The institution of institutionalism: difference, universalism and the legacies of Institutional Critique

Full Te ms & Condi ions o access and use can be ound a h p://www. and online.com/ac ion/jou nalIn o ma ion?jou nalCode= c c20 Download by: [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] Da e: 18 Decembe 2017, A : 01:47 Cul u e, Theo y and C i ique ISSN: 1473-5784 (P in ) 1473-5776 (Online) Jou nal homepage: h p://www. and online.com/loi/ c c20 The ins i u ion o ins i u ionalism: di e ence, uni e salism and he legacies o Ins i u ional C i ique Ca los Ga ido Cas ellano To ci e his a icle: Ca los Ga ido Cas ellano (2017): The ins i u ion o ins i u ionalism: di e ence, uni e salism and he legacies o Ins i u ional C i ique, Cul u e, Theo y and C i ique, DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2017.1410438 To link o his a icle: h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/14735784.2017.1410438 Published online: 17 Dec 2017. Submi you a icle o his jou nal View ela ed a icles View C ossma k da a The ins i u ion o ins i u ionalism: di e ence, uni e salism and he legacies o Ins i u ional C i ique Ca los Ga ido Cas ellano Cen o de Es udos Compa a is as/Ins i u o de His ó ia de A e, Uni e sidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Po ugal ABSTRACT This ex analyses he ela ionship be ween ins i u ionalism, con ex and cul u al c i icism. I s main objec i e is o iden i y how uni e salism has pe mea ed he di e en wa es o Ins i u ional C i ique, condi ioning he sub e si e po en ial con e ed o c ea i e p ac ices and loca ing adical, al e na i e ins i u ionalism wi hin he na ow geo-cul u al landscape o mains eam biennials. Taking as poin o depa u e Cildo Mei eles’s pa icipa o y public in e en ion in documen a 11, I conside how ep esen a ional conce ns a e p i ileged is-à- is isual p ac ices ela ed o coloniali y and di e ence. F om ha posi ion, he a icle a gues ha only by challenging he assumed uni e sali y o he deba es on cul u al ins i u ionalism will we be able o s ess he ele ance o c i ique in add essing cul u al policies and non- ep esen a ional p ac ices. This implies con on ing he oublesome ela ionship be ween Ins i u ional C i ique and mode ni y om a ‘geog aphically-in o med’posi ion capable o ecognising ins i u ionalism as a he e ogeneous body o p ac ices ha a e being globally ans o med. To be e ec i e, a cul u al c i ique mus show he links be ween he majo a icula ions o powe and he mo e-o -less i ial aes he ics o e e yday li e. I mus e eal he sys ema ici y o social ela ions and hei compelling cha ac e o e e yone in ol ed, e en while i poin s o he speci ic discou ses, images and emo ional a i udes ha hide inequali y and aw io- lence. Holmes (2002: 107). Ins i u ionali y is i s and o emos a ques ion o scale. S imson, (2010: 161). 2002 Cildo Mei eles’s con ibu ion o documen a 11 ook he o m o a collabo a i e public p ojec . In Disappea ing Elemen /Disappea ed Elemen , Mei eles used he ne wo k o s ee endo s swa ming Kassel du ing he celeb a ion o documen a o sell un la ou ed popsicles. This in e en ion ook place in a ious loca ions in Kassel du ing he h ee mon hs o documen a. The ges u e o selling wa e in a mo e sophis ica ed o m g an s ins i u ional c i icism geopoli ical aspi a ions: on he one hand, he wo k deals wi h ma e ial exchanges and esou ces aking place in a ansna ional scena io; on he o he , i ope a es wi hin he quin essen ial in e na ional scena io o documen a, one o he © 2017 In o ma UK Limi ed, ading as Taylo & F ancis G oup CONTACT Ca los Ga ido Cas ellano [email p o ec ed] CULTURE, THEORY AND CRITIQUE, 2017 h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/14735784.2017.1410438 Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 mos ele an o ums o con empo a y a wo ldwide. Mei eles’pa icipa o y p ojec also engages he ela ionship be ween a p es ige, economics and ecology; in ha sense, he ac o selling wa e in he o m o popsicles appea s as a me apho o he ela ionship be ween a is ic p oduc ion, use and alue, while also alluding o how basic esou ces such as wa e a e becoming mo e and mo e sca ce. These a e jus some o he laye s a play in Mei eles’s in e en ion. Dealing wi h Disappea ing Elemen /Disappea ed Elemen , Alexande Albe o has also poin ed ou ha i accomplishes se e al goals: i con inues he unmasking o inequali ies be ween cen e and pe iphe y ca ied on by he B azilian a is ic a an -ga de o which Mei eles belongs; i denounces he ola ili y o a globalised and biennial-d i en a wo ld; i poses imely ques ions on ma e iali y, en i onmen alism, sus ainabili y, consu- me ism and p i a isa ion; and inally, i in e wea es ‘ins i u ions and global phenomena’ (Albe o 2006: 302), uncoupling he connec ion be ween Ins i u ional C i ique and local eali ies. Mei eles’s p ojec in documen a can also be in e p e ed as epi omising he con- inui ies wi h and dis ance om he i s mani es a ions o Ins i u ional C i ique in he 1960s and 1970s: 1 in Disappea ing Elemen , he objec o c i icism is no loca ed wi hin he ou walls o an a galle y o wi h a museum’s boa d o us ees; a he , Mei eles poin s a a much wide , global and in isible se o powe ela ions pe pe ua ed by biennials and mega-exhibi ions such as documen a.‘The whole s uc u e o he blockbus e exhibi- ion’, a gues Albe o, ‘is wha ul ima ely is commen ed and cas ed [sic] in o doub in Dis- appea ing Elemen /Disappea ed Elemen ’(303). This las poin bea s special in e es o he objec i es o his a icle. Wha does i mean o cas in o doub he ‘whole s uc u e o he blockbus e exhibi ion’ om wi hin? Wha does he selec ion o documen a o s and o ansna ional powe ela ions wi hin he a wo ld imply he e? Wha lessons can we lea n om Mei eles’s in e en ion? Is he e any o he way o wea ing oge he ‘ins i u ions and global phenomena’? Looking back o e almos 15 yea s, gi en he p oli e a ion o a p ojec s eme ging in he ansna ional con ex o a biennales and hei expansion ac oss he globe, he c i ical aspi a ions ha one can associa e wi h simila a is ic in e en ions ha e become less c i- ically incisi e due o hei equency. As Filipo ic (2005) has explained, al hough bien- nials eme ged wi h he in en ion o coun e ing he cen ali y o mains eam a museums, hey quickly became egula o y ins umen s se ing ou he ules o a is ic con- empo anei y. Fo Filipo ic, he consequences o his p ocess a e ambi alen . She w i es: These pe ennial exhibi ions …pe cei e hemsel es as empo ally punc ual in as uc u es ha emain o e e con empo a y and unbu dened by collec ing and p ese ing wha he aga ies o ime ende simply mode n. The aim o be he pa adigma ic al e na i e o he museum cu s bo h ways, howe e , wi h posi i e and nega i e dis inc ions. The p oli e a ion o biennials in he nine een-nine ies ende ed hem new p i ileged si es o cul u al ou ism and in oduced a ca ego y o a , he bombas ic p opo ions and hollow p emises o which ea ned i he name ‘biennial a ’, a si ua ion ha kno ed he inc easingly spec acula e en s o ma ke in e es s. Tha mega-exhibi ions can be comp omised is a equen lamen , bu in hei bes momen s, hey o e a coun e p oposal o he egula p og amming o he museum as well as occasions o a is s o espass ins i u ional walls and de y he nea pe ime e o which he adi ional ins i u ion o en s ic ly adhe es when i o ganizes 1 The wo k o a is s such as Hans Haacke, Daniel Bu en, Michael Ashe o Ma cel B oodhae s is commonly discussed in ela ion o his i s phase o Ins i u ional C i ique. 2C. GARRIDO CASTELLANO Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 exhibi ions (al hough museums, i mus be said, a e inc easingly challenging hei own once- s aid p o ocols. E en i he e is hen always a isk o ecupe a ion by ma ke o ces, p ojec s such as Mei e- les’s e ain he po en ial o pe o m a c i ique o ins i u ions. In hese p ojec s, he a is chooses a pa icula ins i u ional con ex , in his case ha o documen a, in o de o sub e i s alue sys em. Cu a ed by Okwui Enwezo ( he fi s non-Eu opean a di ec o o he e en ), documen a 11 in oduced a d as ic e amping o he biennial o ma : on his occasion, i included ansdisciplina y ‘pla o ms’in S . Lucia, New Delhi, Vienna and Lagos. The cu a o ial eam, composed o Ca los Basualdo, U e Me a Baue , Susanne Ghez, Sa a Maha aj, Ma k Nash, and Oc a io Zaya, was also a mo e e hnically and cul- u ally di e se han in p e ious edi ions. The challenge ha Mei eles posed o a biennales can be seen, hus, as holding global aspi a ions: wha he wo k seeks o commen on, wha is cas in o doub is no hing less han a whole sys em o exchange and ecogni ion. Howe e , in Disappea ing Elemen /Disappea ed Elemen , he symbol o ins i u ional powe , i s locus, is s ill iden ified wi h he si e o p i ilege ha Kassel and documen a con- s i u e. The c i ical po en ial o Disappea ing Elemen a ises om a con adic ion: on he one hand, he wo k challenges he a ibu ion o ins i u ional powe o he museum o he a galle y, loca ing i wi hin a ansna ional ne wo k holding a biennales; on he o he , he ‘p o incial’locus o documen a is s ill chosen as he pe ec loca ion o g ound ha ansna ional ac o c i icism. Al hough sympa he ic in many espec s o Albe o’s app oach, my in e es s he e will none heless ollow a di e en pa h. Re u ning o Mei eles’s in e en ion as a poin o depa u e o hink abou Ins i u ional C i ique’s democ a ising ole, in his ex I will a gue ha space, and mo e speci ically he loca ion o ins i u ional powe and ins i u ional c i ique wi hin he speci ic place o he mega-exhibi ion, a ises as one o he main pi alls in new a emp s o ede ine bo h p ac ices. 2 Touching b ie ly on Disappea ing Elemen , his a icle seeks o unde s and how ce ain places can s ill be seen as mo e sui able han o he s o in oduce discussions on global con igu a ions. This is by no means an elemen exclusi e o Disappea ing Elemen . On he con a y; whe eas he e has been a ecen in e es in expanding he scope o ins i u ional p ac ices o include decolonial, ins i- uen , in as uc u al and o ganisa ional app oaches and ac ions, hese ha e no been ol- lowed by a (much-needed) p ocess o e ising how he a icula ion be ween ‘ins i u ions and global phenomena’does no cons i u e a na u al co ela ion. In ha sense, del ing in o and in e wining al e na i e geog aphies and genealogies o ins i u ional ges u es a ising om con ex s o he han Eu ame ica s ill a ises as an objec- i e ye o be accomplished. In sho , when a is s a emp o app oach ins i u ional powe no as i is embodied in a physical museum o galle y space, bu a he as a se o ansna- ional ules and powe ela ions, he place associa ed wi h c i icism con inues o be coupled wi h he p o incial scena io o mains eam Wes e n biennales. In a seminal a icle i s published in 1974, he Aus alian a c i ic and his o ian Te y Smi h de ined p o incialism as an obliga ion o some a is ic con ex s o become acquain ed wi h he majo ends in Eu opean and Ame ican a , which would also u n hei 2 The e is no single de ini ion o ins i u ional powe . The a emp s a es aging he po en iali y o his kind o c ea i e p ac- ice a e, as we will see, e y much dependen on ha ambigui y, as well as on he shi ing condi ions unde which ins i- u ional powe is exe ed and displayed. CULTURE, THEORY AND CRITIQUE 3 Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 p oduc ion in o some hing ou moded o dependen upon hese ends. 3 S ongly ejec ing his logic, Smi h posed he ques ion o he p o incialism o a me opolises such as New Yo k, poin ing ou how some a is s and a mo emen s a e g an ed uni e sal alue, whe eas o he (equally ansna ional) genealogies a e unde s ood as belonging o a unique con ex . Following his logic, i is possible o a i m ha he genealogy o Ins i- u ional C i ique emains one o he mos p o incial and geog aphically na ow genealogies o con empo a y a is ic p ac ice, 4 despi e he ecen ly exp essed in e es in inco po a ing a ew cases as global ‘p eceden s’o ‘in luences’o he canonical, Wes e n genealogies o Ins i u ional C i ique and Concep ual A . 5 Explo ing he consequences o his p o incial- ism and inding po en ial c i ical answe s o i a e he main asks pu sued in his a icle. Ins i u ional c i ique Be o e unde aking his ask, a b ie desc ip ion o Ins i u ional C i ique’s objec i es and genealogies is in o de . Ins i u ional C i ique eme ged in he 1960s and 1970s as a way o gene a ing awa eness o he ins i u ional con ex in which a wo ks we e inse ed, while also c i icising his medium. Buchloh (1990: 136) connec ed he appea ance o his in e es in engaging ins i u ions c i ically wi h he e olu ion o Minimal and Concep ual A , poin ing ou how a wo ks we e indissolubly connec ed o he ins i u ional con ex in which hey a e displayed, while highligh ing he impo ance o issues o au onomy and owne ship. He e ogeneous in he o ms adop ed, he i s a emp s o engage c i ically wi h he ins i u ion ocussed on e ealing ha he appa en ly neu al walls o he museum o a galle y in ac ep esen ed a complex, a - om-innocen socioeconomic sys em. By e ealing he elemen s a play behind his neu al image, a is s sough o gen- e a e awa eness among he public ega ding he ole o cul u al ins i u ions in socie y. The ac i i y o Hans Haacke in he ea ly 1970s is symp oma ic o his in e es . Fo example, in his MoMA poll displayed in 1970 he asked isi o s o o e on poli ically o ien ed opics. One yea la e , he disclosed he eal-es a e holdings o one o he Guggenheim Museum us ees. The lis o a is s associa ed wi h his i s wa e o Ins i u ional C i ique is com- monly educed o he qua e o med by Haacke, Daniel Bu en, Michael Ashe and Ma cel B ood hae s. The wo k o hese a is s is also commi ed o laying ba e he con adic ions o ins i u ional neu ali y, be hese physical, adminis a i e o economic. In he 1980s and 1990s, he wo k o he membe s o he so-called second wa e o Ins i- u ional C i ique ma ked a mo e away om limi a ions o his ‘publicness’. P e iously, 3 Smi h (1974:58–59) summa ises his logic by a guing ha he p o incial a is , hen, sees his commi men o a in e ms o s yles o a o compe ing no ions o a ’shis o y –all de e mined in he me opoli an cen e . The main s uc u e o his sel -image is accep ed, no in en ed. Sel -cons uc ion, a le els ha he migh eel o be undamen al, cons an ly eludes him, especially as he makes his a . 4 The e a e, howe e , some ema kable excep ions. See, o example, he deba es ga he ed in he las decade by he Con- cep ualismos del Su : h ps:// edcsu .ne / o EIPCP T ans o m (h p://eipcp.ne /) Ne wo ks. On he impo ance o ex adis- ciplina y in e ac ions in b eaking wi h he hie a chies o he a wo ld, see Expósi o (2006), Holmes (2011). 5 The p o incialism o Ins i u ional C i ique has been poin ed ou in se e al imes, al hough i has no been ackled deeply enough. Examples o his can be ound in Sk ebowski (2013), G een (2006,2014), Nowo ny (2009) and G aw (2005,2006). The disc epancies be ween hese au ho s e idence how unde sco ing he need o o e come he canonisa ion o Ins i- u ional C i ique has no been ollowed by a c i ical e hinking o he global se ings in which ins i u ional dynamics a e inse ed nowadays. 4C. GARRIDO CASTELLANO Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 c i icali y was dependen on he belie ha an asep ic, ‘ou side ’posi ion was possible o he a is . Fo a is s like And ea F ase , F ed Wilson o Renee G een, his is no longe possible. The in e io isa ion o ins i u ional powe would be one o he majo di e ences wi h he p e ious body o a is s, uelled by he expe ience o seeing how ins i u ions ‘ins i- u ionalise’c i ique o hei own pu poses. 6 A is s began concei ing o hemsel es as pa o an a sys em ha canno be educed o he ma e ial symbol o he museum o he a galle y. On he con a y, he whole sys em o in e pe sonal, socioeconomic ela ions in ol ed in con empo a y a would be conside ed ins i u ional. A his poin , he objec- i e o c i icism changed: he poin would no longe be o look o hin s and unco e he u h; a he , a is s would a emp o de e mine how can hey make use o hei own pos- i ion o p i ilege wi hin he a sys em (wi hin he ins i u ion) in o de o ans o m i . Ins i u ional c i ique’s blind spo s The claim ha he locus o ins i u ional powe has emained a ached o a se o ixed places may seem un ealis ic in ligh o he inc easing ansna ionalism o which he a wo ld is subjec ed. Nowadays i would seem naï e o ep esen ins i u ional powe h ough he walls o a museum o an a galle y. Ra he , a ague se o economic and pol- i ical ela ions wi hou a ixed cen e and ope a ing globally is he shape ha comes o ou mind when imagining he ins i u ional side o a is ic con empo anei y (see Smi h 2012, 2016). A is s like F ed Wilson, And ea F ase and Renee G een ha e made g ea con i- bu ions in ans o ming he ‘non-si e’o he a exhibi ion in o he ubiqui ous si e o a is- ic p oduc ion (see G een 2000), and in in oducing issues o ace and gende in o con e sa ions on ins i u ionalism. 7 The wo k o F ase (2005) has been pa icula ly use ul in cla i ying ha a is s a e also pa o he ins i u ional ab ic e en when hey c i- icise i , being he e o e incapable o de e mining a eali y ou side ins i u ional powe . Howe e , i is s iking how discussions o Ins i u ional C i ique ha e emained a ached o an engagemen wi h speci ic loca ions and con ex s in a ew well-known ins i u ional se ings such as majo museums o Wes e n-based biennials. 8 While many new oices ha e been in i ed o he deba es on Ins i u ional C i ique, hus challenging he iew o he mo emen as a de i a ion o he (Eu opean and Ame ican) a an -ga de, he his o ies o ins i u ional powe , he debunking o ins i u ional au ho i y and he a icula ion o s a egic and ac i e co olla ies o Ins i u ional C i ique’s nega i i y coming om he Global Sou h a e s ill unacknowledged o , o a la ge deg ee, absen . 9 This absence ma ks a con inui y ha ex ends h ough he e olu ion o Ins i u ional C i ique 6 This idea was al eady p esen in Buchlow’s i s a emp o de ine Ins i u ional C i ique. In his classic essay ‘Concep ual A 1962–1969: F om he Aes he ic o Adminis a ion o he C i ique o Ins i u ions’(1990: 140), he a i ms, p ophe ically: The c i ical annihila ion o cul u al con en ions i sel immedia ely acqui es he condi ions o he spec acle, ha he insis ence on a is ic anonymi y and he demoli ion o au ho ship p oduces ins an b and names and iden i iable p oduc s, and ha he campaign o c i ique con en ions o isuali y wi h ex ual in e en ions, billboa d signs, anonymous handou s, and pamphle s ine i ably ends by ollowing he p e-es ablished mechanisms o ad e ising and ma ke ing campaigns. 7 Wilson’sMining he Museum emains as one o he mos celeb a ed s eps in ha sense. See Do o (2011). 8 The inco po a ion o biennials as symbols o ins i u ional p i ilege does no con adic his; on he con a y, i has ended o na ow he lis o usual suspec s. 9 The unde s anding o ‘Sou h’p oposed in his a icle is ela ed o pos colonial c i icism’s in e es in expanding and upda - ing he no ion o Thi d Wo ld. See, o example, P ashad (2013). CULTURE, THEORY AND CRITIQUE 5 Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 ac oss decades, mani es a ions and in e es s. F om he ‘phenomenological’and na ional app oach o ins i u ional powe p esen in he so called ‘ i s wa e’, o he inclusion o gende -based and e hnic app oaches ha ook place in he 1980s and ea ly 1990s exem- pli ied in he wo k o F ed Wilson o Renee G een, o he mos ecen a emp s in esu - ec ing Ins i u ional C i ique (see, o example, Albe o and S imson 2009; Raunig and Ray 2009; S eye l 2006), he imagina ion o ins i u ional powe and he a ins i u ion (singula ) emains a neu al, objec i e and one-sided p esence i espec i e o whe e i ma e ialises. Gi en his p edicamen , a po en ial objec i e a ises: o unde s and how Ins i u ional C i ique’s uni e salism has emained un ouched despi e he ‘pos colonial u n’o a is s like F ed Wilson and Renee G een, despi e p ojec s such as Disappea ing Elemen . The app oach o uni e salism p oposed in his a icle bo ows om pos colonial heo y’s in e es in c i icising how ce ain au ho s and ideas a e con e ed uni e sal alidi y, whe eas o he s a e con ined o na owe , ‘local’cul u al con igu a ions. In his seminal wo k P o incializing Eu ope, Dipesh Chak aba y (2000) al eady s essed how he dialec ic be ween uni e salism and p o incialism was c ucial in he cons uc ion o in ellec ual and his o ical adi ions. 10 Wi h ega d o a ins i u ions and Ins i u ional C i ique, uni e s- alism can be app oached in a leas h ee di e en ways, all o hem closely ela ed o he c i ical aspi a ions ou lined abo e: i s , he widesp ead exis ence o con empo a y a ins i u ions a ound he globe canno be de ached om he c ea ion and global expansion o he museum unde s ood as a mode n, Wes e n con i ance de e mining wha should be displayed and how (see Cli o d 1988; Hodde 2012). Secondly, museums and cul u al ins i u ions endea ou o democ a ise cul u e and o ha e a public impac while expanding hei social con ibu ion o inc easingly la ge sec o s o he popula ion. Finally, he c i i- cal ask de eloped by a is s using Ins i u ional C i ique is supposed o eclaim, s ess o eco e his public commi men , hus bols e ing he social ole o cul u al ins i u ions. Unde his logic, he p i ilege o exhibi ional o e in as uc u al o ms in he cons uc- ion o wo ld a iews and he con inemen o ins i u ional powe wi hin a na ow ange o Wes e n a e en s should be iden i ied as pa o a mo e complex dema ca ion, coming along wi h a pa allel p ocess o de-ins i u ionalising and cap u ing pos colonial isual p ac ices. In o he wo ds, he global display o many p ac ices ela ed o pos colonial cul- u al con igu a ions o en akes place only a e he complex nego ia ions be ween a is s and (local and ansna ional) ins i u ional en i ies a e e ased om he equa ion. Wo ld a iews ha e p i ileged display o e in as uc u e, epheme ali y and lexibili y o e du - a ion, exhibi ing o e ins i u ing. The la e e ms a e no absen om cu en deba es in c ea i e p ac ices, bu hey a e no mally a ached in con empo a y c i icism o he cen es o cul u al and economic powe . Fo ins ance, p ojec s such as he Cen e o His- o ical Reenac men s o Dis ic 6 in Sou h A ica o collabo a i e, esea ch-d i en p o- jec s such as he Pan A ican Ne wo k o Independen Con empo anei y (PANIC) a e a he o e on o discussions on al e na i e a spaces and ho izon ally led ins i u ions. 11 These ini ia i es, howe e , a e o en s ill in e p e ed as bela ed eplicas o Wes e n 10 Chak aba y (2000: 5) ou lines how a simila dynamic applies o ime as well, a guing ha ‘I is only wi hin some e y pa icula adi ions o hinking ha we ea undamen al hinke s who a e long dead and gone no only as people belonging o hei own imes bu also as hough hey we e ou own con empo a ies’. 11 Fo a discussion on A ican al e na i e ins i u ional p ac ices, see Kouoh (2013). The PANIC p ojec can be accessed a : h p://panicpla o m.ne / 6C. GARRIDO CASTELLANO Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 phenomena, and consequen ly iden i ied as de i a i e. Some hing simila happens in socially engaged a , whe e ‘pe iphe al’ini ia i es (Tucumán A de and Ala Plás ica in A gen ina o he F en e 3 de Fe e ei o in B azil can be men ioned among he mos ac i e and inno a i e cases) a e playing a c ucial ole in g an ing socially engaged a i s in e na ional ele ance (see Kes e 2011). The in e na ional pu chase o ce ain o ms o a is ic c ea ion, in o he wo ds, can only be unde s ood as he esul o he c oss- ings eme ging ou o global expe iences and expe imen s, in which ‘Sou he n’ini ia i es a e in many cases leading he way. These ini ia i es a e ede ining wha we unde s and an a ins i u ion o be, hus challenging he Wes e n echnology o he museum and i s impac on e i o ies subjec ed o di e en o ms o colonial powe ela ions. Because o his, i is impossible o calib a e he enhanced weigh o al e na i e ins i u ional p ac ices in a p o incial way, wi hou aking in o accoun ha no el y and inno a ion a e o igina - ing mo e and mo e om ‘Sou he n’a is ic con ex s. In a simila way, i is also impossible o main ain a iew o he p oduc ion associa ed wi h hese con ex s limi ed o he o m o he exhibi ion o he biennial. As he examples o e ed he e e eal, nowadays an inc eas- ingly la ge numbe o a is s and a p ac i ione s om all o e he wo ld a e p oducing al e na i e o ganisa ional modes, con on ing cen al in as uc u al conce ns o hei socie ies and c ea ing endu ing pla o ms and ne wo ks. I is om ha s andpoin ha he selec ion o documen a as a pa adigm o ansien ansna ional ela ions can be seen as p oblema ic. Uni e salism, hen and now Disappea ing Elemen /Disappea ed Elemen e eals bo h he pi alls and he pe sis ence o Ins i u ional C i ique when add essing ins i u ional powe in he o m o ansna ional a biennials. Whoe e buys Mei eles’s un la ou ed popsicles is no jus buying a e eshmen : she is also denouncing he commodi ica ion o na u al esou ces, c i icising he use- alue o a is ic exchanges, and censu ing he spec acula cha ac e o mega-exhibi ions like doc- umen a (see Mille 2005). The e is, o cou se, su icien ambi alence in he wo k o allow an opposi e in e p e a ion: we could equally a i m ha ha pe son is aking pa in he commodi ica ion o na u al esou ces, sanc ioning he use- alue o a is ic exchanges and suppo ing he spec acula cha ac e o mega-exhibi ions. This ambi alence is sha ed by many ins alla ions appealing o he implica ion o spec a o s o biennial- based p ojec s, 12 which will no be u he discussed he e. I Mei eles’s wo k in documen a is einse ed he e, i is because i epi omises a mo e c ucial con adic ion: no ma e wha in e p e a ion we make o i , he p ojec s ands o a loca ed ma e ialisa ion o an in an- gible ne wo k o inancial global exchanges, a ne wo k whose angibili y he subsequen yea s o he p esen cen u y would pain ully e eal. The p ojec is, in his sense, dependen on a concep ualisa ion o biennial space as he app op ia e place o c i icism wi h uni e - sal bea ing. Being e sa ile, mul i-laye ed and poin ed as i is, Disappea ing Elemen /Dis- appea ed Elemen seeks a once o make an in e en ion in o global poli ics and he a wo ld. Whe eas he buye o Mei eles’s popsicles is p opelled in o he ubiqui y and 12 The i s e e ence ha comes o mind he e is ine i ably Felix González-To es’sUn i led. Po ai o Ross in L.A. Al hough González-To es’s p ac ice has had a as lis o ollowe s, he poli ical and ac i is dimensions o his wo k a e no so o en appa en . Fo a discussion on how Rela ional Aes he ics has app oached González-To es, see Bishop (2004,2006,2012), Kes e (2004), Pu es and Aslan Selze (2015), W igh (2004). CULTURE, THEORY AND CRITIQUE 7 Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 non-si e o global capi alism, his happens h ough he e y speci ic landscape o documen a. The ac o buying and ea ing he popsicle s ands o in e ening and dis up ing he ealm o he poli ical. 13 Unde s ood om his angle (gi en he expe ience o ecen yea s) and com- pa ed o less cosme ic and mo e loca ion-speci ic o ms o a is ic in e en ion applied o en i onmen al issues such as he Dako a Access Pipeline p o es in he Uni ed S a es, he wo k o a is s such as Ra i Aga wal and Tusha Joag in India, o he ac i i y o Goddy Leye in de elic spaces in Douala, Came oon, Disappea ing Elemen enac s an illusion o uni- e salism pe o med by he a is and sanc ioned by he ins i u ion in he p ecise and sa e- gua ded space o he biennial. Ins i u ional C i ique’s main aspi a ion ( o ensu e he ul ilmen o a ins i u ions’democ a ising and public ole), when appea ing in i s mos educ i e and con la ing e sion, namely uni e salism, can also ep esen i s main bu den. The consequences o his a i ma ion a e ele an since hey de e mine he cu ency o c i icism a a ime ma ked by commonali y and al e na i e, c i ical ins i u ionalism, bu also by p eca iousness, p i a isa ion and a banking (see S eye l 2016). I is no jus ha ‘Sou he n’his o ies o ins i u ionalism ha e been o go en and disca ded, he eby embedding Ins i u ional C i ique’s his o y exclusi ely wi hin he mos canonical e sion o he a an -ga de (B ian-Wilson 2003) bu , a he , ha a whole no ion o wha ins i- u ional powe is has been ins i u ionalised, uni e salised and made na u al, condi ioning no only wha is pe cei ed as powe , bu also he po en ial esponses o i . The clamou o uni e salism in Ins i u ional C i ique is indissolubly linked o i s belonging o mode ni y and o i s aspi a ions o b ing back a ’s public dimension (Albe o 2009). In 1974 Hans Haacke a gued (2005, 53): I espec i e o he ‘a an -ga de’o ‘conse a i e’,‘ igh is ’o ‘le is ’s ance a museum migh ake, i is, among o he hings, a ca ie o socio-poli ical conno a ions. By he e y s uc u e o i s exis ence, i is a poli ical ins i u ion. This is as ue o museums in Moscow o Peking as o a museum in Cologne o he Guggenheim Museum. The ques ion o p i a e o public unding o he ins i u ion does no a ec his axiom. The aspi a ion owa d anspa ency in ins i u ional powe ound in a is s like Haacke also exp esses a desi e o ans o m ins i u ional space in o a public sphe e. By denouncing he supposed neu ali y o he whi e cube, he i s p ac i ione s o Ins i u ional C i ique a emp ed o display he implici mechanisms o poli ical and economic powe and p i i- lege unde lying he appa en ly democ a ic walls o a is ic ins i u ions. The a is ic p ac- ices ha , in he la e 1960s and 1970s, came o be e e ed o as Ins i u ional C i ique e isi ed ha adical p omise o he Eu opean Enligh enmen wi h he in en o con on - ing he a ins i u ions wi h he claim ha hey we e no su icien ly commi ed o he pu sui o publicness ha had b ough hem in o being in he i s place (S imson 2010), le alone s imula ing o ul illing. In his sense, he wo ks o a is s such as Hans Haacke and Daniel Bu en we e coupled wi h a p omise: he p oduc ion o public exchange, o a public subjec , o a public sphe e wi hin he speci ic ield o a . 14 13 This nega i i y implies a e usal o engage on a close le el wi h he economic exchanges which a wo ks c i icise. Kes e (2013) loca es his ea wi hin an aes he ic ajec o y o dis ancing ha ex ends om Kan and Schille o Ado no. The consequence o his dis ancing would be o place he ho izon o change always wi hin some ung aspable u u e, con- sequen ly dismissing any u gency o engagemen in he he e and now. 14 In S eye l’s wo ds (2006): ‘ he claims ha he i s wa e o ins i u ional c i ique oiced we e o cou se ounded in con- empo a y heo ies o he public sphe e, and based on an in e p e a ion o he cul u al ins i u ion as a po en ial public sphe e’. 8C. GARRIDO CASTELLANO Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017 Kes e , G an . 2015.‘On he Rela ionship be ween Theo y and P ac ice in Socially-Engaged A ’. A ailable online a h p://www.abladeo g ass.o g/ e ile-g ound/on- he- ela ionship-be ween- heo y-and-p ac ice-in-socially-engaged-a / (accessed 22 No embe 2017) Kouoh, K. (ed) 2013.Condi ion Repo : Symposium on Building A Ins i u ions in A ica. Os inde n: Ha je Kan z Ve lag. Mille , John. 2005.‘The Show You Lo e o Ha e: A Psychology o he Mega-Exhibi ion’. In Reesa G eenbe g, B uce Fe guson and Sandy Nai ne (ed), Thinking Abou Exhibi ions. London and New Yo k: Rou ledge, 192–196. Nowo ny, S e an. 2009.‘An i-Canoniza ion: The Di e encial Knowledge o Ins i u ional C i ique’. In Ge ald Raunig and Gene Ray (ed), A and Con empo a y C i ical P ac ice. Rein en ing Ins i u ional C i ique. London: MayFly, 21–29. P ashad, V. 2013.The Poo e Na ions: A Possible His o y o he Global Sou h. New Yo k: The New P ess. Pu es, T. and Aslan Selze , S. (ed) 2015.Wha We Wan Is F ee: C i ical Exchanges in Recen A . New Yo k: S a e Uni e si y o New Yo k P ess. Raunig, Ge ald. 2007.‘Ins i uen P ac ices, No. 2. Ins i u ional C i ique, Cons i uen Powe , and he Pe sis ence o Ins i u ing’. A ailable online a h p://eipcp.ne / ans e sal/0507/ aunig/en (accessed 22 No embe 2017) Raunig, G. and Ray, G. (ed) 2009.A and Con empo a y C i ical P ac ice: Rein en ing Ins i u ional C i ique. London: MayFlyBooks. Sheikh, Simon. 2006.‘No es on Ins i u ional C i ique’. A ailable online: h p://eipcp.ne / ans e sal/0106/sheikh/en (accessed 22 No embe 2017) Shole e, G ego y. 2016.‘Me ciless Aes he ic: Ac i is A as he Re u n o Ins i u ional C i ique. A Response o Bo is G oys’.Field. A Jou nal o Socially-Engaged A 4. A ailable online a h p:// ield-jou nal.com/issue-4/me ciless-aes he ic-ac i is -a -as- he- e u n-o -ins i u ional-c i ique- a- esponse- o-bo is-g oys (accessed 22 No embe 2017) Sk ebowski, Luke. 2013.‘A e Hans Haacke’.Thi d Tex 27:1, 115–130. Smi h, Te y. 1974.‘The P o incialism P oblem’.A o um 13:1, 54–59. Smi h, T. 2012.Thinking Con empo a y Cu a ing. New Yo k: Independen Cu a o s In e na ional. Smi h, T. 2016.The Con empo a y Composi ion. Be lin: S e nbe g P ess. S eye l, Hi o. 2006.‘The Ins i u ion o C i ique’. A ailable online a h p://eipcp.ne / ans e sal/ 0106/s eye l/en (accessed 22 No embe 2017) S eye l, Hi o. 2016.‘A Tank in a Pedes al’.E-Flux 70. A ailable online a h p://www.e- lux.com/ jou nal/70/60543/a- ank-on-a-pedes al-museums-in-an-age-o -plane a y-ci il-wa / (accessed 22 No embe 2017) S imson, Blake. 2010.‘Ins i u ionali y as Enligh enmen ’. In Pascal Gielen (ed), Ins i u ional A i udes. Ams e dam: Valiz, 141–167. W igh , S ephen. 2004.‘The Delica e Essence o A is ic Collabo a ion’.Thi d Tex 18:6, 533–545. CULTURE, THEORY AND CRITIQUE 15 Downloaded by [Uni e si a ea de Medicina si Fa macie] a 01:47 18 Decembe 2017