Full text
Mother-child interaction within the Zone of Proximal Development. Impact of adult educational level and socio-affective proximity on the effectiveness of tutoring. Barajas, C. (University of Málaga, Spain) Clemente R.A. (University Jaume I, Spain) VI International Conference “Early Childhood Care and Education” Lomonosov Moscow State University –MSU (Moscow, Russia). 10-13 May, 2017 Abstract Research problem. Adult-child interaction within the zone of proximal development plays a central role in child cognitive development. The effectiveness of teaching to promote learner competence during a joint problem solving session depends on the accuracy of the zone of proximal development perceived in the mind of the tutor. Therefore, it is related to such variables as the tutor’s educational level (formal education promotes more abstract and flexible mental representations of the cognitive demands of the task) and the socio-affective proximity between interlocutors (shared experiences enable the tutor to determine the zone of sensitivity to instruction and to form a more accurate hypothesis of the child’s level of competence and their need for assistance). Aims and methods. This study aims to estimate the effects of adult educational levels and socioaffective proximity between interlocutors on the effectiveness of informal tutoring. The participants comprised 66 boys and girls aged 3-5 years and 66 women with different educational levels and varying degrees of socio-affective proximity with the child with whom they interacted (mothers who lived with their children, mothers who visited their children at residential care centers, and women previously unknown to the children). Dyadic interaction in a classification task was assessed with microgenetic analysis using a codification system following sociogenetic principles. Results. Educational level does not predict tutoring effectiveness; socio-affective proximity does. Mothers with low educational levels are effective tutors when they maintain a high degree of socioaffective proximity with their children. The principal keys to effective tutoring associated with socioaffective proximity are: a) encouraging the autonomy of the child: avoiding both initial aid when placing each new piece and highest level aid which solves completely the operation; and b) adjusting the assistance provided according to the competence demonstrated by the child: following the contingency rule (especially in the provision of proactive aids), and temporarily tolerating errors, providing the opportunity for the child to become aware of their own mistakes. Conclusion and findings. These findings are noteworthy to design future social intervention programs focused to instruct parents with low educational level on the importance of frequent and appropriate interactions with their children. Keywords: informal tutoring, zone of proximal development, ZDP, tutorial effectiveness, educational level, socio-affective proximity
References Carr, A., & Pike, A. (2012). Maternal scaffolding behavior: Links with parenting style and maternal education. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 543-551. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context, 1, 39-64. Chavajay, P., & Rogoff, B. (2002). Schooling and traditional collaborative social organization of problem solving by mayan mothers and children. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 55-66. Conner, D. B., & Cross, D. R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of the presence, efficacy and stability of maternal scaffolding during informal problem-solving interactions. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 315-334. Eisenberg, A. R. (2002). Maternal teaching talk within families of mexican descent: Influences of task and socioeconomic status. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24(2), 206-224. Fidalgo, Z., & Pereira, F. (2005). Socio-cultural differences and the adjustment of mothers' speech to their children's cognitive and language comprehension skills. Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1-21. Kermani, H., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Maternal scaffolding in the child's zone of proximal development across tasks: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 3052. Lunkenheimer, E. S., Kemp, C. J., & Albrecht, E. C. (2013). Contingencies in mother-child teaching interactions and behavioral regulation and dysregulation in early childhood. ().Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Mulvaney, M. K., McCartney, K., Bub, K. L., & Marshall, N. L. (2006). Determinants of dyadic scaffolding and cognitive outcomes in first graders. Parenting, 6(4), 297-320. Nader-Grosbois, N., & Lefèvre, N. (2012). Parents' regulation and self-regulation and performance in children with intellectual disability in problem-solving using physical materials or computers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(2), 449-460. Salonen, P., Lepola, J., & Vauras, M. (2007). Scaffolding interaction in parent-child dyads: Multimodal analysis of parental scaffolding with task and non-task oriented children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(1), 77-96. Sanagavarapu, P. (2012). Does culture intersect with gender of the child in mothers' guidance of preschoolers' puzzle solving? International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 7(1), 31-40. Sun, J., & Rao, N. (2012). Scaffolding interactions with preschool children: Comparisons between chinese mothers and teachers across different tasks. Merrill - Palmer Quarterly, 58(1), 110-140. Tamis-LeMonda, C., Sze, I. N., Ng, F. F., Kahana-Kalman, R., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013). Maternal teaching during play with four-year-olds: Variation by ethnicity and family resources. Merrill - Palmer Quarterly, 59(3), 361-398. Teichman, J. R., & Contreras-Grau, J. (2006). Acculturation and teaching styles among young mainland puerto rican mothers. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(1), 84-101.
