Some messages o Team 10 ha e been ga he ed in ILAUD […] bu ILAUD and Team 10 a e di e en hings”. Indeed, he labo a o y s ongly pushed on he dimension o he p ojec and on he s uden s’ collec i e con ibu ion. The p ojec was no mo e an end poin bu became he ool h ough which e e y possible solu ion o he p oblem could be es ed. Cou ses a ILAUD we e gi en by in e na ional p o essionals like Aldo Van Eyck, Pe e Smi hson, Renzo Piano, S e e Fehn and Balk ishna Vi haldas Doshi, some al eady in Team 10. The labo a o y o med many young s uden s, and se e al would ha e become in e na ionally- ecognized p o essionals -e.g. E ic Mi alles, Ca me Pinos, San iago Cala a a, Ma io Cucinella-. The pape wan s o conside he con ibu ion o ILAUD o u ban s udies and didac ics h ough he examina ion o he ich ma e ial (annual publica ions, pos e s, p ojec s, pho os, e c.) collec ed in he a chi e o he Biblio eca Pole i in Modena. The aim is o poin ou how ILAUD ep esen ed a u ning poin in he o ma ion o he pos -CIAM gene a ion and a ce ain e e ence o he a chi ec u al p ac ices o he XXI cen u y. Keywo ds: CIAM; Gianca lo De Ca lo; ILAUD; Spazio e Socie à; Team 10. Lo enzo G ieco, B eaking Ba ie s. Gianca lo De Ca lo om CIAM o ILAUD 168 The yea 2019 ma ks he cen ennial o he bi h o Gianca lo De Ca lo (1919- 2005)1. Among he mos in luen ial igu es in he pano ama o I alian a chi ec u al cul u e, De Ca lo a ended he las Cong ès in e na ionaux d'a chi ec u e mode ne and led he In e na ional Labo a o y o A chi ec u e and U ban Design (ILAUD), a pionee ing in e na ional cou se in a chi ec u e, ill his dea h in 2005. While s a ing a new discou se on euse and si e-speci ic in a chi ec u e, he expe imen o ILAUD p esen ed a new app oach o didac ics and, wi h i s in e na ional appeal, an icipa ed he la e success o s uden exchange p og ams2. This pape aims a ou lining he heo e ical, poli ical, didac ical and p o essional s imuli which con ibu ed o he cons uc ion o ILAUD, ancho ing i s o igin o he expe iences and he c i icism o De Ca lo wi hin he con ex o CIAM. Su ely in luenced by he in e na ional dialogue o he cong esses, he p og am o he labo a o y del ed deepe in o he hin s o he objec ions o he CIAM ’59 and humanis ically os e ed he connec ion be ween he u ban p ojec and i s speci ic cul u al con ex . Figu e 1. Gianca lo De Ca lo in U bino du ing he ILAUD Residen ial Cou se 1981. U bino, Facol à di Magis e o. 1 On his occasion he Associa ion o A chi ec s o Milan will open he exhibi ion “Gianca lo De Ca lo e l’ILAUD: una on ie a mobile” (May-Decembe 2019). 2 The E asmus p og am would ha e been c ea ed in 1987. REVISITING POST-CIAM GENERATION: deba es, p oposals and in ellec ual amewo k P oceedings. Po o, Ap il 11-13, 2019 169 Al hough De Ca lo’s con ibu ion o CIAM has al eady been indaga ed la gely (Molina i, 2003; Tuscano, 2003; Heu el & Risselada, 2005; Vido o, 2006), ew lines a e he e eques ed o he sake o comple eness. No wishing o educe he complexi y o a igu e as mul i ace ed as De Ca lo, i is app op ia e o colloca e his expe ience wi h CIAM in he con ex o he c i icism o he las Cong ess. I s p od omes we e al eady palpable du ing he nin h CIAM cong ess in Aix-en- P o ence (1953), which signed he pa icipa ion o a new gene a ion o a chi ec s, as Shad ach Woods (1923-1973), Alison Ma ga e Smi hson (1928-1993), Pe e Denham Smi hson (1923-2003), Aldo an Eyck (1918-1999), Geo ges Candilis (1913-1995) and Jacob Be end Bakema (1914-1981). They would ga he in he well-known Team 10, he eam in cha ge o o ganizing he 10 h edi ion o CIAM, o be held in Dub o nik in 1956. Al eady in 1953, he u u e Team 10 membe s s a ed o complain abou he blind a ionalis app oach o he Cong ess, a guing ha in CIAM he ision o he ci y had los i s human dimension. The opposi ion o he g oup unde lined he necessi y o a new momen o sel -c i icism o CIAM. The demand o a enewal b ough he cong ess sec e a y Sig ied Gieidon (1888- 1968) o ask council membe s o p esen a young a chi ec om hei own Coun y o be in oduced in he deba e. In esponse, E nes o Na han Roge s (1909-1969) and Lodo ico Ba biano di Belgiojoso (1909-2004) o I alian o ice B.B.P.R., in cha ge o he I alian eam, decided o b ing he young Gianca lo De Ca lo o he 1955 mee ing, despi e knowing his objec ions o he in ansigen ac ion o he Mode n Mo emen . Indeed, as edi o -in-chie (1953-1965) o Casabella Con inui à, Roge s had al eady in i ed De Ca lo o w i e on he magazine, whe e he young a chi ec had launched a campaign agains o malism in mode n a chi ec u e (De Ca lo, 1953). His edi o ial line had o cons i u e one o he h ee heo e ical di ec ions o he publica ion, along wi h he heme o p e ab ica ion, p esen ed by Ma co Zanuso, and ha o 'con inui y' in a chi ec u e, examined by Roge s (Molina i, 2003, pp. 99-102). The accusa ion o De Ca lo agains o malism was abo e all abou he de achmen o he Mode n Mo emen om he eedom and he cohe ence o ci iliza ion, which was ansla ed in o an allega ion o he indi e ence o a chi ec u e o cul u al and his o ical con ex s. His a icles claimed how op-down Lo enzo G ieco, B eaking Ba ie s. Gianca lo De Ca lo om CIAM o ILAUD 170 and u opic p ojec s, once allied in he igh agains academism, had hen los he con ac wi h he complexi y o he eal wo ld, o e looking he ela ion be ween humans and hei space. The posi ion exp essed in he a icles e ealed he una oidable adhe ence o he young a chi ec o he poli ics o Team 10. In cohe ence wi h his c i icism, in 1957 De Ca lo s epped back om he edi o ial boa d o he magazine. In his le e o esigna ion he lamen ed he con inui y wi h he Mode n Mo emen in he edi o ial line p omp ed by Roge s. He ema ked, abo e all, how in I aly ‘ he a i ma ion o a mode n language is no a all a posi i e esul , since oday e e ybody can use i : he se ious a chi ec s as he philis ines, and abo e all, he p ope y specula ion, which inds i com o able, quick and cheap’ (De Ca lo, 1957). The ision p oposed in Casabella Con inui à o e ed a p elude o he e en discou se ha De Ca lo b ough a he O e lo cong ess o 1959. In Ne he lands, a e p esen ing his p ojec o a public housing complex in Ma e a, he summa ized he his o y o he In e na ional Cong esses3. The excu sus was concluded by he asse ion ha ‘Ciam had died long ago’, accompanied by he desi e o de elop a new in e na ional o ganiza ion o keep ali e he deba e on a chi ec u e (Mum o d, 2000, p. 261). The dispu e clea ly exp essed he new wind agi a ing CIAM: he con as which a ose in O e lo u ned he possibili y o a cease o he cong esses in o a angible solu ion (Newman, 1961). Ex inguished he expe ience o CIAM and los he in e na ional b ea h o a e iew as Casabella Con inui à, De Ca lo ied o ma e ialize his isions in a new o m. ILAUD would ha e been he occasion o i o happen. In he middle we e he yea s o he you h p o es . De Ca lo looked wi h a en ion a he new s uden mo emen s, whose enqui ies ga e new uel o he social heo ies o Team 10. He hough ha hei eques o a e olu ion in he academic hie a chy had o be answe ed wi h a change in he ela ion be ween he ci y and he uni e si y. The heme eme ged in his p ojec s o he uni e si y campuses o U bino (1960-66), Dublin (1963-64) and Pa ia (1970-76) (Zuddas, 2015). The poli ical basis o hei 3 The p ojec o Ma e a ecei ed he disapp o al o Pe e Smi hson o no ha ing looked back o he genuine a chi ec u al con ex o he own. REVISITING POST-CIAM GENERATION: deba es, p oposals and in ellec ual amewo k P oceedings. Po o, Ap il 11-13, 2019 171 spa ial esul s was ins ead sugges ed in he pamphle “La Pi amide Ro escia a” (The O e u ned Py amid), published in Ap il 1968, one mon h be o e he Pa isian May. In he ex De Ca lo accused he dis ance be ween p o esso s and s uden s and denounced he impossibili y o he la e s o pa icipa e, decide and discuss on an ins i u ion which had been c ea ed o hem (De Ca lo, 1968). Such discon en nou ished he need o build a new ool, a ba ie - ee space: an ins i u ion ee om o malism, om he na ion-cen ic heo ies on a chi ec u e, om he s e ile hie a chy o eaching, om he scholas ic negligence owa ds he human en i onmen . The In e na ional Labo a o y o A chi ec u e and U ban Design was bo n. The idea o ILAUD was concei ed by Gianca lo De Ca lo along wi h Ca lo Bo (1911- 2001), ec o o he Uni e si y o U bino om 1947 o his dea h. De Ca lo was he di ec o , Connie E a Occhialini (1951-) he sec e a y. Among he main sou ces o inspi a ion he e we e de ini ely he CIAM summe schools (1949-1956), held in Venice om 1952 o 1956. Thei global discou se consis en ly in luenced he in e na ional a mosphe e o ILAUD, which in ol ed six a chi ec u e schools in Eu ope and he USA. A e a long co espondence wi h se e al uni e si ies, he g oup o six was o med and he ep esen a i es me in Milan in Ap il 1976. The Milan mee ing was ac ually a ep oduc ion o he o ganizing assemblies o CIAM: in ha occasion he leading boa d was se up, p oblems we e discussed, and a inal documen wi h goals was edac ed. Ac i i ies a ILAUD consis ed o wo p og ams: he Residen ial Cou se, wi h a du a ion o abou wo mon hs, and he Pe manen Ac i i ies, wo sho pe iods be o e and a e he esiden ial cou se, used espec i ely o ga he p epa a o y ma e ials o he design phase and o collec he inal wo ks (Occhialini, 2005). The me hodological app oach o didac ics encou aged he emo al o he adi ional di ision be ween s uden s and p o esso s, p omo ing esea ch g oups whe e ‘e e yone would ha e a ole as a p o agonis , he only dis inc ion being ha some would be senio , o he junio esea che s’ (1s Residen ial Cou se U bino 1976, om now on Yea book 1976, 1977, p. 6). Lo enzo G ieco, B eaking Ba ie s. Gianca lo De Ca lo om CIAM o ILAUD 172 Figu e 2. The mani es o ILAUD The i s Residen ial Cou se o ILAUD ook place in U bino om 6 Sep embe o 31 Oc obe 1976. In la e yea s he cou se would ha e mo ed o o he ci ies, such as Siena, San Ma ino and Venice4. Acco ding o he inal ag eemen wi h uni e si ies, he s uden s a ending he i s edi ion we e indi idua ed by p o esso s. They came om he Escuela Tecnica Supe io de A qui ec u a o Ba celona, he Ka holieke Uni e si ei o Leu en, he Massachuse s Ins i u e o Technology, he Oslo School o A chi ec u e, The Uni e si y o U bino and he Eidgenossische Technische Hochescule o Zu ich. English was chosen as a common language o communica ion. The objec i es o he cou se we e summa ized by De Ca lo in a epo , which was published in he opening o he i s yea book 4 F om 1976 o 1981 he labo a o y was based in U bino, hen om 1981 o 1990 in Siena, om 1992 o 1993 again in U bino, om 1994 o 1996 in San Ma ino, om 1997 o 2003 in Venice. In ecen yea s, unde he p esidency o Paolo Cecca elli, ILAUD has o ganized o ma i e e en s in collabo a ion wi h he Uni e si y o Fe a a. REVISITING POST-CIAM GENERATION: deba es, p oposals and in ellec ual amewo k P oceedings. Po o, Ap il 11-13, 2019 173 (Yea book 1976, 1977). The main goals highligh ed by he di ec o we e: he expe imen a ion o new me hodologies and design echniques; he c ea ion o an in e na ional ne o con ac s among s uden s and p o esso s; he oppo uni y o uni e si ies o compa e hei didac ic app oaches; he opening o a channel o cul u al exchange be ween uni e si ies. The backg ounds o s uden s, coming om di e se con ex s and o a ious ages, e lec ed he di e ence among he didac ic me hods o schools, ep esen ing he exis ing deba e be ween he poli ical du ies and he p o essional compe ences o a chi ec s. Admi ing ha schools we e usually o ien ed owa ds one o he wo ex emes and escuing his c i ic owa ds Fo malism, De Ca lo concei ed he labo a o y as a powe ul machine o b eak he ba ie s be ween hese wo s a ic on s (Yea book 1976, 1977, p. 9). In o de o achie e his aim, s uden s we e o be p o ided wi h he igh ins umen s o de eloping a c i ical consciousness. Magazines, o ins ance, we e conside ed by De Ca lo a undamen al ool o app ecia e di e en app oaches o he a chi ec u al p oblem. Tha was he eason why he w o e le e s o he edi o ial boa ds o in e na ional a chi ec u e magazines asking o some ee issues o be dona ed o ILAUD. The ai h in w i en ex s, supposed o ep esen he cu en a chi ec u al deba es, was al eady di used in he cul u al en i onmen o CIAM. In 1949 “Me on” published he ac s o he CIAM cong ess o Be gamo (Me on 33/34, July/Augus 1949), while in 1958 he Helsinki g oup o CIAM ga e li e o a b and-new e iew, “Le Ca é Bleu”. Few yea s a e ins i u ing ILAUD, in 1978, De Ca lo ook he di ec ion o a bilingual I alo-English magazine, “Spazio e Socie à - Space and Socie y”, which es i ies his in e es in he w i en medium. (Daidone, 2018)5. A ILAUD he ecundi y o he pape space was enhanced by he adop ion o he magazine o ma bo h as a pla o m o sha ed knowledge be ween lec u e s and as a ame o he inal p esen a ion o s uden wo ks. F om 1977 he Bulle ins we e p in ed: hey cons i u ed a collec ion o wo k p og ams, p ojec s, esea ches 5 The magazine was bo n in 1975 as he ansla ion o Hen i Le eb e and Ana ol Kopp’s F ench magazine “Espaces e Socié és”. De Ca lo es a ed he nume a ion and chose o publish new o iginal a icles. Lo enzo G ieco, B eaking Ba ie s. Gianca lo De Ca lo om CIAM o ILAUD 174 and epo s o he s a mee ings which we e sen o lec u e s o keep hem upda ed on he ac i i ies o he labo a o y6. The Yea books, ins ead, con ained a mo e de ailed exposi ion o wo ks p oduced du ing he p e ious yea s, combined wi h discussions on aims and on expe ienced c i icali ies, synopsis o lec u es, desc ip ions o p og ams and ips. They se ed as an occasion o p omo ion o ILAUD among uni e si ies, as well as a wi ness o he end p oduc s o he esea ch g oups. P ojec s we e ep esen ed by d awings, schemes and ex s ealized by s uden s, some imes oge he wi h membe s o he s a . I he i s Yea book o he 1976 cou se, published in 1977, was s ill pionee ing, he ollowing issues al eady showed a mo e s uc u ed o ganiza ion7. Figu e 3. D awing om Discussion on pa icipa ion and e- use, by Ma cià Codinachs and En ic Mi alles, om Yea book 1977 (1978), p.127. 6 Bolle ini 1977-2005. Modena, Biblio eca Luigi Pole i, In e na ional Labo a o y o A chi ec u e and U ban Design A chi e 1975 – 2004, . 1. 7 The index o he i s issue lis ed he ollowing en ies: in oduc ion; design opics; lec u es and con e sa ions; appendixes. Appendixes included documen s, no es, c i icism, lis o pa icipan s, calenda , p og am, epo and obse a ions on he Milan mee ing. On he second numbe : in oduc ion, calenda , p esen a ions o schools, semina s, design wo ks, lec u es. REVISITING POST-CIAM GENERATION: deba es, p oposals and in ellec ual amewo k P oceedings. Po o, Ap il 11-13, 2019 175 Yea books e en a es he names o people in ol ed, since hey con ain o each yea he lis s o s uden s, pe manen s a and lec u e s. Many ecognized p o essionals can be ound among hem. Du ing he i s yea among he lec u e s he e we e Ma io Bo a (1943-), José Mun añola (1940-), Ch is ian No be g- Schulz (1926-2000), Dol Schnebli (1928-2009) and Be na do Secchi (1934- 2014). In he 1977 edi ion among he isi ing c i ics he e we e Jacob Bakema, Ludo ico Qua oni (1911-1987) and Pe e Smi hson, among he s uden s he e we e he p omising Spanish En ic Mi alles (1955-2000), Ca me Pinós (1954-) and Josep Ma ia Mon ane (1954-). The adi ion o ex e nal a chi ec u e heo is s, designe s, igu es om he poli ical and ci il socie y, called o lec u e a ILAUD would ha e con inued h ough he yea s8. The in i a ion o Bakema and Smi hson o he second esiden ial cou se unde lines he poli ical deb o ILAUD o he heo ies o Team 10. Bakema spoke abou “A chi ec u e based on ene gy-lines”, p esen ing his wo ks and illus a ing objec i es and me hods o his design (Yea book 1977, 1978, p. 154-155). Pe e Smi hson, o his pa , deal wi h “Risking mo e o he u u e: some u he hough s on connec ion; conce ning na a i e and change o o ganiza ional base”. The p esence o his o y, embodied in mas e pieces o a chi ec u e and a , such as he Flagella ion o Pie o della F ancesca, was o he English a chi ec he occasion o a deepe e lec ion on connec ions, ying o in use “bo h o mal and na a i e connec ion om he classical pas in o he indus ial p esen ” (Yea book 1977, 1978 p. 163). The yea 1977 ma ked he i s o a long se ies o lessons ha Pe e Smi hson ga e a ILAUD; om hen he would pa icipa e e e y yea wi h a lec u e o his, ac ualizing he discou se o Team 10 (Occhialini 2016). He alked o di e en hemes, whose eccen ici y can only be e oked by some o he 8 Many ecognized p o essionals we e in i ed. Among hem he e we e: in 1978 Geo ge Candilis, Ca lo Doglio and José Ma ía Ga cía de Pa edes; in 1979 F ancesco Dal Co, S e e Fehn, Renzo Piano, San iago Cala a a and Aldo Van Eyck; in 1980 Leona do Bene olo, He man He zbe ge and Ma io Manie i-Elia; in 1981 Cha les Moo e; in 1982 he physicis Giuliano To aldo di F ancia; in 1983 Ralph E skine; in 1984 Edoa do Ben enu o and Lucien K oll; in 1985 F ançois Chaslin, José Ma ía Ga cía de Pa edes, Lucien K oll, Renzo Piano and Migueal Angel Roca; in 1986 Gae Aulen i, Reima Pie ilä and Man edo Ta u i; in 1987 Balk ishna Vi haldas Doshi; in 1988 A elie 5, Cha les Moo e and Be na do Secchi; in 1989 William J. R. Cu is, Geo ges Descombes and Aldo Van Eyck; in 1990 He man He zbe ge ; in 1991 Geo ges Descombes and Balk ishna Vi haldas Doshi; in 1992 Neza AlSayyad; in 1993 Danilo Gue i and Ralph E skine; in 1994 F anco Pu ini and he mayo o Naples An onio Bassolino; in 1995 he an h opologis F anco La Cecla, Colin S ans ield Smi h and Juhani Pallasmaa; in 1996 Raine Mahlamäki; in 1997 Leona do Bene olo, he as ophysicis F anco Pacini, And ew Todd and Gino Valle; in 1998 he philosophe and mayo o Venice Massimo Caccia i.