scieee Open visual document viewer

Systemic Creativty in Environmental and Ecological Art

Cardoso, Raquel de Oliveira

Abstract

In a moment when climate change, species depletion, generalized pollution, and other environmental problems are as critical as they are today, it is imperative to put our attention on creative perspectives around these issues. Creativity is the keyword of the present research, and it is seen here as a source and consequence of a society that is interested in positive change. Environmental and ecological artists are only one small part of the great community of people who are trying to overcome environmental issues, but they form an ideal group of people to be analyzed in relation to creativity. Using Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s systemic perspective on creativity, this research has used the information provided by 6 in-depth interviews with environmental and ecological artists to understand what are the forces influencing their creative potential. Among the results, it is clear that the field and its market perspective on the arts is one of the main causes of creativity limitation. Such results are relevant because they provide a very first step in the direction of mitigating such problems, while also generating a deeper understanding of how systemic creativity works.

Full text

Sys emic C ea i i y in En i onmen al and Ecological A Raquel de Oli ei a Ca doso Mas e 's Thesis in Human Ecology and Con empo a y Social Issues July, 2022 Sys emic C ea i i y in En i onmen al and Ecological A Raquel de Oli ei a Ca doso Mas e 's Thesis in Human Ecology and Con empo a y Social Issues July, 2022 2 ABSTRACT In a momen when clima e change, species deple ion, gene alized pollu ion, and o he en i onmen al p oblems a e as c i ical as hey a e oday, i is impe a i e o pu ou a en ion on c ea i e pe spec i es a ound hese issues. C ea i i y is he keywo d o he p esen esea ch, and i is seen he e as a sou ce and consequence o a socie y ha is in e es ed in posi i e change. En i onmen al and ecological a is s a e only one small pa o he g ea communi y o people who a e ying o o e come en i onmen al issues, bu hey o m an ideal g oup o people o be analyzed in ela ion o c ea i i y. Using Mihaly Csikszen mihalyi’s sys emic pe spec i e on c ea i i y, his esea ch has used he in o ma ion p o ided by 6 in-dep h in e iews wi h en i onmen al and ecological a is s o unde s and wha a e he o ces in luencing hei c ea i e po en ial. Among he esul s, i is clea ha he ield and i s ma ke pe spec i e on he a s is one o he main causes o c ea i i y limi a ion. Such esul s a e ele an because hey p o ide a e y i s s ep in he di ec ion o mi iga ing such p oblems, while also gene a ing a deepe unde s anding o how sys emic c ea i i y wo ks. 3 TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT 3 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF TABLES 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 INTRODUCTION 8 HOW CREATIVITY WORKS 10 Wha Is C ea i i y 10 Sys ems Model O C ea i i y 12 A Dynamic Model O The C ea i e P ocess 15 Implica ions O The Model 20 The Roles O C ea i i y In Socie y 22 ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL ART 26 In oduc ion 26 En i onmen al And Ecological A 30 How A Plays A Role In En i onmen al Consciousness 36 A And C ea i i y 41 METHODOLOGY 44 Objec i es 44 Me hodological Op ion 44 ANALYSIS OF THE INTERVIEWS 46 Fi s classi ica ion: Domain 46 Second classi ica ion: Pe son 51 Thi d classi ica ion: Field 64 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 74 APPENDIX 76 Ques ionnai e 76 In e iewee In o ma ion 77 REFERENCES 78 4 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1 The sys ems iew o c ea i i y 16 5 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. B oadly accessible domains 46 Table 2. Speci ic knowledges 47 Table 3. How do you hink you wo k gene a es changes on how we hink, eel, and ac ? 48 Table 4. O igins o he in e es in en i onmen al issues 50 Table 5. C ea i e p ocess 53 Table 6. Social in e ac ions in he c ea i e p ocess 56 Table 7. Selec ion o insigh s o pu sue 57 Table 8. Obs acles and ad an ages ela ed o he ield 59 Table 9. Obs acles ela ed o he domain 60 Table 10. Pe sonal abili ies o deal wi h ield equi emen s 60 Table 11. Field's app oach o en i onmen al a 63 Table 12. Field’s ecogni ion o c ea i i y and alue 66 Table 13. Au onomy o he ield 68 Table 14. Access o esou ces in he ield 69 Table 15. The ield and b igh people 71 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like o ecognize he in aluable assis ance o D . I a Pi es and hank he o he supe ision and suppo . I also would like o hank my pa en s, whose cons an lo e and suppo keep me mo i a ed and con iden , all e y necessa y o me o inally deli e his hesis. My accomplishmen s and success a e because hey belie ed in me. 7 INTRODUCTION In imes in which clima e change, esou ce deple ion, pollu ion, and biodi e si y collapse a e a p essing eali y, he demand o change is echoing in mos co ne s o poli ical and go e nmen al ins i u ions, media, no - o -p o i o ganiza ions, and in ou communi y as a whole. Un o una ely, he e is a clea and wide gap be ween he demand o change and he ac ual p ocess o de eloping a new way o beha ing and unde s anding he wo ld we li e in. The p ocess o changing has c ea i i y a i s co e, and c ea i i y, he e, should no be unde s ood as he capaci y o gene a ing o iginal hough s, al hough his is an impo an aspec o i . C ea i i y is a much mo e complex and mo e comple e p ocess, and i encompasses he gene a ion o a no el y ha is aluable, as well as he implemen a ion o such no el y in a p ac ical manne . The e o e, c ea i i y he e is ge ing a he om he me e cogni i e aspec s o i and ge ing close o wha is called inno a ion. C ea i i y is also a sys emic p ocess, meaning ha i is no an isola ed phenomenon ha can be ully gene a ed o unde s ood h ough a single indi idual insula ed om i s cul u e and socie y. Mihaly Csikszen mihalyi (1988, 1998, 1999) p oposes a sys emic iew o c ea i i y, and i is suppo ed by h ee pilla s: domain, indi idual, and ield. Such a sys emic iew implies ha ou socio-cul u al con ex a ec s c ea i i y and ice- e sa, so how does his demand o change and o a mo e sus ainable way o li ing in luence c ea i e p ocesses? How a e c ea i e p ocesses being shaped by socio-cul u al o ces? Wha a e he elemen s ha enable and block he c ea ion o change? One o he mos c ea i e a eas ha o e he possibili y o answe ing some o hese ques ions is he a s, mo e speci ically he en i onmen al and ecological a s. The a is ic sphe e is known o demanding and gene a ing c ea i i y, bu i also b ings in i s co e he o ces o he ma ke and he in luence o a c i ics, cu a o s, and galle y owne s. Bu besides being an in e es ing g oup o be analyzed, en i onmen al and ecological a is s a e pa o he ounda ion o a new way o li ing in his wo ld, un o una ely, a no so ecognized one. While we pay a en ion o echnological de elopmen , scien i ic disco e ies, and go e nmen al policies, which a e all deeply essen ial o ad ancing sus ainabili y, we should also ecognize ha ac o s wo king on he ans o ma ion o cul u e and on he c ea ion o new ways o unde s anding who we a e and how we connec o ou biosphe e a e also ca ying on hei backs a c ucial aspec o a sus ainable socie y. 8 En i onmen al and ecological a is s a e s onge communica ion agen s han mos esea che s, poli icians, and companies, and hey a e s onge because hey don’ communica e wi h a ionali y, bu wi h hea , wi h emo ions, wi h all ou embodied senses, c ea ing a much s onge empa hy and connec ion be ween public and subjec . So he unde s anding o how he sys em a ec s he c ea i e achie emen s o his g oup o people is undamen al o a deepe comp ehension o he gap be ween demand o change and ac ual beha io change a ound en i onmen al issues. This esea ch aims a unde s anding how sys emic o ces in luence c ea i i y in en i onmen al and ecological a , as well as unde s anding how hese o ces limi o p omo e c ea i e achie emen s in hese a eas, leading o a e lec ion on he socio-ecological consequences o such in luences. 9 Fig. 1 The sys ems iew o c ea i i y Sou ce: Csikszen mihalyi 1999, p. 315 This “map" shows how in e connec ed he h ee sys ems a e, de e mining oge he he occu ence o a c ea i e p oduc . Fo c ea i i y o occu , a se o ules and p ac ices mus be ansmi ed om he domain o he indi idual. The indi idual, hen, mus p oduce a no el a ia ion in he con en o he domain. Such a ia ion mus be selec ed by he ield o be included in he domain (Csikszen mihalyi 1999). The Domain As his igu e is dynamic, he p esen s a ing poin is pu ely a bi a y. I could ha e s a ed om he “pe son,” because his is how c ea i i y is mos ly po ayed, wi h an idea beginning in someone’s head. Bu any in o ma ion ha goes in o such idea exis ed long be o e he c ea i e mind used i . The in o ma ion is s o ed in he symbol sys em o he cul u e, in he cus oma y p ac ices, he language, he speci ici ies o he “domain”. Wi hou access o hese kinds o in o ma ion, a pe son canno make a c ea i e con ibu ion (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). The domain is a necessa y componen o c ea i i y, once i is impossible o make a c ea i e con ibu ion in he absence o a symbolic sys em. O iginal hough canno happen in a acuum, as i has o ope a e on a se o ules, ep esen a ions, and no a ions. One can only be a c ea i e in any gi en domain because one can e alua e he pe o mance o c ea i e endea o s by e e ence o he ela i e domain’s adi ion. Wi h no ules he e is no excep ions, and wi h no adi ion he e is no no el y. Wha we call c ea i i y always in ol es changes in he symbolic sys ems ha o m ou 16 men al s uc u e, so a change ha does no a ec he way we hink, eel, o ac canno be c ea i e (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). C ea i i y happens when a pe son can make a change in he domain, a change ha will be ansmi ed h ough ime. Some people a e mo e likely o gene a e such changes, ei he because hey ha e speci ic pe sonal quali ies, o because hey a e well-posi ioned on he domain by ha ing be e access o i , o because o social condi ions ha allow hese people ee ime o expe imen (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). The Pe son The “pe son" on he sys em con ibu es o he c ea i e p ocess by p oducing some a ia ion in he in o ma ion inhe i ed om he cul u e. The sou ce o such a ia ion may come om inhe i ed o lea ned cogni i e lexibili y, pe sis en mo i a ion, o some a e e en in he pe son’s li e. These a e he aspec s ha a e mos equen ly s udied by psychologis s in e es ed in c ea i i y, bu by i sel , he p ocess o gene a ing a ia ion canno e eal wha c ea i i y is abou , because by ocusing on he indi idual ou o con ex does no allow he obse e o e alua e he p oduced a ia ion (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). An insigh is gene ally unde s ood as some hing ha occu s when a pe son is exposed o new in o ma ion ha esul s in a new way o looking a a p oblem o phenomenon. Mos s udies on his ma e ha e been made by psychologis s, ollowing he endency o ocus on cogni i e p ocesses du ing and leading o he momen o insigh . I has been gene ally assumed ha his momen occu s when he pe son is alone, he e o e being s udied as a cogni i e p ocess ha happens in isola ion (Csikszen mihalyi and Sawye 1995). Bu Csiksen mihaly and Sawye (1995) expand ou om his momen in ime while also embedding i wi hin o he ele an s ages o he c ea i e p ocess. The comple e “li e span” o a c ea i e insigh , al hough eeling like a sho lash, is ac ually en angled in a complex, ime-consuming and undamen ally social p ocess. I is ue ha mos c ea i es do epo hei insigh momen s as soli a y ones, maybe happening du ing a walk, while aking a showe , o while lying in bed igh a e waking up, bu hese epo s a e usually embedded wi hin a mo e complex na a i e ha desc ibes he e o p eceding and ollowing he insigh , s essing he salience o social and in e ac i e ac o s (Csikszen mihalyi and Sawye 1995). Du ing in e iews wi h c ea i e indi iduals, he esponden s desc ibed momen s o c ea i e insigh as some hing ha occu s as a ou -s age p ocess. The i s s age is he ha d wo k and esea ch p eceding he momen o insigh ; he second s age is a pe iod o idle ime alone; he hi d s age is he ac ual insigh ; and he ou h s age is he ha d wo k equi ed o b ing he idea o ui ion. 17 Bo h pe iods o ha d wo k, a he beginning and a he end, a e essen ially social, wi h deep oo s in in e ac ion wi h colleagues and he indi idual’s in e nalized unde s anding o he cul u ally cons i u ed domain. The balance o ha d wo k and idle ime can be also seen as a balance be ween social in e ac ion and indi idual isola ion (Csikszen mihalyi and Sawye 1995). When psychologis s analyze he insigh p ocess wi hou a emp ing o ep esen social in luences, i is ha d o answe o basic ques ions such as how he pe son in eg a es he insigh wi h an ongoing domain o scien i ic o a is ic ac i i y, o o wha ex en he p epa a ion s age is dependen on he symbolic domain o on he social g oup wi hin which he indi idual wo ks, o how an insigh can be e alua ed unless he pe son uses an in e nal comp ehension o he domain (Csikszen mihalyi and Sawye 1995). While many psychologis s choose o esea ch c ea i i y as an indi idual ai , he sys em model enables a mo e cohe en unde s anding o a pe son’s con ibu ion o he c ea i e p ocess. Fi s , i b ings o ligh he ac ha one can only o e a c ea i e a ia ion a e he o she has access o a domain and engage in he equi ed lea ning o i s ules. This means ha mo i a ion is e y ele an , jus as cogni i e ac o s, and hey in e ac wi h he s a e o he domain and he ield (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Second, he sys em model ea i ms how impo an indi idual ac o s a e o he c ea i e p ocess. People who a e likely o inno a e end o ha e pe sonali y cha ac e is ics ha a o he b eaking o ules, and di e gen hinking, p oblem inding, and many o he ac o s explo ed by psychologis s a e ele an in his con ex (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Finally, one e y impo an aspec ha a c ea i e pe son should ha e is he abili y o con ince he ield abou he alue o he no el y one has p oduced. So i is easie o someone o make a c ea i e con ibu ion i one has access o he ield, he ne wo k o con ac s, he pe sonali y ai s ha a o c ea i i y and ha enable one o be aken se iously and he abili y o exp ess onesel in an in elligible way (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). The Field The “ ield" has he ask o selec ing p omising a ia ions and o inco po a e hem in o he domain. The ield includes all he people ha can a ec he s uc u e o such domain. The ield o a , o example, is composed by a eache s, a his o ians, a c i ics, collec o s, galle y owne s, museum cu a o s, and he pee g oup o a is s. So he ield o a , jus like any o he ield, is composed o a ne wo k o in e locking oles, wi h some o hem ha ing a be e chance o 18 inco po a ing selec ed a ia ions in o he domain. The people who ha e his p i ileged posi ion ac as “ga ekeepe s" o he domain (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). E e y ield is embedded in a speci ic social sys em, and he esou ces o a la ge socie y help o suppo he ecogni ion o new ideas. A communi y is mo e likely o do so when he e is disposable weal h as well as disposable a en ion, as people need money and ime o ake an in e es in a domain (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). Bu mos no el ideas will be quickly o go en, because changes a e no adop ed unless hey a e app o ed and de ended by he g oup en i led o decide wha should and should no be included in he domain. These ga ekeepe s a e wha is called he ield. This e m is gene ally used o desc ibe a discipline o kind o endea o , bu he e he e m has a na owe sense, being used only o desc ibe he social o ganiza ion o he domain, o he eache s, c i ics, jou nal edi o s, agency di ec o s, cu a o s, and ounda ion o ice s who decide wha belongs o a domain and wha doesn’ . A e e y le el, om he d awings o small child en o Nobel P ize nomina ions, judges a e assessing new p oduc s and deciding i hey a e c ea i e, meaning i hey a e enough o an imp o emen o be included in a domain (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Needless o say, ields will di e in he igidi y o hei selec i e mechanisms, he sensi i i y o ga ekeepe s, and he dynamic o hei own o ganiza ion. I also ollows ha a ield wi h di use selec ion c i e ia, o one wi h ga ekeepe s who a e no e y espec ed, will ha e mo e di icul y in es ablishing he c ea i i y o a new idea. Also, a new idea will ace di icul ies in being ecognized as c ea i e in cases in which he ield is de ensi e, igid, o is pa o a social sys em ha does no encou age no el y (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). Fields a y in many dimensions, such as he ex en o which hey a e au onomous. Some ields can make c ea i i y judgemen s ela ed o hei own socie y, while o he s mainly medi a e he public opinion. The au onomy o a ield is connec ed o how codi ied i s domain is, so i a domain is a cane o highly codi ied such as molecula biology, he c ea i i y judgemen will be made by a ela i ely small ield. Bu i we a e alking abou mo ies and popula music, domains ha a e e y accessible o he gene al public, he specialized ield won’ be able o decide which wo k will be c ea i e. Fo he same easons, c ea i i y is mo e epheme al in he a s han in he sciences (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Ano he impo an a ia ion among ields is how open o close hey a e o c ea i i y. The openness o a ield depends on i s in e nal o ganiza ion as well as in i s ela ion o he wide socie y. Ins i u ions ha a e highly hie a chical and alue he knowledge o he pas usually see c ea i i y as 19 a h ea , and his phenomenon can be seen in some eligions, academies and ce ain businesses ha seek o gi e leade ship o olde indi iduals in o de o a oid change (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Besides au onomy and openness, he e a e o he cha ac e is ics o a ield ha will make i mo e o less likely o accep c ea i e p oduc s. One ha should be highligh ed is he access o esou ces, because a ield is mo e likely o a ac c ea i e people i i o e s scope o expe imen a ion and ewa ds in case o success. E en hough c ea i e people enjoy wo king in domains o i s own sake, he a ac ion o money and ame should no be discoun ed (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). How cen al a ield is in e ms o socie al alues also de e mines how a ac i e i is o new people ha a e willing o inno a e. Cu en ly, b igh young people a e a ac ed o a a ie y o con as ing domains, bu all o hem ha e widesp ead ideological and/o ma e ial suppo . While some may be a ac ed o compu e science because i p o ides exci ing and in ellec ual challenges, o he s a e a ac ed o oceanog aphy because i migh help o sol e many en i onmen al issues. This is impo an because any gi en ield ha is able o a ac a big numbe o b igh people is mo e likely o wi ness c ea i e b eak h oughs (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). Implica ions o The Model Those who may be mo e used o he pe son-cen e ed app oach on c ea i i y migh eel ha his sys emic app oach is a be ayal o psychology in a o o his o ical o sociological app oaches. Bu he objec i e is no o lea e psychology behind, bu o unde s and he complex con ex in which people ope a e, e en ually en iching ou unde s anding o c ea i i y, in which he pe son is pa o a sys em o mu ual in luences and in o ma ion (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). The Domain Le el This app oach b ings o ligh many ques ions ha a e usually igno ed in c ea i i y esea ch, bu migh hold impo an indings. When ocusing on he domain, some o he impo an ques ions a e “Wha a e he di e se ways in which in o ma ion can be s o ed and ansmi ed, and how does he s uc u e o in o ma ions a ec c ea i i y? Concep s and measu es need o be de eloped in o de o e alua e he s uc u ing o in o ma ion and i s impac on c ea i i y, as well as o disco e which symbol sys ems a e be e able o s o e and ansmi c ea i e ideas (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). Ano he impo an aspec ha needs o be unde s ood is how access o in o ma ion is di e en ially open o di e en ca ego ies o people, aiming o make pas c ea i i y a ailable o as 20 many people as possible, in o de o boos u u e c ea i i y. Mo e impo an o his esea ch, hough, is he ques ion o how o mo i a e people o engage wi h pa icula domains. Wha is ying o be lea ned wi h his ques ion is no how o p o ide ex insic mo i a ions, like money and ecogni ion, hings ha would be conce ns o he ield, bu how o ensu e in insic mo i a ion, which is based on how a ac i e an in o ma ion is p esen ed. I someone is bo ed by a domain, he amoun o po en ial c ea i i y o an indi idual won’ be enough o gene a e he in e es and e o ha a e necessa y o make a c ea i e con ibu ion. The abili y o a ac and sus ain in e es depends on how well he domain is in e nally o ganized, and he e is a lo o be lea ned abou he speci ic mo i a ional alues o di e en ways o pa e ning in o ma ion (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). The Pe son Le el The main concep ual ques ion on he le el o he pe son is “How do some indi iduals can p oduce a g ea e amoun o a ia ion in a gi en domain han o he s?” To answe his ques ion, mo i a ional, a ec i e, and cogni i e a iables should be e alua ed. I is likely ha some child en a e bo n wi h mo e sensi i i y o ce ain kinds o s imuli, he e o e being mo e ad an aged o dealing wi h memes connec ed o wha hey a e mo e sensi i e o. I is also likely ha ea ly expe iences and demog aphic a iables such as social class, sibling posi ion, and eligious upb inging will a ec hei po en ial. The impo ance o p oblem inding as an app oach o c ea i e asks as well as he ways in which a ious in o ma ion p ocessing s a egies a e used by c ea i e child en has been in es iga ed (Csikszen mihalyi and Ge zels 1971, Csikszen mihalyi 1988). Ca e ul s udies o uly c ea i e indi iduals ha encompass all he angles o he complex in e ac ions among pe son, ield, and domain and e y needed and a e a e. Some examples ha ollow his di ec ion a e G ube ’s s udy o Da win, Ge zels and Csikszen mihalyi’s longi udinal s udy (1976) o young a is s, and Feldman’s con inuing in es iga ions o p odigiously gi ed child en (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). The Field Le el I is p obably ue ha we migh know less abou he e ec s o social sys ems on c ea i i y han abou he o he wo le els o he cycle. The impo an ques ions he e a e ela ed o wha o ms o o ganiza ion acili a e he selec ion o new a ian s and hei inclusion in he domain. Some aspec s ha e s a ed o be ecognized, such as he ex ensi e suppo sys em ha is needed in o de o mas e skills in any gi en domain, he social oles and pe sonali y ypes ha de e mine success in he ield, and he ela ionship be ween ea u es o he social sys em and he equency o c ea i e beha io (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). 21 Some impo an ques ions ela ed o he ield a e ‘Who is en i led o decide wha is c ea i e? How c ea i i y can be in luenced h ough he a ibu ional p ocess? Wha does i ake o a new meme o be accep ed in o he domain (Csikszen mihalyi 1998)? I means ha psychologis s s udying c ea i i y ha e began o unde s and how impo an he sys emic app oach is. Because o ha , o he ields o s udy, like he his o y o ideas, o ganiza ional sociology and cogni i e science a e being in eg a ed in o de o ha e a s onge sense on he issue. The sys ems app oach demands ha i s esea che s become e sed in he skills o di e en disciplines, because he e u n in knowledge is wo h he e o (Csikszen mihalyi 1988). The Roles o C ea i i y in Socie y Despi e he g owing discou se ela ed o c ea i i y among p ac i ione s, policymake s and schola s, su p isingly li le a en ion has been paid o he ques ion o why. Why alue c ea i i y? Wha is i s ole in socie y? Wha does i do o socie y? Why socie y should ca e abou i ? Such line o ques ioning unde s ands c ea i i y as a cause in social and in ellec ual endea o s, no jus as an e ec o indi idual cha ac e is ics, social suppo , o cogni i e p ocesses (Mo an 2010). Socie ies cons i u e a kind o “knowledge ecology,” as i unc ions as an in o ma ion-p ocessing ecosys em in which di e en ypes o indi iduals play di e en oles in an in e dependen in o ma ion and esou ce p ocessing ne wo k. We a e now acing condi ions ha d i e he change o ou men al maps, and i happens when ou cu en way o li ing does no wo k anymo e, and he p oblems caused by i a e massi e and p essing. Today, socie ies ace a massi e, in e connec ed c isis ha demands an e olu iona y lea ning es , in which we ei he change o we die (Goe ne 2007). The beginning o he hi d millennium is ans o ming c ea i i y in o some hing absolu ely c i ical. Today, we ha e o deal wi h age-old p oblems such as coexis ence in an inc easingly in e dependen wo ld, as well as mo e ecen issues such as inc easing wo ld popula ion and en i onmen al issues. We need new solu ions and mo e c ea i i y i we wan ou species o su i e (Csikszen mihalyi and Wol e 2000). Wes e n ci iliza ion is ein en ing i sel , because he adi ional mode n pa adigm, wi h a mechanis ic and impe ialis ic app oach o li e is ailing. A new collabo a i e lea ning and ecosys emic iew o humani y is ising o ake i s place. This p ocess o e hinking and ebi h will e en ually emb ace e e y aspec o ou li es, om business, educa ion, and poli ics, o spi i uali y, heal h, and science. Fo ha , an in eg a ion o indi idual c ea i i y, collec i e c ea i i y, and 22 collabo a i e lea ning becomes c ucial o gi e bi h o he nex s age o ci iliza ion. He e, c ea i i y means bo h e ec i e no el y and a na u al, indi idual, and collec i e p ocess ha b ings o li e he necessa y di e si y o hough ha is needed o gene a e be e ways o he collec i e socie al “mind” (Goe ne 2007). C ea i i y, pa icula ly collec i e c ea i i y, is c ucial o collec i e lea ning, because de eloping a new way o unde s anding he wo ld is a g oup p ojec ha equi es many minds wi h di e se pe spec i es wo king no only o c ea e a new pa adigm, bu also o ind mo e e ec i e solu ions o ou cu en p oblems. Collec i e c ea i i y may wo k g adually a i s , in he o m o indi idual c ea i i y wo king ac oss he many spec ums o ou socie ies. E en ually, indi iduals s a ealizing ha many agmen s o solu ions ac ually connec and o m a comp ehensi e new pic u e. Thei c ea i e con ibu ion is he in eg a ion o di e se solu ions in o a single, commonsense amewo k. This amewo k ac s like a lens ha shows o he es o he people a clea and cohe en new pic u e wi h simple connec i e logic, so ha socie y can walk owa ds a new way o li ing (Goe ne 2007). Ou mos p essing c ea i e challenge is he de elopmen o a sus ainable u u e. I is no abou a u opia, a pe ec wo ld, i is he c ea ion o a wo ld whe e peace and he igh o po e y, opp ession, insensi i i y, c uel y and despai a e he s uc u al base o ou socie y (Eisle 2007). A ound he wo ld, millions o people and o ganiza ions use hei c ea i i y o help in he c ea ion o a mo e equi able, sus ainable, and peace ul cul u e. Bu a he same ime, he majo i y o people doub we a e capable o lea ing behind he habi s ha b ough o us ou cu en p oblems (Eisle 2007). The cul u es we c ea e will la gely de e mine i ou li es yles will con inue o eed en i onmen al des uc ion, wa and inequali y, o i we will build a mo e sus ainable and humane wo ld. Cul u es ha encou age e e yday c ea i i y, o c ea i i y in all people and in all a eas (Richa ds 1999) a e essen ial in c i ical imes. We can ei he choose o be passi e, o choose o use ou c ea i i y o c ea e cul u es ha a e aligned wi h he cu en equi emen s o human su i al and walk owa d g ea e consciousness, ca ing, and c ea i i y (Eisle 2007). We humans a e he mos c ea i e species on he plane , we a e amazing beings ha can change no only ou sel es, bu also he en i onmen . Wi h a clea e unde s anding o who we a e, wha we can be, and wha is needed o a mo e jus , peace ul, and sus ainable global cul u e, we can use ou inc edible c ea i e po en ial o build he ounda ions o uly ci ilized cul u es. As co-c ea o s o ou u u e, we ha e in ou hands he possibili y o c ea ing a cul u e ha is in synch wi h cu en social-ecological demands (Eisle 2007). 23 Pu pose is based in alues, and alues signi y he ela i e impo ance o goals and ideals. Focusing on pu pose is imely and i also e eals how people end o exhibi ambi alence in ela ion o c ea i i y. On he one hand, c ea i e pe sons, ins i u ions, and in en ions a e p aised by leade s, poli icians, educa o s, and he media as hose who can sa e ou ill socie y. People also end o desi e o be mo e c ea i e a wo k o in leisu e. Bu , in e es ingly, s udies o c ea i i y and alues o e he las 40 yea s ha e shown ha Ame ican adul s, including eache s, do no alue c ea i i y e y highly. This happens because c ea i i y is gene ally associa ed wi h de iance, ebelliousness, da ing, and independence, and c ea o s migh no be dependable o eliable. They hold di e en alues (Mo an 2010). How ole an and welcoming a e we o di e gence and he dis inc i e ways in which c ea i e people p esen hemsel es? How heal hy and ecep i e a e ou socie al no ms? The answe s o such ques ions a e e y impo an , as hey de ine he nu u ing o discou aging o c ea i i y in ou social se ings. Whe e and how o en do we push away c ea i e ideas and c ea i e people in ou li es because o incon enience and h ea ? And how o en do we classi y c ea i i y as some hing abno mal o e en pa hological, dis ancing ou sel es om wha we conside as “di e en ” (Richa ds 2010)? Socie y has many di e en mechanisms ha end o cons ain c ea i i y. One example is socie al accep ance o only one ideology in a domain. Such ideology could be poli ical, scien i ic, a is ic, educa ional, o any hing else. Fo example, when beha io ism was leading he way in psychology, anyone who w o e an a icle wi h e e ences on in e nal s a es o consciousness would ha e a ha d ime ge ing i published in p es igious scien i ic jou nals. This shows ha when he e is only one dominan ideology, i ends o s amp ou o he s, and he success o such ideology is linked o how well i s amps ou c ea i e compe i o s (S e nbe g and Kau man 2010). One could easily hink ha democ acy is he go e nmen al o ma ha is mos p one o c ea i i y p omo ion, bu al hough i migh be ue, he e is no gua an ee ha a democ a ic socie y will p omo e c ea i i y, because whe e he majo i y ules, c ea i i y may be supp essed. As c ea i e people po en ially make he o he s eel uncom o able, c ea i es may be ejec ed by any o ing p ocedu e. A esea ch conduc ed by Langlois and Roggman shows ha people hink he mos beau i ul aces a e he ones ha a e he mos a e age. The g ea e he numbe o aces ha we e combined by a compu e , gene a ing an a e age ace, he mo e a ac i e he ace became. In he same manne , indi iduals who a e seen as mos socially desi able a e he ones who ep esen he consensus o a g oup, a he han a c ea i e depa u e om he eigning ideology. Being c ea i e, hen, equi es de ia ion om he no m (S e nbe g and Kau man 2010). 24 One o he consequences o he p ocesses desc ibed abo e is ha he ideas ha a e mos ewa ded a e small ad ancemen s, ideas ha mo e some hing o wa d, bu no oo much. This happens because i an idea is iden i ied as being oo adical, i is likely o be ejec ed (S e nbe g and Kau man 2010). S ill, c ea i i y is gene ally held as good, as i in en s and maybe con ols he u u e. Wi h c ea i i y, he u u e becomes an oppo uni y, no a h ea , a leas o he c ea o s. And whe he we can ecognize a si ua ion as an oppo uni y may depend in pa on wha ou pu pose is. Th ough ou ac ions, we posi ion ou sel es in ou u u e, and ou pu pose can enable o inhibi ou abili y o e-cognize, ha is, o hink again and maybe di e en ly, abou a si ua ion, gene a ing oppo uni ies, ans o ming c isis in o lea ning expe iences, obs acles in o challenges, suppo s in o asse s (Mo an 2010). Bu o make i , we ha e o do i oge he . No only because a pa adigma ic change in ol es all laye s o socie y, bu also because by cu ing o he limi s be ween domains we can go u he . The bene i o ho izon al in e ac ions and sha ing — when people sha e knowledge ac oss domains — is ha i encou ages concep ual blending, which is e y impo an o he de elopmen o insigh s. This is a ele an p ocess because, usually, he b ain iles ideas in ca ego ies acco ding o how hey can be used, and such ideas a e no accessed i we need some hing ha would be applied in ano he manne . This b ain mechanism usually makes us mo e e icien , bu i also keeps us om gene a ing insigh s. I happens because ou b eak h oughs o en a i e when we apply old solu ions o new si ua ions, when ins ead o keeping concep s sepa a e, we blend hem oge he and espass on he s anda d bounda ies o hough (Leh e 2012). The abili y o make sepa a e ideas coexis in he mind is a c ucial c ea i e ool, as insigh s come om he o e lap o seemingly un ela ed hough s. They eme ge when concep s a e ecombined and ansposed, shi ing he ules and he bounda ies o domains and o wha is possible (Leh e 2012). The p oblems we ace oday and he dimension o necessa y change demands he me ging o concep s, he b eaking o ules, mo e accessible domains, and mo e e o ul ields. C ea i i y needs a socie y ha alues no el y and app op ia eness oge he . I c ea i i y is no allowed o exis o o be ecognized, i s ole in socie y is deba able. This means ha he ole o c ea i i y in socie y depends in pa on he socie y in which a po en ial o c ea i i y exis s (Mo an 2010). So c ea i i y is he esul o a communi y. Fo i o eme ge, he e mus be a con luence o bo h socie al and indi idual o ces (Sei z 2003). 25 Ecological a has i s basis on ecological e hics and sys ems heo y, explo ing he web o in e ela ionships be ween he physical, biological, cul u al, poli ical, and his o ical aspec s o ecosys ems. Ecological a , he e o e, is based on a b oad in e disciplina y knowledge and is able o appeal o bo h hea and mind. This kind o a asks p obing ques ions, de elops s ong me apho s, iden i y pa e ns, ells s o ies, o e s es o a ion and emedia ion, uses enewable ma e ials and e-imagines sys ems; ecological a is s inspi e, suppo , and inno a e on en i onmen al issues, b inging o ligh ecological ela ionships while p omo ing ecological alues. Ecological a inspi es espec and ca ing o ou plane , i s imula es dialogue, helps on social-ecological ans o ma ions, while also s imula es he imagina ion and cons uc ion o a wo ld whe e he in ini e kinds o li e o ms ound on ea h may lou ish oge he (Wallen 2012). The gen e o ecological a was o iginally concei ed in he 1990s, looking a p ac ices ha eme ged om he la e 1960s onwa ds. I co e s a a ie y o a is ic p ac ices which can be uni ed, as social-ecological modes o engagemen , by sha ed p inciples such as connec i i y, ecological e hical esponsibili y, econs uc ion, s ewa dship o in e ela ionships and o commons, non-linea ( e)gene a i i y, na iga ion and dynamic balancing ac oss mul iple scales, and explo a ions o he ab ic o li e and i s complexi y (Kagan 2014). Helen Maye Ha ison and New on Ha ison, wo o he g ea exponen o ecological a , s a e as ollows (2004): “We belie e ha in a well unc ioning sys em, cul u al di e si y and biodi e si y exis in a s a e o mu ual in e ac ion – he o me sel conscious and able o in end and ans o m, and he la e he pa e n o sel o ganiza ion om which we all sp ing and o which we all e u n, and which ul ima ely de e mines he possible”. This phase ha s a ed in he 1990s and s e ches o he p esen day b ings a mo e di ec engagemen wi h en i onmen al issues and a eexamina ion o he ela ionships be ween a , socie y, and he en i onmen . Ecological a is an impo an pa o ecen pe o ma i e en i onmen al a . Tu nell iden i ies h ee c ea i e lines in his phase: he i s is a commen a y upon en i onmen al issues and c ea i e solu ions o ela ed p oblems, he second o e s symbolic wa nings and poe ic medi a ions on ou cu en ecological p oblems, and he hi d is simply a wi ness o ou si ua ion (Tho nes 2008). While some ecological a wo ks a e ocused on physical inno a ion, ans o ma ion, and es o a ion, o he s a e mo e leaned owa ds inspi ing sociopoli ical ac i ism, while o he s a e mo e concep ual, p omo ing ecological alues and pe cep ions. Wo ks o a ha mix di e se egis e s simul aneously a e gene ally mo e impac ul (Wallen 2012). 32 Ecological a , al hough being a subse o en i onmen al a , e e s o a mo e speci ic and o iginal meaning, conside ing also a se o social-ecological p ac ices, esul ing in a ew salien cha ac e is ics (Kagan 2014). The “ecoa ne wo k" is an in i a ional ne wo k and mailing-lis ha was s a ed in 1999 and oday ga he s mo e han a hund ed p ac i ione s and o he people ela ed o ecoa , among whom a e se e al key pe sonali ies o his mo emen . In 2011, i issued a s a emen as an a emp a sel -de ini ion. I says ha ecological a emb aces an ecological e hic in bo h i s con en and o m/ma e ial, and ha a is s who a e conside ed o be wo king wi h his gen e gene ally subsc ibe o one o mo e o he ollowing p inciples (Kagan 2014): • A en ion o he web o in e ela ionships in ou en i onmen , encompassing physical, biological, cul u al, poli ical, and his o ical aspec s o ecological sys ems. • C ea ion o wo k ha employs na u al ma e ials o engages wi h en i onmen al o ces, such as wind, wa e , o sunligh . • Reclaim, es o e, and emedia e damaged en i onmen s. • In o m he public abou ecological dynamics and he en i onmen al issues aced by humani y oday. • O e new ways o unde s anding and seeing ecological ela ionships, c ea i ely p oposing new possibili ies o co-exis ence, sus ainabili y, and healing. Some o he gene al cha ac e is ics o ecological a we e al eady desc ibed by some a his o ians, a is s, and esea che s since he concep ion o his gen e. Kagan (2014) men ions he a his o ian Suzy Gablik, who made an impo an con ibu ion in 1991 h ough he book The Reenchan men o A , in which she highligh ed h ee ele an cha ac e is ics o his eme ging mo emen ha would come o be known as ecological a : 1. These a e “connec i e” p ac ices, meaning ha hey cul i a e empa hy and esponsible dealings wi h bo h humans and non-humans, a he han a i ming an indi idual sel agains socie y. One ea ly wo k ha symbolizes his cha ac e is ic is Touch Sani a ion (1978-1980) by Mie le Lade man Ukeles. In his sense, ecological a is s o en ge in ol ed wi h eco eminis philosophy, which om he 1980s onwa ds, allowed hem o o e come he igid dicho omies o mode n wo ld, such as na u e s. cul u e, de eloped s. unde eloped wo ld, man s. woman, eason s. emo ion, e c. Such a connec i e quali y in ecological a goes beyond he supe icial connec i i y o “ ela ional aes he ics'' (Kagan 2014). 33 2. These a e p ac ices ha aim o be econs uc i e, gene a i e o sus ainable ways o li ing, and no only decons uc i e o ou mode n social sys ems. Such econs uc i e quali y also implies ha hese p ac ices a e gene ally aiming a being ans o ma i e a he han being ep esen a i e. In he same manne , ecological a canno be conside ed useless, in he sense o a o he sake o a , o unc ional, in he sense o ul illing al eady de e mined unc ions (Kagan 2014). 3. These a e a is ic p ac ices ha base hemsel es on e hical esponsibili ies owa d communi ies, he e unde s ood as bo h human and non-human communi ies o li e (Kagan 2014). Ano he impo an cha ac e is ic o p ac ices in ecological a is he shaping o sha ed spaces o people and o he species and he ad ocacy o such sha ed spaces, such as commons and ecosys ems. These en i onmen s demand common ca e and s ewa dship h ough in e ela ionship. One example o his cha ac e is ic is he “ ans-species a ” o Lynne Hull, which b ings pa icipan s om mul iple species, wi h human being only one o hem. Hull’s wo k encompasses es o a ion o wildli e habi a s ha a e co-concei ed wi h he local human communi ies and es ed o sui abili y by non-humans (Kagan 2014). Because o hese lines o hough , en i onmen al a gene ally does no ocus on he gi s o alen ed indi iduals, p e e ing o ocus on he os e ing o non-possessi e and sha ed au ho ship o a p ocess ha will e en ually ha e a li e o i s own. The wo k de eloped by he Ha isons since he 1970s can be a good example o his idea. Fo hem, he one who enjoys he a is he land i sel , and c ea i i y is unde s ood as a sha ed low, amalgama ing bo h indi idual and collec i e p ocesses. This way o looking a hings is also sha ed by he alues o he “C ea i e Commons” mo emen and, in a mo e gene al manne , wi h he collec i e human managemen o Commons, ha is unde s ood as being bene icial o bio- and cul u al di e si ies (Kagan 2014). Suzi Gablik (1992) does no de end he wo k o indi idual a is s ei he . She is in e es ed in ad ancing he impo an pa adigm shi ha she calls connec i e aes he ics. I lea es behind he my h o he au onomous indi idualis ha has o med he a is ’s iden i y, he idea o he ee and sel -su icien indi idual ha has been an ideal in ou cul u e, and he independen and highly indi idualized consciousness who seek o impose i s own ideas upon he wo ld. Today, we a e so deep in o he e hos o compe i i eness and indi idualis ic modes o hough ha mos o us, li ing in a highly capi alis wo ld, ha e ne e had an expe ience o ue communi y. Wha is aking place is a new, less specialized, and less monocen ic idea o he a is , a i ming ou adical ela edness. We need o cul i a e he connec i e and ela ional sel ho oughly. I is ime o e ise he cul u al my hs ha guide us. Ins i u ional models ocusing on p oduc 34 de elopmen and ca ee achie emen ha e also gene a ed a ha is based on powe and p o i . Indi idualism and eedom we e he symbol o mode nism, bu hey a e no he c ea i e esponse ha ou plane needs now. Ou cu en social-ecological con ex demands complex and sensi i e o ms o in e ac ion and linking, a consciousness ha is di e en om he s uc u al isola ion o indi idualism. The eme ging ecological iew is no longe isola ed and sel -con ained, bu ela ional and in e dependen (Gablik 1992). I implies a ha is oo ed in a “lis ening” sel ha challenges he isola ionis hinking o ou cul u e, ocusing less on indi iduals and mo e on how hey in e ac . A ha is based on his no ion o in e connec edness and in e subjec i i y, o he in e wining o sel and o he s, has a quali y o ela edness ha can only be ully ealized by dialogue, as an open con e sa ion. Monologue has los i s place (Gablik 1992). Kagan (2014) shows ha ecological a ca ies hese p incipals de ended by Gablik, as well as complemen a y ones: - As said be o e, eco-a is s a e in e p e e s o in e dependence, abdica ing om he idea o independen mode n he oes. They alue he idea o egene a ion and hey highligh sys emic e ec s. They ac as coope a o s o li e’s c ea i i y, wha he Ha isons call “con e sa ional d i ”, e e ing o he p ocesses ha can eme ge wi h he a wo k. One example o such idea is how con e sa ional d i acili a ed he e-app op ia ion o Helen and New on Ha ison's G een Hea Vision (1994-1995) by Du ch policymake s, which wo ked owa ds he implemen a ion o a biodi e si y co ido a ound he “g een hea ” o Holland’s Rands ad (Kagan 2014). - They gene ally do no d aw a clea di ide be ween na u e and cul u e, o e coming simpli ying dicho omies. Bu eco-a is s also don’ mix li ing ecosys ems wi h non-li ing cybe ne ics, which is gene ally done by o he a is s who ocus on echnology. This means ha he e is an a oidance o collapsing eali y in o uni-dimensional hinking o igid dialec ics (Kagan 2014). - Eco-a is s a e in e and ansdisciplina y p ac i ione s, bo h when wo king by hemsel es o when wo king in collabo a ion wi h o he p o essionals, as i is o en he case. P o essional collabo a o s come om e y di e se backg ounds, and pa ne ships can be es ablished wi h local communi ies as well (Kagan 2014). - They p ac ice and alue embodied lea ning, meaning ha hey cul i a e wisdom based on sense pe cep ions, in sea ch o deep and spa ialized knowledge o ecological p ocesses in hei local speci ici ies (Kagan 2014). - The p ocess o eco-a is gene ally in e ac i e, in ol ing explo a ion and expe imen a ion, being open o all possibili ies and o ques ions ha can ede ine any hing a any s ep (Kagan 2014). 35 - The p ac ice o ecological a demands a necessa y ecological c i ique (Kagan 2014). I should emain clea ha he elemen s sugges ed he e, especially hose ela ed o he ecological a is s’ explo a ion o he ab ic o li e’s complexi y, a e p esen in all p ac ices o all a is s who a e ela ed o ecoa . Such elemen s should be unde s ood as signs o ce ain quali ies in hese p ac ices which can con ibu e o aes he ics o complexi y and cul u es o sus ainabili y (Kagan 2014). E en hough ecological a is s sha e some common cha ac e is ics, he p ac ice o ecoa is di e se and a is s di e en ia e hemsel es in many di e en ways. While some wo ks o ecological a a e based on di ec in e en ions in na u al habi a s o human in as uc u es, o he s ha e an app oach ha is less in e en ionis a he ma e ial le el, ocusing on expanding human consciousness. Some p ac i ione s engage in poli ically adical ac i ism, o a i ism, de eloping sub e si e poli ical agendas ha me ge wi h ecological p ac ices, while o he s p e e o engage wi h la ge sec ions o he socie y, maybe including mo e conse a i e poli ical o ces (Kagan 2014). In he same manne , some ecological a p ojec s can be closely connec ed o local, na ional o in e na ional policy, in as uc u e, public se ice o p i a e sec o s, while o he s choose o ocus on local communi ies, wo king wi h communi y mobiliza ion and empowe men in many deg ees (Kagan 2014). How A Plays A Role In En i onmen al Consciousness Many o he en i onmen al issues ha socie y aces oday, such as ecosys em collapse, demand a big amoun o public in es men o e e se. Bu his kind o in es men would only be conside ed i he gene al communi y we e suppo i e, and communi y suppo is only likely i he en i onmen al issues a e widely unde s ood. The need o e ec i e communica ion, public ou each, and educa ion o inc ease suppo o beha io change and collec i e ac ion is especially impo an in ela ion o an h opogenic clima e change. Scien is s o en ind i di icul o communica e hei knowledge o he gene al public, and he ole o he a s is mos ly o e looked in his ega d. Ye , he a s a e communica ing issues, in luencing and educa ing people, and challenging dominan pa adigms o a long ime (Cu is e al. 2012). Th oughou his o y, a is s ha e p oduced a wo ks wi h he objec i e o aking hei communi y ou o complacency, a icula ing conce ns abou social jus ice and o he issues, de ining, gene a ing, and summa izing deba es, while also p o iding endu ing s imuli ha con inue o inspi e people down h ough he ages. A is s ha e a his o y o social ac i ism, and he cu en 36 de e io a ion o ou en i onmen is one o he mos p essing conce ns o many con empo a y a is s (Cu is e al. 2012). The associa ion be ween a is s and hose who y o p o ec ou na u al en i onmen has a long his o y, and many a is s use hei wo k as a communica ion ool o sha e impo an insigh s in o human ela ionships wi h na u e. Poe s and w i e s such as Hen y Da id Tho eau and William Wo dswo h, alongside many isual a is s, ha e been in luen ial in shaping a i udes owa d landscape. Today, he e is a g owing ecogni ion o he a s as an impo an acili a o o socie al ans o ma ion o en i onmen al sus ainabili y (Cu is e al. 2012). The a s ha e he capaci y o syn hesize, simpli y, and ansmi complex en i onmen al in o ma ion, also making i mo e in e es ing and easie o emembe . The a s can also gi e a oice o ma ginalized pe spec i es, playing an emancipa o y social ole and con ibu ing o poli ical change. Ano he impo an a ibu e o he a s is hei abili y o e oke emo ions, which a e physiological esponses o pa icula ypes o senso y expe iences. When people become emo ional, hey usually pay mo e a en ion o e en s, consequen ly egis e ing he expe ience in long- e m memo y. Emo ions a e also an impo an in luence on en i onmen al beha io . The a s also bea he abili y o c ea ing memo able momen s and a celeb a o y a mosphe e by emphasizing beau y and wonde o he na u al wo ld, celeb a ing he na u al en i onmen . This is why he a s should be ha nessed o help o sp ead he inc easingly u gen and e e mo e di icul messages o global clima e change science o he gene al public wo ldwide (Cu is e al. 2012). A is s a e able o communica e wi h la ge audiences, and hei wo k has been used as an impo an pa o p o es mo emen s agains wa , social injus ice, po e y, and en i onmen al issues, among o he subjec s (Cu is e al. 2012). The social psychology li e a u e unde s ands he impo ance o knowledge in shaping belie s, a i udes, in en ions o ac , and en i onmen al beha io . Knowledge abou an issue inc eases he awa eness o consequences, which is an impo an ac o in luencing p o en i onmen al beha io . The ole o he a s in educa ing people has been ex ensi ely ecognized, and h ough he communica ion o scien i ic and en i onmen al knowledge, he a s appea o ha e a ole in encou aging people o adop p o en i onmen al beha io (Cu is e al. 2012). Eco-a has i s way o embodying science, and i is essen ial o bo h p ac i ione s and c i ics o unde s and how science in luences he a and how a ansmi s i s ideas ahead. Wallen (2012, p. 237) ci es E ns Haeckel, who de ined ecology in 1870, by saying ha i means " he body o knowledge conce ning he economy o na u e— he in es iga ion o he o al ela ions o he animal bo h o i s ino ganic and o i s o ganic en i onmen .” This de ini ion is no always he p e e ed one 37 by con empo a y ex books, bu any o he ci ed de ini ion o ecology bea s in i he concep o ela ionships. Rela ionships can be unde s ood in h ee main ways: in e ms o cycles o ma e (wa e o nu ien s), lows o ene gy o nes ed sys ems, wi h smalle ne wo ks such as popula ions and communi ies ha a e nes ed in la ge ones, such as ecosys ems o landscape. Ecologis s unde s and ha such ela ionships change o e ime, and ha eedback loops ensu e ha changes in one pa o he sys em a ec he o he s. Whole sys ems, hen, e ol e as o ganisms adap in ela ionship o one ano he . In ecoa and in ac i ism, ecological ela ionships a e gene ally in oked as a way o unde s and and o i y ela ionships o place (Wallen 2012). Aldo Leopoldo (1949) has once said ha "we can only be e hical in ela ion o some hing we can see, eel, unde s and, lo e o o he wise ha e ai h in”, and ecoa ollows his idea by encou aging iewe s o wo k as s ewa ds o he na u al en i onmen , by le ing he public know abou he ull scale and consequences o hei ac ions (Wallen 2012). Ecosys em is he e m used o de ine cons ella ions o ela ionships in a gi en place, and Wallen (2012) uses as e e ence he concep o an ecosys em ha was i s de eloped by Tansey, who in 1935 de ined i as “ he whole sys em (in he sense o physics) including no only he o ganism-complex, bu also he whole complex o physical ac o s o ming wha we call he en i onmen o he biome— he habi a ac o s in he wides sense.” Ano he cen al concep o ecology is he idea o equilib ium o balance wi hin sys ems, which has become mo e p oblema ic o de ine. In he con empo a y pe spec i e, balance is iewed as a dynamic equilib ium, wi h mul iple s able poin s. Se e e pe u ba ions ha c oss he limi s o a sys em may upse balance, o igina ing ipping poin s ha cause he sys em o be eo ganized in a e y di e en , and pe haps less complex, en i onmen ally deg aded s a e (Wallen 2012). Ecosys ems can be in e p e ed as chao ic o complex, bu we should ecognize ha wha can be seen as andom caos a e ac ually o ganized pa e ns, known as s ange a ac o s. Ecoa is s can be ele an by iden i ying and explo ing he implica ions o such pa e ns. Helen and New on Ha ison, o example, wo k by iden i ying la ge-scale pa e ns, which hey desc ibe h ough s ong me apho s, such as Peninsula Eu ope, Se pen ine La ice o G een Hea o Holland. Then, esponding o he ques ions bo n om hese me apho s, he couple c ea es la ge na a i es ha ecommend ac ions o os e ecological well-being (Wallen 2012). Because homeos a ic ecosys ems a e ha d o iden i y and o quan i y as uni s, biologis s ha e inc easingly ad oca ed o biodi e si y as a measu e o he heal h o ecosys ems. The p ese a ion o biodi e si y became he cen al ield o he new ield o conse a ion biology, 38 apidly becoming a widely championed cause. Biodi e si y o e s a s iking measu e o human impac in na u al en i onmen s, and oday we ha e many scien is s posi ing ha humans a e causing he six h g ea mass ex inc ion on he plane , wi h a a e o ex inc ion 100.000 imes highe han he na u al a e (Wallen 2012). Bu he e should be some cau ion on making a wi h ocus on biodi e si y, because i may shi om he holis ic and sys emic hinking p omp ed by he ecosys em’s concep , o a ocus on indi idual species. Calcula ing biodi e si y is appealing because i p o ides wha looks like a simple quan i a i e measu e, mi o ing ou ma e ialis cul u e. Bu he e u n o he emphasis on single pa s o objec s can weaken he concep o biodi e si y, e en mo e i in compa ison o he concep o ecosys em ha is unde s ood in e ms o ela ionships and pa e ns (Wallen 2012). Bu di e si y can be a measu e o many o he a iables as well, like gene ic, molecula , mo phological, habi a , o ecosys emic biodi e si y, bu also o human a ibu es such as cul u al and linguis ic di e si y. I biodi e si y is unde s ood as he sum o hese in e connec ed a iables, i no only enhances he ele ance o each indi idual species o a ibu e, bu also es ablishes he alue o di e si y in all o hese componen s ha compose a sys em, ea i ming he impo ance o ecosys emic complexi y (Wallen 2012). The concep o sus ainabili y may o e a s ong pe spec i e, because i akes he essen ial s ep o placing humans wi hin ecosys ems, ins ead o p esen ing na u al en i onmen s as some hing ou side o human domains, and he e o e some hing ha is no in insically o human conce n. Bu an issue wi h he concep is he popula i y and openness o he e m, shadowing he need o a p ecise speci ica ion o wha is desi able o sus ain. The B und land Commission o he Uni ed Na ions on 20 Ma ch 1987 simply decla ed: “Sus ainable de elopmen is de elopmen ha mee s he needs o he p esen wi hou comp omising he abili y o u u e gene a ions o mee hei own needs”. This de ini ion is open o many in e p e a ions, as well as he manage ial e hos o “mul iple use”, in o ming many go e nmen al agencies. An inhe en p oblem is he ac ha i ini ially gi es non-human beings no s anding besides an u ili a ian one, being iewed as esou ces (Wallen 2012). In p ac ice, sus ainabili y p omo es ela ion, sys emic hinking, in eg a ing ha d sciences, poli ical, and economic eali ies in o ecological amewo ks The 2005 Wo ld Summi de ined ecological, social, and economic demands as he h ee pilla s o sus ainabili y. This is impo an because such unde s anding o sus ainabili y links i o social jus ice, placing human su e ing such as po e y, malnu i ion, lack o educa ion, and disease, in an ecological pe spec i e (Wallen 2012). 39 The cu en economic c isis enhances he challenge o add essing economic and social pilla s while also p omo ing ecological sus ainabili y. The sea ch o al e na i e economic sys ems is p esen in many co ne s (Wallen 2012). Ecology can be unde s ood no only in e ms o scien i ic p inciples, bu also as he basis o e hical ac ion. Ecoa can play a signi ican ole by encou aging dialogue and o e ing al e na i es o a desi able sus ainable u u e, bo h being in o med by and in o ming an en i onmen al alue sys em o ecological e hic, as well as he idea o ecological jus ice. Ecoa is s can mee his challenge by challenging he s a us o dis anced obse e ha is popula in Ca esian science while encou aging us o ge di y, by combining scien i ic unde s anding wi h sensual awa eness o eawaken embodied ela ionships and inno a i e esponses (Wallen 2012). Today, many a is s emb ace a public p esence and he need o ac i e collabo a ion o scien is s and go e nmen o icials. Ecological a is a call o ecognize he g a i y o he cu en ecological c isis, as well as he necessi y o isiona y esponses wi h po en ial o change beha io , policies, and alues. Ecoa b ings o ligh he wonde o he my iad o li ing o ms and he sadness o hei disappea ance. Bu ins ead o igno ing p esen challenges, a is s use ea less ques ioning in o de o ee imagina ion and spawn c ea i e esponses (Wallen 2012). New me apho s and dialogues media ed by a ques ion ei ied ela ionships while gene a ing new ones. F esh na a i es inspi e u he change and inno a ion, and alues and ways o unde s anding he wo ld may shi as new knowledge eme ges. Ecological a , he e o e, is a g owing o ce in he shaping o alues, isions, and inno a ions o a sus ainable li e ha ensu es he well-being o u u e gene a ions o he di e si y o li e o ms li ing on his plane (Wallen 2012). Bu un il his day, only a small numbe o con empo a y scien is s use he a s in a p ac ical way o help in he de elopmen o hei esea ch, ei he by gaining insigh s ha eed in o hei esea ch, o o communica e hei esea ch o he gene al public. Nalini Nadka ni esea ches he bio a o o es canopy, and she es ablishes connec ions wi h di e se audiences ou side he scien i ic sphe e as well as wi h a is s, wi h he pu pose o inc easing awa eness o canopy ecology. O he scien is s me ge an in e es in aes he ics and science. Some scien i ic o ganiza ion in he UK and in Aus alia ha e hos ed a is s in esidence who ha e c ea ed wo ks inspi ed by science. Collabo a ions be ween a and science include he Colo ado EcoA s es i al (www.ecoa sonline.o g/); A and Science Collabo a ions (www.asci.o g/), Synapse (www.synapse.ne .au/index.php), Gene(sis) p ojec (S e n 2005), O ion (www.o iononline.o g/), G een museum (g eenmuseum.o g/), Aus alian Ne wo k o A and Technology (www.ana .o 40 g.au/), and he Mildu a Palimpses (www.a smildu a.com.au/ old_si es/palimpses /pd s/Palimpses 5.pd ) (Cu is e al. 2012). Despi e he ange o collabo a ions be ween a s and science a ound he wo ld, he e is only a e y small mino i y o scien is s who a e ac ually in ol ed wi h i , and he en i onmen al and sus ainabili y li e a u e is mos ly silen abou he ole o he a s in mass communica ing science (Cu is e al. 2012). A And C ea i i y Sei z (2009) s a s a e lec ion abou a and c ea i i y by ci ing Vi ginia Wool , who w o e a book in 1929 called A Room o One’s Own, and in chap e 4 he na a o ela es a iew o g ea wo ks o a ha a e bo n om he combined c ea i e inhe i ance o he communi y: “Fo mas e pieces a e no single and soli a y bi hs; hey a e he ou come o many yea s o hinking in common, o hinking by he body o he people, so ha he expe ience o he mass is behind he single oice” (p. 65). Bu such pe spec i e, as seen be o e, is no pa o he mains eam o con empo a y iews o c ea i e ac i i ies. Jus as con empo a y iews o he na u e o in elligence, he gene al belie bo h among laypeople as well as among social scien is s is ha c ea i i y inhe es in he indi idual and is mos ly a unc ion o indi idual cons i u ion (Sei z 2009). C ea i e ac i i y is he consequence o he assemblage o cul u al domains and poli ical and social ins i u ions ha in luence di ec ly and indi ec ly he de elopmen o indi idual c ea i i y. c ea i e p oduc s can be always conside ed a communi y a ai , being i he esul o he combined indi idual in ellec i e and c ea i e p o iles o many indi iduals, he his o y o c ea i e ideas and hei applica ion o he domains, as well as he ield o cul u al and poli ical o ces ha se e hei legi imiza ion. The di e en ial dis ibu ion o powe and esou ces among indi iduals and g oups, o example, deeply cons ains c ea i e ac i i y in a and o he o ms o c ea i i y (Sei z 2009). Csikszen mihalyi has de eloped esea ch a he School o he A Ins i u e o Chicago (SAIC), one o he p emie a schools in he Uni ed S a es, and his wo k has shown in a p ac ical manne how cul u e and socie y in luence c ea i i y. A longi udinal ollow-up o he o me s uden s ook place 18 yea s a e he i s phase o he esea ch, and i u ned ou ha some o he mos p omising and gi ed a s uden s we e wo king in eal es a e, eaching, o emodeling houses. One was a plumbing con ac o , while he o he was designing swea e s. Al hough hei app oach o such jobs could be c ea i e, he p omise o an independen and c ea i e a is ic ca ee ha had mo i a ed hem in he a school had ei he ne e ma e ialized o had been cu sho (Csikszen mihalyi 2014). 41 EA5 In e ms o knowledge I do a lo o eading, bo h scien i ic eading, ecological eading ha is science based as well, I also ead philosophy and ead o he people’s pe spec i es, one example would be like Rebecca Solni , he e is o he e e ences as well, o cou se. Cul u al e e ences, ob iously ha ela es o o he a is s’ wo k, wo k by o he s in o he c ea i e ields, poe y, music, pe o mance, a s, o he cul u al e e ences, especially ela ed o he buil en i onmen would be a chi ec u e. I also gain knowledge h ough con e sa ion, h ough collabo a ion, collabo a ion wi h o he a is s, wi h scien is s. […] As an a is , I use scien i ic knowledge as a way o inspi e me o make wo k ha p o ides a mo e in ima e and pe sonal expe ience wi h ha subjec o ha scien i ic knowledge, I don’ see my wo k as being didac ic, I see i as being expe ien ial. […] I would say ha mos o he ime i s used mo e as undamen al in o ma ion o inspi e wo ks ha a e mo e pe sonal. The en i onmen al and ecological a is s ha we e in e iewed ha e simila hopes ega ding he changes hey wish o gene a e wi h hei wo k. The hoped changes a e all di ec ed o he public, no o he ield, and hey a e ocused on p o oking hough and e lec ion, ollowed by emo ions and in ui ion. Table 3. How do you hink you wo k gene a es changes on how we hink, eel, and ac ? EA1 The e is an issue he e ha is ha pe haps he i s con en o a wo k is no isible o some people, ha audience may ha e in e p e a ions ha come om hei own his o y, om hei own baggage. I people a e a ac ed o a pa icula o m, o a sculp u e, o any p oposed wo k, hey will ha e eadings, e en i hose eadings a e no he a is 's ea lies eadings. This will gene a e an exchange, hey will be able o abso b his, and his will gene a e an inc ease in easoning. A he same ime, when I ge a e u n om his audience, i always b ings me new hings, i always b ings me app oaches ha some imes I may ha e looked o , o ha e in en ionally wo ked on, bu o en b ings me o he in o ma ion, o he eadings. I hink he e is a wo-way s ee , no only I o e new con en o app oaches o he public, bu also his audience gi es me his kind o eedback. EA2 Th ough awa eness and access o he mos ancien epe oi e o each, he unconscious. The name o my si e is Ma a a Den o, and i is an allusion o his p e ious o es , o he na u al space in which we li e, o which we a e ui while we des oy i and we dis ance ou sel es mo e and mo e. I belie e ha now he e is a e u n o his na u al space, which exis s as a ib a ion, as an in en ion. The name is also an allusion o an in i a ion, because en e ing a o es is an associa ion wi h he unconscious, en e ing a o es means o many o en e in o he oo s o you pe cep ion, en e ing places you do no no mally isi , wi h hidden o ces. [...] I wan o make people awa e o hem, ge hem o know each o he , know whe e hey s ep, whe e hey ea . I ha e wo ked ha d om my pe spec i e on ga den p ojec s, en i onmen al awa eness, and ood awa eness. Basically, he goal is o se up a me hod, o se up an in ui i e school whe e people do no see hemsel es as subo dina e o a discipline bu empowe ed o disco e he powe s hey hemsel es ha e o know. Some ule d owned ou his sensi i i y, so le 's blossom wha 's mu led, elease he eins. EA3 I hink ha he main objec i e is he human, i is a somewha an h opocen ic hing in spi e o he ac ha we a e li ing he An h opocene, bu I hink ou e lec ion is mo e in he sense o hinking he e lec ions 48 o he socie y, in p oposing e lec ions o he socie y, o c i icize some si ua ions depending on he human ma e s i sel . EA4 I hink wi h he wo k ha I do, I am ying o appeal o people’s emo ions and his deep, deep down ins inc o b ing ha ou , o ge hem o no ice na u e, o ge his eeling back, a eeling ha is he e bu is hidden, bu is los . So, wi h his wo k, I am no add essing one speci ic en i onmen al issue, like, say, wa e o he pollu ion o he ai , o mining, o oil, o wha e e i is, my wo k is no doing ha so much, i is mo e abou en i onmen al unde s anding, i is mo e abou a eeling, you know? E oking a eeling o i . These d awings ha I do a e combined wi h he landscape and hey enhance he landscape, so i is a , bu i is also na u e, and hey a e combined, and I hope ha h ough he a in he na u e I can open up people’s minds and speak o hei sense, o hei eeling abou na u e, and I hope ha his will igge hem o hink a li le u he and ealize ha being in na u e is eally g ea . I hope i ge s people’s minds going abou en i onmen al issues and ge s hem o app ecia e he en i onmen mo e, ge s hem o ealize how amazing he na u al wo ld is, how special, how g ea , and how o be a pa o he sys em, and no des oying i . […] My goals a e o ge he agendas I hink a e impo an ac oss as many people as possible, o ge people’s minds going, no so much o ell hem “ his is how i is”, bu a he o make hem hink, o igge hinking abou en i onmen al issues, abou en i onmen , abou he landscape, abou na u e, no so much like a scien is ic diag am ha p esen s clima e change, bu mo e appealing o hei emo ions and senses, and igge ing hem. EA5 I hope ha my wo k will s imula e people o hink abou hei ela ionship wi h na u e in a mo e connec ed and p o ound way, much o my wo k is e y much di ec ed a b inging ha connec ion and ha in e dependen unde s anding be ween onesel and na u e, I belie e ha he undamen al p oblem in ou wo ld is ha people hink ha hey a e sepa a e om na u e ins ead o ealizing ha hey a e na u e. I belie e ha i people ealize ha he wa e ha is going h ough hei body is he same wa e ha is unning h ough he land, and ha he b ea h ha hey b ea h comes o hem om he ees and plan s on he land and wa e , ha we would hink o ou sel es and hink o ou plane in a e y, e y di e en way. I is ha disconnec ion wi h he na u al wo ld ha I belie e ha is he basis o people’s unhappiness and hei disconnec ion wi h each o he , ha lack o ealiza ion ha we a e all connec ed, ha i is all one connec ed ecosys em. […] I hope ha my wo k would ha e people hink abou hei own esponsibili y o hei ac ions and how hey can posi i ely impac change and impac hei li es and he plane . EA6 He e I always hink o he ollowing: one does no ake ca e o wha one does no know, so o example, i you do no ha e con ac wi h na u e, i you do no know how i wo ks, you ha e no way o ca e, you do no know how o ca e abou i , you do no know ha i exis s, so I hink ha when I b ing some o ha epe oi e o my wo k, i 's exac ly o people o pay a en ion, look a ha and hink abou i , so I hink i 's mo e in o de o make ma e s isible, because mos o he imes hey a e implici , hey a e in isible, and he e y idea is o b ing hese issues o ligh , o con empo a y discussion and e lec ion, o om he pas o he u u e, so I belie e i is o gi e insigh in o hese kinds o issues. 49 Second classi ica ion: Pe son The “pe son" is he pa o he sys em ha p oduces some a ia ion in he in o ma ion inhe i ed om he cul u e. Bu why a e hese people capable o gene a ing such a ia ions while o he s a en' ? Wha a e hei mo i a ions and a ec ions owa ds he en i onmen as a subjec (Csikszen mihalyi 1988)? Ano he impo an poin o analysis, as seen be o e, is o unde s and how c ea i es deal wi h an insigh , and how much hey alue social in luences in hei c ea i e p ocesses, as hese ques ions help us o unde s and how a is s in eg a e an insigh wi h a domain o a social g oup (Csikszen mihalyi and Sawye 1995). Also, om a sys emic pe spec i e, we can assume ha a c ea i e endea o is only c ea i e i he wo k has been emb aced by he ield, meaning ha he insigh p ocess o an indi idual is no enough i his indi idual is no able o ans o m he insigh in o some hing o alue, and hen use his o he abili ies o con ince he ield abou he alue o he no el y ha has been p oduced. So an impo an aspec o be analyzed ega ding “pe son” is how hey manage hei ela ionships and wo k p ocesses wi h he ield (Csikszen mihalyi 1998). The in e iewees show ha hei ela ionship wi h na u e gene ally begins du ing childhood, al hough some o hem also na a e ha , al hough hey we e close o na u e as kids, his ela ionship needed ano he s imulus o lou ish in hem as adul s. I is ele an o no ice how hey see he en i onmen al heme as some hing u gen and some hing la ge han li e. I is no a ma e o ano he in e es ing opic, i is impe a i e o alk abou hese issues, and his is an impo an ac o de e mining hei mo i a ions o mo e o wa d, e en hough he e a e many di icul ies in an en i onmen al a is ’s li e. Table 4. O igins o he in e es in en i onmen al issues EA1 I' e always had a sensi i i y o na u e, I' e always been sensi i e o i . I come om a amily ha had an app ecia ion o i , so maybe i comes om my amily, bu I wo y abou i and i is impo an o me o be inse ed in i , since I am ac ing wi h a mechanism ha is qui e po en ha is he plas ic a s, I am in e es ed in ha ing a e lec ion on his momen , and he ma e s o na u e, he ecological issues, he e a e p essing issues a he momen , hese a e some o he issues ha ha e he g ea es impo ance igh now, and i has an impo ance ha a ec s e e yone. 50 EA2 A is ic o c ea i e skills ha e sp ung up in me since I was a child, and my sensi i i y o ma e ials e en ually helped me o c ea e di e se na a i es. I became in e es ed in he en i onmen al heme because o he abundance o esou ces a ailable on he s ee s o he ci y. While he i on is collec ed by s ee dwelle s o be sold, he woods s ay a ailable, and hese a e mos ly om ex ac ion, no one has plan ed hese ees. I was in e es ed in he abundance o his ances al o es o millions o yea s ha was gene a ed in he su oundings, and ha we we e cu ing wi hou any e lec ion, and oday i e u ns o he dumps e s, while he Jaca andás and Pe obas a e no longe sold legally. When I s a ed, he in e es came om he abundance o his ma e ial and om he desi e o ec ea e his na u al en i onmen . These caboclos, hese epe oi es o sensibili y ha I ha e, ha we exal in samba, in ood, a pa ies, whe e does his uel o a ec ion, o e i o y comes om? Wha epai s ha e no been done ye ? Wha a e he bigges cul u al deb s we ha e in B azil? Indigenous and black deb a e ce ain, and he cons an coloniza ion, he my h o coloniza ion ha begins wi h he allacy o ou "disco e y". The emnan s o he s ill exis ing peoples mus be eg ouped, ea anged, and e ealed in some way, and I hink he ole o he a s has much o do wi h i . No only o epai he damage o he people ha exis ed he e be o e, bu also o hei cosmologies, o hei o he wo ld iew na a i es ha a e e y e iden in he cul u al legacy. EA3 Fo example, in he a s I ha e been d awing since I was a child, I began o pain in a sel - augh way, I did some p og amming cou ses, my own eadings on en i onmen al hemes a e complemen ed by my expe iences wi hin he Amazonian expe ience, whe e I also wo ked as a gold digge o 9 yea s, so he e a e many expe iences ha we e only complemen ed la e wi h he in o ma ion o he academy. Wi h espec o my in e es in en i onmen al issues, his s a ed in 2004, which was one o he i s wo ks I did in ela ion o he en i onmen , which was an u ban in e en ion in a ga den, wi h a cu ee unk ha was pain ed in whi e. I pain ed he shade o he ee om ha cu unk, as a o m o e lec ion o e he public measu es ha cu ees indisc imina ely. We c ea ed he shadow o ha ee, as i i s spi i we e s ill he e, and a lady passed by and said "you made he ee's soul," and om ha in e es ing eedback we began o make o he in e en ions in his ega d. Soon a e , I s a ed a mas e 's deg ee in geog aphy, which discussed he issue o hyd opowe , so I s a ed o pick up some academic ex s and gained a li le mo e awa eness o his issue wi hin he Amazonian pe spec i e. Also, ha same yea , I had in e ac ions wi h o he en i onmen al ac i is s and I bough he idea. So ha 's whe e my in e es in he en i onmen s a ed. EA4 I hink i is pe sonal, I hink I ha e always been a ac ed o na u e, e en as a child, I would always be ou side, I would go in o na u e, I would ake bike ips, do my wo k somewhe e in he ields and hings like ha , you know? Maybe he e was an in luence h ough my a he , especially, because he likes he ou doo s a lo . So I’ e always been a so o an en i onmen alis , I’ e always lo ed he en i onmen . I was ob ious, somehow, ha my wo k would a some poin go in o ha di ec ion, e en hough I didn’ plan on i , i jus happened ha way. 51 EA5 G owing up in New Yo k Ci y, he en i onmen ha was my expe ience was ha p ima ily ha o conc e e, me al and glass. I had he g ea o une o being able o go o summe camps, ha ing some expe iences wi h na u e. My pa en s ook me on a ew oad ips o some na ional pa ks, bu I hink he mos impo an connec ion as a child o na u e was ha I li ed e y closed o he Hudson Ri e and he e was a sec ion whe e i was ai ly s ill un ouched land, so I had he expe ience o spending ime he e, especially as a eenage . I also, hough i is no a na u al space, spen qui e a bi o ime in Cen al Pa k, and in a sense i became a place whe e I could e ea om he noise and s ess om he ci y. So I spen a lo o ime in Cen al Pa k, I s ill ind o his day ha when I go o isi NY, a leas once du ing he day I ha e o ind mysel a ha pa k. Du ing he 70s, when I was li ing in Cali o nia, I wasn’ connec ed o he ou side. I was li ing in an ash am, p ac icing yoga, medi a ion and philosophic li es yle, and i has con inued h ough mos o my li e. So I was much mo e ocused on my inne expe ience and no on he ou e wo ld. I wasn’ un il he e was a majo i e in he San Be na dino Moun ains ha was called he Pano ama Fi e, ha I no iced ou side. The moun ains, e y all moun ains, ha you could see basically om anywhe e ou side we e in lames, and I was d awn o go close o he i es and see wha was happening, and ha expe ience, and he p o ound impac ha i had on my communi y, and he loss o p ope y and I belie e some li es, had me hink abou he powe o na u e, and ha na u e was a o ce, mo e powe ul han any hing else, and so hinking abou my own medi a i e p ac ice, and so o ocus on my sel and his inne wo ld changed, and I became in e es ed in he ou e wo ld and he powe o ha , a he han he powe o ha inne expe ience. So I decided o s a pho og aphing he landscape. I was eally h ough he ac o pho og aphing ha I c ea ed an in ima e ela ionship o place and wi h all o he expe ience a ound. I was ocusing on hings ha I ha e no looked a be o e o hough abou . I was h ough ha isual connec ion ha I was de eloping an in ima e ela ionship wi h he na u al wo ld. Tha connec ion con inued o g ow, and I began hiking and backpacking, and spending mo e ime in he wilde ness. I was a huge shi o me, om an u ban and subu ban expe ience, bu I ound ha I eally wasn’ ha in e es ed abou making wo k abou hese wilde ness places ha I would go, I would pho og aph hose places, bu i was eally mo e abou my pe sonal connec ion wi h hose places, and unde s anding ou ecological sys ems, connec ing wi h wild li e, wi h plan s, wi h all lo a and auna, ha ing an expe ience o quie , o space, o sky, and ealizing ha I was one wi h his. EA6 I ne e hough o ha , o be hones , bu I belie e i comes om my amily. When I was li le [...] o mos o he holidays we would a el wi h my mo he o he coun yside o isi ela i es, so we always had a di ec con ac wi h na u e, picking ui s om he ees, ee climbing, lying ki es in he ield, going o he middle o he o es , so we ha e always had his ela ionship wi h na u e since childhood. My amily has always had a di ec ela ionship wi h he land, we always had a ms, so I hink his is a bi imp egna ed in me. I belie e ha his in e es also came much om my b o he , who le aside he idea o being an enginee and decided o s udy biology, so I ended up expe iencing his ajec o y a lo , and he ended up con amina ing me a lo wi h his ision, his ideal o na u e, he impo ance o i , so I hink i comes om he amily and his expe ience wi h my b o he . As p e iously no iced in he answe s abou which e e ences and knowledges hey use, we will no ice again ha he e is a p edominance o in ui ion on hei c ea i e p ocesses. E en hough EA1 and EA2 men ion a e y speci ic s a ing poin o hei c ea i e p ocesses, which is ela ed o he spaces hey a e going o wo k wi h, he nex phases a e much mo e luid and don’ ollow any 52 igo ous p ocess. The e a e no ex e nal o ces shaping hei c ea i i y he e, as hey mos ly eel ee o de elop hei own in ui i e ideas. Table 5. C ea i e p ocess EA1 My c ea i e p ocess is no linea , bu he e a e some hings ha a e epea ed and ha s uc u e his way o building his c ea i e p ocess. I always use esea ch, which is a cons an sea ch. E e y day I dedica e mysel o eading, so ha 's a baggage ha I ca y. Many o my wo ks a e si e speci ic, hey a e wo ks speci ically designed o a p oposed place, some imes by mysel and o en by cu a o s and ins i u ions ha in i e me o do an a wo k. So hese places gi e me a key o c ea e hese a wo ks. I always s a om a lis ening o hese spaces, a lis ening ying o unde s and wha ha space is a his momen , his yea , and a lis ening o wha was his space, wha was his en i onmen , wha is he s o y ha i ca ies, wha is p esen he e, isible and no isible, ha can help o unde s and wha his place is a he momen I p opose some hing o his place. F om his lis ening I will access hese in e nal con en s and see wha is possible o be moun ed he e, which I can p opose o his place. And his comes in qui e di e en ways, o cou se I ha e a epe oi e o app oaches, a isual epe oi e ha I access and ha makes i isible ha i is my wo k and no someone else's, and I hink his comes om he indi idual epe oi e o e e y a is , ha his epe oi e is being buil wi h his o y, wi h he expe ience, wi h he wo k ha you a e building. So he e's ha whole p ocess ha 's wha I always use. The end is e y mu an , i is no an end ha I ha e o eseen whe e o each, and I can only come o an end when I ha e a p oposal ha has a powe ha can ac i a e ha space, a powe ha can become isible wi hin ha space. I eally like o s uc u e my ideas om d awings, some imes e y simple ske ches, bu o me hey gene a e o he easonings. I need o pu hese easoning on pape so I can ha e eadings on i . Some wo ks do happen e en wi hou ha ing a ske ch, a d awing, bu mos o hem ha e, i will depend on he di icul y o he space p oblem ha is placed. EA2 I hink he ela ionship wi h he en i onmen is e y undamen al. When I make an exhibi ion I ask wha ha space was 100, 200, 400 yea s ago, which a e he ages o many woods ha I ha e. Can you imagine how much his o y hese woods ha e seen since hey we e seeds, un il hey g ew, go cu , aged and came he e? They' e seen a lo o his o y. Also I y o know abou he his o y o he neighbo hood. F om he his o y o hese places I y o c i icize i , I y o gi e ano he eading o i , sea ching wi hin he elemen s ha I possess he possibili y o elling hese s o ies. When hey a e neu al spaces, I gi e mysel he pe mission o make a s o y, o na a e a s o y based on B azilian cul u al adi ions, always ying o use he maximum o local elemen s. 53 EA3 Wi h ega d o he echnique, I w i e down some ideas he e and he e, some imes hey a e no simply ideas, hey a e insigh s ha can come in he o m o an image, ideo, and ha is eco ded, and e e y now and hen I look a i , I see i he e is some hing in e es ing, i is a c ea i e ac oo, because i a any momen no hing eels in e es ing o you, you go he e and ind a s imulus, an old idea, an image, a ideo. These hings a e like his, c ea i e me hods a e des ined o chaos and he cosmos, now he exposi o y me hods, he mo e conc e e me hods, he mo e ma e ial, a e des ined o Ca esianism i sel , exposi o y s a egies a e mo e a ional. Fo me he e is no a single c ea i e p ocess, o he e is a single c ea i e p ocess and he e a e se e al me hods, i can be ha oo. Bu some imes i can s a wi h a pho o, an image, an idea, a poem, some imes he s a comes om a c i ical si ua ion ha appea s in he media, a social issue, so he e is no speci ic me hod o begin he c ea i e p ocess. Usually i begins wi h an idea, and i can come in many o ms, and his idea is de eloping, i needs ime o de elop, i i de elops, and some imes you pick up hings e y easily, and o he imes you ha e hings ha ake yea s, hen he e is no speci ic me hodology in he c ea i e p ocess. Fo me i is mo e in ui i e, o c ea e, and hen comes he 90% o swea ing, and in ui ion is 10% o ha , because i inishes wi h a ionaliza ion o e ha in ui ion, closing wi h ano he aes he ic and communica i e in ui ion as well, so I hink his is a sum o ins umen ali ies ha a e coming oge he , he e a e laye s o sedimen , and i amalgama es in a ce ain way ha when i is eady, i is eady. EA4 Some imes we canno e en ocalize i be o e i is done, you know? I is no like “oh, now I am going o do his kind o a ”, I s a ed doing hings wi h snow because i was un a i s , i kind o de elops s ep by s ep. Some imes you do some hing and you migh no e en ake i se iously. We play wi h some hing, and han we no ice he e is some g ea e po en ial in i , and hen we d i e i u he . I hink i happens as you go. You ha e an idea, you do some hing wi h ha idea, maybe some hing small, and hen maybe communica ion wi h o he s will show wha you should do wi h i . I ge s mo e s uc u ed when you ha e o pu hings oge he in o a show, igh ? Bu when you de elop a wo k, excep when i is de eloped o a speci ic pu pose, i ge s s uc u ed, bu i doesn’ allow so much play, you know? I kind o es ic s you a li le bi in how much you can go beyond ha and change hings. Bu i you don’ ha e his speci ic objec i e, he p ocess is no e y s uc u ed, i o en jus lows, i o en comes and akes u ns ha you din’ expec be o e, which o me is e y impo an and e y exci ing, because his makes i mo e in e es ing, you know? To me, o wo k wi h i , and also, hope ully, o he pe son who la e sees i . 54 EA5 My c ea i e p ocess I hink is cons an ly changing and e ol ing, I hink i eally depends on he subjec o he p ojec ha I am wo king on. […] Pho og aphy has been used o me as medi a ion and a way o comp ehend and adap o my en i onmen , so o en I will ind mysel in e es ed in a speci ic subjec , and wha I will do is I will pho og aph ha subjec and ha subjec could be a speci ic plan , i could be a i e , i could be a la ge en i onmen al a ea, i could be a lo o di e en hings, and he ac o pho og aphing helps me o ha e an in ima e expe ience wi h ha , hough I can s ill ha e ha expe ience wi h ha place wi hou pho og aphing i , he pho og aphing o he place c ea es a eco d o ha expe ience, i helps me o in e p e i , i also becomes in a sense a isual dia y o ha expe ience, and addi ionally I do eadings, I will do esea ch, i could be lib a y esea ch, online esea ch, a chi al esea ch ela ed o he subjec ha I am in e es ed in, so my p ocess ends o be bo h h ough my pe sonal expe ience and h ough esea ch and eadings. The e could be in e iews in ol ed wi h people who ha e knowledge abou he subjec ha I am in e es ed in, and i is h ough he ga he ing o all o his ha e en ually I dis ill all o his expe ience and knowledge in o wha he a wo k will be, and o en when In s a I ha e no idea, I am jus d awn o a subjec , I spend ime because I am passiona e abou i , and I wan o lea n and g ow h ough ha expe ience, bu in e ms o wha ha inal a wo k will be, i i will end up being a pho og aph, a pho og aphic p ojec , a se ies o pho og aphs, i i will be a sculp u e, an ins alla ion, i ha p ojec will be sho e m o long e m, i I will comple e i in days, mon hs, yea s, decades, I ha e no idea. I allow he expe ience and he p ocess o un old o me, when i eels done, i is done. O en I ha e a ision in a sense, o some idea ha de elops as Im wo king wi h a ce ain subjec o opic ha in o ms he di ec ion ha ha a wo k will go, as many a is s some a wo ks ail, and some p ojec s o subjec s o in e es I began and hey a e no inished, ei he because I don’ ha e he cla i y o make i o he end, i jus doesn’ seem o be speaking o me, o I don' hink ha i is success ul, i is no mee ing my in en ion, and o he imes i is e y clea ha i is wo king, and I eel ha I wan o see he p ojec o he end and sha e his o a b oade audience. EA6 My p ocess is e y in ui i e, i does no ollow a logic o me hodology ye , i can be bo n e en om an obse a ion, om a e y punc ual ma e , I do no ha e a sequence. My wo k is e y open, and I e en p e e i o be his way, loose , han ying o always go he same way. Co obo a ing Csikszen mihalyi’s ideas, all a is s emphasize he impo ance o social in e ac ions in hei c ea i e p ocesses. They ecognize how hei wo k is in luenced by such exchanges, and hey che ish i . I shows how he wo ks o a a e de i ed om a collec i e ne o inpu s, and how i s eng hens c ea i i y. These exchanges seem o in luence c ea i i y a lo , bu hey a e no seen as a nega i e o ce, his is a o ce ha en iches he c ea i e po en ials o en i onmen al and ecological a is s. 55 Table 6. Social in e ac ions in he c ea i e p ocess EA1 Speaking o me, I hink I ha e a a he lonely job, bu I eally enjoy sha ing his c ea i e p ocess. The ideas come om my easoning, bu how his is buil , I like o sha e wi h o he p o essionals. I accep many opinions, he wo k can o mally change depending on he associa ions I make. I like o sha e p ocesses wi h cu a o s, when hey a e open o i , and when hey ha e a deepe unde s anding o my wo k. I is e y ich o spli p ocesses wi h some p o essionals. Wi h ega d o he public, my wo k o en equi es me o be mo e p esen , and I end up ge ing oo close o he wo k o see how hey decons uc and a e abso bed. I am in e es ed in seeing how his happens, so I am e y p esen in he wo k I do, and o he people also b ing app oaches and app oaches om o he s, bu I like o be close o i , i gi es me uel o do o he jobs. EA2 Social in e ac ions a ec me in an essen ial way, especially he connec ions I ha e wi h he pe iphe y, wi h he bel s o he ci y, wi h who buil he ci y. The basic ques ions I always ask a e wha i used o be on his e ain, who buil i , whe e does his sand and cemen come om, whe e do hese woods come om? And hen you end up alling in o he wo king class, who eally buil ha space, so I always end up ela ing o a lo o sa aus, hiphop, s ee cul u e, ying o cons uc poe ic plo s abou his agili y o he social ab ic, abou he social abyss, abou he alua ion o his deb , on his la e, delayed, pos poned epai . The en i onmen is closely ela ed o hese na i e peoples, because e e y hing is based on ood, lea , d um, and he d umbea o he hea . All he bea s we hea in hiphop, samba, ap, ock, e e y hing came om ha i s p imo dial play o he d um ha imi a es he bea o ou hea . EA3 Rega ding social in e ac ions, hey in luence in one way o ano he . [...] A home I ha e he pa ne ship o my wi e, who is my pa ne in my p ojec s and I am o he p ojec s, and we ha e p ojec s in common. Wo king in a collec i e is also no easy, because some imes you idea is o e come and you emba k on he canoe o o he s, bu you a i e a he end and o en see ha hei idea paid o , bu some imes no . Bu i depends on how open you a e o accep his kind o p ocess. EA4 The connec ion wi h o he s does in luence my wo k. Fo me i is always amazing o see o he a is s wo k, like o go and see galle ies and a museums. I ha e always lo ed o do his. To look a somebody else’s wo k can ge you in o di e en di ec ions, and he same can happen in a con e sa ion wi h ano he a is , o maybe a cu a o , so I would say ha his can help, bu as a is s we a e also soli a y. EA5 I lea n qui e a bi wo king wi h he o he pho og aphe s as we sha e ou esea ch and ou wo k. I ha e colleagues ha I ha e augh wi h a Cal S a e San Be nadino ha ha e inspi ed me h ough hei wo k, and I ha e collabo a ed wi h some o hese colleagues, my son is a heo e ical physicis , my sis e is a chemis y p o esso , so wo o he people ha a e e y close o me a e bo h scien is s and hey bo h wo k a uni e si ies, so I ha e hese people in my li e ha I am e y close wi h and we sha e ideas and i ce ainly impac s my hinking and my c ea i e p ocess. I ha e a e y la ge social ne wo k o a is s who wo k speci ically wi h en i onmen al issues, I ha e been in ol ed wi h he ecoa ne wo k o many yea s and we communica e a a daily basis h ough email, and he e a e nume ous o he a is s ha I am in con ac wi h and also I ha e cu a ed qui e a bi , and his is a wonde ul expe ience o me o in e ac wi h o he a is s who a e wo king on issues o place, on en i onmen al issues. I am cons an ly in e ac ing wi h di e en non-p o i en i onmen al g oups. I also ha e he g ea o une o wo king wi h g adua e s uden s and I’ e had a numbe o s uden s who make wo k dealing wi h en i onmen al issues and ha in e ac ion has de ini ely been spi ing, impac ing my hinking as well as mysel impac ing hei s. 56 EA6 Basically his con ac wi h o he people is c i ical o c ea ing knowledge, expanding ho izons, ge ing ou o you box, so I belie e his is c i ical. When I'm in Se inha hinking abou wo k and mee ing my b o he , I alk o o he people, and hey b ing o he in o ma ion ha goes beyond wha I knew, his is e y impo an o he e olu ion o he wo k, so I belie e ha hey p o oundly help my conques as en i onmen al a is . E en when you ha e con ac wi h he Homeless Mo emen , o you go o he ou ski s o a ci y and lea e he cen e , you see ha he ela ionship o hese people o he en i onmen is o ally di e en , so e en hese social issues end up b inging in ano he way he en i onmen al issues, hey make you hink in a new way, so his is e y impo an o he insigh s, so his exchange is p iceless. As i happens in any o he c ea i e pu sui s, en i onmen al and ecological a is s ha e many insigh s bu selec only a ew o hem o de elop in o comple ion. This selec ion p ocess is, again, e y in ui i e and sel -cen e ed, meaning ha , mos ly, he e a en’ ex e nal ac o s in luencing his p ocess in a s ong way, al hough a is EA4 has poin ed ou ha he selec ions can be done wi h base in e y p agma ic de e mina ions, such as he space whe e he p ojec is going o ake place, he abili ies o onesel , o he lack o money o p oduce some o he ideas. Mos ly, hough, he a is s seem o make he selec ion p io i izing hei own eelings a ound he ideas, and once an idea is selec ed, he di icul ies in pu suing hem will be deal wi h in ano he phase. The po en ial o ideas a e mos ly no de e mined by ex e nal ac o s. Table 7. Selec ion o insigh s o pu sue EA1 I is he ime ha de e mines. I , o e ime, hese ideas emain, I hink he e a e impo an hings he e ha need o be aken in o accoun . When in ime his is los o becomes some hing else, I lea e i aside, bu i is ne e a o al neglec , because i se es o gene a e ano he insigh , ano he idea, in a la e momen . EA2 I he dynamic o ce is e iden , in he sense ha i is ali e, i begins o expand ene gy. Does i emana e ene gy? I he answe is posi i e I will go a e i , i i is emana ing much noise o con usion and he in en ion is no his, I will kill i . EA3 The ac o s I use o analyze my own insigh s depend on my cul u al e e ences. I s a ed d awing om an ea ly age, hen mo ed o clay o a while, saw my mo he making wood ca ing, making pic u es, so I g ew up wa ching he do i . Then I lea ned how o play he piano, I had a classic musical aining, which I ha ed. I spen ime wi hou con ac wi h a and la e I began o iddle wi h pain ing, eng a ing and sculp u e, p ima ily because o money, and hen i s a ed g owing, and you pe cei e he e ish o he idea o a is and a as me chandise, and he newe ones emba k on his canoe. So he b eaking o his pa e n ook place om an academic pe spec i e, and om he e he new cul u al and c i ical e e ences, s udying and eaching a his o y, I ied o unde s and my place in he wo ld and my way o hinking. 57 EA2 The i s hing is o wash he conscience, he second hing is he image, because ins i u ions need o clean hei image and a e inc easingly in es ing in symbols and icons o sus ainabili y. The e is a endency he e because he en i onmen is e y explici , e en mo e i i is colo ul, e hnic, he e is a unky side ha is a ac i e, and ashion, and he cul u al indus y exploi s his a lo . The e is a niche in he ma ke o such opics, I ha e galle y owne s and collec o s who ask o o es ames, bu he po ai o he indigenous su e ing hey do no wan because i is no so comme cial. The e is a demand o p oduce hese g een, p esen and sel -c i ical in elligence ophies ha would be an en i onmen al wo k o a . [...] I is in e es ing o no e ha he e is his will o e u n o na u e, bu wi h obs acles, wha kind o na u e do we wan o be? The demand ha exis s oday is o an a ha does no spi in he ace o he public, because he public knows he p oblems o he plane , bu wan s he beau i ul and exo ic pho o o an A ican who is e y sexy, beau i ul, is s ong, is s ylish, bu ha does no ela e o he public, which does no p o oke i . Bu we also canno gene alize, bu people eally end no o go deepe , and ollow wha a c i ic says. Decisions a e aken a ound he dining able, wi h a wine o 50,000 eais and a bu e o 100,000 eais o 3 people, and hey discuss who bough who, and which a is will exhibi in he museums because hey a e he pa ons o museums, and de ine he schedules o se e al yea s, acco ding o hei pa icula collec ions. This spills in he a is ic p oduc ion, because he a is s a e no blind and many do no ha e enough money, wi h 97% o hem being b oke. The a sec o is e y likely o be eli is . The exhaus ion o con empo a y a comes om ha , because i is based bo h on p ocesses consec a ed by o he a is s o o he au ho s, e y sa e and indi idual obse a ions, he pu sui o such an a is genius x, which we end up ne e con empla ing, so i is e y p e en ious and de ia es people o any kind o assimila ion. I saw a lo o hypoc isy in ha sense, in e ms o a and epe oi e, so I had o gi e up s udying a , because ha 's no wha I wan , so I'm going a e ano he kind o educa ion, so I s a ed a mas e 's deg ee in holis ic s udies, consciousness. EA4 In he a s he e has always been a clea di ision be ween come cial galle ies, ha always un a e y sa e con en , because hey need o sell, because ha is wha hey do. A lo o comme cial galle ies do no ake isks, hey will no show an en i onmen al a is who is maybe young o who hasn’ sold a lo o wo ks, because hey can’ isk ha . Bu hen he e a e non-p o i spaces ha ge hei money no so much h ough a sales, bu also h ough unding, so hey can isk mo e, hey can do mo e hings ha hey eel a e mo e in e es ing and impo an , and ha need o be shown o he public, and no necessa ily enowned a is s who sell a lo . So he e is his di ision in he a wo ld. EA5 I hink ha mos ins i u ions ha ep esen he e alua ion p ocess, speci ically looking a museums, bo h p i a e collec ions ha lead o museums, o public museums, looking a go e nmen ins i u ions, I hink ha in gene al he c i e ia ha is used o he e alua ion o a ha deals wi h en i onmen al issues, en i onmen al a o ecoa o all o ha , is basically he same, and is p ima ily ai ly subjec i e, in e ms o he e alua ion o he quali y o he wo k, he ideas, ce ainly issues abou ele ance o ou ime a e impo an , so he e o e en i onmen al a would be some hing ha would be conside ed as being ex emely imely, especially dealing wi h issues o clima e change, bu I hink bo h objec i e and subjec i e demands and il e s would be he same o mos ins i u ions when i comes o hei collec ions, now in e ms o exhibi ion wo k, galle ies, museums, nonp o i spaces, pop-up spaces, al e na i e spaces, I hink he imeliness o he wo k, he signi icance o he issues would make a di e ence especially igh now, in e ms o showing he wo k, gi ing he wo k exposu e, exposing he wo k o new audiences, so I hink he e is a di e ence when i comes o a ha deals wi h en i onmen al issues. Now o cou se he e a e specialized ins i u ions, ha ocuses speci ically on a and p ac ices ha ela e o he en i onmen , and ob iously in ha case, he cu a o s and a his o ians, and e e yone engaged in a speci ic 64 o ganiza ion o ins i u ion like ha would ha e a ocus on p ese ing c ea ions o he u u e ha is ela ed o a single opic. EA6 The ield aces en i onmen al a wi hou p ejudice, I hink ha he e has always been a li le ela ionship be ween he ield and en i onmen al a s, since he Du ch landscape a is s. I belie e ha he e is no sepa a ion be ween en i onmen al a and o he a s. The ques ion o en i onmen al a s, when you ake ege a ion o a museum, o example, you equi e he museum o be ca e ul wi h he wo k wi h wa e ing, ligh , speci ic ca e, so some imes he museum i sel p e e s a job ha does no equi e main enance han an en i onmen al a wo k ha equi es someone o be esponsible o he ca e o ha wo k. Bu he impo ance o en i onmen al a is as ele an as any o he , i no mo e so oday. Nowadays, I hink i has much mo e ele ance han any o he a , e en o b ing he li ing, o b ing up issues ha some imes people a e no e en awa e o . The i s s esses how he a is s a e en angled in a ma ke ha de ines a e y na ow g oup o ga ekeepe s, in his case galle y owne s, a c i ics and a collec o s. These ga ekeepe s end up in luencing wha some a is s p oduce, as he e is a p e e ence o a ha alks abou he en i onmen , bu in a pleasan and ashionable way, in a way ha is sa e and well ecei ed by mos . This clea ly indica es he p esence o s ong powe s agains c ea i i y. The nex segmen belie es ha en i onmen al and ecological a is gene ally e alua ed by i s quali y, and also o he ac ha his kind o a is dealing wi h imely issues, being i a e y s ong subjec nowadays. Bo h segmen s a e no necessa ily in disag eemen , as he imeliness o a subjec does no nega e a possible p e e ence o wo ks o a ha alk abou he en i onmen bu ha don’ make he public uncom o able. A he same ime, an unp o oca i e piece o a does no necessa ily lack in quali y, i depends o subjec i e e alua ion sys ems ha de ine wha has quali y and wha hasn’ . In bo h cases, hough, i is possible o no ice o ces pushing and pulling c ea i i y in he en i onmen al and ecological a s. These o ces a e some imes unclea , subjec i e, e y ela ed o he changing con ex s o each ins i u ion, exhibi ion, and ci cle o ga ekeepe s, making i di icul o a is s o unde s and wha is being demanded and wha is no , enabling hem o ei he play wi h hese in o ma ions o nega e hem in i s ull, some hing ha has been done by one o he in e iewees in i s en i e y, and in smalle doses by mos o he o he s. The a is s also sha ed hey opinions on how he ield ecognizes an a wo k as c ea i e and aluable, complemen ing some o he ideas al eady p esen on he answe s seen abo e. 65 Table 12. Field’s ecogni ion o c ea i i y and alue EA1 I hink mos o his ield is mo e in e es ed in inding hings ha a e al eady known, hings ha a e al eady, in a way, unde s ood, al eady p ocessed. (...) Many ins i u ions a e in e es ed in epea ing wha has al eady been consolida ed. I is impo an o an a is o become c ea i e in hese places and c ea e ension. Ins i u ions a e no p epa ed o ecei e many kinds o wo k, bu his is being buil be ween a is and ins i u ion. I 's ha d wo k. EA2 The ield mos ly ecognizes a is s using almos ob ious elemen s, e y colo ul, wi h a lo o o namen , wi hou g ea c i ical isions o some hing. Many galle y owne s al eady ask o he p oduc ion o wo ks wi h speci ic dimensions because hey al eady know who is he cus ome hey ha e in mind and which wall he clien is going o pu he wo k on, so i has o embellish he house and go wi h he p e e ences o he cus ome . In o de o b eak ee o his ma ke , en i onmen al a began o ee i sel om his con ex , and began o explo e he open, na u al spaces. EA3 He e we ha e he sys ems ques ion. The momen he wo k becomes ecognized by a pa icula sys em, i becomes alued, his wo k s a s o be used as an asse , as some hing o be specula ed, so o en he a is s ha e hei wo k alued, bu hey a e o ced o ha e a ma ke iew ha is co-op ed by he logic o he inancial ma ke . The wo k by i sel is al eady alued by he a is , i he e is no desi e o aluing i speci ically o he ma ke . The wo k is al eady alued by a ma e o esea ch and igo , and also by ecogni ion o he pee s, and he alo iza ion ha occu s in his sense is in he applica ion ha is gi en o his wo k wi hin a ce ain communi y, which is he e lec ion ha his will lead o ce ain social si ua ions, hen aluing his ype o si ua ion, in a way e en mo e han i s me can iliza ion, i s ade, hen some imes can be in he ield o ideas ha his alue will occu , wi hin hese mo e unde g ound ci cles. EA4 One o he hings is pe sonal, i is abou as e. The o he hing is who he pe son is and who needs o make money ou o his, so his will be a e y impo an ac o o hem. Does his wo k sell? I hey a e mo e on he non-p o i sec o , hey can ake mo e isks and go o some hing ha is mo e o iginal, and also some galle ies and non-p o i s as well ha e ce ain agendas, hey wanna show people who a e kind o a he ma gin o he a wo ld, who a e unde - ep esen ed, no because hei wo k is bad, bu because hey don’ i in o he ealm o he accep ed endy a o he ime. 66 EA5 Im gonna use wo examples o inno a i e and c ea i e app oaches, and hem being seen as alued. One o hem is Kim S ing ellow’s p ac ice, which inco po a es pho og aphy, ideo, sound na a i e, web based wo k, and collabo a ion wi h o he a is s and w i e s, gene a ing a ype o his o ical jou nalism and he ecogni ion ha she ecei ed o he ype o wo k ha she does, as a Guggenheim ellow. Ano he example would be And ea Zi el who also is a Guggenheim ellow, and he wo k being inc edibly c ea i e, inno a i e, and anscending he adi ional way we hink abou a making. So bo h o hese a is s do his, and hey bo h ha e been ecognized o his wo k, ha s addles many di e en a eas, ce ainly And ea Zi el’s wo k is looked a as being mo e sculp u e based, bu a lo o he wo k is based in unc ion, and based in li ing in ha mony wi h na u e, so bo h o hese p ac ices ha e ecei ed ecogni ion in he ield and he e o e been seen o be aluable, al hough hey don’ i in any p econcei ed ideas and gen es, so I hink ha hese wo a is s, again, bo h o hem being highly ecognized and being women, which I hink is eally impo an , since he e is s ill a clima e o gi ing mo e exhibi ions and mo e acquisi ions o male a is s. I hink ha bo h o hese a is s who also each, inspi e many o be c ea i e, and o y and explo e many new a eas and de elop new a eas and disciplines wi hin a , so i ’s de ini ely a ec ing c ea i i y when you ha e inno a i e a is s like hese wo and many o he a is s who a e dealing wi h en i onmen al a ecei e ecogni ion. I can also hink o Michael Lundg en, he jus was awa ded a Guggenheim ellowship and he is a pho o based a is s doing a qui e expe imen al wo k, coming om mo e adi ional pe spec i e o pho og aphy, s ill wo king wi h ilm, and making wo k ha is e y much abou he expe ience o place. EA6 My way o making a , as I do no depend on his inancial e u n ha comes om he ci cui , he mains eam, he o icial ma ke ing ci cui o a , I do no ha e o wo y abou wha people a e going o hink o how he ma ke will eac . I am e y in ui i e in my c ea ions, c ea i i y always lows, has no obs acles because he cu a o has said some hing, o because o he ma ke , o because he e is no inancial e u n. I do no hink i is up o me as an a is o hink abou how he ield ecognizes o ails o ecognize a job, I hink i is up o me o do and le hem ind wha hey p e e . Again, mos o he esponden s ha e shown ha he ield has a p e e ence o pas eu ized ideas, c ea ions ha a e easily accep ed by mos , ha ul ill he needs o ma ke . In ui ion and c ea i i y comes back when he a is ees himsel o he sel om he necessi y o making money ou o i , o when he a is seeks o use g an s p o ided by ins i u ions ha do no depend on he a ma ke . Again, when asked abou he au onomy o he ma ke , he a is s poin ou ha he e is no au onomy i one is inse ed in he a ma ke , while some au onomy can be gained once he a is disconnec his o he sel om such s uc u es. The public opinion is also impo an , ha ing e ec s on he ield i sel , as i o ces ga ekeepe s o open space o a wo ks based in popula subjec s, and i also d i es collec o ’s desi es up, he e o e gene a ing mo e ma ke alue o a wo ks ha deal wi h popula subjec s. 67 Table 13. Au onomy o he ield EA1 Economic o ces g ea ly in luence he ield. Public opinion also in luences. As en i onmen al issues become mo e p esen in socie y, his ield has o become mo e sensi i e o his. The public and socie y, i hey a e dealing wi h his, will cause changes in he ield. EA3 These sys ems a e au onomous wi hin hei own limi a ions, he ield i sel is an ex e nal o ce, he momen you s a wo king on he issue o ading a commodi y, you a e al eady inside an ex e nal p ocess and a he same ime in e nal because he ma ke does no ecei e mo emen excep h ough he commodi y, excep in he mo e unde g ound ci cles, in which he commodi y no longe has ha ole, bu he ield o e s a judgmen o alue ha comes om hose who unde s and hemsel es as specialis s, he a is s en e in o a labeling o en i onmen al a , and may su e a alo iza ion o a de alua ion, bu no by he wo k i sel , bu by he ma e o he e ish o he commodi y i sel . EA5 I hink i eally depends on he a is in e ms o being au onomous. Wi hin he ield I hink i has o do i hey a e making wo k ha is mean o be ma ke ed wi hin he galle y wo ld o i hey a e making wo k ha is only going o be ou in he public sphe e, ei he in he public a , o i i has in e en ion wi h a speci ic si e. The e a e a is s who do eco-based wo k ha mi iga e a si ua ion, an en i onmen al si ua ion and posi i ely impac i , so one example would be someone like Be sy Damon and he p ojec in China, so in e ms o being au onomous, i you a e wo king wi h a galle y and he ma ke i is ha d o be o ally au onomous. I you a e doing public a , wo king wi hin he public sphe e, i is di icul o be o ally au onomous, hough he e a e a is s who ce ainly can ha e a p ac ice ha is mo e au onomous, ha is mo e sel -suppo ed and non-impac ed in he same way by public opinion o o he o ces. EA6 The alue o a wo k depends on how many b ands ha wo k collec s. Fo example, i he wo k was done by a g ea a is i al eady has a b and, i a g ea collec o bough a wo k, i ge s ano he b and, i he piece pa icipa ed in a majo exhibi ion, i ge s ano he b and i he wo k was passed o a second collec o i wins ano he b and, i i wen h ough a la ge galle y she wins ano he b and. The mo e i is passed on and pa icipa es in exhibi ions and ins i u ions, i adds alue o he wo k. The a is is he las pe son o ha e in luence o e he alue o he wo k; in ac , i is he one who ac s he leas in his alo iza ion, so he e is always he igu e o he ma chand, he collec o , he galle y owne , he cu a o , he public. The e u n o he public is also impo an because i helps o a ouse he in e es o a collec o in acqui ing such a wo k o e en he in e es o he deale o ma ke ha wo k o a collec o , gene a ing a alua ion loop. Fo example, in a ai s, he wo k begins in a galle y, bu du ing he ai ano he galle y buys his wo k, and he wo k goes h ough se e al galle ies and a he end o he ai he wo k e u ns o he i s galle y, whe e i began, and a he ime o his e u n, he wo k e u ns wi h a much g ea e added alue, due o he b ands and ins i u ions, o he specula ion o a . Con inuing o ein o ce he ideas ha ha e been p e iously p esen ed, when he a is s we e asked how was he access o esou ces in he ield, hey answe ed by saying ha money is gene ally a big p oblem, ha i is ha d o be ecognized inside he ield, ha a is s should look o unding ou side o he classic sou ces o he ield, bu ha non o hese issues limi hei wo k. En i onmen al and ecological a is a labo o lo e, i is based on u gency and also on an inne 68 desi e o pu ou he e he bes a wo k one can gene a e. These a e he p io i ies, and money and ame a e looked a as possible consequences. Table 14. Access o esou ces in he ield EA1 The e a e esou ces o hese p ac ices, bu hey a e es ic ed esou ces. O cou se, his is al eady be e han 20 yea s ago, bu in a coun y like B azil his is s ill e y es ic ed. I is ha d no o ha e money, bu hese a e choices ha an a is makes, whe e his wo k will ha e highe powe o ue cha ac e is ics. So, o cou se, whoe e builds objec s, hey a e much easie o ma ke , and his e e s o mone a y esou ces, and whoe e chooses o he pa hs has o ind o he possibili ies o make hei wo k iable. I know many a is s who a e banking hei own wo ks, who wo k in o he sphe es, ha e pa allel wo ks, and use hese esou ces o inance hei own p ojec s. EA2 I you pick an es ablished and ecognized en i onmen al a is like F ans K ajcbe g, he had a lo o ha d imes in li e, he's a Jew, who an away om nazism, bu Ma c Chagall paid a icke o him o come o Rio de Janei o in he 1940s and he became one o he g ea B azilian a is s, wi h expensi e wo ks. He has a big con on a ion wi h space, his a m in Bahia has been obbed 500 imes, he has a e y s ong s a emen , his wo k is e y ecognized and he has enough money, bu he is s ill e y h ea ened all he ime. A he age o 90 he is ulne able, ye . The e, on a pe sonal le el, in my pe sonal dimension o ac ion, I ha e managed o su i e hanks o p ojec s ha I do wi h SESC, which is ou g ea na ional pa on o he a s, some p i a e ounda ions in i e o esidencies, calls a e opened he e and he e. Al hough he e is a g ea spo ligh on he a s ma ke , somehow you see ha he ma ke , in gene al, no only in he a s, i becomes a s anda d o conduc o socie ies, bu ew elec ed li e om i , i is a lo o spo ligh o jus a ew people, and he es s ays wi h no hing. Bu i you wo k has some magne ism and ounda ion i is going o ha e an accep ance and hings s a o change, bu he e is no a lo o abundance. Fo e y ew you see an excess o esou ces, hese a e ew elec ed, i depends on pe sonal ela ions mo e han he o ce o he wo k i sel . The e a e many wonde ul a is s who will ne e be ecognized. EA3 I am no in e es ed in he ma e s o ame o money, i hey come I hope hey a e a ecogni ion o a job ha is well done, ha hey will be an au oma ic issue, bu hey a e no some hing o be sough and desi ed, no as a i s p ojec ion, bu as a consequence. The impo an hing is o s ay ali e, o con inue o ins iga e, ques ion, p o oke es angemen , and lea e o he nex gene a ions seeds o wha ou ques ions we e, wha was o be ali e in a ce ain pe iod and o ac acco ding o you conscience o you ideals, I hink his is he mos in e es ing hing o us in e ms o a , is o con inue p oducing and ma king ou symbolic e i o y in his wo ld made o isual a i ac s. EA4 I hink he lack o money de ini ely could in luence a is s, howe e , mos a is s ha I know a e no d i en by money, so a lo o us do ou wo k because we wan o do i , because we eel i is impo an . The e a e excep ions o his, de ini ely, he e a e a is s who a e e y sa y in he ms o ma ke ing and who will eally look whe e is he ma ke , bu I would say ha his is he mino i y o a is s. I would say ha he majo i y o us do wha we hink we need o do, and wha we eel is igh o do. 69 EA5 I ha e ecei ed se e al g an s in pa ne ship wi h he Wa e Resou ces Ins i u e o do my wo k, which is unique in ha ypically hose ypes o g an s go o scien is s and he e ha e been g an s ha ha e come h ough ha ha e suppo ed my a is ic p ac ice. I ha e been o una e o gain unding h ough g an w i ing o suppo my wo k, ha ing ha inancial suppo as well as ha ing hose deadlines, as well as ha ing o comple e p ojec s o ul ill g an s ce ainly helps wi h accomplishmen s in he ield. As I men ioned, unding coming om such hings as he Guggenheim Founda ion has been suppo ing se e al a is s ha I am awa e o , ha wo k in his eal. I hink ha he e a e di e en ypes o g an s ou he e ha a is s can pu sue, ce ainly, i hei wo k is no some hing ha is easily ma ke able, i is mo e di icul o hem o make wo k o sell o make unds ha can suppo hei p ac ice, I hink ha he e a e many a is s ha wo k in en i onmen al/ecological a s ha each o a li ing like mysel , ha seems o be ai ly common in he ield. I also men ioned in ano he ques ion ha I ha e been able o ge g an s h ough my wo k wi h he Wa e Resou ces Ins i u e, some o ha money has come om en i onmen al p o ec ion agencies, i has come om o he unding sou ces ha ypically would und scien i ic esea ch, bu because I am wo king in collabo a ion wi h p o esso s who each in sciences and do esea ch in sciences I ha e access o unding and suppo , so I hink in many cases a is s wo king in en i onmen al and ecological a s migh be inding unding ou side a s unding o suppo hei wo k. I hink ha he e is mo e and mo e public ecogni ion o a is s wo king in ou ield, I know ha he e is se e al awa ds ou he e ha is speci ically designed o a is s dealing wi h en i onmen al issues, annual awa ds. I see calls o nomina ions on a egula basis o such, I hink ha he e is ce ainly mo e and mo e publishe s who a e publishing books ha deal wi h ou ield and I hink ha he cu a o s who a e de eloping he e p ojec s a e inding suppo ei he h ough museums o uni e si y p ac ices, o some imes some comme cial publishe s. In e ms o how his a ec s how a is s see hese a s, I hink hese a is s who pa icipa e in en i onmen al and ecological a s do his wo k because ha is whe e hei hea is, because ha is wha hey belie e is mos impo an in e ms o hei own p ac ice, I hink we do wha e e we need o do o gain esou ces o do he wo k and i is no some hing ha impac s us no doing he wo k, i we ind ha he e is no much suppo as maybe o ano he ype o a . I hink ha in gene al, in he USA, he e isn’ he ype o suppo o a is s ha you see in eu opean coun ies o you see in Canada, so in US so much o wha a is s do is sel - unded. EA6 The ield is e y es ic ed, you can ha dly ge in o he ield wi hou ha ing a di ec ela ionship wi h someone, i is e y closed. I you wan o open a galle y, i you do no ha e a di ec ela ionship wi h he collec o s, wi h he people who buy, o wi h a ma chand, o wi h museums, he galle y will no wo k. So i 's a e y closed ci cle. The e a e e y clea p ocedu es o you o en e his ci cle, bu he a is who wan s o make money wi h a , i he dedica es himsel e ec i ely and is hones , I hink he can ge a inancial e u n, I hink he can li e o he a s. O cou se he wo k has o be good and has o ha e an accep ance om he public. Because o he quali ies o his domain, he ield is being able o a ac b igh people. En i onmen al issues a e gaining momen um, a e ge ing mo e popula , and uni e si ies a e de eloping mo e specialized cou ses a ound he en i onmen al and ecological a s. People who a e in e es ed in hese subjec s a e, supposedly, also mo e open o new ideas and mo e willing o b ing such messages u he . These a e good news, and i is ce ainly a me i o how a ac i e he domain is, wi h he ield main aining i s s uc u al issues. 70 Table 15. The ield and b igh people EA1 Yes, he ield succeeds in a ac ing b igh people. Anyone who is sensi ized by his ype o wo k al eady has a mo e open mind, has a mo e sensi i e app oach o a wo k o a . These b illian people a e no only hose who wo k in he ield o he en i onmen al a s, bu also hose o he gene al public. I hink he e a e a lo o b igh people ou he e who a e ouched by i and who can e e be a e i in hei own places, can echo ha wo k on o he on s, in o he media and en i onmen s. EA2 I is a ac ing! EA4 Now i is, i is e y endy igh now, bu i was no when I was in a school. When I was in a school we new abou land a , bu i wasn’ abou en i onmen al a , i was abou land a , i was abou he majes y o his big wo k in he landscape, we did no ques ion his in an en i onmen al con ex . This is a e y new hing, and new p og ams in di e en a schools now ha e en i onmen al a , which is e y new, bu i isn’ b oade han al eady is because o inancial es ic ions. Many a ins i u ions wan o es ablish an en i onmen al a s p og am bu ac ually can’ because he e is no enough money. And now, wi h a unding diminishing, a is s jus wo k on ha on hei own. Bu i is e y endy now, and a is going wi h his end. The e was a ime when a was o he a is s and people didn’ know abou i , and a lo o people didn’ e en go o museums because hey el like hey didn’ unde s and i , such as in he 90s and 2000s. I was kind o like science, hey didn’ ge i ! I was e y concep ual and i didn’ communica e enough o people, i was e y abs ac in a sense ha nobody knew wha i was abou . Now i is comple ely di e en , people ya n o i , you know? They wan i , because i speaks ou wha hey hink, wha hey eel. 71 EA5 Yes, o cou se. I hink ha he e a e many b illian a is s who a e engaging in an a p ac ice ha ocus on en i onmen al and ecological issues. I hink he e a e mo e uni e si y p og ams ha a e p o iding acul y in his a ea o specializa ion, encou aging g adua e s udies in his a ea, so he e is ce ainly wi hin he a academy suppo o a ac young a is s, eme ging a is s in his a ea. I hink ha in e ms o , he e a e many a is s who a e in e es ed in en i onmen al issues, bu don’ necessa ily do he esea ch o p o ide wo k ha is as knowledge-based as i could be, in o ma ion based as i could be, he e a e ce ainly alen ed a is s doing wo k abou he en i onmen bu i maybe mo e o a pic u esque o pic o ial e e ence a he han coming om ha d esea ch, and ha doesn’ mean ha hey a e no b igh , hey a e e y alen ed and making beau i ul and seduc i e wo k, bu maybe no qui e he same as a ha is coming om a s onge esea ch ounda ion. I hink in gene al he e a e so many a is s, especially he e in he US whe e he e a e so many g adua e p og ams, bu in he las ew yea s we ha e seen en ollmen s su e because he e is no as much oppo uni y o a is s, he e is no as many acul y jobs o a is s. So no ma e wha ield o gen e o a ea ha hey wo k in as a is s, i is so expensi e a his poin o hem o s udy, and hey end up wi h his ou ageous loans, so i has ce ainly because an issue. Being able o jus inancially sus ain one’s ca ee as an a is , no ma e wha a ea hey wo k he e in US has ce ainly become mo e o a challenge o eme ging a is s. I pe sonally ha e me qui e a numbe o ecen g adua es om MFA p og ams in he US who a e commi ed o a p ac ice in en i onmen al and ecological a , and I am inspi ed by hei ene gy and hei ideas, hei c ea i i y, hei inno a ion, and also hei commi men o pu sue hei p ac ice hough i is inancially challenging o hem. I hink in gene al a p ac ice ha is based in esea ch and in his case en i onmen al science is going o a ac a ce ain ype o pe son who is b igh and wan s o engage in such a p ac ice ha in many cases is open o collabo a ion and doing esea ch ha is in a numbe o ields, ob iously beyond esea ch in a . I also hink ha he s a e o he plane , wha is happening wi h clima e change, all he issues a hand, and he c i ical need o ind solu ions is he pe ec oppo uni y o a is s o engage in such a p ac ice, and ce ainly we need in elligen , c ea i e minds o become pa o he ield. I hink as he challenges globally ela ed o clima e change become mo e e iden and mo e pa o ou e e yday expe ience, we will see mo e and mo e a is s become pa o he ield o en i onmen al and ecological a . EA6 O cou se he ield has b igh people, in a you ha e o gi e you blood, 100%. The exhibi ions a e also ecognized by he amoun o public hey ha e, so i he wo k is no so good bu he exhibi ion had a la ge audience, i becomes inc edible. I hink o ha e his e iciency, he ma ke seeks b illian people, seeks people who a e good a alking, w i ing, o good a business and sales. O cou se he e a e b igh people in he ield. Bu some imes wha you win can no pay o he bill. 72 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In his esea ch, an explo a ion o o ces shaping c ea i i y in en i onmen al and ecological a s was conduc ed, ollowing he sys emic app oach o c ea i i y designed by Csikszen mihalyi and, he e o e, delinea ing his esea ch a ound h ee dis inc sphe es: domain, pe son, and ield. The esul s ha e shown ha he domain does no es ic c ea i i y in any way, on he con a y, i enhances he c ea i e po en ial in a is s. By ocusing on in ui ion, popula cul u e and pe sonal expe iences, a is s do no eel ied by he kind o con en hey a e wo king wi h. Al hough he e is a pe sonal desi e o ha e mo e scien i ic e e ences abou en i onmen al issues, in gene al, such “ha d" in o ma ions do no become an essen ial pa o he a wo ks. Maybe, wi h a close connec ion be ween a is s and scien is s, a ui ul exchange would enable he scien is s o be e unde s and hei communi y as well as how o communica e wi h hem, while a is s would maybe eel mo e compelled o explo e he scien i ic ealm in hei a wo ks in a deepe way. The domain is also esponsible o he inc edible de o ion ha a is s ha e o he en i onmen al subjec . All he challenges ha a ca ee as an a is p esen s o hem a e o e come by a e y s ong mo i a ion o b ing impo an e lec ions abou na u e o he public. Wi h en i onmen al issues gaining momen um and a en ion, plus he magne ism o his domain, an impo an lux o b igh people a ound his ield is almos gua an eed. The pe son sphe e has shown ha he a is s ha e de eloped pe sonal connec ions o na u e du ing hei childhood, e en hough some o hem needed s onge expe iences a ound his subjec as adul s in o de o di ec hei a en ion o i . Thei c ea i e p ocesses a e e y luid, mos ly ollowing he in ui ion, bu some imes pai ing i wi h a small se o pa ame e s, namely he space whe e he a wo k will be done. The e is a lo o eedom in he pe sonal sphe e, and a s ong ecogni ion o how social in e ac ions deeply collabo a e wi h hei wo k as c ea i es. This u he indica es ha a sys emic app oach o c ea i i y is a necessi y, and ha a is s a e well equipped o unde s and hei communi ies and how o communica e wi h hem. Bu he ue obs acles o his p o ession s a o appea he e, and hey a e ela ed o he pe sonal abili ies o manage wha needs o be done in o de o he ield o ecognize hem. The e is a huge amoun o p essu e ela ed o he social beha io o a is s, and hey all eel hey do no deli e wha is needed. This is whe e hey eel hey all sho , and his could be an impo an de e minan o c ea i i y. 73 Kau man, James C., and Ronald A. Beghe o, 2009. “Beyond big and li le: The Fou C model o c ea i i y.” Re iew o Gene al Psychology, 13:1–12. Kozbel , Aa on, Ronald A. Beghe o, and Ma k A. Runco. 2010. “Theo ies o C ea i i y.” In The Camb idge Handbook o C ea i i y, edi ed by James C. Kau man and Robe J. S e nbe g, 20-47. New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess Leh e , Johan. 2012. Imagine: How C ea i i y Wo ks. Bos on: Hough on Mi lin. Leopold, Aldo A. 1949. A Sand Coun y Almanac. Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess, p. 214. Manuel-Na a e e, Da id, Buzinde, Ch is ine N. 1997. “Socio-ecological agency: om ‘human excep ionalism’ o coping wi h ‘excep ional’ global en i onmen al change.” In The In e na ional Handbook o En i onmen al Sociology, edi ed by Michael R. Redcli and G aham Woodga e Mo an, Seana. 2010. “The Roles o C ea i i y in Socie y,” In The Camb idge Handbook o C ea i i y, edi ed by James C. Kau man and Robe J. S e nbe g, 74-92. New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. Ox o d English Dic iona y. 2016. “Humanism.” Rad o d, Mike. 2004. “Emo ion and C ea i i y.” The Jou nal o Aes he ic Educa ion 38(1):53-64. Richa ds, Ru h. 2010. “E e yday C ea i i y: P ocesses and Way o Li e - Fou Key Issues.” In The Camb idge Handbook o C ea i i y, edi ed by James C. Kau man and Robe J. S e nbe g, 189-215. New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess Runco, Ma k A., and Ga e J. Jaege . 2012. “The S anda d De ini ion o C ea i i y.” C ea i i y Resea ch Jou nal 24(1):92-96 Sawye , Robe K. 2006. Explaining c ea i i y: The science o human inno a ion. New Yo k: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess. Sei z, Jay A. 2003. “A communi a ian app oach o c ea i i y.” Mind, Cul u e, and Ac i i y 10(3): 245–249. Sei z, Jay A. 2009. A Communi a ian App oach o C ea i i y S ein, Mo is I. 1953. “C ea i i y and Cul u e.” Jou nal o Psychology. 36: 311-322. S e nbe g, Robe J., and James C. Kau man. 2010. “Cons ain s on C ea i i y.” In The Camb idge Handbook o C ea i i y, edi ed by James C. Kau man and Robe J. S e nbe g, 467-482. New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess Simon on, Dean K. 1988. Scien i ic genius. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. 80 Simon on, Dean K. 1990. “Poli ical pa hology and socie al c ea i i y.” C ea i i y Resea ch Jou nal 3(2): 85-99. Tho nes, John E. 2008. A Rough Guide o En i onmen al A . Annual Re iew o En i onmen and Resou ces. 33:391–411 Uni ed Na ions Gene al Assembly (20 Ma ch 1987), “Ou Common Fu u e: Repo o he Wo ld Commission on En i onmen and De elopmen ,” <www.un-documen s.ne /oc -02.h m> Wa d, Thomas B. and Yuliya Kolomy s. 2010. “Cogni ion and C ea i i y.” In The Camb idge Handbook o C ea i i y, edi ed by James C. Kau man and Robe J. S e nbe g, 93-112. New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess Wallen, Ru h. 2012. Ecological A : A Call o Visiona y In e en ion in a Time o C isis. Leona do. 45(3): 234-242 Wol e, Ca y. 2009. Wha Is Pos humanism? Minneapolis: Uni e si y O Minneso a P ess 81