Curriculum and lived experience. Tensions lived by teachers in the process of curriculum making
Abstract
En esta comunicación profundizamos en las tensiones que vive el profesorado cuando las pretensiones del plan curricular y la experiencia vivida en clase no coinciden. A través de una indagación narrativa ahondamos en la experiencia de un docente de Educación Secundaria. A través de un análisis exegético, ponemos en conversación el relato del profesor con la literatura científica, tratando de abrir preguntas e hilos de pensamientos que ayuden a que las tensiones puedan ser vividas de manera fructífera.
Full text
CURRICULUM AND LIVED EXPERIENCE: NARRATIVE INQUIRY ON
TENSIONS LIVED BY TEACHERS IN THE PROCESS OF CURRICULUM MAKING
1
Diego Ma ín Alonso
Nie es Blanco Ga cía
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This pape is pa o a la ge esea ch p ojec (EDU2016-77576-P) linked wi h Spanish
and Eu opean conce ns abou cu iculum and educa i e ela ionships. The Eu opean
s a egic amewo k Educa ion and T aining 2020 unde lines ha cu iculum e o m
plays a e y impo an ole in mode nising he educa ion sys em. Fo his eason, o e
he pas decade he e ha e been signi ican cu icula e o ms, bo h a na ional and
Eu opean le el, wi h he pu pose o imp o ing educa ion and oca ional aining
(CEDEFOP, 2012) Bu , wha is cu iculum? Wha is i pu pose? How can i help o
imp o e educa ion?
Ra ely he e is a coincidence be ween he planned cu iculum, wha is expec ed o lea n
by s uden s and wha hey eally lea n in hei expe ience a school. Then we could use
and a end o wo di e en ideas o which may become he o igin o ensions in eaching
p ac ice: cu icula plan and li ed cu iculum.
Fo ou esea ch, we ake he no ion “cu icula plan” as a symbolic objec (S enhouse,
1987) ha ga he s he ideas o all s akeholde s ha a e in e es ed, o di e en easons,
on gi ing hei opinion abou wha mus be included in he class oom (Olson, 2000).
Cu icula plan is amed in a adi ional cu icula pe spec i e, which akes i as cou se
o s udies, namely, as objec i es and con en s ha a e expec ed o be acqui ed by
s uden s a he end o a school pe iod.
Gi en ha expe ience (li ed cu iculum) p ecedes any kind o lea ning, aking educa ion
me ely in e ms o ins umen al applica ion se s limi s on he au onomy and g ow h o
s uden s, since hey a e seen as an “objec i e objec ” sepa a e om hei con ex and
expe ience (Van Manen, 2003).
In o de o answe o he eali y o li ed cu iculum, Clandinin & Connelly (1992) c ea ed
he concep “cu iculum making”, which unde s and ha cu iculum is expe ience,
which is li ed in a pa icula si ua ion and ela ionally (Dewey, 1997; Schwab, 2013), so
i is cons uc ed and econs uc ed na a i ely h ough he expe ience (Connelly &
Clandinin, 1988).
When cu iculum is unde s ood as a plan o cou se o s udies, i is o go en ha is he
educa i e ela ionship wha o igins and p omo es he cons uc ion o knowledge and,
hence, makes lea ning possible. On his way eache s a e li ing a con inuous ension
1
Pape p esen a ion a ECER17 – he Eu opean Con e ence on Educa ional Resea ch, o ganized by he
Eu opean Educa ional Resea ch Associa ion, celeb a ed in Copenhagen in Augus 2017.
be ween wo di e en oices: he equi emen s o cu icula p og ams and hei
expe ience in he class oom wi h s uden s.
F om his conce n a ise he esea ch ques ions: Wha ensions do exis be ween
cu icula plan and li ed expe ience a school? How can eache s ackle ensions when
cu icula plan con lic s wi h he li e o he class oom? Consequen ly, in o de o answe
o hese ques ions we o mula e he esea ch p oposal: del e in o ensions li ed by
eache s be ween cu icula plan and li ed expe ience. This knowledge ies o open
new lines o hough which can help o li e ensions in a ui ul way (Con e as, 2016),
ins ead o o igina e con lic s and disag eemen s wi h educa ional p ac ice.
We alk in e ms o ensions because i allows us o e lec he eeling ha eache s li e
when hey ind hemsel es in he middle o opposing o ces (Be y, 2007): on one hand
a e he objec i es and con en s o he cu icula plan and, on he o he hand, he
necessi y o a ending o he pa icula li e o he class oom.
Tensions can be li ed in wo di e en ways: ei he as a disag eemen be ween opposing
o ces o as an impe us mo ing o ask and explo e new ways o cons uc ing he
educa i e ela ionship, i means, in a ui ul way (Con e as, 2016). We do no y o
sol e o emo e ensions because ambi alences a e in insic o eaching p o ession.
Ra he , he goal mus be o ecognize hem and manage he si ua ion.
METHDO AND METHODOLOGY
This pape is pa o a na a i e inqui y made in a High School in Málaga (Spain).
Na a i e inqui y (Clandinin, Pusho , & O , 2007) pays a en ion o e e y singula li e as
cons uc ed in ela ion wi h o he people, in a pa icula si ua ion and space, so i is
ocused on li es jus as hey a e li ed and old. In o he wo ds, we do no y o look o
gene alizable knowledge o absolu e u hs, bu ou in en ion is o ge he sense o
expe iences and imagine possible al e na i es (Clandinin, 2013) on he landscape o
ensions ha eache s li e.
A main ques ion guides us in he esea ch: Wha ensions do eache s li e in he p ocess
o cu iculum making? In o de o y o del e in o his conce n we ha e wo ked wi h
Juan, a compu e science eache . We could de ine him as a eache who akes ca e o
his ela ionship wi h s uden s, gi es classes keeping in mind s uden s´ li es and shows a
e lec i e a i ude owa ds his own eaching p ac ice. The pu pose ha leads us o wo k
wi h him is hinking om his expe ience and his s o y (Blanco, Molina, & López, 2015),
del ing in o he unde s anding o eache p o ession and i s complexi ies.
Fieldwo k s a ed in Sep embe 2016, we a e ga he ing in o ma ion weekly by eco ding
in e iews and class oom obse a ion (Sie a & Blanco, 2015; Van Manen, 2003). This
pape is ocused on a speci ic momen o he schola yea in which he educa ional
inspec ion asked he educa ional eam o he high school o make a signi ican change
in hei class oom planning, acco ding o he new Spanish educa ional legisla ion.
Though he ela ionship wi h cu icula plan is cons an , he sho ime pe iod ha
eache s had and he i ulence o he demands made ha ensions (which no mally a e
calmed) inc eased and we e li ed wi h a highe powe . Fo his eason, we concen a e
he pape on his expe ience, in o de o o e si ua ions in which ensions be ween
cu icula plan and li ed cu iculum a e palpable.
RESULTS
Teache s´ p o essional landscape (Clandinin & Connelly, 1995) is ull o oices ha y o
say wha is impo an o do by eache s a school. Beyond he need o iden i y hese
s akeholde s (Gimeno, 1988), wha is eally impo an is unde s anding hei ela ion
wi h eache s´ cu icula si ua ion, gi en ha hey do no wo k in isola ion bu in a
complex and dynamic ela ionship wi h he communi y (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988).
In o de o hink abou ensions li ed by eache s in his angled landscape, we ha e
loca ed hem in ou di e en dimensions:
- Needs: cu icula plan is made unde he assump ion ha e e y agen in ol ed
knows s uden s’ needs and i is designed wi h he pu pose o co e ing hese
in e ed needs. Howe e , when eache s come in o he class oom, s uden s can
exp ess needs ha may be di e en (Noddings, 2005) and migh con lic wi h
he in e ed ones.
- Language: eache is loca ed be ween wo di e en languages (Bá cena, La osa,
& Mèlich, 2006). On one side, cu icula plan p omo es a echnical language, wi h
a ocabula y ha ex ols planning, objec i es and e alua ion o esul s. On he
o he hand, eache s mus manage a language o expe ience, wi h a pedagogical
ocabula y and ocused on educa ional p ac ice.
- Time: cu icula plan es ablishes con en s ha eache s mus achie e in a
p ede ined ime pe iod. These imes a e o en ixed ollowing echnical and
adminis a i e c i e ia, wha gene a es s ess and ushes o achie e
p ede e mined objec i es.
- Unce ain y: while eache s ollow he de ailed sequence o con en s and
objec i es ixed on he cu icula plan, hey ha e o manage wi h ension ha
a ises when hei eali y does no i wi h he p ede ined p og am. The way in
which ensions a e sol ed will depend on he eedom ha eache s ha e
a ending o he singula i y o hei class oom and using he p og am as a
oadmap and no as a s ic p o ocol o ollow.
REFERENCIAS
Bá cena, F., La osa, J., & Mèlich, J. C. (2006). Pensa la educación desde la expe iencia.
Re is a Po uguesa de Pedagogia, (40-1), 233-259.
Be y, A. (2007). Reconcep ualizing Teache Educa o Knowledge as Tensions: Explo ing
he ension be ween aluing and econs uc ing expe ience. S udying Teache
Educa ion, 3(2), 117-134. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/17425960701656510
Blanco, N., Molina, M. D., & López, A. (2015). Ap ende de la escuela pa a da ida a la
uni e sidad. Re is a in e uni e si a ia de o mación del p o eso ado, (82), 61-76.
CEDEFOP. (2012). Cu iculum e o m in Eu ope he impac o lea ning ou comes.
Luxembou g: Publica ions O ice o he Eu opean Union. Recupe ado a pa i de
h p://www.cede op.eu opa.eu/EN/Files/5529_en.pd
Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Engaging in na a i e inqui y. Walnu C eek, Cali o nia: Le Coas
P ess, Inc.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teache as cu iculum make . En P. W. Jackson
(Ed.), Handbook o esea ch on cu iculum: a p ojec o he Ame ican Educa ional
Resea ch Associa ion (pp. 363-401). New Yo k: MacMillan.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1995). Teache s’ P o essional Knowledge Landscapes:
Teache S o ies S o ies o Teache s School S o ies S o ies o Schools. Educa ional
Resea che , 25(3), 24-30. h ps://doi.o g/10.3102/0013189X025003024
Clandinin, D. J., Pusho , D., & O , A. M. (2007). Na iga ing Si es o Na a i e Inqui y.
Jou nal o Teache Educa ion, 58(1), 21-35.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0022487106296218
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teache s as Cu iculum Planne s. Na a i es o
Expe ience. New Yo k: Teache s College P ess.
Con e as, J. (Ed.). (2016). Tensiones uc í e as: explo ando el sabe pedagógico en la
o mación del p o eso ado : una mi ada desde la expe iencia. Ba celona:
Oc aed o.
Dewey, J. (1997). Expe ience and educa ion (1s Touchs one ed). New Yo k: Touchs one.
Gimeno, J. (1988). El cu iculum: una e lexión sob e la p ác ica. Mad id: Ediciones
Mo a a.
Noddings, N. (2005). Iden i ying and esponding o needs in educa ion. Camb idge
Jou nal o Educa ion, 35(2), 147-159.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/03057640500146757
Olson, M. R. (2000). Cu iculum as a Mul is o ied P ocess. Canadian Jou nal o Educa ion
/ Re ue canadienne de l’éduca ion, 25(3), 169-187.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/1585952
Schwab, J. J. (2013). The p ac ical: a language o cu iculum. Jou nal o Cu iculum
S udies, 45(5), 591-621. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00220272.2013.809152
Sie a, J. E., & Blanco, N. (2015). El ap endizaje de la escucha en la in ese igación
educa i a. Inédi o.
S enhouse, L. (1987). La in es igación como base de la enseñanza. Mad id: Mo a a.
Van Manen, M. (2003). In es igación educa i a y expe iencia i ida: ciencia humana
pa a una pedagogía de la acción y la sensibilidad. Ba celona: Idea Books.