scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Coupled analysis of a backfill hydration test

Alonso Pérez de Agreda, Eduardo,Lloret Morancho, Antonio,Delahaye, Carlos Héctor,Vaunat, Jean,Gens Solé, Antonio,Volckaert, G.

Abstract

BACCHUS2 in situ isothermal wetting experiment has been analysed by means of a coupled flow-deformation approach. Backfill material, a mixture of Boom clay powder and high density pellets, has been extensively tested in the laboratory in order to determine its hydraulic and mechanical properties. Parameters of constitutive equations were derived from this experimental data base. Two mechanical constitutive models have been used in the simulation of the 'in situ' experiment: a state surface approach and an elastoplastic model. Calculations have shown several features of the hydration process which help to understand the behaviour of expansive clay barriers. Predictions using both models have been compared with each other and with actual measurement records. This has allowed a discussion of the comparative mertis of both approaches and the identiÞcation of some critical parameters of backfill behaviour. Overall agreement between calculations and field measurements is encouraging and shows the potential of the methods developed to model the behaviour of engineered clay barriers in the context of nuclear waste disposal.

Full text

*Corresponding to E. E. Alonso, E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Technical University of Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain CCC 0363—9061/98/010001—27$17.50 Received 30 March 1995 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Revised 4 April 1997 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, VOL. 22, 1—27 (1998) COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST E. E. ALONSO1*, A. LLORET1, C. H. DELAHAYE1, J. VAUNAT1, A. GENS1AND G. VOLCKAERT2 1E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Technical University of Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain 2SCK-CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol. Belgium SUMMARY BACCHUS2 in situ isothermal wetting experiment has been analysed by means of a coupled flowdeformation approach. Backfill material, a mixture of Boom clay powder and high density pellets, has been extensively tested in the laboratory in order to determine its hydraulic and mechanical properties. Parameters of constitutive equations were derived from this experimental data base. Two mechanical constitutive models have been used in the simulation of the ‘in situ’ experiment: a state surface approach and an elastoplastic model. Calculations have shown several features of the hydration process which help to understand the behaviour of expansive clay barriers. Predictions using both models have been compared with each other and with actual measurement records. This has allowed a discussion of the comparative mertis of both approaches and the identification of some critical parameters of backfill behaviour. Overall agreement between calculations and field measurements is encouraging and shows the potential of the methods developed to model the behaviour of engineered clay barriers in the context of nuclear waste disposal. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) (No. of Figures: 20 No. of Tables: 2 No. of Refs: 19) Key words: expansive clay; hydromechanics; unsaturated soils; nuclear waste; in situ test 1. INTRODUCTION Compacted clays are adopted as appropriate engineered barriers in design concepts which consider the placement of the nuclear waste canisters in deep geological formation other than salt (clay, marl, granite). Very active clays (bentonites) or compacted mixtures of clay powder and high-density clay pellets have been suggested as suitable materials. Once installed in contact with the (usually saturated) natural host rock these barriers experience: (a) a transient wetting phase governed by the rate of absorption of natural water and (b) a transient temperature regime controlled by the decaying heat power input induced by the canister. The process is complex since parts of the barrier in the proximity of the hot canisters will be initially dried, whereas the outer boundary of the compacted barrier will surely hydrate and expand. The host rock close to the clay buffer will also experience a transient drying—wetting phase as the natural clay first loses water towards the unsaturated compacted fill and later resaturates. Stresses will be controlled by the relatively low initial stress state of the compacted buffer, the development of shrinkage and swelling strains and the stiffness of the backfill and surrounding host rock. Temperature changes are also coupled with hydrothermal phenomena in several ways (water vapour transfer is strongly dependent on temperature and it also influences permeability, water retention and mechanical properties). In summary, a number of inter-related processes affect the clay buffer and host rock. The time length of this phase and its potential effects in modifying or conditioning some of the key properties of the barrier (such as its tightness) are difficult to predict. For this reason a number of large-scale ‘in situ’ hydration experiments such as BACCHUS2, performed in the HADES underground research laboratory located in Mol, Belgium, and excavated in the Miocene plastic Boom clay at 220 m depth, have been carried out. These tests provide useful data for the validation of models but, for practical reasons, only a limited period of the hydration process is monitored. From a basic, fundamental type of view this initial phase is characterized by the unsaturated nature of the compacted clay barrier. In this paper the coupled hydro-mechanical behaviour of a clay barrier will be analysed in connection with the BACCHUS2 experiment. In contrast with the previous discussion, no heat source was used in BACCHUS2 and therefore the analysis reported here is isothermal. Two alternative mechanical analyses of the in situ test will be presented in the paper. The first analysis is based on the concept of state surface as a convenient way to describe clay volumetric deformations in terms of changes of mean stress and suction. This approach has several limitations (irreversible and path-dependent effects cannot be modelled and neither the effect of suction changes in deviatoric strains, nor the influence of deviatoric stresses on volumetric changes induced by suction changes are considered). However, it has proved useful to model coupled flow and deformation phenomena in swelling and collapsing soils. A computer code (NOSAT) has been developed by the authors within the state surface framework and has been used in the past in the analysis of earthdams swelling foundations and multilayer barriers.1~3 In the second analysis reported, an elastoplastic constitutive law has been adopted to describe the mechanical behaviour of the backfill material. The same set of laboratory tests has been used to derive model parameters in both cases. The comparison between the predictions of both models and measured results has an added interest which is rarely found in comparison of predictions with performance. 2. THEORETICAL BASIS The isothermal flow-deformation problem in an unsaturated soil requires the solution of the following governing equations: water mass balance L(o8nS3) Lt#div (o8v8)"0 (1) air mass balance L Lt[o!n(1!S3#HS 3 )]#div [o!(v!#Hv8)]"0 (2) equilibrium equations L Lxj (pij!dij p!)#Lp! Lxi #bi"0 (3) 2E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) where o8,o!are mass densities of water and air; v8and v!water and air (Darcy) velocities; nporosity; S3degree of saturation; HHenry’s constant; (pij!dij p!) net stresses (i.e. the excess of total stress, pij, over air pressure, p!). Note that when suction is zero, air and water pressures become equal and equation (3) becomes the equilibrium equation in terms of effective stresses. This situation applies, initially, to the saturated natural clay. Flow of water and air is assumed to be governed by generalized Darcy’s laws. Permeabilities are assumed to vary with suction and void ratio according to K8(e,S3)"Ko 8/(1#AsB) (4) K!(e,S3)"Cc! k! [e(1!S3)]D(5) where Ko 8is the water permeability for saturated conditions, sis the matric suction (s"p!!p8); c!specific weight of air; k!air viscosity; evoid ratio and A,B,C,Dparameters. It is also required to specify the water retention characteristics of the soil. The following variation of degree of saturation with suction has been adopted in the analysis:4 S3"0·995!E(1!exp(!sF)) (6) where E,Fare constants. In order to describe the mechanical behaviour of unsaturated soils, the authors have developed two alternative formulations. The first and simpler one focuses on an adequate representation of the volumetric3behaviour of the soil against suction changes. A state surface approximation relates changes in void ratio with net stress and suction and may be used to formulate a general coupled flow-deformation approach.5A more consistent and general elastoplastic model describes important features of unsaturated soil behaviour such as irreversibility of strains, joint swelling-collapse phenomena and changes in soil strength with suction.6,7 The two approaches will be outlined below. 2.1 State surface approach A convenient way to formulate the stress—strain relationship under the state surface framework is to consider the volumetric strains induced by suction changes as initial thermal-like strains: dp* ij"Dijkl (dekl!deodkl) (7) where p* ij"pij!dij p!are the net stresses and deoare the suction-induced volumetric strains. They are given by an empirical expression relating void ratio and changes in net mean stress and suction. Based on the analysis of several suction controlled experimental programs, the following equation has been proposed:8 e"d#alog (p!p!)#blog (s#p!5)#clog(p!p!) log (s#p!5) (8) where a,b,c,dare constants, pthe mean total stress and p!5 the atmospheric pressure. For small changes of stress and suction linearized expressions may also be suitable: e"d@#a@(p!p!)#b@(s#p!5)#c@(p!p!)(s#p !5) (9) COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 3 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) In the analysis presented here, coefficients of the matrix Dcorrespond to an isotropic non-linear elastic model defined by a compressibility modulus, Kt, and a shear modulus, Gt.Ktis obtained directly from (7) or (8) by differentiation: 1 Kt "1 1#eo de d(p!p ! )(10) Gtis obtained from Kt, through a constant Poisson’s ratio. This implies that the shear modulus varies also with the current net mean confining stress in a way similar to Kt. 2.2 Elastoplastic model Under triaxial stress states (p,q,s) where pis the net mean stress [p"(p1#2p3)/3!p!], qis the deviatoric stress (q"p1!p3) and sthe matric suction the model postulates a yield function given by the following family of ellipses: q2!M2(p#ps)(p o !p)"0 (11) In this equation psis related to the increase in apparent cohesion with suction and is given by ps"kss(12) and pois the current yield stress for isotropic stress conditions and is related to the applied suction through Apo p#B"Ap* o p#B(j(o)~i)@(j(s)~i)(13) where p* o, the yield net stress for saturated conditions, is the hardening parameter and j(s) is the slope of the virgin compression line for isotropic conditions. j(s) is related to suction through j(s)"j(o)[(1!r) exp(!bs)#r] (14) In the preceding equation, M,ks,j(o), i,p#,rand bare model parameters. Mis the slope of the critical state line, j(o) is the slope of the virgin compression line for saturated conditions, iis the slope of the (elastic) isotropic unloading—reloading paths and pcis a reference stress. rdefines the compression index at high suctions and bprovides the rate of change of j(s) with s. It is assumed in the model that hardening is controlled by the plastic volumetric strains (de1 v) through dp* o p* o "l j(o)!ide1 v(15) where v"1#eis the specific volume. A non-associated flow rule relating shear (de1 q) and volumetric deformations (dep v) was adopted: de1 q de1 v "2qa M2(2p#ps!po)(16) where ais a constant related to M,iand j(o). Volumetric and deviatoric elastic strains induces by stress (p,q) and suction (s) changes inside the yield locus are given by de% v"i v dp p(17) 4E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) de% q"G 3dq(18) de% s"is ds s#p!5 (19) where isis the compressibility modulus against suction changes and Gthe constant shear stiffness. This model reproduces expansive and collapse deformations but has some limitations for highly expansive materials. A double structure model, which is a modification of the previously outlined framework, is able to reproduce better specific features of behaviour of those materials.9 In this paper, however, the basic form of the elastoplastic model will be used in the simulation of the ‘in situ’ BACCHUS2 test. 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE BACCHUS2 TEST The experimental set-up is shown in Figure 1. A bottom steep plate (diameter: 475 mm; thickness 50 mm) welded to an instrumented central ram (/"80 mm) was lowered into the bottom of a large diameter shaft (/"490—540 mm) drilled from the floor of the HADES underground research tunnel located at 220 m depth in overconsolidated Boom clay. The shaft reaches a depth of 14 m below the tunnel and the experiment was installed between 11 and 14 m depth. Once the steel and ram were in place, a 50/50 mixture of Boom clay powder and high-density pellets industrially compacted by means of rotating tangential wheels to a dry unit weight of (c$"21 kN/m3) was hand compacted to an average dry density varying between 14 and 16 kN/m3. Figure 1 shows schematically some of the instruments installed to monitor the progressive hydration of the backfill. Total pressure cell (PT in Figure 1) and piezometers (PW in Figure 1) were installed in flexible steel stands welded to the bottom plate. Piezometers were also installed on the surface of the central ram. This ram was prepared to act as a filter/drain for incoming water and, alternatively as a water injector. In fact, during the first phase of the test (October 1993—November 1994) the fill was hydrated from the natural clay. A second phase started in November 1994, in which water was injected through the central ram. This paper refers only to the first natural hydration phase. The progress of hydration was monitored by carrying out thermal probe tests. The distribution of temperatures induces by a heat pulse was measured by means of a network of thermocouple sensors installed across the fill. The heat pulse induced by a central probe lasted 5 d and was carried out at constant electric power (120 W at the beginning of the test when the fill was dry and 140 W at the end of the experiment when the backfill was saturated). When the fill was dry the maximum temperature rise varied from 45°C close to the heater to 30—32°C at the interface with the natural clay. This temperature range changed to 35—30°C when the fill was saturated. These transient temperature changes are believed to induce very small thermo-hydro-mechanical changes in the fill. In fact, after the cooling phase readings of the instrumentation (pore water and total pressure transducers) remained within the current trend of changes. More details may be found in.10 Back calculated thermal conductivity values at several radial positions have been converted into moisture contents and degrees of saturation by means of a correlation obtained in the laboratory. COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 5 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 1. BACCHUS2 experiment (Reference 10) The host clay is also instrumented in the vicinity of the hydration test. Temperature, total and pore water pressures and humidity measurements (by means of a neutron probe) can be performed at different radial distances.11 6E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 3. Simulation of initial conditions. (a) initial state. (b) borehole drilling. (c) backfill compaction. (d) final state Figure 2. Geometry of the analysis 4. BOUNDARY AND INITIAL CONDITIONS Axisymmetric and plain strain conditions in a central horizontal plane have been assumed in the analysis. The geometry is indicated in Figure 2: a central rigid cylinder (/"80 mm) is in contact with the backfill. The interface between natural clay and compacted soil is a 0·5 m diameter cylinder. Boundary conditions, as specified below, have been imposed, in the natural clay, in an outer cylinder, 7·0 m in a diameter. Initial conditions for the hydration test have been established by means of a simulation of the actual operations: excavation of the shaft and compaction of the backfill mixture. The sequence of calculations performed to determine initial stress conditions is indicated schematically in Figure 3. The initial state of stress in the host natural clay was derived from COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 7 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) ‘in situ’ measurements. Based on those results, an almost isotropic stress state (total horizontal stress, po)"2·02 MPa; total vertical stress, po7"1·9 MPa was assumed). The large excavation (/"500 mm) (Figure 3(b)) modifies the initial state of stress in the natural Boom clay and allows the installation of the test set up. Then, the effect of compaction of the backfill is simulated by means of a small horizontal stress (po"0·05 MPa) (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). The initial suction of the fill was taken as 60 MPa according to the initial degree of saturation and the measured water retention curve.12 A zero displacement and impervious boundary (for both water and air) was imposed at the radius r"3·50 m. Computed results showed that during the whole transient phase of the experiment significant changes of mechanical and hydraulic variable took place within a radius not exceeding 1 m. The selected outer boundary remains in a zone essentially unchanged by the presence of the experiment. Mixed boundary conditions were prescribed on the surface of the steel cylinder: if the fill tends to move inwards zero displacement is imposed. However, if the backfill moves outwards a zero stress condition is assumed. A drain-type condition was adopted in this probe/backfill content: the boundary is impervious unless the water pressure becomes positive in the vicinity of the contact. In this case, a zero pressure boundary is imposed. 5. SOIL PARAMETERS 5.1. Hydraulic properties Water retention and hydraulic properties are common to the two analyses performed. The variation of hydraulic conductivity with suction was modelled by equation (4) and requires the determination of parameters Ko 8,Aand B. In order to do so, a hydration experiment carried out by SCK-CEN (Boom clay powder (c$"17 kN/m3; initial water content by weight, 2·6 percent) has been modelled by means of computer code NOSAT. In this experiment, a 70 mm long column of compacted soil was subjected, on one end, to a hydraulic pressure of 10 kPa. The other end was maintained at atmospheric pressure. A detailed account of the measurement techniques and results is given in.12 Water content was periodically monitored at close intervals by means of an X-ray tomographic technique. Measured results are given in Figure 4. Water intake by the sample was also measured and modelled (Figure 5). The best agreement was found for the set of parameters given in Table I (backfill). Based on laboratory permeability tests, a different permeability for saturated conditions was adopted for the natural clay. However, variation with suction was kept identical in both materials. Variation of air conductivity with suction was based on measurements of relative gas conductivity carried out by SCK-CEN within MEGAS project.13 The air conductivity was measured by a pulse test technique. Parameters Cand Dof equation (5) are also given in Table I. Finally, retention curves were based on laboratory determinations of the variation of degree of saturation with suction for a sample of Boom clay powder compacted at a dry unit weight, c$"17 kN/m3. Measured points and the adopted analytical relationship are shown in Figure 6. Parameters Eand Fof equation (6) are given in Table I. 5.2. Mechanical parameters State surface approach. Wetting tests carried out in conventional and suction controlled oedometer devices on compacted samples of Boom clay powder and pellets provided the data for 8E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 4. Comparison between measured and estimated evolution of water content along the specimen in the hydration experiment parameter determination. Tests performed in conventional oedometers involved a single step wetting of samples from its initial as-compacted state. In suction-controlled oedometers a large reduction in suction was first applied from the high initial value to a suction close to 0·5 MPa. Further wetting was then controlled in steps by reducing nitrogen pressure. Vertical loads in the range 0—1000 kPa were applied in combination with the mentioned suction changes. A least squares techniques was used to minimize the differences between calculations, as given by equation (8), and measured strains. The optimum state surface is plotted in Figure 7 and the parameters are given in Table II. The adopted surface predicts a swelling strain of 15·7 percent when the fill is wetted under a vertical stress of 10 kPa. The vertical stress which prevents any swelling when the soil is saturated is 440 kPa12. A ring of natural clay close to the interface with the unsaturated compacted fill is first partially dried as water is sucked into the fill. Eventually, it saturates again as saturation of the fill progresses. This transient shrinkage-wetting episode experienced by the natural clay was also modelled with a state surface. Drying tests performed in samples compacted to c$"17 kN/m3and in situ measured values of shear modulus COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 9 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 12. Evolution of radial displacements. (a) s.s. approach. (b) e.p. approach in both models. Within the s.s. approach any change in average net stress or suction results in a parallel change of soil stiffness. Under the e.p. framework the (elastic) stiffness parameters remain constant irrespective of loading and suction changes, provided the stress path lies within the current yield surface. This important qualitative difference provides an explanation for some discrepancies between calculations carried out with both models. Radial stresses (Figure 13) are, however, relatively homogeneous within the fill and experience a continuous increase in time. Larger values are computed under the e.p. approach. Similar results are obtained for the mean net stress. 16 E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 13. Evolution of radial stresses in the backfill for different radial coordinates. (a) s.s. approach. (b) e.p. approach Stress paths in both (p,s) and (p,q) planes provide an accurate image of the processes experienced by points of the backfill and host clay as the hydration process develops. Consider first in Figure 14 the stress paths of the backfill in the (p,s) plane. The plotted paths are typical swelling pressure type of paths: as suction decreases, confining pressures increase. All the points within the fill experience a qualitatively similar behaviour. Consider, however, in Figure 15 the (p,s) stress paths for two points of the natural clay close to the backfill interface. The initial fill-induced dessication implies a reduction in net mean stress. In the long term, the clay regains saturation (suction decreases again) as the mean stress increases. COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 17 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 14. Stress paths in (p,s) plane for points of the backfill. (a) s.s. approach. (b) e.p. approach Stress paths in (p,q) plane demonstrate that the process is relatively complex (Figure 16). In both approaches a steady increase in net mean stress is found although shear stress reversals are also computed. Points near the centre of the backfill maintain states close to hydrostatic conditions whereas the maximum deviatoric stresses are found at the backfill boundaries. 18 E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 15. Stress paths in (p,s) plane for points in the natural clay close to the interface. (a) s.s. approach. (b) e.p. approach Measured radial stresses at two positions within the backfill (r"0·22 m and r"0·11 m) are compared with computations in Figures 17 and 18 respectively. Field data exhibits a marked scatter when stresses along North and South directions are compared. The state surface approach predicts a rapid early development of stresses and a continuous decrease in the rate of stress COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 19 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 16. Stress paths in (p,q) plane for points within the backfill. (a) s.s. approach. (b) e.p. approach development. In this way, it overestimates all the measurements at the beginning of the hydration period and tends to underestimate the lowest values of measured stresses (North direction) at larger times. This behaviour is linked with the continuous decrease of soil stiffness as suction reduces implied by the state surface approach. Note that in this approach, the modulus of 20 E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 17. Total radial stresses measured in two sensors located at r"0·22 m and model results Figure 18. Total radial stresses measured in two sensors located at r"0·11 m and model results COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 21 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 19. Suction-net mean stress paths for the elastoplastic approach. (a) Suction plotted in log scale. (b) Suction plotted in natural scale volumetric compressibility is directly obtained through differentiation of the state surface for void ratio (equation (10)). The elastoplastic results are qualitatively different. Computed stresses increase of a constant rate during a first stage (the first 350 d), and begin to decay later. Radial stresses based on this 22 E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) Figure 20. Evolution of computed radial stresses at r"0·22 m and r"0·11 m for two values of the saturated yield stress p* o model occupy a central position between North and South results for r"0·22 m and reproduce more accurately the maximum stresses measured at r"0·11 m. This behaviour is explained in Figure 19 which shows the suction-net mean stress paths computed for r"0·22 m and r"0·11 m. The figures show also the effect of changing the value of the saturated yield stress, p* o(from p* o"120 kPa to p* o"150 kPa). The initial position of the Loading Collapse yield curves for those two values of p* ohas also been plotted in Figure 19. Before hitting the yield locus, the wetting path followed by the fill lies within the elastic region postulated in the model. Along this part of the (p,s) path the soil behaves elastically and its compressibility does not change since constant elastic parameters have been adopted. This explains the constant rate of radial stress development in earlier times during the test. However, when the stress path reaches the current yield locus, irreversible volumetric compressive strains begin to develop and net mean stresses develop slowly as suction decreases. A ‘kink’ in the (p,s) stress path is therefore obtained when the LC yield curve is reached. The overall soil compressibility increases and this is also reflected in computed radial stress beyond some time (Figures 17 and 18). The relevance of the saturated initial yield net mean stress, p* o, is further illustrated in Figure 20, which shows the computed evolution of radial stresses for the considered radial distances and two values of p* o. The smaller elastic region for p* o"120 kPa implies that the backfill reaches earlier a softening state (collapse conditions) as hydration proceeds. This results in a decaying rate of radial stress development beyond a certain time. For p* o"150 kPa, however, most of the fill remains elastic during the simulation performed and this explains the stiffer response of the backfill. Parameter p* ohas, therefore, a relevant influence on the results of the elastoplastic analysis. 7. CONCLUSIONS One of the main purposes of the BACCHUS2 hydration in situ test was to provide data for the validation of hydro-mechanical models for partially saturated compacted clay fills. An extensive COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 23 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) program of laboratory tests of compacted Boom clay powder and compacted mixtures of powder and pellets has provided data on permeability, water retention characteristics and volumetric deformation of the fill under varying suction (or saturation) conditions. Instrumentation of the natural Boom clay deposits near the test emplacement has also provided data to specify initial and boundary conditions of the experiment. Enough information has therefore been obtained to allow a simulation of test performance. Two alternative mechanical models of soil behaviour (state surface description for volumetric deformations and an elastoplastic model) have been compared in the analysis performed. The existing experimental data base of fill behaviour has allowed the identification of parameters of both approaches. The methodology for parameter identification represents a major part of the modelling effort and has only been outlined in this paper. More details may be found in Reference 12. It can be said that the state surface approach requires less parameters than the elastoplastic counterpart and they are also more readily found. The analysis of the computed results reveals that the apparently simple phenomenon of fill hydration is in fact a complex coupled processes for the backfill and the immediate natural clay. The plotted stress paths indicate that the fill experiences deviatoric stress reversals whereas in the natural clay a drying-wetting cycle takes place. Comparison between measured and computed evolution of backfill saturation shows a good agreement for the two models used. In addition, the specific description of mechanical behaviour has a very limited effect on saturation changes. Measured radial stresses within the backfill are markedly non-symmetrical, and this probably indicates non-homogeneous characteristics in the fill, the natural clay or both, which were not intended or, indeed, foreseen during test installation. Symmetrical conditions were assumed in the analysis but, nevertheless, the comparison between measured and computed radial stresses has provided an interesting insight into the relative merits of the two approaches adopted. Radial stresses derived from the elastoplastic approach develop in time at a rate consistent with measurements. Computed absolute values are close to the average measured values. The elastoplastic approach shows an encouraging potential to model mechanical phenomena within barriers experiencing a progressive hydration. Computed results are, however, critically dependent on some key parameters of the model. The significance of the hardening parameter (saturated yield stress), a parameter which is difficult to estimate in practice, has been presented. Computed stresses based on the state surface approach present more discrepancies with measured values and, more specifically, with the time development of stresses. The model overestimates stresses in the short term and overestimates them in the long term. This represents a qualitative disagreement with observed behaviour which has been explained by the apparently unrealistic continuous and rapid softening of the soil as hydration proceeds. A better understanding of phenomena taking place in swelling clay barriers experiencing natural hydration from the host rock has been gained. Also, present modelling capabilities at sample scale (constitutive behaviour) and real scale (field equations) have been verified within the framework of a comprehensive laboratory and ‘in situ’ testing program. Overall, results are satisfactory and it is believed that the analysis presented in the paper is a positive step towards the development of more accurate models for the prediction of engineered clay barriers performance. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work described has been supported by the Spanish national agency for nuclear waste disposal (ENRESA) and by the EU through Projects FI2W-CT-91-0033 and FI2W-CT-91-0102. 24 E. E. ALONSO E¹A¸. (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998) BACCHUS2 test was performed by the Belgian nuclear energy center, SCK-CEN, under the direction of G. Volckaert. J. Vaunat is the recipient of a fellowship of the Human Capital and Mobility Programme of the EU. Basic research has been supported by the Spanish scientific and technical research agency (CICYT) through research grants PS92-0702 and PB93-0964. APPENDIX: NOTATION F:Force; ¸: Length; M:Mass; ¹: Time a,b,c,dconstant parameters in equation relating void ratio with net stress and suction changes (state surface approach) a@,b@,c@,d@constant parameters in equation relating void ratio with net stress and suction changes (simplified expression; state surface approach) A,Bconstant parameters in equation relating unsaturated water permeability with suction bibody forces in equilibrium equation, F/¸3 D,Cconstant parameters in equation relating unsaturated air permeability with suction and void ratio, [C:(L2)] e,e0void ratio; initial void ratio E,Fconstant parameters in equation relation degree of saturation with suction [F: (FL~2)~1] Gelastic shear modulus (elastoplastic model), F/L2 Gtnon-linear elastic shear modulus (state surface approach), F/L2 HHenry’s constant ("0·018) Ktnonlinear elastic modulus of soil compressibility (state surface approach), F/L2 K8permeability to water (unsaturated conditions) I/T K0 8permeability to water (saturated conditions), L/T ksParameter describing the increase in cohesion with suction (elastoplastic model) Mslope of critical state failure envelope nporosity pnet mean stres (triaxial stress states) ("p1#2p3/3!p!)F/L2 p !air pressure, F/L2 p!5 atmospheric pressure, F/L2 pcreference stress (elastoplastic model), F/L2 pocurrent yield net mean stress (for suction s)F/L2 p * ocurrent effective mean yield stress (saturated state), F/L2 psapparent cohesion in terms of net mean stresses (elastoplastic model), F/L~2 p8water pressure, F/L2 qdeviatoric stress (triaxial stress states) ("p1!p3)F/L2 rparameter defining maximum soil stiffness (elastoplastic model) Srdegree of saturation smatric suction ("p!"p8), F/L2 v!velocity of air (Darcy), I/T v8velocity of water (Darcy), I/! vspecific volume ("1#e) aparameter of the nonassociated flow rule (elastoplastic model) COUPLED ANALYSIS OF A BACKFILL HYDRATION TEST 25 (1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol. 22, 1—27 (1998)