scieee Open visual document viewer

Multi-carrier modulations over sparse channels: communication, channel estimation, and radar sensing

Gaudio, Lorenzo

Abstract

Every year, in every field, the research introduces many novelties to contribute to the improvement of the state-of-the-art technologies. Under this context, the upgrade in terms of hardware capabilities and functionalities necessitates a constantly updated definition of the software, to be able to exploit all the possibilities owned by each single equipment. By mostly focusing on communication, i.e., the capability to send useful information from a source to a destination, the research looks forward to the definition of new communication standards, to break the limits imposed by outdated mechanisms and rules. Under this context, the upcoming technology for wireless and digital communications is the 5G standard, which brings improvements in both hardware equipment and software definition. Differently from its predecessor, i.e., the LTE (4G) standard, many new use cases and scenarios will be introduced. For instance, the improvements move towards the maximization of the data rate, to support the growing and massive amount of traffic data (especially from mobile users), the minimization of the latency, to enable new delay-intolerant services, and to optimize the energy consumption of any device, together with its cost. From a more technical point of view and of relevant interest for this dissertation, new vehicular communication (V2V, V2X) scenarios are going to be studied, by mostly focusing on millimeter wave frequency bands, strictly linked to the definition of massive MIMO antenna systems exploiting huge antenna gains through beamforming, necessary to contrast the high propagation loss typical of that frequencies. Under this context, against common and well known radar systems, able to efficiently detect and locate a target within the range-velocity plane, new joint radar and communications techniques are taking part of the current literature. These system are mainly focused on the transmission of useful information towards the targets, which are, thus, not only “passively” detected, and a single equipment is able to perform both operational modes, avoiding to split the functionalities between two distinct subsystems (with increased cost and complexity). Hence, there are mainly two approaches to solve the aforementioned problem. The first one considers the application of common radar waveforms, adapted to carry useful information with them. The second one, which is the one explored in this dissertation, takes into account typical communication waveforms (single- or multi-carrier), and, while communication tasks come naturally, the radar processing is performed with novel methods exploiting the knowledge of the transmitted information (known by both transmitter and receiver, if physically colocated), thus differs from a more direct, or “radar-like”, threshold analysis of the backscattered power from the target. The choice of the communication waveform is subject to a non trivial tradeoff. On one hand, the system aims the maximization of the communication achievable rate, i.e., the amount of information sent in a time-frequency window. On the other hand, radar tasks have to be performed with as much precision as possible, in order to correctly localize a target in all dimensions, i.e., range, velocity, and space (angular) location. Typically, pure radar tasks are performed with chirp-like pulses, i.e., short single-carrier impulses with large bandwidth, such that the total energy delivered towards the targets is compensated by the band occupation of the signal. Thus, the joint definition of a short pulse, together with large bandwidth, leads to a very precise localization of the target over the three aforementioned domains. However, the amount of (possible) useful information, impressed on top of such chirp, is poor. A solution to improve the communication rate is the use of multi-carrier digital waveforms, modulating information symbols not only in time domain (as single-carrier) but also in the frequency band, split in many subcarriers each occupied by a different modulation symbol. However, limitations are linked to the definition of the symbol time and the subcarrier spacing, which are in a one-to-one relation, and a good localization is not only challenging, for instance, in terms of signal processing algorithms, but also definitely sub-optimal with respect to single-carrier solutions, but this is the cost to pay in order to bring communication features together with radar tasks. In conclusion, the current literature is moving towards the definition of new multi-carrier schemes able to break the limits, in terms on communica- tion rate, imposed by classical radar waveforms, and the optimization of the tradeoff between the two different tasks is an open problem, whose optimal solutions have not been defined yet. The choice of the multi-carrier modulation for joint radar and communica tion falls into two distinct waveforms, i.e., orthogonal frequency-division mul- tiplexing (OFDM) modulation and orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation. OFDM is the most popular multi-carrier modulation of recent years, widely studied and standardized in most of the current communication standards, including 5G. The motivation of this choice is simple: thanks to the application of a cyclic prefix between symbols, i.e., a guard interval to prevent inter-symbol interference, and under the assumption of absence of inter-carrier interference, which holds under reasonable amount of the Doppler effect and subcarrier spacing, the communication channel can be diagonalized and symbol-by-symbol detection performed. Clearly, the appealing simplicity of detection makes OFDM the best choice for modern digital communications. On the other hand, OTFS is a modulation waveform with two big differences with respect to its direct competitor. First, it does not necessitate the insertion of the cyclic prefix, achieving a better communications rate, i.e., more information is sent over a time-frequency window, but at the cost of a more complex detection approach, working blockwise and not symbol-by-symbol. Second, OTFS is not sensitive to delay and Doppler shifts, meaning that its performance is kept constant whatever the distance and the speed between transmitter and (target) receiver. This feature is very appealing for joint radar and communication tasks, being the scenario very dynamical, with possible remarkable Doppler shifts and delays, increased by considering the round-trip time between radar transmitter and target. Based on the aforementioned analysis, in this dissertation we take care of a fair comparison between the two digital modulation formats, from the point of view of radar, parameter estimation, achievable communication rate, channel estimation, and more other tasks, to determine their positive and negative aspects, such that a system designer is able to choose the most suitable waveform for a given scenario or application.

Full text

UNIVERSIT ` A DEGLI STUDI DI PARMA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN “TECNOLOGIE DELL’INFORMAZIONE” CICLO XXXIII Mul i-Ca ie Modula ions O e Spa se Channels: Communica ion, Channel Es ima ion, and Rada Sensing Coo dina o e: Chia .mo P o . Ma co Loca elli Tu o e: Chia .mo P o . Giulio Cola olpe Chia .mo P o . Giuseppe Cai e Do o ando: Lo enzo Gaudio Anni 2017/2020 a chi c ede in me Con en s In oduc ion 1 S a e o he a 5 1 Mul i Ca ie Modula ions 9 1.1 The Communica ion Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.2 O hogonal F equency Di ision Mul iplexing (OFDM) Modu- la ion ................................ 11 1.2.1 Inpu Ou pu Rela ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.3 O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion . . . . 16 1.3.1 Sys em Model and De ini ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1.3.2 Modula ion and T ansmission o e he Channel . . . . . 18 1.3.3 Demodula ion........................ 20 1.3.4 Special Case: Rec angula Wa e o ms . . . . . . . . . . 25 1.3.5 Conside a ions on ma ix Ψ................ 27 1.3.6 Symbols shi wi hin he Dopple -delay g id . . . . . . . 32 1.3.7 Gene al Wa e o ms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1.3.8 The C oss-Ambigui y Func ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2 ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion 39 2.1 Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 2.1.1 OFDM ........................... 39 i ii Con en s 2.1.1.1 Maximum Likelihood Es ima o . . . . . . . . 39 2.1.1.2 C ame´ -Rao lowe bound (CRLB) . . . . . . . 41 2.1.2 OTFS ............................ 43 2.1.2.1 Maximum Likelihood Es ima o . . . . . . . . 43 2.1.2.2 C am´e -Rao Lowe Bound (CRLB) . . . . . . 48 2.1.2.3 ML Wa e all Analysis o Single Pa h . . . . . 49 2.2 Rada Resolu ion and Mul i-Ta ge De ec ion . . . . . . . . . . 53 2.3 Simula ionResul s ......................... 55 2.3.1 Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion . . . . . . . . . 55 2.3.2 Join Rada and Communica ion Pe o mance . . . . . . 57 2.3.3 Sel -In e e ence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3 ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions 65 3.1 In oduc ion............................. 65 3.2 Physicalmodel ........................... 68 3.2.1 OTFS Inpu Ou pu Rela ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.2.2 Beam o ming ma ices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.3 Join De ec ion and Pa ame e s Es ima ion . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3.3.1 Successi e In e e ence Cancella ion (SIC) and Join Ta - ge De ec ion and Pa ame e s Es ima ion Algo i hm . . 76 3.3.2 Reduced-Complexi y Pa ame e Es ima ion . . . . . . . 79 3.3.3 C am´e -Rao Lowe Bound (CRLB) . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 3.4 Nume ical Resul s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 3.4.1 Simula ion Resul s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 4 OTFS De ec ion 91 4.1 In oduc ion............................. 91 4.2 TheDe ec o s............................ 93 4.2.1 P oposed MP-based de ec o (“Ma ix Galgo i hm” — MPG)............................ 93 4.2.2 Ano he MP-based algo i hm (“Ma ix Ψalgo i hm” — MPΨ)............................ 97 Con en s iii 4.2.3 Linea block-wise MMSE equaliza ion . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.3 Pe o mance o Sepa a ed De ec ion and Decoding . . . . . . . 99 5 Channel Es ima ion 105 5.1 In oduc ion............................. 105 5.2 OFDM Modula ion and he CS Algo i hm . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 5.2.1 The LASSO Sol e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 5.2.1.1 Complexi y o he LASSO Sol e and S ep Size Re inemen ....................114 5.2.1.2 So -Th esholding Ope a o . . . . . . . . . . . 115 5.2.1.3 Nes e o ’s Accele a ion Fac o . . . . . . . . . 117 5.2.2 Pilo Scheme ........................118 5.2.3 Recei ed Samples Exp ession — Real and App oxima ed Channel Condi ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 5.3 OTFS Modula ion and he P oposed Es ima ion Algo i hm . . 120 5.3.1 Pilo Scheme ........................122 5.3.2 Channel Es ima ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 5.4 Compa ison in Te ms o P ag ama ic Capaci y . . . . . . . . . 127 5.4.1 Simula ion Resul s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.5 Conclusions.............................137 Bibliog aphy 145 Lis o Figu es 1.1 Channeldomains........................... 10 1.2 OTFSsys emmodel ........................ 16 1.3 Di ichle unc ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 1.4 Dopple -delay shi example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1.5 Two dimensional Di ichle unc ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 1.6 C oss-ambigui y unc ion examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.1 Wa e all beha io . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2.2 RMSE cu es o ange and eloci y, and Gaussian capaci y . . 58 2.3 RMSE cu es o mul i-pa h case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 2.4 RMSE sel -in e e ence cu es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.1 B oadcas ing and acking scena ios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.2 Recei e beam con igu a ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.3 T ansmi e beam o ming examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.4 RMSE o a single a ge and de ec ion w. . . dis ance . . . . . 84 3.5 RMSE o wo a ge s including de ec ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 3.6 Example o masking e ec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 3.7 T acking scena io wi h mul i-beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 3.8 RMSE pe o mance o acking phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 4.1 Fac o g aph o ma ix G..................... 95 4.2 Fac o g aph o ma ix Ψ..................... 97 2 In oduc ion ion loss ypical o ha equencies. Unde his con ex , agains common and well known ada sys ems, able o e icien ly de ec and loca e a a ge wi hin he ange- eloci y plane, new join ada and communica ions echniques a e aking pa o he cu en li e a u e. These sys em a e mainly ocused on he ansmission o use ul in o ma ion owa ds he a ge s, which a e, hus, no only “passi ely” de ec ed, and a single equipmen is able o pe o m bo h ope a ional modes, a oiding o spli he unc ionali ies be ween wo dis inc subsys ems (wi h inc eased cos and complexi y). Hence, he e a e mainly wo app oaches o sol e he a o emen ioned p oblem. The i s one conside s he applica ion o common ada wa e o ms, adap ed o ca y use ul in o ma ion wi h hem. The second one, which is he one explo ed in his disse a ion, akes in o accoun ypical communica ion wa e o ms (single- o mul i-ca ie ), and, while communica ion asks come na u ally, he ada p ocessing is pe o med wi h no el me hods exploi ing he knowledge o he ansmi ed in o ma ion (known by bo h ansmi e and ecei e , i physically coloca ed), hus di e s om a mo e di ec , o “ ada -like”, h eshold analysis o he backsca e ed powe om he a ge . The choice o he communica ion wa e o m is subjec o a non i ial adeo . On one hand, he sys em aims he maximiza ion o he communica ion achie able a e, i.e., he amoun o in o ma ion sen in a ime- equency window. On he o he hand, ada asks ha e o be pe o med wi h as much p ecision as possible, in o de o co ec ly localize a a ge in all dimensions, i.e., ange, eloci y, and space (angula ) loca ion. Typically, pu e ada asks a e pe o med wi h chi p-like pulses, i.e., sho single-ca ie impulses wi h la ge bandwid h, such ha he o al ene gy deli e ed owa ds he a ge s is compensa ed by he band occupa ion o he signal. Thus, he join de ini ion o a sho pulse, oge he wi h la ge bandwid h, leads o a e y p ecise localiza ion o he a ge o e he h ee a o emen ioned domains. Howe e , he amoun o (possible) use ul in o ma ion, imp essed on op o such chi p, is poo . A solu ion o imp o e he communica ion a e is he use o mul i-ca ie digi al wa e o ms, modula ing in o ma ion symbols no only in ime domain (as single-ca ie ) bu also in he equency band, spli in In oduc ion 3 many subca ie s each occupied by a di e en modula ion symbol. Howe e , limi a ions a e linked o he de ini ion o he symbol ime and he subca ie spacing, which a e in a one- o-one ela ion, and a good localiza ion is no only challenging, o ins ance, in e ms o signal p ocessing algo i hms, bu also de ini ely sub-op imal wi h espec o single-ca ie solu ions, bu his is he cos o pay in o de o b ing communica ion ea u es oge he wi h ada asks. In conclusion, he cu en li e a u e is mo ing owa ds he de ini ion o new mul i-ca ie schemes able o b eak he limi s, in e ms on communica- ion a e, imposed by classical ada wa e o ms, and he op imiza ion o he adeo be ween he wo di e en asks is an open p oblem, whose op imal solu ions ha e no been de ined ye . The choice o he mul i-ca ie modula ion o join ada and communica- ion alls in o wo dis inc wa e o ms, i.e., o hogonal equency-di ision mul- iplexing (OFDM) modula ion and o hogonal ime equency space (OTFS) modula ion. OFDM is he mos popula mul i-ca ie modula ion o ecen yea s, widely s udied and s anda dized in mos o he cu en communica- ion s anda ds, including 5G. The mo i a ion o his choice is simple: hanks o he applica ion o a cyclic p e ix be ween symbols, i.e., a gua d in e al o p e en in e -symbol in e e ence, and unde he assump ion o absence o in e -ca ie in e e ence, which holds unde easonable amoun o he Dopple e ec and subca ie spacing, he communica ion channel can be diagonalized and symbol-by-symbol de ec ion pe o med. Clea ly, he appealing simplici y o de ec ion makes OFDM he bes choice o mode n digi al communica ions. On he o he hand, OTFS is a modula ion wa e o m wi h wo big di e ences wi h espec o i s di ec compe i o . Fi s , i does no necessi a e he inse - ion o he cyclic p e ix, achie ing a be e communica ions a e, i.e., mo e in o ma ion is sen o e a ime- equency window, bu a he cos o a mo e complex de ec ion app oach, wo king blockwise and no symbol-by-symbol. Second, OTFS is no sensi i e o delay and Dopple shi s, meaning ha i s pe o mance is kep cons an wha e e he dis ance and he speed be ween ansmi e and ( a ge ) ecei e . This ea u e is e y appealing o join ada 4 In oduc ion and communica ion asks, being he scena io e y dynamical, wi h possible e- ma kable Dopple shi s and delays, inc eased by conside ing he ound- ip ime be ween ada ansmi e and a ge . Based on he a o emen ioned anal- ysis, in his disse a ion we ake ca e o a ai compa ison be ween he wo digi al modula ion o ma s, om he poin o iew o ada , pa ame e es i- ma ion, achie able communica ion a e, channel es ima ion, and mo e o he asks, o de e mine hei posi i e and nega i e aspec s, such ha a sys em designe is able o choose he mos sui able wa e o m o a gi en scena io o applica ion. S a e o he A By ex ending he in oduc ion, some de ails a e p o ided he e, wi h he co e- sponding e e ences o li e a u e, bu some o he a e le o he in oduc ions o chap e s. The 5G communica ion s anda d will b ing some no el ies o o e come ou da ed and old echniques [1]. By mos ly ocusing on mul i-ca ie modula- ion o ma s, in pa icula OFDM [2, 3] and OTFS [4, 5, 6], his disse a ion p o ides a comple e analysis and pe o mance compa ison unde di e en sce- na ios, wi h he common denomina o o he spa se desc ip ion o he com- munica ion channel [7], whose cha ac e is ics depend on he su ounding en i- onmen . Unde his con ex , ypical channels a e cha ac e ized by ew e lec- o s wi h hei ela i e line-o -sigh and small numbe o addi ional mul i-pa h componen s (g ound e lec ion and some o he e lec ions om, e.g., me al su - aces) [8, 9]. Mo i a ed by eme ging ehicula applica ions (V2X) [10], join ada and communica ion sys ems ha e been s udied, in such a con igu a ion he wo unc ions sha e he same physical esou ces [11, 12]. Thus, di e - en ly om pu e ada asks, which aim o de ec a ge s wi h high esolu ion [12, 13], also an ac i e communica ion, i.e., he ansmission o use ul da a, is conside ed, such ha bo h unc ionali ies migh wo k oge he o join ly imp o e he pe o mance. No e ha his di e s om ypical beacon-based ini ial acquisi ion o communica ion s anda ds [14, 15, 16, 17, 18], whe e he alignmen be ween ansmi e and ecei e is achie ed h ough a so o hand- shake, i.e., he wo en i ies alk oge he o achie e he common ask. Gi en 6 S a e o he a he appealing o join ada and communica ion sys ems o u u e ehicle- o- e e y hing (V2X) communica ions, he ecen li e a u e p o ides many di e - en and de ailed solu ions [19, 20, 21, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26], basically di ided in o wo classes: in o ma ion-embedded ada wa e o ms [11, 27, 24] and com- munica ion wa e o ms applied o ada de ec ion and pa ame e es ima ion [11, 19, 21, 26, 28, 29]. Mo eo e , no e ha he join ly app oach could b eak he limi s imposed by sepa a ed, o esou ce sha ing, me hods [30]. This disse - a ion, as said be o e, s udies he case o communica ion wa e o ms applied o ada , by e iewing some well-known signal p ocessing o OFDM (see [26, 21] and e e ences he ein), while exploi ing new me hods o OTFS, whose base- lines a e sha ed by o he wo ks in he li e a u e, bu in di e en shapes (see, e.g., [28, 29, 15]). In o de o demons a e ha he join app oach is supe- io (no always bu gi en some sys em se ups) wi h espec o he physical esou ces spli o one o he o he ask, he compa ison will also ake in o accoun ypical ada wa e o ms [13, 20]. When a communica ion wa e o m is employed, he p oblems o ada de- ec ion and pa ame e es ima ion a e based on he knowledge o he in o ma- ion ansmi ed and backsca e ed om a a ge , which esul s o be known i ada ansmi e and ecei e a e coloca ed. No e ha his is also pos- sible hanks o ull-duplex con igu a ions [31, 32, 33], which limi s he sel - in e e ence o he sys em, which esul s, on he o he hand, unable o p ope ly wo k i his condi ion is no ul illed. Thus, in o ma ion symbols a e ea ed as known in he condi ioning o p obabili y densi y unc ions du ing digi al signal p ocessing ope a ions, as, e.g., in [15], a he han unknown as in ypi- cal de ec ion p oblems [34]. Hence, he join ada sensing and communica ion pa adigm esul s simila o classical channel es ima ion schemes, because he inal goal is equi alen , i.e., he cha ac e iza ion o he su ounding channel. Being he channel s a e in o ma ion, i.e., he knowledge o he communica ion channel, equi ed o pe o m cohe en de ec ion in any scena io, he li e a- u e ea ing i s es ima ion is wide [34]. Gene ally, his in o ma ion is ac- cessed h ough symbols, i.e., pilo s, known a bo h ansmi e and ecei e S a e o he a 7 [35, 36, 37]. I is s aigh o wa d o unde s and ha , by aking in o accoun a ull block o symbols backsca e ed om a a ge , in a join ada and com- munica ion scheme, all symbols ake he ole o pilo s. Many echniques o sol e he channel es ima ion p oblem a e p esen in li e a u e. By aking in o accoun he spa se channel ep esen a ion in he Dopple -delay domain (see, e.g., [7, 5]), o OFDM, hese echniques migh use concep s om comp essed sensing li e a u e, e.g., [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 35, 43], while OTFS p opose a a i- e y o solu ions, based on minimum-mean squa e e o es ima ion, maximum likelihood, comp essed sensing, and o he s [37, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. A las , by aking in o accoun he addi ional spa ial dimension, mul i an- enna sys ems a e s udied. The choice o conside ing mul iple-inpu mul iple- ou pu (MIMO) con igu a ions o ada is undamen al [49]. In ac , o he han opening o angle o a i al (o , equi alen ly, space) es ima ion o he a ge , i allows, h ough a ca e ul design o he beam pa e n [50], o sep- a a ely ack di e en objec s o a ge s [51, 52], while imp o ing he powe deli e ed owa ds a di ec ion, hanks o he addi ional an enna gain, which is e y ele an in V2X ada s [20] and opens o ansmission o e millime e wa e equency bands [50]. By conside ing he p oblem o ada de ec ion, a non i ial adeo appea s wi h espec o he angula co e age o he beam pa e n. On one hand, a wide angula sec o co e age enables o de ec po en- ially mo e a ge s simul aneously, i he ecei ed backsca e ed powe is high enough. On he o he hand, a mo e di ec ional alloca ion o he powe owa ds a na owe angula sec o , g an s a highe ecei ed signal- o-noise a io, a he cos o a ime-consuming sea ch (as classical ada successi ely swapping ad- jacen egions, see, e.g.,[13]). Di e en solu ions can be ound in he li e a u e (see, e.g., [52, 53, 15, 54]). Mo eo e , his disse a ion will ea he p oblem o misma ch be ween he numbe o an ennas and he numbe o adio e- quency chains. In ac , by conside ing MIMO con igu a ions o e millime e wa e equency bands, i is di icul o implemen a ully digi al beam o ming, o , equi alen ly, o associa e one adio equency chain pe an enna (includ- ing A/D con e sion, modula ion, and ampli ica ion) in a small o m ac o 8 S a e o he a and highly in eg a ed echnology o e a la ge signal bandwid h. The e o e, o millime e wa e au omo i e applica ions, we s udy hyb id digi al-analog beam o ming schemes (see, e.g., [55, 56] and e e ences he ein), hus, wi hou elying on op imal ull-duplex con igu a ions as gene ally done in li e a u e [49, 52, 54]. Mo e de ails abou he s a e-o - he-a will be gi en wi hin he ollowing chap e s. Chap e 1 Mul i Ca ie Modula ions 1.1 The Communica ion Channel The communica ion channel desc ibes how he ansmi ed signal is modi ied when a eling h ough he communica ion medium (e.g., an op ical ibe , he ai , a coppe line, e c.). Di e en impai men s and e ec s cha ac e ize each di e en scena io, and he associa ed channel is comple ely desc ibed by i s channel impulse esponse (CIR). These e ec s, including, o ins ance, ading luc ua ions, shadowing, delay, equency shi s, phase noise, e c., a e desc ibed by ma hema ical models, exploi ed du ing he algo i hmic design o de ec o s, es ima o s, and any o he digi al signal p ocessing (DSP) which could be pe o med by he communica ion ecei e (Rx). The channel conside ed in his disse a ion is ime- equency a ying, i.e., i s beha io changes wi h espec o (w. . .) he ime ins an and he ca - ie (o subca ie ) equency conside ed. In o de o simpli y i s ea men , he channel can be ep esen ed in dis inc domains, each owning i s di e en (bu beha io ally equi alen ) desc ip ion unc ion. In ac , clea ly, he channel beha io mus emain he same while i s ep esen a ion changes. In o de o swi ch be ween di e en domains, a di ec o in e se Fou ie ans o m (i.e., F o F−1, espec i ely) has o be applied [7]. Fig. 1.1 shows all he domains and 9 10 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions γ( , τ)H( , ) Γ(ν, )h(ν, τ) F F−1 F F−1 F−1 F F−1 F Figu e 1.1: Channel domains. he ela i e Fou ie ans o ms. In he op igh posi ion o Fig. 1.1 we ind he ime- equency domain, wi h unc ion H( , ). Conside ing only di ec Fou ie ans o ms, i.e., F, we i s mo e o he Dopple - equency domain (Γ(ν, )), hen o he Dopple -delay domain (h(ν, τ)), and inally o he ime-delay do- main (γ( , τ)). I is in e es ing o no e ha he channel desc ip ion in he Dopple -delay domain elies in i s physical ep esen a ion, o geome y, which simpli ies he o e all ma hema ical analysis [4, 5, 7]. In ac , ypically, only a small numbe o e lec o s (o p opaga ion pa hs) akes pa o a channel, which is hus spa se and can be modeled wi h ew pa ame e s. Mo eo e , he geome y o he su ounding en i onmen slowly changes in ime (w. . . he ame du a ion), beha io which could be exploi ed du ing he algo i hmic design. The spa se ep esen a ion o he channel h(ν, τ) can be gi en as [7] h(ν, τ) = P−1 X p=0 hpδ(τ−τp)δ(ν−νp),(1.1) whe e Pis he numbe o p opaga ion pa hs, hp,τp, and νp ep esen he pa h gain, delay, and Dopple shi associa ed o he p- h pa h. The key poin is ha he channel beha io is disc e e in he numbe o pa hs. In o he wo ds, a single symbol ansmi ed o e he channel is shi ed in he delay domain, i.e., is ecei ed wi h a delay o τp, and i s equency is shi ed o νp(Dopple 1.2. O hogonal F equency Di ision Mul iplexing (OFDM) Modula ion 11 e ec ). An ex ension o he (1.1) aking in o accoun MIMO an enna sys ems can be ound in Chap e 3 and in [7]. 1.2 O hogonal F equency Di ision Mul iplexing (OFDM) Modula ion Be o e en e ing in o he de ails o OFDM signal p ocessing, o ada and communica ion pu poses, we will b ie ly desc ibe he basics o his modula- ion echnique, o be e unde s and hings o come. This p e ends o be an o e iew o mainly aspec s which a e ele an o ou analysis, while a mo e in-dep h desc ip ion can be ound in many di e en digi al communica ion books (see, e.g., [2, 3]) and wo ks in li e a u e [2, 57, 58]. As he name sugges s, OFDM is a mul iplexing scheme which modula es da a (in o ma ion symbols) on dis inc pa allel o hogonal equencies (see also he pionee ing wo k [58]). In gene al, OFDM uses a ce ain numbe o sub- ca ie s, o equally spli he a ailable bandwid h, and some ime slo s, which, oge he , iden i y an OFDM ame. The dimension o such ame depends on he pa icula applica ion, which could aim a low-la ency sys ems, i.e., smalle ames in ime, o necessi a es la ge dimensions o cope and es ima e unknown channel impai men s. As a no a ion, a se o modula ion symbols ansmi ed o e di e en subca ie s a he same ime is called OFDM sym- bol, while mo e OFDM symbols (in ime) o m he OFDM ame. The o hogonali y o he equency di ision is achie ed by choosing a con- s an subca ie spacing ∆ , gene ally de ined as he in e se o he symbol du a ion T, i.e., ∆ = 1/T, in o de o a oid da a loss du ing il e ing ope - a ions. Thus, by assuming a ec angula shaping pulse o du a ion T o mod- ula e cons ella ion symbols a he ansmi e (Tx) side, whose exp ession is 18 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions c oss-ambigui y unc ion (CAF) be ween he wo pulses, use ul o suc- cessi e conside a ions, i.e., Cg x,g x ( , ),Zg∗ x( 0− )g x( 0)e−j2π 0d 0.(1.15) We adop ed he de ini ion o [13], while o he exp essions migh be ound in li e a u e (wi h no signi ican changes on he inal esul s and sys em beha io ).  Conside a ime- a ying channel whe e he maximum delay and Dopple shi o e all mul ipa h componen s a e gi en by τmax and νmax, espec- i ely. The pa ame e s Tand ∆ de e mine he maximum ole able delay and Dopple , espec i ely, such ha νmax <∆ and τmax < T. We will now look in o a de ailed de i a ion o he OTFS inpu -ou pu ela ion, which is he base o any signal p ocessing applied a e wo ds. 1.3.2 Modula ion and T ansmission o e he Channel The OTFS Tx i s maps symbols x[k, l] o samples X[n, m], om he Dopple - delay domain o he ime- equency domain, acco ding o g ids Γ and Λ, using he ISFFT, i.e., X[n, m] = 1 √NM N−1 X k=0 M−1 X l=0 x[k, l]ej2π(nk N−ml M),(1.16) o n= 0,...N −1, m = 0,...M −1.2Eq. (1.16) shows ha each in o ma- ion symbol x[k, l], belonging o any complex cons ella ion alphabe , is mod- ula ed by a wo-dimensional basis unc ion in he ime- equency domain, i.e., 2No e ha , since he ISFFT is a Fou ie ans o ma ion be ween wo-dimensional do- mains, a no maliza ion ac o has o be aken in o accoun . The no maliza ion ac o 1/(NM) could be a bo h di ec and in e se ans o ma ion, wi h a squa e oo , o jus a one side, wi hou he squa e oo . 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 19 exp j2πnk N−ml M. Nex , he ime- equency modula o con e s he sam- ples X[n, m] o a con inuous- ime wa e o m s( ), by he use o he ansmi (shaping) pulse g x( ), i.e., s( ) = N−1 X n=0 M−1 X m=0 X[n, m]g x( −nT)ej2πm∆ ( −nT ).(1.17) Eq. (1.17) can be seen as a disc e e Heisenbe g ans o m pa ame e ized by g x( ) [5, 4]. The pulse s( ) is he p oduc o he supe posi ion o delay-and- modula e ope a ions on he pulse wa e o m g x( ), shi ed in ime and in e- quency. No e ha i is use ul o exp ess s( ) h ough an Heisenbe g ans o m since he cascade o wo Heisenbe g ans o ms, one o he modula o and one o he channel, can be exp essed as a unique unc ion. No e ha he equali y ∆ T = 1 implies ej2πm∆ ( −nT )=ej2πm∆ ,(1.18) which simpli ies (1.17) leading o he equi alen signal model s( ) = N−1 X n=0 M−1 X m=0 X[n, m]g x( −nT)ej2πm∆ ,(1.19) which can be ound, e.g., in [26, Page 13, Equa ion (3.4)]. The signal s( ) is ansmi ed o e he ime- equency a ying channel wi h complex baseband CIR h(ν, τ) speci ied in (1.1). The ecei ed signal, neglec ing o simplici y he noise, is ( ) = ZZ h(ν, τ)s( −τ)ej2πν dτdν , (1.20) which is a con inuous Heisenbe g ans o m pa ame e ized in h(ν, τ). No e ha , by subs i u ing (1.1) in o (1.20), he double in eg a ion is alid only whe e he wo del as a e equal o one, simpli ying in a single summa ion o e p= 0, . . . , P −1. This subs i u ion is done in subsequen calculus. 20 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions 1.3.3 Demodula ion A he Rx, a ma ched il e compu es he CAF (see (1.15)) in he ollowing way Y( , ) = Ag x, ( , ) = Zg∗ x  0−   0e−j2π 0d 0.(1.21) By subs i u ing (1.20) in (1.21), we ob ain Y( , ) = Zg∗ x  0− ZZ h(ν, τ)s 0−τej2πν 0dτdνe−j2π 0d 0, (1.22) and, by using (1.17) Y( , ) = Zg∗ x  0− "ZZ N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 h(ν, τ)Xn0, m0g x  0−τ−n0T ej2πm0∆ ( 0−τ−n0T)ej2πν 0dτdν#e−j2π 0d 0,(1.23) while, by eo de ing e ms Y( , ) = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 Xn0, m0"ZZ h(ν, τ)(Zg∗ x  0− g x  0−τ−n0T ej2πm0∆ ( 0−τ−n0T)ej2πν 0e−j2π 0d 0)dτdν#.(1.24) The ma ched il e ou pu is ob ained by sampling Y( , ) as Y[n, m] = Y( , ) =nT, =m∆ .(1.25) Now, by ecalling he unc ion inside he squa e b acke s and sampling, we de ine Hn,m n0, m0=ZZ h(ν, τ)"Zg∗ x  0−nTg x  0−τ−n0T ej2πm0∆ ( 0−τ−n0T)ej2π(ν−m∆ ) 0d 0#dτdν . (1.26) 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 21 By subs i u ing 00 = 0−τ−n0T, we ge Hn,m n0, m0=ZZ h(ν, τ)"Zg∗ x  00 −n−n0T+τg x  00 ej2πm0∆ 00 ej2π(ν−m∆ )( 00+n0T+τ)d 00#dτdν =ZZ "Zg∗ x  00 −n−n0T+τg x  00 e−j2π((m−m0)∆ −ν) 00 d 00#h(ν, τ)ej2π(ν−m∆ )(n0T+τ)dτdν =ZZ h(ν, τ)Ag x,g x n−n0T−τ, m−m0∆ −ν ej2πνn0Tej2πντ e−j2πm∆ τ dτdν , (1.27) and, by conside ing he channel speci ied in (1.1), i becomes Hn,m n0, m0= P−1 X p=0 hpAg x,g x n−n0T−τp,m−m0∆ −νp ej2πνpn0Tej2πνpτpe−j2πm∆ τp.(1.28) I is s aigh o wa d o ob ain he inpu -ou pu ela ion o OTFS, gi en by Y[n, m] = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 Hn,m n0, m0Xn0, m0.(1.29) No e ha Eq.(1.29) can be spli o di ec ly and sepa a ely show he pa s 22 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions in ol ed in (Dopple -delay) ISI and ICI, hus Y[n, m] = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 Hn,m n0, m0Xn0, m0 =Hn,m [n, m]X[n, m] + M−1 X m0=0 m06=m Hn,m n, m0Xn, m0 + N−1 X n0=0 n06=n M−1 X m0=0 Hn,m n0, m0Xn0, m0,(1.30) in which he i s e m indica es he cu en symbol X[n, m], wi h he associ- a ed channel esponse, he second e m is he ICI, i.e., he o al in e e ence a di e en equencies m06=mbu wi hin he same ime slo no he cu en symbol X[n, m], and, a las , he hi d e m is he ISI. No e ha , a his poin , he shape o he pulses is unknown, so he e a e possibly in ini e (pas and u u e) in e e ing e ms. P oceeding u he , s a ing om (1.30) and exploi ing (1.16), we ob ain Y[n, m] = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 Hn,m n0, m0Xn0, m0 = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 Hn,m n0, m0"N−1 X k0=0 M−1 X l0=0 x[k0, l0] √NM ej2πn0k0 N−m0l0 M#.(1.31) By applying he ISFFT ( om now on, o he sake o b e i y, we emo e he summa ion subsc ip s and supe sc ip s, which a e, howe e , in acco d o he 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 23 a o emen ioned ea men ) y[k, l] = X n,m X n0,m0X k0,l0 Hn,m n0, m0x[k0, l0] NM ej2πn0k0 N−m0l0 Me−j2π(nk N−ml M) =X k0,l0 x[k0, l0] NM  X n,m X n0,m0 Hn,m n0, m0ej2πn0k0 N−m0l0 Me−j2π(nk N−ml M)  =X k0X l0 x[k0, l0] NM hk,l k0, l0,(1.32) in which, by using he de ini ion in (1.28), including he CIR in (1.1), we ge hk,l k0, l0=X N,M X n0,M0 P−1 X p=0 hpAg x,g x n−n0T−τp,m−m0∆ −νp ej2πνpn0Tej2πνpτpe−j2πm∆ τpej2πn0k0 N−m0l0 Me−j2π(nk N−ml M).(1.33) No e ha Ag x,g x n−n0T−τ, m−m0∆ −ν= Zg∗ x  0−n−n0T+τg x  0e−j2π[(m−m0)∆ −νp] 0d 0,(1.34) and since he ecei ed signal ( ) is sampled a ime in e als 0= 1/(M∆ ) o equi alen ly 0=T/M, we ge Ag x,g x =T M i=∞ X i=−∞ g∗ x iT M−n−n0T+τpg x iT M e−j2π[(m−m0)∆ −νp]i M∆ .(1.35) 24 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions So, by eo de ing e ms (no e ha ∆ T = 1) and de ining h0 i=hiej2πντ hk,l k0, l0=T M P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X n e−j2π(k N)n"X n0 ej2πk0+νpNT Nn0 i=∞ X i=−∞ g∗ x iT M−n−n0T+τpg x iT M X m ej2π−∆ i M∆ +τp+l MmX m0 e−j2πl0 M−i Mm0ej2πνpi M∆ #) =T M P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X n e−j2π(k N)n"X n0 ej2πk0+νpNT Nn0 i=∞ X i=−∞ g∗ x iT M−n−n0T+τpg x iT M (X m ej2π(−i−M∆ τp+l)m M)(X m0 e−j2π(−i+l0)m0 M)ej2πνpi M∆ #). (1.36) A his poin , i is use ul o de ine he Di ichle ke nel unc ion, ha is Di (φ, Z), Z−1 X z=0 ej2πφ z Z=ej2πφ −1 ej2πφ/Z −1=ejπφ ejπφ −e−jπφ ejπφ/Z ejπφ/Z −e−jπφ/Z =ejπφ(Z−1)/Z sin (πφ) sin (πφ/Z).(1.37) A plo o he unc ion is gi en in Fig. 1.3. The alue o he unc ion is equal o Z(o −Zdepending i Zis e en o odd) when φis a mul iple o Z, and is equal o ze o o all o he s in ege alues o φ. Mo eo e , no e ha he Di ichle ke nel has he ollowing p ope y sin (πφ) sin π Zφ=sin (π(φ+Z)) sin π Z(φ+Z).(1.38) which could be use ul o successi e analysis. 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 (a) Z= 5. -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 (b) Z= 6. Figu e 1.3: Example o Di ichle unc ions Di (φ, Z) = sin(πφ) sin(πφ/Z). Thus, he exp ession o y[k, l] becomes y[k, l] = X k0,l0 x[k0, l0] NM T M P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X n e−j2πk n NX n0"∞ X i=−∞ g x iT M g∗ x iT M−n−n0T+τpDi (l−i−τpM∆ , M) Di l0−i, Mej2πνpi M∆ #ej2π(k0+νpNT )n0 N) =X k0,l0 x[k0, l0] NM T P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X nX n0 g∗ x l0T M−n−n0T+τp g x l0T MDi l−l0−τpM∆ , Me−j2πk n Nej2πνpl0 M∆ ej2π(k0+νpNT )n0 N).(1.39) 1.3.4 Special Case: Rec angula Wa e o ms As a p ac ical special case, conside a ec angula wa e o m o du a ion Tand ampli ude 1/√T, i.e., g x( ) = g x( ) = ec ( ), as de ined in (1.2). I τmax < T, only he signal o he i s p eceding slo is in ol ed in he ISI calcula ion, i.e., 26 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions n0=n−1. In his case g∗ x pT M−T+τpg x pT M=1 √T 1 √T=1 T,(1.40) o he alues o pwhe e he p oduc o he wo pulses is nonze o. Thus, o ec angula pulses, he sum Pn0 akes in o accoun only wo e ms, i.e., n0=n and n0=n−1. By using hese esul s, s a ing om (1.39), we ob ain y ec [k, l] = X k0,l0 x[k0, l0] NM P−1 X p=0 h0 p (X n e−j2π(k−k0−νpNT )n Nej2πνpl0 M∆ Di l−l0−τpM∆ , M)+(X n e−j2π(k−k0−νpNT )n N Di l−l0−τpM∆ , Mej2πνpl0 M∆ e−j2π(k0+νpNT ) N)! =X k0,l0 x[k0, l0] NM P−1 X p=0 h0 pDi νpNT −k+k0, Nej2πνpl0 M∆ Di l−l0−τpM∆ , M1 + e−j2πk0+νpNT N.(1.41) Howe e , no e ha , ha ing conside ed he mul iplica ion be ween he wo ec angula pulses g x( ) and g x( ), he l0in ol ed in he wo e ms inside he cu ly b acke s is di e en , since i conside s he pulses o e lap wi hin he in e al [0, M −1−dτp/(T/M)e] and [M−1−bτp/(T/M)c, M −1], whe e d·e and b·c indica es he nea es uppe and lowe in ege , espec i ely. We inally ge y[k, l] = P−1 X p=0 h0 pX k0 Di νpNT −k+k0, NX l0 Di l−l0−τpM∆ , M ej2πνpl0 M∆ x[k0, l0] NM ×   1 i l0∈l0 ISI e−j2πνpT+k0 Ni l0∈l0 ICI ,(1.42) 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 27 whe e we used    l0 ISI ,n0, M −1−d τp T/M eo l0 ICI ,nM−1−b τp T/M c, M −1o.(1.43) Thus, he channel ma ix exp ession o he p- h pa h becomes Ψp k,k0l, l0=1 NM Di νpNT −k+k0, NDi l−l0−τpM∆ , M ej2πνpl0 M∆ ×   1l0∈l0 ICI e−j2πνpT+k0 Nl0∈l0 ISI .(1.44) The inpu ou pu ela ion becomes y[k, l] = X k0,l0 P−1 X p=0 h0 pΨp k,k0l, l0xk0, l0,(1.45) which can be ep esen ed in ma ix o m as y=  P−1 X p=0 h0 pΨp x,(1.46) wi h yand x ec o s o dimension NM ×1 ob ained by s acking he ecei ed samples and in o ma ion symbols, espec i ely, and Ψpma ix o dimension MN ×MN, whose {k, k0, l, l0}elemen is de ined in (1.44). 1.3.5 Conside a ions on ma ix Ψ We now conside some special cases o ma ix Ψp, o any single pa h p.  Ze o delay — Ze o Dopple :τp=νp= 0. Ψp k,k0l, l0=   1 i (l=l0, k =k0) 0 else .(1.47) When bo h delay and Dopple a e ze o, Ψp esul s o be he iden i y ma- ix. The channel does no modi y he ansmi ed symbols, he ecei ed signal is simply y=x+ noise. 34 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions −5 0 −4−2024 0 0.5 1 |A| Figu e 1.5: Two dimensions isual example o Di ichle unc ions in bo h do- mains, whe e |A|is he no malized ampli ude alue, in acco d o he hea map o Fig. 1.4. suppo . By s a ing om (1.39) and de ining q,(n−n0), we ge y[k, l] = T NM X k0,l0 xk0, l0P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X n e−j2πk n NX n0 ej2π(k0+νpNT )n0 Nej2πνpl0 M∆ g∗ x l0T M−n−n0T+τpg x l0T MDi l−l0−τpM∆ , M) =X k0,l0 x[k0, l0]T NM P−1 X p=0 h0 p(X n e−j2πk n N ∞ X q=−∞ ej2π(k0+νpNT )n−q Nej2πνpl0 M∆ g∗ x l0T M−qT +τpg x l0T MDi l−l0−τpM∆ , M) =x[k0, l0]T NM X k0,l0 P−1 X p=0 h0 pg x l0T MDi l−l0−τpM∆ , Mej2πνpl0 M∆ X n ej2π(k0+νpNT −k)n N!∞ X q=−∞ e−j2π(k0+νpNT )q Ng∗ x l0T M−qT +τp. (1.60) 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 35 No e ha only he e m in b acke s depends on n, and i is a Di ichle unc ion X n ej2π(k0+νpNT −k)n N,Di νpNT −k+k0, N.(1.61) Hence y[k, l] = X k0,l0 x[k0, l0]T NM P−1 X p=0 h0 pDi l−l0−τpM∆ , MDi νpNT −k+k0, N g x l0T M(∞ X q=−∞ e−j2π(k0+νpNT )q Ng∗ x l0T M−qT +τp) ej2πνpl0 M∆ .(1.62) The e m unde cu ly b acke s akes in o accoun in e e ing pulses shi ed o mul iples o Tw. . . he summa ion index q. Depending on he suppo o he pulses, i.e., when he ene gy is abo e a ce ain h eshold i he pulse suppo is in ini e, only a ixed numbe o in e e es appea s ( o le and o igh ), indica ed by Ip. The summa ion o e qcan be hus limi ed o [−Ip, Ip]. We inally ge y[k, l] = X k0,l0 x[k0, l0]T NM P−1 X p=0 h0 pDi l−l0−τpM∆ , MDi νpNT −k+k0, N ej2πνpl0 M∆ g x l0T M(Ip X q=−Ip e−j2π(k0+νpNT )q Ng∗ x l0T M−qT +τp). (1.63) No e ha a pulse no sa is ying he Nyquis condi ion, i.e., la equency ep esen a ion, changes he noise p ope ies. The noise associa ed o he e- cei ed samples is no whi e anymo e, and changes wi hin he pulse de ini ion. This ac mus be conside ed in he ma hema ical and simula ion model. Wha is he ole o he shaping pulses in he cons uc ion o he channel ma ix Ψ? The s uc u e o Ψis domina ed by he Di ichle unc ion alues, w. . . he in ege / ac ional delay and Dopple shi s and he indices l, l0, k, k0. 36 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions The ISI and ICI e ec s caused by he shaping pulses add o he Di ichle be- ha io , bu how? One can hink ha op imized “well-known” pulses ha ing limi ed CAF in ime- equency domain should be adop ed [60], bu he e ec in he dual Dopple -delay domain emains no clea . In ac , he Dopple -delay ISI and ICI weakly depend on he adop ed shaping pulse, and a e domina ed by he Di ichle unc ions, whose exp essions appea om he pa icula ans- o ma ions pe o med by modula o and demodula o , and no om he choice o he ansmi ed and ecei ed pulses (see Sec. 1.3.1). Fo hese easons, once common well-con ined ime- equency pulses a e adop ed [60], i is no gua - an eed o achie e good pe o mance also in he Dopple -delay domain. This ac is also con i med in [61]. The conclusion could be ha , wha e e he chosen pulse (also di e en be ween ansmi e and Rx), he e a e no pe o mance gua an ees. Fo com- ple eness, he nex sec ion will p esen some known pulses and he associa ed CAFs, oge he wi h inal conside a ions on he adop ed pulses. 1.3.8 The C oss-Ambigui y Func ion In ada scena ios, he CAF is a wo-dimensional unc ion o delay and Dopple showing he dis o ion o a e u ned pulse a he Rx ma ched il e due o delay and Dopple shi o he mo ing a ge (see, e.g., [13, 60]). The ambigui y unc- ion desc ip ion is only de e mined by he p ope ies o he ansmi ed pulse and he ma ched il e ( ecei ed pulse). By aking in o accoun he de ini ion o CAF in (1.15) [13], ecalled he e o con enience Cg x,g x ( , ),Zg∗ x( 0− )g x( 0)e−j2π 0d 0,(1.64) we show i s beha io when di e en pulses g x( ) and g x( ) a e used. Fig. 1.6 shows ha di e en pulses achie e dis inc pe o mance in e ms o sp eading in ime and in equency o he CAF. Fo ins ance, as shown in Fig. 1.6 (a), since ec angula pulses ha e in ini e suppo in he equency domain, he p ojec ion o he CAF on he equency plane slowly decays and 1.3. O hogonal Time F equency Space (OTFS) Modula ion 37 necessi a es some ime o each he ze o “ loo ”, while alues nea he peak poin ha e ema kable magni ude. A di e en beha io is shown when wo Gaussian pulses a e adop ed (Fig. 1.6 (b)). In ac , ha ing Gaussian pulses ini e suppo in he equency domain, hey exhibi a apid decay o ze o a ound peak poin . A simila conside a ion occu s in he ime domain, which is con i med by looking a he p ojec ion on he ime plane. A las , compa e Fig. 1.6 (b) and 1.6 (c) o ha e an idea on how Gaussian pulses wi h di e en a iances change he beha io o he p ojec ions o e he ime and equency planes. The de ini ion o good shaping pulses, wi h he co esponding CAF, is a p oblem o p ima y in e es in ypical ada sys ems. Fo mo e de ails, o ins ance, e e o he analysis ca ied on in [60], sugges ing he use o pulses well localized in he ime- equency domain. Rega ding OTFS, pionee ing wo ks [4, 5] a e based on he assump ion o ideal bi-o hogonal pulses sa is ying pe ec in e e ence p ope ies, i.e., e- sul ing o be del as in bo h ime and equency planes. Howe e , hese pulses canno be c ea ed in eal elec onic ci cui s, and di e en solu ions mus be adop ed. Thus, i is possible o ind in li e a u e many examples o OTFS mod- ula ion based on ec angula pulses [62, 46], whose CAF sp eads in equency, acco ding o Fig. 1.6, bu i easie o handle (ma hema ically speaking) wi hin he de i a ion o he OTFS inpu -ou pu ela ion. An in-dep h nume ical anal- ysis compa ing he pe o mance o OTFS wi h di e en pulses ( ec angula , oo - aised cosine, Gaussian) has been ca ied on, esul ing in simila pe o - mance, and hus no shown he e o he sake o b e i y. This ac has been also con i med in [61]. Thus, we ook ad an age o he simplici y in e ms o ma hema ical ea ing o ec angula pulses, as gene ally done in li e a u e, by keeping in mind ha a di e en ea men is possible, bu does no lead o ema kable pe o mance imp o emen , a leas in he conside ed scena ios. 38 Chap e 1. Mul i Ca ie Modula ions −1 0 1−10 −50510 0 0.5 1 |A| (a) Rec angula pulses, g x( ) = g x( ). −2 0 −10 −50510 0 0.5 |A| (b) Gaussian pulses, σ2 1,g x( ) = g x( ). −2 0 −10 −50510 0 0.2 0.4 |A| (c) Gaussian pulses, σ2 2> σ2 1,g x( )6= g x( ). Figu e 1.6: C oss-ambigui y unc ion o di e en pulses. Chap e 2 ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion 2.1 Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion 2.1.1 OFDM 2.1.1.1 Maximum Likelihood Es ima o S a ing om he a o emen ioned analysis, by ocusing o simplici y on a single- a ge case (P= 1), we neglec he p-pa h subsc ip o he ollowing de i a ions based on OFDM. Since da a symbols a e known by he ada Rx (which could be coloca ed wi h he Tx (monos a ic ada ) o no (bis a ic ada )), and he noise is i.i.d. Gaussian ci cula ly symme ic, he ada Rx can shi he da a symbol phase wi hou changing he noise s a is ics. The e- o e, he ada obse a ion, including he noise and symbol-by-symbol phase o a ion, can be w i en as zn,m =An,mhej2πnToνe−j2πm∆ τ +wn,m ,(2.1) whe e An,m =|xn,m|deno es he ampli ude o he ansmi ed symbol and wn,m is he addi i e whi e Gaussian noise (AWGN) wi h ze o mean and uni 39 40 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion a iance. The maximum likelihood (ML) es ima o o channel gain, ange, and eloc- i y o he obse a ion model in (2.1) is ob ained by gene alizing he app oach in [26, Chap e 3.3.3] o he case o a bi a ily ampli ude Asymbols, wi h Abeing he ma ix collec ing he ime- equency en ies {An,m}. Fo he se o pa ame e s θ= (h, ν, τ), we wish o ind he es ima o minimizing he likelihood unc ion l(z|θ,A) = X nX mzn,m−hAn,mej2π(νnTo−m∆ τ) 2 .(2.2) Assuming ha he pai (ν, τ) is known, by le ing he de i a i e o l(z|θ,A) w. . . hequal o ze o, we ob ain he es ima ion ˆ ho he complex channel gain h, which is ˆ h=Z(ν, τ) Pn,m A2 n,m ,(2.3) whe e he DFT/in e se disc e e Fou ie ans o m (IDFT) ope a ion is de ined as Z(ν, τ), M−1 X m=0 N−1 X n=0 zn,mAn,me−j2πνnToej2πm∆ τ ,(2.4) which is a wo-dimensional pe iodog am. By plugging (2.3) in o (2.2) and ollowing simila s eps as [13, Chap e 7.2.2]), he es ima o o he emaining unknown pa ame e s in gi en by (ˆν, ˆτ) = a g max (ν,τ)∈Γ0|Z(ν, τ)|2,(2.5) whe e we conside ed a disc e ized se Γ0o delay and Dopple equency axes wi h s ep sizes 1/(M0∆ ) and 1/(N0To), espec i ely, wi h N0≥Nand M0≥ M. No e ha Γ0is in line wi h he de ini ion in (1.13), bu wi h g ea e g anula i y o achie e an highe accu acy wi hin he es ima ion p ocess. In summa y, o compu e he join ML es ima o o he se o unknown pa ame e s (h, τ, ν) he ollowing s eps a e done: 2.1. Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion 41 1. Compu e he DFT/IDFT ou pu Z(ν, τ). This s ep which can be e i- cien ly implemen ed by using as Fou ie ans o m (FFT)-based design. 2. Choose (ˆν, ˆτ) maximizing |Z(ν, τ)|2o e Γ0, o some N0and M0(de- pending o he a ge accu acy le el). 3. Le he channel gain be ˆ h=Z(ˆν, ˆτ)/Pn,m A2 n,m. Clea ly, s a ing om he delay and Dopple es ima ions, i is possible o de i e he co esponding ange and eloci y es ima ions, espec i ely gi en by ˆ = ˆτc/2 and ˆ = ˆνc/(2 c). 2.1.1.2 C ame´ -Rao lowe bound (CRLB) I is well known ha he C ame´ -Rao lowe bound (CRLB) p o ides a heo- e ical lowe bound on he a iance o any es ima o [3, 34]. The de i a ion o he CRLB depends on he pa icula sys em se ing, bu i is always based on a common denomina o , i.e., he cons uc ion o he Fishe in o ma ion ma ix. Suppose we ha e only one pa h, i.e., P= 1, o simpli y he no a ion. Fo he calcula ion o he CRLB conside a ec o o unknown pa ame e s θ o be es ima ed. Gi en (y|θ), which is he condi ional dis ibu ion o he channel ou pu ygi en he se o unknown pa ame e s θ, i he egula i y condi ion is sa is ied Ey∂ ∂θln (y|θ)=   Ey∂ ∂h ln (y|θ) Ey∂ ∂τ ln (y|θ) Ey∂ ∂ν ln (y|θ)  =   0 0 0   ,(2.6) hen, any unbiased es ima o p o iding ˆ θhas co a iance ma ix Cˆ θ=Ehˆ θ−Ehˆ θiˆ θ−Ehˆ θi∗i,(2.7) which sa is ies Cˆ θ−I(θ)−1≥0∀θ.(2.8) 42 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion The ma ix I(θ) is he Fishe in o ma ion ma ix, whose (i, j) elemen is [I(θ)]i,j =−Ey∂2ln (y|θ) ∂θi∂θj,(2.9) whe e indexes (i, j) selec he unknown pa ame e s wi hin he ec o θ. Mo e- o e , (2.8) implies ha diagonal elemen s o Cθdomina es hose o I(θ)−1, hence Va hˆ θii≥hI(θ)−1iii ≥1 [I(θ)]ii .(2.10) Conside he ec o o unknown pa ame e s θ= (α, ϕ, , ), whe e α=|h|, ϕ=∠(h), =Toν, and = ∆ τ, om (2.1) we ob ain zn,m =An,mαejϕej2πn e−j2πm +wn,m .(2.11) By le ing sn,m =An,mαejϕej2πn e−j2πm , we de i e he 4 ×4 Fishe in o ma- ion ma ix de ined as [I(θ,A)]i,j = 2Pa gRe (X n,m ∂sn,m ∂θi∗∂sn,m ∂θj),(2.12) whe e Pa g akes in o accoun any possible powe cons ain on ansmi ed symbols. We hus ha e ∂sn,m ∂α =An,mejϕe+j2πn e−j2πm (2.13a) ∂sn,m ∂ϕ =jαAn,mejϕe+j2πn e−j2πm (2.13b) ∂sn,m ∂ = (j2πn)αAn,mejϕe+j2πn e−j2πm (2.13c) ∂sn,m ∂ = (−j2πm)αAn,mejϕe+j2πn e−j2πm .(2.13d) Fo a model gi en in (2.11), he MMSE o and is lowe bounded by σ2 ˆ ≥N0 2|h|2 e (A) d(A)(2.14a) σ2 ˆ ≥N0 2|h|2 e (A) d(A),(2.14b) 2.1. Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion 43 whe e e (A), e (A), d(A) a e gi en by e (A) = (2π)2(X n,m (A2 n,m)·X n,m (m2A2 n,m)−hX n,m mA2 n,mi2),(2.15a) e (A) = (2π)2(X n,m (A2 n,m)·X n,m (n2A2 n,m)−hX n,m nA2 n,mi2),(2.15b) d(A) = (2π)4nX n,m (A2 n,m)hX n,m n2A2 n,mihX n,m m2A2 n,mi + 2hX n,m nA2 n,mihX n,m mA2 n,mihX n,m nmA2 n,mi−X n,m (A2 n,m)hX n,m nmA2 n,mi2 −hX n,m n2A2 n,mihX n,m mA2 n,mi2−hX n,m m2A2 n,mihX n,m nA2 n,mi2o.(2.15c) In he egime o la ge Mand N, he CRLB o and a e gi en by σ2 ˆ ≥6 |h|2Pa g(2π)2MN(N2−1) ,(2.16a) σ2 ˆ ≥6 |h|2Pa g(2π)2MN(M2−1) .(2.16b) Fo a special case o cons an en elope (An,m =pPa g o all n, m), he abo e exp essions coincide wi h hose in [26, Sec ion 3.3]. 2.1.2 OTFS 2.1.2.1 Maximum Likelihood Es ima o Based o he esul s o Chap e 1 and Sec. 1.3.1, he ec o ized inpu -ou pu ela ion is y= P−1 X p=0 hpΨp(τp, νp)x+w.(2.17) We wish o es ima e he se o unknown pa ame e s θ= (¯ h,¯ τ,¯ ν), wi h ¯ h= [h0, . . . , hP−1], ¯ τ= [τ0, . . . , τP−1], and ¯ ν= [ν0, . . . , νP−1], whe e he ba indica es he ue channel pa ame e alue. 50 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion maximiza ion based es ima o in his disse a ion): namely, when he noise domina es he use ul signal, he maxima o he likelihood unc ions end o be andomly placed anywhe e on he sea ch g id. In he ollowing, we analyze he wa e all e ec , o ansi ion, o he single pa h case P= 1, i.e., we sea ch and s udy he egion a ound he h eshold SNR alue whe e he apid de e io a ion occu s. Mo eo e , simula ions esul s show ha he p o ided wa e all p edic ion o P= 1 is also e y accu a e o he mul ipa h case P > 1.1This also con i ms he e idence ha he p oposed app oxima ed i e a i e ML es ima ion desc ibed in Algo i hm 1 is e ec i ely e y good, and pe o ms e y close o he ue ML.2 Following he easoning o [64, 65], we de ine as “ou lie ” he e en ha a maximum o he likelihood unc ion is andomly placed on he g id Γ, a he han wi hin he clus e o poin s su ounding he ue alue (¯τ0,¯ν0). Le α∈ {τ, ν}be he unknown pa ame e o be es ima ed, i.e., τo νindi e en ly. By he law o o al p obabili y o e he disc e ized g id Γ (whe e we calcula e he ML es ima o ), we can exp ess he es ima ion MSE as MSE = Eh(ˆα−¯α)2i=X i∈Γ P (ε(i)) (ˆαi−¯α)2 ≤X i∈Γ P (˜ε(i)) (ˆαi−¯α)2.(2.36) whe e ¯αis he ue alue o he pa ame e , ˆαis an es ima ion o such pa am- e e , and P (ε(i)) deno es he p obabili y o e o o choosing αi a he han ¯α. While e alua ing P (ε(i)) may be ex emely di icul , also because he ue pa ame e ¯α∈R, we ob ain an uppe bound by conside ing pai wise e o p obabili ies, i.e., eplacing P (ε(i)) wi h he p obabili y ha he de ec o chooses αi a he han ¯αwhen hese a e he only wo al e na i es. Since he 1This is also ue because he MSE pe o mance be ween he single pa h and he mul ipa h case a e e y simila . 2Ob iously, he CRLB o P= 1 yields also a lowe bound o he case P > 1, in he case whe e we simply add mo e mul ipa h componen s wi h independen s a is ics, and he p esence o mo e unknown pa ame e s does no gene ally help he es ima ion o each single a ge pa ame e s. 2.1. Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion 51 pai wise e o e en ˜ε(i) con ains he ue e o e en ε(i), i ollows ha he inequali y o (2.36) p o ides an uppe bound. Thus, he de ini ion o he pai wise e o p obabili y is P (˜ε(i)) ,P nl(y|θi,x)> l y|¯ θ,xo,(2.37) whe e l(y|θi,x) and ly|¯ θ,xa e he alues ob ained om he e alua ion o he likelihood unc ion a g id poin i, wi h pa ame e θi, and when he se o ue pa ame e s ¯ θis aken in o accoun , espec i ely. A his poin , he p oblem is educed o he compu a ion o he pai wise e o p obabili ies P (ε(i)), o i∈Γ, which can be de i ed as ollows. We no ice ha , aking in o accoun he use ul signal appea ing in (2.28) P (˜ε(i)) ≈P |xHΨH iy|2>|xH¯ ΨHy|2,(2.38) wi h ¯ Ψ he channel ma ix compu ed wi h he ue se o pa ame e s, and whe e we exploi ΨH iΨi=I,∀i, o P= 1. De ining he join ly condi ionally Gaussian andom a iables zi,xHΨH iy=xHΨH i¯ Ψx+xHΨH iw,(2.39) ¯z,xH¯ ΨHy=xHx+xH¯ ΨHw,(2.40) wi h i s and second o de momen s    E [¯z] = kxk2,Va [¯z] = σ2 wkxk2 E [zi] = xHΨH i¯ Ψx,Va [zi] = σ2 wkxk2,(2.41) and Co [¯z, zi] = σ2 wxH¯ ΨHΨix,(2.42) a good app oxima ion o P (˜ε(i)) is gi en by [64] P (˜ε(i)) ≈1 2exp (−kxk4 2σ2 wNM )I0xHΨH i¯ Ψx·kxk2 2σ2 wNM ,(2.43) 52 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion −30 −28 −26 −24 −22 −20 −18 −16 −14 −12 −10 10−1 100 101 102 103 104 SNR RMSE CRLB Wa e all Es ima ion Random Es ima ion Figu e 2.1: Wa e all beha io example w. . . o he bounds. whe e I0is he modi ied Bessel unc ion o he i s kind o o de 0. The MSE es ima ion can be hus compu ed by subs i u ing (2.43) in o (2.36), using he abo e de ini ions. The esul ing (app oxima ed) uppe bound ends o be loose a low SNR, whe e he ou lie s a e likely o occu and he associa ed e o p obabili ies a e high, bu becomes mo e accu a e mo ing owa ds he ML wa e all egion, hus, when he ou lie p obabili y dec eases. Fu he mo e, he MSE s ic ly depends on he g id esolu ion and may o may no each he CRLB o inc eas- ing SNR depending on he sys ema ic e o incu ed by he g id disc e iza ion. As a ma e o ac , in ou nume ical esul s we ook ca e o using a sea ch g id ine enough such ha he disc e iza ion sys ema ic e o is no isible in he explo ed ange o SNRs, and, pa icula ly, when he wa e all alls o he CRLB. Mo eo e , o con as he looseness o he MSE uppe bound ob ained in (2.36) a low SNR, we de ine he i ial uppe bound MSE ≤1 |Γ|X i∈Γ (ˆαi−¯α)2,(2.44) 2.2. Rada Resolu ion and Mul i-Ta ge De ec ion 53 ha co esponds o es ima e by choosing andom g id poin s, i.e., comple ely dis ega ding he ecei ed signal. Then, pu ing oge he (2.36) (wi h he pai wise e o p obabili y app ox- ima ion in (2.43)) and he abo e “ andom es ima ion” bound in (2.44), we inally ob ain he app oxima ed MSE uppe bound as MSE .min (X i∈Γ P (˜ε(i)) (ˆαi−¯α)2,X i∈Γ (ˆαi−¯α)2 |Γ|),(2.45) whose beha io is shown in Fig. 2.1, oge he wi h he CRLB in oduced he e- a e . Thus, he ML pe o mance o he es ima o s ands on he andom es- ima ion s aigh line o low SNR, ollows he CRLB o high SNR, and he ansi ion be ween hese wo ex emes occu s a ound he wa e all es ima ion. Simula ion esul s show ha he a o emen ioned analysis is able o accu- a ely p edic he wa e all beha io o he ML es ima o . 2.2 Rada Resolu ion and Mul i-Ta ge De ec ion Unde he assump ion o he poin a ge model [17, 66], un il now we ha e an- alyzed a single a ge scena io. Rada ope a ions can be essen ially pe o med wi h wo di e en app oaches. The i s one, conside s a ada pe iodically scanning angula sec o s, as ypical na al o ai plane ada s. In his con ex , by making he beam as di ec i e as possible, i.e., assuming a e y na ow beam and angula co e age, i is easonable o assume he p esence o jus one a ge in any di ec ion (o mul iple a ge s sha ing he same di ec ion and assuming no blockage o he signal p opaga ion). As an al e na i e, he second app oach is based on a wide angula sec o co e age. In such a case, since he a ge loca ion is no a p io i known, a join es ima ion o Dopple , delay, and angle o a i al (AoA) should be pe o med a he ada Rx. In bo h app oaches, he ada ange and eloci y esolu ions acqui e a cen al ole, p o iding he min- imum dis ance and eloci y a which wo di e en a ge s can be sepa a ely de ec ed, i.e., such ha hey a e no seen as a single en i y. 54 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion Conside he ansmi ed symbols o be a anged wi hin he Dopple -delay g id in (1.13). The de ini ion o N,M,B(bandwid h), T, and c(ca ie e- quency) is e y impo an . By ollowing he con inuous ime signal exp ession in (1.17), symbols a e spaced by T(seconds) in ime and ∆ (He z) in e- quency. The ada esolu ions a e compu ed in he ollowing. S a ing om he de ini ion o Dopple shi we ge ν,2 c c⇒ ,νc 2 c ,(2.46) and since he minimum Dopple s ep is ∆ /N, he eloci y esolu ion esul s o be νs ep =∆ N⇒ es ,νs epc 2N c =∆ c 2N c .(2.47) Equi alen ly, s a ing om he de ini ion o delay we ge τ,2 c⇒ ,τc 2,(2.48) and since he minimum delay s ep is T/M, he ange esolu ion is τs ep =T M⇒ es ,τs epc 2M=Tc 2M.(2.49) I we impose, as gene ally done in mul i-ca ie sys ems, he equali y ∆ , 1/T, oge he wi h B=M∆ , p e ious o mulas become    es =Tc/2 = c/(2B) es = ∆ c/(2 ) = Bc/(2NM c) .(2.50) This analysis p o ides he limi s o a ada sys em based on a mul i-ca ie communica ion wa e o m. E en i he ange esolu ion s ic ly depends on he bandwid h B, and his is alid o any ada sys em, he only way o educe he eloci y esolu ion, ha ing imposed ∆ = 1/T, is o inc ease he dimension o he ansmi ed block o da a, h ough Nand M. Howe e , his ansla es in inc easing he o al signal du a ion and dec easing he subca ie s spacing, which could lead o an inc ease o he compu a ional complexi y (i 2.3. Simula ion Resul s 55 blockwise ope a ions ha e o be compu ed), o inc eased in e e ence e ec s ( o ins ance o OFDM). This is he cos o he p oposed join ada pa ame e es ima ion and communica ion se up using OFDM and/o OTFS, which allows he simul aneous ansmission o use ul in o ma ion and ada sensing wi hou any adeo , bu equi es complex signal p ocessing ope a ions ( o con as he block dimension o he in e e ence). On he o he hand, one can bypass he a o emen ioned p oblem by con- side ing he addi ional spa ial dimension, i.e, wi h a mul i an enna sys em, such ha dis inc a ge s can be iden i ied in h ee di e en domains: ange (delay), eloci y (Dopple ), and angula posi ion. As we will see, ou p oposed me hod is able o co ec ly de ec a ge s which a e sepa able in a leas one domain ou o h ee (delay, Dopple , and angle). 2.3 Simula ion Resul s 2.3.1 Join S a e Sensing and Communica ion The ada (backsca e ed) and o wa d communica ion SNRs a e de ined as SNR ad =λ2σ csG2 (4π)3 4 Pa g σ2 w ,(2.51) SNRcom =λ2G2 (4π)2 2 Pa g σ2 w ,(2.52) espec i ely, whe e λ=c/ cis he wa eleng h, σ cs is he ada c oss-sec ion in m2,Gis he an enna gain, and is he dis ance be ween Tx and Rx. In he case o mul ipa h, we ix SNRcom o be he SNR o he line o sigh (LoS) componen , and we add mul ipa h componen s wi h p og essi ely lowe SNRs, such ha he sum SNR o he channel inc eases wi h he numbe o pa hs P. This co esponds o he physically meaning ul case ha a iche p opaga ion en i onmen con eys mo e signal powe . Table 2.1 summa izes he ele an simula ion pa ame e s inspi ed by he au omo i e communica ion s anda d 56 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion Table 2.1: Simula ion pa ame e s c= 5.89 GHz M= 64 B= 10 MHz N= 50 ∆ =B/M = 156.25 kHz T= 1/∆ = 6.4µs σ cs = 1 m2G= 100 = 20 m = 80 km/h IEEE 802.11p [21], whe e and deno e he a ge ange and eloci y aken in o accoun .3 By b ie ly e iewing OFDM modula ion, we in oduce a widely used ada wa e o m known as equency modula ed con inuous wa e (FMCW) [13, Chap- e 4.6], in o de o unde s and he gain o he p oposed me hods agains well-known and cu en ly used app oaches o ada ehicula applica ions. Fo bo h OFDM and FMCW we conside a symbol leng h o To=TGI +T, i.e., including he possible p esence o a gua d in e al deno ed by TGI, gene - ally longe han he maximum pa h delay τmax. In OFDM he gua d in e al esul s o be he CP, ex ensi ely discussed in Sec. 1.2. In FMCW, he ada ansmi e sends a sequence o iden ical “chi p” pulses o du a ion T, each ollowed by a gua d in e al o leng h TGI o a oid in e -pulse in e e ence. By deno ing wi h φ( )=( c+B 2T ) he phase a ime , he ansmi signal is gi en by s( ) = N−1 X i=0 ej2πφ( −iT0) ec  −iT0 T,(2.53) whe e Nis he numbe o consecu i e pulses. T ansmi ing (2.53) o e he channel in (1.1), we ge he ecei ed signal ( ), whose exp ession, by neglec ing 3No e ha , i he condi ions τmax < T and νmax <∆ a e sa is ied, he nume ical esul s a e independen o he choice o and . 2.3. Simula ion Resul s 57 he noise, is gi en in (1.20), bu wi h he cu en s( ). A e some algeb a, i is easy o show ha he p oduc o he ecei ed and he ansmi signals gi es y( ) = ( )s∗( ) = P−1 X p=0 hpej2πνp e−j2π cτp N−1 X i=0 e−j2π b,p( −iT0−τp/2) ,(2.54) whe e b,p =B Tτpdeno es he so-called bea ing equency o pa h p. The ecei e samples y( ) e e y T/M o each pulse, i.e., o =iTo+lT Mwhe e i deno es he pulse index and ldeno es he sample index. By le ing L=M+C deno es he numbe o samples pe pulse, he sampled ecei ed signal can be ew i en as y[i, l] = yiT0+l s=X p hpej2π( b,p+νp)l sej2πνpiT0,(2.55) o i= 0, . . . , N −1 and l= 0, . . . , L −1, whe e hpabso bs a cons an phase e m independen o he indices i, l. The es ima ion o he 2Punknown pa ame e s {τp, νp}is hus ob ained by selec ing he peak o he ange-Dopple map ound by applying a wo- dimensional DFT o he noisy samples in (2.55) as p oposed in [26, 20]. The ange and eloci y o he a ge a e ob ained by he es ima es o {τ0, ν0}. 2.3.2 Join Rada and Communica ion Pe o mance The i s wo sub igu es o Fig. 2.2 show he eloci y and ange es ima ion oo MSE (RMSE) e sus SNR ad o a pu e LoS channel (P= 1) and o OTFS, OFDM, and FMCW. We no ice ha bo h digi al modula ion o ma s p o ide as accu a e ada pe o mance as FMCW, while ansmi ing use ul in o ma ion o any possible Rx. In addi ion, he hi d sub igu e o Fig. 2.2 shows he achie able a e o OFDM and OTFS, o simplici y o de i a ion, when Gaussian independen and independen and iden ically dis ibu ed (i.i.d.) symbols CGauss a e sen h ough he channel. This p o ides an achie able a e in he case o join de- ec ion and decoding, wi h uncons ained complexi y, as a unc ion o SNRcom, 58 Chap e 2. ML Me hods o Rada Pa ame e Es ima ion −40 −35 −30 −25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 SNR ad [dB] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m/s] OTFS OTFS CRLB OFDM FMCW OTFSWa e all Es ima ion OTFSRandom Es ima ion −40 −35 −30 −25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 SNR ad [dB] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m] OTFS OTFS CRLB OFDM FMCW OTFSWa e all Es ima ion OTFSRandom Es ima ion 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 SNRcom [dB] CGauss / [bi s/s/Hz] COTFS Gauss COFDM Gauss Figu e 2.2: F om op o bo om: he RMSE o he a ge eloci y es ima ion ˆ s SNR ad, he RMSE o he a ge ange es ima ion ˆ s SNR ad, and he Gaussian capaci y CGauss s. SNRcom, o he cu es indica ed in he di e en legends. 2.3. Simula ion Resul s 59 gi ing a quali a i e idea o pe o mance cu es. A mo e accu a e model should conside only de ec ion, i.e., sepa a ed om decoding, calcula ing he achie - able communica ion a e in e ms o p agma ic capaci y, as ex ensi ely done in Chap e 4. Gi en he ac ha we can model he block inpu -ou pu ela ion o OTFS as a MIMO channel, he mu ual in o ma ion wi h Gaussian inpu s and pe ec channel s a e in o ma ion (CSI) a he ecei e is gi en by [67] COTFS Gauss =NT NT +TGI 1 NM log2de I+ SNRcomΨΨH.(2.56) A simila exp ession o OFDM, owing o he ac ha he channel ma ix in OFDM is diagonal, wi h consequen symbol-by-symbol de ec ion, yields COFDM Gauss =T T+TGI log2(1 + SNRcom).(2.57) The ac o s NT/(NT +TGI) and T/(T+TGI) o OTFS and OFDM, espec- i ely, a e in oduced in o de o ake in o accoun he (possible) inse ion o a gua d in e al. In OTFS, a gua d in e al o du a ion TGI is inse ed a he end o each ame, whose du a ion is TOTFS =NT, comp ising Nconsecu i e symbols in he ime domain (see Chap e 1). In con as , in OFDM, he gua d in e al akes he o m o a CP, inse ed o each OFDM symbol o du a ion T. The ame size is hus TOFDM =NTo=N(T+Tcp). I is clea ha o p ac ical alues o he OTFS ame leng h N, he o e - head paid by OTFS is much less han he CP o e head paid by OFDM (in hese esul s we used TGI =T/4, which is ypical in he IEEE 802.11 amily o s anda ds). On he o he hand, he la ge o e head incu ed by OFDM yields a pa icula ly simple ecei e s uc u e, allowing symbol-by-symbol de ec ion hanks o he diagonaliza ion o he channel. In con as , OTFS equi es block- wise de ec ion o e he whole ame, which can be e y compu a ionally in- ensi e, especially o la ge Nand M. This is why he p oposed so -ou pu symbol de ec o p esen ed in Sec ion 4.2.1 is o pa icula in e es . Nex , we p esen a second se o esul s whe e we conside only OTFS bu in he p esence o a mul ipa h channels (P > 1, up o P= 4), showing 66 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions on a de ec ed a ge , maximizing he BF gain and he ecei ed SNR, shall be used o minimize “mul i- a ge ” in e e ence du ing a possible acking and communica ion phase [49, 13, 70]. Clea ly, wi hin he a ge de ec ion phase, a non- i ial adeo appea s. On one hand, wide angula sec o s co e age enable he de ec ion o mul iple a ge s i he ecei ed backsca e ed powe is high enough. On he o he hand, a mo e di ec ional BF g an s a highe ecei ed SNR, and hus longe de ec able a ge dis ance, a he cos o a ime-consuming sea ch o e na owe angula sec o s (as classical ada suc- cessi ely swapping adjacen egions, see, e.g., [13]). Di e en solu ions o he a o emen ioned p oblem can be ound in li e a u e (see, e.g., [52, 53, 15, 54]). As an ex ension o [71] and o he concep s in oduced in he p e ious pa s, his chap e s udies he join a ge de ec ion and pa ame e es ima- ion p oblem wi h a mono-s a ic MIMO ada adop ing OTFS, and ex ends he li e a u e esul s on MIMO con igu a ions (see, e.g., [44, 72]). The use o communica ion wa e o ms o MIMO ada has been mo i a ed by he join ada and communica ion pa adigm (as showed in Sec. 2.1), whe e wo unc- ions a e implemen ed by sha ing he same esou ces and he same wa e o m (see e.g. [24, 27, 25] and e e ences he ein). Con a y o he exis ing wo ks on ada sensing using OTFS [46, 71, 28], his use case conside s a MIMO ada unde a p ac ical mmWa e sys em a chi ec u e, such ha he numbe o adio equency (RF) chains (N ) is much smalle han he numbe o an- ennas (Na). In ac , he di icul ies ela ed o he implemen a ion o a ully digi al BF, o , equi alen ly, associa e one RF chain pe an enna (including A/D con e sion, modula ion, and ampli ica ion) in a small o m ac o and highly in eg a ed echnology o e a la ge signal bandwid h, a e well known. The e o e, ocusing on mmWa e au omo i e applica ions, we conside hyb id digi al-analog (HDA) BF schemes as ypically conside ed in li e a u e (see, e.g., [55, 56] and e e ences he ein). We will s udy wo di e en scena ios, explo ing he a o emen ioned BF adeo . The i s scena io conside s a Tx BF design wi h beam co e ing a wide angula sec o , o join ly pe o m a ge de ec ion, pa ame e es ima ion, and mul icas ing o a common message o 3.1. In oduc ion 67 all possible ac i e use s (see Fig. 3.1a). A possible applica ion o his model is, o ins ance, a base s a ion moun ed nea a highway able o collec a - ic in o ma ion h ough ada capabili ies while communica ing i s knowledge o ac i e Rx.1Assuming he communica ion phase es ablished, i.e., de ec ion al eady pe o med, he second scena io conside s a Tx BF wi h di ec ed na - ow beams, such ha indi idual in o ma ion s eams a e sen o he de ec ed use s, o g oups o use s, as depic ed in Fig. 3.1b. I is impo an o s ess he ac ha he ada Rx uses a wide beam pa e n consis ing o N beams, as illus a ed in Fig. 3.2, in o de o ob ain a meaning ul ec o obse a ion, necessa y o AoA es ima ion, ega dless o he ope a ing phase. This is in a sha p con as o he hyb id beam alignmen conside ed in a ypical communi- ca ion sys em, whe e he Rx also applies BF and ob ains a scala obse a ion p ecluding he es ima ion o he AoA (see, e.g., [55, 50] and e e ences he ein). Unde his se up, we p opose an e icien ML-based scheme combined wi h HDA BF o join ly pe o m a ge de ec ion and pa ame e es ima ion. Mo e p ecisely, ou scheme i s pe o ms a ge de ec ion and supe - esolu ion es- ima ion o delay, Dopple shi , and AoA using a wide angula beam along which a single da a s eam is sen . Then, once he a ge s a e de ec ed, he subsequen acking phase pe o ms he pa ame e es ima ion using mul iple na ow beams along which mul iple da a s eams can be sen . Ou nume i- cal esul s demons a e ha he p oposed scheme is able o eliably de ec mul iple a ge s while essen ially achie ing he CRLB o ada pa ame e es- ima ion. Fu he mo e we in es iga e a ious scena ios o nea - a e ec s o a ge s, showing ha a successi e in e e ence cancella ion (SIC) mechanism is able o e icien ly emo e he masking e ec be ween a ge s loca ed a di - e en anges om he ada , and we p o ide an in-dep h analysis o he wo scena ios o in e es , showing hei limi s and ad an ages. 1I is clea ha , ge ing id o he message sen , ada asks can be pe o med by using any well known ada wa e o m [13], and he use o a digi al communica ion o ma is poin less ( he ansmission o in o ma ion could s a in a second communica ion phase, e.g., wi hin a ime di ision p o ocol). 68 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions Tx / Rada Rx Communica ion Rx / Rada Ta ge Tx / Rada Rx Wide Angula Sec o / GTX Wide Angula Sec o / GTX (a) De ec ion phase Tx / Rada Rx Communica ion Rx / Rada Ta ge Ta ge BF / GTX Ta ge BF / GTX Tx / Rada Rx Ta ge BF / GTX Ta ge BF / GTX (b) T acking phase Figu e 3.1: Two scena ios wi h wo di e en Tx beam pa e ns. In (a), a Tx (a base s a ion o a ca ) b oadcas s a common message explo ing a wide angula sec o . In (b), we conside di ec ional BF owa ds he de ec ed a ge s. The Rx always makes use o a wide beam wi hin he angula sec o o in e es . We ema k he e he used no a ion. (·)Tdeno es he anspose ope a ion. (·)Hdeno es he He mi ian (conjuga e and anspose) ope a ion. Ope a o |·| deno es he absolu e alue |x|i x∈R, o he ca dinali y (numbe o elemen s) o a disc e e se , i.e., |F|, i Fis a disc e e se . 3.2 Physical model We conside a join ada de ec ion and pa ame e es ima ion sys em ope - a ing o e a channel bandwid h Band a he ca ie equency c. The Tx is equipped wi h a mono-s a ic MIMO ada wi h Naan ennas and N RF 3.2. Physical model 69 Rada Rx N Beams Wide Angula Sec o Figu e 3.2: Beam con igu a ion a he ada Rx o he wo scena ios depic ed in Fig. 3.1. N beams co e a wide angula sec o . chains, ope a ing in ull-duplex mode.2The ada Rx (coloca ed wi h he Tx, i.e., mono-s a ic assump ion) p ocesses he backsca e ed signal o iden i y he p esence o a ge s wi hin he beam, while es ima ing pa ame e s o in e es such as ange, eloci y, and AoA. A poin a ge model is aken in o accoun , such ha each a ge can be ep esen ed h ough i s LoS pa h only [17, 21, 15]. By le ing he s ee ing angle φ∈[−π 2,π 2], by conside ing an an enna a ay wi h λ/2 spacing (whe e λis he wa eleng h), he Tx and Rx a ays a e gi en by a(φ) and b(φ) espec i ely, whe e a(φ)=(a1(φ), . . . , aNa(φ))T∈CNa, deno es he uni o m linea a ay esponse ec o o he ada Rx wi h an(φ) = ej(n−1)πsin(φ), n = 1, . . . , Na,(3.1) and bn(φ) = an(φ). In ac , gi en he mono-s a ic ada , he same s ee ing angle φis bo h a ada Tx and Rx, hus, ec o s aand b esul o be equal. The channel is modeled as an ex ension o he P- ap ime- equency selec i e 2Full-duplex ope a ions can be achie ed wi h su icien isola ion be ween he Tx and he ( ada ) de ec o and possibly in e e ence analog p e-cancella ion in o de o p e en he ( ada ) de ec o sa u a ion [31, 73, 32]. 70 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions channel in (1.1) including he addi ion spa ial dimension, which is gi en by [7] H( , τ) = P−1 X p=0 hpb(φp)aH(φp)δ(τ−τp)ej2πνp ,(3.2) whose dimension is Na×Na, whe e Pis he numbe o a ge s, hpis a complex channel gain including he pa hloss, νp=2 p c cand τp=2 p ca e he ound- ip Dopple shi and delay, while φpdeno es he AoA, each co esponding o he p- h a ge , espec i ely. 3.2.1 OTFS Inpu Ou pu Rela ion We conside OTFS wi h Msubca ie s o bandwid h ∆ each, such ha he o al equency band is gi en by B=M∆ . As al eady w i en in many p e ious chap e s, Tdeno es he symbol ime, and he OTFS ame du a ion is NT. The Dopple -delay dimensions, acco ding o (1.13), a e Nand M, while he equa ion T∆ = 1 is always alid (see Chap e 1 and Sec. 1.3 o mo e de ails). In o de o conside he a o emen ioned di e en ope a ional modes, i.e., de ec ion and acking phases, we le Nsdeno e he numbe o da a s eams o be sen in each ime- equency slo , such ha Ns= 1 co esponds o he mul icas ing o a single da a s eam (in a possible de ec ion phase whe e a base s a ion wan s o sha e a common in o ma ion while de ec ing ac i e a ge s) and Ns≤N co esponds o he b oadcas ing o indi idual da a s eams ( owa ds he ac i e a ge s al eady de ec ed in he p e ious phase). Following he s anda d de i a ion o he inpu -ou pu ela ion o OTFS (see Sec. 1.3), he e we ex end he equa ions o also conside he addi ional spa ial dimension. Le us deal wi h Ns-dimensional da a symbols {xk,l}, o k= 0, . . . , N−1, l= 0, . . . , M−1, belonging o any cons ella ion, and a anged in he N×M wo-dimensional Dopple -delay g id Γ = {(k/NT, l/M∆ )}in (1.13). The Tx i s applies he ISFFT o con e da a symbols {xk,l}in o a Ns×1 block {X[n, m]}in he ime- equency domain X[n, m] = N−1 X k=0 M−1 X l=0 xk,lej2π(nk N−ml M),(3.3) 3.2. Physical model 71 o n= 0, . . . , N −1, m= 0, . . . , M −1, sa is ying he a e age powe cons ain E[X[n, m]HX[n, m]] = Pa g/(NMNa)INa, whe e INsdeno es an iden i y ma ix o dimension Nsand Pa g some o al maximum powe allowed by he sys em. A e assigning Nss eams o N RF chains h ough a mapping ma ix V∈ CN ×Ns(since gene ally Ns≤N , hus a mapping is necessa y), he Tx gene a es he N -dimensional con inuous- ime signal s( ) = V N−1 X n=0 M−1 X m=0 X[n, m]g x( −nT)ej2πm∆ ( −nT ),(3.4) in which g x( ) is he shaping pulse applied in ansmission (see Chap e 1 o mo e de ails and Sec. 1.3.8). Since he numbe o RF chains is ypically much smalle han he numbe o an ennas, di e en ypes o HDA a chi ec u es be ween RF chains and an ennas ha e been conside ed in he li e a u e (see e.g. [55]). In his pape , we ocus on he ully-connec ed HDA scheme o [55]. Fo any HDA a chi ec u e, he Tx applies he hyb id BF ma ix deno ed by F∈CNa×N ha cap u es bo h baseband and RF analog BF (see [51, 54]), while he Rx sees he ecei ed signal o a educed dimension h ough a p ojec ion ma ix deno ed by U∈CN ×Na. By imposing (FVVHFH) = Na, he o al powe cons ain Pa g is sa is ied. In o he wo ds, he Rx canno access o each an enna elemen , bu ob ains only a p ojec ion o he ecei ed signal. By ansmi ing he signal (3.4) o e he channel (3.2), he N -dimensional con inuous- ime ecei ed signal is gi en by ( ) = P−1 X p=0 hpUb(φp)aH(φp)Fs( −τp)ej2πνp ,(3.5) whe e we omi ed he noise o simplici y. I is in e es ing he e o compa e hese equa ions wi h he single spa ial dimensional ones p esen ed in Sec. 1.3. The ou pu o he Rx il e -bank adop ing a gene ic ecei e shaping pulse 72 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions g x( ) is y( , ) = Z ( 0)g∗ x( 0− )e−j2π 0d 0 =Z 0 g∗ x( 0− ) P−1 X p=0 hpUb(φp)aH(φp)Fs( 0−τp)ej2πνp 0e−j2π 0d 0 =X p,n0,m0 hpUb(φp)aH(φp)FVX[n0, m0]Z 0 g∗ x( 0− )g x( 0−τp−n0T) ej2πm0∆ ( 0−τp−n0T)ej2π(νp− ) 0d 0.(3.6) By sampling a =nT and =m∆ , we ob ain y[n, m] = y( , )| =nT, =m∆ = N−1 X n0=0 M−1 X m0=0 hn,m[n0, m0],(3.7) whe e he ime- equency domain inpu -ou pu ela ion hn,m[n0, m0] is hn,m[n0, m0] = P−1 X p=0 h0 pUb(φp)aH(φp)FVX[n0, m0]ej2πn0T νp Cg x,g x ((n−n0)T−τp,(m−m0)∆ −νp)e−j2πm∆ τp,(3.8) whe e Cu, (τ, ν) deno es he CAF, we le h0 p=hpej2πνpτp, and imposed he e m e−j2πmn0∆ T = 1, ∀n0, m, unde he hypo hesis T∆ = 1. Since each Xi[n, m] is gene a ed ia ISFFT, he ecei ed signal in he delay-Dopple do- main is ob ained by he applica ion o he SFFT y[k, l] = X n,m y[n, m] NM ej2π(ml M−nk N)=X k0,l0 gk,k0l, l0,(3.9) whe e he ISI coe icien o he Dopple -delay pai [k0, l0] seen by sample [k, l] is gi en by gk,k0l, l0=X p h0 pUb(φp)aH(φp)FVxk0,l0Ψp k,k0[l, l0],(3.10) 3.2. Physical model 73 −60−50−40−30−20−10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 Angle BF Gain [dB] Co e age 10◦ Co e age 20◦ Co e age 30◦ Figu e 3.3: BF design o di e en angula co e age. Clea ly, wide he beam, less he BF gain. wi h Ψp k,k0[l, l0] de ined as Ψp k,k0[l, l0] = X n,n0,m,m0 Cg x,g x ((n−n0)T−τp,(m−m0)∆ −νp) NM ej2πn0T νp e−j2πm∆ τpej2πn0k0 N−m0l0 Me−j2π(nk N−ml M),(3.11) while simpli ied e sion o Ψp k,k0[l, l0] ob ained by app oxima ing he CAF can be ound in Sec. 1.3. 3.2.2 Beam o ming ma ices The design o he BF ma ix Fa he ada Tx depends on he ope a ing phase, and anyway Fis chosen such ha Tx and Rx a e aligned owa ds he same wide angula sec o . Following [51, Sec ion III.C], we cons uc F∈CNa×N o co e a wide angula sec o [−θ, θ] as ollows. By ep esen ing his angula sec o by a disc e e se o N angles, deno ed by Θ = {±(θ/(2N ) + kθ/N )}, 74 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions o k= 0, . . . , N /2−1, each column o F= [ 1,..., N ] akes he o m i=a(θi) |a(θi)|, i = 1, . . . , N ,(3.12) whe e a(θi) is de ined in (3.1) and aking in o accoun a sui able no maliza ion. An example on how he BF beams, w. . . he associa ed gain, look like is shown in Fig. 3.3, o di e en angula co e age. Du ing he a ge acking phase, we o m mul iple na ow beams co e- sponding o he es ima ed AoA o he de ec ed a ge s. This is illus a ed wi h ed and blue beams, co esponding o wo di e en AoA, in Fig. 3.1b. Assum- ing ha P a ge s a e de ec ed and hei espec i e AoA a e es ima ed, we cons uc Fby eplacing θiby ˆ φp o he i s Pcolumns in (3.12) [51, Sec ion III.B]. In such a case, he BF gain owa ds a single a ge is app oxima ely ≃Na, while dec eases o each o he conside ed a ge , i.e., ≃Na/P. Con a y o he ansmi beam o ming ma ix, he educ ion ma ix Ua he ada Rx emains he same o bo h de ec ion and acking phases. Namely, we se U=FH, whe e each column is gi en in (3.12). This is illus a ed in Fig. 3.2. This choice o an iso opic ecei e beam enables o ob ain a mul i- dimensional signal o AoA es ima ion in bo h de ec ion and acking phases. 3.3 Join De ec ion and Pa ame e s Es ima ion We wish o es ima e he se o ou pa ame e s θ={h0 p, φp, τp, νp}∈TP, wi h T=C×R×R×R. By de ining Gp(τp, νp, φp),(Ub (φp)aH(φp)FV)⊗Ψp,(3.13) whe e ⊗is he K onecke p oduc ,3as he N NM ×NsNM ma ix ob ained by mul iplying Ψpby a di e en coe icien o (Ub (φp)aH(φp)FV). Thus, by s acking Xin o a NsNM-dimensional ec o xand de ining an ou pu ec o 3No e ha AX×Y⊗BZ×K=CXZ×Y K . 3.3. Join De ec ion and Pa ame e s Es ima ion 75 yo dimension NMN ×1, he ecei ed signal in he p esence o noise is y= P−1 X p=0 h0 pGp(τp, νp, φp)x+w,(3.14) whe e wdeno es he AWGN ec o wi h independen and iden ically dis- ibu ed en ies o ze o mean and a iance σ2 w. The p oblem consis s, i s , o he de ec ion o he P a ge s (in case o a i s acquisi ion phase), oge he wi h he es ima ion o he associa ed 4Ppa ame e s (complex channel coe i- cien , Dopple , delay, and angle) om he N MN-dimensional ecei ed signal. To his end, we de ine he ML unc ion as l(y|θ,x) =  y−X p h0 pGpx 2 , =yHy−yHX p h0 pGx −X p h0∗ pxHGHy +xH X p h0 pG!H X q h0 qGq!x,(3.15) whe e we use he sho hand no a ion Gp,G(τp, νp, φp). No e he simila i ies and di e ences w. . . (2.27). The ML solu ion is gi en by ˆ θ= a g min θ∈T P l(y|θ,x).(3.16) Fo a ixed se o {φp, τp, νp}, he ML es ima o o {h0 p}is gi en by sol ing he ollowing se o equa ions xHGH p  P−1 X q=0 h0 qGq x=xHGH py, p = 0, . . . , P −1.(3.17) By plugging (5.34) in o (5.32), i eadily ollows ha minimizing l(y|θ,x) educes o maximize he ollowing unc ion l2(y|θ,x) = X p h0 pyHGpx=X p Sp(τp, νp, φp)−Ip({h0 q}q6=p,θ),(3.18) 82 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions While wo dis inc a ge s in he angle domain can be iden i ied i he angula esolu ion mee s some condi ions (depending on he numbe o an- ennas, he angula dis ance be ween he wo a ge s, and he an enna a ay p ope ies) [13]. The eloci y and he ange esolu ion is de e mined by he sys em pa ame e s in Table 3.1 and gi en by es =Bc 2NM c [m/s] , es =c 2B[m] .(3.29) In o de o ge a easonable ange esolu ion, e.g., <1 [m], a la ge bandwid h has o be conside ed.7Since he eloci y esolu ion is di ec ly p opo ional o B, o a ixed c, he only way o ob ain lowe alues is o inc ease he block size NM, leading o a ema kable inc ease in compu a ional complexi y, which could be no a o dable. Fo his eason, we se he sys em pa ame e s by ocus- ing on a easonable ange esolu ion (and heo e ical maximum ange) unde a easible compu a ional complexi y. No e ha he maximum ange could no be achie ed i he backsca e ed powe is below he noise loo . Howe e , he chosen sys em se up leads o an una oidable e y la ge eloci y esolu ion. Unde he a o emen ioned assump ions, aken a he beginning o Sec ion 5.4, he p oblem o a ge s iden i iabili y appea s only in he angula domain. How- e e , his only happens a mmWa e, hus, ange and eloci y esolu ions a e epo ed he e o comple eness, since he p oposed scheme could a ge lowe equencies, whe e he a o emen ioned assump ion migh no be sa is ied. Rema k: The pa ame e es ima ion pe o mance o he p oposed ML- based algo i hm, in pa icula ange and eloci y es ima ion, s ic ly depends on he dimension o he block o da a sen , i.e., he p oduc N·M. Thus, he sys em pa ame e s o Tab. 3.1 can be easily uned o achie e he desi ed le els o ada esolu ions (modi ying he bandwid h), acquisi ion ime (based on he leng h o he OTFS ame in ime), maximum ange, e c. Clea ly, he CRLB changes acco dingly. Mo eo e , no e ha his is also possible hanks o 7No e ha a adeo appea s. La ge bandwid hs mean mo e p ecise esolu ion, bu lowe heo e ical maximum ange (wi h he same N×Mg id). We ema k ha ou algo i hm is comple ely independen o hese choices. 3.4. Nume ical Resul s 83 OTFS modula ion, which is no sensi i e o Dopple and delay e ec s. Rema k: The ( ada ) ange and eloci y esolu ion in (3.29) indica es he minimum necessa y a ge s spacing, in one o he wo domains, such ha bo h o hem a e dis inguishable a he ada Rx. This is no linked o he pe o mance o ou ML-based de ec o , which is able o accu a ely es ima e he pa ame e s a beyond he esolu ion in (3.29). Thus, he e is a huge di e ence be ween a ge s iden i iabili y and es ima ion pe o mance. 3.4.1 Simula ion Resul s Fig. 3.4 shows he ada pe o mance in e ms o p obabili y o de ec ion (PD), ange/ eloci y/AoA es ima ion du ing he de ec ion phase (Fig. 3.1a). When mo e han one a ge is conside ed wi hin he simula ion scena io, he PD Pd is a e aged w. . . all P a ge s, i.e., Pd=PP−1 p=0 Pd(p) P,(3.30) whe e Pd(p) deno ed he PD o he p- h a ge . Fi s , no e ha , by conside ing an angula co e age o 10 deg ees (blue line), he maximum ange o co ec ly iden i y a a ge , limi ed by he pa hloss and hus di e en om he heo e ical limi indica ed in Table 3.1, is abou 110 m. Fo any dis ance be ween Tx and a ge , he es ima ion pe o mance o ada pa ame e s o in e es ( ange, eloci y, and AoA) ollows he co espond- ing CRLB. Mo e in de ails, no e ha a he limi ange o 110 m, he RMSE o ange, eloci y, and angle a e espec i ely, ≃4·10−2[m], ≃1.6·101[m/s], ≃4·10−2[deg ee]. As expec ed, gi en he sys em pa ame e s, he eloci y RMSE is qui e poo , while he o he es ima ion pe o mances a e sa is ac o y. Howe e , a p ope BF design owa ds a ge s, in a subsequen acking phase, could imp o e he es ima ion pe o mance maximizing he ecei ed SNR, as showed in nex esul s. As seen om Fig. 3.4, by inc easing he angle sec o om 10◦ o 30◦, he backsca e ed powe ge s smalle (less BF gain), hence he maximum ange signi ican ly dec eases. The e exis s a non- i ial adeo 84 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130 140 150 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Range [m] Pd Sec o 10◦ Sec o 20◦ Sec o 30◦ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130 140 150 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 Sec o 10◦20◦30◦ [m] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130 140 150 10−1 100 101 102 Sec o 10◦20◦30◦ [m/s] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m/s] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130 140 150 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 Sec o 10◦20◦30◦ ϕ[deg] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ϕ] / [deg] Figu e 3.4: De ec ion phase. Single a ge a a di e en dis ance wi hin he illumina ed angula sec o o speci ied co e age. RMSE pe o mance wi h as- socia ed CRLB and de ec ion pe o mance. Na= 128. 3.4. Nume ical Resul s 85 be ween he wid h o beams and ada pe o mance. Wide angula sec o s al- low o explo e he en i onmen in less ime, bu wi h limi ed maximum ange, while na owe sec o s maximize he ecei ed powe and he maximum a ge ange, a he cos o a ime consuming beam sweeping sea ch. Clea ly, RMSE pe o mance can no be compu ed i he PD is equal o 0, i.e., he a ge is no de ec ed, hus RMSE cu es may s op a ce ain anges, as isible in Fig. 3.4. Fig. 3.5 shows he pe o mance o he SIC echnique p esen ed in Algo i hm 2 du ing he de ec ion phase in he scena io depic ed in Fig. 3.6. Namely, he Tx wishes o de ec wo a ge s, one a ixed dis ance o 10 [m], he o he mo ing w. . . he x-axis, i.e., om 20 o 150 [m] (see Fig. 3.6). SIC is necessa y because he close a ge (black ca ) will mask he u he a ge (blue ca ) so ha he la e canno be de ec ed. Fi s , he i s plo o Fig. 3.5, e e ed o he PD, shows ha , when he mo ing a ge is loca ed a anges g ea e han 90 [m], co esponding o he ela i e ange beyond 80 [m], he masking e ec is no emo ed e icien ly by he SIC echnique ( he esidual in e e ence is ema kable), and he a ge a longe dis ance is no de ec ed co ec ly. In ac , a he ex eme poin , he cu e la s o Pd= 0.5, because only one a ge ou o wo (clea ly, he closes o he ada Rx, i.e., he one ixed a 10 [m]) is co ec ly de ec ed. As clea ly isible, he pe o mance in e ms o RMSE, which conside s in his case he es ima ion pe o mance a e aged w. . . he de ec ed a ge s (no e ha he a ge loca ed a 10 [m] is always de ec ed co ec ly), sligh ly changes while conside ing one o wo a ge s, as a con i ma ion o he e ec i eness o he p oposed algo i hm. No e ha he blue cu es o Fig. 3.5 co espond o he blue ones o Fig. 3.4. Now we conside he acking phase co esponding o Fig. 3.1b. The sce- na io akes in o accoun one Tx and h ee a ge s wi hin an angula sec o o 10◦, as shown in Fig. 3.7. Fig. 3.8 shows he RMSE pe o mance o he e e - ence a ge (black ca ), in he p esence o o he wo a ge s (blue ca s), No e ha dis ance, eloci y, and angula posi ion o all h ee a ge s a e andomly chosen a e e y Mon e Ca lo i e a ion, in such a way he comple e masking 86 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Range [m] Pd 1 Ta ge 2 Ta ge s 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10−3 10−2 10−1 N. Ta ge s 1 2 [m] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10−1 100 101 102 N. Ta ge s 1 2 [m/s] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m/s] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10−3 10−2 10−1 N. Ta ge s 1 2 ϕ[deg] CRLB Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ϕ] / [deg] Figu e 3.5: De ec ion phase. Two a ge , one loca ed a 10 [m] and he o he mo ing a a di e en dis ance (x-axis) wi hin he illumina ed 10◦angula sec- o as shown in Fig. 3.6. RMSE pe o mance wi h associa ed CRLB. De ec ion pe o mance. Na= 128. 3.4. Nume ical Resul s 87 Fixed Ta ge Mo ing Ta ge Tx / Rada Rx Figu e 3.6: Example o scena io depic ed in Fig. 3.5. The ixed a ge (in black) masks he mo ing a ge , in blue, which changes i s loca ion wi hin he illumina ed angula sec o . Re e ence Ta ge Tx / Rada Rx In e e ence Ta ge In e e ence Ta ge Rx BF Pa e n Figu e 3.7: Example o scena io depic ed in Fig. 3.8. The goal is o co ec ly es ima e he pa ame e s o he e e ence a ge (in black), while in e e ence a ge s (in blue) lay wi hin he same Rx BF pa e n (depic ed in Fig. 3.2 and wi h he black shape in his igu e). 88 Chap e 3. ML Rada Me hods in MIMO Con igu a ions 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 NaSim CRLB 16 32 64 128 Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m] 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 10−1 100 101 102 103 NaSim CRLB 16 32 64 128 Range [m] RMSE[ˆ ] / [m/s] 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 NaSim CRLB εBW 16 32 64 128 Range [m] RMSE[ˆ φ] / [deg ee◦] Figu e 3.8: T acking scena io. Tx BF dis inc beams owa ds h ee di e en a ge s. 3.4. Nume ical Resul s 89 e ec p esen ed in Fig. 3.5 does no occu , and an a e age o RMSE esul s is inally compu ed. F om Fig. 3.8, we obse e ha he RMSE c i ically depends on he numbe o an ennas. This is because he BF gain g ows p opo ionally wi h he numbe o an ennas and inc eases he backsca e ed signal powe . Mo eo e , no e ha a ( e e sed) “wa e all” beha io is shown o ange and eloci y es ima ion. This is because, e en i he p esence o he a ge is gi en o g an ed, low SNR alues migh s ill lead o a la ge e o du ing he Dopple - delay ML maximiza ion (see Algo i hm 2). The wa e all beha io is ypical o ML es ima o s and has been ex ensi ely analyzed in Sec. 2.1.2.3. Also no e ha he AoA RMSE pe o mance is uppe limi ed by he 3-dB beamwid h o he beam pa e n (see, e.g., [51, 76]). In ac , supposing ha he a ge posi ion lies wi hin he 3-dB beamwid h, also he ini ial AoA es ima ion ( he uppe and lowe limi o ma ix Ω in (3.21)) is limi ed o ha wid h. As a consequence, he RMSE does no exceed a sys ema ic e o , indica ed as εBW, calcula ed by a e aging o e andom AoA es ima ion ealiza ions wi hin he ange o possibili ies, i.e., be ween he uppe and lowe limi se by he 3-dB beamwid h o he beam pa e n, equi alen ly o he analysis ela ed o (2.44), which can be also applied o ange and eloci y es ima ions. Chap e 4 OTFS De ec ion 4.1 In oduc ion We will now ocus on he OTFS da a de ec ion a he Rx side. By conside ing he communica ion-o ien ed channel model in (1.1), i.e., aking in o accoun one-way Dopple and delay shi (modeling a o wa d communica ion channel, agains he ada wo-way scena io), in line wi h mos o he cu en li e a u e on OTFS de ec ion (e.g., [62, 4]) we assume pe ec CSI a he Rx, i.e., he knowledge o channel ma ix Ψ. The acquisi ion o such CSI is a dis inc p oblem o independen in e es , ha will be analyzed in 5 and has been s udied in li e a u e in ecen yea s (see, e.g., [37, 44, 45]). In his chap e , we conside sepa a e de ec ion and decoding, whe e he Rx consis s o he conca ena ion o a so -ou pu symbol de ec o , p oducing so -es ima es o he coded symbols x, and a (sepa a e) decode ha akes such es ima es as he ou pu o a i ual channel ha inco po a es also he de ec o . Thus, we do no conside “ u bo equaliza ion” schemes, in which de ec ion and decoding a e join ly pe o med h ough successi e i e a ions in- ol ing eedback loops (as, e.g., in [77]). This choice is jus i ied by he ac ha he p esence o a o wa d e o co ec ion scheme, oge he wi h he speci ic de ini ion o he channel model, could obscu e he eal pe o mance o he de- 91 98 Chap e 4. OTFS De ec ion disc e e a iables aking alues in C. The e o e, i has a complexi y equal o |C|di−1, whe e |·|indica es he ca dinali y o he se , which may be p ohibi i ely la ge o la ge cons ella ions and, abo e all, i depends on he spa si y o he channel. The e o e, he exac applica ion o he SPA compu a ion ules o he FG ob ained di ec ly om he ma ix Ψis highly imp ac ical. Fo his eason, he au ho s o [62] p opose o use a Gaussian app oxima ion o he in e e ing symbols in he compu a ion a nodes Qi(x), which e ec i ely elies o a so in e e ence cancella ion app oach, as al eady widely used in u bo equaliza ion and in he con ex o mul iuse de ec ion in [39, 85]. The de ails o he esul ing MP algo i hm can be ound in [62]. I should be also men ioned ha , o he sake o simplici y and in o de o inc ease he spa si y o he FG in Fig. 4.2, he de ec o p oposed in [62] cons uc s he nominal ma ix Ψby ounding he delay shi s o in ege s on ecei e sampling g id. Unde his condi ion, he channel ma ix is e y spa se since many coe icien s co esponding o sampling a non-in ege delay shi s a e iden ically o ze o, and he numbe o connec ions o each node is e- duced, while p ese ing he leng h-4 cycles p oblem, una oidable wi h his app oach. Ne e heless, since he assump ion is gene ally no sa is ied by eal- wo ld channels, such app oxima ion o he channel ma ix esul s in neglec ing a signi ican componen o he ISI. We shall e i y ha when such in ege de- lay shi ounding is applied o he cons uc ion o he nominal ma ix Ψused by he de ec o bu he ac ual delay shi s ha e a ac ional componen (as i is always he case in p ac ice), he misma ch yields a signi ican pe o - mance deg ada ion. This shows ha neglec ing he ac ional pa o delays and Dopple shi s, as ou inely done in he li e a u e o OTFS, may be indeed qui e misleading. 4.2.3 Linea block-wise MMSE equaliza ion As a u he e m o compa ison we conside also he s anda d linea MMSE block equalize , applied o he channel model (2.17). In his case, he so - ou pu is simply he linea MMSE es ima e o symbols x om he obse a ion 4.3. Pe o mance o Sepa a ed De ec ion and Decoding 99 y, gi en by ˆ xLMMSE =ΨHΨΨH+σ2 wI−1y.(4.13) The complexi y o his app oach is p opo ional o O(NM)3, so i becomes quickly un easible o ypical alues o Nand M. A low-complexi y (mis- ma ched) linea minimum mean squa e e o (LMMSE) app oach was ecen ly p oposed in [47], elying on he cyclic p ope ies o channel ma ix Ψunde pe ec bi-o hogonali y o shaping pulses g x( ) and g x( ), oge he wi h he assump ion o on-g id Dopple and delay shi s (wi h Dopple -delay g id Γ). In eal channel condi ions, i.e., in he p esence o p ac ical ec angula pulses and non-in ege delay and Dopple shi s, he pe o mance o his app oach isibly deg ades. 4.3 Pe o mance o Sepa a ed De ec ion and Decoding As al eady men ioned, we cha ac e ize he pe o mance o sepa a ed de ec ion and decoding schemes in e ms o p agma ic capaci y, i.e., he mu ual in o ma- ion o he i ual channel wi h inpu he cons ella ion symbols, assumed wi h uni o m p obabili y, and ou pu p o ided by he so -ou pu o he de ec o . This mu ual in o ma ion p o ides an achie able a e o sepa a ed de ec ion and decoding, o any gi en de ec ion scheme [78, 79]. Le us conside a sequence o symbols {xk}belonging o he signal con- s ella ion C, and le Vk(xk) deno es he de ec o so -ou pu . In he case o MP-based de ec o s, Vk(xk) is gi en in he o m o a pos e io p obabili y dis ibu ion on xk∈ C, while in he case o linea equalize s (e.g., he linea MMSE es ima o in (4.13)), his is gi en as he noisy es ima e ˆxkwhich is ea ed as he ou pu o a ( i ual) AWGN channel. In any case, he p ag- ma ic capaci y is simply de ined as he symbol-by-symbol mu ual in o ma ion IPC (xk;V(xk)). When V(xk) akes on he o m o a pos e io p obabili y dis- 100 Chap e 4. OTFS De ec ion ibu ion, his can be easily calcula ed as IPC(xk;V(xk)) ,H(xk)−H(xk|V(xk)) = log2C − X xk∈C V(xk) log2 1 V(xk),(4.14) and, by conside ing a Mon e Ca lo simula ion o e Kdi e en ealiza ions IPC = K−1 X k=0 H(xk)−H(xk|V(xk)) = log2C − 1 K K−1 X k=0   X xk∈C V(xk) log2 1 V(xk)   .(4.15) In he case o linea equaliza ion (i.e., V(xk) = ˆxk), he p agma ic capaci y is simply gi en by he symme ic capaci y (i.e., wi h symbols used wi h uni o m p obabili y) o he signal cons ella ion C, o an AWGN channel wi h SNR equal o he ou pu signal- o-in e e ence noise a io (SINR) o he equalize [67]. Fo he sake o compa ison, we also show he symme ic capaci y o he signal cons ella ion in an AWGN channel wi h SNR equal o SNRcom (i.e., he SNR o he LoS pa h), deno ed by Csym AWGN, and he mu ual in o ma ion wi h Gaussian inpu s COTFS Gauss , o he case P= 1. Fig. 4.3 and Fig. 4.4 show he pe o mance o he a ious me hods o OTFS so -ou pu de ec ion o a 16-quad a u e ampli ude modula ion (QAM) and sys em pa ame e s lis ed in Tab. 2.1. Fig. 4.3 shows he esul s o he (un ealis ic) case whe e he channel Dopple shi s and delays a e exac ly on he disc e e Dopple -delay g id Γ used by he ecei e sampling. In con as , Fig. 4.4 shows he esul s when he ac ual channel has a bi a y Dopple and delay shi s (wi h a andom uni o mly dis ibu ed ac ional pa ), while ce - ain algo i hms s ill assume such in ege g id when cons uc ing he nominal channel ma ix Ψused by he de ec o (as ad oca ed o example in [62, 47]). We no ice ha he p oposed MP-based app oach based on he de ini ion o ma ix Gou pe o ms he one in [62] in bo h scena ios. In pa icula , i 4.3. Pe o mance o Sepa a ed De ec ion and Decoding 101 −4−2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 SNRcom [dB] P agma ic Capaci y — IPC hbi s symboli 16-QAM P= 1 P= 2 P= 3 P= 4 MPG MPΨ LMMSE LMMSELC Csym AWGN COTFS Gauss Figu e 4.3: Symbols de ec ion pe o mance in e ms o p agma ic capaci y o 16-QAM modula ion. The cu es show he beha io o ma ix Gbased MP algo i hm and MP algo i hm o [62] unde app oxima ed channel condi ions, i.e., wi h delay and Dopple shi s on he Dopple -delay g id, o a mul ipa h channel wi h di e en numbe o componen s P. 102 Chap e 4. OTFS De ec ion −4−2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 SNRcom [dB] P agma ic Capaci y — IPC hbi s symboli 16-QAM P= 1 P= 2 P= 3 P= 4 MPG MPΨ LMMSE LMMSELC Csym AWGN COTFS Gauss Figu e 4.4: Symbols de ec ion pe o mance in e ms o p agma ic capaci y o 16-QAM modula ion. The cu es show he beha io o ma ix Gbased MP algo i hm and MP algo i hm o [62] unde eal channel condi ions, i.e., wi h delay and Dopple shi s no on he Dopple -delay g id, o a mul ipa h channel wi h di e en numbe o componen s P. 4.3. Pe o mance o Sepa a ed De ec ion and Decoding 103 su e s om almos no deg ada ion due o he non-in ege Dopple and de- lay shi s, unlike he me hod o [62], which has been de i ed based on hese s ong assump ions. The LMMSE equalize (4.13) wi h ull complexi y yields e y good pe o mance, paying only a small SNR penal y w. . . he p oposed MP-based scheme o P= 1,2, and ou pe o ming he MP-based scheme o iche sca e ing P= 3,4. Howe e , as said be o e, i s complexi y is cubic in he ame dimension NM, which is una o dable in p ac ical implemen a- ions. Un o una ely, he low-complexi y LMMSE es ima o (cu es indica ed by LMMSELC in he igu es), p oposed in [47] and exploi ing a speci ic s uc- u e o he channel ma ix Ψ, which equi es doubly block ci culan ea u e o he OTFS channel ma ix, is sa is ied only when g x( ) and g x( ) a e bi- o hogonal. Unde such condi ion, as demons a ed in [47], his scheme coin- cides wi h he MMSE block equalize , bu wi hou he need o a la ge ma ix in e sion. Howe e , by adop ing physically ealizable and ealis ic ec angula pulses, which clea ly do no sa is y he bi-o hogonal condi ion he doubly block ci culan ea u e is los . Thus, ou simula ions show ha he app oach [47] is no compe i i e when applied o a channel model using ec angula pulses, as in ui i ely expec ed. I should be no iced ha bi-o hogonali y o pulses wi h ime- equency p oduc equal o 1 is ma hema ically impossible [84], and elaying on such assump ion may be e y misleading. No e ha we only ea a 16-QAM modula ion. Howe e , he esul s a e e y clea and plo s wi h di e en modula ion o ma s would ha e only been a con i ma ion o wha we s a ed abo e. Chap e 5 Channel Es ima ion 5.1 In oduc ion In a gi en communica ion scena io, he CSI, i.e., he knowledge o he commu- nica ion channel, is equi ed a he Rx o pe o m cohe en de ec ion [34], i.e., o co ec ly demodula e he ansmi ed symbols based on he (known) chan- nel ans o ma ion. The mos common app oach o acqui e he CSI is h ough he ansmission o known symbols, usually called pilo s [34]. Gene ally, hese pilo s a e a anged wi hin he block o in o ma ion symbols, ollowing a chosen ixed pa e n known o bo h Tx and Rx (see e.g, [35, 36, 86]), in such a way when a comple e block is ecei ed, he Rx is able o ins an ly pe o m cohe en de ec ion, o ins ance, wi hou wai ing o some o he side in o ma ion om ano he sou ce.1I is also well-known ha , subjec o he meaning ul and widely used assump ion o block ading (i.e., he p opaga ion channel emains cons an o e blocks o consecu i e ime-domain symbols, while i may change 1In some communica ion scena ios (o s anda d) he Tx could send an en i e block o pilo symbols, i.e., wi hou in o ma ion da a, ollowed by blocks wi h no pilo s. Unde he assump ion o slowly a ying channel s a is ics, he symbol de ec ion is based on he es i- ma ion made om he i s block. This case has no bee conside ed, by ocusing on a pe block channel es ima ion, wi h associa ed bene i s and losses. 105 106 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion independen ly om block o block), pilo -aided schemes a e indeed nea ly in o ma ion- heo e ically op imal in e ms o he capaci y scaling in he high spec al e iciency / high SNR egime (see, e.g., [87, 88, 89, 90]). Clea ly, de- pending on he pa icula applica ion and communica ion scena io, bo h he pilo pa e n and he channel es ima ion algo i hm should be op imized. As ypical elec onic sys ems a e a ec ed by he mal noise, he es ima ed CSI is no pe ec bu a lic ed by an es ima ion e o , whose magni ude depends on di e en pa ame e s, e.g., he channel SNR, he numbe o pilo s pe block, he es ima ion algo i hm (wi h ela ed con e gence speed, complexi y, accu acy). The es ima ed communica ion channel exp ession is hus used o pe o m co- he en de ec ion a he Rx side. By aking he achie able communica ion a e as he mos ele an and meaning ul pe o mance me ic, which is a measu e o he amoun o use ul in o ma ion sen in a block o symbols, a adeo appea s be ween he numbe o pilo s pe block, dedica ed o he CSI es ima ion, and he numbe o in o ma ion-bea ing symbols. The op imiza ion o his adeo is gene ally no i ial, depending on he modula ion o ma and on he chan- nel p opaga ion cha ac e is ics, and i s op imiza ion is usually pe o med by ials, gi en he di icul y o ind closed- o m op imiza ion c i e ia, as done in ou successi e analysis. Gi en he a o emen ioned sys em se up and ela ed p oblems and chal- lenges, we analyse he symbol de ec ion pe o mance in e ms o p agma ic capaci y, i.e., he achie able a e o he channel induced by he signal con- s ella ion and he de ec o so -ou pu [78, 79], o OTFS and OFDM, bo h designed o handle ime- equency selec i e channels as (1.1). This is equi a- len o wha is done in Chap e 4, ecalled he e o he sake o comple eness. In gene al, a so -ou pu de ec o a he Rx side p oduces an es ima e o he pos- e io p obabili y o he ansmi ed symbols gi en he ecei ed signal block (pilo s and da a). This es ima ed pos e io p obabili y (e.g., in he o m o log-likelihood a ios) is hen passed o a decode , ha ea s he sequence o so -ou pu symbols as he ou pu o a i ual channel. The p agma ic capaci y is he capaci y o such i ual channel, wi h disc e e inpu ep esen ed by he 5.1. In oduc ion 107 modula ion symbols, and so -ou pu gene a ed by he de ec o . Hence, he p agma ic capaci y is ep esen a i e o he achie able a e unde he assump- ion o sepa a ed de ec ion and decoding, i.e., wi hou “ u bo” ep ocessing o he channel ou pu once he decode ou pu is a ailable (see, e.g., [91, 92] and e e ences he ein). In p ac ice, i e a i e “ u bo” de ec ion is e y ha d o implemen since o en he de ec o is implemen ed in ha dwa e (e.g., in an in eg a ed ci cui ) and he decode is implemen ed in so wa e, and maybe e en in a di e en loca ion (as o example in he so-called 7.2 spli be ween ha dwa e and so wa e, enabling cloud-based p ocessing o he signals om emo e adio heads [93]). Fo his eason, we belie e ha p agma ic capaci y o sepa a ed de ec ion and decoding is a e y meaning ul pe o mance me ic o compa e di e en modula ion o ma s and he associa ed pilo schemes and so -ou pu de ec o s. In o de o make a ai compa ison be ween he wo modula ion o ma s in e ms o achie able communica ion a e, he pilo o e head necessa y o achie e a sa is ac o y es ima ion o he CSI has been aken in o accoun . Since he loss (no use ul in o ma ion is ansmi ed) associa ed o he p esence o pilo s canno be neglec ed, he achie able communica ion a e ine i ably de i- a es om he co esponding uppe bound, depic ed by he AWGN symme ic capaci y. Mo eo e , oge he wi h he pilo o e head, we also conside he (likely) p esence o a gua d in e al (GI) o CP, which addi ionally educes he achie able a e. A pe -block GI is used in OTFS o a oid in e -block in- e e ence (IBI) [61], while a CP is used o e e y OFDM symbol o a oid ISI and o make symbols o hogonal, hanks o he diagonaliza ion o he channel ma ix, unde he assump ion o low ICI, condi ion which is no ha d o be sa is ied. He e a i s signi ican di e ence be ween he wo modula ion o ma s e iden ly appea s. In ac , especially when he channel delay is signi ican , he CP leng h ends o be a la ge ac ion (e.g., 25%) o he symbol ime, leading o a ema kable loss in e ms o capaci y. On he o he hand, OTFS does no need a pe symbol sepa a ion, bu his comes a he cos o a non-negligible in- c ease in signal p ocessing complexi y caused by he ema kable Dopple -delay 114 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion We used as s opping c i e ion he maximum numbe o i e a ions. No e ha he sh inking ope a ion is allowed because ze o en ies o ec o ˆ ha i e a ion icanno assume a alue 6= 0 a i e a ion i0> i [99]. F om a complexi y poin o iew, he i s i e a ions a e he mos cos ly, while he algo i hm can un >106 imes keeping he complexi y almos cons an and he compu a ional ime linea (when he numbe o i e a ions is la ge enough, i.e., a away om s a ing cos ly ones). 5.2.1.1 Complexi y o he LASSO Sol e and S ep Size Re inemen The sensing ma ix Dis composed o Gcolumns o leng h NM. While he dimensions Nand Mdepends on sys em se ings and can be somehow con- olled o uned, he dimension G akes in o accoun he es ima ion p ecision, o g anula i y, o he sea ching g id Γ. Hence, he la ge he dimension G, he mo e eliable he esul . Using some examples:  I Γ is equi alen o he Dopple -delay g id (delay and Dopple shi s in ege mul iple o he g id), G=NM and Dis a NM ×NM ma ix. Blockwise ope a ions adop ed by any LASSO sol e a e easible in his amewo k.  I he s ep size o bo h Dopple and delay axis is a ac ion 1/ρ o he Dopple -delay g id s ep, G≃ONM ·ρ2and Dis app oxima ely a NM ×NM ·ρ2ma ix. Clea ly, inc easing he g anula i y o he g id quickly inc eases he complexi y. In o de o o e come he complexi y induced by sea ching g id wi h ine g anula i y, i is possible o e ine he s ep size in successi e phases, a he han di ec ly de ining a low ac ional alue o he en i e g id. The p oposed e inemen scheme is illus a ed in Algo i hm 3. Du ing he Peak Selec ion s ep, i he numbe o mul ipa h componen s Pis no a ailable a he ecei e , ins ead selec all local maxima o peaks (o he g oups o es ima es) whose magni ude is abo e a ce ain h eshold ( o be de ined). 5.2. OFDM Modula ion and he CS Algo i hm 115 Algo i hm 3: Re inemen o he G anula i y Resul : Fine es ima ion ˆ h o LASSO p oblem (5.14). Coa se Es ima ion: Fo any LASSO sol e , ge a i s coa se es ima ion ˆ hsuch ha he sea ching g id Γ is equi alen o he Dopple -delay g id (i.e., delay and Dopple shi s in ege mul iple o he g id). In his case G=NM and Dis a NM ×NM ma ix; Fo I e a ion i= 1,2, . . . do •Peak Selec ion: Selec he i s Plocal maxima o ˆ h; •S ep Re inemen A ound Maxima: Build a new sensing ma ix based on an ex ension o ma ix Dsuch ha he s ep size a ound he peaks is dec eased (i.e., he g anula i y and he p ecision a e inc eased); •Fine Es ima ion: Fo any LASSO sol e , ge a ine es ima ion ˆ h. End No e ha du ing he Coa se Es ima ion s ep, i.e., when Dis an NM × NM ma ix, i is possible o adop he app oach p oposed in [100] o sol e he LASSO minimiza ion in (5.14). The algo i hm o [100], bene i ing o he hie a chical s uc u e o ec o h, is able o p o ide a i s coa se and eliable es ima ion op imizing he compu a ional complexi y. Howe e , i h akes o - g id alues, he app oach o [100] becomes inapp op ia e, as con i med by he p esen ed simula ion esul s. Fo his eason, a e a Coa se Es ima ion, i.e., wi hin he I e a ion s ep, ano he LASSO sol e mus be chosen o ob ain he bes pe o mance in e ms o channel es ima ion. 5.2.1.2 So -Th esholding Ope a o In o de o sol e he LASSO minimiza ion p oblem, a so h esholding ope - a o is used in (5.17). The choice o his unc ion is jus i ied in he ollowing. 116 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion By s a ing om he inpu -ou pu ela ion in ma ix o m y=xSDh +z,Ah +z,(5.19) he esidual sum o squa es (RSS) o he LASSO sol e is gi en by RSS (h) = 1 2 NM−1 X i=0  yi− G−1 X j=0 hjAi,j  2 +λ G−1 X j=0 |hj|.(5.20) By aking he de i a i e o he i s and second e ms o he RSS w. . . θkwe ge ∂ ∂hk   1 2 NM−1 X i=0  yi− G−1 X j=0 hjAi,j  2   =− NM−1 X i=0 Ai,k    yi− G−1 X j=0 j6=k hjAi,j   +hk NM−1 X i=0 Ai,k ,−ρk+hkηk,(5.21) ∂ ∂hk   λ G−1 X j=0 |hj|   =         −λi hk<0 [−λ, λ] i hk= 0 λi hk>0 ,(5.22) in which he de i a i e a hk= 0 can assume wo di e en alues. By pu ing hings oge he ∂RSS (h) ∂hk =−ρk+hkηk+∂ ∂hk λ|hk|,(5.23) and, by se ing he de i a i e equal o ze o (since we a e ying o minimize he LASSO cos unc ion) ∂RSS (h) ∂hk =0=         −ρk+hkηk−λi hk<0 [−ρk−λ, −ρk+λ] i hk= 0 −ρk+hkηk−λi hk>0 .(5.24) 5.2. OFDM Modula ion and he CS Algo i hm 117 We mus ensu e ha he closed in e al [−ρk−λ, −ρk+λ] con ains he ze o such ha hkis a global minimum, i.e., 0∈[−ρk−λ, −ρk+λ]⇒ −λ≤ρk≤λ . (5.25) Thus, inally ψs (hk, λ) =          (ρk+λ)/ηki ρk<−λ 0 i −λ≤ρk≤λ (ρk−λ)/ηki ρk> λ ,(5.26) which is he so h esholding ope a o ψs (hk, λ) wi h no maliza ion cons an 1/ηk. 5.2.1.3 Nes e o ’s Accele a ion Fac o The Nes e o ’s accele a ion ac o go e ns he dependency be ween wo suc- cessi e es ima ions, while ema kably educing he con e gence ime o he algo i hm [97]. The choice o he op imiza ion coe icien αiis no manda o y. By ollowing he pionee ing wo k [98], which inspi ed many o he wo ks, e.g., [96], αican be ecu si ely de ined as ξi+i=1 + q4ξ2 i+ 1 2,(5.27) αi=ξi−1 ξi+i ,(5.28) wi h ξ0= 1. Ano he choice simply based on he i e a ion index iis αi= (i−1)/(i+ 2) [97, 98]. Bo h solu ions desc ibe a cu e g owing om an ini ial alue (“ a ” om 1) up o 1. The associa ed plo s, wi h hei simila beha io s, can be seen in Fig. 5.1. The mos conse a i e choice is αi= 1, o which he dependency om he p e ious es ima ed alues is maximized, while he less conse a i e choice is αi= 0, comple ely o ge ing he p e ious es ima ed alues. In ui i ely, a small alue o αiis p e e able o he i s noisy i e a ions, 118 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 i αi αi= (i−1) /(i+ 2) αi= (ξi−1) /ξi+i Figu e 5.1: The e olu ion o αio e i e a ions i o di e en app oaches. while a pa ame e αinea o one should be chosen when he eliabili y o he es ima ion inc eases. 5.2.2 Pilo Scheme The op imiza ion o a de e minis ic sensing ma ix o CS con igu a ions, such as LASSO, is up o now one o he mos s udied open p oblems in CS he- o y. In ac , he ypical pe o mance gua an ees o CS equi e p ope ies such as he es ic ed isome y p ope y [101, 38], o which explici cons uc ions a e no a ailable and e en checking he p ope y o a gi en andomly gen- e a ed ma ix is exponen ially complex [102]. On he o he hand, ensembles o andomly gene a ed ma ices ha e he p ope y o sa is ying hese p op- e ies wi h high p obabili y [38]. Hence, he e we eso o a pseudo- andom pilo placemen on he 2-dimensional ime- equency g id o ansmi ed sym- bols. Simula ion esul s ha e shown ha such andom placemen achie es wi h high p obabili y he bes pe o mance w. . . egula “la ice” placemen s (e.g., equally spaced combina ions o subca ie s o ime slo s), as usually speci ied in wi eless s anda ds [36]. An example o a andom pilo scheme is depic ed in Fig. 5.2. Mo eo e , gene ally, dis inc con igu a ions o a ixed numbe o 5.2. OFDM Modula ion and he CS Algo i hm 119 Figu e 5.2: Example o a andom pilo scheme o OFDM modula ion. pilo s, andomly placed wi hin he 2-dimensional g id, p o ides simila pe - o mance in e ms o channel es ima ion. I pilo s a e no placed andomly bu ollow some pe iodic pa e n, he algo i hm o sol ing he LASSO p o- duces a in e io esul s. This beha io is caused by he pe iodic sampling o a andom Fou ie ma ix (i.e., Ho Dhsp). This is he eason why commonly used pilo schemes (see, e.g., [36] and e e ences he ein), gene ally s uc u ed o pe iodic, a e no sui able o he CS-based es ima ion o OFDM sys ems (assuming ha he OFDM channel is ep esen ed by a Fou ie ma ix). O e - all, he aim i o maximize he o e all achie able a e unde andom pilo placemen . Hence, we can op imize he numbe o pilo s pe block o seek he op imal adeo be ween CSI es ima ion quali y and pilo o e head (see (5.41) in he ollowing and nume ical esul s in Sec. 5.4). 5.2.3 Recei ed Samples Exp ession — Real and App oxima ed Channel Condi ions Wi hou en e ing in o de ails o he comple e inpu -ou pu de i a ion o a CP OFDM sys em which can be ound in Sec ion 1.2, we only p o ide he ecei ed 120 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion sample exp ession, which is y[n, m] = 1 M P−1 X p=0 hpej2πνpnT M−1 X m0=0 xn, m0e−j2πm0∆ τp M−1 X i=0 ej2πi M νp ∆ ej2πi(m0−m) M (5.29) ≈1 M P−1 X p=0 hpej2πνpnT M−1 X m0=0 xn, m0e−j2πm0∆ τp M−1 X i=0 ej2πi(m0−m) M = P−1 X p=0 hpej2πνpnT e−j2πτpm∆ x[n, m].(5.30) By conside ing eal and app oxima ed channel condi ions, he ecei ed samples a ime ins an nand subca ie ma e espec i ely gi en by (5.29) and (5.30), in which he ICI- ee app oxima ion ollows he assump ion νmax/∆ 1, and he las equali y ollows by using he o hogonali y p ope y. No e ha he exp ession (5.30) is equi alen o (5.6), meaning ha he ICI- ee assump ion has been aken in o accoun o he algo i hmic design. When compa ing OTFS and OFDM, he channel model in (5.30) is conside ed, such ha he absence o ICI assump ion holds. Howe e , by ocusing he a en ion on OFDM only, he pe o mance compa ison is ex ended o he case o eal channel condi ions, i.e., wi h inpu -ou pu ela ion (5.29), showing he pe o mance deg ada ion when he ICI- ee assump ion is a o be sa is ied. Clea ly, a simila analysis o OTFS is meaningless, being he wa e o m no sensi i e o he magni ude o delay and Dopple shi s. 5.3 OTFS Modula ion and he P oposed Es ima ion Algo i hm By neglec ing, bu keeping in mind, he comple e de i a ion o he OTFS inpu -ou pu ela ion, which can be ound in Chap e 1, we can p oceed u he desc ibing he channel es ima ion p ocedu e, which is inspi ed by [86]. The inpu -ou pu ela ion exp essed in ma ix, shown he i s ime in (1.44), is 5.3. OTFS Modula ion and he P oposed Es ima ion Algo i hm121 epo ed he e o con enience y=  P−1 X p=0 hpΨp x+z,(5.31) whe e zdeno es he AWGN wi h ze o mean and co a iance ma ix σ2INM . No e ha Ψpimplici ly akes in o accoun a Dopple -delay pai (τp, νp), i.e., Ψp,Ψp(τp, νp). Wi hou en e ing in o ma hema ical de ails which can be ound in Sec. 1.3, he e ec o he channel o symbols a anged in blocks is sho ly desc ibed in he ollowing. Conside a block composed by all ze o magni ude symbols bu one non- ze o, ha ing enough ene gy o be well dis inguishable, w. . . o he noise loo , and posi ioned anywhe e wi hin he block. No e ha he posi ion o he sym- bol does no in luence he esul , since he channel shi e ec is ci cula wi hin he block, as p o ed by he esul s o Sec. 1.3. This block is hus ansmi - ed o e he ime- equency selec i e channel in (5.3). A he Rx, mos o he ene gy concen a es in a poin o he block (o , mo e p ecisely, a poin pe mul- ipa h componen ), while dissipa ing o he su ounding posi ions, acco ding o Fig. 1.4, whe e and example o blocks o ansmi ed symbols and ecei ed samples blocks a e depic ed. The in ui i e es ima ion o he pai s (τp, νp), o each mul ipa h componen , ollows by sea ching he peaks wi hin he ecei ed samples g id, successi ely associa ed o an es ima e (ˆτp,ˆνp) (as sugges ed in [86]). Howe e , his in ui i e es ima ion p ocedu e is only able o p o ide he in ege pa s o he Dopple and delay shi s, associa ed o he Dopple -delay g id poin , whe e a peak is de ec ed, collec ing enough ene gy. The ac ional pa s o delay and Dopple shi s a e, ins ead, associa ed o he dissipa ion o he ene gy a ound he peak poin s (see Fig. 1.4), and ha e o be ea ed and analyzed sepa a ely. The app oxima ion o he channel beha io o in ege Dopple and delay shi s, as done in [86], allows his in ui i e es ima ion p ocedu e o wo k co - ec ly, bu only unde such non- ealis ic channel condi ions. Thus, based on he ML es ima o p oposed in Sec. 1.3, he idea o [86] is ex ended, and a 122 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion 25 50 32 64 0 10 20 NM  Figu e 5.3: Example o a pilo scheme o OTFS modula ion. Wi hin he block o dimension N×M he cen e ed pilo wi h high ene gy εis well dis in- guishable, and su ounded i s by ze o pilo s ( he hollow zone) and a e by in o ma ion symbols (he e, o con enience, wi h uni ene gy). eliable es ima ion algo i hm wo king unde ealis ic channels is p o ided. 5.3.1 Pilo Scheme A block o N×M ansmi ed symbols con ains bo h in o ma ion bea ing symbols and pilo s. The a angemen o pilo s consis s o a ec angula egion placed wi hin he block (no necessa ily in he middle, since he channel e ec is ci cula ) con aining wo ypes o symbols (see Fig. 5.3):  Ze o Pilo s: Placed be ween in o ma ion symbols and non-ze o pilo s o gua an ee as less in e e ence as possible be ween hem. The Di ich- le ke nel unc ions appea ing in he OTFS inpu -ou pu ela ion (see Sec. 1.3 and in pa icula (1.44)) a e apidly dec easing non-nega i e unc ions (see Fig. 1.3 and 1.5), hence, pe ec o hogonali y be ween in o ma ion symbols and pilo s canno be achie ed, bu , a leas , he Dopple -delay ISI can be educed. 5.3. OTFS Modula ion and he P oposed Es ima ion Algo i hm123 25 50 32 64 0 2 4 N M  Figu e 5.4: Example o a pilo scheme o OTFS modula ion. Wi hin he block o dimension N×M he pla eau o pilo s wi h high ene gy εis well dis in- guishable, and su ounded i s by ze o pilo s ( he hollow zone) and a e by in o ma ion symbols (he e, o con enience, wi h uni ene gy).  Peak Pilo : A single pilo symbol wi h high ene gy, collec ing he ene gy o all ze o pilo s, is placed a he g id cen e . I s shi s in he Dopple - delay g id a e used o p o ide he ini ial coa se es ima ion o he Dopple - delay pai s, which esul s o be as and simple. Gi en his pilo a angemen , he numbe o pilo symbols has o be op imized o ma ch he op imal pe o mance-o e head adeo , while keeping cons an he o al block ene gy. Gi en some pa icula sys em se ups, such as communica ion including non-linea ampli ie no cons an channel beha iou s o e block symbols in ime, basing he es ima ion algo i hm on jus one symbol ( he peak pilo ) could no be a sa e app oach. In such cases, he pilo scheme can be ex ended, o ins ance, by conside ing a ec angula egion composed o ze o pilo s and a pla eau on non-ze o pilo s (see Fig. 5.4), ins ead o jus he peak pilo . We would like o s ess he ac ha he successi e algo i hm design is no only sui able o he a o emen ioned pilo con igu a ion, bu is able o p o ide eli- 130 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion o p agma ic capaci y. Fo ins ance, by conside ing a CP o leng h T/4, being T he symbol ime, he loss is T T+T/4=T 5T/4=4 5= 0.8 = 20% .(5.42) This means ha , wi h a modula ion o ca dinali y C, while he maximum achie able a e is log2Cbi s/symbol, OFDM sa u a es a 0.8·log2Cbi s/symbol. The o e all loss akes in o accoun bo h he pilo o e head and he p esence o a CP and/o GI (also o leng h T/4, o consis ency). Ano he impo an aspec is he de ini ion o he numbe o pilo s |P| w. . . he ambien dimension G. Many ea u es a e in luenced by his choice. Conside i s OFDM modula ion. I is well known in he CS li e a u e ha he minimum numbe o pilo s (o measu emen s, om CS li e a u e) o eco e a spa se signal is gi en by he loga i hmic scaling ac o [105] |P| ≥ Plog G P,(5.43) whe e Phe e ep esen he numbe o non-ze o componen s o he ec o o be es ima ed. Thus, gi en a mul ipa h channel wi h Ppa hs and a sensing ma ix o dimension G(de ined in (5.7)), he (asymp o ically) minimum numbe o pilo symbols necessa y o sol e he minimiza ion p oblem in (5.14) is gi en by (5.43). Due o he loga i hmic scaling, he unc ion is slowly inc easing, e en i he g anula i y o he sensing ma ix and i s dimension g ows (see Sec ion 5.2.1.1). Howe e , while (5.43) p o ides a lowe bound on he dimension, he op imal pe o mance migh be achie ed o a numbe o pilo s di e en om he minimum. Fo his eason, i he numbe o pilo s used o a gi en se up (i.e., o ixed Pand G) is well abo e he lowe limi , we can s a e ha while inc easing he dimension G, he op imal numbe o pilo s sligh ly changes. Hence, he pilo loss in (5.41) ends o ze o, while inc easing he ambien dimension G, which is di ec ly linked o he block size NM (assuming, o simplici y, on-g id pa hs shi s and neglec ing he e inemen solu ion depic ed in Alg. 3), and OFDM bene i s om la ge blocks. No e ha his is no a p ecise quan i a i e analysis bu i jus gi es a quali a i e idea o in ui ion 5.4. Compa ison in Te ms o P ag ama ic Capaci y 131 on how la ge he numbe o pilo s pe block should be, knowing ha he a o emen ioned CS-based condi ions a e always gi en up o cons an ac o s ha depend on he speci ic p oblem, SNR, shape o he sensing ma ix, and o he a iables. Fo OTFS modula ion, he pilo scheme p esen ed in Sec. 5.3.1 and i s es ima ion algo i hm a e independen o he block dimension, since he shi o he peak pilo , and so he ough es ima ion, is only associa ed o he maxi- mum Dopple and delay o he channel de ined in (5.2). Hence, i ollows ha he pilo o e head ends o ze o while inc easing he block dimension, hence, as o OFDM, also OTFS bene i s om la ge blocks. Mo eo e , i he dimen- sion o he block inc eases, one can se mo e pilo s o ze o o aise he powe o he peak pilo , allowing he de ec ion o low powe sca e ing componen s in he h eshold-based app oach (as explained a he beginning o Sec. 5.4). Howe e , limi s on he block dimension comes, i s , om impo an es ic- ions on OTFS de ec ion compu a ional complexi y (as seen in Chap e 4 and [46]), and hen om he block ading assump ion, which b eaks down i he block becomes oo la ge (see Chap e 1). Thus, ealis ic block sizes ha e o be conside ed in bo h di ec ions. Mo eo e , as an icipa ed in Sec. 5.2, in o de o es ic o he classical low-complexi y symbol-by-symbol MMSE es ima ion o OFDM we ha e ne- glec ed he ICI. As al eady seen in (5.29), he ICI depends on he a io be ween he subca ie spacing ∆ and he maximum Dopple shi in oduced by he channel. In o de o ha e negligible ICI he necessa y condi ion is ∆ νmax, o , equi alen ly, νmax/∆ 1. Since ∆ =B/M, wi h B o al bandwid h, he condi ion may no be sa is ied when he numbe o subca ie s Mbe- comes oo la ge, e en o mode a e Dopple . He e, we insis on neglec ing ICI and conside he ange o sys em pa ame e s o which his assump ion is in- deed i ually exac . Fu he mo e, we no ice ha while OFDM incu s in his addi ional limi a ion, OTFS emains no sensi i e o he Dopple shi . 132 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion Table 5.1: Sys em pa ame e s c= 5.89 [GHz] M= 64 B= 10 [MHz] N= 50 ∆ =B/M = 156.25 [kHz] T= 1/∆ = 6.4 [µs] 5.4.1 Simula ion Resul s In he ollowing igu es, we plo he p agma ic capaci y s. SNR o OTFS and OFDM modula ions wi h quad a u e phase-shi keying (QPSK) modula ed symbols, o a ime- equency mul ipa h channel wi h Pcomponen s a ec ed by AWGN, and unde non-pe ec CSI. The channel es ima ion has been pe - o med wi h he pilo schemes and he algo i hms o Sec. 5.2 o OFDM and Sec. 5.3 o OTFS. As a e e ence benchma k, we plo he AWGN (symme ic) capaci y Csym AWGN o QPSK modula ion, which esul s o be no achie able due o he pilo o e head. The sys em pa ame e s a e lis ed in Table 5.1. Fig. 5.5 shows he pe o mance o OFDM o a di e en numbe o pilo symbols. Fo he case P= 1, i easy o no e ha he pe o mance sligh ly changes o di e en pilo o e heads, whose pe cen age is indica ed in he legend. On he o he hand, as sugges ed by (5.43) and associa ed discussion, i he numbe o non-ze o componen s o be es ima ed inc eases, i.e., wi h P > 1, he channel es ima ion algo i hm needs mo e pilo s o wo k e icien ly. Gi en hese esul s, om now on, we will conside a pilo o e head o 3.125%, achie ing, in ou se up, he bes adeo be ween es ima ion accu acy and achie able p agma ic capaci y ( o any numbe o sca e ing componen s). Fig. 5.6 shows he pe o mance o OTFS wi h di e en de ec ion algo- i hms. The MP so -ou pu de ec ion app oach o [46] is able o almos achie e he AWGN capaci y unde non-pe ec CSI o a low numbe o sca e ing componen s, oge he wi h a ema kable educ ion o he compu a ional com- plexi y [46]. Howe e , in line wi h he esul s o [46] and Chap e 4, he de ec- 5.4. Compa ison in Te ms o P ag ama ic Capaci y 133 −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 1 SNR [dB] IPC hbi s symboli 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5% 3.125% 3.75% 4.375% Csym AWGN −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 SNR [dB] 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5% 3.125% 3.75% 4.375% Csym AWGN P= 2 −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 SNR [dB] 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5% 3.125% 3.75% 4.375% Csym AWGN P= 3 −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 SNR [dB] 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5% 3.125% 3.75% 4.375% Csym AWGN P= 4 Figu e 5.5: P agma ic Capaci y s. SNR o OFDM modula ion wi h mul ipa h componen s Pand di e en pilo o e head (whose pe cen age is indica ed in he legend). 134 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 1 SNR [dB] IPC hbi s symboli LMMSE / 5.28% G/ 5.28% Csym AWGN −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 2 SNR [dB] LMMSE / 5.28% G/ 5.28% Csym AWGN −50 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 3 SNR [dB] LMMSE / 5.28% G/ 5.28% Csym AWGN −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 4 SNR [dB] LMMSE / 5.28% G/ 5.28% Csym AWGN Figu e 5.6: P agma ic Capaci y s. SNR o OTFS modula ion wi h mul ipa h componen s P, di e en de ec ion algo i hms, i.e., LMMSE and MP app oach o [46], o a ixed pilo o e head, in pe cen age 5.28%. 5.4. Compa ison in Te ms o P ag ama ic Capaci y 135 o pe o mance dec eases wi h inc easing mul ipa h. No e ha he small loss w. . . Csym AWGN unde non-pe ec CSI is an indica o o he pe o mance o he channel es ima ion algo i hm, which esul s o be e y accu a e (o he wise he cu e would ha e de ia ed om he benchma k). In ligh o hese esul s, we see ha he e is no eason o adop he LMMSE es ima o o OTFS, which esul s in highe complexi y and wo se pe o mance (see Chap e 4 and [46] o a mo e de ailed analysis). Hence, om now on, o he compa ison wi h OFDM modula ion, we conside he MP “Ma ix-G” app oach o Chap e 4. In Fig. 5.7, we plo he p agma ic capaci y s. SNR o OFDM and OTFS unde he con igu a ions men ioned abo e. Fi s o all, i is possible o no e ha pe o mance sligh ly dec ease while inc easing he numbe o mul ipa h componen s, p o ing he obus ness o he pilo schemes and he algo i hms p oposed. The pilo o e head has been chosen ad hoc o bo h modula ions. Fo OTFS, as said in Sec. 5.3.1, he peak cen e ed pilo collec s all he ene gy o su ounding ze o pilo s, and he pe cen age o o e head (indica ed in he igu es) is also an indica o o he peak pilo ene gy. Fo OFDM, as poin ed ou be o e, he op imal adeo be ween es ima ion pe o mance and pilo o e head has been ound by b u e- o ce sea ch o e a sui able se o possibili ies (some o hem a e isible in Fig. 5.5). While he pe o mance o he wo modula ions is simila , he p esence o a pe symbol CP o OFDM ema kably de e io a es he p agma ic capaci y, while a pe block GI o OTFS in oduces a negligible loss. In Fig. 5.8, we plo he p agma ic capaci y o OFDM o a ixed alue o SNR, i.e., 18 dB, while changing he a io be ween he maximum Dopple shi and he subca ie spacing, i.e., νmax/∆ , aking in o accoun a di e en numbe o subca ie s M(N= 50 o all cases). In his case, he ecei ed samples a e ob ained by conside ing a eal channel aking in o accoun he ICI, i.e., (5.29), while he channel es ima ion wo ks unde he hypo hesis o an ideal in e e ence- ee channel. In ui i ely, he pe o mance deg ades when he ICI becomes signi ican . No e ha he es ima ion pe o mance o he LASSO sol e is independen o he numbe o subca ie Mand, o his eason, 136 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 1 SNR [dB] IPC hbi s symboli −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 2 SNR [dB] −50 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 3 SNR [dB] IPC hbi s symboli −5 0 5 10 15 20 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 P= 4 SNR [dB] MOD OFDM OTFS (G)Csym AWGN Pilo O e head 3.125% 5.28% - OFDM CP OTFS GI (G) Figu e 5.7: The cu es ake in o accoun he loss ela ed o he p esence o pilo s in he block o N×Msymbols. The OFDM CP cu e includes he CP o e head which is 0.25 o he symbol ime, while he OTFS GI cu e includes a GI o he en i e block. A QPSK modula ion is used. The legend indica es he pe cen age o pilo symbols. 5.5. Conclusions 137 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 νmax/∆ IPC hbi s symboli M= 64 M= 128 M= 256 M= 512 Csym AWGN Figu e 5.8: P agma ic Capaci y s. νmax/∆ a io o OFDM modula ion wi h P= 1, a SNR = 18 dB. wha e e he choice o νmax and M, he pe o mance o OFDM depends only on hei a io. Fig. 5.8 shows ha he p agma ic capaci y pe o mance s a s dec easing signi ican ly o νmax/∆ ≃0.15. Almos he same beha io is shown o di e en numbe o subca ie s M(no epo ed he e o he sake o space limi a ion), excep o he pe cen age o pilo loss due o di e en block dimensions, suppo ing wha s a ed abo e. Howe e , as poin ed ou in Table 5.2, while he pe o mance is almos cons an , he maximum ole able Dopple (o eloci y), in e sely p opo ional o M, is no . Fo hese easons, as expec ed, OFDM is no independen o he block dimension and he sys em has o be de ined p ope ly o ope a e in he ange whe e he ICI is negligible. 5.5 Conclusions We ca ied ou a ai compa ison be ween OFDM and OTFS modula ion o - ma s in e ms o maximum achie able a e o p ac ical sepa a ed de ec ion and decoding, quan i ied by he p agma ic capaci y measu ed a he so - 138 Chap e 5. Channel Es ima ion νmax/∆ 0.1 0.15 0.2 M 64 1431 [km/h] 2147 [km/h] 2863 [km/h] 128 715 [km/h] 1073 [km/h] 1431 [km/h] 256 357 [km/h] 536 [km/h] 715 [km/h] 512 178 [km/h] 268 [km/h] 357 [km/h] Table 5.2: Maximum suppo able eloci y w. . . he a io νmax/∆ o OFDM modula ion wi h subca ie spacing ∆ =B/M and ca ie equency c= 5.89 GHz. The eloci y is gi en by =c·νmax/(2 c). de ec o ou pu . We conside ed wo pilo schemes and channel es ima ion algo i hms each one speci ically sui ed o he gi en modula ion scheme. Bo h pilo and CSI es ima ion schemes a e able o achie e e y good pe o mance (nea genie- aided) unde ime- a ying communica ion channel in he spa si y egime o a small numbe o numbe o mul ipa h componen s. This conclusion is ully suppo ed by nume ical esul s, whe e simula ion cu es achie e he heo e - ical benchma k unde non-pe ec CSI, p o ing he quali y o he p oposed app oaches. OTFS achie es a be e communica ion a e mainly because o he p esence o a pe block gua d in e al a he han a pe symbol cyclic p e ix as in OFDM. This o cou se comes a he cos o a mo e complex channel es ima ion scheme, wo king on la ge block-wise ope a ions. In e ms o so -ou pu da a de ec ion, he use o he message passing so -ou pu de ec o o Chap e 4 yields cons an pe symbol complexi y o OTFS, which is he same scaling law o symbol-by-symbol MMSE de ec ion o OFDM. Al hough we do no claim ha he complexi y o he wo de ec o s 5.5. Conclusions 139 is iden ical, in ac he ac ual complexi y di e o some implemen a ion-based cons an . Finally, we can obse e ha OTFS is indeed e y insensi i e o he mag- ni ude o he Dopple shi s, while he pe o mance o OFDM deg ades sig- ni ican ly e en unde small- o-mode a e Dopple alues i he numbe o sub- ca ie s inc eases. The e o e, OTFS is e ec i ely a good candida e o high- mobili y sys ems in u al en i onmen s (e.g., high speed ains [106]) o ae ial en i onmen s (e.g., UAVs [107]), whe e Dopple shi s may be la ge, and he p opaga ion channel con ains ypically he line-o -sigh and a ew o he e- lec ion componen s (e.g., g ound e lec ion, hills, la ge buildings), and i is he e o e spa se in he Dopple -delay domain.