scieee Open visual document viewer

Ruminal microbiota is associated with feed-efficiency phenotype of fattening bulls fed high-concentrate diets

Costa-Roura, S.; Villalba, D.; Blanco, M.; Balcells, J.; Casasús, I.; Seradj, A.R.

Abstract

Abstract: Context: Improving feed efficiency in livestock production is of great importance to reduce feeding costs. Aims: To examine the relationship between ruminal microbiota and variation in feed efficiency in beef cattle fed concentrate-based diets. Methods: Residual feed intake of 389 fattening bulls, supplied with corn-based concentrate and forage ad libitum, was used to estimate animals' feed efficiency. Faeces and ruminal fluid samples, from 48 bulls chosen at random, were collected to estimate their forage intake and to determine their apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation and microbiota. Those animals with extreme values of feed efficiency (high-efficiency (HE, n = 12) and low-efficiency (LE, n = 13)) were subjected to further comparisons. Alpha biodiversity was calculated on the basis of the normalised sequence data. Beta diversity was approached through performing a canonical correspondence analysis based on log-transformed sequence data. Genera differential abundance was tested with an ANOVA-like differential expression analysis and genera interactions were determined applying the sparse correlations for compositional data technique. Key results: No differences in dry matter intake were found between the two categories of feed efficiency (P = 0.699); however, HE animals had higher apparent digestibility of dry matter (P = 0.002), organic matter (P = 0.003) and crude protein (P = 0.043). The concentration of volatile fatty acids was unaffected by feed efficiency (P = 0.676) but butyrate proportion increased with time in LE animals (P = 0.047). Ruminal microbiota was different between HE and LE animals (P = 0.022); both a biodiversity and genera network connectance increased with time in LE bulls (P = 0.005 for Shannon index and P = 0.020 for Simpson index), which suggests that LE animals hosted a more robust ruminal microbiota. Certain genera usually related to high energy loss through methane production were found to establish more connections with other genera in LE animals' rumen than in HE ones. Microbiota function capability suggested that methane metabolism was decreased in HE finishing bulls. Conclusions: Rumen microbiota was associated with feed efficiency phenotypes in fattening bulls fed concentrate-based diets. Implications: The possible trade-off between feed efficiency and robustness of ruminal microbiota should be taken into account for the optimisation of cattle production, especially in systems with intrinsic characteristics that may constitute a disturbance to rumen microbial community. Costa-Roura, S.; Villalba, D.; Blanco, M.; Casasús, I.; Balcells, J.; Seradj, A.R.

Full text

Ruminal mic obio a is associa ed wi h eed-e ficiency pheno ype o a ening bulls ed high-concen a e die s S. Cos a-Rou a A , D. Villalba A,D , M. Blanco B,C , I. Casasús B,C , J. Balcells A and A. R. Se adj A A Depa amen de Ciència Animal, Uni e si a de Lleida, A inguda Alcalde Ro i a Rou e 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain. B Unidad de P oducción y Sanidad Animal, Cen o de In es igación y Tecnología Ag oalimen a ia de A agón (CITA), A enida Mon añana 930, 50059, Za agoza, Spain. C Ins i u o Ag oalimen a io de A agón –IA2 (CITA-Uni e sidad de Za agoza), Za agoza, Spain. D Co esponding au ho . Email: [email p o ec ed] Abs ac Con ex . Imp o ing eed e ficiency in li es ock p oduc ion is o g ea impo ance o educe eeding cos s. Aims. To examine he ela ionship be ween uminal mic obio a and a ia ion in eed e ficiency in bee ca le ed concen a e-based die s. Me hods. Residual eed in ake o 389 a ening bulls, supplied wi h co n-based concen a e and o age ad libi um, was used oes ima eanimals’ eede ficiency.Faecesand uminalfluidsamples, om48bullschosena andom,we ecollec ed o es ima e hei o age in ake and o de e mine hei appa en diges ibili y, uminal e men a ion and mic obio a. Those animalswi hex eme alueso eede ficiency(high-e ficiency(HE,n=12)andlow-e ficiency(LE,n=13))we esubjec ed o u he compa isons. Alphabiodi e si y was calcula ed on he basis o heno malised sequence da a. Be a di e si y was app oached h ough pe o ming a canonical co espondence analysis based on log- ans o med sequence da a. Gene a di e en ial abundance was es ed wi h an ANOVA-like di e en ial exp ession analysis and gene a in e ac ions we e de e mined applying he spa se co ela ions o composi ional da a echnique. Key esul s.No di e ences in d y ma e in ake we e ound be ween he wo ca ego ies o eed e ficiency (P=0.699); howe e , HE animals had highe appa en diges ibili y o d y ma e (P= 0.002), o ganic ma e (P= 0.003) and c ude p o ein (P= 0.043). The concen a ion o ola ile a y acids was una ec ed by eed e ficiency (P= 0.676) bu bu y a e p opo ion inc eased wi h ime in LE animals (P= 0.047). Ruminal mic obio a was di e en be ween HE and LE animals (P= 0.022); bo h abiodi e si y and gene a ne wo k connec ance inc eased wi h ime in LE bulls (P= 0.005 o Shannon index and P= 0.020 o Simpson index), which sugges s ha LE animals hos ed a mo e obus uminal mic obio a. Ce ain gene a usually ela ed o high ene gy loss h ough me hane p oduc ion we e ound o es ablish mo e connec ions wi h o he gene a in LE animals’ umen han in HE ones. Mic obio a unc ion capabili y sugges ed ha me hane me abolism was dec eased in HE finishing bulls. Conclusions.Rumenmic obio awasassocia edwi h eede ficiencypheno ypesin a eningbulls edconcen a e-based die s. Implica ions. The possible ade-o be ween eed e ficiency and obus ness o uminal mic obio a should be aken in o accoun o he op imisa ion o ca le p oduc ion, especially in sys ems wi h in insic cha ac e is ics ha may cons i u e a dis u bance o umen mic obial communi y. Keywo ds: appa en diges ibili y, bee ca le, eed e ficiency, umen mic obial communi y. Recei ed 5 June 2020, accep ed 27 No embe 2020, published online 28 Janua y 2021 In oduc ion Imp o ing eed e ficiency (FE) in bee ca le p oduc ion sys ems p o ides an oppo uni y o cu down on he cos o eeding li es ock. In ha sense, esidual eed in ake (RFI) can be used as an index o FE ha is independen o a ia ion in bodyweigh (BW) and a e age daily gain (ADG; A hu e al. 2001; Schenkel e al.2004; A hu and He d 2008), being he gold s anda d index o examine biological mechanisms associa ed wi h in e -animal di e ences in FE. Mo eo e , some s udies ha e demons a ed he possibili y o selec ion o low RFI as a s a egy o g eenhouse gas mi iga ion, as i has been co ela ed wi h lowe me hane emission and g ea e die diges ibili y (He d and A hu 2009). Limi a ions in conduc ing RFI ials ( eco ding BW and eed in ake o a CSIRO PUBLISHING Animal P oduc ion Science h ps://doi.o g/10.1071/AN20344 Jou nal compila ion CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY www.publish.csi o.au/jou nals/an SPECIAL ISSUE long ime) and sea ching o umen mic obial ma ke s o iden i y e ficien animals wi h low RFI ha e become a con empo a y challenge. Resea ch in ca le has ocused mos ly on he mic obial esponse o die a y changes and managemen p ac ices, whe eas ials o unde s anding he ela ionship be ween hos FE pheno ype and umen mic obio a a e sca ce and ye o be unde aken (Mye e al.2015). P e ious s udies ha e shown ha umen mic obes a e esponsible o ene gy supply h ough p oducing o ganic acids (Hun ing on 1990), and mos axa associa ed wi h a ia ion in FE ha e been ela ed o celluloly ic, e men a i e and me abolic ac i i ies (Mye e al.2015). The e o e, di e ences in he p oduc ion a e o o ganic acids lead o a ia ion in nu ien diges ibili y and e men a ion ha ul ima ely change animals’pheno ypic e ficiency (He d and A hu 2009). This expe imen aimed o unde s and he ela ionship be ween uminal mic obio a and a ia ion in FE o bee ca le ed concen a e-based die s. Ma e ials and me hods Animals, die s and housing Residual eed-in ake da a om wo eeding expe imen s comp ising 389 a ening bulls we e used o explo e ela ionships be ween uminal mic obio a and FE. This da ase included 317 animals aised a he esea ch acili ies o Coope a i a d’I a s d’U gell,SCCP (I a s d’U gell, Spain, 414105000N, 05805300E) and 72 animals om he CITA-La Ga cipolle a Resea ch S a ion (Jaca, Spain, 423703400N, 03001000W). All p ocedu es we e pe o med unde P ojec Licence CEEA 01-07/16 and app o ed by he in-house E hics Commi ee o Animal Expe imen s a he Uni e si y o Lleida. Ca e and use o animals we e in acco dance wi h he Spanish Policy o Animal P o ec ion RD 53/2013, which mee s he Eu opean Union Di ec i e 2010/63 on he p o ec ion o animals used o expe imen al and o he scien ificpu poses. Animals aised a he esea ch acili ies o Coope a i a d’I a s d’U gell,SCCP we e dis ibu ed in he ollowing ou ba ches: ba ches Numbe 1 o Numbe 3 included 231 Hols ein bulls (63–83 animals pe ba ch) and ba ch Numbe 4 included 86 Mon belia d bulls. BW and eed in ake da a we e collec ed on a daily basis. Animals aised a CITA-La Ga cipolle a Resea ch S a ion we e dis ibu ed in he ollowing h ee ba ches: ba ches Numbe 5 and Numbe 6 included 28 and 32 Pa da de Mon aña bulls espec i ely, and ba ch Numbe 7 included 12 Pi enaica bulls. Fo hese animals, BW was measu ed weekly and eed in ake da a we e collec ed on a daily basis. Bodyweigh and eed in ake da a we e eco ded h oughou he en i e a ening phase; he fi s 150 days we e conside ed as he g owing phase (121 days old, s.d. 37 days; and 162 kg BW, s.d. 49 kg), ollowed by a finishing phase, which las ed un il animals eached slaugh e weigh (336 days old, s.d.: 31; and 501 kg BW, s.d. 56 kg). Animals we e ed concen a e and o age ad libi um,which we e p o ided sepa a ely in wo di e en bunke s, and hey had ee access o d inking wa e , ollowing he con en ional bee ca le eeding sys em in Spain. The concen a es used we e e y simila in composi ion and hei main ing edien s we e aw co n, co n glu en eed, aw ba ley, co n d ied dis ille s g ains wi h solubles and aw chickpea; whe eas o age used was mainly ba ley s aw (349 animals), oa s haylage (20 animals) and e ch haylage (20 animals). Feed chemical and nu i ional composi ion is shown in Table 1. Measu emen s and sampling In ake o concen a es was eco ded au oma ically a bo h esea ch acili ies, by using au oma ic eed s a ions ha we e equipped wi h a eedbunk (p o ided wi h a scale) and an indi idual eede . When a cal en e ed he eede , i was iden ified and i s concen a e in ake was ob ained by di e ence be ween ini ial and final eedbunk weigh . Feed s a ions a ailable a he esea ch acili ies o Coope a i a d’I a s d’U gell,SCCP we e addi ionally equipped wi h a scale unde he indi idual eede by which he animals we e au oma ically weighed a each isi , whe eas a CITA-La Ga cipolle a Resea ch S a ion, BW da a we e eco ded manually once a week. Faeces and uminal fluid samples om 48 bulls (selec ed a andom wi hin ba ches) we e collec ed wice, a mid-g owing pe iod (GRO, 159 days old and 225 kg BW) and mid-finishing pe iod (FIN, 266 days old and 434 kg BW), o o age in ake es ima ion and diges ibili y, uminal e men a ion and mic obial communi y cha ac e isa ion. Faecal exc e ion and o age in ake we e calcula ed on he basis o concen a e in ake and adap ing he wo indiges ible- ma ke sys em (Owens and Hanson 1992), by using ch omium oxide as an ex e nal ma ke and acid insoluble ash as in e nal ma ke . Then, appa en diges ibili y o d y ma e (DM), o ganic ma e (OM) and c ude p o ein (CP) we e es ima ed. De ailed in o ma ion abou ma ke adminis a ion, eed and aeces analy ical de e mina ions and appa en diges ibili y calcula ions ha e been desc ibed in Cos a-Rou a e al.(2020). Ruminal fluid was sampled in he mo ning by using an o al s omach ube connec ed o a acuum pump. Each sample was Table 1. Feed chemical and nu i ional composi ion Valuesa emeans, wi h minimumandmaximum gi en inpa en heses. ADF, acid de e gen fib e; CP, c ude p o ein; DM, d y ma e ; EE, e he ex ac ; NDF, neu al de e gen fib e; OM, o ganic ma e ; PDIN and PDIE, p o ein diges ible in he small in es ine allowed by p o ein and ene gy; UFV, o age uni o mea p oduc ion Pa ame e Concen a e Fo age Chemical composi ion (%DM) DM (% esh weigh ) 87.1 (85.6–87.9) 65.8 (48.9–85.7) OM 94.6 (94.0–94.8) 88.9 (84.3–92.6) CP 13.0 (11.2–14.0) 11.2 (7.2–16.4) EE 4.2 (2.5–7.2) 2.0 (1.4–2.7) NDF 16.6 (13.5–20.7) 57.1 (44.2–75.5) ADF 5.9 (4.7–7.9) 33.5 (28.2–43.8) Nu i ional composi ion UFV (UFV/kg DM) 1.02 (0.97–1.03) 0.55 (0.36–0.73) PDIN (g/kg DM) 91.8 (79.8–95.9) 65.4 (40.8–93.7) PDIE (g/kg DM) 87.4 (80.3–94.9) 56.0 (52.6–58.0) BAnimal P oduc ion Science S. Cos a-Rou a e al. ob ained h ough wo sequen ial collec ions. Fi s , uminal fluid (~200 mL) was collec ed and disca ded o a oid sample con amina ion wi h sali a ha could ge in o he ube du ing i s in oduc ion h ough he animal’s mou h and oesophagus. A e ha , uminal fluid (~200 mL) was e- ex ac ed, s ained h ough a cheeseclo h and i s pH was eco ded (Tes o 205, Tes o AG, Ge many). Then, uminal fluid was sampled o DNA ex ac ion, and de e mina ion o ammonia-ni ogen (N) and ola ile a y acid (VFA) concen a ions, and immedia ely ozen on d y ice. Sample p ese a ion condi ions and analy ical p ocedu es o ammonia-N and VFA de e mina ion a e de ailed in Cos a- Rou a e al.(2020). Ex ac ion and sequencing o DNA Ex ac ion o DNA was pe o med on eeze-d ied uminal fluid ( he ini ial amoun o he sample was 60 mg) h ough physical dis up ion (1 min) by using a bead bea e (Mini-bead Bea e 1, BioSpec P oduc s, USA) and subsequen DNA pu ifica ion was pe o med wi h he QIAamp DNA S ool Mini Ki (ID: 51504; QIAGEN N.V., Ge many), wi h he modifica ions o g ea e empe a u e (95C) and g ea e elu ion ime (3 min) o ensu e maximum DNA concen a ion in he final elu e. Amplifica ion o DNA was pe o med by using p ime s 341F and 805R, which a ge he V3 and V4 egions o he bac e ial and a chaeal 16S RNA. Sequencing was conduc ed on an Illumina MiSeq 2x300 pla o m by E a7 Bioin o ma ics (Spain). Assembly and fil a ion o sample eads, as well as ope a ional axonomic uni (OTU) p epa a ion ha e been de ailed in Cos a-Rou a e al.(2020). Es ima ion o RFI and clus e ing Weigh da a we e fi ed o a hi d-deg ee polynomials model in unc ion o age (Eqn 1) ha allows he es ima ion o he ADG o each animal a any age. Weigh i;age ¼P j¼3 j¼0bBATCH;jþAi;j  agejþei;age ð1Þ whe e b BATCH,j is he ba ch e ec (fixed); A i,j, is he j h andom coe ficien o he i h animal e ec ; age is he age o he animal (days) and e i,age he esidual e m. The ea e , ADG_de was ob ained as he fi s de i a i e o Eqn 1 o each mon h by using he mon hly a e age age o each animal (Eqn 2). The indi idual ADG de ia ion (ADG_de ) will accoun o hedi e enceo g ow ho heanimalcompa edwi h he a e age o he ba ch a each age. ADG de i;age ¼P j¼3 j¼1j·Ai;jage j-- 1ðÞ ð2Þ In o al, 86 eco ds (3%) ou o h ee s anda d de ia ions o he mean we e conside ed as ou lie s and excluded om he da ase . Residual eed in ake was modelled (Eqn 3) using he andom eg ession coe ficien app oach p oposed by Sa ie o e al. (2014). The model included ba ch, age (mon hs), ADGde , me abolic weigh (MW; mon hly mean BW 0.64 ) and was defined as ollows: FIij ¼B0;animal i þBa ch ·agejþðBa ch þB1;animal iÞ ·MWij þðBa ch þB2;animal iÞ·ADG de ij þeij ð3Þ whe e FI ij is DM in ake measu ed o Animal iin Mon h jand B k , animal i a e he andom coe ficien s o animal e ec modelled using an uns uc u ed ma ix o a iances be ween hem. The inclusion o ba ch e ec in Eqn 1and Eqn 3assu ed ha he FE calcula ed was no a ec ed by die di e ences. On he basis o he indi idual coe ficien s o ADG (B 1, animal i ) and MW (B 2, animal i ), animals we e seg ega ed in o ou ca ego ies o FE, as ollows: (1) Animals wi h posi i e coe ficien s o bo h ADG and MW belonged o ‘low-e ficiency in ADG and low-e ficiency in MW’ca ego y. (2) Animals wi h posi i e coe ficien o ADG bu nega i e coe ficien o MW belonged o ‘low-e ficiency in ADG and high-e ficiency in MW’ca ego y. (3) Animals wi h nega i e coe ficien o ADG bu posi i e coe ficien o MW belonged o ‘high-e ficiency in ADG and low-e ficiency in MW’ca ego y. (4) Animals wi h nega i e coe ficien s o bo h ADG and MW belonged o ‘high-e ficiency in ADG and high-e ficiency in MW’ca ego y. Fo he pu pose o he p esen s udy, he wo ex eme ca ego ies (1 and 4) we e conside ed as high-e ficiency (HE, posi i e RFI) and low-e ficiency (LE, nega i e RFI) animals, espec i ely. This clus e ing (HE s LE) was subjec ed o bioin o ma ic analyses o appa en diges ibili y, uminal e men a ion and mic obio a da a as explained below. Bioin o ma ics Sequence da a we e no malised and abiodi e si y indices we e calcula ed o measu e he a iabili y o OTUs wi hin a sample (R Co e Team 2020, Vegan package). To measu e di e ences in mic obio a composi ion among samples, bdi e si y was app oached h ough pe o ming a canonical co espondence analysis, based on log- ans o med OTU da a (ze os we e eplaced by adding 1 o each alue), and including FE (HE s LE), pe iod (GRO s FIN) and bo h ADG and MW coe ficien s as explana o y a iables (R Co e Team 2020, Vegan package). To ci cum en he composi ional bias p oblem (Tsilimig as and Fodo 2016; Gloo e al.2017;Calle2019), we applied he Ai chison’s cen ed log a io (cl ) ans o ma ion o ca y he da a o a Euclidean space, a e eplacing ze os by adding 1 o each alue. So as o es he significance o he ollowing e ec s: FE (HE s LE), pe iod (GRO s FIN) and bo h ADG and MW coe ficien s on mic obio a composi ion, a pe mu a ional mul i a ia e analysis o a iance (Adonis) was conduc ed on he basis o he cl Euclidean dis ance and calcula ing s a is ical significance a e 10000 andom pe mu a ions (R Co e Team 2020, Vegan package). So as o deciphe which gene a abundance we e esponsible o he di e ences among g oups, an ANOVA-like di e en ial Ruminal mic obio a and eed e ficiency in bulls Animal P oduc ion Science C exp ession (ALDEx) analysis was conduc ed o e hose gene a p esen a leas a 50% o he indi iduals (R Co e Team 2020, Aldex2 package; Fe nandes e al.2013). Finally, o desc ibe he in e ac ions wi hin umen mic obial communi y, we pe o med a ne wo k analysis h ough spa se co ela ions o composi ional da a (Spa CC) echnique (R Co e Team 2020, SpiecEasi package; F iedman and Alm 2012) o e hose gene a p esen a leas a 50% o he indi iduals. Mic obial ne wo ks we e g aphically ep esen ed (R Co e Team 2020; ig aph package) and hei complexi y was desc ibed in e ms o numbe o nodes (gene a), numbe o edges (significan posi i e o nega i e co ela ions), node deg ee (numbe o connec ions ha any node es ablishes wi h o he nodes) and be weenness (measu e o cen ali y in a g aph based on sho es pa hs). Mic obio a unc ional con en was assessed using a opic model app oach (R Co e Team 2020; heme agenomics package) ha consis s on (1) cap u ing g oups o co- occu ing axa e med ‘ opics’, (2) unco e ing wi hin- opic unc ional po en ial, and (3) linking hese opics and hei unc ional con en o specific sample ea u es (e.g. FE pheno ypes; Woloszynek e al.2019). S a is ical analyses The models o RFI we e sol ed using MIXED p ocedu e o SAS s a is ical so wa e (SAS 9.4, Ca y, NC, USA). In ake, appa en diges ibili y, uminal e men a ion pa ame e s and mic obial abiodi e si y da a we e analysed wi h a mixed model, including FE (HE s LE), pe iod (GRO s FIN) and hei in e ac ion as fixed e ec s and animal as a andom e ec , o accoun o epea ed measu emen s (R Co e Team 2020, lme4 package). Di e ences among leas squa e means we e assessed using Tukey mul iple-compa ison es (R Co e Team 2020, emmeans package). Indi idual samples ou o h ee s anda d de ia ions o he mean we e disca ded and no included in he s a is ical analysis. Resul s a e epo ed as leas squa e means and s anda d e o o mean. Significan e ec s we e decla ed a P<0.05 and endency o di e ence a Pbe ween 0.05 and 0.10. Resul s The ou defined FE ca ego ies based on andom eg ession coe ficien s included be ween 85 and 108 animals each; he wo ex eme ca ego ies co esponding o HE and LE animals had s a is ically di e en means o ADG and MW coe ficien s (Table S1, a ailable as Supplemen a y Ma e ial o his pape ). The se o 48 bulls ha we e sampled o appa en diges ibili y, uminal e men a ion and mic obio a cha ac e isa ion we e equally dis ibu ed wi hin he ou ca ego ies. The FE by pe iod in e ac ions we e no significan o any o he esponse a iables measu ed in he p esen s udy; hus, only he main e ec s means a e p esen ed and discussed. In ake, appa en diges ibili y and uminal e men a ion pa ame e s Da a on DM in ake (Table 2) indica ed ha bulls’concen a e and o age in akes we e simila be ween FE ca ego ies (HE s LE). Howe e , animals classified as HE had g ea e appa en Table 2. D y ma e (DM) in ake, nu ien appa en diges ibili y and uminal e men a ion pa ame e s Ob ained in in ensi ely ea ed bulls in he ollowing wo pe iods: g owing (GRO: 159 days old and 225 kg bodyweigh ) and finishing (FIN: 266 days old and 434 kg bodyweigh ). Residual eed in ake was modelled o classi y animals in o wo ca ego ies o eed e ficiency, namely, high e ficiency (HE, n = 12) and low e ficiency (LE, n = 13). S anda d e o o he mean (s.e.m.) and significance o eed e ficiency and pe iod e ec s a e shown. No eed e ficiency by pe iod in e ac ion was s a is ically significan (P>0.05) and hese a e no included in he able. A: P, ace a e- o-p opiona e a io; CP, c ude p o ein; N, ni ogen; OM, o ganic ma e ; VFA, ola ile a y acids. Mean alues wi hin a ow ollowed by di e en le e s di e significan ly (a P=0.05) Pa ame e Feed e ficiency Pe iod s.e.m. P- alue HE LE GRO FIN Feed e ficiency Pe iod In ake DM (kg/day) 7.52 7.64 5.88b 9.28a 0.235 0.699 <0.001 Concen a e DM 6.40 6.59 5.28b 7.72a 0.191 0.479 <0.001 Fo age DM 1.09 0.93 0.60b 1.42a 0.137 0.397 <0.001 Appa en diges ibili y coe ficien s (%) DM 75.16a 70.82b 72.88 73.09 0.955 0.002 0.875 OM 76.15a 71.94b 73.84 74.25 0.995 0.003 0.760 CP 71.53a 68.52b 69.64 70.41 1.020 0.043 0.579 Ruminal e men a ion pa ame e s pH 6.93 6.97 7.16a 6.75b 0.080 0.710 <0.001 Ammonia-N (mg/L) 12.36 19.27 12.03 19.59 3.618 0.181 0.095 VFA (mmol/L) 70.87 74.41 68.22 77.05 6.102 0.676 0.183 VFA (%) Ace a e 49.63 51.42 49.32 51.73 1.532 0.403 0.093 P opiona e 37.70 35.88 38.89a 34.69b 1.867 0.487 0.015 Bu y a e 8.18 8.38 7.70b 8.86a 0.425 0.737 0.025 B anched-chain VFA 1.93 1.99 1.66b 2.27a 0.128 0.724 <0.001 Ra io A:P 1.42 1.58 1.30b 1.69a 0.148 0.431 0.017 DAnimal P oduc ion Science S. Cos a-Rou a e al. diges ibili y coe ficien s o DM, OM and CP han did hei LE coun e pa s. Da a on uminal e men a ion pa ame e s (Table 2)showed no di e ences in uminal pH be ween HE and LE bulls. Ammonia-N concen a ion was low and a iable among animals; he e o e, no s a is ical di e ences be ween FE ca ego ies we e ound. Al hough he o al VFA concen a ion emained una ec ed by FE, nume ical di e ences we e ound in mola p opo ions o he main VFA; HE animals had a lowe p opo ion o ace a e and a highe p opo ion o p opiona e han did LE ones. Bu y a e p opo ion inc eased wi h ime in he case o LE animals (7.46% s 9.30% o GRO and FIN pe iods, espec i ely; P= 0.047) whe eas i emained equal o HE animals (7.95% s 8.42% o GRO and FIN, espec i ely; P= 0.908). In con as , b anched-chain VFA p opo ion (isobu y a e and iso ale a e) inc eased wi h ime only in he case o HE bulls (1.55% s 2.31% o GRO and FIN, espec i ely; P=0.006). Mic obial da ase ea u es Sequencing p ocedu e yielded an a e age o (mean s.e.m.) 19862 2215 sequences pe sample, esul ing in 973259 sequences in he whole s udy. In o al, 787 OTUs we e ob ained a he 98% sequence-simila i y cu -o le els, wi h 114 5 as he mean numbe o OTUs pe sample. Good’s co e age alue was 99.69 0.03%, sugges ing ha mo e han 99% o bac e ial and a chaeal phylo ypes we e iden ified. The unclassified a e o OTUs a genus le el was 0.75 0.09%. Sha ed OTUs by all indi iduals in each FE ca ego y and pe iod we e deemed o be co e bac e ial/a chaeal communi ies. Co e communi y ga he ed 69.90 2.94% o analysed sequences and was composed o fi e OTUs, namely, P e o ella uminicola,unclassified P e o ella (bo h ep esen ing mo e han 84% o sha ed sequences), unclassified Rosebu ia, Sha pea azabuensis and unclassified Me hanob e ibac e . Mic obial communi y biodi e si y Alpha biodi e si y (Table 3) was ound o be simila among bulls di e ing in hei FE; howe e , Shannon and Simpson index alues inc eased wi h ime only in LE animals (Shannon index 1.51 s 2.13, P= 0.005; Simpson index 0.53 s 0.70, P= 0.020, o GRO and FIN, espec i ely). Be a biodi e si y is g aphically ep esen ed in Fig. 1,as well as he e ec s o explana o y a iables included in he model, namely, FE, pe iod, and bo h MW and ADG coe ficien s in he RFI model. Samples a e clea ly clus e ed by pe iod and FE, wi h he e ec s o MW and ADG coe ficien s being less g aphically e iden . Adonis es esul s confi med he o eseen di e ences in uminal mic obio a composi ion when compa ing sampling pe iods (GRO s FIN, P<0.001), FE ca ego ies (HE s LE, P= 0.022) and MW coe ficien alues (P= 0.021), bu no in he case o ADG coe ficien alues (P= 0.276). S a is ical di e ences in abundance o gene a be ween FE ca ego ies (HE s LE) could no be de ec ed by ALDEx analysis, ega dless o he sampling pe iod (Fig. S1, a ailable as Supplemen a y Ma e ial o his pape ). Mic obial ne wo k Mic obial ne wo ks we e buil o es in e ac ions among bac e ial and a chaeal gene a (Fig. 2). Deg ee o in e ac ion Table 3. Ruminal mic obial abiodi e si y Ob ained in in ensi ely ea ed bulls in he ollowing wo pe iods: g owing (GRO: 159 days oldand 225 kg bodyweigh ) andfinishing(FIN:266daysoldand434kg bodyweigh ).Residual eedin ake wasmodelled oclassi yanimalsin o wo ca ego ies o eed e ficiency, namely, high e ficiency (HE, n = 12) and low e ficiency (LE, n = 13). S anda d e o o he mean (s.e.m.) and significance o eed e ficiency and pe iod e ec s a e shown. No eed e ficiency by pe iod in e ac ion was s a is ically significan (P>0.05) and hese a e no included in he able. Mean alues wi hin a ow ollowed by di e en le e s di e significan ly (a P= 0.05) Pa ame e Feed e ficiency Pe iod s.e.m. P- alue HE LE GRO FIN Feed e ficiency Pe iod Shannon index 1.76 1.82 1.53b 2.05a 0.149 0.760 <0.001 Simpson index 0.61 0.61 0.54b 0.68a 0.050 0.942 0.002 Richness 101.10 107.69 96.87b 111.92a 5.824 0.408 0.072 2 1 0 –1 –2 –2 0 2 CCA1 MW PERIOD HE_GRO LE_GRO HE_FIN LE_FIN ADG FEED EFFICIENCY CCA2 Fig. 1. G aphical ep esen a ion o canonical co espondence analysis (CCA) on bac e ial and a chaeal ope a ional axonomic uni s (OTUs) in uminal fluid, ob ained in in ensi ely ea ed bulls in he ollowing wo pe iods: g owing (GRO: 159 days old and 225 kg bodyweigh ) and finishing (FIN: 266 days old and 434 kg bodyweigh ). Residual eed in ake was modelled o classi y animals in o wo ca ego ies o eed e ficiency, namely, high e ficiency (HE) and low e ficiency (LE). The analysis included eed e ficiency, pe iod, and bo h a e age daily gain (ADG) and me abolic weigh (MW) coe ficien s as explana o y a iables. Ruminal mic obio a and eed e ficiency in bulls Animal P oduc ion Science E was s udied h ough he numbe o gene a (nodes) ha es ablished significan in e ac ions (edges) wi h o he gene a, as well as he numbe o in e ac ions es ablished pe node (node deg ee). Du ing he g owing pe iod, HE bulls had simila numbe o nodes aking pa in he mic obial ne wo k as did LE bulls (26 in HE s 24 in LE), bu highe numbe o edges(57inHE s28inLE)andahighe a e agenode deg ee (4.38 in HE s 2.33 in LE). Du ing he finishing pe iod, mic obial ne wo k a chi ec u e changed; HE bulls con inued o ha e mo e co ela ing nodes han did LE bulls (30 in HE s 21 in LE), bu LE animals d as ically inc eased hei numbe o edges (53 in HE s 59 in LE) and he node deg ee (3.53 in HE s 5.62 in LE). Mo eo e , we in es iga ed mic obial gene a ha ac as main in o ma ion ga eways in ne wo ks in e ms o be weenness cen ali y, i.e. he ex en o which one node lies on pa hs ha connec o he nodes. Ne wo ks o HE animals p esen ed highe be weenness cen ali y han did hose o LE animals in g owing (3.88 in HE s 1.04 in LE) bu no in finishing (2.37 in HE s 2.52 in LE) pe iod. Mic obial unc ional capabili y A e p edic ing unc ional con en o uminal mic obio a, wo pa hways we e ound o be di e en ially exp essed depending on he animal FE pheno ype. In he g owing pe iod, ABC anspo e pa hway (ATP-dependen anspo o molecules ac oss cell memb ane) was mo e ac i e in HE animals han in LE animals, and, in he finishing pe iod, me hane me abolism Eubac e ium Psych obac e T eponema T eponema Acine obac e Pseudo amibac e Pseudo amibac e Lac obacillus B e ibac e ium A h obac e Dialis e Dialis e Bi idobac e ium Bi idobac e ium Bac e oides Pseudobu y i ib io P e o ella Me hanob e ibac e Jeo ga icoccus Jeo ga icoccus Tu icibac e Tu icibac e Co ynebac e ium Co ynebac e ium Co ynebac e ium B achybac e ium S aphylococcus S aphylococcus Psych obac e S aphylococcus Pseudomonas Bu y i ib io Clos idium Eubac e ium Eubac e ium Mi suokella Mi suokella Mi suokella P e o ella Olsenella Lac obacillus Bi idobac e ium Bu y i ib io Bu y i ib io Dialis e Dialis e T eponema Acidaminococcus Pseudomonas Pseudobu y i ib io Pseudobu y i ib io Selenomonas Selenomonas O senella Rosebu ia Die zia P e o ella P e o ella Aga hobac e Aga hobac e Clos idium Clos idium Aga hobac e Pep oclos idium T eponema Rosebu ia Lachnoclos idium Allisonella Sha pea Sha pea Rosebu ia Ruminococcus Ruminococcus Ruminococcus Ruminococcus Bac e oides Acine obac e Fib obac e Selenomonas Me hanob e ibac e Me hanob e ibac e Pseudo amibac e Pseudo amibac e Megasphae a Megasphae a Megasphae a Mi suokella Allisonella Sha pea Acidaminococcus Olsenella Selenomonas Facklamia Facklamia Fib obac e Fib obac e Fib obac e (a)(b) (c)(d) Candida us_Phy oplasma Candida us_Phy oplasma Ae ococcus Weissella Fig. 2. Bac e ial and a chaeal gene a ne wo k in he umen o in ensi ely ea ed a ening bulls: (a–c) GRO: 159 days old and 225 kg bodyweigh ; (b–d) FIN: 266 days old and 434 kg bodyweigh . Residual eed in ake was modelled o classi y animals in o wo ca ego ies o eed e ficiency, namely, (a, b) high e ficiency (HE) and (c, d)lowe ficiency (LE). Ne wo ks we e gene a ed on he basis o hose gene a ha es ablished significan co ela ions ( >0.60 and P<0.05). G een and ed edges indica e posi i e and nega i e co ela ions, espec i ely. Node size is p opo ional o genus abundance in he uminal fluid. FAnimal P oduc ion Science S. Cos a-Rou a e al. was down egula ed in he umen o HE indi iduals when compa ed wi h LE animals. Discussion RFI and mechanisms unde lying he a iabili y o FE Va ia ions in RFI occu due o po en ial physiological mechanisms such as diges ion, e men a ion and me abolism (He d and A hu 2009). Ou findings showed ha HE animals appa en ly diges ed mo e eed, in e ms o DM, OM and CP, han did LE ones. These esul s a e in acco dance wi h p e ious s udies in which mo e e ficien animals showed a highe nu ien diges ibili y and a smalle nu ien loss h ough was e and me hane emission (Richa dson e al.1996; Nk umah e al.2006). Negesse e al.(2017) also obse ed imp o ed appa en diges ibili y coe ficien s o DM, OM and CP in HE hei e s; hese animals exc e ed a smalle p opo ion o N h ough aeces and hei N biological alue (diges ible N a io) was highe han ha o less e ficien hei e s, sugges ing ha CP diges ion and me abolism may be enhanced in HE animals. In compa ison, de Assis Lage e al.(2019)didno find di e ences in diges ibili y coe ficien s o such nu ien s bu hey epo ed a endency o HE hei e s o be e diges e he ex ac ac ion. Vola ile a y acids a e p oduc s o umen mic obial e men a ion o ca bohyd a es, cons i u ing he main ene gy sou ce o uminan s (Be gman 1990). Al hough di e ences be ween HE and LE bulls did no each significance o any uminal e men a ion pa ame e , nume ical alues indica ed ha LE animals had a e men a ion pa e n o ien ed owa ds he p oduc ion o highe mola p opo ion o ace ic and less p opionic acids han did HE animals, wi h he consequen e ec on ace a e- o-p opiona e a io. These obse ed di e ences in umen e men a ion pa e n may be playing a ole in he bulls’FE pheno ype, since me abolic hyd ogen p oduced in he fi s s ep o ace ic acid pa hway is la e aken up by me hanogens, inc easing ene gy loss h ough gas emissions (Unge eld 2020). Du ing he g owing pe iod, mola p opo ions o he majo VFA we e simila o hose obse ed by Yus e e al.(2020)in bee hei e s ed a simila ad libi um concen a e plus s aw die . Howe e , du ing he finishing pe iod, he highe amoun o o al VFA, concomi an wi h significan ly lowe uminal pH, we e oo ed in he inc eased DM in ake and, consequen ly, in he highe ex en o e men a ion p ocess. Howe e , p opionic acid showed a di e en end and i was highe in younge animals. He nandez-U dane a e al.(1976) epo ed ha o age- o-concen a e a io a ec s he mola p opo ions o VFA, which o high-concen a e die s changes owa ds dec eased ace ic and inc eased p opionic acid; he e o e, in ou expe imen , he lowe o age- o-concen a e a io du ing he g owing (11%) han in he finishing pe iod (18%) can explain he obse ed dec eased p opo ion o p opionic acid wi h ime. RFI and uminal mic obial communi y In he p esen s udy, Illumina sequencing echnology was used o analyse bac e ial and a chaeal composi ion, biodi e si y, connec ance and unc ional capabili y wi hin he umen o in ensi ely ea ed bulls di e ing in hei FE. A nega i e co ela ion be ween uminal mic obial a biodi e si y and FE has been p e iously desc ibed in milking cows (Shaba e al.2016), sugges ing ha e ficien mic obio as a e less complex bu mo e specialised in p o iding highe concen a ions o ele an ou pu me aboli es ha can be used o mee hos ’s ene gy equi emen s. In a simila manne , ou esul s showed ha mic obial adi e si y alues significan ly inc eased wi h ime only in LE bulls. Mic obial di e si y is also posi i ely co ela ed wi h communi y s abili y and obus ness, as bo h di e en ial esponse o a iable condi ions and unc ional edundancy o species a e enhanced (McCann 2000; Moya and Fe e 2016). Thus, i seems easonable o hypo hesise ha a biodi e si y o he mic obio a has posi i e and nega i e coexis ing e ec s on ecosys em obus ness and eed u ilisa ion e ficiency, espec i ely. The ac ha LE bulls conside ably inc eased hei gene a ne wo k connec ance wi h ime, while HE bulls kep i cons an o e en diminished i , suppo s he hypo hesis ha LE animals’ uminal mic obio a could be mo e obus and ha e an enhanced abili y o cope wi h possible dis u bances (Dunne e al.2002). E en hough bdi e si y ep esen a ion showed clea clus e ing o bulls’mic obial communi y, no s a is ical di e ences in he abundance o main gene a could be ound be ween FE ca ego ies. Conside ing ha some s udies ha e had success in epo ing a ela ionship be ween ce ain mic obial axa and animal’sFE(McCanne al.2014;Mye e al.2015; Pe ea e al.2017;Delgadoe al.2019), we conside ha he ollowing ac o s could hinde de ec ion o such ela ionship: (1) he e can be subs an ial animal- o-animal a ia ion in he umen mic obial communi y, hus equi ing a g ea e numbe o animals o be able o obse e a significan associa ion be ween mic obial axa and FE (B ulc e al.2009; Weime e al.2010), and (2) he lack o di e ences obse ed be ween FE ca ego ies a he main- gene a le el may indica e ha he impo an a ia ion in mic obial communi ies lies a a fine esolu ion (e.g. a species le el o low-abundance gene a). Ki elmann e al.(2014) desc ibed he exis ence o h ee uminal mic obial communi ies linked o di e en me hane yields in sheep; umino ype H was cha ac e ised by he highes me hane emissions and ha bou ed he highe abundance o species belonging o Ruminococcus, o he Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospi aceae, Ca abac e iaceae, Cop ococcus, o he Clos idiales, P e o ella, o he Bac e oidales and Alphap o eobac e ia. In a ecen s udy in sheep, Ghanba i Maman e al.(2020) also iden ified ce ain genes om Lachnospi aceae, Ruminococcus,Bu y i ib io and Selenomonas axa ha can ha e significan e ec s on me hane p oduc ion pa hway. In acco dance wi h hese s udies, ou co- abundance analysis showed ha ce ain gene a p e iously ela ed o high me hane emission (e.g. Me hanob e ibac e , Rosebu ia,Aga hobac e ,Bu y i ib io,Pseudobu y i ib io, Ruminococcus,Selenomonas) ei he we e mo e cen al o e ol ed o be mo e cen al in LE animal ne wo ks du ing he ansi ion om g owing o finishing pe iods (Tables S2, Table S3, a ailable as Supplemen a y Ma e ial o his pape ), which could a leas pa ially cause hei lowe FE. Ruminal mic obio a and eed e ficiency in bulls Animal P oduc ion Science G Recen s udies ha e highligh ed a possible ela ionship be ween mic obial me abolic unc ions and he animal’sFE, bu he na u e o such ela ionship is s ill unclea . Li e al. (2016) obse ed ha HE ca le had a mo e ac i e me abolism o nucleo ides, as well as o a ious ene gy-gene a ing molecules (e.g. p opanoa e, glyoxyla e and dica boxyla e, s a ch and suc ose), hypo hesising ha such inc eased me abolic ac i i y could enhance eed diges ion and p o ide he hos wi h mo e nu ien s. Li e al.(2016) and Elolimy e al. (2020) also epo ed ha umen mic obio a o he mos e ficien ca le was mo e ac i e in cell p oli e a ion and su i abili y, inducing cellula g ow h and inc easing ole ance o i al in ec ion; likewise, ou esul s showed enhanced cell memb ane anspo unc ions in HE g owing animals. Finally, he obse ed dec ease o me hane me abolism ac i i y in HE finishing bulls (Shaba e al. 2016) suppo s he p e ious idea ha high and low me hane emi e s can ha e a simila abundance o uminal me hanogens bu di e en ial exp ession and ansc ip ion o me hanogenesis pa hway genes (Shi e al.2014). Conclusions The explo a ion o he ela ionship be ween umen mic obial communi y and hos FE showed inc eased nu ien diges ibili y in HE animals. Alpha biodi e si y and gene a ne wo k connec ance inc eased wi h ime in LE bulls, highligh ing a possible ade-o be ween FE and uminal mic obio a obus ness. Mo eo e , ce ain gene a ha ha e p e iously been ela ed o high me hane emission we e mo e cen al in LE animals’gene a ne wo ks. Ou esul s ha e p o ided e idence ha he umen mic obio a could be one o he biological ac o s associa ed wi h a ia ion in ca le FE. Conflic s o in e es The au ho s decla e no conflic s o in e es . Acknowledgemen s Special hanks a e ex ended o J. R. Be olín Pa dos o hei labo a o y assis ance. This s udy is a pa o GenTORE p ojec and ecei ed unding om he Eu opean Union H2020 p og am unde g an ag eemen no727213 and Ins i u o Nacional de In es igación y Tecnología Ag a ia y Alimen a ia (RTA-14-038-C02). S. Cos a- Rou a is ecipien o a esea ch aining g an om Spanish Minis y o Science and Inno a ion (FPU 2016/03761). A. R. Se adj con ac is financed by GenTORE p ojec . Re e ences A hu JPF, He d RM (2008) Residual eed in ake in bee ca le. Re is a B asilei a de Zoo ecnia 37, 269–279. doi:10.1590/S1516-3598 2008001300031 A hu PF, A che JA, Johns on DJ, He d RM, Richa dson EC, Pa nell PF (2001) Gene ic and pheno ypic a iance and co a iance componen s o eed in ake, eed e ficiency, and o he pos weaning ai s in Angus ca le. Jou nal o Animal Science 79,2805–2811. doi:10.2527/ 2001.79112805x Be gman EN (1990) Ene gy con ibu ions o ola ile a y acids om he gas oin es inal ac in a ious species. Physiological Re iews 70, 567–590. doi:10.1152/phys e .1990.70.2.567 B ulc JM, An onopoulos DA, Be g Mille ME, Wilson MK, Yanna ell AC, DinsdaleEA,Edwa dsRE,F ankED,Eme sonJB,WacklinP,Cou inho PM, Hen issa B, Nelson KE, Whi e BA (2009) Gene-cen ic me agenomics o he fibe -adhe en bo ine umen mic obiome e eals o age specific glycoside hyd olases. P oceedings o he Na ional Academy o Sciences o he Uni ed S a es o Ame ica 106, 1948–1953. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806191105 Calle ML (2019) S a is ical analysis o me agenomics da a. Genomics & In o ma ics 17, e6. doi:10.5808/GI.2019.17.1.e6 Cos a-Rou a S, Balcells J, de la Fuen e G, Mo a-Gil J, Llanes N, Villalba D (2020) Nu ien u iliza ion e ficiency, uminal e men a ion and mic obial communi y in Hols ein bulls ed concen a e-based die s wi h di e en o age sou ce. Animal Feed Science and Technology 269, 114662. doi:10.1016/j.ani eedsci.2020.114662 de Assis Lage CF, Ges ei a Coelho S, Diniz Ne o H do C, Rocha Malacco VM, Pacheco Rod igues JP, Sac amen o JP, Sama ini Machado F, Ribei o Pe ei a LG, Ribei o Tomich T, Magalhães Campos M (2019) Rela ionship be ween eed e ficiency indexes and pe o mance, body measu emen s, diges ibili y, ene gy pa i ioning, and ni ogen pa i ioning in p e-weaning dai y hei e s. PLoS One 14, e0223368. doi:10.1371/jou nal.pone.0223368 Delgado B, Bach A, Guasch I, González C, Elcoso G, P yce JE, Gonzalez- Recio O (2019) Whole umen me agenome sequencing allows classi ying and p edic ing eed e ficiency and in ake le els in ca le. Scien ific Repo s 9, 11. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36673-w Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Ma inez ND (2002) Ne wo k s uc u e and biodi e si y loss in ood webs: obus ness inc eases wi h connec ance. Ecology Le e s 5, 558–567. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00354.x Elolimy A, Alha hi A, Zeineldin M, Pa ys C, Loo JJ (2020) Residual eed in ake di e gence du ing he p eweaning pe iod is associa ed wi h unique hindgu mic obiome and me abolome p ofiles in neona al Hols ein hei e cal es. Jou nal o Animal Science and Bio echnology 11, 13. doi:10.1186/s40104-019-0406-x Fe nandesAD,MacklaimJM,LinnTG,ReidG, Gloo GB (2013)ANOVA- like di e en ial exp ession (ALDEx) analysis o mixed popula ion RNA-seq. PLoS One 8, e67019. doi:10.1371/jou nal.pone.0067019 F iedman J, Alm EJ (2012) In e ing co ela ion ne wo ks om genomic su ey da a. PLoS Compu a ional Biology 8, e1002687. doi:10.1371/ jou nal.pcbi.1002687 Ghanba i Maman L, Palizban F, Fallah A anaki F, Elmi Ghiasi N, A iaeenejad S, Gha a i MR, Hosseini Salekdeh G, Ka ousi K (2020) Co-abundance analysis e eals hidden playe s associa ed wi h high me hane yield pheno ype in sheep umen mic obiome. Scien ific Repo s 10, 4995. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61942-y Gloo GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2017) Mic obiome da ase s a e composi ional: and his is no op ional. F on ie s in Mic obiology 8, 2224. doi:10.3389/ micb.2017.02224 He d RM, A hu PF (2009) Physiological basis o esidual eed in ake. Jou nal o Animal Science 87, E64–E71. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1345 He nandez-U dane a A, Coppock CE, McDowell RE, Gianola D, Smi h NE (1976) Changes in o age-concen a e a io o comple e eeds o dai y cows. Jou nal o Dai y Science 59, 695–707. doi:10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(76)84260-9 Hun ing on G (1990) Ene gy me abolism in he diges i e ac and li e o ca le: influence o physiological s a e and nu i ion. Rep oduc ion, Nu i ion, De elopmen 30,35–47. doi:10.1051/ nd:19900103 Ki elmann S, Pina es-Pa iño CS, Seedo H, Ki k MR, Ganesh S, McEwan JC, Janssen PH (2014) Two di e en bac e ial communi y ypes a e linked wi h he low-me hane emission ai in sheep. PLoS One 9, e103171. doi:10.1371/jou nal.pone.0103171 LiF,ZhouM,OminskiK,GuanLL(2016)Does he umenmic obiomeplay a ole in eed e ficiency o bee ca le? Jou nal o Animal Science 94, 44–48. doi:10.2527/jas.2016-0524 HAnimal P oduc ion Science S. Cos a-Rou a e al. McCann KS (2000) The di e si y–s abili y deba e. Na u e 405, 228–233. doi:10.1038/35012234 McCann JC, Wiley LM, Fo bes TD, Rouque e FM, Tedeschi LO (2014) Rela ionship be ween he umen mic obiome and esidual eed in ake- e ficiency o B ahman bulls s ocked on be mudag ass pas u es. PLoS One 9, e91864. doi:10.1371/jou nal.pone.0091864 Moya A, Fe e M (2016) Func ional edundancy-induced s abili y o gu mic obio a subjec ed o dis u bance. T ends in Mic obiology 24, 402–413. doi:10.1016/j. im.2016.02.002 Mye PR, Smi h TPL, Wells JE, Kuehn LA, F ee ly HC (2015) Rumen mic obiome om s ee s di e ing in eed e ficiency. PLoS One 10, e0129174. doi:10.1371/jou nal.pone.0129174 Negesse T, Da C, Kundu SS (2017) Residual eed in ake, diges ibili y o nu ien s and e ficiency o wa e u iliza ions in Mu ah bu alo hei e s. Jou nalo Dai y,Ve e ina y&AnimalResea ch5,74–80.doi:10.15406/ jd a .2017.05.00138 Nk umah JD, Okine EK, Ma hison GW, Schmid K, Li C, Basa ab JA, P ice MA, Wang Z, Moo e SS (2006) Rela ionships o eedlo eed e ficiency, pe o mance, and eeding beha io wi h me abolic a e, me hane p oduc ion, and ene gy pa i ioning in bee ca le. Jou nal o Animal Science 84, 145–153. doi:10.2527/2006.841145x Owens FN, Hanson CF (1992) Ex e nal and in e nal ma ke s o app aising si e and ex en o diges ion in uminan s. Jou nal o Dai y Science 75,2605–2617. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92) 78023-0 Pe ea K, Pe z K, Oli o SK, Williams A, Lachman M, Ishaq SL, Thomson J, Yeoman CJ (2017) Feed e ficiency pheno ypes in lambs in ol e changes in uminal, colonic, and small-in es ine-loca ed mic obio a. Jou nal o Animal Science 95,2585–2592. doi:10.2527/jas2016.1222 R Co e Team (2020) ‘R: a language and en i onmen o s a is ical compu ing.’(R Founda ion o S a is ical Compu ing: Vienna, Aus ia) Richa dson EC, He d RM, A hu PF, W igh J, Xu G, Dibley K, Oddy VH (1996) Possible physiological indica o s o ne eed con e sion e ficiency in bee ca le. P oceedings o he Aus alian Socie y o Animal P oduc ion 21, 103–106. Sa ie o D, Be y DP, F iggens NC (2014) Towa ds an imp o ed es ima ion o he biological componen s o esidual eed in ake in g owing ca le. Jou nal o Animal Science 92,4 67–476. doi:10.2527/ jas.2013-6894 Schenkel FS, Mille SP, Wil on JW (2004) Gene ic pa ame e s and b eed di e ences o eed e ficiency, g ow h, and body composi ion ai s o young bee bulls. Canadian Jou nal o Animal Science 84,177–185. doi:10.4141/A03-085 Shaba SKB, Sasson G, Do on-Faigenboim A, Du man T, Yaacoby S, Be g Mille ME, Whi e BA, Sh e ze N, Miz ahi I (2016) Specific mic obiome-dependen mechanisms unde lie he ene gy ha es e ficiency o uminan s. The ISME Jou nal 10,2958–2972. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.62 Shi W, Moon CD, Leahy SC, Kang D, F oula J, Ki elmann S, Fan C, Deu sch S, Gagic D, Seedo H, Kelly WJ, A ua R, Sang C, Soni P, Li D, Pina es-Pa iño CS, McEwan JC, Janssen PH, Chen F, Visel A, Wang Z, A wood GT, Rubin EM (2014) Me hane yield pheno ypes linked o di e en ial gene exp ession in he sheep umen mic obiome. Genome Resea ch 24,1517–1525. doi:10.1101/g .168245.113 Tsilimig as MCB, Fodo AA (2016) Composi ional da a analysis o he mic obiome: undamen als, ools, and challenges. Annals o Epidemiology 26,330–335. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.002 Unge eld EM (2020) Me abolic hyd ogen flows in umen e men a ion: p inciples and possibili ies o in e en ions. F on ie s in Mic obiology 11, 589. doi:10.3389/ micb.2020.00589 Weime PJ, S e enson DM, Man o ani HC, Man SLC (2010) Hos specifici y o he uminal bac e ial communi y in he dai y cow ollowing nea - o al exchange o uminal con en s. Jou nal o Dai y Science 93,5902–5912. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3500 Woloszynek S, Mell JC, Zhao Z, Simpson G, O’Conno MP, Rosen GL (2019) Explo ing hema ic s uc u e and p edic ed unc ionali y o 16S RNA amplicon da a. PLoS One 14, e0219235. doi:10.1371/jou nal. pone.0219235 Yus e S, Amanzouga ene Z, de Vega A, Fonde ila M, Blanco M, Casasús I (2020) E ec o p eweaning die on pe o mance, blood me aboli es and umen e men a ion a ound weaning in cal es o wo bee b eeds. Animal P oduc ion Science 60,1018–1027. doi:10.1071/AN19152 Handling edi o : Di Maybe y Ruminal mic obio a and eed e ficiency in bulls Animal P oduc ion Science I www.publish.csi o.au/jou nals/an