TOWARDSINTEGRATEDDESIGNSTRATEGIESFORIMPLEMENTINGBIPV SYSTEMSINTOURBANRENEWALPROCESSES:PRELIMINARYCASESTUDYIN NEUCHÂTEL(SWITZERLAND) SergiAguacilLaboratoryofArchitectureandSustainableTechnologies (LAST) ÉcolepolytechniquefédéraledeLausanne(EPFL) [email protected] SophieLufkinLAST‐EPFL[email protected] EmmanuelReyLAST‐EPFL
[email protected] Fig1:Diagramoftheproposedresearchmethodology WHICHAREYOURARCHITECTURAL(R)SOLUTIONSTOTHESOCIAL,ENVIRONMENTALANDECONOMIC CHALLENGESOFTODAY? Researchsummary Europeanenergydirectivesdefinehighly‐demandingperformancestandards,fromzero‐energy buildingstopositive‐energybuildings.InSwitzerland,oneofthespecificobjectivesofthenew“Energy strategy2050”istoinstallPVsystemsonexistingbuildingsurfacesinordertocover1/3oftheannual Swissdemandforelectricity.Inviewoftheconsiderableimportanceofurbanrenewalprocesses, building‐integratedphotovoltaic(BIPV)systemsthereforeprovideacrucialresponsetothechallenges oftheenergyturnaround.However,inspiteoftechnologicprogressandeconomicevolution,diverse typesofobstacleslimitalarge‐scaleadvancedPVintegrationintourbanrenewalprocesses. Inthiscontext,urbanandarchitecturaldesigntowardsincreasedintegration–andthereforeincreased acceptance–providesanessentialsolutiontoovercomethesebarriers.Itrepresentsakeyelement towardsestablishingasystematiclinkbetweenBIPVandthenecessaryrenewaloftheconsiderable existingbuildingstock.Towardsthisaim,thepresentpaperproposesafirstapproachtodefineaholistic multi‐criteriaassessmentmethodologyforBIPV‐adaptedsolutionsinurbanrenewaldesignprocesses intheSwisscontext.Thisdocumentpresentsthefirststepstowardsthevalidationoftheproposed methodologythroughapreliminarycasestudyinNeuchâtel(Switzerland). Keywords:building‐integratedphotovoltaics,energyefficiency,renewableenergy,sustainable architecturaldesign,urbanrenewal,renovationstrategy,multi‐criteriaassessment.
1.Introduction OneofthetopprioritiesofEuropeancountries istoreduceenergyconsumptionand greenhouseeffectinthebuiltenvironment. Towardsthisaim,sincethecityoftomorrowis largelyalreadybuilt,manystrategiesstressthe importanceofurbanrenewalprocesses towardsmoresustainabilityintermsof economic,socialandenvironmentalimpacts. Indeed,therearestillhugepotentialenergy savingstobemadeinEuropeancountriesin general,andinSwitzerlandinparticular.Most residentialbuildingswerebuiltbefore1985and requirelargeamountsofenergytoensurethe minimumindoorthermalcomfort(OFS,2014). Inresponse,recentresearchworkshavestarted consideringthelargeexistingbuildingstock, bringingtolighttheconsiderableimportanceof urbanrenewalstrategiesforthesustainability ofthebuiltenvironmentinthenextdecades (Riera,Rey,2013). Inparallel,oneoftheobjectivesofthe“Energy strategy2050”istoinstallPVsystemson approximately30%ofexistingbuildingsurfaces inordertocover1/3oftheannualSwiss demandforelectricity(IEA,2002).Buildingintegratedphotovoltaic(BIPV)systems thereforeprovideacrucialresponsetothe challengesoftheenergyturnaround(SFOE, 2014). BIPVisagrowinganddiverseareaofresearch. Inparticular,itincludesresearchonthe developmentofnewproducts,modelling, simulation,assessmentoftheirintegration, electricalandthermalperformancesof mountedmodules(Frontinietal.,2012). 2.Researchobjectives Despiteallthistechnologicalprogress,onlya smallpartoftheavailablelocalpotentialfor BIPVisvalorisedinurbanareas(integrationinto roofandfaçadeselements).Diversetypesof obstacleslimitalarge‐scaleadvancedPV integrationintourbanrenewalprocesses.Most barriersarerelatedtothelimitedmotivationof architecturaldesigners,arestrictedknowledge oftheBIPVpotentialandaninsufficiencyof aesthetically‐convincingexemplarybuildings (Heinstein,Ballif,Perret‐Aebi,2013). Toaddressthischallenge,urbanand architecturaldesigntowardsincreased integration–andthereforeincreased acceptance–couldpotentiallyprovidea decisivesolution.Althoughitremainslargely disconnectedfromsolarrenewableenergy issues(Nault,Andersen,Rey,2013),it representsakeyelementtowardsestablishing asystematiclinkbetweenBIPVandthe necessaryrenewaloftheconsiderableexisting buildingstock. Therefore,insteadofconsideringBIPVasa technicalconstraintfordesigners,weproposea newapproachbasedontheintegrationofBIPV solutionsasanew“rawmaterial”for architecturalrenewalprojects(Aiulfi,Rey,2010; Rey,2014).Byprioritizingarchitecturalquality anddialoguewiththebuiltenvironment,itaims atidentifyingwhichconstructionelementscan besubstitutedbythemostappropriatePV components.Thelatterwillnotonlyprovide answerstothesamerequirementsasother partsofthebuildingenvelope(waterandair tightness,mechanicalresistance,etc.),butalso generateelectricityonsitefromarenewable energysource. Towardsthisaim,anambitiousresearchproject entitledACTIVEINTERFACESiscurrentlybeing developedinordertostudyinastructuredand in‐depthmannerthetechnological,spatial, legalandsocio‐economicparametersrelatedto thedevelopmentofnewadaptedsolutions, takingintoaccountdiversecriteria(energy, comfort,LCA,costs,aesthetics,costsof
electricityandgridconnection).Crossingover thelimitsofcurrentpractices,thisongoing projectaimsatdesigningandassessingBIPV‐ adaptedscenariosembodyingdifferenturban renewalstrategiesintheSwisscontextthrough amulti‐criteriaassessmentmethodology. Thepresentpaperisthefirstmilestoneonthe roadtowardstheseintegrateddesignstrategies forimplementingBIPVsystemsintourban renewaldesignprocesses.Itpresentsthe resultsfromthepreliminarycasestudyin Neuchâtel(Switzerland),basedonthe simplifiedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferent urbanrenewalscenarios.Theintermediary objectiveistotest,validateandfindwaysto improvetheproposedmethodology. 3.Proposedmethodology Themethodologyinvolvesfourmainphases:1) preselectionofanarchetypalbuilding;2)study ofthecurrentstateofthebuildingandofthe thermalenvelope’sconstructiondetails;3) developmentofthreearchitecturalrenewal scenariosembodyingdifferentlevelsof intervention;4)multi‐criteriaassessmentofthe designscenarios. 3.1Preselectionofanarchetypalbuilding Theprocessofidentificationofthefirstcase studystartswithananalysisofthecityaturban scale.Firstlybasedonatypologicalstudy includingparameterssuchastheconstruction periodandtype,itusesdifferentsourcessuch asthecurrentmasterplan,aerialimages, informationfromregistrationofthepropriety andstatisticaldatafromtheconstruction sector. Subsequently,toselectarepresentative buildingwithineacharchetypaltype,five selectioncriteriaaredefined,relatedtothe opportunitytoimplementBIPVelements.They arelistedbelowonaprioritybasis: 1. Contextandurbanmorphology 2. Solaraccess(roof/façades) 3. Averageheritageprotection 4. Stakeholdersintherenovationprocess (typeofownership) 5. Accesstoinformationonthebuilding 3.2Descriptionofthecasestudy Thebuildingchosenforthefirsttestofthe methodologyisanurbanresidentialbuilding typicalofthe70’s:afour‐storeycommunal property,consistingof18apartmentsand1,287 m 2 oflivingfloorarea.Thisbuildinghasbeen recentlyrenovatedwithoutconsideringthe integrationofBIPV(Baueretal.,2013),beinga publicpropertybuilding,theenergysavingdata havebeenpublishedanditwillbeusedto validateoursresultsusingtheproposed methodology. Intermsofactivesystems,thebuildingis connectedtothedistrictheat2ing(DH)ofthe citytocoverheatinganddomestichotwater (DHW)needs(Fig2). Fig2:Buildingimagebeforerenovation(Google) Accordingtothearchitecturalapproachbased onarenovationdesignprocess,astudyofthe thermalenvelope’sconstructiondetailsis crucialtoidentifyopportunitiestoimplement photovoltaicelements.Theexistingbuilding
presentsaconcretesandwichpanelfaçade, composedbyaninteriorplaster,concrete, insulationandexternalconcretefacing.The doublesloperoofiscomposedbyreinforced concrete,insulationwoodenplateandceramic tile(Fig3). 3.3Descriptionoftherenewalscenarios Forthepurposeofthispaper,threesimplified architecturalrenewalscenariosembodying differentlevelsofinterventionareproposed:A) Currentstate(referencecase):representsthe currentsituationofthebuildingwithoutany renovationstrategy;B)Currentlegal requirements:groupofmeasuresthatensure compliancewiththeminimumlevelof performanceaccordingtoSIA380/1:2009 (currentSwissbuildingperformancestandard). C)BIPVrenovation:groupofstrategiesthat ensurecompliancewiththelevelof performanceaccordingtoSIA380/1:2009 (currentSwissbuildingperformancestandard) withtheintegrationofPVelementsintothe roofrenovationprocess(Table1).Inorderto focusonthedevelopmentofthemethodology, BIPVonfacadesisbeingdeliberately overlooked. Fig3:Envelopedetailsforinsulationstrategy Elements A BC Facades ‐∆Insulation Roof ‐∆Insulation ∆Insulation+BIPV Windows ‐Replacement+shadingsystem Table1:Improvementstrategiesforeachscenario 3.4Definitionofassessmentindicators Tocarryoutamulti‐criteriaevaluationofthe designscenarios,sevenindicatorsaredefined. Theyassessandcomparetheirperformancesin termsofenergy,economicandenvironmental aspects(Table2).Thispreliminarydefinitionwill providethebasisforthemorein‐depth assessmentinthefuturestepsoftheresearch project. Energyconsumption ‐PrimaryenergyconsumptionkWhPE/m2.yea r ‐EquivalentGHGemissionsCO2EQ/m2.yea r Photovoltaicinstallation ‐Annualproduction kWhFE/m2.yea r ‐Ratioelectricitycovered% Costsandpayback ‐Renovationcost CHF ‐Payback years ‐Impactonrent CHF/ m2.yea r Table2:Assessmentindicators 4.Simulation Thetoolusedtoestimatetheassessment criteriarelatedtoenergyconsumption, emissionsandphotovoltaicproductionis DesignBuilderv.4(basedontheEnergyPlus simulationengine.www.designbuilder.co.uk). Foreconomiccriteria,thecalculationhasbeen donewiththeEPIQRtool(F.Flourentzouetal., 2000),developedfortestingdifferentrenewal scenariosandidentifyingthemostperforming one(s).
4.1Inputdataforenergyconsumption Themeanvaluesforthecorresponding constructionperiod(1960‐1970)intheSwiss contextareusedtodefinetheinputdataofthe currentstatus(A)(Giebeleretal.,2011).For scenariosBandC,theU‐valuescorrespondto SIA380/1:2009requirements(Table3). ScenarioABC Exteriorwalls W/m²K 0.70.20.2 Roof1.30.2 0.2 Internalfloor1.10.2 0.2 Window2.61.3 1.3 Glazin g 2.81.0 1.0 Windowsframe1.61.3 1.3 Vent.+Infiltr. r/h1.00.50.5 Table3:Inputdataforthedifferentscenarios 4.2Inputdataforphotovoltaicinstallation ThechoiceoftheBIPVcomponenttobeusedin scenarioCrespondstothewillofcarryingouta rehabilitationwhichpreservesthearchitectural qualityofthebuilding,whilecompromisingas littleaspossiblethelevelofelectricityproduced (Swisspearl,2015).TheSwisspearlINTEGRAL2® PVmodule(Fig.4)waschosentosubstitutethe existingtilesintheretrofittingprocessofthe roofinsulation.Basedonthemonocrystalline (sc‐Si)technologyofPVcells,anefficiencyof 14%isestimated(Cerón,Caamaño‐Martín, Neila,2013). Fig4:RoofBIPVcomponent(www.swisspearls.ch) Accordingtothetechnicalspecifications,the installedpowercanbeestimatedat1kWp=7m2 ofPV.Priceisaround3,000CHF/kWp,including inverters,wiring,accessoriesandconnectors. Weproposetocovertheentireroofofthe building(360m2)usingBIPVelements, substitutingtheactualtilesduringthe improvementprocessoftheroofinsulation. 4.3Inputdataforcostsandpayback OneofthemainconcernsaboutBIPV installationsisrelatedtotheeconomicand financialaspects.Therefore,theprecise evaluationofthecostsisanessentialaspectof theproposedmethodology.Theestimationof thepaybackperiodforeachsituationis calculatedbycountingthenumberofyearsit willtaketorecoverthecashinvestedina project,usingenergycostsavingsandextra revenuesfromthesaleofPVenergyproduced. Thismethodisrecommendedbythecostoptimalmethodologyappliedtorenewal processes(BPIE,2011),consideringmedium‐or long‐terminvestmentscenarios.Forthiscase,a horizonof40years(3%ofinterestrate)has beenconsidered.Apartfromenergysavings, wealsotookintoaccounttherepercussionof theinvestmentcostonpriceofthemonthly rent;3differentthresholdsareanalysed:3%for minimumprofitability,4.5%foraverage profitabilityand6%forsignificantprofitability (Table6). 5.Results 5.1Energyconsumption ThetargetsetbytheSIA380/1:2009for housing,consideringAth=1,764m2and AE=1,587m2is45kWh/m2peryear (renovations).Thetargetisachievedfor scenariosBandC(Fig5),correspondingto56% savingsonheatingenergydemand.Intermsof
finalenergyconsumption,scenariosBandC achieve58%savings(accordingtotheHOLISTIC report),relateddirectlytoconsumptioncosts. Withtheaimofanalysingtheinfluenceofan architecturalrenovationbasedonpassive strategiestoreduceenergydemand,noactive improvementstrategiesareproposedtoreduce energyconsumptionofDHWandelectricity(Fig 6). Thevaluesobtainedforthecurrentsituation (scenarioA)farexceedthetargetvaluessetby SIA380/1.Theyshowthechangesneededto achievethegoalssetbythe“EnergyStrategy 2050”andhighlighttheimportanceof strategiestopromoteurbanrenewalprocesses. Fig5:Heatingneeds (kWh/m2.year) Fig6:Finalenergyconsumption(kWh/m2.year) Fig7:Netenergyconsumptionandemissions Comparingtheresultsintermsofprimary energyisessentialtotakeintoaccountthe originofeachenergysource.Inthiscase,we havenotproposedanychangeofenergysource (DH)tohighlighttheinfluenceofthe photovoltaicinstallation(Fig8). Toobtaintheresultsofthenetprimaryenergy consumptionandCO2equivalentemissions,it isnecessarytousecoefficientstoconvertfrom finaltoprimaryenergy.IntheSwisscontext, thesecoefficientsareprovidedbySIA380/1 (Table4). ElectricityDH k g CO2e q /kWh 0.1620.162 kWhEP/kWhEF 2.9700.810 Table4:Conversioncoefficients 5.2Photovoltaicinstallation ConcerningtheBIPVstrategyimplementedin scenarioC,theestimatedproductionofthe installationis49,262kWhperyear(50kWp), correspondingto39.2kWh/m 2 peryear(116.4 kWh/m 2 peryearintermsofprimaryenergy savings)(Fig.7),or177%ofdomesticelectricity consumption.Thecostoftheinstallationis approximately150,000CHF. 5.3Costsandpayback TheglobalcostsofrenewalscenariosBandC correspondto236,400CHFand386,400CHF respectively.ThedifferenceliesintheBIPV installation,whichrepresentsanadditionalcostof 63%comparedtoscenarioB. Profitability threshold Rentincrease(CHF/m2peryear) ABC 3.0% ‐ +5.5+9.0 4.5% ‐ +8.3+13.5 6.0% ‐ +11.0+18.0 Table5:Rentincreaseforeachscenario Inthiscasewehavechosen3%ofprofitability thresholdstotakeintoaccountthe repercussionoftheinvestmentcostontherent 78 44.2 44.2 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 ABC Heatingneed(kWh/m2.year) 91.7 52.9 52.9 24.8 24.8 24.8 22.1 22.1 22.1 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 ABC Heating DHW Electricity 160 128.5 12.1 25.9 20.8 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 ABC Primaryenergyconsumption(kWh/m².year) EquivalentGHGemissions(CO2/m².year) DHW EL HDHW EL H BIPV prod.
(Table5),ascomparedwiththeaveragevalue oftherentintheregionofNeuchâtel,estimated at220CHF/m2peryear(OFS,2015). Inthisregard,itisimportanttojointlyrepresent thethreedifferentscenariostocomparetheir performancesandhighlighttheeffectivenessof eachstrategy(Fig9). IntheSwisscontext,thesaleandpurchaseprice ofelectricityisapprox.0.2CHF/kWh,tax included.Financialaidtotackletheinvestment cost(correspondingtoaround1,000CHFper kWpinstalled)areobtainedonlyifthe installationislessthan30kWp(Swissgrid, 2015).Usingthesedata,thepaybackis24years forscenarioBand16yearsforscenarioC.The BIPVstrategythusrepresentsapaybacktime 30%shorterthankstotheextrarevenue generatedbythesaleoftheenergyproduced. Fig8:Costevolutionofenergyconsumptionand paybackestimation 6.Conclusions Basedontheresultsoftheevaluation,itseems clearthatenergyrenovationprojectswithout integrationofrenewalenergyingeneraland BIPVinparticulararenolongeranoptionifwe wanttoachievetheobjectivesofthe“Energy strategy2050”.Today,renovationprojects improvingthebuildingenvelopewithavery highlevelofthermalenergyperformanceare necessary,butnotsufficient.Compensating buildings’energyconsumptionbyproducing electricityon‐sitehasbecomenumberone priority.Inthissense,byproposingnew adaptedBIPVsolutionsforurbanrenewal processes,theresearchcontributesto advancingarchitecturalandconstructiondesign practicesinthisdirection. Atanearlystageoftheresearch,theresultsof thispreliminaryapplicationcasestudyhighlight severalinterestingelements,suchasthe shorterpaybackperiodoftheBIPVscenario, justtakingintoaccountasimplestpassive strategy(insulation)40%savingofheatingare achieved.Itseemseasilyarriveto80%oftotal savingswithintroducingofmixstrategies (passive,activeandrenewalenergysystems). Economicaspects,inparticular,appearaskey elementstounderstandobstaclesandfindways ofgettingaroundthem.Inthissense,thetype offinancingisanessentialissueandwillrequire specificattentioninthefuturephasesofthe project.Thedistributionofeconomicbenefits generatedbytheBIPVelectricityproduction amongtheinvolvedstakeholders(ownerand tenant)isanotherkeyaspect. Thispreliminarystudyalsoallowsafirst validationoftheproposedmethodologyand opensupperspectivesfortheupcoming processoffinalisationandrefinement. First,inordertosupportamoreholistic approach,implicitintheconceptofsustainable development,itisessentialtoincreasethe numberofindicators.Themulti‐criteria assessmentneedsnotonlytotakeinto considerationquantitativeandqualitative parameters,butalsotoincludecriteriafromall threepillarsofsustainability(i.e.notonly environmentalandeconomicindicators,but alsosocioculturalones).Amongothers,wewill includeindoorcomfortandLCAassessmentof 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CHF Years Scenario_A Scenario_B Scenario_C
theentirerenovationproject.Theintegrationof theseadditionalindicatorswillrequireusing newsimulationtoolsspecificallydesigned assessretrofittingprojectswithBIPV. Furthermore,theamountofscenarioswillalso needtobeincreasedinordertodefineand evaluateabroadernumberofBIPVretrofitting options.BIPVproductswillbeintroducedto substitutenotonlyroofelements,butalso façadecomponents.Differentlevelsof interventionwillthusbedistinguishedwith moresubtlety,frombasicsanitationto substitution,includingrenovationand transformationstrategies.Finally,afterthese variousrefinementswillhavebeencarriedout, furtherphasesoftheresearchwillconsistin applyingthemethodologytootherarchetypal buildings.Theseupcomingcasestudieswill ensurethevalidationofthefinalised methodologyandenabletheextrapolationof themostperformingBIPVrenovationstrategies aturbanscale.Moreover,thesecasestudies willprovidearchitects,installersandpublic authoritieswithacatalogueofinnovativeand adapted“bestpractice”solutionsforalargescaleadvancedBIPVintegrationintourban renewalprocesses. 7.Acknowledgments ThisworkwassupportedbytheSwissNational ScienceFoundation(SNSF)–NationalResearch ProgramNRP70“EnergyTurnaround”andthe EcolePolytechniqueFédéraledeLausanne (EPFL). 8.References AiulfiD.,ReyE.(2010).Lestechnologiesvertes, matièrespremièrespourlacréativitédes architectes.Neuchâtel:MICRO10,specialized lectures. BPIE(2013).Implementingthecost‐optimal methodologyinEUCountries.Brussels:BPIE. CerónI.,Caamaño‐MartínE.,NeilaF.J.(2013)‘State‐ of‐the‐art’ofbuildingintegratedphotovoltaic products.RenewableEnergy,58(0)127‐133. FlourentzouF.,DroutsaK.,WittchenK.B.(2000), EPIQRsoftware.Energy&Buildings,31(2000), 129‐136. Frontini,F.etal.(2012).Acasestudyofsolar technologiesadoption:criteriaforBIPV integrationinsensitivebuiltenvironment. EnergyProcedia,30(2000),1006‐1015. GiebelerG.etal.(2011).Rénoverlebâti. Maintenance,reconversion,extension. Lausanne:PressesPolytechniqueset universitairesromandes. HeinsteinP.,BallifC.,Perret‐AebiL.E.(2013). BuildingIntegratedPhotovoltaics(BIPV): Review,Potentials,BarriersandMyths.Green, 3(2),125‐156. BauerF.,OswaldD.,TrachselC.,ReyE.(2013) HOLISTIC:Retourd'expériences.PublicFinal Report.Neuchâtel:CONCERTOProgram. IEA(Internationalenergyagency).(2002).Potential forBuildingIntegratedPhotovoltaics,Report PVPST7‐4.Switzerland:IEA NaultE.,AndersenM.,ReyE.(2013).SolarPotential andInteractiveDesignintheUrbanContext. Munich:sb13,April24‐26. Officefédéraldelastatistique.(2015).Neuchâtel. ReyE.(2014)FromSpatialDevelopmenttoDetail. CollectionNotatio.Lucerne:QuartPublishers ReyE.etal.(2015),Buildingintegrated photovoltaics.ACTIVEINTERFACES,NRP 70(EnergyTurnaround)andNRP71(Managing EnergyConsumption),Kick‐offMeetingLuzern, 24April RieraPérezM,ReyE(2013).Amulti‐criteria approachtocompareurbanrenewalscenarios foranexistingneighbourhood.Casestudyin Lausanne(Switzerland).Buildingand Environment,65(2013),58‐70. SFOE.(2014)EnergyStrategy2050. SIA(2009).SIA380/1:2009L'énergiethermiquedans lebâtiment.Zurich. Swissgrid.(2015).RetrievedApril23,2015,from http://www.swissgrid.ch