scieee Open visual document viewer

The integrated design of building services by an equipped and eco-efficient module (MOTE2)

Giordano, Roberto,Allione, Cristina,Clos, Andrè,Montacchini, Elena,Tedesco, Silvia

Abstract

[EN] The targets set out by European Directives concerning the energy savings in the construction sector refer both to building envelope and to its services. With regard to building services it is mandatory meeting requirements related to heating, cooling, lighting and ventilation.Building services take up a variable space in the buildings that cannot be considered anymore negligible and they would always be fully integrated into buildings.Equipped and Eco-efficient Technological Module (MOTE2) is a research project aimed at implementing the integration in a unique services cupboard of some building services: heating and cooling; domestic hot water; mechanical ventilation.The project was organized according to four main phases. In phase 1 a set of rules was defined matching requirements related to the energy efficiency to environmental building design standards. During the phase 2 six building models were studied in order to size the corresponding building services according to scenario analysis set down for existing buildings. In phase 3 the project was focused on designing the assembly among services.The cupboard design is like a Tetris® game through the planning of the best combination among services shape. Based on the drawings developed a first mock-up was built up and monitored. Finally, in phase 4 the paper deals with the MOTE2’s expected performances.Outlook and some conclusions point out the future steps of the research activities.

Full text

Ma e a, modi ica ion: cu Example o a se ices cupboa d design o he building model “M” Size. The isome ic iews show he en elope o he each se ices and hei combina ion in o he cupboa d. Vi u io In e na ional jou nal o A chi ec u e Technology and Sus ainabili y Volume 2 13 ABSTRACT The a ge s se ou by Eu opean Di ec i es conce ning he ene gy sa ings in he cons uc ion sec o e e bo h o building en elope and o i s se ices. Wi h ega d o building se ices i is manda o y mee ing equi emen s ela ed o hea ing, cooling, ligh ing and en ila ion. Building se ices ake up a a iable space in he buildings ha canno be conside ed anymo e negligible and hey would always be ully in eg a ed in o buildings. Equipped and Eco-e icien Technological Module (MOTE2) is a esea ch p ojec aimed a implemen ing he in eg a ion in a unique se ices cupboa d o some building se ices: hea ing and cooling; domes ic ho wa e ; mechanical en ila ion. The p ojec was o ganized acco ding o ou main phases. In phase 1 a se o ules was de ined ma ching equi emen s ela ed o he ene gy e iciency o en i onmen al building design s anda ds. Du ing he phase 2 six building models we e s udied in o de o size he co esponding building se ices acco ding o scena io analysis se down o exis ing buildings. In phase 3 he p ojec was ocused on designing he assembly among se ices. The cupboa d design is like a Te is® game h ough he planning o he bes combina ion among se ices shape. Based on he d awings de eloped a i s mock-up was buil up and moni o ed. Finally, in phase 4 he pape deals wi h he MOTE2’s expec ed pe o mances. Ou look and some conclusions poin ou he u u e s eps o he esea ch ac i i ies. KEYWORDS echnological in eg a ion o building se ices, se ices cupboa d o building The in eg a ed design o building se ices by an equipped and eco-e icien module (MOTE2) 1 Poli ecnico di To ino, Depa men o A chi ec u e and Design 2 Sa o o G oup S. .l., Ecodesign consul an Robe o Gio dano1, C is ina Allione2, And é Clos1, Elena Mon acchini1, Sil ia Tedesco1 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4995/ i u io-ija s.2016.6795 14 1. INTRODUCTION In ecen yea s a consis en legisla i e amewo k aimed a signi ican ly imp o ing he ene gy e iciency o Eu opean buildings s ock ha e been laid down, i.e. he Ene gy Pe o mance o Buildings Di ec i e (Di ec i e 2010/31/EU), he Ene gy E iciency Di ec i e (Di ec i e 2012/27/EU) and he Renewable Ene gy Di ec i e (Di ec i e 2009/28/EU). Pa icula ly ele an is he EPBD ecas s a ing ha new buildings occupied by public au ho i ies and p ope ies ha e o be Nea ly Ze o Ene gy Buildings (NZEBs) by Decembe 31, 2018 and ha new buildings ha e o be NZEBs by Decembe 31, 2020. Acco ding o he EPBD a NZEB is a building ha has a e y high-ene gy pe o mance wi h nea ly ze o o e y low amoun o ene gy equi ed o be co e ed by ene gy om enewable sou ces, including enewable ene gy p oduced on-si e o nea by. Based on hese p emises in he las yea s se e al Eu opean Coun ies, including I aly, ha e been adop ing se e al measu es and incen i es o ge ene gy sa ings in he cons uc ion sec o . The se ou a ge s e e bo h o building en elope, by means an imp o emen o building sys ems pe o mances in e m o he mal insula ion, con ol o ai leakages and he mal ine ia, and o building se ices, since i is manda o y mee ing equi emen s ela ed o hea ing, cooling, ligh ing and en ila ion (Pe ago e . al., 2009). Nowadays building se ices ake up a a iable space in he buildings - acco ding o hei uses - ha canno be conside ed anymo e negligible (e.g. hospi als o some ac o ies equi e sophis ica ed ins alla ions). Only in ecen imes i g ows he awa ness abou he impac o se icing sys ems and subsys ems on he building. Un il ew yea s ago he design and ins alla ion o se ices was conside ed ela i ely unimpo an . The buildings we e simple ; ea u ed wi h boile s and ai hea ing, pipewo ks, adia o s and con ec o s as well as wi h a ume cupboa d in he ki chens and in he ba h ooms. No hing mo e han ha . A agmen ed app oach in planning and cons uc ion o en ook place (Ha ison e . al., 2000). Unpleasan l y he lack o a p ope in eg a ion is equen ly no iceable e en in newly cons uc ed buildings. Sys ems, pipes and duc s a e ung ace ully leaned on he buildings oo and on he walls (Figu e 1). On he whole a gene al building design e hinking is equi ed. A chi ec s, ci il enginee s and o he s akeholde s in ol ed in he design and cons uc ion p ocesses ha e o be conscious on he ele ancy conce ning he building se ices “accommoda ion” as well as he impo ance o hei suppo and enclosu e. The pape deals wi h a ese ch p ojec whe e he building se ices we e sized o p o iding occupan s com o bu – abo e all - hey a e designed o be ully in eg a ed in o he building. Figu e 1. Reale Mu ua Insu ance Headqua e (Tu in). Example o lack o in eg a ion be ween building design and i s se ices. Vi u io In e na ional jou nal o A chi ec u e Technology and Sus ainabili y Volume 2 15 2. THE RESEARCH PROJECT: MOTE2 Wi h he knowledge ha se ices would always be in eg a ed in o he s uc u es and sys ems o he buildings - since he ea lies s ages o he design p ocess - i was de ined he main objec i e o a esea ch p ojec en i led MOTE2 (Equipped and Eco- e icien Technological Module) o in eg a ing in a unique se ices cupboa d (o small s o e oom) he main building en i onmen al se ices. Pa icula ly he esea ch was ocused on he ollowing sys ems: hea ing and cooling; Domes ic Ho Wa e (DHW); mechanical en ila ion. In he esea ch p ojec o he se ices, such as: li ins alla ions, usually de ined as sel -con ained elemen s, and sani a y accommoda ions, usually de ined as u ili y se ices, we e no included. As mo e in English means a small pa icle o a e y iny pa o a subs ance, he p ojec laid down o use he smalles olume in he apa men s wi h a cupboa d whe e he en i onmen al se ices a e collec ed in he closes space possible wi hou sca i ying sa e y, main enance and epai s. An in e disciplina y eam was in ol ed in he esea ch p ojec : he Depa men o A chi ec u e and Design, DAD (Poli ecnico di To ino) and a leading en e p ise in p e ab ica ed buildings and p eassembled sys ems (Sa o o G oup S. .l.). The e u bishmen o he exis ing esiden ial building and new semide ached houses a e he main e e ence ma ke s o he Sa o o G oup. Acco ding o such assump ions he esea ch was ocused mainly on de eloping a se ices cupboa d i o housings e o i , new houses wi h cen al hea ing sys em and new houses wi h indipenden hea ing sys em o ou amilies1. Two I alian clima e zones (Figu e 2) we e conside ed in he scena io analysis and in he ene gy assessmen : Zone E (deg ee days a e age alue 2700) and Zone F (deg ee days a e age alue 3500). 3. METHODOLOGY The esea ch was o ganized acco ding o he phases he ea e desc ibed: sȩ phase 1: se ou o ene gy and en i onmen al equi emen s; sȩ phase 2: scena io analysis and ene gy assessmen ; sȩ phase 3: design and p o o yping; sȩ phase 4: alue p oposi ion de ini ion and pe o mance e alua ion. Figu e 2. I aly Clima e Zones. Zone E and Zone F we e chosen in he building ene gy analysis. 16 3.1 SET OUT OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS As men ioned en i onmen al building se ices no mally include ins alla ions o mee ing indoo com o equi emen s wi h ega ds o hea ing, cooling and en ila ion. In phase 1 a se o ules was de ined ma ching manda o y equi emen s ela ed o he Eu opean Di ec i es on ene gy e iciency o echnical s anda ds and speci ica ions go e ning he en i onmen al building design app oach. Speci ically he ollowing en i onmen al s anda ds we e analysed and adop ed: sȩ UNI EN 15643-1 and 2: 2010 - Sus ainabili y o cons uc ion wo ks; sȩ UNI 11277:2008 - Sus ainabili y in buildings. Such s anda ds enable o assess he en i onmen al li e cycle o new buildings and he en i onmen al pe o mances o he emaining se ice li e and he end-o -li e o exis ing buildings. Thus a b oade se o equi emen s was aken in o accoun acco ding o he well-known li e cycle design app oach. On he whole ou li e cycle s ages we e conside ed: p oduc ion s age; cons uc ion s age; use and main enance s ages; end-o -li e s age. Se en equi emen s we e associa ed o p oduc ion, including mechanical s eng hs o ma e ials, weigh o componen s and use o g een ma e ials. Two equi emen s we e associa ed o cons uc ion, comp ising assembling solu ions o easy epai s and eplacing. Thi een equi emen s we e associa ed o use s age, encompassing se ices main enance and occupan com o . Th ee equi emen s we e inally associa ed o end-o -li e, in ol ing ma e ials and componen s li e-span and ecycling. Fo each o he wen y- h ee equi emen s a ela ed pe o mance assessmen (quan i a i e o quali a i e) was p o ided, acco ding o he s anda ds and echnical speci ica ions, o ad-hoc implemen ed, in cohe ence wi h he s anda ds and echnical speci ica ions. As shown in he ollowing pa ag aphs he equi emen s se ou was meaning ul o he se ice cupboa d design, o sizing he se ices and o he ma e ials selec ion. 3.2 SCENARIO ANALYSIS AND ENERGY ASSESSMENT The scena io analysis ca ied ou e e s o a se o heo e ical building models wi h same building ea u es, en elope pe o mances and use s beha iou . Th ee ini ial building models e e ence sizes we e assumed in he analysis, wi h he ollowing condi ioend (use ull) loo a ea: Small Size (S= 50 m2), Medium Size (M=80 m2) and La ge Size (L = 120m2). A e wa ds he e e ence Sizes we e u he spli in wo ca ego ies acco ding o he ype o hea ing sys em. The building models ha we e s udied wi h a cen al hea ing sys em we e classi ied wi h he code X. Thus h ee building models we e classi ied as: S, M, L (independen hea ing sys em) and h ee building Table 1. Theo e ical building models ea u es Building Models Size S;XsM;XML; XL G oss Floo a ea (m2)60 95 140 Condi ioned loo a ea (m2)50 80 125 Condi ioned olume (m3)150 240 375 Numbe o s o ey abo e loo s (n) 1 1 1 A e age loo - o- loo heigh (m) 3 3 3 Su ace a ea- o- olume a io (m-1) 0.8 0.8 0.8 Vi u io In e na ional jou nal o A chi ec u e Technology and Sus ainabili y Volume 2 17 models we e classi ied as: XS, XM, XL (cen al hea ing sys em). The main e e ence buildings ea u es a e summa ised in he able 1. Wi h ega d o he buildings en elope, he models we e designed o mee he manda o y ene gy equi emen s in o ce ( e e ence yea 2016; UNI TS 11300: 1-2-3-4) o clima e zone E and F (Table 2). Table 2. Building en elope pe o mances Table 3. Use s and associa ed needs o he building models Fu he mo e in he scena io analysis we e de ined he numbe o use s and hei needs in e ms o indoo com o empe a u e and wa e consumed by washing and cooking. See able 3. In he scena io analysis was no conside ed he P ima y Ene gy Demand (PED) o hea ing and cooling. Such assump ion is di ec ly co ela ed o he NZEB app oach men ioned in he in oduc ion. The NZEB expec s an amoun o elec ici y o eed he building p oduced on-si e o nea by by enewable ene gy sou ces. In he building models he di ec ene gy was deduced acco ding o a e e ence amewo k: clima e da a; Building sys ems Zone E Zone F Wall sys ems (wi h he mal b idge co ec ion) Ex e nal insula ion laye Ex e nal insula ion laye Roo Sys em Ven ila ed oo , ex e nal insula ion laye Ven ila ed oo ex e nal insula ion laye Windows sys em Double glazing wi h one laye low-E Double glazing wi h one laye low-E A e age U- alue opaque ele- men s (W/m2K) Uop=0,25 Uop=0,22 A e age U- alue galazing ele- men s (W/m2K) Uw=1,7 Uw=1,5 Building models S,XSM,XML,XL N º o occupan s 2-3 3-4 5-6 DHW supply (l/day) 90 120 190 Occupancy schedule 24/24 hou s -7/7 days Indoo com o empe a u e Tin, H = 20º C Tin, C= 26º C building ea u es; use needs. Bu in such models i was no possibile se ing down he p ima y ene gy con e sion ac o s, since such ac o s (co ela ed o he indi ec ene gy alue) a e s ongly dependen on he enewable o ossil sou ces used; he p ima y ene gy i is no an easy p edic able based model, i s alue is in luenced by se e al condi ions such as he egional and na ional elec ici y ene gy-mix as well he ype o ene gy sou ces adop ed on si e, nea by o a om he building si e, e.g. al hough F ance and I aly a e each o he nea he elec ici y is p oduced wi h comple ely di e en sys ems. Thus due o he high numbe o a iables o conside o e e y building Size analysed - we e only accoun ed he di ec ene gy needs. Finally o he six scena ios no sola o in e nal gains we e aken in o accoun . I was assumed o ca ying ou an ene gy analysis h ough a conse a i e app oach. The hea ing and cooling loads and he DHW demand we e e e ed o a “design day” when se ices un a ull capaci y o ully loaded and he building models a e ully occupied by use s. The ene gy analysis was ca ied ou wi h ega ds o he six scena ios de eloped (Pianese, 2009 and UNI 10339:1995). The ollowing da a we e pe o med: he mal ene gy need o hea ing and cooling; he mal ene gy need o DHW; ai low a e (exchange and cooling). 18 Table 4 displays he ene gy analysis esul s conce ning wo o he building models analysed: M Size and XM Size. Fo he six scena ios he ypes o buildings se ices can a y ex emely acco ding o ene gy demands and o exchange ai low a e calcula ion. The esea ch p ojec s ou lined eigh op ions ha can be assumed as bes se ices nowadays a ailable on o he ma ke o he indoo en i onmen al com o and he domes ic wa e supply (Figu e 3) (ASHRAE 2006; D’Alessand is, 2011; Palmie i, 2011). Wi h ega d o igu e 3, on he le side a e shown he ypes building se ices aken in o accoun in he esea ch p ojec . Acco ding o he ene gy analysis ca ied ou , he code S ma ched wi h a numbe ( om 1 o 8) shows he sui able con igu a ions planned o p o ide hea ing, cooling, DHW and ai changes. Fo e e y building model o deducing he numbe and he ype o se ices o use i is necessa y ollowing he do ed line. Fo example he S.1 con igu a ion p o ides a hyd onic hea ing sys em eed wi h elec ici y (H.1); a DHW hea exchange connec ed o he he mal s o age (D.1); a an-coil (C.2 and AT.1); an elec ic en ila ion acili y (AE.1). While o cooling, ai dehumidi ica ion and ai exchange se ices he S.1 con igu a ion p o ides a sys em (C.2+AT.1+AE.1) ha in eg a es a wo-way low en ila ion sys em (blowe s, hea eco e y uni and ai plenum) and a cooling ea men on he in ake ai (di ec -expansion coils uelled by e ige an gas). Fu he mo e o e e y analysed se ice a e iden i ied he sys em ea u es (e.g. H.1 is a se ice comp ising a hyd onic hea ing sys em, a ank o he s o age and an in ake mani old). Fu he mo e he building se ice sys ems a e classi ied bo h acco ding o he unc ion and o he main luid used (gas, ai o wa e ). Finally he S.7 and S.8 a e he con igu a ions i o buildings wi h cen al hea ing sys ems. Among he eigh e e ence con igu a ions a couple we e chosen (see igu e 3, he highligh ed con igu a ions S.1 and S.7). The selec ion was based on he equi emen s se ou in phase 1 wi h ega ds o use s age. The o me - S.1 - is sui able o independen hea ing sys ems; he la e – S.7 – (as men ioned) is Table 4. The mal needs and building se ices sizing pa ame e s. Summa y able. Figu e 3. The building se ices op ions analysed and he possible con igu a ions aimed a p o iding hea ing, cooling, Domes ic Ho Wa e and en ila ion in he building models. Building Models: M Size; XM Size Clima e Zone E F Hea ing Ene gy need (kWh/m2)40 56 Max. he mal load (W/m2)28 33 Cooling Ene gy need (kWh/m2)16 16 Max. he mal load (W/m2)45 35 DHW (Domes ic Ho Wa e ) Ene gy need (kWh/y) 1270 Wa e need (l/ day) 120 Max. DWH low a e (l/min) 25 Max. DWH emp. supply (Cº) 45 Ai -Flow a e Exchange ai - low a e (m3/h) 150 Cooling ai . low a e (m3/h) 1050 750 Vi u io In e na ional jou nal o A chi ec u e Technology and Sus ainabili y Volume 2 19 20 sui able o cen al hea ing sys ems. No e ha in he S.7 con igu a ion he cooling needs a e me by he mechanical en ila ion sys em. 3.3 DESIGN AND PROTOTYPING Following comple ion he ene gy assessmen o he six building models and he choice o he building se ices, he esea ch p ojec was ocused on designing he assembly o se ices hemsel es. The se ices cupboa d design was basically ca ied ou h ough a co ela ion p ocess among he se ices ha we e selec ed and he equi emen s se ou in phase 1. As a ule he design was in luenced by he ollowing pe o mances: du abili y o se ices; easy in eg a ion o se ices in o he buildings; lexibili y o he se ices o be used in di e en housing condi ions (A aianese, 2008). The sizing o he building se ices and he s udy o hei li e s ages we e key aspec s. Pa icula ly he s udy was ocused on he ollowing cha ac e is ics: sȩ se ices weigh (kg); sȩ se ices en elope (m3); sȩ se up p ocedu es (e.g. minimum space in cm a ound he se ice o pe mi hei ins alla ion in sa e y and p ope ly condi ions); sȩ main enance equency (numbe and ime o epai s and eplacemen s); sȩ disposal p ocedu es and se ices was e managemen . In his phase a se o eal building se ices was selec ed and compa ed o he mal and en ila ion needs o each model analysed. Based on a e age alues in e ms o leng h, wid h and heigh , he building se ices we e shaped and ske ched-ou as a simpli ied en elope. Fu he o each shaped se ices was associa ed a colou . The co e igu e - wi h e e ence o S.7 con igu a ion - shows he se ices needed o he M Size building model. A numbe iden i ies a se ice, while a numbe and a le e e e s o a combina ion o se ices. In pa icula in igu e 3: 1 and 1b we e ma ched o iden i ing he hea ing se ice; 2 was ma ched o DHW sys em; 3 was ma ched o he combina ion o mechanical en ila ion sys em and cooling se ice; 4 was ma ched o space equi ed o hos ing he elec ical de ices. Fo he M model he cupboa d is 2,00 m leng h; 0,8 m wid h and 2,40 m heigh . As shown in igu e 4 he cupboa d heigh (less han 2,70 m) makes a ailable an easy echnological in eg a ion bo h in he new buildings and in he exis ing ones. On he whole he se ices cupboa d design was like a Te is® game. The cupboa d en elope de i es by he bes combina ion among all necessa y shapes. An analysis and a selec ion o ma e ials and componen s implemen ed he se ices cupboa d design. Consis en ly o he design app oach adop ed o sizing and shaping he building se ices, he ma e ials and componen s we e so ed - once again - acco ding o he equi emen s amewo k de ined in phase 1. The wood based panels we e assumed as sui able solu ion. Such selec ion is he ou come o a co ela ion p ocess among pe o mances ela ed o: mechanical esis ance; li e span; ib a ion dampen; noise educ ion; embodied ene gy and embodied ca bon used o he panelling manu ac u ing; p oduc ion cos s; dis ance o po en ial supplie s. A solid wood panelling was designed o he se ice cupboa d shell (50 mm hickness) and o he pa i ioning (40 mm). Pa icula ly he pa i ioning was help ul o de ine he ca i y o s o e he elec ical de ices and he wi e connec ions. Based on he de ailed cupboa d d awings a i s mock-up – named as he esea ch p ojec : MOTE2 – was inally buil up. To ge a quickly echnological assessmen a couple o wo kshops we e a anged ( he numbe was in luenced by esea ch p ojec du a ion: 18 mon hs). The wo kshops we e aimed a assessing he achie abili y o he building se ices design along wi h he ma e ials selec ion ca ied ou . Du ing he wo kshops Sa o o G oup laid-down o build he S Size building model wi h independen hea ing sys em. While he mock-up was assembled some li le imp o emen s o he p e iews d awings we e necessa y. Ne e heless he me hodological app oach