Theoretical description of hadroproduction and production on nuclear targets of ϕ-mesons at very high energies

Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Theoretical description of hadroproduction and production on nuclear targets of ϕ -mesons at very high energies To cite this article: G H Arakelyan et al 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1137 012045 View the article online for updates and enhancements. You may also like Selected topics in diffraction with protons and nuclei: past, present, and future L Frankfurt, V Guzey, A Stasto et al. - Progress and open questions in the physics of neutrino cross sections at intermediate energies L Alvarez-Ruso, Y Hayato and J Nieves - This content was downloaded from IP address 193.144.83.125 on 09/02/2024 at 07:14 Content from this work may be used under the terms of theCreativeCommonsAttribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd XIII International Conference on Beauty, Charm and Hyperon Hadrons (BEACH 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1137 (2018) 012045 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012045 1 Theoretical description of hadroproduction and production on nuclear targets of φ-mesons at very high energies G H Arakelyan1, C Merino2and Yu M Shabelski3 1A.Alikhanyan National Scientific Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute), Yerevan 0036, Armenia 2Departamento de F´ısica de Part´ıculas, Facultade de F´ısica and Instituto Galego de F´ısica de Altas Enerx´ıas (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galiza, Spain 3Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) and NCR Kurchatov Institute, Gatchina, St.Petersburg 188350, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We expose the current experimental and theoretical situation of the interesting case of the production of φmesons in up to very high energy collisions of hadrons on both nucleon and nuclear targets. The φ-meson is a system of s¯squarks, and though sand ¯squarks have non-zero masses, their masses are not large enough to make standard perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) applicable. This makes the φ-meson an interesting intermediate case between the soft (non-perturbative) and the hard (perturbative) regimes. At the same time, the φ-meson is rarely produced, and it can be sensitive to the production mechanism. Here, we update the theoretical description of the experimental data of φ-mesons hadroproduction on nucleon and nucleus targets in a wide energy region already presented in [1, 2], by including more recent experimental data into the analysis. We use the Quark-Gluon String Model (QGSM) formalism [3, 4] that gives a quantitatively consistent description of the spectra of secondary φmesons in pp-collisions for a large scope of the initial energy, going up to RHIC and LHC. In the case of collisions with a nuclear target, the QGSM description of the experimental initial energy dependence of the produced φ-mesons is also quantitatively good. At the same time, the QGSM provides a natural explanation for the unusually small shadow corrections experimentally observed in proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions at very high energies for the inclusive density (saturation of the inclusive density) [5, 6] in the central rapidity region. In Fig. 1, the rapidity dependence of the density dn/dy of φ-mesons produced in pp-collisions at 158 GeV/c [7, 8] is compared to the results of the corresponding calculation based on QGSM (solid curve). The agreement is quite reasonable. We also compare two new experimental points by the ALICE Collaboration on the density dn/dy of φ-mesons produced in pp-collisions at 2,76 [9] and 7 TeV [10], with the results of the corresponding QGSM calculations. The dashed curve represents the theoretical results for 2.76 TeV, and the dashed-dotted curve those for 7 TeV. The dotted curve shows the model prediction for 14 TeV. As it can be seen in Fig. 1, XIII International Conference on Beauty, Charm and Hyperon Hadrons (BEACH 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1137 (2018) 012045 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012045 2 the results of the QGSM calculations are remarkably higher than the experimental data. This 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Figure 1. Experimental data [7, 8] on the y-spectra dn/dy of φ-mesons produced in pp collisions at 158 GeV/c, and the results of the corresponding calculation based on the QGSM (solid line). The dashed and dashed-dotted lines represent the results of the QGSM calculations at 2.76 and 7 TeV, and they are compared with corresponding experimental points in the central rapidity region, |y| ≤ 0.5 [9, 10]. The dotted line is the QGSM prediction for 14 TeV. discrepancy is quite unexpected, since in general the QGSM calculations show a good agreement with the experimental data for proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions, both at RHIC and LHC energies. The explanation could be connected with the extrapolation to pT= 0 of the experimental data, that were actually measured at transverse momenta pT≥0.4 GeV/c. The experimental data are shown in Fig. 1, as in the original papers [9, 10], after extrapolation. In Fig. 2, the experimental data by the HERA-B Collaboration on the rapidity dependence of the inclusive cross section for φ-meson production, dσ/dy, in pA collisions for different C,Ti, and Wtargets at √s= 41.6 GeV [11], and for rather small rapidity ranges, are given along with the results of corresponding calculations based on the QGSM. The theoretical results reasonably compare with these experimental data everywhere, with the exception of some differences in the positive region of y≥0. These differences slitghly increase with the atomic number Aof the target, becoming more apparent for the Wnucleus. In the case of the production of particles such as pions and kaons, which make a dominant contribution to the mean multiplicity, a new shadowing effect [12] becomes significant, starting from an energy of √s= 40 to 60 GeV . For φ-meson production this new screening effect is in principle not noticeable, even in the region of the RHIC energies, but it clearly appears at the LHC energies possibly due to the fact that the mass of the strange quark is not negligible. Let us now consider the experimental data on φ-meson production in heavy ion collisions at energies from √s= 17.3 to 200 GeV. In Table 1, the experimental values of the midrapidity inclusive densities, dn/dy (|y| ≤ 0.5), for φ-meson production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions, obtained by the NA49 Collaboration (√s= 17.3 GeV [7, 8]), and those obtained at RHIC (STAR and PHENIX Collaborations, √s= 62.4 GeV [13], 130 GeV [14, 15], and XIII International Conference on Beauty, Charm and Hyperon Hadrons (BEACH 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1137 (2018) 012045 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012045 3 10 -1 1 10 10 2 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 Figure 2. Experimental data on the ydependence of the cross section for φ-meson production, dσ/dy, in pA collisions on different nuclei (A=C,Ti,W), at the energy √s= 41.6 GeV [11] (stars and triangles) and results of corresponding calculations based on QGSM (curves). Table 1. Experimental values of dn/dy,|y| ≤ 0.5, for φ-meson production in central nucleusnucleus collisions at different energies, and results of corresponding calculations based on the QGSM. Reaction Centrality Energy Experimental data QGSM %√s, GeV on dn/dy (|y| ≤ 0.5) Pb + Pb 0−5% 17.3 2.35 ±0.15 [7, 8] 2.764 Au + Au 0−20% 62.4 3.52 ±0.08 ±0.45 [13] 3.36 Au + Au 0−11% 130. 5.73 ±0.37, ±0.57 [14, 15] 6.15 Au + Au 0−5% 200. 7.95 ±0.11 ±0.73 [13] 8.12 Au + Au 0−5% 200. 7.70 ±0.30 [16] 8.12 200 GeV [13, 16]), are compared with the results of corresponding calculations based on the QGSM. The QGSM calculations show that in the case of φ-meson production, the inelasticshadowing effects are very weak even at RHIC energies, being virtually invisible against the experimental errors. Next, we estimate the significance of the shadowing contribution for φ-meson production in the LHC energy range. In ref. [12], it was explained that already at RHIC the inclusive density for the production of secondary particles exhibits significant saturation effects, both in pP b and in PbPb collisions, what it has since been experimentally confirmed [17, 18]. Saturation effects can be explained by inelastic-shadowing corrections connected to the multipomeron interactions [12], that are negligible at low energies due to the suppression of the longitudional part of the nuclear form factor. In the case of interactions with nuclei, the mean number of Pomerons is large, and even at the RHIC and LHC energies their interactions become significant. Since the growth of the initial energy weakens the suppression of the longitudinal part of the nuclear factor, the inelastic-shadowing corrections become more and more significant as the initial energy increases. XIII International Conference on Beauty, Charm and Hyperon Hadrons (BEACH 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1137 (2018) 012045 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012045 4 The calculations of inclusive densities and multiplicities with accounting for the inelastic shadowing can be performed in the percolation approach, both for pp [19] and heavy ion collisions [20]. The results of these calculations are in good agreement with the experimental data over a broad energy region. The detailed description of the application of the percolation approach to φmeson hadroproduction was published in reference [1, 2]. Now, we compare the experimental data on φ-meson production in collisions on nuclear targets at LHC energies, with the results of the corresponding QGSM calculations. In Fig. 3 we present the result of the QGSM calculations for the rapidity dependence of the density dn/dy of φ-meson production in PbPb collisions, for centrality 5% with (solid curve) and without (dashed curve) including the inelastic-shadowing effect [2]. One can see that the inelastic-shadowing contribution is sizeable in the midrapidity region, but it decreases sharply as the rapidity y grows. Also in Fig. 3, the QGSM prediction [2] is compared with the experimental point on dn/dy for φ-meson production in central PbP b collisions at √s= 2.76 TeV by the ALICE Collaboration [21]. 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Figure 3. Comparison of the QGSM prediction for the rapidity dependence of the density of φ-meson production, dn/dy, in central PbPb collisions at √s= 2.76 TeV (solid curve) with one experimental point by ALICE Collaboration [21]. The dashed curve represents the result of the QGSM calculation without including the inelastic-shadowing effect. In Table 2 we present the results of the QGSM calculations for LHC energies, obtained without using any additional parameter with respect to the calculations at lower energies, so these results can be considered as theoretical predictions. The comparison with the corresponding available experimental data is also shown. Unfortunately, only one experimental point by the ALICE Collaboration [21] is currently available on the φ-meson production density dn/dy (|y| ≤ 0.5) in PbPb collisions at √s= 2.76 TeV and centrality 5%, and the same occurs for φ-meson production in pP b collisions at √s= 5.02 Tev for non-single diffraction (NSD) events [22]. As we can see in Table 2, QGSM gives a rather good description of these ALICE Collaboration points, but, of course, new experimental data on φ-meson production at LHC energies, both for pPb and PbPb collisions, will be crucial in order to draw final conclusions. XIII International Conference on Beauty, Charm and Hyperon Hadrons (BEACH 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1137 (2018) 012045 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012045 5 Table 2. Experimental point by the ALICE Collaboration [21] on dn/dy,|y| ≤ 0.5, for φ-meson production in PbPb collisions at √s= 2.76 TeV, compared to the result of corresponding QGSM calculation. We also compare the result of the QGSM calculation with the experimental point on pPb collisions at √s= 5.02 TeV, for non-single diffraction (NSD) events [22]. Reactions Centrality Energy Experimental data QGSM √s,TeV dn/dy (|y| ≤ 0.5) Pb + Pb 0−5% 2.76 13.8 ±0.5 ±1.7 ±0.1 [21] 13.57 p + Pb NSD 5.02 0.1344 ±0.005 ±0.0069 ±0.0081 [22] 0.14 The QGSM provides a reasonable description of the rapidity yspectra of φ-meson production for the interaction of different hadron beams with a nucleon target in a wide energy region, by using for the only unknown parameter in the QGSM analysis, the normalization parameter aφ, the value aφ= 0.11, determined by comparison with experimental data in the energy region up to the RHIC range, where the screening contribution is negligible for φ-meson production. At LHC energies, a new parameter nmax appears in the calculation of the inelastic nuclear shadowing contribution [2]. This parameter is connected with the number of cutted pomerons, and it has a smooth energy dependence. The QGSM results shown in Table 2 for pPb collisions at √s= 5.02 TeV, and for PbPb collisions √s= 2.76 TeV, were obtained by taking values nmax = 32 and 37, respectively. Acknowledgments CM wants to congratulate the organizers of BEACH 2018 for the nice scientific atmosphere created at the conference. This work has been supported by Russian RSCF grant No. 14-22- 00281, by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci´on of Spain under project FPA2017-83814-P, and Maria de Maeztu Unit of Excellence MDM-2016-0692, and by Xunta de Galicia, Spain, under 2015-AEFIS (2015-PG034), AGRUP2015/11. References [1] Arakelyan G H, Merino C and Shabelski Yu M 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 114019 [2] Arakelyan G H, Merino C and Shabelski Yu M 2017 Phys. At. Nucl. 80 1197 [3] Kaidalov A B and Ter-Martirosyan K A 1984 Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 39 979; 1984 Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 40 135 [4] Kaidalov A B 2003 Phys. At. Nucl. 66 1994 [5] Arakelyan G H, Capella A, Kaidalov A B and Shabelski Yu M 2002 Eur. Phys. J. C26 81 [6] Arakelyan G H, Merino C and Shabelski Yu M 2016 Eur. Phys. J. A52 9 [7] Afanasev S V et al. NA49 Collaboration 2000 Phys. Lett. B491 59 [8] Anticic T et al. NA49 Collaboration 2010 Eur. Phys. J. C68 1 [9] Adam J et al. ALICE Collaboration 2017 Phys. Rev. C95 064606 [10] Abelev B et al. ALICE Collaboration 2012 Eur. Phys. J. C72 2183 [11] Abt I et al. HERA-B Collaboration 2007 Eur. Phys. J. C50 315 [12] Capella A, Kaidalov A and Tran Thanh Van J 1999 Acta Physica Hungarica-Heavy Ion Phys. A9169 [13] Abelev B I et al. STAR Collaboration 2009 Phys. Rev. C79 064903 [14] Adcox K et al. PHENIX Collaboration 2004 Phys. Rev. C69 024904 [15] Adler C et al. STAR Collaboration 2002 Phys. Rev. C65 041901 [16] Adams J et al. STAR Collaboration 2005 Phys. Lett. B612 181 [17] Back B B et al. PHOBOS Collaboration 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 3100 [18] Adcox K et al. PHENIX Collaboration 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 3500 [19] Bautista I, Pajares C and Dias de Deus J 2012 Nucl. Phys. A882 44 [20] Bautista I, Pajares C, Milhano G and Dias de Deus J 2012 Phys. Rev. C86 034909 [21] Abelev B et al. ALICE Collaboration 2015 Phys. Rev. C91 024609 [22] Adam J et al. ALICE Collaboration 2016 Eur. Phys. J. C76 245