scieee Open visual document viewer

Skeletal Class III Malocclusion in an Adult Patient – Orthodontics versus Orthognathic Surgery: Is there Another Alternative?

Pérez Varela, Juan Carlos; Iglesias Sánchez, Beatriz; López Vila, Miriam

Abstract

Class III malocclusions are considered to be one of the most difficult problems to treat. Due to the significant number of patients with Class III malocclusion who cannot undergo orthognathic surgery for different reasons, we have proposed an alternative treatment that we have called surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) + temporary anchorage devices (TADs) which allows solving mild and moderate Class III malocclusion combined with maxillary compression, obtaining acceptable esthetic and functional results. We present a case report of an adult female with skeletal Class III malocclusion with compression in the maxillary and mandibular asymmetry, who was treated with SARPE + TADs. The result is acceptable in terms of occlusion function, esthetic of the smile, and facial esthetics

Full text

© 2018 APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Published by Wol e s Kluwe - Medknow 161 Add ess o co espondence: D . Juan Ca los Pé ez Va ela, C/Dou o Teixei o N 12 1, 15701, San iago De Compos ela, A Co uña, Spain. E‑mail: jcpe [email p o ec ed], clinicadelno [email p o ec ed] Access his a icle online Websi e: www.apospublica ions.com DOI: 10.4103/apos.apos_63_18 Quick Response Code: Abs ac Class III malocclusions a e conside ed o be one o he mos di icul p oblems o ea . Due o he signi ican numbe o pa ien s wi h Class III malocclusion who canno unde go o hogna hic su ge y o di e en easons, we ha e p oposed an al e na i e ea men ha we ha e called su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion (SARPE) + empo a y ancho age de ices (TADs) which allows sol ing mild and mode a e Class III malocclusion combined wi h maxilla y comp ession, ob aining accep able es he ic and unc ional esul s. We p esen a case epo o an adul emale wi h skele al Class III malocclusion wi h comp ession in he maxilla y and mandibula asymme y, who was ea ed wi h SARPE + TADs. The esul is accep able in e ms o occlusion unc ion, es he ic o he smile, and acial es he ics. Keywo ds: Case epo , Class III malocclusion, maxilla y comp ession, o hodon ics, su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion + empo a y ancho age de ices Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien – O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? Case Repo Juan Ca los Pé ez Va ela, Bea iz Iglesias Sánchez, Mi iam López Vila Depa men o O hodon ics, Uni e si y o San iago de Compos ela, Galicia, Spain How o ci e his a icle: Pé ez Va ela JC, Sánchez BI, Vila ML. Skele al class III malocclusion in an adul pa ien – o hodon ics e sus o hogna hic su ge y: Is he e ano he al e na i e? APOS T ends O hod 2018;8:161-7. This is an open access jou nal, and a icles a e dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion‑NonComme cial‑Sha eAlike 4.0 License, which allows o he s o emix, weak, and build upon he wo k non‑comme cially, as long as app op ia e c edi is gi en and he new c ea ions a e licensed unde he iden ical e ms. Fo ep in s con ac : ep in [email protected] In oduc ion Acco ding o he classi ica ion o D . Angle, Class III is he malocclusion in which he es ibula g oo e o he lowe i s mola is loca ed mesial o he mesiobuccal cusp o he uppe i s mola .[1] I is necessa y o dis inguish a den al Class III malocclusion om skele al one because in he second, he malocclusion is due o a disp opo ion in he bony bases, which may be due o a e ogna hism o he uppe jaw, a mandibula p ogna hism, o a combina ion o bo h.[2,3] The highes p e alence o Class III malocclusions is ound in Asia (12%) and Eu ope, alues anging be ween 1.5% and 5.3% and in Caucasians in No h Ame ica be ween 1% and 4%.[4,5] The skele al de o mi ies a e he esul o he p esence o anomalies in he posi ion o he maxilla and mandible. In malocclusions in which a single bone is in ol ed, maxilla y e usion is mo e common (19.5%) han a mandibula p o usion (19.2%), al hough he p esence o hese wo ea u es in a combined o m is mo e common (30.2%).[6,7] In he ea men o skele al Class III malocclusion in adul s, he e a e basically wo ea men al e na i es: o hodon ic ea men and su gical ea men combined wi h o hodon ics. The choice o one o he o he will depend on se e al ac o s; one o he main ones will be he deg ee o bone disc epancy, since o hodon ic camou lage can only be done when Class III malocclusion is mild. On he o he hand, no all pa ien s a e willing o unde go su gical ea men , due o i s cos , in asi e na u e, o heal h condi ions, despi e being he ideal op ion om he o hodon ic poin o iew.[8‑10] In cases in which, in addi ion o he sagi al p oblem, he e is a ans e sal p oblem due o maxilla y comp ession, i is possible o pe o m a segmen ed Le Fo (combining Le Fo I wi h os eo omies ha allow disjunc ion). Ano he op ion is he p e ious execu ion o a su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion (SARPE).[11‑13] Fede ico He nández Al a o desc ibes he SARPE pe o med on 257 pa ien s, unde local anes hesia and seda ion, making a comple e Le Fo I wi hou mobiliza ion, which achie es a o al elease and bipa i ion o he maxilla ha gua an ees skele al dis ac ion and p e en s a damaging load a he den al le el.[14] Due o he numbe o pa ien s wi h Class III malocclusion wi h maxilla y Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? 162 APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 Figu e 1: Ini ial ex ao al pho og aphs Figu e 2: Ini ial in ao al pho og aphs Figu e 3: Ini ial ele adiog aph and o hopan omog aphy Figu e 4: Cone beam compu ed omog aphy be o e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion comp ession who e use ea men wi h o hogna hic su ge y, we ha e p oposed a less in asi e solu ion o he pa ien , mo e economically a o dable, and ha ob ains e y good esul s, bo h es he ically and unc ionally. This al e na i e consis s in he pe o mance o a SARPE unde local anes hesia and seda ion, and he placemen o minipla es, wo supe io s a he le el o he p e ygoid and wo in e io s in he symphysis, be ween he la e al inciso s and he canines. The case p esen ed is a Class III malocclusion wi h maxilla y comp ession, mandibula asymme y, and de ia ion o he lowe line o he igh . Al hough he ideal op ion o co ec all he p oblems was o hogna hic su ge y, he pa ien decided o unde go ea men o SARPE + empo a y ancho age de ices (TADs), assuming ha he mandibula asymme y would no be co ec ed. Diagnosis and e iology The pa ien is an adul o 28 yea s old p esen ing wi h ans e sal and sagi al hypoplasia o he maxilla, skele al asymme y, de ia ion o he lowe line o he igh , and c owding. Clinical on al examina ion e ealed an asymme ical ace. The p o ile assessmen e ealed conca e p o ile, wi h an e io acial di e gence, la cheekbone con ou , and pu e es he ics o he smile in he on al and la e al iews [Figu e 1]. When we analyzed he smile in de ail, we obse ed c owding, poo coo dina ion o he den al midlines, and he uppe ee h a e wo n [Figu e 1]. In ao al examina ion e ealed Class III mola and canine ela ion on bo h sides. The mandibula midline was de ia ed 4.5 mm o he igh . The pa ien had uppe and lowe c owding and comp ession in he maxilla [Figu e 2]. Tempo omandibula join (TMJ) examina ion e ealed a li le disc epancy be ween cen ic ela ion and cen ic occlusion, and he pa ien complained o pain in he join . Cephalome ic examina ion e ealed e ogna hic maxilla (SNA 73º) and Class III malocclusion (Wi s ‑10mm and ANB ‑4º) [Figu e 3 and Table 1]. T ea men p og ess Due o he la ge numbe o adul pa ien s who p esen Class III malocclusion bu decide no o unde go o hogna hic su ge y, despi e being he ideal op ion, o di e en easons explained abo e, we decided o de ise an in e media e op ion be ween camou lage and o hogna hic su ge y. When a SARPE is pe o med o sol e maxilla y comp ession, he pala ine and p e ygoid su u es a e eleased. I we also add some minipla es a he le el o he Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 163 p e ygoids each side by es ibula and o he s be ween he lowe la e al inciso s and he lowe canines by es ibula , we can pull o wa d he maxilla, bene i ing om he elease o he p e ygoid su u es made in he SARPE. We ha e de ined his echnique as SARPE + TADs. O hodon ic ea men combined wi h SARPE + TADs consis s o h ee phases: p esu gical o hodon ic ea men , su gical ea men , and pos su gical o hodon ic ea men . Table 1: Cephalome ic alues Value Mean Ini ial T ea men p e‑SARPE Final SNA (º) 82±3.5 73 73 76.5 SNPg (º) 80±3.5 77 77 77 SNB (º) 80±2 77.5 77.5 77.5 ANPg (º) 2±1.5 −4.5 −4.5 −1 ANB (º) 2±1 −4 −4 −0.5 SN/ANS‑PNS (º) 8±3.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 SN/GoGn (º) 33±2.5 38 38 38 ANS‑PNS/GoGn (º) 25±6.0 20 20 20 +1/ANS‑PNS (º) 110±6.0 108 108 119.5 −1/GoGn (º) 94±7.0 83 91 82 O e je (mm) 3.5±2.5 −0.3 −2 0.3 O e bi e (mm) 2±2.5 1.7 1.5 2 In e incisal (º) 132±6.0 147 142 137 Wi s 0±1 −10 −10 −4 SARPE: Su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Figu e 5: Tele adiog aph be o e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Figu e 7: In ao al pho og aphs be o e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Figu e 8: Ex ao al pho og aphs a e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Figu e 6: Ex ao al pho og aphs be o e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Figu e 9: In ao al pho og aphs a e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? 164 APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 Figu e 10: Cone-beam compu ed omog aphy a e maxilla y expansion Figu e 11: In ao al pho og aphs du ing he ea men Figu e 12: Final ex ao al pho og aphs Figu e 13: Final in ao al pho og aphs Figu e 14: Final in ao al scan (CBCT) o measu e he ans e sal p oblem [Figu es 4 and 5]. The pa ien i s needed a su ge y o expand he maxilla y by SARPE echnique be o e he placemen o b acke s in he uppe a ch. In ou p o ocol, his su ge y is conside ed ambula o y because i is pe o med unde local anes hesia and seda ion on an ou pa ien basis in 30 min [Figu es 6‑9]. Nex , he pa ien unde wen he ope a ion o SARPE + TADs. The ac i a ion was 3 u ns pe day, and an in e maxilla y elas ic was placed om he igh uppe minipla e o he lowe igh one and ano he om he uppe le minipla e o he lowe le one, wi h o ces o 200–400 g pe side o app oxima ely 24 h a day ( he pa ien can only emo e hem o ea and b ush he ee h) [Figu e 8]. Once he desi ed expansion was ob ained, we made a CBCT o con i m ha he expansion was comple ely co ec ed and o measu e he sagi al ad ance o he maxilla [Figu e 10]. One mon h la e o he las u n o he sc ew, we bonded he b acke s in he uppe a ch and we closed he dias ema and coo dina ed he den al a ches o achie e an In pa ien s wi h skele al p oblems and TMJ pain, we p opose o use a spli in uppe a ch, and we decompensa e he lowe a ch o make su e which is he eal ans e sal and sagi al p oblem o 4 mon hs. A e his i s phase, we did a ele adiog aph [Figu e 4 and Table 1] and a cone‑beam compu ed omog aphy Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 165 Figu e 15: Final cone-beam compu ed omog aphy Figu e 16: Final ele adiog aph Figu e 17: Supe posi ion o he acings be o e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion (blue) and inal ( ed) on he an e io c anial base adequa e occlusion and es he ics o he smile ( o cen e he midlines, ob ain mola and canine in Class I, achie e o e bi e wi h in e maxilla y elas ics, and ge a co ec smile a ch) [Figu e 11]. The elas ics o he minipla es con inued o be placed un il he pa ien ’s sagi al p oblem was esol ed. Du ing he ea men , we used he ollowing a ches: • Alignmen : 0.014 NiTi and 0.016 NiTi • Le eling: 0.017 × 0.025 NiTi. • To que and space closu e: 0.019 × 0.025 s eel wi e • Finishing: 0.018 s eel wi e wi h bindings. T ea men esul s A e he ea men , he b acke s and TADs we e emo ed and inal adiog aphs we e aken. The esul a e he ea men is accep able. We ob ained a signi ican imp o emen in alignmen , occlusion unc ion, coo dina ion o he midlines, and es he ics o he smile in on al and la e al iews and acial es he ics. The mandibula asymme y was no co ec ed since o hogna hic su ge y would ha e been necessa y o his pu pose [Figu es 12 and 13]. The lingual occlusion is accep able, and we can see i wi h he den al scan [Figu e 14]. In he CBCT, we can obse e ha he oo s a e in he middle o he al eola bone, and he e is no oo eso p ion [Figu e 15]. Cephalome ic examina ion showed an ad ance o he maxilla (SNA 76.5º), a Class I malocclusion (Wi s ‑4 and ANB ‑0.5º) and a co ec in e incisal angle (137º) [Figu e 16 and Table 1]. The main changes ob ained in he ea men o SARPE + TADs in he pa ien a e as ollows [Table 1]: • The e ha e been no o a ions o he maxilla y o mandibula plane • The Class III malocclusion has been comple ely co ec ed (ANB om −4º o −0.5º, Wi s om −10 o −4 mm) • P ope ad ancemen o maxilla has been achie ed (SNA om 73º o 76.5º) • The inclina ion o he uppe inciso (119.5º) and he lowe (92º) is co ec ed • The in e incisal angle is co ec ed (137º) • The o e je dec eased om ‑2 o 0mm. In o de o isualize he changes p oduced a e he ea men o he pa ien wi h SARPE + TADs, he supe posi ion o he acings a e SARPE and inal, on he an e io c anial base, was made, showing all he Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? 166 APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 Figu e 19: Compa ison be ween ini ial and inal in ao al pho og aphs Figu e 18: Compa ison be ween ini ial and inal ex ao al pho og aphs Figu e 20: Re en ion ex ao al pho og aphs changes p e iously exposed [Figu e 17], and a compa ison be ween in ao al and ex ao al pho og aphs was made [Figu es 18 and 19]. Two yea s la e , he occlusion unc ion is s able. The es he ic o he smile is accep able. The pa ien does no ha e TMJ p oblems [Figu es 20 and 21]. Conclusion In cases whe e he e a e a maxilla y comp ession and a mild o mode a e Class III malocclusion, and/o when he pa ien ejec s he op ion o o hogna hic su ge y due o i s economic cos , heal h condi ions, o in asi e na u e, he ea men o SARPE + TADs is an op ion ha ob ains e y Va ela, e al.: Skele al Class III Malocclusion in an Adul Pa ien -O hodon ics e sus O hogna hic Su ge y: Is he e Ano he Al e na i e? APOS T ends in O hodon ics | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | July-Sep embe 2018 167 Figu e 21: Re en ion in ao al pho og aphs accep able esul s, bo h unc ionally and es he ically, and allows pa ien s o sol e skele al p oblems ha un il now could only be co ec ed wi h o hogna hic su ge y. Decla a ion o pa ien consen The au ho s ce i y ha hey ha e ob ained all app op ia e pa ien consen o ms. In he o m, he pa ien has gi en his consen o he images and o he clinical in o ma ion o be epo ed in he jou nal. The pa ien unde s ands ha he names and ini ials will no be published and due e o s will be made o conceal he iden i y, bu anonymi y canno be gua an eed. Financial suppo and sponso ship Nil. Con lic s o in e es The e a e no con lic s o in e es . Re e ences 1. P o i WR. The de elopmen o den o acial de o mi y: In luence and e iological ac o . In: P o i WR, Whi e RP J ., Sa e DM. Con empo a y T ea men o Den o acial De o mi y. S . Louis: CV Mosby; 2003. 2. Ngan P, Moon W. E olu ion o Class III ea men in o hodon ics. Am J O hod Den o acial O hop 2015;148:22‑36. 3. Benyahia H, Aza oual MF, Ga cia C, Hamou E, Abouqal R, Zaoui F. T ea men o skele al Class III malocclusions: O hogna hic su ge y o o hodon ic camou lage? How o decide. In O hod 2011;9:196‑209. 4. Ca los Pé ez Va ela J, Sánchez BI. O hodon ic ea men o an asymme ic case wi h Class III malocclusion, c owding, and an impac ed canine. APOS T ends O hod 2016;6:306‑11. 5. Va ela JC, Sanchez BI. O hosu gical managemen o an asymme ic case wi h class III malocclusion and ans e sal p oblema in he maxilla. APOS T ends O hod 2016;6:160‑5 6. Sun B, Tang J, Xiao P, Ding Y. P esu gical o hodon ic decompensa ion al e s al eola bone condi ion a ound mandibula inciso s in adul s wi h skele al Class III malocclusion.In J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:12866‑73. 14. 7. Zhang J, Li X. Den oal eola compensa ion in skele al Class III pa ien s ea ed wi h o hogna hic su ge y. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015;50:656‑60. 8. A ne GW, Be gman RT. Facial keys o o hodon ic diagnosis and ea men planning –Pa II. Am J o hod Den o acial O hop 1993;103:395‑411. 9. A ne GW, Be gman RT. Facial Keys o o hodon ic diagnosis and ea men planning. Pa I. Am J O hod Den o acial O hop 1993;103:299‑312. 10. Lee CH, Pa k HH, Seo BM, Lee SJ. Mode n ends in Class III o hogna hic ea men : A ime se ies analysis. Angle O hod. A ailable om: h ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go /pubmed/27513030. [Las accessed on 2016 Aug 11]. 11. De gin G, Ak op S, Va ol A, Ugu lu F, Ga ip H. Complica ions ela ed o su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion. O al Su g O al Med O al Pa hol O al Radiol 2015;119:601‑7. 11. 12. Möhlhen ich SC, Modabbe A, Kamal M, F i z U, P esche A, HÖlzle F. Th ee‑dimensional e ec s o p e igomaxilla y disconnec ion du ing su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion: A cada e ic s udy. O al Su g O al Med Pa hol O al Radiol 2016;121:602‑8. 13. Fe nandez‑San omán J, Donascimen o MG, López AC, Fe ol MF, Be ondo IA. T ans e se maxilla y dis ac ion in pa ien s wi h pe iodon al pa hology o insu icien oo h ancho age using cus omade de ices. J O al Maxillo ac Su g 2010;68‑1530‑6 14. He nandez‑Al a o F1, Ma eque Bueno J, Diaz A, Pagés CM. Minimally in asi e su gically assis ed apid pala al expansion wi h limi ed app oach unde seda ion: a epo o 283 consecu i e cases. J O al Maxillo ac Su g. 2010;68:2154‑8.