Repositorio Institucional de Documentos
Abstract
Se trata de diseñar materiales desde la perspectiva del Inglés como lengua Franca; entendiendo por lengua franca, la comunicación entre hablantes nativos y no nativos del inglés. Es decir, el uso del inglés como lengua de uso entre gente que no comparte una misma lengua materna. El diseño de materiales esta basado en situaciones de contexto real que se dan en la vida diaria;por ejemplo: role-plays, problem-solving, etc. Muñoz Mateo, Daphne; Luzón Marco, María José
Full text
ELT MATERIALS DESIGN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ENGLISH AS A LINGUA FRANCA Daphne Muñoz Mateo Supervised by Mª José Luzón TRABAJO FIN DE MÁSTER UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA FACULTAD DE EDUCACIÓN Máster en formación del profesorado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria, Bachillerato, Formación Profesional y Enseñanzas de Idiomas, Artísticas y Deportivas. Especialidad de lenguas extranjeras: Inglés.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2.Definitions and attitudes ................................................................................ 2 3.Describing ELF ............................................................................................. 5 4.ELF and English Language Teaching ........................................................... 7 5.Implications of ELF for the teaching of English ........................................... 8 6.Teaching English from the perspective of ELF and Communicative Strategies .......................................................................................................... 14 6.1.Communication strategies ...................................................................... 15 6.2.Strategies for a good communication .................................................... 16 7.Design of a didactic unit ................................................................................ 19 7.1. Learning unit: A trip around the world ................................................. 19 7.1.1.Objectives ....................................................................................... 20 7.1.2.Contents and activities ................................................................... 21 7.1.3.Methodology .................................................................................. 25 7.1.4.Materials for Lesson plans ............................................................. 27 8.Conclusions ................................................................................................... 60 9.References ..................................................................................................... 63
1 1.Introduction Due to the current necessities of international communication, English has become a universal or global language. English is considered the lingua franca in the globalized world in which we live. This is the reason why it is so important to know this language in this interconnected world. Nowadays, English is needed for academic education, in order to be able to communicate with others in international contexts, etc. Today, English is used as a lingua franca, that is, as the main language for communication between those people who do not share a common first language. People communicate in English in several contexts such as tourism, aid work, science, business, etc. There are lots of varieties of English and learners who visit nations in which English is spoken are amazed by the variation they encounter in local accents. There are many ways of using English in those nations and individuals can vary in the repertoires they employ taking into account several factors like for example: social class, occupation, sexuality, gender, social status, multilingualism, education, social context, etc. In this project I assume that all varieties of English are good and acceptable and that English is spoken by people all around the world and therefore is not the property of native speakers. It is important to speak English to communicate with everybody belonging to any part of the world. It is important to know that when speaking a foreign language, in this case English, what is really relevant is the fact of being understood so that communication is effective, so intelligibility is essential in any interaction. Intelligibility means being understood by the person you are talking to. Smith and Nelson (1985: 333-342) suggest that intelligibility is composed by: 1. “intelligibility, the ability of the listener to recognize individual words or utterances.” 2. “comprehensibility, the listener’s ability to understand the meaning of the word or utterance in its given context.”
2 3. “interpretability, the ability of the listener to understand the speaker’s intentions behind the word or utterance.” Smith and Nelson’s model focuses on the nature of this term (intelligibility) by saying it is interactional between speaker and hearer. Being intelligible means being understood by a listener at a particular time and situation. The purpose of this project is to discuss the implications that the concept of English as a lingua franca has for the teaching of English and design a learning unit where these implications have been taken into account. I will first provide a brief definition of English as a lingua franca (ELF). Then, I will focus on the concept of lingua franca and on its implications for teaching English and on the goals of teaching it from that perspective. I will finish this project with the design of a learning unit focused on English as a lingua franca, that is, designed from that perspective. In this learning unit, the communicative approach will be emphasized and the unit will be based on social interactions providing my students with real-context situations. 2. Definitions and attitudes To explain the meaning of English as a lingua franca, Jennifer Jenkins (2009) makes reference to the concept of “world Englishes” (WE) defining it as all local varieties of English but regardless of Kachru´s (1992) three circles. Kachru’s (1992) three circles are: The inner circle, the outer circle and the expanding circle. The inner circle refers to the traditional bases of English, where it is the main language. This circle includes UK, USA, Canada, Australia, Ireland and New Zealand. These are considered “norm providing”. The outer circle concerns the earlier phases of the spread of English in settings that were not native and where the language has become part of the country’s chief institutions, where English is considered to be a second language in a multilingual setting. These varieties are called “norm developing” and include Singapore, India, Malawi, and over fifty territories. The expanding circle includes those nations that are aware of the importance of English as an International language. English is taught as a foreign language in these nations because it is considered a useful tool for international communication. These nations do not belong to the group of countries colonized by the members of the inner circle.
3 Jenkins (2009) has not taken into account whether the different varieties of English are considered standard and educated, that is, she does not distinguish among Canadian, Indian, etc. in the way prescriptive grammarians and others do. Jenkins points out that many WE scholars do not consider Expanding Englishes as legitimate varieties. For instance Yano (1991) argues that English is not used in Japan by the majority and it is not used enough to consider it as Japanese English. The Expanding Circle I have mentioned before refers to English as interlanguage or learner English, and also as of greater or lesser proficiency depending on their proximity to a variety of the Inner Circle. According to Jenkins (2009), Lingua Franca is the language people having different mother tongues, i.e. the language that people who come from different linguacultural backgrounds, choose to communicate. Most ELF researchers include all the users of English within the definition of ELF without taking into account which circle of use they come from. Native speakers need to make adjustments to their local English variety so that their interlocutors can understand them when they take part in a lingua franca context. ELF involves two aspects which are: the common ground and the local variation. The first one contains linguistic forms that shares with ENL (English as a native language) and also forms that differ from ENL and that have arisen through the contact among the speakers of ELF and through the influence of the L1 on the English of ELF speakers. Both ELF and ENL involve a good deal of local variation and potential to accommodation; the users´ attempt to adjust their speech to make it more intelligible for their interlocutors by means of repetition, paraphrasing, code-switching, etc. (Cogo and Dewey, 2006; Kirkpatrick, 2008). The concept of ELF is a complex one and there is no general agreement on its definition. Sometimes, ELF is discussed in relation to EIL (English as an international language), and both terms are used interchangeably. Seidlhofer (cited in Jenkins, 2006) suggests that international English is a unitary variety. Drawing on Bolton (2004), Jenkins (2006: 160) states that the term international English “is used to refer to the local Englishes of those non-mother tongue countries where it has an intranational institutionalized role, although some researchers also include the mother tongue English
4 countries in their definitions”. The term international English is also used to refer to the international communication across national and linguistic boundaries. ELF researchers prefer to use the term English as a lingua franca instead of English as an international language even though both terms are used. The purpose of scholars researching on ELF is not to describe and codify a single ELF variety. When communicating and participating in an international communication, one should be familiar with certain forms and also have a linguistic repertoire that are used and intelligible across groups of English speakers who have different mother tongues. The key idea here is that accommodation is very important. (Jenkins, 2006). ELF interactions take place in politics, science, business, media discourse, etc. so they should be paid more attention taking into account they are different from interactions between native speakers, and between native and non-native speakers. The fact is that there are many interactions in English between people who do not control grammar and lexis and pronunciation because they do not conform to the norms, so nonstandard English is becoming more and more visible. There are also two provisos related to ELF research. ELF distinguishes between difference (from ENL) and deficiency (interlanguage) assuming that difference from ENL does not entail it is an error. Not all the ELF speakers are proficient so many of them are not fully competent and make some errors. There is the empirical question about which items are ELF variants and which are ELF errors. This depends on factors like systematicity, communicative effectiveness, etc. The second proviso refers to the fact that “ELF researchers do not believe either pedagogic decisions about language teaching should follow on automatically from language descriptions or that the linguistic compiling the corpora should make those decisions” (Jenkins, 2009: 202), that is, when ELF features have been identified and codified, ELF researchers claim that these features should not necessarily be taught to learners of English. Many people think that in order to communicate in an effective way in ELF contexts it is necessary and essential to imitate ENL speakers. We will study this later and we will see this is not necessarily true. In order for communication to be effective
5 we need to use some communication strategies rather than imitate the accents of native speakers. (Jenkins, 2009). 3. Describing ELF Research on ELF has focused mainly on spoken data for two reasons: the language is removed from the standardizing influence of writing, and spoken interactions are reciprocal allowing the negotiation of meaning while producing and receiving different utterances, which facilitates the observation concerning intelligibility among those people who speak. (Seidlhofer, 2004: 215). Most research on ELF has focused on pragmatics and phonology. According to Jenkins (2000), pronunciation is one of the causes of intelligibility problems in ELF interactions. She coined the term “Lingua Franca Core”, which refers to which phonological features are essential and which are not for intelligible pronunciation in the cases in which English is spoken in lingua franca contexts. Several analyses were carried out by collecting data from speakers with a wide range of L1, by observing instances of communication and miscommunication breakdown in mixed-L1 classrooms and social settings. Through these analyses the main pronunciation errors that led to intelligibility problems, were discovered. Those that cause problems were incorporated into the LFC and only they were considered. The core areas are: 1. The consonant inventory with the exception of the dental fricatives (θ) and (ð), and of dark “l” [ɫ]. 2. Aspiration of word-initial voiceless stop /p/, /t/, and /k/ which were heard as their lenis counterparts /b/, /d/, and /g/; shortening of vowels sounds before fortis consonants, the maintenance of length before those consonants that are lenis. 3. No omission of sounds in word-initial clusters, omission in word-medial and word-final clusters according to L1 English rules of syllable structure. 4. Contrast between long and short vowels. 5. Production and placement of the nuclear stress.
6 According to Jenkins the sounds /θ/, /ð/ and [ɫ] are considered non-core. These sounds are taught as particularly English. Some sounds such as: /f, v/ or /s, z/, or /t, d/ can substitute for /θ, ð/ because it is not crucial for intelligibility. The same is true with these features: The quality of vowels Weak forms Features related to connected speech like assimilation Grammatical meaning, pitch direction Placement of word stress Stress-timing Although early ELF studies focused on phonology, currently ELF studies focus more on pragmatics. Some of the results of these studies, mentioned by Seidlhofer (2004) are the following: During ELF interactions, misunderstandings are not frequent. In case of they take place, they are resolved by using different communication strategies like repetition and rephrasing, or simply by changing the topic. Interference from L1 interactional norms is quite rare. Interlocutors adopt what Firth called “let-it-pass principle” (1996) which refers to the fact that ELF talk is consensus-oriented, cooperative, and supportive. One of the important factors in ELF conversations is the interlocutors’ cultural background and shared knowledge. Lexicogrammatical features are the most noticeable, accessible ones in ELF speech. Most English teachers consider some errors in urgent need of correction but they are not really problematic and they are not an obstacle for successful communication. Some of these errors are: The third person present tense –s which we usually forget
7 The confusion between the relatives who / which The insertion of definite and indefinite article where they are not necessary and also the omission of them when they are obligatory The insertion of redundant prepositions The overused of some verbs of high semantic generality (i.e. have, make, etc.) The use of correct forms in tag questions is a failure The use of that-clauses instead of infinitive-constructions Overdoing explicitness 4.ELF and English Language Teaching According to Penny Ur (2009) the user of English as a lingua franca may be native or non-native so he/she is typically bi-lingual, multilingual, or bi-dialectal and the purpose of teaching English from the perspective of lingua franca is the use of communicative and comprehension strategies. A speaker needs a wide knowledge of vocabulary, accurate grammar and an easily understood accent to be considered a fully competent speaker. There are different options when considering which English should be taught: A) A native variety: The advantages are the following: it is considered to be prestigious, defined and codified, it is accepted by many teachers and learners, it presents a clear basis for materials. The disadvantages are: it is not the variety used by all fully competent speakers, it is not considered appropriate to be used in ELF contexts, it is difficult to choose one of the native varieties, and full competence is not usually achievable (Cook, 1999). B) A common core syllabus: What is really important when teaching a language is the fact of teaching it for communication. Many users of English as a lingua franca communicate effectively using a limited grammar and without standard grammatical usages. Most times errors that are considered variant forms are commonly used by many users of English as a lingua franca but they do not need to be corrected because
14 Stage 4: Non-core items should be also added to this repertoire (receptive one). Stage 5: Also a range of L1 English accents and varieties should be added to the receptive repertoire. Jenkins gives priority to the addition of L2 English accent and varieties rather than its L1 counterparts. 6. Teaching English from the perspective of ELF and Communicative strategies Teaching English from the perspective of English as a lingua franca implies a communicative approach. Using language for communicative purposes not only means to use language forms in a correct way but the context in which language is used is extremely relevant to linguistic interactions between groups and individuals. In order to be able to communicate adequately, a competent language user has to use a rule system, that is, context has a rule system and is structured. According to Littlewood (1981: VIII) all the learners have to develop different strategies for relating these linguistic structures to their communicative functions in real situations and in real time. CLT places emphasis on social interaction and is related to the concepts of negotiation, interpretation, and expression. When talking about oral communication, we should not forget about reading and writing because they are also important. In order for communication to be effective, Kumaravadivelu (2006) proposes a strategic framework that consists of some macrostrategies through which the teacher can generate his own microstrategies. Some of these macrostrategies are especially relevant when teaching English from an ELF perspective: Facilitate negotiated interaction: it refers to interaction between student-student and student-teacher. Students have to have freedom to initiate a conversation, to be involved in explanations, turn taking, confirmations, comprehension, etc. Students learning a second language should be given opportunities for negotiating interaction to accelerate their comprehension and their linguistic production. What is really important is to modify and restructure interactions with one´s interlocutors until reaching mutual comprehension paying attention to form and meaning.
15 1. Non-native produce more negotiations of meaning more frequently. They tend to ask open questions etc. The best way to promote interactions and the negotiation of meaning is to make students work in groups. 2. Contextualize linguistic input: context must be meaningful and syntax is conditioned by pragmatics. What it is really important is the structure of propositions, words, texts, etc. Semantic, pragmatic and syntactic features should not be isolated. 3. Promote learner autonomy: students should be aware of their learning and they should be equipped with necessary means. So that the students´ learning is more effective, they have to use a great variety of strategies. The teacher should help the students to promote their autonomy. 4. Raise cultural consciousness: Teaching culture is very important, and according to Stern (cited in Kumaravadivelu, 2006) it serves to help students to increase comprehension from a native speaker´s perspective. Both teachers and students are informants. 6.1 Communication strategies When students learn a new language, they have to interact with others in the target language but as their knowledge about it is limited, they have to resort to different strategies of communication they usually use when communicating in their mother tongue. These strategies are very important to achieve intelligibility in interactions and this is the reason why they should be taught in the classroom when approaching the teaching of English from the perspective of ELF. The notion of L2 communication strategies (CSs) was first raised at the beginning of the 1970s. Their main function is to handle difficulties or breakdowns in communication and when speakers have not an advanced level; (Gass and Varonis, 1991).There is not a universal definition for CSs but there exist several taxonomies, including different ranges of language devices such as paraphrase, filled pauses, code switching, interactional meaning-negociation (clarification and requests).
16 In 1972, Selinker (cited in Dörnyei and Lee Scott, 1997) coined the term “communicative strategy” and proposed that the different strategies of L2 communication are one of the five processes involved in L2 learning. Savignon (1972) talked about the relevance of coping strategies (she refers to CSs) in communicative language teaching and testing. Canale and Swain in 1980 included CSs in their model of communicative competence. Faerch and Kasper (1983a) published a volume called “Strategies in Interlanguage Communication”. These two publications were focused primarily on identifying and classifying CSs, and on their teachability (cited in Dörnyei and Lee Scott, 1997). Researchers coincide that the principal purpose of CS use is to manage problems in communication, hence their importance in the teaching of English from the perspective of ELF. The following list provides examples CS (Dörnyei and Scott, 1997: 188). 6.2. Strategies for a good communication (table 1) 1. Message reduction (topic avoidance): the message is reduced by avoiding some structures of the language or topics that are considered to be problematic, or by leaving out some intended elements for a lack of linguistic resources. 2. Circumlocution (paraphrase): description, illustration or exemplification of the properties of the target object or action. 3. Approximation: using an alternative lexical item like a related term which shares semantic features with the target word. 4. Use of all-purpose words: extending a general lexical item that is empty to contexts where there is a lack of a specific word. (e.g. thing). 5. Code switching: inclusion of L1/L3 words with their respective pronunciations in L2 speech. 6. Self-repair: self-initiated corrections are made in one’s own speech. 7. Other-repair: correction of something in the speech of the interlocutor. 8. Self-rephrasing: repeating something by using paraphrase or by adding something.
17 9. Over-explicitness: for the achievement of a particular communicative goal, more words are used than what is considered normal in similar L1. 10. Mime (non-linguistic/paralinguistic strategies): description of whole concepts in a non-verbal way, or by accompanying a verbal strategy with a visual illustration. 11. Use of fillers: use of gambits to fill pauses, to gain time, etc. in order to keep communication channel open at times of difficulty. 12. Self-repetition: repetition of a word or words immediately after they have been said. 13. Other-repetition: repetition of something the interlocutor said to gain time. 14. Feigning understanding: attempt to carry on the conversation without understanding something by pretending to understand. 15. Direct appeal for help: asking the interlocutor an explicit question concerning a gap in one’s L2 knowledge. 16. Asking for repetition: request of repetition in those cases in which we do not hear or understand something properly. 17. Asking for clarification: request of an explanation of a meaning structure that results unfamiliar. 18. Asking for confirmation: request of confirmation of something that has been heard or understood correctly. 19. Expressing non-under-standing: expressing the fact that one did not understand something, either verbally and non-verbally. 20. Interpretive summary: extended paraphrase of the message of the interlocutor to make sure the speaker has understood correctly. 21. Comprehension check: ask questions with the purpose of checking if the interlocutor follows you.
18 22. Own-accuracy check: “checking that what you said was correct by asking a concrete question or repeating a word with a question intonation”. 23. Response: confirm: confirmation of what the interlocutor has said or suggested.
19 7. Design of a learning unit from the perspective of ELF I have designed a learning unit from an ELF perspective but I am not going to include the whole learning unit in this project due to space constraints and because I want to focus on those aspects to which we have to pay special attention when a learning unit is designed from that perspective. These are the reasons why I only include objectives, contents, methodology and the activities designed for the different lessons. I have deleted for my TFM some aspects such as the criteria for the organization of this learning unit and also evaluation and assessment because I want to focus more on the design of materials from the perspective of English as a Lingua Franca. 7.1. Learning unit: A trip around the world The title of this didactic unit is “A trip around the world”. I have chosen this topic because I want to design this unit from the perspective of English as a Lingua Franca. As I have said before, what is really important from this perspective is the fact that students will be able to understand other people and to make themselves understood when speaking English. Lessons deal with different countries so there are two lessons for each country, except for three lessons, which are about different countries. The purpose is to use countries in which English is spoken as an official language, as a lingua franca or international language, etc. English as a lingua franca involves native and non-native speakers of English. Each lesson plan is about a specific topic. For example lesson one and two are about how to choose a place to go on holidays and about making reservations in a hotel to enjoy these holidays. In fact, almost all the unit is related to accommodation since it has been designed for vocational education of accommodation (Grado superior de alojamiento), specifically for the group 1H32 at the high-school Miralbueno (Zaragoza). The main objective of vocational education of accommodation is to provide students with the necessary information so that they are able to develop their professional degree once they have obtained the respective professional qualification. Students have to learn how to be manager of area of accommodation, president of the reception, coordinator of quality, coordinator of events, etc. In this learning unit, I am going to focus on basic aspects related to the management of hotels, etc. This learning unit is important for this
20 vocational education because students will work at hotels, receptions, etc, and they will have to face different clients and customers speaking different languages. They will need a high level in English, since it is the lingua franca in tourism, to be able to communicate with people coming from any part of the world. Besides, they need to know how to make a reservation, how to give solutions when a customer is not satisfied with the hotel service, how to cope in a foreign country, etc. One of the main objectives is to communicate and I have tried to reflect in my learning unit all these aspects, and the most important goal of this learning unit is to help learners become more effective communicators in international contexts. The course for which the unit has been designed is an ESP (English for specific purposes) course. According to Dudley-Evans (1997), ESP courses are designed to meet the learners’ specific needs, they should use the methodology and the activities of the discipline it serves ESP, and they focus on the language appropriate for the different activities in terms of lexis, register, grammar, discourse, study skills, and genre. ESP can be designed for specific disciplines and may use a different methodology from that of General English, in specific teaching situations. Moreover, ESP is designed for adult learners; those at a tertiary level institution or in a professional work situation, even though it could be designed for those learners at a secondary school level as well. It is usually designed for intermediate or advanced students. According to Hutchinson et al. (1987:19) ESP is an approach to language teaching in which all the decisions as to content and method are based on the learner’s reason for learning. 7.1.1 Objectives As there is no specific Aragonese Curriculum for vocational education, I have taken into account the objectives of 4th grade secondary education established in the Aragonese Curriculum. General objectives of the learning unit: To understand specific and general information from different oral and written descriptive texts about different cultures and topics related to their degree involving real-context situations. (Stage objectives: 1, 3).
21 To write different kinds of texts (descriptive, narrative, argumentative) about diverse topics such as apologies, happenings, etc. related to their vocational education, trying to make them comprehensible. (Stage objective: 4). To communicate in an oral and written way effectively in everyday communicative situations such as complaints, happenings, etc. (Stage objectives: 1, 4). To develop communicative skills, both receptive and productive, with the purpose of exchanging information within and outside the classroom about different events, cultures, happenings, etc. (Stage objectives: 2). To transfer the communicative strategies acquired in the mother tongue to the foreign language or to the learning process of other languages, by interacting with others in real context situations. (Stage objectives: 2). To reflect on how the language operates, as an element which facilitates the learning process doing tasks and, as an instrument for the development of autonomy. (Stage objectives: 6, 8). To think about their own learning processes and to develop interest to be successful carrying out the established tasks. (Stage objectives: 6, 10). To access the cultural knowledge transferred by the foreign language, having concern for it and for their speakers, to achieve a better international understanding by reading different cultural texts, etc. (Stage objectives: 9). To appreciate the foreign language as a means of communication with people belonging to other cultures, and as a guide of social and interpersonal relationships. (Stage objectives: 7,8). To show a receptive attitude and a self-confident attitude towards the use of the target language; English. (Stage objective: 10). 7.1.2 Contents and activities Teaching English from the perspective of Lingua Franca implies paying special attention to some of the competences established by the Aragonese Curriculum.
22 Phonologic competence: it refers to the ability to identify and produce sonorous (resonant) sequences to facilitate the comprehension and the expression of meanings. We have to pay special attention to word stress, intonation and rhythm to avoid breakdowns in communication. Discursive competence: it refers to the ability to structure and control the discourse taking into account several aspects such as coherence, cohesion, style, topic, register, among others. What is really important here is the ability to respond adequately and spontaneously, to adapt the communication to the other speaker, to use different strategies that allow that communication, etc. Some of the most important strategies of communication are: the ability to deal with interruptions during communication by changing the topic, the ability to ask for repetitions, clarifications to overcome the different difficulties, breakdowns and misunderstandings in communication, the ability to compensate linguistic deficiencies by paraphrasing, using synonyms and antonyms, by pointing objects, by expressing through corporal language. Kirkpatrick (2007: 194) emphasizes that “students … need to be taught the communicative strategies that aid successful cross-cultural communication […]. These strategies include the accommodation of different linguistic and sociolinguistic norms and a range of repair strategies which can be used in the face of misunderstanding”. Intrapersonal competence: it refers to one’s attitudes, values, beliefs, motivation, cognitive styles that favour the learning process and the learner’s personal development. It includes the ability to deal with emotions such as frustration, stress, anger, etc. Interpersonal competence: It includes the ability to be connected to others, to cooperate with others, to negotiate and solve conflicts, etc. These last two competences refer to the idea of conceiving English as a lingua franca; as a language used by native and non-native speakers and as a language in which all the varieties are acceptable and none is better than the others. They refer to the ability to allow partial comprehension within a communicative situation. In order to determine the content for the unit, as there is no specific Aragonese Curriculum for Vocational Education, I have taken into account the four modules established by the Aragonese Curriculum for the 4th grade secondary education.
23 Module 1: listening, speaking and conversation Oral interaction to reach an agreement on where to go on holidays (Munich or Frankfurt). Comparison of different hotels and expression of different opinions based on this comparison, etc. Oral transaction: making a reservation in a hotel knowing both roles; the receptionist and the client roles. Comprehension of a video about how to book a room in a hotel. Discrimination among different sounds as regards minimal pairs and word and sentence stress. Comprehension of a video about minimal pairs. Comprehension of a video about word and sentence stress. Comprehension of a listening related to a complaint for a poor service at a hotel. Use of communication strategies to solve difficulties during communicative interaction with the purpose of initiating, keeping, and concluding communicative exchanges. Module 2: Reading and writing Reading different online reviews of Munich and Frankfurt. Writing of an e-mail to one friend you made last year telling him about your decision related to holidays. Comprehension of a text about aspects to take into account when choosing a place to go on holidays. Writing sentences in which comparative and superlative forms are. Comprehension of relevant information to take into account when planning to book a room in a hotel.
30 Handout for the students http://www.10best.com/destinations/germany/frankfurt/
31 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060722010618AAMxIHw http://forum.virtualtourist.com/Germany-11-2-10102403/frankfurt-or-munich.html
32 E-mail (example) Dear Chloè I write you to tell you that next summer i am going to go on Holidays. I am so happy because after so much time I am going to enjoy my holidays. I will visit Germany, Munich concretely. I look forward to going there because people say it is a fantastic place. The truth is that I did not mind where to go but people’s comments about Munich make me think about taking advantage and going there. Besides, my partner also wants to go there and he has been trying to convince me. It is so great to visit a new place. I would like you to come with us. Wouldn’t you? Please think about it, I am sure you will like the place a lot. I hope your answer, you cannot miss this opportunity. Sincerely Anna E-mail (example) Dear Pierre First of all, I write to you to know how you are because we have not talked since two months. I also write you to ask for advice because I am very confused. I am thinking where to go on holidays next summer, I want to go to Germany but don’t know exactly the city. I know you have ever been in Munich and in Frankfurt so which of these places do you like the most? Where are you going to go on holidays next summer? Please, tell me something about one of these cities you already know and advice me where to go. Moreover, you can think about visiting with me one of them. I hope your answer. Sincerely Brenda Relevance of unit for teaching English from the perspective of the ELF Awareness on the part of the learner that despite making errors when speaking or writing, communication may prove understandable. (some errors do not imply misunderstandings and breakdowns in communication). Use of communication strategies Authentic materials because SS are provided with online reviews about hotels and with real pictures of Frankfurt and Munich. Real context situations because SS have to decide where to go on holidays by reading different reviews, etc. What is important is the non-linguistic outcome, e.g. reaching an agreement on where to go on holidays.
33 LESSON 2: GERMANY Learning objectives: To discuss and reach an agreement on the most relevant aspects when making a hotel reservation. To understand and use new vocabulary needed to make a reservation in a hotel. To book a room in a hotel. To understand information on hotels, on travel websites. To use information on hotels to make a decision. Sequencing of activities: SS have to look at the box (see handout below) and say which of these aspects they would take into account for making a reservation in a hotel. They have to explain which aspects apart from those of the box they would take into account and list all of them in order of preference or importance. In case SS do not know all the vocabulary, they have to ask their partners to explain the meaning to each other in English. SS will be provided with the box with the different aspects to take into account and later with the text about those aspects. SS have to work as a whole class and there will be T-SS interaction. (READING AND SPEAKING). T will give his SS a handout with two images (they will be projected as well) with their respective information corresponding to two rooms of different hotels in Munich and two images of two rooms corresponding to different hotels in Frankfurt. Depending on the place SS have chosen for going on holidays and also depending on which aspects they think are more important for making a reservation, they have to answer some questions and make a list against and for each hotel to decide where they want to make their reservation. Then, they have to make a list of at least ten adjectives that they would use or should use to compare them and they have to try to write a sentence with each one of them comparing both hotels. SS have to work in pairs. (SPEAKING). SS have to work in pairs. One student has to choose three words he/she does not know (see handout below, ‘go to task three’). The other student has to explain these words to him/her. Then, T introduces the activity by showing a video in which a man is simulating how to make a reservation in a hotel. SS have to perform a role-play (clientreceptionist) according to what they have chosen in the two previous activities. (LISTENING, READING AND SPEAKING). Handout for students Task 1: Look at the box and say which of these aspects you would take into account when making a reservation in a hotel. Would you have to take into account other aspects? Which ones? List them in order of preference or importance and say why you ordered them in that way. If you do not know all the aspects written in the box, ask your partner to explain the meaning to you (in English). (see the text about aspects to take into account when making a reservation after doing this).
34 Price, purpose of the travel, location, complimentary breakfast, parking, number of stars, pet-friendliness, family-friendliness, reliability, extra-fees, location, onsite-facilities. Less important More important ASPECTS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT WHEN MAKING A RESERVATION 1. Location: This has a lot to do with why you're traveling. If it's for business, for instance, you’re going to want to be located in a convenient area, whereas if you’re planning to sightsee, a hotel that’s centrally located is probably your best bet. And if you just need to relax or get away from it all, you might want to look for something a little more remote or located in a scenic area. 2. Parking: If you’re arriving by car at your hotel, you’re going to need a place to park. Things to consider here are if the hotel offers parking, how much it charges for that parking, and how secure the parking lot is. 3. Extra fees: When choosing a hotel, you need to decide what amenities you’re going to need and find out whether they’re included in the rate. For instance, if you need access to Internet, then you may want to look for a hotel that offers complementary Wi-Fi. 4. Number of stars: The star rating is the most common way by which hotels are categorized. Essentially, the more stars, the better the quality of the facility is. This is a good way to compare hotels and also to determine whether you are looking at something that’s more economical or more luxurious. 5. Onsite facilities: Depending on what you’re looking for in a hotel, you definitely want to check into what’s located onsite. You may want a pool or a restaurant, or you may be looking for other offerings, such as a spa or a golf course. 6. Complimentary breakfast: This can make a real difference in your budget and should be factored into the overall rate of the hotel. After all, buying breakfast for a family of four over a week’s time can really add up. If the hotel doesn’t offer this amenity, then see if you can request a refrigerator and microwave in the room, so you can make your own breakfast there. 7. Family-friendliness: If you’re going to be traveling with small children, you want to be sure you choose a hotel that will accommodate them. Be sure to research basics, such as optional cribs, a pool or recreation area, and refrigerators in the room. Also look and see
35 what extras each particular hotel has to offer families, such as discounted kids’ meals, onsite babysitting, and other perks. 8. Pet-friendliness: Likewise, if you’re bringing the family dog, you want to be careful when choosing your hotel. Of course, the facility needs to accept dogs, but you should also look into whether there are any extra cleaning fees, if they provide a dog run, and if there’s a place to walk the dog nearby. 9. Reliability versus local flavor: This is one of the bigger decisions you have to make when choosing a hotel. You may prefer to stay in bigger chain hotels, where you have a pretty good idea of what to expect. Or you might be a more adventuresome type, who wants to stay in a family-owned hotel or a bed-and-breakfast in order to experience more of the local flavor. 10. Reviews: Finally, when choosing a hotel, always consult the online reviews. There are websites that are solely dedicated to this purpose, and you can read recent experiences of real customers in order to get a feel for what you can expect. http://www.superpages.com/supertips/top-10-choosing-hotel.html Task 2: The first two images with their respective information correspond to two rooms of different hotels in Munich and the second two refer to two rooms of different hotels in Frankfurt. Depending on the place you have chosen to go on holidays and also depending on which aspects you think to be most important when making a reservation. Which hotel do you prefer? Why? Why do you like it the most? You can make a list against and for each hotel to decide where you want to make your reservation and make a list of at least ten adjectives that you are going to use or should use to compare them and try to write a sentence with each one of them comparing both hotels. Le Meridien Munich (Munich) http://www.hotelchatter.com/files/1425/lemeridienmunich.jpg
36 Hotel Features The Le Meridien Munich is located in the heart of Munich General Room Service, Restaurant, Bar / Lounge, Mini Bar, Cable / Satellite TV, Connecting Rooms, Hair Dryer, Complimentary Toiletries, TV, Bathrobes, Shower, En suite, Private Bathroom, Private Toilet Activities Bath / Hot Tub, Garden Services Conference Room(s), Multilingual Staff, Secretarial Service, Wake-up Service, Laundry service Parking Parking is available. Check-in From 3:00 PM Check-out Prior to 12:00 PM http://offers-en.besthoteloffers.net/Hotel/Le_Meridien_Munich.htm Hotelisssimo Haberstock (Munich) http://www.hoteller.com/images/traveling/hotels/1000000/1000000/992600/992512/992512_21_b.jpg?no rmal
37 Hotel Features This hotel is conveniently situated in the city centre. General Pet Friendly, Mini Bar, Cable / Satellite TV, Hair Dryer, TV, Shower Activities Water Activities, Fishing Services Business Center, Elevator / Lift, 24-Hour Reception, Dry Cleaning, Multilingual Staff, SafeDeposit Box, Laundry service, Designated Smoking Area Internet High-speed Internet is available at this hotel. Wireless internet on site. Parking Parking is available. Check-in From 2:00 PM Check-out Prior to 11:00 AM http://offers-en.besthoteloffers.net/Hotel/Hotelisssimo_Haberstock.htm Comfort Hotel Frankfurt City Center http://www.hotelclub.com/hotels/Germany/Frankfurt/Comfort_Hotel_Frankfurt_City_Center.h15093/ Hotel Facilities Located in the heart of Frankfurt Baby Sitting Service Dining Room Internet Access - Wireless Lobby Reception Safe Deposit Box Bar / Lounge Faxing Facilities Laundry Facilities
38 Pets Allowed Restaurant Tour Desk Currency Exchange Services Internet Access - High Speed Lift / Elevator Photocopying Facilities Room Service Room Facilities Cable / Satellite TV Mini Bar Telephone Ensuite / Private Bathroom Safe Voicemail Hairdryer Tea and Coffee Making Facilities http://www.hotelclub.com/Comfort-Hotel-Frankfurt-City-Center/ http://static.asiarooms.com/hotelphotos/laterooms/91034/gallery/comfort-hotel-frankfurt-city-centerfrankfurt-am-main_030220100211374028.jpg Colour Hotel Frankfurt Hotel Facilities Bar / Lounge Non-Smoking Rooms Internet Access – Wireless Pets Allowed Lift / Elevator Safe Deposit Box Room Facilities Alarm Clock Heating Writing Desk Cable / Satellite TV Shower Hairdryer Telephone http://www.hotelclub.com/Colour-Hotel-Frankfurt/ http://r-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max300/360/360984.jpg TASK 3: To work in pairs; you have to choose three words and explain to your partner the meaning of those words they do not know (that are those they have chosen). Then, Introduction of the activity will take place by showing a video in which a man is simulating how to make a reservation in a hotel, try and play the role of the person who makes the reservation (client) and the receptionist but according to the
39 place and the hotel that you have chosen for going on holidays in the two previous activities.. (LISTENING, READING AND SPEAKING). VIDEO: RESERVING A ROOM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovrzq0QEJQg Interesting vocabulary to know (go to task 3): Vacancies: twin beds: double bed: be listed under: cardholder: Check-in : receipt: dime: along the bottom: ranging from: bellboy: On file: check-out: to settle: lounge area: rebate: safe: shuttle: checking account: Making Reservations (examples) Receptionist: Good morning. Welcome to The Grand Woodward Hotel. Client: Hi, good morning. I'd like to make a reservation for the third weekend in September. Do you have any vacancies? R: Yes sir, we have several rooms available for that particular weekend. And what is the exact date of your arrival? C: The 24th. R: How long will you be staying? C: I'll be staying for two nights. R: How many people is the reservation for? C: There will be two of us. R: And would you like a room with twin beds or a double bed? C: A double bed, please. R: Great. And would you prefer to have a room with a view of the ocean? C: If that type of room is available, I would love to have an ocean view. What's the rate for the
46 Task 2: Each group will chose a spokesperson so that he/she explains to their classmates the main ideas, the differences, and the similarities of both cultures expressed in the section they have read. If any student in the class does not understand, they will have to ask for repetition or clarification. (READING, SPEAKING). TASK 3: You are going to work on the reading about how to behave in Ireland (the same text as in task 1). The task consists of taking into account all the aspects that the text is about and commenting how to behave in Spain using the vocabulary of the text for guiding and the aspects appearing in the text. For example: You have to comment on how to greet people, how to behave in a pub, how to order and pay, where to sit, etc. (READING, SPEAKING). How to Behave in Ireland! GROUP 1 6 For the most part Irish people are relaxed and laid back and welcome all visitors warmly. But it’s useful when visiting a foreign country to have some idea of how things are normally done – it helps to avoid misunderstandings and to smooth social interaction. People on Dublin Street by Jody Art Meeting & Greeting: Talking to People Chatting with Oscar Wilde and James Joyce in Galway by sterte Keep it casual is the best advice when meeting people in Ireland. Irish people are naturally gregarious and talkative and will happily chat with total strangers, falling easily into conversation while waiting for a bus, standing in line in a store or traveling on a train. The preferred topic of conversation in such situations is often the weather – there is always plenty to discuss when it comes to Ireland’s weather! Unless you are prepared to be disagreed with and to engage in lively debate, it’s probably best to avoid politics. This is especially true if you are American and want to talk US politics – Irish people not only have strong views about domestic politics but are generally well informed and up for a good argument about US politics too. Avoid being overly critical of anything in the local area. People are very proud of their place and don’t like to hear it criticised by ‘outsiders’ – even if they will happily moan about the very same things among themselves! The upside is that most people are pleased to be asked for recommendations about things to do and see in the locality, giving good advice about places to
47 eat or to find entertainment, and will often go out of their way to ensure you get the best from your visit to their home town. People will frequently say “hello” or “nice day” or just nod and smile a greeting when passing a stranger on the street, though obviously not so much in more crowded places! This should not be seen as an attempt to start a conversation – just smile back, return the greeting and carry on. GROUP 2 Handshake or Kiss? Handshake by theperplexingparadox When first meeting someone or on encountering an acquaintance, people may shake hands or not even do that on informal occasions – a friendly greeting is often enough. Relatives and close friends often kiss each other on one or both cheeks, continental style, a habit that is becoming more widespread in recent years, but this would not be the norm when greeting strangers. The Finger Twitch When driving on narrow country roads, where cars are few and speeds are low, drivers meeting an oncoming vehicle will acknowledge the other motorist by raising a hand or a finger from the steering wheel in salutation. It doesn’t necessarily mean they know the driver of the other car, they’ll greet everyone this way and a response in kind is expected. In the Pub: Observing Custom Relaxing in Murphy’s in Dingle by TMWeddle
48 The pub in Ireland is more than somewhere you go to drink, it’s a meeting place and there will generally be regular customers present who know each other well, even if this isn’t immediately evident to someone walking in for the first time. This is particularly the case in rural pubs, less so in very large pubs in towns and cities. However people in pubs are there for the social occasion and are so are happy to talk to visitors and to include them in conversation. How to Order & Pay Most pubs do not have table service. You go to the bar, order and pay for your drinks and can then chose to remain at the bar to drink them or take them to a table. In larger pubs, especially in cities and at busy times, and in pubs where food is served, table service may be available, but you can still choose to go to the bar and order yourself. There is no tab system in Irish bars. You are expected to pay for your drinks as and when they are ordered. The exception is in a hotel where you are resident, where you can add them to your room bill. GROUP 3 Where to sit? As a general rule of thumb if you sit (or stand) at the counter other customers are likely to strike up a conversation with you, if you take your drinks to a quiet table in the corner they will leave you alone. Standing Your Round Round of pints, by Francesco Crippa When in the company of a group of people in a pub, a system of ’rounds’ is traditionally used, whereby each person in turn will buy, or offer to buy, a drink for all others in the company. It is not the done thing to just buy yourself a drink without making the offer to buy one for everyone else – those who fail to do so risk being looked upon as mean and unsociable. Possibly the most damning thing an Irish person can say about someone is that they ‘never stand their round’. While it is quite acceptable to turn down the offer of a drink when someone else is buying a round – just say ‘I’m alright, thanks’ – you don’t get to skip your turn just because you are not thirsty! The best advice for dealing with the rounds system is to get in with your offer to buy as early as you possibly can – come in with your offer (“Can I get you a drink?”) just before the fastest drinker in the party has emptied their glass. Otherwise you can end up drinking a lot more than
49 you intended to while waiting for your turn to come – and you daren’t leave before it does unless you want to earn an instant reputation for meanness! GROUP 4 Tipping in Ireland: When & How Much Tipping by adrian Tipping is not as universal a practice in Ireland as it is elsewhere. Most restaurants apply a service charge which theoretically replaces the tip, but if service has been good an additional tip of about 10-15% is about right. Some more casual restaurants have a plate or bowl at the cash desk where you can leave a tip to be distributed among all the staff. Unlike the situation in the USA, wait staff do not depend on tips for their income, though they certainly appreciate acknowledgment of a job well done. Taxi drivers, hairdressers, spa staff and others are generally tipped about 10%. Hotel porters and room service staff will usually expect something round €2-€5 depending on the extent of the service provided. Drivers/guides on tour buses are usually tipped at the end of a trip, sometimes with a communal tip collected from all of those on the tour. The amount is up to the individual, and will depend on the length of the tour and the quality of the service. Owners of B&Bs do not expect to be tipped, nor do they expect gifts. Tipping in Pubs Tipping staff in pubs is a special case. While staff who bring drinks to a table may be given a small tip, those serving from behind the counter don’t expect tips and if you leave money on the counter will probably assume you have forgotten to pick up your change and return it to you. If you do want to give a tip to bar staff, the polite way is to hand over a sum of money approximately equal to the price of a pint of beer while saying something like “Have one for yourself later” – theoretically you are not giving a tip, you are buying a drink at some future time, which is far more acceptable.
50 Smoking in Public Places Smoking outside the pub by Gryts Since March 2004 it has been illegal to smoke in any enclosed public space, which includes bars, restaurants, shops, offices, public transport, cinemas – pretty much all indoor places except your home or a designated smoking bedroom in a hotel. The ban on smoking brought with it a massive increase in sales of awnings and patio heaters as pubs made arrangements for their smoking customers to enjoy an outdoor cigarette in some level of comfort – many pubs, hotels and restaurants how have designated areas for this purpose. Don’t be tempted to try to beat the smoking ban by lighting up indoors and pleading ignorance, it will not be tolerated by those around you and there are hefty fines for transgressors. http://www.dochara.com/info/misc-info/how-to-behave-in-ireland/ Relevance of unit for teaching English from the perspective of the ELF Use of communication strategies, e.g. defining unknown words, asking for repetition, asking for clarification, expressing with other words, etc. Intercultural knowledge: knowledge of the culture of other countries in which English is spoken. (plurilingualism and pluriculturalism). SS have to know about different cultures in countries of which English is spoken. Real context situations: comparing is an activity people usually do. Authentic materials: the text is written by non-native speakers of English. There are some mistakes in the text but this does not make difficult understand the text.
51 LESSON 5: IRELAND Learning objectives: To express their opinions about the pronunciation of English and its implications by answering some questions. To recognize examples of minimal pairs within a text about how to behave in Ireland. To identify other different minimal pairs which do not appear in the text. To discriminate among sounds. Sequencing of activities: SS; in a whole class discussion and T-SS discussion, have to answer some questions related to pronunciation. Before doing this, SS will be asked what aspects we have to take into account to learn a new language; in this case English. When they say one of them is pronunciation, they will have to answer all these questions (see handout below). (SPEAKING). SS; in a whole class discussion and T-SS discussion, have to look at different minimal pairs and answer some questions about them. T will pronounce them to facilitate this task. They have to transcribe the main sounds of each minimal pair. They will be also shown a video about minimal pairs before doing this task so that they can do it. (SS will have to see the other at their homes to know more about minimal pairs) (LISTENING, SPEAKING). T writes the minimal pairs on the board in a table, as in the example (see handout below). T drills the pronunciation around the class. Then, she dictates four of the words, but tells the students they only need to write the number, not the word. So, if I say "cut, but, ankle, fun" the students should write "1,1,2,1". Then the students work in pairs - one dictates the words, the other says which number. SS will work as a whole-class discussion and as T-SS discussion. (WRITING, SPEAKING). SS work in pairs. Each student has a different set of words which they must dictate to their partner. But, get them to stand on opposite sides of the room, so they must shout. Play background music to make it even more challenging. (SPEAKING). In groups of four or five, SS have to think about five minimal pairs and then, they have to share what they have thought with their classmates. (SPEAKING AND WRITING). *NOTE: As it is possible there will not have enough time to do it, SS may do the last activity at their homes. T probably will decide to show the video of minimal pairs about vowels because they are relevant in lingua franca core.
52 Handout for students Task 1: Answer the following questions related to pronunciation due to pronunciation is a very important part of the English language. Do you think pronunciation is important when learning English? Why (not)? Do you think English pronunciation is difficult? Do you have difficulties in acknowledge some words when they are pronounced due to their similarity? Can you give me some example of these words? Have you ever heard about minimal pairs? Do you know what they are? Before doing this, students will be asked what aspects we have to take into account to learn a new language; in this case English. When they say one of them is pronunciation, they will have to answer all these questions. (SPEAKING). Task 2: Look at the following minimal pairs and answer the following questions: What do most of these minimal pairs have in common? What is the difference within each minimal pair? Try to transcribe the main sounds of each minimal pair. You will be shown a video about minimal pairs before doing this task so that you can do it and T will read each pair for you. (you will have to see the other at your homes to know more about minimal pairs) (LISTENING, SPEAKING). hurt-heart hut-hat ship-sheep sill-seal chick-cheek bin-bean burn-barn fur-far tail-tile Videos about minimal pairs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcZ2kf1sy7Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y56fePbg7uk Task 3: Number dictation: T writes the minimal pairs on the board in a table, as in the example below. She drills the pronunciation around the class. Then, she dictates four of the words, but tells the students they only need to write the number, not the word. So, if I say "cut, but, ankle, fun" you should write "1,1,2,1". Then you have to work in pairs - one dictates the words, the other says which number. (WRITING, SPEAKING). 1 2 cut cat but bat uncle ankle fun fan http://www.tinyteflteacher.co.uk/teacher/pronunciation/minimalpairs.html
53 Task 4: Shouting Dictation: A bit noisy, but great to get students exaggerating the mouth shapes. Work in pairs, each student has a different set of words which must dictate to his partner. But, get them to stand on opposite sides of the room, so you must shout. Play background music to make it even more challenging. (SPEAKING). STUDENT A Dabble List Look Rich Fly Flea STUDENT B Long Double Fly Wrist Grass http://www.tinyteflteacher.co.uk/teacher/pronunciation/minimalpairs.html Task 5: Now you know about minimal pairs you are going to separate into groups of four or five. Each group has to think about five minimal pairs and then, you have to share what you have thought with your classmates. (SPEAKING AND WRITING). Relevance of unit for teaching English from the perspective of the ELF Awareness of lingua franca core: SS will learn that differences among several sounds are relevant for an effective communication. Not distinguishing among sounds may lead to misunderstandings and breakdowns in communication. Importance of some pronunciation characteristics that affect an effective communication.
54 LESSON 6: SEVERAL COUNTRIES WHERE ENGLISH IS SPOKEN Learning objectives: To understand oral conversations between people using English as a lingua franca. To be aware of the importance of the implications of English as a lingua franca. Sequencing of activities: SS are going to be shown a video; an interview, about the different traditions and customs in Britain and other countries. T checks SS’ comprehension by asking different questions (whole class discussion): SS have to comment on any aspect they have heard t when watching the video. (LISTENING, SPEAKING). SS have to write down individually (the correction will be as a whole class discussion and as T-SS interaction) the most relevant aspects as regards language used in the video, the way in which speakers communicate between them, if communication strategies are used or not, etc. It is a personal reflection on language. (WRITING). This task is a debate among the whole classroom. SS have to agree on how language is used in the video. They have to take into account several aspects such as: if the speakers are native or not, if they are understandable when speaking English, if they like their accent. They have to reflect all together on whether all varieties of English are equally acceptable, whether people whose mother tongue is not English are able to speak it as if they were native, whether it is important to sound like a native when speaking English. (SPEAKING). Handout for students Task 1: SS are going to be shown a video in which there are two people talking about the different traditions and customs in countries in which English is spoken; one of the them is the interviewer and the other one the interviewee (A Polish man). To check if you have understood the conversation you have to answer different questions: What is the main topic of the video? What are the countries Viktor mentions? Do you remember some of the traditions he has talked about? Comment on any aspect you have heard about when watching the video. (LISTENING, SPEAKING). http://webapps.ael.uni-tuebingen.de/backbone-search/faces/search.jsp
55 Task 2: For this task, pay special attention to the video. You have to write down the most relevant aspects as regards language used in the video, the way in which speakers communicate between them, if communication strategies are used or not, etc. It is a personal reflection on language. (WRITING). Task 3: This task is a debate among the whole classroom. You have to agree on how language is used in the video. To do this, take into account several aspects such as: if the speakers are native or not, if they are understandable when speaking English, if they have a good accent. Reflect all together on whether all varieties of English are equally acceptable, whether people whose mother tongue is not English are able to speak it as if they were native, whether it is important to sound like a native when speaking English. (SPEAKING). Relevance of unit for teaching English from the perspective of the ELF Real context situation. Authentic materials. Use of communication strategies: The boy who is talking in the video is not a native speaker of English and it is easy to realize this. However, it is also very easy to understand his speech. Even if he does not have a native pronunciation. Anybody who can speak English language understands what this boy is talking about and what he is saying. Moreover, while speaking, Viktor is constantly making stops in his speech and also repeating some utterances so he uses different communication strategies. Importance of the debate and of the group’s reflection on whether it is important to speak like a native of English. Reflection on whether a non-native of English may be understood when speaking that language if he/she does not sound like a native. This is related to the intrapersonal competence since people are not able to speak another language; English in this case, when they feel frustrated. Attitude is very important when learning a language.
62 To conclude, the main purpose of teaching English from an ELF perspective is to achieve students are effective communicators by using different communication strategies and to be fully competent speakers of English.
63 9. References Alptekin, C. (2005). Dual Language Instruction: Multiculturalism through a lingua franca. In A TESOL Symposium on Dual Language Education: Teaching and Learning in Two Languages in the ELF Setting (pp.5-11). Instanbul: Bogaziçi University. Bolton, K. (2004). World Englishes. In Davis, A. & Elder, C. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistic (pp.369-396). Oxford, England: Blackwell. Bozman, T. (1997). A Practice for Spanish Students of English Phonetics. Sound barriers. Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistic, 1, 1-47. Cogo, A. and Dewey, M. (2006). Efficiency in ELF communication: from pragmatic motives to lexico-grammatical innovation. Nordic Journal of English Studies 5, 59-94. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quartely, 33/2, 185-209. Dörney, Z. & Scott, M.L. (1995b). Communication Strategies: An empirical analysis with retrospection. In Turley, J.S. & Lusby, K. (Eds), Selected papers from the proceedings of the 21st AnnualSymposium of the Deseret Langugage and Linguistic Society,155-168. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. Dörney, Z. & Scott, M.L. (1997). Communication Strategies in a Second Language: Definitions and Taxonomies. Language learning 47,173-210. Dörney, Z. and Scott, M.L. (1995a). Communication Strategies: What are they and what are they not? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistic (AAAL), Long Beach,CA. Dörney, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 55-85.
64 Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press. Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983a). Strategies in interlanguage communication. Harlow, UK: Longman. Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality. On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237–259. Gass,S.M, & Varonis, E.M. (1991). Miscommunication in nonnative discourse. In Coupland, N., Giles, H. & Wiemann, J.M. (Eds), Miscommunication and problematic talk (pp.121-145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gobierno de Aragón (2007). Currículo Aragonés para lenguas extranjeras en Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Orden de 9 de mayo de 2007, del Departamento de Educación, Cultura y Deporte del Gobierno de Aragón. González-Ruiz, C (2009). El uso de estrategias de comunicación oral entre aprendientes de ELE en uncontexto asiático. Actas del primer congreso español sobre lengua extranjera en Asia-Pacífico. URL: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/publicaciones_centros/pdf/mani la_2009/11_investigaciones_04.pdf (Accessed 25 April 2014). Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learner-centered approach. Cambridge University Press. Hymes, D.H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In Pride, J.B. and Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293, (part 2). Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenkins, J. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca. TESOL Quartely, 40/1:157-181. Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28/2: 200-207.
65 Kachru, B.B. (1992). Teaching World Englishes. In Kachru, B.B. (Ed.) (1985,1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. (pp.355-365). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English LanguageTeaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). English as an official working language of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): features and strategies. English Today 94: 27-34. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends: TESOL Quartely, 40/1: 59-81. Lowenberg, P. (2002). Assessing English proficiency in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes , 21: 431–435. McKay, S. L. (in press). EIL curriculum development. In Rubdy, R. & Saraceni, M. (Eds.), English in the world: Global rules, global roles. Bangkok: IELE Press at Assumption University. Mckay, S. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Savignon, S.J. (1972). Communication competence: An experiment in foreign-language teaching. Philadelphia: The center for Curriculum Development. Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca: USA: Cambridge University Press. 24: 209-239. Selinker,L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10: 209-230. Skehan, P. (1998a). Task-based instruction. Annual review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268-286. Smith, L. E. and Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: directions and resources. World Englishes, 4, 3, 333-342.
66 Stott, T. and Revell, R.(2004). English for The Hotel and Catering Industry: Oxford University Press. Ur, P. (2009). English as a Lingua Franca and some Implications for English Teachers. Paper presented at TESOL France Colloquium 2009. Yano, Y. (2008) Comment 5 in the Forum on Colingualism. World Englishes 27, (pp.139-40). Sources for materials Apology letters. “Apology letters from hotel”. On: http://www.apologyletters.net/apology_letter_from_hotel.php (Accessed 10 March; 2014) British council. Teaching English. “Word stress”. On: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/word-stress (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Dochara.com. your Irish friend. “People on Dublin street”. On: http://www.dochara.com/info/misc-info/how-to-behave-in-ireland/ (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Green, L. (2014). Things to do in Frankfurt, Germany. USA today 10 best. URL: http://www.10best.com/destinations/germany/frankfurt/ (Accessed 6 March; 2014) Hotel club. (2000-2014), on: http://www.hotelclub.com/Colour-Hotel-Frankfurt/ (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Hotel club. On: http://www.hotelclub.com/Comfort-Hotel-Frankfurt-City-Center/ (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Hotel club. On: http://www.hotelclub.com/hotels/Germany/Frankfurt/Comfort_Hotel_Frankfurt_ City_Center.h15093/ (Accessed 10 March; 2014) http://www.perfectyourenglish.com/businessenglish/complaint-letter-sample.gif (Accessed 10 March; 2014)
67 Superpages.com. “10 things to consider when choosing a hotel”,(2014), on: http://www.superpages.com/supertips/top-10-choosing-hotel.html (Accessed 6 March; 2014) The tiny TEFL teacher. Minimal pairs pronunciation activities. On: http://www.tinyteflteacher.co.uk/teacher/pronunciation/minimalpairs.html (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Virtual tourist. “Germany travel answers”. (1994-2004), on: http://forum.virtualtourist.com/Germany-11-2-10102403/frankfurt-ormunich.html (Accessed 6 March; 2014) Visit Scotland. “Traditional Scottish food”, on: http://www.visitscotland.com/about/food-drink/traditional (Accessed 11 March; 2014) Woodward English. (2003-2014), on: http://www.vocabulary.cl/Lists/HotelDialogues.htm (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Yahoo answers. ‘Frankfurt or Munich?’, on: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060722010618AAMxIHw (Accessed 6 March; 2014) Youtube.es. on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbcEiFTmkQo (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Youtube.es. on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcZ2kf1sy7Y (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Youtube.es. on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovrzq0QEJQg (Accessed 10 March; 2014) Youtube.es. on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y56fePbg7uk (Accessed 10 March; 2014)