Full text
Con en s lis s a ailable a ScienceDi ec
Bioma e ials
jou nal homepage: www.else ie .com/loca e/bioma e ials
Hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammed ehicles deli e d ugs locally o
inflamed si es o in es ine
Wei Li
a,1
, Yunzhan Li
b,1
, Zehua Liu
a,1
, Na ha Ke dsakundee
a,c
, Ming Zhang
b
, Feng Zhang
a
,
Xueyan Liu
b
, Tomás Baule h-Ramos
a,d,e
, Wenhua Lian
b
, E mei Mäkilä
, Ma ianna Kemell
g
,
Yaping Ding
a
, B uno Sa men o
d,e
, Ruedeeko n Wiwa anapa apee
c
, Ja no Salonen
,
Hongbo Zhang
h
, Jouni T. Hi onen
a
, Dong ei Liu
a,i,∗∗∗
, Xianming Deng
b,∗∗
, Hélde A. San os
a,i,∗
a
D ug Resea ch P og am, Di ision o Pha maceu ical Chemis y and Technology, Facul y o Pha macy, Uni e si y o Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland
b
S a e Key Labo a o y o Cellula S ess Biology & Inno a ion Cen e o Cell Signaling Ne wo k and S a e-P o ince Join Enginee ing Labo a o y o Ta ge ed D ugs om
Na u al P oduc s and School o Li e Sciences, Xiamen Uni e si y, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China
c
Depa men o Pha maceu ical Technology, Facul y o Pha maceu ical Sciences, P ince o Songkla Uni e si y, 90110 Ha Yai, Thailand
d
Ins i u o de In es igação e Ino ação em Saúde (I3S), Ins i u o de Engenha ia Biomédica (INEB), Uni e si y o Po o, Rua Al edo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Po o, Po ugal
e
Ins i u o Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salaza (ICBAS), Uni e si y o Po o, Rua Jo ge Vi e bo 228, 4150-180 Po o, Po ugal
Labo a o y o Indus ial Physics, Depa men o Physics, Uni e si y o Tu ku, Tu ku 20014, Finland
g
Depa men o Chemis y, Facul y o Science, Uni e si y o Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
h
Depa men o Pha maceu ical Sciences Labo a o y & Tu ku Cen e o Bio echnology, Åbo Akademi Uni e si y, Tu ku 20520, Finland
i
Helsinki Ins i u e o Li e Science (HiLIFE), Uni e si y o Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland
ARTICLE INFO
Keywo ds:
Po ous silicon
Hyb id nanopa icle
S imuli esponsi e
Ta ge ing
D ug deli e y
ABSTRACT
O ally adminis able d ug deli e y ehicles a e de eloped o manage incu able inflamma o y bowel disease
(IBD), howe e , hei he apeu ic ou comes a e comp omised by he side effec s o sys emic d ug exposu e.
He ein, we use hyalu onic acid unc ionalized po ous silicon nanopa icle o b idge enzyme- esponsi e hyd ogel
and pH- esponsi e polyme , gene a ing a hie a chical s uc u ed (nano-in-nano-in-mic o) ehicle wi h p o-
g ammed p ope ies o ully and sequen ially o e come he mul iple obs acles o efficien ly deli e ing d ugs
locally o inflamed si es o in es ine. A e o al adminis a ion, he pH- esponsi e ma ix p o ec s he embedded
hyb id nanopa icles con aining d ug loaded hyd ogels agains he spa ially a iable physiological en i onmen s
o he gas oin es inal ac un il hey each he inflamed si es o in es ine, p e en ing p ema u e d ug elease.
The nega i ely cha ged hyb id nanopa icles selec i ely a ge he inflamed si es o in es ine, and g adually
elease d ug in esponse o he mic oen i onmen o inflamed in es ine. O e all, he de eloped hie a chical
s uc u ed and p og ammed ehicles load, p o ec , anspo and elease d ugs locally o inflamed si es o in-
es ine, con ibu ing o supe io he apeu ic ou comes. Such s a egy could also inspi e he de elopmen o
nume ous hie a chical s uc u ed ehicles by o he po ous nanopa icles and s imuli- esponsi e ma e ials o he
local deli e y o a ious d ugs o ea plen y o inflamma o y gas oin es inal diseases, including IBD, gas o-
in es inal cance s and i al in ec ions.
1. In oduc ion
Inflamma o y bowel disease (IBD), including ulce a i e coli is and
C ohn's disease, is ch onic, elapsing and medically incu able in-
flamma o y diso de s o he in es ine [1]. Cu en a ailable he apies
ail o adequa ely manage he IBD symp oms and a e equen ly
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.bioma e ials.2018.09.024
Recei ed 12 Augus 2018; Recei ed in e ised o m 13 Sep embe 2018; Accep ed 16 Sep embe 2018
∗
Co esponding au ho . D ug Resea ch P og am, Di ision o Pha maceu ical Chemis y and Technology, Facul y o Pha macy, Uni e si y o Helsinki, Helsinki
00014, Finland.
∗∗
Co esponding au ho . S a e Key Labo a o y o Cellula S ess Biology & Inno a ion Cen e o Cell Signaling Ne wo k and S a e-P o ince Join Enginee ing
Labo a o y o Ta ge ed D ugs om Na u al P oduc s and School o Li e Sciences, Xiamen Uni e si y, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
∗∗∗
Co esponding au ho . D ug Resea ch P og am, Di ision o Pha maceu ical Chemis y and Technology, Facul y o Pha macy, Uni e si y o Helsinki, Helsinki
00014, Finland.
1
These au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k.
E-mail add esses: dong ei.liu@helsinki.fi(D. Liu), [email p o ec ed] (X. Deng), helde .san os@helsinki.fi(H.A. San os).
Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
A ailable online 19 Sep embe 2018
0142-9612/ © 2018 The Au ho s. Published by Else ie L d. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY license
(h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/BY/4.0/).
T
associa ed wi h se e e side effec s esul ing om sys emic d ug ex-
posu e [2]. One app oach o mo e efficacious and sa e IBD he apy
could be nano/mic o- ehicles media ed local d ug deli e y o achie e
high d ug concen a ion a he inflamed si es o in es ine wi h minimal
exposu e o heal hy in es ine o dis an issues [3].
D ug deli e y ehicles can a he easily each inflamed in es ine o
local d ug deli e y by ec al adminis a ion which howe e leads o
poo pa ien compliance [4–6]. Fo IBD he apy, pa ien compliance
can ne e be o e emphasized, which lies in he ac ha incu able IBD,
wi h mos o he pa ien s diagnosed unde he age o 30, usually e-
qui es li elong adminis a ion o d ugs o manage symp oms [1]. O al
adminis a ion p o ides he g ea es deg ee o pa ien compliance,
howe e i makes he local d ug deli e y o inflamed in es ine ex-
emely challenging, as he co esponding d ug deli e y ehicles should
ulfill mul iple asks du ing hei jou ney om o al ca i y o inflamed
in es ine. Specifically, an op imal ehicle should p o ec he d ug and
p e en p ema u e d ug elease in he spa ially a iable physiological
en i onmen s o he gas oin es inal (GI) ac , selec i ely a ge he
discon inuously dis ibu ed inflamed si es o in es ine which is usually
su ounded by heal hy in es ine, and g adually elease d ug in esponse
o he mic oen i onmen o inflamed in es ine.
To hese ends, di e se ehicles, such as polyme pa icles [7–11],
ino ganic pa icles [12,13], liposomes [14], solid lipid pa icles [15],
and hyd ogels [11,16], ha e been de eloped. These ehicles, al hough
a e consis ed o no el ma e ials, ha e no demons a ed he abili y o
ully and sequen ially o e come he mul iple obs acles o deli e ing
d ugs locally o inflamed in es ine, and hei he apeu ic ou comes,
hough encou aging, a e s ill subop imal and significan ly comp omised
by he side effec s o sys emic d ug exposu e. Such us a ing si ua ion
p omp s a e hink o he ehicle design s a egy solely dependen on
ma e ial composi ion, and aises a en ion o he s uc u e design o
ehicles o IBD he apy. A hie a chical s uc u ed ehicle, wi h each
le el in i s hie a chy being endowed by a ional selec ed ma e ial wi h
desi ed unc ion, holds p omise o sequen ially ackle each o he
mul iple obs acles o local d ug deli e y o inflamed in es ine.
Mesopo ous nanopa icles, such as po ous silicon (PSi), po ous si-
lica, halloysi e, e c., a e flexible in he loading/co-loading o d ugs wi h
diffe en physicochemical p ope ies [17–23], due o hei unable
mesopo ous s uc u e, la ge po e olume and high specificsu ace a ea
[24–26], and hei hie a chized mesopo es make hem p omising can-
dida es o cons uc ing hie a chical s uc u ed ehicles [22]. Meso-
po ous nanopa icles encapsula ed in pH- esponsi e polyme s ( wo le-
els o hie a chy) can deli e d ugs o he desi ed segmen o in es ine,
howe e he loaded d ugs a e usually apidly eleased om mesopo es
nanopa icles in an uncon olled manne due o hei eely accessed
po es [23,27,28]. Hyd ogels o med by small molecules such as i-
glyce ol monos ea a e (507 g mol
−1
) and aco byl palmi a e (AP)
(415 g mol
−1
) can encapsula e d ugs, and hei enzyme-labile bonds
enable g adual elease o d ugs in esponse o deg ada i e enzymes,
including ma ix me allop o einases (MMPs) and es e ases [5,29,30],
ha a e up- egula ed and eleased in inflamed issue [5,29–34]. In-
spi ed by hese ac s, we specula e ha AP (molecule size ∼2.60 nm
[35]) can be co-loaded wi h d ugs and u he assembled wi h d ugs
in o hyd ogels inside he mesopo es o PSi nanopa icles. The esul an
AP loaded PSi nanopa icles a e hen expec ed o g adually elease
d ugs in esponse o he mic oen i onmen o inflamed in es ine.
Fu he mo e, he e sa ile su ace chemis y o PSi nanopa icles
makes hem a p omising candida e o a ge ing he inflamed si es o
in es ine. Specifically, inflamma ion o he colon mucosa is accom-
panied by des uc ion and inc eased discon inui y o he mucus laye
[36], and in si u accumula ion o posi i ely cha ged p o eins including
ans e in [14], eosinophil ca ionic p o ein [37] and bac e icidal/
pe meabili y-inc easing p o ein [38]. Consequen ly, posi i e cha ges
build up on he su ace o damaged epi helial offe a a ge o d ug
deli e y ehicles wi h nega i e su ace cha ge [5,14,39]. Rega ding PSi
nanopa icles, nega i e cha ge can be eadily ob ained on hei su ace
h ough su ace modifica ions.
He e, we epo a hie a chical s uc u ed ehicle (AP@PSi-HA@
HPMCAS) based on hyalu onic acid (HA) unc ionalized PSi nano-
pa icles (PSi-HA), AP and hyd oxyp opyl me hylcellulose ace a e suc-
cina e (HPMCAS) wi h diffe en solubili y p ofiles depending on pH
(LF, MF and HF g ades) o efficien local d ug deli e y o inflamed
in es ine ia o al adminis a ion. Budesonide (BUD), a glucoco icoid
o IBD he apy [10], se es as a model d ug in his s udy. AP and BUD
a e co-loaded and in si u gelled inside he mesopo es o PSi-HA hyb id
nanopa icles, and hen delica ely encapsula ed in HPMCAS by mic o-
fluidic echnique o o m BUD loaded AP@PSi-HA@HPMCAS. We hy-
po hesize ha , a e o al adminis a ion, pH- esponsi e HPMCAS ma-
ix will p e en p ema u e d ug elease om AP@PSi-HA
nanopa icles in GI ac un il hey each o a e close o he inflamed
si es o in es ine. A e he dissolu ion o HPMCAS, nega i ely cha ged
AP@PSi-HA nanopa icles will hen selec i ely bind o he inflamed
si es o in es ine by elec os a ic adhesion, and hen g adually elease
d ug in esponse o inflamma ion due o he enzyme-labile bonds o AP
(Fig. 1). O e all, he hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammable e-
sponsi e AP@PSi-HA@HPMCAS will load, p o ec , anspo and e-
lease d ugs locally o inflamed si es o in es ine a e o al adminis a-
ion, and con ibu e o no only supe io he apeu ic efficacy bu also
conside ably educed sys emic d ug exposu e.
2. Resul s and discussion
The p epa a ion p ocess o he hie a chical s uc u ed and p o-
g ammable esponsi e BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF o deli e ing BUD is
schema ically illus a ed in Fig. 2a. HA was conjuga ed on o he su ace
o ca boxyl- e mina ed PSi nanopa icles (Fig. 2b, Fig. S1a) using
Fig. 1. P oposed mechanism o he d ug deli e y by
hie a chical s uc u ed and p og amed ehicles
(AP@PSi-HA@HPMCAS) h ough GI ac wi h IBD.
HPMCAS (LF, MF and HF g ades), wi h diffe en pH
dissolu ion h esholds a ailable, dissol es in specific
segmen o he GI ac . The eleased AP@PSi-HA
nanopa icles wi h nega i e su ace cha ge do no
adhe e o he in ac mucosa, whe eas only adhe e o
he inflamed mucosa which is cha ac e ized by de-
ple ion o mucus, accumula ion o posi i ely cha ged
p o eins, and enhancemen o pe meabili y o he
epi helial cell laye . The deg ada i e enzymes e-
leased by he inflamed cells deg ade he AP hy-
d ogel, which leads o he elease o d ug om AP@
PSi-HA.
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
323
spe mine (SPM) as linke ia 1-e hyl-3-(3-dime hylaminop opyl) ca -
bodiimide/N-hyd oxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) eac ion o o m PSi-HA
hyb id nanopa icles (Fig. 2c, Fig. S1b) wi h nega i e su ace cha ge
(−30 ± 2 mV) o a ge ing inflamed in es inal mucosa and high col-
loidal s abili y (Fig. 2d and e) o mic ofluidic encapsula ion. The
success ul conjuga ion o HA on o PSi was indica ed by he pa icle size
and su ace cha ge a ia ions a e each eac ion s ep (Fig. 2 ), and
confi med by he appea ance and enhancemen o amide I band a
1642 cm
−1
in he Fou ie - ans o m in a ed spec oscopy (FTIR)
spec a (Fig. 2g) a e each eac ion s ep in addi ion o he inhe i ance
o cha ac e is ic bands o PSi, SPM and HA in PSi-HA (Fig. 2g). The
amoun o HA in PSi-HA was de e mined o be 12.5 ± 1.3 w % by
he mog a ime ic analysis (Fig. S2). Small molecula BUD and AP
we e co-loaded in o PSi-HA a 65 °C, and hen we e cooled down o
oom empe a u e o he in si u gela ion o AP and BUD inside PSi-HA
o o m BUDAP@PSi-HA, making use o he eadily empe a u e con-
olled gela ion beha io o AP (Fig. S3). BUDAP@PSi-HA was subse-
quen ly encapsula ed in LF o o m he final hie a chical s uc u ed
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF pa icles (35 ± 1 μm) (Fig. 2h) using d ople
mic ofluidics. The ob ained uni o m pa icle size is beneficial o
achie ing con olled and ep oducible d ug elease p ofiles [40]. The
success ul co-loading o BUD and AP in PSi-HA and encapsula ion o
BUDAP@PSi-HA in LF we e confi med by FTIR (Fig. S4). The loading
deg ee o BUD in BUDAP@PSi-HA and BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF was
24.5 ± 0.1% and 3.8 ± 0.3%, espec i ely.
The dis ibu ion o BUDAP@PSi-HA nanopa icles in he LF ma ix
was e alua ed by con ocal mic oscopy. To enable he isualiza ion, PSi-
HA was conjuga ed wi h fluo escein iso hiocyana e (FITC, g een) and
LF ma ix was labelled wi h e ame hyl hodamine (TRITC, ed). The
con ocal images indica ed ha PSi-HA was e enly dis ibu ed in he LF
ma ix (Fig. 2h), and scanning elec on mic oscopy (SEM) image
showed ha BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF had smoo h su ace and well defined
sphe ical shape (Fig. 2h).
The de eloped hie a chical s uc u ed AP@PSi-HA@LF was hen
in es iga ed o i s p og ammable esponsi e p ope ies. The pH- e-
sponsi e dissolu ion beha io o p o ec i e ma ix was fi s ly e alua ed
by imme sing PSi-HA@LF in aqueous buffe solu ions a a ious pH
alues, s a ing om pH 1.2 o 5.5. PSi-HA@LF was in ac a pH < 5.5,
and immedia ely began o dissol e a pH 5.5 (Fig. 3a), while pa icles
made by MF and HF only s a ed o dissol e when pH eached 6.0 and
Fig. 2. a) Fab ica ion p ocess o hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammable esponsi e ehicles (BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF). b–c) T ansmission elec on mic oscopy (TEM)
image o b) PSi and c) PSi-HA. d) Size and e) polydispe si y index (PDI) o PSi and PSi-HA dispe sing in Milli-Q wa e du ing 2 h, demons a ing he high colloidal
s abili y o PSi-HA o e ime. Da a ep esen mean ± SD. (n= 3). ) Size, PDI, and su ace ze a po en ial o PSi, PSi-SPM and PSi-HA. g) FTIR o PSi, SPM, PSi-SPM,
HA and PSi-HA. h) The monodispe si y o he ab ica ed BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF was s udied by con ocal mic oscopy and SEM. PSi-HA was conjuga ed wi h FITC andLF
laye was labelled wi h TRITC. The con ocal images showed he FITC (g een), TRITC ( ed) and he o e lay (yellow) channels. The su ace o he pa icles was
obse ed by SEM. (Fo in e p e a ion o he e e ences o colo in his figu e legend, he eade is e e ed o he Web e sion o his a icle.)
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
324
6.8, espec i ely [23,41]. To u he e alua e he pH- esponsi e p op-
e ies o PSi-HA@HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF), BUD was solely loaded in
PSi-HA@HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF). BUD@PSi-HA@LF, BUD@PSi-HA@
MF and BUD@PSi-HA@HF only began o elease BUD when he pH
eached 5.5, 6.0 and 6.8, espec i ely, and he elease was nea ly
comple e wi hin 30 min (Fig. S5) due o he sho disin eg a ion ime
(∼10 min acco ding o he manu ac u e ) o HPMCAS (LF, MF and HF).
The p ecisely pH- igge ed d ug elease beha io s o PSi-HA@HPMCAS
sugges i s po en ial o elease BUD a specific segmen o he in es ine
by he flexible selec ion and combina ion o LF, MF and HF. The in-
es inal pH o mice is lowe han ha o human [42], he e o e, LF
a he han MF o HF was used o he animal expe imen s.
The enzyme- esponsi e p ope ies o d ug loaded AP@PSi-HA@LF
we e fi s ly in es iga ed in buffe solu ions. In con as o he apid
elease o BUD om PSi-HA@LF, AP@PSi-HA@LF only sligh ly e-
leased BUD (6.5% a 6 h) in he absence o lipase e en hough pH
eached 5.5. Wi h inc easing concen a ion o lipase, g adual elease o
BUD om AP@PSi-HA@LF was accele a ed, i.e., 8.5%, 75.6% and
88.4% a 6 h o 0.01, 1 and 100 U/mL lipase, espec i ely (Fig. 3b),
sugges ing AP@PSi-HA@LF can adjus d ug elease o ma ch he dis-
ease ac i i y a inflamed in es ine. IBD is cha ac e ized by a iable
disease ac i i y o e ime wi h fla es and pe iods o low disease ac-
i i y. A disease ac i i y-dependen d ug deli e y ehicle is likely o
a oid sub- o sup a- he apeu ic d ug concen a ions locally du ing
pe iods o high o low disease ac i i y, espec i ely, esul ing in max-
imized he apeu ic efficacy and minimized sys emic d ug exposu e
[30].
O e all, BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF exhibi ed pH and enzyme p og am-
mable esponsi e d ug elease beha io s. To simula e d ug elease om
AP@PSi-HA@LF unde inflamma o y condi ions, BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF
was incuba ed wi h supe na an collec ed om human mac ophages
cul u ed wi h o wi hou lipopolysaccha ide (LPS). In compa ison o
uns imula ed mac ophages, mac ophages ac i a ed by LPS enhanced
he enzyma ic ac i i ies in he supe na an [5,30,32,33], which esul ed
in significan ly inc eased BUD elease (Fig. 3c). The abo e enzyme- e-
sponsi e d ug elease beha io s sugges ha AP@PSi-HA@LF would
p e e en ially elease BUD a he si es o inflamed in es ine a he han
heal hy in es ine o dis an heal hy issues, and he e o e educe sys-
emic d ug exposu e which o en causes side effec s.
Since AP@PSi-HA@LF is designed o o al d ug deli e y, wo
human in es inal epi helial cell lines, Caco-2 clone C2Bbe1 and HT29-
MTX, we e used o assess i s sa e y. A e 24 h incuba ion wi h bo h cell
lines, he e was no e idence o cy o oxici y o PSi-HA@LF and
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF as well as hei componen s, i.e., PSi-HA, AP and
BUD (Fig. S6, Fig. S7 and Fig. S8).
The he apeu ic efficacy and sys emic abso p ion o BUD deli e ed
by AP@PSi-HA@LF we e fi s ly s udied using in i o IBD model. The in
i o IBD model consis ed o iple co-cul u ed cells including in es inal
epi helial cells, human blood-de i ed mac ophages and dend i ic cells
ha we e s imula ed by p o-inflamma o y cy okine in e leukin-1β(IL-
1β) in combina ion wi h lipopolysaccha ide (LPS) (Fig. S9). The ex-
pe imen al imeline o se ing up he in i o IBD model and subsequen
es ing o BUD o mula ions is shown in Fig. S10. As an indica ion o he
in eg i y and pe meabili y o he monolaye , ansepi helial elec ical
Fig. 3. a) SEM images o PSi-HA@LF a e imme sion in buffe solu ions a pH 1.2 and 5.0 o 2 h, and a pH 5.5 o 5 min and 2 h b) pH and enzyme sequen ially
esponsi e BUD elease om AP@PSi-HA@LF in a se ies o pH buffe s a 37 °C. Enzyme (lipase; 0.01, 1, and 100 U/mL) was added a 3 h. Da a a e means ± SD
(n= 3). c) BUD elease om AP@PSi-HA@LF upon incuba ion o 24 h a 37 °C wi h cul u e supe na an om LPS ac i a ed human mac ophages. Da a a e
means ± SD (n= 3). d) No malized IL-8 elease o Caco-2 clone, mac ophages and dend i ic cells iple co-cul u e IBD model a e induc ion o inflamma ion and
subsequen ea men wi h a ious BUD o mula ions and blank ehicle con ol (wi hou BUD). Da a a e means ± SD (n= 4). e) Pe mea ion p ofiles o BUD ac oss
he Caco-2 clone monolaye s co-cul u ed wi h mac ophages and dend i ic cells in bo h heal hy and inflamed condi ions. ) Appa en pe meabili y coefficien s (P
app
)
o BUD calcula ed om he pe mea ion p ofiles o BUD. Da a a e means ± SD (n= 3).
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
325
esis ance (TEER) alue was moni o ed du ing he expe imen pe iod.
Compa ed o ee BUD and BUD@PSi-HA@LF, BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF
ea men eco e ed he TEER o he highes le el, and was significan ly
highe a day 1 (Fig. S11). Fu he mo e, as a ma ke o inflamma ion,
IL-8 elease om he cells unde he ea men o diffe en BUD o -
mula ions was measu ed. BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF ea men significan ly
educed he IL-8 p oduc ion o he lowes le el (Fig. 3d), which in-
dica es a p olong he apeu ic effec o p og ammable esponsi e
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF han ee BUD and BUD@PSi-HA@LF, mainly
owing o he sus ained d ug elease p o ided by he emaining enzyme-
esponsi e BUDAP@PSi-HA on monolaye s.
Since AP@PSi-HA@LF is designed o local deli e y o BUD o
p ecise he apy o IBD ia o al adminis a ion, i s effec s on sys emic
d ug abso p ion is ano he impo an e alua ion index. AP@PSi-HA@
LF significan ly educed he pe meabili y o BUD ac oss he monolaye s
in compa ison o ee BUD and PSi-HA@LF in bo h inflamed and
heal hy condi ions (Fig. 3e and ), which is a ibu ed o he much
slowe elease o BUD om AP@PSi-HA@LF (Fig. 3b and c). Thus,
deli e ing d ug by hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammable e-
sponsi e AP@PSi-HA@LF will esul in a majo educ ion in sys emic
d ug abso p ion and consequen ly educe he possibili y o side effec s.
To maximize he he apeu ic efficacy and minimize he sys emic
exposu e o d ug deli e ed by AP@PSi-HA@LF in i o, AP@PSi-HA@LF
should selec i ely adhe e o he inflamed si es o in es ine. We hy-
po hesize ha he nega i e su ace cha ge o AP@PSi-HA
(−32 ± 1 mV) will acili a e i s a ge ing o he inflamed in es inal
epi helium, whe e posi i ely cha ged p o eins a e accumula ed
[14,37,38]. To e i y his hypo hesis, he adhesion p ope ies o AP@
PSi-HA we e fi s ly es ed in i o using syn he ic su aces. BUDAP@PSi-
FITC/HA (−33 ± 2 mV) was incuba ed on glass slides o polys y ene
pla es coa ed wi h human ans e in (posi i ely cha ged) o po cine
mucin (nega i ely cha ged), simula ing inflamed and heal hy epi he-
lium, espec i ely [5]. Compa ed o mucin coa ed su aces, ans e in
coa ed su aces e ained much mo e pa icles (Fig. 4a) and showed a
14.9- old highe fluo escence signal (Fig. 4b) a e ex ensi e washing
wi h phospha e buffe ed saline (PBS). In ano he con ol expe imen ,
BUDAP@PSi-FITC/HA was incuba ed wi h a ca ionic polye hylenimine
(PEI) solu ion o con e i s su ace cha ge om nega i e o posi i e
(35 ± 2 mV). As p edic ed, his cha ge con e sion abolished he p e-
e en ial adhesion o BUDAP@PSi-HA o ans e in coa ed su aces and
enhanced i s adhesion o he mucin coa ed su aces (Fig. S12).
Following he p omising esul s in i o, we u he examined he
a ge ing o AP@PSi-HA o inflamed mucosa using in i o IBD model,
i.e., dex an sul a e sodium (DSS)-induced mouse coli is model. Mice
wi h coli is and no mal mice ecei ed a single dose o BUDAP@PSi-
Cy7/HA@LF (−31 ± 1 mV o BUDAP@PSi-Cy7/HA) ( o IVIS ima-
ging) o BUDAP@PSi-FITC/HA@LF ( o con ocal imaging) by o al ga-
age. Mice wi h coli is showed significan ly g ea e e en ion o fluo -
escence han no mal mice a e he adminis a ion o BUDAP@PSi-Cy7/
HA@LF o 2 h and 5 h (Fig. 4c and d). Con ocal mic oscopy images o
dis al end o colon sec ions (Fig. 4e) showed he a ge ing o BUDAP@
PSi-FITC/HA o he inflamed si es o colon. Toge he wi h he pH and
enzyme esponsi e p ope ies o AP@PSi-HA@LF, we would expec
ha hie a chical s uc u ed AP@PSi-HA@LF can efficien ly deli e
BUD locally o inflamed si es o in es ine by execu ing i s p og ammed
unc ions in he GI ac suffe ed wi h IBD.
We hen es ed he in i o he apeu ic efficacy o BUD deli e ed by
hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammable esponsi e AP@PSi-HA@LF
in DSS-induced mouse coli is model. BUD was s udied a low dose (L,
0.5 mg/kg) and high dose (H, 1.5 mg/kg), espec i ely. F ee BUD
(FBUDL and FBUDH), blank ehicles wi hou BUD, i.e., AP@PSi-HA@
LF (PL and PH) and pH- esponsi e BUD@PSi-HA@LF (BUDL and
BUDH) we e employed as con ols o demons a e he he apeu ic
benefi s o hie a chical s uc u ed and p og ammable esponsi e
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF (BUDAPL and BUDAPH). A e induc ion o he
coli is o 7 d, he ea men was conduc ed by daily o al ga age o 7 d,
du ing which he body weigh o coli is mice g adually dec eased
(Fig. 5a). Whe eas ea men wi h BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF (BUDAPL and
BUDAPH) significan ly mi iga ed weigh loss as compa ed o ee BUD
(FBUDL and FBUDH) and BUD@PSi-HA@LF (BUDL and BUDH)
(Fig. 5a). The se e i y o coli is was assessed by disease ac i i y index
(DAI). In e es ingly, all ea ed g oups showed significan ly educed
DAI a e ea men o 7 d as compa ed o coli is g oup, and he
minimal DAI was ound o BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF (BUDAPL and BU-
DAPH) (Fig. 5b). Besides, BUDAPH no ably p ese ed colon leng h
when compa ed o FBUDH and BUDH (Fig. S13). Fu he mo e, he le-
els o ypical p oinflamma o y cy okines including IL-1βand IL-6 we e
quan ified. Coli is mice exhibi ed ele a ed le els o bo h IL-1βand IL-6
han no mal mice (Fig. 5c and d). O e all, he le els o IL-1βand IL-6
dec eased a e ea men wi h BUD o mula ions, and he g oup o
mice ea ed wi h BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF showed he lowes concen a-
ion o IL-1βand IL-6 in compa ison o he o he ea ed g oups.
Addi ional in o ma ion was ob ained by examining and sco ing
hema oxylin and eosin (H&E) s ained his ological sec ions o dis al end
(Fig. 5e and ) o colon issues. The coli is was cha ac e ized by su-
pe ficial e osions, deple ion o goble cells, infil a ion o he colon
lamina p op ia wi h inflamma o y cells, and c yp hype ophy [5,9].
Disease se e i y was significan ly educed in mice ea ed wi h BUD@
PSi-HA@LF (BUDL and BUDH) and BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF (BUDAPL and
BUDAPH) (Fig. 5e), and ep esen a i e images (Fig. 5 ) demons a e
ha ea men wi h BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF offe ed he bes imp o emen
in pa hological inju ies, which was also confi med by TUNEL s aining
(Fig. S14). O e all, BUD deli e ed by hie a chical s uc u ed and p o-
g ammable esponsi e AP@PSi-HA@LF exhibi s supe io he apeu ic
efficacy han ee BUD and BUD deli e ed by pH- esponsi e PSi-HA@
LF, which was a ibu ed o he p o ec ion o BUDAP@PSi-HA in GI
ac by LF, a ge ing o BUDAP@PSi-HA o he inflamed si es o colon
and subsequen p olonged elease o BUD om AP@PSi-HA in esponse
o he mic oen i onmen o inflamed in es ine.
3. Conclusions
In summa y, we ha e de eloped a hie a chical s uc u ed and p o-
g ammable esponsi e AP@PSi-HA@HPMCAS ehicle o efficien local
d ug deli e y o inflamed si es o in es ine in IBD he apy ia o al ad-
minis a ion. The p epa ed ehicles showed well-defined sphe ical
shape and uni o m pa icle size. The pH- esponsi e ma ix p o ec s he
d ug and AP co-loaded PSi nanopa icles agains he complex en-
i onmen o he GI ac be o e eaching he desi ed segmen o in-
es ine, and p e en s p ema u e d ug elease. The nega i ely cha ged
AP@PSi-HA nanopa icles selec i ely a ge he inflamed si es o in-
es ine, and locally elease he d ug in esponse o he inflamma ion
g adually o e a p olonged du a ion. Compa ed o ee d ug and con-
en ional pH- esponsi e pa icles, d ug deli e ed by hie a chical
s uc u ed and p og ammable esponsi e AP@PSi-HA@HPMCAS ex-
hibi supe io he apeu ic efficacy and significan ly educed sys emic
d ug exposu e, subs an ia ing he impo ance o enginee ing hie -
a chical s uc u ed and p og ammed ehicles o deli e ing d ugs lo-
cally o inflamed si es o in es ine.
4. Ma e ials and me hods
4.1. P epa a ion o PSi nanopa icles
Elec ochemical anodiza ion me hod was used o p epa e un-
decylenic acid modified he mally hyd oca bonized PSi (UnTHCPSi), as
desc ibed in de ail elsewhe e [43]. B iefly, monoc ys alline p + - ype
Si (100) wa e s (0.01–0.02 Ωcm esis i i y) we e elec ochemically
anodized in a 1:1 ( / ) aqueous hyd ofluo ic acid (38%)–e hanol
elec oly e by applying epea ed low and high cu en densi y pulsed
e ching p ofile. The esul ing PSi wi h high po osi y ac u e planes and
hyd ogen- e mina ed su ace was subsequen ly de ached om he
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
326
subs a e as ee-s anding mul ilaye films by ab up ly inc easing he
cu en densi y o elec opolishing egion. The mal hyd oca boniza ion
o he PSi films was pe o med by exposing hem o a 1:1 ( / ) N
2
/
ace ylene (C
2
H
2
)flow (1 L min
−1
) o 15 min a oom empe a u e,
ollowed by a hea ea men o 15 min a 500 °C. The ob ained THCPSi
films we e hen ea ed wi h 10-undecenoic acid o 16 h a 120 °C. The
UnTHCPSi films we e finally we ball milled o p oduce nanopa icles
and sepa a ed using cen i uga ion o ob ain he final PSi nanopa icles
wi h desi ed pa icle size. Ni ogen adso p ion–deso p ion iso he ms o
PSi nanopa icles we e measu ed a 77 K on a gas adso p ion analyze
(Mic ome i ics T iS a 3000, USA). The specific su ace a ea was de-
e mined om he adso p ion b anch o he ni ogen iso he m using he
B unaue -Emme -Telle (BET) heo y [44], and he po e olume was
de e mined as he o al adso bed amoun a a ela i e p essu e (p/p
0
)o
0.97. The a e age diame e o he po es was 4 × po e olume/specific
su ace a ea. The specific su ace a ea and po e olume o PSi nano-
pa icles used in his s udy we e 305 ± 10 m
2
/g and
0.89 ± 0.01 cm
3
/g, espec i ely. The a e age diame e o he po es
was calcula ed o be 11.6 ± 0.4 nm.
4.2. P epa a ion o HA
The aqueous solu ion o HA sodium sal (Sigma-Ald ich, USA) was
dialyzed agains 0.01 M HCl o 24 h and hen agains Milli-Q wa e o
an addi ional 24 h o con e HA om i s sodium sal o m o acid o m.
The acid o m o HA was eco e ed by lyophiliza ion [45].
Fig. 4. a) Con ocal mic oscopy images and b) fluo escence in ensi ies (quan ified by mic opla e eade ) o BUDAP@PSi-FITC/HA a e incuba ion wi h uncoa ed,
mucin coa ed (simula ing heal hy epi helium) o ans e in coa ed (simula ing inflamed epi helium) su aces o 1 h a 37 °C, ollowed by washing wi h PBS o 3
imes. Da a a e means ± SD (n = 6). c–d) Mice wi h DSS-induced coli is and no mal mice we e o ally adminis a ed wi h BUDAP@PSi-Cy7/HA@LF. c) The li ing
mice we e imaged using IVIS fluo escence imaging sys em a e 2 h and 5 h, espec i ely. d) The mice we e sac ificed 5 h a e adminis a ion, and he in es ines we e
dissec ed and imaged using IVIS fluo escence imaging sys em. The o al fluo escence in ensi y was de e mined in a s anda d-size egion o in e es (ROI) d awn
a ound he whole in es ine (c) o colon (d). (c) and (d) sha e he same adiance scale ba s. Da a a e means ± SD (n = 3). e) Immunofluo escence images o dis al end
o colon dissec ed om no mal mice and mice wi h coli is 5 h a e o ally adminis a ed wi h BUDAP@PSi-FITC/HA@LF. Nucleus and mac ophages we e s ained by
DAPI and F4/80, espec i ely. All he images ha e he same scale ba .
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
327
4.3. P epa a ion o PSi-HA nanopa icles
PSi nanopa icles we e co alen ly conjuga ed wi h SPM using he
EDC/NHS eac ion. Typically, 1 mg PSi nanopa icles we e dispe sed in
1 mL o anhyd ous dime hyl o mamide (DMF) (Sigma-Ald ich, USA).
Then 4 μL (22.6 μmol) EDC (Sigma-Ald ich, USA) and 3 mg (26.1 μmol)
NHS (Sigma-Ald ich, USA) we e added in o he abo e suspension and
s i ed o e nigh . Subsequen ly, 20 mg (98.8 μmol) SPM (ACROS
O ganic, UK) we e added and s i ed o e nigh . The p epa ed PSi-SPM
nanopa icles we e collec ed by cen i uga ion and ex ensi ely washed
wi h DMF o 3 imes. 4 mg HA we e dissol ed in 1 mL anhyd ous di-
me hyl sul oxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Ald ich, USA). Then 2.8 μL EDC and
1.8 mg NHS we e added and s i ed o 2 h. A e wa ds, 1 mg PSi-SPM
nanopa icles we e dispe sed in o he abo e solu ion and s i ed o e -
nigh . The ob ained PSi-HA nanopa icles we e collec ed by cen-
i uga ion and ex ensi ely washed wi h Milli-Q wa e o 5 imes.
The amoun o HA on he su ace o PSi nanopa icles was es ima ed
using TGA 7 he mog a ime e (Pe kinElme , USA). The samples we e
hea ed om oom empe a u e o 850 °C a a hea ing a e o 20 °C/min
unde a 200 mL/min N
2
flush. The measu emen s we e done in ipli-
ca es.
4.4. Loading o BUD and AP in PSi-HA nanopa icles
BUD and AP we e co-loaded in o PSi-HA nanopa icles using an
imme sion me hod. BUD and AP we e dissol ed oge he in a mix u e o
e hanol–H
2
O (1:1 / ) a a concen a ion o 25 and 75 mg mL
−1
, e-
spec i ely, a 65 °C. 10 mg PSi-HA we e added in o 2 mL o he abo e
solu ion and s i ed o 3 h a 65 °C. A e wa ds, he BUD and AP loaded
PSi-HA (BUDAP@PSi-HA) nanopa icles we e collec ed by cen i uga-
ion o 3 min using p e-wa med o o , and hen we e allowed o cool
down o oom empe a u e o he gelling o AP be o e washing by
Milli-Q wa e . The p ocedu es o p epa e PSi-HA loaded wi h BUD only
(BUD@PSi-HA) and PSi-HA loaded wi h AP only (AP@PSi-HA) we e
he same as BUDAP@PSi-HA, and he concen a ion o BUD and AP in
e hanol–H
2
O (1:1 / ) was 25 and 75 mg mL
−1
, espec i ely.
4.5. Fab ica ion o flow- ocusing de ice o mic ofluidics
Bo osilica e glass cylind ical capilla ies (Wo ld P ecision
Ins umen s, USA) and glass slides we e used o assemble he mic o-
fluidic flow- ocusing de ice [23,27]. The inne capilla y had an ou e
diame e o 1000 μm. Fi s ly, he inne capilla y was ape ed using a
mic opipe e pulle (P-97, Su e Ins umen , USA), and hen enla ged
o 350 μm. Subsequen ly, he ape ed capilla y was inse ed in o he
igh end o he ou e capilla y wi h an inne diame e o 1120 μm. Two
Fig. 5. The apeu ic efficacy o a ious BUD o mula ions on IBD model o DSS-induced coli is in mice. a) Body weigh and b) DAI o mice du ing 7 d o induc ion o
coli is model and 7 d o ea men . Da a we e no malized as a pe cen age o he body weigh a day 0. c–d) The le els o c) IL-1βand d) IL-6 a e 7 d o ea men . e)
His opa hology sco e o he dis al end o colon a e 7 d o ea men . ) Rep esen a i e H&E his ology images o he dis al end o colon a e 7 d o ea men . All he
images ha e he same scale ba . Da a a e means ± SD (n= 5). *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01 and ***p< 0.001 e sus he coli is g oup.
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
328
sy inges we e linked o he mic ofluidic de ice using polye hylene
ubes o allow he independen injec ion o he inne and ou e fluids
con olled by pumps (PHD 2000, Ha a d Appa a us, USA). A ans-
pa en epoxy esin (5 min
®
Epoxi, De con, USA) was used o seal he
mic ofluidic de ice whe e equi ed.
4.6. Fab ica ion o pH- esponsi e mic opa icles
PSi-HA nanopa icles we e encapsula ed in pH-sensi i e HPMCAS
(ShinE su, Japan) o o m PSi-HA@HPMCAS mic opa icles using
wa e -in-oil-in-wa e (W/O/W) double emulsion h ough a mic ofluidic
flow- ocusing de ice. Th ee g ades (LF, MF and HF) o HPMCAS, which
a y in hei pH-dependen solubili y, we e used. The LF, MF and HF
g ades o HPMCAS dissol e a pH ≥5.5, 6.0 and 6.8, espec i ely. Fo
he mic ofluidic encapsula ion, HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF) was dissol ed
in e hyl ace a e (EA) a a concen a ion o 10 mg mL
−1
2 mg PSi-HA
nanopa icles we e dispe sed in 100 μL Milli-Q wa e and added d op-
wise in o 1 mL HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF) solu ion unde sonica ion
(Sonics, Sonics & Ma e ials Inc, USA) o p oduce he p ima y emulsion
(W/O) which se ed as he inne dispe sed fluid. 2% w/ P-407 (BASF,
Ge many) aqueous solu ion (pH 5) was used as he ou e con inuous
fluid o ob ain a s able W/O/W emulsion. The inne fluid (3.5 mL h
−1
)
was ocused by he ou e fluid (15 mL h
−1
), and he o med d ople s
we e collec ed in 1% w/ P-407 aqueous solu ion (pH 5). A e wa ds,
he p oduced PSi-HA@HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF) mic opa icles we e
collec ed by cen i uga ion.
4.7. Fab ica ion o BUD and/o AP loaded mic opa icles
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF, BUD@PSi-HA@HPMCAS (LF, MF o HF) and
AP@PSi-HA@LF mic opa icles we e p epa ed using BUDAP@PSi-HA,
BUD@PSi-HA and AP@PSi-HA nanopa icles, espec i ely, unde he
same condi ion as he PSi-HA@LF mic opa icles. The loading deg ees
o BUD in pa icles we e de e mined by s i ing he pa icles in a
mix u e o PBS and ace oni ile (1:1 / ) o dissol e he HPMCAS
ma ix and AP hyd ogel, and o elease all he loaded BUD. The amoun
o BUD was quan ified by Agilen 1100 high pe o mance liquid ch o-
ma og aphy (HPLC) (Agilen Technologies, USA) wi h a mobile phase
composed o phospho ic acid (0.1%, pH 3.2) and ace oni ile ( olume
a io 52:48) a a flow a e o 1.4 mL min
−1
a 25 °C. The wa eleng h
used o BUD quan ifica ion was 244 nm. A Disco e y
®
C18 column
(4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm, Supelco Analy ical, USA) was used as s a iona y
phase and he injec ion olume o he samples was 20 μL.
4.8. Physicochemical p ope ies o nanopa icles and mic opa icles
The pa icle size, PDI and su ace cha ge o nanopa icles we e
de e mined by Ze asize Nano ZS (Mal e n Ins umen s L d, UK) in
Milli-Q wa e wi h pH adjus ed o 7.4 by HCl/NaOH.
The s abili y o nanopa icles was e alua ed by ollowing hei
changes on size and PDI a e incuba ion o 200 μgmL
−1
o nano-
pa icles wi h Milli-Q wa e (pH 7.4) du ing 2 h. Samples we e wi h-
d awn a 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, and dilu ed in Milli-Q wa e (pH
7.4) o measu ing he size and PDI. Milli-Q wa e was used o s abili y
es as i was used o dispe sing he PSi-HA nanopa icles du ing he
mic ofluidic ab ica ion o PSi-HA@HPMCAS.
The s uc u e o nanopa icles and mo phology o mic opa icles
we e obse ed by TEM (JEOL 1400, Japan) and SEM (Hi achi S-4800,
Japan), espec i ely. The mic opa icles we e pla inum spu e ed be-
o e imaging. The pa icle size o mic opa icles was de e mined using
Image J (NIH, USA), and a leas 100 pa icles we e analyzed. The
chemical composi ion o he nanopa icles and mic opa icles was
cha ac e ized by FTIR (Ve ex 70, B uke , USA). The samples we e
mixed wi h KB (FTIR g ade, Sigma-Ald ich, USA) and p essed in o
pelle s. The pelle s consis ed o 1 mg o sample and 200 mg o KB . The
FTIR spec a we e eco ded in he ange o 4000–400 cm
−1
wi h a
esolu ion o 4 cm
−1
using OPUS 5.5 so wa e.
Fo s udying he dis ibu ion o PSi-HA nanopa icles wi hin he LF
mic opa icles, PSi-HA was labelled wi h FITC (The mo Fishe
Scien ific, USA) as desc ibed in ollowing sec ions, and he LF polyme
was mixed wi h TRITC (The mo Fishe Scien ific, USA) a a mass a io
o 100 o 1. A e mic ofluidic ab ica ion as desc ibed abo e, he
p oduced PSi-HA@LF mic opa icles we e placed in o 35 mm Pe i dish
(Ma Tek, USA), and imaged using con ocal mic oscope (Leica SP5 II
HCS A, Ge many).
4.9. pH- esponsi e dissolu ion beha io o mic opa icles
To in es iga e he pH- esponsi e dissolu ion beha io o he p e-
pa ed PSi-HA@LF mic opa icles, hey we e moun ed on o s ubs using
ca bon ape, and hen ea ed wi h buffe solu ions a diffe en pH
alues (1.2 and 5.0) o 2 h and a pH 5.5 o 5 min and 2 h. The excess
solu ions we e emo ed and he samples we e d ied a oom empe a-
u e o 24 h. The mic opa icles wi hou any ea men we e used as a
con ol. All samples we e pla inum spu e ed be o e imaging.
4.10. pH- esponsi e d ug elease s udy
The pH- esponsi e d ug elease p ofiles o BUD@PSi-HA@HPMCAS
(LF, MF and HF) we e s udied in con inuous g adien pH media a 37 °C
wi h shaking a 150 pm. F ee BUD was used as con ol g oup. Samples
con aining 50 μg BUD we e added in o 50 mL media a pH 1.2, and he
pH was hen g adually inc eased o 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.8. A p e-
de e mined ime in e als, 200 μL o sample we e wi hd awn om each
sample and he elease media was eplaced wi h 200 μL o esh media.
Samples we e fi s ly cen i uged (16100 g, 3 min), and hen he d ug
concen a ions in he supe na an we e quan ified by HPLC.
4.11. Enzyme- esponsi e d ug elease s udy
The enzyme- esponsi e d ug elease p ofiles o BUDAP@PSi-HA@
LF we e s udied in con inuous g adien pH media wi hou and wi h
0.01, 1 o 100 U/mL o The momyces lanuginosus lipase (Sigma-Ald ich,
USA) a 37 °C wi h shaking a 150 pm. BUD@PSi-HA@LF and ee BUD
we e used as con ol g oups. Samples con aining 50 μg BUD we e added
in o 50 mL media a pH 1.2, and he pH was hen g adually inc eased o
5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.8. Lipase was added when pH was inc eased o 5.0.
A p ede e mined ime in e als, 200 μL o sample we e wi hd awn
om each sample and he elease media was eplaced wi h 200 μLo
esh media. Samples we e fi s ly cen i uged (16100 g, 3 min), and
hen he d ug concen a ions in he supe na an we e quan ified by
HPLC.
BUD elease was also s udied in cul u e supe na an om human
mac ophages. The me hod o ob aining mac ophages was desc ibed in
de ail in la e sec ions. Mac ophages we e cul u ed wi hou and wi h
0.1 μgmL
−1
lipopolysaccha ide (LPS) (Sigma-Ald ich, USA), and su-
pe na an was collec ed a e 4 and 24 h. 10 mg BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF
we e suspended in 1 mL o Milli-Q wa e (pH 5.0), and 20 μL o his
suspension we e added o 1 mL o supe na an om uns imula ed o
LPS-s imula ed mac ophages. A e incuba ion a 37 °C o 24 h, sam-
ples we e cen i uged a 16100 g o 5 min, and BUD concen a ion in
he supe na an was measu ed by HPLC.
4.12. Cell line cul u e
Human colon ca cinoma (Caco-2), Caco-2 clone C2Bbe1 and human
colon adenoca cinoma (HT29-MTX) cells we e sepa a ely cul u ed in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (HyClone, USA) wi h
4.5 g L
−1
glucose, supplemen ed wi h 10% e al bo ine se um (Gibco,
In i ogen, USA), 1% nonessen ial amino acids, 1% L-glu amine, peni-
cillin (100 IU mL
−1
) and s ep omycin (100 mg mL
−1
) (all om
HyClone, Logan, UT). The cells we e main ained a 37 °C wi h an
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
329
a mosphe e o 5% CO
2
and 95% ela i e humidi y, and he cul u e
media we e changed e e y o he day. P io o each es , he cells we e
ha es ed using 0.25% ( / ) ypsin–e hylenediamine e aace ic acid
(EDTA)–phospha e buffe solu ion.
4.13. Mac ophages and dend i ic cells cul u e
Buffy coa s we e p ocessed by Ficoll-Paque g adien cen i uga ion
o ob ain he pe iphe al blood mononuclea cells (PBMCs).
Mac ophages and dend i ic cells we e diffe en ia ed om CD14
+
monocy es ha we e isola ed om PBMCs using CD14 Mic oBeads
(Mil enyi Bio ec). These cells we e cul u ed wi h mac ophage medium
(RPMI 1640 medium wi h 1% L-glu amine (HyClone, USA), supple-
men ed wi h 10% human se um AB (BioWes , F ance), 1% nonessen ial
amino acids, penicillin (100 IU mL
−1
) and s ep omycin
(100 mg mL
−1
), and 1% sodium py u a e (Gibco, UK)). Mac ophages
we e ob ained a e cul i a ion o 6 d wi h mac ophage medium, while
dend i ic cells we e ob ained a e cul i a ion o 6 d wi h mac ophage
medium supplemen ed wi h 80 ng/mL ecombinan human GM-CSF
(Pep o ec, USA) and 80 ng/mL ecombinan human IL-4 (Pep o ec,
USA) [46].
4.14. Cy o oxici y s udies
100 μL Caco-2 clone and HT29-MTX cells we e sepa a ely seeded in
96-well pla es a a densi y o 2 × 10
5
cells mL
−1
. A e he cells we e
le o a ach o 24 h, he cul u e medium was disca ded and he cells
we e washed wi h 100 μL esh 1 × Hank's Balanced Sal Solu ion
(HBSS)−HEPES (pH 7.4). Then PSi, PSi-HA and PSi-HA@LF a con-
cen a ions o 25, 50, 100, 250 and 500 μgmL
−1
(PSi o equi alen ) in
HBSS−HEPES (pH 7.4), AP a concen a ions o 5, 10, 25, 50 and
100 μgmL
−1
in HBSS−HEPES (pH 7.4), and ee BUD, BUDAP@PSi-
HA and BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF a concen a ions o 5, 10, 20, 50 and
100 μgmL
−1
(BUD o equi alen ) in HBSS−HEPES (pH 7.4) we e
added o each well. A e incuba ion o 24 h, he cells we e washed
wice wi h HBSS−HEPES (pH 7.4) and he numbe o iable cells was
quan ified using CellTi e -Glo
®
(P omega Co po a ion, USA). The lu-
minescence was measu ed using Va ioskan Flash pla e eade (The mo
Fishe Scien ific, USA). HBSS−HEPES (pH 7.4) and 1% o T i on X-100
we e used as nega i e con ol and posi i e con ol, espec i ely. All he
expe imen s we e pe o med a leas in iplica e.
4.15. In i o IBD model
In i o IBD model was modified om p e ious s udies [47–49].
6×10
4
Caco-2 clone cells we e seeded in o he apical compa men o
12-T answell
®
pla e, 1 × 10
4
mac ophages and 1 × 10
4
dend i ic cells
we e seeded in o he basola e al compa men . The co-cul u e was kep
wi h Caco-2 medium (0.5 mL) in he apical compa men and mac o-
phage medium (1.5 mL) in he basola e al compa men , and he
medium was changed e e y o he day in bo h he apical and basola e al
compa men s. The co-cul u e was cul i a ed o 21 d o o m cell
monolaye s. Fo he inflamed model, 0.5 mL Caco-2 medium wi h
20 ng/mL IL-1β(Pep o ec, USA) and 0.1 μgmL
−1
LPS was added o he
apical compa men and incuba ed o 2 d.
4.16. D ug pe meabili y ac oss in es inal cell monolaye s
The pe meabili y expe imen s we e pe o med using in i o IBD
model a 37 °C wi h shaking a 100 pm, in compa ison wi h heal hy
in es inal cell monolaye s. A e 2 d o cul i a ion wi h o wi hou s i-
mula ion, he medium om he apical compa men was collec ed o
dispe sing he samples. 500 μL ee BUD, BUD@PSi-HA@LF and
BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF in apical medium we e added in o he apical
compa men a a BUD (o equi alen ) concen a ion o 50 μgmL
−1
.A
specific ime poin s (5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min), 100 μL sample
we e collec ed om he basola e al compa men and eplaced wi h he
same olume o esh medium. The amoun o pe mea ed BUD in he
basola e al compa men was quan ified by HPLC, and he P
app
was
calcula ed, as desc ibed elsewhe e [20]. The expe imen s we e ca ied
ou in iplica e.
4.17. In i o ea men es s
A e 2 d o s imula ion, bo h apical and basola e al medium we e
emo ed, and cells we e washed 3 imes wi h PBS. F ee BUD, BUD@
PSi-HA@LF and BUDAP@PSi-HA@LF we e added in o he apical
compa men , p o iding an equi alen BUD dose o 25 μg pe well.
A e 4 h o incuba ion, which app oxima es d ug e en ion ime in he
in es ine o IBD pa ien s [50], he apical medium was emo ed and
eplaced wi h esh Caco-2 medium. The monolaye s we e used bo h o
ansepi helial elec ical esis ance (TEER) and IL-8 measu emen s. IL-8
was quan ified by enzyme-linked immunoso ben assay (ELISA) ki s
(BD Biosciences) acco ding o he manu ac u e 's p o ocol.
4.18. Fluo escence labelling o nanopa icles
FITC labelled PSi-SPM (PSi-FITC) and Cy7 labelled PSi-SPM (PSi-
Cy7) we e p epa ed by o e nigh s i ing o 10 mg o PSi-SPM wi h
0.1 mg o FITC-NHS (The mo Fishe Scien ific, USA) and 0.1 mg o Cy7-
NHS (Lumip obe, Ge many) in DMF, espec i ely. The ob ained PSi-
FITC and PSi-Cy7 we e conjuga ed wi h HA using he EDC/NHS eac-
ion as desc ibed abo e o p oduce FITC labelled PSi-HA (PSi-FITC/HA)
and Cy7 labelled PSi-HA (PSi-Cy7/HA), espec i ely.
4.19. In i o adhesion o nanopa icles
FITC labelled PSi-HA we e used o imaging in all in i o adhesion
expe imen s. Heal hy and inflamed mucosa we e simula ed by coa ing
Lab-Tek™8-chambe slides (The mo Fishe Scien ific, USA) o 96-well
polys y ene pla es (Co ning, USA) wi h mucin om po cine s omach
(Sigma-Ald ich, USA) and human ans e in (Sigma-Ald ich, USA),
espec i ely [5]. B iefly, mucin solu ion (30 mg mL
−1
in HBSS) was
added o he chambe slides/pla es and incuba ed a oom empe a u e
o 2 h wi h gen le shaking. T ans e in solu ion (500 μgml
−1
in PBS)
was added o he chambe slides/pla es and incuba ed o e nigh a
37 °C. Chambe slides/pla es incuba ed wi h PBS o e nigh a 37 °C
we e used as uncoa ed chambe slides/pla es. A e incuba ion,
chambe slides/pla es we e washed wi h PBS o 3 imes. FITC labelled
BUDAP@PSi-HA we e dispe sed in PBS a a concen a ion o
50 μgml
−1
, and hen added o each well o he chambe slides/pla es.
The chambe slides/pla es we e gen ly shaken a oom empe a u e o
1 h. Wells we e hen washed wi h PBS o 3 imes. The chambe slides
we e imaged using con ocal mic oscope (Leica TCS SP5 II HCS A,
Ge many), and he fluo escence in ensi ies o he pla es we e quan ified
using Va ioskan™LUX (The mo Fishe Scien ific, USA).
In a second se o expe imen s, ca ionic b anched polye hylenimine
(PEI) (∼25,000 g mol
−1
, Sigma-Ald ich, USA) (10 mM, pH 4.0) was
added o he FITC labelled BUDAP@PSi-HA o con e i s su ace
cha ge om nega i e o posi i e, and he adhesion expe imen was
pe o med using uncoa ed-, mucin-coa ed, and ans e in-coa ed
chambe slides/pla es as desc ibed abo e.
4.20. DSS-induced coli is model
Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks) we e pu chased om Beijing Vi al
Ri e Labo a o y Animal Technology Co., L d. Mice we e ed o -
mula ed d inking wa e con aining 3% DSS (MW 36–50 kDa; MP
Biochemical, Hlki ch, F ance) ad libi um h oughou he expe imen
(day 0 o day 14). The body weigh s o mice we e moni o ed and he
weigh s we e eco ded as pe cen age o ini ial bodyweigh . Clinical
e alua ions including he assessmen o s ool consis ency and he
W. Li e al. Bioma e ials 185 (2018) 322–332
330