scieee Open visual document viewer

Epigenome-wide DNA methylation profiling of periprostatic adipose tissue in prostate cancer patients with excess adiposity-a pilot study

Cheng, Y,Monteiro, C,Matos, M,You, J,Fraga, A,Pereira, C,Catalán, V,Rodríguez, A,Gómez-Ambrosi, J,Frühbeck, G,Ribeiro, R,Hu, P

Abstract

This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Manitoba Research Health Council, University of Manitoba, and China Scholarship Council.

Full text

RESEARCH Open Access Epigenome-wide DNA me hyla ion p o iling o pe ip os a ic adipose issue in p os a e cance pa ien s wi h excess adiposi y—a pilo s udy Yan Cheng 1,2 , Cá ia Mon ei o 3,4 , And eia Ma os 5,6 , Jiaying You 1 , A elino F aga 6,7 , Ca ina Pe ei a 3,8 , Vic o ia Ca alán 9,10 , Amaia Rod íguez 9,10 , Ja ie Gómez-Amb osi 9,10 , Gema F ühbeck 9,10,11 , Rica do Ribei o 3,5,6,12,13*† and Pingzhao Hu 1*† Abs ac Backg ound: Pe ip os a ic adipose issue (PPAT) has been ecognized o associa e wi h p os a e cance (PCa) agg essi eness and p og ession. He e, we sough o in es iga e whe he excess adiposi y modula es he me hylome o PPAT in PCa pa ien s. DNA me hyla ion p o iling was pe o med in PPAT om obese/o e weigh (OB/OW, BMI > 25 kg m −2 ) and no mal weigh (NW, BMI < 25 kg m −2 ) PCa pa ien s. Signi ican di e ences in me hyla ed CpGs be ween OB/OW and NW g oups we e in e ed by s a is ical modeling. Resul s: Fi e housand i e hund ed wen y-six di e en ially me hyla ed CpGs we e iden i ied be ween OB/OW and NW PCa pa ien s wi h 90.2% hype me hyla ed. Fou hund ed eigh y- h ee o hese CpGs we e ound o be loca ed a bo h p omo e s and CpG islands, whe eas he ep esen ing 412 genes we e ound o be in ol ed in plu ipo ency o s em cells, a y acid me abolism, and many o he biological p ocesses; 14 o hese genes, pa icula ly FADS1,MOGAT1, and PCYT2, wi h p omo e hype me hyla ion p esen ed wi h signi ican ly dec eased gene exp ession in ma ched samples. Addi ionally, 38 genes we e co ela ed wi h an igen p ocessing and p esen a ion o endogenous an igen ia MHC class I, which migh esul in a y acid accumula ion in PPAT and umo immune e asion. Conclusions: Resul s showed ha he whole epigenome me hyla ion p o iles o PPAT we e signi ican ly di e en in OB/OW compa ed o no mal weigh PCa pa ien s. The epigene ic a ia ion associa ed wi h excess adiposi y likely esul ed in al e ed lipid me abolism and immune dys egula ion, con ibu ing owa ds un a o able PCa mic oen i onmen , hus wa an ing u he alida ion s udies in la ge samples. Keywo ds: DNA me hyla ion, Pe ip os a ic adipose issue, Obesi y, P os a e cance , Mic oen i onmen Backg ound P os a e cance (PCa) is one o he mos equen malig- nancies in men and he second leading cause o cance - ela ed dea h in he No h Ame ica and mos wes e n Eu opean coun ies [1,2]. Epidemiological s udies suppo obesi y o excess adiposi y as an impo an en i onmen al isk ac o o PCa, being p ima ily associa ed wi h ad anced disease and dea h [3]. Pe ip os a ic adipose issue (PPAT), a whi e a depo su ounding he p os a e capsula -like s uc u e, has been ecognized o ha e he po en ial o exe p o- umo al endoc ine and pa ac ine in luences on p os a e cance cell’s biological pheno ypes [4]. The e is now e idence ha obesi y and o e weigh esul in excess a deposi a PPAT [5], al e ed a y acid p o ile [6], mig a ion o umo cells [7], sec e ion o a a ie y o adipokines, such as in e leukin-1 be a (IL-1b), os eopon in, lep in, umo nec osis ac o alpha (TNF-a), * Co espondence: [email p o ec ed];[email p o ec ed] † Equal con ibu o s 3 Molecula Oncology G oup, Po uguese Ins i u e o Oncology, Po o, Po ugal 1 Depa men o Biochemis y and Medical Gene ics & Depa men o Elec ical and Compu e Enginee ing, Uni e si y o Mani oba, Winnipeg, Canada Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle © The Au ho (s). 2018 Open Access This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons license, and indica e i changes we e made. The C ea i e Commons Public Domain Dedica ion wai e (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/publicdomain/ze o/1.0/) applies o he da a made a ailable in his a icle, unless o he wise s a ed. Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s13148-018-0490-3 and dec eased adiponec in, hus con ibu ing o a umo mic oen i onmen ha ul ima ely acili a es PCa agg es- si eness [7,8]. DNA me hyla ion is a well-known epigene ic mechan- ism esul ing om he in e ac ion be ween en i onmen- al ac o s and he genome [9]. DNA me hyla ion wi h a ia ion o CpG si es is associa ed wi h issue-speci ic gene modula ion and in ol ed in pheno ype ansmis- sion and in he de elopmen o diseases [10]. Excess adiposi y, as a consequence o en i onmen al ac o s such as excessi e ood consump ion o inac i e li es yle, has been iden i ied as a egula o o epigene ic modi ica- ion in adipose issue. Recen indings om expe imen al s udies sugges ed ha modi ica ion o DNA me hyla ion pa e n in adipose issue and adipocy es was ela ed wi h de elopmen o cance , ype 2 diabe es, and ca dio ascu- la diseases h ough in luencing me abolism and in lam- ma ion [11–13]. Addi ionally, se e al s udies epo ed al e ed DNA me hyla ion in PCa cells as compa ed wi h adjacen benign issue, and some signi ican ly me hyl- a ed CpG si es and genes we e ound o be esponsible o he occu ence and p og ession o PCa [14–16]. Ne e heless, he epigenome-wide DNA me hyla ion p o ile o PPAT om excess adiposi y PCa pa ien s is cu en ly unknown despi e i s po en ial mechanis ic in ol emen in obesi y associa ion wi h PCa. The aim o his s udy was o pe o m a epigene ic- wide associa ion s udy (EWAS) in o de o e alua e DNA me hyla ion p o ile o PPAT ob ained om obese/ o e weigh (OB/OW) in compa ison wi h no mal weigh (NW) PCa pa ien s and iden i y di e en ially me hyla ed si es. We also explo ed he consequen ial po en ial bio- logical unc ions ha accoun o he e ec o PPAT om OB/OW subjec s in PCa molecula mechanisms. Me hods S udy samples This s udy included en p os a e cance pa ien s om he Po uguese Ins i u e o Oncology, Po o Cen e. In- clusion c i e ia and condi ions o his s udy ha e been p e iously epo ed, including he p ocedu es o PPAT collec ion, handling, and s o age [4]. B ie ly, PPAT was collec ed and immedia ely p ocessed in he ope a ing oom and anspo ed o he labo a o y wi hin 2 h in app op ia e cul u e media and empe a u e condi ions, in o de o minimize p e-analy ical e o s. Pa ien s’ signed in o med consen and esea ch p ocedu es we e app o ed by he ins i u e’s e hics commi ee. The clinical and pa hological cha ac e is ics o pa ici- pan s a e p esen ed in Table 1. The en subjec s we e selec ed om a la ge g oup o pa ien s unde going p os a e su ge y (n= 51) [4,17] ha i ed he s ic inclusion and exclusion c i e ia, in o de o con ol o a iables ha migh in luence adipose issue gene exp ession o me hyla ion (e.g., an i-diabe ic o an i- dyslipidemia d ugs, s age o disease and PSA, concomi an diseases such as diabe es, o he neoplasia o me abolic synd ome). Subjec s we e ma ched o age a diagnosis, PSA alue, Gleason g ade, and s age o disease, which di e ed in body mass index (BMI). BMI was calcula ed by di iding weigh in kilog ams by he squa ed heigh in me e s and ca ego ized using he WHO (Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion) c i e ia: no mal weigh , BMI < 25 kg m −2 , o e weigh , 25 ≤BMI < 30 kg m −2 , and obese, BMI ≥ 30 kg m −2 . Obese and o e weigh we e combined in o one excess adiposi y g oup (n=5, BMI≥25 kg m −2 ) e sus no mal weigh g oup (n= 5, BMI < 25 kg m −2 ). The e o e, he wo g oups we e selec ed o di e only by BMI, in o de o e lec ou objec i e o assessing whe he excess adiposi y (BMI) in luences PPAT me hyla ion p o ile. Epigenome-wide DNA me hyla ion analysis DNA was isola ed om PPAT using Pu egene hisal ex ac ion me hod (Qiagen/Gen a). B ie ly, he issue was minced wi h scalpels in a s e ile pe i dish on ice and hen ans e ed o Pu egene Cell Ki o o e nigh P o einase K diges a 55 °C. A second P o einase K diges was done he nex mo ning o 5 h. DNA om he diges ed issue was pu i ied using Pu egene ex ac- ion p o ocol (Qiagen/Gen a). Pu i ied DNA was washed 2× wi h 70% e hanol and DNA pelle ai d ied and ehyd a ed in TE (10 mM T is-Cl, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.5). Epigenome-wide DNA me hyla ion was ana- lyzed using he In inium Human Me hyla ion450 (HM450) BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in he Cen e o Applied Genomics (To on o). This a ay Table 1 Clinicopa hological cha ac e is ics o PCa pa ien s by BMI ca ego y Cha ac e NW (n= 5) OB/OW (n=5) P alue Age (yea s) 65.2 ± 3.8 63.2 ± 2.5 0.67 a BMI (kg/m 2 ) 23.0 ± 0.3 29.0 ± 0.9 0.0003 a Gleason sco e < 7 2 (40%) 1 (20%) ≥7 3 (60%) 4 (80%) 1.00 b S age OCPCa 2 (40%) 2 (40%) EPCa 3 (60%) 3 (60%) 1.00 b Smoking s a us Yes 1 5 No 4 0 0.05 b PSA (ng/ml) 10.7 ± 2.7 12.1 ± 3.23 0.74 a Da a a e p esen ed as mean ± SD o numbe (%). Signi ican di e ence be ween OB/OW and NW was e alua ed using a es and b Fishe ’s exac es OB/OW obese/o e weigh , NW no mal weigh , BMI body mass index; PSA, p os a e speci ic an igen; PCa, p os a e cance ; OCPCa, o gan-con ined p os a e cance ; EPCa, ex a-p os a ic PCa Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 2 o 15 con ains 485,577 p obes, which co e 21,231 (99%) Re Seq genes. B ie ly, DNA was bisul i e-con e ed using he EZ DNA me hyla ion ki (Zymo Resea ch, O ange, CA, USA) and hen used on he In inium Assay® ollowed by he In inium HD Assay Me hyla ion P o ocol (Illumina). The imaging da a on he BeadChips was cap u ed by Illumina iScan sys em. Da a il e ing and no maliza ion Raw me hyla ion le el o each p obe was ep esen ed by me hyla ion β alue, which was calcula ed based on β= in ensi y o he me hyla ed allele/(in ensi y o he unme hyla ed allele + in ensi y o he me hyla ed allele + 100). M alues we e he logi ans o ma ion o β alues based on M=log 2 (β/(1 −β)), which makes he da a mo e homoscedas ic and app op ia e o u he bioin o ma ic and s a is ical analysis. Me hyla ion alues we e no malized using he unc- ional no maliza ion algo i hm implemen ed in Min i R package [18]. Quali y con ol was pe o med by exclud- ing CpG p obes, which a e ound by Chen e al. o be c oss- eac i e wi h a eas o he genome no a he si e o in e es [19], as well as con ol p obes and p obes on sex ch omosomes. We analyzed a o al o 438,458 CpG si es om he PPAT o 5 OB/OW PCa pa ien s and 5 NW PCa pa ien s. Di e en ial me hyla ion analysis A s a is ical linea modeling app oach was applied o he de ec ed di e en ially me hyla ed CpG si es (DMCs) asso- cia ed wi h obesi y in PPAT using he Bioconduc o “limma”package [20]. Hype - o hypome hyla ion was de e mined when me hyla ion le els o CpGs inc eased o dec eased be ween he OB/OW PCa g oup and he NW PCa g oup based on mean di e en β> 0 o < 0. False disco e y a e (FDR)-co ec ed P alues we e de e mined acco ding o he me hod o Benjamin and Hochbe g’s (BH me hod) mul iple es ing p ocedu e [21]. Di e en ially me hyla ed egions (DMRs) we e iden i ied using he “Bumphun e ”me hod implemen ed in he “chAMP”Rpackage wi h he pa ame e s (B= 1000, useWeigh s = TRUE, minP obes = 10, pickCu o = TRUE, and o he se ings wi h de aul alues) [22]. The p opo ions o signi ican hype - o hypome hy- la ed CpGs we e calcula ed and isualized acco ding o hei ela ion o he nea es genes o o he CpG islands, sepa a ely. Gene p omo e egion was de ined as 1500 base pai s (bp) and 200 bp ups eam o he ansc ip ion s a si e (TSS) (TSS1500 and TSS200) [23]. Iden i ied genes we e selec ed when mo e han wo signi ican ly hype me hyla ed CpGs we e simul aneously loca ed in he p omo e egion. Func ions, pa hway, and ne wo k en ichmen analysis Gene on ology (GO) and KEGG pa hway en ichmen ana- lyses we e pe o med o explo e he biological unc ions o signi ican ly me hyla ed genes using he online bioin o - ma ic ool En ich [24]. P o ein-p o ein in e ac ion (PPI) analysis o all DMC- ela ed genes was pe o med using Ne wo kAnalys acco ding o STRING da abase [25]. Associa ion analysis be ween DNA me hyla ion and gene exp ession We ha e p e iously pe o med gene exp ession expe i- men o he PPAT o he 5 OB/OW PCa pa ien s and he 5 NW PCa pa ien s using he HG-U133 Plus 2.0 A yme ix GeneChip A ay (A yme ix, San a Cla a, CA, USA) [4]. Di e en ial gene exp ession (DGE) ana- lysis be ween he OB/OW PCa pa ien s and he NW PCa pa ien s was e-pe o med using he Bioconduc o “limma”package as p e iously desc ibed [4]. Spea man’s ank co ela ion analysis was pe o med be ween he me hyla ion p o iles o he hype me hyla ed CpGs and he gene exp ession p o iles o he genes in PPAT. Resul s Clinical cha ac e is ics Clinical cha ac e is ics o PCa pa ien s in his s udy we e s a i ied acco ding o obesi y classi ica ion g oups and a e p esen ed in Table 1. Mean age, PSA le el, Gleason sum sco e, and cance s age in subjec s wi h PCa we e simila (P alue > 0.05) be ween OB/OW and NW g oups. As expec ed, he mean BMI o he OB/OW g oup was signi ican ly highe han ha o he NW sub- jec s (P alue < 0.01). All he pa ien s in he OB/OW g oup a e ex-smoke s o ac i e smoke s, while only one pa ien in he NW g oup is a smoke (P alue = 0.05). Epigenome-wide DNA me hyla ion p o iling o PPAT To s udy he impac o obesi y s a us on DNA me hyla- ion p o iles and o iden i y di e en ially me hyla ed CpG si es in PPAT om OB/OW and NW p os a e cance pa ien s, we conduc ed epigenome-wide DNA me hyla- ion analyses. A lowcha o he da a analysis is depic ed in Addi ional ile 1: Figu e S1. A e quali y con ol and il e ing, he In inium a ay gene a ed me hyla ion da a o 438,458 CpG si es, om which 5526 we e di e en ially me hyla ed a e FDR con ol in he PPAT o OB/OW PCa pa ien s compa ed o NW (adjus ed P alue < 0.25; Addi ional ile 2: Table S1 and Table 2). The unsupe ised hie a chical clus e ing o DMCs showed di e en ial DNA me hyla ion pa e ns in PPAT be ween OB/OW and NW samples (Addi ional ile 3: Figu e S2). The majo i y o DMCs we e hype me hyla ed (n= 4985, 90.2%), wi h 9.8% hypome hyla ed CpG si es (n= 541) in OB/OW e sus NW p os a e cance pa ien s (Fig. 1a, b, c). Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 3 o 15 Ch omosomal dis ibu ion o he DMCs To u he explo e he me hyla ion p o ile, we in es i- ga ed he ch omosome dis ibu ion o DMCs. Resul s showed ha hype me hyla ed CpG si es we e loca ed a ch omosomes 1, 6, 11, and 17 (p opo ion > 6%, Fig. 1d) and hypome hyla ed CpG si es we e loca ed a ch omo- somes 1, 2, 6, 7, and 11 (p opo ion > 6%, Fig. 1e). Me hyla ion a ia ions o hype me hyla ed DMCs and hypome hyla ed DMCs we e ound mainly dis ibu ed on ch omosomes 1, 6, and 11, sugges ing ha he DNA me hyla ion al e a ions in hese ch omosomes we e co ela ed wi h he body weigh changes in p os a e pa ien s. Fu he mo e, we compa ed he dis ibu ion o he DMCs (hype - and hypome hyla ed, sepa a ely) wi h he dis ibu ion o all e alua ed CpG si es based on hei ela ion o nea es gene egions (Fig. 2 , Addi ional ile 4: Table S2) o hei ela ion o CpG islands (Fig. 2g, Addi ional ile 5: Table S3) using χ 2 es . The esul s showed ha hype me hyla ed CpGs a e mainly loca ed a TSS1500 ( ansc ip ion s a si es 1500), IGR (in e genic Table 2 Di e en ially me hyla ed CpG si es in PPAT be ween obese/o e weigh PCa pa ien s and no mal weigh con ols P obe ID Ch omosome and coo dina e (GRCh37) Nea es gene Rela ion o gene egion Rela ion o CpG island DNAm β di e ence (%) P alue Adjus ed P alue (< 0.25) Hype me hyla ed CpG si es cg09476130 ch 1:159870086 CCDC19 TSS200 Island 12.1 1.87E−03 0.213 cg21293934 ch 18:14748230 ANKRD30B TSS200 Island 11.2 1.83E−03 0.212 cg16925210 ch 2:216946718 PECR TSS200 Island 11.2 2.44E−03 0.226 cg11625005 ch 5:1295737 TERT TSS1500 Island 11.1 1.38E−03 0.196 cg07039560 ch 5:140683681 SLC25A2 TSS200 Island 10.5 2.24E−03 0.222 cg00329447 ch 8:145028170 PLEC1 TSS200 Island 10.1 3.41E−03 0.244 cg24463471 ch 1:25257978 RUNX3 TSS1500 Island 9.9 3.58E−04 0.155 cg26149485 ch 19:2428350 TIMM13 TSS1500 Island 9.7 3.36E−04 0.154 cg05156901 ch 22:51016646 CPT1B TSS200 Island 9.3 3.05E−03 0.238 cg18689454 ch 21:45705694 AIRE TSS200 Island 9.3 7.33E−04 0.174 cg01454592 ch 3:49236800 CCDC36 TSS200 Island 9.3 2.89E−03 0.236 cg24041556 ch 19:10736059 SLC44A2 TSS200 Island 9.1 2.15E−05 0.110 cg22257574 ch 9:135754383 C9o 98 TSS200 Island 9.0 1.97E−05 0.110 cg23005885 ch 15:90543450 ZNF710 TSS1500 Island 8.9 6.20E−04 0.169 cg05726756 ch 17:46608288 HOXB1 TSS200 Island 8.6 1.67E−03 0.206 cg12782180 ch 7:127880932 LEP TSS1500 Island 8.5 9.78E−04 0.184 cg04675542 ch 5:150284416 ZNF300 TSS200 Island 8.4 3.42E−03 0.244 cg10134527 ch 6:33283015 TAPBP TSS1500 Island 8.4 3.19E−03 0.241 cg23387569 ch 12:58120011 LOC100130776 TSS200 Island 8.4 3.39E−04 0.155 cg17205324 ch 14:23835595 EFS TSS1500 Island 8.3 1.46E−04 0.133 cg24402300 ch 19:55591437 EPS8L1 TSS1500 Island 8.2 2.02E−03 0.216 cg18081258 ch 14:21494161 NDRG2 TSS1500 Island 8.2 1.05E−03 0.187 cg00730561 ch 10:102279703 SEC31B TSS200 Island 8.1 4.82E−04 0.162 cg17791651 ch 1:38513489 POU3F1 TSS1500 Island 8.0 1.31E−04 0.133 Hypome hyla ed CpG si es cg03462171 ch 16:1664488 CRAMP1L TSS200 Island −8.2 2.30E−03 0.223 cg11648730 ch 5:92907151 FLJ42709 TSS1500 Island −6.4 1.72E−03 0.207 cg04558166 ch 1:210001279 C1o 107 TSS200 Island −4.0 1.75E−03 0.209 cg25472897 ch 8:145560555 SCRT1 TSS1500 Island −3.1 1.53E−03 0.201 cg17612948 ch 5:110427863 WDR36 TSS200 Island −3.0 1.70E−03 0.207 cg21665057 ch 3:196295764 WDR53 TSS1500 Island −2.4 2.42E−03 0.225 cg12683173 ch 7:69063404 AUTS2 TSS1500 Island −1.4 3.30E−03 0.242 cg04872557 ch 1:76190008 ACADM TSS200 Island −1.0 1.96E−03 0.215 Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 4 o 15 egion), N-sho e, and S-sho e, and hypome hyla ed CpGs a e mos ly loca ed a he gene body and open sea. Func ional en ichmen analysis o signi ican ly obesi y-associa ed DMCs To in es iga e he po en ial biological ele ance o he sig- ni ican DMCs, we u he il e ed 483 DMCs (dis ibu ed wi hin 413 genes) om a o al o 5526 DMCs acco ding o hei loca ions a bo h he gene p omo e and CpG island (Addi ional ile 6: Table S4). Fou hund ed se en y- i e o he 483 DMCs ( ep esen ing 404 genes) we e hype me hyla ed. Func ional en ichmen analysis o he hype me hyla ed genes showed ha hese genes we e en iched o biological p ocesses, such as pa e n speci ica ion p ocess, neu on di e en ia ion, neu on a e speci ica ion, and nega i e egula ion o phospha e me abolic p ocess (adjus ed P alue < 0.05, Addi ional ile 7: Table S5), as well as molecula unc ions, such as Fig. 1 Epigene ic p o iles o di e en ially me hyla ed CpGs o PPAT be ween OB/OW and NW g oups. Manha an plo s show epigene ic p o iles o all inc eased me hyla ed CpGs (a) and all dec eased me hyla ed CpGs (b). The X-axis shows ch omosomes, and he Y-axisisa−log10 (P alue). The black line ep esen s he h eshold o adjus ed P alue = 0.25. CpGs abo e he black line a e signi ican ly hype - o hypome hyla ed. The olcano plo o DNA me hyla ion (c) shows a signi ican di e ence in PPAT be ween he OB/OW and NW g oups. Fou housand nine hund ed eigh y- i e hype me hyla ed CpGs a e labeled in ed, and 541 hypome hyla ed CpGs a e labeled in g een (adjus ed P alue > 0.25). The p opo ions o hype - and hypome hyla ed CpGs on each ch omosome a e shown in (d)and(e). The black line indica es i he p opo ions o hype -andhypome hyla edCpGs on a ch omosome a e highe han 6%. The dis ibu ion o signi ican DMCs (hype - o hypome hyla ed CpGs) and globe DNA me hyla ion CpGs in loca ions ela ed o he nea es gene egions and CpG islands a e shown in and g. Hype me hyla ed CpGs a e mainly loca ed a TSS1500 ( ansc ip ion s a si es 1500), IGR (in e genic egion), N-sho e ( he 2 kb egions ups eam o he CpG islandbounda ies),andS-sho e( he2kb egions downs eam o he CpG island bounda ies), and hypome hyla ed CpGs a e mos ly loca ed a he gene body and open sea. The di e ence o he p opo ion o CpGs among he h ee CpG g oups was calcula ed based on he χ 2 es (*P< 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001, ns no signi ican ). CpG islands we e de ined as DNA sequences (500 base windows; excluding mos epe i i e Alu-elemen s) wi h a GC base composi ion g ea e han 50% and a CpG obse ed/expec ed a io o mo e han 0.6. The 2 kb egions immedia ely ups eam (N_Sho e) and downs eam (S_Sho e) o he CpG island bounda ies we e de ined as “CpG island sho es,”and he 2 kb egions ups eam (N_Shel ) and downs eam (S_Shel ) o he CpG island sho es we e e e ed as “CpG island shel es.”Open seas we e he egions mo e han 4 kb om CpG islands Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 5 o 15 neu opep ide ecep o ac i i y and sequence-speci ic DNA-binding RNA polyme ase II ansc ip ion ac o ac- i i y (adjus ed P alue < 0.1, Addi ional ile 8: Table S6). KEGG pa hway en ichmen analysis showed ha hype - me hyla ed genes we e in ol ed in signaling pa hways egula ing plu ipo ency o s em cells, a y acid me abol- ism, basal cell ca cinoma, non-alcoholic a y li e disease (NAFLD), and AMPK signaling pa hway (P alue < 0.05, Addi ional ile 9: Table S7). We mapped he 404 hype me hyla ed genes o he STRING da abase and gene a ed a p o ein-p o ein in e - ac ion (PPI) ne wo k by he Ne wo kAnalys . The la ges subne wo k was iden i ied o include 247 nodes (genes) and 403 edges (Fig. 2a). In he ne wo k, he size o he nodes was based on hei deg ee alues and he colo o nodes was based on hei P alues. This ne wo k con- ained 118 seed genes om he DMCs, and he en ich- men pa hway analysis showed ha he genes o he Fig. 2 P o ein-p o ein in e ac ion analysis. aA subne wo k composing o 247 nodes and 403 edges was gene a ed using me hyla ed genes. Blue do s ep esen he genes in ol ed in p os a e cance ; ed and pink do s ep esen he seeds (me hyla ed genes) acco ding o he di e en P alues; he g ay do s ep esen he p o eins which we e closely in e ac ed wi h he seeds, and he ci cle size ep esen s he node deg ee. bThe pa hway en ichmen analysis shows he subne wo k is mainly en iched in cance pa hways (P<0.0001) Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 6 o 15 subne wo k we e mos ly in ol ed in he pa hways o p os- a e cance and o he cance s (Fig. 2b,Addi ional ile10: Table S8, adjus ed P alue < 0.05). Pa icula ly, he gene UBC (ubiqui in C) was ound o be a hub connec ing wi h many o he nodes in he ne wo k, sugges ing ha he gene may play impo an biological oles in he PPAT o obese PCa pa ien s. Selec ed genes wi h mul iple me hyla ed CpG si es In o de o explo e ep ession o genes by DNA me hy- la ion modi ica ions, we selec ed genes which had mul- iple hype me hyla ed CpG si es ( he numbe o me hyla ed CpG si es ≥2, in a leas one o he si es wi h ameandi e enceo β> 3% and an adjus ed P alue < 0.25) (Addi ional ile 1: Figu e S1 and Addi ional ile 11:TableS9). A o al o 38 genes wi h 100 di e en ially me hyla ed CpG si es we e selec ed, which included TAPBP,RUNX3,CPT1B, CPT1C,MOGAT3,WNT2,andAIRE (Addi ional ile 11: Table S9). No ably, he p omo e egion o TAPBP (TAP- binding p o ein) had eigh hype me hyla ed CpG si es in he p omo e (Fig. 3a), which we e signi ican ly mo e me hyla ed in he OB/OW han hose in he NW g oups (Fig. 3b), wi h ameandi e enceo β alue g ea e han 5% (Addi ional ile 10: Table S8). Spea man’s ank co ela ion showed s ong associa ion ( 2 =0.73–0.97) o he eigh hype me hyla ed CpGs in he TAPBP p omo e wi h hei me hyla ion le els (Fig. 3c). Pa hway analysis o hese genes e ealed en ichmen o a y acid me abolism, PPAR signaling pa hway, glucagon signaling pa hway, AMPK signaling pa hway, glyce olipid me abolism, basal cell ca cinoma, an igen p ocessing and p esen a ion, ECM ecep o in e ac ion, and insulin esis ance (adjus ed P alue < 0.25) (Addi ional ile 12: Table S10). Di e en ial me hyla ed egions analysis Ten DMRs we e iden i ied (P< 0.01) in obesi y PPAT samples compa ed o no mal weigh con ols (Table 3). The size o he DMRs a ied om 161 o 1287 bp. No e- wo hy, ou ou o he en DMRs we e disco e ed on ch omosome 6. Eigh egions we e loca ed in genes, and wo we e in he in e genic egion. Fou egions we e in he gene p omo e o FAM104A,C17o 80,HOXA4A, and TAPBP. Associa ion analysis be ween DNA me hyla ion and mRNA exp ession Inc eased DNA me hyla ion o p omo e in CpG islands was ob iously linked o gene ansc ip ional silencing [26]. The e o e, we ela ed hype me hyla ed CpG si es in PPAT wi h genes showed dec eased gene exp ession le el om ou p e iously gene a ed mRNA exp ession da a [4]. DNA me hyla ion o 16 CpG si es, co esponding o 14 genes, was associa ed wi h signi ican ly dec eased ansc ip s in OB/OW g oup (P alue < 0.05) (Table 4). The Spea man’s ank co ela ion analysis showed ha eigh o he 14 genes ha e signi ican ly nega i e associa ion (P alue < 0.05) be- ween he me hyla ion p o iles and he gene exp ession p o ileso hesegenes(Table4). The ep ession genes we e mainly in ol ed in me abolic pa hways (Addi ional ile 13: Table S11, adjus ed P alue < 0.25), such as MOGAT1 (glyce olipid me abolism), FADS1 ( a y acid me abolism and biosyn hesis o unsa u a ed a y acids), and PCYT2 (glyce ophospholipid me abolism). The mRNA exp ession le el o FADS1 was signi ican ly dec eased in he PPAT o obese wi h p os a e cance s in ou p e ious s udy using qRT-PCR [4]. Besides hese, GO en ichmen analysis showed ha hese genes a e unc ionally ela ed o ecep o binding (neu opep ide ecep o binding, dopamine ecep o binding, and insulin ecep o binding) and enzyme ac i i y (acid phospha ase ac i i y, me alloca boxypep idase ac i i y, and acylglyce ol O-acyl ans e ase ac i i y) (Addi ional ile 14: Table S12, adjus ed P alue < 0.25). Discussion This pilo s udy e ealed signi ican di e ences o DNA me hyla ion p o iles be ween he PPATs om OB/OW e sus NW PCa pa ien s. Va ia ions in global DNA me hyla ion demons a ed ha excess adiposi y played an impo an ole in DNA me hyla ion le el o PPAT issues in p os a e cance pa ien s, which p o ide an oppo uni y o explo e he e ec o obesi y on PPAT epigene ic modi ica ion and subsequen ly on p os a e cance . These indings epo ed o he i s ime in PPAT depo a e in conco dance wi h p e ious wo ks epo ing ha excess adiposi y and BMI ac i a e DNA me hyla ion in adipose issue [27–29]. Thus, conside ing he p esen unde s anding o he po en ial causal ela ionship be ween excess adiposi y and cance [30], diabe es [11], and ca dio ascula disease [31], ou esul s p o ide me hyla ed candida e genes, which migh os e esea ch on he po en ial biological mechanisms unde - lying epigene ic egula ion o PPAT by excess adiposi y and p os a e cance . Gi en ha DNA me hyla ion o CpGs loca ed a p o- mo e s and islands a e associa ed wi h gene ansc ip- ion silencing, we pe o med a s ic il e ing o DMCs and explo ed he biological unc ions o all p omo e hype me hyla ed genes, aiming o ind he c i ical me h- yla ed CpGs in he PPAT be ween he obese and no mal weigh PCa pa ien s. Bioin o ma ic analysis showed ha he en iched pa hways we e mos ly in ol ed in me a- bolic diso de s, pa icula ly a y acid deg ada ion and glyce olipid and choline me abolism. These pa hways a e known o media e he p o- umo al e ec o whi e adipose issue in umo s, hus con ibu ing o umo i- genesis and me as asis [32,33], pa icula ly in p os a e cance [5]. Findings om o he oncological models high- ligh excess adiposi y-associa ed impac in me hyla ion Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 7 o 15 Fig. 3 Visualiza ion and analysis o hype me hyla ed CpG si es in TAPBP p omo e .aThe ch omosome posi ions o hype me hyla ed CpG si es show ha DMCs a e loca ed a ch 6 (p21.32), which is in he egion o TSS1500 (pink squa e) o TAPBP and a he loca ion o CpG island 31. bMe hyla ion le els o eigh CpG si es in PPAT om OB/OW and NW PCa pa ien s ha e shown a signi ican di e ence. cCo ela ion analysis shows s ong co ela ion (Spea man co ela ion coe icien 2 0.73~ 0.97) be ween he eigh hype me hyla ed CpG si es based on he mean β alue di e ence o indi idual p obes Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 8 o 15 ma ke s known o associa e wi h po en ial e ec in he cance mic oen i onmen (e.g., a oma ase, p os aglandin E 2 ecep o in b eas cance ) [34,35]. Obesi y has also been shown o associa e wi h me hyla ion o cance - ela ed genes (E-cadhe in, p16, and RAR-β(2)) di ec ly in malignan b eas cells [36,37]. Pa hway en ichmen analysis showed a s ong associ- a ion be ween p omo e hype me hyla ion o CPT1B, CPT1C,ACADM, and FADS1, wi h a y acid me abol- ism. CPT1B (ca ni ine palmi oyl ans e ase 1B) and CPT1C (ca ni ine palmi oyl ans e ase 1C) genes encode a e-limi ing enzymes in a y acid deg ada ion and play c i ical oles in long-chain a y acid (LCFA) β-oxida ion by con olling anspo a ion o long-chain a y acyl- CoAs om he cy oplasm ac oss he ou e mi ochond ia memb ane [38]. Maple e al. epo ed ha inc eased me hyla ion o speci ic CpGs in he CPT1B p omo e was co ela ed wi h dec eased CPT1B ansc ip s in he skele al muscle a e lipid o e supply in se e e obesi y, which esul ed in obese indi idual’s incapaci y o inc ease a oxida ion, con ibu ing o me abolic in lex- ibili y [39]. Al hough he biochemical unc ion o CPT1C has been e i ied o be necessa y o he egula ion o ene gy homeos asis in CPT1C knockou mouse b ain [40], he s udy o CPT1C me hyla ion was absen . CPT1B and CPT1C we e p e iously epo ed o be highly exp essed in he muscle, b ain, and many o he no mal issues including adipocy es [41]. Taken oge he , hese indings sugges ha me hyla ion o speci ic CpG si es in he CPT1B and CPT1C p omo e s likely esul in gene Table 3 Di e en ially me hyla ed egions (DMR) in PPAT o obese/o e weigh PCa pa ien s compa ed o no mal weigh con ols DMR Ch S a –end (bp) Size (bp) P alue FDR Loca ed gene DMCs* Rela ion o CpG island 1 6 30,038,791–30,039,801 1010 5.11E−05 2.07E−02 RNF39 37(0) Island 2 6 29,648,161–29,649,084 923 1.54E−03 2.08E−01 ZFP57 # 22(0) Open sea 3 17 71,228,123–71,228,832 709 3.10E−03 2.86E−01 FAM104A 4(3) Island 4 17 71,228,123–71,228,832 709 3.10E−03 2.86E−01 C17o 80 10(8) Island 5 12 42,720,006–42,720,167 161 5.56E−03 2.86E−01 PPHLN1 4(0) Island 6 6 31,650,735–31,651,158 423 5.59E−03 2.86E−01 MIR4646 # 16(0) Island 7 7 27,169,674–27,170,961 1287 5.66E−03 2.86E−01 HOXA4 17(11) Island 8 6 33,282,736–33,283,145 409 5.87E−03 2.86E−01 TAPBP 18(18) Island 9 20 57,463,763–57,464,129 366 6.74E−03 2.86E−01 GNAS 15(0) Island 10 16 86,546,938–86,547,322 384 7.03E−03 2.86E−01 FOXF1 4(0) Sho e #The DMR is loca ed a he in e genic egion Ch ch omosome *The numbe in he b acke is he quan i ies o DMCs loca ed a he p omo e (TSS200 and TSS1500) egions Table 4 Genes hype me hyla ed in p omo e s wi h signi ican ly dec eased gene exp ession Gene symbol DNA me hyla ion Gene exp ession Co ela ion analysis P obe ID DNAm β di . (%) Adjus ed P alue (< 0.25) P obe ID FC P alue (< 0.05) Spea man’s ank co ela ion coe icien P alue (< 0.05) UCN cg20442078 5.6 0.17 8051061 −1.12 3.61E−02 −8.42E−01 2.23E−03 CCHCR1 cg00160818 1.9 0.17 8124868 −1.14 1.73E−02 −7.45E−01 9.21E−03 CRB3 cg14782015 4.3 0.20 8025041 −1.13 1.84E−02 −7.21E−01 1.21E−02 AGBL4 cg21834207 3.2 0.13 7915971 −1.17 1.29E−02 −6.73E−01 1.97E−02 INSL3 cg10174482 4.2 0.13 8035345 −1.13 4.94E−02 −6.36E−01 2.72E−02 ANKRD30B cg21293934 11.2 0.21 8069499 −1.17 2.24E−02 −6.08E−01 3.11E−02 FADS1 cg16213375 3.6 0.16 7948612 −1.8 9.55E−04 −5.88E−01 4.01E−02 PAPL cg18481683 2.3 0.24 8028570 −1.19 1.45E−02 −5.52E−01 5.21E−02 MOGAT1 cg12678667 4 0.15 8048725 −1.28 3.87E−02 −4.67E−01 8.91E−02 PPP1R1B cg09762778 5 0.12 8006865 −1.27 4.74E−02 −4.67E−01 8.91E−02 PRUNE2 cg00390775 4.4 0.15 8161884 −1.31 1.91E−02 −3.82E−01 1.39E−01 CIDEA cg18309817 1.8 0.18 8020211 −1.32 3.21E−02 −2.97E−01 2.03E−01 PCYT2 cg19583655 6.2 0.21 8019280 −1.26 6.38E−04 −1.88E−01 3.04E−01 SCUBE1 cg07697597 1.7 0.23 8076586 −1.23 9.03E−03 −4.24E−02 4.59E−01 FC old change, DNAm βdi . DNAm βdi e ence Cheng e al. Clinical Epigene ics (2018) 10:54 Page 9 o 15