Can we get around rural isolation? Adolescents and mobile telephones in rural areas: a case study in Galicia
Abstract
This article presents the findings of research examining a group of secondary school students from an agricultural district in ruralGalicia,Spain. Research methods used include quantitative and qualitative techniques such as participant observation. The authors analyze to what degree and for what purpose rural adolescents communicate via mobile telephones and if gender accounts for any significant differences in this usage. Our findings show that rural adolescents are indeed avid users of mobile telephones and suggest that because of this they are getting around the physical inaccessibility and inherent isolation of rural communities.
Full text
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013), 2586-2608 1932–8036/20130005
Copy igh © 2013 (Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose). Licensed unde he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion Non-comme cial No De i a i es (by-nc-nd). A ailable a h p://ijoc.o g.
Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion?
Adolescen s and Mobile Telephones in Ru al A eas:
A Case S udy o Galicia
CARLOS FERRÁS
1
YOLANDA GARCÍA
MARIÑA POSE
Uni e si y o San iago de Compos ela
This a icle p esen s he indings o esea ch examining a g oup o seconda y school
s uden s om an ag icul u al dis ic in u al Galicia, Spain. Resea ch me hods used
include quan i a i e and quali a i e echniques such as pa icipan obse a ion. The
au ho s analyze o wha deg ee and o wha pu pose u al adolescen s communica e ia
mobile elephones and i gende accoun s o any signi ican di e ences in his usage.
Ou indings show ha u al adolescen s a e indeed a id use s o mobile elephones and
sugges ha because o his hey a e ge ing a ound he physical inaccessibili y and
inhe en isola ion o u al communi ies.
Keywo ds: mobile elephone, ex message, adolescen s, digi al di ide, u al isola ion
In oduc ion
In Spain, 53% o households we e connec ed o he In e ne in 2011, a a e below he EU
a e age o 56%. Acco ding o Méndez and Rod íguez (2011), in Spain he e a e s ill la ge di e ences
be ween u al and u ban egions in he use o communica ion echnologies. This was pa icula ly ue in
Galicia, a his o ical egion wi h s ong u al adi ions loca ed in he no hwes o he Ibe ian Peninsula, in
which only 40% o amilies we e connec ed o he In e ne . Acco ding o he Ins i u o Nacional de
Es adís ica (INE) o he Spanish Go e nmen o 2011, mobile elephone usage is s ongly es ablished
he e, wi h an a e age o 1.1 mobile elephones pe capi a. In Spain, access o he In e ne ia mobile
elephones is widesp ead, and i is hi d in Eu opean usage a es a e No way and Sweden (O ange
Founda ion, 2012). Howe e , in Spain, access o high-speed ne wo ks h ough mobile elephone is no
possible in u al a eas loca ed away om he main communica ions ne wo ks ha un nea mo o ways
1
This a icle is based on esea ch inanced by he Depa men o Inno a ion o he Spanish go e nmen
(CSO2009-10894).
Ca los Fe ás: ca los. e [email protected]
Yolanda Ga cía: yolanda.ga cia. [email protected]
Ma iña Pose: ma [email protected]
Da e submi ed: 2011–10–17
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2587
and ailway lines. In he case o Galicia, INE da a o 2011 show lowe a es o mobile In e ne access and
lowe a es o household In e ne access han he na ional a e age. In his con ex , we ask how Galician
u al eenage s use mobile elephones o o e come hei geog aphical isola ion and wha gende
di e ences may exis in his ega d.
The isola ion o u al communi ies has been a ecu ing opic (Copus, 2001). Ru al adolescen s
ha e ne e had he same eady access o means o communica ions as ha e hei u ban coun e pa s
because he a i al and sp ead o inno a ions and echnology o u al a eas has always lagged behind
ci ies (Cai nc oss, 1997; Wa , 2012). Likewise, because o he physical dis ances and low popula ion
densi ies in ol ed, ace- o- ace communica ion has also been limi ed. Ru al isola ion plays a la ge ole in
explaining why social ela ionships and communica ion ha e always been di e en in u al and u ban
a eas (Cai nc oss, 1997; Kalan a idis, 2006). Bu now we a e cu en ly wi nessing a new p ocess in which
u al adolescen s pa icipa e subs an ially in mobile communica ions, and i is possible ha u u e u al
economic de elopmen migh be shaped less by low a es o accessibili y and isola ion (F iedman, 2006).
Con en ional landline elephones we e slow o a i e in Galician owns and illages, bu ou indings show
ha mobile elephone usage is sp eading quickly and wi h i comes a g ea e possibili y o o e coming he
geog aphical and social isola ion and inaccessibili y inhe en in u al a eas.
In a s udy o Spanish uni e si y s uden s by Go do López (2006), he In e ne is seen as a
channel o pa icipa ion and exp ession, a cul u e o easy and ins an aneous communica ion eadily
accessible o young adul s and adolescen s. In his s udy, we obse e ha mobile elephones and ex
messages also cons i u e i al elemen s in he socializa ion p ocess o seconda y school s uden s in u al
Galicia. In e es ing ques ions a ise as o he ex en his echnology con ibu es o b idging he digi al
di ide be ween u al and u ban communi ies, how and o wha pu pose i is used, and i s ela ionship o
con en ional o -line means o communica ion.
This a icle p esen s he indings o esea ch ca ied ou on a g oup o seconda y school s uden s
om he dis ic o San a Comba, an ag icul u al egion ound in he in e io o A Co uña, Galicia. The
ieldwo k was conduc ed du ing wo weeks in Ma ch 2011. Ou objec i e was o examine mobile elephone
usage among u al adolescen s and de e mine i and o wha ex en gende accoun ed o any signi ican
di e ences in usage, pa icula ly in ex messaging. Ou esea ch me hods include quan i a i e and
quali a i e echniques as well as pa icipan obse a ion in g oup wo k sessions held in he s uden s’
school. Ou indings show ha mobile communica ions echnology is ully deployed in his u al
communi y.
How Do Today’s Adolescen s Communica e?
Mobile elephone echnology is he mos widesp ead echnology used by adolescen s oday and
he one wi h he g ea es unc ional impac (Ma ínez, Miguel, & To ajada, 2009). In a gende
compa ison, 73% o adolescen Spanish gi ls ha e a mobile elephone compa ed o 64% o adolescen
2588 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
boys.
2
Mobile elephones ha e been he ocus o bo h quan i a i e and quali a i e s udies on he use o
echnology by adolescen s and he implica ions his has on he shaping o gende iden i y. In his s udy,
we analyze he in luence o mobile elephones on he shaping o gende iden i y among adolescen s in a
u al communi y and gende di e ences in he linguis ic unc ions ha ex messages se e o boys and
gi ls.
The li e a u e on in o ma ion and communica ions echnology (ICT) poin s o a pe sis en digi al
di ide in e ms o gende (Cas año, 2008; Ka z, 2003; Ochai a, Espinosa, & Gu ié ez, 2011; Wajcman,
2006). Mobile elephones possess a special se o a ibu es ha make hem pa icula ly appealing o
emales, especially adolescen s (Ling, 2008). Ling (2004) and Chen and Ka z (2009) alk abou he mobile
elephone and i s pe sonal na u e as an ex ension o social li e, i s ole in he o ma ion o iden i y, i s
in luence in eshaping he empo al and spa ial hy hms o social in e ac ions, and i s powe ul abili y o
se e as a socializing agen and acili a o o amilial and social ies. In addi ion, he e a e impo an
ac o s ela ed o in imacy, p i acy, and sa e y (Cas ells, Fe nández-A de ol, Qiu, & Sey, 2007; Chen &
Ka z, 2009; Inkinen, 2008; Ka z, 2003; Ka z, 2006; Ling, 2008; Ma ínez e al., 2009; Pe ie a, 2006).
The e a e also aspec s ha adolescen s ind appealing, including mobile elephone’s accessibili y, ex
messaging, mul i unc ionali y (i.e., nume ous applica ions ha can be downloaded), and en e ainmen
possibili ies (Ka z, 2003; Ling, 2004). One mus also add ha pa en s, likewise, con ibu e o usage as
hey use mobile elephones as a way o keeping abs on hei child en. Acco ding o a s udy by he
Ins i u o Nacional de Tecnologías de la Comunicación (INTECO) and O ange Founda ion (2010), 88% o
Spanish pa en s a e eassu ed knowing hey can con ac hei child en on hei mobile elephone. Bu
su p isingly, child en do no eel hey ha e any less eedom o p i acy in hei pe sonal ela ionships jus
because hei pa en s can eadily con ac hem. In ac , 69.6% o adolescen s hink ha ha ing a mobile
elephone g an s hem mo e, no less, au onomy. Adolescen s on he oad o adul hood a e ypically
in ol ed in a complex and o en con using p ocess o iden i y o ma ion; hey hus place a g ea e social
impo ance on iends han hey do on amily (Na al & Sádaba, 2005). In his sense, mobile elephones
a e a way o communica e wi h hei social ne wo k o pee s, ee om pa en al con ol (Ling, 2002).
A he same ime, o he s udies wa n agains he po en ial ha m ul e ec s o excessi e use o
mobile elephones by adolescen s,
3
who a e gene ally mo e p one o engage in addic i e beha io wi h
ICTs because hey a e highly sensi i e o hei social en i onmen and because his echnology is so
p esen in hei li es. Howe e , adolescen addic ion o mobile elephones is cu en ly unsubs an ia ed.
2
. See Ins i u o Nacional de Tecnologías de la Comunicación (INTECO) and O ange Founda ion (2010),
Es udios sob e segu idad y p i acidad en el uso de los se icios mó iles po los meno es españoles
[S udies on secu i y and p i acy in he use o mobile se ices by Spanish mino s] and Es udio sob e el uso
de los sma phones en los meno es [S udy on he use o sma phones in he mino s]. Re ie ed om
h p://www.in eco.es/Es udios/Es udio_mo iles_meno es and
h p://www.in eco.es/Es udios/Es udio_sma phones_meno es
3
. Fo example, see G ane , Be anuy, Sánchez, and Cas ellana (2007), Qué uso hacen los jó enes y
adolescen es de in e ne y del mó il? [How you h and adolescen s use he In e ne and mobile pHone?].
In Luís Ál a ez Pousa, Joám E ans Pim, Ósca C espo A igbay (Eds.), Comunicación e xu en ude: Ac as do
Fo o In e nacional (pp. 71–90). León, Spain: A co Lib os.
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2589
Wha indings do show is ha he majo i y o adolescen s and young adul s gene ally exhibi easonable
use o mobile elephones and he In e ne , wi h only occasional p oblems. Howe e , misuse o hese
echnologies can ha e nega i e consequences o amily ela ionships and academic pe o mance.
Along wi h hei socializa ion aspec ― he possibili y o main aining immedia e con ac wi h one’s
social ne wo ks―mobile elephones ha e also mean a so o libe a ion o adolescen s om hei
pa en s. Mo eo e , ha ing a mobile elephone is a way o adolescen s o de ine hei iden i y: No only
can hey cus omize hei mobile elephone’s nume ous unc ional ea u es in so many ways, bu hey can
also c ea e hei own codes o communica ion (Ling, 2002, 2004, 2008). Du ing adolescence,
communica ion wi h one’s pee s is undamen al, so much so ha he ole models once played by pa en s
a e played by pee s, who now make up an adolescen ’s main poin o e e ence (Malo, Casas, Figue , &
González, 2006). Social ela ionships wi h pee s a e gene ally mo e impo an o gi ls han o boys. Fo
Ling (2002), his ac is associa ed wi h a ype o p esocializa ion, which gi ls unde go du ing adolescence
o he subsequen oles hey will adop as adul women. These oles a e ela ed o he con ibu ion
women make o main aining social and amily ela ionships. As Ma ínez e al. (2009) con i m, in many
cases mobile elephones a e no used o ac ual con e sa ion bu a he as a way o sea ch o emo ional
in ol emen o o ac as a kind o i ual cop esence. In o he wo ds, one seeks ecogni ion as belonging
o he g oup, con i ma ion o a long-dis ance social ela ionship, being pa o he ecei e ’s li e, in sho ,
jus “being he e.” This is especially impo an o he u al adolescen s in ou s udy who, because o
geog aphical dis ances and low popula ion densi y, equen ly canno physically be cop esen wi h hei
pee s.
Many linguis s ha e ound i mo e appealing o deal wi h communica ion han wi h language and
o conce n hemsel es wi h all hose aspec s, codes, and phenomena ha in e ene in he communica i e
p ocess. Fo his eason, p agma ics has gained ollowe s among language schola s: The communica i e
si ua ion su ounding he speake s― hei sha ed unde s anding o he wo ld, deduc ions, in e ences, and
implica ions―also o ms pa o he message and gi es meaning o i s p oduc ion. We can deciphe he
meaning o an isola ed u e ance i we unde s and he code in which i was p oduced. Bu we a e only able
o unde s and i s ue meaning i we know he con ex and si ua ion in which i was p oduced; wha
pu pose i se es in in e ac ions; and who used i and unde wha social, pe sonal, and cul u al
ci cums ances. The o mal simpli ica ion o which w i en language has been subjec ed in new channels o
echnological communica ion is a consequence o he po en ial ha ex alinguis ic ac o s ha e in he
cons uc ion o sense. A syn he ic w i en language, seldom subjec ed o adi ional con en ions, can s ill
be e ec i e: I keeps he communica i e si ua ion in mind and is en iched by isual codes. In his way, i
e lec s and, in u n, shapes how new gene a ions pe cei e and s uc u e he wo ld.
Me hodology and Field Wo k
Ou case s udy was conduc ed in a seconda y school in San a Comba, a u al ag icul u al dis ic
in Galicia loca ed 35 kilome e s om San iago de Compos ela (Figu e 1). F om a socioeconomic
pe spec i e, he egion o San a Comba exhibi s he classic u al pa e n o low demog aphic densi y. I
has a popula ion o 10,500 inhabi an s dis ibu ed h oughou dozens o a ms and illages. O e he las
ou decades, i has unde gone p onounced u al ligh and has expe ienced demog aphic con ac ion.
2590 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
None heless, San a Comba boas s highly e ile land o ca le anching and specializes in dai y ca le and
milk p oduc ion. This en i onmen has led o highe - han-a e age pe capi a income han o he Galician
dis ic s and an equal o e en highe income han some Galician ci ies (Ins i u o Galego de Es a is ica,
2008).
We ca ied ou ou esea ch in a public seconda y school called Te a do Xallas. Ou s udy was
only possible hanks o he coope a ion o he adminis a i e and eaching s a along wi h ha o he
adolescen pa icipan s hemsel es, whose ages anged om 12 o 15. Gi en ha all he pa icipan s we e
mino s, we ob ained hei pa en s’ consen ( h ough he school’s adminis a ion) p io o ini ia ing ou
esea ch. Pa icipan obse a ion and da a collec ion ook place in he class oom du ing ou in ense wo k
sessions wi h wo ocus g oups. Ou quali a i e esea ch me hod was based on pa icipan obse a ion
echniques, wi h close indi idual and g oup in e ac ion among esea che s and s uden s alike.
Communica ing wi h young adolescen s is no easy ask o adul s ou side hei social ci cle. In ligh o his,
we se ou o es ablish an in o mal and hough p o oking wo king ela ionship. We communica ed he
de ails and objec i es o ou esea ch openly and clea ly, hus c ea ing an a mosphe e o mu ual us .
Resea ch and da a collec ion ook place in wo consecu i e and complemen a y phases. We di ided he
pa icipan s in o wo ocus g oups: olde adolescen s (aged 14 o 15) wi h g ea e expe ience using mobile
elephones bu who we e mo e app ehensi e abou publicly showing hei ex messages and younge
adolescen s (unde age 14) wi h less expe ience using mobile elephones bu who we e mo e willing o
sha e hei ex messages.
In he i s phase o da a collec ion, we o med a ocus g oup o ga he he opinions o 19 10 h-
g ade s uden s (7 boys and 12 gi ls), all be ween he ages o 14 and 15. The opics discussed included
owne ship o digi al echnologies, abili y and expe ience using digi al echnologies, pa e ns o in e ac ion
and communica ion, exp essions o iden i y, in asions o p i acy, physical and emo ional sa e y, and
addic i e beha io .
Du ing he discussion, we sys ema ically in oduced in o ma ion abou he opics o be discussed.
F om he e, s uden s ga e hei opinions on, and subjec i e e alua ion o , ha in o ma ion. These
opinions and e alua ions hen se ed o ini ia e g oup dialogues and discussions. So as no o in luence
he pa icipan s’ opinions, we s ic ly limi ed ou pa icipa ion in hese discussions o obse a ion.
Howe e , i is possible ha ou me e p esence as esea che s migh ha e a ec ed he esul s.
In he second phase, we collec ed, obse ed, and analyzed he mobile ex messages o 16
se en h-g ade s uden s: 8 boys and 8 gi ls aged 12 o 14. To do so, s uden s we e asked o comple e an
open su ey in which hey ep oduced he ex messages hey had sen p io o comple ing he su ey and
ha we e sa ed in he sen messages a ea on hei mobile elephones. The s uden s hemsel es chose
which messages o include and ep oduced he ex exac ly as i had been sen . In addi ion, hey also
ew o e he ex as i would appea in ull o m using o mal ules o w i ing.
4
We also collec ed da a
4
. All o iginal ex messages and hei ull- o m e sions a e ep oduced he ein exac ly as hey appea ed
on he su eys wi hou linguis ic modi ica ion o any kind. The s uden s’ ull- o m e sions demons a e
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2591
ega ding hei age (all we e bo n be ween 1996 and 1997), sex, language o choice, and app oxima e
ime hey spend sending ex messages daily. Despi e he selec ion p ocess explained in he me hodology,
we we e able o analyze all he SMS gene a ed by all su eyed in a ai ly b ie pe iod o ime. The
ieldwo k was conduc ed du ing wo weeks in Ma ch o 2011.
Ini ially, 15 gi ls and 12 boys ag eed o pa icipa e. Whe eas he in e es o he gi ls held s eady
h oughou he s udy, boys we e no as en husias ic. Fou o he male s uden s who ag eed o ake pa
u ned in blank su eys. Al hough we do no know exac ly why, we can make he ollowing assump ions as
o he ac o s ha migh ha e in e ened in hei decision:
They had ew o no messages o sha e because hey had o “clean hem up” since hei pa en s
check hei mobile elephones (as he s uden s hemsel es o en allege). In any case, bo h he
pa icipan s and hei pa en s o legal gua dians we e ully awa e o his pa o he s udy p io o
pa icipa ing in i .
They migh ha e doub ed he au onomous na u e o he su ey, ea ing ha hei eache s would
ecognize hei handw i ing.
Masculine language used in ex s may be c ude, and hey migh no wan anyone ou side o hei
social ci cle o see i .
The conside able in e es ha his ac i i y gene a ed among emale s uden s migh ha e caused
a so o dis us among hei male pee s. One mus wonde i boys conside ex ing “gi ly”
compa ed o o he o ms o communica ion, which would explain hei ese a ions abou he
su ey. I his is indeed ue, in a u al en i onmen like he one in his s udy, male sensi i i y o
gende ed oles is pe haps e en g ea e han ha o emales when he boys hide hei p oblems
o isola ion. In he case o some male s uden s, ou knowledge o hei social and pe sonal
ci cums ances leads us o assume ha ei he hey do no ha e a mobile elephone o hey lack a
social ne wo k o iends wi h whom o exchange messages. Consequen ly, so as no o call
a en ion o ei he si ua ion—especially in on o hei classma es— hey p e ended o pa icipa e
bu u ned in blank ques ionnai es.
Finally, boys and gi ls migh ex o di e en easons; ha is, he unc ion ex messaging se es
is gende speci ic. Boys and gi ls migh choose he ype o ICT ha bes esponds o hei needs
and communica i e in en ions, and hese choices migh di e be ween gende s. Wha pu poses
ex messaging se es o boys and gi ls is p ecisely he unknown a iable in ou s udy.
Compa ed o he a e age numbe o messages sen by gi ls (17), he a e age sen by boys (9) is
conside ably lowe , and hei messages a e s ikingly mo e b ie as well. Consequen ly, ou inal da a se
consis ed o 210 ex messages: 136 om gi ls and 74 om boys.
ha hey s ill ha e no in e nalized he o mal ules o w i ing o , a leas , ha hey ha e no aken hem
e y se iously (especially i hey a e no going o be es ed o i ).
2592 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
Figu e 1. Loca ion o he s udy a ea in Galicia, Spain.
Sou ce o map: Fe ás and O’Flanagan (2012).
Adolescen s Con inually Connec ed
The indings o his s udy show ha adolescen s make use o a wide a ie y o mobile elephone
unc ions. These include making oice calls, aking and downloading pho os, lis ening o music,
exchanging iles, and playing games. Fo he majo i y o adolescen s, mobile elephones ep esen an
ex ension o hei social li e, a o m o making hei p esence known and o displaying hei pe sonali y o
hei pee s. This exp ession o iden i y occu s bo h h ough he usage o he elephone as well as h ough
he physical elephone i sel , which can be cus omized wi h acepla es, ing ones, icons, and wallpape s.
Fo mos adolescen s, mobile elephones ha e become an e e yday objec ully in eg a ed in o
hei li es. All o he adolescen s who pa icipa ed in he ocus g oups ha e hei own mobile elephone.
They do admi , hough, ha in some places―such as a school― hey knowingly un he isk o ha ing he
elephone aken away. The ollowing ype o commen was hea d equen ly among he pa icipan s: “A
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2593
school we can’ ha e mobiles. Ei he you hide hem eally well o hey ge aken away om you. Bu
e e yone akes one anyway.”
We obse ed ha o all he unc ions ha mobile elephones o e , he one used mos is ex
messaging. Howe e , his has mo e o do wi h an economic decision han wi h a pe sonal choice. The
majo i y o he s uden s su eyed, especially boys, p e e calling hei iends a he han making he
e o o compose a ex message. The ollowing ypes o commen s we e equen ly hea d in he ocus
g oup discussions:
Gi l: “We send mo e messages, lo s mo e, all o hem.”
Boy: “I like calling be e han ex ing, bu I ha e o do i [ ex ] because i ’s cheape .”
Boy: “I ex because i ’s ee wi h my calling plan, bu I call oo. I p e e o call, and since I ha e
a con ac I always call.”
Gi l: “Tha ’s because ou pa en s pay o he In e ne and we ha e o pay o ou phones. I my
mobile was ee, I would use i mo e.”
Boy: “I also p e e o call. I’m eally lazy; i akes me o e e o ype a message.”
Gi l: “I’m no lazy abou sending ex s, bu i depends on who you’ e alking o. The e a e some
people you don’ wan o alk o, so you send hem a ex .”
Wha is s iking in many cases is ha mobile elephones a e no used o alk, pe se, bu a he
o se up an al e na i e con ac
5
using ano he echnological de ice (on he In e ne o a landline phone).
He e, i is he con ex ha gi es meaning o he in e ac ion:
Gi l: “I ha dly alk on Tuen i
6
. . . you’ e ne e connec ed a he same ime unless you say ha
you’ll call and hang up so hey know o connec , and basically when I wan o se up a ime o
alk wi h people, I do his: I say, ‘Gi e me a missed call [on my mobile] and we can alk on
Tuen i.’ I ’s easie . I ’s like we use ou mobile o no i y each o he abou some hing, bu we alk
on he In e ne . Mobiles a e o when you don’ ha e In e ne igh hen.”
We obse ed ha gi ls alued in imacy and p i acy in hei communica ions mo e han boys did
and ha mobile elephones o med an impo an pa o his p i a e sphe e. As one gi l explains,
5
See Simón, A. (2008). Tuen i, la compe encia de Facebook hecha en España [Tuen i, acebook
compe i ion made in Spain]. In Cinco Días. Re ie ed om
h p://cincodias.com/cincodias/2008/04/11/emp esas/1207921214_850215.h ml
2594 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
You can’ use he In e ne o ac ually alk; you always ha e o ype. And i , le ’s say,
you’ e alking o someone and a e a aid ha someone else migh see you o some hing
like ha , i ’s be e o alk on he phone.
Fo he majo i y o he pa icipan s, mobile elephones a e indispensable o communica e wi h
hei pee s, no because hey can ac ually say hings bu because hey can main ain con ac wi h each
o he . Mobile echnology is hus seen as an ex ension o hei body; i is ne e swi ched o and goes
whe e e hey do. They need o be con inually connec ed:
Boy: “You ake you mobile ou o you pocke , and ha ’s i . You always ha e i wi h you, and
you don’ ha e o be w i ing when you don’ ha e ime.”
Gi l: “You ake you mobile e e ywhe e. You jus g ab i and go.”
In his sense, using a mobile elephone has mo e o do wi h being connec ed han wi h he
message i sel . This gi es mobile communica ion a pha ic-appella i e unc ion: he calle appeals o he
ecei e o make his/he p esence known while he calle is simul aneously making his/he own p esence
known. Obse e he ollowing commen s:
Boy: “Bu i ’s like lo s o imes, okay, you can hink abou wha you’ e going o say, bu you alk
jus o be alking; you say silly hings jus because i ’s ee and you wan o use up he messages
you’ e go le [ e e ing o he ee message o e s by mobile phone companies], and so you
w i e ‘Hey! Wha ’s up?’ and you send i o di e en numbe s.”
Boy: “I depends. Some imes you call someone and you ha e o alk he whole ime because
he e a e some eally bo ing people ou he e. You gi e hem you li e s o y, and hey don’ ell
you a single hing. You can call and hen no say any hing. I’d a he alk on he phone han send
a ex . . . bu alk abou some hing. The e a e also hings ha you’ e emba assed o alk abou
on he phone and you end up sending a ex . Besides, my pa en s don’ e en know how o ead
ex s.”
We also obse ed ha only on a e occasion do mobile elephones cons i u e an in asion o
p i acy. In ac , i is p ecisely because hei pa en s can each hem a any ime on hei mobile
elephones ha adolescen s eel hey ac ually ha e mo e eedom o mo emen and independence.
Gi l: “Since I ha e my mobile, I eel mo e independen .”
Gi l: “I don’ eel like my pa en s con ol me mo e. They don’ call me so much, and besides, i I
wan o a i e a li le la e, I call hem, and ha ’s i . I ’s be e .”
Boy: “I ’s like, besides, say you wan o s ay ou a li le longe , you can le hem know a home,
and e e y hing’s okay. I you don’ ha e you mobile, you ha e o go home.”
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2601
Table 1. Appella i e and Pha ic Func ions o Mobile Telephones.
Appella i e Func ion
Pha ic Func ion
Why didn’ you go o school? Le me know.
Hey wha ’s up. Le me know please I’m bo ed.
Come a 17:15. can you?
Wha ’s up?
B ing he came a and don’ gi e any hing o olga in
on o anybody.
Wha a e you doing now
Wha do “an onela” and “nemias” wan o do o me a
he s o e [“nemias” is a nickname]
Yeah, we’d be e s op I’m using up all my
minu es. Ciaooo [belly laugh]
A e you going o San iago? Please le me know hon
kisses.
Abb e ia e o c ying ou loud!!
Hi when you come can you b ing me he came a co d
please.
Wha a e you doing?
B ing me he ennis balls please hey’ e on he co ee
able.
Hi Lucia. [laugh e ]
Wha ’s up hon did you see Mad i Ba sa [Mad id-
Ba celona oo ball ma ch]
Hi beau i ul! Can’ alk now.
Wha ’s up did you see he ilm on Channel 3
Tell me some hing please.
He e a e some o he messages coded as ha ing a e e en ial o exp essi e unc ion:
Re e en ial unc ion
Exp essi e unc ion
They punished me and won’ le me go ou
Hey swee ie! Tha ’s li e! No one wan ed you o
go.
The English ones a e on page 32 o he wo kbook
So y i ’s jus ha I’m eally emba assed
playing on he PlayS a ion
I lo e you so much! Mo e han anyone in he
wo ld.
II. The Co ela ion Be ween he Func ion o he Message and Gende
We co ela ed gende wi h he unc ions o he messages, which o m he independen and
dependen a iables, espec i ely. To do so, we used VARBRUL compu e so wa e (Gold a b X o
Windows).
10
The indings o how hese wo a iables in e ac wi h each o he a e highly signi ican :
10
. Gold a b X is a so wa e package ha is widely used o quan i a i e s udies on linguis ic a ia ion. I
wo ks wi h he s a is ical model o mul iple eg essions. All he VARBRUL applica ions a e ee. The one
used in his s udy can be downloaded along wi h i s use manual a
2602 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
VARBRUL, h ough mul iple eg ession analysis, eached con e gence in he i h i e a ion. An analysis o
he c oss- abula ion ables (Table 2) shows ha 45.7% o he messages ha e an appella i e unc ion,
21.4% pha ic, 17.1% ep esen a i e, and 15.7% exp essi e. In e ms o gende , he mos signi ican
di e ences occu wi h he appella i e, pha ic, and exp essi e unc ions: boys sen 65% o he appella i e
messages, compa ed o 34.4% sen by gi ls. These pe cen ages a e e e sed o messages wi h a pha ic
unc ion: 63.3% sen by gi ls, compa ed o 36.7% by boys. The exp essi e unc ion is much mo e
equen among gi ls (77% compa ed o 23%), and he ep esen a i e unc ion is he same (50%) o
bo h sexes. Mo e han 140 o 210 messages analyzed used an impe a i e o an in e oga i e; 70 we e
om boys and 70 om gi ls.
In addi ion, we iden i ied wo basic linguis ic esou ces used in ex messages o exp ess
appella i e in en ions: he in e oga i e and he impe a i e (Table 3). O he 42 appella i e messages sen
by boys, 32 con ained an in e oga i e and 10 an impe a i e unc ion. C oss abula ion o he a iables
in e oga i e + impe a i e yielded only one occasion whe e he wo a iables occu oge he . These
esul s indica e ha boys p e e he in e oga i e o e he impe a i e. Gi ls sen 22 messages wi h an
appella i e unc ion, 21 o mula ed wi h an in e oga i e, and 9 wi h an impe a i e, he wo a iables
occu ing in a leas 9 messages. These indings hus indica e ha he use o an in e oga i e plus an
impe a i e o he appella i e unc ion is mo e equen among gi ls.
11
We co ela ed gende and he use o poli eness o mulas and hei ela ionship o he appella i e
unc ion. The s a is ical analysis o his a iable did no yield signi ican esul s gi en he low numbe o
occu ences o hese o mulas. I seems he e is li le oom o cou esy in adolescen s’ ex messages:
only 11% con ained exp essions such as please, hanks, o a modal e b wi h an in ini i e (“can you ell
me”). Gi ls sen 75% o hese messages.
We likewise examined i he use o he oca i e was used o one down he appella i e o ce o
he message and coded i s use by di e en ia ing be ween he absence o he oca i e and he p esence o
a deno a i e o a ec i e oca i e. He e, he indings we e equally insigni ican since 80.5% o he 140
messages analyzed lack a oca i e o any kind. Only 26 con ained a oca i e, 19 o which we e a ec i e
(“cu ie,” “hon,” “beau i ul,” “sexy,” “swee ie”) and 7 deno a i e ( he ecei e ’s name). The e a e also no
no able gende di e ences in he use o he a ec i e oca i e (8 cases by boys and 11 by gi ls). Likewise,
he p esence o he oca i e is no associa ed wi h he appella i e unc ion o he message gi en ha o
he 19 messages ha con ained a ec i e oca i es, 10 we e pha ic, 5 appella i e, and 2 exp essi e. The 7
deno a i e oca i es ha appea ed in he sample belong o messages wi h di e se linguis ic unc ions.
h p://indi idual.u o on o.ca/ agliamon e/gold a b.h m. A comple e desc ip ion o his applica ion and i s
use in sociolinguis ic esea ch is ound in Mo eno Fe nández (1994).
11
. The use o a ques ion ma k is no always necessa y o iden i y his unc ion. Example: “Despois que es
i comp a a a de conmigo”[La e do you wan o go shopping in he a e noon wi h me]. The modal
e b “que e ” (wan ) in he second pe son singula is su icien o assign an appella i e-in e oga i e alue
o he u e ance.
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2603
Table 2. Tex Messages by Gende and Linguis ic Func ion.
Linguis ic
Func ion
Gi ls
No. (% o N)
Boys
No. (% o N)
All Subjec s
N (% o N)
Appella i e
22 (34.4)
42 (65.6)
64 (45.7)
Exp essi e
17 (77.3)
5 (22.7)
22 (15.7)
Pha ic
19 (63.3)
11 (36.7)
30 (21.4)
Rep esen a i e
12 (50)
12 (50)
24 (17.1)
Ns
70
70
140
VARBRUL ou pu : Con e gence a i e a ion 5; Inpu 0.503;
G oup # 1— : 0.497, a: 0.341, : 0.630, e: 0.770;
Log likelihood = −98.806.
Table 3. Tex Messages by Gende , Linguis ic Func ion, and Linguis ic Resou ce Used.
Numbe o Messages
Using an Impe a i e
_________________
Numbe o Messages
Using an In e oga i e
____________________
Func ion
by Gende
No
Used
Used
N
No
Used
Used
N
Appella i e
Gi ls
Boys
13
32
9
10
22
42
1
10
21
32
22
42
Exp essi e
Gi ls
Boys
16
5
1
0
17
5
15
5
1
0
16
5
Pha ic
Gi ls
Boys
18
11
1
0
19
11
7
4
12
7
19
11
Rep esen a i e
Gi ls
Boys
12
12
0
0
12
12
12
12
0
0
12
12
N
Gi ls
Boys
59
60
11
10
70
70
35
31
35
39
70
70
2604 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
Conclusion
Fo he u al adolescen s in ou sample, mobile elephones ha e become an in eg al pa o daily
li e, which hey use p ima ily o exchange ex messages. They eel ha ha ing a mobile elephone gi es
hem g ea e independence om hei pa en s and allows hem o become socially in eg a ed in hei pee
g oups. Gi ls a e mo e dependen on hei mobile elephones han a e boys, and hey alue he in imacy
his echnology allows hem o ha e in hei social ela ionships mo e as well. They also place g ea e
alue on knowing hei ela i es can loca e hem a any ime and he sense o secu i y his gi es hem.
Al hough bo h boys and gi ls exp essed eeling a ce ain amoun o anxie y i hey a e dep i ed o hei
mobiles, gi ls expe ience his anxie y o a g ea e deg ee.
When complex communica i e exchanges a e wha adolescen s seek, ex messages se e o se
up a ime and place o mee o o edi ec in e ac ion o ano he channel o communica ion. Bu e en
hough adolescen s p e e o he sys ems o communica ion (such as oice calls o In e ne cha ooms),
hey a e mo e inclined o use mobile ex messaging because i is quick and a o dable. I is p ecisely
hese wo ea u es ha adolescen s ake ad an age o o be pe manen ly connec ed o hei pee s. Wha
is impo an o adolescen s is o es ablish a mu ual “being he e” wi h hei pee s, ha is, o e i y ha
hei iends a e “ he e” while con i ming hei own p esence. This explains why hei ex messages ha e
a p edominan ly appella i e, pha ic, o pha ic-appella i e unc ion: o solici in e ac ion o o open o
main ain a communica i e exchange. As Ca men Galán (2004) a i ms,
being in o med in hese new imes is no hing mo e han cons an ly being online, ha is,
a ailable o and loca able by e e yone and o he mos i olous hings. . . We no
longe ha e o “ ell hings,” we ha e “ o be loca able,” which is he same as saying
iden i ied. (p. 1100)
Ob aining da a om emale pa icipan s was much easie han om male pa icipan s; gi ls seem
o be mo e inclined han boys o use mobile ex messaging, o a leas a e mo e willing o sha e hei
expe ience. The easons o his di e ence a e unclea . One possibili y con empla ed and con i med in his
s udy is ha boys and gi ls use ex messaging o di e en easons; he e o e, i is mo e in e es ing and
e ec i e o one g oup han o he o he . Wha ou esul s e eal is ha gi ls ake pa icula ad an age o
his o m o communica ion o exp essi e and pha ic unc ions.
Wo king wi h a co pus o ex messages ins ead o wi h comple e sequences o dialogues g ea ly
limi s ou unde s anding o he messages and hei in en ions. Only by ha ing he sequence o u n-
akings ha comp ise he comple e communica i e exchange can we begin o unde s and hose messages
whose in en ions a e ambiguous,
12
analyze he p esence o g ee ings and lea e- akings, de ec code-
11. E en so, in some cases we would mos likely ha e o ha e access o he communica i e si ua ion and
he sha ed unde s anding o he wo ld be ween sende and ecei e , which a e highly complica ed o
ob ain.
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2605
swi ching caused by ex e nal ac o s, and unde s and why punc ua ion has become supe luous in
communica i e si ua ions ha ely on w i ing.
I is in e es ing o obse e whe e he p io i ies o adolescen s ha e aken language i sel . The
desi e o mone a y sa ings has led o linguis ic economy as well in he educ ion o cha ac e s. Thei
ul ima e objec i e is o send a message whose in en ion is pe ec ly clea a he lowes mone a y and
linguis ic cos possible. Pe haps we a e wi nessing he c ea ion o a new ype o ja gon linked o language
economy in which he p agma ic ac o s ha su ound a communica i e ac a e inc easingly c ucial o he
message o make sense.
In sho , we can a gue ha adi ional u al isola ion can be o e come hanks o he mobile
elephone. Ou case s udy in Galicia has demons a ed ha he u al adolescen s in ou sample ully
emb ace his echnology in o de o be pe manen ly connec ed, hus ge ing a ound he physical and
social isola ion inhe en in u al communi ies. In he ligh o all hese indings, and looking owa d he
u u e, we a e le wi h in e es ing compa a i e esea ch on u ban adolescen s.
2606 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
Re e ences
Cai nc oss, F. (1997). The dea h o dis ance. Camb idge, MA: Ha a d Business School.
Cas año, C. (2008). La segunda b echa digi al [The second digi al di ide]. Mad id, Spain: Ediciones
Cá ed a.
Cas ells, M., Fe nández-A de ol, M., Qiu, J., & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile comunica ion socie y: A global
pe spec i e. Camb idge, MA: MIT P ess.
Copus, A. (2001). F om co e-pe iphe y o polycen ic de elopmen : Concep s o spa ial and aspa ial
pe iphe iali y. Eu opean Planning S udies, 9(4), 539–552.
Chen, Y.-T., & Ka z, J. E. (2009). Ex ending amily o school li e: College s uden s’ use o he mobile
phone. In e na ional Jou nal o Human-Compu e S udies, 67, 179–191.
Fe ás, C., & O’Flanagan, P. (2012). Small-holding and sus ainable amily a ming in Galicia and I eland: A
compa a i e case s udy. No ois. En i onnmen , Aménagemen , Socié é, 224(3), 61–76.
F iedman, T. (2006). La ie a es plana. B e e his o ia del mundo globalizado del siglo XXI [The wo ld is
la : A b ie his o y o he 21s cen u y]. Mad id, Spain: Ediciones Ma ínez Roca.
Galán, C. (2004). Q s k ablms? En el p incipio e a el mó il [Q s k ablms? In he beginning was he
mobile]. In M. Villayand e Llamaza es (Ed.), Ac as del V Cong eso de Lingüís ica Gene al
[P oceedings o he V Cong ess o Gene al Linguis ics], (pp. 1099‒1107). León, Spain: A co
Lib os.
Go do López, J. (2006). Jó enes y cul u a messenge [Young and messenge cul u e]. Mad id, Spain:
Inju e.
G ane , D., Be anuy, M., Sánchez, A., & Cas ellana, M. (2007). ¿Qué uso hacen los jó enes y adolescen es
de In e ne y del mó il? [How you h and adolescen s use he In e ne and mobile phone? ]. In L.
Ál a ez Pousa, J. E ans Pim, & O. C espo A gibay (Eds.), Comunicación e Xu en ude: Ac as do
Fo o In e nacional (pp. 71–90). León, Spain: A co Lib os.
Ins i u o Galego de Es a is ica. (2008). Galicia en ci as [Galicia in numbe s]. Re ie ed om
h p://www.ige.eu/es a ico/h ml/gl/galicia_en_ci as/GaliciaEnCi as.h m
Ins i u o Nacional de Es adís ica. (2012). Encues a sob e equipamien o y uso de ecnologías de la
in o mación y comunicación en los hoga es [Su ey on equipmen and use o in o ma ion
echnologies and communica ion in homes]. Re ie ed om
h p://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do? ype=pcaxis&pa h=/ 25/p450& ile=inebase
In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7 (2013) Can We Ge A ound Ru al Isola ion? 2607
Ins i u o Nacional de Tecnologías de la Comunicación (INTECO) and O ange Founda ion (2010). Es udios
sob e segu idad y p i acidad en el uso de los se icios mó iles po los meno es españoles
[S udies on secu i y and p i acy in he use o mobile se ices by Spanish mino s] and Es udio
sob e el uso de los sma phones en los meno es [S udy on he use o sma phones in he
mino s]. Re ie ed om
h p://www.in eco.es/Es udios/Es udio_mo iles_meno es,
h p://www.in eco.es/Es udios/Es udio_sma phones_meno es
Inkinen, T. (2008). Gende and he social use o mobile echnologies. F om in o ma ion socie y policies o
e e yday p ac ices. In P. U eng & T. C esswell (Eds.), Gende ed Mobili ies (pp. 213–228).
Alde sho , UK: Ashga e.
Kalan a idis, C. H.(2006). A s udy in o he localiza ion o u al businesses in i e Eu opean Coun ies.
Eu opean Planning S udies, 14(1), 61–78.
Ka z, J. E. (Ed.) (2003). Machines ha become us: The social con ex o in e pe sonal communica ion
echnologies. Pisca away, NJ: T ansac ion Publishe s.
Ka z, J. E. (2006). Magic in he Ai : Mobile Communica ions and he T ans o ma ion o Social Li e.
Pisca away, NJ: T ansac ion Publishe s.
Lee, C. (2003). How does ins an messaging a ec in e ac ion be ween he gende s? Re ie ed om
www.s an o d.edu/class/pw 3-25/g oup2/pd s/IM_Gende s.pd .
Ling, R. (2002). Chicas adolescen es y jó enes adul os a ones: Dos subcul u as del elé ono mó il
[Adolescen gi ls and young adul men: Two subcul u es o he mobile phone]. Es udios de
Ju en ud, 57, 33–46.
Ling, R. (2004). The Mobile Connec ion: he Cell Phone’s Impac on Socie y. San F ancisco, CA: Mo gan
Kau mann Publishe s.
Ling, R. (2008). New ech, new ies: How mobile communica ion is eshaping social cohesion. Camb idge,
MA: MIT P ess.
Malo, S., Casas, F., Figue , C., & González, M. (2006). El elé ono mó il: Disponibilidad, usos y elaciones
po pa e de los adolescen es en e 12 y 16 años [The mobile phone: A ailabili y, uses and
ela ionships by he adolescen s aged 12 o 16 yea s]. Es udios sob e Educación, 10, 55–78.
Ma ínez, I., Miguel, J., & To ajada, I. (2009, Decembe ). Mo ilizad@s: Muje es y comunicaciones
mó iles en España [Mobilized: Women and mobile communica ions in Spain]. Feminismo/s, 15–
34.
2608 Ca los Fe ás, Yolanda Ga cía, Ma iña Pose In e na ional Jou nal o Communica ion 7(2013)
Méndez, S., & Rod íguez, E. (2011). Consecuencias u u as del despe a de una gene ación de
adolescen es digi ales. Escena ios posibles [Fu u e consequences o he awakening o a
gene a ion o digi al adolescen s. Possible scena ios]. Re is a de Es udios de la Ju en ud, 92, 11–
36.
Mo eno Fe nández, F. (1994). Sociolingüís ica, es adís ica e in o má ica [Sociolinguis ics, s a is ics and
compu e ]. Lingüís ica, 6, 95–154.
Na al, C., & Sádaba, C. (2005). Ju en ud y medios de comunicación en e a en e [You h acing he
media]. Re is a de Es udios de Ju en ud, 68, 9–16.
O ange Founda ion. (2013). E-España. In o me anual sob e la sociedad de la in o mación [E-Spain. Annual
epo on he in o ma ion socie y]. Re ie ed om
h p:// undaciono ange.es/ undaciono ange/analisis/eespana/e_espana13.h ml
Ochai a, E., Espinosa, M. A., & Gu ié ez, H. (2011). Las necesidades adolescen es y las nue as
ecnologías de la in o mación y la comunicación [The adolescen needs and new echnologies o
in o ma ion and communica ion]. Re is a de Es udios de la Ju en ud, 92, 87–110.
Pe ie a, R. (2006). T ans o ming echnologies: Al e ed sel es—Mobile phones and In e ne use in he
Philippines. Manila, Philippines: De Salle Uni e si y P ess.
Rice, R. E., & Ka z, J. E. (2003). Compa ing In e ne and mobile phone usage: digi al di ide o usage,
adop ion, and d opou s. Telecommunica ions Policy, 27, 597–623.
Sanko , D., Tagliamon e, S. A., & Smi h, E. (2005). Gold a b X. A mul i a ia e analysis applica ion.
Re ie ed om h p://indi idual.u o on o.ca/ agliamon e/gold a b.h m
Simón, A. (2008). Tuen i, la compe encia de Facebook hecha en España [Tuen i, acebook compe i ion
made in Spain]. In Cinco Días. Re ie ed om
h p://cincodias.com/cincodias/2008/04/11/emp esas/1207921214_850215.h ml
Tannen, D. (1994). Gende and discou se. New Yo k, NY: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Vidal Alba, D. (2003). Los mensajes de ex o en el elé ono mó il [Tex messaging on mobile phone]. In
J.L. Gi ón, S. Iglesias, F.J. He e o & A. Na bona (Eds.), Es udios O ecidos al P o eso José Jesús
de Bus os To a [S udies o e ed o P o esso José Jesús de Bus os To a ]. (pp. 921–935) (Vol.
2). Mad id, Spain: Uni e sidad Complu ense de Mad id.
Wajcman, J. (2006). El ecno eminismo [Techno eminism]. Colección eminismos [Feminisms collec ion].
Mad id, Spain: Ediciones Cá ed a.
Wa , B. (2012). Global geog aphies o he In e ne . Do d ech , Ne he lands: Sp inge .